I put forward a petition which I will forward to freediver to have lonweekend removed as a mod on this forum.
I am over his lies and manipulation and now it is the last staw after he has threatened to ban me and called me a liar after I mentioned in a thread Piers Akerman was a sexual assaulter. Here is my evidence I am not lying.
Akerman has had charges of sexual harassment levelled against him by employees. Five former employees, three of whom agreed to be named, said they witnessed Mr Akerman sexually harass female members of his staff.[2][3] A group of female staff at The Sunday Herald met and agreed to protect each other in the office from Akerman's advances.[2][3]

[edit] AssaultOne of the most controversial episodes in Akerman's life was his alleged threat to assault the literary editor of The Advertiser, Shirley Stott Despoja.[2][3] The dispute ended before a full bench of the Supreme Court where the newspaper appealed against Stott Despoja's successful worker's compensation claim for stress-related sickleave pay. Stott Despoja alleged: "I was physically threatened by the editor while alone with him in an office in a dispute over my work." The appeal by The Advertiser was dismissed and Stott Despoja won her $4000 claim.[2][3]



I vote yes to remove longweekend.

i vote no.

that is not evidence, there is no reference, it was offtopic.
it also may make the site legally liable

go suck your dummy

Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2011 at 3:28pm:

i vote no. that is not evidence, there is no reference, it was offtopic. it also may make the site legally liable go suck your dummy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piers_Akermanlink. now go and suck your jesus doll

ahah - a reference !!!!!!!!!!!

and what thread was this related to ?  dear dummysucker

Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2011 at 3:38pm:

ahah - a reference !!!!!!!!!!! and what thread was this related to ?  dear dummysucker

you're off topic,moron

skippy. wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2011 at 3:34pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 3:28pm: i vote no. that is not evidence, there is no reference, it was offtopic. it also may make the site legally liable go suck your dummy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piers_Akermanlink. now go and suck your jesus doll

But was he ever convicted???

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2011 at 3:56pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 3:34pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 3:28pm: i vote no. that is not evidence, there is no reference, it was offtopic. it also may make the site legally liable go suck your dummy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piers_Akermanlink. now go and suck your jesus doll But was he ever convicted???

Why did the advertiser lose its appeal and why did the supreme court award her damages?

This has less to do with the case and much more to do with longwhine trying to silence left wing opinion,even when the facts are provided, this is all over the net, there is no way Akerman could take action.

skippy. wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2011 at 4:01pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 3:56pm: skippy. wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 3:34pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 3:28pm: i vote no. that is not evidence, there is no reference, it was offtopic. it also may make the site legally liable go suck your dummy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piers_Akermanlink. now go and suck your jesus doll But was he ever convicted??? Why did the advertiser lose its appeal and why did the supreme court award her damages?

I meant the sexual harrassment,
The other one was almost a given, claiming 'stress related sickleave' is pretty much a sure-fire winner....

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2011 at 4:07pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 4:01pm: gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 3:56pm: skippy. wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 3:34pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 3:28pm: i vote no. that is not evidence, there is no reference, it was offtopic. it also may make the site legally liable go suck your dummy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piers_Akermanlink. now go and suck your jesus doll But was he ever convicted??? Why did the advertiser lose its appeal and why did the supreme court award her damages? I meant the sexual harrassment, The other one was almost a given, claiming 'stress related sickleave' is pretty much a sure-fire winner....

Why doesn't it surprise me you'd support this creep.

skippy. wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2011 at 4:18pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 4:07pm: skippy. wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 4:01pm: gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 3:56pm: skippy. wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 3:34pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 3:28pm: i vote no. that is not evidence, there is no reference, it was offtopic. it also may make the site legally liable go suck your dummy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piers_Akermanlink. now go and suck your jesus doll But was he ever convicted??? Why did the advertiser lose its appeal and why did the supreme court award her damages? I meant the sexual harrassment, The other one was almost a given, claiming 'stress related sickleave' is pretty much a sure-fire winner.... Why doesn't it surprise me you'd support this creep.

I don't, actually...
I don't even read his columns....
But making an accusation like that is nearly as bad as Derryn Hinch's thing about naming child molesters before it's been proven in court (which is illegal btw) and on about the same level as what you complain that Friyay does, which I also don't support....

If we're voting, I vote no too (sorry, Skip).

I think the modding position is important to Longy and I wouldn't like to see him lose it, even if he is a crotchety old smelly sock.

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2011 at 4:44pm:

If we're voting, I vote no too (sorry, Skip). I think the modding position is important to Longy and I wouldn't like to see him lose it, even if he is a crotchety old smelly sock.

It takes a while for a global moderator to find the middle road and L/W hasn't been doing the job that long, but he certainly needs to stop calling members' names. If he wants the standard of posting in this place to improve - he needs to lead by example.

A global moderator should practise what he preaches - or at least try to.

Yes, Mantra, I completely agree.

Hopefully he'll pull his head in.

Sorry, Skipp but I also do not seek Longy's removal as a Mod.

As you know, I have had cause to request that he back-off and demonstrate more fairness and consistency - sans personal abuse.

However, should he not make a better effort to moderate his moderation style, then I might return to change my position.

Oh, and I don't want Skipp, or any other genuine political animals, to be driven off here eitherer!

i dont know really

at least he got rid of DRAH

Nay.

One more thing ..

I petition that we vote this topic the most stupid topic for 2011.

Now, there's an idea!

:-X

Longweekend should be banned for giving irresponsible financial advice to people.

barnaby joe wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2011 at 5:20pm:

i dont know really at least he got rid of DRAH

WTF was DRAH????

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 12:10am:

barnaby joe wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 5:20pm: i dont know really at least he got rid of DRAH WTF was DRAH????

DeathRidesAHorse

I see FD sees fit to bury his mistake of making longwhine a mod in an aussie run forum .  ::)
He did the same with the POL animal link, I would have thought that was feedback, I suppose he doesn't like looking at his mistakes.

mantra wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2011 at 5:09pm:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 4:44pm: If we're voting, I vote no too (sorry, Skip). I think the modding position is important to Longy and I wouldn't like to see him lose it, even if he is a crotchety old smelly sock. It takes a while for a global moderator to find the middle road and L/W hasn't been doing the job that long, but he certainly needs to stop calling members' names. If he wants the standard of posting in this place to improve - he needs to lead by example. A global moderator should practise what he preaches - or at least try to.

yes, i'ld agree with that onhe.
As a mod it is a bit boring, have to facilitate discussion fairly and freely .

I just rang Rupert and asked him and he advised 'no'.

So it's a no from me, too.

skippy. wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 7:13am:

I see FD sees fit to bury his mistake of making longwhine a mod in an aussie run forum .  ::) He did the same with the POL animal link, I would have thought that was feedback, I suppose he doesn't like looking at his mistakes.

You are referring to the Relationships boar, where Mod & Aussie seem to be the same/sock and yes, that does seem to be one likely burial area for FD to get things out of sight.

Bobby. wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2011 at 11:40pm:

Longweekend should be banned for giving irresponsible financial advice to people.

Bump to Longweekend.

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2011 at 10:03pm:

Nay. One more thing .. I petition that we vote this topic the most stupid topic for 2011.

it_is_the_light would probably win that accolade several times over (or has he finally given up?), but it's definitely up there.

muso wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 1:52pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 10:03pm: Nay. One more thing .. I petition that we vote this topic the most stupid topic for 2011. it_is_the_light would probably win that accolade several times over (or has he finally given up?), but it's definitely up there.

Pretty funny coming from lisa, her threads would fill the top 100 dumbass threads in any competition. LOLZ kissy kissy.

muso wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 1:52pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 10:03pm: Nay. One more thing .. I petition that we vote this topic the most stupid topic for 2011. it_is_the_light would probably win that accolade several times over (or has he finally given up?), but it's definitely up there.

Looks like he's back on Yahoo....

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 3:11pm:

muso wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:52pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 10:03pm: Nay. One more thing .. I petition that we vote this topic the most stupid topic for 2011. it_is_the_light would probably win that accolade several times over (or has he finally given up?), but it's definitely up there. Looks like he's back on Yahoo....

I thought they closed that joint down ,is the politics forum still open there?

skippy. wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 3:40pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 3:11pm: muso wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:52pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 10:03pm: Nay. One more thing .. I petition that we vote this topic the most stupid topic for 2011. it_is_the_light would probably win that accolade several times over (or has he finally given up?), but it's definitely up there. Looks like he's back on Yahoo.... I thought they closed that joint down ,is the politics forum still open there?

No, just a few....it_is_the_light is posting on the conspiracy forum.....big surprise huh??

(well I think it's him....can't be too many people who finish posts with 'namaste'..)

Forgiven.

muso wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 1:52pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 10:03pm: Nay. One more thing .. I petition that we vote this topic the most stupid topic for 2011. it_is_the_light would probably win that accolade several times over (or has he finally given up?), but it's definitely up there.

Ah yeah .. good point.

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 9:37pm:

muso wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:52pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 10:03pm: Nay. One more thing .. I petition that we vote this topic the most stupid topic for 2011. it_is_the_light would probably win that accolade several times over (or has he finally given up?), but it's definitely up there. Ah yeah .. good point.

Lisa - you never replied to me when I wrote:


Quote:

Longweekend should be banned for giving irresponsible financial advice to people.

Bobby. wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 10:35pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 9:37pm: muso wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:52pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 10:03pm: Nay. One more thing .. I petition that we vote this topic the most stupid topic for 2011. it_is_the_light would probably win that accolade several times over (or has he finally given up?), but it's definitely up there. Ah yeah .. good point. Lisa - you never replied to me when I wrote: Quote: Longweekend should be banned for giving irresponsible financial advice to people.

I'd say the comment got the attention it deserved.

qikvtec wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 10:39pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 10:35pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 9:37pm: muso wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:52pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 10:03pm: Nay. One more thing .. I petition that we vote this topic the most stupid topic for 2011. it_is_the_light would probably win that accolade several times over (or has he finally given up?), but it's definitely up there. Ah yeah .. good point. Lisa - you never replied to me when I wrote: Quote: Longweekend should be banned for giving irresponsible financial advice to people. I'd say the comment got the attention it deserved.

But Longweekend pretends to be a successful person in financial terms &
offers free financial advice to people on this forum with no disclaimers.
He is so irresponsible.
He told people to buy houses 18 months ago & continued up till this day
while the whole time, property was going down & still is.

Longweekend is a loser & he gives losing advice.
I say sack him.

Quote:

Longweekend is a loser & he gives losing advice. I say sack him.

If you choose to take advice from individuals on a chat forum, then whose fault is that?
The objective here is opinion is it not?

Or are you expecting some magical forum of mass opinions which are always right?

Amadd wrote on Nov 4^th, 2011 at 6:08am:

Quote: Longweekend is a loser & he gives losing advice. I say sack him. If you choose to take advice from individuals on a chat forum, then whose fault is that? The objective here is opinion is it not? Or are you expecting some magical forum of mass opinions which are always right?

No - however I expect Longweekend to apologise to all his readers
for giving them wrong advice & to say sorry to any people who lost money.

Bobby. wrote on Nov 4^th, 2011 at 7:41am:

Amadd wrote on Nov 4th, 2011 at 6:08am: Quote: Longweekend is a loser & he gives losing advice. I say sack him. If you choose to take advice from individuals on a chat forum, then whose fault is that? The objective here is opinion is it not? Or are you expecting some magical forum of mass opinions which are always right? No - however I expect Longweekend to apologise to all his readers for giving them wrong advice & to say sorry to any people who lost money.

Seriously, are you really over 13?  Quit while you're ahead.

muso wrote on Nov 4^th, 2011 at 7:49am:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 4th, 2011 at 7:41am: Amadd wrote on Nov 4th, 2011 at 6:08am: Quote: Longweekend is a loser & he gives losing advice. I say sack him. If you choose to take advice from individuals on a chat forum, then whose fault is that? The objective here is opinion is it not? Or are you expecting some magical forum of mass opinions which are always right? No - however I expect Longweekend to apologise to all his readers for giving them wrong advice & to say sorry to any people who lost money. Seriously, are you really over 13?  Quit while you're ahead.

I am serious - it's about time people were held to account for their stupid advice.

On some forums you must apologise if you make an error - or you are banned.

This forum doesn't have that rule but it should and any
gentleman should apologise anyway.

and any
gentleman should apologise anyway.
OH well, that's longies get out clause then. :P

skippy. wrote on Nov 4^th, 2011 at 4:03pm:

and any gentleman should apologise anyway. OH well, that's longies get out clause then. :P

Sure is a get out clause.
Notice he hasn't even turned up on this thread?

Bobby. wrote on Nov 4^th, 2011 at 5:32pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 4th, 2011 at 4:03pm: and any gentleman should apologise anyway. OH well, that's longies get out clause then. :P Sure is a get out clause. Notice he hasn't even turned up on this thread?

Why should he? This is Skippys personal campaign to remove Longy as a moderator, requiring no comment or justification of his postion from Longy.  For the record I don't support this move.

buzzanddidj wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2011 at 10:12am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 9:46am: Just less ridiculous rules would be a start.   The last charge of BLASPHEMY was laid, in Australia, in 1919 The "offence" has since been removed from the statute books But it is NOW banned on ozpolitic forums You can say or hear the "F" word, any time after 9pm on free to air television - without breaking any laws But it is NOW banned on ozpolitic forums Vilification by RACE is a crime in this country Yet on ozpolitic forums - it is free and open slather GO FIGURE ! ( ... perhaps "forum rules" should be more in line with Australian legal and community standards - rather than a personal opinion of one in power ?)

buzzanddidj wrote on Nov 5^th, 2011 at 10:52am:

buzzanddidj wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 10:12am: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 2nd, 2011 at 9:46am: Just less ridiculous rules would be a start.   The last charge of BLASPHEMY was laid, in Australia, in 1919 The "offence" has since been removed from the statute books But it is NOW banned on ozpolitic forums You can say or hear the "F" word, any time after 9pm on free to air television - without breaking any laws But it is NOW banned on ozpolitic forums Vilification by RACE is a crime in this country Yet on ozpolitic forums - it is free and open slather GO FIGURE ! ( ... perhaps "forum rules" should be more in line with Australian legal and community standards - rather than a personal opinion of one in power ?)

Interesting points, buz. how about we all throw in and take longwhine to court, your points are valid, he is trying to enforce something that would be thrown out of court.The freakin bible bashing nut job doesn't even own the site.

Skippy,

Quote:

Interesting points, buz. how about we all throw in and take longwhine to court, your points are valid, he is trying to enforce something that would be thrown out of court. The freakin bible bashing nut job doesn't even own the site.

Freediver is the man who runs this site so he makes the rules
not Longweekend or the courts.
Actually Longweekend is not too bad - at least he hasn't banned me yet.
I only want him to apologise when he makes errors.
He's got too much pride to do that.  ;D

muso wrote on Nov 4^th, 2011 at 7:49am:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 4th, 2011 at 7:41am: Amadd wrote on Nov 4th, 2011 at 6:08am: Quote: Longweekend is a loser & he gives losing advice. I say sack him. If you choose to take advice from individuals on a chat forum, then whose fault is that? The objective here is opinion is it not? Or are you expecting some magical forum of mass opinions which are always right? No - however I expect Longweekend to apologise to all his readers for giving them wrong advice & to say sorry to any people who lost money. Seriously, are you really over 13?  Quit while you're ahead.

Ditto.

Bobby. wrote on Nov 5^th, 2011 at 2:28pm:

Skippy, Quote: Interesting points, buz. how about we all throw in and take longwhine to court, your points are valid, he is trying to enforce something that would be thrown out of court. The freakin bible bashing nut job doesn't even own the site. Freediver is the man who runs this site so he makes the rules not Longweekend or the courts. Actually Longweekend is not too bad - at least he hasn't banned me yet. I only want him to apologise when he makes errors. He's got too much pride to do that.  ;D

It would be awesome if EVERYONE apologised if/when they made errors.

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 5^th, 2011 at 2:42pm:

muso wrote on Nov 4th, 2011 at 7:49am: Bobby. wrote on Nov 4th, 2011 at 7:41am: Amadd wrote on Nov 4th, 2011 at 6:08am: Quote: Longweekend is a loser & he gives losing advice. I say sack him. If you choose to take advice from individuals on a chat forum, then whose fault is that? The objective here is opinion is it not? Or are you expecting some magical forum of mass opinions which are always right? No - however I expect Longweekend to apologise to all his readers for giving them wrong advice & to say sorry to any people who lost money. Seriously, are you really over 13?  Quit while you're ahead. Ditto.

Come on Lisa - support me not Longweekend.  :'(

Bobby. wrote on Nov 5^th, 2011 at 2:44pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 5th, 2011 at 2:42pm: muso wrote on Nov 4th, 2011 at 7:49am: Bobby. wrote on Nov 4th, 2011 at 7:41am: Amadd wrote on Nov 4th, 2011 at 6:08am: Quote: Longweekend is a loser & he gives losing advice. I say sack him. If you choose to take advice from individuals on a chat forum, then whose fault is that? The objective here is opinion is it not? Or are you expecting some magical forum of mass opinions which are always right? No - however I expect Longweekend to apologise to all his readers for giving them wrong advice & to say sorry to any people who lost money. Seriously, are you really over 13?  Quit while you're ahead. Ditto. Come on Lisa - support me not Longweekend.  :'(

Unfortunately I am unable to give you 100% support here.

The fact remains, just like everyone else, Longy's posts reflect his opinions (which are based on his personal experiences).

There is nothing at all wrong with that.

Really racking up the support.... ::)

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 5^th, 2011 at 2:44pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 5th, 2011 at 2:28pm: Skippy, Quote: Interesting points, buz. how about we all throw in and take longwhine to court, your points are valid, he is trying to enforce something that would be thrown out of court. The freakin bible bashing nut job doesn't even own the site. Freediver is the man who runs this site so he makes the rules not Longweekend or the courts. Actually Longweekend is not too bad - at least he hasn't banned me yet. I only want him to apologise when he makes errors. He's got too much pride to do that.  ;D It would be awesome if EVERYONE apologised if/when they made errors.

Well Lisa,
I am big enough to apologise when I make errors.
I have done so before & will do it again. ;)

Bobby. wrote on Nov 5^th, 2011 at 3:29pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 5th, 2011 at 2:44pm: Bobby. wrote on Nov 5th, 2011 at 2:28pm: Skippy, Quote: Interesting points, buz. how about we all throw in and take longwhine to court, your points are valid, he is trying to enforce something that would be thrown out of court. The freakin bible bashing nut job doesn't even own the site. Freediver is the man who runs this site so he makes the rules not Longweekend or the courts. Actually Longweekend is not too bad - at least he hasn't banned me yet. I only want him to apologise when he makes errors. He's got too much pride to do that.  ;D It would be awesome if EVERYONE apologised if/when they made errors. Well Lisa, I am big enough to apologise when I make errors. I have done so before & will do it again. ;)

My comments were actually tongue in cheek, that said ,it wont be long before someone takes similar action in cyber world.

Bobby. wrote on Nov 5^th, 2011 at 3:29pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 5th, 2011 at 2:44pm: Bobby. wrote on Nov 5th, 2011 at 2:28pm: Skippy, Quote: Interesting points, buz. how about we all throw in and take longwhine to court, your points are valid, he is trying to enforce something that would be thrown out of court. The freakin bible bashing nut job doesn't even own the site. Freediver is the man who runs this site so he makes the rules not Longweekend or the courts. Actually Longweekend is not too bad - at least he hasn't banned me yet. I only want him to apologise when he makes errors. He's got too much pride to do that.  ;D It would be awesome if EVERYONE apologised if/when they made errors. Well Lisa, I am big enough to apologise when I make errors. I have done so before & will do it again. ;)

I know Bobby. You are a good man and a dear friend.

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 5^th, 2011 at 3:42pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 5th, 2011 at 3:29pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 5th, 2011 at 2:44pm: Bobby. wrote on Nov 5th, 2011 at 2:28pm: Skippy, Quote: Interesting points, buz. how about we all throw in and take longwhine to court, your points are valid, he is trying to enforce something that would be thrown out of court. The freakin bible bashing nut job doesn't even own the site. Freediver is the man who runs this site so he makes the rules not Longweekend or the courts. Actually Longweekend is not too bad - at least he hasn't banned me yet. I only want him to apologise when he makes errors. He's got too much pride to do that.  ;D It would be awesome if EVERYONE apologised if/when they made errors. Well Lisa, I am big enough to apologise when I make errors. I have done so before & will do it again. ;) I know Bobby. You are a good man and a dear friend.

Thanks Lisa - you're a sweety.

Maybe I should apologise on behalf of Longweekend to all his readers?  :)

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 5^th, 2011 at 2:55pm:

Unfortunately I am unable to give you 100% support here. The fact remains, just like everyone else, Longy's posts reflect his opinions (which are based on his personal experiences). There is nothing at all wrong with that.

but badweekend confuses his rubbish opinions with fact !!

LW's actions over the past week have made me question who it is that is moderating HIM.

Now someone has been banned for "repeated drug references".


I am an adult.


I dont want or need a G-rated discussion forum.


I am ok with sex , drugs, politics and religious references.




this nannying is ridiculous.




For all you righties who bemoan political correctness and the thought police , this is a situation where you can express your views.

I thought I was responsible for all the drug references on here during the past 24hrs - I can remember making three of them.

darkhall67 wrote on Nov 8^th, 2011 at 8:39pm:

For all you righties who bemoan political correctness and the thought police , this is a situation where you can express your views.

Very well .. as a right winger I wish to express the view that this topic consists of pure, unadulterated bovine faecal matter.

Thank you.

Speaking of democracy and freedom - check this out: -



longweekend58 wrote on Nov 8^th, 2011 at 7:05pm:

your point is what exactly? that the libs allow free expresison of opinion while the labor party allows no individuality at all and gets its polices from unelected union leaders? this is why the libs have been in power far more than labor in the last century. its called democracy. look it up.

What a shame, that certain Libs don't practice what they preach, eh!?

Life_goes_on wrote on Nov 8^th, 2011 at 8:53pm:

I thought I was responsible for all the drug references on here during the past 24hrs - I can remember making three of them.

LMAO!

Bobby. wrote on Nov 5^th, 2011 at 2:28pm:

Actually Longweekend is not too bad - at least he hasn't banned me yet.

Bobby, both you and Last Nail LOVE Longy. For years you three have thrown yourselves together in continuous online combat .. and you've enjoyed every minute of it! Come on, admit it!

Bobbythebat
Quote:

Actually Longweekend is not too bad - at least he hasn't banned me yet.

No - you haven't been banned Bobby, but you have been humiliated and degraded by him publicly.


Quote:

Do you sniff toenail's butt too, booby-poodle? http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1294658062/1457#1457 seriously??? that is your answer? damn u r a moron as well as a butt-sniffing sycophant. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1294658062/1462#1462

mantra wrote on Nov 9^th, 2011 at 5:16am:

Bobbythebat Quote: Actually Longweekend is not too bad - at least he hasn't banned me yet. No - you haven't been banned Bobby, but you have been humiliated and degraded by him publicly. [quote]Do you sniff toenail's butt too, booby-poodle? http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1294658062/1457#1457 seriously??? that is your answer? damn u r a moron as well as a butt-sniffing sycophant. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1294658062/1462#1462

[/quote]


Longweekend is guilty of the most vile abuse possible on this forum -
that's why I was surprised that he got the moderator job.
Maybe Freediver didn't know about the abuse I suffered from him.
Thanks for providing those examples that I had forgotten about.

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 8^th, 2011 at 10:05pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 5th, 2011 at 2:28pm: Actually Longweekend is not too bad - at least he hasn't banned me yet. Bobby, both you and Last Nail LOVE Longy. For years you three have thrown yourselves together in continuous online combat .. and you've enjoyed every minute of it! Come on, admit it!

I don't love Longy.
I do however enjoy winning every argument with him.
You know when he's lost - he resorts to Ad-Hominem attacks.

It's a NO vote from me.