The Prime Minister visits bushfire-ravaged Tasmania, and blames the usual suspect:

‘’While you would not put any one event down to climate change … we do know that over time as a result of climate change we are going to see more extreme weather events,’’ she said.

But at the end of that report:
A man has been accused of starting a 10,000-hectare bushfire in southern Tasmania. Police allege a 31-year-old New Norfolk man left a campfire unattended near Lake Repulse last week, sparking the huge blaze which has burned through 10,600 hectares since Friday. Police said they would proceed with a charge of leaving an unextinguished fire unattended.

she only got that 100% wrong  ;D, nothing to see here...move on peoples sheeples

Because bushfires never happened before???

This is an example of the power of pre-concieved opinions.

Typical doomsday cultist

’While you would not put any one event down to climate change … we do know that over time as a result of climate change we are going to see more extreme weather events,’’ she said.


Yeh when you idiot. Are you talking from the doomsday anthropogenic cult or are you suggesting in the event of natural climate change.

You guys have got it all wrong

Here's the link

The arsonist - he's the product of global warming

Climate change caused the warming in his parents' loins

It overheated his pappi's sperm that forever changed his concenption and dna

Once born - he was hit by the Earth's yellow sun hence becoming an arsonist

Alarmists have what they called as "Observational Science"

They "observe" the common factors and make inferences

Take the case of an arsonist:

Most arsonists are male - therefore all males are arsonist

All arsonists have played with matches - therefore ban all matches

All arsonists have played with fuel - therefore ban all fuel which also cause climate change

All arsonists are humans - therefore all human are arsonists

Maqqa wrote on Jan 8^th, 2013 at 9:50am:

You guys have got it all wrong Here's the link The arsonist - he's the product of global warming Climate change caused the warming in his parents' loins It overheated his pappi's sperm that forever changed his concenption and dna Once born - he was hit by the Earth's yellow sun hence becoming an arsonist Alarmists have what they called as "Observational Science" They "observe" the common factors and make inferences Take the case of an arsonist: Most arsonists are male - therefore all males are arsonist All arsonists have played with matches - therefore ban all matches All arsonists have played with fuel - therefore ban all fuel which also cause climate change All arsonists are humans - therefore all human are arsonists

Ok...you've run out of medication?

adelcrow wrote on Jan 8^th, 2013 at 9:55am:

Maqqa wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:50am: You guys have got it all wrong Here's the link The arsonist - he's the product of global warming Climate change caused the warming in his parents' loins It overheated his pappi's sperm that forever changed his concenption and dna Once born - he was hit by the Earth's yellow sun hence becoming an arsonist Alarmists have what they called as "Observational Science" They "observe" the common factors and make inferences Take the case of an arsonist: Most arsonists are male - therefore all males are arsonist All arsonists have played with matches - therefore ban all matches All arsonists have played with fuel - therefore ban all fuel which also cause climate change All arsonists are humans - therefore all human are arsonists Ok...you've run out of medication?

your electrodes are loose again?

Maqqa wrote on Jan 8^th, 2013 at 10:02am:

adelcrow wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:55am: Maqqa wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:50am: You guys have got it all wrong Here's the link The arsonist - he's the product of global warming Climate change caused the warming in his parents' loins It overheated his pappi's sperm that forever changed his concenption and dna Once born - he was hit by the Earth's yellow sun hence becoming an arsonist Alarmists have what they called as "Observational Science" They "observe" the common factors and make inferences Take the case of an arsonist: Most arsonists are male - therefore all males are arsonist All arsonists have played with matches - therefore ban all matches All arsonists have played with fuel - therefore ban all fuel which also cause climate change All arsonists are humans - therefore all human are arsonists Ok...you've run out of medication? your electrodes are loose again?

You seem to be talking even more rubbish that you usually do and I assume its to early for you to be boozed up so its gotta be the meds

adelcrow wrote on Jan 8^th, 2013 at 10:05am:

You seem to be talking even more rubbish that you usually do and I assume its to early for you to be boozed up so its gotta be the meds

FFS adel

I used your rubbish template

Maqqa wrote on Jan 8^th, 2013 at 9:50am:

You guys have got it all wrong Here's the link The arsonist - he's the product of global warming Climate change caused the warming in his parents' loins It overheated his pappi's sperm that forever changed his concenption and dna Once born - he was hit by the Earth's yellow sun hence becoming an arsonist Alarmists have what they called as "Observational Science" They "observe" the common factors and make inferences Take the case of an arsonist: Most arsonists are male - therefore all males are arsonist All arsonists have played with matches - therefore ban all matches All arsonists have played with fuel - therefore ban all fuel which also cause climate change All arsonists are humans - therefore all human are arsonists

Intersting and accurate observation  ;D


ps someone should tell gillard that extreme weather events are not increasing too  ;D

Watch out.  You can't criticise the Prime Minister or you'll be branded a "misogynist"......

You can't question how bush fires start as you'll be branded a "denier"

I wonder if the firies will use CO2 to put some of the blazes out?

The Eco-Socialists should be demonstrating against their use surely. ::) ::) ::)

Innocent bystander wrote on Jan 8^th, 2013 at 7:03am:

The Prime Minister visits bushfire-ravaged Tasmania, and blames the usual suspect: ‘’While you would not put any one event down to climate change … we do know that over time as a result of climate change we are going to see more extreme weather events,’’ she said. But at the end of that report: A man has been accused of starting a 10,000-hectare bushfire in southern Tasmania. Police allege a 31-year-old New Norfolk man left a campfire unattended near Lake Repulse last week, sparking the huge blaze which has burned through 10,600 hectares since Friday. Police said they would proceed with a charge of leaving an unextinguished fire unattended.

‘’While you would not put any one event down to climate change … we do know that over time as a result of climate change we are going to see more extreme weather events,’’ she said.

That is absolutely correct.

I am not sure what you think that statement has do do with someone being charged with leaving a campfire unattended.

Would you like to explain why you think that makes the PM's statement incorrect? 

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 8^th, 2013 at 10:33am:

Innocent bystander wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 7:03am: The Prime Minister visits bushfire-ravaged Tasmania, and blames the usual suspect: ‘’While you would not put any one event down to climate change … we do know that over time as a result of climate change we are going to see more extreme weather events,’’ she said. But at the end of that report: A man has been accused of starting a 10,000-hectare bushfire in southern Tasmania. Police allege a 31-year-old New Norfolk man left a campfire unattended near Lake Repulse last week, sparking the huge blaze which has burned through 10,600 hectares since Friday. Police said they would proceed with a charge of leaving an unextinguished fire unattended. ‘’While you would not put any one event down to climate change … we do know that over time as a result of climate change we are going to see more extreme weather events,’’ she said. That is absolutely correct. I am not sure what you think that statement has do do with someone being charged with leaving a campfire unattended. Would you like to explain why you think that makes the PM's statement incorrect?

Talking natual climate change, sure it is dangerous to leave a fire going in a heat wave amoungst a forest.

Innocent bystander wrote on Jan 8^th, 2013 at 10:12am:

Maqqa wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:50am: You guys have got it all wrong Here's the link The arsonist - he's the product of global warming Climate change caused the warming in his parents' loins It overheated his pappi's sperm that forever changed his concenption and dna Once born - he was hit by the Earth's yellow sun hence becoming an arsonist Alarmists have what they called as "Observational Science" They "observe" the common factors and make inferences Take the case of an arsonist: Most arsonists are male - therefore all males are arsonist All arsonists have played with matches - therefore ban all matches All arsonists have played with fuel - therefore ban all fuel which also cause climate change All arsonists are humans - therefore all human are arsonists Intersting and accurate observation  ;D ps someone should tell gillard that extreme weather events are not increasing too  ;D

Why would someone tell Gillard that extreme weather events are not increasing?  That is simply wrong

Anthropogenic Influence on Long Return Period Daily Temperature Extremes at Regional Scales
...Therefore, it is concluded that the influence of anthropogenic forcing has had a detectable influence on extreme temperatures that have impacts on human society and natural systems at global and regional scales. External influence is estimated to have resulted in large changes in the likelihood of extreme annual maximum and minimum daily temperatures.
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/2010JCLI3908.1


For example, 60 years ago in the continental United States, the number of new record high temperatures recorded around the country each year was roughly equal to the number of new record lows. Now, the number of new record highs recorded each year is twice the number of new record lows, a signature of a warming climate, and a clear example of its impact on extreme weather.1

The increase in record highs extends outside the U.S. as well. A similar two to one ratio of record highs to record lows recently has been observed in Australia.2 Over the past decade, 75 counties set all-time record highs but only 15 countries set all-time record lows. In 2010, 19 countries set new all-time record high temperatures, but not a single country set a new all-time record low (among those countries keeping these statistics)
http://climatecommunication.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/big_recordhighs.jpg
http://climatecommunication.org/new/articles/extreme-weather/overview/

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 8^th, 2013 at 10:41am:

Innocent bystander wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:12am: Maqqa wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:50am: You guys have got it all wrong Here's the link The arsonist - he's the product of global warming Climate change caused the warming in his parents' loins It overheated his pappi's sperm that forever changed his concenption and dna Once born - he was hit by the Earth's yellow sun hence becoming an arsonist Alarmists have what they called as "Observational Science" They "observe" the common factors and make inferences Take the case of an arsonist: Most arsonists are male - therefore all males are arsonist All arsonists have played with matches - therefore ban all matches All arsonists have played with fuel - therefore ban all fuel which also cause climate change All arsonists are humans - therefore all human are arsonists Intersting and accurate observation  ;D ps someone should tell gillard that extreme weather events are not increasing too  ;D Why would someone tell Gillard that extreme weather events are not increasing?  That is simply wrong Anthropogenic Influence on Long Return Period Daily Temperature Extremes at Regional Scales ...Therefore, it is concluded that the influence of anthropogenic forcing has had a detectable influence on extreme temperatures that have impacts on human society and natural systems at global and regional scales. External influence is estimated to have resulted in large changes in the likelihood of extreme annual maximum and minimum daily temperatures. http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/2010JCLI3908.1 For example, 60 years ago in the continental United States, the number of new record high temperatures recorded around the country each year was roughly equal to the number of new record lows. Now, the number of new record highs recorded each year is twice the number of new record lows, a signature of a warming climate, and a clear example of its impact on extreme weather.1 The increase in record highs extends outside the U.S. as well. A similar two to one ratio of record highs to record lows recently has been observed in Australia.2 Over the past decade, 75 counties set all-time record highs but only 15 countries set all-time record lows. In 2010, 19 countries set new all-time record high temperatures, but not a single country set a new all-time record low (among those countries keeping these statistics) http://climatecommunication.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/big_recordhighs.jpg http://climatecommunication.org/new/articles/extreme-weather/overview/

Could be because you are getting fooled by your own cults BS. Pre-requisite, you must believe, so I guess you are the useful idiot.

Does NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) keep two separate sets of climate books for the USA?

Busted. Read the story to find out what is going on with yet more fudging. Leaving out the issue of fudging with homoginised data, the cooling the past and warming the present through data fudging upward.

http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/nyt_revised_july2012.png


http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/01/06/does-noaas-national-climatic-data-center-ncdc-keep-two-separate-sets-of-climate-books-for-the-usa/

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 8^th, 2013 at 10:49am:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:41am: Innocent bystander wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:12am: Maqqa wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:50am: You guys have got it all wrong Here's the link The arsonist - he's the product of global warming Climate change caused the warming in his parents' loins It overheated his pappi's sperm that forever changed his concenption and dna Once born - he was hit by the Earth's yellow sun hence becoming an arsonist Alarmists have what they called as "Observational Science" They "observe" the common factors and make inferences Take the case of an arsonist: Most arsonists are male - therefore all males are arsonist All arsonists have played with matches - therefore ban all matches All arsonists have played with fuel - therefore ban all fuel which also cause climate change All arsonists are humans - therefore all human are arsonists Intersting and accurate observation  ;D ps someone should tell gillard that extreme weather events are not increasing too  ;D Why would someone tell Gillard that extreme weather events are not increasing?  That is simply wrong Anthropogenic Influence on Long Return Period Daily Temperature Extremes at Regional Scales ...Therefore, it is concluded that the influence of anthropogenic forcing has had a detectable influence on extreme temperatures that have impacts on human society and natural systems at global and regional scales. External influence is estimated to have resulted in large changes in the likelihood of extreme annual maximum and minimum daily temperatures. http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/2010JCLI3908.1 For example, 60 years ago in the continental United States, the number of new record high temperatures recorded around the country each year was roughly equal to the number of new record lows. Now, the number of new record highs recorded each year is twice the number of new record lows, a signature of a warming climate, and a clear example of its impact on extreme weather.1 The increase in record highs extends outside the U.S. as well. A similar two to one ratio of record highs to record lows recently has been observed in Australia.2 Over the past decade, 75 counties set all-time record highs but only 15 countries set all-time record lows. In 2010, 19 countries set new all-time record high temperatures, but not a single country set a new all-time record low (among those countries keeping these statistics) http://climatecommunication.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/big_recordhighs.jpg http://climatecommunication.org/new/articles/extreme-weather/overview/ Could be because you are getting fooled by your own cults BS. Pre-requisite, you must believe, so I guess you are the useful idiot. Does NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) keep two separate sets of climate books for the USA? Busted. Read the story to find out what is going on with yet more fudging. http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/nyt_revised_july2012.png http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/01/06/does-noaas-national-climatic-data-center-ncdc-keep-two-separate-sets-of-climate-books-for-the-usa/

It might be helpful if you actually read a post before responding to it.

WTF does your cut and paste from a denier blog have to do with the simple fact that extreme weather events are becoming more frequent?

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 8^th, 2013 at 10:51am:

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:49am: rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:41am: Innocent bystander wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:12am: Maqqa wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:50am: You guys have got it all wrong Here's the link The arsonist - he's the product of global warming Climate change caused the warming in his parents' loins It overheated his pappi's sperm that forever changed his concenption and dna Once born - he was hit by the Earth's yellow sun hence becoming an arsonist Alarmists have what they called as "Observational Science" They "observe" the common factors and make inferences Take the case of an arsonist: Most arsonists are male - therefore all males are arsonist All arsonists have played with matches - therefore ban all matches All arsonists have played with fuel - therefore ban all fuel which also cause climate change All arsonists are humans - therefore all human are arsonists Intersting and accurate observation  ;D ps someone should tell gillard that extreme weather events are not increasing too  ;D Why would someone tell Gillard that extreme weather events are not increasing?  That is simply wrong Anthropogenic Influence on Long Return Period Daily Temperature Extremes at Regional Scales ...Therefore, it is concluded that the influence of anthropogenic forcing has had a detectable influence on extreme temperatures that have impacts on human society and natural systems at global and regional scales. External influence is estimated to have resulted in large changes in the likelihood of extreme annual maximum and minimum daily temperatures. http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/2010JCLI3908.1 For example, 60 years ago in the continental United States, the number of new record high temperatures recorded around the country each year was roughly equal to the number of new record lows. Now, the number of new record highs recorded each year is twice the number of new record lows, a signature of a warming climate, and a clear example of its impact on extreme weather.1 The increase in record highs extends outside the U.S. as well. A similar two to one ratio of record highs to record lows recently has been observed in Australia.2 Over the past decade, 75 counties set all-time record highs but only 15 countries set all-time record lows. In 2010, 19 countries set new all-time record high temperatures, but not a single country set a new all-time record low (among those countries keeping these statistics) http://climatecommunication.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/big_recordhighs.jpg http://climatecommunication.org/new/articles/extreme-weather/overview/ Could be because you are getting fooled by your own cults BS. Pre-requisite, you must believe, so I guess you are the useful idiot. Does NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) keep two separate sets of climate books for the USA? Busted. Read the story to find out what is going on with yet more fudging. http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/nyt_revised_july2012.png http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/01/06/does-noaas-national-climatic-data-center-ncdc-keep-two-separate-sets-of-climate-books-for-the-usa/ It might be helpful if you actually read a post before responding to it. WTF does your cut and paste from a denier blog have to do with the simple fact that extreme weather events are becoming more frequent?

You arent too bright are you.

You are being lied to via data manipulation.

Your extremes are not extremes at all. They are natural variable temps and more than likely less than the 30's.

You want to believe homiginised manipulated data, cool the past warm the present data (against the raw data), then that is your problem but dont expect anyone not in the cult to align with your cult belief.

Swagman wrote on Jan 8^th, 2013 at 10:28am:

Watch out.  You can't criticise the Prime Minister or you'll be branded a "misogynist"...... You can't question how bush fires start as you'll be branded a "denier" I wonder if the firies will use CO2 to put some of the blazes out? The Eco-Socialists should be demonstrating against their use surely. ::) ::) ::)

Allah forbid we should make a comment about illegal entrants less we are called racist

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 8^th, 2013 at 12:07pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:51am: progressiveslol wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:49am: rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:41am: Innocent bystander wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:12am: Maqqa wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:50am: You guys have got it all wrong Here's the link The arsonist - he's the product of global warming Climate change caused the warming in his parents' loins It overheated his pappi's sperm that forever changed his concenption and dna Once born - he was hit by the Earth's yellow sun hence becoming an arsonist Alarmists have what they called as "Observational Science" They "observe" the common factors and make inferences Take the case of an arsonist: Most arsonists are male - therefore all males are arsonist All arsonists have played with matches - therefore ban all matches All arsonists have played with fuel - therefore ban all fuel which also cause climate change All arsonists are humans - therefore all human are arsonists Intersting and accurate observation  ;D ps someone should tell gillard that extreme weather events are not increasing too  ;D Why would someone tell Gillard that extreme weather events are not increasing?  That is simply wrong Anthropogenic Influence on Long Return Period Daily Temperature Extremes at Regional Scales ...Therefore, it is concluded that the influence of anthropogenic forcing has had a detectable influence on extreme temperatures that have impacts on human society and natural systems at global and regional scales. External influence is estimated to have resulted in large changes in the likelihood of extreme annual maximum and minimum daily temperatures. http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/2010JCLI3908.1 For example, 60 years ago in the continental United States, the number of new record high temperatures recorded around the country each year was roughly equal to the number of new record lows. Now, the number of new record highs recorded each year is twice the number of new record lows, a signature of a warming climate, and a clear example of its impact on extreme weather.1 The increase in record highs extends outside the U.S. as well. A similar two to one ratio of record highs to record lows recently has been observed in Australia.2 Over the past decade, 75 counties set all-time record highs but only 15 countries set all-time record lows. In 2010, 19 countries set new all-time record high temperatures, but not a single country set a new all-time record low (among those countries keeping these statistics) http://climatecommunication.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/big_recordhighs.jpg http://climatecommunication.org/new/articles/extreme-weather/overview/ Could be because you are getting fooled by your own cults BS. Pre-requisite, you must believe, so I guess you are the useful idiot. Does NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) keep two separate sets of climate books for the USA? Busted. Read the story to find out what is going on with yet more fudging. http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/nyt_revised_july2012.png http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/01/06/does-noaas-national-climatic-data-center-ncdc-keep-two-separate-sets-of-climate-books-for-the-usa/ It might be helpful if you actually read a post before responding to it. WTF does your cut and paste from a denier blog have to do with the simple fact that extreme weather events are becoming more frequent? You arent too bright are you. You are being lied to via data manipulation. Your extremes are not extremes at all. They are natural variable temps and more than likely less than the 30's. You want to believe homiginised manipulated data, cool the past warm the present data (against the raw data), then that is your problem but dont expect anyone not in the cult to align with your cult belief.

Still waiting for you to explain what your cut and paste from a denier blog have to do with the simple fact that extreme weather events are becoming more frequent?  Not just in the USA, but worldwide.

Your denier blog does not address that point at all.  How about you try to actually understand what is being posted before responding?

adelcrow wrote on Jan 8^th, 2013 at 9:55am:

Maqqa wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:50am: You guys have got it all wrong Here's the link The arsonist - he's the product of global warming Climate change caused the warming in his parents' loins It overheated his pappi's sperm that forever changed his concenption and dna Once born - he was hit by the Earth's yellow sun hence becoming an arsonist Alarmists have what they called as "Observational Science" They "observe" the common factors and make inferences Take the case of an arsonist: Most arsonists are male - therefore all males are arsonist All arsonists have played with matches - therefore ban all matches All arsonists have played with fuel - therefore ban all fuel which also cause climate change All arsonists are humans - therefore all human are arsonists Ok...you've run out of medication?

oh noes: maqqa finally realised how boring meth amphetamine is!!

rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 8^th, 2013 at 12:55pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 12:07pm: rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:51am: progressiveslol wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:49am: rabbitoh07 wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:41am: Innocent bystander wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:12am: Maqqa wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:50am: You guys have got it all wrong Here's the link The arsonist - he's the product of global warming Climate change caused the warming in his parents' loins It overheated his pappi's sperm that forever changed his concenption and dna Once born - he was hit by the Earth's yellow sun hence becoming an arsonist Alarmists have what they called as "Observational Science" They "observe" the common factors and make inferences Take the case of an arsonist: Most arsonists are male - therefore all males are arsonist All arsonists have played with matches - therefore ban all matches All arsonists have played with fuel - therefore ban all fuel which also cause climate change All arsonists are humans - therefore all human are arsonists Intersting and accurate observation  ;D ps someone should tell gillard that extreme weather events are not increasing too  ;D Why would someone tell Gillard that extreme weather events are not increasing?  That is simply wrong Anthropogenic Influence on Long Return Period Daily Temperature Extremes at Regional Scales ...Therefore, it is concluded that the influence of anthropogenic forcing has had a detectable influence on extreme temperatures that have impacts on human society and natural systems at global and regional scales. External influence is estimated to have resulted in large changes in the likelihood of extreme annual maximum and minimum daily temperatures. http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/2010JCLI3908.1 For example, 60 years ago in the continental United States, the number of new record high temperatures recorded around the country each year was roughly equal to the number of new record lows. Now, the number of new record highs recorded each year is twice the number of new record lows, a signature of a warming climate, and a clear example of its impact on extreme weather.1 The increase in record highs extends outside the U.S. as well. A similar two to one ratio of record highs to record lows recently has been observed in Australia.2 Over the past decade, 75 counties set all-time record highs but only 15 countries set all-time record lows. In 2010, 19 countries set new all-time record high temperatures, but not a single country set a new all-time record low (among those countries keeping these statistics) http://climatecommunication.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/big_recordhighs.jpg http://climatecommunication.org/new/articles/extreme-weather/overview/ Could be because you are getting fooled by your own cults BS. Pre-requisite, you must believe, so I guess you are the useful idiot. Does NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) keep two separate sets of climate books for the USA? Busted. Read the story to find out what is going on with yet more fudging. http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/nyt_revised_july2012.png http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/01/06/does-noaas-national-climatic-data-center-ncdc-keep-two-separate-sets-of-climate-books-for-the-usa/ It might be helpful if you actually read a post before responding to it. WTF does your cut and paste from a denier blog have to do with the simple fact that extreme weather events are becoming more frequent? You arent too bright are you. You are being lied to via data manipulation. Your extremes are not extremes at all. They are natural variable temps and more than likely less than the 30's. You want to believe homiginised manipulated data, cool the past warm the present data (against the raw data), then that is your problem but dont expect anyone not in the cult to align with your cult belief. Still waiting for you to explain what your cut and paste from a denier blog have to do with the simple fact that extreme weather events are becoming more frequent?  Not just in the USA, but worldwide. Your denier blog does not address that point at all.  How about you try to actually understand what is being posted before responding?

Dam. You bring highs on temps. That is not extreme weather. That is in the same ballpark as my content. Go grow a brain FF sake.

Me showing you the highs that you love are more than likely just homoginised data, not raw. It is from what I linked to and from the cool the past, warm the present data manipulation going on.