If you're so sure that I am her, then please post some evidence. Any will do. Until then, kindly shut up.

What's this got to do with the politics board mellie?

I'm still awaiting evidence.

Hi Mel.


By the way, who is Mel ?

Feeling a bit low & needing someone to acknowledge your existence princess? :-/

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_aLmfh1Q_BZs/TLR5aORsCeI/AAAAAAAAADQ/EskzHlveJIk/s1600/Lonely+01.jpg

Still awaiting evidence.

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2011 at 1:09pm:

Feeling a bit low & needing someone to acknowledge your existence princess? :-/

Yea, me thinks "matty" loves all the attention. ;D

Doctor Jolly wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2011 at 1:00pm:

Hi Mel. By the way, who is Mel ?

Mel or Mellie was a 'unique' personality that used to post on these boards....( a LOT).
She left in a huff, or was banned ( I'm not quite sure).
Since then, some people on here seem convinced that anyone and everyone who disagrees with them IS mellie or one of her alternate ID's ('sockpuppets' or 'socks')..

So 'mellie' is sort of like the forum 'bogeyman' (or bogeyperson)...


Personally I don't think matty is mellie..his syntax and attitudes are very different to mellie's..

Oh mellie!

matty wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2011 at 12:08pm:

If you're so sure that I am her, then please post some evidence. Any will do. Until then, kindly shut up.

I agreed with you yesterday that people continually making that accusation should stop and people should talk about policies and issues and not "who is being who" etc etc

I am trying to work out how creating this thread helps that case.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2011 at 2:51pm:

matty wrote on Jun 23rd, 2011 at 12:08pm: If you're so sure that I am her, then please post some evidence. Any will do. Until then, kindly shut up. I agreed with you yesterday that people continually making that accusation should stop and people should talk about policies and issues and not "who is being who" etc etc I am trying to work out how creating this thread helps that case.

See post 4

Nice poster smithy.

What about this one?

---

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2011 at 2:58pm:

Nice poster smithy. What about this one?

Nice, did you see this article?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/20/james-verone-robs-bank_n_880660.html


Quote:

James Verone said he walked up to a teller at a Gastonia, N.C. bank and handed her a note. It said "This is a bank robbery, please only give me one dollar." Verone then told the teller he'd be sitting in a nearby chair, waiting for the police. The 59-year-old said he did everything he could to get caught so he could receive free health care in jail. Verone has a growth on his chest, two ruptured disks and a problem with his left foot. With no job, Verone thought his desperate plan was the best way to provide for himself. Verone was charged with larceny. Courtney Boyd Myers at The Next Web notes Verone's plot provides clear evidence of a flawed medical system.

How'd you like the 10 points on Ronnie Raygun

It's interesting mate, I will give you that. An interesting take on it.

What strikes me though is that in the poll done last year of citizens who were asked "Who if they had the choice would they want as President right now if they could pick any President from history"

Of those aged 35+, 69% said Ronald Reagan.

Reagan won 49 states out of 50 in 1984.

The 1980s mate. A safer world, a better world, socially, culturally and we all knew our place. We were the good guys, the Soviet Communists were the bad guys, and Miami Vice was on TV...

It's a bit long, but I'd love this for a signature.


"I've spoken of the shining city all my political life, but I don't know if I ever quite communicated what I saw when I said it.
But in my mind, it was a tall proud city built on rocks stronger than oceans, wind swept, God blessed, and teeming with people of all kinds living in harmony and peace - a city with free ports that hummed with commerce and creativity, and if there had to be city walls, the walls had doors, and the doors were open to anyone with the will and the heart to get here.

That's how I saw it, and see it still. How Stands the City?

And how stands the city on this winter night? More prosperous, more secure and happier than it was eight years ago. But more than that: after 200 years, two centuries, she still stands strong and true on the granite ridge, and her glow has held steady no matter what storm.

And she's still a beacon, still a magnet for all who must have freedom, for all the Pilgrims from all the lost places who are hurtling through the darkness, toward home.

We've done our part. And as I "walk off into the city streets," a final word to the men and women of the Reagan Revolution - the men and women across America who for eight years did the work that brought America back:

My friends, we did it. We weren't just marking time, we made a difference. We made the city stronger - we made the city freer - and we left her in good hands.

All in all, not bad. Not bad at all.

And so, goodbye.

God bless you. And God bless the United States of America."

Ronald W Reagan,
The White House, Jan 11 1989

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2011 at 3:19pm:

It's interesting mate, I will give you that. An interesting take on it. What strikes me though is that in the poll done last year of citizens who were asked "Who if they had the choice would they want as President right now if they could pick any President from history" Of those aged 35+, 69% said Ronald Reagan. Reagan won 49 states out of 50 in 1984. The 1980s mate. A safer world, a better world, socially, culturally and we all knew our place. We were the good guys, the Soviet Communists were the bad guys, and Miami Vice was on TV... It's a bit long, but I'd love this for a signature. "I've spoken of the shining city all my political life, but I don't know if I ever quite communicated what I saw when I said it. But in my mind, it was a tall proud city built on rocks stronger than oceans, wind swept, God blessed, and teeming with people of all kinds living in harmony and peace - a city with free ports that hummed with commerce and creativity, and if there had to be city walls, the walls had doors, and the doors were open to anyone with the will and the heart to get here. Ronald W Reagan, The White House, Jan 11 1989

Who would have though old Ronny was a refugee sympathiser.

Bloody commie.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2011 at 3:19pm:

It's interesting mate, I will give you that. An interesting take on it. What strikes me though is that in the poll done last year of citizens who were asked "Who if they had the choice would they want as President right now if they could pick any President from history" Of those aged 35+, 69% said Ronald Reagan. Reagan won 49 states out of 50 in 1984. The 1980s mate. A safer world, a better world, socially, culturally and we all knew our place. We were the good guys, the Soviet Communists were the bad guys, and Miami Vice was on TV...

JFK would of been a lot better president then Reagan would even been

Never seen before and never been repeated since.

---

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2011 at 4:02pm:

Never seen before and never been repeated since.

is that his only claim to frame expect B grades movies he was in

name anything he done for America

That map says a lot more about the low IQ of yanks than it does about the ability of a B grade movie actor.

How many americans actually voted in that election and what percentage of the adult population was it?

adelcrow wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2011 at 4:31pm:

How many americans actually voted in that election and what percentage of the adult population was it?

Electoral vote - Reagan 525,     Mondale  13

States carried - Reagan  49,      Mondale  1 + DC

Popular vote - Reagan  54,455,472,     Mondale -  37,577,352

Percentage - Reagan - 58.8%,      Mondale -  40.6%

Psephologists pointed to "Reagan Democrats"—millions of Democrats who voted for Reagan, as in 1980.

They characterized such Reagan Democrats as southern whites and northern blue collar workers who voted for Reagan because they credited him with the economic recovery, saw Reagan as strong on national security issues, and perceived the Democrats as supporting the poor and minorities at the expense of the middle class.

The Democratic National Committee commissioned a study after the election that came to these conclusions, but suppressed the "explosive report" afraid that it would offend its key voters.

percentage of the total adult population?
not just those that could be bothered voting..the reagan/ mondale election seemed to me to be more significant because most Americans didnt want either of them  :)

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2011 at 4:35pm:

adelcrow wrote on Jun 23rd, 2011 at 4:31pm: How many americans actually voted in that election and what percentage of the adult population was it? Electoral vote - Reagan 525,     Mondale  13 States carried - Reagan  49,      Mondale  1 + DC Popular vote - Reagan  54,455,472,     Mondale -  37,577,352 Percentage - Reagan - 58.8%,      Mondale -  40.6%

Er...that doesn't answer the question as asked...

LOL...snap...

Honestly..who would vote for Mondale?
He was an idiot and an embarrassment

Honestly..its like the last election here, Gillard and Abbott..there was no way I was going to vote for either of them.
I would rather have not voted if I couldnt vote for Costello or Turnbull

I can't agree with that.

Look at the people's current views of the Reagan era and their view of him as President.

How do you explain so many Americans asserting they would have him back as President tomorrow if they could?

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2011 at 4:35pm:

adelcrow wrote on Jun 23rd, 2011 at 4:31pm: How many americans actually voted in that election and what percentage of the adult population was it? Electoral vote - Reagan 525,     Mondale  13 States carried - Reagan  49,      Mondale  1 + DC Popular vote - Reagan  54,455,472,     Mondale -  37,577,352 Percentage - Reagan - 58.8%,      Mondale -  40.6%

population of America in 1984 was 235,825,000 people

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/peo_pop-people-population&date=1984

According to your figure only 37,631,807 people voted so I wouldn't call that a good result

Just say 234,000,00 people were eligible to vote so that is 196,368,193 didn't vote and you reckon compulsory voting is no good

There was more that didn't vote then voted for Reagan.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2011 at 4:59pm:

How do you explain so many Americans asserting they would have him back as President tomorrow if they could?

Ignorance and stupidity. Look what else happened in 1984.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Eacm4qittuI/TAfd16tpLHI/AAAAAAAAADc/w85lA-vFRtw/s1600/inflation.gif

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2011 at 4:39pm:

Psephologists pointed to "Reagan Democrats"—millions of Democrats who voted for Reagan, as in 1980. They characterized such Reagan Democrats as southern whites and northern blue collar workers who voted for Reagan because they credited him with the economic recovery, saw Reagan as strong on national security issues, and perceived the Democrats as supporting the poor and minorities at the expense of the middle class. The Democratic National Committee commissioned a study after the election that came to these conclusions, but suppressed the "explosive report" afraid that it would offend its key voters.

What exactly is a 'Psephologist'..is that like what 'normal' intelligent, literate person calls a 'psychologist'???

Why you are here andrei is your sister older or younger then you

Well I may as well post it here so people know how we got on to it :)

http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/ronald_reagan4.jpg


Quote:

Tomorrow will mark the 100th anniversary of President Reagan’s birth, and all week, conservatives have been trying to outdo each others’ remembrances of the great conservative icon. Senate Republicans spent much of Thursday singing Reagan’s praise from the Senate floor, while conservative publications have been running non-stop commemorations. Meanwhile, the Republican National Committee and former GOP House Speaker Newt Gingrich are hoping to make a few bucks off the Gipper’s centennial. But Reagan was not the man conservatives claim he was. This image of Reagan as a conservative superhero is myth, created to unite the various factions of the right behind a common leader. In reality, Reagan was no conservative ideologue or flawless commander-in-chief. Reagan regularly strayed from conservative dogma — he raised taxes eleven times as president while tripling the deficit — and he often ended up on the wrong side of history, like when he vetoed an Anti-Apartheid bill. ThinkProgress has compiled a list of the top 10 things conservatives rarely mention when talking about President Reagan:    1. Reagan was a serial tax raiser. As governor of California, Reagan “signed into law the largest tax increase in the history of any state up till then.” Meanwhile, state spending nearly doubled. As president, Reagan “raised taxes in seven of his eight years in office,” including four times in just two years. As former GOP Senator Alan Simpson, who called Reagan “a dear friend,” told NPR, “Ronald Reagan raised taxes 11 times in his administration — I was there.” “Reagan was never afraid to raise taxes,” said historian Douglas Brinkley, who edited Reagan’s memoir. Reagan the anti-tax zealot is “false mythology,” Brinkley said.    2. Reagan nearly tripled the federal budget deficit. During the Reagan years, the debt increased to nearly $3 trillion, “roughly three times as much as the first 80 years of the century had done altogether.” Reagan enacted a major tax cut his first year in office and government revenue dropped off precipitously. Despite the conservative myth that tax cuts somehow increase revenue, the government went deeper into debt and Reagan had to raise taxes just a year after he enacted his tax cut. Despite ten more tax hikes on everything from gasoline to corporate income, Reagan was never able to get the deficit under control.    3. Unemployment soared after Reagan’s 1981 tax cuts. Unemployment jumped to 10.8 percent after Reagan enacted his much-touted tax cut, and it took years for the rate to get back down to its previous level. Meanwhile, income inequality exploded. Despite the myth that Reagan presided over an era of unmatched economic boom for all Americans, Reagan disproportionately taxed the poor and middle class, but the economic growth of the 1980′s did little help them. “Since 1980, median household income has risen only 30 percent, adjusted for inflation, while average incomes at the top have tripled or quadrupled,” the New York Times’ David Leonhardt noted.    4. Reagan grew the size of the federal government tremendously. Reagan promised “to move boldly, decisively, and quickly to control the runaway growth of federal spending,” but federal spending “ballooned” under Reagan. He bailed out Social Security in 1983 after attempting to privatize it, and set up a progressive taxation system to keep it funded into the future. He promised to cut government agencies like the Department of Energy and Education but ended up adding one of the largest — the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, which today has a budget of nearly $90 billion and close to 300,000 employees. He also hiked defense spending by over $100 billion a year to a level not seen since the height of the Vietnam war.    5. Reagan did little to fight a woman’s right to choose. As governor of California in 1967, Reagan signed a bill to liberalize the state’s abortion laws that “resulted in more than a million abortions.” When Reagan ran for president, he advocated a constitutional amendment that would have prohibited all abortions except when necessary to save the life of the mother, but once in office, he “never seriously pursued” curbing choice.

Quote:

6. Reagan was a “bellicose peacenik.” He wrote in his memoirs that “[m]y dream…became a world free of nuclear weapons.” “This vision stemmed from the president’s belief that the biblical account of Armageddon prophesied nuclear war — and that apocalypse could be averted if everyone, especially the Soviets, eliminated nuclear weapons,” the Washington Monthly noted. And Reagan’s military buildup was meant to crush the Soviet Union, but “also to put the United States in a stronger position from which to establish effective arms control” for the the entire world — a vision acted out by Regean’s vice president, George H.W. Bush, when he became president.    7. Reagan gave amnesty to 3 million undocumented immigrants. Reagan signed into law a bill that made any immigrant who had entered the country before 1982 eligible for amnesty. The bill was sold as a crackdown, but its tough sanctions on employers who hired undocumented immigrants were removed before final passage. The bill helped 3 million people and millions more family members gain American residency. It has since become a source of major embarrassment for conservatives.    8. Reagan illegally funneled weapons to Iran. Reagan and other senior U.S. officials secretly sold arms to officials in Iran, which was subject to a an arms embargo at the time, in exchange for American hostages. Some funds from the illegal arms sales also went to fund anti-Communist rebels in Nicaragua — something Congress had already prohibited the administration from doing. When the deals went public, the Iran-Contra Affair, as it came to be know, was an enormous political scandal that forced several senior administration officials to resign.    9. Reagan vetoed a comprehensive anti-Apartheid act. which placed sanctions on South Africa and cut off all American trade with the country. Reagan’s veto was overridden by the Republican-controlled Senate. Reagan responded by saying “I deeply regret that Congress has seen fit to override my veto,” saying that the law “will not solve the serious problems that plague that country.”    10. Reagan helped create the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden. Reagan fought a proxy war with the Soviet Union by training, arming, equipping, and funding Islamist mujahidin fighters in Afghanistan. Reagan funneled billions of dollars, along with top-secret intelligence and sophisticated weaponry to these fighters through the Pakistani intelligence service. The Talbian and Osama Bin Laden — a prominent mujahidin commander — emerged from these mujahidin groups Reagan helped create, and U.S. policy towards Pakistan remains strained because of the intelligence services’ close relations to these fighters. In fact, Reagan’s decision to continue the proxy war after the Soviets were willing to retreat played a direct role in Bin Laden’s ascendancy. Conservatives seem to be in such denial about the less flattering aspects of Reagan; it sometimes appears as if they genuinely don’t know the truth of his legacy. Yesterday, when liberal activist Mike Stark challenged hate radio host Rush Limbaugh on why Reagan remains a conservative hero despite raising taxes so many times, Limbaugh flew into a tirade and demanded, “Where did you get this silly notion that Reagan raised taxes?”

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/02/05/142288/reagan-centennial/

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2011 at 5:07pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 23rd, 2011 at 4:39pm: Psephologists pointed to "Reagan Democrats"—millions of Democrats who voted for Reagan, as in 1980. They characterized such Reagan Democrats as southern whites and northern blue collar workers who voted for Reagan because they credited him with the economic recovery, saw Reagan as strong on national security issues, and perceived the Democrats as supporting the poor and minorities at the expense of the middle class. The Democratic National Committee commissioned a study after the election that came to these conclusions, but suppressed the "explosive report" afraid that it would offend its key voters. What exactly is a 'Psephologist'..is that like what 'normal' intelligent, literate person calls a 'psychologist'???

No.

http://tinyurl.com/5rsoszv

Ronny was a bit of legend though.   he may have had dodgy home policies but internationally he was a star.

The whole star-wars hoax to make the russians crumble was amazing.

I saw a show not long ago about it. Goes along the lines of one of the big wigs in Russian spying sold off all the names of spies in the west.  Russie was using these to keep up with the americans in military terms.  The US (and UK, etc) were able to round up all the spies at once, meaning the russians were blind to what they were doing.

Based on this Ronny played the biggest poker hand in history saying (with a straight face) that the US was spending trillions on a missile defense shield.  Russians couldnt match the money, and couldnt discount that it was possible.

They lost all there bargaining power, and came crawling back to the cold war negotiating table.  Star wars was never going to get off the ground. Too much unproven technology.

Awesome.

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2011 at 5:08pm:

Well I may as well post it here so people know how we got on to it :)

We also got onto it because I seriously couldn't bear another Is Matty Mellie thread.

Hence why not discuss the 1984 US Election instead?

My memory of the Reagan/ Thatcher years was the world wide recession both these idiots created.
Its funny that it took another Republican in GWBush to do the same thing  :)

adelcrow wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2011 at 5:21pm:

My memory of the Reagan/ Thatcher years was the world wide recession both these idiots created. Its funny that it took another Republican in GWBush to do the same thing  :)

I am not sure if you recall the condition of both countries when they took over.

In the UK we had bodies left unburied, rubbish piled up in Covent Garden and Leicester Square, a top rate of tax over 80%, all public sector unions holding Callaghan's Government to ransom.

Mrs Thatcher promptly smashed the Unions, privatised the loss making junk like Leyland Daf and turned us into the 4th richest country in the world. Overtaking France.

As for Reagan, he brought about a tough line to the USSR, recused the hostages and ensured Americans were not again ashamed to be American (as they had been told to be by the Democrats since the end of the Nixon years) - plus not have to line up in car lines 30 long for a gallon of gasoline.

Both were saviors of their relevant countries.

The western world owes a debt of gratitude to both Reagan and Thatcher.

adelcrow wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2011 at 5:21pm:

My memory of the Reagan/ Thatcher years was the world wide recession both these idiots created. Its funny that it took another Republican in GWBush to do the same thing  :)

By the way - the recession that occurred in the United States was caused by a reduction in economic controls initiated by William Jefferson Clinton.

---

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2011 at 5:28pm:

adelcrow wrote on Jun 23rd, 2011 at 5:21pm: My memory of the Reagan/ Thatcher years was the world wide recession both these idiots created. Its funny that it took another Republican in GWBush to do the same thing  :) I am not sure if you recall the condition of both countries when they took over. In the UK we had bodies left unburied, rubbish piled up in Covent Garden and Leicester Square, a top rate of tax over 80%, all public sector unions holding Callaghan's Government to ransom. Mrs Thatcher promptly smashed the Unions, privatised the loss making junk like Leyland Daf and turned us into the 4th richest country in the world. Overtaking France. As for Reagan, he brought about a tough line to the USSR, recused the hostages and ensured Americans were not again ashamed to be American (as they had been told to be by the Democrats since the end of the Nixon years) - plus not have to line up in car lines 30 long for a gallon of gasoline. Both were saviors of their relevant countries. The western world owes a debt of gratitude to both Reagan and Thatcher.

It must be nice to have a Messiah. Comforting!

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2011 at 1:52pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Jun 23rd, 2011 at 1:00pm: Hi Mel. By the way, who is Mel ? Mel or Mellie was a 'unique' personality that used to post on these boards....( a LOT). She left in a huff, or was banned ( I'm not quite sure). Since then, some people on here seem convinced that anyone and everyone who disagrees with them IS mellie or one of her alternate ID's ('sockpuppets' or 'socks').. So 'mellie' is sort of like the forum 'bogeyman' (or bogeyperson)... Personally I don't think matty is mellie..his syntax and attitudes are very different to mellie's..

Thanks gizmo. Could someone please tell me WHO mel is?? And to all of those of you saying that I like attention, WTF? I don't like being accused of something/someone that I am not. How many other bloody posters do you go and ask? You want to treat me totally different.

matty wrote on Jun 24^th, 2011 at 4:39pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jun 23rd, 2011 at 1:52pm: Doctor Jolly wrote on Jun 23rd, 2011 at 1:00pm: Hi Mel. By the way, who is Mel ? Mel or Mellie was a 'unique' personality that used to post on these boards....( a LOT). She left in a huff, or was banned ( I'm not quite sure). Since then, some people on here seem convinced that anyone and everyone who disagrees with them IS mellie or one of her alternate ID's ('sockpuppets' or 'socks').. So 'mellie' is sort of like the forum 'bogeyman' (or bogeyperson)... Personally I don't think matty is mellie..his syntax and attitudes are very different to mellie's.. Thanks gizmo. Could someone please tell me WHO mel is?? And to all of those of you saying that I like attention, WTF? I don't like being accused of something/someone that I am not. How many other bloody posters do you go and ask? You want to treat me totally different.

This is about the 4th thread started by you asking for proof your not mellie.
Pigs Arse you don't want attention.

http://www.bigfooty.com/images/tshirts/pigs_arse.png

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jun 24^th, 2011 at 4:46pm:

matty wrote on Jun 24th, 2011 at 4:39pm: gizmo_2655 wrote on Jun 23rd, 2011 at 1:52pm: Doctor Jolly wrote on Jun 23rd, 2011 at 1:00pm: Hi Mel. By the way, who is Mel ? Mel or Mellie was a 'unique' personality that used to post on these boards....( a LOT). She left in a huff, or was banned ( I'm not quite sure). Since then, some people on here seem convinced that anyone and everyone who disagrees with them IS mellie or one of her alternate ID's ('sockpuppets' or 'socks').. So 'mellie' is sort of like the forum 'bogeyman' (or bogeyperson)... Personally I don't think matty is mellie..his syntax and attitudes are very different to mellie's.. Thanks gizmo. Could someone please tell me WHO mel is?? And to all of those of you saying that I like attention, WTF? I don't like being accused of something/someone that I am not. How many other bloody posters do you go and ask? You want to treat me totally different. This is about the 4th thread started by you asking for proof your not mellie. Pigs Arse you don't want attention. http://www.bigfooty.com/images/tshirts/pigs_arse.png

So it couldn't have anything to do with the fact that people have, and continue to, make accusations about me, without any evidence?

matty wrote on Jun 24^th, 2011 at 4:53pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jun 24th, 2011 at 4:46pm: matty wrote on Jun 24th, 2011 at 4:39pm: gizmo_2655 wrote on Jun 23rd, 2011 at 1:52pm: Doctor Jolly wrote on Jun 23rd, 2011 at 1:00pm: Hi Mel. By the way, who is Mel ? Mel or Mellie was a 'unique' personality that used to post on these boards....( a LOT). She left in a huff, or was banned ( I'm not quite sure). Since then, some people on here seem convinced that anyone and everyone who disagrees with them IS mellie or one of her alternate ID's ('sockpuppets' or 'socks').. So 'mellie' is sort of like the forum 'bogeyman' (or bogeyperson)... Personally I don't think matty is mellie..his syntax and attitudes are very different to mellie's.. Thanks gizmo. Could someone please tell me WHO mel is?? And to all of those of you saying that I like attention, WTF? I don't like being accused of something/someone that I am not. How many other bloody posters do you go and ask? You want to treat me totally different. This is about the 4th thread started by you asking for proof your not mellie. Pigs Arse you don't want attention. http://www.bigfooty.com/images/tshirts/pigs_arse.png So it couldn't have anything to do with the fact that people have, and continue to, make accusations about me, without any evidence?

The thread had stopped being about you but you had to drag yourself back into focus of attention. Get over yourself.

With respect matty, the fact people were infinitely more interested in talking about a US Presidential election from 27 years ago than the thread title speaks volumes to me.....

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 25^th, 2011 at 12:25pm:

With respect matty, the fact people were infinitely more interested in talking about a US Presidential election from 27 years ago than the thread title speaks volumes to me.....

So what? I don't care what you discuss, as long as people stop accusing me of being mellie.

I think people will probably stop if you stop bringing it up.

Honestly, I don't care who is who on here, people should talk about subjects and policies.

The multi personalities and the who is who was what dragged Yahoo down to the level of Purdown Hospital*

* A local Bristol thing. A hospital now closed down that became a by-word for people certifiable.

nobody smacking cares about bristol things you pretentious goon

http://www.enciclopedia.com.pt/images/wave-surfing_9424.jpg

http://www.travelagentcentral.com/files/travelagent/nodes/2010/24451/DukeKahanamokuLagoon-Aerial_FP.jpg

http://img4.myrecipes.com/i/recipes/ay/08/barbeque-chicken-ay-1875596-l.jpg

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRsRU61vOo7rmTUo4W0FsgvRVRfkC6BWaf6IglXVIP8eN62UQ9bIQ&t=1

http://www.vedainformatics.com/veranda/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/test-cricket.jpg

Just a few things I'd rather discuss 8-)
How sweet is that barrelll on the mal :)

Cricket is soooo slow and boring.

NRL  .. now that's another matter :)

Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 26^th, 2011 at 6:10pm:

Cricket is soooo slow and boring. NRL  .. now that's another matter :)

lol lisa, what other sport can I settle into the lounge at 11 am and not get up for 6 hours :D

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jun 27^th, 2011 at 6:44pm:

lol lisa, what other sport can I settle into the lounge at 11 am and not get up for 6 hours :D

My apologies! Indeed you raise a VERY VALID point.

I owe much to cricket (and also golf). Both sports have assisted me greatly in my hour of need. How?? By helping me settle my twins and helping them get back to Sleepy Bay.

I am Mellie :D