...maddy not happy  >:(

I have to wonder what constitutes a reason for censorship with some of the mods (one in particular, and even the manager) on this site.

After innocently replying to a post which was started about Zeitgeist 2, I ended up in a discussion in which I wasn't much interested.
I'd already posted a thread about the movie on the Sprituality forum and didn't find anybody who'd watched it, but then I came across this one on the Fringe forum which was posted a couple of days earlier than mine.
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1223347391/all

Anyway, this is how it ended up.




Quote:

You've got three options and must choose two. 1. Drop the hostility. 2. Accept someone can be familiar with ideas without having studied the same curriculum as yourself. 3. Piss off.

This was my reply which was censored by the weasel:

;D  I'll give you 3 options and you must choose none of them.

1. Show me where I have been hostile

2. Watch the movie so that you are able to discuss it

3. Piss off

You're a crackup  ;D


My reply was censored and replaced with 'Lose the hostility and the arrogance Amadd.'

My muscles are puny?  :-[

I guess I need to do some more exercise. You can be my gym buddy Amadd.

I'm waiting..

There are no questions here for me to answer. You are just having a whinge and a sook.

Questions you have asked I have answered in at least two places.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1223347391/all
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1224026243/all

Can you answer what I've asked you in those threads?

You can keep asking me questions until the cows come home weasel, but nothing will justify your (control freak) editing of my simple comments.
There was absolutely no justification for your actions at all.

I felt perfectly justified and I thought I explained why.


Quote:

Anyway, like I said, I want to discuss it with somebody who's seen it...end.

Quote:

Thanks for posting the link to this movie, but you won't get much discussion of it here. Try ats maybe?

Gonna answer my questions yet?

Quote:

You are just having a whinge and a sook

Well I think that you know the truth here. You were having a whinge and a sook because I poked a bit of fun and you weren't happy with it.

I suppose if you'd taken into account the things that I was wanting to discuss, then you would see that your actions taken purely based on ego falls into line with my discussion points.

I don't think that you're worthy of moderating a thread because you are too biased and controllable.

No Amadd.

I did not have a problem with you poking fun at me and being hostile in a passive aggressive manner.

When you decided to take an elitist stance in the forum that I have control over, I decided to rain on your parade.

I am perfectly content with the way I treated you, and I would happily do it again.

I was more than happy to attempt to discuss anything you wanted to raise regarding the movie, and if I did not understand something you could explain it to me, or I could google it, and then we could discuss it some more.

Sorry I am not of the same 'class' as you because I have not seen the film.

You know I do believe its love.

Garden wedding/civil ceremony...small and intimate.

Sit down 40 people.

BYO plonk

Quote:

No Amadd. I did not have a problem with you poking fun at me and being hostile in a passive aggressive manner. When you decided to take an elitist stance in the forum that I have control over, I decided to rain on your parade. I am perfectly content with the way I treated you, and I would happily do it again. I was more than happy to attempt to discuss anything you wanted to raise regarding the movie, and if I did not understand something you could explain it to me, or I could google it, and then we could discuss it some more. Sorry I am not of the same 'class' as you because I have not seen the film.

'nuff said. You admit that were trying to a be numbheaded control freak for no reason at all.



Quote:

You know I do believe its love.

Hmm..dunno 'bout that Kate...I'd rather trawl the asylums for a female spastic.

well maddy you shouldnt sweat the small stuff.

bad for your health. If your not careful your legs will drop off and what then?    ;)

Quote:

'nuff said. You admit that were trying to a be numbheaded control freak for no reason at all.

Can you even read? I gave a reason. You can't call me a control freak when you act all, I AM NOT DISCUSSING THIS WITH YOU UNLESS YOU WATCH THE MOVIE. You are a hypocrite. Moron.


Quote:

Hmm..dunno 'bout that Kate...I'd rather trawl the asylums for a female spastic.

When are they letting you out? Probably not this week considering your limited insight and inability to detect social cues.

Whatever...you haven't answered my question in any rational way and I've answered all of yours.

Why did you censor my post?

Anyway, I think I hear my guitar calling me...I need to play "Everything Zen".

Amadd wrote on Oct 15^th, 2008 at 7:54pm:

Whatever...you haven't answered my question in any rational way and I've answered all of yours. Why did you censor my post? Anyway, I think I hear my guitar calling me...I need to play "Everything Zen".

I've answered all your questions and provided reasoning when doing so. You have never done that, you have just attacked me to which I have responded. You're delusional Amadd. The world only exists inside your head and you can't see it from the point of view of anyone else.

I explained why you got censored. And I would do it exactly the same way again.

Quote:

I explained why you got censored. And I would do it exactly the same way again.

Of course you would wease....of course you would.

Oh I just picked up on this one.  ;D  You're an absolute disgrace weasel. To yourself and to all of humanity.

Here you caught in the act of trying to take control of my thread to get me under your control.
Can't you see it FD?


Quote:

I'll take them Sprint. Also, could I please have this thread moved to Fringe, it deals with conspiracies in religion and corrupt financial systems more so than it is a spiritual discussion. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1223545257

Now you are professing that you know the content of something that you haven't even seen ...or you deny that you have seen.

You're an absolutely repulsive freak  ;D

You placed it in the wrong section. Like I wrote in the same thread, if I got hit with a drugs topic I'd move it.

I addressed this.

You're grasping at nothing.

Go have a lie down.

If you wanted to talk about the Jesus conspiracy, yay, cool. But instead you posted a link to a movie, which goes on about things such as religious conspiracies, 9/11 conspiracies, US fed reserve conspiracies, one world government conspiracies and secret societies and what not.

Clearly a fringe topic. How stupid do you have to be to not see that?

Here's a critical review of your messiah.

http://infowars.wordpress.com/2008/10/13/zeitgeist-addendum-a-critical-review/

Go buy a can of  "EGO-BOOST'

You have no idea which category the subject falls into because you've spent hours denying the need to watch it in order to discuss it.

Pathetic weasel....pathetic!

I'm absolutely sickened.

Amadd wrote on Oct 15^th, 2008 at 9:04pm:

Go buy a can of  "EGO-BOOST' You have no idea which category the subject falls into because you've spent hours denying the need to watch it in order to discuss it. Pathetic weasel....pathetic! I'm absolutely sickened.

I don't need to watch it because I know what's in it and have discussed it with people who have watched it.

Whilst not being intimately familiar with the film, I am certain it is a fringe topic.

Tell me Amadd, is it a fringe topic or not? Let's see how stupid you really are.

Is discussion of the movie Zeitgeist or Zeitgeist: Addendum a topic that is most suited to the fringe board of this website? Yes or no?

I'm feeling so much love emanating from this thread. :D

Oi...Amadd....'Weasel' is my term, I've copyrighted it. You'll have to PM me for permission to use it (which I will hapily give).

What you are saying is essentially Catholics and Anglicans are unable to discuss Christianity with each other because their versions of the Bible are slightly different and they would never be able to understand each other.

Quote:

Oi...Amadd....'Weasel' is my term, I've copyrighted it. You'll have to PM me for permission to use it (which I will hapily give).

Well it didn't take me very many encounters to realise that this term would have been used extensively by others.
I think that it was a sub-conscious name given to himself, but he couldn't quite admit to himself that he's a weasel.

It seems to me that I'm arguing with RSF from Cracker...and that would be an insult to myself to be bothered trying to get some sense into his thick scone. I'm surprised that FD would even consider him to be worthy of being a moderator.

But to answer his ridiculously stupid question:


Quote:

Tell me Amadd, is it a fringe topic or not? Let's see how stupid you really are. Is discussion of the movie Zeitgeist or Zeitgeist: Addendum a topic that is most suited to the fringe board of this website? Yes or no?

No. The theme of the film is spiritual. ie: the possibility of something better than a grab for cash.  This theme is found more extensively in the second half of the movie/doco and these are the points which I was wanting to discuss. Ergo, I placed it in the spiritual forum.
The review that you put up was way off the mark IMO. There's nothing at all dangerous to a rational thinking person...much the opposite.
And drop the word "messiah" because you are making even more of an idiot of yourself if that's at all possible.
It's no different than wanting to discuss points in a movie that I might find important or interesting.

Your bum buddy is back...go play some swordfights with him...or maybe some toothpick fights.

Thanks for your courteous reply. I have nothing to add except that I will disagree and hope you don't follow the direction the creators of Zeitgeist wish you to pursue too closely.

IC,  :-? I find it difficult to understand how you can disagree so vehemently with something that you don't even know about.
But that's the type of thinking that makes me think that you are RSF. If not, you must be a close relative.

Maybe I am a distant relation. I have no idea who RSF is.

I disagree with something I have a fairly good understanding of, from my reckoning.

I'm closing this thread. If you have complaints about censorship on the member run boards, please take it up on that board. If you don't like the response, stop using the board.