Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Political Parties >> The Greens >> Greens to 'retire' Bob Brown http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1308193623 Message started by Jasignature on Jun 16th, 2011 at 1:07pm |
Title: Greens to 'retire' Bob Brown Post by Jasignature on Jun 16th, 2011 at 1:07pm
The offensive anti-homosexual slur in the original title removed by mozzaok. Stop using childish anti-gay language, it is unacceptable.
I have my dreadlocked feral sources amongst the Greens that they now recognise the importance of their party to the Australian Public and are taking the Greens future a bit more seriously than just providing policy upon legalising Heroine and Gay Marriages. They wish to bring back more conservative 'environmental' issues. They will also refuse any future application for re-appointment by Peter Garrett. |
Title: Re: Greens to 'retire' Bob Brown Post by cods on Jun 16th, 2011 at 1:44pm It_is_the_Darkness wrote on Jun 16th, 2011 at 1:07pm:
did you actually read their rubbish or are you making that up? I think they are anti war as well.. wonder what shocks went through them yesterday with news "woman to go to the front"..lol.. can just see that battleaxe Rhiannon... saying nooooooooo they are too fragile. |
Title: Re: Greens to 'retire' Bob Brown Post by alevine on Jun 16th, 2011 at 1:47pm cods wrote on Jun 16th, 2011 at 1:44pm:
actually the greens supported the move. Just FYI. |
Title: Re: Greens to 'retire' Bob Brown Post by Jasignature on Jun 17th, 2011 at 12:58am
Well I think Australian 'male' soldiers need to harden the bugger up.
Whats the problem? Are they afraid they will have to carry an extra load for their female co-fighters? I worked as a male nurse and had to bust my butt for all sorts of women who made a mockery of 'equality and sexism' by dumping extra work upon me because ...I'm male. Australian Miltary is an embarressment these days. ::) |
Title: Re: Greens to 'retire' Bob Brown Post by Jasignature on Jun 17th, 2011 at 1:01am
I tend to think many hard-right Conservationists are 'Military' anyway. Difference is that they do it to protect vulnerable species not Polititians ...which is what all 'real' Militaries should be doing. No wonder the 'politically' motivated Australian soldiers are all wheeners.
|
Title: Re: Greens to 'retire' Bob Brown Post by BigOl64 on Jun 17th, 2011 at 6:31am It_is_the_Darkness wrote on Jun 17th, 2011 at 12:58am:
So when you were a male nurse and helping your female collegues with their work was anyone trying to kill you with an enfilade of live rounds? If not, you are once again crapping on from a point of total ignorance. It's not the ADF that's an embarrassment. |
Title: Re: Greens to 'retire' Bob Brown Post by nairbe on Jun 17th, 2011 at 7:51am
I really don't get what you are on about. Yep the greens have to look at policy more now as they have a big responsibility to the country which has asked them to hold the balance of power in the senate. This will most likely be in place for six years minimum so good it is what the country expects.
As for their long held policy of DECRIMINALISING DRUGS, i would support a real debate on this but not the sort of ignorant hateful debate this country has decided to pursue at the moment on everything. After all it might seem a mad idea to decriminalise but prohibition has proved a massive disaster with drugs simply being a hugh money market for organised crime and the use escalating from a smoke of pot on the weekends back in the 70's and 80's to teens having dangerous psychotic episodes on all sorts of manufactured powders in dangerous home lab's. Sometimes we can fail for 30 years and still not lean any lessons. |
Title: Re: Greens to 'retire' Bob Brown Post by creep on Jun 17th, 2011 at 1:03pm It_is_the_Darkness wrote on Jun 16th, 2011 at 1:07pm:
Will the Greens be helping to save our trees? If they do, then they would have to be advocating for No Carbon Tax! |
Title: Re: Greens to 'retire' Bob Brown Post by astro_surf on Jun 17th, 2011 at 1:08pm
This thread is pure fiction
|
Title: Re: Greens to 'retire' Bob Brown Post by adelcrow on Jun 17th, 2011 at 3:46pm
Only an idiot would vote Labor or Coalition after their behaviour over the last decade.
Vote Green (if you're educated and you care) or Independent (if you're a far right bogan feral)..you know it makes sense :D |
Title: Re: Greens to 'retire' Bob Brown Post by mozzaok on Jun 17th, 2011 at 9:33pm
I removed two of astro's posts that just had huge images of bob brown, and then a page of "the greens" poster repeated.
Do not post huge images just to be annoying astro, it makes you look silly, and it adds nothing to the debate. |
Title: Re: Greens to 'retire' Bob Brown Post by astro_surf on Jun 17th, 2011 at 10:03pm
You call this debate? Ye gods ::)
|
Title: Re: Greens to 'retire' Bob Brown Post by life_goes_on on Jun 17th, 2011 at 10:06pm
How many replies (count this one in on the tally) to someone who is clearly delusional and by no means the full quid?
|
Title: Re: Greens to 'retire' Bob Brown Post by Jasignature on Jun 18th, 2011 at 7:18pm
Well if you guys haven't figured out I'm a "who you know" rather than "what you know", then you would have figured that even if Rudd returns like a prima-donna savior to the ALP - the fact remains that the Indpendents/Greens are gaining popularity upon a Federal level.
Let alone the Liberals will hold on against the Union onslaught. (wonder if they'll hire the Rebel Bikers to wave the Confederate Flag? :-?) So if you guys can't figure out that my Politics comes from a 'position of freedom', that is - 'free' politics, without the need to be paid in a position of 'power' like those that you are used to ...then I suggest you sing the 'Swagman' song again. ;) People talk because POWER TO THE PEOPLE and not the PM/GG in regards to the 'future' of this country. So call it 'fictional' for want of 'non-fictional' but the buck doesn't stop here ...it starts. :) |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved. |