7 Dead in 'Domestic Terrorism' Shooting at Wisconsin Sikh Temple
http://abcnews.go.com/US/sikh-temple-shooting-oak-creek-wisconsin-domestic-terrorism/story?id=16933779

Quote:

Seven people were shot and killed today at a Sikh temple in Oak Creek, Wis., in what officials are treating as a domestic terrorism incident. Three other people -- two civilians and a police officer -- were injured and were being treated at a local hospital. Individuals attending Sunday services at the Sikh Temple of Wisconsin, just south of Milwaukee, fled in all directions this morning when a gunman entered and began firing. Many hid in bathrooms or other rooms within the temple while the shooter attacked, according to police.

So the media is reporting another lone gunman attack.

But..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWZvTmg1rnc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ecdSKi9_fs

1,2,3 or 4.

Not sure of the point?

FriYAY wrote on Aug 6^th, 2012 at 10:44am:

1,2,3 or 4. Not sure of the point?

Well because the lone gunman idea will continue to be pushed when evidence proves this is possibly incorrect just like in many other lone gunman shootings.
But you are right, who cares if we are being lied to.

bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6^th, 2012 at 10:50am:

FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:44am: 1,2,3 or 4. Not sure of the point? Well because the lone gunman idea will continue to be pushed when evidence proves this is possibly incorrect just like in many other lone gunman shootings. But you are right, who cares if we are being lied to.

OK, but so? Why would people cover it up? I don’t get it, what’s to gain? Can you explain it to me?

It happened in the US. I don’t care if it was 1,2,3 or 10.

FriYAY wrote on Aug 6^th, 2012 at 10:56am:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:50am: FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:44am: 1,2,3 or 4. Not sure of the point? Well because the lone gunman idea will continue to be pushed when evidence proves this is possibly incorrect just like in many other lone gunman shootings. But you are right, who cares if we are being lied to. OK, but so? Why would people cover it up? I don’t get it, what’s to gain? Can you explain it to me? It happened in the US. I don’t care if it was 1,2,3 or 10.

Why don't you ask the people who continue to lie about it?

bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6^th, 2012 at 10:57am:

FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:56am: bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:50am: FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:44am: 1,2,3 or 4. Not sure of the point? Well because the lone gunman idea will continue to be pushed when evidence proves this is possibly incorrect just like in many other lone gunman shootings. But you are right, who cares if we are being lied to. OK, but so? Why would people cover it up? I don’t get it, what’s to gain? Can you explain it to me? It happened in the US. I don’t care if it was 1,2,3 or 10. Why don't you ask the people who continue to lie about it?

What people lie about it?

Why do people lie about it?

FriYAY wrote on Aug 6^th, 2012 at 10:59am:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:57am: FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:56am: bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:50am: FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:44am: 1,2,3 or 4. Not sure of the point? Well because the lone gunman idea will continue to be pushed when evidence proves this is possibly incorrect just like in many other lone gunman shootings. But you are right, who cares if we are being lied to. OK, but so? Why would people cover it up? I don’t get it, what’s to gain? Can you explain it to me? It happened in the US. I don’t care if it was 1,2,3 or 10. Why don't you ask the people who continue to lie about it? What people lie about it? Why do people lie about it?

Dude phuk off

bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6^th, 2012 at 11:02am:

FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:59am: bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:57am: FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:56am: bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:50am: FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:44am: 1,2,3 or 4. Not sure of the point? Well because the lone gunman idea will continue to be pushed when evidence proves this is possibly incorrect just like in many other lone gunman shootings. But you are right, who cares if we are being lied to. OK, but so? Why would people cover it up? I don’t get it, what’s to gain? Can you explain it to me? It happened in the US. I don’t care if it was 1,2,3 or 10. Why don't you ask the people who continue to lie about it? What people lie about it? Why do people lie about it? Dude phuk off

Answer the questions, dood...

The Heartless Felon wrote on Aug 6^th, 2012 at 11:10am:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 11:02am: FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:59am: bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:57am: FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:56am: bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:50am: FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:44am: 1,2,3 or 4. Not sure of the point? Well because the lone gunman idea will continue to be pushed when evidence proves this is possibly incorrect just like in many other lone gunman shootings. But you are right, who cares if we are being lied to. OK, but so? Why would people cover it up? I don’t get it, what’s to gain? Can you explain it to me? It happened in the US. I don’t care if it was 1,2,3 or 10. Why don't you ask the people who continue to lie about it? What people lie about it? Why do people lie about it? Dude phuk off Answer the questions, dood...

Clearly I already did

bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6^th, 2012 at 11:02am:

FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:59am: bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:57am: FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:56am: bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:50am: FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:44am: 1,2,3 or 4. Not sure of the point? Well because the lone gunman idea will continue to be pushed when evidence proves this is possibly incorrect just like in many other lone gunman shootings. But you are right, who cares if we are being lied to. OK, but so? Why would people cover it up? I don’t get it, what’s to gain? Can you explain it to me? It happened in the US. I don’t care if it was 1,2,3 or 10. Why don't you ask the people who continue to lie about it? What people lie about it? Why do people lie about it? Dude phuk off

Hey?

That’s your answer? Tell me to f off. LOL you’re pathetic. ::)

So you have no answers, you just put up conspiracy crap then abuse people trying to understand your post.



Does anyone know who lies about it and why?

The poster doesn’t seem to have a clue. :-?

FriYAY wrote on Aug 6^th, 2012 at 11:13am:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 11:02am: FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:59am: bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:57am: FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:56am: bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:50am: FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:44am: 1,2,3 or 4. Not sure of the point? Well because the lone gunman idea will continue to be pushed when evidence proves this is possibly incorrect just like in many other lone gunman shootings. But you are right, who cares if we are being lied to. OK, but so? Why would people cover it up? I don’t get it, what’s to gain? Can you explain it to me? It happened in the US. I don’t care if it was 1,2,3 or 10. Why don't you ask the people who continue to lie about it? What people lie about it? Why do people lie about it? Dude phuk off Hey? That’s your answer? Tell me to f off. LOL you’re pathetic. ::) So you have no answers, you just put up conspiracy crap then abuse people trying to understand your post. Does anyone know who lies about it and why? The poster doesn’t seem to have a clue. :-?

I already answered the questions you pathetic sack of crap and you already knew the answers before hand.

You haven't answered sh!t.
Why is it a false flag, what could be gained from it in Americas interest?
Or are we on the "FEMA death camps" tangent?

Dsmithy70 wrote on Aug 6^th, 2012 at 11:22am:

You haven't answered sh!t. Why is it a false flag, what could be gained from it in Americas interest? Or are we on the "FEMA death camps" tangent?

Where did I state that you sack of shyt?

The point is guns. It only took 1 incident in australia but in america its gunna take a lot more.

SOB

Guns aren't the porblem - nutters are the problem.


Quote:

SHENYANG, Aug. 2 (Xinhua) -- A teenager allegedly killed eight people and injured five in a knife attack Wednesday night in northeast China's Liaoning province, local authorities said Thursday. The killing spree occurred at about 9 p.m. Wednesday in Yongling township in Xinbin Manchu autonomous county in the city of Fushun, the Fushun city's publicity department said in a statement. The 17-year-old suspect, a native of Xinfu district in downtown Fushun, stabbed to death two relatives of his girlfriend after having conflicts with his girlfriend, an initial investigation showed. The teenager, surnamed Li, killed another six people and injured five while fleeing the scene, it said. The killer has been held by police. A further investigation into the killing is under way.

bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6^th, 2012 at 11:26am:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 11:22am: You haven't answered sh!t. Why is it a false flag, what could be gained from it in Americas interest? Or are we on the "FEMA death camps" tangent? Where did I state that you sack of shyt?

Thats the point o'abusive one (do you think its tough or unnerves me?)

Post 1 - you implied it was a false flag with the "BUT" then posting a you tube with that very title.
You've implied there was more than one gunman but it is being covered up
Friyay was confused on what you were trying to get across (as we all are) & asked quite reasonably for you to explain your thoughts to which this childish exchange ensued.

Oh my!

The personal abuse is atrocious.  :-X :-X

Sacks of shite, phuk off!!!! :o :o

Let’s hope the MOD is good to the word about abuse. :-?

What an angry thing you are. :(

Another lone gunman?

Without a gun he is just another lone man.

Dnarever wrote on Aug 6^th, 2012 at 1:43pm:

Another lone gunman? Without a gun he is just another lone man.

Do you really think you can keep guns from the hands of people that want to use them for sinister purposes?

Without the man it is just 1 lone gun…..

FriYAY wrote on Aug 6^th, 2012 at 1:50pm:

Dnarever wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 1:43pm: Another lone gunman? Without a gun he is just another lone man. Do you really think you can keep guns from the hands of people that want to use them for sinister purposes? Without the man it is just 1 lone gun…..

Without the man it may as well be a toaster - it just doesn't matter.

bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6^th, 2012 at 11:02am:

FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:59am: bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:57am: FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:56am: bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:50am: FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:44am: 1,2,3 or 4. Not sure of the point? Well because the lone gunman idea will continue to be pushed when evidence proves this is possibly incorrect just like in many other lone gunman shootings. But you are right, who cares if we are being lied to. OK, but so? Why would people cover it up? I don’t get it, what’s to gain? Can you explain it to me? It happened in the US. I don’t care if it was 1,2,3 or 10. Why don't you ask the people who continue to lie about it? What people lie about it? Why do people lie about it? Dude phuk off

These are pretty simple questions Saul. If you post conspiracy theories on a politics website people will expect you to at least make sense.

Dsmithy70 wrote on Aug 6^th, 2012 at 11:22am:

You haven't answered sh!t. Why is it a false flag, what could be gained from it in Americas interest? Or are we on the "FEMA death camps" tangent?

You've seen the vid and there are more than one vid doing the rounds right now where eye-witnesses have stated there were multiple shooters

So, do you believe the whore media

or do you believe the eye-witnesses ?  That's the first thing you need to clarify for yourself

Once you have, it's up to you to work out why the whore media might be lying to you and the rest of the world

Same goes for all the other Peter Pans who CHOOSE to believe the whore media over eye-witnesses

And while you're at it, you might feel motivated to ask yourself WHO has most to gain -- the whore media

or those who were there during the shooting and saw the shooter/s with their own eyes

quote
And while you're at it, you might feel motivated to ask yourself WHO has most to gain -- the whore media

or those who were there during the shooting and saw the shooter/s with their own eyes

thats easy the winging eye witness , just trying to big note themselfs with the media. I'am good I was a witness to a tradgic event.

Forget "domestic terrorism" or "false flag attacks" - It's just another frustrated beta male.  They seem to be becoming more common lately don't they?

Would be interesting to plot the rise of mass shootings agaisnt the rise of feminism (male disempowerment)  I reckon we'd see quite a strong correlation.

The eye witnesses?

Like the “Chika chika boom” girl?

:D :D

Bunch of pathetic idiots

freediver wrote on Aug 6^th, 2012 at 7:21pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 11:02am: FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:59am: bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:57am: FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:56am: bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:50am: FriYAY wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 10:44am: 1,2,3 or 4. Not sure of the point? Well because the lone gunman idea will continue to be pushed when evidence proves this is possibly incorrect just like in many other lone gunman shootings. But you are right, who cares if we are being lied to. OK, but so? Why would people cover it up? I don’t get it, what’s to gain? Can you explain it to me? It happened in the US. I don’t care if it was 1,2,3 or 10. Why don't you ask the people who continue to lie about it? What people lie about it? Why do people lie about it? Dude phuk off These are pretty simple questions Saul. If you post conspiracy theories on a politics website people will expect you to at least make sense.

If it were a conspiracy theory then you idiots wouldn't have a problem facing it head on instead of being the pathetic sacks of crap that you are.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qSt6LoXQ6A

PZ547 wrote on Aug 7^th, 2012 at 9:12pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 11:22am: You haven't answered sh!t. Why is it a false flag, what could be gained from it in Americas interest? Or are we on the "FEMA death camps" tangent? You've seen the vid and there are more than one vid doing the rounds right now where eye-witnesses have stated there were multiple shooters So, do you believe the whore media or do you believe the eye-witnesses ?  That's the first thing you need to clarify for yourself Once you have, it's up to you to work out why the whore media might be lying to you and the rest of the world Same goes for all the other Peter Pans who CHOOSE to believe the whore media over eye-witnesses And while you're at it, you might feel motivated to ask yourself WHO has most to gain -- the whore media or those who were there during the shooting and saw the shooter/s with their own eyes

I haven't watched the vids.
Had Saul actually tried to reasonably respond to FriYay I might have taken the time, but the "Dude Phuk Off" when pressed
lead me to post my response.

Dsmithy70 wrote on Aug 8^th, 2012 at 12:37pm:

PZ547 wrote on Aug 7th, 2012 at 9:12pm: Dsmithy70 wrote on Aug 6th, 2012 at 11:22am: You haven't answered sh!t. Why is it a false flag, what could be gained from it in Americas interest? Or are we on the "FEMA death camps" tangent? You've seen the vid and there are more than one vid doing the rounds right now where eye-witnesses have stated there were multiple shooters So, do you believe the whore media or do you believe the eye-witnesses ?  That's the first thing you need to clarify for yourself Once you have, it's up to you to work out why the whore media might be lying to you and the rest of the world Same goes for all the other Peter Pans who CHOOSE to believe the whore media over eye-witnesses And while you're at it, you might feel motivated to ask yourself WHO has most to gain -- the whore media or those who were there during the shooting and saw the shooter/s with their own eyes I haven't watched the vids. Had Saul actually tried to reasonably respond to FriYay I might have taken the time, but the "Dude Phuk Off" when pressed lead me to post my response.

hahah yet you have no problem with friyay posting unreasonably.
The questions were already answered and if you didn't know that then you shouldn't have been making comments.

Chillax brah.

Now then - what is your take on this mass shooting? 

Its a senseless Nazi hate crime for which the US Government and the political thugs that have been running western societies into social law and fascism bear the moral responsibility... Fight fascism in the West - sue the crap out of them...:) :)

... wrote on Aug 8^th, 2012 at 2:29pm:

Chillax brah. Now then - what is your take on this mass shooting?

I have no take.
But if the official story is to be taken seriously then they are going to need to account for the eye witness reports.
Unless its now crazy to listen to witnesses.

bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 8^th, 2012 at 6:34pm:

... wrote on Aug 8th, 2012 at 2:29pm: Chillax brah. Now then - what is your take on this mass shooting?  I have no take. But if the official story is to be taken seriously then they are going to need to account for the eye witness reports. Unless its now crazy to listen to witnesses.

A bet each way, huh. One has to wonder why you're getting so uppity about it when someone asks you a question.