Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Spirituality >> "Silence is consent" - congrats to Paul Haggis http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1256602448 Message started by sprintcyclist on Oct 27th, 2009 at 10:14am |
Title: "Silence is consent" - congrats to Paul Haggis Post by sprintcyclist on Oct 27th, 2009 at 10:14am Quote:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,26265846-12377,00.html |
Title: Re: "Silence is consent" - congrats to Paul Haggis Post by muso on Oct 27th, 2009 at 10:43am Sprintcyclist wrote on Oct 27th, 2009 at 10:14am:
I just conducted a quick audit (attached), and on that basis, I agree that Scientology has characteristics that mark it as a dangerous and evil cult. 8-) ![]() |
Title: Re: "Silence is consent" - congrats to Paul Haggis Post by sprintcyclist on Oct 27th, 2009 at 11:04am thanks for the irrefutable proof muso ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: "Silence is consent" - congrats to Paul Haggis Post by Amadd on Nov 5th, 2009 at 7:54pm
I think Ron L Hubbard would have, or must have, been a really good poker player. Far better than the original inventors of Jesus Christ, because he didn't have an "unknown" history on his side.
What a great scam. He appeals to the male ego brilliantly. First there is information that seems very logical and scientific, but then the further that one is roped in, the more incomprehensible the logic becomes. The ego will sacrifice logic for power any day of the week (hence we have politicians) and logic is sacrificed big time in scientology. Ahh yes, they are progressing further towards revealing the "big secret", but in actuality, they are closing themselves off from the real truth. Not too dissimilar from most other pursuits I suppose.i |
Title: Re: "Silence is consent" - congrats to Paul Haggis Post by muso on Nov 7th, 2009 at 7:56am Amadd wrote on Nov 5th, 2009 at 7:54pm:
That reminds me of my initial learning experience with Quantum mechanics. ;D (until I actually started to understand it) Regardless of the field, if you totally confuse people with a mass of details, it tends to convince them of the legitimacy of the argument. From the perspective of an individual, he will tend to take things on faith, in the belief that even if he doesn't understand it, nobody else seems to have a problem with it - After all, nobody is asking questions. The herd mentality prevails if everybody else takes that same attitude, and nobody actually admits that they don't understand. It's the same with many religions. Scientology doesn't have a monopoly on brainwashing. |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved. |