but all the posts cut out..why is that ?

Enviro posted a pic of 'me' etc and comments from sprint and deepy etc...all gone.

I put a picture up on my relationships thread that was  removed for the 2nd time Freediver-Why???

How was that picture pornagraphic  or offensive??

wrote on Apr 25^th, 2007 at 11:12pm:

but all the posts cut out..why is that ? Enviro posted a pic of 'me' etc and comments from sprint and deepy etc...all gone.

I thought I was exceptionally humorous too.    I'm not going to be funny if you're going to cut them out.

it wasnt me really deepy-Enviro was being a pr-ick- ,its his speciality.

I haven't been doing anything. Where did you move the thread from and to?

There is a lot of talk in here about freedom of speech etc.

If Freediver we have the capacity to post pictures- why then are we not provided with a set of guidelines to know when we are breaching guidelines--

gratuitous violence-pornography etc.

It seems you have rules for men and women on this forum. Men can do what they like-women are to be kept in their box?

wrote on Apr 25^th, 2007 at 11:26pm:

There is a lot of talk in here about freedom of speech etc. If Freediver we have the capacity to post pictures- why then are we not provided with a set of guidelines to know when we are breaching guidelines-- gratuitous violence-pornography etc. It seems you have rules for men and women on this forum. Men can do what they like-women are to be kept in their box?

correction..one set of rules for men and on set of rules for women.Double standards in other words.

There are ways around censorship...you can always email me directly with pictures of your new brazilian  ;D

wrote on Apr 25^th, 2007 at 11:31pm:

There are ways around censorship...you can always email me directly with pictures of your new brazilian  ;D

sacly- you wish!  :-/

sacly- you wish!

It could be a wish, or it could be a nightmare...from my POV I'm the only one who can decide. Post pics or STFU  :P

wrote on Apr 25^th, 2007 at 11:39pm:

sacly- you wish! It could be a wish, or it could be a nightmare...from my POV I'm the only one who can decide. Post pics or STFU  :P

does that mean stu-ff you?

Sort of...google is your friend  ;)

If it was a mistake google couldnt help me anyway hey scaly?

nite

STFU--

well done scaly-

Have you come across the 'feedback' board yet?

Forum Policies

http://ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1172540626

what was offensive about the pic I posted of the 3 guys on the seat?

EXPLAIN FREEDIVER___SO WE KNOW FOR FUTURE REFERENCE!!!!!!

Nothing. It was the picture of the guy with the transparent underwear.

so you didnt think he was cute then?

I couldn't see his face.

wrote on Apr 25^th, 2007 at 11:31pm:

There are ways around censorship...you can always email me directly with pictures of your new brazilian  ;D

So this was one of those pricks that were here ay?

This morning I had to delete some threads and posts for the first time that wasn't just removing spam. They are in a 'recycle bin' board that isn't viewable to the public. What should I do when this happens? I can:

• Lock the thread
  
• Move the thread to a visible board that people can't post in
  
• Remove the thread from public view
  

What would you prefer? The second option has the advantage that people can still see the sort of thing that is considered inappropriate. You can also judge for yourself whether I am being consistent with the standards.

remove the thread from public veiw..

These flaming threads are usually victimising one person..and are based on personal differences of opinion..so are personal in nature and quite hurtful.

I sincerely aplogise for the rubbish posted on the forum last night..even though Im pretty sure in most cases I dont start them..Im usually heckled..but no excuse for letting them do my head in..!

No get rid of the threads..not worth keeping around..just rubbish.

yes, just delete them.

"Whats behind us is not in front of us" - The Cannonball Rally

I think they should be kept and viewed for posterity's sake.

I have nothing to hide  ;)

IQRSLOW is at it again  , seeing as though this thread is about the flaming of the other night..it has now registered under my name..with a aslight diffrenece that the dash is in between and not an underscore..

I guess this is to ensure that the flaming of the this forum just keeps going and going..not from me, Im disengaged as I said, but its not right that it be allowed to pretend its me around here ..not fair to me or anyone who may think theyre talking to me either.

:-X

I voted depends.

If they are in an area set aside for that topic, is ok.
Noone has to go there and continually look if they are not interested in it.

If it spills over everywhere, unfair on those that want just political stuff.

Sort of like the "chat" area.

Had another suggestion.

Sorry, it means more work for you freediver.

Perhaps rejig some rooms. Some topics (evolution vs creation and the like)  sort of do not have a forum for themselves.  The politicians suck forum is at odds with the general political forum.

What if the politicians suck forum is renamed to "Philosophy", put all philosophical topics there.
All the politicians suck topics go into the general political forum

sprint''

do u think u could suck a bit harder???

I mean now that you are oz politics mod? ;)

Sucking up ? That's not sucking up. I was not even puckering !

;D

Sprint,

old man you did a tafe course in sucking up !!  ;)

Did a tafe course - I ran it .   :)

You aint seen nothing yet.
Might do a gratituous "sucking up demonstration" for your benefit.  Pick the lucky person

ME!!!!

why r we suggesting to censor religious views? what happened to freedom of speech?

as long as a person's posts are relevant to the topic then it should be allowed, i.e. don't bring religion into a political discussion if the topic doesn't involve religion.

yes, Skeptik,

this is probably right id say. If its in context and not overbearing its not a problem.
iT seems to be that some of us became a bit worried that the political element of the site would be overtaken by
Religion. We lost a couple of good posters to this new element and a few have also threatened to go.

Its settled own now and kind of getting back to normal. I hope Aus nat returns. He is a good poster. :(
:

bUT aUS nAT IS NOT COMING BACK. :(

wrote on Apr 24^th, 2007 at 5:31pm:

bUT aUS nAT IS NOT COMING BACK. :(

But i did!   Only seperate church from state.

I object to oceans deleting my latest posting on her relationship forum.
It disagreed with her views, but did not abuse anyone and was not rude.

This has happened before.
Poor form by a moderator to delete on grounds of disagreeing

-

Off topic replies have been moved to This Thread

ozadmin wrote on Oct 31^st, 2007 at 12:13am:

Off topic replies have been moved to This Thread

Yeah!! Your awesome! AND you have perfect grammar!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH!