Offensive' Trad loses libel action
July 31, 2009 - 12:25PM

Islamic identity Keysar Trad's defamation case against a Sydney radio station has collapsed, with a Supreme Court justice saying Trad did in fact make remarks that were ‘‘offensive", "racist" and ‘‘condoned violence".

Today's judgment comes in opposition to a jury's decision in 2007 that found Mr Trad was defamed by broadcaster Jason Morrison, who implied that he was a disgraceful, dangerous individual who incited people to commit violent acts.

The case stems from comments made by Morrison about Mr Trad on talkback radio in December 2005, shortly after the Cronulla riots.

The legal team for Harbour Radio, the owners of 2GB, argued that the information claimed to be defamatory was in fact true.

After hearing evidence about Mr Trad's reputation and the effect of the broadcast, Justice Peter McClellan ruled today that Mr Trad's claim should be dismissed.

‘‘There is little doubt that many of the plaintiff's remarks are offensive to Jewish persons and homosexuals," Justice McClellan said in his judgment.

Neither Mr Trad nor Morrison were at Sydney's Supreme Court to hear the judgment.

‘‘Many of his remarks are distasteful and appear to condone violence," the judgment continued.

‘‘I'm satisfied that the plaintiff does hold views which can properly be described as racist.

‘‘I'm also satisfied that he encourages others to hold those views. In particular he holds views derogatory of Jewish people.

‘‘The views which he holds would not be acceptable to most right-thinking Australians," Justice McClelland's judgment said.

Outside court, a representative of Mr Trad said he planned to appeal.

The parties are due to meet again next Thursday to discuss costs in the matter.

AAP

http://www.smh.com.au/national/offensive-trad-loses-libel-action-20090731-e3qd.html

the aussie legal system muscles up against a racist sexist violently inclined religious person.

Trad has always been a worry and only the LW and PC media have been protecting him.

Hooray...  light shone under his rock at last

never thought of that, wonder how the apologetics feel about this ?
i can guess the howls of injustice coming from muslims

No, no, no. It is a blatant racist conspiracy by Christian right wing zionist white supremacists against Muslims. So-called 'justice', eh? There is no justice in white racist Christian zionist Australia. McClelland, eh? Say no more. Probably a Mendelshon, just changed his name. Typical of you, brainwashed rednecks - you believe everything except Islam.
This just shows the extent of zionist control of the Australian courts and society and everything. We all know that Islam is tolerant, it is peaceful and it is the best thing since sliced infidels.

Assalam alaykum,
Lestat
Abu Rashid
and thousands of others

Another Muslim Butt is guilty of racism. How very unbelievable.  



Asian man who called policemen 'white redneck hooligans' is guilty of racism
From The London Telegraph
Hassan Butt, 29,  who called police officers "white redneck hooligans" has been found guilty of making racist remarks.
Butt, who once admitted having claimed he was a terrorist to make money from the media, was convicted of committing a racially aggravated public order offence by District Judge Diana Baker at Manchester Magistrates Court.
He made the remarks after police arrested his brother, dentist Omer Butt, in a row over parking. Pc Christian Allanson overheard Butt say loudly into his mobile phone: "'I'm just here with these white redneck hooligans'."
He told the court Butt also said: "'Where's my brother, you're not the Gestapo'."
Pc Allanson said: " . .  due to the fact we were white police officers. I believe it was a very offensive comment."
Butt also taunted officers by asking if they were BNP members . . . He also asked officers who arrested and searched him: "Do you like feeling Pakis up?"
Judge Baker told him: "You demonstrated towards the officers hostility based on their membership of a racial group. . . I take seriously any form of racist abuse and feel the courts must strive to protect people."




This  little Butt was fined and ordered to pay costs.

Soren wrote on Jul 31^st, 2009 at 6:26pm:

No, no, no. It is a blatant racist conspiracy by Christian right wing zionist white supremacists against Muslims. So-called 'justice', eh? There is no justice in white racist Christian zionist Australia. McClelland, eh? Say no more. Probably a Mendelshon, just changed his name. Typical of you, brainwashed rednecks - you believe everything except Islam. This just shows the extent of zionist control of the Australian courts and society and everything. We all know that Islam is tolerant, it is peaceful and it is the best thing since sliced infidels. Assalam alaykum, Lestat Abu Rashid and thousands of others

That is the moslem mindset.

THE FALLACY.....
Where or when the superiority of moslems is not confirmed [in a society], it is because of systematic 'discrimination' against moslems.


THE FACT.....
Moslems do not accept equality before the law, with non-moslems.
Moslems demand the introduction of Sharia, everywhere, because moslems know that Sharia, as a legal system, discriminates against non-moslems.
Sharia law empowers, and is, a legal apartheid, favouring moslems, against non-moslems.
Within ALL Sharia jurisdictions, it is recognised that moslems are innocent, whereas non-moslems are ALWAYS 'guilty' people.
'Human rights' are for moslems, in moslem societies.
Non-moslems are regarded as 'guilty' people, within ALL Sharia jurisdictions.




The Koran

" "And believe no one unless he follows your religion." Say: "True guidance is the Guidance of Allah......"
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/013.qmt.html#003.073



Anjem Choudary - a UK moslem community leader,
here on YOUTUBE, he explaining to the dumb Kuffar,
how within ISLAM, moslems are innocent, and non-moslems are guilty.

"...when we say innocent people, we mean muslims."
"....[not accepting ISLAM] is a crime against God."
"...If you are a non-muslim, then you are guilty of not believing in God."
"...as a muslim....i must have *hatred* towards everything which is non-ISLAM."
"...[muslims] allegence is always with the muslims, so i will never condemn a muslim for what he does."
"...Britain has always been Dar al Harb [the Land of War]"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maHSOB2RFm4






See also.....


AN ETHICAL BASIS FOR WAR
by Bill Warner (Jan 2007)
"......Jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, and most atheists agree that lying, theft, murder, destroying the sanctity of family, and lusting after other people’s property is bad behavior.
Upon reflection, all of these prohibitions prevent harm to others. We don’t harm others and we don’t want to be harmed. We all want to be treated well and this is the best way to treat others, hence the Golden Rule:
Do unto others, as you would have them do unto you.
The Golden Rule is an ethic of unity. Everyone is treated the same. One ethical system for all people.
This has been said in many ways in many religions and cultures. But there is a religion and culture that does not agree with these ethics—Islam.
......What are Islamic ethics and where do we find them?
.....A Muslim should be a brother to other Muslims (not the rest of humanity). A Muslim should not kill another Muslim. A Muslim may lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
So for Islam the ethical statements are:
Do not kill another Muslim.
Do not steal from another Muslim.
Do not deceive another Muslim.
Islam divides the entire world into Islam and nonbelievers and has two sets of ethics, one for Islam and another for the rest. The Golden Rule has the equality of all humanity as its basis. It is not: Do unto some people, as you would have them do unto you, but do unto all people as you would have them do unto you.
Islam denies the universality of the Golden Rule because Islam starts with the division of the entire world, all humanity, into two different groups—Islamic and non-Islamic. Every aspect of Islamic ethics is based upon this separation. Having two distinct groups leads to two different ethical codes. Said another way, Islam has dualistic ethics.
Deceit, violence and force are optional actions against the unbelievers. Believers are to be treated as brothers and sisters. Islam’s ethics are based upon:
Good is whatever advances Islam.
Evil is whatever resists Islam.
over two pages...
http://www.newenglishreview.org/custpage.cfm?frm=5208&sec_id=5208
http://www.newenglishreview.org/custpage.cfm?frm=5209&sec_id=5209

And the sensitive types among us wonder - why is tolerance and multicultural piety going always only one way? Shurely shome mishtake.
And then their reflex kicks in immediately - why, it must be us! We are not tolerant, not sensitive, not culturally aware enough! We should not have enemies, only friends whose grievances we haven't accommodated yet. ( I am channeling Gaybriel, the esteemed moderator of this very board.)

And then along comes redneck McClelland and ruins it all. There is nervous silence only broken intermittently by the sound of shuffling feet from the Politically and Culturally Correct.

It's Justice McClellan, the President of the CCA.

Justice McLelland is dead, and has been for some time. They used the names interchangeably in the article.

Constant suits against anyone who dares criticise them is part of the litigation jihad, designed to chill any free speech or any criticism of Islam.

The costs Trad will be forced to pay under this judgment have reached $400,000. He will appeal as he is shocked. So am I as we have always accommodated minority groups to the extreme, especially Muslims. It will be interesting to see what the next verdict will be by a different Judge.

trad shows his utter compempt for aussie law by not being present at the announcement of the trial.
He knew he was going to lose and his arrogance would not let him be there to hear it.