Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Feedback >> Secret Women's Business http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1339260183 Message started by Frances on Jun 10th, 2012 at 2:43am |
Title: Secret Women's Business Post by Frances on Jun 10th, 2012 at 2:43am
Do we really need this part of the forum any more? It seems to have degenerated into a mutual admiration society for The Tolerator, Grandmaster and Amadd (with interjections from Jasignature fom time to time).
I think we should either do away with it altogether and incorporate the posts into the general board, or maybe just retitle it Secret Men's Business, as that seems to be what it has become. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Spot of Borg on Jun 10th, 2012 at 4:14am
intolerator is grandmaster - changed his name
SOB |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by freediver on Jun 10th, 2012 at 8:24am
Has anyone seen Auzgurl lately?
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by pansi1951 on Jun 10th, 2012 at 2:28pm
Auzgurl was lisa, last seen sucking down souvlaki's in downtown Marrickville.
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Grandmaster on Jun 10th, 2012 at 2:31pm
Don't like it, don't read it Frances.
Simple answer to a pathetic whine. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by mantra on Jun 10th, 2012 at 2:32pm
Auzgurl is still around - not that she logs in here under that nick.
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by jalane on Jun 17th, 2012 at 2:36am
well I totally agree with Frances....
Change the name to Men's Business. Or delete it. It is offensive, disrespectful of the rules of the board and blatantly sexist. Now I know Lisa is(was) AuzG I 'm not surprised no-one has done anything about the creeps like you yes you - whatever your name is,,Honky, etc etc etc etc... wee weelittle master you are a joke and you deliberately harass any female who expresses a view,, you are a waste of space. Guess I'll have to go beyond and above ,,, dwad.!!! |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by mantra on Jun 17th, 2012 at 6:58am Emma wrote on Jun 17th, 2012 at 2:36am:
Auzgurl and Lisa live in two different states. There are similarities in their posting style and avatars - but the personalities are different. SWB is becoming crass. It's not so much the subjects talked about, but when you start getting into bodily functions - it's going a step too far. I have been trying to find AG to see whether she is prepared to relinquish this sub-forum to someone else. She needs to contact FD - although if she does, will it be the real Auzgurl? I don't know whether her membership is shared with others. She hasn't logged in for a year. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by angeleyes on Jun 17th, 2012 at 8:04am
Typical bunch of whiny whinging women.
Jalane posts crap in the deadhorse range. Mantra post twice a month if we are unlucky and mostly it's a whinge. Frances at least has a brain and a thought process even though I may not agree with her. Come on girls..........toughen up. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by mantra on Jun 17th, 2012 at 8:07am angeleyes wrote on Jun 17th, 2012 at 8:04am:
You're a new member - how do you know what I do? It's not a matter of toughening up - it's a matter of maintaining a few standards. Let males discuss their erections in another sub-forum, although I doubt any of the moderators would accept it. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by MOTR on Jun 17th, 2012 at 8:11am
And angeleyes is a misogynist who likes to dress in drag.
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Amadd on Jun 17th, 2012 at 8:11am Quote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the topic stemmed from one started by Sprint called "secret men's business" which was frequented often by "Auzgurl", (who is definitely not Lisa). The topic started by Sprint was, I think, done in fun, because obviously it's not secret on an open chat forum, and obviously the opposite sex can't help but look at it and get involved. I think most of us debate vehemently on different subjects at times, so why get your knickers in a knot because this one just happens to concern women's rights vs. men's rights? Aren't we even allowed to say what we think anymore? ..As the saying goes.."If you can't stand the heat, then get back in the kitchen"...or something like that ;D ....oh I crack me up sometimes ;D Many moons ago, I was banned from the muslim froum by a camel riding, sword wielding dictator. I don't think that I was being particlularly offensive, but apparently some subjects are too revered for mere mortal men to discuss. If women really truly want to discuss "secret women's business" secretly, then here's a free tip: Don't do it on an open chat forum! ..Otherwise, just get out your engineering manuals and build a bridge. Failing that, there could also be some juicy input (in a gossip sense that is :D) from women that might well be worth reading. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by mantra on Jun 17th, 2012 at 8:18am
I don't think SWB needs much moderation. It would be a pity to see it over-moderated. Some of the posts are a bit crude, but that's not a major problem.
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by mantra on Jun 17th, 2012 at 8:33am MOTR wrote on Jun 17th, 2012 at 8:11am:
He's been here before and obviously resurrected himself under another nick. I doubt he'll last long if he persists with the constant flow of insults to other members. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Grandmaster on Jun 17th, 2012 at 10:05am
I note I've been banned from the sub forum.
Piss weak doesn't even begin to describe it. But you'll be pleased to know that if I've got soemthing to post, I'll just do it in general or chat, and the SWB sub forum will continue to wither and die, just as it had before I injected what little life there is into it. So how strong are your beliefs, that anything contrary must be silenced? Nothings has changed, except my resolve has been strengthened to keep kicking you haters in your cobwebbed c...s. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by mantra on Jun 17th, 2012 at 10:12am ... wrote on Jun 17th, 2012 at 10:05am:
FD must have found another moderator or else some members have made formal complaints. Yes it will wither and die if it's over-moderated. Personally I don't mind the controversial posts - although the ones discussing toilet habits are unnecessary. Probably an open-minded male would be better as a moderator. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by grandmaster II on Jun 17th, 2012 at 11:20am
So....banned from the whole forum now eh?
Not so much as a warning, a PM, anything. And all for the heinous crime of posting feedback on the feedback board. Might have been a good idea to check WHO started abusing who before copping out like that. Becasue make no mistake, this complaint is simply a thinly veiled way of saying "I can't refute what you say any other way, so I've got to shut you up somehow." Meh. Pathetic doesn't even beging to describe it. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by mantra on Jun 17th, 2012 at 11:33am ... wrote on Jun 17th, 2012 at 10:05am:
Maybe it was this that got you banned GM. Can you find another way to say what you mean? |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Spot of Borg on Jun 17th, 2012 at 11:37am mantra wrote on Jun 17th, 2012 at 11:33am:
Could be a glitch of some sort. SOB |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by PoliticalPuppet on Jun 17th, 2012 at 11:39am grandmaster II wrote on Jun 17th, 2012 at 11:20am:
:'( :'( Crying like a women hey?? ;D |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Morning Mist on Jun 17th, 2012 at 12:45pm
I'd like to know why Grandmaster was banned.
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by mantra on Jun 17th, 2012 at 1:13pm Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jun 17th, 2012 at 12:45pm:
It would have to be this. I overlooked it initially - but it isn't acceptable by any standards. ... wrote on Jun 17th, 2012 at 10:05am:
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Morning Mist on Jun 17th, 2012 at 1:49pm
I've seen far worse.
Some clown here wanted to put a bullet in my head a few months back. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by pansi1951 on Jun 17th, 2012 at 1:55pm
Has anyone got an Ahh bra?
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by gizmo_2655 on Jun 17th, 2012 at 1:57pm
What confuses me, is that I seem to be banned too.....
And I don't even go there very much. I went to take a look at what all the hoohaa is about, and can't get in....Did they just lock out the letter 'G' names???? |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by pansi1951 on Jun 17th, 2012 at 2:04pm
Me too. I think the thread has been locked or something??????
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by freediver on Jun 17th, 2012 at 2:18pm Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jun 17th, 2012 at 1:49pm:
Can you give me the details please? |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by MOTR on Jun 17th, 2012 at 2:27pm freediver wrote on Jun 17th, 2012 at 2:18pm:
A conservatives worst nightmare. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Spot of Borg on Jun 17th, 2012 at 2:38pm MOTR wrote on Jun 17th, 2012 at 2:27pm:
lolololololol SOB |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Morning Mist on Jun 17th, 2012 at 5:21pm freediver wrote on Jun 17th, 2012 at 2:18pm:
From poster Jalane to me in the thread Leftist Ideology in a Nutshell: Quote:
I am in the process of trying to find this thread so I can provide the link. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Morning Mist on Jun 17th, 2012 at 5:23pm
It's already been 'dealt' with here anyway:
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1328922100 I didn't seek revenge, rather, I just wanted the underlying nastiness of the 'equality' and 'tolerance' crowd exposed. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Morning Mist on Jun 17th, 2012 at 5:36pm |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by jalane on Jun 17th, 2012 at 7:19pm
this Board is a joke and an insult, MM, as you know quite well.
I think it should be deleted entirely ASAP. It is nothing but a pathetic farce, and MM..... if you look at the replies of other posters at the time, you'll see the they didin't agree with you then. What was your name then??? ... Having another try you pitiful puppet/or is that sock?? Just how many names DO you use?? hmm? most of the shite probably all comes from you. How many socks do you wear DWAD. ?? But make the answer appear in Stupid Men's Business OK?? 8-) |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Morning Mist on Jun 17th, 2012 at 7:26pm Emma wrote on Jun 17th, 2012 at 7:19pm:
Just as I thought, anything that doesn't agree with you must be deleted or done away with. The topic we 'discussed' (I use that term loosely) were, and still are, legitimate points of discussion. See, this is what happens in the academic arena, you debate points. You don't have your interlocutor silenced through force. If it was a war maybe, but not in a debate forum. Perhaps you ought to joined the armed forces? |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by mantra on Jun 17th, 2012 at 7:39pm Emma wrote on Jun 17th, 2012 at 7:19pm:
Jalene - SWB has been here for years - you haven't. What right have you or anyone got to demand that a sub-forum be deleted? If you don't like the name calling - you need to refrain from doing it yourself. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Karnal on Jun 18th, 2012 at 2:44pm Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jun 17th, 2012 at 2:04pm:
Me too. And I agree with everybody. Why would anyone ban me? |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Frances on Jun 18th, 2012 at 2:50pm
The sub-forum must have been locked - I can't get into it either. Not much of a loss really - it had degenerated into something I don't think it was intended to be.
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by pansi1951 on Jun 18th, 2012 at 3:30pm Karnal wrote on Jun 18th, 2012 at 2:44pm:
They wouldn't Karnal, you're the life of the party dude!!!! |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Karnal on Jun 18th, 2012 at 4:55pm Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jun 18th, 2012 at 3:30pm:
Thanks, Pansi. It must be a bit boring in secret women's business though. Who've they got? I noticed Jalane had a post. Maybe she can talk to herself - she's quite good at that. She must be having a real party in secret women's business. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Karnal on Jun 18th, 2012 at 4:58pm Frances wrote on Jun 18th, 2012 at 2:50pm:
It degenerated into a Grandmaster whinge fest - lots of scientific evidence he hadn't read for things he didn't know anything about. Now that's an internet forum. The invention of paper, the printing press, the telegraph, mass media, the internet. Degeneration. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Aussie on Jun 18th, 2012 at 4:59pm
Odd. I tried to access the Forum, and was told:
"You are not allowed to access this section. " Why? |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Karnal on Jun 18th, 2012 at 5:02pm
Maybe you need a business permit.
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by .Annie. on Jun 18th, 2012 at 6:03pm
I very rarely agreed with anything Wesley said, but I'd like to throw my 2 cents in and say a ban is a bit much.
If he doesn't come back, this forum will have lost a member that was at least interesting and had the courage to post what he believed (even if a lot of it was crap). What happened to the warning? I got one when I 'overstepped' the line. Why didn't he? |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by .Annie. on Jun 18th, 2012 at 6:07pm Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jun 17th, 2012 at 5:23pm:
Oh bullshit. You were a complete pussy about it. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Antonio Primo de Rivera on Jun 18th, 2012 at 7:08pm
so who can actually see the womans forum now
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by mantra on Jun 18th, 2012 at 7:29pm
I posted there today. There must be others who can access it too.
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by MOTR on Jun 18th, 2012 at 7:39pm
Maybe you have to be registered as a female member. That would ensure secret women's business remained secret. Confined to women and socks.
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by mantra on Jun 18th, 2012 at 7:47pm
I'm assuming Frances and Annie are females yet they claim they can't access it either. We'll just have to wait and see what eventuates there.
I didn't realise Wesley was Grandmaster - I thought he generally made good posts. Perhaps he'll only get a short ban. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by .Annie. on Jun 18th, 2012 at 7:52pm
I never claimed I couldn't access it. Yet I just tried and I can't.
How would you know that, Mantra? |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by mantra on Jun 18th, 2012 at 8:15pm Annie Anthrax wrote on Jun 18th, 2012 at 7:52pm:
I didn't know - I misread your post Annie. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Frances on Jun 18th, 2012 at 8:58pm
It must have come alive again some time this afternoon. I've just been in there checking it out.....
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by jalane on Jun 18th, 2012 at 9:22pm
feedback - its still on as far as I can see, I just posted on it.
For the last time. My reasons are my own, but I'll share a little ... I've heard enough putdowns of me or women , or girls etc etc to last me a lifetime. I choose not to be subject to such shite on this thread. Simple. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Morning Mist on Jun 18th, 2012 at 9:44pm Annie Anthrax wrote on Jun 18th, 2012 at 6:07pm:
Thanks for showing everyone that 'understanding' and 'tolerance' you feminists are famous for. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Karnal on Jun 18th, 2012 at 11:26pm mantra wrote on Jun 18th, 2012 at 8:15pm:
Yes, how would you know that, Mantra? As far as I can tell, you and Jalane are the only ones who can get in. And we know Jalane's not doing any banning. On another note, I was banned from the multicultural forum once - a lifetime ban I might add - for speaking Arabic. The funny thing is I don't speak any Arabic at all. Well, insh'allah. Still, the multicultural moderator wasn't happy with it. No speakie English, no talkie here. Kabesh! I'm not sure why I've been banned from secret women's business, but I'll hazard a guess: I don't have a pink Venus symbol in my profile. I must say, I find these gender roles most restrictive and unnecessary. What were you saying about gender again, Honky? Ah yes, there has to be segregation. Looks like the whole board's been segregated. Mantra, can we get in if we pay? |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by mantra on Jun 19th, 2012 at 1:02am
I have no influence or moderation powers here Karnal. I have no idea what's happening with SWB. I quite liked the way it was evolving - except a couple of females didn't - so it's been partially shut down by the looks of it.
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Amadd on Jun 19th, 2012 at 6:23am
Yeah, I can't gain access either.
It seems that my mind is stymied forevermore...Oh what to do now? ;D |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Amadd on Jun 19th, 2012 at 6:38am
I very much doubt that FD would enforce such an undemocratic restriction on an open forum which is moderated by nobody.
But who knows these days? Ordinary people tend to be quite trite and twisted. Then again, he may be making a point that it would be pretty boring to have no differing opinion, or no differing passion. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by mantra on Jun 19th, 2012 at 8:52am Amadd wrote on Jun 19th, 2012 at 6:38am:
I've got no idea, but the quickest way to kill it is to close it off to most of the members. Jalene has more influence than I gave her credit for. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Karnal on Jun 19th, 2012 at 9:16am mantra wrote on Jun 19th, 2012 at 1:02am:
I see. Well, it must be Jalane. Whoever would have suspected her of being a moderator? |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Amadd on Jun 19th, 2012 at 9:31am
I don't really think jalane has much influence, even if she does enable herself to thwart a democratic POV.
It's not anything special. Any dumbass can be a destroyer of democracy. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by skippy. on Jun 19th, 2012 at 2:17pm
I cant access it either. FD must have closed it down. Unless AG snuck in and had a tanty. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by freediver on Jun 19th, 2012 at 8:08pm
SWB now has a minimum IQ requirement to gain entry.
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by jalane on Jun 20th, 2012 at 1:27am
good to hear.
:) |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Spot of Borg on Jun 20th, 2012 at 6:09am freediver wrote on Jun 19th, 2012 at 8:08pm:
Only the minimum iq can get in? Whats that 65? So only soren can get in? lol she must be lonely in there. SOB |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by mantra on Jun 20th, 2012 at 6:23am freediver wrote on Jun 19th, 2012 at 8:08pm:
I'm not sure which way to read that. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Amadd on Jun 20th, 2012 at 6:34am freediver wrote on Jun 19th, 2012 at 8:08pm:
Really? Isn't it true that when the doctor holds up a baby and slaps it's bum, the dix fall off the dumb ones? ;D |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by mantra on Jun 20th, 2012 at 7:00am Amadd wrote on Jun 20th, 2012 at 6:34am:
It looks that way. Oh well - those who protested the loudest should now feel obliged to make some decent contributions there. Maybe an all female forum will offer some entertainment, although personally I can't see it. ::) |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Amadd on Jun 20th, 2012 at 11:14am
I agree with you that it's gonna get real boring real quick.
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by wonderwoman on Jun 21st, 2012 at 8:23pm freediver wrote on Jun 19th, 2012 at 8:08pm:
What do you mean by this? |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Gist on Jun 21st, 2012 at 8:32pm MissFixItOrElse wrote on Jun 21st, 2012 at 8:23pm:
It means, wonderwoman, that by having to ask that question, chances are you failed to qualify. ;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by wonderwoman on Jun 21st, 2012 at 8:40pm
Dont think so. I just posted there.
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Amadd on Jul 18th, 2012 at 12:27am
Just let us know when you are missing some pragmatic male input OK? ;D
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by jalane on Jul 18th, 2012 at 12:41am
I THINK YOU ARE CONFUSED AMAD
;D |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Amadd on Jul 18th, 2012 at 12:44am
No confusion here, I know you all backwards.
Without da drama, you cannot survive. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Frances on Jul 18th, 2012 at 12:48am Amadd wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 12:27am:
Don't worry - I'm not missing any of that..... |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Amadd on Jul 18th, 2012 at 12:51am
Just let me know when you want to know yourselves, I'll tell you all about you. ;D
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by jalane on Jul 18th, 2012 at 1:23am
you are a silly dirty bird, aren't you Amadd?
At least you're not claiming to be female anymore. As if ...! ;D |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Jasignature on Jul 18th, 2012 at 6:33am
Hi peoples. :)
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Amadd on Jul 18th, 2012 at 9:49am |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Elvis Wesley on Jul 18th, 2012 at 10:30am Frances wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 12:48am:
I'm sure you're not - ignorance IS bliss after all. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Frances on Jul 18th, 2012 at 10:48am Amadd wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 9:49am:
I think that Jalane's comment should have been directed at Wesley - his profile shows his gender as female - probably something he forgot to change after he dropped his "strong independent womyn" identity. On the other hand, maybe he hasn't had the operation yet..... |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Elvis Wesley on Jul 18th, 2012 at 10:57am
nar didn't forget - I just want the perks on offer for being female. ie access to SWB. It seems female O-pression is as much a myth online as it is in reality.
Aaaand I'm comfortable enough in my sexuality to pretend to be a womyn. :-X |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Jasignature on Jul 18th, 2012 at 2:19pm
Good idea about the new SWB Restriction. ;)
|
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Elvis Wesley on Jul 18th, 2012 at 3:09pm It_is_the_Darkness wrote on Jul 18th, 2012 at 2:19pm:
Agreed. It keeps the white knights out. |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by jalane on Jul 18th, 2012 at 7:43pm
Hmm
Well I would apologise if incorrect about Amadd.... but Ithink he did display as female...for a short time..when we were all mixing it on SWB. Sorry if I'm wrong.... can't be bothered checking to be honest. :) r or it might have been on some of the spin-offs. :D |
Title: Re: Secret Women's Business Post by Amadd on Jul 18th, 2012 at 10:39pm
Not that it really matters, but I haven't changed my name even once on this board (to date that is ;) )
You can quote me on that. |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved. |