Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Political Parties >> Australian Labor Party >> gillards a dud http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1291238570 Message started by codswal on Dec 2nd, 2010 at 7:22am |
Title: gillards a dud Post by codswal on Dec 2nd, 2010 at 7:22am Dec 02, 2010 Former Labor leader Mark Latham, regarded by some commentators as having nearly cost Julia Gillard the last election, now appears set on costing her the next. In a column on the Financial Review, Mr Latham says some time in this parliamentary term, Labor factional bosses will need to deal with the reality that Julia Gillard is a dud leader who can't win. He said the trick would be for Labor to change leaders without triggering a change of government. As it now stands, her leadership is protected by the agreement with the independents who could legitimately say a change of leader would mean their agreement to back Labor in parliament no longer applied. Mr Latham said Labor's NSW right was restive with heavyweight Graham Richardson arguing that under Ms Gillard, policy paralysis was developing. He said Mr Richardson was already exploiting the proven destabilisation technique of criticising her staff while NSW right leader Mark Arbib, who played a key role in dumping Kevin Rudd, was not a happy camper. "The Arbib/Richardson tactic will be to grind down Gillard, seeping poison into the press, a slow burning strategy of attrition," he said. Mr Latham said the NSW right candidate was Immigration Minister Chris Bowen who should be prime minister by the end of 2012, provided he could build a relationship with the independent MPs. Mr Latham was opposition leader from December 2003 to January 2005. His intervention in the election campaign was regarded as a distraction which cost Labor valuable momentum. ------------- I would think blind freddy could see that.. rudd will have the last laugh thats for sure. |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by Greens_Win on Dec 2nd, 2010 at 7:32am
Labor has as big a problem with it's left and right factions, as does Liberals.
Both Liberal and Labor wings are well due to imploded. As for replacing Gillard, wishful thinking. |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by philperth2010 on Dec 2nd, 2010 at 7:34am
It is good form to post a link to other peoples comments Cods......you would not like people to think this you wrote this rubbish would you???
Lathams opinion is pure poison and has no basis in reality.....Latham has proven he is an ignorant pig to most people.....I am suprised you hold his opinion so highly Cods??? ;) |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by sprintcyclist on Dec 2nd, 2010 at 10:16am greens_lose - yes, the alp has a problem. it's basis for existing is false, so it makes mistakes everywhere. |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by Ernie on Dec 2nd, 2010 at 10:21am
And after all your good work putting hicks in his place, cods, for which you deservedly garnered much praise for your style, you post an "Extremist Rant".
;) |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by chicken_lipsforme on Dec 2nd, 2010 at 11:22am
Well Latham should certainly know who the duds are.
Takes one to know one. |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by codswal on Dec 2nd, 2010 at 4:13pm philperth2010 wrote on Dec 2nd, 2010 at 7:34am:
ho hum phil you are the only one that complains.. you know full well I have no idea how to do all this c&p.I can bring something forward but thats all. sorry if you dont like Lathams comments.hes a silly old bugger I agree as for Latham and holding his opinion highly!! remember I dont PAY him.. and this was on the news channel on here and just about everyone prints up something on Howard or Abbott I think you will find another thread on the same topic.. Lathams comments.. be fair phil.. I do my best I can switch this on and off and thats about tops..I cant even highlight...and you know what they say about teaching old puppies new tricks??????. btw Michael Costa is also giving the Labs a canning.. all saying shes gotta go. its funny though they only say it after they have left the game.. when they are sitting next to them.. they have all this lurrrv |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by codswal on Dec 2nd, 2010 at 4:15pm Please delete wrote on Dec 2nd, 2010 at 10:21am:
a rant!!! I am shocked..I bet you voted for Latham as well as phil.. dont you think he has a point though... I mean she isnt living up to expectations is she?????.. well lets put it this way I hope you all had more expectation of her than you are getting! |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by codswal on Dec 2nd, 2010 at 4:16pm chicken_lipsforme wrote on Dec 2nd, 2010 at 11:22am:
I have to buy that one...ha.ha. |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by sprintcyclist on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 10:55am
her nbn is getting the thumbs down by all the experts
Quote:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/watchdog-urges-julia-gillard-to-reject-nbns-monopoly-plan/story-fn59niix-1225964807868 |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by skippy. on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 11:06am Quote:
LOL, Hong Kong, about the size of Penrith, LOL. Was that you that wrote that retard comment sprint? Wireless would be great, but what about the bush? we cant even get mobile reception at my place and its only 23 KMs from the largest city on the NSW north coast. How do the Libs intend to give high speed broadband to the bush? wireless, LOL. ;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by codswal on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 11:58am
well there is almost 8 million people in Hong Kong..rather more than in the whole of NSW... seems to me skippy that when people leave the cities they leave it for all sorts of reasons..they do in some case give up having sewage..phone connections..all sorts of things and they know that before they make their choice to live in the bush/ country, it is not the same as living in the city...and its not meant to be.
now you are all saying we/they are entitled to the NBN because for some unknown reason they are all in a hurry when it comes to the web. . these people live without hospitals.. even schools in some parts. ambulances taxi service.. no pizza delivery. mail once a week. yet this is the new B.all and End all of the world to them.. makes me wonder how they survive all this time without it!! |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by codswal on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 11:59am
ps as for mobil reception sometimes its the same in Canberra..lol,you kind of take it in your stride.
|
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by Miss Anne Dryst on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 12:00pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 10:55am:
But Julia knows more (in her mind)! |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by skippy. on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 12:06pm codswal wrote on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 11:58am:
23KMs from a major city is NOT the bush. We deserve the same services as people in major cities, the city closest to me, 23 KMs away, houses Telstra's major call centre in Australia, many businesses are no longer tied to the CBD of Sydney, its called progress, something if left up to the likes of you, would not have moved past a horse and cart. |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by Miss Anne Dryst on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 12:09pm skippy. wrote on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 12:06pm:
It is for Gillard's electorate of Lalor. |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by buzzanddidj on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 12:17pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 10:55am:
ALL the experts ? Are these the same "all the experts" that say climate change is not occurring ? |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by Miss Anne Dryst on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 12:21pm buzzanddidj wrote on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 12:17pm:
Can you provide anything that proves that (man-made) climate change is occurring? |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by skippy. on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 12:31pm Quote:
Well seeing as though you asked the question, can you provide any evidence it is not? |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by aussiefree2ride on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 12:32pm Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 12:21pm:
You need to have faith. |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by Miss Anne Dryst on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 12:33pm aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 12:32pm:
LOL Yes have to believe in the invisible man too. The lefties greenies will say, can you prove the invisible man does not exist. |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by skippy. on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 12:38pm Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 12:33pm:
I knew you couldn't, I just wanted to highlight your status as a dufus. |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by Dnarever on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 12:39pm Quote:
So in 2013 it will be Bowen against Pyne? |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by skippy. on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 12:41pm Dnarever wrote on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 12:39pm:
Oh LOL, imagine cwissy whine as Lib leader,LOL. |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by sprintcyclist on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 1:12pm
more judas false promises and inaction
Quote:
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/whale-watch/calls-for-gillard-to-seek-whaling-injunction-20101202-18iat.html |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by skippy. on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 1:16pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 1:12pm:
Yep, its disgusting sprint. Could you just remind us all what that great conservationist John Howard did about the Japanese whaling? |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by chicken_lipsforme on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 1:24pm aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 12:32pm:
Absolutely faith, and it also would help to have a certain degree of gullability too. And a distinct ability to be selective and ignore certain facts also comes in handy. ;D |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by chicken_lipsforme on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 1:28pm skippy. wrote on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 12:31pm:
Somehow I don't think it's up to them to prove anything. It's the man made climate change soothsayers are the ones pushing this particular barrow. And so far, they have come up well short of the mark. |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by skippy. on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 2:08pm chicken_lipsforme wrote on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 1:28pm:
LOl another confusionalist who cant even put forward a substantial case for his confusionalism, I'll bet he votes conservative too,LOL. :o :o |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by sprintcyclist on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 2:32pm skippy - Quote:
fancy a leftard divertying the topic !!!!!!!! As you asked, Johnny said it was an unwinnable case and he would not pursue it legally. that is what he did. judas said she'ld stop them, and she's done zippo |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by skippy. on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 2:35pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 2:32pm:
So Howard did ZIPPO, thanks for that sprinty. 8-) Why are the current opposition calling for action then? when in government they said it was unwinnable and as you've said, did ZIPPO. |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by Miss Anne Dryst on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 4:48pm skippy. wrote on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 2:35pm:
Rudd gave a commitment as part of his election speech in 2007. Howard was upfront with the electorate and advised that Australia could not win the case. Rudd misled the electorate with c_rap promises knowing full well that Australia couldn't win. |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by skippy. on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 4:50pm Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 3rd, 2010 at 4:48pm:
Thanks for your imput,mellie. :D |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by sprintcyclist on Dec 4th, 2010 at 12:31pm skippys just reinforced the belief all leftards have. they'ld rather be lied to and pretend something than be told the facts. anyhow, here is some more facts Quote:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/home-truths-from-former-labor-heavyweights/story-e6frg6zo-1225965396494 she's worse than krudd |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by skippy. on Dec 4th, 2010 at 3:36pm
has created the perception
You left out this kind of important bit of the statement, sprinty. That's OK, perception has never been one of your strong points. :o |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by Miss Anne Dryst on Dec 4th, 2010 at 5:23pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 4th, 2010 at 12:31pm:
Well it is skippy sprint so that's no surprise. And yes you're right Gillard is worse that Rudd if that were possible. |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by nichy on Dec 14th, 2010 at 6:58am
AND ANOTHER OF THE DUD'S CLASSIC MONEY WASTER:
JULIA Gillard's cash-for-clunkers proposal would cost 15 times more than an emissions trading scheme to reduce carbon pollution. And no research has been conducted on the fallout on used car dealers from the vehicle buyback policy. Bureaucrats charged with administering the Cleaner Car Rebate scheme have confirmed that compliance to ensure vehicles were scrapped was a "major concern" overseas. Under the plan, owners of cars manufactured before January 1, 1995, will be eligible for a $2000 rebate when they buy a new car with a Green Vehicle Guide greenhouse rating of six or above. The scheme is capped at 200,000 vehicles over four years. Climate Change Minister Greg Combet has repeatedly declined to detail the carbon abatement cost per tonne of the cleaner car scheme, which has already been delayed for six months. But the Department of Innovation has now confirmed for the first time that the cost of abatement under the $430 million scheme is $429.70 per tonne over the decade |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by sprintcyclist on Dec 14th, 2010 at 8:18am No wonder this is just another scheme that has gone quiet. has she achieved anything FOR Australia ???????????? |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by aussiefree2ride on Dec 14th, 2010 at 8:23am Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 8:18am:
Well, she got Oprah over for a lesbian love in. That`s helped us out no end! |
Title: Re: gillards a dud Post by sprintcyclist on Dec 14th, 2010 at 9:55am she stumbling form one cock-up to the next. the failures are continuing, this weeks cock-ups are the bank reform and the mining tax. |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved. |