Yes the perplexing question that has haunted man since the age of time.
Some say it is diamonds (are a girls best friend), some say it is a pet dog or even a cat, others may say it is wealth, power or even  ahum "size".
But forget all that there was a man in Illinois who had a more, let's say, ...interesting perspective.
An alligator.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/lifestyle/the-other-side/illinois-man-who-kept-alligator-to-woo-women-charged/story-e6frfhk6-1226051644056

Oh, we like size, honey. The bigger the better.

. . .is love. Not just physical love, that too, but also caring, compassionate, secure love.
But how many of we men are able or willing to give it? Not many, certainly not me often enough.

It's the communication bit I have a problem with, they're off another planet y'know  ;D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YP_g4TajBk

Karnal wrote on May 7^th, 2011 at 6:48pm:

Oh, we like size, honey. The bigger the better.

Not bellies either.

Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike
Carbon penalty forces Qantas airfare hike  GO WARMONGERS!!!!!!!!  ;D ;D

Before women had a say in it (and as dictated by more powerful men than you), the answer was always.."Who gives a crap?".

Women still want that same answer, and they'll bang your ass off for it.

Men these days are just hopeless cases that are not only dictated to by more powerful men, they are also dictated to by
women.

OMG...what a pathetic sellout nation we live in.
No smacking wonder we have the best dollar...hahaha..
We're too damned scared to sell it.

The truth is that I don't force myself to like these women that I am forced to live with. I but tolerate them and their meaningless methods of control.
They shall never ever ever control me as long as I shall live. ...by will of my greatgrandfather and for what I respect of him for myself.
For the  horrible death he died for me to live for. For what makes sense to me.
When a single pathetic woman makes some sort of real sacrifice for this country , then I will have some real respect. Not before.i

When a single pathetic woman makes some sort of real sacrifice for this country , then I will have some real respect. Not before.

Your name, I assume, betrays your culture, so your whole attitude is not surprising.
I imagine a camel is worth more than a woman.
If you knew something of the history of this country in the last 220 years then your comment highlighted above might not have been made. But then again it probably would.

What women are we discussing here, let alone cussing??

Are we talking about the little breeder woman who wants to have 5 kids, two pairs are twins ...she's that fertile and full of milk.
Are we talking about the tall achiever woman, who hardly has sex but is wealthy and living a quality of life over many men who growl to hide their own inabilites to better her and live the 'better life'.
Are we talking the boring female who only enjoys sexual pleasure but not pro-creation and who is beautiful but dull away from the bedsheets.
Are we talking the interesting 'mate' female who is full of personality and pizzaz with many friends and family ties with a kid or two from a marriage or two and knows how to chill with the girl crew.
????
So which is it?
To be honest, there are another four versions, but I only know these enough to comment.

So which do you want?
The Pro-Creative Female?
The Sexual Pleasure Female?
The Quality of Life Female?
The Quality of Female life?
...the Redneck, the Wanker, the Gay or the Yobbo ???? ;D

Are we talking about the little breeder woman who wants to have 5 kids, two pairs are twins ...she's that fertile and full of milk.

Are we talking about the tall achiever woman, who hardly has sex but is wealthy and living a quality of life over many men who growl to hide their own inabilites to better her and live the 'better life'.

Are we talking the boring female who only enjoys sexual pleasure but not pro-creation and who is beautiful but dull away from the bedsheets.

Are we talking the interesting 'mate' female who is full of personality and pizzaz with many friends and family ties with a kid or two from a marriage or two and knows how to chill with the girl crew.

- Jas


OH frack .. I've been through all these phases lol!

I'm currently at the last phase .. smirk :P

So whats a woman "like you" then ...want?
(and no I can't give you that - try for something else)

It_is_the_Darkness wrote on May 16^th, 2011 at 1:20am:

So whats a woman "like you" then ...want? (and no I can't give you that - try for something else)

HA!

Jas .. let's just say that when I die my epitaph will read: She had her cake and ate it too.

Has a chocolate penis that orgasms money been mentioned? ;)

Listen, sugar, I've told you before. No money no honey. Got it?

Oh, I likes me a bit of choclit.

This would have to be the dumbest thread I've ever read. And Amadd, you'd have to be the biggest wanker I've come across in a long time. We all want different things in life and it all comes down to the individual person, regardless of gender.

Oh really? Is that true?
Do men crave Dick and women crave Dora?

Take a reality check buddy.

mickey rat wrote on May 16^th, 2011 at 7:38pm:

This would have to be the dumbest thread I've ever read. And Amadd, you'd have to be the biggest wanker I've come across in a long time. We all want different things in life and it all comes down to the individual person, regardless of gender.

This is all too true. I`m sick & tired with women being lumped into one category, eg. news items like ""Abbott offends women by saying "NO MEANS NO!"".  This is virtually stating that all women are neurotic, shallow, self centred airheads, with nothing better to do than look out for silly little word plays to get outraged by.

get a life!

Quote:

get a life!

Get a frikin' point of view which doesn't need to change every time "Women's weakly "put's out a new edition.

You're weak as piss. You wouldn't fight your way out of a wet paper bag idiot.

Come fight with us.  Come fight for freedom. But be prepared to have your guts spilt over the battle-field.

You are just not up to it, so stuff off.i

Are you really ready for equality? Are you up to it?
Are you really ready to be  tortured, raped, decapitated, or just strewn to bits across the battlefield? Or doesn't that happen these days?

You know, you gotta be fighting for your man who is trundling down to the pub and banging any stray whilst you are sacrificing all of this.
Are you still up to it? Is it a worthwhile cause?

Me thinks it is not at all a worthwhile cause for women. Not worth fighting for at all.

Hence they don't...and they won't. They are infantile.i

Amadd wrote on May 17^th, 2011 at 10:38am:

Are you really ready for equality? Are you up to it? Are you really ready to be  tortured, raped, decapitated, or just strewn to bits across the battlefield? Or doesn't that happen these days? You know, you gotta be fighting for your man who is trundling down to the pub and banging any stray whilst you are sacrificing all of this. Are you still up to it? Is it a worthwhile cause? Me thinks it is not at all a worthwhile cause for women. Not worth fighting for at all. Hence they don't...and they won't. They are infantile.

your a smacking loon champ!

Well better to be a loon who says it like it is rather than how it is not.

The way it is, is that men fight for the protection of women. That's the way it's always been.
You start talking about women fighting for the protection of men, and then we are talking loooooon.
Get the pic at all?

Do you see the pic there champ?

C'mon dsmithy, discuss rationally. Are you able?

Tell me your points. I want to here them.

Let me know how much of a moron you actually are.

Amadd wrote on May 17^th, 2011 at 10:59am:

Well better to be a loon who says it like it is rather than how it is not. The way it is, is that men fight for the protection of women. That's the way it's always been. You start talking about women fighting for the protection of men, and then we are talking loooooon. Get the pic at all? Do you see the pic there champ?

The 'progressives' would like to think that gender roles have not just blurred, but been completely reversed in the few decades since their ideology became flavour of the month.  But they are kidding themselves if they think millions of years of evolution can be undone, just because they wish it so.
That 'more and more' men are performing non-traditional roles is not evidence of a shift - there jhave always been weak men, but in times past, survival of the fittest made sure they never made it to adulthood, let alone got a chance to breed.

Back it up dsmithy.

No I am not an alpha male at all. But you are destroyed all the same.
Asshole...liar.

mickey rat wrote on May 16^th, 2011 at 7:38pm:

This would have to be the dumbest thread I've ever read. And Amadd, you'd have to be the biggest wanker I've come across in a long time. We all want different things in life and it all comes down to the individual person, regardless of gender.

Oh, yeah? How many dicks you had, sweetie? I can tell you now, the bigger the better.

I don't mind me some choclit, but I likes sugar the best.

I think that any logical woman would realise that she wouldn't make those dastardly sacrifices for a man.
Dat's the truth bb. you know it.
...so do yuor sisters.

Nope, you wouldn't sacrifice your life for me to sit on the couch and eat pizza, so you're not much to me in reagrds to equality.

So how 'bout a real version of equality ...hmmmm?

Otherwise I'm goin' away bb, and you miss the blessedness of my beautriful skin.  ;D

Amadd wrote on May 17^th, 2011 at 11:43am:

I think that any logical woman would realise that she wouldn't make those dastardly sacrifices for a man. Dat's the truth bb. you know it. ...so do yuor sisters. Nope, you wouldn't sacrifice your life for me to sit on the couch and eat pizza, so you're not much to me in reagrds to equality. So how 'bout a real version of equality ...hmmmm? Otherwise I'm goin' away bb, and you miss the blessedness of my beautriful skin.  ;D

It's a thread regarding what may impress a women.
Some bloke in the US thought it was having a dangerous animal as a pet.
What in FSM your on about with spilling your guts on battlefields is anyone's guess.
LOON!

Amadd wrote on May 17^th, 2011 at 10:59am:

Well better to be a loon who says it like it is rather than how it is not. The way it is, is that men fight for the protection of women. That's the way it's always been. You start talking about women fighting for the protection of men, and then we are talking loooooon. Get the pic at all? Do you see the pic there champ?

....idiots go to war, not men!

My take on what he was getting at was that men provide security and protection for their people, and this can extend to going to war.  It's not just a coincidence that men are physically stronger and more aggressive than women - this is the role they have traditonally played and they have evolved to play it well.

... wrote on May 17^th, 2011 at 12:09pm:

My take on what he was getting at was that men provide security and protection for their people, and this can extend to going to war.  It's not just a coincidence that men are physically stronger and more aggressive than women - this is the role they have traditonally played and they have evolved to play it well.

Then guns and weaponised anthrax were invented!

LOL!

ONLY SLAVES GO TO WAR!!!

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 17^th, 2011 at 12:12pm:

... wrote on May 17th, 2011 at 12:09pm: My take on what he was getting at was that men provide security and protection for their people, and this can extend to going to war.  It's not just a coincidence that men are physically stronger and more aggressive than women - this is the role they have traditonally played and they have evolved to play it well. Then guns and weaponised anthrax were invented! LOL! ONLY SLAVES GO TO WAR!!!

uhuh.  And if your loved ones were under genuine threat?  You would hide in the cupboard I suppose?

... wrote on May 17^th, 2011 at 12:09pm:

My take on what he was getting at was that men provide security and protection for their people, and this can extend to going to war.  It's not just a coincidence that men are physically stronger and more aggressive than women - this is the role they have traditonally played and they have evolved to play it well.

Probably right, but what it got to do with the OP only he would know.
Then again die in jihad get 72 virgins.
Notice it says virgins not women.

... wrote on May 17^th, 2011 at 12:19pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 17th, 2011 at 12:12pm: ... wrote on May 17th, 2011 at 12:09pm: My take on what he was getting at was that men provide security and protection for their people, and this can extend to going to war.  It's not just a coincidence that men are physically stronger and more aggressive than women - this is the role they have traditonally played and they have evolved to play it well. Then guns and weaponised anthrax were invented! LOL! ONLY SLAVES GO TO WAR!!! uhuh.  And if your loved ones were under genuine threat?  You would hide in the cupboard I suppose?

GO WATCH MANPOWER AND SOOTHE THAT NUCLEAR INSPIRED BEAST, KID!  :o :o

Dsmithy70 wrote on May 17^th, 2011 at 12:19pm:

... wrote on May 17th, 2011 at 12:09pm: My take on what he was getting at was that men provide security and protection for their people, and this can extend to going to war.  It's not just a coincidence that men are physically stronger and more aggressive than women - this is the role they have traditonally played and they have evolved to play it well. Probably right, but what it got to do with the OP only he would know. Then again die in jihad get 72 virgins. Notice it says virgins not women.

yes, it pays to read the fine print before signing up for Jihad.  Good point about them not necessarily being women, but it would also pay to ask yourself WHY they are virgins?  

---

I communicate with my wife regularly---
I call her from the pub to come get me! ;D

... wrote on May 17^th, 2011 at 12:24pm:

it would also pay to ask yourself WHY they are virgins?

LOL

Dsmithy70 wrote on May 17^th, 2011 at 12:19pm:

... wrote on May 17th, 2011 at 12:09pm: My take on what he was getting at was that men provide security and protection for their people, and this can extend to going to war.  It's not just a coincidence that men are physically stronger and more aggressive than women - this is the role they have traditonally played and they have evolved to play it well. Probably right, but what it got to do with the OP only he would know. Then again die in jihad get 72 virgins. Notice it says virgins not women.

There was nothing untowards with the OP, rather just the oddity of the newspaper item of the guy who had the "novel" and felt that an alligator would impress women.
I suppose the guy felt it was his role/duty/objective to impress women in order to get procreative recreation opportunities.

Yes but are we talking Achiever males or just Breeders?

... wrote on May 17^th, 2011 at 12:19pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 17th, 2011 at 12:12pm: ... wrote on May 17th, 2011 at 12:09pm: My take on what he was getting at was that men provide security and protection for their people, and this can extend to going to war.  It's not just a coincidence that men are physically stronger and more aggressive than women - this is the role they have traditonally played and they have evolved to play it well. Then guns and weaponised anthrax were invented! LOL! ONLY SLAVES GO TO WAR!!! uhuh.  And if your loved ones were under genuine threat?  You would hide in the cupboard I suppose?

Yep, DH would stay in the closet. Sook!

Amadd wrote on May 17^th, 2011 at 9:13am:

Quote: get a life! Get a frikin' point of view which doesn't need to change every time "Women's weakly "put's out a new edition. You're weak as piss. You wouldn't fight your way out of a wet paper bag idiot. Come fight with us.  Come fight for freedom. But be prepared to have your guts spilt over the battle-field. You are just not up to it, so stuff off.

Try not to get so much sand in your moving parts Sonny.  Also, it`ll be more comfortable if you don`t mince quite so tightly, when you strut.  :-*

Breeder males like Amadd need to feel superior to women,
because they are inferior to Achiever males who feel quite relaxed about being inferior to Achiever females because those females are inferior to Breeder females.
Its all relative  :D ...in a round-about sort of way.Lol

mavisdavis wrote on May 18^th, 2011 at 8:21am:

... wrote on May 17th, 2011 at 12:19pm: BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 17th, 2011 at 12:12pm: ... wrote on May 17th, 2011 at 12:09pm: My take on what he was getting at was that men provide security and protection for their people, and this can extend to going to war.  It's not just a coincidence that men are physically stronger and more aggressive than women - this is the role they have traditonally played and they have evolved to play it well. Then guns and weaponised anthrax were invented! LOL! ONLY SLAVES GO TO WAR!!! uhuh.  And if your loved ones were under genuine threat?  You would hide in the cupboard I suppose? Yep, DH would stay in the closet. Sook!

I'd be smarter than going to war for an anonymous warmonger that's for sure!!  ;) ;D ;D 8-) :-? ::)

yeh, cum get that!  ;) ;)

.......................................................... where is that extra bottle?  8-)

:D :D

*** mavis is an anonymous warmonger !!!!!!!!!!!! ****

LOL, ............................... yeh, NOT!!!  :( :-X :-X

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 19^th, 2011 at 2:46am:

.......................................................... where is that extra bottle?  8-)

You drank it before darlink.

"I want women"
"I want women"
:D ;)

Quote:

The 'progressives' would like to think that gender roles have not just blurred, but been completely reversed in the few decades since their ideology became flavour of the month.  But they are kidding themselves if they think millions of years of evolution can be undone, just because they wish it so. That 'more and more' men are performing non-traditional roles is not evidence of a shift - there jhave always been weak men, but in times past, survival of the fittest made sure they never made it to adulthood, let alone got a chance to breed.

..said it more succinctly than in my aforementioned emotional posts.

It's just an idealogoly (idealogolies are a dime a dozen)...it's by no means a reality.

Well I can only see Hispanic Maids being the perfect match for the likes of you two.

Amadd wrote on May 22^nd, 2011 at 1:44am:

Quote: The 'progressives' would like to think that gender roles have not just blurred, but been completely reversed in the few decades since their ideology became flavour of the month.  But they are kidding themselves if they think millions of years of evolution can be undone, just because they wish it so. That 'more and more' men are performing non-traditional roles is not evidence of a shift - there jhave always been weak men, but in times past, survival of the fittest made sure they never made it to adulthood, let alone got a chance to breed. ..said it more succinctly than in my aforementioned emotional posts. It's just an idealogoly (idealogolies are a dime a dozen)...it's by no means a reality.

I think men have always taken on many of the "non-traditional" roles.
My grandad bought up my mother and her siblings. My grandma died.

we are quite capable of non-traditional roles and it benefits everyone