Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Thinking Globally >> British General admits reality of war on Islam
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1289814445

Message started by abu_rashid on Nov 15th, 2010 at 7:47pm

Title: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by abu_rashid on Nov 15th, 2010 at 7:47pm
When will our leader admit the reality too? Why send more and more people to their deaths, and to mercilessly murder innocent civilians, when it's clear the leaders of the war consider it unwinnable.



West cannot defeat al-Qaeda, says UK forces chief

General Sir David Richards tells Andrew Marr it is not possible to conquer an 'idea' such as Islamism

The West can only contain, not defeat, militant groups such as al-Qaeda, the head of the UK's armed forces has said.

General Sir David Richards, a former Nato commander in Afghanistan, said Islamist militancy would pose a threat to the UK for at least 30 years.

But he told the BBC's Andrew Marr Show a clear-cut victory over militants was not achievable.

The BBC's Frank Gardner said the comments reflect a "new realism" in UK and US counter-terrorism circles.

Our security correspondent said such an admission five years ago might have been considered outrageous and defeatist.

Gen Richards, 58, took over as chief of the defence staff last month, after a spell as head of the British army.

'Secure lives'
Before he was due to lay a wreath at the Cenotaph as part of the UK's Remembrance Sunday commemorations, Gen Richards told the BBC's Andrew Marr Show it was important to get the balance of remembrance right.

"It's something we've got to be very careful about... there's a lot of dwelling on death as opposed to what those people who have died achieved in their sadly too often too brief lives, but those people have done immense things that are good and I think we need to focus a bit more on that," he said.

Britain has lost 343 soldiers in Afghanistan since 2001.

But Gen Richards told the BBC it was not possible to defeat the Taliban or al-Qaeda militarily.

"You can't. We've all said this. David Petraeus has said it, I've said it.

"The trick is the balance of things that you're doing and I say that the military are just about, you know, there.

"The biggest problem's been ensuring that the governance and all the development side can keep up with it within a time frame and these things take generations sometimes within a time frame that is acceptable to domestic, public and political opinion," he said.

He said extremist Islamism could not be eradicated as an idea.

"I don't think you can probably defeat an idea, it's something we need to battle back against as necessary, but in its milder forms why shouldn't they be allowed to have that sort of philosophy underpinning their lives.

"It's how it manifests itself that is the key and can we contain that manifestation - and quite clearly al-Qaeda is an unacceptable manifestation of it," he said.

Security lapse
Shadow defence secretary Jim Murphy told the BBC Gen Richards was "right" that there was no purely military solution and said there would be "no white flag surrender moment".


Gen Sir David Richards is currently head of the British army

"This is a complicated issue. It will be for the long haul. It's got to do with history.

"But I think he's right to talk about the different ways that this has got to be taken on - militarily yes but diplomatically and in a peaceful sense of nation building in Afghanistan is also important," he said.

Former British Chief of the General Staff, General Sir Richard Dannatt, agreed warfare had entered a new era and needed the support of development programmes.

"In conventional wars, you talk about winning and losing.

"What we're trying to do here is succeed sufficiently to put Afghanistan as a sufficiently stable state that can look after itself and doesn't become ungoverned space into which al-Qaeda or other terrorist groups could reoccupy," he said.

Gen Richards comments came as the Foreign Office apologised to a group of MPs after a fact-finding trip to Afghanistan and Pakistan had to be called off because of a security lapse.

Next week's visit by members of the Commons defence select committee was cancelled after an unencrypted e-mail was sent out by an embassy official in Kabul, prompting fears that the MPs' safety may have been compromised.

The Foreign Office said it would be trying to rearrange a visit for the MPs.

A Foreign Office spokesman said: "We have offered our apologies for this regrettable lapse in our procedures and have assured the committee that we will do all we can to arrange a successful visit in the future."

Source: BBC

Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by Soren on Nov 15th, 2010 at 8:36pm

abu_rashid wrote on Nov 15th, 2010 at 7:47pm:
When will our leader admit the reality too? Why send more and more people to their deaths, and to mercilessly murder innocent civilians, when it's clear the leaders of the war consider it unwinnable.




The West can only contain, not defeat, militant groups such as al-Qaeda, the head of the UK's armed forces has said.



Consider yourself contained in Afghanistan.

Feeling better??



Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by chicken_lipsforme on Nov 16th, 2010 at 6:51am
There is no war on Islam, there never was.
Just a war on terrorists.
And the UK can certainly withdraw from the field of combat claiming it's all too hard, however if people think that this will reduce the prospect of bombs going off in the West they are much mistaken.
Terrorists have been attacking the West long before 11th Sept 2001.

Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by Karnal on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:26am

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 6:51am:
There is no war on Islam, there never was.
Just a war on terrorists.


Ah. That would explain why the US harbour anti-Castro terrorists, providing a safe haven for a number of plane bombers wanted in countries like Panama and Bolivia.

Y'ur either with us or against us.

Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by chicken_lipsforme on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:29am

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:26am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 6:51am:
There is no war on Islam, there never was.
Just a war on terrorists.


Ah. That would explain why the US harbour anti-Castro terrorists, providing a safe haven for a number of plane bombers wanted in countries like Panama and Bolivia.

Y'ur either with us or against us.


They'd be called freedom fighters now Karnal wouldn't they, seeing as they are on our side?

Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by Karnal on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:51am

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:29am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:26am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 6:51am:
There is no war on Islam, there never was.
Just a war on terrorists.


Ah. That would explain why the US harbour anti-Castro terrorists, providing a safe haven for a number of plane bombers wanted in countries like Panama and Bolivia.

Y'ur either with us or against us.


They'd be called freedom fighters now Karnal wouldn't they, seeing as they are on our side?


Oh yes, of course, CL. Our side: that's the side against the Islamicists, right?

Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by chicken_lipsforme on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:59am

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:51am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:29am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:26am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 6:51am:
There is no war on Islam, there never was.
Just a war on terrorists.


Ah. That would explain why the US harbour anti-Castro terrorists, providing a safe haven for a number of plane bombers wanted in countries like Panama and Bolivia.

Y'ur either with us or against us.


They'd be called freedom fighters now Karnal wouldn't they, seeing as they are on our side?


Oh yes, of course, CL. Our side: that's the side against the Islamicists, right?


No, our side's the one that we are told to be on by our senior partner in world peace.

Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by gizmo_2655 on Nov 16th, 2010 at 1:05pm

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:51am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:29am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:26am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 6:51am:
There is no war on Islam, there never was.
Just a war on terrorists.


Ah. That would explain why the US harbour anti-Castro terrorists, providing a safe haven for a number of plane bombers wanted in countries like Panama and Bolivia.

Y'ur either with us or against us.


They'd be called freedom fighters now Karnal wouldn't they, seeing as they are on our side?


Oh yes, of course, CL. Our side: that's the side against the Islamicists, right?


Castro is a Muslim???

Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by abu_rashid on Nov 16th, 2010 at 1:12pm
chicken lips,

Nice to see you admit your hypocrisy, even if it had to be extracted out of you by using your serious lack of intelligence against you.

Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by Karnal on Nov 16th, 2010 at 1:24pm

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:59am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:51am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:29am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:26am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 6:51am:
There is no war on Islam, there never was.
Just a war on terrorists.


Ah. That would explain why the US harbour anti-Castro terrorists, providing a safe haven for a number of plane bombers wanted in countries like Panama and Bolivia.

Y'ur either with us or against us.


They'd be called freedom fighters now Karnal wouldn't they, seeing as they are on our side?


Oh yes, of course, CL. Our side: that's the side against the Islamicists, right?


No, our side's the one that we are told to be on by our senior partner in world peace.


World peace? The Kingdom of Bhutan?

Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by Karnal on Nov 16th, 2010 at 1:25pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 1:05pm:

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:51am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:29am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:26am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 6:51am:
There is no war on Islam, there never was.
Just a war on terrorists.


Ah. That would explain why the US harbour anti-Castro terrorists, providing a safe haven for a number of plane bombers wanted in countries like Panama and Bolivia.

Y'ur either with us or against us.


They'd be called freedom fighters now Karnal wouldn't they, seeing as they are on our side?


Oh yes, of course, CL. Our side: that's the side against the Islamicists, right?


Castro is a Muslim???


Is he? That explains it, then.

Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by chicken_lipsforme on Nov 16th, 2010 at 1:28pm

abu_rashid wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 1:12pm:
chicken lips,

Nice to see you admit your hypocrisy, even if it had to be extracted out of you by using your serious lack of intelligence against you.


Somehow I don't think it's my hypocrasy Abu, but it is how things are in the world.
I would have thought someone with such a superior mind as yourself would have realised that.

Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by gizmo_2655 on Nov 16th, 2010 at 1:55pm

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 1:25pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 1:05pm:

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:51am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:29am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:26am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 6:51am:
There is no war on Islam, there never was.
Just a war on terrorists.


Ah. That would explain why the US harbour anti-Castro terrorists, providing a safe haven for a number of plane bombers wanted in countries like Panama and Bolivia.

Y'ur either with us or against us.


They'd be called freedom fighters now Karnal wouldn't they, seeing as they are on our side?


Oh yes, of course, CL. Our side: that's the side against the Islamicists, right?


Castro is a Muslim???


Is he? That explains it, then.


That was actually sarcasm Karnal.....


Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by abu_rashid on Nov 16th, 2010 at 2:54pm
chicken lips,

You are resigning to the fact that the hysteria that is 'terrorism' is a load of garbage, a scheme cooked up to de-legitimise the warfare of the enemy.

And you palm it off casually as "That's just the way the world is, you should know that".

I'm fine with it, since I can see past the facade, but don't you think it undermines all the other crap you go on about... just a little?

Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by chicken_lipsforme on Nov 17th, 2010 at 7:26am

abu_rashid wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 2:54pm:
chicken lips,

You are resigning to the fact that the hysteria that is 'terrorism' is a load of garbage, a scheme cooked up to de-legitimise the warfare of the enemy.
And you palm it off casually as "That's just the way the world is, you should know that".
I'm fine with it, since I can see past the facade, but don't you think it undermines all the other crap you go on about... just a little?


I'm afraid their is nothing to legitimise or de-legitimise in my mind when discussing civilian groups who spend their waking moments finding ways to kill innocent people, so I'm not even bothering with that.
These terrorist groups will always find something in the West that offends them in one way or another which justifies their actions to them, and they have been doing that long before 9/11.
Whether it be the writing in a book, or naming a doll Mohammed are two things that come to mind.
And the West today having their armies marching though Muslim lands hunting down this filth just gives a further justification to their henious actions in their minds.
Even if our armies weren't marching through these lands, these terrorist scum would continue to attack until they are stopped like they did before the 'War on Terror'.
The only facade is the the one belief that had the West not reacted after 9/11, the world would be a safer place.
And whether you like it or not, things are as they are and their is nothing an individual can do about it.
The important thing though is that these maggots that do attack innocent people in foreign places like Bali or Lockerbie or 9/11 are caught and put down.

Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by aussiefree2ride on Nov 17th, 2010 at 7:41am
Brian (Abu_Rashbag), you were born into and nurtured by, western civilisation.  Every sizable group in humanity will always contain misfits and malcontents. These individuals invariably display a contemptuous attitude toward their own people who have rejected them, in times of war they`re described as "traitorous scum".  

This "runt of the litter syndrome" is easily seen for what it is, perhaps you were the fat kid no one would play with, or the runt who couldn`t fit in.  Either way, life sucks eh Brian.

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by chicken_lipsforme on Nov 17th, 2010 at 9:03am

aussiefree2ride wrote on Nov 17th, 2010 at 7:41am:
Brian (Abu_Rashbag), you were born into and nurtured by, western civilisation.  Every sizable group in humanity will always contain misfits and malcontents. These individuals invariably display a contemptuous attitude toward their own people who have rejected them, in times of war they`re described as "traitorous scum".  

This "runt of the litter syndrome" is easily seen for what it is, perhaps you were the fat kid no one would play with, or the runt who couldn`t fit in.  Either way, life sucks eh Brian.

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


There possibly could also be a certain amount of excitement involved for some knowing ASIO is watching and listening to their every move.
Walter Mitty would have been proud.

Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by Soren on Nov 17th, 2010 at 10:50am

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 1:05pm:

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:51am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:29am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:26am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 6:51am:
There is no war on Islam, there never was.
Just a war on terrorists.


Ah. That would explain why the US harbour anti-Castro terrorists, providing a safe haven for a number of plane bombers wanted in countries like Panama and Bolivia.

Y'ur either with us or against us.


They'd be called freedom fighters now Karnal wouldn't they, seeing as they are on our side?


Oh yes, of course, CL. Our side: that's the side against the Islamicists, right?


Castro is a Muslim???



No. Castro is Jewish. Everobody knows that.



Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by Karnal on Nov 17th, 2010 at 11:53am

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 17th, 2010 at 7:26am:
Even if our armies weren't marching through these lands, these terrorist scum would continue to attack until they are stopped like they did before the 'War on Terror'.
The only facade is the the one belief that had the West not reacted after 9/11, the world would be a safer place.


Not sure what you're saying here, CL - that the War On Terror makes the world a safer place? That the WOT has prevented terrorism?

Castro looks very Jewsih, doesn't he.


Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by aussiefree2ride on Nov 17th, 2010 at 3:03pm

Soren wrote on Nov 17th, 2010 at 10:50am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 1:05pm:

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:51am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:29am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:26am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 6:51am:
There is no war on Islam, there never was.
Just a war on terrorists.


Ah. That would explain why the US harbour anti-Castro terrorists, providing a safe haven for a number of plane bombers wanted in countries like Panama and Bolivia.

Y'ur either with us or against us.


They'd be called freedom fighters now Karnal wouldn't they, seeing as they are on our side?


Oh yes, of course, CL. Our side: that's the side against the Islamicists, right?


Castro is a Muslim???



No. Castro is Jewish. Everobody knows that.





You sure that`s Castro?  Looks like Groucho Marx to me.

Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by gizmo_2655 on Nov 17th, 2010 at 4:21pm

aussiefree2ride wrote on Nov 17th, 2010 at 3:03pm:

Soren wrote on Nov 17th, 2010 at 10:50am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 1:05pm:

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:51am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:29am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 11:26am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2010 at 6:51am:
There is no war on Islam, there never was.
Just a war on terrorists.


Ah. That would explain why the US harbour anti-Castro terrorists, providing a safe haven for a number of plane bombers wanted in countries like Panama and Bolivia.

Y'ur either with us or against us.


They'd be called freedom fighters now Karnal wouldn't they, seeing as they are on our side?


Oh yes, of course, CL. Our side: that's the side against the Islamicists, right?


Castro is a Muslim???



No. Castro is Jewish. Everobody knows that.





You sure that`s Castro?  Looks like Groucho Marx to me.



Umm I'd say Woody Allen, with a cheap beard....

Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by Soren on Nov 17th, 2010 at 10:12pm
No, no, no. That  IS Castro befor the nose job. You can see the Cuban Libetration Front insignia on his cap.




Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by chicken_lipsforme on Nov 18th, 2010 at 6:46am

Karnal wrote on Nov 17th, 2010 at 11:53am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 17th, 2010 at 7:26am:
Even if our armies weren't marching through these lands, these terrorist scum would continue to attack until they are stopped like they did before the 'War on Terror'.
The only facade is the the one belief that had the West not reacted after 9/11, the world would be a safer place.


Not sure what you're saying here, CL - that the War On Terror makes the world a safer place? That the WOT has prevented terrorism?


It certainly is no safer today than before the WOT, despite the amount of lives lost and effort put into prosecuting this war.
My point was that some others forget the West was a target long before the WOT happened, and the West walking away from this war doesn't mean that we will no longer be targets.

Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by abu_rashid on Nov 18th, 2010 at 7:13am

Quote:
My point was that some others forget the West was a target long before the WOT happened


That's right, because they were causing mayhem and bloodshed all over the Muslim world long before the WOI.

Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by Karnal on Nov 18th, 2010 at 9:01am

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 18th, 2010 at 6:46am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 17th, 2010 at 11:53am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 17th, 2010 at 7:26am:
Even if our armies weren't marching through these lands, these terrorist scum would continue to attack until they are stopped like they did before the 'War on Terror'.
The only facade is the the one belief that had the West not reacted after 9/11, the world would be a safer place.


Not sure what you're saying here, CL - that the War On Terror makes the world a safer place? That the WOT has prevented terrorism?


It certainly is no safer today than before the WOT, despite the amount of lives lost and effort put into prosecuting this war.
My point was that some others forget the West was a target long before the WOT happened, and the West walking away from this war doesn't mean that we will no longer be targets.


I agree with you, CL. The WOT has done nothing except make Amerika look like a waning power. And you can't even call it a War On Terror - why did we invade Iraq of all places?

How COULD you have a war on terror?

How can you have a war on drugs, or a war on crime?

War is a dumb metaphor. The Muslims have got a better one: jihad, or struggle.

There are no good sides in this one. This is a "war" where everyone's wrong.



Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by chicken_lipsforme on Nov 18th, 2010 at 10:09am

abu_rashid wrote on Nov 18th, 2010 at 7:13am:

Quote:
My point was that some others forget the West was a target long before the WOT happened


That's right, because they were causing mayhem and bloodshed all over the Muslim world long before the WOI.


I don't think those who died in the Bali bombings were causing mayhem and bloodshed anywhere Abu.
They were targetted because the terrorists were fruitloops who had issues with westerners being in Bali.
There actions were not supported by the local government, nor by the Indonesian government, nor by the vast majority of the Balanese people that welcome tourism.
These crackpots don't really need a reason like Western governments were causing bloodshed and mayhem in foreign lands thousands of kilometers away to do what they do.

Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by Karnal on Nov 18th, 2010 at 11:20am

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 18th, 2010 at 10:09am:

abu_rashid wrote on Nov 18th, 2010 at 7:13am:

Quote:
My point was that some others forget the West was a target long before the WOT happened


That's right, because they were causing mayhem and bloodshed all over the Muslim world long before the WOI.


I don't think those who died in the Bali bombings were causing mayhem and bloodshed anywhere Abu.
They were targetted because the terrorists were fruitloops who had issues with westerners being in Bali.
There actions were not supported by the local government, nor by the Indonesian government, nor by the vast majority of the Balanese people that welcome tourism.
These crackpots don't really need a reason like Western governments were causing bloodshed and mayhem in foreign lands thousands of kilometers away to do what they do.


I'd never excuse mass murder for the sake of a cause, but I can understand how Bali would appear to devout Muslims. A stretch of sunburnt, drunken rich yobs from the West. Tits, alcohol, Western hubris, everything that goes against Islam.

Of course, Bali is a Hindu island, and tourism gives them an economy. I'd say there's an element of jealousy in there, but the Balinese have a history of conflict with their neighbouring Muslim islands.

To just blow it up is a rather inarticulate response, but I can see the frustration. If Sydney was full of drunken Chinese d!ckheads, we'd be a tad frustrated too - and we're not even Muslims. Well, most of us, anyway.


Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by aussiefree2ride on Nov 18th, 2010 at 1:28pm

abu_rashid wrote on Nov 18th, 2010 at 7:13am:

Quote:
My point was that some others forget the West was a target long before the WOT happened


That's right, because they were causing mayhem and bloodshed all over the Muslim world long before the WOI.



Good.

Title: Re: British General admits reality of war on Islam
Post by Imperium of the Rising Sun on Nov 22nd, 2010 at 5:14pm
I don't know why people go to Bali on vacation now that you mention it. It sounds pretty boring.

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.