Chanting "sayonara nuclear power" and waving banners, tens of thousands of people have marched in central Tokyo demanding the Japanese government abandon atomic energy in the wake of the Fukushima nuclear accident.     [smiley=thumbsup.gif]

The demonstration underscored how deeply a Japanese public long accustomed to nuclear power has been affected by the March 11 crisis, when a tsunami caused core meltdowns at three reactors at the Fukushima Dai-ichi complex.

The disaster - the worst nuclear accident since Chernobyl - led to radiation being spewed across a wide part of north-eastern Japan, forcing the evacuation of about 100,000 people who lived near the plant and raising fears of contamination in everything from fruit and vegetables to fish and water.


"Radiation is scary," said Nami Noji, a 43-year-old mother who came to the protest on Monday's national holiday with her four children, aged 8-14.

"There's a lot of uncertainty about the safety of food, and I want the future to be safe for my kids."

Police estimated the crowd at 20,000, while organisers said there were three times that many.

In addition to fears of radiation, the Japanese public and corporate world have had to put up with electricity shortages in sweltering heat after more than 30 of Japan's 54 nuclear reactors went idle over the summer to undergo inspections.

Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda, who took office earlier this month, has said Japan will restart reactors that clear safety checks.

But he has also said the country should reduce its reliance on atomic energy over the long term and explore alternative sources of energy. He has not spelled out specific goals.

Before the disaster, this earthquake-prone country derived 30 per cent of its electricity from nuclear power. Yet Japan is also a resource-poor nation, making it a difficult, time-consuming process for it to come up with viable alternative forms of energy.

Mari Joh, a 64-year-old woman who travelled from Hitachi city to collect signatures for a petition to shut down the Tokai Dai-ni nuclear plant not far from her home, acknowledged that shifting the country's energy sources could take 20 years.

"But if the government doesn't act decisively now to set a new course, we'll just continue with the status quo," she said on Monday. "I want to use natural energy, like solar, wind and biomass."

Before the march, the protesters gathered in Meiji Park to hear speakers including a woman from Fukushima prefecture, Ruiko Muto, who described herself as a "hibakusha", an emotionally laden term for survivors of the atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Those evacuated from around the plant remain uncertain about when, if ever, they will be able to return to their homes.

An AP-GfK poll showed that 55 per cent of Japanese wanted to reduce the number of nuclear reactors in the country, while 35 per cent would like to leave the number about the same. Four per cent wanted an increase, while three per cent want to eliminate them entirely.

The poll, which surveyed 1000 adults between July 29 and August 10, had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.8 percentage points.

Author Kenzaburo Oe, who won the Nobel literature prize in 1994 and has campaigned for pacifist and anti-nuclear causes, also addressed the crowd.

He and musician Ryuichi Sakamoto, who composed the score to the movie The Last Emperor, were among the event's supporters.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/environment/japanese-march-against-nuclear-power-20110920-1kj7c.html#ixzz1YuHmCJKN

Twenty thousand is not many in a country with the population of Japan Crooky. I do get the point though, the Japanesse have suffer more than any nation on this planet from the cruelty of nuclear war and accidents. They are justified in rejecting the reconstruction or expansion of any nuclear program. Yet they remain a country that denies their crimes of WW2 and tries to hail heros from such a painful time in their history.

The questions are more around, will the world ever accept responsibility for its self and stop carrying on like selfish children and put nuclear power and weapons away until they truly understand nuclear and its implications? I doubt it, as usual there is too much money to be made and that will win every time.

If Japan really do abandon Nuclear energy, the alternative would have to be coal fired, and guess who they will come to for that.

Cha-ching $$$

GoddyofOz wrote on Sep 25^th, 2011 at 2:10pm:

If Japan really do abandon Nuclear energy, the alternative would have to be coal fired, and guess who they will come to for that. Cha-ching $$$

Actually i would think they, being the ingenious peoples they are would turn their attention to alternative energy and have an answer to base load in a decade. Most likely they would pay for it with an ETS and we will be left behind as is the normal because it required leadership and we are too small to do that.

And what alternative source will that be?

Spain tried the green route and is looking rather stuffed. The problem is coal is the best we have. Nothing is cheaper and more efficient than it. Maybe by 2050 we will have more option, but not much before then o wouldn't wager.

Stewart wrote on Sep 27^th, 2011 at 2:38am:

And what alternative source will that be? Spain tried the green route and is looking rather stuffed. The problem is coal is the best we have. Nothing is cheaper and more efficient than it. Maybe by 2050 we will have more option, but not much before then o wouldn't wager.

Solar power was 24 hour back in the 80s!

;) ;)

nairbe wrote on Sep 25^th, 2011 at 3:23pm:

GoddyofOz wrote on Sep 25th, 2011 at 2:10pm: If Japan really do abandon Nuclear energy, the alternative would have to be coal fired, and guess who they will come to for that. Cha-ching $$$ Actually i would think they, being the ingenious peoples they are would turn their attention to alternative energy and have an answer to base load in a decade. Most likely they would pay for it with an ETS and we will be left behind as is the normal because it required leadership and we are too small to do that.

They'll definately use solar and wind and geothermal! Cost will be the defining factor of course but they have plenty of options!!!

Markets are meant to be robust: they can embrace the future like no other people on Earth so it's certainly ripe for interesting times!!!

Didn't they shoot a sattelite out of orbit a year or so ago, or was that the Chinese!??!

Ah, ...those Asians aren't dumb!!!  :o :o