Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Gillard backs Israel
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1353036139

Message started by Shane B on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:22pm

Title: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Shane B on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:22pm
“The Government condemns the repeated rocket and mortar attacks on Israel from the Gaza Strip and calls on Hamas to cease these immediately,’’ the PM said.

”Australia supports Israel’s right to defend itself against these indiscriminate attacks. Such attacks on Israel’s civilian population are utterly unacceptable.


Well done.

http://news.com.au/national/hamas-should-stop-attacks-says-julia-gillard/story-fndo4cq1-1226518010810

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:28pm
Yep agreed.

Israel needs our support.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:30pm
Figgers. She is a yank puppet afterall.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Annie Anthrax on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:34pm
Gillard the f.uckwit.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:37pm

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:34pm:
Gillard the f.uckwit.


For condemning an escalation from a terrorist group firing unguided missiles over the border and supporting suicide bombings?

Yeah shame on her eh?

Some of you need to realize what Israel faces on a daily basis from these primates who surround them.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by pansi1951 on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:45pm

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:34pm:
Gillard the f.uckwit.



I'll second that!!!

what a stooge!

Her bf has Jewish connections so it's to be expected.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Annie Anthrax on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:45pm
No. Gillard is a f.uckwit and an immoral unethical hypocrite of the highest order for her support of Israel's terrorism against Gazan civilians and the illegal assassination of its key figures without trial.

It's Palestinian children getting blown to bits. Last I read it was 4. They might not mean much to you (being brown and all) but I'm sure as hell they meant a lot to their families.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:51pm
The guy was the military head of a terrorist organization that has committed atrocities including the bombing of Israeli women and children.

Israel is to be applauded for removing such scum from this planet.

Also you may want to look at what those idiots in Gaza are doing, sending unguided missiles over the border to a town that could hit anything.

See the difference?

Israel - Guided air to surface missile targetting terrorists.
Hamas - Unguided missiles blindly fired into Israel with no care what they hit.

Given your Muslim connections, me thinks you're a tad biased love.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by salad in on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:54pm
I can't understand why the Gazans are upset. Isn't the desire of muslims to be near Halla? Israel is expediting the wishes of these muslims. What's the problem?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Annie Anthrax on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:54pm


Quote:
The guy was the military head of a terrorist organization that has committed atrocities including the bombing of Israeli women and children.


By that reasoning, the IDF and Bibi and his buddies are guilty of the same crime.


Quote:
Israel - Guided air to surface missile targetting terrorists



Then why the obscene civilian casualty rates whenever Israel decides to take out a few 'terrorists'?


Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:54pm
Who not what, eh Andrei?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:57pm

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:54pm:

Quote:
The guy was the military head of a terrorist organization that has committed atrocities including the bombing of Israeli women and children.


By that reasoning, the IDF and Bibi and his buddies are guilty of the same crime.

[quote]
Israel - Guided air to surface missile targetting terrorists



Then why the obscene civilian casualty rates whenever Israel decides to take out a few 'terrorists'?

[/quote]

Because Hamas deliberately fire from civilian areas.
They couldn't give a toss about their own people.

Strange how much of the western world has come out in support of Israel on this one isn't it?
Oh or are they all just anti-Muslim? LOL

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:00pm

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:45pm:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:34pm:
Gillard the f.uckwit.



I'll second that!!!

what a stooge!

Her bf has Jewish connections so it's to be expected.



Annie's husband is a Muslim so is her stance to be expected as well?

Or do you only apply your bias one way?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Annie Anthrax on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:00pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:57pm:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:54pm:

Quote:
The guy was the military head of a terrorist organization that has committed atrocities including the bombing of Israeli women and children.


By that reasoning, the IDF and Bibi and his buddies are guilty of the same crime.

[quote]
Israel - Guided air to surface missile targetting terrorists



Then why the obscene civilian casualty rates whenever Israel decides to take out a few 'terrorists'?


Because Hamas deliberately fire from civilian areas.
They couldn't give a toss about their own people.

[/quote]


You couldnt be more of a moron if you tried, love. Care to show me which part of Gaza isn't densely populated with civilians? They've been herded in and caged like animals - everywhere is a civilian neighbourhood.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by salad in on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:00pm
I consider muslims to be filth*.

*My religion allows me to say that.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:03pm

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:00pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:57pm:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:54pm:

Quote:
The guy was the military head of a terrorist organization that has committed atrocities including the bombing of Israeli women and children.


By that reasoning, the IDF and Bibi and his buddies are guilty of the same crime.

[quote]
Israel - Guided air to surface missile targetting terrorists



Then why the obscene civilian casualty rates whenever Israel decides to take out a few 'terrorists'?


Because Hamas deliberately fire from civilian areas.
They couldn't give a toss about their own people.



You couldnt be more of a moron if you tried, love. Care to show me which part of Gaza isn't densely populated with civilians? They've been herded in and caged like animals - everywhere is a civilian neighbourhood.[/quote]

So you don't think its idiotic to fire missiles from a densely populated area?

Why fire them at all?

What do they think would happen?
Israel just let's them attack them?

Fool.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Annie Anthrax on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:04pm

Quote:
What do they think would happen?
Israel just let's them attack them?


That works both ways, yes?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:05pm
Do your rules apply for everyone Andrei?
What about the Jews in ww2 ghettos? Were they allowed to defend themselves?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:08pm

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:04pm:

Quote:
What do they think would happen?
Israel just let's them attack them?


That works both ways, yes?


Israel unilaterally withdrew from Gaza and there is no soldier left in the territory.
Israel restricts the border but given these people are trying to enter its country, it is entitled to do so.

Hamas continue to fire rockets into Israel and support suicide bombs despite having full control of Gaza.

It is they who are to blame.


Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by alevine on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:22pm

Shane B wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:22pm:
“The Government condemns the repeated rocket and mortar attacks on Israel from the Gaza Strip and calls on Hamas to cease these immediately,’’ the PM said.

”Australia supports Israel’s right to defend itself against these indiscriminate attacks. Such attacks on Israel’s civilian population are utterly unacceptable.


Well done.

http://news.com.au/national/hamas-should-stop-attacks-says-julia-gillard/story-fndo4cq1-1226518010810


what would you expect?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by alevine on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:24pm
Ah, nice to see the usual garbage from the usual idiots (Andrei/salad dim)


Both "governments" should be condemned for all of this idiocy. Hamas for targeting civilians. Isarel for killing children and civilians in their latest "military" attack.


Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Shane B on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:28pm

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:45pm:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:34pm:
Gillard the f.uckwit.



I'll second that!!!

what a stooge!

Her bf has Jewish connections so it's to be expected.


:D :D :D :D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:42pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:57pm:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:54pm:

Quote:
The guy was the military head of a terrorist organization that has committed atrocities including the bombing of Israeli women and children.


By that reasoning, the IDF and Bibi and his buddies are guilty of the same crime.

[quote]
Israel - Guided air to surface missile targetting terrorists



Then why the obscene civilian casualty rates whenever Israel decides to take out a few 'terrorists'?


Because Hamas deliberately fire from civilian areas.
They couldn't give a toss about their own people.

Strange how much of the western world has come out in support of Israel on this one isn't it?
Oh or are they all just anti-Muslim? LOL[/quote]

No they are just pro-yank and sooner or later its going to have to stop.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by hawil on Nov 16th, 2012 at 3:32pm

salad in wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:00pm:
I consider muslims to be filth*.

*My religion allows me to say that.

As long as there are people with views like this, than the world will never enjoy prolonged peace.
Gillard is just another stooge of the US, and Hillary probably told her what to say.
I,am not very informed about the situation in this area, but what I noticed from the media, the Israelis always manage to kill ten Palestinians for a loss of one Israeli.
If it were not for the US, Israel could not throw its weight around so much, but I don't agree with the idea that Muslims should have the right to take over the world.
The UN should be more vocal and active on the animosity between the Islamic and Western world, if that is possible, because the UN seems to be another stooge of the US.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by bobbythebat1 on Nov 16th, 2012 at 3:41pm
Who cares about what a red head says?

What is the UN doing?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 16th, 2012 at 3:44pm

hawil wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 3:32pm:

salad in wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:00pm:
I consider muslims to be filth*.

*My religion allows me to say that.

As long as there are people with views like this, than the world will never enjoy prolonged peace.
Gillard is just another stooge of the US, and Hillary probably told her what to say.
I,am not very informed about the situation in this area, but what I noticed from the media, the Israelis always manage to kill ten Palestinians for a loss of one Israeli.
If it were not for the US, Israel could not throw its weight around so much, but I don't agree with the idea that Muslims should have the right to take over the world.
The UN should be more vocal and active on the animosity between the Islamic and Western world, if that is possible, because the UN seems to be another stooge of the US.

Israel dont need the yanks Rembember the 6 day war
they beat the shyte out of thr towel heads ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by chicken_lipsforme on Nov 16th, 2012 at 3:48pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:37pm:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:34pm:
Gillard the f.uckwit.


For condemning an escalation from a terrorist group firing unguided missiles over the border and supporting suicide bombings?

Yeah shame on her eh?

Some of you need to realize what Israel faces on a daily basis from these primates who surround them.


Agreed.
It wont be long before the IDF enters Gaza again to root out the terrorists.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 16th, 2012 at 3:51pm

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 3:48pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:37pm:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:34pm:
Gillard the f.uckwit.


For condemning an escalation from a terrorist group firing unguided missiles over the border and supporting suicide bombings?

Yeah shame on her eh?

Some of you need to realize what Israel faces on a daily basis from these primates who surround them.


Agreed.
It wont be long before the IDF enters Gaza again to root out the terrorists.

Who would of thought you would agree with a terrorist supporter...
Why would the IDF enter somewhere else when they could root themselves out where they are now?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Hyperion on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:24pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:08pm:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:04pm:

Quote:
What do they think would happen?
Israel just let's them attack them?


That works both ways, yes?

Israel is a fascist country, with fascist 5th column supporters who justify the killing of civilian men women and children.


Israel unilaterally withdrew from Gaza and there is no soldier left in the territory.
Israel restricts the border but given these people are trying to enter its country, it is entitled to do so.

Hamas continue to fire rockets into Israel and support suicide bombs despite having full control of Gaza.

It is they who are to blame.

Israel is a fascist country with fascist 5th column supporters.
How they justify killing civilians is like the fascists of the last century. Stop the blocade.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by gold_medal on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:27pm

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:54pm:

Quote:
The guy was the military head of a terrorist organization that has committed atrocities including the bombing of Israeli women and children.


By that reasoning, the IDF and Bibi and his buddies are guilty of the same crime.

[quote]
Israel - Guided air to surface missile targetting terrorists



Then why the obscene civilian casualty rates whenever Israel decides to take out a few 'terrorists'?

[/quote]


becase the terrorist you think are heroes hide deliberately in schools, kindergartens and on many occasions LITERALLY behind women and children.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by gold_medal on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:29pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:24pm:
Ah, nice to see the usual garbage from the usual idiots (Andrei/salad dim)


Both "governments" should be condemned for all of this idiocy. Hamas for targeting civilians. Isarel for killing children and civilians in their latest "military" attack.


the difference is that only one side fired first - GAZA. and the targetting of a terrorist leader for assassination is a globally accepted modus operandi. terrorists by their very nature lose the protection of host countries.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:39pm

gold_medal wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:29pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:24pm:
Ah, nice to see the usual garbage from the usual idiots (Andrei/salad dim)


Both "governments" should be condemned for all of this idiocy. Hamas for targeting civilians. Isarel for killing children and civilians in their latest "military" attack.


the difference is that only one side fired first - GAZA. and the targetting of a terrorist leader for assassination is a globally accepted modus operandi. terrorists by their very nature lose the protection of host countries.

So you do not support people being able to defend themselves?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Annie Anthrax on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:54pm

gold_medal wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:27pm:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:54pm:

Quote:
The guy was the military head of a terrorist organization that has committed atrocities including the bombing of Israeli women and children.


By that reasoning, the IDF and Bibi and his buddies are guilty of the same crime.

[quote]
Israel - Guided air to surface missile targetting terrorists



Then why the obscene civilian casualty rates whenever Israel decides to take out a few 'terrorists'?



becase the terrorist you think are heroes hide deliberately in schools, kindergartens and on many occasions LITERALLY behind women and children.[/quote]


Another idiot.

Jabari certainly wasn't hiding in a school, was he? And yet still the civilians die.

Gaza has one of the highest population densities in the world. Do you understand what that means?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:55pm
768 rockets have been fired so far this year into Israel by the unwashed backwood scum Hamas.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:56pm

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:54pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:27pm:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:54pm:

Quote:
The guy was the military head of a terrorist organization that has committed atrocities including the bombing of Israeli women and children.


By that reasoning, the IDF and Bibi and his buddies are guilty of the same crime.

[quote]
Israel - Guided air to surface missile targetting terrorists



Then why the obscene civilian casualty rates whenever Israel decides to take out a few 'terrorists'?



becase the terrorist you think are heroes hide deliberately in schools, kindergartens and on many occasions LITERALLY behind women and children.



Another idiot.

Jabari certainly wasn't hiding in a school, was he? And yet still the civilians die.

Gaza has one of the highest population densities in the world. Do you understand what that means?[/quote]


It means there are to  many bloody mussys.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:58pm
Another idiot.

Jabari certainly wasn't hiding in a school, was he? And yet still the civilians die.


Who gives a sh1t? I certainly don't.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by gold_medal on Nov 16th, 2012 at 6:35pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:39pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:29pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:24pm:
Ah, nice to see the usual garbage from the usual idiots (Andrei/salad dim)


Both "governments" should be condemned for all of this idiocy. Hamas for targeting civilians. Isarel for killing children and civilians in their latest "military" attack.


the difference is that only one side fired first - GAZA. and the targetting of a terrorist leader for assassination is a globally accepted modus operandi. terrorists by their very nature lose the protection of host countries.

So you do not support people being able to defend themselves?


when they attack first? no.

Ghandi might have chosen not to fight back, but his philospohy rarey works.

If you attack a Hells Angel, why do you think he cannot defned himself and in the process beat the crap outta you?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by gold_medal on Nov 16th, 2012 at 6:37pm

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:54pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:27pm:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:54pm:

Quote:
The guy was the military head of a terrorist organization that has committed atrocities including the bombing of Israeli women and children.


By that reasoning, the IDF and Bibi and his buddies are guilty of the same crime.

[quote]
Israel - Guided air to surface missile targetting terrorists



Then why the obscene civilian casualty rates whenever Israel decides to take out a few 'terrorists'?



becase the terrorist you think are heroes hide deliberately in schools, kindergartens and on many occasions LITERALLY behind women and children.



Another idiot.

Jabari certainly wasn't hiding in a school, was he? And yet still the civilians die.

Gaza has one of the highest population densities in the world. Do you understand what that means?[/quote]

Hamas fires rockets from school yards and kindergartens. It's also pretty good at firing from apartment buildings and when Israeli troops last entered Gaza, the Hamas lunatics were quite happy to fire from behind women and children.

and having a high population density does not give you cause to rain death down on others because you decide to fire a rocket at Israeli CIVILIANS.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by gold_medal on Nov 16th, 2012 at 6:38pm

Dr No wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:55pm:
768 rockets have been fired so far this year into Israel by the unwashed backwood scum Hamas.


no one seems willing to defend that from the pro-terrorist lot.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by adelcrow on Nov 16th, 2012 at 6:40pm
Its quite foolish to buy into the propaganda from either side least of all the well oiled Israeli propaganda machine.
The Jewish state is trying to start a major conflict in the region and the way they are going they have been planning it for quite some time.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by gold_medal on Nov 16th, 2012 at 6:44pm

adelcrow wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 6:40pm:
Its quite foolish to buy into the propaganda from either side least of all the well oiled Israeli propaganda machine.
The Jewish state is trying to start a major conflict in the region and the way they are going they have been planning it for quite some time.


That is just plain STUPID and then some. Exactly what is the advantage for Israel to start a conflict with Gaza? Come on... construct a valid argument for what they have to gain other than stopping missile attacks. They dont wish to attack other countries and no one is going to help the gazans... they havent any other time!

So do you have an actual argument or just a silly observation?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by salad in on Nov 16th, 2012 at 6:50pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:24pm:
Ah, nice to see the usual garbage from the usual idiots (Andrei/salad dim)


Both "governments" should be condemned for all of this idiocy. Hamas for targeting civilians. Isarel for killing children and civilians in their latest "military" attack.


You are welcoming into our country people who hold such vile views so why is mine so bad?

Are the Hamas rockets so selective that they only kill Israeli civilians yet spare children of horrific death? Clever rockets indeed.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by salad in on Nov 16th, 2012 at 6:54pm

gold_medal wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 6:38pm:
no one seems willing to defend that from the pro-terrorist lot.


It ain't hard to figure out what to do is it. Hamas fire rockets and Israel returns fire. Hamas does nothing and Israel does nothing. What would a normal group do, fire rockets or get about their daily lives? Hamas is just plain stupid.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 16th, 2012 at 6:58pm

gold_medal wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 6:38pm:

Dr No wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:55pm:
768 rockets have been fired so far this year into Israel by the unwashed backwood scum Hamas.


no one seems willing to defend that from the pro-terrorist lot.

Pffffft

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by gold_medal on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:00pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 6:58pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 6:38pm:

Dr No wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:55pm:
768 rockets have been fired so far this year into Israel by the unwashed backwood scum Hamas.


no one seems willing to defend that from the pro-terrorist lot.

Pffffft


thanks for proving my point!  well done!

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:11pm

gold_medal wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:00pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 6:58pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 6:38pm:

Dr No wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:55pm:
768 rockets have been fired so far this year into Israel by the unwashed backwood scum Hamas.


no one seems willing to defend that from the pro-terrorist lot.

Pffffft


thanks for proving my point!  well done!

Do you really want me to ask the questions you know you cant answer...again???

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:14pm
Thank you Prime Minister Gillard for your support to us.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:20pm
1. There is no Israeli in Gaza.
2. They fire rockets and rockets into Israel.
3. Hamas are terrorists.

It is for the people to decide if they want war or peace.
I would like peace myself but if they want war then I know we can bring them hell on earth if they want this.

It is for Gaza to choose.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by gold_medal on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:22pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:11pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:00pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 6:58pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 6:38pm:

Dr No wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:55pm:
768 rockets have been fired so far this year into Israel by the unwashed backwood scum Hamas.


no one seems willing to defend that from the pro-terrorist lot.

Pffffft


thanks for proving my point!  well done!

Do you really want me to ask the questions you know you cant answer...again???


I know you think you make devastating arguments but you shoudl try getting other people to assess them. Fools always think they make briliant examples while other people facepalm at their stupidity. In fact, the dumber they really are the smarter they think they are. SOB is the perfect example - someone who is mocked by all and sundry, yet is too stupid to notice it.

You run a close second.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Aussie on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:32pm
I sent this to an Israeli Cabbie mate of mine.

"Hope all your family are okay, even though I do not support this poo fight, no matter who started it.'

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by rabbitoh07 on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:36pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:51pm:
The guy was the military head of a terrorist organization that has committed atrocities including the bombing of Israeli women and children.

Yes - Israel committed an terrorism against Gazan civilians and the illegal assassination of its key figures without trial.

Australia should be condemning Israel's terrorism just as mush as Hamas.

Grow a set Julia.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:37pm

gold_medal wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:22pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:11pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:00pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 6:58pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 6:38pm:

Dr No wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 5:55pm:
768 rockets have been fired so far this year into Israel by the unwashed backwood scum Hamas.


no one seems willing to defend that from the pro-terrorist lot.

Pffffft


thanks for proving my point!  well done!

Do you really want me to ask the questions you know you cant answer...again???


I know you think you make devastating arguments but you shoudl try getting other people to assess them. Fools always think they make briliant examples while other people facepalm at their stupidity. In fact, the dumber they really are the smarter they think they are. SOB is the perfect example - someone who is mocked by all and sundry, yet is too stupid to notice it.

You run a close second.
Then logic would dictate that you would be able to explain why arguments of mineare stupid or whatever but you don't.
1. Can you think of a legitimate different between Israel and Nazi Germany?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:41pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:36pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:51pm:
The guy was the military head of a terrorist organization that has committed atrocities including the bombing of Israeli women and children.

Yes - Israel committed an terrorism against Gazan civilians and the illegal assassination of its key figures without trial.

Australia should be condemning Israel's terrorism just as mush as Hamas.

Grow a set Julia.


Don't be so stupid.
We are a country defending ourself against terrorists.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:43pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:20pm:
1. There is no Israeli in Gaza.
2. They fire rockets and rockets into Israel.
3. Hamas are terrorists.

It is for the people to decide if they want war or peace.
I would like peace myself but if they want war then I know we can bring them hell on earth if they want this.

It is for Gaza to choose.

1. What relevance does this have to anything?
2. Palestine has a right to defend itself.
3. Its pretty hard to argue that something can be terrorism when it is in response to terrorism in my opinion.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:45pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:41pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:36pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:51pm:
The guy was the military head of a terrorist organization that has committed atrocities including the bombing of Israeli women and children.

Yes - Israel committed an terrorism against Gazan civilians and the illegal assassination of its key figures without trial.

Australia should be condemning Israel's terrorism just as mush as Hamas.

Grow a set Julia.


Don't be so stupid.
We are a country defending ourself against terrorists.

Can you explain how you could be defending when you are illegally occupying them?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:46pm
We gave Gaza to them. There is no occupation. There is no Israeli there.

Israel will always defend against attacks which threaten our people.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:47pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:45pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:41pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:36pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:51pm:
The guy was the military head of a terrorist organization that has committed atrocities including the bombing of Israeli women and children.

Yes - Israel committed an terrorism against Gazan civilians and the illegal assassination of its key figures without trial.

Australia should be condemning Israel's terrorism just as mush as Hamas.

Grow a set Julia.


Don't be so stupid.
We are a country defending ourself against terrorists.

Can you explain how you could be defending when you are illegally occupying them?


We are not in Gaza you fool.
There is no occupation. We left years ago.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:48pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:46pm:
We gave Gaza to them. There is no occupation. There is no Israeli there.

Israel will always defend against attacks which threaten our people.

What exactly do you call this?

Sorry but you obviously do not understand the definition of the word 'defence'. Please consult a dictionary.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:50pm
Do you know where Gaza is?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:51pm
Can you explain how you could be defending when you are illegally occupying them?



Who says it's "illegally occupying them"?

You? SOB? The mussy lover Annie?

Hardly any intelligence amongst that trio.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:51pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:50pm:
Do you know where Gaza is?

You will note that I have not said you are occupying internal Gaza officially.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:52pm
Here is a history lesson too, why do you think the borders changed in 1947,1949 and 1967?

Who do you think attacked and lost?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:53pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:51pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:50pm:
Do you know where Gaza is?

You will note that I have not said you are occupying internal Gaza officially.



Nor are they occupying Gaza unofficially.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by adelcrow on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:56pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:52pm:
Here is a history lesson too, why do you think the borders changed in 1947,1949 and 1967?

Who do you think attacked and lost?


Shouldn't you be home defending the mother country instead of hiding in Australia like a coward?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:56pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:51pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:50pm:
Do you know where Gaza is?

You will note that I have not said you are occupying internal Gaza officially.


We are not occupying Gaza at all.
We gave it to them.
Guess who had before we. Palestinians? Wrong. Egypt.
Egyptians think Palestinians are second class like Jordan does, like Lebanon does, like Tunisians does.

Palestinians are treated better by Israel than their Arab "friends".

Trust me there is just one people more disliked than Palestinians in their Arab League and it is Iranians.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:57pm

adelcrow wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:56pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:52pm:
Here is a history lesson too, why do you think the borders changed in 1947,1949 and 1967?

Who do you think attacked and lost?


Shouldn't you be home defending the mother country instead of hiding in Australia like a coward?


Who is hiding?
I have served my national service. I leave here now in just 4 weeks now and then home to Eretz Israel.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:59pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:52pm:
Here is a history lesson too, why do you think the borders changed in 1947,1949 and 1967?

Who do you think attacked and lost?

You will note that under international law it is illegal to gain land via military actions. This makes it an illegal military occupation of Palestinian lands.
If I take you from your house and put you in a Nazi ghetto, that does not make your house mine.

Why should anyone listen to you when you either have no knowledge or respect for common law?


Dr No wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:53pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:51pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:50pm:
Do you know where Gaza is?

You will note that I have not said you are occupying internal Gaza officially.



Nor are they occupying Gaza unofficially.


Well obviously there are going to be agents and the like operating in Gaza.




When one queries the definition of occupation you will find that there essentially is an official occupation of Gaza:

Quote:
oc·cu·pa·tion  (ky-pshn)
n.
1.
a. The act or process of holding or possessing a place.
b. The state of being held or possessed.
2.
a. Invasion, conquest, and control of a nation or territory by foreign armed forces.
b. The military government exercising control over an occupied nation or territory.

Israel does have pretty much control Gaza in most aspects.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by lisa.greek on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:02pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:56pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:51pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:50pm:
Do you know where Gaza is?

You will note that I have not said you are occupying internal Gaza officially.


We are not occupying Gaza at all.
We gave it to them.
Guess who had before we. Palestinians? Wrong. Egypt.
Egyptians think Palestinians are second class like Jordan does, like Lebanon does, like Tunisians does.

Palestinians are treated better by Israel than their Arab "friends".

Trust me there is just one people more disliked than Palestinians in their Arab League and it is Iranians.



My apologies here - I was born in the 50s so have only history to guide me.    My understanding is that the Jewish people were so despised that no one wanted them.   I also understand that an agreement was reached between Britain and the USA ( plus other countries) that an annexure of another country would be forced to house these apparently unwanted people .   Is this true?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:09pm

lisa.greek wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:02pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:56pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:51pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:50pm:
Do you know where Gaza is?

You will note that I have not said you are occupying internal Gaza officially.


We are not occupying Gaza at all.
We gave it to them.
Guess who had before we. Palestinians? Wrong. Egypt.
Egyptians think Palestinians are second class like Jordan does, like Lebanon does, like Tunisians does.

Palestinians are treated better by Israel than their Arab "friends".

Trust me there is just one people more disliked than Palestinians in their Arab League and it is Iranians.



My apologies here - I was born in the 50s so have only history to guide me.    My understanding is that the Jewish people were so despised that no one wanted them.   I also understand that an agreement was reached between Britain and the USA ( plus other countries) that an annexure of another country would be forced to house these apparently unwanted people .   Is this true?


I am in the 1980s born but no that's not correct.
There is different views on the birth of the state of Israel.
My grandparents are there early after they yes are not welcome in Czech Republic when they come from a Nazi camp.
But they are invited by Ben Guriin to come and live in peace in Israel new state.
The intent is for shared states both Arab and Jew but this becomes not possible.
The Arabs attack from day 0

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by hawil on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:12pm

FRED. wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 3:44pm:

hawil wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 3:32pm:

salad in wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 2:00pm:
I consider muslims to be filth*.

*My religion allows me to say that.

As long as there are people with views like this, than the world will never enjoy prolonged peace.
Gillard is just another stooge of the US, and Hillary probably told her what to say.
I,am not very informed about the situation in this area, but what I noticed from the media, the Israelis always manage to kill ten Palestinians for a loss of one Israeli.
If it were not for the US, Israel could not throw its weight around so much, but I don't agree with the idea that Muslims should have the right to take over the world.
The UN should be more vocal and active on the animosity between the Islamic and Western world, if that is possible, because the UN seems to be another stooge of the US.

Israel dont need the yanks Rembember the 6 day war
they beat the shyte out of thr towel heads ;D ;D ;D ;D

You are either naive or very cunning; Israel gets all the technology and money to be the best equipped army in that region.
If the Jews are so heroic, why did they go like lambs to the slaughter in the so called holocaust and not fight back?
If you are going to dye, why not dye fighting.
This does not mean, that I approve of the holocaust, although I might doubt that it was, as it has been portrait and milked by Jews for all they can get out of it.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:12pm

lisa.greek wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:02pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:56pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:51pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:50pm:
Do you know where Gaza is?

You will note that I have not said you are occupying internal Gaza officially.


We are not occupying Gaza at all.
We gave it to them.
Guess who had before we. Palestinians? Wrong. Egypt.
Egyptians think Palestinians are second class like Jordan does, like Lebanon does, like Tunisians does.

Palestinians are treated better by Israel than their Arab "friends".

Trust me there is just one people more disliked than Palestinians in their Arab League and it is Iranians.



My apologies here - I was born in the 50s so have only history to guide me.    My understanding is that the Jewish people were so despised that no one wanted them.   I also understand that an agreement was reached between Britain and the USA ( plus other countries) that an annexure of another country would be forced to house these apparently unwanted people .   Is this true?

The reality is that during and after WW2 the Palestinians accepted millions of Jewish refugees who were fleeing the Nazis. Them along with the many Jews who were already living in Palestine owned only a small minority of Palestinian land but lived happily for the most part with them.
The UK and US 'gave' them the majority of land in Palestine, combined forces along with the Jews and Jewish terrorist groups forced Palestinians from their homes etc..
From then Israel slowly claimed the vast majority of Palestinian land, forcing Palestinians into ghettos resembling the ghettos in Nazi occupied lands which the jews were forced in and still complain about to this day.



Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:14pm
forcing Palestinians into ghettos resembling the ghettos in Nazi occupied lands

Bullshit.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:18pm
After a relatively quiet night on the Israeli side of the border, Friday morning saw the renewal of rocket fire from the Gaza Strip toward Israel's south. Several rockets hit residential areas in Ashdod; a woman sustained light injuries and a few residents suffered an anxiety attack following the rocket fire. The Israel Defense Forces struck some 150 targets overnight in Gaza.

On Thursday night, two Fajr rockets were fired toward Tel Aviv. Sirens were sounded in the Tel Aviv area for the first time since the Gulf War in 1991.

Since Operation Pillar of Defense began on Wednesday, Palestinians in Gaza have reported 19 killed and more than 150 wounded, while more than 300 rockets and mortar shells have been fired from Gaza toward Israel, leaving three dead and more than five wounded.. Iron Dome batteries have intercepted more than 130 rockets bound to hit populated areas.

The IDF said that since the operation began with the assassination of Ahmed Jabari, it has struck most of the Fajr launching sites in Gaza. The Iranian-made Fajr rockets, when fired from the northern Gaza Strip, can hit cities in central Israel.

The IDF is now preparing for the possibility of expanding the operation, including the use of ground forces in the Gaza Strip. The IDF General Staff on Friday morning approved the initial draft of 16 thousand army reservists.


http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/live-blog-rockets-slam-into-israel-s-south-in-third-day-of-idf-operation-in-gaza-1.478193


If there is a draft ii for ground assault, i will be included as I am in the +3 - 7 year post military service reservist band.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:18pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:09pm:

lisa.greek wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:02pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:56pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:51pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:50pm:
Do you know where Gaza is?

You will note that I have not said you are occupying internal Gaza officially.


We are not occupying Gaza at all.
We gave it to them.
Guess who had before we. Palestinians? Wrong. Egypt.
Egyptians think Palestinians are second class like Jordan does, like Lebanon does, like Tunisians does.

Palestinians are treated better by Israel than their Arab "friends".

Trust me there is just one people more disliked than Palestinians in their Arab League and it is Iranians.



My apologies here - I was born in the 50s so have only history to guide me.    My understanding is that the Jewish people were so despised that no one wanted them.   I also understand that an agreement was reached between Britain and the USA ( plus other countries) that an annexure of another country would be forced to house these apparently unwanted people .   Is this true?


I am in the 1980s born but no that's not correct.
There is different views on the birth of the state of Israel.
My grandparents are there early after they yes are not welcome in Czech Republic when they come from a Nazi camp.
But they are invited by Ben Guriin to come and live in peace in Israel new state.
The intent is for shared states both Arab and Jew but this becomes not possible.
The Arabs attack from day 0

I guess they had a pretty good propaganda system operating in Israel by then hey...
Those same grandparents who saw death camps in a concentration camp?  :D ;)

Ben Guriin really had nothing to do with it, he may have invited some people but it was the Palestinians who accepted millions of Jewish refugees into Palestine.
The Jews then proceeded to repay their kindness by violently forcing them from their homes and killing thousands of innocent people.
Unfortunately it is not possible to violently and illegally force peoples from their homes and not have some of them defend themselves, although obviously its possible to hypocritically complain when they defend themselves.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:19pm

Dr No wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:14pm:
forcing Palestinians into ghettos resembling the ghettos in Nazi occupied lands

Bullshit.

I will take it back if you can identify a legitimate difference..

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:21pm
Avram why was it ok for people like your 'grandparents' to defend themselves in Nazi ghettos but not ok for Palestinians to defend themselves in Scumraeli ghettos?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by adelcrow on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:23pm
Israel is trying to start WW3 so they dont have to deal with Iran alone.
Lets just hope Russia and China get a few nukes into the region to stop Israel from copying the Nazis in WW2 coz the yanks are not gonna try and stop them.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:23pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:18pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:09pm:

lisa.greek wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:02pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:56pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:51pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:50pm:
Do you know where Gaza is?

You will note that I have not said you are occupying internal Gaza officially.


We are not occupying Gaza at all.
We gave it to them.
Guess who had before we. Palestinians? Wrong. Egypt.
Egyptians think Palestinians are second class like Jordan does, like Lebanon does, like Tunisians does.

Palestinians are treated better by Israel than their Arab "friends".

Trust me there is just one people more disliked than Palestinians in their Arab League and it is Iranians.



My apologies here - I was born in the 50s so have only history to guide me.    My understanding is that the Jewish people were so despised that no one wanted them.   I also understand that an agreement was reached between Britain and the USA ( plus other countries) that an annexure of another country would be forced to house these apparently unwanted people .   Is this true?


I am in the 1980s born but no that's not correct.
There is different views on the birth of the state of Israel.
My grandparents are there early after they yes are not welcome in Czech Republic when they come from a Nazi camp.
But they are invited by Ben Guriin to come and live in peace in Israel new state.
The intent is for shared states both Arab and Jew but this becomes not possible.
The Arabs attack from day 0

I guess they had a pretty good propaganda system operating in Israel by then hey...
Those same grandparents who saw death camps in a concentration camp?  :D ;)

Ben Guriin really had nothing to do with it, he may have invited some people but it was the Palestinians who accepted millions of Jewish refugees into Palestine.
The Jews then proceeded to repay their kindness by violently forcing them from their homes and killing thousands of innocent people.
Unfortunately it is not possible to violently and illegally force peoples from their homes and not have some of them defend themselves, although obviously its possible to hypocritically complain when they defend themselves.



I am only going to say to you 1 more time, there was a Nazi killing operation at Majdanek where my grandfather was after he is taken from Praha.

Show some respect.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:28pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:23pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:18pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:09pm:

lisa.greek wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:02pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:56pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:51pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:50pm:
Do you know where Gaza is?

You will note that I have not said you are occupying internal Gaza officially.


We are not occupying Gaza at all.
We gave it to them.
Guess who had before we. Palestinians? Wrong. Egypt.
Egyptians think Palestinians are second class like Jordan does, like Lebanon does, like Tunisians does.

Palestinians are treated better by Israel than their Arab "friends".

Trust me there is just one people more disliked than Palestinians in their Arab League and it is Iranians.



My apologies here - I was born in the 50s so have only history to guide me.    My understanding is that the Jewish people were so despised that no one wanted them.   I also understand that an agreement was reached between Britain and the USA ( plus other countries) that an annexure of another country would be forced to house these apparently unwanted people .   Is this true?


I am in the 1980s born but no that's not correct.
There is different views on the birth of the state of Israel.
My grandparents are there early after they yes are not welcome in Czech Republic when they come from a Nazi camp.
But they are invited by Ben Guriin to come and live in peace in Israel new state.
The intent is for shared states both Arab and Jew but this becomes not possible.
The Arabs attack from day 0

I guess they had a pretty good propaganda system operating in Israel by then hey...
Those same grandparents who saw death camps in a concentration camp?  :D ;)

Ben Guriin really had nothing to do with it, he may have invited some people but it was the Palestinians who accepted millions of Jewish refugees into Palestine.
The Jews then proceeded to repay their kindness by violently forcing them from their homes and killing thousands of innocent people.
Unfortunately it is not possible to violently and illegally force peoples from their homes and not have some of them defend themselves, although obviously its possible to hypocritically complain when they defend themselves.



I am only going to say to you 1 more time, there was a Nazi killing operation at Majdanek where my grandfather was after he is taken from Praha.

Show some respect.

Already forced to ignore 90% of what I say...History never repeats they say  ::)

I never said people weren't killed there, I said the holocaust didn't happen there.

A terrorist telling people to have respect?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:34pm
It is the Engineering Corps, they are always the first reservists called.


Gantz issues IDF draft orders for 16,000 reservists

By YAAKOV LAPPIN


IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Benny Gantz issued draft orders for 16,000 reservists on Friday, as Operation Pillar of Defense entered its third day. Most of the reservists serve in the IDF's Engineering Corps.

The engineering corps would play a vital part in any ground operation into the Gaza Strip, enabling armored vehicles to move across the border into Gaza. The IDF operation to root out terror in the coastal territory has consisted of air raids on terror targets thus far.

The Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee unanimously authorized on Thursday Defense Minister Ehud Barak's request to enlist up to 30,000 reservists.

The IDF will issue "order nine," which is an irregular order in cases of emergency for reservists to immediately report to duty.

"The residents of the south are in the real line of fire, and only their strength will allow the IDF to meet its capabilities," Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee chairman Ronnie Bar-On (Kadima) said. "Israel is passing on a clear message to terrorist organizations in Gaza that disrupting life in the South will not continue."


Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:41pm
For you aussies who do not know about the situation - which i understand.


Gaza reality

By JERUSALEM POST EDITORIAL

11/15/2012 22:28

While Israel has not only the right but the moral obligation to defend the residents of the South, Operation Pillar of Defense – like Operation Cast Lead – will not change the fundamental dynamics in Gaza.

It was clear that Israel had to act to restore its deterrence in the South. During most of the nearly four years since Operation Cast Lead ended with a strong Israeli victory, Hamas not only refrained from attacking Israel, but also actively prevented other terrorist organizations operating in Gaza – Islamic Jihad, Salafists and al-Qaida affiliated groups – from launching attacks.

But all that has changed. Hamas become increasingly daring.

The rise to power in Egypt of its ally and ideological comrade the Muslim Brotherhood was one factor leading to Hamas’s belligerence. Hamas allowed itself to be more daring, emboldened by the fact that its neighbor, the most populous Arab state, identifies with Hamas’s goals and that the majority of Egyptians are virulent opponents of Israel.

And the Muslim Brotherhood is on the ascendancy elsewhere, from Tunisia and Morocco, where there are Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated governments, to Jordan and Libya. In Syria, the Muslim Brotherhood is one of the largest opposition forces fighting to overthrow the Assad regime.

In the eyes of many Muslims supporting Muslim Brotherhood-oriented movements in the region, or those with an even more religiously extreme, militantly uncompromising position, Hamas is revered for spearheading the offensive against “the Zionist entity.”

A striking sign that Hamas has achieved considerable regional and international legitimacy was the emir of Qatar’s recent visit to the Gaza Strip, which included a promise to provide $400 million in reconstruction aid to the Hamas government.

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, interested in cashing in on the Sunni Islamist resurgence brought by the Arab Spring to revive the Ottoman-era Turkish dominance of the region, is also reportedly considering a formal visit to Gaza.

Meanwhile, justifiably or not, the Muslim world perceives the Obama administration as weak. And Hamas is betting that as the conflict in the south drags on, US President Barack Obama will be less outspoken than George W. Bush was in his support of Israel. And Egypt – which is highly dependent on US aid – is betting that it will not be put under enormous US pressure to force Hamas to stop the rocket and mortar fire against Israel.

Under the new geopolitical circumstances, Hamas has not only allowed the various terrorist organizations in Gaza to shoot rockets and mortar shells at civilians in the South and attack IDF patrols. The anti- Semitic terrorist organization – which includes The Protocols of the Elders of Zion in its official Charter – has increasingly launched attacks of its own. The resulting escalations have resulted in nearly 1,000 rockets and mortar shells fired at Israel since the beginning of the year.

Israel was left little choice but to use force to restore deterrence. Hamas must be made to realize that it will pay a hefty price for targeting innocent Israelis. And a broad consensus that spans the mainstream political spectrum supports the move.

But we must keep our expectations to a minimum.

Just as Operation Cast Lead did not fundamentally change the reality on the ground in Gaza, the present military offensive – Operation Pillar of Defense – will not transform the Gaza Strip. Islamist extremists pursuing the reactionary goal of returning the Arab world to an imagined, pristine Islam that purportedly existed centuries ago is on the ascendancy not just in Gaza but across the region.

This message is particularly potent for Gaza’s 1.6 million (and growing) population – 44 percent of whom are aged 14 or under, according to the CIA World Factbook.

Young people tend to be particularly susceptible to the sort of unwavering black-and-white certainty proffered by fundamentalist Islam.

While Israel has not only the right but the moral obligation to defend the residents of the South, Operation Pillar of Defense – like Operation Cast Lead – will not change the fundamental dynamics in Gaza. We hope that, as was the case with Cast Lead, Pillar of Defense will restore our military deterrence, which – in the present geopolitical situation – is the only means of achieving quiet in the South.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:44pm
The first line is bunk..

Quote:
While Israel has not only the right but the moral obligation to defend the residents of the South, Operation Pillar of Defense – like Operation Cast Lead – will not change the fundamental dynamics in Gaza.

By the definition of the word it is impossible for Israel to be defending itself.

Obviously not going to be worth wasting my time to read the rest of the 'article'.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 16th, 2012 at 9:08pm
Israel is trying to start WW3 so they dont have to deal with Iran alone.
Lets just hope Russia and China get a few nukes into the region to stop Israel from copying the Nazis in WW2 coz the yanks are not gonna try and stop them.


What a vile twisted person you are.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 16th, 2012 at 9:15pm

Dr No wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 9:08pm:
Israel is trying to start WW3 so they dont have to deal with Iran alone.
Lets just hope Russia and China get a few nukes into the region to stop Israel from copying the Nazis in WW2 coz the yanks are not gonna try and stop them.


What a vile twisted person you are.

Yeah, how dare Iran try and have a way to defend itself against terrorists...

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 16th, 2012 at 9:16pm
Yeah, how dare Iran try and have a way to defend itself against terrorists...

Pardon?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 16th, 2012 at 10:15pm
Maybe Gillard should stop sucking up to faceless racist white men and show a moral back bone... :) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 17th, 2012 at 5:12am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:23pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:18pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:09pm:

lisa.greek wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 8:02pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:56pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:51pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:50pm:
Do you know where Gaza is?

You will note that I have not said you are occupying internal Gaza officially.


We are not occupying Gaza at all.
We gave it to them.
Guess who had before we. Palestinians? Wrong. Egypt.
Egyptians think Palestinians are second class like Jordan does, like Lebanon does, like Tunisians does.

Palestinians are treated better by Israel than their Arab "friends".

Trust me there is just one people more disliked than Palestinians in their Arab League and it is Iranians.



My apologies here - I was born in the 50s so have only history to guide me.    My understanding is that the Jewish people were so despised that no one wanted them.   I also understand that an agreement was reached between Britain and the USA ( plus other countries) that an annexure of another country would be forced to house these apparently unwanted people .   Is this true?


I am in the 1980s born but no that's not correct.
There is different views on the birth of the state of Israel.
My grandparents are there early after they yes are not welcome in Czech Republic when they come from a Nazi camp.
But they are invited by Ben Guriin to come and live in peace in Israel new state.
The intent is for shared states both Arab and Jew but this becomes not possible.
The Arabs attack from day 0

I guess they had a pretty good propaganda system operating in Israel by then hey...
Those same grandparents who saw death camps in a concentration camp?  :D ;)

Ben Guriin really had nothing to do with it, he may have invited some people but it was the Palestinians who accepted millions of Jewish refugees into Palestine.
The Jews then proceeded to repay their kindness by violently forcing them from their homes and killing thousands of innocent people.
Unfortunately it is not possible to violently and illegally force peoples from their homes and not have some of them defend themselves, although obviously its possible to hypocritically complain when they defend themselves.



I am only going to say to you 1 more time, there was a Nazi killing operation at Majdanek where my grandfather was after he is taken from Praha.

Show some respect.


That isnt an answer to the question. There was an israeli killing operation in gaza the other day. You show some respect.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 17th, 2012 at 5:14am
Why the draft? So they are going to go into gaza and slaughter more ppl? Someone needs to nuke israel.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by aquascoot on Nov 17th, 2012 at 6:21am
people arent seriously comparing nazi concentration camps to palestinian camps are they. ;) ;)

aushwitz....walking skeletons, fighting over a crust of bread.

gaza....big fat arabs , watch the tv footage, they all seem fat to me,  half of em with mobile phones and video cameras,
firing their stupid guns in the air (yes hitler left the jews have guns and rockets)

fair dinkum , you lefties are retarded.

for the 10 th time,  if you want to wail in front of the tv, dont wail for these show pony palestinians, wail for the poor kids in africa that eat a bowl of dirt a day.
oh but theyre not as "trendy' as those dumb arabs that lost a war and then think the victors should be nice to them

i'd say arm the jews with tasers instead of guns but spot and western would probably think this was over the top in terms of brutality ;) ;)

meanwhile spot says "someone should just nuke israel"

go and do some reflection on this subject and then come back and apologize.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 17th, 2012 at 6:31am
meanwhile spot says "someone should just nuke israel"


Does anyone take Spot seriously besides Spot?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by adelcrow on Nov 17th, 2012 at 6:32am
The people of Gaza are some of the most impoverished in the world purely because of Israels crimes against humanity and war crimes.
It may be fairer to compare ongoing Jewish crimes with the Serbian atrocities against the Bosnians.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by pansi1951 on Nov 17th, 2012 at 6:40am

Prevailing wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 10:15pm:
Maybe Gillard should stop sucking up to faceless racist white men and show a moral back bone... :) :)



It's too late, she's already committed herself to the rat-pack, it would be political suicide to get all 'lefty' and suddenly recognise who the real terrorists are.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 17th, 2012 at 6:46am

aquascoot wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 6:21am:
people arent seriously comparing nazi concentration camps to palestinian camps are they. ;) ;)

aushwitz....walking skeletons, fighting over a crust of bread.

gaza....big fat arabs , watch the tv footage, they all seem fat to me,  half of em with mobile phones and video cameras,
firing their stupid guns in the air (yes hitler left the jews have guns and rockets)

fair dinkum , you lefties are retarded.

for the 10 th time,  if you want to wail in front of the tv, dont wail for these show pony palestinians, wail for the poor kids in africa that eat a bowl of dirt a day.
oh but theyre not as "trendy' as those dumb arabs that lost a war and then think the victors should be nice to them

i'd say arm the jews with tasers instead of guns but spot and western would probably think this was over the top in terms of brutality ;) ;)

meanwhile spot says "someone should just nuke israel"

go and do some reflection on this subject and then come back and apologize.


No - i obviously was exaggerating about the nuke because that would take gaza out too but israel needs to be stopped.


SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by aquascoot on Nov 17th, 2012 at 7:52am

adelcrow wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 6:32am:
The people of Gaza are some of the most impoverished in the world purely because of Israels crimes against humanity and war crimes.
It may be fairer to compare ongoing Jewish crimes with the Serbian atrocities against the Bosnians.



i dispute that,  i would imagine they have far better access to nutrition, healthcare, education then many many people in third world countries.
they certainly get the lions share of the attention.
again, note 1500 deaths during the last israeli invasion  versus 2 million in the south sudan war.

they also persist with targeting non combatants in israel and israel shows some restraint in not just annihilating them.

its up to the moderate palestinians to clean up the nutbags in palestine. until they do that, they really cant expect any better treatment.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 17th, 2012 at 7:55am

aquascoot wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 7:52am:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 6:32am:
The people of Gaza are some of the most impoverished in the world purely because of Israels crimes against humanity and war crimes.
It may be fairer to compare ongoing Jewish crimes with the Serbian atrocities against the Bosnians.



i dispute that,  i would imagine they have far better access to nutrition, healthcare, education then many many people in third world countries.
they certainly get the lions share of the attention.
again, note 1500 deaths during the last israeli invasion  versus 2 million in the south sudan war.

they also persist with targeting non combatants in israel and israel shows some restraint in not just annihilating them.

its up to the moderate palestinians to clean up the nutbags in palestine. until they do that, they really cant expect any better treatment.


What a load of crap. Are ordinary citizens in australia expected to capture and kill nutjobs like ivan milat?

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by MOTR on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:00am

salad in wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:54pm:
I can't understand why the Gazans are upset. Isn't the desire of muslims to be near Halla? Israel is expediting the wishes of these muslims. What's the problem?


That's just sick. People who have no empathy for the deaths of innocent children are just sick.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:01am
What a load of crap. Are ordinary citizens in australia expected to capture and kill nutjobs like ivan milat?

SOB


And you wonder why people laugh at you.  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:01am

MOTR wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:00am:

salad in wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:54pm:
I can't understand why the Gazans are upset. Isn't the desire of muslims to be near Halla? Israel is expediting the wishes of these muslims. What's the problem?


That's just sick.


And suicide bombers aren't?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by MOTR on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:04am

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:01am:

MOTR wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:00am:

salad in wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:54pm:
I can't understand why the Gazans are upset. Isn't the desire of muslims to be near Halla? Israel is expediting the wishes of these muslims. What's the problem?


That's just sick.


And suicide bombers aren't?


How does one follow from the other. You do realise innocent children were killed.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:05am
This is sick.
sick_.jpg (11 KB | 37 )

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:06am

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:01am:
What a load of crap. Are ordinary citizens in australia expected to capture and kill nutjobs like ivan milat?

SOB


And you wonder why people laugh at you.  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Awww no answer to that one then?

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:06am
How does one follow from the other. You do realise innocent children were killed.


Are you really that stupid to think that suicide bombers haven't killed children?

My guess is yes you are.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:09am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:06am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:01am:
What a load of crap. Are ordinary citizens in australia expected to capture and kill nutjobs like ivan milat?

SOB


And you wonder why people laugh at you.  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Awww no answer to that one then?

SOB



I hope you have donated your brain to science in your will. It will make for some interesting research.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Kat on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:12am

Nothing would make me happier than seeing Israel getting its ass handed to it on a plate.....

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by MOTR on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:12am

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:06am:
How does one follow from the other. You do realise innocent children were killed.


Are you really that stupid to think that suicide bombers haven't killed children?

My guess is yes you are.


I didn't say that, or anything close to that. I said it was sick to have no empathy for the deaths of innocent children. Only a moron would conclude that means children have not died at the hands of suicide bombers.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:13am



Sectarian Clashes Feared After Suicide Attack Kills Children, Women in Nigerian Church
Read more at http://www.christianpost.com/news/sectarian-clashes-feared-after-suicide-attack-kills-children-women-in-nigerian-church-84100/#Ch2CtQA8FwBxgHOU.99

By Anugrah Kumar , Christian Post Contributor
October 29, 2012|12:40 pm

At least 15 people, mostly children and women, were killed and about 150 others were injured after a suicide bomber disguising himself as a Christian attacked a large Catholic church in northern Nigeria's Kaduna city during Sunday morning service, raising fears of renewed sectarian violence.

A suicide bomber driving a Toyota jeep carrying explosives and led by a motorcyclist attacked Saint Rita's Catholic Church in Kaduna on Sunday morning, according to allafrica.com.

Read more at http://www.christianpost.com/news/sectarian-clashes-feared-after-suicide-attack-kills-children-women-in-nigerian-church-84100/#Ch2CtQA8FwBxgHOU.99

According to an Associated Press count, more than 680 people have died in killings and bombings blamed on Boko Haram this year alone.

Read more at http://www.christianpost.com/news/sectarian-clashes-feared-after-suicide-attack-kills-children-women-in-nigerian-church-84100/#Ch2CtQA8FwBxgHOU.99


Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:14am
I condemn Gillard for condoning and inciting Israeli Violence against the peace loving Palestinians...
:P :P

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Shane B on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:15am

Kat wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:12am:
Nothing would make me happier than seeing Israel getting its ass handed to it on a plate.....


Sorry to disappoint, but that won't be happening.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:16am

MOTR wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:12am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:06am:
How does one follow from the other. You do realise innocent children were killed.


Are you really that stupid to think that suicide bombers haven't killed children?

My guess is yes you are.


I didn't say that, or anything close to that. I said it was sick to have no empathy for the deaths of innocent children. Only a moron would conclude that means children have not died at the hands of suicide bombers.



Best you re read your posts.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:18am

Shane B wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:15am:

Kat wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:12am:
Nothing would make me happier than seeing Israel getting its ass handed to it on a plate.....


Sorry to disappoint, but that won't be happening.



Don't you know Kat is an ex railway man?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by MOTR on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:21am

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:16am:

MOTR wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:12am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:06am:
How does one follow from the other. You do realise innocent children were killed.


Are you really that stupid to think that suicide bombers haven't killed children?

My guess is yes you are.


I didn't say that, or anything close to that. I said it was sick to have no empathy for the deaths of innocent children. Only a moron would conclude that means children have not died at the hands of suicide bombers.



Best you re read your posts.


With absolutely no respect intended, Dr. No, you are a moron.

Because Salad in is a sick individual how does it follow that suicide bombers aren't.

You obviously have the IQ of a box of raisins.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:23am

MOTR wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:21am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:16am:

MOTR wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:12am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:06am:
How does one follow from the other. You do realise innocent children were killed.


Are you really that stupid to think that suicide bombers haven't killed children?

My guess is yes you are.


I didn't say that, or anything close to that. I said it was sick to have no empathy for the deaths of innocent children. Only a moron would conclude that means children have not died at the hands of suicide bombers.



Best you re read your posts.


With absolutely no respect intended, Dr. No, you are a moron.


I will accept that as a compliment coming from you.  :-* :-*

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by aquascoot on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:24am
again, its just inconsistent from the left.

they support the right of the palestinians to throw every single weapon at their disposal at the jews but expect the jews to pull their punches.

you just dont understand how a conflict works.

could you imagine julius ceasar or geneghis khan or napoleon or more recently churchill or patton  holding back.

holding back only prolongs the pain.
like a brown snake in your back yard or a rabid dog attacking your kids.

you move with overwhelming force and crush those who oppose you.its no good just stirring the snake up with a few rocks, kill the bugger and burn its corpse

this is exactly what the palestinians would do if they had the airforce and the tanks and the jews had the small arms.

when did wars become all touchy feely.
why draw it out for generations and cause generational hate and pain.

attack you enemy, overwhelm your enemy, defeat your enemy and then like the marshall plan in germany rebuild your enemy in your likeness.

if the allies had pulled up on the borders of germany in 1945 we'd probably still be negotiating and putting up missile defence shields in london.

the arabs attacked israel in 66, they lost.
now take it like a man and move on.

the jews problem and americas problem since 1945 is they pussyfoot around probing at the boil,  get a big knife out and cut it as deep and as quickly as you can.  better for all concerned.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by bobbythebat1 on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:53am
aqua - how about stopping the blockade?

That might work.
The Jews need to find out why the Pallys are firing rockets at them.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Kat on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:00am

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:18am:

Shane B wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:15am:

Kat wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:12am:
Nothing would make me happier than seeing Israel getting its ass handed to it on a plate.....


Sorry to disappoint, but that won't be happening.



Don't you know Kat is an ex railway man?



Well, many thanks for that insightful and vitally relevant post... :-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:01am

aquascoot wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:24am:
again, its just inconsistent from the left.

they support the right of the palestinians to throw every single weapon at their disposal at the jews but expect the jews to pull their punches.

you just dont understand how a conflict works.

could you imagine julius ceasar or geneghis khan or napoleon or more recently churchill or patton  holding back.

holding back only prolongs the pain.
like a brown snake in your back yard or a rabid dog attacking your kids.

you move with overwhelming force and crush those who oppose you.its no good just stirring the snake up with a few rocks, kill the bugger and burn its corpse

this is exactly what the palestinians would do if they had the airforce and the tanks and the jews had the small arms.

when did wars become all touchy feely.
why draw it out for generations and cause generational hate and pain.

attack you enemy, overwhelm your enemy, defeat your enemy and then like the marshall plan in germany rebuild your enemy in your likeness.

if the allies had pulled up on the borders of germany in 1945 we'd probably still be negotiating and putting up missile defence shields in london.

the arabs attacked israel in 66, they lost.
now take it like a man and move on.

the jews problem and americas problem since 1945 is they pussyfoot around probing at the boil,  get a big knife out and cut it as deep and as quickly as you can.  better for all concerned.

This is just a red herring, we condemn utterly the Israeli aggression against the peace loving Palestinians and demand the violence is stopped immediately and unconditional surrender to world peace and harmony...stop making excuses for war crimes...
8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:03am

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 6:40am:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 10:15pm:
Maybe Gillard should stop sucking up to faceless racist white men and show a moral back bone... :) :)



It's too late, she's already committed herself to the rat-pack, it would be political suicide to get all 'lefty' and suddenly recognise who the real terrorists are.

Yes but she might win back her soul... :) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by rabbitoh07 on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:05am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:41pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 7:36pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:51pm:
The guy was the military head of a terrorist organization that has committed atrocities including the bombing of Israeli women and children.

Yes - Israel committed an terrorism against Gazan civilians and the illegal assassination of its key figures without trial.

Australia should be condemning Israel's terrorism just as mush as Hamas.

Grow a set Julia.


Don't be so stupid.
We are a country defending ourself against terrorists.

Don't be stupid.

Israel just committed an an terrorism against Gazan civilians and an illegal assassination

No one is denying that Hamas have also committed terrorist acts.

But it is no excuse for Israel to also practice terrorism.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Soren on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:11am

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:45pm:
No. Gillard is a f.uckwit and an immoral unethical hypocrite of the highest order for her support of Israel's terrorism against Gazan civilians and the illegal assassination of its key figures without trial.

It's Palestinian children getting blown to bits. Last I read it was 4. They might not mean much to you (being brown and all) but I'm sure as hell they meant a lot to their families.


There is no Israeli terrorism. There has been Israeli response to 100 indiscriminate rocket attacks of Israeli civilian areas. All sane leaders around the world support the right of a UN member state to defend its civilian population from terrorist attacks like these Hamas rocket attacks.
As for 'without trial', Hamas and all the other islamists outfits organised the kidnapping and imprisonment of Gilad Shalit without trial. They carry out bombings of, always without trial.

What is this mania of treating the terrorist organisations as if they were adolescent delinquents who only need a stern talking-to.

As for the children - you know as well as anyone that the IDF does not target civilians. Islamists militants, like terrorists of every kind, dress like the population they hide behind.



Here's what I want to know: why did Hamas and the other salafist monsters fire 100 rockets into Israel? Why now? WHat's the point?



Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by brumbie on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:16am

aquascoot wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:24am:
again, its just inconsistent from the left.

they support the right of the palestinians to throw every single weapon at their disposal at the jews but expect the jews to pull their punches.

you just dont understand how a conflict works.

could you imagine julius ceasar or geneghis khan or napoleon or more recently churchill or patton  holding back.

holding back only prolongs the pain.
like a brown snake in your back yard or a rabid dog attacking your kids.

you move with overwhelming force and crush those who oppose you.its no good just stirring the snake up with a few rocks, kill the bugger and burn its corpse

this is exactly what the palestinians would do if they had the airforce and the tanks and the jews had the small arms.

when did wars become all touchy feely.
why draw it out for generations and cause generational hate and pain.

attack you enemy, overwhelm your enemy, defeat your enemy and then like the marshall plan in germany rebuild your enemy in your likeness.

if the allies had pulled up on the borders of germany in 1945 we'd probably still be negotiating and putting up missile defence shields in london.

the arabs attacked israel in 66, they lost.
now take it like a man and move on.

the jews problem and americas problem since 1945 is they pussyfoot around probing at the boil,  get a big knife out and cut it as deep and as quickly as you can.  better for all concerned.


Well said aqua,it is the only way with this,there can never be any negotiation,both sides realise this...a full on frontal is the only way this will be solved.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by rabbitoh07 on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:19am

Soren wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:11am:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:45pm:
No. Gillard is a f.uckwit and an immoral unethical hypocrite of the highest order for her support of Israel's terrorism against Gazan civilians and the illegal assassination of its key figures without trial.

It's Palestinian children getting blown to bits. Last I read it was 4. They might not mean much to you (being brown and all) but I'm sure as hell they meant a lot to their families.


There is no Israeli terrorism. There has been Israeli response to 100 indiscriminate rocket attacks of Israeli civilian areas. All sane leaders around the world support the right of a UN member state to defend its civilian population from terrorist attacks like these Hamas rocket attacks.
As for 'without trial', Hamas and all the other islamists outfits organised the kidnapping and imprisonment of Gilad Shalit without trial. They carry out bombings of, always without trial.

What is this mania of treating the terrorist organisations as if they were adolescent delinquents who only need a stern talking-to.

As for the children - you know as well as anyone that the IDF does not target civilians. Islamists militants, like terrorists of every kind, dress like the population they hide behind.



Here's what I want to know: why did Hamas and the other salafist monsters fire 100 rockets into Israel? Why now? WHat's the point?

Yes - that is right.  Israel carried out an act of terroism by firing a missile into Gaza to carry out a summary excecution without trial.

THe fact that Hamas may have also carried out terrorist acts does not allow Israel to carry out acts of terrorism as well.

If they want to stop terrorism - perhaps they could remove the illegal blockade on Gaza.
Being terrorists themselves will only make it worse.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by adelcrow on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:21am
Israel decided long ago that after the US elections they were going to start ww3 in the Middle East.
Its no wonder the Jews have been persecuted throughout the ages when we realise what a bunch of war mongering terrorists they have always been.
Lets just hope they get nuked off the face of the earth so we can finally rid ourselves of these cockroaches forever.
The world doesn't need the Jews to constantly destabilise every region they decide to settle in.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by rabbitoh07 on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:23am

aquascoot wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:24am:
again, its just inconsistent from the left.

they support the right of the palestinians to throw every single weapon at their disposal at the jews but expect the jews to pull their punches.

you just dont understand how a conflict works.

could you imagine julius ceasar or geneghis khan or napoleon or more recently churchill or patton  holding back.

holding back only prolongs the pain.
like a brown snake in your back yard or a rabid dog attacking your kids.

you move with overwhelming force and crush those who oppose you.its no good just stirring the snake up with a few rocks, kill the bugger and burn its corpse

this is exactly what the palestinians would do if they had the airforce and the tanks and the jews had the small arms.

when did wars become all touchy feely.
why draw it out for generations and cause generational hate and pain.

attack you enemy, overwhelm your enemy, defeat your enemy and then like the marshall plan in germany rebuild your enemy in your likeness.

if the allies had pulled up on the borders of germany in 1945 we'd probably still be negotiating and putting up missile defence shields in london.

the arabs attacked israel in 66, they lost.
now take it like a man and move on.

the jews problem and americas problem since 1945 is they pussyfoot around probing at the boil,  get a big knife out and cut it as deep and as quickly as you can.  better for all concerned.

Good example.

The only way a brown snake in your backyard will hurt you is if you torment it or try to catch it or kill it.

Leave it alone to go about its business and respect that it has as much right to be there as you do - and it will leave you alone.

If israel attacks or blockades the "brown snake" it will strike at them too.
Pretty obvious really. 
Terrorism from Israel will only make things worse.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:28am

adelcrow wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:21am:
Israel decided long ago that after the US elections they were going to start ww3 in the Middle East.
Its no wonder the Jews have been persecuted throughout the ages when we realise what a bunch of war mongering terrorists they have always been.
Lets just hope they get nuked off the face of the earth so we can finally rid ourselves of these cockroaches forever.
The world doesn't need the Jews to constantly destabilise every region they decide to settle in.

These Israelis are violent white men, immigrants from the USA & Russia not the pacifist ultra orthodox Jews who got persecuted in the holocaust you lying racist antisemite sh1t... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:35am

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:09am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:06am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:01am:
What a load of crap. Are ordinary citizens in australia expected to capture and kill nutjobs like ivan milat?

SOB


And you wonder why people laugh at you.  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Awww no answer to that one then?

SOB



I hope you have donated your brain to science in your will. It will make for some interesting research.


Was i even talking to you there? No i wasnt.

If ordinary citizens are expected to stop "terrorists" in gaza then why arent ordinary citizens in australia expected to stop ppl like milat?

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by John Smith on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:37am
Nuke the middle east and be done with it .... there will never be a resolution to the conflict ....

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:38am

adelcrow wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:21am:
Israel decided long ago that after the US elections they were going to start ww3 in the Middle East.
Its no wonder the Jews have been persecuted throughout the ages when we realise what a bunch of war mongering terrorists they have always been.
Lets just hope they get nuked off the face of the earth so we can finally rid ourselves of these cockroaches forever.
The world doesn't need the Jews to constantly destabilise every region they decide to settle in.


Yeah the problem  with that is that the west bank would be radiated too. Better a "surgical strike" to take out " a couple of large apartment buildings".

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by adelcrow on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:40am
The violence will continue while the terrorist state of Israel sits on stolen land and continues to repress and persecute the original inhabitants.
Israel uses murder and terrorism to spark unrest in the region knowing full well the consequences.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:43am

Bobby. wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:53am:
aqua - how about stopping the blockade?

That might work.
The Jews need to find out why the Pallys are firing rockets at them.


Bobby the blockade is a restriction on dangerous materials entering through Israel.
We are not going to stop this.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:46am

adelcrow wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:40am:
The violence will continue while the terrorist state of Israel sits on stolen land and continues to repress and persecute the original inhabitants.
Israel uses murder and terrorism to spark unrest in the region knowing full well the consequences.


You are just extremist with this talk and when you call us a terrorist state it makes you look silly.
We are a nation state who have offered peace several times.
Think, why do we not clash with Fatah?
It because they try to work with us.

Hamas? Hizbollah? Islamic Jihad? No they just want war.
Well we can bring it to them if that's their choice.

We will never take backwards steps when our people are threatened.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:47am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:43am:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:53am:
aqua - how about stopping the blockade?

That might work.
The Jews need to find out why the Pallys are firing rockets at them.


Bobby the blockade is a restriction on dangerous materials entering through Israel.
We are not going to stop this.


Who are you to blockade another country?

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:48am
Remove the violent Ferrel white apartheid occupation state of Israel set up illegally by the USA & Britain in 1948...Even the holocaust victim Jews don't want it...Stop Western aggression and expansionism into Asia & Africa... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by philperth2010 on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:49am
The West has supported rebel groups to overthrow Governments in the ME they did not like.....Now we have what looks like an Islamic extremist uprising in the ME.....Israel is not getting any safer by destabilizing the region.....What is the UN doing supporting unknown rebels against Sovereign Governments anyway.....When is it Saudi Arabia's turn???

::) ::) ::)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:49am

adelcrow wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:21am:
Israel decided long ago that after the US elections they were going to start ww3 in the Middle East.
Its no wonder the Jews have been persecuted throughout the ages when we realise what a bunch of war mongering terrorists they have always been.
Lets just hope they get nuked off the face of the earth so we can finally rid ourselves of these cockroaches forever.
The world doesn't need the Jews to constantly destabilise every region they decide to settle in.


And you say you have Jews as friends.
Do they know you call us cockroaches?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Annie Anthrax on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:50am

Quote:
Here's what I want to know: why did Hamas and the other salafist monsters fire 100 rockets into Israel? Why now? WHat's the point?


This is why. Ask yourself why this isn't reported in mainstream media.


Quote:
Furthermore, articles that do mention the Palestinian casualties in Gaza consistently report that Israeli operations are in response to rockets from Gaza and to the injuring of Israeli soldiers. However, the chronology of events of the recent flare-up began onNovember 5, when an innocent, apparently mentally unfit, 20-year old man, Ahmad al-Nabaheen, was shot when he wandered close to the border. Medics had to wait for six hours to be permitted to pick him up and they suspect that he may have died because of that delay. Then, on November 8, a 13-year old boy playing football in front of his house was killed by fire from the IOF that had moved into Gazan territory with tanks as well as helicopters. The wounding of four Israeli soldiers at the border on November 10 was therefore already part of a chain of events where Gazan civilians had been killed, and not the triggering event.


http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/maureen-clare-murphy/linguists-including-noam-chomsky-condemn-reprehensible-gaza-coverage

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:53am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:47am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:43am:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:53am:
aqua - how about stopping the blockade?

That might work.
The Jews need to find out why the Pallys are firing rockets at them.


Bobby the blockade is a restriction on dangerous materials entering through Israel.
We are not going to stop this.


Who are you to blockade another country?

SOB


We are a country ensuring material is not used for aggression.

We stop and check everything.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:53am

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:50am:

Quote:
Here's what I want to know: why did Hamas and the other salafist monsters fire 100 rockets into Israel? Why now? WHat's the point?


This is why. Ask yourself why this isn't reported in mainstream media.

[quote]Furthermore, articles that do mention the Palestinian casualties in Gaza consistently report that Israeli operations are in response to rockets from Gaza and to the injuring of Israeli soldiers. However, the chronology of events of the recent flare-up began onNovember 5, when an innocent, apparently mentally unfit, 20-year old man, Ahmad al-Nabaheen, was shot when he wandered close to the border. Medics had to wait for six hours to be permitted to pick him up and they suspect that he may have died because of that delay. Then, on November 8, a 13-year old boy playing football in front of his house was killed by fire from the IOF that had moved into Gazan territory with tanks as well as helicopters. The wounding of four Israeli soldiers at the border on November 10 was therefore already part of a chain of events where Gazan civilians had been killed, and not the triggering event.


http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/maureen-clare-murphy/linguists-including-noam-chomsky-condemn-reprehensible-gaza-coverage[/quote]

Electronic intifada??
;D


Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:56am
Annie you are married to a Lebanese?
That makes sense.

Gang of women who attack and then run.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Annie Anthrax on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:57am
Yes. If you weren't too lazy to read the link, you'd see it is a joint open letter from concerned academics like Chomsky and Bustros that has been published on the EI site.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Annie Anthrax on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:59am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:56am:
Annie you are married to a Lebanese?
That makes sense.


Not anymore. And guess what? I still think you're despicable.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:04am

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:57am:
Yes. If you weren't too lazy to read the link, you'd see it is a joint open letter from concerned academics like Chomsky and Bustros that has been published on the EI site.


Chomsky??

Ah yes he is very anti Israel and has made disgusting comments about Jews.
I am not surprised.

I ask though, why do the regular Aussies I have met here in my time been so in favor of my country?
So many Aussies said "Good on you guys wish we did the same"

Now we have support publicly from your Government too.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by adelcrow on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:07am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:04am:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:57am:
Yes. If you weren't too lazy to read the link, you'd see it is a joint open letter from concerned academics like Chomsky and Bustros that has been published on the EI site.


Chomsky??

Ah yes he is very anti Israel and has made disgusting comments about Jews.
I am not surprised.

I ask though, why do the regular Aussies I have met here in my time been so in favor of my country?
So many Aussies said "Good on you guys wish we did the same"

Now we have support publicly from your Government too.


While Israel continues to murder, torture, terrorise and steal they should expect anti Israeli sentiment from across the globe

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Annie Anthrax on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:11am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:04am:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:57am:
Yes. If you weren't too lazy to read the link, you'd see it is a joint open letter from concerned academics like Chomsky and Bustros that has been published on the EI site.


Chomsky??

Ah yes he is very anti Israel and has made disgusting comments about Jews.
I am not surprised.

I ask though, why do the regular Aussies I have met here in my time been so in favor of my country?
So many Aussies said "Good on you guys wish we did the same"

Now we have support publicly from your Government too.



What disgusting comments has Chomsky made about Jews?

And yes, I've seen the support for your government's actions but it doesn't really matter when it comes from the lunatic fringe I guess. Every country has freaks like that. Unfortunately, your country elected them to government - I can't see that happening here. Perhaps that's why you don't leave?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:20am

Quote:
people arent seriously comparing nazi concentration camps to palestinian camps are they. Wink Wink

aushwitz....walking skeletons, fighting over a crust of bread.

gaza....big fat arabs , watch the tv footage, they all seem fat to me,  half of em with mobile phones and video cameras,
firing their stupid guns in the air (yes hitler left the jews have guns and rockets)

Exactly where can Palestinians grow fresh food or how can they import fresh healthy food when Israel stops their right to do so.
If you have to smuggle food in then you are going to need to smuggle unhealthy food full of sugar, sodium and preservatives so they do not go off. A consequence of this is obesity.

What exactly is your problem with that?

You are pathetic.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:21am

aquascoot wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 7:52am:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 6:32am:
The people of Gaza are some of the most impoverished in the world purely because of Israels crimes against humanity and war crimes.
It may be fairer to compare ongoing Jewish crimes with the Serbian atrocities against the Bosnians.



i dispute that,  i would imagine they have far better access to nutrition, healthcare, education then many many people in third world countries.

You probably would imagine but that is about as far as it goes.


Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:25am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:43am:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:53am:
aqua - how about stopping the blockade?

That might work.
The Jews need to find out why the Pallys are firing rockets at them.


Bobby the blockade is a restriction on dangerous materials entering through Israel.
We are not going to stop this.

Yeah all those dangerous musical instruments and stuff like that.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:30am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:46am:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:40am:
The violence will continue while the terrorist state of Israel sits on stolen land and continues to repress and persecute the original inhabitants.
Israel uses murder and terrorism to spark unrest in the region knowing full well the consequences.


You are just extremist with this talk and when you call us a terrorist state it makes you look silly.
We are a nation state who have offered peace several times.
Think, why do we not clash with Fatah?
It because they try to work with us.

Hamas? Hizbollah? Islamic Jihad? No they just want war.
Well we can bring it to them if that's their choice.

We will never take backwards steps when our people are threatened.

If that is extremist then what does that make you?

Israel cannot offer peace when it is illegally and militarily occupying their land, please consult the definition of peace.

You forget that Hamas and similar groups already have war, you are occupying them and have been killing, torturing and destroying the lives of their innocent civilians indiscriminately for over half a century.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by adelcrow on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:31am

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:25am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:43am:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:53am:
aqua - how about stopping the blockade?

That might work.
The Jews need to find out why the Pallys are firing rockets at them.


Bobby the blockade is a restriction on dangerous materials entering through Israel.
We are not going to stop this.

Yeah all those dangerous musical instruments and stuff like that.


We should probably stop Israel from receiving "dangerous goods" if its an international crime to import such things.
Israel cant have it both ways

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:31am

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:30am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:46am:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:40am:
The violence will continue while the terrorist state of Israel sits on stolen land and continues to repress and persecute the original inhabitants.
Israel uses murder and terrorism to spark unrest in the region knowing full well the consequences.


You are just extremist with this talk and when you call us a terrorist state it makes you look silly.
We are a nation state who have offered peace several times.
Think, why do we not clash with Fatah?
It because they try to work with us.

Hamas? Hizbollah? Islamic Jihad? No they just want war.
Well we can bring it to them if that's their choice.

We will never take backwards steps when our people are threatened.

If that is extremist then what does that make you?

Israel cannot offer peace when it is illegally and militarily occupying their land, please consult the definition of peace.

You forget that Hamas and similar groups already have war, you are occupying them and have been killing, torturing and destroying the lives of their innocent civilians indiscriminately for over half a century.

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;Dbull shyte in your dreams  ;D ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:33am

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:57am:
Yes. If you weren't too lazy to read the link, you'd see it is a joint open letter from concerned academics like Chomsky and Bustros that has been published on the EI site.


I would never go to that link.
If Barak calls stage 2 reservist for ground assault then that is me.
These people support me to be shot at and killed.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:33am

Quote:
bull shyte in your dreams

You are welcome to prove me wrong.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Annie Anthrax on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:34am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:46am:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:40am:
The violence will continue while the terrorist state of Israel sits on stolen land and continues to repress and persecute the original inhabitants.
Israel uses murder and terrorism to spark unrest in the region knowing full well the consequences.


You are just extremist with this talk and when you call us a terrorist state it makes you look silly.
We are a nation state who have offered peace several times.
Think, why do we not clash with Fatah?
It because they try to work with us.

Hamas? Hizbollah? Islamic Jihad? No they just want war.
Well we can bring it to them if that's their choice.

We will never take backwards steps when our people are threatened.



Israel is a 'nation state' who assassinated its only true hope of peace.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:35am

adelcrow wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:07am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:04am:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:57am:
Yes. If you weren't too lazy to read the link, you'd see it is a joint open letter from concerned academics like Chomsky and Bustros that has been published on the EI site.


Chomsky??

Ah yes he is very anti Israel and has made disgusting comments about Jews.
I am not surprised.

I ask though, why do the regular Aussies I have met here in my time been so in favor of my country?
So many Aussies said "Good on you guys wish we did the same"

Now we have support publicly from your Government too.


While Israel continues to murder, torture, terrorise and steal they should expect anti Israeli sentiment from across the globe


But it is the opposite. Lots of Aussies cheer Israel and your government supports us.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:36am

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:33am:

Quote:
bull shyte in your dreams

You are welcome to prove me wrong.


Why bother,   ;)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:36am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:35am:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:07am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:04am:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:57am:
Yes. If you weren't too lazy to read the link, you'd see it is a joint open letter from concerned academics like Chomsky and Bustros that has been published on the EI site.


Chomsky??

Ah yes he is very anti Israel and has made disgusting comments about Jews.
I am not surprised.

I ask though, why do the regular Aussies I have met here in my time been so in favor of my country?
So many Aussies said "Good on you guys wish we did the same"

Now we have support publicly from your Government too.


While Israel continues to murder, torture, terrorise and steal they should expect anti Israeli sentiment from across the globe


But it is the opposite. Lots of Aussies cheer Israel and your government supports us.

And yet people educated on the issue do not.  :-?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:37am

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:11am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:04am:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:57am:
Yes. If you weren't too lazy to read the link, you'd see it is a joint open letter from concerned academics like Chomsky and Bustros that has been published on the EI site.


Chomsky??

Ah yes he is very anti Israel and has made disgusting comments about Jews.
I am not surprised.

I ask though, why do the regular Aussies I have met here in my time been so in favor of my country?
So many Aussies said "Good on you guys wish we did the same"

Now we have support publicly from your Government too.



What disgusting comments has Chomsky made about Jews?

And yes, I've seen the support for your government's actions but it doesn't really matter when it comes from the lunatic fringe I guess. Every country has freaks like that. Unfortunately, your country elected them to government - I can't see that happening here. Perhaps that's why you don't leave?


I do leave in Dec. My studies are finished. But my visa is valid to march 13.
But if Barak calls stage 2 reservists I am called up.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:37am

FRED. wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:36am:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:33am:

Quote:
bull shyte in your dreams

You are welcome to prove me wrong.


Why bother,   ;)

Well you would probably get a lot of money from rich jews if you could prove that Israel wasn't illegal and militarily occupying Palestine.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:39am

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:37am:

FRED. wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:36am:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:33am:

Quote:
bull shyte in your dreams

You are welcome to prove me wrong.


Why bother,   ;)

Well you would probably get a lot of money from rich jews if you could prove that Israel wasn't illegal and militarily occupying Palestine.


What THU   ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:40am
There was a UN recognition of Israel.
That is why we exist.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:42am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:40am:
There was a UN recognition of Israel.
That is why we exist.

Recognition of what?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:42am
I condemn Israel, Great Britain and Israel for waging racist white male violence and aggression in Asia, Africa and the ME... :) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:44am

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:42am:
I condemn Israel, Great Britain and Israel for waging racist white male violence and aggression in Asia, Africa and the ME... :) :)

FFS

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:44am
All White Men share collective guilt for the atrocities of Israel and the occupation...
8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:46am

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:44am:
All White Men share collective guilt for the atrocities of Israel and the occupation...
8-) 8-)


Dont you worry about it NUGGET  ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Annie Anthrax on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:46am

FRED. wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:44am:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:42am:
I condemn Israel, Great Britain and Israel for waging racist white male violence and aggression in Asia, Africa and the ME... :) :)

FFS

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D



Stellar contribution there. True to form. Well done.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:48am

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:46am:

FRED. wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:44am:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 10:42am:
I condemn Israel, Great Britain and Israel for waging racist white male violence and aggression in Asia, Africa and the ME... :) :)

FFS

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D



Stellar contribution there. True to form. Well done.


Well THANK YOU   ;) ;)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:11am
Yes I denounce White Males and all of their racist territorial, economic and military ambition in the ME, Asia and Africa, I denounce the Gillard Government for the utter contemptible stream of violence enabling verbal diarrhea they keep churning out - especially foreign Minister Carr...

Stop the race war,. stop White male violence and aggression...

White Male Violence is the only serious impediment to peace Bob Carr...White Males and their Armies must cease and desist from all violence beyond their borders...
8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:14am

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:11am:
Yes I denounce White Males and all of their racist territorial, economic and military ambition in the ME, Asia and Africa, I denounce the Gillard Government for the utter contemptible stream of violence enabling verbal diarrhea the keep churning out - especially foreign Minister Carr...

Stop the race war,. stop White male violence and aggression...

White Male Violence is the only serious impediment to peace Bob Carr...White Males and their Armies must cease and desist from all violence beyond their borders...
8-) 8-)


WOW You do have some problems,,dont you  ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:15am

FRED. wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:14am:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:11am:
Yes I denounce White Males and all of their racist territorial, economic and military ambition in the ME, Asia and Africa, I denounce the Gillard Government for the utter contemptible stream of violence enabling verbal diarrhea the keep churning out - especially foreign Minister Carr...

Stop the race war,. stop White male violence and aggression...

White Male Violence is the only serious impediment to peace Bob Carr...White Males and their Armies must cease and desist from all violence beyond their borders...
8-) 8-)


WOW You do have some problems,,dont you  ;D

No, I believe in non violence and peace...you are the problem...I deplore your attitude... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:17am
I condemn White Male violence and aggression in all of its forms and the Western Governments supporting it...  :) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:19am

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:15am:

FRED. wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:14am:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:11am:
Yes I denounce White Males and all of their racist territorial, economic and military ambition in the ME, Asia and Africa, I denounce the Gillard Government for the utter contemptible stream of violence enabling verbal diarrhea the keep churning out - especially foreign Minister Carr...

Stop the race war,. stop White male violence and aggression...

White Male Violence is the only serious impediment to peace Bob Carr...White Males and their Armies must cease and desist from all violence beyond their borders...
8-) 8-)


WOW You do have some problems,,dont you  ;D

No, I believe in non violence and peace...you are the problem...I deplore your attitude... 8-) 8-)


;D STIFF    ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:20am
White men and their families all interbreed amongst themselves and wage social, economic & Military war all over the world including here in Australia... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:21am

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:20am:
White men and their families all interbreed amongst themselves and wage social, economic & Military war all over the world including here in Australia... 8-) 8-)


;D ;D What WAR in  Australia ?   ;D ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:22am
The world should join me in denouncing white male violence and calling for their immediate cessation of all aggression and violence and unconditional surrender to world peace and harmony...
:) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by perceptions_now on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:22am
As I have previously said, it seems that there are a couple of likely outcomes.

1) Both sides and their supporters, accept that the past can not be changed, but with good will & an acceptance of change on the part of both sides, a reasonable future is still negotiable.

2) Both sides and their supporters, continue their current approach to each other.

In respect of approach one, an outcome is possible where the past remains but all sides concentrate on a decent future for each other and eventually learn to live together, without tearing at the very fabric of their lives!

In respect of approach two, eventually the very fabric of their lives of both sides is completely torn asunder, no one wins & everyone loses!

The choices may & may not, be quite that stark, but they are the two essential choices!

To all involved, I suggest a step back & a deep breath, may actually be the first step forward, on a new path.

This path needs to be walked together, by both sides into possibly a more hopeful & brighter future.

The specifics of any lasting arrangements in the region must come from the active participants, but those arrangements will also necessarily involve proposals, which at first sight may seem to go too far, by both sides!

This dilemma, will no doubt, require the clearing of stumbling blocks along the way, some of which have been created by the respective antagonists, whilst some of those stumbling blocks were created by others in the international community.

Should both sides Fail to walk this path together, they may well condemn future generations, both directly and indirectly involved, to become permanently lost, in a dark wilderness of distress, distrust & outright destruction.

Finally, the choices are for those directly & indirectly affected. I hope that the right choices are made, primarily by both sides of this dilemma and that a way past this Gordian Knot can be found!

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:23am

FRED. wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:21am:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:20am:
White men and their families all interbreed amongst themselves and wage social, economic & Military war all over the world including here in Australia... 8-) 8-)


;D ;D What WAR in  Australia ?   ;D ;D

Piss off idiot, White men have been waging war in this country against peace for over two hundred years of the occupation... :) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:25am

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:23am:

FRED. wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:21am:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:20am:
White men and their families all interbreed amongst themselves and wage social, economic & Military war all over the world including here in Australia... 8-) 8-)


;D ;D What WAR in  Australia ?   ;D ;D

Piss off idiot, White men have been waging war in this country against peace for over two hundred years of the occupation... :) :)


;D ;D ;D  You poor SOUL  Please DONT BREED   ;) ;)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:25am
White Men around the world including here in Australia must cease and desist all racist violence and aggression...that is the impediment to world peace... :) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:27am

FRED. wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:25am:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:23am:

FRED. wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:21am:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:20am:
White men and their families all interbreed amongst themselves and wage social, economic & Military war all over the world including here in Australia... 8-) 8-)


;D ;D What WAR in  Australia ?   ;D ;D

Piss off idiot, White men have been waging war in this country against peace for over two hundred years of the occupation... :) :)


;D ;D ;D  You poor SOUL  Please DONT BREED   ;) ;)

You are forgiven for your ignorance and you are free to ignore me as I will you from this moment on...you are a troll... :) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:28am
White Male aggression and Western Governments around the worlds are the greatest threat to world peace... :) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:29am

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:27am:

FRED. wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:25am:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:23am:

FRED. wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:21am:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:20am:
White men and their families all interbreed amongst themselves and wage social, economic & Military war all over the world including here in Australia... 8-) 8-)


;D ;D What WAR in  Australia ?   ;D ;D

Piss off idiot, White men have been waging war in this country against peace for over two hundred years of the occupation... :) :)


;D ;D ;D  You poor SOUL  Please DONT BREED   ;) ;)

You are forgiven for your ignorance and you are free to ignore me as I will you from this moment on...you are a troll... :) :)


;D ;D ;D ;D And you thin k your not a TROLL  FFS

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:50am
White Males violence and military expansionism must cease in the ME and around the world..the global community must insist on this... :) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 17th, 2012 at 12:05pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:28am:
White Male aggression and Western Governments around the worlds are the greatest threat to world peace... :) :)


I never understand anything this man says

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 17th, 2012 at 12:07pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 12:05pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 11:28am:
White Male aggression and Western Governments around the worlds are the greatest threat to world peace... :) :)


I never understand anything this man says

;D ;D ;D   "MAN"  FFS 

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 17th, 2012 at 1:00pm
I will be in the next draft of letters if they action the increase from the current 16,000.
I have finished my studies now and I am under 30.




.......................................


Cabinet OKs 75,000 reservists for possible Gaza operation

By JPOST.COM STAFF, YAAKOV LAPPIN

LAST UPDATED: 11/16/2012 23:41

Government increases cap of reservists for possible ground operation in Gaza from 30,000 to 75,000; FM Liberman says the government is not considering toppling Hamas.

Defense Minister Ehud Barak approved the IDF's request on Friday evening to increase the maximum number of reservists it could enlist, seeking cabinet approval to mobilize up to 75,000 troops ahead of a possible Gaza ground operation.

The Inner Cabinet, a group of nine senior ministers, met for over three hours to discuss the possibility of a ground operation into the Hamas-controlled enclave, but released no statements or indications as to what transpired during the meeting.

Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman, however, told Channel 10 that toppling Hamas is not on the agenda as a goal for Operation Pillar of Defense.

"We are definitely considering a ground operation, but toppling Hamas, I think that's something that the next government will have to decide," he said.

Liberman also told Channel 2 that the IDF will only stop its attacks against Hamas and other terrorist organizations in the Gaza Strip once Israel accomplishes its goals of stopping rocket fire and increasing deterrence.

"Each time that Hamas fires [into Israel], there will be a harsher and harsher response," he added.

Debate over invading Gaza comes after three days of constant rocket-fire from the Strip, which has reached as far as Tel Aviv and Jerusalem for the first time, and targeted Israeli strikes against terrorist leaders and weapons depots in Gaza.

On Friday morning, IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Benny Gantz issued draft orders to 16,000 out the 30,000 reservists the cabinet approved Thursday. Most of the reservists called up thus far serve in the IDF's Engineering Corps.

The engineering corps would play a vital part in any ground operation into the Gaza Strip, enabling armored vehicles to move across the border into Gaza. The IDF operation to root out terror in the coastal territory has consisted of air raids on terror targets thus far.


The IDF assassinated two Hamas members in Gaza on Friday evening.

The first, Muhammad Abu Jalal, was a Hamas company commander in central Gaza's El Muazi area, and the second, Khaled Shaeer, operated anti-tank missiles.

Earlier, the IDF sent text messages to 12,000 Gazan civilians, warning them to stay away from Hamas members.

The IDF warned that its activities would continue into the night on Friday, warning Hamas to take cover.

"Terrorists in Gaza should hide. Tonight won't be calm in Gaza," IDF spokesman Yoav Mordechai said. "We're hitting hundreds of rocket launchers in waves of air strikes, including right now."

The IDF also revealed on Friday that it had taken out Hamas's nascent drone program.

The military recently focused its intelligence efforts on a group of Hamas terrorists who were developing and producing drones designed to strike fortified targets in Israel.

The terrorists were under the instruction of Iranian technical instructors, and the 'production team' carried test flights in Gaza of the drones.

The IAF struck the test flight sites in recent attacks

http://www.jpost.com/Defense/Article.aspx?id=292195

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 17th, 2012 at 1:07pm
So the "operation" is to finally wipe them all out?

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 17th, 2012 at 1:09pm
My understandings is that the operation is to secure the safety of the citizens of Israel from attack.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 17th, 2012 at 1:12pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 1:09pm:
My understandings is that the operation is to secure the safety of the citizens of Israel from attack.

If this was the operation then why not just stop occupying other peoples land illegally?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 17th, 2012 at 1:13pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 1:09pm:
My understandings is that the operation is to secure the safety of the citizens of Israel from attack.


Then why blow up their govt depts where birth certs are registered? Apparently the archives are ruined. Now theres a whole bunch more refugees with no ID.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Shane B on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:22pm
Hamas bumper stickers:

If you can read this you are within the blast radius

My Other Car Is a Crater

Honk if your horn is not currently connected to a detonator

Baby with a bomb in his diaper on board

If this van’s tick-tockin’, don’t come a knockin’

THE BEST WEIGHT LOSS PROGRAM EVER

My child was briefly an honor student at Kill Yourself Elementary

Incoming Objects Are Closer Than They Appear

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:27pm
     Why did the Auschwitz shower heads have 12 holes? Because Jews have 10 fingers!!





    Hitler: Tuday, Hitlerr is feeling generrouz. Tuday, Hitlerr is sending half of you home! Jews of the concentration camp: Heeee!!!!!!! (joy and happiness). Hitler: Hans, brring ze chainsaw!





    What's the difference between a ton of coal and a thousand Jews? Jews burn longer.





    Have you heard about the new German microwave? It's got ten seats inside.





    Hitler and Goering were arguing about the Jews, Goering stating that they were quite clever people and Hitler vehemently denying they were any such thing.

    Finally Goering told Hitler that they should go out in the city and Goering would show Hitler it was true. Hitler agreed, so they disguised themselves and went out on the street.

    Goering took Hitler into a shop, went up to the counter, and asked the clerk: "Do you have any left-handed teacups?" The clerk stared at Goering for a moment and then said no, mein herr, I do not.

    The two left with Hitler complaining that he did not understand what the point of this was and Goering telling him to be patient. They went to another shop and Goering gave the same act: "Do you have any left-handed teacups?" The clerk stared and shrugged his shoulders.

    They left with Hitler becoming incensed over this nonsense and Goering begging for patience. Finally they went into a Jewish shop; Goering again asked the clerk: "Do you have any left-handed teacups?"

    The clerk smiled graciously, went into the back room and made a show of rummaging around, brought out a saucer and teacup, set down the saucer, and carefully placed the cup with the handle pointed so Goering could pick it with his left hand. "There you are, mein herr!" the clerk said.

    Goering bought the teacup, thanked the clerk, and the two men left. Goering turned to Hitler and said: "See, I told you the Jews were very clever people."

    "I don't see what was so clever about that," Hitler snapped. "He just happened to have one in stock!"





    Question: Why don't Jewish cannibals like eating Germans? Answer: They give them gas.





    What's the difference between a Jew and a Pizza?

        The pizza doesn't scream when you put it in the oven.
        About $5.65
        You take out the pizza. In one piece.





    Regarding the question of how many Jews can be got into a Volkswagen Beetle, the idea was to provoke a rigorous, Revisionist analysis, devoid of emotional appeals and implausible "eye-witness" accounts, of the facts of the matter. For example, what is the internal volume of a Volkswagen Beetle? What is the cubic capacity of the ashes remaining after cremation of a human being, on average? Time for the Revisionist pocket calculator! And what of reports from some quarters that Volkswagen Beetles of certain vintages had no ashtray? Can our thesis survive this fundamental challenge? Time will tell.





    Two Jewish children are sitting on top of a roof near a chimney. A passer-by asks, 'What are you doing there?' 'We are waiting for our parents.'





    What were Jews used for in connection with the 1936 Olympics? For the cindertrack and the Olympic flame.


Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:30pm
You should be banned for this anti semitism

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:31pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:30pm:
You should be banned for this anti semitism

So posting jokes is anti semetic but committing terrorist acts against semites in Palestine is acceptable? Not sure how that makes any sense.
You have just said you are probably going to go fight in a terrorist army, illegally invade a country and partake or aid in the killing of innocent semites.. And you complain about jokes?
:-?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:38pm
I said if they call reservists after this 16,000 then I will be next.
To fight for a army of a UN nation state.

Your jokes about holocaust are despicable.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:40pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:38pm:
I said if they call reservists after this 16,000 then I will be next.
To fight for a army of a UN nation state.

Your jokes about holocaust are despicable.

What relevance does being a 'UN nation state' have with an illegal occupation?
If my jokes are despicable then your involvement in terrorism against semites is
despicable x10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:41pm
There is no justification for this white male violence White Male violence and aggression = Nazism... The world must be clear and unequivocal in its condemnation of White Male aggression and warmongering around the world...Speak up against unprovoked attacks against the peace loving Palestinians!
:) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:44pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:31pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:30pm:
You should be banned for this anti semitism

So posting jokes is anti semetic but committing terrorist acts against semites in Palestine is acceptable? Not sure how that makes any sense.
You have just said you are probably going to go fight in a terrorist army, illegally invade a country and partake or aid in the killing of innocent semites.. And you complain about jokes?
:-?


Also i didnt see him complaining about the other jokes in the post before.

You missed the one about the gas bill . . . .cant remember it

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by perceptions_now on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:58pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:41pm:
There is no justification for this white male violence White Male violence and aggression = Nazism... The world must be clear and unequivocal in its condemnation of White Male aggression and warmongering around the world...Speak up against unprovoked attacks against the peace loving Palestinians!
:) :)


Prev,
You are throwing a lot of mud, some of it may stick & some deservedly stick.

But, I assure you, ALL WHITE MALES ARE NOT NAZI & that includes me !!!


Btw, do you realise that some non white males & females of all colours, MAY also exhibit aggression, from time to tome?


Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 4:00pm
The Holocaust Victim Jewish Pacifists speak out against White Israeli Male Zionism and Jewish children Protest and denounce the Military draft...


Quote:
Jerusalem Children Demonstrate Against Zionist Draft

Thousands of Orthodox Jewish boys gathered in Sabbath Square in Jerusalem this Monday afternoon, July 16, to protest proposals to draft members of their community into the Israeli army. The demonstration was organized by the Eidah Chareidis, the independent anti-Zionist rabbinate of Jerusalem. :-?

The boys arrived from directly from school at 5:30 PM. Participating schools included Toldos Aharon, Toldos Avraham Yitzchok, Satmar and Dushinsky. The children wore signs attached to their clothing or hats reading, “”Daddy! Mommy! Save me from falling into the claws of army, civilian or national service!”

Other signs read “Our children will not fall victim to the government's Cantonist decree” – referring to the 19th century czarist Russian practice of drafting young children into the army for life, forcing them to abandon Judaism.
:(

Other signs read, “We have never taken any funding from you and therefore we are not at your mercy. We want neither your honey nor your stinger.” And: “If you will not permit us to live as Jews, we will die as Jews.” >:( >:( And: “When I grow up I will be a soldier in the Torah of G-d.” And: “State of Israel! You will never succeed in uprooting from us 'Hear O Israel!'"

Some of the children were handcuffed to each other with toy handcuffs, to symbolize their willingness to go to jail rather than serve the Zionist state.

Rabbi Yitzchok Shlomo Blau, a representative of the Eidah, opened the gathering by leading the children in reciting Psalms and the “Avinu Malkeinu” prayer. Then Rabbi Chaim Uri Freund led the recital of the Shma. Rabbi S. Blau, principal of the Satmar school, delivered a speech.

The climax of the gathering was a speech by one of the boys, who said, “Even if they throw our fathers into jail or beat them to force them to join the army, we will stand up to the test. We will continue to stand by our religious principles, and we will be observant Jews.”

The children then marched up Strauss Street, turned on Neviim Street and came back down Yishayahu Street.

The demonstration was well-covered in the secular Israeli and world media. However, some media writers misunderstood the demonstration's message. The Associated Press wrote, "The ultra-Orthodox fear assimilation in the secular military and claim they are serving the state by serving G-d in prayer and study." Actually, the ultra-Orthodox do not believe in the state or its army, and do not wish to serve it in any way. Their objection is not to the secularism that currently characterizes the army, but to the concept of an army itself.

The Eidah Chareidis represents the Old Yishuv, the community of Jews who lived in Jerusalem long before there was a Zionist movement. They know better than anyone that Jews enjoyed good relations with Arabs before Zionism, and that the Israeli state and army has only made life more dangerous for everyone. 8-)Furthermore, they believe that Jews must live humbly under non-Jewish governments until the coming of the messiah; a Jewish government such as the State of Israel is forbidden. Their only wish is to continue living their lives peacefully, without any interaction with the state.
http://www.truetorahjews.org/issues/childrenagainstarmy


Stand firm Jewish Pacifists..we stand with you against White Male Aggression, Nazism and with you in the struggle for world peace and harmony...
Spin this away Adolf...I know you will try you G_d forsaken Nazi warmonger...

:) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 4:04pm

perceptions_now wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:58pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:41pm:
There is no justification for this white male violence White Male violence and aggression = Nazism... The world must be clear and unequivocal in its condemnation of White Male aggression and warmongering around the world...Speak up against unprovoked attacks against the peace loving Palestinians!
:) :)


Prev,
You are throwing a lot of mud, some of it may stick & some deservedly stick.

But, I assure you, ALL WHITE MALES ARE NOT NAZI & that includes me !!!


Btw, do you realise that some non white males & females of all colours, MAY also exhibit aggression, from time to tome?


All White Males who are aggressive and violent are Nazis...especially those who try to justify and cloak their violence with platitudes of self defense and provocation... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 4:05pm


Thousands of Jewish Kids Protest the draft...
:) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Soren on Nov 17th, 2012 at 4:46pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:35am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:09am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:06am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:01am:
What a load of crap. Are ordinary citizens in australia expected to capture and kill nutjobs like ivan milat?

SOB


And you wonder why people laugh at you.  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Awww no answer to that one then?

SOB



I hope you have donated your brain to science in your will. It will make for some interesting research.


Was i even talking to you there? No i wasnt.

If ordinary citizens are expected to stop "terrorists" in gaza then why arent ordinary citizens in australia expected to stop ppl like milat?

SOB



Hamas is in charge in Gaza, and they fire the rockets. The Milats are not in charge in Australia.

Gawd, you are a painful idiot.


Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 4:52pm
The White mans Greed, economic aggression and violence is the root of all evil...the global community must prevail on Western Nations to disarm and renounce all territorial, economic and Military aspirations against others...The West must surrender unconditionally and lay down their arms...
:) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 17th, 2012 at 4:54pm

Quote:
Hamas is in charge in Gaza, and they fire the rockets.

And why don't they have the right to defend themselves?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 4:55pm
On behalf of the Global community I demand the unconditional surrender and cessation of all hostilities of the Israeli state...
8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 5:10pm
I condemn the racist Gillard Government and the faceless White Men for inciting Israeli aggression and violence against the peace loving Palestinian people...
:P :P

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by perceptions_now on Nov 17th, 2012 at 6:41pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 4:04pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:58pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:41pm:
There is no justification for this white male violence White Male violence and aggression = Nazism... The world must be clear and unequivocal in its condemnation of White Male aggression and warmongering around the world...Speak up against unprovoked attacks against the peace loving Palestinians!
:) :)


Prev,
You are throwing a lot of mud, some of it may stick & some deservedly stick.

But, I assure you, ALL WHITE MALES ARE NOT NAZI & that includes me !!!


Btw, do you realise that some non white males & females of all colours, MAY also exhibit aggression, from time to tome?


All White Males who are aggressive and violent are Nazis...especially those who try to justify and cloak their violence with platitudes of self defense and provocation... 8-) 8-)


And those non white males & females of all colours, who MAY also exhibit aggression, from time to time, are they also Nazi's?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 17th, 2012 at 6:51pm

perceptions_now wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 6:41pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 4:04pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:58pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:41pm:
There is no justification for this white male violence White Male violence and aggression = Nazism... The world must be clear and unequivocal in its condemnation of White Male aggression and warmongering around the world...Speak up against unprovoked attacks against the peace loving Palestinians!
:) :)


Prev,
You are throwing a lot of mud, some of it may stick & some deservedly stick.

But, I assure you, ALL WHITE MALES ARE NOT NAZI & that includes me !!!


Btw, do you realise that some non white males & females of all colours, MAY also exhibit aggression, from time to tome?


All White Males who are aggressive and violent are Nazis...especially those who try to justify and cloak their violence with platitudes of self defense and provocation... 8-) 8-)


And those non white males & females of all colours, who MAY also exhibit aggression, from time to time, are they also Nazi's?
Depends if they are defending themselves or not

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 17th, 2012 at 6:58pm
The Gillard Government must withdraw its Armies from all racist engagements around the world, I condemn the Gillard Government and I condemn the Victoria Cross and the Iron Cross and everything those abominable racist Nazi symbols represent... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 17th, 2012 at 7:27pm

Soren wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 4:46pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:35am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:09am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:06am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:01am:
What a load of crap. Are ordinary citizens in australia expected to capture and kill nutjobs like ivan milat?

SOB


And you wonder why people laugh at you.  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Awww no answer to that one then?

SOB



I hope you have donated your brain to science in your will. It will make for some interesting research.


Was i even talking to you there? No i wasnt.

If ordinary citizens are expected to stop "terrorists" in gaza then why arent ordinary citizens in australia expected to stop ppl like milat?

SOB



Hamas is in charge in Gaza, and they fire the rockets. The Milats are not in charge in Australia.

Gawd, you are a painful idiot.


Doesnt matter. Why should ordinary citizens be expected to take on the militia? Here you would be charged with treason if you tried to get rid of gillard.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Soren on Nov 17th, 2012 at 7:32pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 7:27pm:

Soren wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 4:46pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:35am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:09am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:06am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:01am:
What a load of crap. Are ordinary citizens in australia expected to capture and kill nutjobs like ivan milat?

SOB


And you wonder why people laugh at you.  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Awww no answer to that one then?

SOB



I hope you have donated your brain to science in your will. It will make for some interesting research.


Was i even talking to you there? No i wasnt.

If ordinary citizens are expected to stop "terrorists" in gaza then why arent ordinary citizens in australia expected to stop ppl like milat?

SOB



Hamas is in charge in Gaza, and they fire the rockets. The Milats are not in charge in Australia.

Gawd, you are a painful idiot.


Doesnt matter. Why should ordinary citizens be expected to take on the militia?

SOB



Because they voted in Hamas. They know what Hamas stands for. They chose Hamas, knowing what that choice means- rocket attacks, suicide bombings and all the rest.

bugger, you are stupid.

But is doesn't mater.




Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by perceptions_now on Nov 17th, 2012 at 7:36pm

perceptions_now wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 6:41pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 4:04pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:58pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 3:41pm:
There is no justification for this white male violence White Male violence and aggression = Nazism... The world must be clear and unequivocal in its condemnation of White Male aggression and warmongering around the world...Speak up against unprovoked attacks against the peace loving Palestinians!
:) :)


Prev,
You are throwing a lot of mud, some of it may stick & some deservedly stick.

But, I assure you, ALL WHITE MALES ARE NOT NAZI & that includes me !!!


Btw, do you realise that some non white males & females of all colours, MAY also exhibit aggression, from time to tome?


All White Males who are aggressive and violent are Nazis...especially those who try to justify and cloak their violence with platitudes of self defense and provocation... 8-) 8-)


And those non white males & females of all colours, who MAY also exhibit aggression, from time to time, are they also Nazi's?


So Prev, do I take it, from your silence, that aggressive non white males & females of all colours are not Nazi's?

And, if that is your answer, then it begs the question, if NOT, WHY NOT?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:01pm



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6U2ZQ0EhN4

BOOM!!!!!!!!!!!!

:)  :)  :)  :)  :)  :)  :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:11pm
How do you get 1,000 Jews in a phonebox? Throw in a pound coin. How do you get them out again? Tell them it's a gas chamber.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:13pm
Thats all you have.

Just anti-semitic hatred....

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by gold_medal on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:14pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 7:27pm:

Soren wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 4:46pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:35am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:09am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:06am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:01am:
What a load of crap. Are ordinary citizens in australia expected to capture and kill nutjobs like ivan milat?

SOB


And you wonder why people laugh at you.  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Awww no answer to that one then?

SOB



I hope you have donated your brain to science in your will. It will make for some interesting research.


Was i even talking to you there? No i wasnt.

If ordinary citizens are expected to stop "terrorists" in gaza then why arent ordinary citizens in australia expected to stop ppl like milat?

SOB



Hamas is in charge in Gaza, and they fire the rockets. The Milats are not in charge in Australia.

Gawd, you are a painful idiot.


Doesnt matter. Why should ordinary citizens be expected to take on the militia? Here you would be charged with treason if you tried to get rid of gillard.

SOB


what if she refused to hold elections? Or what if she disbanded the judiciary or suspended the constitution? What if there was conviction and sentence without a trial?

would you consider being a hero or a coward?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:16pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:11pm:
How do you get 1,000 Jews in a phonebox? Throw in a pound coin. How do you get them out again? Tell them it's a gas chamber.



You and borg are disgusting turds. Hopefully you both will be run over by a bus.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:16pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:13pm:
Thats all you have.

Just anti-semitic hatred....
Sorry I don't blow up semites instead like you. Way to make a man feel inadequate.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:17pm

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:16pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:11pm:
How do you get 1,000 Jews in a phonebox? Throw in a pound coin. How do you get them out again? Tell them it's a gas chamber.



You and borg are disgusting turds. Hopefully you both will be run over by a bus.

Your thinking about a train  :D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 18th, 2012 at 5:44am

Soren wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 7:32pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 7:27pm:

Soren wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 4:46pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:35am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:09am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:06am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:01am:
What a load of crap. Are ordinary citizens in australia expected to capture and kill nutjobs like ivan milat?

SOB


And you wonder why people laugh at you.  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Awww no answer to that one then?

SOB



I hope you have donated your brain to science in your will. It will make for some interesting research.


Was i even talking to you there? No i wasnt.

If ordinary citizens are expected to stop "terrorists" in gaza then why arent ordinary citizens in australia expected to stop ppl like milat?

SOB



Hamas is in charge in Gaza, and they fire the rockets. The Milats are not in charge in Australia.

Gawd, you are a painful idiot.


Doesnt matter. Why should ordinary citizens be expected to take on the militia?

SOB



Because they voted in Hamas. They know what Hamas stands for. They chose Hamas, knowing what that choice means- rocket attacks, suicide bombings and all the rest.

bugger, you are stupid.

But is doesn't mater.


So its your fault gillard is in power?

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 18th, 2012 at 5:47am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:13pm:
Thats all you have.

Just anti-semitic hatred....


Your weak excuses and attacks are sounding pretty lame there avram. Address the issues or not but you look pretty silly with that lame chestnut.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 18th, 2012 at 5:49am

gold_medal wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:14pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 7:27pm:

Soren wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 4:46pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 9:35am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:09am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:06am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:01am:
What a load of crap. Are ordinary citizens in australia expected to capture and kill nutjobs like ivan milat?

SOB


And you wonder why people laugh at you.  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Awww no answer to that one then?

SOB



I hope you have donated your brain to science in your will. It will make for some interesting research.


Was i even talking to you there? No i wasnt.

If ordinary citizens are expected to stop "terrorists" in gaza then why arent ordinary citizens in australia expected to stop ppl like milat?

SOB



Hamas is in charge in Gaza, and they fire the rockets. The Milats are not in charge in Australia.

Gawd, you are a painful idiot.


Doesnt matter. Why should ordinary citizens be expected to take on the militia? Here you would be charged with treason if you tried to get rid of gillard.

SOB


what if she refused to hold elections? Or what if she disbanded the judiciary or suspended the constitution? What if there was conviction and sentence without a trial?

would you consider being a hero or a coward?


Are you saying you would kill her? Take the law into your own hands despite what anyone else might think? How would you do this? How would you get close to her? Tell me - im sure ASIO would be interested to hear too.

The cops do that already BTW.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 18th, 2012 at 5:51am

Dr No wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:16pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 17th, 2012 at 8:11pm:
How do you get 1,000 Jews in a phonebox? Throw in a pound coin. How do you get them out again? Tell them it's a gas chamber.



You and borg are disgusting turds. Hopefully you both will be run over by a bus.


Cya in your next sock . . ..  .

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by aquascoot on Nov 18th, 2012 at 6:50am
again spot and western and others.
your view of reality doesnt reflect reality.

holocaust jokes aside.
to compare palestine today to the jews in WW2 is a silly comparison

even if we accept that the palestinains live in a "ghetto" lets compare it to say the warsaw ghetto.

could you imagine herr hitlers response if the residents of warsaw were firing rockets on german civilians?
someone called me pathetic because i said the palestinians all looked well fed. this person pointed out their obesity crisis was due to the fact they cant get fresh fruit and veges easily .  did the nazis have an obesity problem in their camps?

the palestinians have elections and elect the terrorist arm of politics (or certainly the side which wants israel driven into the sea).
did the jews in warsaw get to elect the military arm  ;) of polish jews whose stated policy was to annihilate germany?

there was no media, no scrutiny, no worldwide debate about the jews in WW2.


the number of civilians killed in palestine in the last 5 years would number a few hundred, maybe a few thousand.
thats a death rate maybe of a civilan every day as opposed to over a million a year in WW2 or around 3000 a day .

you are simply not winning your case arguing this is a new holocaust.

again, i'm sure the moderate palestinians want hamas gone as much as the jews (though as soren says they voted them in).

again rather then death by 1000 strokes it would be better to close these camps and resettle these palestinians in rich arabs states. saudi and the others.

why does this not happen.  because the arabs are more racist then you think. they despise the palestinians and wont have them in their country despite their enormous oil wealth.

really, the media should just fade away and concentrate on people more deserving of help.

the kenyans trying to fight off the muslim extremists in somalia might be a good place to start.



Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:21am
You dont see the similarities because you dont want to see the similarities. The irony is staggering that it would be the jews that are treating another group of ppl like this.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by pansi1951 on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:23am
Gillard is one leader that's in the minority on this one. She's Obama's handbag.
...............................................................................

Global anti-Israel protests staged as fears of Gaza ground invasion escalate

Israel’s airstrikes on Gaza have sparked global protests condemning the attack. Thousands of people across the Middle East, the West, and Europe have come out to show their disdain. Yet, some countries remain convinced of Israel’s right to attack.

Israel’s airstrikes on Gaza have sparked global protests condemning the attack. Thousands of people across the Middle East, the West, and Europe have come out to show their disdain. Yet, some countries remain convinced of Israel’s right to attack.

Israel’s Operation Pillar of Defense – which began Wednesday and has taken the lives of 39 Palestinians and three Israelis so far, according to Palestinian local media – has divided the international world.
In Egypt’s capital, Cairo, several thousand protesters came out Friday to demonstrate against the Israeli attacks, chanting “we will go to Gaza in our millions,” swearing to “sacrifice ourselves for you, Palestine.”

read more:

http://rt.com/news/israel-gaza-attack-protests-932/

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by pansi1951 on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:28am
The ultimate weapon, apart from Anthrax. I love anonymous, the friendly enemy.
......................................................................................................

Anonymous hack hundreds of Israeli websites, delete Foreign Ministry database in support of Gaza

Hacker group Anonymous has launched a massive attack named #OpIsrael on almost 700 Israeli websites, protesting against Operation Pillar of Defense in Gaza. Israeli media confirmed the group’s move.

The hackers reportedly took down websites ranging from high-profile governmental structures such as the Foreign Ministry to local tourism companies’ pages.
The biggest attack as of now has been the Israeli Foreign Ministry’s international development program, titled Mashav. Anonymous announced on Twitter they’ve hacked into the program’s database, with the website remaining inaccessible at the moment.

“There is [sic] so many defaced Israeli websites right now, that we just made a list of them,” Anonymous tweeted.
The hacktivists also took down the Israeli President's official website and the blog of the country's Defense Force, www.idfblog.com, posting the news on Twitter using their infamous #TANGO DOWN hashtag.

The Jerusalem Post has confirmed the group’s assault, including the attack on the Foreign Ministry’s website, as well as those of Kadima party, Bank of Jerusalem, and Tel Aviv Municipality. The latter is online as of now. Among other functions, it provides residents with directions to bomb shelters. Meanwhile, the majority of the web pages that were taken down were blank, but some showed pro-Palestinian images and messages, Jerusalem Post reported.

It was mentioned, however, that most of the 663 pages on the list were subdomains of the same site, and many proved to be still online and functioning properly.

Most of the sites were simply unavailable, but others displayed pro-Palestinian images and messages. One site whose front page was replaced with an image of a man wearing a Palestinian kaffiye, displayed a message reading: "This attack is in response to the Injustice against the Palestinian people."

http://rt.com/news/anonymous-gaza-israel-website-938/

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:34am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:21am:
You dont see the similarities because you dont want to see the similarities. The irony is staggering that it would be the jews that are treating another group of ppl like this.

SOB



Borg, you crack me up with your naivety  .


;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:05am
Twitter

#istandwithisrael

A72Q6tKCAAAlGrA.jpg (59 KB | 28 )

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:06am
Our spirit is never broken, the Jewish people.
A77Y2suCAAARZ6v.jpg (58 KB | 29 )

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:23am

Dr No wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:34am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:21am:
You dont see the similarities because you dont want to see the similarities. The irony is staggering that it would be the jews that are treating another group of ppl like this.

SOB



Borg, you crack me up with your naivety  .


;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D



Awww poor lil troll cant argue with that huh . . . . . . has to lash out . .

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:23am
Another sure fire way to get ppl to "stand with you" is to tell them you are better than them so they have to protect you.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by bobbythebat1 on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:27am
I think this attack on Gaza is all part of a much larger attack on Iran.

The Jews are clever.
If they would have attacked Iran directly they would have had missiles
from Gaza & Lebanon hitting Israel.
This way they can neutralise Gaza first
then possibly Lebanon -
then they can attack Iran & have only one enemy to contend with at a time.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:32am
The self defense argument is a lie and a crime against world peace and harmony...the one to raise his fist and his gun for any reason is a Nazi...there is no justification for violence...they just want to kid you there is... :) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by aquascoot on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:53am

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:32am:
The self defense argument is a lie and a crime against world peace and harmony...the one to raise his fist and his gun for any reason is a Nazi...there is no justification for violence...they just want to kid you there is... :) :)



we agree :D :D
arab-jihadis-in-gaza.jpg (35 KB | 30 )

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:54am
Stand with Israel
God-with-Israel-26581619606.jpg (41 KB | 30 )

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by pansi1951 on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:57am

Bobby. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:27am:
I think this attack on Gaza is all part of a much larger attack on Iran.

The Jews are clever.
If they would have attacked Iran directly they would have had missiles
from Gaza & Lebanon hitting Israel.
This way they can neutralise Gaza first
then possibly Lebanon -
then they can attack Iran & have only one enemy to contend with at a time.



I totally agree. Watch!

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by pansi1951 on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:59am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:54am:
Stand with Israel



Is that the same God that let you down so badly in the holocaust? Or have you found a more reliable one?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by bobbythebat1 on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:00am

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:57am:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:27am:
I think this attack on Gaza is all part of a much larger attack on Iran.

The Jews are clever.
If they would have attacked Iran directly they would have had missiles
from Gaza & Lebanon hitting Israel.
This way they can neutralise Gaza first
then possibly Lebanon -
then they can attack Iran & have only one enemy to contend with at a time.



I totally agree. Watch!



Thanks Pansi - my theory is original.
I have predicted what will happen.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:00am

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:57am:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:27am:
I think this attack on Gaza is all part of a much larger attack on Iran.

The Jews are clever.
If they would have attacked Iran directly they would have had missiles
from Gaza & Lebanon hitting Israel.
This way they can neutralise Gaza first
then possibly Lebanon -
then they can attack Iran & have only one enemy to contend with at a time.



I totally agree. Watch!

Remember the Israelis behind the violence in the middle east are all secular white Nazis...non of them are orthodox religious Jews who are all pacifists and non violent... :) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by adelcrow on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:02am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:54am:
Stand with Israel


;D you think god is helping Israel steal land and murder innocent women and children  ;D
Good one  ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Armchair_Politician on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:02am

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:45pm:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:34pm:
Gillard the f.uckwit.



I'll second that!!!

what a stooge!

Her bf has Jewish connections so it's to be expected.


Israel has been on the receiving end of a barrage of rockets fired from the Gaza strip for quite some time now, with little in the way of retaliation from the Israeli's. I guess they decided that enough was enough and as is their right, they've struck back to defend themselves. I have no sympathy whatsoever for those in Gaza who are being hunted down by the Israeli's. They've brought this action upon themselves. I do, however, feel sorry for ordinary Palestinians who just want to live in peace, but are forced to live under the rule of militants hellbent on the destruction of Israel. If Israel occupied Gaza, I'd support that action.

Regarding your juveline comments, I wouldn't expect any different from an uneducated fool like yourself.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:03am
I know that my facts get in the way of your propaganda Adolf...but stiff, I am not giving you any room to move you G_d forsaken Nazi warmonger... :) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:06am
None of the people firing weapons in Israel have been personally attacked or injured, they are firing weapons because they ware violent racist white male Nazis...and they are firing weapons at peace loving Palestinians who have never done anything to harm them... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by bobbythebat1 on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:06am

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:00am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:57am:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:27am:
I think this attack on Gaza is all part of a much larger attack on Iran.

The Jews are clever.
If they would have attacked Iran directly they would have had missiles
from Gaza & Lebanon hitting Israel.
This way they can neutralise Gaza first
then possibly Lebanon -
then they can attack Iran & have only one enemy to contend with at a time.



I totally agree. Watch!

Remember the Israelis behind the violence in the middle east are all secular white Nazis...non of them are orthodox religious Jews who are all pacifists and non violent... :) :)



Whitey - go away - Jews are not Nazis.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:07am
''The Australian Government condemns the repeated rocket and mortar attacks on Israel from the Gaza Strip and calls on Hamas to cease these immediately.
Australia supports Israel's right to defend itself against these indiscriminate attacks. Such attacks on Israel's civilian population are utterly unacceptable.''

Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard



''Israel has a right to self-defence and Israel has been under pretty serious attack from elements in Gaza for quite some time now.
The authorities in Gaza plainly are not stopping those attacks and it's perfectly appropriate for Israel to take strong steps in response. Australia should do what it can to ensure the countries of the Middle East recognise and acknowledge Israel's right to exist within secure borders.''

Australian Opposition Leader, Tony Abbott





burns-foreignpolicy1resized.jpg (6 KB | 31 )

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by adelcrow on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:09am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:07am:
''The Australian Government condemns the repeated rocket and mortar attacks on Israel from the Gaza Strip and calls on Hamas to cease these immediately.
Australia supports Israel's right to defend itself against these indiscriminate attacks. Such attacks on Israel's civilian population are utterly unacceptable.''

Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard



''Israel has a right to self-defence and Israel has been under pretty serious attack from elements in Gaza for quite some time now.
The authorities in Gaza plainly are not stopping those attacks and it's perfectly appropriate for Israel to take strong steps in response. Australia should do what it can to ensure the countries of the Middle East recognise and acknowledge Israel's right to exist within secure borders.''

Australian Opposition Leader, Tony Abbott


Our pollies can say what they like..they dont speak for anyone but themselves

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by skippy. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:10am
Yea! Gillard and Abbott are both supporting this abhorrent terrorist state. :(

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by pansi1951 on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:14am

Timeline from 29th October proves that Israel shattered the truce.
...................................................................................................


How Israel shattered Gaza truce leading to escalating death and tragedy: a timeline

Today, 3 Israelis were killed as a result of rocket fire from Gaza.

This came after Israel had killed 13 Palestinians, including 3 children and a woman, and injured 115, including 26 children and 25 women since yesterday, 14 November.

This will be presented by Israel – and sympathetic or careless world media – as another justification for Israel’s attacks on Gaza to stop rocket fire. But this narrative is false.

Where there was calm and an effective truce, Israel chose to shatter it, bringing about the current deadly escalation.

In general, Palestinians fired rockets, or attacked the Israeli army, as a response to Israeli attacks, seeking to avoid escalation and publicly embracing a truce. Take a look at the sequence:

Timeline from 29th October

http://iajv99.wordpress.com/2012/11/16/how-israel-shattered-gaza-truce-leading-to-escalating-death-and-tragedy-a-timeline/

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:14am
Orthodox Jews are pacifists who believe in world peace...non of them are involved in the violence against Palestinians and they denounce the Israeli state and Zionism...All White Male warmongers are Nazis...

Orthodox Jews support the peace loving Palestinians and denounce the illegal Israeli state set up by violent white male Nazis from Britain and the USA...you get no room to move Adolf, there is no justification for violence, non of the people killing Palestinians have been personally attacked or injured... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:17am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6U2ZQ0EhN4

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!

:)  :)  :)  :)  :)  :)  :)  :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by salad in on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:19am
We must praise Israel for acting as the final agent.


Quote:
The Hereafter is what Muslims believe is most important; in Islamic terminology, it is called the akhirah, “the end” or “the last.” The akhirah is what is to come at the end of our lives here, and the final aim of all believers is to be in a good place for the rest of eternity. To this end, Muslims try not to get distracted from their true purpose: to worship God and to strive in righteousness. The Qur'an reminds: “Oh you who believe! Revere God, and let every soul look to what he has sent forth for tomorrow [the Hereafter]. Yes, revere God, for God is Well-Acquainted with all that you do. And do not be like those who forgot God, and He made them forget themselves. Such are the rebellious transgressors” (Qur'an 59:18–19).

http://www.netplaces.com/understanding-islam/the-hereafter/life-after-death.htm


Muslims desire to be near their god. It is their aim to be in a good place. Let's hope they have a safe trip. May Halla be with you.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:19am
The Israeli State is not Jews, it is a bogus state set up in 1948 by white male Nazis from Britain and the USA for the purpose of a race war in the Middle east...Orthodox Religious Jews...the Holocaust Victims are pacifists and non violent...they wont respond to any violence done to them ever... :) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:21am
The people driving the violence in Israel Palestine are all white male Nazis not Jews... :) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by bobbythebat1 on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:37am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:17am:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6U2ZQ0EhN4

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!

:)  :)  :)  :)  :)  :)  :)  :)


Hi Avram - was this a pinpoint surgical strike in Gaza?



israel-airstrike-gaza-horizontal-gallery_003.jpg (103 KB | 33 )

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:39am
The picture above is of unprovoked white male Nazi war crimes against the peace loving Palestinian people... :) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:41am

Bobby. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:37am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:17am:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6U2ZQ0EhN4

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!

:)  :)  :)  :)  :)  :)  :)  :)


Hi Avram - was this a pinpoint surgical strike in Gaza?


Yes Bobby see the difference in Israeli strikes v Hamas unguided rockets fired into Israel?
We target terrorists and remove them.
They fire no guidance missiles at our cities.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:41am
Violent white male Nazis from the UK and the USA are illegally occupying lands in the Middle East and launching unprovoked attacks on the innocent people living there...these are White Male Nazis doing this... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:42am
We target specific buildings.
They hit anything including schools.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:44am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:54am:
Stand with Israel


So obama is your enemy now? Make up your mind.

SOB

Your picture:
God-with-Israel-26581619606_001.jpg (41 KB | 27 )

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:45am
Peace loving Palestinians are not in Britain or America firing at them...so why are white male Nazis launching unprovoked attascks on peace loving Palestinians in their own lands...even the Jews don't want white Nazis there...

8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by bobbythebat1 on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:50am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:42am:
We target specific buildings.
They hit anything including schools.



What about this precision surgical strike?


israel-airstrike-gaza-horizontal-gallery_004.jpg (103 KB | 30 )

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by skippy. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:52am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:42am:
We target specific buildings.
They hit anything including schools.

Why dont you go back and fight for Israel instead of hiding here like a gutless wonder ? Oh that's right, you're just a fake Jew created by one of  the sock queens here. ::)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:53am
Even the indigenous Jewish community have sided with the Palestinians against unprovoked white Male Nazi violence in Palestine..

8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:56am
If the IDF increase the call from the 16.000, I am in the next draft as finished studies, under 30 years old and served in last 5 years.
So I will be in the Operation if this happens and leave Australia early.

This is reality. It is why we are reservists.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:58am

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:53am:
Even the indigenous Jewish community have sided with the Palestinians against unprovoked white Male Nazi violence in Palestine..

8-) 8-)



That's a group of radicals who were bought by Ahmadinejad.
They do not speak for 99% of the Jewish people.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by bobbythebat1 on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:59am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:56am:
If the IDF increase the call from the 16.000, I am in the next draft as finished studies, under 30 years old and served in last 5 years.
So I will be in the Operation if this happens and leave Australia early.

This is reality. It is why we are reservists.



Don't go Avram.
The Pallys may very well have high firing rate machine guns supplied from Iran -
including tank buster missiles.
The Israeli casualties could be high.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 10:05am
Jews and Holocaust victims in Palestine  make their position pretty clear about unprovoked British and American White Male Nazi violence by the occupation against the peace loving Palestinians...

8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 10:11am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:58am:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:53am:
Even the indigenous Jewish community have sided with the Palestinians against unprovoked white Male Nazi violence in Palestine..

8-) 8-)



That's a group of radicals who were bought by Ahmadinejad.
They do not speak for 99% of the Jewish people.

Lolololo - they are the Jewish people, religiously, by decent and in every way and were living in peace with Palestinians long before White Male Nazi warmongers came from Britain and America with their guns and racist bombs in 1948...

8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by adelcrow on Nov 18th, 2012 at 10:14am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:56am:
If the IDF increase the call from the 16.000, I am in the next draft as finished studies, under 30 years old and served in last 5 years.
So I will be in the Operation if this happens and leave Australia early.

This is reality. It is why we are reservists.


Go now..If you dont it'll all be over once Iran launches its Russian nukes at Israel.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 10:15am

8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 18th, 2012 at 10:18am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:56am:
If the IDF increase the call from the 16.000, I am in the next draft as finished studies, under 30 years old and served in last 5 years.
So I will be in the Operation if this happens and leave Australia early.

This is reality. It is why we are reservists.



Well? Why is obama your enemy?

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 10:19am
8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 18th, 2012 at 10:19am

Bobby. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:59am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:56am:
If the IDF increase the call from the 16.000, I am in the next draft as finished studies, under 30 years old and served in last 5 years.
So I will be in the Operation if this happens and leave Australia early.

This is reality. It is why we are reservists.



Don't go Avram.
The Pallys may very well have high firing rate machine guns supplied from Iran -
including tank buster missiles.
The Israeli casualties could be high.


I doubt it. there has been a blockade forever and we havent seen any evidence of it so far.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by perceptions_now on Nov 18th, 2012 at 10:23am

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:41am:
Violent white male Nazis from the UK and the USA are illegally occupying lands in the Middle East and launching unprovoked attacks on the innocent people living there...these are White Male Nazis doing this... 8-) 8-)



So Prev, now it's only agressive white males from the UK & the USA?

How about, those non white males, females of all colours, from all other places in the world, who MAY also exhibit aggression, from time to time, are they also Nazi's?


Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by bobbythebat1 on Nov 18th, 2012 at 10:26am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 10:19am:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:59am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:56am:
If the IDF increase the call from the 16.000, I am in the next draft as finished studies, under 30 years old and served in last 5 years.
So I will be in the Operation if this happens and leave Australia early.

This is reality. It is why we are reservists.



Don't go Avram.
The Pallys may very well have high firing rate machine guns supplied from Iran -
including tank buster missiles.
The Israeli casualties could be high.


I doubt it. there has been a blockade forever and we havent seen any evidence of it so far.

SOB



Come on Spot - you wouldn't have the guts to charge a Pally machine gun nest.

Avram is a brave man.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 10:26am

8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 10:29am

Go back home to Britain and the USA White Male Nazi warmongers...and leave the peace loving Jewish and Palestinians in peace... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 18th, 2012 at 10:30am

Bobby. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 10:26am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 10:19am:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:59am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:56am:
If the IDF increase the call from the 16.000, I am in the next draft as finished studies, under 30 years old and served in last 5 years.
So I will be in the Operation if this happens and leave Australia early.

This is reality. It is why we are reservists.



Don't go Avram.
The Pallys may very well have high firing rate machine guns supplied from Iran -
including tank buster missiles.
The Israeli casualties could be high.


I doubt it. there has been a blockade forever and we havent seen any evidence of it so far.

SOB



Come on Spot - you wouldn't have the guts to charge a Pally machine gun nest.

Avram is a brave man.


What has bravery got to do with shooting unarmed children?

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by perceptions_now on Nov 18th, 2012 at 10:48am

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 10:29am:

Go back home to Britain and the USA White Male Nazi warmongers...and leave the peace loving Jewish and Palestinians in peace... 8-) 8-)


So Prev, YOU ARE SAYING, it's only aggressive white males from the UK & the USA, who are Nazi's?

So, those non white males, females of all colours, from all other places in the world, who MAY also exhibit aggression, from time to time, why are they not also Nazi's?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 18th, 2012 at 10:49am

Bobby. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 10:26am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 10:19am:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:59am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:56am:
If the IDF increase the call from the 16.000, I am in the next draft as finished studies, under 30 years old and served in last 5 years.
So I will be in the Operation if this happens and leave Australia early.

This is reality. It is why we are reservists.



Don't go Avram.
The Pallys may very well have high firing rate machine guns supplied from Iran -
including tank buster missiles.
The Israeli casualties could be high.


I doubt it. there has been a blockade forever and we havent seen any evidence of it so far.

SOB



Come on Spot - you wouldn't have the guts to charge a Pally machine gun nest.

Avram is a brave man.

Ignorance is not a measuring stick for bravery.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:23am
Hatikvah.
Support-Israel-29479065299.jpg (70 KB | 24 )

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by adelcrow on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:34am
What are you doing here..shouldnt you be flying home to kill some women and children

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:37am
The innocent women?
3-122107j1.jpg (213 KB | 32 )

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:39am
This in discussion of a suicide woman bomber who blew up 3 Israeli civilians in Jerusalem.

Tell me about these peace loving peoples again.
suicides.jpg (65 KB | 29 )

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by adelcrow on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:39am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:37am:
The innocent women?


Most of the people killed by the Jews are innocent civilians..thats a simple fact

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:40am

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:39am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:37am:
The innocent women?


Most of the people killed by the Jews are innocent civilians..thats a simple fact



All of the suicide bombers who detonate in civilian areas are Palestinian.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by skippy. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:04pm

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:34am:
What are you doing here..shouldnt you be flying home to kill some women and children

Avram is here because  its a sock of one of the puppeteers. Real Jews are not as ignorant as Avram, real Jews know that Israel is a terrorist state.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:06pm

skippy. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:04pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:34am:
What are you doing here..shouldnt you be flying home to kill some women and children

Avram is here because  its a sock of one of the puppeteers. Real Jews are not as ignorant as Avram, real Jews know that Israel is a terrorist state.

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D DRIPPY DRIPPY  DRIPPY    ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by bobbythebat1 on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm

skippy. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:04pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:34am:
What are you doing here..shouldnt you be flying home to kill some women and children

Avram is here because  its a sock of one of the puppeteers. Real Jews are not as ignorant as Avram, real Jews know that Israel is a terrorist state.



Avram is a brave man who will risk death to fight for his beliefs.
He's off to Gaza to confront the Pallys.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by MOTR on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:39am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:37am:
The innocent women?


Most of the people killed by the Jews are innocent civilians..thats a simple fact


Which Avram has never disputed.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by skippy. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:17pm

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:06pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:04pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:34am:
What are you doing here..shouldnt you be flying home to kill some women and children

Avram is here because  its a sock of one of the puppeteers. Real Jews are not as ignorant as Avram, real Jews know that Israel is a terrorist state.

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D DRIPPY DRIPPY  DRIPPY    ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Laugh ll you like ,Fwed, anyone with half a brain can see Avram is a sock, just like,Matty/Shane/sexy beast/Lyne I could go on, it's so easy to spot them, yet the dish its keep making them up.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by skippy. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:18pm

Bobby. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:04pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:34am:
What are you doing here..shouldnt you be flying home to kill some women and children

Avram is here because  its a sock of one of the puppeteers. Real Jews are not as ignorant as Avram, real Jews know that Israel is a terrorist state.



Avram is a brave man who will risk death to fight for his beliefs.
He's off to Gaza to confront the Pallys.

Then his mummy comes in to wake him up.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:18pm

MOTR wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:39am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:37am:
The innocent women?


Most of the people killed by the Jews are innocent civilians..thats a simple fact


Which Avram has never disputed.


;D ;D ;D ;D  INNOCENT     ;D ;D ;D   FFS What crapp    "500 rockets in 7 days"

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by bobbythebat1 on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:22pm

skippy. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:18pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:04pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:34am:
What are you doing here..shouldnt you be flying home to kill some women and children

Avram is here because  its a sock of one of the puppeteers. Real Jews are not as ignorant as Avram, real Jews know that Israel is a terrorist state.



Avram is a brave man who will risk death to fight for his beliefs.
He's off to Gaza to confront the Pallys.

Then his mummy comes in to wake him up.



No way - Avram is the real deal.
He was in operation cast lead.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:23pm
Skippy you claim everyone is a sock.

Now whilst you're probably right with the whole Matty, Sexy Beast, Lynn one - Its clear as day Avram knows a sh+tload about the region, the language and the culture to not be a sock, or if he is (which I highly doubt) its not the same as the others.

From his time on here, I think its become reasonably obvious Avram is probably who he says he is.
He seems to have little to no interest in Australian affairs.

I think your paranoia occasionally does you a disservice.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:40pm

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:18pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:39am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:37am:
The innocent women?


Most of the people killed by the Jews are innocent civilians..thats a simple fact


Which Avram has never disputed.


;D ;D ;D ;D  INNOCENT     ;D ;D ;D   FFS What crapp    "500 rockets in 7 days"


As you would if someone was bombing the heck out of you - what thats the time to lay down and die you say? Not to defend yourself? Gawd you ppl are brainwashed. Willingly most prolly.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:41pm
AVRAM when are you going to answer me

Why is considered an enemy of israel?????????

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:44pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:40pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:18pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:39am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:37am:
The innocent women?


Most of the people killed by the Jews are innocent civilians..thats a simple fact


Which Avram has never disputed.


;D ;D ;D ;D  INNOCENT     ;D ;D ;D   FFS What crapp    "500 rockets in 7 days"


As you would if someone was bombing the heck out of you - what thats the time to lay down and die you say? Not to defend yourself? Gawd you ppl are brainwashed. Willingly most prolly.

SOB


FFS MORON   The rockets came FIRST    >:( >:( >:( >:(

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by John Smith on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:45pm

Bobby. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:04pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:34am:
What are you doing here..shouldnt you be flying home to kill some women and children

Avram is here because  its a sock of one of the puppeteers. Real Jews are not as ignorant as Avram, real Jews know that Israel is a terrorist state.



Avram is a brave man who will risk death to fight for his beliefs.
He's off to Gaza to confront the Pallys.


you mean to confront those kids and civillians who mean to harm his country with rocks !!!!

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:49pm

John Smith wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:45pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:04pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:34am:
What are you doing here..shouldnt you be flying home to kill some women and children

Avram is here because  its a sock of one of the puppeteers. Real Jews are not as ignorant as Avram, real Jews know that Israel is a terrorist state.



Avram is a brave man who will risk death to fight for his beliefs.
He's off to Gaza to confront the Pallys.


you mean to confront those kids and civillians who mean to harm his country with rocks !!!!


UNAIMED ROCKET     >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by skippy. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:50pm

John Smith wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:45pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:04pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:34am:
What are you doing here..shouldnt you be flying home to kill some women and children

Avram is here because  its a sock of one of the puppeteers. Real Jews are not as ignorant as Avram, real Jews know that Israel is a terrorist state.



Avram is a brave man who will risk death to fight for his beliefs.
He's off to Gaza to confront the Pallys.


you mean to confront those kids and civillians who mean to harm his country with rocks !!!!

Yea, but they're big rocks.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:51pm

John Smith wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:45pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:04pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:34am:
What are you doing here..shouldnt you be flying home to kill some women and children

Avram is here because  its a sock of one of the puppeteers. Real Jews are not as ignorant as Avram, real Jews know that Israel is a terrorist state.



Avram is a brave man who will risk death to fight for his beliefs.
He's off to Gaza to confront the Pallys.


you mean to confront those kids and civillians who mean to harm his country with rocks !!!!


Kids have learned how to fire mobile short range ballistic missiles now have they?
Rocks?!
You seen how many rockets they've fired into Israel the last few weeks?

Sh+tload more than rocks.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:51pm

skippy. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:50pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:45pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:04pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:34am:
What are you doing here..shouldnt you be flying home to kill some women and children

Avram is here because  its a sock of one of the puppeteers. Real Jews are not as ignorant as Avram, real Jews know that Israel is a terrorist state.



Avram is a brave man who will risk death to fight for his beliefs.
He's off to Gaza to confront the Pallys.


you mean to confront those kids and civillians who mean to harm his country with rocks !!!!

Yea, but they're big rocks.


;) LIKE THE ONES IN YOU HEAD   

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:52pm
Real Palestinian Torah Jews say British & American White Male Nazi Israel has no right to exist and no right to defend itself...

:) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:53pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:51pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:45pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:04pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:34am:
What are you doing here..shouldnt you be flying home to kill some women and children

Avram is here because  its a sock of one of the puppeteers. Real Jews are not as ignorant as Avram, real Jews know that Israel is a terrorist state.



Avram is a brave man who will risk death to fight for his beliefs.
He's off to Gaza to confront the Pallys.


you mean to confront those kids and civillians who mean to harm his country with rocks !!!!


Kids have learned how to fire mobile short range ballistic missiles now have they?
Rocks?!
You seen how many rockets they've fired into Israel the last few weeks?

Sh+tload more than rocks.


Funny that they would try to defend themselves.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:53pm

skippy. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:50pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:45pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:04pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:34am:
What are you doing here..shouldnt you be flying home to kill some women and children

Avram is here because  its a sock of one of the puppeteers. Real Jews are not as ignorant as Avram, real Jews know that Israel is a terrorist state.



Avram is a brave man who will risk death to fight for his beliefs.
He's off to Gaza to confront the Pallys.


you mean to confront those kids and civillians who mean to harm his country with rocks !!!!

Yea, but they're big rocks.


They're called rockets and they've been exploding and landing in Israeli towns and harming their civilians!

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:54pm

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:44pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:40pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:18pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:39am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:37am:
The innocent women?


Most of the people killed by the Jews are innocent civilians..thats a simple fact


Which Avram has never disputed.


;D ;D ;D ;D  INNOCENT     ;D ;D ;D   FFS What crapp    "500 rockets in 7 days"


As you would if someone was bombing the heck out of you - what thats the time to lay down and die you say? Not to defend yourself? Gawd you ppl are brainwashed. Willingly most prolly.

SOB


FFS MORON   The rockets came FIRST    >:( >:( >:( >:(


Obviously you know you are wrong because you have to resort to namecalling.

The most recent deluge of rockets - the ones you are talking about - the 500 - were not first. They were in defence.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:56pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:54pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:44pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:40pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:18pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:39am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:37am:
The innocent women?


Most of the people killed by the Jews are innocent civilians..thats a simple fact


Which Avram has never disputed.


;D ;D ;D ;D  INNOCENT     ;D ;D ;D   FFS What crapp    "500 rockets in 7 days"


As you would if someone was bombing the heck out of you - what thats the time to lay down and die you say? Not to defend yourself? Gawd you ppl are brainwashed. Willingly most prolly.

SOB


FFS MORON   The rockets came FIRST    >:( >:( >:( >:(


Obviously you know you are wrong because you have to resort to namecalling.

The most recent deluge of rockets - the ones you are talking about - the 500 - were not first. They were in defence.

SOB


>:( >:( smacking  B U L L  S H I T

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 1:00pm
The Jewish People say Israel has no right to exist and no right to defend itself according to their religion...so why do White Nazi warmonger Governments say different...?

8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by skippy. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 1:00pm
Fwed has a potty mouth. ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 1:03pm

skippy. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 1:00pm:
Fwed has a potty mouth. ;D

ITS THE ONLY WAY TO GET THROUGH TO THE DUMB  SEA HUNTS ON THIS BOARD ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 18th, 2012 at 1:37pm

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:56pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:54pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:44pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:40pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:18pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:39am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:37am:
The innocent women?


Most of the people killed by the Jews are innocent civilians..thats a simple fact


Which Avram has never disputed.


;D ;D ;D ;D  INNOCENT     ;D ;D ;D   FFS What crapp    "500 rockets in 7 days"


As you would if someone was bombing the heck out of you - what thats the time to lay down and die you say? Not to defend yourself? Gawd you ppl are brainwashed. Willingly most prolly.

SOB


FFS MORON   The rockets came FIRST    >:( >:( >:( >:(


Obviously you know you are wrong because you have to resort to namecalling.

The most recent deluge of rockets - the ones you are talking about - the 500 - were not first. They were in defence.

SOB


>:( >:( smacking  B U L L  S H I T


Hahahahaha you just prove my point.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 1:45pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 1:37pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:56pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:54pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:44pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:40pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:18pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:39am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:37am:
The innocent women?


Most of the people killed by the Jews are innocent civilians..thats a simple fact


Which Avram has never disputed.


;D ;D ;D ;D  INNOCENT     ;D ;D ;D   FFS What crapp    "500 rockets in 7 days"


As you would if someone was bombing the heck out of you - what thats the time to lay down and die you say? Not to defend yourself? Gawd you ppl are brainwashed. Willingly most prolly.

SOB


FFS MORON   The rockets came FIRST    >:( >:( >:( >:(


Obviously you know you are wrong because you have to resort to namecalling.

The most recent deluge of rockets - the ones you are talking about - the 500 - were not first. They were in defence.

SOB


>:( >:( smacking  B U L L  S H I T


Hahahahaha you just prove my point.

SOB


;D  What point  TROLL    ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:04pm
The Gillard Government shares in the collective guilt or all violent white Nazis for the attacks on Gaza that even the Jewish people condemn... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:10pm

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 1:45pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 1:37pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:56pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:54pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:44pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:40pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:18pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:39am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:37am:
The innocent women?


Most of the people killed by the Jews are innocent civilians..thats a simple fact


Which Avram has never disputed.


;D ;D ;D ;D  INNOCENT     ;D ;D ;D   FFS What crapp    "500 rockets in 7 days"


As you would if someone was bombing the heck out of you - what thats the time to lay down and die you say? Not to defend yourself? Gawd you ppl are brainwashed. Willingly most prolly.

SOB


FFS MORON   The rockets came FIRST    >:( >:( >:( >:(


Obviously you know you are wrong because you have to resort to namecalling.

The most recent deluge of rockets - the ones you are talking about - the 500 - were not first. They were in defence.

SOB


>:( >:( smacking  B U L L  S H I T


Hahahahaha you just prove my point.

SOB


;D  What point  TROLL    ;D


That you have no argument so you have to namecall. Read back - is your concentration that bad? its right here in the quotes.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:16pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:10pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 1:45pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 1:37pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:56pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:54pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:44pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:40pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:18pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:39am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:37am:
The innocent women?


Most of the people killed by the Jews are innocent civilians..thats a simple fact


Which Avram has never disputed.


;D ;D ;D ;D  INNOCENT     ;D ;D ;D   FFS What crapp    "500 rockets in 7 days"


As you would if someone was bombing the heck out of you - what thats the time to lay down and die you say? Not to defend yourself? Gawd you ppl are brainwashed. Willingly most prolly.

SOB


FFS MORON   The rockets came FIRST    >:( >:( >:( >:(


Obviously you know you are wrong because you have to resort to namecalling.

The most recent deluge of rockets - the ones you are talking about - the 500 - were not first. They were in defence.

SOB


>:( >:( smacking  B U L L  S H I T


Hahahahaha you just prove my point.

SOB


;D  What point  TROLL    ;D


That you have no argument so you have to namecall. Read back - is your concentration that bad? its right here in the quotes.

SOB


;) ;) I see your back STUPID I thought you ran off to SUCK YOUR MUMMY'S TIT  ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:26pm

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:16pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:10pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 1:45pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 1:37pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:56pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:54pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:44pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:40pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:18pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:39am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:37am:
The innocent women?


Most of the people killed by the Jews are innocent civilians..thats a simple fact


Which Avram has never disputed.


;D ;D ;D ;D  INNOCENT     ;D ;D ;D   FFS What crapp    "500 rockets in 7 days"


As you would if someone was bombing the heck out of you - what thats the time to lay down and die you say? Not to defend yourself? Gawd you ppl are brainwashed. Willingly most prolly.

SOB


FFS MORON   The rockets came FIRST    >:( >:( >:( >:(


Obviously you know you are wrong because you have to resort to namecalling.

The most recent deluge of rockets - the ones you are talking about - the 500 - were not first. They were in defence.

SOB


>:( >:( smacking  B U L L  S H I T


Hahahahaha you just prove my point.

SOB


;D  What point  TROLL    ;D


That you have no argument so you have to namecall. Read back - is your concentration that bad? its right here in the quotes.

SOB


;) ;) I see your back STUPID I thought you ran off to SUCK YOUR MUMMY'S TIT  ;D ;D ;D


Poor widdle trolly trying to get itself banned but too bad so sad the moderators dont pay attention much.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:30pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:26pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:16pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:10pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 1:45pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 1:37pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:56pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:54pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:44pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:40pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:18pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:39am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:37am:
The innocent women?


Most of the people killed by the Jews are innocent civilians..thats a simple fact


Which Avram has never disputed.


;D ;D ;D ;D  INNOCENT     ;D ;D ;D   FFS What crapp    "500 rockets in 7 days"


As you would if someone was bombing the heck out of you - what thats the time to lay down and die you say? Not to defend yourself? Gawd you ppl are brainwashed. Willingly most prolly.

SOB


FFS MORON   The rockets came FIRST    >:( >:( >:( >:(


Obviously you know you are wrong because you have to resort to namecalling.

The most recent deluge of rockets - the ones you are talking about - the 500 - were not first. They were in defence.

SOB


>:( >:( smacking  B U L L  S H I T


Hahahahaha you just prove my point.

SOB


;D  What point  TROLL    ;D


That you have no argument so you have to namecall. Read back - is your concentration that bad? its right here in the quotes.

SOB


;) ;) I see your back STUPID I thought you ran off to SUCK YOUR MUMMY'S TIT  ;D ;D ;D


Poor widdle trolly trying to get itself banned but too bad so sad the moderators dont pay attention much.

SOB


;D If they did they would have F U of ages ago

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:31pm
Hands up who thinks the Jewish people, pacifists and the disabled think violent Nazi warmonger Whitey's motives are suspicious when he talks about Euthanasia and state murder of the infirm...  :) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:36pm
The Gillard Governrnent is responsible for much of the current bloodshed in Gaza for inciting the rogue Zionist state to attack the innocent Palestinian people...something even the indigenous Jews of Palestine condemn...

Peace Now - the State of Israel must surrender unconditionally and the Western Governments withdraw their armies from all foreign soil... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:51pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:36pm:
The Gillard Governrnent is responsible for much of the current bloodshed in Gaza for inciting the rogue Zionist state to attack the innocent Palestinian people...something even the indigenous Jews of Palestine condemn...

Peace Now - the State of Israel must surrender unconditionally and the Western Governments withdraw their armies from all foreign soil... 8-) 8-)


;) ;) Save the WORLD   PLEASE DONT BREED PREVAILING

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:52pm

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:30pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:26pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:16pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:10pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 1:45pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 1:37pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:56pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:54pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:44pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:40pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:18pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:14pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:39am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 11:37am:
The innocent women?


Most of the people killed by the Jews are innocent civilians..thats a simple fact


Which Avram has never disputed.


;D ;D ;D ;D  INNOCENT     ;D ;D ;D   FFS What crapp    "500 rockets in 7 days"


As you would if someone was bombing the heck out of you - what thats the time to lay down and die you say? Not to defend yourself? Gawd you ppl are brainwashed. Willingly most prolly.

SOB


FFS MORON   The rockets came FIRST    >:( >:( >:( >:(


Obviously you know you are wrong because you have to resort to namecalling.

The most recent deluge of rockets - the ones you are talking about - the 500 - were not first. They were in defence.

SOB


>:( >:( smacking  B U L L  S H I T


Hahahahaha you just prove my point.

SOB


;D  What point  TROLL    ;D


That you have no argument so you have to namecall. Read back - is your concentration that bad? its right here in the quotes.

SOB


;) ;) I see your back STUPID I thought you ran off to SUCK YOUR MUMMY'S TIT  ;D ;D ;D


Poor widdle trolly trying to get itself banned but too bad so sad the moderators dont pay attention much.

SOB


;D If they did they would have F U of ages ago


That was pretty lame running out of steam? disappointed the mods prolly dont see you hahahahaha . . . .

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:53pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lX18zUp6WPY

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:55pm

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:51pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:36pm:
The Gillard Governrnent is responsible for much of the current bloodshed in Gaza for inciting the rogue Zionist state to attack the innocent Palestinian people...something even the indigenous Jews of Palestine condemn...

Peace Now - the State of Israel must surrender unconditionally and the Western Governments withdraw their armies from all foreign soil... 8-) 8-)


;) ;) Save the WORLD   PLEASE DONT BREED PREVAILING

Or you could just stop your violence and aggression and plunder of the earth and surrender unconditionally to world peace and harmony...and I would encourage all racist Nazi white male warmongers too...especially the government...the best thing they could do is abolish the Victoria Cross...give me one now and I will urinate on it... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:59pm


Peace Loving Jews from Palestine love Iran, condemn White Male Nazi Israel..,.
8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:59pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:55pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:51pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:36pm:
The Gillard Governrnent is responsible for much of the current bloodshed in Gaza for inciting the rogue Zionist state to attack the innocent Palestinian people...something even the indigenous Jews of Palestine condemn...

Peace Now - the State of Israel must surrender unconditionally and the Western Governments withdraw their armies from all foreign soil... 8-) 8-)


;) ;) Save the WORLD   PLEASE DONT BREED PREVAILING

Or you could just stop your violence and aggression and plunder of the earth and surrender unconditionally to world peace and harmony...and I would encourage all racist Nazi white male warmongers too...especially the government...the best thing they could do is abolish the Victoria Cross...give me one now and I will urinate on it... 8-) 8-)


LOL  You will never be GOOD ENOUGH to piss on a VC      ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 18th, 2012 at 3:00pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lX18zUp6WPY

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 3:05pm
Peace Loving Jews from Palestine Love Iran...condemn Britain & The USA's racist white Nazi Israel...

:) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 18th, 2012 at 3:06pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lX18zUp6WPY

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 3:15pm

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:59pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:55pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:51pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 2:36pm:
The Gillard Governrnent is responsible for much of the current bloodshed in Gaza for inciting the rogue Zionist state to attack the innocent Palestinian people...something even the indigenous Jews of Palestine condemn...

Peace Now - the State of Israel must surrender unconditionally and the Western Governments withdraw their armies from all foreign soil... 8-) 8-)


;) ;) Save the WORLD   PLEASE DONT BREED PREVAILING

Or you could just stop your violence and aggression and plunder of the earth and surrender unconditionally to world peace and harmony...and I would encourage all racist Nazi white male warmongers too...especially the government...the best thing they could do is abolish the Victoria Cross...give me one now and I will urinate on it... 8-) 8-)


LOL  You will never be GOOD ENOUGH to piss on a VC      ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Pissing on the Victoria Cross or any other Military symbol of state violence and power at least makes them useful for public convenience... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by magpie on Nov 18th, 2012 at 4:08pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 12:23pm:
Skippy you claim everyone is a sock.

Now whilst you're probably right with the whole Matty, Sexy Beast, Lynn one - Its clear as day Avram knows a sh+tload about the region, the language and the culture to not be a sock, or if he is (which I highly doubt) its not the same as the others.

From his time on here, I think its become reasonably obvious Avram is probably who he says he is.
He seems to have little to no interest in Australian affairs.

I think your paranoia occasionally does you a disservice.

Sanofi (and I've no idea how she would know), picked Avram as a 3rd rate imitation, who couldn't speak Hebrew, didn't know squat about the university he was supposed to be attending, nor anything about Jaffa.
the victorious alliance know who Avram's sock is... but prolly won't reveal it @ this time because of, either classified reasons or, there will be so much fun to be had...
;D



Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 4:51pm
I piss on an Australian Army slouch hat - just so the diggers in Afghanistan know they do not have my endorsement or support to be doing the violence they are doing in that country...

8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 4:57pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 4:51pm:
I piss on an Australian Army slouch hat - just so the diggers in Afghanistan know they do not have my endorsement or support to be doing the violence they are doing in that country...

8-) 8-)

>:( >:( >:( THERE IS A NAME FOR GUTLESS B A S  T A R D S LIKE YOU     >:( >:( >:(

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 5:02pm

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 4:57pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 4:51pm:
I piss on an Australian Army slouch hat - just so the diggers in Afghanistan know they do not have my endorsement or support to be doing the violence they are doing in that country...

8-) 8-)

>:( >:( >:( THERE IS A NAME FOR GUTLESS B A S  T A R D S LIKE YOU     >:( >:( >:(

And there is a name for you Adolf..what about all the soldiers in the coalition of the Chilling committing suicide because of what you turned them into...yes, in the name of all the war dead...I piss on the Slouch Hat and grind it into the dirt...
8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 5:05pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 5:02pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 4:57pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 4:51pm:
I piss on an Australian Army slouch hat - just so the diggers in Afghanistan know they do not have my endorsement or support to be doing the violence they are doing in that country...

8-) 8-)

>:( >:( >:( THERE IS A NAME FOR GUTLESS B A S  T A R D S LIKE YOU     >:( >:( >:(

And there is a name for you Adolf..what about all the soldiers in the coalition of the Chilling committing suicide because of what you turned them into...yes, in the name of all the war dead...I piss on the Slouch Hat and grind it into the dirt...


>:( >:( CLIMB BACK IN YOUR HOLE  SLAG  >:( >:(

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 5:07pm

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 5:05pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 5:02pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 4:57pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 4:51pm:
I piss on an Australian Army slouch hat - just so the diggers in Afghanistan know they do not have my endorsement or support to be doing the violence they are doing in that country...

8-) 8-)

>:( >:( >:( THERE IS A NAME FOR GUTLESS B A S  T A R D S LIKE YOU     >:( >:( >:(

And there is a name for you Adolf..what about all the soldiers in the coalition of the Chilling committing suicide because of what you turned them into...yes, in the name of all the war dead...I piss on the Slouch Hat and grind it into the dirt...


>:( >:( CLIMB BACK IN YOUR HOLE  SLAG  >:( >:(

I let my dog and my cat piss on the slouch hat - that symbol of white male Nazi aggression and violence...its all it deserves and I spit on it as well... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by skippy. on Nov 18th, 2012 at 5:15pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 4:51pm:
I piss on an Australian Army slouch hat - just so the diggers in Afghanistan know they do not have my endorsement or support to be doing the violence they are doing in that country...

8-) 8-)

I would never do/ endorse/or condone that.The actions of our governments is not the fault of our soldiers. They are doing their jobs as per orders.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 6:02pm

skippy. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 5:15pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 4:51pm:
I piss on an Australian Army slouch hat - just so the diggers in Afghanistan know they do not have my endorsement or support to be doing the violence they are doing in that country...

8-) 8-)

I would never do/ endorse/or condone that.The actions of our governments is not the fault of our soldiers. They are doing there jobs as per orders.

I pissed on the symbol of their Military and everything it represents not on them, I do not endorse what they did and there are thousands of soldiers who feel the same way about their Military symbols as well - many burn their medals...everything to do with Military service is evil and a painful awakening to that awaits most soldiers when they return from war...

If you lie to the soldiers you condone their actions, you support the war you are responsible for what they do and the pain their violence causes to others and themselves...

What the soldiers are doing in Afghanistan is without moral justification or redemptive purpose...it is war crimes....

I piss on the slouch hat and Government awarded Military service medals and I encourage all of the soldiers to do the same immediately and renounce violence and aggression...

People are responsible for their actions...nothing could make me follow an order that contravened my conscience...the soldiers will have to live with the evil they did and attempt to find redemption teaching the young to renounce violence and surrender to peace... 8-) 8-) 

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 18th, 2012 at 6:09pm

skippy. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 5:15pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 4:51pm:
I piss on an Australian Army slouch hat - just so the diggers in Afghanistan know they do not have my endorsement or support to be doing the violence they are doing in that country...

8-) 8-)

I would never do/ endorse/or condone that.The actions of our governments is not the fault of our soldiers. They are doing their jobs as per orders.

100% correct.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 6:13pm
Many soldiers burn their medals when they return home...what they have done and become cannot be understated...Male violence and aggression is Nazism...I cannot call these soldiers anything but Nazis, warmongers and murderers...they will have to live with the evil they have done...there is no point mitigating this...taking the life of another who never did anything to you is murder...and especially since they went to the country of another to kill them...how obscene and morally repulsive...Lest we forget... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 6:34pm
How many innocent people have died at the hands of Australian soldiers in their own homeland...?  What did Afghan and Iraqi people ever do to our soldiers...?  What did the peace loving Palestinians ever do to the West that they carpet bomb them day and night...? 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 6:36pm
Did you know the White Male American Nazi Pilot who dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was able to live with himself and sleep at night...this is what war does to peoples humanity... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by lisa.greek on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:02pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 6:36pm:
Did you know the White Male American Nazi Pilot who dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was able to live with himself and sleep at night...this is what war does to peoples humanity... 8-) 8-)



Do you also know he was a hero in the eyes of the Western World?  He forced the surrender of the Imperial Japanese Forces, who for years, raped, tortured and killed thousands of innocent people.

The only problem with the two bombs that were dropped on Japan is that they were not big enough. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:04pm
I don't understand your logic at all.
The pilot of the USA plane was fighting against nazism.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Soren on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:10pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 6:36pm:
Did you know the White Male American Nazi Pilot who dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was able to live with himself and sleep at night...this is what war does to peoples humanity... 8-) 8-)



What happened to you?? What turned you into a raving looney? How can you sleep with yourself??




Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Aussie on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:12pm
Just allow Prevailing s/his meltdown and hope that the white coats get there soon to help s/him out.

In the mean time, ignore s/him.

:D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Soren on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:28pm

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:32pm
How is it physically possible for Israel to be the ones retaliating?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Soren on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:01pm
Gaza is governed by Hamas, elected by the people of Gaza. Gaza is not occupied by Israel. Gaza gets untold millions from Europe to build a functioning society.

They buy weapons instead and decide to fire rockets into Israel, a separate country, not governed by Hamas.

Israel hits back.

That's how it is possible for Israel to hit back.

Isn't that horrible of them - the jooos are not taking it quietly like they used to for centuries. P!sses you off, doesn't it?


Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:25pm

lisa.greek wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:02pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 6:36pm:
Did you know the White Male American Nazi Pilot who dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was able to live with himself and sleep at night...this is what war does to peoples humanity... 8-) 8-)



Do you also know he was a hero in the eyes of the Western World?  He forced the surrender of the Imperial Japanese Forces, who for years, raped, tortured and killed thousands of innocent people.

The only problem with the two bombs that were dropped on Japan is that they were not big enough. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

To white Nazis he was a hero...I will concede that...to humanity...he was a monster, a mass murderer, an enemy of peace, an enemy of civilization... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:37pm
Israel has no right to exist and no right to defend themselves and that is not me saying that, that is Jewish people of deep faith and their Rabbi's who follow the Torah...people who have lived in peace in Palestine for over 2000 years before the British and American Nazis came in 1948...
8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:56am

lisa.greek wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:02pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 6:36pm:
Did you know the White Male American Nazi Pilot who dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was able to live with himself and sleep at night...this is what war does to peoples humanity... 8-) 8-)



Do you also know he was a hero in the eyes of the Western World?  He forced the surrender of the Imperial Japanese Forces, who for years, raped, tortured and killed thousands of innocent people.

The only problem with the two bombs that were dropped on Japan is that they were not big enough. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


So you would have slept just fine if you killed that many ppl?

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:59am

Soren wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 8:01pm:
Gaza is governed by Hamas, elected by the people of Gaza. Gaza is not occupied by Israel. Gaza gets untold millions from Europe to build a functioning society.

They buy weapons instead and decide to fire rockets into Israel, a separate country, not governed by Hamas.

Israel hits back.

That's how it is possible for Israel to hit back.

Isn't that horrible of them - the jooos are not taking it quietly like they used to for centuries. P!sses you off, doesn't it?


BS. They have no proper weapons and cant have a "functioning society" when every time they start to get anywhere the israelis bomb them and destroy everything. Why have the israelis bombed the registry office and destroyed all  the archives in their "targeted attacks"?

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by aquascoot on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:43am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:56am:

lisa.greek wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:02pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 6:36pm:
Did you know the White Male American Nazi Pilot who dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was able to live with himself and sleep at night...this is what war does to peoples humanity... 8-) 8-)



Do you also know he was a hero in the eyes of the Western World?  He forced the surrender of the Imperial Japanese Forces, who for years, raped, tortured and killed thousands of innocent people.

The only problem with the two bombs that were dropped on Japan is that they were not big enough. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


So you would have slept just fine if you killed that many ppl?

SOB


you again show a lack of understanding of maths.
a ground invasion of japan was estimated to result in the deaths of 3 million japanese civilians.
even on okinawa the japanese civilian deaths were higher than the atomic bomb deaths as the japanese civilian flung themselves off cliffs.over 100,000 civilians dies on this small outpost, many women and children jumping to their death. google it borg. it was twice as many as the bomb killed.
a ground invasion of japan would have seen civilian deaths on an unprescedented scale
i would sleep very well at night dropping those bombs

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:03am

aquascoot wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:43am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:56am:

lisa.greek wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:02pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 6:36pm:
Did you know the White Male American Nazi Pilot who dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was able to live with himself and sleep at night...this is what war does to peoples humanity... 8-) 8-)



Do you also know he was a hero in the eyes of the Western World?  He forced the surrender of the Imperial Japanese Forces, who for years, raped, tortured and killed thousands of innocent people.

The only problem with the two bombs that were dropped on Japan is that they were not big enough. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


So you would have slept just fine if you killed that many ppl?

SOB


you again show a lack of understanding of maths.
a ground invasion of japan was estimated to result in the deaths of 3 million japanese civilians.
even on okinawa the japanese civilian deaths were higher than the atomic bomb deaths as the japanese civilian flung themselves off cliffs.over 100,000 civilians dies on this small outpost, many women and children jumping to their death. google it borg. it was twice as many as the bomb killed.
a ground invasion of japan would have seen civilian deaths on an unprescedented scale
i would sleep very well at night dropping those bombs


It has nothing to do with math - you show a lack of understanding of conscience. That pilot prolly had years and years of therapy.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by brumbie on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:15am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:03am:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:43am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:56am:

lisa.greek wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:02pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 6:36pm:
Did you know the White Male American Nazi Pilot who dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was able to live with himself and sleep at night...this is what war does to peoples humanity... 8-) 8-)



Do you also know he was a hero in the eyes of the Western World?  He forced the surrender of the Imperial Japanese Forces, who for years, raped, tortured and killed thousands of innocent people.

The only problem with the two bombs that were dropped on Japan is that they were not big enough. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


So you would have slept just fine if you killed that many ppl?

SOB


you again show a lack of understanding of maths.
a ground invasion of japan was estimated to result in the deaths of 3 million japanese civilians.
even on okinawa the japanese civilian deaths were higher than the atomic bomb deaths as the japanese civilian flung themselves off cliffs.over 100,000 civilians dies on this small outpost, many women and children jumping to their death. google it borg. it was twice as many as the bomb killed.
a ground invasion of japan would have seen civilian deaths on an unprescedented scale
i would sleep very well at night dropping those bombs


It has nothing to do with math - you show a lack of understanding of conscience. That pilot prolly had years and years of therapy.

SOB


Conscience?...google the rape of nanking.In fact just do some homework on world war 2 spot

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:44am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:03am:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:43am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:56am:

lisa.greek wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:02pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 6:36pm:
Did you know the White Male American Nazi Pilot who dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was able to live with himself and sleep at night...this is what war does to peoples humanity... 8-) 8-)



Do you also know he was a hero in the eyes of the Western World?  He forced the surrender of the Imperial Japanese Forces, who for years, raped, tortured and killed thousands of innocent people.

The only problem with the two bombs that were dropped on Japan is that they were not big enough. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


So you would have slept just fine if you killed that many ppl?

SOB


you again show a lack of understanding of maths.
a ground invasion of japan was estimated to result in the deaths of 3 million japanese civilians.
even on okinawa the japanese civilian deaths were higher than the atomic bomb deaths as the japanese civilian flung themselves off cliffs.over 100,000 civilians dies on this small outpost, many women and children jumping to their death. google it borg. it was twice as many as the bomb killed.
a ground invasion of japan would have seen civilian deaths on an unprescedented scale
i would sleep very well at night dropping those bombs


It has nothing to do with math - you show a lack of understanding of conscience. That pilot prolly had years and years of therapy.

SOB



Give it some thought SOB, it was 1945.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 8:02am

aquascoot wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:43am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:56am:

lisa.greek wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:02pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 6:36pm:
Did you know the White Male American Nazi Pilot who dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was able to live with himself and sleep at night...this is what war does to peoples humanity... 8-) 8-)



Do you also know he was a hero in the eyes of the Western World?  He forced the surrender of the Imperial Japanese Forces, who for years, raped, tortured and killed thousands of innocent people.

The only problem with the two bombs that were dropped on Japan is that they were not big enough. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


So you would have slept just fine if you killed that many ppl?

SOB


you again show a lack of understanding of maths.
a ground invasion of japan was estimated to result in the deaths of 3 million japanese civilians.
even on okinawa the japanese civilian deaths were higher than the atomic bomb deaths as the japanese civilian flung themselves off cliffs.over 100,000 civilians dies on this small outpost, many women and children jumping to their death. google it borg. it was twice as many as the bomb killed.
a ground invasion of japan would have seen civilian deaths on an unprescedented scale
i would sleep very well at night dropping those bombs

You reduce your logic over what manner to senselessly kill hundreds of thousands of innocent peace loving people by a simply mathematical equation...?

There was a third option...go home and stop fighting....none of those soldiers from the US had any busibness being there and the innocent peace loving Japanese people had never done anything to that Pilot...yet he annihilates hundreds of thousands of people he never met before in a heart beat...The West has yet to own up to this war crime and deal with it...We collectively owe an apology to Japan for a crime they themselves would have considered cowardice and barbaric and never would have committed...  8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 8:04am

brumbie wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:15am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:03am:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:43am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:56am:

lisa.greek wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:02pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 6:36pm:
Did you know the White Male American Nazi Pilot who dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was able to live with himself and sleep at night...this is what war does to peoples humanity... 8-) 8-)



Do you also know he was a hero in the eyes of the Western World?  He forced the surrender of the Imperial Japanese Forces, who for years, raped, tortured and killed thousands of innocent people.

The only problem with the two bombs that were dropped on Japan is that they were not big enough. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


So you would have slept just fine if you killed that many ppl?

SOB


you again show a lack of understanding of maths.
a ground invasion of japan was estimated to result in the deaths of 3 million japanese civilians.
even on okinawa the japanese civilian deaths were higher than the atomic bomb deaths as the japanese civilian flung themselves off cliffs.over 100,000 civilians dies on this small outpost, many women and children jumping to their death. google it borg. it was twice as many as the bomb killed.
a ground invasion of japan would have seen civilian deaths on an unprescedented scale
i would sleep very well at night dropping those bombs


It has nothing to do with math - you show a lack of understanding of conscience. That pilot prolly had years and years of therapy.

SOB


Conscience?...google the rape of nanking.In fact just do some homework on world war 2 spot

None of the peace loving people of Japan or innocent civilians the USA slaughtered committed any of the crimes to mentioned..., :-? :-?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by brumbie on Nov 19th, 2012 at 8:12am
You see what happens when they allow access to computers in institutions  :(

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Soren on Nov 19th, 2012 at 8:14am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:59am:
Why have the israelis bombed the registry office and destroyed all  the archives in their "targeted attacks"?

SOB


In response to the 100 rockets the Pallos fired into Israeli civilian areas.

What would you have advised them to destroy instead?

Oh, I forgot. Your advice would be to let the Pallos do what they want, including firing at Israeli civilians who deserve it because the Israeli civilians are implicated in what Israel does - but the poor Pallo civilians who elected the terrorist arm of the Muslim Brotherhood aren't.
As I said a couple of times, you are ready to convert to Islam, you have reached the requisite level of mental acuity.









Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 8:25am
Indigenous Palestinian Jews who are Pacifists say Israel has no right to exist and no right to defend themselves...they have been living in peace with the Palestinians for many many centuries before the British & American warmongers invaded and occupied their country Palestine...

Its good to see the Torah Jews are still pissing Adolf Hitler off...

:) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 19th, 2012 at 9:09am

brumbie wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:15am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:03am:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:43am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:56am:

lisa.greek wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:02pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 6:36pm:
Did you know the White Male American Nazi Pilot who dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was able to live with himself and sleep at night...this is what war does to peoples humanity... 8-) 8-)



Do you also know he was a hero in the eyes of the Western World?  He forced the surrender of the Imperial Japanese Forces, who for years, raped, tortured and killed thousands of innocent people.

The only problem with the two bombs that were dropped on Japan is that they were not big enough. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


So you would have slept just fine if you killed that many ppl?

SOB


you again show a lack of understanding of maths.
a ground invasion of japan was estimated to result in the deaths of 3 million japanese civilians.
even on okinawa the japanese civilian deaths were higher than the atomic bomb deaths as the japanese civilian flung themselves off cliffs.over 100,000 civilians dies on this small outpost, many women and children jumping to their death. google it borg. it was twice as many as the bomb killed.
a ground invasion of japan would have seen civilian deaths on an unprescedented scale
i would sleep very well at night dropping those bombs


It has nothing to do with math - you show a lack of understanding of conscience. That pilot prolly had years and years of therapy.

SOB


Conscience?...google the rape of nanking.In fact just do some homework on world war 2 spot


Obviously you cant get your head around the concept. So you are a psychopath i take it? Do you have meds for it? Do they make you have a conscience or just keep you from being violent?

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by brumbie on Nov 19th, 2012 at 9:12am
I take it you didn't google it

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 19th, 2012 at 9:12am

Soren wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 8:14am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:59am:
Why have the israelis bombed the registry office and destroyed all  the archives in their "targeted attacks"?

SOB


In response to the 100 rockets the Pallos fired into Israeli civilian areas.

What would you have advised them to destroy instead?

Oh, I forgot. Your advice would be to let the Pallos do what they want, including firing at Israeli civilians who deserve it because the Israeli civilians are implicated in what Israel does - but the poor Pallo civilians who elected the terrorist arm of the Muslim Brotherhood aren't.
As I said a couple of times, you are ready to convert to Islam, you have reached the requisite level of mental acuity.


After all the noise about targeted attacks you would think they would be targeting the rockets or where the rockets are coming from? Not going for maximum damage to civilians?

You cant talk about anyone elses "mental acuity" mate - look in the mirror. WTH the fairy king has favourites! 

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FriYAY on Nov 19th, 2012 at 9:17am

Prevailing wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 8:02am:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:43am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:56am:

lisa.greek wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:02pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 6:36pm:
Did you know the White Male American Nazi Pilot who dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was able to live with himself and sleep at night...this is what war does to peoples humanity... 8-) 8-)



Do you also know he was a hero in the eyes of the Western World?  He forced the surrender of the Imperial Japanese Forces, who for years, raped, tortured and killed thousands of innocent people.

The only problem with the two bombs that were dropped on Japan is that they were not big enough. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


So you would have slept just fine if you killed that many ppl?

SOB


you again show a lack of understanding of maths.
a ground invasion of japan was estimated to result in the deaths of 3 million japanese civilians.
even on okinawa the japanese civilian deaths were higher than the atomic bomb deaths as the japanese civilian flung themselves off cliffs.over 100,000 civilians dies on this small outpost, many women and children jumping to their death. google it borg. it was twice as many as the bomb killed.
a ground invasion of japan would have seen civilian deaths on an unprescedented scale
i would sleep very well at night dropping those bombs

You reduce your logic over what manner to senselessly kill hundreds of thousands of innocent peace loving people by a simply mathematical equation...?

There was a third option...go home and stop fighting....none of those soldiers from the US had any busibness being there and the innocent peace loving Japanese people had never done anything to that Pilot...yet he annihilates hundreds of thousands of people he never met before in a heart beat...The West has yet to own up to this war crime and deal with it...We collectively owe an apology to Japan for a crime they themselves would have considered cowardice and barbaric and never would have committed...  8-) 8-)


;D ;D ;D

If the nips didn't want US soldiers to bomb them, they probably shouldn't have started by bombing Pearl Harbor.

;D ;D ;D

I condem all violence by nasty little nippers.

;D ;D ;D



Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 19th, 2012 at 9:22am

brumbie wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 9:12am:
I take it you didn't google it


Google what? Theres nothing to google. I was talking about the pilot's state of mind after killing so many ppl.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by brumbie on Nov 19th, 2012 at 9:27am
Theres nothing to google ;D ;D

Try telling that to Bowen for example.


You are quick to respond on this forum with aggression but your response to any aggressive

acts around the world is to suggest we all pat them on the head and offer to make it better

by bending down with our ass in the air.If anything it is your psyche that is

disturbing.Your bravery is only mustered when sitting behind a computer screen.You fake

ideals and beliefs just to get a response,you make cheap remarks about people when you have

been backed into a corner and then you go running to the man when people say boo back.You

are a cheap and thoroughly obnoxious human being.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Soren on Nov 19th, 2012 at 10:13am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 9:12am:
You cant talk about anyone elses "mental acuity" mate - look in the mirror. WTH the fairy king has favourites! 

SOB

;D ;D

You are imam material, pal, if not an ayatollah.


Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 19th, 2012 at 11:33am

brumbie wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 9:27am:
Theres nothing to google ;D ;D

Try telling that to Bowen for example.


You are quick to respond on this forum with aggression but your response to any aggressive

acts around the world is to suggest we all pat them on the head and offer to make it better

by bending down with our ass in the air.If anything it is your psyche that is

disturbing.Your bravery is only mustered when sitting behind a computer screen.You fake

ideals and beliefs just to get a response,you make cheap remarks about people when you have

been backed into a corner and then you go running to the man when people say boo back.You

are a cheap and thoroughly obnoxious human being.


What are you talking about? When have i ever suggested anything of the sort?

I guess you are mad cause you realise you were wrong. Lashing out as usual.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 19th, 2012 at 11:34am

Soren wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 10:13am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 9:12am:
You cant talk about anyone elses "mental acuity" mate - look in the mirror. WTH the fairy king has favourites! 

SOB

;D ;D

You are imam material, pal, if not an ayatollah.


Why would you say that to an atheist? Ahhh just to try and insult. Lame.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FriYAY on Nov 19th, 2012 at 11:40am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 9:12am:

Soren wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 8:14am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:59am:
Why have the israelis bombed the registry office and destroyed all  the archives in their "targeted attacks"?

SOB


In response to the 100 rockets the Pallos fired into Israeli civilian areas.

What would you have advised them to destroy instead?

Oh, I forgot. Your advice would be to let the Pallos do what they want, including firing at Israeli civilians who deserve it because the Israeli civilians are implicated in what Israel does - but the poor Pallo civilians who elected the terrorist arm of the Muslim Brotherhood aren't.
As I said a couple of times, you are ready to convert to Islam, you have reached the requisite level of mental acuity.


After all the noise about targeted attacks you would think they would be targeting the rockets or where the rockets are coming from? Not going for maximum damage to civilians?
You cant talk about anyone elses "mental acuity" mate - look in the mirror. WTH the fairy king has favourites! 

SOB



Do you really thing they are targeting civilians for maximum damage?

LOL

Don’t you think if they wanted maximum civilian casualties they could have killed 1000’s more by now?

You don’t tell me anything you just go on and on and you don’t make no sense (thanks Chisel)

Dullard……

;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 11:42am

FriYAY wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 9:17am:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 8:02am:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:43am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:56am:

lisa.greek wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:02pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 6:36pm:
Did you know the White Male American Nazi Pilot who dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was able to live with himself and sleep at night...this is what war does to peoples humanity... 8-) 8-)



Do you also know he was a hero in the eyes of the Western World?  He forced the surrender of the Imperial Japanese Forces, who for years, raped, tortured and killed thousands of innocent people.

The only problem with the two bombs that were dropped on Japan is that they were not big enough. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


So you would have slept just fine if you killed that many ppl?

SOB


you again show a lack of understanding of maths.
a ground invasion of japan was estimated to result in the deaths of 3 million japanese civilians.
even on okinawa the japanese civilian deaths were higher than the atomic bomb deaths as the japanese civilian flung themselves off cliffs.over 100,000 civilians dies on this small outpost, many women and children jumping to their death. google it borg. it was twice as many as the bomb killed.
a ground invasion of japan would have seen civilian deaths on an unprescedented scale
i would sleep very well at night dropping those bombs

You reduce your logic over what manner to senselessly kill hundreds of thousands of innocent peace loving people by a simply mathematical equation...?

There was a third option...go home and stop fighting....none of those soldiers from the US had any busibness being there and the innocent peace loving Japanese people had never done anything to that Pilot...yet he annihilates hundreds of thousands of people he never met before in a heart beat...The West has yet to own up to this war crime and deal with it...We collectively owe an apology to Japan for a crime they themselves would have considered cowardice and barbaric and never would have committed...  8-) 8-)


;D ;D ;D

If the nips didn't want US soldiers to bomb them, they probably shouldn't have started by bombing Pearl Harbor.

;D ;D ;D

I condem all violence by nasty little nippers.

;D ;D ;D

The atomic bombing of Japan was an unprovoked war time atrocity unparalleled on innocent peace loving civilians that had never done any body any harm... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FriYAY on Nov 19th, 2012 at 1:44pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 11:42am:

FriYAY wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 9:17am:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 8:02am:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:43am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:56am:

lisa.greek wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 7:02pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 6:36pm:
Did you know the White Male American Nazi Pilot who dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was able to live with himself and sleep at night...this is what war does to peoples humanity... 8-) 8-)



Do you also know he was a hero in the eyes of the Western World?  He forced the surrender of the Imperial Japanese Forces, who for years, raped, tortured and killed thousands of innocent people.

The only problem with the two bombs that were dropped on Japan is that they were not big enough. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


So you would have slept just fine if you killed that many ppl?

SOB


you again show a lack of understanding of maths.
a ground invasion of japan was estimated to result in the deaths of 3 million japanese civilians.
even on okinawa the japanese civilian deaths were higher than the atomic bomb deaths as the japanese civilian flung themselves off cliffs.over 100,000 civilians dies on this small outpost, many women and children jumping to their death. google it borg. it was twice as many as the bomb killed.
a ground invasion of japan would have seen civilian deaths on an unprescedented scale
i would sleep very well at night dropping those bombs

You reduce your logic over what manner to senselessly kill hundreds of thousands of innocent peace loving people by a simply mathematical equation...?

There was a third option...go home and stop fighting....none of those soldiers from the US had any busibness being there and the innocent peace loving Japanese people had never done anything to that Pilot...yet he annihilates hundreds of thousands of people he never met before in a heart beat...The West has yet to own up to this war crime and deal with it...We collectively owe an apology to Japan for a crime they themselves would have considered cowardice and barbaric and never would have committed...  8-) 8-)


;D ;D ;D

If the nips didn't want US soldiers to bomb them, they probably shouldn't have started by bombing Pearl Harbor.

;D ;D ;D

I condem all violence by nasty little nippers.

;D ;D ;D

The atomic bombing of Japan was an unprovoked war time atrocity unparalleled on innocent peace loving civilians that had never done any body any harm... 8-) 8-)



LOL

What about all the lives lost in Tokyo?

Or is it just a crime when you use big bombs?



Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 1:49pm
On ANZAC day we should all piss on a slouch hat to remind ourselves never to be so stupid ever again as to believe their lies... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FriYAY on Nov 19th, 2012 at 1:58pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 1:49pm:
On ANZAC day we should all piss on a slouch hat to remind ourselves never to be so stupid ever again as to believe their lies... 8-) 8-)


LOL

I can’t wait to see this.

Will you attend dawn service and do this?

Or will you be sitting at home like a coward in your crap and piss stained undies?

I got money on the later. 8-)



Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 2:06pm

FriYAY wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 1:58pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 1:49pm:
On ANZAC day we should all piss on a slouch hat to remind ourselves never to be so stupid ever again as to believe their lies... 8-) 8-)


LOL

I can’t wait to see this.

Will you attend dawn service and do this?

Or will you be sitting at home like a coward in your crap and piss stained undies?

I got money on the later. 8-)

At the Gallipoli dawn service...I condemn militarism and the soldiers who fight wars... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 19th, 2012 at 2:09pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 2:06pm:

FriYAY wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 1:58pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 1:49pm:
On ANZAC day we should all piss on a slouch hat to remind ourselves never to be so stupid ever again as to believe their lies... 8-) 8-)


LOL

I can’t wait to see this.

Will you attend dawn service and do this?

Or will you be sitting at home like a coward in your crap and piss stained undies?

I got money on the later. 8-)

At the Gallipoli dawn service...I condemn militarism and the soldiers who fight wars... 8-) 8-)

The people fighting at Gallipoli didn't have a choice...

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 2:10pm
I never donate to legacy...my donations go to victims charities in Japan, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and other countries white male Nazi warmongers have committed unprovoked warcrimes in... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 19th, 2012 at 2:12pm

FriYAY wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 11:40am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 9:12am:

Soren wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 8:14am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:59am:
Why have the israelis bombed the registry office and destroyed all  the archives in their "targeted attacks"?

SOB


In response to the 100 rockets the Pallos fired into Israeli civilian areas.

What would you have advised them to destroy instead?

Oh, I forgot. Your advice would be to let the Pallos do what they want, including firing at Israeli civilians who deserve it because the Israeli civilians are implicated in what Israel does - but the poor Pallo civilians who elected the terrorist arm of the Muslim Brotherhood aren't.
As I said a couple of times, you are ready to convert to Islam, you have reached the requisite level of mental acuity.


After all the noise about targeted attacks you would think they would be targeting the rockets or where the rockets are coming from? Not going for maximum damage to civilians?
You cant talk about anyone elses "mental acuity" mate - look in the mirror. WTH the fairy king has favourites! 

SOB



Do you really thing they are targeting civilians for maximum damage?

LOL

Don’t you think if they wanted maximum civilian casualties they could have killed 1000’s more by now?

You don’t tell me anything you just go on and on and you don’t make no sense (thanks Chisel)

Dullard……

;D ;D ;D


Of course they are. Targeting the registry office and archives they now have caused maximum damage to the economy by making heaps of ppl not be able to prove they exist or are married etc. Bit like targeting australias SS or ATO.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 19th, 2012 at 2:16pm
You play with the fire, you burn your hands.

Hamas have received many warnings now. They ignored them so now they pay the cost.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FriYAY on Nov 19th, 2012 at 2:18pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 2:10pm:
I never donate to legacy...my donations go to victims charities in Japan, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and other countries white male Nazi warmongers have committed unprovoked warcrimes in... 8-) 8-)



Last time your troll garbage got tipped on your head, you resorted to pissy name-calling and carried on like a little girl and left the thread.

If I could be fkd I’d make you do it again.

Have fun at the dawn service and wash your piss soaked undies before you go, hey?

;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 2:24pm

FriYAY wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 2:18pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 2:10pm:
I never donate to legacy...my donations go to victims charities in Japan, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and other countries white male Nazi warmongers have committed unprovoked warcrimes in... 8-) 8-)



Last time your troll garbage got tipped on your head, you resorted to pissy name-calling and carried on like a little girl and left the thread.

If I could be fkd I’d make you do it again.

Have fun at the dawn service and wash your piss soaked undies before you go, hey?

;D

Hey, nice bullsh1t...did your armies cowardice in killing the innocent win for me the freedom to piss on the slouch hat or did my freedom come from within Adolf...?
;D ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by adelcrow on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:08pm
Given that the Jews tortured, humiliated and murdered our lord and saviour and the son of God..Jesus Christ its not to difficult for them to torture, humiliate and murder innocent women and children.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by darkhall67 on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:15pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 2:16pm:
You play with the fire, you burn your hands.

Hamas have received many warnings now. They ignored them so now they pay the cost.




So what are the children being killed?

Chump change?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:27pm

adelcrow wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:08pm:
Given that the Jews tortured, humiliated and murdered our lord and saviour and the son of God..Jesus Christ its not to difficult for them to torture, humiliate and murder innocent women and children.


Jesus Christ was killed by the Romans.
He is also not considered the son of God.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:28pm

darkhall67 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:15pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 2:16pm:
You play with the fire, you burn your hands.

Hamas have received many warnings now. They ignored them so now they pay the cost.




So what are the children being killed?

Chump change?


What of the Israeli children killed by Hamas?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by darkhall67 on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:33pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:28pm:

darkhall67 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:15pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 2:16pm:
You play with the fire, you burn your hands.

Hamas have received many warnings now. They ignored them so now they pay the cost.




So what are the children being killed?

Chump change?


What of the Israeli children killed by Hamas?




Absolutely terrible.



Your point?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by dsmithy70 on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:37pm
Nuke the whole place & start again.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by adelcrow on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:38pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:37pm:
Nuke the whole place & start again.


Just send the Jews back to Poland and Russia where they came from...

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:47pm

darkhall67 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:33pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:28pm:

darkhall67 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:15pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 2:16pm:
You play with the fire, you burn your hands.

Hamas have received many warnings now. They ignored them so now they pay the cost.




So what are the children being killed?

Chump change?


What of the Israeli children killed by Hamas?




Absolutely terrible.



Your point?


No rockets, no air strike retaliation.

They are responsible for every death, not we.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:49pm

adelcrow wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:38pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:37pm:
Nuke the whole place & start again.


Just send the Jews back to Poland and Russia where they came from...


I am from Haifa. I have never lived in any European country.
My homeland is Israel. We are not leaving.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:55pm
But the Jews are pacifists who say Israel has no right to exist and no right to defend themselves...so why do all these white Nazi warmongers from Europe pretend to speak in their name...?

8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by dsmithy70 on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:57pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:49pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:38pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:37pm:
Nuke the whole place & start again.


Just send the Jews back to Poland and Russia where they came from...


I am from Haifa. I have never lived in any European country.
My homeland is Israel. We are not leaving.





Is this image correct?

If it is, do you not think they have a right to be pissed?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:59pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:47pm:

darkhall67 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:33pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:28pm:

darkhall67 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:15pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 2:16pm:
You play with the fire, you burn your hands.

Hamas have received many warnings now. They ignored them so now they pay the cost.




So what are the children being killed?

Chump change?


What of the Israeli children killed by Hamas?




Absolutely terrible.



Your point?


No rockets, no air strike retaliation.

They are responsible for every death, not we.


How can you expect them to stop when you are bombing them? They have a right to defend themselves. Every time they stop you ppl try to take more of their land or their water or bulldoze their homes or call down airstrikes on large apartment buildings.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by aquascoot on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:59pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:37pm:
Nuke the whole place & start again.


i'll have to check if sportsbet have got odds on this.
it is certainly a possibility.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:00pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:57pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:49pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:38pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:37pm:
Nuke the whole place & start again.


Just send the Jews back to Poland and Russia where they came from...


I am from Haifa. I have never lived in any European country.
My homeland is Israel. We are not leaving.





Is this image correct?

If it is, do you not think they have a right to be pissed?

Seeing how much the pro Israel brigade whinges now, its virtually impossible to imagine what they would be like if Israel was in Palestine's position.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:00pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:47pm:

darkhall67 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:33pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:28pm:

darkhall67 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:15pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 2:16pm:
You play with the fire, you burn your hands.

Hamas have received many warnings now. They ignored them so now they pay the cost.




So what are the children being killed?

Chump change?


What of the Israeli children killed by Hamas?




Absolutely terrible.



Your point?


No rockets, no air strike retaliation.

They are responsible for every death, not we.


Wow you cant even take responsibility for your actions

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by darkhall67 on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:00pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:49pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:38pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:37pm:
Nuke the whole place & start again.


Just send the Jews back to Poland and Russia where they came from...


I am from Haifa. I have never lived in any European country.
My homeland is Israel. We are not leaving.




Yes.

The longer that you occupy the land the harder it will be to undo it as more children (of russian and polish and other jews) are born there.

Which doesnt mean that the formation of israel wasnt a mistake.

It was.


But it is a cake that cant be unmade.


But that doesnt mean israel shouldnt be criticised and condemned for its  actions.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by aquascoot on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:01pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:57pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:49pm:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:38pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 3:37pm:
Nuke the whole place & start again.


Just send the Jews back to Poland and Russia where they came from...


I am from Haifa. I have never lived in any European country.
My homeland is Israel. We are not leaving.





Is this image correct?

If it is, do you not think they have a right to be pissed?



are those green zones , marine parks where fishing is banned.  ;) ;)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:03pm
Dsmithy do you know why the borders changed?
Do you know they attacked us just 1 day after our nation is born?
Do you know they attacked us on one of our holiest days in the calendar?

The borders changed due to the Arabs.

Oh and also Gaza has only ever been controlled by Palestinians since Israel gave it to them.
Before Egypt controlled it.

Jordan only gave up claims to West Bank of the Jordan in the 1980s.

Arabs think Palestinians are 2nd class people and use them only as political tool.
They don't care about them at all.

Read up your Middle East history.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by adelcrow on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:13pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:03pm:
Dsmithy do you know why the borders changed?
Do you know they attacked us just 1 day after our nation is born?
Do you know they attacked us on one of our holiest days in the calendar?

The borders changed due to the Arabs.

Oh and also Gaza has only ever been controlled by Palestinians since Israel gave it to them.
Before Egypt controlled it.

Jordan only gave up claims to West Bank of the Jordan in the 1980s.

Arabs think Palestinians are 2nd class people and use them only as political tool.
They don't care about them at all.

Read up your Middle East history.


Land stolen by the European Jews after WW2..did they learn nothing from the holocaust and who fought for their freedom?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by aquascoot on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:20pm

adelcrow wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:13pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:03pm:
Dsmithy do you know why the borders changed?
Do you know they attacked us just 1 day after our nation is born?
Do you know they attacked us on one of our holiest days in the calendar?

The borders changed due to the Arabs.

Oh and also Gaza has only ever been controlled by Palestinians since Israel gave it to them.
Before Egypt controlled it.

Jordan only gave up claims to West Bank of the Jordan in the 1980s.

Arabs think Palestinians are 2nd class people and use them only as political tool.
They don't care about them at all.

Read up your Middle East history.


Land stolen by the European Jews after WW2..did they learn nothing from the holocaust and who fought for their freedom?


all land is stolen by someone, you could give it back to the persians or the greeks, the romans, the ottomans, the mongols , whoever.

avram is right in that israel was attacked and beat off its enemies.  to the victor go the spoils.

we could give new guinea back to the germans (mite not be a bad idea ;))

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by dsmithy70 on Nov 19th, 2012 at 5:12pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:03pm:
Dsmithy do you know why the borders changed?
Do you know they attacked us just 1 day after our nation is born?
Do you know they attacked us on one of our holiest days in the calendar?

The borders changed due to the Arabs.

Oh and also Gaza has only ever been controlled by Palestinians since Israel gave it to them.
Before Egypt controlled it.

Jordan only gave up claims to West Bank of the Jordan in the 1980s.

Arabs think Palestinians are 2nd class people and use them only as political tool.
They don't care about them at all.

Read up your Middle East history.



I believe that the agreed borders are those after the 6 day war.
It's the fact Israel allows illegal settlements to be built then a few years down the track legitimizes them through time occupied.

It is like a ever increasing cancer.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 19th, 2012 at 5:18pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:03pm:
Dsmithy do you know why the borders changed?
Do you know they attacked us just 1 day after our nation is born?
Do you know they attacked us on one of our holiest days in the calendar?

The borders changed due to the Arabs.

Oh and also Gaza has only ever been controlled by Palestinians since Israel gave it to them.
Before Egypt controlled it.

Jordan only gave up claims to West Bank of the Jordan in the 1980s.

Arabs think Palestinians are 2nd class people and use them only as political tool.
They don't care about them at all.

Read up your Middle East history.


Oh? What "class" do you assign them? (you as in israelis not you as in you cause i know what you think of them).

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by adelcrow on Nov 19th, 2012 at 5:35pm
Killing women and children is nothing just ask the Nazis..they were not as efficient at genocide as the Jews have become but they taught the Jews everything they knew.
The Palestinians are the 21st century Jews and the Jews have become the 21st century Nazis.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Soren on Nov 19th, 2012 at 5:37pm
There have been massive population shifts in the last 80-100 years due to the two world wars and numerous local wars. Dozens of new countries emerged and many countries disappeared.

All countries have accepted these changes to the extent that there are no violent conflicts - except for the Muslim Arabs absolute refusal to cede territory to Jews.

This is not about a new country - there have been numerous new countries emerging from the ruins of various empires, Ottoman and others. This is about the Arabs refusing to let the Jews live on what the Arabs regarded as 'Muslim land'.
For Muslims, the rule is, 'once Muslim, always Muslim', even if the territory was conquered by force from non-Muslims. Conquest is only permitted by Muslims. reconquest from Muslims is not permitted by anyone.

The Jews, in effect, reconquered what they regard as their own homeland. The establishment of Israel doesn't differ, in its historical dimensions, from the Spanish re-conquest of the Iberian peninsula from the Muslims.






Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 19th, 2012 at 5:39pm

Quote:
All countries have accepted these changes to the extent that there are no violent conflicts - except for the Muslim Arabs absolute refusal to cede territory to Jews.

You can't think of any difference regarding Palestine?

Quote:
This is about the Arabs refusing to let the Jews live on what the Arabs regarded as 'Muslim land'.

Except of course for the thousands of jews that lived there before ww2 and the millions that seeked asylum there during ww2...

Quote:
For Muslims, the rule is, 'once Muslim, always Muslim',

Whats the rule for the Jews?

Quote:
The Jews, in effect, reconquered what they regard as their own homeland.

And thats as far as that idea gets.

Quote:
The establishment of Israel doesn't differ, in its historical dimensions, from the Spanish re-conquest of the Iberian peninsula from the Muslims.
What people are still suffering because of the Spanish conquest?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by adelcrow on Nov 19th, 2012 at 5:50pm
The Palestinians were our allies in WW2 and we allowed the Jews to steal their land...shame on the Jews for stealing from those who helped save them and shame on us for letting them get away with it.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:00pm
But it was White Male Nazis who stole the land off the Palestinians and the Jews who has been living in Palestine ion peace for centuries...shame on the white male aggressor for genocide Palestine in the name of the Jews...
The West started, endorses and commits the genocide against Palestine...The Jews want White Nazi Israel gone as much as the rest of Palestine...if only the West would go home and stop invading other countries...shame on them...

:) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by adelcrow on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:03pm
The Jews stole the land in the middle east from those that freed them from the Nazi death camps...shame on the Jews and now they are murdering the descendants of those that freed them.
The lesson has been learnt..next time never give the Jews an inch.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:03pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 5:39pm:

Quote:
All countries have accepted these changes to the extent that there are no violent conflicts - except for the Muslim Arabs absolute refusal to cede territory to Jews.

You can't think of any difference regarding Palestine?
[quote]This is about the Arabs refusing to let the Jews live on what the Arabs regarded as 'Muslim land'.

Except of course for the thousands of jews that lived there before ww2 and the millions that seeked asylum there during ww2...

Quote:
For Muslims, the rule is, 'once Muslim, always Muslim',

Whats the rule for the Jews?

Quote:
The Jews, in effect, reconquered what they regard as their own homeland.

And thats as far as that idea gets.

Quote:
The establishment of Israel doesn't differ, in its historical dimensions, from the Spanish re-conquest of the Iberian peninsula from the Muslims.
What people are still suffering because of the Spanish conquest?[/quote]
Oh yes...they are extinct, like Palestine will be as soon as the white male Nazi aggressor has completed his violent work...the west has genocides countless cultures and multi millions of people...all white male Nazis carry a collective, shared inherited blood guilt...
8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:07pm
There is not a crime of Genocide in the world that white male Nazis have not had a hand in somewhere along the lune...they will even false flag another people like pacifist Jews they massacred in world war 2...their is no end to the evil psychopathy of white male Nazism..
8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by perceptions_now on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:08pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:03pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 5:39pm:

Quote:
All countries have accepted these changes to the extent that there are no violent conflicts - except for the Muslim Arabs absolute refusal to cede territory to Jews.

You can't think of any difference regarding Palestine?
[quote]This is about the Arabs refusing to let the Jews live on what the Arabs regarded as 'Muslim land'.

Except of course for the thousands of jews that lived there before ww2 and the millions that seeked asylum there during ww2...
[quote]For Muslims, the rule is, 'once Muslim, always Muslim',

Whats the rule for the Jews?

Quote:
The Jews, in effect, reconquered what they regard as their own homeland.

And thats as far as that idea gets.

Quote:
The establishment of Israel doesn't differ, in its historical dimensions, from the Spanish re-conquest of the Iberian peninsula from the Muslims.
What people are still suffering because of the Spanish conquest?[/quote]
Oh yes...they are extinct, like Palestine will be as soon as the white male Nazi aggressor has completed his violent work...the west has genocides countless cultures and multi millions of people...all white male Nazis carry a collective, shared inherited blood guilt...
8-) 8-)[/quote]

Prev,
Why don't you take some more pills and try for REALITY?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:09pm
White Male Nazis scapegoat the victims they genocide to justify and continue creating new victims and new atrocities against new people...

8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:11pm
The White Male Nazi is the root of all evil in the world from beginning to end...he is the devils spawn...there is nothing redeeming or good in him...nothing... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by dsmithy70 on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:16pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:11pm:
The White Male Nazi is the root of all evil in the world from beginning to end...he is the devils spawn...there is nothing redeeming or good in him...nothing... 8-) 8-)






Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:17pm

adelcrow wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 5:35pm:
Killing women and children is nothing just ask the Nazis..they were not as efficient at genocide as the Jews have become but they taught the Jews everything they knew.
The Palestinians are the 21st century Jews and the Jews have become the 21st century Nazis.


Horse sh*t

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:19pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 5:12pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:03pm:
Dsmithy do you know why the borders changed?
Do you know they attacked us just 1 day after our nation is born?
Do you know they attacked us on one of our holiest days in the calendar?

The borders changed due to the Arabs.

Oh and also Gaza has only ever been controlled by Palestinians since Israel gave it to them.
Before Egypt controlled it.

Jordan only gave up claims to West Bank of the Jordan in the 1980s.

Arabs think Palestinians are 2nd class people and use them only as political tool.
They don't care about them at all.

Read up your Middle East history.



I believe that the agreed borders are those after the 6 day war.
It's the fact Israel allows illegal settlements to be built then a few years down the track legitimizes them through time occupied.

It is like a ever increasing cancer.


You will find most people like me accept there should be no more settlements and just existing ones kept.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:20pm
The White mans propaganda is to blame their victim while they kill them, he always has an excuse to justify his violence...he even uses past crimes he has committed to justify new violence...there is not one violent white male Nazi worth spitting on... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:24pm
Zionism is the White mans Crime...

::) ::)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:34pm
The people of Asia ME & Africa cannot afford to ignore white male Nazi aggression and violence the world must resist violence with surrender to non violence - the violent must be protested, shouted down, condemned...The world must unite in its rejection of violence and its condemnation of all who endorse it... :) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by dsmithy70 on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:35pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:19pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 5:12pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:03pm:
Dsmithy do you know why the borders changed?
Do you know they attacked us just 1 day after our nation is born?
Do you know they attacked us on one of our holiest days in the calendar?

The borders changed due to the Arabs.

Oh and also Gaza has only ever been controlled by Palestinians since Israel gave it to them.
Before Egypt controlled it.

Jordan only gave up claims to West Bank of the Jordan in the 1980s.

Arabs think Palestinians are 2nd class people and use them only as political tool.
They don't care about them at all.

Read up your Middle East history.



I believe that the agreed borders are those after the 6 day war.
It's the fact Israel allows illegal settlements to be built then a few years down the track legitimizes them through time occupied.

It is like a ever increasing cancer.


You will find most people like me accept there should be no more settlements and just existing ones kept.



You never answered.

Is the map of 2011 accurate?

Again if it is, no wonder you your happy with no more and keeping the existing.

It's gone from a racial/religious/historical problem to one of population control for the Israelis.

You can't fit anymore Jewish returners :-?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:39pm
Zionism is the White Mans Crime and Psychosis...he speaks falsely in the name of the Jew who has always been subservient, non violent and a pacifist and uses the Jew as a scapegoat for his own violent evil nature...

::) ::)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by dsmithy70 on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:03pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:39pm:
Zionism is the White Mans Crime and Psychosis...he speaks falsely in the name of the Jew who has always been subservient, non violent and a pacifist and uses the Jew as a scapegoat for his own violent evil nature...

::) ::)


You left out Nazi



Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:08pm
Truth annoying you Adolf...?

Zionism is the Whte Nazi White Mans doctrine to scapegoat the Pacifist Jew just like Nazism was...the White man Kills and blames his victims...

The Jew has always been the violent white mans convenient scapegoat and target...

8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by gold_medal on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:09pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:03pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:39pm:
Zionism is the White Mans Crime and Psychosis...he speaks falsely in the name of the Jew who has always been subservient, non violent and a pacifist and uses the Jew as a scapegoat for his own violent evil nature...

::) ::)


You left out Nazi



I knew there was something missing...

Celts?
Germans?
English and the I remembered the insane ones current target...

nazis.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:11pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:35pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 6:19pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 5:12pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 4:03pm:
Dsmithy do you know why the borders changed?
Do you know they attacked us just 1 day after our nation is born?
Do you know they attacked us on one of our holiest days in the calendar?

The borders changed due to the Arabs.

Oh and also Gaza has only ever been controlled by Palestinians since Israel gave it to them.
Before Egypt controlled it.

Jordan only gave up claims to West Bank of the Jordan in the 1980s.

Arabs think Palestinians are 2nd class people and use them only as political tool.
They don't care about them at all.

Read up your Middle East history.



I believe that the agreed borders are those after the 6 day war.
It's the fact Israel allows illegal settlements to be built then a few years down the track legitimizes them through time occupied.

It is like a ever increasing cancer.


You will find most people like me accept there should be no more settlements and just existing ones kept.



You never answered.

Is the map of 2011 accurate?

Again if it is, no wonder you your happy with no more and keeping the existing.

It's gone from a racial/religious/historical problem to one of population control for the Israelis.

You can't fit anymore Jewish returners :-?


The map has changed many times.
It changed recently because we gave them land that their Arab friends never allowed them.

But this is all not relevant.
The current operations are occurring because they attack us.
If they do not fire rockets they do not receive retaliation.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:12pm
Gaza is not about the Jew...its about White Male aggression & Violence...Nazism... 8-) 8-)

The Reality below...Jews and Palestinians are brothers...Zionism is the White mans Lie...

8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by gold_medal on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:16pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:12pm:
Gaza is not about the Jew...its about White Male aggression & Violence...Nazism... 8-) 8-)

The Reality below...Jews and Palestinians are brothers...Zionism is the White mans Lie...

8-) 8-)


if your single operating brain cell ever dies....

we'd probably not even notice the difference.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:18pm
Already they have fired 17 rockets into South Israel by 10am Monday.
See how they do not learn???

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by adelcrow on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:20pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:18pm:
Already they have fired 17 rockets into South Israel by 10am Monday.
See how they do not learn???


Yep..you would expect people to be considerate after their land was stolen.
I cant see what their problem is  ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by gold_medal on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:23pm

adelcrow wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:20pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:18pm:
Already they have fired 17 rockets into South Israel by 10am Monday.
See how they do not learn???


Yep..you would expect people to be considerate after their land was stolen.
I cant see what their problem is  ;D


well they are about to get bombed back into the stone age for their stupidity. Of course that isnt much of a distance since the last gazan invention was...

the retarded child suicide bomber.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:24pm
They fire from Gaza which has no Israeli soldier in.
Also Gaza has never been Palestinian until we gave it.
It was Egypt before.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:24pm
The Jew has always been the scapegoat for the violence of White Male aggression...violent white Men are behind Zionism not the Jews...the Jews are at peace with their Middle East brothers...

Violent White Men tell lies...


8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:26pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:24pm:
The Jew has always been the scapegoat for the violence of White Male aggression...violent white Men are behind Zionism not the Jews...the Jews are at peace with their Middle East brothers...

Violent White Men tell lies...


8-) 8-)


This group of Orthodox in Iran has been called traitors.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by dsmithy70 on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:45pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:11pm:
If they do not fire rockets they do not receive retaliation.



Why do they fire rockets?

Seriously do you wish to examine the issue in detail or do you wish to post state propaganda.

I have no religious or political leaning, as you can see from my 1st post I'm fed up with the bickering.

Get along or blow each other to bits, but make it quick, I'm sick of the 6 monthly show.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:48pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:26pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:24pm:
The Jew has always been the scapegoat for the violence of White Male aggression...violent white Men are behind Zionism not the Jews...the Jews are at peace with their Middle East brothers...

Violent White Men tell lies...


8-) 8-)


This group of Orthodox in Iran has been called traitors.

Yes...by violent White Men who have cooped their identity...but none of their beliefs...they have been living in Palestine for centuries...the White People occupying Palestine came only recently from the USA & Russia...

Crimes of the Violent White male Creature...

The Crusades
The Inquisitions
Annihilation of indigenous cultures around the world
colonialism
New Land/Empty Land/Terra Nullis
Child Abduction
Institutional child sexual abuse
Institutional Female abuse
Slavery
Zionism
Communism
Segregation
Apartheid
World War 1
Eugenics - Forced sterilization programs
Nazism
World War 2
Lebensraum
Lebensborn
The Holocaust
Hiroshima
Nagasaki
The Korean War
The Stolen Generation
The Vietnam War
Globalism
9/11
The War On Terror
Invasion of Afghanistan
Invasion of Iraq
1 million dead Iraqi babies
annihilation of the Palestinian people

Now honestly...who really believes the lies of the violent white male creature or...the evidence of their eyes...

8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 9:16pm
I guess Adolf does not want to address the crimes of the Violent White Male Creature throughout history and explain to us why his latest crime in Palestine is also the Jews fault and not a crime of his own twisted sick soul... :) :) How is it the Jews fault this time Adolf...


8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by JC Denton on Nov 19th, 2012 at 10:06pm
gotta love how prevailing can spew his vile, hateful anti-white rhetoric without attracting even the slightest objection.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by progressiveslol on Nov 19th, 2012 at 10:14pm

JC Denton wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 10:06pm:
gotta love how prevailing can spew his vile, hateful anti-white rhetoric without attracting even the slightest objection.

It is a bit odd. I just ignore the racist. You would think someone would have complained about his racism, not me.

Maybe it is time.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 19th, 2012 at 10:20pm
Is outlining the legacy of crimes of violent white men racist and odd now is it...how do violent racist white men hide behind any Victimology...where is the room to hide so much inherited blood guilt... :P :P

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 19th, 2012 at 10:28pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:45pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:11pm:
If they do not fire rockets they do not receive retaliation.



Why do they fire rockets?

.


Yes, why do they? Because as I have said before, they have received land that their arab brothers have never one time given to them.

Many people - in fact 90% of people - just want to live side by side in peace but they must stop firing rockets.

Ay3DCIgCUAEVKbp.jpg (46 KB | 42 )

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 20th, 2012 at 5:32am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:26pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:24pm:
The Jew has always been the scapegoat for the violence of White Male aggression...violent white Men are behind Zionism not the Jews...the Jews are at peace with their Middle East brothers...

Violent White Men tell lies...


8-) 8-)


This group of Orthodox in Iran has been called traitors.


Of course they have. Will they be exterminated?

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 20th, 2012 at 5:36am

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 10:14pm:

JC Denton wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 10:06pm:
gotta love how prevailing can spew his vile, hateful anti-white rhetoric without attracting even the slightest objection.

It is a bit odd. I just ignore the racist. You would think someone would have complained about his racism, not me.

Maybe it is time.


Why? He is allowed to be racist just as you lot (mutation, elvira, etc) with your racism against non-whites. You are all allowed to be racist.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 20th, 2012 at 5:37am
Well they cant stop when you are killing them

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by aquascoot on Nov 20th, 2012 at 5:59am
i think the jews need to practice some pavlov conditioning on the palestinians.

no more surgical strikes.

pavlov tells us that the "reward' must be instantaneous to produce maximal effect.

first leaflet drop to inform the arabs that israel will fire no bombs UNLESS hamas chuck one over the wall first.
if the good people of palestine can stop hamas, they have NOTHING to fear.

but for every pissy little rocket that comes over , a 1000 lb bomb will be coming back the other way.
just like the untargetted rockets from hamas, this will also be untargetted (fairs, fair).

if you dont like it, take some action and root out the rocket firers.

i feel this is a fair and effective tactic.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 20th, 2012 at 6:20am
You have to hand it to violent White Men...they never change their stripes...exterminate a whole people, (Palestinians) take their country, scapegoat the Jews and the victim and still manage to have a debate on "Voluntary Euthanasia" at the same time...

Peace at the point of the exterminators guns... :D :D


Quote:
Crimes of the Violent White male Creature...

The Crusades
The Inquisitions
Annihilation of indigenous cultures around the world
colonialism
New Land/Empty Land/Terra Nullis
Child Abduction
Institutional child sexual abuse
Institutional Female abuse
Slavery
Zionism
Communism
Segregation
Apartheid
World War 1
The Holodomor
The Soviet Gulags
Eugenics - Forced sterilization programs
Nazism
World War 2
Hitler
Stalin
Churchill
Roosevelt
Lebensraum
Lebensborn
The Holocaust
Hiroshima
Nagasaki
Creation Of The State Of Israel
The Korean War
The Stolen Generation
Forced Aboriginal Assimilation
The Aboriginal Intervention
The Vietnam War
The My Lai Massacre
Globalism
9/11
The War On Terror
Invasion of Afghanistan
Invasion of Iraq
1 million dead Iraqi babies
annihilation of the Palestinian people


100 dead innocent Asians in a couple of days at the hands of violent White men... :P :P

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 20th, 2012 at 6:24am
Can someone tell the violent White Men in Israel and around the world to stop scapegoating the Jews and Palestinians while they are exterminating them please...

8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 20th, 2012 at 7:30am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 5:36am:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 10:14pm:

JC Denton wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 10:06pm:
gotta love how prevailing can spew his vile, hateful anti-white rhetoric without attracting even the slightest objection.

It is a bit odd. I just ignore the racist. You would think someone would have complained about his racism, not me.

Maybe it is time.


Why? He is allowed to be racist just as you lot (mutation, elvira, etc) with your racism against non-whites. You are all allowed to be racist.

SOB



And you Spot,  are allowed to be stupid if that is your want.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by gold_medal on Nov 20th, 2012 at 7:45am

Dr No wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 7:30am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 5:36am:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 10:14pm:

JC Denton wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 10:06pm:
gotta love how prevailing can spew his vile, hateful anti-white rhetoric without attracting even the slightest objection.

It is a bit odd. I just ignore the racist. You would think someone would have complained about his racism, not me.

Maybe it is time.


Why? He is allowed to be racist just as you lot (mutation, elvira, etc) with your racism against non-whites. You are all allowed to be racist.

SOB



And you Spot,  are allowed to be stupid if that is your want.


and it is a right that he exercises daily - while waiting for his F111 to arrive.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by dsmithy70 on Nov 20th, 2012 at 8:02am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 10:28pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:45pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:11pm:
If they do not fire rockets they do not receive retaliation.



Why do they fire rockets?

.


Yes, why do they? Because as I have said before, they have received land that their arab brothers have never one time given to them.

Many people - in fact 90% of people - just want to live side by side in peace but they must stop firing rockets.




Exactly what percentage of the total land mass is on those maps?

The ground handed back does look impressive, so impressive that it leads me to question the validity of them.

Frankly it looks like the map I posted only with the roles reversed, take one look at the situation and anyone would call that bullsh!t, so how big is that section?
A 100 square kilometer area, 1000, 5000?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 20th, 2012 at 8:07am
Land Violent White Men illegally Occupying Palestine have handed back for peace...

;D ;D :D :D ::) ::)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by gold_medal on Nov 20th, 2012 at 8:09am

Dsmithy70 wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 8:02am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 10:28pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:45pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 7:11pm:
If they do not fire rockets they do not receive retaliation.



Why do they fire rockets?

.


Yes, why do they? Because as I have said before, they have received land that their arab brothers have never one time given to them.

Many people - in fact 90% of people - just want to live side by side in peace but they must stop firing rockets.




Exactly what percentage of the total land mass is on those maps?

They ground handed back does look impressive, so impressive that it leads me to question the validity of them.

Frankly it looks like the map I posted only with the roles reversed, take one look at the situation and anyone would call that bullsh!t, so how big is that section?
A 100 square kilometer area, 1000, 5000?


Im not sure that I get your point. The map shows accurately the land that israel has given away in return for peace. What is your criticism exactly?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 20th, 2012 at 8:10am

Dr No wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 7:30am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 5:36am:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 10:14pm:

JC Denton wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 10:06pm:
gotta love how prevailing can spew his vile, hateful anti-white rhetoric without attracting even the slightest objection.

It is a bit odd. I just ignore the racist. You would think someone would have complained about his racism, not me.

Maybe it is time.


Why? He is allowed to be racist just as you lot (mutation, elvira, etc) with your racism against non-whites. You are all allowed to be racist.

SOB



And you Spot,  are allowed to be stupid if that is your want.


Why are you obsessed with me?

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by gold_medal on Nov 20th, 2012 at 8:15am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 8:10am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 7:30am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 5:36am:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 10:14pm:

JC Denton wrote on Nov 19th, 2012 at 10:06pm:
gotta love how prevailing can spew his vile, hateful anti-white rhetoric without attracting even the slightest objection.

It is a bit odd. I just ignore the racist. You would think someone would have complained about his racism, not me.

Maybe it is time.


Why? He is allowed to be racist just as you lot (mutation, elvira, etc) with your racism against non-whites. You are all allowed to be racist.

SOB



And you Spot,  are allowed to be stupid if that is your want.


Why are you obsessed with me?

SOB


if you were clever enough (yeah right) you would notice that he is mocking you and laughing at you because of the stellar stupidity you display on a daily basis.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by dsmithy70 on Nov 20th, 2012 at 8:17am

gold_medal wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 8:09am:
Im not sure that I get your point. The map shows accurately the land that israel has given away in return for peace. What is your criticism exactly?



So your saying Israel has given over 1/2 it's territory back?

If this is the case I would ask what's the Palo's problem?

Why are they living in Ghetto's, why are they cut off from family etc, all their arguments are fairytales if this map is correct.


Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 20th, 2012 at 8:56am
Simply Priceless unbeatable scapegoating spin and lies by violent white men to project blame to their victims...

1.  Why didn't the Jews fight back when they were led to the gas chambers...

2.  The Palestinian Rocket attacks must stop..

3.  Look how much land we stole by force in the ME that we have handed back for peace...

4.  Why is Hamas killing its own people...




Quote:
Crimes of the Violent White male Creature...

The Crusades
The Inquisitions
Annihilation of indigenous cultures around the world
colonialism
New Land/Empty Land/Terra Nullis
Child Abduction
Institutional child sexual abuse
Institutional Female abuse
Slavery
Zionism
Communism
Segregation
Apartheid
World War 1
The Holodomor
The Soviet Gulags
Eugenics - Forced sterilization programs
Nazism
World War 2
Hitler
Stalin
Churchill
Roosevelt
Lebensraum
Lebensborn
The Holocaust
Hiroshima
Nagasaki Creation Of The State Of Israel
The Korean War
The Stolen Generation
Forced Aboriginal Assimilation
The Aboriginal Intervention
The Vietnam War
The My Lai Massacre
Globalism
9/11
The War On Terror
Invasion of Afghanistan
Invasion of Iraq
1 million dead Iraqi babies
annihilation of the Palestinian people

8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 20th, 2012 at 8:58am
deleted

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by dsmithy70 on Nov 20th, 2012 at 9:01am
I love it when you re-quote yourself.

It adds so much gravitas to you profound insights.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by aquascoot on Nov 20th, 2012 at 9:05am
all wars from white nazis and not peace loving others.?? :D :D

you better go set up your machete shop in rwanda prev.

fastest kill rate since 1945.

of course, some of the africans were saved by very brave whiteys who hid them in their hotels in the capital.

by the way prev, you cant really put hitler and churchill in the same list.
they cant both be nazi's mate. i think they were fighting each other.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 20th, 2012 at 9:21am
Peace loving Asians and Africans have never ever committed an atrocity of any kind...I challenge you to offer up one crime against peace by any of the peace loving peoples of the world...All violence committed by aggressive White Men are Nazi crimes... 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 20th, 2012 at 9:22am

aquascoot wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 9:05am:
all wars from white nazis and not peace loving others.?? :D :D

you better go set up your machete shop in rwanda prev.

fastest kill rate since 1945.

of course, some of the africans were saved by very brave whiteys who hid them in their hotels in the capital.

by the way prev, you cant really put hitler and churchill in the same list.
they cant both be nazi's mate. i think they were fighting each other.

Nobody said violent White male Nazis weren't idiots... ::) ::)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by dsmithy70 on Nov 20th, 2012 at 9:28am

Prevailing wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 9:21am:
Peace loving Asians and Africans have never ever committed an atrocity of any kind...I challenge you to offer up one crime against peace by any of the peace loving peoples of the world...All violence committed by aggressive White Men are Nazi crimes... 8-) 8-)



Quote:
Sino-Japanese War
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

There were two wars known as the Sino-Japanese War :

    The First Sino-Japanese War (1894-1895) between China (the Qing Dynasty) and Japan (the Empire of Japan), primarily over control of Korea
    The Second Sino-Japanese War (1937-1945) between China (Republic of China) and Japan (the Empire of Japan), from 1941 on as part of World War II

Other wars involving China and Japan were:

    The Mongol invasions of Japan in 1274 and 1281: a coalition of Mongol, Chinese and Korean troops under the Yuan dynasty unsuccessfully invaded Kamakura Japan

    War between Ming dynasty and Japanese Wokous during mid 16th century

    The Japanese invasions of Korea (1592–1598) was a full scale war between a Ming dynasty and Joseon coalition and the invading Japanese

    The 1895 Japanese invasion of Taiwan (1895) of the ex-Qing, Chinese inhabited Republic of Formosa

    Japan was part of the Eight-Nation Alliance that invaded Qing dynasty China during the Boxer Rebellion (1898-1901)

    The Jinan Incident (1928) between Japanese-backed warlords and the Kuomingtang

    The Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931

    The January 28 Incident (1932) between the Republic of China and the Empire of Japan in, and around, Shanghai

    The Defense of the Great Wall (1933) of Rehe (province) and subsequent Actions in Inner Mongolia (1933–1936)



Quote:
The Nanking Massacre or Nanjing Massacre, also known as the Rape of Nanking, was a mass murder and war rape that occurred during the six-week period following the Japanese capture of the city of Nanking (Nanjing), the former capital of the Republic of China, on December 13, 1937 during the Second Sino-Japanese War. During this period, hundreds of thousands of Chinese civilians and disarmed soldiers were murdered by soldiers of the Imperial Japanese Army.[1][2] Widespread rape and looting also occurred.[3][4] Historians and witnesses have estimated that 250,000 to 300,000 people were killed.[5] Several of the key perpetrators of the atrocities, at the time labelled as war crimes, were later tried and found guilty at the Nanjing War Crimes Tribunal, and were subsequently executed. Another key perpetrator, Prince Asaka, a member of the Imperial Family, escaped prosecution by having earlier been granted immunity by the Allies.



Quote:
Unit 731 (731部隊 Nana-san-ichi butai?, Chinese: 731部队) was a covert biological and chemical warfare research and development unit of the Imperial Japanese Army that undertook lethal human experimentation during the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945) and World War II. It was responsible for some of the most notorious war crimes carried out by Japanese personnel. Unit 731 was based at the Pingfang district of Harbin, the largest city in the Japanese puppet state of Manchukuo (now Northeast China).

It was officially known as the Epidemic Prevention and Water Purification Department of the Kwantung Army (関東軍防疫給水部本部 Kantōgun Bōeki Kyūsuibu Honbu?). Originally set up under the Kempeitai military police of the Empire of Japan, Unit 731 was taken over and commanded until the end of the war by General Shiro Ishii, an officer in the Kwantung Army.

Between 3,000 and 12,000 men, women, and children[1][2][3]—from which around 600 every year were provided by the Kempeitai[4]—were murdered during the human experimentation conducted by Unit 731 at the camp based in Pingfang alone, which does not include victims from other medical experimentation sites.[5] Almost 70% of the victims who died in the Pingfang camp were Chinese, including both civilian and military.[6] Close to 30% of the victims were Russian.[7] Some others were South East Asians and Pacific Islanders, at the time colonies of the Empire of Japan, and a small number of the prisoners of war from the Allies of World War II[8] (although many more Allied POWs were victims of Unit 731 at other sites[1]).

Many of the scientists involved in Unit 731 went on to prominent careers in post-war politics, academia, business, and medicine. Some were arrested by Soviet forces and tried at the Khabarovsk War Crime Trials; others surrendered to the American Forces. The reason they were not tried was that the information and experience gained in the studies of the biological warfare was of a great value for the United States biological weapons development program.[9] On 6 May 1947, Douglas MacArthur, as Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces, wrote to Washington that "additional data, possibly some statements from Ishii probably can be obtained by informing Japanese involved that information will be retained in intelligence channels and will not be employed as 'War Crimes' evidence."[10] The deal was concluded in 1948.


Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 20th, 2012 at 9:54am

Dsmithy70 wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 9:28am:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 9:21am:
Peace loving Asians and Africans have never ever committed an atrocity of any kind...I challenge you to offer up one crime against peace by any of the peace loving peoples of the world...All violence committed by aggressive White Men are Nazi crimes... 8-) 8-)



Quote:
Sino-Japanese War
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

There were two wars known as the Sino-Japanese War :

    The First Sino-Japanese War (1894-1895) between China (the Qing Dynasty) and Japan (the Empire of Japan), primarily over control of Korea
    The Second Sino-Japanese War (1937-1945) between China (Republic of China) and Japan (the Empire of Japan), from 1941 on as part of World War II

Other wars involving China and Japan were:

    The Mongol invasions of Japan in 1274 and 1281: a coalition of Mongol, Chinese and Korean troops under the Yuan dynasty unsuccessfully invaded Kamakura Japan

    War between Ming dynasty and Japanese Wokous during mid 16th century

    The Japanese invasions of Korea (1592–1598) was a full scale war between a Ming dynasty and Joseon coalition and the invading Japanese

    The 1895 Japanese invasion of Taiwan (1895) of the ex-Qing, Chinese inhabited Republic of Formosa

    Japan was part of the Eight-Nation Alliance that invaded Qing dynasty China during the Boxer Rebellion (1898-1901)

    The Jinan Incident (1928) between Japanese-backed warlords and the Kuomingtang

    The Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931

    The January 28 Incident (1932) between the Republic of China and the Empire of Japan in, and around, Shanghai

    The Defense of the Great Wall (1933) of Rehe (province) and subsequent Actions in Inner Mongolia (1933–1936)


[quote]The Nanking Massacre or Nanjing Massacre, also known as the Rape of Nanking, was a mass murder and war rape that occurred during the six-week period following the Japanese capture of the city of Nanking (Nanjing), the former capital of the Republic of China, on December 13, 1937 during the Second Sino-Japanese War. During this period, hundreds of thousands of Chinese civilians and disarmed soldiers were murdered by soldiers of the Imperial Japanese Army.[1][2] Widespread rape and looting also occurred.[3][4] Historians and witnesses have estimated that 250,000 to 300,000 people were killed.[5] Several of the key perpetrators of the atrocities, at the time labelled as war crimes, were later tried and found guilty at the Nanjing War Crimes Tribunal, and were subsequently executed. Another key perpetrator, Prince Asaka, a member of the Imperial Family, escaped prosecution by having earlier been granted immunity by the Allies.



Quote:
Unit 731 (731部隊 Nana-san-ichi butai?, Chinese: 731部队) was a covert biological and chemical warfare research and development unit of the Imperial Japanese Army that undertook lethal human experimentation during the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945) and World War II. It was responsible for some of the most notorious war crimes carried out by Japanese personnel. Unit 731 was based at the Pingfang district of Harbin, the largest city in the Japanese puppet state of Manchukuo (now Northeast China).

It was officially known as the Epidemic Prevention and Water Purification Department of the Kwantung Army (関東軍防疫給水部本部 Kantōgun Bōeki Kyūsuibu Honbu?). Originally set up under the Kempeitai military police of the Empire of Japan, Unit 731 was taken over and commanded until the end of the war by General Shiro Ishii, an officer in the Kwantung Army.

Between 3,000 and 12,000 men, women, and children[1][2][3]—from which around 600 every year were provided by the Kempeitai[4]—were murdered during the human experimentation conducted by Unit 731 at the camp based in Pingfang alone, which does not include victims from other medical experimentation sites.[5] Almost 70% of the victims who died in the Pingfang camp were Chinese, including both civilian and military.[6] Close to 30% of the victims were Russian.[7] Some others were South East Asians and Pacific Islanders, at the time colonies of the Empire of Japan, and a small number of the prisoners of war from the Allies of World War II[8] (although many more Allied POWs were victims of Unit 731 at other sites[1]).

Many of the scientists involved in Unit 731 went on to prominent careers in post-war politics, academia, business, and medicine. Some were arrested by Soviet forces and tried at the Khabarovsk War Crime Trials; others surrendered to the American Forces. The reason they were not tried was that the information and experience gained in the studies of the biological warfare was of a great value for the United States biological weapons development program.[9] On 6 May 1947, Douglas MacArthur, as Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces, wrote to Washington that "additional data, possibly some statements from Ishii probably can be obtained by informing Japanese involved that information will be retained in intelligence channels and will not be employed as 'War Crimes' evidence."[10] The deal was concluded in 1948.

[/quote]
You still have not offered up one example of a crime against peace committed by peace loving Asian and African people...I on the other hand can give you several pages of crimes of violence by aggressive violent white men...

Quote:
Crimes of the Violent White male Creature...

The Crusades
The Inquisitions
Annihilation of indigenous cultures around the world
colonialism
New Land/Empty Land/Terra Nullis
Child Abduction
Institutional child sexual abuse
Institutional Female abuse
Slavery
Zionism
Communism
Segregation
Apartheid
World War 1
The Holodomor
The Soviet Gulags
Eugenics - Forced sterilization programs
Nazism
World War 2
Hitler
Stalin
Churchill
Roosevelt
Lebensraum
Lebensborn
The Holocaust
Hiroshima
Nagasaki Creation Of The State Of Israel
The Korean War
The Stolen Generation
Forced Aboriginal Assimilation
The Aboriginal Intervention
The Vietnam War
The My Lai Massacre
Globalism
9/11
The War On Terror
Invasion of Afghanistan
Invasion of Iraq
1 million dead Iraqi babies
annihilation of the Palestinian people

Just one example will suffice that relates directly to peace loving non violent Asian and African people...

8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by gold_medal on Nov 20th, 2012 at 10:11am

Dsmithy70 wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 8:17am:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 8:09am:
Im not sure that I get your point. The map shows accurately the land that israel has given away in return for peace. What is your criticism exactly?



So your saying Israel has given over 1/2 it's territory back?

If this is the case I would ask what's the Palo's problem?

Why are they living in Ghetto's, why are they cut off from family etc, all their arguments are fairytales if this map is correct.


the map is correct. Granted, giving back the sinai DESERT isnt not that impressive although it is probably partly because after spending 40 years wandering there 4000 years ago the last thing they wanted was that damned place all over again!

The whole palestinian problem is best my complex arguments. Im not putting the Israeli-only position. I am however seeing that Israel sits in a place surrounded by implacable enemies swoen to its destruction that regularly invade. When the palestinians lob missles at civilian areas and suicide bomb school buses whatdo they really expect back in return? Yes, their stuation is difficult but they are mostly the architects of their own trouble. They were offered a single separate state but refused. They have been granted land which they literally polluted. (they were given gaza and instead of maintaining their sewerage works they let them break down and refused israeli offers to fix them. now they pump serage into the groundwater which is now destroyed. funnily enough, they are now short of water). They elect a terrorist group as government.

and on and on it goes. We have zero idea what it is like to live under constant threat and regular attack.  I dont think we can easily cast criticisms to either side without a better understanding.

Damn Abraham! Should have kept his cloak zipped!

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 20th, 2012 at 10:58am
That 40 year story sounds familiar - isnt it out of one of the fairy tale books? So basically not actually history.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 20th, 2012 at 12:18pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 10:58am:
That 40 year story sounds familiar - isnt it out of one of the fairy tale books? So basically not actually history.

SOB

There is history in the Bible, there are Atlases and historical timelines, maps and survey manuals to aid in study of the history in it...only an ignorant fool rejects knowledge and it is a miserable fool that deliberately tries to deny and bury knowledge out of personal prejudice and closed mindedness....How do you understand anything if you have not studied and meditated on it whether you agree or not and how do you even have a right to have an opinion if it is based on ignorance... :P :P

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 20th, 2012 at 12:23pm
The violent white male occupiers scapegoating mantra...

1. Israel has a right to exist...

2. Israel has a right to defend themselves...

3. The rockets must stop...





:D :D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 20th, 2012 at 12:46pm
Gaza was given to the Palestinians freely by goodwill.
Their thanks has been to fire rockets unguided into my country and threaten our citizens.

This we will not accept.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 20th, 2012 at 12:47pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 12:46pm:
Gaza was given to the Palestinians freely by goodwill.
Their thanks has been to fire rockets unguided into my country and threaten our citizens.

This we will not accept.

What good are fiction stories when we are talking about real life events, Terrorist?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 20th, 2012 at 12:55pm

Quote:
Gaza was given to the Palestinians freely by goodwill of the Aggressive Violent White Male Nazi Zionist Occupier...

;D ;D ;D ;D




:) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 20th, 2012 at 1:28pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 12:18pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 10:58am:
That 40 year story sounds familiar - isnt it out of one of the fairy tale books? So basically not actually history.

SOB

There is history in the Bible, there are Atlases and historical timelines, maps and survey manuals to aid in study of the history in it...only an ignorant fool rejects knowledge and it is a miserable fool that deliberately tries to deny and bury knowledge out of personal prejudice and closed mindedness....How do you understand anything if you have not studied and meditated on it whether you agree or not and how do you even have a right to have an opinion if it is based on ignorance... :P :P


Not if the only evidence for it is a fairy tale book. Do you believe everything in the jack and the beanstalk book? How about the little mermaid?

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 20th, 2012 at 1:29pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 12:46pm:
Gaza was given to the Palestinians freely by goodwill.
Their thanks has been to fire rockets unguided into my country and threaten our citizens.

This we will not accept.


Given to them? When you threw them out of israel? What you magnanimously allowed them to settle there? As if they had a choice?

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 20th, 2012 at 1:54pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 1:28pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 12:18pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 10:58am:
That 40 year story sounds familiar - isnt it out of one of the fairy tale books? So basically not actually history.

SOB

There is history in the Bible, there are Atlases and historical timelines, maps and survey manuals to aid in study of the history in it...only an ignorant fool rejects knowledge and it is a miserable fool that deliberately tries to deny and bury knowledge out of personal prejudice and closed mindedness....How do you understand anything if you have not studied and meditated on it whether you agree or not and how do you even have a right to have an opinion if it is based on ignorance... :P :P


Not if the only evidence for it is a fairy tale book. Do you believe everything in the jack and the beanstalk book? How about the little mermaid?

SOB

A book is a book, you have to at least attempt to try to read it from the perspective of the light of the people who wrote it.  And to compare it with a fairy tale just demonstrates the shallow depth of your level of comprehension ability.  Much of the Bible and other early manuscripts record the thoughts and experiences of real life people known as the Tribes of Israel, a lot of it can be verified by alternative sources - eg the Egyptian and Babylonian history and the history of the Greeks and the Romans...wake up to yourself and stop being such an asspie...You want to reject all knowledge...?  Because all knowledge has been written by real life people through the light they had and we are not much better in our own age...You just think you are... ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Quantum on Nov 20th, 2012 at 3:04pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 10:58am:
That 40 year story sounds familiar - isnt it out of one of the fairy tale books? So basically not actually history.

SOB


No shock in that post. Considering it is coming from the same fool that doesn't believe Herod the Great was a real person because he is mentioned in the Bible, why would anyone be surprised. Let me bet, you don't believe in the Egyptians, the Persians, the Babylonians or even the Romans ay spot. After all, they are in the silly "fairytale" book so they must be false...

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Peter Freedman on Nov 20th, 2012 at 3:15pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 16th, 2012 at 1:28pm:
Yep agreed.

Israel needs our support.



What Israel needs is someone to belt Netanayu over the head till he sees some sense and stop supporting Israel till he does.

Dunno what Andrei needs but hope he gets it soon.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Yadda on Nov 20th, 2012 at 3:29pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 12:23pm:
The violent white male occupiers scapegoating mantra...

1. Israel has a right to exist...

2. Israel has a right to defend themselves...

3. The rockets must stop...





:D :D




"Judaism rejects Zionism" ???






Zion

Zion = = Jerusalem

KJV Bible the word Zion is found 152 times.

KJV Bible the word Jerusalem is found 811 times.


In the Koran, Jerusalem is mentioned,     0 [zero] times.





Those who would destroy Israel, will be destroyed.


1 Kings 8:1
Then Solomon assembled the elders of Israel, and all the heads of the tribes, the chief of the fathers of the children of Israel, unto king Solomon in Jerusalem, that they might bring up the ark of the covenant of the LORD out of the city of David, which is Zion.

Psalms 14:7
Oh that the salvation of Israel were come out of Zion! when the LORD bringeth back the captivity of his people, Jacob shall rejoice, and Israel shall be glad.

Psalms 48:1
Great is the LORD, and greatly to be praised in the city of our God, in the mountain of his holiness.
Beautiful for situation, the joy of the whole earth, is mount Zion, on the sides of the north, the city of the great King.

Psalms 50:1
The mighty God, even the LORD, hath spoken, and called the earth from the rising of the sun unto the going down thereof.
2  Out of Zion, the perfection of beauty, God hath shined.
3  Our God shall come, and shall not keep silence: a fire shall devour before him, and it shall be very tempestuous round about him.
4  He shall call to the heavens from above, and to the earth, that he may judge his people.

Psalms 65:1
Praise waiteth for thee, O God, in Sion: and unto thee shall the vow be performed.
2  O thou that hearest prayer, unto thee shall all flesh come.
3  Iniquities prevail against me: as for our transgressions, thou shalt purge them away.
Blessed is the man whom thou choosest, and causest to approach unto thee, that he may dwell in thy courts: we shall be satisfied with the goodness of thy house, even of thy holy temple.

++
Psalms 69:34
Let the heaven and earth praise him, the seas, and every thing that moveth therein.
35  For God will save Zion, and will build the cities of Judah: that they may dwell there, and have it in possession.
36  The seed also of his servants shall inherit it: and they that love his name shall dwell therein.

++
Psalms 87:1
His foundation is in the holy mountains.
The LORD loveth the gates of Zion more than all the dwellings of Jacob.
3  Glorious things are spoken of thee, O city of God. Selah.
4  I will make mention of Rahab and Babylon to them that know me: behold Philistia, and Tyre, with Ethiopia; this man was born there.
5  And of Zion it shall be said, This and that man was born in her: and the highest himself shall establish her.

++
Psalms 110:2
The LORD shall send the rod of thy strength out of Zion: rule thou in the midst of thine enemies.

Psalms 125:1
They that trust in the LORD shall be as mount Zion, which cannot be removed, but abideth for ever.
2  As the mountains are round about Jerusalem, so the LORD is round about his people from henceforth even for ever.
3  For the rod of the wicked shall not rest upon the lot of the righteous; lest the righteous put forth their hands unto iniquity.
4  Do good, O LORD, unto those that be good, and to them that are upright in their hearts.
5  As for such as turn aside unto their crooked ways, the LORD shall lead them forth with the workers of iniquity: but peace shall be upon Israel.

++
Psalms 129:4
The LORD is righteous: he hath cut asunder the cords of the wicked.
Let them all be confounded and turned back that hate Zion.

++
Psalms 132:13
For the LORD hath chosen Zion; he hath desired it for his habitation.



Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 20th, 2012 at 4:00pm

Yadda wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 3:29pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 12:23pm:
The violent white male occupiers scapegoating mantra...

1. Israel has a right to exist...

2. Israel has a right to defend themselves...

3. The rockets must stop...





:D :D




"Judaism rejects Zionism" ???






Zion

Zion = = Jerusalem

KJV Bible the word Zion is found 152 times.

KJV Bible the word Jerusalem is found 811 times.


In the Koran, Jerusalem is mentioned,     0 [zero] times.





Those who would destroy Israel, will be destroyed.


1 Kings 8:1
Then Solomon assembled the elders of Israel, and all the heads of the tribes, the chief of the fathers of the children of Israel, unto king Solomon in Jerusalem, that they might bring up the ark of the covenant of the LORD out of the city of David, which is Zion.

Psalms 14:7
Oh that the salvation of Israel were come out of Zion! when the LORD bringeth back the captivity of his people, Jacob shall rejoice, and Israel shall be glad.

Psalms 48:1
Great is the LORD, and greatly to be praised in the city of our God, in the mountain of his holiness.
Beautiful for situation, the joy of the whole earth, is mount Zion, on the sides of the north, the city of the great King.

Psalms 50:1
The mighty God, even the LORD, hath spoken, and called the earth from the rising of the sun unto the going down thereof.
2  Out of Zion, the perfection of beauty, God hath shined.
3  Our God shall come, and shall not keep silence: a fire shall devour before him, and it shall be very tempestuous round about him.
4  He shall call to the heavens from above, and to the earth, that he may judge his people.

Psalms 65:1
Praise waiteth for thee, O God, in Sion: and unto thee shall the vow be performed.
2  O thou that hearest prayer, unto thee shall all flesh come.
3  Iniquities prevail against me: as for our transgressions, thou shalt purge them away.
Blessed is the man whom thou choosest, and causest to approach unto thee, that he may dwell in thy courts: we shall be satisfied with the goodness of thy house, even of thy holy temple.

++
Psalms 69:34
Let the heaven and earth praise him, the seas, and every thing that moveth therein.
35  For God will save Zion, and will build the cities of Judah: that they may dwell there, and have it in possession.
36  The seed also of his servants shall inherit it: and they that love his name shall dwell therein.

++
Psalms 87:1
His foundation is in the holy mountains.
The LORD loveth the gates of Zion more than all the dwellings of Jacob.
3  Glorious things are spoken of thee, O city of God. Selah.
4  I will make mention of Rahab and Babylon to them that know me: behold Philistia, and Tyre, with Ethiopia; this man was born there.
5  And of Zion it shall be said, This and that man was born in her: and the highest himself shall establish her.

++
Psalms 110:2
The LORD shall send the rod of thy strength out of Zion: rule thou in the midst of thine enemies.

Psalms 125:1
They that trust in the LORD shall be as mount Zion, which cannot be removed, but abideth for ever.
2  As the mountains are round about Jerusalem, so the LORD is round about his people from henceforth even for ever.
3  For the rod of the wicked shall not rest upon the lot of the righteous; lest the righteous put forth their hands unto iniquity.
4  Do good, O LORD, unto those that be good, and to them that are upright in their hearts.
5  As for such as turn aside unto their crooked ways, the LORD shall lead them forth with the workers of iniquity: but peace shall be upon Israel.

++
Psalms 129:4
The LORD is righteous: he hath cut asunder the cords of the wicked.
Let them all be confounded and turned back that hate Zion.

++
Psalms 132:13
For the LORD hath chosen Zion; he hath desired it for his habitation.

Wow...this should be good...

:D :D :D :D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 20th, 2012 at 4:58pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 1:54pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 1:28pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 12:18pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 10:58am:
That 40 year story sounds familiar - isnt it out of one of the fairy tale books? So basically not actually history.

SOB

There is history in the Bible, there are Atlases and historical timelines, maps and survey manuals to aid in study of the history in it...only an ignorant fool rejects knowledge and it is a miserable fool that deliberately tries to deny and bury knowledge out of personal prejudice and closed mindedness....How do you understand anything if you have not studied and meditated on it whether you agree or not and how do you even have a right to have an opinion if it is based on ignorance... :P :P


Not if the only evidence for it is a fairy tale book. Do you believe everything in the jack and the beanstalk book? How about the little mermaid?

SOB

A book is a book, you have to at least attempt to try to read it from the perspective of the light of the people who wrote it.  And to compare it with a fairy tale just demonstrates the shallow depth of your level of comprehension ability.  Much of the Bible and other early manuscripts record the thoughts and experiences of real life people known as the Tribes of Israel, a lot of it can be verified by alternative sources - eg the Egyptian and Babylonian history and the history of the Greeks and the Romans...wake up to yourself and stop being such an asspie...You want to reject all knowledge...?  Because all knowledge has been written by real life people through the light they had and we are not much better in our own age...You just think you are... ;D ;D ;D ;D


Nope. The bible is fiction. Not only that but it contains nothing that is actually useful in the way of "history". If its the only source then its fiction.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 20th, 2012 at 4:59pm

Quantum wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 3:04pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 10:58am:
That 40 year story sounds familiar - isnt it out of one of the fairy tale books? So basically not actually history.

SOB


No shock in that post. Considering it is coming from the same fool that doesn't believe Herod the Great was a real person because he is mentioned in the Bible, why would anyone be surprised. Let me bet, you don't believe in the Egyptians, the Persians, the Babylonians or even the Romans ay spot. After all, they are in the silly "fairytale" book so they must be false...


Link to where i said anything of the sort.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 20th, 2012 at 5:28pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 4:58pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 1:54pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 1:28pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 12:18pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 10:58am:
That 40 year story sounds familiar - isnt it out of one of the fairy tale books? So basically not actually history.

SOB

There is history in the Bible, there are Atlases and historical timelines, maps and survey manuals to aid in study of the history in it...only an ignorant fool rejects knowledge and it is a miserable fool that deliberately tries to deny and bury knowledge out of personal prejudice and closed mindedness....How do you understand anything if you have not studied and meditated on it whether you agree or not and how do you even have a right to have an opinion if it is based on ignorance... :P :P


Not if the only evidence for it is a fairy tale book. Do you believe everything in the jack and the beanstalk book? How about the little mermaid?

SOB

A book is a book, you have to at least attempt to try to read it from the perspective of the light of the people who wrote it.  And to compare it with a fairy tale just demonstrates the shallow depth of your level of comprehension ability.  Much of the Bible and other early manuscripts record the thoughts and experiences of real life people known as the Tribes of Israel, a lot of it can be verified by alternative sources - eg the Egyptian and Babylonian history and the history of the Greeks and the Romans...wake up to yourself and stop being such an asspie...You want to reject all knowledge...?  Because all knowledge has been written by real life people through the light they had and we are not much better in our own age...You just think you are... ;D ;D ;D ;D


Nope. The bible is fiction. Not only that but it contains nothing that is actually useful in the way of "history". If its the only source then its fiction.

SOB

How would you know...?  You are an ignoramus who knows nothing, understands nothing...has read nothing and forms opinion based on prejudice and not reason.  Now the Greeks were always open to ideas and knowledge...they craved it, they sought it, they simply did not dismiss ideas and knowledge...why do you keep embarassing yourself...Do you reject all knowledge?  Because all knowledge has been written by human beings...Egyptians built statues with Birds heads and worshiped them...the Romans worshiped a Pantheon of gods...one day people will look at the literature of today and should they reject our History because Whitey was here with his Zionism, Nazism, communism, climate change, New Age, various religious sects...?  Your problem is you have an existential crises and fear knowledge, you fear your capacity to grasp understanding you, you reject what you fear... :P :P,

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Big Dave on Nov 20th, 2012 at 5:44pm
Blacky set fire to the australian landscape and modified the flora and fauna. Blacky even made a bunch of mega fauna extinct.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 20th, 2012 at 5:49pm

Quote:
Crimes of the Violent White male Creature...

The Crusades
The Inquisitions
Annihilation of indigenous cultures around the world
colonialism
New Land/Empty Land/Terra Nullis
Capital Punishment
Torture
Child Abduction
Institutional child sexual abuse
Institutional Female abuse
Slavery
Convict Exile
Port Arthur
Zionism
Communism
Segregation
Apartheid
World War 1
The Holodomor
The Soviet Gulags
Eugenics - Forced sterilization programs
Nazism
World War 2
Hitler
Stalin
Churchill
Roosevelt
Lebensraum
Lebensborn
The Holocaust
Hiroshima
Nagasaki
Creation Of The State Of Israel
The Cold War
The Korean War
The Stolen Generation
Forced Aboriginal Assimilation
The Aboriginal Intervention
The Vietnam War
The My Lai Massacre
Globalism
Port Arthur Massacre
9/11
The War On Terror
Invasion of Afghanistan
Invasion of Iraq
1 million dead Iraqi babies
annihilation of the Palestinian people

Climate Change...?

:o :o :o :o

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by aquascoot on Nov 20th, 2012 at 5:50pm

Big Dave wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 5:44pm:
Blacky set fire to the australian landscape and modified the flora and fauna. Blacky even made a bunch of mega fauna extinct.


true  , good lateral thinking ;) ;)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Big Dave on Nov 20th, 2012 at 5:53pm

aquascoot wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 5:50pm:

Big Dave wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 5:44pm:
Blacky set fire to the australian landscape and modified the flora and fauna. Blacky even made a bunch of mega fauna extinct.


true  , good lateral thinking ;) ;)

:) :) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 20th, 2012 at 6:00pm
I am leaving Australia early than planned on Friday. It has Been a wonderful year In this country.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by red baron on Nov 20th, 2012 at 6:14pm
Ever heard the expression, "It's hard to remember your original intention was to drain the swamp when your up to your arse in alligators?"

You see that is the status quo for both sides in the Middle East conflict.

Forget all about who started it or whose fault it was. It's gotten way past there.

Now it's just a simple case of who has the biggest freaking gun.

Israel have 70,000 troops massed on the border.

Thing is, who is going to blink first?

So far the Muslims have proved one thing, they can't fight their way out of a wet paper bag, they make the Italians look like a Colossus.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Big Dave on Nov 20th, 2012 at 6:15pm
Best of luck Avram. Don't get taken alive. Just kidding.
Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 6:00pm:
I am leaving Australia early than planned on Friday. It has Been a wonderful year In this country.


Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 20th, 2012 at 6:18pm

Big Dave wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 6:15pm:
Best of luck Avram. Don't get taken alive. Just kidding.
Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 6:00pm:
I am leaving Australia early than planned on Friday. It has Been a wonderful year In this country.


Thank you. I am going a little early but not much.
It has been a fun year here. You have a fantastic country and people. I will be sorry to leave it.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by red baron on Nov 20th, 2012 at 6:20pm
Here's some advice you can use Avram. Squeeze the trigger don't jerk it, lead about one body width in front of your target at distance shooting the direction your target is heading, let your breathe out before you fire your shot. And...always, always maintain your weapon.......

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 20th, 2012 at 6:21pm

red baron wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 6:20pm:
Here's some advice you can use Avram. Squeeze the trigger don't jerk it, lead about one body width in front of your target at distance shooting the direction your target is heading, let your breathe out before you fire your shot. And...always, always maintain your weapon.......

Stop supporting terrorism Red

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by dsmithy70 on Nov 20th, 2012 at 6:25pm
הישאר בטוח והוגן גם אברם

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 20th, 2012 at 6:30pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 6:25pm:
הישאר בטוח והוגן גם אברם



Thank you and my best wishes to you.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 20th, 2012 at 6:34pm
ELECTION 2013 - HUGE SUPPORT FOR OPERATION PILLAR OF DEFENSE, NOT FOR GROUND INVASION

Israelis expressed strong backing for Operation Pillar of Defense’s attacks by air but hesitancy to add a ground offensive, according to polls taken in recent days.

The polls were taken amid questions over whether thousands of IDF reservists who were called up would be used for ground operations or whether Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak were bluffing when they threatened to enter the Gaza Strip.

A poll taken by Panels for the Israeli Center for Political Training found that 85 percent of Israelis believe embarking on the operation was the correct decision. But when asked what should happen next, 45% said to continue air strikes, 22% said to seek a cease-fire and just 25% recommended a ground offensive.

A Dialog poll taken for Haaretz had similar results, with 84% supporting the operation, 39% saying it should be continued by air, 19% calling for an immediate cease-fire and 30% backing a ground operation.

A Midgam poll taken for Channel 10 on Thursday, the first full day of the operation, found that 91% of Israelis supported it. Seventy-six percent called for it to continue and 22% said to seek a cease-fire.

Netanyahu and Barak fared well in all of the polls, which showed that an overwhelming majority of Israelis do not believe they began the operation for political reasons.

Asked whether they were satisfied with Netanyahu’s performance running the operation, 78% answered affirmatively in the Panels poll and 55% in the Dialog one. Barak’s approval was 70% and 52% in the Panels and Dialog surveys respectively.

In response to Midgam’s question on who is fit to handle Israel’s security challenges, 41% said Netanyahu, 18% Barak, 7% former prime minister Ehud Olmert, 6% Kadima chairman Shaul Mofaz, 4% Labor leader Shelly Yacimovich, 3% former foreign minister Tzipi Livni and 2% Yesh Atid chairman Yair Lapid.

When asked by Dialog whether Barak should remain defense minister, 42% answered affirmatively and 41% said no. When Panels asked who was most fit to be defense minister, former IDF chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. (res.) Gabi Ashkenazi, who is barred from holding the post during his current cooling-off period finished first, followed by Vice Premier Moshe Ya’alon, and Barak.

Both the Dialog and Panels polls found that the Center-Right bloc would win 66 seats, the Center- Left bloc 50-51 mandates, and renegade Shas MK Haim Amsalem’s new Am Shalem party three to four seats. Netanyahu and Liberman’s Likud- Beytenu joint list would win 41 seats in the Dialog survey and 38 in the Panels poll, in which National Union MK Arieh Eldad’s newly created Strength for Israel party passes the 2% electoral threshold with three seats.

http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=292597

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by adelcrow on Nov 20th, 2012 at 6:48pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 6:34pm:
ELECTION 2013 - HUGE SUPPORT FOR OPERATION PILLAR OF DEFENSE, NOT FOR GROUND INVASION

Israelis expressed strong backing for Operation Pillar of Defense’s attacks by air but hesitancy to add a ground offensive, according to polls taken in recent days.

The polls were taken amid questions over whether thousands of IDF reservists who were called up would be used for ground operations or whether Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak were bluffing when they threatened to enter the Gaza Strip.

A poll taken by Panels for the Israeli Center for Political Training found that 85 percent of Israelis believe embarking on the operation was the correct decision. But when asked what should happen next, 45% said to continue air strikes, 22% said to seek a cease-fire and just 25% recommended a ground offensive.

A Dialog poll taken for Haaretz had similar results, with 84% supporting the operation, 39% saying it should be continued by air, 19% calling for an immediate cease-fire and 30% backing a ground operation.

A Midgam poll taken for Channel 10 on Thursday, the first full day of the operation, found that 91% of Israelis supported it. Seventy-six percent called for it to continue and 22% said to seek a cease-fire.

Netanyahu and Barak fared well in all of the polls, which showed that an overwhelming majority of Israelis do not believe they began the operation for political reasons.

Asked whether they were satisfied with Netanyahu’s performance running the operation, 78% answered affirmatively in the Panels poll and 55% in the Dialog one. Barak’s approval was 70% and 52% in the Panels and Dialog surveys respectively.

In response to Midgam’s question on who is fit to handle Israel’s security challenges, 41% said Netanyahu, 18% Barak, 7% former prime minister Ehud Olmert, 6% Kadima chairman Shaul Mofaz, 4% Labor leader Shelly Yacimovich, 3% former foreign minister Tzipi Livni and 2% Yesh Atid chairman Yair Lapid.

When asked by Dialog whether Barak should remain defense minister, 42% answered affirmatively and 41% said no. When Panels asked who was most fit to be defense minister, former IDF chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. (res.) Gabi Ashkenazi, who is barred from holding the post during his current cooling-off period finished first, followed by Vice Premier Moshe Ya’alon, and Barak.

Both the Dialog and Panels polls found that the Center-Right bloc would win 66 seats, the Center- Left bloc 50-51 mandates, and renegade Shas MK Haim Amsalem’s new Am Shalem party three to four seats. Netanyahu and Liberman’s Likud- Beytenu joint list would win 41 seats in the Dialog survey and 38 in the Panels poll, in which National Union MK Arieh Eldad’s newly created Strength for Israel party passes the 2% electoral threshold with three seats.

http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=292597


Why are you telling us this?
Go back the the Middle East if its so important to you.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Quantum on Nov 20th, 2012 at 7:33pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 4:59pm:

Quantum wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 3:04pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 10:58am:
That 40 year story sounds familiar - isnt it out of one of the fairy tale books? So basically not actually history.

SOB


No shock in that post. Considering it is coming from the same fool that doesn't believe Herod the Great was a real person because he is mentioned in the Bible, why would anyone be surprised. Let me bet, you don't believe in the Egyptians, the Persians, the Babylonians or even the Romans ay spot. After all, they are in the silly "fairytale" book so they must be false...


Link to where i said anything of the sort.

SOB


Ok


Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 4th, 2012 at 4:11am:

Adamant wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 4:45pm:
Did you know that in the days of Herod, Israel was larger than it is today.



Herod? are you saying that because a fiction book says something it must be history?

SOB



Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 20th, 2012 at 7:46pm

Quantum wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 7:33pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 4:59pm:

Quantum wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 3:04pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 10:58am:
That 40 year story sounds familiar - isnt it out of one of the fairy tale books? So basically not actually history.

SOB


No shock in that post. Considering it is coming from the same fool that doesn't believe Herod the Great was a real person because he is mentioned in the Bible, why would anyone be surprised. Let me bet, you don't believe in the Egyptians, the Persians, the Babylonians or even the Romans ay spot. After all, they are in the silly "fairytale" book so they must be false...


Link to where i said anything of the sort.

SOB


Ok


Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 4th, 2012 at 4:11am:

Adamant wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 4:45pm:
Did you know that in the days of Herod, Israel was larger than it is today.



Herod? are you saying that because a fiction book says something it must be history?

SOB



Spot will claim you doctored his post.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Quantum on Nov 20th, 2012 at 8:24pm

Dr No wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 7:46pm:
Spot will claim you doctored his post.


Yes, there is no way to get anything through to him.

If I don't show the quote he says; "hahahahaha you got caught lying you lying liar." If I quote in full he will just say; "what? What has what you quoted got to do with what you caused me of? You're lying again." If I spell it out for him by quoting the exact sentence in question; "you're quote mining and misrepresenting what I said you liar."

Yes, he will find a reason to deny anything that shows what a moron he is.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 21st, 2012 at 5:39am

Quantum wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 7:33pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 4:59pm:

Quantum wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 3:04pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 10:58am:
That 40 year story sounds familiar - isnt it out of one of the fairy tale books? So basically not actually history.

SOB


No shock in that post. Considering it is coming from the same fool that doesn't believe Herod the Great was a real person because he is mentioned in the Bible, why would anyone be surprised. Let me bet, you don't believe in the Egyptians, the Persians, the Babylonians or even the Romans ay spot. After all, they are in the silly "fairytale" book so they must be false...


Link to where i said anything of the sort.

SOB


Ok


Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 4th, 2012 at 4:11am:

Adamant wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 4:45pm:
Did you know that in the days of Herod, Israel was larger than it is today.



Herod? are you saying that because a fiction book says something it must be history?

SOB


Where did I say he wasnt a real person? The context of it was airy fairy.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 21st, 2012 at 5:40am

Dr No wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 7:46pm:

Quantum wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 7:33pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 4:59pm:

Quantum wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 3:04pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 10:58am:
That 40 year story sounds familiar - isnt it out of one of the fairy tale books? So basically not actually history.

SOB


No shock in that post. Considering it is coming from the same fool that doesn't believe Herod the Great was a real person because he is mentioned in the Bible, why would anyone be surprised. Let me bet, you don't believe in the Egyptians, the Persians, the Babylonians or even the Romans ay spot. After all, they are in the silly "fairytale" book so they must be false...


Link to where i said anything of the sort.

SOB


Ok


Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 4th, 2012 at 4:11am:

Adamant wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 4:45pm:
Did you know that in the days of Herod, Israel was larger than it is today.



Herod? are you saying that because a fiction book says something it must be history?

SOB



Spot will claim you doctored his post.


What? What kind of lying scum are you?

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 21st, 2012 at 5:41am

Quantum wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 8:24pm:

Dr No wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 7:46pm:
Spot will claim you doctored his post.


Yes, there is no way to get anything through to him.

If I don't show the quote he says; "hahahahaha you got caught lying you lying liar." If I quote in full he will just say; "what? What has what you quoted got to do with what you caused me of? You're lying again." If I spell it out for him by quoting the exact sentence in question; "you're quote mining and misrepresenting what I said you liar."

Yes, he will find a reason to deny anything that shows what a moron he is.


You really cant handle it that most ppl are smarter than you can you. In real life to you try to bully ppl? I expect most ppl in real life are smarter than you too so you must have to lash out  . . . .

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 21st, 2012 at 6:50am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 21st, 2012 at 5:41am:

Quantum wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 8:24pm:

Dr No wrote on Nov 20th, 2012 at 7:46pm:
Spot will claim you doctored his post.


Yes, there is no way to get anything through to him.

If I don't show the quote he says; "hahahahaha you got caught lying you lying liar." If I quote in full he will just say; "what? What has what you quoted got to do with what you caused me of? You're lying again." If I spell it out for him by quoting the exact sentence in question; "you're quote mining and misrepresenting what I said you liar."

Yes, he will find a reason to deny anything that shows what a moron he is.


You really cant handle it that most ppl are smarter than you can you. In real life to you try to bully ppl? I expect most ppl in real life are smarter than you too so you must have to lash out  . . . .

SOB



If they are, which I doubt, you certainly aren't on that list Spot.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 21st, 2012 at 6:57am
Here is proof you aren't on the list Spot.


No. They arent. Some of the shows *may* give labour equal coverage occasionally but the main news etc are all biased just like the others in favour of abbott. They cut off labour ppl who are talking to the press to go to liberal ppl who are talking. When something happens they go find out what abbott thinks of it instead of the PM.

SOB[/quote]

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 21st, 2012 at 7:54am

Dr No wrote on Nov 21st, 2012 at 6:57am:
Here is proof you aren't on the list Spot.


No. They arent. Some of the shows *may* give labour equal coverage occasionally but the main news etc are all biased just like the others in favour of abbott. They cut off labour ppl who are talking to the press to go to liberal ppl who are talking. When something happens they go find out what abbott thinks of it instead of the PM.

SOB
[/quote]

I got an aussie spell checker. Not that it has anything to do with anything.

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Quantum on Nov 21st, 2012 at 8:00am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 21st, 2012 at 5:41am:
You really cant handle it that most ppl are smarter than you can you. In real life to you try to bully ppl? I expect most ppl in real life are smarter than you too so you must have to lash out  . . . .

SOB


Actually when I find people who are smarter than me (and I am happy to admit that there are many) I usually try to learn from them. You should try it. Maybe start with prevailing's posts and work your way up. You will then be able to learn off the rest of us in a few decades.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 21st, 2012 at 8:02am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 21st, 2012 at 7:54am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 21st, 2012 at 6:57am:
Here is proof you aren't on the list Spot.


No. They arent. Some of the shows *may* give labour equal coverage occasionally but the main news etc are all biased just like the others in favour of abbott. They cut off labour ppl who are talking to the press to go to liberal ppl who are talking. When something happens they go find out what abbott thinks of it instead of the PM.

SOB


I got HAVE an aussie  Aussie spell checker. Not that it has anything to do with anything.

SOB[/quote]

Fixed.

I shouldn't have to do this as you claim to be smarter than me.



Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 21st, 2012 at 9:13am

Dr No wrote on Nov 21st, 2012 at 8:02am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 21st, 2012 at 7:54am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 21st, 2012 at 6:57am:
Here is proof you aren't on the list Spot.


No. They arent. Some of the shows *may* give labour equal coverage occasionally but the main news etc are all biased just like the others in favour of abbott. They cut off labour ppl who are talking to the press to go to liberal ppl who are talking. When something happens they go find out what abbott thinks of it instead of the PM.

SOB


I got HAVE an aussie  Aussie spell checker. Not that it has anything to do with anything.

SOB


Fixed.

I shouldn't have to do this as you claim to be smarter than me.


[/quote]

Nope. I got an aussie spell checker. I had an american one and it was annoying and i had to correct it all the time. Now i have an aussie one (that i got).

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 21st, 2012 at 5:56pm
I am going home tomorrow for obvious reasons spot.
I am not going to say anymore of the details.

I have finished my studies and leave Sydney tomorrow.
My main regret is I still have places I this country I have not visited.
But I must go.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 21st, 2012 at 5:57pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 21st, 2012 at 5:56pm:
I am going home tomorrow for obvious reasons spot.
I am not going to say anymore of the details.

I have finished my studies and leave Sydney tomorrow.
My main regret is I still have places I this country I have not visited.
But I must go.

Terrorist scum.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Soren on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 10:29am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 10:19am:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:59am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 18th, 2012 at 9:56am:
If the IDF increase the call from the 16.000, I am in the next draft as finished studies, under 30 years old and served in last 5 years.
So I will be in the Operation if this happens and leave Australia early.

This is reality. It is why we are reservists.



Don't go Avram.
The Pallys may very well have high firing rate machine guns supplied from Iran -
including tank buster missiles.
The Israeli casualties could be high.


I doubt it. there has been a blockade forever and we havent seen any evidence of it so far.

SOB



That 'bockade' can't be all that serious - how wlse could they have obtained those hundreds of Iranian missiles they have been shooting at Israel?


Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by aquascoot on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 10:41am

bobbythefap1 wrote on Nov 21st, 2012 at 5:57pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 21st, 2012 at 5:56pm:
I am going home tomorrow for obvious reasons spot.
I am not going to say anymore of the details.

I have finished my studies and leave Sydney tomorrow.
My main regret is I still have places I this country I have not visited.
But I must go.

Terrorist scum.



I  agree,  happy hunting avram, shoot as many of the terrorist scum as you can find.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by pansi1951 on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:02am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 21st, 2012 at 5:56pm:
I am going home tomorrow for obvious reasons spot.
I am not going to say anymore of the details.

I have finished my studies and leave Sydney tomorrow.
My main regret is I still have places I this country I have not visited.
But I must go.



Is Israel going to violate the cease fire ......AGAIN?

You won't get a medal, you're late!

I hope your nose doesn't get in the way of the gun barrel.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:09am

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:02am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 21st, 2012 at 5:56pm:
I am going home tomorrow for obvious reasons spot.
I am not going to say anymore of the details.

I have finished my studies and leave Sydney tomorrow.
My main regret is I still have places I this country I have not visited.
But I must go.



Is Israel going to violate the cease fire ......AGAIN?

You won't get a medal, you're late!

I hope your nose doesn't get in the way of the gun barrel.



How old are you Pansi?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:13am

Dr No wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:09am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:02am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 21st, 2012 at 5:56pm:
I am going home tomorrow for obvious reasons spot.
I am not going to say anymore of the details.

I have finished my studies and leave Sydney tomorrow.
My main regret is I still have places I this country I have not visited.
But I must go.



Is Israel going to violate the cease fire ......AGAIN?

You won't get a medal, you're late!

I hope your nose doesn't get in the way of the gun barrel.



How old are you Pansi?


I think there might be a bit of DEMENTURE THERE  Dr No   ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:35am

FRED. wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:13am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:09am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:02am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 21st, 2012 at 5:56pm:
I am going home tomorrow for obvious reasons spot.
I am not going to say anymore of the details.

I have finished my studies and leave Sydney tomorrow.
My main regret is I still have places I this country I have not visited.
But I must go.



Is Israel going to violate the cease fire ......AGAIN?

You won't get a medal, you're late!

I hope your nose doesn't get in the way of the gun barrel.



How old are you Pansi?


I think there might be a bit of DEMENTURE THERE  Dr No   ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D



Sheesh, is she that old?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:35am

FRED. wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:13am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:09am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:02am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 21st, 2012 at 5:56pm:
I am going home tomorrow for obvious reasons spot.
I am not going to say anymore of the details.

I have finished my studies and leave Sydney tomorrow.
My main regret is I still have places I this country I have not visited.
But I must go.



Is Israel going to violate the cease fire ......AGAIN?

You won't get a medal, you're late!

I hope your nose doesn't get in the way of the gun barrel.



How old are you Pansi?


I think there might be a bit of DEMENTURE THERE  Dr No   ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Does it effect your spelling?

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:45am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:35am:

FRED. wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:13am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:09am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:02am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 21st, 2012 at 5:56pm:
I am going home tomorrow for obvious reasons spot.
I am not going to say anymore of the details.

I have finished my studies and leave Sydney tomorrow.
My main regret is I still have places I this country I have not visited.
But I must go.



Is Israel going to violate the cease fire ......AGAIN?

You won't get a medal, you're late!

I hope your nose doesn't get in the way of the gun barrel.



How old are you Pansi?


I think there might be a bit of DEMENTURE THERE  Dr No   ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Does it effect your spelling?

SOB



Does it affect yours Borg?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Annie Anthrax on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:57am
How old are you, Dr Dick? Obviously not old enough to know better.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:57am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:35am:

FRED. wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:13am:

Dr No wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:09am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:02am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 21st, 2012 at 5:56pm:
I am going home tomorrow for obvious reasons spot.
I am not going to say anymore of the details.

I have finished my studies and leave Sydney tomorrow.
My main regret is I still have places I this country I have not visited.
But I must go.



Is Israel going to violate the cease fire ......AGAIN?

You won't get a medal, you're late!

I hope your nose doesn't get in the way of the gun barrel.



How old are you Pansi?


I think there might be a bit of DEMENTURE THERE  Dr No   ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Does it effect your spelling?

SOB


I seriously hope that irony is intended.
Having seen the majority of his posts though I doubt it.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 12:01pm

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:57am:
How old are you, Dr Dick? Obviously not old enough to know better.


So you have no problem with the blatantly racist and anti-Jewish comment from Pansi then?

You probably don't. You don't like Jews do you.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Annie Anthrax on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 12:05pm
Glass houses and all that, Andrei. I remember you advocating the carpet bombing of Muslim children. You have no room to talk.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 12:07pm

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:57am:
How old are you, Dr Dick? Obviously not old enough to know better.



To know what better?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 12:09pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 12:01pm:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:57am:
How old are you, Dr Dick? Obviously not old enough to know better.


So you have no problem with the blatantly racist and anti-Jewish comment from Pansi then?

You probably don't. You don't like Jews do you.



You got that right Andrei, Annie is a mussy lover.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 12:12pm

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 12:05pm:
Glass houses and all that, Andrei. I remember you advocating the carpet bombing of Muslim children. You have no room to talk.


Didn't answer the question.
One can only assume you don't have an issue with blatant anti-semitic remarks?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Annie Anthrax on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 12:15pm
I'm a lover of people in general, Dr.

Jews, Muslims...I don't discriminate.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Annie Anthrax on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 12:17pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 12:12pm:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 12:05pm:
Glass houses and all that, Andrei. I remember you advocating the carpet bombing of Muslim children. You have no room to talk.


Didn't answer the question.
One can only assume you don't have an issue with blatant anti-semitic remarks?


Oh, I do.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 12:34pm

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 11:57am:
How old are you, Dr Dick? Obviously not old enough to know better.



Once more for Annie. To know what better??

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Avram Horowitz on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 12:41pm
Ok this is all my friends.

Sure i may come to here and say hello in the future but the time difference from home to this country means not many people will be here on my daytimes.

I have had a wonderful time to study, meet new friends and to speak with this forum who I didnt know existed until I come looking for politics of my guest country.

I was due to leave in Jan/Feb of '13 and to travel some around AU and NZ but obviously this isn't possible this time for obvious reasons. I have asked if my return is necessary last night and it is still so, therefore it is the time to say au revoir.

Remember, this is a beautiful country - it is at peace, you have resources, you have stable politics and you have a big country with lots and lots of space.
Try to sometimes look outside of your own country and realize that you have a very lucky situation which so many of us the other parts of the world would dearly love.

I wish you well and I will come by here and say hello and ask about your big issues of carbon tax and your big immigration problem (LOL).

If wish to wave me goodbye i am on CX100  :)


So for now, Kol Tuv Aussies as we say in Hebrew.

:)  :)  :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Annie Anthrax on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 12:57pm
Safe travels, Avram. Be gentle.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 12:58pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 12:41pm:
Ok this is all my friends.

Sure i may come to here and say hello in the future but the time difference from home to this country means not many people will be here on my daytimes.

I have had a wonderful time to study, meet new friends and to speak with this forum who I didnt know existed until I come looking for politics of my guest country.

I was due to leave in Jan/Feb of '13 and to travel some around AU and NZ but obviously this isn't possible this time for obvious reasons. I have asked if my return is necessary last night and it is still so, therefore it is the time to say au revoir.

Remember, this is a beautiful country - it is at peace, you have resources, you have stable politics and you have a big country with lots and lots of space.
Try to sometimes look outside of your own country and realize that you have a very lucky situation which so many of us the other parts of the world would dearly love.

I wish you well and I will come by here and say hello and ask about your big issues of carbon tax and your big immigration problem (LOL).

If wish to wave me goodbye i am on CX100  :)


So for now, Kol Tuv Aussies as we say in Hebrew.

:)  :)  :)



Safe trip and good luck.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 12:58pm

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 12:57pm:
Safe travels, Avram. Be gentle.


Hypocrite.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Shane B on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 1:01pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 12:41pm:
Ok this is all my friends.

Sure i may come to here and say hello in the future but the time difference from home to this country means not many people will be here on my daytimes.

I have had a wonderful time to study, meet new friends and to speak with this forum who I didnt know existed until I come looking for politics of my guest country.

I was due to leave in Jan/Feb of '13 and to travel some around AU and NZ but obviously this isn't possible this time for obvious reasons. I have asked if my return is necessary last night and it is still so, therefore it is the time to say au revoir.

Remember, this is a beautiful country - it is at peace, you have resources, you have stable politics and you have a big country with lots and lots of space.
Try to sometimes look outside of your own country and realize that you have a very lucky situation which so many of us the other parts of the world would dearly love.

I wish you well and I will come by here and say hello and ask about your big issues of carbon tax and your big immigration problem (LOL).

If wish to wave me goodbye i am on CX100  :)


So for now, Kol Tuv Aussies as we say in Hebrew.

:)  :)  :)


Goodbye Avram,

It was a pleasure to host you in Australia.

I am proud of your support and service to Israel. You are a good person.

Please be safe and may God bless and protect youself and mighty Israel. Visit again soon.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Annie Anthrax on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 1:02pm
How am I a hypocrite? I certainly don't wish Avram any harm and I sure as hell hope he's gentle with the people his government oppresses.

No hypocrisy there.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 1:12pm
Try here for a start.


http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1353036139/0


Posts 3 and 6.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by pansi1951 on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 1:31pm

You precious people sit here for years calling Muslims all the despicable names under the sun and you have the hide to have a go at me for mentioning Avram's big schnozz, well! get over yourselves, he can't help it, he inherited it from his ancestors, poor dear. That's no reason not to warn him to be careful, it must get in the way in warfare.

Remember what you said andrei?

Here it is

andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....

Have you got one too Andrei? a gigantic schnozz, I mean?

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 1:33pm
The rest of the world believes the Zionist state should be dissolved...

8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Annie Anthrax on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 1:37pm

Dr No wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 1:12pm:
Try here for a start.


http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1353036139/0


Posts 3 and 6.



Yes. I stand by every word that I wrote in those replies. I never once wished Israelis harm.

Perhaps you just fail to grasp the meaning of hypocrisy. Most genuine hypocrites do.

Keep trying.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FRED. on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 1:38pm

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 1:31pm:
You precious people sit here for years calling Muslims all the despicable names under the sun and you have the hide to have a go at me for mentioning Avram's big schnozz, well! get over yourselves, he can't help it, he inherited it from his ancestors, poor dear. That's no reason not to warn him to be careful, it must get in the way in warfare.

Remember what you said andrei?

Here it is

andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....

Have you got one too Andrei? a gigantic schnozz, I mean?


;D ;D ;D ;D Idiot  how can your RELIGON DICTATE THE SIZE OF YOU NOSE

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 1:46pm
The thing is, I have never met a genuine Jew who supports the Zionist state...its the inbred white ruling class that built it...its a white apartheid state set up by Britain and America in 1948...

;) ;)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by FriYAY on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 1:51pm
Morons have got the entire border with Egypt, which is controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood, and all they can get into Gaza is poxy sky-rockets.

You’d recon they’d go for food and medical supplies and such.

Morons.

::)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 1:58pm

FriYAY wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 1:51pm:
Morons have got the entire border with Egypt, which is controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood, and all they can get into Gaza is poxy sky-rockets.

You’d recon they’d go for food and medical supplies and such.



Morons.

::)



At least they aren't bringing in truck loads of rocks in from Egypt. After the last few days they have at least ten years supply.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 2:04pm
Whats wrong with this picture...?

A violent thinly bred White male Zionist...



A Pacifist anti-Zionist...

:D :D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by pansi1951 on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 2:04pm

FRED. wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 1:38pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 1:31pm:
You precious people sit here for years calling Muslims all the despicable names under the sun and you have the hide to have a go at me for mentioning Avram's big schnozz, well! get over yourselves, he can't help it, he inherited it from his ancestors, poor dear. That's no reason not to warn him to be careful, it must get in the way in warfare.

Remember what you said andrei?

Here it is

andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....

Have you got one too Andrei? a gigantic schnozz, I mean?


;D ;D ;D ;D Idiot  how can your RELIGON DICTATE THE SIZE OF YOU NOSE



From lying, the Pinnochio effect, all the better to sniff out shekels too.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 2:06pm
Zionism is a violent scapegoating white male crime against Jews, Palestinians and Asians... :) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 2:07pm

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 2:04pm:

FRED. wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 1:38pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 1:31pm:
You precious people sit here for years calling Muslims all the despicable names under the sun and you have the hide to have a go at me for mentioning Avram's big schnozz, well! get over yourselves, he can't help it, he inherited it from his ancestors, poor dear. That's no reason not to warn him to be careful, it must get in the way in warfare.

Remember what you said andrei?

Here it is

andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....

Have you got one too Andrei? a gigantic schnozz, I mean?


;D ;D ;D ;D Idiot  how can your RELIGON DICTATE THE SIZE OF YOU NOSE



From lying, the Pinnochio effect, all the better to sniff out shekels too.



You don't need a long nose to sniff out the mussys.

You never see them in the personal hygiene aisle in Coles or Woolies.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 2:09pm
Violent white male pedo rings out, Muslim refugees yes...

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 2:17pm

Dr No wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 2:07pm:
You don't need a long nose to sniff out the mussys.

You never see them in the personal hygiene aisle in Coles or Woolies.



Yes, Aldi are becoming increasingly popular.

I wish they'd hurry up and open a store in WA.


Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 2:26pm
Australia...in fact the whole world would be a much better place without violent aggressive white male pedo rings and we would be even more blessed with more cultural diversity from Muslim Immigration... :) :)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 2:31pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 2:26pm:
Australia...in fact the whole world would be a much better place without violent aggressive white male pedo rings and we would be even more blessed with more cultural diversity from Muslim Immigration... :) :)



You calling your self a pedo?

You do fit the violent, aggressive profile,  I presume you maybe white, probably are a male but certainly not a man.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 3:24pm

FRED. wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 1:38pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 1:31pm:
You precious people sit here for years calling Muslims all the despicable names under the sun and you have the hide to have a go at me for mentioning Avram's big schnozz, well! get over yourselves, he can't help it, he inherited it from his ancestors, poor dear. That's no reason not to warn him to be careful, it must get in the way in warfare.

Remember what you said andrei?

Here it is

andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....

Have you got one too Andrei? a gigantic schnozz, I mean?


;D ;D ;D ;D Idiot  how can your RELIGON DICTATE THE SIZE OF YOU NOSE


No thats for the fairy king to dictate isnt it . . . .

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 3:31pm

Dr No wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 2:31pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 2:26pm:
Australia...in fact the whole world would be a much better place without violent aggressive white male pedo rings and we would be even more blessed with more cultural diversity from Muslim Immigration... :) :)



You calling your self a pedo?

You do fit the violent, aggressive profile,  I presume you maybe white, probably are a male but certainly not a man.


Do you talk to your mother like that?

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 4:01pm

Dr No wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 2:31pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 2:26pm:
Australia...in fact the whole world would be a much better place without violent aggressive white male pedo rings and we would be even more blessed with more cultural diversity from Muslim Immigration... :) :)



You calling your self a pedo?

You do fit the violent, aggressive profile,  I presume you maybe white, probably are a male but certainly not a man.

Who could possibly have a problem with doing away with the existence and the secrecy of the virus of organized violent white male pedo rings & child abductors...?
:o :o

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by aquascoot on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 4:15pm

Prevailing wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 2:04pm:
Whats wrong with this picture...?

A violent thinly bred White male Zionist...



A Pacifist anti-Zionist...

:D :D



i reckon that top bloke would go down well at one of soren's carr-b-que's

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 7:37pm
Pansi your remarks are out and out racist.
There is nothing more to say than that. The characteristics are straight out of a Nazi book
Shame on you for your disgusting anti semitism.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by mozzaok on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 8:40pm
Comments that promote ignorant and hateful racial stereotypng are unacceptably low behaviour, and I suggest that memberrs try harder to refrain from all racial abuse, at all times.
People who take issue with some actions of the Israeli govenment should address their criticism against the government and it's policies, without resorting to vile and ignorant propaganda reminiscent of a time when such talk acted as a forerunner to the horrors which necessitated the formation of Israel in the first place.
Israel was created so that a race that had been subjected to the most vile and brutal persecution imaginable, could have a safe haven, a place they could feel safe and secure, where a future free from racial persecution  could be guaranteed.
The least that any decent human should do is to refuse to be party to any regression to the ugly racial attacks that have been unfairly directed at Jewish people for too long.
Anti-semitism is ugly, and stupid, but even worse, it is dangerous, and that is why it should never be tolerated.

So, cut it out.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Dr No on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 8:50pm

mozzaok wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 8:40pm:
Comments that promote ignorant and hateful racial stereotypng are unacceptably low behaviour, and I suggest that memberrs try harder to refrain from all racial abuse, at all times.
People who take issue with some actions of the Israeli govenment should address their criticism against the government and it's policies, without resorting to vile and ignorant propaganda reminiscent of a time when such talk acted as a forerunner to the horrors which necessitated the formation of Israel in the first place.
Israel was created so that a race that had been subjected to the most vile and brutal persecution imaginable, could have a safe haven, a place they could feel safe and secure, where a future free from racial persecution  could be guaranteed.
The least that any decent human should do is to refuse to be party to any regression to the ugly racial attacks that have been unfairly directed at Jewish people for too long.
Anti-semitism is ugly, and stupid, but even worse, it is dangerous, and that is why it should never be tolerated.

So, cut it out.



You aren't speaking to decent human beings here if you are referring to Pansi and Western Apologist.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Western Apologist on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 8:51pm

mozzaok wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 8:40pm:
Comments that promote ignorant and hateful racial stereotypng are unacceptably low behaviour, and I suggest that memberrs try harder to refrain from all racial abuse, at all times.
People who take issue with some actions of the Israeli govenment should address their criticism against the government and it's policies, without resorting to vile and ignorant propaganda reminiscent of a time when such talk acted as a forerunner to the horrors which necessitated the formation of Israel in the first place.
Israel was created so that a race that had been subjected to the most vile and brutal persecution imaginable, could have a safe haven, a place they could feel safe and secure, where a future free from racial persecution  could be guaranteed.
The least that any decent human should do is to refuse to be party to any regression to the ugly racial attacks that have been unfairly directed at Jewish people for too long.
Anti-semitism is ugly, and stupid, but even worse, it is dangerous, and that is why it should never be tolerated.

So, cut it out.

Wow you really are pathetic and unbelievably ignorant.

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 9:30pm
Are you trying to say criticizing the white apartheid terrorist state of Israel illegally set up in Asia illegally by violent White warmongers from Britain is antisemitic?  Because I have never met a real pacifist religious Jew who was a Zionist..I suggest to you Zionism is itself antisemitic and a Nazi scapegoating doctrine...The Holocaust Jews were pacifists, pacifist Jews want to see the State of Israel dissolved, they believe there is nothing more antisemitic than the state of Israel set up by racist White warmongers for their own aggressive imperial design in the region so make your point and prove it or are you trying to shut down debate? 8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 9:33pm
I never thought I would see the day when they would call criticizing Hitler as antisemitic...now that is spin and reverse mirror magic of the highest order... :D :D

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Prevailing on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 9:41pm

8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Soren on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 9:46pm

aquascoot wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 4:15pm:

Prevailing wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 2:04pm:
Whats wrong with this picture...?

A violent thinly bred White male Zionist...



A Pacifist anti-Zionist...

:D :D



i reckon that top bloke would go down well at one of soren's carr-b-que's

Don't tell me he was Karrchmowshkovitz before he was Carr??

:o :o :o


Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 23rd, 2012 at 5:33am

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 7:37pm:
Pansi your remarks are out and out racist.
There is nothing more to say than that. The characteristics are straight out of a Nazi book
Shame on you for your disgusting anti semitism.


But you say nothing about the hygiene comment?

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard backs Israel
Post by Spot of Borg on Nov 23rd, 2012 at 5:35am

mozzaok wrote on Nov 22nd, 2012 at 8:40pm:
Comments that promote ignorant and hateful racial stereotypng are unacceptably low behaviour, and I suggest that memberrs try harder to refrain from all racial abuse, at all times.
People who take issue with some actions of the Israeli govenment should address their criticism against the government and it's policies, without resorting to vile and ignorant propaganda reminiscent of a time when such talk acted as a forerunner to the horrors which necessitated the formation of Israel in the first place.
Israel was created so that a race that had been subjected to the most vile and brutal persecution imaginable, could have a safe haven, a place they could feel safe and secure, where a future free from racial persecution  could be guaranteed.
The least that any decent human should do is to refuse to be party to any regression to the ugly racial attacks that have been unfairly directed at Jewish people for too long.
Anti-semitism is ugly, and stupid, but even worse, it is dangerous, and that is why it should never be tolerated.

So, cut it out.


"anti-semitism" is a word used as an excuse to stop any criticism of jews @ all and they are a stupid religion like all the others. Why should they have their own word. If criticising muslems is allowed why not jews? Seriously lopsided.

SOB

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.