Australian Politics Forum

Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl General Discussion >> Thinking Globally >> Mitt Romney http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1338501365 Message started by Spot of Borg on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 7:56am

Title: Mitt Romney
Post by Spot of Borg on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 7:56am

Really how will it effect us if he becomes president of america? And does he have a chance? I think he does if spelling has anything to do with it.

http://9hardware.com/blog/apple/631.html

Quote:

First of all, kudos to Mitt Romney and his campaign for offering an official iPhone app to solicit micro donations and help spread the word. But we can’t say kudos to the fact that the app contains a pretty grave spelling mistake. The official iPhone app for Romney supporters gives users a selection of background images they can use for their phone.

One of them is a stark red background with bold white letters promoting “A Better Amercia.” The word “Amercia” appears large and prominent right in the middle of the screen. It’s highly unlikely Romney will take any serious flack for this, but in a campaign this heated, no mistake can be discounted.

The misspelling is already making its way around Twitter and Instagram and all those typical channels. When contacted by TalkingPointsMemo.com, the Romney campaign simply stated that it was “corrected immediately.” However, Apple still has to approve the update, so the flaw is still out there for everyone to see. Obama also has an official iPhone app. He spells America correctly.

SOB

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by John Smith on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 7:57am

George Bush Jnr Version II

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by pansi1951 on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 8:41am

He just needs spellcheck.

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by Spot of Borg on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 8:53am

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 8:41am:

He just needs spellcheck.

lol yeah but you would think it woulda been picked up before the app was released. Its the front page hahaha.

SOB

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by pansi1951 on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 9:13am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 8:53am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 8:41am:

He just needs spellcheck.

lol yeah but you would think it woulda been picked up before the app was released. Its the front page hahaha.

SOB

Outsourcing ha ha

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by PoliticalPuppet on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 10:47am

How will it effect us?

The next president will lead us into a new war, this is a guarantee.

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by Uncle Meat on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 10:52am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 7:56am:

And does he have a chance?

Obama will win his second term.

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by PoliticalPuppet on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 10:54am

Uncle Meat wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 10:52am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 7:56am:

And does he have a chance?

Obama will win his second term.

Not if the votes weren't rigged :)

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by Spot of Borg on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 10:57am

Uncle Meat wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 10:52am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 7:56am:

And does he have a chance?

Obama will win his second term.

I think it doesnt matter which one gets in anyway. Same crap will happen either way. Iran Syria or both?

SOB

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by PoliticalPuppet on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:03am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 10:57am:

Uncle Meat wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 10:52am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 7:56am:

And does he have a chance?

Obama will win his second term.

I think it doesnt matter which one gets in anyway. Same crap will happen either way. Iran Syria or both?

SOB

Not if its out of them two. Ron Paul would have been different but the voting system is rigged anyway.
It is hard to say what is happening.
I think maybe Africa first because its getting to boiling point over there with the Chinese.
Syria has already been invaded, once that is complete I expect them to take geographical position and Iran will be after but who knows when.

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by Uncle Meat on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:05am

bobbythefap1 wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 10:54am:

Uncle Meat wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 10:52am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 7:56am:

And does he have a chance?

Obama will win his second term.

Not if the votes weren't rigged :)

No, that was Bush.

Obama will win his second term, and it will all be above board with no major hiccups.

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by PoliticalPuppet on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:09am

Uncle Meat wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:05am:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 10:54am:

Uncle Meat wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 10:52am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 7:56am:

And does he have a chance?

Obama will win his second term.

Not if the votes weren't rigged :)

No, that was Bush.

Obama will win his second term, and it will all be above board with no major hiccups.

I think the Bush thing was just a distraction or maybe a mocking of the public.. Because his opponent was a puppet as well and it wouldn't really matter if either of them won.
Yeah but if he was up against Ron Paul he wouldn't win.
This is the first time they would have actually needed to keep someone out because Ron Paul has so much support and isnt a puppet.

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by FriYAY on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:27am

Obama will win a 2nd IMO.

If Ron Paul was so popular why didn’t he win any (might have got a couple, can’t remember) primaries?

Santorum, Romney and can’t think of his name ex speaker dude??? all out polled Paul easily in most races, i thought?

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by PoliticalPuppet on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:30am

FriYAY wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:27am:

He did win a few and they were in the states with a transparent, non electric voting system.
Anywhere an open count was held in front of a camera Ron Paul won by a huge margin.
Its fairly plain to see has a lot more support then the media is telling you.

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by FriYAY on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:40am

bobbythefap1 wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:30am:

FriYAY wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:27am:

Yeah but nah.

That all sounds a bit conspiratorial. He didn’t get the support to run; I’d say this is how most would see it. Just Like Santorum, Perry and…ah WTF’s his name ex speaker dude.

The Rep’s best bet was Christie.

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by The tolerator on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:42am

Uncle Meat wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 10:52am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 7:56am:

And does he have a chance?

Obama will win his second term.

Yep. Regardless of what he's done (or hasn't done) in his term, his "minority majority" strategy can't be beat.

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by Spot of Borg on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:47am

FriYAY wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:40am:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:30am:

FriYAY wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:27am:

I wouldn't chuck the idea out so fast. conspiracies happen. Look @ poor ole thomson.

SOB

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by Spot of Borg on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:48am

... wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:42am:

Uncle Meat wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 10:52am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 7:56am:

And does he have a chance?

Obama will win his second term.

Yep. Regardless of what he's done (or hasn't done) in his term, his "minority majority" strategy can't be beat.

Whats that strategy?

SOB

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by PoliticalPuppet on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 12:57pm

FriYAY wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:40am:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:30am:

FriYAY wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:27am:

And what do you base that opinion on?
He does have the support to win because unlike for other people his delegates are loyal will not just fold and end up voting for Romney.

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by FriYAY on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 2:04pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 12:57pm:

FriYAY wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:40am:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:30am:

FriYAY wrote on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 11:27am:

And what do you base that opinion on?
He does have the support to win because unlike for other people his delegates are loyal will not just fold and end up voting for Romney.

There’s much speculation about delegates being compelled to vote for the nomination and many think there could be a “revolution” of types and shift support to Paul. All to do with

Don’t get me wrong, i think Paul would be a good option for the Rep’s.

From an article….

Mitt Romney surpassed the 1,144 delegate count needed with his win in the Texas Primary last night. Now the remaining Primaries are just a formality before the Republican National Convention, August 27-30, 2012, in Tampa, FL.
But, what if the delegates are not bound to Romney or any candidate on the "first ballot" vote as the RNC keeps repeating and the media keeps parroting?
Who would the delegates vote for at the Republican National Convention in Tampa, if they knew that the RNC in 2008 put a rule into effect that clearly states that the delegates are not bound to any candidate regardless of State Party rules?
Would we see the Ron Paul revolution that many Paul delegates say we will?

The rule….
Rule number 38:
No delegate or alternate delegate shall be bound by any attempt of any state or Congressional district to impose the unit rule.

http://www.examiner.com/article/rnc-delegates-not-bound-to-any-candidate-on-first-ballot

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by PoliticalPuppet on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 3:53pm

Quote:

Its possible, which is a big step. Might not happen with Paul but he has set the path for others like him to come next election and so on. His son Rand Paul is well on the way and may even become Vice president under romney, bit of a sell out but it will be necessary to get the top job later on.
Paul is the only viable candidate out there, you cannot deny that Obama and Romney are just puppets.

I look forward to seeing what happens, not that there is much hope.
If you actually watch what is happening there tho, there is no doubt that Ron has close to a majority.
And not only that his followers and delegates are 100% loyal. Which is something we have not ever seen before.

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by it_is_the_light on Jun 1^st, 2012 at 6:49pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwiJd2ZMAGY

Mitt Romney is Related to Obama & Bush (One Bloodline Rules The World)

Time Magazine: Ancestry.com Finds that Mitt Romney and George W. Bush Are Cousins

http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/12/20/family-ties-ancestry-com-finds-that-romne...

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by it_is_the_light on Jun 2^nd, 2012 at 3:09pm

http://www.infowars.com/top-mitt-romney-donors-update/

Top Mitt Romney Donors: Update

Then again, here is Obama:

So on one hand Wall Street, and on the other Law Firms, the Government, and Academia – the four sides of the Status Quo square.
America: the best place to legally purchase a president.

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by Spot of Borg on Jun 2^nd, 2012 at 3:19pm

How the heck do they get that informaiton and when they do how do they know its right?

SOB

Title: Re: Mitt Romney
Post by it_is_the_light on Jun 3^rd, 2012 at 6:14pm

its common knowledge

all political donations must be disclosed

(not all are disclosed however a fraction is disclosed

on the books)

as it were

and so it is

namaste