More women murdered by the Western terrorists in their "war onof terror".

---

13 civilians killed in US assassination drone attack in Yemen

A Yemeni police official says at least thirteen civilians have lost their lives in a fresh US assassination drone strike in the Arab state.

The official, speaking on condition of the anonymity, said the raid took place at around 4:00 p.m. local time (1300 GMT) on Sunday in the Radaa area - situated 130 kilometers (80 miles) southeast of the Yemeni capital, Sana’a - and struck two vehicles, Xinhua reported.

The official added that two women were also among the victims of the incident.

Washington has been using its assassination drones in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen and Somalia and claims that it is targeting terrorists, but the attacks have mostly led to massive civilian deaths.

The UN has slammed the US terror drone attacks as targeted killings and says they pose a challenge to the international law.

Reports, however, say that the CIA is seeking to expand its covert drone attacks in Yemen, despite the fact that the airstrikes mostly result in civilian casualties.

Source: PressTV

Drone attacks are not terrorism.

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 11:09am:

Drone attacks are not terrorism.

So if Palestine defended itself with drones?

bobbythefap1 wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 11:11am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 11:09am: Drone attacks are not terrorism. So if Palestine defended itself with drones?

where?!
doesnt exist

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 11:12am:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 11:11am: Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 11:09am: Drone attacks are not terrorism. So if Palestine defended itself with drones? where?! doesnt exist

Naw poor little hypocrite terrorist.

There is no Palestine.

HAHAHAHA

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 11:24am:

There is no Palestine. HAHAHAHA

Link?

bobbythefap1 wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 11:38am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 11:24am: There is no Palestine. HAHAHAHA Link?

Where is it?

---

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 11:40am:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 11:38am: Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 11:24am: There is no Palestine. HAHAHAHA Link? Where is it?

Bet you don't have the balls to post a pre 1940 map do you?

why post a map which is old and no longer relevant.

Do you think Germany exists?

If you look at pre 18th century maps it does not.

What about Australia? Is this aboriginal land?

:D

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 11:45am:

why post a map which is old and no longer relevant. Do you think Germany exists? If you look at pre 18th century maps it does not. What about Australia? Is this aboriginal land? :D

Filthy little terrorist, thank you for proving my point.
Enjoy your holocaust.

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 11:12am:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 11:11am: Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 11:09am: Drone attacks are not terrorism. So if Palestine defended itself with drones? where?! doesnt exist

Ok, so if Iran defends itself by using drones on Zionist civilians, that's ok by you?

Iran?

What drones?

Iran fight with sticks and stones, they are stone age people.

I am more fearful of my mother.

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 2:01pm:

Iran? What drones? Iran fight with sticks and stones, they are stone age people. I am more fearful of my mother.

So why is your Zionist squatter leadership talking up the dire need to immediately attack them?

Iran acquired a U.S drone by hacking into it's control signals. They have reverse engineered it and will begin producing their own.

So the question stands, would you think it ok for them to begin using said drones to attack Zionist squatters?

refer to us correctly.

Whichever you wish -

State of Israel
Eretz YIsrael
אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל‎‎
Eres Yisraʼel

Whichever you wish to pick, then maybe i can answer your question.

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 2:20pm:

refer to us correctly. Whichever you wish - State of Israel Eretz YIsrael אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל‎‎ Eres Yisraʼel Whichever you wish to pick, then maybe i can answer your question.

Bucket of ScumRael, with a side serving of stolen land.

bobbythefap1 wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 2:57pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:20pm: refer to us correctly. Whichever you wish - State of Israel Eretz YIsrael אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל‎‎ Eres Yisraʼel Whichever you wish to pick, then maybe i can answer your question. Bucket of ScumRael, with a side serving of stolen land.

Which says more about YOU than about Israel....or Avram

gizmo_2655 wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 3:29pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:57pm: Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:20pm: refer to us correctly. Whichever you wish - State of Israel Eretz YIsrael אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל‎‎ Eres Yisraʼel Whichever you wish to pick, then maybe i can answer your question. Bucket of ScumRael, with a side serving of stolen land. Which says more about YOU than about Israel....

Why do you support terrorists?
What would you say if it was you or your family they were slaughtering and keeping locked up like cattle?

bobbythefap1 wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 3:30pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 3:29pm: bobbythefap1 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:57pm: Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:20pm: refer to us correctly. Whichever you wish - State of Israel Eretz YIsrael אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל‎‎ Eres Yisraʼel Whichever you wish to pick, then maybe i can answer your question. Bucket of ScumRael, with a side serving of stolen land. Which says more about YOU than about Israel.... Why do you support terrorists? What would you say if it was you or your family they were slaughtering and keeping locked up like cattle?

I don't support 'terrorists'...I do however support countries (like Israel) that are attack by terrorists

And there is no "slaughtering and keeping locked up like cattle" involved...

gizmo_2655 wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 4:18pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 3:30pm: gizmo_2655 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 3:29pm: bobbythefap1 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:57pm: Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:20pm: refer to us correctly. Whichever you wish - State of Israel Eretz YIsrael אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל‎‎ Eres Yisraʼel Whichever you wish to pick, then maybe i can answer your question. Bucket of ScumRael, with a side serving of stolen land. Which says more about YOU than about Israel.... Why do you support terrorists? What would you say if it was you or your family they were slaughtering and keeping locked up like cattle? I don't support 'terrorists'...I do however support countries (like Israel) that are attack by terrorists And there is no "slaughtering and keeping locked up like cattle" involved...

Except those 'terrorists' are defending themselves where as Israel is on the offensive..Would you consider yourself a terrorist if you fought a country that occupied Australia?

Your second sentence shows that you have no knowledge of the subject.

bobbythefap1 wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 2:57pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:20pm: refer to us correctly. Whichever you wish - State of Israel Eretz YIsrael אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל‎‎ Eres Yisraʼel Whichever you wish to pick, then maybe i can answer your question. Bucket of ScumRael, with a side serving of stolen land.

Did you know that in the days of Herod, Israel was larger than it is today. The Muslims STOLE that land from the Jews! The Jews then took their land back.

Should they be allowed to TAKE BACK ALL THAT WAS THEIRS AT THE TIME OF HEROD?

And if not, why not?

Adamant wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 4:45pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:57pm: Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:20pm: refer to us correctly. Whichever you wish - State of Israel Eretz YIsrael אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל‎‎ Eres Yisraʼel Whichever you wish to pick, then maybe i can answer your question. Bucket of ScumRael, with a side serving of stolen land. Did you know that in the days of Herod, Israel was larger than it is today. The Muslims STOLE that land from the Jews! The Jews then took their land back. Should they be allowed to TAKE BACK ALL THAT WAS THEIRS AT THE TIME OF HEROD? And if not, why not?

Did you know the jews in Israel today can in no way prove they are descended from 'gods chosen people'?

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 11:09am:

Drone attacks are not terrorism.

No.  Drone attacks are most definitely terrorism

Adamant wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 4:45pm:

Did you know that in the days of Herod, Israel was larger than it is today.

What nonsense. It was about half the size of the current Zionist installation. It didn't go south of the dead sea at all.


Adamant wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 4:45pm:

The Muslims STOLE that land from the Jews! The Jews then took their land back.

When Muslims arrived, Jews were long gone, the Pagan Romans had booted them out centuries before, and the Christian Arabs living there hadn't seen the Jews for centuries either.

If anything Muslims allowed them back in.


Adamant wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 4:45pm:

Should they be allowed to TAKE BACK ALL THAT WAS THEIRS AT THE TIME OF HEROD? And if not, why not?

No they should not! No people should be allowed to evict others, to claim land that they say was theirs 2000 odd years ago.

In the year 3788, should the descendants of Aboriginals be allowed to TAKE BACK ALL THAT WAS THIERS AT THE TIME OF CAPTAIN COOK? Would it be ok for your descendants to be booted from their homes by them? And be bombed if they disagreed and herded into refugee camps?

rabbitoh07 wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 5:25pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 11:09am: Drone attacks are not terrorism. No.  Drone attacks are most definitely terrorism

That is your opinion.
I do not share this opinion.

abu_rashid wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 6:02pm:

Adamant wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 4:45pm: Did you know that in the days of Herod, Israel was larger than it is today. What nonsense. It was about half the size of the current Zionist installation. It didn't go south of the dead sea at all. Adamant wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 4:45pm: The Muslims STOLE that land from the Jews! The Jews then took their land back. When Muslims arrived, Jews were long gone, the Pagan Romans had booted them out centuries before, and the Christian Arabs living there hadn't seen the Jews for centuries either. If anything Muslims allowed them back in. Adamant wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 4:45pm: Should they be allowed to TAKE BACK ALL THAT WAS THEIRS AT THE TIME OF HEROD? And if not, why not? No they should not! No people should be allowed to evict others, to claim land that they say was theirs 2000 odd years ago. In the year 3788, should the descendants of Aboriginals be allowed to TAKE BACK ALL THAT WAS THIERS AT THE TIME OF CAPTAIN COOK? Would it be ok for your descendants to be booted from their homes by them? And be bombed if they disagreed and herded into refugee camps?

You know Israel will remain.
Accept it. We are here.

"There is one thing driving us all as Israelis in our fight with the Arabs. It's called No Alternative"
Golda Meir

Adamant wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 4:45pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:57pm: Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:20pm: refer to us correctly. Whichever you wish - State of Israel Eretz YIsrael אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל‎‎ Eres Yisraʼel Whichever you wish to pick, then maybe i can answer your question. Bucket of ScumRael, with a side serving of stolen land. Did you know that in the days of Herod, Israel was larger than it is today. The Muslims STOLE that land from the Jews! The Jews then took their land back. Should they be allowed to TAKE BACK ALL THAT WAS THEIRS AT THE TIME OF HEROD? And if not, why not?

Herod? are you saying that because a fiction book says something it must be history? Seriously australia and america didnt even exist 2k years ago. aboriginals, indians, maoris . . . .should the lands they occupied be given back to them now?

Of course we have heard all this silly crap before. israel is a terrorist state.

SOB

Herod isn't fiction you fool no more so than the Romans are.

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 7:52am:

Herod isn't fiction you fool no more so than the Romans are.

Maybe mr stupid but the fiction book doesnt give you rights to the land.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 4:11am:

Adamant wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 4:45pm: bobbythefap1 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:57pm: Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:20pm: refer to us correctly. Whichever you wish - State of Israel Eretz YIsrael אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל‎‎ Eres Yisraʼel Whichever you wish to pick, then maybe i can answer your question. Bucket of ScumRael, with a side serving of stolen land. Did you know that in the days of Herod, Israel was larger than it is today. The Muslims STOLE that land from the Jews! The Jews then took their land back. Should they be allowed to TAKE BACK ALL THAT WAS THEIRS AT THE TIME OF HEROD? And if not, why not? Herod? are you saying that because a fiction book says something it must be history? Seriously australia and america didnt even exist 2k years ago. aboriginals, indians, maoris . . . .should the lands they occupied be given back to them now? Of course we have heard all this silly crap before. israel is a terrorist state. SOB

It's not a matter of giving lands back - it's a matter of if they're strong enough to take and hold it, it is theirs.

... wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 11:04am:

It's not a matter of giving lands back - it's a matter of if they're strong enough to take and hold it, it is theirs.

If their only valid claim to the land is the fact they've used the most force to take it, then they shouldn't have any complaints when force is used by the inhabitants to stop them taking it.

abu_rashid wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 11:18am:

... wrote on Sep 4th, 2012 at 11:04am: It's not a matter of giving lands back - it's a matter of if they're strong enough to take and hold it, it is theirs. If their only valid claim to the land is the fact they've used the most force to take it, then they shouldn't have any complaints when force is used by the inhabitants to stop them taking it.

true.  But you're not so naive as to think 'the inhabitants' possess the necessary force are you?  Stone-throwing youths usually come off 2nd best when pitted against tanks and gunships... 

Abu don't even think to mention Egypt.

Their military is no match for ours.
You do know we have the best equipped military in the region?

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 4:11am:

Adamant wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 4:45pm: bobbythefap1 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:57pm: Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:20pm: refer to us correctly. Whichever you wish - State of Israel Eretz YIsrael אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל‎‎ Eres Yisraʼel Whichever you wish to pick, then maybe i can answer your question. Bucket of ScumRael, with a side serving of stolen land. Did you know that in the days of Herod, Israel was larger than it is today. The Muslims STOLE that land from the Jews! The Jews then took their land back. Should they be allowed to TAKE BACK ALL THAT WAS THEIRS AT THE TIME OF HEROD? And if not, why not? Herod? are you saying that because a fiction book says something it must be history? Seriously australia and america didnt even exist 2k years ago. aboriginals, indians, maoris . . . .should the lands they occupied be given back to them now? Of course we have heard all this silly crap before. israel is a terrorist state. SOB

Firstly, Herod is only mentioned in the New Testament. The part the Jews use (what the Christians would call the Old Testament) does not mention him, as it was written before he existed. So he is not even in their so called fiction like you claim. First mistake.

Secondly, you're trying to mock someone by claiming that Herod is a work of fiction made by religious people. That Herod and the entire Herodian dynasty didn't exist. That's not just a mistake, that is ignorance to the extreme.

You know nothing of history or peoples beliefs yourself, yet you mock them and pass judgement on their intelligence. Stop being such a damn fool.

Quantum wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 12:18pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 4th, 2012 at 4:11am: Adamant wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 4:45pm: bobbythefap1 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:57pm: Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:20pm: refer to us correctly. Whichever you wish - State of Israel Eretz YIsrael אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל‎‎ Eres Yisraʼel Whichever you wish to pick, then maybe i can answer your question. Bucket of ScumRael, with a side serving of stolen land. Did you know that in the days of Herod, Israel was larger than it is today. The Muslims STOLE that land from the Jews! The Jews then took their land back. Should they be allowed to TAKE BACK ALL THAT WAS THEIRS AT THE TIME OF HEROD? And if not, why not? Herod? are you saying that because a fiction book says something it must be history? Seriously australia and america didnt even exist 2k years ago. aboriginals, indians, maoris . . . .should the lands they occupied be given back to them now? Of course we have heard all this silly crap before. israel is a terrorist state. SOB Firstly, Herod is only mentioned in the New Testament. The part the Jews use (what the Christians would call the Old Testament) does not mention him, as it was written before he existed. So he is not even in their so called fiction like you claim. First mistake. Secondly, you're trying to mock someone by claiming that Herod is a work of fiction made by religious people. That Herod and the entire Herodian dynasty didn't exist. That's not just a mistake, that is ignorance to the extreme. You know nothing of history or peoples beliefs yourself, yet you mock them and pass judgement on their intelligence. Stop being such a damn fool.

No dick the herod thing was a minor part of the point.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 12:37pm:

Quantum wrote on Sep 4th, 2012 at 12:18pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 4th, 2012 at 4:11am: Adamant wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 4:45pm: bobbythefap1 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:57pm: Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:20pm: refer to us correctly. Whichever you wish - State of Israel Eretz YIsrael אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל‎‎ Eres Yisraʼel Whichever you wish to pick, then maybe i can answer your question. Bucket of ScumRael, with a side serving of stolen land. Did you know that in the days of Herod, Israel was larger than it is today. The Muslims STOLE that land from the Jews! The Jews then took their land back. Should they be allowed to TAKE BACK ALL THAT WAS THEIRS AT THE TIME OF HEROD? And if not, why not? Herod? are you saying that because a fiction book says something it must be history? Seriously australia and america didnt even exist 2k years ago. aboriginals, indians, maoris . . . .should the lands they occupied be given back to them now? Of course we have heard all this silly crap before. israel is a terrorist state. SOB Firstly, Herod is only mentioned in the New Testament. The part the Jews use (what the Christians would call the Old Testament) does not mention him, as it was written before he existed. So he is not even in their so called fiction like you claim. First mistake. Secondly, you're trying to mock someone by claiming that Herod is a work of fiction made by religious people. That Herod and the entire Herodian dynasty didn't exist. That's not just a mistake, that is ignorance to the extreme. You know nothing of history or peoples beliefs yourself, yet you mock them and pass judgement on their intelligence. Stop being such a damn fool. No dick the herod thing was a minor part of the point. SOB

It was still you trying to mock someone and showing that you have no idea what you are talking about. If you knew Herod was a real person you would not have used him as even a minor point.

... wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 11:54am:

true.  But you're not so naive as to think 'the inhabitants' possess the necessary force are you?  Stone-throwing youths usually come off 2nd best when pitted against tanks and gunships...

They've always possessed the necessary force. The only reason it was taken was due to external support for Zionism. The billions of dollars in foreign aide, military hardware and diplomatic support given to them is what has brought about the current situation.

Likewise, now as the Muslim world begins to break off the shackles of colonialism, and return to Islamically-leaning governments, the Palestinian side will receive much more external support, and the force exerted back against the Zionist squatters will indeed result in their departure.

Quantum wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 12:18pm:

Firstly, Herod is only mentioned in the New Testament. The part the Jews use (what the Christians would call the Old Testament) does not mention him, as it was written before he existed. So he is not even in their so called fiction like you claim. First mistake. Secondly, you're trying to mock someone by claiming that Herod is a work of fiction made by religious people. That Herod and the entire Herodian dynasty didn't exist. That's not just a mistake, that is ignorance to the extreme. You know nothing of history or peoples beliefs yourself, yet you mock them and pass judgement on their intelligence. Stop being such a damn fool.

Regardless, the Herodian kingdom was only about half the size of the current Zionist installation, and it was a Roman province, not an independent state of its own.

abu_rashid wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 1:31pm:

... wrote on Sep 4th, 2012 at 11:54am: true.  But you're not so naive as to think 'the inhabitants' possess the necessary force are you?  Stone-throwing youths usually come off 2nd best when pitted against tanks and gunships...  They've always possessed the necessary force. The only reason it was taken was due to external support for Zionism. The billions of dollars in foreign aide, military hardware and diplomatic support given to them is what has brought about the current situation. Likewise, now as the Muslim world begins to break off the shackles of colonialism, and return to Islamically-leaning governments, the Palestinian side will receive much more external support, and the force exerted back against the Zionist squatters will indeed result in their departure.

And the fact that it was taken is as clear indication as you can get that they don't possess the necessary force.  It don't matter where the power comes from, only that they have it. 

abu_rashid wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 1:31pm:

... wrote on Sep 4th, 2012 at 11:54am: true.  But you're not so naive as to think 'the inhabitants' possess the necessary force are you?  Stone-throwing youths usually come off 2nd best when pitted against tanks and gunships...  They've always possessed the necessary force. The only reason it was taken was due to external support for Zionism. The billions of dollars in foreign aide, military hardware and diplomatic support given to them is what has brought about the current situation. Likewise, now as the Muslim world begins to break off the shackles of colonialism, and return to Islamically-leaning governments, the Palestinian side will receive much more external support, and the force exerted back against the Zionist squatters will indeed result in their departure.

This is just fantasy land.

Do you really think this group of disorganized stone throwers will ever make us leave??

Never never never.

How many lessons from us do they want?

... wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 1:34pm:

And the fact that it was taken is as clear indication as you can get that they don't possess the necessary force.  It don't matter where the power comes from, only that they have it.

No it doesn't matter where it came from initially... but it will matter in the near future, because the West's support will eventually dry up. They are too busy worrying about themselves now to worry about propping up someone else. And the Muslim countries are beginning to rise. Pretty soon the tables will be turned.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 4:11am:

Adamant wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 4:45pm: bobbythefap1 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:57pm: Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:20pm: refer to us correctly. Whichever you wish - State of Israel Eretz YIsrael אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל‎‎ Eres Yisraʼel Whichever you wish to pick, then maybe i can answer your question. Bucket of ScumRael, with a side serving of stolen land. Did you know that in the days of Herod, Israel was larger than it is today. The Muslims STOLE that land from the Jews! The Jews then took their land back. Should they be allowed to TAKE BACK ALL THAT WAS THEIRS AT THE TIME OF HEROD? And if not, why not? Herod? are you saying that because a fiction book says something it must be history? Seriously australia and america didnt even exist 2k years ago. aboriginals, indians, maoris . . . .should the lands they occupied be given back to them now? Of course we have heard all this silly crap before. israel is a terrorist state. SOB

Herod The Great was a REAL person, not just a character in the bible...unless you think that all the writings of the Roman Empire are fiction too...

What happened last time all the Arabs came together and attacked my country?

See below photo from the Golan, 1967.

---

Yeh... this time it's going to be Muslims coming together, not Arabs.

are you going to throw your stones at me again?

It was always so fun when they have stones and i have a Tavor semi-automatic bullpup.

abu_rashid wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 2:59pm:

... wrote on Sep 4th, 2012 at 1:34pm: And the fact that it was taken is as clear indication as you can get that they don't possess the necessary force.  It don't matter where the power comes from, only that they have it.  No it doesn't matter where it came from initially... but it will matter in the near future, because the West's support will eventually dry up. They are too busy worrying about themselves now to worry about propping up someone else. And the Muslim countries are beginning to rise. Pretty soon the tables will be turned.

Yep, well nothing lasts forever.  I don't see it playing out like that, but who knows?  Stranger things have happened.

abu_rashid wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 3:19pm:

Yeh... this time it's going to be Muslims coming together, not Arabs.

Bring on the Caliphate hey? Can’t wait to see how the Shiite and Sunni go fighting together.

Well bring it on!

You’ll be blowing the poo out of each other while taking on the west.

FriYAY wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 3:32pm:

abu_rashid wrote on Sep 4th, 2012 at 3:19pm: Yeh... this time it's going to be Muslims coming together, not Arabs. Bring on the Caliphate hey? Can’t wait to see how the Shiite and Sunni go fighting together. Well bring it on! You’ll be blowing the poo out of each other while taking on the west.

The tiny Shi'a sect has existed in Islam almost since the beginning, in fact it used to be bigger back in the days of Manzikert and other such "meetings" between the West and Islam, so if that's your "insurance policy" for guarding against the rise of Islam, then you're fooling nobody but yourself.

History has showed me and my countrymen before me that they are a gang of disorganized desert dogs basically.


"Our greatest motivator for the conflict with the Arabs can be summed up in two words: No Alternative"

The Palestinians are better to make peace with us because we can wipe them from the map if we wanted but we havent.

abu_rashid wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 3:40pm:

FriYAY wrote on Sep 4th, 2012 at 3:32pm: abu_rashid wrote on Sep 4th, 2012 at 3:19pm: Yeh... this time it's going to be Muslims coming together, not Arabs. Bring on the Caliphate hey? Can’t wait to see how the Shiite and Sunni go fighting together. Well bring it on! You’ll be blowing the poo out of each other while taking on the west. The tiny Shi'a sect has existed in Islam almost since the beginning, in fact it used to be bigger back in the days of Manzikert and other such "meetings" between the West and Islam, so if that's your "insurance policy" for guarding against the rise of Islam, then you're fooling nobody but yourself.

What you really want is a Caliphate, yes?

Who’s going to lead these united forces?

Do you think there will be gays in the Unified Muslim Armed forces?

We will need plenty of detention centers in the desert to round up all you peasants that come over here and give you somewhere to stay, while you try and take over the world with your AK47’s.

Baaaaaaaahahahahahahahaha

abu_rashid wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 3:40pm:

FriYAY wrote on Sep 4th, 2012 at 3:32pm: abu_rashid wrote on Sep 4th, 2012 at 3:19pm: Yeh... this time it's going to be Muslims coming together, not Arabs. Bring on the Caliphate hey? Can’t wait to see how the Shiite and Sunni go fighting together. Well bring it on! You’ll be blowing the poo out of each other while taking on the west. The tiny Shi'a sect has existed in Islam almost since the beginning, in fact it used to be bigger back in the days of Manzikert and other such "meetings" between the West and Islam, so if that's your "insurance policy" for guarding against the rise of Islam, then you're fooling nobody but yourself.

Iraq is looking good as the team leader of the Caliphate!!!

NOT! :( :(