I pray that the inhuman scum who perpetrated these crimes against humanity receive the strongest justice possible, and that those who support and back this also taste the fruits of their wickedness to the strongest degree, in this life and the hereafter.

---

Deformed babies in Fallujah Iraq

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYnDw1ReVhw&feature=player_embedded

Young women in Fallujah in Iraq are terrified of having children because of the increasing number of babies born grotesquely deformed, with no heads, two heads, a single eye in their foreheads, scaly bodies or missing limbs. In addition, young children in Fallujah are now experiencing hideous cancers and leukaemias. These deformities are now well documented, for example in television documentaries on SKY UK on September 1 2009, and on SKY UK June 2008. Our direct contact with doctors in Fallujah report that:

In September 2009, Fallujah General Hospital had 170 new born babies, 24% of whom were dead within the first seven days, a staggering 75% of the dead babies were classified as deformed.

This can be compared with data from the month of August in 2002 where there were 530 new born babies of whom six were dead within the first seven days and only one birth defect was reported.

Doctors in Fallujah have specifically pointed out that not only are they witnessing unprecedented numbers of birth defects but premature births have also considerably increased after 2003. But what is more alarming is that doctors in Fallujah have said, "a significant number of babies that do survive begin to develop severe disabilities at a later stage".

As one of a number of doctors, scientists and those with deep concern for Iraq, Dr Chris Burns-Cox, a British hospital physician, wrote a letter to the Rt. Hon. Clare Short, M.P. asking about this situation. She wrote a letter to the Rt. Hon.Douglas Alexander, M.P. the Secretary of State of the Department for International Development (a post she had held before she resigned on a matter of principle in May 2003 ) asking for clarification of the position of deformed children in Fallujah.

Source: Uruknet

Sounds like normal ugly arabs being born to me.

Thats why they wear rags on their head.

Perhaps Saddam's supposed WMD's are buried there deep down, and are deteriorating near the water source.

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 18^th, 2011 at 7:42am:

Perhaps Saddam's supposed WMD's are buried there deep down, and are deteriorating near the water source.

haha, you are a zionist...you probably actually believe this.

Lestat wrote on Mar 18^th, 2011 at 8:04am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 18th, 2011 at 7:42am: Perhaps Saddam's supposed WMD's are buried there deep down, and are deteriorating near the water source. haha, you are a zionist...you probably actually believe this.

Haha, you are a goose...and you have no theory as to how this might have occurred.

I wasn't aware there's still a dolt that was stupid enough to believe the WMD nonsense, even after the propagators of it themselves admitted they made it all up.

Fail.

Quote:

Sounds like normal ugly arabs being born to me. Thats why they wear rags on their head.

You'd be better off devoting your spare time to getting an education you half wit.

So are we to assume that the US has somehow manipulated the local gene pool to ensure the birth of babies with 'no heads, two heads, a single eye in their foreheads, scaly bodies or missing limbs' ?

If this is true it's more likely the result of generations of inbreeding than some nefarious western plot.

Quote:

So are we to assume that the US has somehow manipulated the local gene pool to ensure the birth of babies with 'no heads, two heads, a single eye in their foreheads, scaly bodies or missing limbs' ?

I think it's pretty well known they showered the city with chemical weapons.


Quote:

If this is true it's more likely the result of generations of inbreeding than some nefarious western plot.

I don't know why I'm bothering to respond to a cretin that can't even read... anyway here it is again:


Quote:

This can be compared with data from the month of August in 2002 where there were 530 new born babies of whom six were dead within the first seven days and only one birth defect was reported.

Would you like some help in sounding that out?

Some of these responses are truly sickening.

What kind of inhuman scum thinks like this?

I saw the program on the deformed babies in Fallujah. The Americans pushed all their old army vehicles and military paraphernalia into the river and the water was poisoned. It is truly sickening and a blight on humanity. Wherever the USA go, they leave a trail of destruction.

Look at the kids still getting blown up in Cambodia.....do you think the yanks will go back and clean up their crap? not on your nellie, they leave it for good Samaritans from other countries to do.

I can only imagine the crap they'll leave in Afghanistan when they walk away from it.

abu_rashid wrote on Mar 20^th, 2011 at 1:54pm:

Some of these responses are truly sickening. What kind of inhuman scum thinks like this?

Thankfully not all of us, although we are a very racist country.

jackflash wrote on Mar 18^th, 2011 at 6:34am:

Sounds like normal ugly arabs being born to me. Thats why they wear rags on their head.

I wonder what they'd say about your stubbies with your balls hanging out.

abu_rashid wrote on Mar 20^th, 2011 at 1:54pm:

Some of these responses are truly sickening. What kind of inhuman scum thinks like this?

These people for a start: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=cba_1255204179

This is just one example of the systemic barbarism of the islamic world. I picked this one at random as there are so many to choose from.  So abu, you and your sycophantic little mate what_next can save your outrage for your co-religionists. :P

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 18^th, 2011 at 9:00am:

Lestat wrote on Mar 18th, 2011 at 8:04am: chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 18th, 2011 at 7:42am: Perhaps Saddam's supposed WMD's are buried there deep down, and are deteriorating near the water source. haha, you are a zionist...you probably actually believe this. Haha, you are a goose...and you have no theory as to how this might have occurred.

hehe, you actually believe that Saddam buried WMD under the ground, and decided to not use them when his country was invaded...and even after he was captured, and killed, still chose to take the secret of those 'apparently' buried WMD to his grave.

And you think I'm the goose??
:D:D:D

Belgarion wrote on Mar 20^th, 2011 at 11:09am:

So are we to assume that the US has somehow manipulated the local gene pool to ensure the birth of babies with 'no heads, two heads, a single eye in their foreheads, scaly bodies or missing limbs' ? If this is true it's more likely the result of generations of inbreeding than some nefarious western plot.

lol...ever heard of Uranium depleted weapons...you dim wit?

abu_rashid wrote on Mar 20^th, 2011 at 1:54pm:

Some of these responses are truly sickening. What kind of inhuman scum thinks like this?

now now Abu...its not nice to abuse the mentally challenged.

We should pity them....

Belgarion wrote on Mar 20^th, 2011 at 5:24pm:

abu_rashid wrote on Mar 20th, 2011 at 1:54pm: Some of these responses are truly sickening. What kind of inhuman scum thinks like this? These people for a start: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=cba_1255204179 This is just one example of the systemic barbarism of the islamic world. I picked this one at random as there are so many to choose from.  So abu, you and your sycophantic little mate what_next can save your outrage for your co-religionists. :P

I'm surprised you actually have the mental capabilities to use google. Did your mummy help you?

abu_rashid wrote on Mar 20^th, 2011 at 1:54pm:

Some of these responses are truly sickening. What kind of inhuman scum thinks like this?

Hey we just picked it up from your lot. You know the type that sends men and women as suicide bombers.

Now there is an idea abu. You can become a suicide bomber.

Never happen as you  are GUTLESS SCUM.

Lestat wrote on Mar 21^st, 2011 at 8:07am:

[quote author=abu_rashid link=1300358166/0#9 date=1300593297]Some of these responses are truly sickening. What kind of inhuman scum thinks like this?

now now Abu...its not nice to abuse the mentally challenged.

We should pity them....[/quote


Speaking of mentally challenged and in comes lestat.

..someone in here has changed their name and is pretending to be a junior member.

The putrid foul stench of their cowardice and de-masking is singeing this forum's very essence
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3009/3164607593_60363f3551.jpg

Foolosophy wrote on Mar 21^st, 2011 at 10:24am:

..someone in here has changed their name and is pretending to be a junior member. The putrid foul stench of their cowardice and de-masking is singeing this forum's very essence http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3009/3164607593_60363f3551.jpg

You seem to have a love affair with sh1t foolhardly.

This is the second post of yours that is full of it.

Sorry I take that back. It is the second post showing sh1t as opposed to reading your sh1t.

Lestat wrote on Mar 21^st, 2011 at 8:06am:

Belgarion wrote on Mar 20th, 2011 at 11:09am: So are we to assume that the US has somehow manipulated the local gene pool to ensure the birth of babies with 'no heads, two heads, a single eye in their foreheads, scaly bodies or missing limbs' ? If this is true it's more likely the result of generations of inbreeding than some nefarious western plot. lol...ever heard of Uranium depleted weapons...you dim wit?

Actually no...the term used when I was in the ADF was Depleted Uranium...and the WHO des not believe it has any adverse effect on the human reproductive system
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs257/en/

"Potential health effects of exposure to depleted uranium
In the kidneys, the proximal tubules (the main filtering component of the kidney) are considered to be the main site of potential damage from chemical toxicity of uranium. There is limited information from human studies indicating that the severity of effects on kidney function and the time taken for renal function to return to normal both increase with the level of uranium exposure.
In a number of studies on uranium miners, an increased risk of lung cancer was demonstrated, but this has been attributed to exposure from radon decay products. Lung tissue damage is possible leading to a risk of lung cancer that increases with increasing radiation dose. However, because DU is only weakly radioactive, very large amounts of dust (on the order of grams) would have to be inhaled for the additional risk of lung cancer to be detectable in an exposed group. Risks for other radiation-induced cancers, including leukaemia, are considered to be very much lower than for lung cancer.
Erythema (superficial inflammation of the skin) or other effects on the skin are unlikely to occur even if DU is held against the skin for long periods (weeks).
No consistent or confirmed adverse chemical effects of uranium have been reported for the skeleton or liver.
No reproductive or developmental effects have been reported in humans.Although uranium released from embedded fragments may accumulate in the central nervous system (CNS) tissue, and some animal and human studies are suggestive of effects on CNS function, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions from the few studies reported."

So you'll just have to look a little closer to home, probably at some very unbiblical reproductive customs,;) , for a scapegoat.

...I wonder who was born to a toothless bearded hag?

Foolosophy wrote on Mar 21^st, 2011 at 1:20pm:

...I wonder who was born to a toothless bearded hag?

I know I know.

You and your sister.

what_next wrote on Mar 20^th, 2011 at 4:56pm:

jackflash wrote on Mar 18th, 2011 at 6:34am: Sounds like normal ugly arabs being born to me. Thats why they wear rags on their head. I wonder what they'd say about your stubbies with your balls hanging out.

Don't fret, it will come back into fashion again soon. ;D

Spock is an Arab

Belgarion wrote on Mar 21^st, 2011 at 1:10pm:

Lestat wrote on Mar 21st, 2011 at 8:06am: Belgarion wrote on Mar 20th, 2011 at 11:09am: So are we to assume that the US has somehow manipulated the local gene pool to ensure the birth of babies with 'no heads, two heads, a single eye in their foreheads, scaly bodies or missing limbs' ? If this is true it's more likely the result of generations of inbreeding than some nefarious western plot. lol...ever heard of Uranium depleted weapons...you dim wit? Actually no...the term used when I was in the ADF was Depleted Uranium...and the WHO des not believe it has any adverse effect on the human reproductive system http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs257/en/ "Potential health effects of exposure to depleted uranium In the kidneys, the proximal tubules (the main filtering component of the kidney) are considered to be the main site of potential damage from chemical toxicity of uranium. There is limited information from human studies indicating that the severity of effects on kidney function and the time taken for renal function to return to normal both increase with the level of uranium exposure. In a number of studies on uranium miners, an increased risk of lung cancer was demonstrated, but this has been attributed to exposure from radon decay products. Lung tissue damage is possible leading to a risk of lung cancer that increases with increasing radiation dose. However, because DU is only weakly radioactive, very large amounts of dust (on the order of grams) would have to be inhaled for the additional risk of lung cancer to be detectable in an exposed group. Risks for other radiation-induced cancers, including leukaemia, are considered to be very much lower than for lung cancer. Erythema (superficial inflammation of the skin) or other effects on the skin are unlikely to occur even if DU is held against the skin for long periods (weeks). No consistent or confirmed adverse chemical effects of uranium have been reported for the skeleton or liver. No reproductive or developmental effects have been reported in humans.Although uranium released from embedded fragments may accumulate in the central nervous system (CNS) tissue, and some animal and human studies are suggestive of effects on CNS function, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions from the few studies reported." So you'll just have to look a little closer to home, probably at some very unbiblical reproductive customs,;) , for a scapegoat.

oh well...if WHO says so then it must be true. It doesn't surprise me that a dimwit such as yourself cannot recognise propaganda when they see it.

No reproductive or developmental effects have been reported in humans??

wow...

So all those deformed babies born in Iraq after uranium depleted weapons were used in the 90's....must be a coincidence.

Buy hey, none of these were reported.....

Seems those drugs they pumped you with in the ADF have impacted your ability to think? Thats if it wasn't seriously impaired already....

jackflash wrote on Mar 21^st, 2011 at 8:29am:

Lestat wrote on Mar 21st, 2011 at 8:07am: [quote author=abu_rashid link=1300358166/0#9 date=1300593297]Some of these responses are truly sickening. What kind of inhuman scum thinks like this? now now Abu...its not nice to abuse the mentally challenged. We should pity them....[/quote Speaking of mentally challenged and in comes lestat.

hehe, whats up Jackflash....have a soreass?

Changing alias's..how pathetic you are. :D:D

jackflash wrote on Mar 21^st, 2011 at 11:37am:

Foolosophy wrote on Mar 21st, 2011 at 10:24am: ..someone in here has changed their name and is pretending to be a junior member. The putrid foul stench of their cowardice and de-masking is singeing this forum's very essence http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3009/3164607593_60363f3551.jpg You seem to have a love affair with sh1t foolhardly. This is the second post of yours that is full of it. Sorry I take that back. It is the second post showing sh1t as opposed to reading your sh1t.

Your hardly one to talk...every post of yours is full of sh1t. Yet we all tolerate you.....and laugh. :D

Looks like this thread is heading down the s-bend, so best we close it I think.