Word is ACA have interviewed an escort connected to the Thomson affair.

Also they have uncovered more discrepancies in his story.

angeleyes wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 6:02pm:

Word is ACA have interviewed an escort connected to the Thomson affair. Also they have uncovered more discrepancies in his story.

Oh its gotta be true if its on ACA, mellie. dimwit. ::)

skippy. wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 6:05pm:

angeleyes wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:02pm: Word is ACA have interviewed an escort connected to the Thomson affair. Also they have uncovered more discrepancies in his story. Oh its gotta be true if its on ACA, mellie. dimwit. ::)

Lefties struggle with the 1,100 page FWA report so why should anything else be more palatable?

Maqqa wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 6:06pm:

skippy. wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:05pm: angeleyes wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:02pm: Word is ACA have interviewed an escort connected to the Thomson affair. Also they have uncovered more discrepancies in his story. Oh its gotta be true if its on ACA, mellie. dimwit. ::) Lefties struggle with the 1,100 page FWA report so why should anything else be more palatable?

it was only a matter of time before they found the hooker. What an idiot is Thomson! He could have come clean about it years ago and no one would care. now it is front page news for weeks.

It could be any hooker deciding to get some fame. And maybe some money.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 6:21pm:

It could be any hooker deciding to get some fame. And maybe some money. SOB

Could be, should be, maybe, what if.

It's ok you keep sticking up for your low life brother.

angeleyes wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 6:25pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:21pm: It could be any hooker deciding to get some fame. And maybe some money. SOB Could be, should be, maybe, what if. It's ok you keep sticking up for your low life brother.

Heh. Another person who just tries to insult ppl willy nilly.

I say he is innocent until proven guilty. I do not "defend" him nor do i defend the idiots who want to lynch him.

SOB

I say all Hypocritical Christians vote Liberal!

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 6:36pm:

angeleyes wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:25pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:21pm: It could be any hooker deciding to get some fame. And maybe some money. SOB Could be, should be, maybe, what if. It's ok you keep sticking up for your low life brother. Heh. Another person who just tries to insult ppl willy nilly. I say he is innocent until proven guilty. I do not "defend" him nor do i defend the idiots who want to lynch him. SOB

and you think he hasnt been? what was the FWA if not proof? and if you think he didnt go to the hookers then you are probably one of 5 people in the country who think that and not even Thomson thinks that. he just desperately wants everyone to believe it.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 6:21pm:

It could be any hooker deciding to get some fame. And maybe some money. SOB

I am sure THOMO already has his answer to that one...ha.ha.ha..

he has turned this into a circus  does he really think he can point fingers and have no one retaliate.he is mad.. why didnt his wife stop him.. this whole thing was so  rehearsed it was like watching an episode of Law and Order..

apart from the rusted on I havent sen one person thats taken it seriously...that is if you dont count the independents..hahahahaha..

nope it isnt funny I am over it.. either charge him or let him go..

I am not sure I am ready to hear the hookers version of this...

Why didn't they get rid of him years ago? Why pre-select him in 2010? The same goes for Slipper.

longweekend58 wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 8:43pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:36pm: angeleyes wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:25pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:21pm: It could be any hooker deciding to get some fame. And maybe some money. SOB Could be, should be, maybe, what if. It's ok you keep sticking up for your low life brother. Heh. Another person who just tries to insult ppl willy nilly. I say he is innocent until proven guilty. I do not "defend" him nor do i defend the idiots who want to lynch him. SOB and you think he hasnt been? what was the FWA if not proof? and if you think he didnt go to the hookers then you are probably one of 5 people in the country who think that and not even Thomson thinks that. he just desperately wants everyone to believe it.

longy they have now transformed into Escorts.. they no longer are called hookers.

it takes on a whole new meaning.

cods wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 8:51pm:

longweekend58 wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 8:43pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:36pm: angeleyes wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:25pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:21pm: It could be any hooker deciding to get some fame. And maybe some money. SOB Could be, should be, maybe, what if. It's ok you keep sticking up for your low life brother. Heh. Another person who just tries to insult ppl willy nilly. I say he is innocent until proven guilty. I do not "defend" him nor do i defend the idiots who want to lynch him. SOB and you think he hasnt been? what was the FWA if not proof? and if you think he didnt go to the hookers then you are probably one of 5 people in the country who think that and not even Thomson thinks that. he just desperately wants everyone to believe it. longy they have now transformed into Escorts.. they no longer are called hookers. it takes on a whole new meaning.

Apparently this week for the first time he apparently didn't go to them - they came to him is the claim of the week.

For several years we had been told that he was visiting brothels? Who would have known

Dnarever wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 11:40pm:

cods wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 8:51pm: longweekend58 wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 8:43pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:36pm: angeleyes wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:25pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:21pm: It could be any hooker deciding to get some fame. And maybe some money. SOB Could be, should be, maybe, what if. It's ok you keep sticking up for your low life brother. Heh. Another person who just tries to insult ppl willy nilly. I say he is innocent until proven guilty. I do not "defend" him nor do i defend the idiots who want to lynch him. SOB and you think he hasnt been? what was the FWA if not proof? and if you think he didnt go to the hookers then you are probably one of 5 people in the country who think that and not even Thomson thinks that. he just desperately wants everyone to believe it. longy they have now transformed into Escorts.. they no longer are called hookers. it takes on a whole new meaning. Apparently this week for the first time he apparently didn't go to them - they came to him is the claim of the week. For several years we had been told that he was visiting brothels? Who would have known

He paid for hookers. If the mistake was made that you had to go to a brothel for that, then it could be an easy mistake to make.

I am sure he has been atleat once to create an account and have his credit card and license on file. All it would take is a phone call from there on, even if in WA.

Online poll at the DT website says only 900 believe Thomson, while nearly 18,000 do not believe him. I think the non-believers have it!

Dnarever wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 11:40pm:

cods wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 8:51pm: longweekend58 wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 8:43pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:36pm: angeleyes wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:25pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:21pm: It could be any hooker deciding to get some fame. And maybe some money. SOB Could be, should be, maybe, what if. It's ok you keep sticking up for your low life brother. Heh. Another person who just tries to insult ppl willy nilly. I say he is innocent until proven guilty. I do not "defend" him nor do i defend the idiots who want to lynch him. SOB and you think he hasnt been? what was the FWA if not proof? and if you think he didnt go to the hookers then you are probably one of 5 people in the country who think that and not even Thomson thinks that. he just desperately wants everyone to believe it. longy they have now transformed into Escorts.. they no longer are called hookers. it takes on a whole new meaning. Apparently this week for the first time he apparently didn't go to them - they came to him is the claim of the week. For several years we had been told that he was visiting brothels? Who would have known

WHO WHAT WHERE IS IT CLAIMED THEY CAME TO HIM?????????


as far as I have made out he was in a hotel full of union delegates..

would he really have them visit him when he knew he was being set up with hookers????...LOL...


YOU MAKE THE MOST BIZARRE  CLAIMS...

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 6:36am:

Online poll at the DT website says only 900 believe Thomson, while nearly 18,000 do not believe him. I think the non-believers have it!

oh come on everyone knows the readers on the DT are.. racist.bigots.liars. thieves.Nazi's, blood lusting murderers. know nothings..

accept the 900 of course.

I believe THOMO had a lash out at ACA last night for the hooker interview.... everyones a liar bar him.. amazing..

progressiveslol wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 12:55am:

Dnarever wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 11:40pm: cods wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 8:51pm: longweekend58 wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 8:43pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:36pm: angeleyes wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:25pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:21pm: It could be any hooker deciding to get some fame. And maybe some money. SOB Could be, should be, maybe, what if. It's ok you keep sticking up for your low life brother. Heh. Another person who just tries to insult ppl willy nilly. I say he is innocent until proven guilty. I do not "defend" him nor do i defend the idiots who want to lynch him. SOB and you think he hasnt been? what was the FWA if not proof? and if you think he didnt go to the hookers then you are probably one of 5 people in the country who think that and not even Thomson thinks that. he just desperately wants everyone to believe it. longy they have now transformed into Escorts.. they no longer are called hookers. it takes on a whole new meaning. Apparently this week for the first time he apparently didn't go to them - they came to him is the claim of the week. For several years we had been told that he was visiting brothels? Who would have known He paid for hookers. If the mistake was made that you had to go to a brothel for that, then it could be an easy mistake to make. I am sure he has been atleat once to create an account and have his credit card and license on file. All it would take is a phone call from there on, even if in WA.

He paid for hookers. If the mistake was made that you had to go to a brothel for that, then it could be an easy mistake to make.


It has been the consistant claim for about 2 years - but apparently not this week.

Thompson says have a look at the film from the Brothels, The conservatives then say but you didn't go to the brothels, even though that was exactly what they had been claiming for years now.

cods wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 6:37am:

Dnarever wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 11:40pm: cods wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 8:51pm: longweekend58 wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 8:43pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:36pm: angeleyes wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:25pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:21pm: It could be any hooker deciding to get some fame. And maybe some money. SOB Could be, should be, maybe, what if. It's ok you keep sticking up for your low life brother. Heh. Another person who just tries to insult ppl willy nilly. I say he is innocent until proven guilty. I do not "defend" him nor do i defend the idiots who want to lynch him. SOB and you think he hasnt been? what was the FWA if not proof? and if you think he didnt go to the hookers then you are probably one of 5 people in the country who think that and not even Thomson thinks that. he just desperately wants everyone to believe it. longy they have now transformed into Escorts.. they no longer are called hookers. it takes on a whole new meaning. Apparently this week for the first time he apparently didn't go to them - they came to him is the claim of the week. For several years we had been told that he was visiting brothels? Who would have known WHO WHAT WHERE IS IT CLAIMED THEY CAME TO HIM????????? as far as I have made out he was in a hotel full of union delegates.. would he really have them visit him when he knew he was being set up with hookers????...LOL... YOU MAKE THE MOST BIZARRE  CLAIMS...

I understand that it is difficult to keep up with your current claims, It changed this week aparently.

Don't ask me what happened - I'm not a Liberal stratagist.

Oh please - I heard this EXACT SAME THING - more than a year ago and yet nothing ever went to air.

They've obviously made the call that the story is now big enough to risk the potential defamation suite.

If ACA want to pay me $60,000 I'm happy to swear an avidavit saying he paid me to have sex with him

Dnarever wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:56am:

cods wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 6:37am: Dnarever wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 11:40pm: cods wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 8:51pm: longweekend58 wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 8:43pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:36pm: angeleyes wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:25pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:21pm: It could be any hooker deciding to get some fame. And maybe some money. SOB Could be, should be, maybe, what if. It's ok you keep sticking up for your low life brother. Heh. Another person who just tries to insult ppl willy nilly. I say he is innocent until proven guilty. I do not "defend" him nor do i defend the idiots who want to lynch him. SOB and you think he hasnt been? what was the FWA if not proof? and if you think he didnt go to the hookers then you are probably one of 5 people in the country who think that and not even Thomson thinks that. he just desperately wants everyone to believe it. longy they have now transformed into Escorts.. they no longer are called hookers. it takes on a whole new meaning. Apparently this week for the first time he apparently didn't go to them - they came to him is the claim of the week. For several years we had been told that he was visiting brothels? Who would have known WHO WHAT WHERE IS IT CLAIMED THEY CAME TO HIM????????? as far as I have made out he was in a hotel full of union delegates.. would he really have them visit him when he knew he was being set up with hookers????...LOL... YOU MAKE THE MOST BIZARRE  CLAIMS... I understand that it is difficult to keep up with your current claims, It changed this week aparently. Don't ask me what happened - I'm not a Liberal stratagist.

WHAT CLAIMS DID THE LIB S MAKE THIS WEK.. YOU READ IT YOU MUST REMEMBER WHERE YOU GO BACK YEARS REMEMBERING WHAT THEY SAID..DONT GIVE ME THAT..

ITS MORE OF YOUR DRIBBLE..


Olive mentioned that films of men arriving would not make any difference in a court of law as prossies go to the sleazy bags... so it would prove nothing...she wasnt referring to this case in particular... but why would it make any difference to have street video that THOMO CLAIMS IS THE LAW IN BOTH STATES..

WHICH HAS BEEN PROVED TO BE ANOTHER LIE... IT ISNT LAW.


CAPS NOT INTENDED SORRY.



WE OR AT LEAST ME IS NOT HAVING ANY TROUBLE KEEPING UP WITH claims>.. ONLY thomos..



the latest being there would be video film... and his demand police spend time looking to prove his innocence lovely. I thought it was their job to prove someone guilty...


you keep on digging I am sure something will turn up that will get THOMO off the hook beautifully..

I dont put anything past this lot I can tell you

PoliticalReality wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 8:09am:

Oh please - I heard this EXACT SAME THING - more than a year ago and yet nothing ever went to air. They've obviously made the call that the story is now big enough to risk the potential defamation suite. If ACA want to pay me $60,000 I'm happy to swear an avidavit saying he paid me to have sex with him

wow thats good to know...

I didnt see it did I miss much?

I am getting my daily dose of sleazy on here.

Surely, Channel 9 are joking!!

you guys have to be joking if you believe a hooker paid 60k for an interview isnt going to say whatever the heck they want her to say.  She is for sale. Offer her 70k and get her to say she never saw him before.

SOB

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 6:36am:

Online poll at the DT website says only 900 believe Thomson, while nearly 18,000 do not believe him. I think the non-believers have it!

That is the point - the media and conservative parties driving public opinion does not mean you lock someone up.

That is the function of our legal system.

If it were as clear cut as many make it seem he would have been charged and convicted a long time ago.

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 6:36am:

Online poll at the DT website says only 900 believe Thomson, while nearly 18,000 do not believe him. I think the non-believers have it!

Oh he must be guilty if an online poll says so. Dimwit in a skirt.

Dnarever wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 8:44am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 6:36am: Online poll at the DT website says only 900 believe Thomson, while nearly 18,000 do not believe him. I think the non-believers have it! That is the point - the media and conservative parties driving public opinion does not mean you lock someone up. That is the function of our legal system. If it were as clear cut as many make it seem he would have been charged and convicted a long time ago.

very righteous I am sure.. what you are saying is blanket blackout..

no one including those who believe him should have an opinion.. even worse put it in print.. is that what you are saying..???


you see you cant have a forum that only looks at one side.. so its blanket blackout..

its hard for you guys to accept I realize that..

but no one and i mean NO ONE on the boards has the POWER to lock this man up or even find him guilty..


ask OJ.

skippy. wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 8:45am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 6:36am: Online poll at the DT website says only 900 believe Thomson, while nearly 18,000 do not believe him. I think the non-believers have it! Oh he must be guilty if an online poll says so. Dimwit in a skirt.

you mean!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! it isnt soooooooooooooooo

cods wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 8:48am:

skippy. wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 8:45am: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 6:36am: Online poll at the DT website says only 900 believe Thomson, while nearly 18,000 do not believe him. I think the non-believers have it! Oh he must be guilty if an online poll says so. Dimwit in a skirt. you mean!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! it isnt soooooooooooooooo

It must be true,cods, Piers Akerman and an online poll said so. ::) We don't need any Innocent until proven guilty trials here, this is Australia, hang him.

I have to concede that the ONE aspect of the whole barrage of allegations against Thompson that made me wonder if it may have been at least partially unfounded was the fact that NO prostitutes had come out with a story saying they did get money for services from him.
Even though it is not illegal, it would have damaged his credibility in the public eye.
Yet after so many years, none had so far come forward, despite the fact that we already know that they do not limit their choices in how they make money, like most others.
A very significant proportion are heroin addicts, and as such, are usually in great need of money, so any who could prove themselves credible enough, could get a very big payday, from the sleazy tabloid scum, cash for comment crowd.
But for years none took that potential paycheque, bearing in mind that the opportunity to do so disappears the moment that Thompson is found guilty of something, and resigns, or is sacked.
So I have to admit to having very grave reservations about the bona fides of such a claim, at this late stage.

It may prove to be credible, it may not, and the CASH component of the story means that if they go with the hooker with a heart of gold, who just could not bear to see the Parliament brought into disrepute, so is providing her story free, will not be accepeted at face value, and friends or relatives who magically have their mortgage disappear, or discover a long lost inheritance, would also be in the sights of those who would investigate any such a claim. Dangerous waters for a TV station to go be swimming in.

In fact, we may end up with Craig Thompson owning Ch. 9, we could see a whole set of new programming if that happens.
He may start showing, things like;
Ripleys, Believe It or Not,
or Films like;
Shame
Downfall
Outside The Law
Endgame
Deception,
Sex, Lies and Videotape,
as movies of the week,
and one just for his old mate Tony,
10 Things I Hate About You.

I will watch with interest.

in fact, we may end up with Craig Thompson owning Ch. 9


Yeah like he was going to own Fairfax.  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Well the hooker has made a statutory declaration. that could lead to prision time if found not to be true, will Thomson do the same?

mozzaok wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 9:31am:

I have to concede that the ONE aspect of the whole barrage of allegations against Thompson that made me wonder if it may have been at least partially unfounded was the fact that NO prostitutes had come out with a story saying they did get money for services from him. Even though it is not illegal, it would have damaged his credibility in the public eye. Yet after so many years, none had so far come forward, despite the fact that we already know that they do not limit their choices in how they make money, like most others. A very significant proportion are heroin addicts, and as such, are usually in great need of money, so any who could prove themselves credible enough, could get a very big payday, from the sleazy tabloid scum, cash for comment crowd. But for years none took that potential paycheque, bearing in mind that the opportunity to do so disappears the moment that Thompson is found guilty of something, and resigns, or is sacked. So I have to admit to having very grave reservations about the bona fides of such a claim, at this late stage. It may prove to be credible, it may not, and the CASH component of the story means that if they go with the hooker with a heart of gold, who just could not bear to see the Parliament brought into disrepute, so is providing her story free, will not be accepeted at face value, and friends or relatives who magically have their mortgage disappear, or discover a long lost inheritance, would also be in the sights of those who would investigate any such a claim. Dangerous waters for a TV station to go be swimming in. In fact, we may end up with Craig Thompson owning Ch. 9, we could see a whole set of new programming if that happens. He may start showing, things like; Ripleys, Believe It or Not, or Films like; Shame Downfall Outside The Law Endgame Deception, Sex, Lies and Videotape, as movies of the week, and one just for his old mate Tony, 10 Things I Hate About You. I will watch with interest.

You know waiting for someone to come forward who could be dead, would be a long wait. Did you ever factor in that the man was not that great that you would remember him. The hooker could have died. The hooker does not have enough evidence to put herself into a his word against hers fight.

Waiting for a hooker to come forward could be almost fruitless.

This hooker would have to come up with something other than 'yeh I slept with him'

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 9:41am:

Well the hooker has made a statutory declaration. that could lead to prision time if found not to be true, will Thomson do the same?

And it was done without a burker.

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 9:41am:

Well the hooker has made a statutory declaration. that could lead to prision time if found not to be true, will Thomson do the same?

He wouldnt and we all know why.

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 9:41am:

Well the hooker has made a statutory declaration. that could lead to prision time if found not to be true, will Thomson do the same?

And how would a court of law prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that she's not telling the truth?

Geez right wing loonys have no sense of humour at all.
Dumb, mean, and dull as dish water, no wonder they never get anything right.

mozzaok wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 9:31am:

I have to concede that the ONE aspect of the whole barrage of allegations against Thompson that made me wonder if it may have been at least partially unfounded was the fact that NO prostitutes had come out with a story saying they did get money for services from him. Even though it is not illegal, it would have damaged his credibility in the public eye. Yet after so many years, none had so far come forward, despite the fact that we already know that they do not limit their choices in how they make money, like most others. A very significant proportion are heroin addicts, and as such, are usually in great need of money, so any who could prove themselves credible enough, could get a very big payday, from the sleazy tabloid scum, cash for comment crowd. But for years none took that potential paycheque, bearing in mind that the opportunity to do so disappears the moment that Thompson is found guilty of something, and resigns, or is sacked. So I have to admit to having very grave reservations about the bona fides of such a claim, at this late stage. It may prove to be credible, it may not, and the CASH component of the story means that if they go with the hooker with a heart of gold, who just could not bear to see the Parliament brought into disrepute, so is providing her story free, will not be accepeted at face value, and friends or relatives who magically have their mortgage disappear, or discover a long lost inheritance, would also be in the sights of those who would investigate any such a claim. Dangerous waters for a TV station to go be swimming in. In fact, we may end up with Craig Thompson owning Ch. 9, we could see a whole set of new programming if that happens. He may start showing, things like; Ripleys, Believe It or Not, or Films like; Shame Downfall Outside The Law Endgame Deception, Sex, Lies and Videotape, as movies of the week, and one just for his old mate Tony, 10 Things I Hate About You. I will watch with interest.

That was supposed to be comedy?

mozzaok wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 9:49am:

Geez right wing loonys have no sense of humour at all. Dumb, mean, and dull as dish water, no wonder they never get anything right.

Well the comedy was a little dull and a bit hard to tell if it was sarc, serious or just the mantra of 'he will sue the A off the media'

Looking back at it now knowing it was a joke..... he... hehee...hmmmm

mozzaok wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 9:49am:

Geez right wing loonys have no sense of humour at all. Dumb, mean, and dull as dish water, no wonder they never get anything right.

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh and thats only the righties..

hilarious.. you make my day.

if you handnt called us loonies and dukk as dishwater  you may have got away with that..

calling someone!!! anyone !!!!names is not a good look or humorous.

angeleyes wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 9:53am:

mozzaok wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 9:31am: I have to concede that the ONE aspect of the whole barrage of allegations against Thompson that made me wonder if it may have been at least partially unfounded was the fact that NO prostitutes had come out with a story saying they did get money for services from him. Even though it is not illegal, it would have damaged his credibility in the public eye. Yet after so many years, none had so far come forward, despite the fact that we already know that they do not limit their choices in how they make money, like most others. A very significant proportion are heroin addicts, and as such, are usually in great need of money, so any who could prove themselves credible enough, could get a very big payday, from the sleazy tabloid scum, cash for comment crowd. But for years none took that potential paycheque, bearing in mind that the opportunity to do so disappears the moment that Thompson is found guilty of something, and resigns, or is sacked. So I have to admit to having very grave reservations about the bona fides of such a claim, at this late stage. It may prove to be credible, it may not, and the CASH component of the story means that if they go with the hooker with a heart of gold, who just could not bear to see the Parliament brought into disrepute, so is providing her story free, will not be accepeted at face value, and friends or relatives who magically have their mortgage disappear, or discover a long lost inheritance, would also be in the sights of those who would investigate any such a claim. Dangerous waters for a TV station to go be swimming in. In fact, we may end up with Craig Thompson owning Ch. 9, we could see a whole set of new programming if that happens. He may start showing, things like; Ripleys, Believe It or Not, or Films like; Shame Downfall Outside The Law Endgame Deception, Sex, Lies and Videotape, as movies of the week, and one just for his old mate Tony, 10 Things I Hate About You. I will watch with interest. That was supposed to be comedy?

has it crossed your mind these girls might sign a contract forbidding them to talk about their clients?? I would think there are a lot of VIP men shaking in their collective boots to be honest.

if one gets paid to talk at these prices.. WOW watch out.

I bet they nearly did backspins when THOMO claimed there are videos of their comings and goings..hahahahahahahahahahahah squirm squirm

The Government needs to expedite this affair to its conclusion or stand accused of using the Thompson affair as a Trojan to undermine the morale of workers and trust in their unions.

I set it up, anyone with half a brain could have knocked it out the park.

The loony right response should have been, (if they were not all dumber than dirt)


Quote:

or Films like; Shame, on Thompson, his Downfall will come, because he behaved Outside The Lawso that brings us to the Endgamewhere his Deception,will be exposed, by Sex, Lies and Videotape, as movies of the week, and one just for his old mate Tony, 10 Things I Hate About You.

Come on guys, do some of the lifting, I am still waiting to be convinced you know something that I have not been privy to, stop holding out.
What do you guys KNOW, (I am using that in the literal sense, so, "he looked like he was lying", or stuff like that won't past muster) about what has been proven about Thompson, that you are not telling, because I am still waiting to see the evidence.

mozzaok wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 10:05am:

I set it up, anyone with half a brain could have knocked it out the park. The loony right response should have been, (if they were not all dumber than dirt) Quote: or Films like; Shame, on Thompson, his Downfall will come, because he behaved Outside The Lawso that brings us to the Endgamewhere his Deception,will be exposed, by Sex, Lies and Videotape, as movies of the week, and one just for his old mate Tony, 10 Things I Hate About You. Come on guys, do some of the lifting, I am still waiting to be convinced you know something that I have not been privy to, stop holding out. What do you guys KNOW, (I am using that in the literal sense, so, "he looked like he was lying", or stuff like that won't past muster) about what has been proven about Thompson, that you are not telling, because I am still waiting to see the evidence.

Well, like in real life, you have to make a judgement call on what is garbage and what is worth your time. This gets you through the day without getting information overload and wasting valuable time that is in short supply.

I just so happened to skip that part of your thread because of the lead up, went into my sifting garbage mode. Quick scan, no thought needed about the content, except if you knew or cared there was a hidden message.

As a worker I have been face to face with corrupt union leadership w working hand in hand with the Government to undermine workers.  Leadership must be seen to be accountable and above reproach and using this Thompson affair as a political propaganda tool is unacceptable to the rights of workers.  If there has been corruption, then lets see the investigation make a finding or an exoneration of Thompson.  Otherwise, I am left deeply suspicious about the agenda of the whole thing.

progressiveslol wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 10:09am:

mozzaok wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 10:05am: I set it up, anyone with half a brain could have knocked it out the park. The loony right response should have been, (if they were not all dumber than dirt) Quote: or Films like; Shame, on Thompson, his Downfall will come, because he behaved Outside The Lawso that brings us to the Endgamewhere his Deception,will be exposed, by Sex, Lies and Videotape, as movies of the week, and one just for his old mate Tony, 10 Things I Hate About You. Come on guys, do some of the lifting, I am still waiting to be convinced you know something that I have not been privy to, stop holding out. What do you guys KNOW, (I am using that in the literal sense, so, "he looked like he was lying", or stuff like that won't past muster) about what has been proven about Thompson, that you are not telling, because I am still waiting to see the evidence. Well, like in real life, you have to make a judgement call on what is garbage and what is worth your time. This gets you through the day without getting information overload and wasting valuable time that is in short supply. I just so happened to skip that part of your thread because of the lead up, went into my sifting garbage mode. Quick scan, no thought needed about the content, except if you knew or cared there was a hidden message.

precisely we know whats coming same old attack attack even when its shift attack at all costs

and mozz has the hide to call righties boring a dull.


funny how though they support him.. they dont have any evidence for that yet they demand evidence from anyone that just doesnt happen to believe him..

to my kind anyone that has at least one investigation into their behavior in this case more than ONE INVESTIGATION.

has to say there is something rotton in the state of demark.otherwise why look.. and why look for 3.5. years.??


thats all I am saying.

I wonder if these guys would give Milat the benefit of the doubt..??????

cods wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 10:15am:

precisely we know whats coming same old attack attack even when its shift attack at all costs and mozz has the hide to call righties boring a dull. funny how though they support him.. they dont have any evidence for that yet they demand evidence from anyone that just doesnt happen to believe him.. to my kind anyone that has at least one investigation into their behavior in this case more than ONE INVESTIGATION. has to say there is something rotton in the state of demark.otherwise why look.. and why look for 3.5. years.?? thats all I am saying. I wonder if these guys would give Milat the benefit of the doubt..??????

Everyone is entitled to the presumption of innocence - in serious violent cases the accused is held till it is determined.

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 9:41am:

Well the hooker has made a statutory declaration. that could lead to prision time if found not to be true, will Thomson do the same?

She was paid 60k for that declaration. Im sure its legit.

Thomson may have already done stat decs. I expect he has but the media doesnt show us everything . Especially where his defense is concerned.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 11:01am:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 9:41am: Well the hooker has made a statutory declaration. that could lead to prision time if found not to be true, will Thomson do the same? She was paid 60k for that declaration. Im sure its legit. Thomson may have already done stat decs. I expect he has but the media doesnt show us everything . Especially where his defense is concerned. SOB

Thomson has been caught out telling to many fibs, i don't think he would of made any statutory declaration.
Like his defamation case, came out telling us the News paper settled and paid him when it was him who had to pay out their legal costs because he didn't have a leg to stand on.

A hooker can remember individual "John's" from 7 years ago?

FFS get some perspective.

Dsmithy70 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 12:57pm:

A hooker can remember individual "John's" from 7 years ago? FFS get some perspective.

But if she can identify specific details of the place, events and personal markings of Thommo then he's cooked!!!

Maqqa wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 1:00pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 12:57pm: A hooker can remember individual "John's" from 7 years ago? FFS get some perspective. But if she can identify specific details of the place, events and personal markings of Thommo then he's cooked!!!

You going the "mole on upper right-hand side of scrotum" angle Maqqa.
Maybe Tone will demand he drop his pants when the house next sits.

If they had 6 votes or so, this wouldn't even be an issue for Labor - he would have been stood aside in a heartbeat.

Gillard needs Thomson and is willing to weather the political controversy that results from this whole saga. Short term it may keep her in power till the next election, but long term the labor brand is so tarnished it will take several years to build that trust with the voters back up again.

Dsmithy70 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 1:04pm:

Maqqa wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 1:00pm: Dsmithy70 wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 12:57pm: A hooker can remember individual "John's" from 7 years ago? FFS get some perspective. But if she can identify specific details of the place, events and personal markings of Thommo then he's cooked!!! You going the "mole on upper right-hand side of scrotum" angle Maqqa. Maybe Tone will demand he drop his pants when the house next sits.

Read my comment again - it was inclusive!!!

Second - the scrutiny on Thommo would be even more if these markings are identified. So it's up to Thommo to disprove it to ease the pressure

Therefore it's it's actually not in Abbott's interest to make the demand

Phallic Baldwin wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 1:27pm:

If they had 6 votes or so, this wouldn't even be an issue for Labor - he would have been stood aside in a heartbeat. Gillard needs Thomson and is willing to weather the political controversy that results from this whole saga. Short term it may keep her in power till the next election, but long term the labor brand is so tarnished it will take several years to build that trust with the voters back up again.

Phallic Baldwin, I'll thank you to stop impersonating Matty. Cease this nonsense at once.

Phallic Baldwin wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 1:27pm:

If they had 6 votes or so, this wouldn't even be an issue for Labor - he would have been stood aside in a heartbeat. Gillard needs Thomson and is willing to weather the political controversy that results from this whole saga. Short term it may keep her in power till the next election, but long term the labor brand is so tarnished it will take several years to build that trust with the voters back up again.

He HAS been stood aside, very early on he stood down as Chair of the Economic Committee and he's now been suspended from the Party and is excluded from the Caucus

You do realise that there is actually NOTHING else that Gillard can do to him - he's not elected to Parliament on her say so - She is the PM on his ...

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 12:36pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 11:01am: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 9:41am: Well the hooker has made a statutory declaration. that could lead to prision time if found not to be true, will Thomson do the same? She was paid 60k for that declaration. Im sure its legit. Thomson may have already done stat decs. I expect he has but the media doesnt show us everything . Especially where his defense is concerned. SOB Thomson has been caught out telling to many fibs, i don't think he would of made any statutory declaration. Like his defamation case, came out telling us the News paper settled and paid him when it was him who had to pay out their legal costs because he didn't have a leg to stand on.

Another LIE - Thomson did not have to pay anyone's legal costs other than his own.  He declined to proceed with the defamation case - there has been no award of costs against him.

PoliticalReality wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 2:10pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 12:36pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 11:01am: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 9:41am: Well the hooker has made a statutory declaration. that could lead to prision time if found not to be true, will Thomson do the same? She was paid 60k for that declaration. Im sure its legit. Thomson may have already done stat decs. I expect he has but the media doesnt show us everything . Especially where his defense is concerned. SOB Thomson has been caught out telling to many fibs, i don't think he would of made any statutory declaration. Like his defamation case, came out telling us the News paper settled and paid him when it was him who had to pay out their legal costs because he didn't have a leg to stand on. Another LIE - Thomson did not have to pay anyone's legal costs other than his own.  He declined to proceed with the defamation case - there has been no award of costs against him.

how can the courts award costs when he settled out of court to pay the costs?

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 2:14pm:

PoliticalReality wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 2:10pm: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 12:36pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 11:01am: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 9:41am: Well the hooker has made a statutory declaration. that could lead to prision time if found not to be true, will Thomson do the same? She was paid 60k for that declaration. Im sure its legit. Thomson may have already done stat decs. I expect he has but the media doesnt show us everything . Especially where his defense is concerned. SOB Thomson has been caught out telling to many fibs, i don't think he would of made any statutory declaration. Like his defamation case, came out telling us the News paper settled and paid him when it was him who had to pay out their legal costs because he didn't have a leg to stand on. Another LIE - Thomson did not have to pay anyone's legal costs other than his own.  He declined to proceed with the defamation case - there has been no award of costs against him. how can the courts award costs when he settled out of court to pay the costs?

There was no settlement on costs - either way

Just because you say it doesn't make it true

Dnarever wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 10:29am:

cods wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 10:15am: precisely we know whats coming same old attack attack even when its shift attack at all costs and mozz has the hide to call righties boring a dull. funny how though they support him.. they dont have any evidence for that yet they demand evidence from anyone that just doesnt happen to believe him.. to my kind anyone that has at least one investigation into their behavior in this case more than ONE INVESTIGATION. has to say there is something rotton in the state of demark.otherwise why look.. and why look for 3.5. years.?? thats all I am saying. I wonder if these guys would give Milat the benefit of the doubt..?????? Everyone is entitled to the presumption of innocence - in serious violent cases the accused is held till it is determined.

and her is the rub that you seem not to understand. Milat was considered innocent under the law until found guilty. That didnt stop the police or the magistrates from treating him as a guilty man. He was JAILED upon arrest. He was made to pay a very severe pentaly while still technically innocent. And why did that happen? BECAUSE HIS GUILT WAS OBVIOUS. the court was there simply to confirm that obvious truth.

The same is true of Thomson. Technically innocent, it does not mean his innocence is an assumption that he can parade and play on. It is never as simple as it sounds.

Dsmithy70 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 12:57pm:

A hooker can remember individual "John's" from 7 years ago? FFS get some perspective.

good point but if you were asked what is the morr believable claim - thomsons 'set up claim' or the hooker's memory, which is the more believable option?

the hookers memory. That story is at least believable if a little unlikely. Thomsons claim however is unbelievable and utterly unlikely.

longweekend58 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 3:21pm:

Dnarever wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 10:29am: cods wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 10:15am: precisely we know whats coming same old attack attack even when its shift attack at all costs and mozz has the hide to call righties boring a dull. funny how though they support him.. they dont have any evidence for that yet they demand evidence from anyone that just doesnt happen to believe him.. to my kind anyone that has at least one investigation into their behavior in this case more than ONE INVESTIGATION. has to say there is something rotton in the state of demark.otherwise why look.. and why look for 3.5. years.?? thats all I am saying. I wonder if these guys would give Milat the benefit of the doubt..?????? Everyone is entitled to the presumption of innocence - in serious violent cases the accused is held till it is determined. and her is the rub that you seem not to understand. Milat was considered innocent under the law until found guilty. That didnt stop the police or the magistrates from treating him as a guilty man. He was JAILED upon arrest. He was made to pay a very severe pentaly while still technically innocent. And why did that happen? BECAUSE HIS GUILT WAS OBVIOUS. the court was there simply to confirm that obvious truth. The same is true of Thomson. Technically innocent, it does not mean his innocence is an assumption that he can parade and play on. It is never as simple as it sounds.

No. It wasnt because his guilt was obvious. It was because anyone charged with a crime like that violent or murder is held until its determined they are safe to let out or for a certain amount of hours (yeah I think its 48 hours and if nothing has turned up they have to let them go). It was the nature of this offense. He was still presumed innocent though legally.

SOB

PoliticalReality wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 2:29pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 2:14pm: PoliticalReality wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 2:10pm: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 12:36pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 11:01am: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 9:41am: Well the hooker has made a statutory declaration. that could lead to prision time if found not to be true, will Thomson do the same? She was paid 60k for that declaration. Im sure its legit. Thomson may have already done stat decs. I expect he has but the media doesnt show us everything . Especially where his defense is concerned. SOB Thomson has been caught out telling to many fibs, i don't think he would of made any statutory declaration. Like his defamation case, came out telling us the News paper settled and paid him when it was him who had to pay out their legal costs because he didn't have a leg to stand on. Another LIE - Thomson did not have to pay anyone's legal costs other than his own.  He declined to proceed with the defamation case - there has been no award of costs against him. how can the courts award costs when he settled out of court to pay the costs? There was no settlement on costs - either way Just because you say it doesn't make it true

on the same hand, YOUR say-so doesnt mean anything either. Thomson initialted a foolish defamation suit and pulled it once he realised fairfax had PROOF. and since the NSW police have also said that it was true, he has no leg to stand on.

longweekend58 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 3:23pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 12:57pm: A hooker can remember individual "John's" from 7 years ago? FFS get some perspective. good point but if you were asked what is the morr believable claim - thomsons 'set up claim' or the hooker's memory, which is the more believable option? the hookers memory. That story is at least believable if a little unlikely. Thomsons claim however is unbelievable and utterly unlikely.

Have you read this? Seems to be more reasonable than you think.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1337824466

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 3:25pm:

longweekend58 wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 3:21pm: Dnarever wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 10:29am: cods wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 10:15am: precisely we know whats coming same old attack attack even when its shift attack at all costs and mozz has the hide to call righties boring a dull. funny how though they support him.. they dont have any evidence for that yet they demand evidence from anyone that just doesnt happen to believe him.. to my kind anyone that has at least one investigation into their behavior in this case more than ONE INVESTIGATION. has to say there is something rotton in the state of demark.otherwise why look.. and why look for 3.5. years.?? thats all I am saying. I wonder if these guys would give Milat the benefit of the doubt..?????? Everyone is entitled to the presumption of innocence - in serious violent cases the accused is held till it is determined. and her is the rub that you seem not to understand. Milat was considered innocent under the law until found guilty. That didnt stop the police or the magistrates from treating him as a guilty man. He was JAILED upon arrest. He was made to pay a very severe pentaly while still technically innocent. And why did that happen? BECAUSE HIS GUILT WAS OBVIOUS. the court was there simply to confirm that obvious truth. The same is true of Thomson. Technically innocent, it does not mean his innocence is an assumption that he can parade and play on. It is never as simple as it sounds. No. It wasnt because his guilt was obvious. It was because anyone charged with a crime like that violent or murder is held until its determined they are safe to let out or for a certain amount of hours (yeah I think its 48 hours and if nothing has turned up they have to let them go). It was the nature of this offense. He was still presumed innocent though legally. SOB

garbage. when arrested you go straight to the cells. police may decide to grant bail or the courts may decide to do so instead. either way, ARREST and CHARGED carries with it an implict declaration of guilt and often punished as such even without a court case.

The point is that some of you seem to think 'presumption of innocnce' is some kind of magic wand that keeps everyone away from any recknoing of their deeds. it has never been that way nor meant to be. you simplify it to ridiculous levels.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 3:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 3:23pm: Dsmithy70 wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 12:57pm: A hooker can remember individual "John's" from 7 years ago? FFS get some perspective. good point but if you were asked what is the morr believable claim - thomsons 'set up claim' or the hooker's memory, which is the more believable option? the hookers memory. That story is at least believable if a little unlikely. Thomsons claim however is unbelievable and utterly unlikely. Have you read this? Seems to be more reasonable than you think. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1337824466 SOB

Ive read it and it is an idiotic - almosty breathtakingly silly post. It contructs scenarios that are implausible simply to say that Thomson could be innocent. Not at any point in this ridiculous fantasy does it seek the simple or obvious conclusion. It is the very worst example of investigation. it starts with a conclusion and then works backs constructing an elaborate set of incidents to support it. And in true Thomson style, not a single elecment is supported by even a grain of truth. Fantasy all the way.

lol ACA are saying thomson's $770 dinner fee that he admits to, is actually a $770 bill that links to an escort service. Busted you fool.

Internat Immobiliare (on his CC bill) is actually an escort service in Sydney, to which, admitted by thomson, he was in sydney and spent the $770 on a dinner function.

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

progressiveslol wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:12pm:

lol ACA are saying thomson's $770 dinner fee that he admits to, is actually a $770 bill that links to an escort service. Busted you fool.

It's rare that a dinner bill that high has such neat rounding numbers

$770 has a nice ring of "paid for a hooker" to it

Quote:

Internat Immobiliare (on his CC bill) is actually an escort service in Sydney, to which, admitted by thomson, he was in sydney and spent the $770 on a dinner function.

Link....or it did not happen.

;)

Maqqa wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:14pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 7:12pm: lol ACA are saying thomson's $770 dinner fee that he admits to, is actually a $770 bill that links to an escort service. Busted you fool. It's rare that a dinner bill that high has such neat rounding numbers $770 has a nice ring of "paid for a hooker" to it

I would think that $770 is an equally odd number for that type of service as well.

Dnarever wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:24pm:

Maqqa wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 7:14pm: progressiveslol wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 7:12pm: lol ACA are saying thomson's $770 dinner fee that he admits to, is actually a $770 bill that links to an escort service. Busted you fool. It's rare that a dinner bill that high has such neat rounding numbers $770 has a nice ring of "paid for a hooker" to it I would think that $770 is an equally odd number for that type of service as well.

$700 + GST. seems rather round to me

Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:23pm:

Quote: Internat Immobiliare (on his CC bill) is actually an escort service in Sydney, to which, admitted by thomson, he was in sydney and spent the $770 on a dinner function. Link....or it did not happen. ;)

wheres the copy of your law degree and admission to the bar lying lawyer-wannabe?

longweekend58 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:26pm:

Dnarever wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 7:24pm: Maqqa wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 7:14pm: progressiveslol wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 7:12pm: lol ACA are saying thomson's $770 dinner fee that he admits to, is actually a $770 bill that links to an escort service. Busted you fool. It's rare that a dinner bill that high has such neat rounding numbers $770 has a nice ring of "paid for a hooker" to it I would think that $770 is an equally odd number for that type of service as well. $700 + GST. seems rather round to me

Is that for the $70 banquet for ten?

I hear its better than sex.

Dsmithy70 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 1:04pm:

Maqqa wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 1:00pm: Dsmithy70 wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 12:57pm: A hooker can remember individual "John's" from 7 years ago? FFS get some perspective. But if she can identify specific details of the place, events and personal markings of Thommo then he's cooked!!! You going the "mole on upper right-hand side of scrotum" angle Maqqa. Maybe Tone will demand he drop his pants when the house next sits.

Actually smithy, isn't PYNE in charge of "business" in da house?
That sort of job could be right up his alley. (No direction implied)

My law degree is not in question.  This is:


Quote:

Internat Immobiliare (on his CC bill) is actually an escort service in Sydney, to which, admitted by thomson, he was in sydney and spent the $770 on a dinner function.

Link, if you please.

:)

longweekend58 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 3:31pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 3:27pm: longweekend58 wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 3:23pm: Dsmithy70 wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 12:57pm: A hooker can remember individual "John's" from 7 years ago? FFS get some perspective. good point but if you were asked what is the morr believable claim - thomsons 'set up claim' or the hooker's memory, which is the more believable option? the hookers memory. That story is at least believable if a little unlikely. Thomsons claim however is unbelievable and utterly unlikely. Have you read this? Seems to be more reasonable than you think. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1337824466 SOB Ive read it and it is an idiotic - almosty breathtakingly silly post. It contructs scenarios that are implausible simply to say that Thomson could be innocent. Not at any point in this ridiculous fantasy does it seek the simple or obvious conclusion. It is the very worst example of investigation. it starts with a conclusion and then works backs constructing an elaborate set of incidents to support it. And in true Thomson style, not a single elecment is supported by even a grain of truth. Fantasy all the way.

Its not there to show he is innocent. Its there to show he *could* be innocent. Its possible.

SOB

Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:29pm:

My law degree is not in question.  This is: Quote: Internat Immobiliare (on his CC bill) is actually an escort service in Sydney, to which, admitted by thomson, he was in sydney and spent the $770 on a dinner function. Link, if you please. :)

your LAw Degree (or rather the unsubstantiated claim that you have one) is.

show it please. you are a liar.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:30pm:

longweekend58 wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 3:31pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 3:27pm: longweekend58 wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 3:23pm: Dsmithy70 wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 12:57pm: A hooker can remember individual "John's" from 7 years ago? FFS get some perspective. good point but if you were asked what is the morr believable claim - thomsons 'set up claim' or the hooker's memory, which is the more believable option? the hookers memory. That story is at least believable if a little unlikely. Thomsons claim however is unbelievable and utterly unlikely. Have you read this? Seems to be more reasonable than you think. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1337824466 SOB Ive read it and it is an idiotic - almosty breathtakingly silly post. It contructs scenarios that are implausible simply to say that Thomson could be innocent. Not at any point in this ridiculous fantasy does it seek the simple or obvious conclusion. It is the very worst example of investigation. it starts with a conclusion and then works backs constructing an elaborate set of incidents to support it. And in true Thomson style, not a single elecment is supported by even a grain of truth. Fantasy all the way. Its not there to show he is innocent. Its there to show he *could* be innocent. Its possible. SOB

you dod know that a non-critical belief in conspiracy theories without evidence is a sign of schizophrenia?

Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:29pm:

My law degree is not in question.  This is: Quote: Internat Immobiliare (on his CC bill) is actually an escort service in Sydney, to which, admitted by thomson, he was in sydney and spent the $770 on a dinner function. Link, if you please. :)

What link is that. Is that to satisfy you. Na, not today, maybe the day I give a shi.

BTW you will have to ask ACA as it is their allegation.

The link on which this was posted:


Quote:

....but as part of that finding they also say that THOMSON was there.

....or was that just a figment of imagination?

Quote:

your LAw Degree (or rather the unsubstantiated claim that you have one) is. show it please. you are a liar.

No will do Elde Fruit.  To do so would allow you to have my private information, and that is not gonna happen.

:)

First google result to show up. Bolt.

Just worse and worse.

Now A Current Affair says it has found another item in Craig Thomson’s expenses - $770 spent on May 7, 2005 - that is actually for a Sydney escort agency, Boardroom Escorts. The charge appears on bills as made out to the innocuous International Immobiliare.

A Current Affair says Thomson’s expenses, as detailed by Fair Work Australia, place him in Sydney on that day, using this credit card for other expenses. It claims to have interviewed the Boardroom Escorts prostitute, although she was not seen or quoted.

From the Fair Work report:

Internat Immobiliaire $770 - May 2005

587. The statement issued in relation to Mr Thomson’s CBA Mastercard for the period ending 27 May 2005 records an entry for a transaction on or about 7 May 2005 titled ‘Internat Immobiliare, Sydney Aus’ for $770. HSUNO.010.0073

588. No documents have been produced by the HSU to FWA evidencing that the transaction and the payment made in connection with ‘Internat Immobiliare’ of Sydney were authorised by the National Council and the National Executive…

590. Mr Thomson was asked by FWA to explain what the payment in connection with ‘Internet Immobiliar’ related to. He gave the following evidence about the matter (Thomson PN 1334):


I’m not a hundred per cent sure we did have a national executive meeting in Fremantle, but I don’t particularly know. I’m not sure what ‘Internet Immobiliaire ‘ is in Sydney on 7 May.

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/thomson_accused_of_paying_another_prostitute_with_hsu_money/

Seems like their rates are pretty high. $700 in 2005 would seem about right.

http://www.boardroomescorts.com.au/sydney-escort-rates/

Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:49pm:

The link on which this was posted: Quote: ....but as part of that finding they also say that THOMSON was there. ....or was that just a figment of imagination?

Where was thomson?

Is this like where's wally?

I did not ask where Thomson was. I asked for the link which supports this:


Quote:

but as part of that finding they also say that THOMSON was there.

Link please?

Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 8:09pm:

I did not ask where Thomson was. I asked for the link which supports this: Quote: but as part of that finding they also say that THOMSON was there. Link please?

Sorry not trying to confuse but it was me asking where he was, I don't know where either he was or the link is.

Maybe one would answer the other, who knows.

New information from Herald Sun

A MYSTERY payment to a company that Craig Thomson claims was incidental to the running of his union shares the name of a company set up by a Sydney sex industry kingpin, the Herald Sun has found.

Mr Thomson has always claimed the other brothel transactions listed in his name were frauds, but he has admitted to making a $770 payment to Internat Immobiliare.

Mr Thomson told FWA investigators he did not know what the payment related to but his lawyers argued the payment was "was incidental to the general administration of the HSU and that expenditure did not require the approval of the national executive or the national council''.

But the Herald Sun can reveal that a company called International Immobilaire was established by Sydney sex industry kingpin Graeme George Edwards in October 2003.

Mr Edwards ran the Boardroom Escort Agency and once described himself as "the biggest player in Australia's sex industry''.


The Boardroom is the escort agency where a former prostitute, who has been interviewed by A Current Affair, worked.

The payment to Internat Immobiliare was at the same time the woman claims she encountered Mr Thomson.

ACA also reported that International Immobiliare was a holding company set up to take payments on behalf of the Boardroom.

International Immobilaire was deregistered in 2008 after Mr Edwards was charged over the alleged abduction of one of his brothel managers.

The charges were eventually dropped and Mr Edwards moved to New Zealand where he opened a Mexican restaurant.

Mr Thomson today declined to answer a series of specific questions about the Immobilaire transaction.

"I have done nothing wrong and I refer you to my statement I made in Parliament on Monday.  I further understand ACA are not at this stage broadcasting anything related to the woman on legal advice,'' he said.

The Herald Sun can also reveal that police have been told to look into whether Mr Thomson used American Express cards on escorts.

Detectives with Strikeforce Carnarvon in NSW are believed to have referred to Victoria Police fraud squad detectives information about an American Express card allegedly linked to Thomson.

Sex industry sources in Victoria have told police to look into Thomson's use of that card, not only the Diners Club card and MasterCard records checked by Fair Work Australia.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/sex-boss-had-similarly-named-company/story-fn7x8me2-1226366140209

Highlighted is also interesting. Another card to look for escort agencies that are hidden behind different names?

How would a prostitute remember any individual man's dick? What an absurd and preposterous claim.

Aussie wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:29pm:

My law degree is not in question.

Well, actually it is. You are trying to claim, by a carefully cultivated innuendo, a more authoritative understanding of these matters because of obliquely hinted-at legal qualification, whereas there is nil evidence in your posts that you have any such legal quals. 

You can express whatever opinion you have, of course, but your posts have not shown any evidence of any legal training.

More from the Telegraph

Escort's claims could sink MP Craig Thomson


THE woman at the centre of the latest Craig Thomson scandal works in the thoroughbred industry in northern NSW.

The Daily Telegraph can reveal the woman, originally from New Zealand, lives at Cabarita Beach after previously working in Sydney as an escort with Boardroom Escorts.

Now in her 30s, she left the sex industry and moved north to Murwillumbah, where she worked at horse stables as a strapper before her NSW Racing registration expired in October last year.

The woman has been taken to an overseas location after Channel 9's A Current Affair offered her $60,000 to speak about her alleged encounters with the Dobell MP.

Meanwhile, police are investigating fresh claims Mr Thomson used a third credit card - supplied by a contractor - to pay for prostitutes.



http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/sydney-news/escorts-claims-could-sink-mp-craig-thomson/story-fn7q4q9f-1226366166474

Escort's claims could sink MP Craig Thomson
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/sydney-news/escorts-claims-could-sink-mp-craig-thomson/story-fn7q4q9f-1226366166474
Results: Poll

Do you believe Craig Thomson?

Yes   5.36% (1387 votes)
No   94.64% (24497 votes)

cods wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 8:49pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:21pm: It could be any hooker deciding to get some fame. And maybe some money. SOB I am sure THOMO already has his answer to that one...ha.ha.ha.. he has turned this into a circus  does he really think he can point fingers and have no one retaliate.he is mad.. why didnt his wife stop him.. this whole thing was so  rehearsed it was like watching an episode of Law and Order.. apart from the rusted on I havent sen one person thats taken it seriously...that is if you dont count the independents..hahahahaha.. nope it isnt funny I am over it.. either charge him or let him go.. I am not sure I am ready to hear the hookers version of this...

At it again Cods.   Just be fair.  THOMSON ? turned it into a circus??? ::) ::) Give it over Cods. Thats as pure a line of blindness as any other I have seen from you to date.!

What do you know?? hmm, that the actual appointed investigators don't.?  Be honest, .... you know nothing about it, you just have a prejudicial opinion of any person who is not a Lib . 
And THAT is obvious.!!
But its not up to you.. or me... or PP or the other morons.

You are OVER IT.  ?? Bored  with the tar and feathers???  Lucky you.  Thomson doesn't have that option... and I wish all the moron libs and media who haven't got anything better to do were ALSO. OVER IT!!

What a deceitful distraction from the real today this has become, and what an apparent avenue for attack by the pitiful Abbott.  Had to laugh  tonight at question time.
Again he showed his puerility in the face of real issues.
What an f'in failure.. ;D.... Gillard wiped the floor with him,,  and so she should. He is so far outside of what is GOOD for Aus its incredible to me people still listen to him.
He is  without weight, without credibility, and projects an aura of desperation.

I LOVE THAT.!!!!!!!!




"I am not sure I am ready to hear the hookers version of this".....   why is that???
She's probably done plenty of libs in her time.
Assuming it is anything other than a typical embarrassing ACA deflection of truth and a foul smell.
Haven't watched it for decades.!!! It is crap.!!!

I wish they would sort this out in court and be done with it. Even though there are a lot of inconsistencies in Craig Thomson's story, somehow I think that if you paid a prostitute $60,000, she would bugger anybody you chose - or their life at least.  The term "credible witness" doesn't immediately spring to mind, but it would certainly make for a good story with $60,000 worth of embellishments. You could even get a professional script writer and some acting lessons thrown in for that price. 

However if Craig Thomson is really innocent and has any integrity whatsoever, he should be taking legal action against Channel 9.

muso wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 4:18am:

I wish they would sort this out in court and be done with it. Even though there are a lot of inconsistencies in Craig Thomson's story, somehow I think that if you paid a prostitute $60,000, she would bugger anybody you chose - or their life at least.  The term "credible witness" doesn't immediately spring to mind, but it would certainly make for a good story with $60,000 worth of embellishments. You could even get a professional script writer and some acting lessons thrown in for that price.  However if Craig Thomson is really innocent and has any integrity whatsoever, he should be taking legal action against Channel 9.

It is almost useless using her now we know what we know. Do we really need to confirm it was thomson now. We know he spent the $770 on a dinner function *cough cough*

He has lied in parliament with this little nugget.

longweekend58 wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:33pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 7:30pm: longweekend58 wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 3:31pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 3:27pm: longweekend58 wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 3:23pm: Dsmithy70 wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 12:57pm: A hooker can remember individual "John's" from 7 years ago? FFS get some perspective. good point but if you were asked what is the morr believable claim - thomsons 'set up claim' or the hooker's memory, which is the more believable option? the hookers memory. That story is at least believable if a little unlikely. Thomsons claim however is unbelievable and utterly unlikely. Have you read this? Seems to be more reasonable than you think. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1337824466 SOB Ive read it and it is an idiotic - almosty breathtakingly silly post. It contructs scenarios that are implausible simply to say that Thomson could be innocent. Not at any point in this ridiculous fantasy does it seek the simple or obvious conclusion. It is the very worst example of investigation. it starts with a conclusion and then works backs constructing an elaborate set of incidents to support it. And in true Thomson style, not a single elecment is supported by even a grain of truth. Fantasy all the way. Its not there to show he is innocent. Its there to show he *could* be innocent. Its possible. SOB you dod know that a non-critical belief in conspiracy theories without evidence is a sign of schizophrenia?

Nope you are wrong.

SOB

Soren wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 11:28pm:

Aussie wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 7:29pm: My law degree is not in question.  Well, actually it is. You are trying to claim, by a carefully cultivated innuendo, a more authoritative understanding of these matters because of obliquely hinted-at legal qualification, whereas there is nil evidence in your posts that you have any such legal quals.  You can express whatever opinion you have, of course, but your posts have not shown any evidence of any legal training.

My dad was a lawyer (mainly solicitor) and Aussie seems to use the same information retrieval systems. Also same jargon.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 6:44am:

Soren wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 11:28pm: Aussie wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 7:29pm: My law degree is not in question.  Well, actually it is. You are trying to claim, by a carefully cultivated innuendo, a more authoritative understanding of these matters because of obliquely hinted-at legal qualification, whereas there is nil evidence in your posts that you have any such legal quals.  You can express whatever opinion you have, of course, but your posts have not shown any evidence of any legal training. My dad was a lawyer (mainly solicitor) and Aussie seems to use the same information retrieval systems. Also same jargon. SOB

Well that explains why Gillard uses the same information retrieval systems and jargon as a clown.

Emma wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 2:00am:

cods wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 8:49pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 23rd, 2012 at 6:21pm: It could be any hooker deciding to get some fame. And maybe some money. SOB I am sure THOMO already has his answer to that one...ha.ha.ha.. he has turned this into a circus  does he really think he can point fingers and have no one retaliate.he is mad.. why didnt his wife stop him.. this whole thing was so  rehearsed it was like watching an episode of Law and Order.. apart from the rusted on I havent sen one person thats taken it seriously...that is if you dont count the independents..hahahahaha.. nope it isnt funny I am over it.. either charge him or let him go.. I am not sure I am ready to hear the hookers version of this... At it again Cods.   Just be fair.  THOMSON ? turned it into a circus??? ::) ::) Give it over Cods. Thats as pure a line of blindness as any other I have seen from you to date.! What do you know?? hmm, that the actual appointed investigators don't.?  Be honest, .... you know nothing about it, you just have a prejudicial opinion of any person who is not a Lib .  And THAT is obvious.!! But its not up to you.. or me... or PP or the other morons. You are OVER IT.  ?? Bored  with the tar and feathers???  Lucky you.  Thomson doesn't have that option... and I wish all the moron libs and media who haven't got anything better to do were ALSO. OVER IT!! What a deceitful distraction from the real today this has become, and what an apparent avenue for attack by the pitiful Abbott.  Had to laugh  tonight at question time. Again he showed his puerility in the face of real issues. What an f'in failure.. ;D.... Gillard wiped the floor with him,,  and so she should. He is so far outside of what is GOOD for Aus its incredible to me people still listen to him. He is  without weight, without credibility, and projects an aura of desperation. I LOVE THAT.!!!!!!!! "I am not sure I am ready to hear the hookers version of this".....   why is that??? She's probably done plenty of libs in her time. Assuming it is anything other than a typical embarrassing ACA deflection of truth and a foul smell. Haven't watched it for decades.!!! It is crap.!!!

Thomson could've ended this years ago if he'd just taken it like a man and confessed. But noooooo, he's dragged it out and dragged his wife through it with him - along with the Labor Party. These are the actions of an extremely selfish individual.

progressiveslol wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 6:46am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 25th, 2012 at 6:44am: Soren wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 11:28pm: Aussie wrote on May 24th, 2012 at 7:29pm: My law degree is not in question.  Well, actually it is. You are trying to claim, by a carefully cultivated innuendo, a more authoritative understanding of these matters because of obliquely hinted-at legal qualification, whereas there is nil evidence in your posts that you have any such legal quals.  You can express whatever opinion you have, of course, but your posts have not shown any evidence of any legal training. My dad was a lawyer (mainly solicitor) and Aussie seems to use the same information retrieval systems. Also same jargon. SOB Well that explains why Gillard uses the same information retrieval systems and jargon as a clown.

That's disrespectful to clowns. She's just an idiot, and a very selfish one at that.

muso wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 4:18am:

I wish they would sort this out in court and be done with it. Even though there are a lot of inconsistencies in Craig Thomson's story, somehow I think that if you paid a prostitute $60,000, she would bugger anybody you chose - or their life at least.  The term "credible witness" doesn't immediately spring to mind, but it would certainly make for a good story with $60,000 worth of embellishments. You could even get a professional script writer and some acting lessons thrown in for that price.  However if Craig Thomson is really innocent and has any integrity whatsoever, he should be taking legal action against Channel 9.

The problem with a less-than-credible hooker telling her story is that it is still more credible than Thomsons story. if nothing else, it is an indcation of just how poorly he is believed that a paid-for-whore has more beleivability.

The problem with a less-than-credible hooker telling her story is that it is still more credible than Thomsons story. if nothing else, it is an indcation of just how poorly he is believed that a paid-for-whore has more beleivability.



All hookers are not less-than-credible. Having had some contact in the industry (no I haven't worked as a hooker) Of the three women I know  that worked as escorts, two were RNs and one was going to Uni and now is a psychotherapist.

They had drug and health test every three months.

angeleyes wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 8:49am:

The problem with a less-than-credible hooker telling her story is that it is still more credible than Thomsons story. if nothing else, it is an indcation of just how poorly he is believed that a paid-for-whore has more beleivability. All hookers are not less-than-credible. Having had some contact in the industry (no I haven't worked as a hooker) Of the three women I know  that worked as escorts, two were RNs and one was going to Uni and now is a psychotherapist. They had drug and health test every three months.

fopr every one you find working thru uni there are 10 working their way thru drug addiction. The word of a hooker will always be less-than-credible and perhaps unfairly so but it remains that way.

Quote:

Well that explains why Gillard uses the same information retrieval systems and jargon as a clown.

Quote:

That's disrespectful to clowns. She's just an idiot, and a very selfish one at that.

Ok. So all semblance of discussion is now gone and its just a gillard bash.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 9:27am:

Quote: Well that explains why Gillard uses the same information retrieval systems and jargon as a clown. [quote]That's disrespectful to clowns. She's just an idiot, and a very selfish one at that.

Ok. So all semblance of discussion is now gone and its just a gillard bash.

SOB[/quote]

She is as much at fault as Thomson. eh was told in 2010 not to let him stand again becaus of his past. and since it all blew up she has repeatedly refused to make him  come to account for his actions. Even now, she is doing nothing to end this charade.

its all gillards fault

angeleyes wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 8:49am:

The problem with a less-than-credible hooker telling her story is that it is still more credible than Thomsons story. if nothing else, it is an indcation of just how poorly he is believed that a paid-for-whore has more beleivability. All hookers are not less-than-credible. Having had some contact in the industry (no I haven't worked as a hooker) Of the three women I know  that worked as escorts, two were RNs and one was going to Uni and now is a psychotherapist. They had drug and health test every three months.

She has signed a statutory declaration and can go to prison if she is found to have lied. I hardly think she would risk her freedom over a pig like Thomson. Also, she has NOT been paid yet. That will not happen until (if) the story goes to air.

Quote:

That will not happen until (if) the story goes to air.

She gets paid.  The story has well and truly gone to air.

Can you credibly explain why you posted this:


Quote:

I hardly think she would risk her freedom over a pig like Thomson.

A pig?

longweekend58 wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 9:38am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 25th, 2012 at 9:27am: Quote: Well that explains why Gillard uses the same information retrieval systems and jargon as a clown. [quote]That's disrespectful to clowns. She's just an idiot, and a very selfish one at that. Ok. So all semblance of discussion is now gone and its just a gillard bash. SOB

She is as much at fault as Thomson. eh was told in 2010 not to let him stand again becaus of his past. and since it all blew up she has repeatedly refused to make him  come to account for his actions. Even now, she is doing nothing to end this charade.[/quote]

It is not up to her, it's up to the branch.

Just like preselecting Slipper was an idiotic and questionable move, why don't the Libs ever mention that one? To be fair, it's not Abbott to blame, it's the local branch up here (I am from his electorate).

now we have Armpit and Longy and ///? that other dude. ::) ::)

None of your  posts have validity. you have no objectivity.

Must say I'm pleased to hear that the AFP have obtained evidence of threats made against Mr Thomson, ... and -  even more happy to hear that Abbott's  disgustingly false 'so-called' sympathy speech today, saying 'what he did' is also being investigated by the AFP. It was NOT ACCEPTABLE.  Youu want THIS person to lead our Country.??? ::) :o :o

Just face it people, this whole thing has been orchestrated in a blatant attempt to reduce Labor's numbers  in our minority government.
Really, its the sort of thing you'd might expect to hear in an African nation,... and not like it.

Now we have it too.
To hear the rhetoric coming out of the mouths of these (indescribable) pollies will perhaps, at last, help some aussies to understand why we are a 3rd world country, in many respects,...

I consider it a tragedy for Australia that this  (indescribable) person holds such sway, and hope the mouthy morons prove to be just a noisy gaggle,  a lunatic impulse,  that will die out, as it should, and soon. Sooner the better.!!

Emma wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 10:17pm:

now we have Armpit and Longy and ///? that other dude. ::) ::) None of your  posts have validity. you have no objectivity. Must say I'm pleased to hear that the AFP have obtained evidence of threats made against Mr Thomson, ... and -  even more happy to hear that Abbott's  disgustingly false 'so-called' sympathy speech today, saying 'what he did' is also being investigated by the AFP. It was NOT ACCEPTABLE.  Youu want THIS person to lead our Country.??? ::) :o :o Just face it people, this whole thing has been orchestrated in a blatant attempt to reduce Labor's numbers  in our minority government. Really, its the sort of thing you'd might expect to hear in an African nation,... and not like it. Now we have it too. To hear the rhetoric coming out of the mouths of these (indescribable) pollies will perhaps, at last, help some aussies to understand why we are a 3rd world country, in many respects,... I consider it a tragedy for Australia that this  (indescribable) person holds such sway, and hope the mouthy morons prove to be just a noisy gaggle,  a lunatic impulse,  that will die out, as it should, and soon. Sooner the better.!!

Should be good to see charges laid and people go to gaol for threatening thomson. hould look a little like the gillard non-credible scientists with death threats, which BTW getup are still trotting out as if true..

As for Tony Abbott, nothing will come of it. Rightly so.

Will phony Tony stand down while the Federal police investigate him?

The ALP is reduced to playing the victim and begging for sympathy while they wait for the day of execution...

skippy. wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 10:32pm:

Will phony Tony stand down while the Federal police investigate him?

We shall see after a period of 3 and a half years. By then, some findings of some sort may have been found. Come back and ask after that point in time.

I cant wait for Abbot  to form Government, he knows he has to go after corporate welfare and owes his election to people like me who fight the Global Corporate Maggot day in and day out.

skippy. wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 10:32pm:

Will phony Tony stand down while the Federal police investigate him?

NO he won't, and in truth nor should he,... ANY MORE than Thomson should.


As for Tony Abbott, nothing will come of it. Rightly so. - Quote PL
So proglol is another with an inside line eh?..Don't make me laugh, my ribs are sore enough already.!! ;D

Let's see what she says. I don't think that Thomson is facing anywhere near of what he actually deserves. Good on the hooker for coming forward.

Why do the left seem to be ignoring the fact that Thomson is not facing allegations, he is facing FINDINGS, concluded after an almost 4 year investigation??

Aussie wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 9:12pm:

Quote: That will not happen until (if) the story goes to air. She gets paid.  The story has well and truly gone to air. Can you credibly explain why you posted this: [quote]I hardly think she would risk her freedom over a pig like Thomson.

A pig?[/quote]

The story has well and truly gone to air.   

What rubbish. 
Of course I wouldn't watch ACA if you paid me, so maybe it was on tonight.?!??
I doubt it has, and I doubt it ever will. Please correct me if this sex-worker is anything other than just  another machination in this whole tawdry scheme.

matty wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 10:53pm:

Let's see what she says. I don't think that Thomson is facing anywhere near of what he actually deserves. Good on the hooker for coming forward.

Ahhhh... Matty.!!

So from your post I must assume 'she' hasn't actually come forward.

Good on the hooker for coming forward.

Gawd what a laugh. :)  So 'she' has come forward, -- I haven't heard anything about that.  Just the garbage that usually gets used to promote ACA.

Where was this???
::) ::)

Puppet.

Emma wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 11:04pm:

matty wrote on May 25th, 2012 at 10:53pm: Let's see what she says. I don't think that Thomson is facing anywhere near of what he actually deserves. Good on the hooker for coming forward. Ahhhh... Matty.!! So from your post I must assume 'she' hasn't actually come forward. Good on the hooker for coming forward. Gawd what a laugh. :)  So 'she' has come forward, -- I haven't heard anything about that.  Just the garbage that usually gets used to promote ACA. Where was this??? ::) ::) Puppet.

The interview will be on ACA on Monday night. Just another nail in the coffin of this corrupt, arrogant and Communist Green/Labor coalition.

If she signed a Stat Dec - can Thomson sue her for defamation?

Maqqa wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 11:53pm:

If she signed a Stat Dec - can Thomson sue her for defamation?

I think so, Maqqa. ACA has made it clear that he told yet another lie. Let's see if he has the guts to say what he did in Parliament, out in the open, and not under the protection of Parliamentary Privilege.

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 9:03pm:

[quote author=4F40494B424B574B5D2E0 link=1337760143/100#100 date=1337899795][highlight] She has signed a statutory declaration and can go to prison if she is found to have lied. I hardly think she would risk her freedom.............

Oh ??? 
What a w--ker.  where do you live?  in LaLaLand?? If I'm quoting someone other than Armpit ::)it doesn't matter.

This alleged person risks her life evryday......for $60.000 ??..... piece of piss.!!!!!

It's blatantly obvious that the hooker is telling the truth, but the lefties continue to claim that he's innocent, and live in different universe. So much for social justice, right?

matty wrote on May 26^th, 2012 at 12:42am:

Maqqa wrote on May 25th, 2012 at 11:53pm: If she signed a Stat Dec - can Thomson sue her for defamation? I think so, Maqqa. ACA has made it clear that he told yet another lie. Let's see if he has the guts to say what he did in Parliament, out in the open, and not under the protection of Parliamentary Privilege.

You'd think so would you Matty ??
ACA has made it clear that he told yet another lie.

You are ludicrous.!!  This is ponderous, realllly ponderous.!!!

ACA??? has made it clear..... ??  You have to be a child Matty.  If you are older than 20 I'd be astonished.!! You are informed by ACA???

You believe this out of some desperate need... just what that is I'd not want to know, but you and your dogma and ignorance are just too harmful to ignore, and your desire to add to the poison is lamentable.
I'd say, if YOU ever faced such a concerted attack by so many, right or wrong, and occupied a public position.... that you would fall far below the standards and courage the statements made by Mr Thomson in Parliament showed.++
 
Personally, I think this is a much bigger issue than what Mr Thomson DID or DID NOT do.

This particular bit of pollie nastiness shows just how low the Abbott Brigade has fallen,  and just how many gullible fearful people he has dragged into the abyss with him.

WHY ?? Reasonably, in any normal period of time, these allegations would not be the number one News item. 
The fact that Abbott is trying to topple the government with his malicious and manipulative tactics seems to have escaped you. 

OH right hang on.... thats the way you think our country should operate. All the time.
OUTSIDE of LAW.
Actually, this should make many people happy, this discord.  Anarchists and the like. You know?
Only beware, what you wish for may come true.
8-)

matty wrote on May 26^th, 2012 at 12:48am:

It's blatantly obvious that the hooker is telling the truth, but the lefties continue to claim that he's innocent, and live in different universe. So much for social justice, right?

Sorry must have missed something.!!

So the woman in question HAS been aired on ACA nationwide?? Or somewhere else???
Must have surely, if you can say.......It's blatantly obvious that the hooker is telling the truth....

Can you validate this??
Where have you heard or read this??? :)

skippy. wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 10:32pm:

Will phony Tony stand down while the Federal police investigate him?

Investigate him for what? Albanese twisting his words into a completely different sentence?

corporate_whitey wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 10:39pm:

The ALP is reduced to playing the victim and begging for sympathy while they wait for the day of execution...

I dont usually bother with whitey   I am worried he is making sense...


the devil made him do it... it was nothing to do with him...

I think the devils name was Abbott..

and he slunk into the HSU when St THOMOs back was turned..and set out to get him..

with hookers.. no less..

not even trannies. or gays..just plain old fashioned hookers...terrifying..


a brighter person would ,have just paid the $6000 and said it was all a mistake..

but a dickhead decides to sue FAIRFAX.

ho hum!!!!

Was the hooker on TV? Did I miss it?

SOB

matty wrote on May 26^th, 2012 at 12:42am:

Maqqa wrote on May 25th, 2012 at 11:53pm: If she signed a Stat Dec - can Thomson sue her for defamation? I think so, Maqqa. ACA has made it clear that he told yet another lie. Let's see if he has the guts to say what he did in Parliament, out in the open, and not under the protection of Parliamentary Privilege.

If so then you'd think the hooker would would either have nothing to lose (other than the $60K) or she would have ACA's lawyers protecting her

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 26^th, 2012 at 8:49am:

Was the hooker on TV? Did I miss it? SOB

not yet...she isnt a hooker anymore I read.. this was a few years back..

so she is pretty brave to come out now..

it could air next week.. I think

matty wrote on May 26^th, 2012 at 12:48am:

It's blatantly obvious that the hooker is telling the truth, but the lefties continue to claim that he's innocent, and live in different universe. So much for social justice, right?

Matty, stop masturbating. And if you must then please keep your putrid fantasies to yourself.

Emma wrote on May 26^th, 2012 at 1:12am:

matty wrote on May 26th, 2012 at 12:48am: It's blatantly obvious that the hooker is telling the truth, but the lefties continue to claim that he's innocent, and live in different universe. So much for social justice, right? Sorry must have missed something.!! So the woman in question HAS been aired on ACA nationwide?? Or somewhere else??? Must have surely, if you can say.......It's blatantly obvious that the hooker is telling the truth.... Can you validate this?? Where have you heard or read this??? :)

Okay, jalane, you take the word of a proven liar over someone who has signed a stat dec.

Gist wrote on May 26^th, 2012 at 2:43pm:

matty wrote on May 26th, 2012 at 12:48am: It's blatantly obvious that the hooker is telling the truth, but the lefties continue to claim that he's innocent, and live in different universe. So much for social justice, right? Matty, stop masturbating. And if you must then please keep your putrid fantasies to yourself.

I'm not going to respond to you anymore when you post disgusting and vile things like this. How old are you?

Hey Thompson you Maggot... :-X
http://thebsreport.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/hanging_noose_310.jpg
Go ahead, make my day... :-*

corporate_whitey wrote on May 26^th, 2012 at 4:43pm:

Hey Thompson you Maggot... :-X http://thebsreport.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/hanging_noose_310.jpg Go ahead, make my day... :-*

Whitey showing his Christian spirit.

MOTR wrote on May 26^th, 2012 at 4:58pm:

corporate_whitey wrote on May 26th, 2012 at 4:43pm: Hey Thompson you Maggot... :-X http://thebsreport.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/hanging_noose_310.jpg Go ahead, make my day... :-* Whitey showing his Christian spirit.

TERRIBLE i agree but dont recall him ever claiming to be a CHRISTIAN>

MOTR wrote on May 26^th, 2012 at 4:58pm:

corporate_whitey wrote on May 26th, 2012 at 4:43pm: Hey Thompson you Maggot... :-X http://thebsreport.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/hanging_noose_310.jpg Go ahead, make my day... :-* Whitey showing his Christian spirit.

Whitey showing his progressive spirit

As far as Whitey is concerned Thomson can't start burning fast enough.

Whitey wants to lend Thommo his own personal noose..I think that rather generous of him.

matty wrote on May 26^th, 2012 at 12:48am:

It's blatantly obvious that the hooker is telling the truth, but the lefties continue to claim that he's innocent, and live in different universe. So much for social justice, right?

Exactly, Matty, even if she was lying, she would be telling the truth. That's something these lefties just don't understand.

Karnal wrote on May 26^th, 2012 at 6:28pm:

matty wrote on May 26th, 2012 at 12:48am: It's blatantly obvious that the hooker is telling the truth, but the lefties continue to claim that he's innocent, and live in different universe. So much for social justice, right? Exactly, Matty, even if she was lying, she would be telling the truth. That's something these lefties just don't understand.

Yes she could be the waitress who served the $770 dinner in the whore house with no kitchen.

Hey Maggot Man

You're so sincere you don't even know how to spell his name.!!
:) ;D ;D

MOTR wrote on May 26^th, 2012 at 5:04pm:

As far as Whitey is concerned Thomson can't start burning fast enough.

so whats that got to do with him being a christian...for all you know he could be a Muslim.

cods wrote on May 27^th, 2012 at 10:48am:

MOTR wrote on May 26th, 2012 at 5:04pm: As far as Whitey is concerned Thomson can't start burning fast enough. so whats that got to do with him being a christian...for all you know he could be a Muslim.

He claims to be a Christian, one of the select.

progressiveslol wrote on May 26^th, 2012 at 6:34pm:

Karnal wrote on May 26th, 2012 at 6:28pm: matty wrote on May 26th, 2012 at 12:48am: It's blatantly obvious that the hooker is telling the truth, but the lefties continue to claim that he's innocent, and live in different universe. So much for social justice, right? Exactly, Matty, even if she was lying, she would be telling the truth. That's something these lefties just don't understand. Yes she could be the waitress who served the $770 dinner in the whore house with no kitchen.

the lefties continue to claim that he's innocent,

Not sure any Lefty is saying that.

Exactly, Yes

Still nobody is saying that - but a conga line of support for a statment which is incorrect is interesting.

the whore house with no kitchen

I am not sure what you being so intimately conversant with whore house facilities means or is it only one particular whore house.

Anyone else find the noose to be in poor taste and offensive?

MOTR wrote on May 27^th, 2012 at 10:58am:

cods wrote on May 27th, 2012 at 10:48am: MOTR wrote on May 26th, 2012 at 5:04pm: As far as Whitey is concerned Thomson can't start burning fast enough. so whats that got to do with him being a christian...for all you know he could be a Muslim. He claims to be a Christian, one of the select.

where has he done that?... I have never seen him claim anything just rant against everything

Dnarever wrote on May 27^th, 2012 at 12:26pm:

Anyone else find the noose to be in poor taste and offensive?

I have said my piece on that.. its terrible and should have been removed by now..

cods wrote on May 27^th, 2012 at 12:26pm:

MOTR wrote on May 27th, 2012 at 10:58am: cods wrote on May 27th, 2012 at 10:48am: MOTR wrote on May 26th, 2012 at 5:04pm: As far as Whitey is concerned Thomson can't start burning fast enough. so whats that got to do with him being a christian...for all you know he could be a Muslim. He claims to be a Christian, one of the select. where has he done that?... I have never seen him claim anything just rant against everything

If the search function worked I'd find it for you. He was going through a phase where everyone was going to burn and only the chosen few would make it to the kingdom of heaven. Seems he is not much of a sharer our Whitey.

cods wrote on May 27^th, 2012 at 12:28pm:

Dnarever wrote on May 27th, 2012 at 12:26pm: Anyone else find the noose to be in poor taste and offensive? I have said my piece on that.. its terrible and should have been removed by now..

If I was modding, I'd leave it there as a mark of disgrace on the Poster.

The noose is offensive but should not be removed. It says more about the person who posted it than we could ever say about him.

Peter Freedman wrote on May 27^th, 2012 at 4:38pm:

The noose is offensive but should not be removed. It says more about the person who posted it than we could ever say about him.

whitey has a problem I think everyone realizes that.his abuse of everyone and everything..say s everything...

however in this case a noose for someone..who is under threat is in appalling taste.

Still nothing from ACA.  I reckon this has been a dud, and ACA has surrendered.

Aussie wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:47pm:

Still nothing from ACA.  I reckon this has been a dud, and ACA has surrendered.

todays news ACA have handed it over to the police..


I dont think they are allowed to show it.. THOMO probably had it stopped which is his right.

How & what right are you talking about?

cods wrote on May 31^st, 2012 at 8:18am:

Aussie wrote on May 30th, 2012 at 6:47pm: Still nothing from ACA.  I reckon this has been a dud, and ACA has surrendered. todays news ACA have handed it over to the police.. I dont think they are allowed to show it.. THOMO probably had it stopped which is his right.

I think it may have more to do with the barrage or criticism they got over their last Thomson attack. They realise that they will only hurt their programs reputation and credibility.

Dnarever wrote on May 31^st, 2012 at 10:28am:

cods wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 8:18am: Aussie wrote on May 30th, 2012 at 6:47pm: Still nothing from ACA.  I reckon this has been a dud, and ACA has surrendered. todays news ACA have handed it over to the police.. I dont think they are allowed to show it.. THOMO probably had it stopped which is his right. I think it may have more to do with the barrage or criticism they got over their last Thomson attack. They realise that they will only hurt their programs reputation and credibility.

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Dnarever wrote on May 31^st, 2012 at 10:28am:

cods wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 8:18am: Aussie wrote on May 30th, 2012 at 6:47pm: Still nothing from ACA.  I reckon this has been a dud, and ACA has surrendered. todays news ACA have handed it over to the police.. I dont think they are allowed to show it.. THOMO probably had it stopped which is his right. I think it may have more to do with the barrage or criticism they got over their last Thomson attack. They realise that they will only hurt their programs reputation and credibility.

what was that about?????.can you be more specific??


thinking about that... so far I havent seen one program come out in support of him  has any program or journo...made any attempt to claim like he claims



HE HAS DONE NOTHING WRONG?

i DID SEE PARTLY THE Oakes interview..was he for or against??

cods wrote on May 31^st, 2012 at 8:18am:

Aussie wrote on May 30th, 2012 at 6:47pm: Still nothing from ACA.  I reckon this has been a dud, and ACA has surrendered. todays news ACA have handed it over to the police.. I dont think they are allowed to show it.. THOMO probably had it stopped which is his right.

If Thomson had it 'stopped' the other Media outlets would have been all over it.  Nah....silence.

ACA had their promotion at Thomson's expense, as is the way of all these days.

Aussie wrote on May 31^st, 2012 at 4:54pm:

cods wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 8:18am: Aussie wrote on May 30th, 2012 at 6:47pm: Still nothing from ACA.  I reckon this has been a dud, and ACA has surrendered. todays news ACA have handed it over to the police.. I dont think they are allowed to show it.. THOMO probably had it stopped which is his right. If Thomson had it 'stopped' the other Media outlets would have been all over it.  Nah....silence. ACA had their promotion at Thomson's expense, as is the way of all these days.

well you dont have to believe or watch. as I am sure they dont pay you too..

however they have handed it over to the police..

we can let them decide if she the hooker is a liar or THOMO is.

I am sure THOMO and the ALP are delighted with your support keep up the good work they need all the help they can get!

cods wrote on May 31^st, 2012 at 3:05pm:

Dnarever wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 10:28am: cods wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 8:18am: Aussie wrote on May 30th, 2012 at 6:47pm: Still nothing from ACA.  I reckon this has been a dud, and ACA has surrendered. todays news ACA have handed it over to the police.. I dont think they are allowed to show it.. THOMO probably had it stopped which is his right. I think it may have more to do with the barrage or criticism they got over their last Thomson attack. They realise that they will only hurt their programs reputation and credibility. what was that about?????.can you be more specific?? thinking about that... so far I havent seen one program come out in support of him  has any program or journo...made any attempt to claim like he claims HE HAS DONE NOTHING WRONG? i DID SEE PARTLY THE Oakes interview..was he for or against??

If you look at the ACA web site you will find about 180 comments on the story around 50% calling it gutter journalism and committing to not watch ACA again.

This is not really about guilt or innocence any more but about enough is enough. We have authorities who make the decision and not either the media or opposition.

I suspect that the numbers clearly show ACA that if the pursue this topic it will impact their ratings in a manner they would not like.

Dnarever wrote on May 31^st, 2012 at 6:44pm:

cods wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 3:05pm: Dnarever wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 10:28am: cods wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 8:18am: Aussie wrote on May 30th, 2012 at 6:47pm: Still nothing from ACA.  I reckon this has been a dud, and ACA has surrendered. todays news ACA have handed it over to the police.. I dont think they are allowed to show it.. THOMO probably had it stopped which is his right. I think it may have more to do with the barrage or criticism they got over their last Thomson attack. They realise that they will only hurt their programs reputation and credibility. what was that about?????.can you be more specific?? thinking about that... so far I havent seen one program come out in support of him  has any program or journo...made any attempt to claim like he claims HE HAS DONE NOTHING WRONG? i DID SEE PARTLY THE Oakes interview..was he for or against?? If you look at the ACA web site you will find about 180 comments on the story around 50% calling it gutter journalism and committing to not watch ACA again. This is not really about guilt or innocence any more but about enough is enough. We have authorities who make the decision and not either the media or opposition. I suspect that the numbers clearly show ACA that if the pursue this topic it will impact their ratings in a manner they would not like.

If they played the episode, I would start watching them again.

With them giving over evidence to the police, it has given me some thought to watch them again.

progressiveslol wrote on May 31^st, 2012 at 7:51pm:

If they played the episode, I would start watching them again. With them giving over evidence to the police, it has given me some thought to watch them again.

You are right of course - I can see that you deserve each other.

as I would expect proglol.!

You and Cods ACA fans as you are, put a 'spin' on all your posts.

Sure you aren't members of the LNP.? ::)

Wait for the Umpire!!!!   .... YEAH? Cease your mindless remarks.!

And how about the moronic failed ' dash'  to safety by Abbott and cronies.!!!!!!
Hilarious. !! NOT!!!!!!!!! :(
Shameful such things now happen in our Parliament.!! >:( >:(

Someone seriously needs to disappear.!!! >:(

cods wrote on May 31^st, 2012 at 8:18am:

Aussie wrote on May 30th, 2012 at 6:47pm: Still nothing from ACA.  I reckon this has been a dud, and ACA has surrendered. todays news ACA have handed it over to the police.. I dont think they are allowed to show it.. THOMO probably had it stopped which is his right.

I heard it had nothing to do with anything Thomson's legal reps may have said/done. It was at the request of Police so that airing the story did not affect the integrity of the investigation.

could I be wrong ??

aRMpIT USES THE WORD  -  INTEGRITY.!! :-? :-?

P'haps the foulness of this LNP cadre is getting through, at last.!!

If I misinterpret you ArmPit, I offer my condolences. ;)

Emma wrote on May 31^st, 2012 at 8:28pm:

as I would expect proglol.! You and Cods ACA fans as you are, put a 'spin' on all your posts. Sure you aren't members of the LNP.? ::) Wait for the Umpire!!!!   .... YEAH? Cease your mindless remarks.! And how about the moronic failed ' dash'  to safety by Abbott and cronies.!!!!!! Hilarious. !! NOT!!!!!!!!! :( Shameful such things now happen in our Parliament.!! >:( >:( Someone seriously needs to disappear.!!! >:(

I take it you dont comprehend english very well.

Spell "start watching again", then read it out loud real slow. Then (try to) comprehend the difference to "always watch it regardless"

Now you can stop your thomson gang-green cronyism.

progressiveslol wrote on May 31^st, 2012 at 7:51pm:

[quote author=092A2E1C133627272F266E07362028430 link=1337760143/161#161 date=

If they played the episode, I would start watching them again.

With them giving over evidence to the police, it has given me some thought to watch them again.[/quote]

Ok, you WERE an ACA fan, big time,  got disallusioned, but now......it has given me some thought to watch them again

Fair enough?? :-?

Emma wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 12:48am:

progressiveslol wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 7:51pm: [quote author=092A2E1C133627272F266E07362028430 link=1337760143/161#161 date= If they played the episode, I would start watching them again. With them giving over evidence to the police, it has given me some thought to watch them again.

Ok, you WERE an ACA fan, big time,  got disallusioned, but now......it has given me some thought to watch them again

Fair enough?? :-?[/quote]
Good, glad I could help educate you. You are almost there.

progressiveslol wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 12:50am:

Emma wrote on Jun 1st, 2012 at 12:48am: progressiveslol wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 7:51pm: [quote author=092A2E1C133627272F266E07362028430 link=1337760143/161#161 date= If they played the episode, I would start watching them again. With them giving over evidence to the police, it has given me some thought to watch them again. Ok, you WERE an ACA fan, big time,  got disallusioned, but now......it has given me some thought to watch them again Fair enough?? :-?

Good, glad I could help educate you. You are almost there.[/quote]




i DONT SEE WHAT A PERSON WATCHES OR READS HAS GOT ANYTHING TO DO WITH ANYONE TO BE HONEST..ooops....got a very touchy caps key.,..urrrrgh.


it annoys me as I believe everyone has to get their information.. from somewhere..

no different to the climate change science... its someone elses information they are interpreting.

one comes on here with an opinion regarding something they have read or heard via the media in some form..

if you read GETUP or CRIKEY on subjects that make the govt look a fool

  you wont get too much information. they will constantly bleat telling you to back off..they prefer you to know as little as possible.

I have yet to see THOMOS side.. he was very careful in parliament not to read anything that might exonerate him... which struck me as being odd.

as I have already said.. if it was me with an opportunity like that.. I would have had a foot high folder to wave saying it was full of evidence to prove I am innocent..as claimed..

saying he was overseas on one occasion  wouldnt be too hard to prove.

as for the hooker... I can only believe she had more proof than just her word she had sex for money with him...I mean anyone can claim that cant they???

I wonder if he found those street videos he claims all brothels have to have!!!!!!!!!!

i DONT SEE WHAT A PERSON WATCHES OR READS HAS GOT ANYTHING TO DO WITH ANYONE TO BE HONEST..ooops....got a very touchy caps key.,..urrrrgh.


it annoys me as I believe everyone has to get their information.. from somewhere..

no different to the climate change science... its someone elses information they are interpreting.

one comes on here with an opinion regarding something they have read or heard via the media in some form..

if you read GETUP or CRIKEY on subjects that make the govt look a fool

  you wont get too much information. they will constantly bleat telling you to back off..they prefer you to know as little as possible.

I have yet to see THOMOS side.. he was very careful in parliament not to read anything that might exonerate him... which struck me as being odd.

as I have already said.. if it was me with an opportunity like that.. I would have had a foot high folder to wave saying it was full of evidence to prove I am innocent..as claimed..

saying he was overseas on one occasion  wouldnt be too hard to prove.

as for the hooker... I can only believe she had more proof than just her word she had sex for money with him...I mean anyone can claim that cant they???
I wonder if he found those street videos he claims all brothels have to have!!!!!!!!!![/quote]



Give it a rest Cods/whoever you are. Remind me of some old bird called Para.. ::)..

....  I mean really we don't need you to tell us you can only believe ......what suits you.  That's obvious already!. ::)
I commend you as a trier. But, perhaps you and your like should try to look at things in a NEW way.!!

OK  settle down.. no need to panic... life will go on.

 

Emma wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 9:38pm:

i DONT SEE WHAT A PERSON WATCHES OR READS HAS GOT ANYTHING TO DO WITH ANYONE TO BE HONEST..ooops....got a very touchy caps key.,..urrrrgh. it annoys me as I believe everyone has to get their information.. from somewhere.. no different to the climate change science... its someone elses information they are interpreting. one comes on here with an opinion regarding something they have read or heard via the media in some form.. if you read GETUP or CRIKEY on subjects that make the govt look a fool   you wont get too much information. they will constantly bleat telling you to back off..they prefer you to know as little as possible. I have yet to see THOMOS side.. he was very careful in parliament not to read anything that might exonerate him... which struck me as being odd. as I have already said.. if it was me with an opportunity like that.. I would have had a foot high folder to wave saying it was full of evidence to prove I am innocent..as claimed.. saying he was overseas on one occasion  wouldnt be too hard to prove. as for the hooker... I can only believe she had more proof than just her word she had sex for money with him...I mean anyone can claim that cant they??? I wonder if he found those street videos he claims all brothels have to have!!!!!!!!!!

Give it a rest Cods/whoever you are. Remind me of some old bird called Para.. ::)..

....  I mean really we don't need you to tell us you can only believe ......what suits you.  That's obvious already!. ::)
I commend you as a trier. But, perhaps you and your like should try to look at things in a NEW way.!!

OK  settle down.. no need to panic... life will go on.

 
[/quote]



ANY CHANCE OF YOU DEBATING THE TOPIC AND NOT THE MESSENGER???..

i GUESS NOT really, you dont have much to contribute to anything that I have seen.,

you remind me of a nitpicker.. someone who has not a thing to offer just criticism and constant whingeing..


why dont you read a good book you are after all not paid to read my posts..

and your comments!!!!!!!!... well I am sure they make you feel a whole lot better after getting that off your chest.

Pretty sure I read somewhere recently how the police were reviewing some tapes. Cant find anything in google about it though. Eventually it will all be out.

SOB

[quote author ]  ANY CHANCE OF YOU DEBATING THE TOPIC AND NOT THE MESSENGER???..

i GUESS NOT really, you dont have much to contribute to anything that I have seen.,

you remind me of a nitpicker...blah blah blah blah blah[/quote]

If you could actually post something that deserved a measured response, rather than simply repeating these inanities, perhaps I would .!

Seems to me you are referring to yourself.. :)


So what pray tell.... IS THE TOPIC....??  ACCORDING TO YOU?

tHE ALLEGED PRO MUST HAVE KNOWN HEAPS..!!!  ????///

Perhaps I was being too obtuse.??

OK  -  What an unverified and spurious claim ....  ridiculous and prejudiced .... what else is there to say??

There you go.  verify at will

OK 
you no can do. I understand ..perfectly.

Not to worry Cods, you are entitled to air your opinions, as am I.
I'd say  sorry.......
except...

posts like yours (earlier) offend me. Simple as that.
You are ignoring the reality of the matter, as it stands.

We all must wait for the appropriate body, to find on this matter.  To continue muck raking is simply a ?? waste of all our time.  :)

It's irrelevant if you believe him or not ... he hasn't been charged with anything, he certainly hasn't been convicted of any crime ... so far all you have is a report from someone who may have their own agenda  ..... many people believe Neil Armstrong didn't really walk on the moon ...it doesn't make it true just because they believe it ... its called due process, everyone is entitled to it ..... look it up sometime

Emma wrote on May 31^st, 2012 at 10:11pm:

could I be wrong ?? aRMpIT USES THE WORD  -  INTEGRITY.!! :-? :-? P'haps the foulness of this LNP cadre is getting through, at last.!! If I misinterpret you ArmPit, I offer my condolences. ;)

You seem to have summed up and assessed phony Tonys office girl up remarkably accurately.
armpit. ;D

Emma wrote on Jun 2^nd, 2012 at 7:43pm:

OK  you no can do. I understand ..perfectly. Not to worry Cods, you are entitled to air your opinions, as am I. I'd say  sorry....... except... posts like yours (earlier) offend me. Simple as that. You are ignoring the reality of the matter, as it stands. We all must wait for the appropriate body, to find on this matter.  To continue muck raking is simply a ?? waste of all our time.  :)

so I suggest you dont waste your time reading m y posts.... how simple can that be.???


I wont comment on your comments as they are all about ME... not one on the topic.. which is


STAND BY FOR MORE THOMSON.


that part must have escaped you...


and you think it says.


STAND BY FOR MORE CODS..


tsk tsk..

sorry if I talk about THOMO.. what a shame as it is I didnt start the thread????..

I do stick to the thread THOMO.. I do not attack the poster for having a different opinion to myself..

I know your comprehension of that is difficult..


I dont want to!nor would I dare tell you not to open any thread that involves THOMO


but it does work for me... you start a thread I dont open it..I find it a huge help...

skippy. wrote on Jun 2^nd, 2012 at 9:33pm:

Emma wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 10:11pm: could I be wrong ?? aRMpIT USES THE WORD  -  INTEGRITY.!! :-? :-? P'haps the foulness of this LNP cadre is getting through, at last.!! If I misinterpret you ArmPit, I offer my condolences. ;) You seem to have summed up and assessed phony Tonys office girl up remarkably accurately. armpit. ;D

what is it with the lefties.. you love silly name calling.. god I stopped that when I left school... remember nem she did it ad nauseum.

its like the bully in school he gets a rush when he calls someone a name like poofter..

no wonder bullying is rampant in our school... when you have to see what some parents do in their spare time


now its flowed onto our work space where peoples lives are being made intolerable..


do you think its the same bullies that bullied at school?.. or just someones bad luck.?

cods wrote on Jun 3^rd, 2012 at 10:31am:

skippy. wrote on Jun 2nd, 2012 at 9:33pm: Emma wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 10:11pm: could I be wrong ?? aRMpIT USES THE WORD  -  INTEGRITY.!! :-? :-? P'haps the foulness of this LNP cadre is getting through, at last.!! If I misinterpret you ArmPit, I offer my condolences. ;) You seem to have summed up and assessed phony Tonys office girl up remarkably accurately. armpit. ;D what is it with the lefties.. you love silly name calling.. god I stopped that when I left school... ..............................bullies at school etc.

Now Cods I'll have to point out to you the post you made  (above in bigger type).

so these comments you make here are NOT addressing the author(s)???
rather than the comment.??  See its gotta work both ways.  ::)

Calling people who don't agree with your view.. 'lefties'..  and describing them as people who ...'love silly name calling'... is precisely what you condemn in me and others.

Why is THAT not clear?

As for the bullies rave... are you implying I am a bully.???
Not that I think your opinion is applicable, but whats the diff??

what is it with the lefties.. you love silly name calling.. god I stopped that when I left school...
-Cods.

Errr well seems your view of your own actions, isn't supported BY your actions. You clearly DID NOT stop that when you left school.  Bully???  Were you?? Sadly, it wouldn't surprise me at all. :(

posts like yours (earlier) offend me. Simple as that. [/highlight]
You are ignoring the reality of the matter, as it stands.

We all must wait for the appropriate body, to find on this matter. 
Quote- Me  (Jalane)





[b]I wont comment on your comments as they are all about ME... not one on the topic.. which is
STAND BY FOR MORE THOMSON.

that part must have escaped you...

.. I do not attack the poster for having a different opinion to myself..
I know your comprehension of that is difficult..


- Cods.[/quote][/b]




Once again your words are irreconcilable. !++

Please see my posted quote (above top) Not ALL ABOUT YOU are they? About your posts.! YES!

Don't get your knickers in a knot over this moronic bit of politics cods.
There are more important things in the world than .....this garbage.!! >:(

Pity is , too many Australians can't see beyond their own perceived self-interest,  which is usually erroneously guided by media.
Media = A mere handfull of Rich Australians who want to keep their profits, and DONT WANT to ADD to Australia's well-being, overall. They have CONDITIONS.!!

Know what I say to those, like Rhinehart?????
This is NOT your country, this is OURS. THIS is NOT your domain,to rule over.
These RICHES you have received, belong EQUALLY to the Australian people,  NOT YOU..
THEY do NOT belong to you.!!

I am astonished daily by the poor, the pensioners , the disabled, spouting this anti- carbon tax rubbish they hear on TV . I am amazed to hear this.

They don't seem to know who butters THEIR own bread. They are all concerned for the poor hard done- by billionaires.!@!!!!!!!!!..


Where does THAT come from???
One example-- people like cods.!!!
It would be HILARIOUS-- if it was a TV Satire. But ..its NOT TV people.THIS is our lives and our futures.


HEY
I told yous before...... the gloves are off.... no more MS NICE GIRL/






,

ok I give up.. you win..

now leave me alone.. or do you have a thing about cods???..

you came over from yahoo didnt you?..

none of anything you have said makes the slightest sense..you just want to rant about me.. why i wish I knew..

calling someone a leftie... and of course I am the only one.. puts me in the same league as someone that calls a poster Armpit instead of his correct ID..I just dont see it you ar right..


no I dont expect a soul to agree with me.. I have known for a long time you and I have not a thing in common..

that is why I avoid dealing with you its pointless.


so you win..now I am happy to move on and forget this encounter.

and so we hear today that this knowledgeable former prostitute was actually IN NZ  at the time of the(se) supposed liaison with Mr Thomson.  For $770 no less.!!

If someone has started another thread, load it on this one.

Now the putrid lies begin to show.
Now the indignant opposition led by the Abbott cadre find their true colours exposed. Traitorous attempts to illegally pull down our Govt.!!! UNDENIABLE.
Now the media is seen for the tripe it is....NB: ACA deserves especial condemnation. TT ?  best story break so far.!!

Want to do another poll any one???
;D ;D ;D :D

Can't resist this......

I TOLD YOU SO, MORONS.!! :D

cods wrote on Jun 4^th, 2012 at 9:55am:

ok I give up.. you win.. now leave me alone.. or do you have a thing about cods???.. you came over from yahoo didnt you?.. none of anything you have said makes the slightest sense..you just want to rant about me.. why i wish I knew.. calling someone a leftie... and of course I am the only one.. puts me in the same league as someone that calls a poster Armpit instead of his correct ID..I just dont see it you ar right.. no I dont expect a soul to agree with me.. I have known for a long time you and I have not a thing in common.. that is why I avoid dealing with you its pointless. so you win..now I am happy to move on and forget this encounter.

as a third party reading both yours and jalans comments, I'd say she makes perfect sense and you got sent back into your kennel ...   now behave

http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/political-news/majority-has-no-sympathy-for-thomson-20120603-1zq53.html

MORE than 50 per cent of voters believe the opposition's pursuit of Craig Thomson was either reasonable or did not go far enough, while fewer than one-third feel the Coalition has overstepped the mark.

The findings are contained in the latest Fairfax/Nielsen poll, which sampled 1400 voters from Thursday to Saturday last week.

The past fortnight of Parliament has been dominated by Mr Thomson, now an independent MP after being exiled from Labor over allegations he misused almost $500,000 in members' funds while he was national secretary of the Health Services Union.

Already the subject of two police investigations, a now-completed inquiry by Fair Work Australia, pending Federal Court action and a hearing by Parliament's privileges committee, Mr Thomson pleaded recently for an end to his pursuit by the Coalition and the media. He questioned whether the intention was to drive him to the brink.

This fuelled concerns about Mr Thomson's wellbeing and sparked a greater debate about the decline in civility in politics.

The poll found that while there was significant concern about the treatment of Mr Thomson, it did not reflect the majority view.

Of those polled, 31 per cent thought the opposition had gone too far, 37 per cent believed its pursuit of the MP had been ''reasonable'' while 16 per cent said it had ''not gone far enough''.

The various views reflect political allegiances. Greens and Labor voters - 48 per cent apiece - believed the attacks had gone too far while only 16 per cent of Coalition voters were of this view.

Conversely, 29 per cent of Labor voters and 27 per cent of Greens voters believed the pursuit had been reasonable, compared with 48 per cent of Coalition voters.

And only 7 per cent of Labor voters and 9 per cent of Greens voters said it had not gone far enough, compared with 24 per cent of Coalition voters.

The tenacity of the opposition attacks is believed to have contributed to a slump in the approval rating for Tony Abbott, in Newspoll and today's Fairfax poll.

Meanwhile, Mr Thomson's supporters in the union's internal battle are keen to turn the spotlight on the supposed whistleblower, Kathy Jackson.

In February, the Herald reported an email alleging Ms Jackson had laundered money through a colleague's bank account, which Ms Jackson emphatically denied.

Six weeks later, expenditure by Ms Jackson was referred to Victoria Police by the union's acting general secretary, Peter Mylan.

Documentation on those transactions have been leaked in recent days but the police had declined to investigate, telling Ms Jackson there had ''not been a complaint of criminal behaviour''.

The transactions related to the HSU's Victoria Three branch, which Ms Jackson headed before it merged with other branches to form the powerful HSU East branch.