Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Thinking Globally >> Automated killer robots 'threat to humanity' http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1204086225 Message started by freediver on Feb 27th, 2008 at 2:23pm |
Title: Automated killer robots 'threat to humanity' Post by freediver on Feb 27th, 2008 at 2:23pm
Anyone else watching the new terminator series on TV?
Automated killer robots 'threat to humanity': expert http://news.smh.com.au/automated-killer-robots-threat-to-humanity-expert/20080227-1v6s.html Increasingly autonomous, gun-totting robots developed for warfare could easily fall into the hands of terrorists and may one day unleash a robot arms race, a top expert on artificial intelligence told AFP. "They pose a threat to humanity," said University of Sheffield professor Noel Sharkey ahead of a keynote address Wednesday before Britain's Royal United Services Institute. Intelligent machines deployed on battlefields around the world -- from mobile grenade launchers to rocket-firing drones -- can already identify and lock onto targets without human help. There are more than 4,000 US military robots on the ground in Iraq, as well as unmanned aircraft that have clocked hundreds of thousands of flight hours. The first three armed combat robots fitted with large-caliber machine guns deployed to Iraq last summer, manufactured by US arms maker Foster-Miller, proved so successful that 80 more are on order, said Sharkey. South Korea and Israel both deploy armed robot border guards, while China, India, Russia and Britain have all increased the use of military robots. Washington plans to spend four billion US dollars by 2010 on unmanned technology systems, with total spending expected rise to 24 billion, according to the Department of Defense's Unmanned Systems Roadmap 2007-2032, released in December. James Canton, an expert on technology innovation and CEO of the Institute for Global Futures, predicts that deployment within a decade of detachments that will include 150 soldiers and 2,000 robots. The use of such devices by terrorists should be a serious concern, said Sharkey. Captured robots would not be difficult to reverse engineer, and could easily replace suicide bombers as the weapon-of-choice. "I don't know why that has not happened already," he said. |
Title: Re: Automated killer robots 'threat to humanity' Post by mantra on Feb 27th, 2008 at 3:36pm
Interesting - we have robots to kill and maim and for the lucky survivors - robots to nurse them back to health.
Quote:
|
Title: Re: Automated killer robots 'threat to humanity' Post by fakir on Mar 19th, 2008 at 7:33am
Sharkey is obviously not a scientist, otherwise he wouldn't make such a stupid statement as "it wouldn't be difficult to reverse-engineer".
These things will be almost impossible to reverse engineer, as the software and command controls are encrypted, and require sophisticated equipment to control. Sharkey talks as if these are just toasters or some HAL that you can just talk to. |
Title: Re: Automated killer robots 'threat to humanity' Post by freediver on Mar 19th, 2008 at 9:02am
How long would the encryption last in enemy hands?
|
Title: Re: Automated killer robots 'threat to humanity' Post by fakir on Mar 20th, 2008 at 3:57am
what kind of equipment and education do you think terrorists have exactly? Wiring up a bomb is a heck of a lot different from cracking 128bit encryption. Even if you could crack it - these "robots" are remote devices, not self-thinking terminators. You can't just make a remote device - those things are sophisticated. Furthermore, defense scientists build in fail-safe devices precisely for the times that the robots fall in enemy hands.
|
Title: Re: Automated killer robots 'threat to humanity' Post by deepthought on Mar 20th, 2008 at 6:29am freediver wrote on Mar 19th, 2008 at 9:02am:
About as long as 128 bit encryption lasts generally assuming they have highly skilled technicians and very fast computers and assuming everyone on the planet networked to help the terrorist it should only take a few thousand years. But I would think a self destruct mechanism would have worked before then so it would be a colossal waste of time. |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved. |