Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Bennelong's back. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1282057406 Message started by sprintcyclist on Aug 18th, 2010 at 1:03am |
Title: Bennelong's back. Post by sprintcyclist on Aug 18th, 2010 at 1:03am Quote:
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-election/poll-has-abbott-reeling-20100817-128lf.html?autostart=1 |
Title: Re: Bennelong's back. Post by Ernie on Aug 18th, 2010 at 4:28am
Why don't you post the whole article, sprint?
|
Title: Re: Bennelong's back. Post by Amadd on Aug 18th, 2010 at 7:41am Quote:
It probably just proves Sprint that the seat "per se' " is insignificant to a large degree. McKew is a journalist by trade and has hardly been heard from in the media for the past three years. The real significance of the seat of Bennelong in regards to the rest of the country is very minor. It was only significant because Howard was placed in that once relatively safe Liberal seat. A seat is just a seat, and whether it be McKew or Alexander who wins it, it is not of any greater importance to the nation as a whole than any other seat voted upon. I get the impression Sprint that you are implying that Bennelong has some cultural significance above all other seats because Howard was once systematically placed there by the party that he should have been faithful to and wasn't. There are no "Mecca's" in a democracy, not Gallipoli either.i |
Title: Re: Bennelong's back. Post by sprintcyclist on Aug 18th, 2010 at 9:03am every seat we win is significant, this one moreso than others. |
Title: Re: Bennelong's back. Post by Equitist on Aug 18th, 2010 at 9:12am Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 18th, 2010 at 9:03am:
LOL...judging by the patently partisan local papers, that I read when I visit my parents in Bennelongland, I'd suggest that: the Local libs are totally obsessed with the significance of regaining Howard's former seat - to the point of looking like fundamentalcases... |
Title: Re: Bennelong's back. Post by aussiefree2ride on Aug 18th, 2010 at 9:18am Equitist wrote on Aug 18th, 2010 at 9:12am:
Thank you for your unbiased and non fanatical opinnion. ;D |
Title: Re: Bennelong's back. Post by Equitist on Aug 18th, 2010 at 9:22am aussiefree2ride wrote on Aug 18th, 2010 at 9:18am:
1. I grew up in Bennelongland and my parents still live there and therefore I have a valid and special interest - have you ever lived there!? 2. Have you personally read the increasingly-biased pro-Lib pages of the TWT over a number of years - and can you refute what I claim!? |
Title: Re: Bennelong's back. Post by DARWIN on Aug 18th, 2010 at 9:33am
LOL a 300-sample poll, Moe of 6-7% so that poll can be Maxine winning it quite easy. The money going on to former tennis “great” (and lousy commentator) is probably by Lib zealots who don’t understand statistics. LoL!
Formerly held by our worst-ever Treasurer and worst-ever PM, the second PM ever to lose his seat! |
Title: Re: Bennelong's back. Post by aussiefree2ride on Aug 18th, 2010 at 1:16pm Equitist wrote on Aug 18th, 2010 at 9:22am:
1. No 2. No - yes. The last section of your rant (especially) isn`t based on fact, rather conjecture and an emotional figment of your |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved. |