A young man says he had a sexual relationship with Mr Ashby in Townsville in 2003, when he was 15 and Mr Ashby was in his mid-twenties.

This is getting juicy as both biatches go for the jugular.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-07-30/730-james-ashby/4164568

By the looks of Ashby, I doubt he was much over 15 in 2003  either .....

What a dirty pedo.

Hang em and hang em high.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsMQABEiRMc

just read the story ... if its true then Ashby can only blame himself .... you reap what you sow and all that

But surely the lefties on here are going to say it was the 15 yr olds fault, judging from all the vitriol recently.

Come on, lets hear it. The victim is the aggressor. It was what the 15 yr old was wearing at the time that made it happen.

What a grubby little episode of political history in Australia this has turned out to be. And to think its engineers are going to be running the country soon.

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 30^th, 2012 at 9:19pm:

But surely the lefties on here are going to say it was the 15 yr olds fault, judging from all the vitriol recently. Come on, lets hear it. The victim is the aggressor. It was what the 15 yr old was wearing at the time that made it happen.

There is no defence aginst using a 15 year old if the claim is true.

But I would be against hanging him till we actually know that it is true.

Is this why Matty has gone to ground???

;) ;) ;)

philperth2010 wrote on Jul 30^th, 2012 at 9:37pm:

Is this why Matty has gone to ground??? ;) ;) ;)

No that was a few years ago and matty isn't 15 till next year.

http://moroniclodge.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/james-ashby-mal-brough.jpg

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 30^th, 2012 at 9:19pm:

But surely the lefties on here are going to say it was the 15 yr olds fault, judging from all the vitriol recently. Come on, lets hear it. The victim is the aggressor. It was what the 15 yr old was wearing at the time that made it happen.

Traditionally that is the attitude of "righties".

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 5:55am:

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 30th, 2012 at 9:19pm: But surely the lefties on here are going to say it was the 15 yr olds fault, judging from all the vitriol recently. Come on, lets hear it. The victim is the aggressor. It was what the 15 yr old was wearing at the time that made it happen. Traditionally that is the attitude of "righties". SOB

Well if thats the case, then times have changed. It is now lefties.

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 6:31am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 5:55am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 30th, 2012 at 9:19pm: But surely the lefties on here are going to say it was the 15 yr olds fault, judging from all the vitriol recently. Come on, lets hear it. The victim is the aggressor. It was what the 15 yr old was wearing at the time that made it happen. Traditionally that is the attitude of "righties". SOB Well if thats the case, then times have changed. It is now lefties.

No. It is the messed up minds of the right brigade that say such things.

I'm as left as they get and I would never condemn the victim.  A man in his mid 20's shouldn't be having sex with a fifteen year old even if he did consent, they are far too naive and vulnerable at that age and it's illegal anyway.

Ashby started this, so he deserves what he gets. If you want to fling accusations around to gain power, you better be sure you're squeaky clean.

This latest scenario is yet to be proven, but the plot thickens.

congrats to ozpolitic, you blokes were onto this last week.
groundbreaking site ;) ;)

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 6:58am:

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 6:31am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 5:55am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 30th, 2012 at 9:19pm: But surely the lefties on here are going to say it was the 15 yr olds fault, judging from all the vitriol recently. Come on, lets hear it. The victim is the aggressor. It was what the 15 yr old was wearing at the time that made it happen. Traditionally that is the attitude of "righties". SOB Well if thats the case, then times have changed. It is now lefties. No. It is the messed up minds of the right brigade that say such things. I'm as left as they get and I would never condemn the victim.  A man in his mid 20's shouldn't be having sex with a fifteen year old even if he did consent, they are far too naive and vulnerable at that age and it's illegal anyway. Ashby started this, so he deserves what he gets. If you want to fling accusations around to gain power, you better be sure you're squeaky clean. This latest scenario is yet to be proven, but the plot thickens.

lol and yet you continue on your hypocritical path of the new leftie. The victim started this and deserves everything he gets. Wow daft lol.

Ashby's a victim of his own cunning stunt that will most likely sink him in the end.

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 7:58am:

Ashby's a victim of his own cunning stunt that will most likely sink him in the end.

So is the 15 yr old going by your logic.

Let us not forget that Ashby and Slipper are both products of the LNP.....Many prominent Liberals have supported James Ashby against Peter Slipper and must come clean about their involvement in the accusations leveled against the former speaker.....Mr Ashby has never been a victim IMO and was always in it for personal gain.....If Mal Brough is worried about being smeared by his irregular relationship with Ashby he should not have met with the bloke 4 times and then lied about it should he???

::) ::) ::)

Oh what a tangled web we weave,
When first we practise to deceive!
Sir Walter Scott (1771 - 1832), Marmion, Canto vi. Stanza 17.

philperth2010 wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 8:13am:

Let us not forget that Ashby and Slipper are both products of the LNP.....Many prominent Liberals have supported James Ashby against Peter Slipper and must come clean about their involvement in the accusations leveled against the former speaker.....Mr Ashby has never been a victim IMO and was always in it for personal gain.....If Mal Brough is worried about being smeared by his irregular relationship with Ashby he should not have met with the bloke 4 times and then lied about it should he??? ::) ::) ::) Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first we practise to deceive! Sir Walter Scott (1771 - 1832), Marmion, Canto vi. Stanza 17.

lets not forget that slipper is labors problem now.

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 7:59am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 7:58am: Ashby's a victim of his own cunning stunt that will most likely sink him in the end. So is the 15 yr old going by your logic.

He is no longer 15 and is not in it for personal gain unlike Ashby.....Perhaps James Ashby is an innocent victim and needed guidance from senior Liberals because he was unable to decide whether to pursue Peter Slipper for sexual harassment.....The LNP have now put their reputation on the word of James Ashby.....The LNP are involved up to their lying armpits and must support Ashby no matter what happens.....After all it was their advice that put him in this situation.....LOL!!!

:) :) :)

philperth2010 wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 8:21am:

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 7:59am: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 7:58am: Ashby's a victim of his own cunning stunt that will most likely sink him in the end. So is the 15 yr old going by your logic. He is no longer 15 and is not in it for personal gain unlike Ashby.....Perhaps James Ashby is an innocent victim and needed guidance from senior Liberals because he was unable to decide whether to pursue Peter Slipper for sexual harassment.....The LNP have now put their reputation on the word of James Ashby.....The LNP are involved up to their lying armpits and must support Ashby no matter what happens.....After all it was their advice that put him in this situation.....LOL!!! :) :) :)

They can only act on what a victim tells them. Are you suggesting we no longer believe or help victims of sexual harassment in the workplace.

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 8:15am:

philperth2010 wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 8:13am: Let us not forget that Ashby and Slipper are both products of the LNP.....Many prominent Liberals have supported James Ashby against Peter Slipper and must come clean about their involvement in the accusations leveled against the former speaker.....Mr Ashby has never been a victim IMO and was always in it for personal gain.....If Mal Brough is worried about being smeared by his irregular relationship with Ashby he should not have met with the bloke 4 times and then lied about it should he??? ::) ::) ::) Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first we practise to deceive! Sir Walter Scott (1771 - 1832), Marmion, Canto vi. Stanza 17. lets not forget that slipper is labors problem now.

Not at all.....Peter Slipper is an independent.....He will not stand as a Labor MP and is a product of the LNP.....Peter Slipper is already dead in a political sense.....The only ones he can now bring down are those that supported James Ashby.....Lets see if the LNP stand by their man that they put in this situation.....Somehow I doubt it judging by the way Brough is already distancing himself.....Ashby has served his purpose.....Lets see the rabid right turn on him now his true character is coming to light!!!

:) :) :)

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 8:25am:

philperth2010 wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 8:21am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 7:59am: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 7:58am: Ashby's a victim of his own cunning stunt that will most likely sink him in the end. So is the 15 yr old going by your logic. He is no longer 15 and is not in it for personal gain unlike Ashby.....Perhaps James Ashby is an innocent victim and needed guidance from senior Liberals because he was unable to decide whether to pursue Peter Slipper for sexual harassment.....The LNP have now put their reputation on the word of James Ashby.....The LNP are involved up to their lying armpits and must support Ashby no matter what happens.....After all it was their advice that put him in this situation.....LOL!!! :) :) :) They can only act on what a victim tells them. Are you suggesting we no longer believe or help victims of sexual harassment in the workplace.

If you are a social worker or police officer I can understand why someone would seek their advice and support.....Going to political opponents of the person you are making the allegations against and then setting out to gain evidence to support the claims you are making is bullshit.....Why am I not surprised you cannot see Ashby is a victim of his own political ambition or stupid for saying he was going to get the speaker in February and then setting out to do so???

::) ::) ::)

philperth2010 wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 8:31am:

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 8:25am: philperth2010 wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 8:21am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 7:59am: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 7:58am: Ashby's a victim of his own cunning stunt that will most likely sink him in the end. So is the 15 yr old going by your logic. He is no longer 15 and is not in it for personal gain unlike Ashby.....Perhaps James Ashby is an innocent victim and needed guidance from senior Liberals because he was unable to decide whether to pursue Peter Slipper for sexual harassment.....The LNP have now put their reputation on the word of James Ashby.....The LNP are involved up to their lying armpits and must support Ashby no matter what happens.....After all it was their advice that put him in this situation.....LOL!!! :) :) :) They can only act on what a victim tells them. Are you suggesting we no longer believe or help victims of sexual harassment in the workplace. If you are a social worker or police officer I can understand why someone would seek their advice and support.....Going to political opponents of the person you are making the allegations against and then setting out to gain evidence to support the claims you are making is bullshit.....Why am I not surprised you cannot see Ashby is a victim of his own political ambition or stupid for saying he was going to get the speaker in February and then setting out to do so??? ::) ::) ::)

That is how victims roll sometimes. Do we make the victim a perp because they did not handle themselves the way we think they should. You are still stepping into the victim is in the wrong. The new lefty.

where is longstupid with his comments about pdeo's being labor only  ... the kid was 15, that makes ashby a pedo ...

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 7:49am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 6:58am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 6:31am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 5:55am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 30th, 2012 at 9:19pm: But surely the lefties on here are going to say it was the 15 yr olds fault, judging from all the vitriol recently. Come on, lets hear it. The victim is the aggressor. It was what the 15 yr old was wearing at the time that made it happen. Traditionally that is the attitude of "righties". SOB Well if thats the case, then times have changed. It is now lefties. No. It is the messed up minds of the right brigade that say such things. I'm as left as they get and I would never condemn the victim.  A man in his mid 20's shouldn't be having sex with a fifteen year old even if he did consent, they are far too naive and vulnerable at that age and it's illegal anyway. Ashby started this, so he deserves what he gets. If you want to fling accusations around to gain power, you better be sure you're squeaky clean. This latest scenario is yet to be proven, but the plot thickens. lol and yet you continue on your hypocritical path of the new leftie. The victim started this and deserves everything he gets. Wow daft lol.

Hangon a minute . . .  are you saying ashby was the victim and the 15 year old was the evildoer?

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 9:09am:

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 7:49am: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 6:58am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 6:31am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 5:55am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 30th, 2012 at 9:19pm: But surely the lefties on here are going to say it was the 15 yr olds fault, judging from all the vitriol recently. Come on, lets hear it. The victim is the aggressor. It was what the 15 yr old was wearing at the time that made it happen. Traditionally that is the attitude of "righties". SOB Well if thats the case, then times have changed. It is now lefties. No. It is the messed up minds of the right brigade that say such things. I'm as left as they get and I would never condemn the victim.  A man in his mid 20's shouldn't be having sex with a fifteen year old even if he did consent, they are far too naive and vulnerable at that age and it's illegal anyway. Ashby started this, so he deserves what he gets. If you want to fling accusations around to gain power, you better be sure you're squeaky clean. This latest scenario is yet to be proven, but the plot thickens. lol and yet you continue on your hypocritical path of the new leftie. The victim started this and deserves everything he gets. Wow daft lol. Hangon a minute . . .  are you saying ashby was the victim and the 15 year old was the evildoer? SOB

He's a bit confused today, mixing up left ideals with right etc.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 9:09am:

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 7:49am: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 6:58am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 6:31am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 5:55am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 30th, 2012 at 9:19pm: But surely the lefties on here are going to say it was the 15 yr olds fault, judging from all the vitriol recently. Come on, lets hear it. The victim is the aggressor. It was what the 15 yr old was wearing at the time that made it happen. Traditionally that is the attitude of "righties". SOB Well if thats the case, then times have changed. It is now lefties. No. It is the messed up minds of the right brigade that say such things. I'm as left as they get and I would never condemn the victim.  A man in his mid 20's shouldn't be having sex with a fifteen year old even if he did consent, they are far too naive and vulnerable at that age and it's illegal anyway. Ashby started this, so he deserves what he gets. If you want to fling accusations around to gain power, you better be sure you're squeaky clean. This latest scenario is yet to be proven, but the plot thickens. lol and yet you continue on your hypocritical path of the new leftie. The victim started this and deserves everything he gets. Wow daft lol. Hangon a minute . . .  are you saying ashby was the victim and the 15 year old was the evildoer? SOB

Your stupidity stems from jumping in late, well part of it.

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 10:44am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 9:09am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 7:49am: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 6:58am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 6:31am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 5:55am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 30th, 2012 at 9:19pm: But surely the lefties on here are going to say it was the 15 yr olds fault, judging from all the vitriol recently. Come on, lets hear it. The victim is the aggressor. It was what the 15 yr old was wearing at the time that made it happen. Traditionally that is the attitude of "righties". SOB Well if thats the case, then times have changed. It is now lefties. No. It is the messed up minds of the right brigade that say such things. I'm as left as they get and I would never condemn the victim.  A man in his mid 20's shouldn't be having sex with a fifteen year old even if he did consent, they are far too naive and vulnerable at that age and it's illegal anyway. Ashby started this, so he deserves what he gets. If you want to fling accusations around to gain power, you better be sure you're squeaky clean. This latest scenario is yet to be proven, but the plot thickens. lol and yet you continue on your hypocritical path of the new leftie. The victim started this and deserves everything he gets. Wow daft lol. Hangon a minute . . .  are you saying ashby was the victim and the 15 year old was the evildoer? SOB Your stupidity stems from jumping in late, well part of it.

and your stupidity? I guess that was just a gift at birth ....

John Smith wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 11:28am:

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 10:44am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 9:09am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 7:49am: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 6:58am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 6:31am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 5:55am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 30th, 2012 at 9:19pm: But surely the lefties on here are going to say it was the 15 yr olds fault, judging from all the vitriol recently. Come on, lets hear it. The victim is the aggressor. It was what the 15 yr old was wearing at the time that made it happen. Traditionally that is the attitude of "righties". SOB Well if thats the case, then times have changed. It is now lefties. No. It is the messed up minds of the right brigade that say such things. I'm as left as they get and I would never condemn the victim.  A man in his mid 20's shouldn't be having sex with a fifteen year old even if he did consent, they are far too naive and vulnerable at that age and it's illegal anyway. Ashby started this, so he deserves what he gets. If you want to fling accusations around to gain power, you better be sure you're squeaky clean. This latest scenario is yet to be proven, but the plot thickens. lol and yet you continue on your hypocritical path of the new leftie. The victim started this and deserves everything he gets. Wow daft lol. Hangon a minute . . .  are you saying ashby was the victim and the 15 year old was the evildoer? SOB Your stupidity stems from jumping in late, well part of it. and your stupidity? I guess that was just a gift at birth ....

A person as dumb as you should not be making guesses.

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 11:35am:

John Smith wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 11:28am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 10:44am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 9:09am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 7:49am: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 6:58am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 6:31am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 5:55am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 30th, 2012 at 9:19pm: But surely the lefties on here are going to say it was the 15 yr olds fault, judging from all the vitriol recently. Come on, lets hear it. The victim is the aggressor. It was what the 15 yr old was wearing at the time that made it happen. Traditionally that is the attitude of "righties". SOB Well if thats the case, then times have changed. It is now lefties. No. It is the messed up minds of the right brigade that say such things. I'm as left as they get and I would never condemn the victim.  A man in his mid 20's shouldn't be having sex with a fifteen year old even if he did consent, they are far too naive and vulnerable at that age and it's illegal anyway. Ashby started this, so he deserves what he gets. If you want to fling accusations around to gain power, you better be sure you're squeaky clean. This latest scenario is yet to be proven, but the plot thickens. lol and yet you continue on your hypocritical path of the new leftie. The victim started this and deserves everything he gets. Wow daft lol. Hangon a minute . . .  are you saying ashby was the victim and the 15 year old was the evildoer? SOB Your stupidity stems from jumping in late, well part of it. and your stupidity? I guess that was just a gift at birth .... A person as dumb as you should not be making guesses.

are you worried that my guesses are more factual than your carefully (i use the term lightly) researched knowledge?

John Smith wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 11:41am:

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 11:35am: John Smith wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 11:28am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 10:44am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 9:09am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 7:49am: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 6:58am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 6:31am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 5:55am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 30th, 2012 at 9:19pm: But surely the lefties on here are going to say it was the 15 yr olds fault, judging from all the vitriol recently. Come on, lets hear it. The victim is the aggressor. It was what the 15 yr old was wearing at the time that made it happen. Traditionally that is the attitude of "righties". SOB Well if thats the case, then times have changed. It is now lefties. No. It is the messed up minds of the right brigade that say such things. I'm as left as they get and I would never condemn the victim.  A man in his mid 20's shouldn't be having sex with a fifteen year old even if he did consent, they are far too naive and vulnerable at that age and it's illegal anyway. Ashby started this, so he deserves what he gets. If you want to fling accusations around to gain power, you better be sure you're squeaky clean. This latest scenario is yet to be proven, but the plot thickens. lol and yet you continue on your hypocritical path of the new leftie. The victim started this and deserves everything he gets. Wow daft lol. Hangon a minute . . .  are you saying ashby was the victim and the 15 year old was the evildoer? SOB Your stupidity stems from jumping in late, well part of it. and your stupidity? I guess that was just a gift at birth .... A person as dumb as you should not be making guesses. are you worried that my guesses are more factual than your carefully (i use the term lightly) researched knowledge?

refer to my previous post about you guessing.

Every homosexual child abuser should hang their heads in shame today...and don't retort with the lies that there is no connection between being queer and a pedo, the two are one, this should convince the bleeding hearts and grievance industry that the marriage equality agenda is bogus propaganda.... :P :P

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 11:57am:

John Smith wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 11:41am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 11:35am: John Smith wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 11:28am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 10:44am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 9:09am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 7:49am: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 6:58am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 6:31am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 5:55am: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 30th, 2012 at 9:19pm: But surely the lefties on here are going to say it was the 15 yr olds fault, judging from all the vitriol recently. Come on, lets hear it. The victim is the aggressor. It was what the 15 yr old was wearing at the time that made it happen. Traditionally that is the attitude of "righties". SOB Well if thats the case, then times have changed. It is now lefties. No. It is the messed up minds of the right brigade that say such things. I'm as left as they get and I would never condemn the victim.  A man in his mid 20's shouldn't be having sex with a fifteen year old even if he did consent, they are far too naive and vulnerable at that age and it's illegal anyway. Ashby started this, so he deserves what he gets. If you want to fling accusations around to gain power, you better be sure you're squeaky clean. This latest scenario is yet to be proven, but the plot thickens. lol and yet you continue on your hypocritical path of the new leftie. The victim started this and deserves everything he gets. Wow daft lol. Hangon a minute . . .  are you saying ashby was the victim and the 15 year old was the evildoer? SOB Your stupidity stems from jumping in late, well part of it. and your stupidity? I guess that was just a gift at birth .... A person as dumb as you should not be making guesses. are you worried that my guesses are more factual than your carefully (i use the term lightly) researched knowledge? refer to my previous post about you guessing.

whay makes you think it would sound any more clever the second time around?

it's a case of what goes around comes around !!

Prevailing wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 1:40pm:

Every homosexual child abuser should hang their heads in shame today...and don't retort with the lies that there is no connection between being queer and a pedo, the two are one, this should convince the bleeding hearts and grievance industry that the marriage equality agenda is bogus propaganda.... :P :P

So you support opposite sex child abusers? Seriously mate . . . .  its all child abuse . . . .

SOB

Bobby. wrote on Jul 30^th, 2012 at 9:09pm:

What a dirty pedo. Hang em and hang em high. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsMQABEiRMc

WHERE ARE THE HEADLINES ON THE FRONT PAGES WITH 24 HOUR SPECULATION ON LEADERSHIP???

OH, AND COLOUR PHOTOS!!

MY LONELY EXISTANCE DEMANDS COLOUR PHOTOS SO THAT MY WATER COOLER STORIES CAN HAVE ADDED VENOM!!!

Prevailing wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 1:40pm:

Every homosexual child abuser should hang their heads in shame today...and don't retort with the lies that there is no connection between being queer and a pedo, the two are one, this should convince the bleeding hearts and grievance industry that the marriage equality agenda is bogus propaganda.... :P :P

Exactly. It should be made clear that their secret plan is to marry our children.

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 3:18pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jul 30th, 2012 at 9:09pm: What a dirty pedo. Hang em and hang em high. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsMQABEiRMc WHERE ARE THE HEADLINES ON THE FRONT PAGES WITH 24 HOUR SPECULATION ON LEADERSHIP??? OH, AND COLOUR PHOTOS!! MY LONELY EXISTANCE DEMANDS COLOUR PHOTOS SO THAT MY WATER COOLER STORIES CAN HAVE ADDED VENOM!!!

Oh, Bobbie's got photos, Death. Quite a few.

Why's it always the homos that molest children?

... wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 5:13pm:

Why's it always the homos that molest children?

Its not. They are just getting the most media attention.

SOB

Hmmm...I dunno...that sounds a little too convenient.

Link?

... wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 6:07pm:

Hmmm...I dunno...that sounds a little too convenient. Link?

I think we could agree the vast majority of molestation is carried out by men, but not all men are gay.
The media does focus on the sexual orientation of the perpetrator as a gay man is all that much more Scary/Icky depending on your moral view.

Karnal wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 4:59pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 3:18pm: Bobby. wrote on Jul 30th, 2012 at 9:09pm: What a dirty pedo. Hang em and hang em high. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsMQABEiRMc WHERE ARE THE HEADLINES ON THE FRONT PAGES WITH 24 HOUR SPECULATION ON LEADERSHIP??? OH, AND COLOUR PHOTOS!! MY LONELY EXISTANCE DEMANDS COLOUR PHOTOS SO THAT MY WATER COOLER STORIES CAN HAVE ADDED VENOM!!! Oh, Bobbie's got photos, Death. Quite a few.

It's about time we hanged them & gave them some  justice.

The speech from Hang em High.



Quote:

Francis Elroy Duffy, Prisoner: Now Preacher? The Preacher: You may say your peace now. Francis Elroy Duffy, Prisoner: You're now looking, for the last time, at the mortal body of Francis Elroy Duffy, born to John and Edna Duffy, good, God-fearing folk. Who raised me up to be a good man and a good Christian, and I was a good Christian, a good husband to my beloved wife, good father to my children, who I leave behind, hoping that they, and all you, will learn this here lesson which I leave you with. When you take the devil into your mouth, you're doomed! For he is lying there in wait for you inside that bottle of whiskey. Waiting for you to take him into your mouth. Waiting to get down into your guts where he can do his devil's work. Liquor is the most foul, evil thing in this here world. It destroyed good men like myself. It'll destroy you too. Beer is not much better - it's slower, cheaper. So take these words of advice. And remember, you heard them from a poor sinner, got no more cause to lie, 'cause he's going to meet his Maker. Now he's ready. Well that's all I've got to say.

All this then makes Mal Bough look a better candidate for the Sunshine coast then.

these lies a all engineered by the discrasted Gay Peter Sliper.

2 gay men accusing each other , and another vultue looking on and waiting in the wings.

load of gargbage these story are, but we the public are stupid enough to beleive them.

Prevailing wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 1:40pm:

Every homosexual child abuser should hang their heads in shame today...and don't retort with the lies that there is no connection between being queer and a pedo, the two are one, this should convince the bleeding hearts and grievance industry that the marriage equality agenda is bogus propaganda.... :P :P

The 2 are NOT 1 and thats an idiotic thing to say.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2012 at 11:28am:

Prevailing wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 1:40pm: Every homosexual child abuser should hang their heads in shame today...and don't retort with the lies that there is no connection between being queer and a pedo, the two are one, this should convince the bleeding hearts and grievance industry that the marriage equality agenda is bogus propaganda.... :P :P The 2 are NOT 1 and thats an idiotic thing to say. SOB

That's like saying every lesbian is a pedo, that's just stupid.

So what excuse for the married heterosexual pedo's?

Marriage encourages paedophilia???

Your argument is twisted.

I bet there would be a deafening uproar if Ashby was a youth pastor.

Now it's all fullness of time, must rush to judgement, let the invertsigations take place, no rush to judge and be seen, god forbid, judgemental. Nothing is worse than being seen as judgemental.


Or even if he diddled 15 year old girls. Hetero kiddie fiddler. Orf with his head.

But as he is an arse bandit, PC pieties clash with normal reflexes of justice.

Prevailing wrote on Jul 31^st, 2012 at 1:40pm:

Every homosexual child abuser should hang their heads in shame today...and don't retort with the lies that there is no connection between being queer and a pedo, the two are one, this should convince the bleeding hearts and grievance industry that the marriage equality agenda is bogus propaganda.... :P :P

What a disgusting thing to say.

A 1994 study, led by Carole Jenny of the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, surveyed 269 cases of children who were sexually molested by adults. In 82 percent of cases, the alleged offender was a heterosexual partner of a close relative of the child, the researchers reported in the journal Pediatrics. In only two out of 269 cases, the offender was identified as being gay or lesbian.

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/94/1/41.abstract

These are very serious allegations. The man has not even been charged, so it's a tad premature to be drawing conclusions. The Facebook postings may appear damning, but are they fabricated? We need to leave these things to the police and the courts before we pass judgement.

MOTR wrote on Aug 4^th, 2012 at 6:15am:

Prevailing wrote on Jul 31st, 2012 at 1:40pm: Every homosexual child abuser should hang their heads in shame today...and don't retort with the lies that there is no connection between being queer and a pedo, the two are one, this should convince the bleeding hearts and grievance industry that the marriage equality agenda is bogus propaganda.... :P :P What a disgusting thing to say. A 1994 study, led by Carole Jenny of the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, surveyed 269 cases of children who were sexually molested by adults. In 82 percent of cases, the alleged offender was a heterosexual partner of a close relative of the child, the researchers reported in the journal Pediatrics. In only two out of 269 cases, the offender was identified as being gay or lesbian. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/94/1/41.abstract

As most of us already knew.

Prevailing makes things up.

Who told you to spread those fibs prevailing? the church?

Bobby. wrote on Jul 30^th, 2012 at 9:09pm:

What a dirty pedo. Hang em and hang em high. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsMQABEiRMc

When is the hanging?