Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1357643771

Message started by the wise one on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:16pm

Title: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by the wise one on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:16pm

(Image: screen shot of story on news.com.au)



Quote:
David Flint and his extreme rightwing chums are looking to set up an Australian version of the U.S. Tea Party movement. Senior correspondent Barry Everingham is most amused.

David Flint is becoming more loopy as the days roll on; his latest ridiculous fantasy is to link the rightwing CANdo organisation – which he runs in tandem with Australians  for Constitutional Monarchy – with a Cory Bernardi thought bubble, loosely based on the idiotic, unpatriotic, lunatic, Tea Party cowboy outfit, which almost made the U.S.A. the world’s laughing stock.

Now to give Flint his dues he isn’t the only “celebrity” connected to CANdo: Alan Jones, Australia’s most reviled broadcaster, is a patron, along with the highly regarded yet even more highly misguided businessman Hugh Morgan, who my late wife and I have known for many years, in spite of his extremist right wing leanings. Jones, of course, is someone no decent Australian would want to be seen with.

Another CANdo cum Tea Party aficionado is Jai Martinkovits, who Flint is grooming to eventually take over ACM when Flint is either removed – which we hear isn’t too far away – or  voluntarily retires — which means, in effect, he dies on the job. I have been warning Jai for some time to be more discerning about the company he keeps, but he takes no heed. Jai, you will eventually rue the day you didn’t take my advice.

Now, late last year Flint and young Jai went public about this Australian Tea Party nonsense, which means the “sponsors” of ACM – there are no members as such – will at last realise that ACM is, despite Flint’s claims  to the contrary , a political organisation whose roots are deep inside the furthrest rightwing extremes of the Liberal Party. That faction is peopled  by the likes of the foul-mouthed Sophie Mirabella; the extreme Cory Bernardi, the thuggish woman-hating Tony Abbott; the frontbench representative of Cardinal Pell, Kevin Andrews; the impossibly named Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells and, for God’s sake, my own local member, the loud-mouthed Kelly O’Dwyer — to name but a few.

http://youtu.be/CAj30f-_CyU

Now, Flint has really crazy ideas about the role of this “Australian Tea Party”, not the least being  the return of corporal punishment in schools.

The Indonesian-born, silver-haired, icon then made a startling admission in respect to his claim – he had indeed been caned when he had spoken out of turn in Singapore, which may explain a lot about Flint and begs the question of whether the caner got as much pleasure from the incident as the recipient — after all, David did say he didn’t step out if line again. That, of course, is a value judgement, as there are many – nay, thousands – of people who think Flint steps out of line every time he opens his mouth.

As an example, he says the reaction to comments his mate Jones made about Julia Gillard’s father “dying of shame” were an overreaction!

He says half asylum seekers of the arriving on boats are not genuine refuges and he wants protect the legal rights of citizens to denigrate each other without fear of legal action.

If that isn’t un-Australian, please tell me please what is.

He even defends the anti- gay marriage comments of his idol Cory Bernardi and seems to think that gay marriage could result in legalising human sex with animals!

As though that isn’t enough, he has a bizarre prediction that legalising gay marriage might even see local Muslims call for the legalisation of polygamy, which he fears, if it came about, could cause a run on the welfare system.

This seems to me a hint of ridiculing his Indonesian heritage – his own genealogy – about which most people in the same position would take some pride in – and, on further examination, perhaps may throw up some burqa wearing relatives.

But Flint is Flint and he is the gift that keeps on giving – to the Republicans.


http://youtu.be/nGK34F4uDWI





http://www.independentaustralia.net/2013/politics/the-mad-hatters-australian-tea-party/

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by corporate_whitey on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:21pm
Organizing them all under one banner makes it easier to place them under surveillance and to share that information :)...

:)

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Kat on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:31pm

WHAT a bunch of nut-bars.

NOT WANTED HERE.

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Robert Paulson on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:41pm

Kat wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:31pm:
WHAT a bunch of nut-bars.

NOT WANTED HERE.



never heard of 'em.  What do they do that makes em nut-bars?

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by progressiveslol on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:46pm

... wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:41pm:

Kat wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:31pm:
WHAT a bunch of nut-bars.

NOT WANTED HERE.



never heard of 'em.  What do they do that makes em nut-bars?

I think it goes along the lines of not being a left leaning political activist. Everyone is a nutbar that does not lean to the left from centre according to the far left activists.

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by corporate_whitey on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:49pm
I generally see people who are about kicking the marginalized and threatening their security and safety and nothing else as nutbars... :)

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Peter Freedman on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:58pm

... wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:41pm:

Kat wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:31pm:
WHAT a bunch of nut-bars.

NOT WANTED HERE.



never heard of 'em.  What do they do that makes em nut-bars?


Think Sarah Palin - you'll get the idea.

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Swagman on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:59pm
Looks like the neo hippy Pinko Eco-Socialists have got some competition....and they don't like it. :-?




Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by corporate_whitey on Jan 8th, 2013 at 11:30pm
Victimizing the poor and threatening pacifists is not competition...its a crime against humanity... :)

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Spot of Borg on Jan 9th, 2013 at 5:25am

... wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:41pm:

Kat wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:31pm:
WHAT a bunch of nut-bars.

NOT WANTED HERE.



never heard of 'em.  What do they do that makes em nut-bars?


Seriously? You have never heard of the tea party? Do you not have access to international news?

SOB

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Spot of Borg on Jan 9th, 2013 at 5:26am

Swagman wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:59pm:
Looks like the neo hippy Pinko Eco-Socialists have got some competition....and they don't like it. :-?


Which party are they?

SOB

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Kat on Jan 9th, 2013 at 5:53am

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:46pm:

... wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:41pm:

Kat wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:31pm:
WHAT a bunch of nut-bars.

NOT WANTED HERE.



never heard of 'em.  What do they do that makes em nut-bars?

I think it goes along the lines of not being a left leaning political activist. Everyone is a nutbar that does not lean to the left from centre according to the far left activists.



Possibly.

Except I'm a LONG way from being 'far-left', as those who know
me in RL can testify.. although I do claim to be an 'activist' when
it comes to a better deal for welfare recips.

That does NOT mean I'm 'far-left'.

This mob are nut-bars because THEY ARE extremists. And
extremists are bad news, whether right OR left.

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by aquascoot on Jan 9th, 2013 at 6:17am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 5:26am:

Swagman wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:59pm:
Looks like the neo hippy Pinko Eco-Socialists have got some competition....and they don't like it. :-?


Which party are they?

SOB



socialist pinkos ?

well that would be labor
the greens and the liberal party.
and all the independants.

early parole for good behaviour for bob katter and barnaby joyce.

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Spot of Borg on Jan 9th, 2013 at 6:20am

aquascoot wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 6:17am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 5:26am:

Swagman wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:59pm:
Looks like the neo hippy Pinko Eco-Socialists have got some competition....and they don't like it. :-?


Which party are they?

SOB



socialist pinkos ?

well that would be labor
the greens and the liberal party.
and all the independants.

early parole for good behaviour for bob katter and barnaby joyce.


Labour and liberal are exactly the same in policies so i guess you would consider liberal "socialist" as well?

What exactly has labour done that you think it socialist?

SOB

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by aquascoot on Jan 9th, 2013 at 7:23am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 6:20am:

aquascoot wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 6:17am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 5:26am:

Swagman wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:59pm:
Looks like the neo hippy Pinko Eco-Socialists have got some competition....and they don't like it. :-?


Which party are they?

SOB



socialist pinkos ?

well that would be labor
the greens and the liberal party.
and all the independants.

early parole for good behaviour for bob katter and barnaby joyce.


Labour and liberal are exactly the same in policies so i guess you would consider liberal "socialist" as well?

What exactly has labour done that you think it socialist?

SOB


since malcolm fraser ( a great socialist)  we have had many socialists.

keating perhaps was the best for the market and business,

but howard was a terrible socialist
gillard is a member of some socialist forum. all her union mates are pinker than the rock star by that name
the loonie greens are socialists (well they dont know what they are,,, they are just nincompoops)
abbott is a catholic big government socialist with no ideas for business

medicare...socialist
black armbands...socialist
multiculturalism...socialist
un...socialist
kyoto...world socialism
national curiculum...socilaist
ndis..socialist
nbn...socialist
welfare state..socialist
progressive tax...socialist


the major parties support all this.

only the russians and chinese support free markets, no imigration, flat rate tax and the abandonment of the nanny state.


i wish mr PUTIN was running in oz (but campbell will have to do, til he gets to the lodge) ;) ;)

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Swagman on Jan 9th, 2013 at 7:32am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 5:26am:

Swagman wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:59pm:
Looks like the neo hippy Pinko Eco-Socialists have got some competition....and they don't like it. :-?


Which party are they?

SOB


Seriously? You don't know?

The Greens and their various adaptions...

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by adelcrow on Jan 9th, 2013 at 7:40am
Just what we need..more right wing extremists modelled on the gun happy Tea Baggers

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Swagman on Jan 9th, 2013 at 7:53am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 6:20am:

aquascoot wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 6:17am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 5:26am:

Swagman wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:59pm:
Looks like the neo hippy Pinko Eco-Socialists have got some competition....and they don't like it. :-?


Which party are they?

SOB



socialist pinkos ?

well that would be labor
the greens and the liberal party.
and all the independants.

early parole for good behaviour for bob katter and barnaby joyce.


Labour and liberal are exactly the same in policies so i guess you would consider liberal "socialist" as well?

What exactly has labour done that you think it socialist?

SOB


You mean apart from it (Socialism) being in their constitution

http://www.alp.org.au/getattachment/3350e9d4-ac61-47e9-8c7e-dbcaea7d628c/our-platform/

Quote:
The Australian Labor Party is a democratic socialist party and has the objective of the democratic
socialisation of industry, production, distribution and exchange, to the extent necessary to eliminate
exploitation and other anti-social features in these fields
.


It Married the Greens and thus endorses the Greens Party's radical eco-socialist policies :( :( :(

It introduced an unmandated carbon tax as a means of wealth redistribution under the guise of saving the world. :(

It wasted lots of taxpayer money on useless scams to pork barrell more votes. :(

It has given the Taxed Enough Already (TEA) taxpayer over $300 billion in future income tax increases.  (Yes folks going into debt is in effect a future tax increase) :(

And what aqua says.......>


aquascoot wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 7:23am:
medicare...socialist
black armbands...socialist
multiculturalism...socialist
un...socialist
kyoto...world socialism
national curiculum...socilaist
ndis..socialist
nbn...socialist
welfare state..socialist
progressive tax...socialist


etcetera  etcetera  etcetera  etcetera  etcetera  etcetera

:D :D :D

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Spot of Borg on Jan 9th, 2013 at 8:18am

Swagman wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 7:53am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 6:20am:

aquascoot wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 6:17am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 5:26am:

Swagman wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:59pm:
Looks like the neo hippy Pinko Eco-Socialists have got some competition....and they don't like it. :-?


Which party are they?

SOB



socialist pinkos ?

well that would be labor
the greens and the liberal party.
and all the independants.

early parole for good behaviour for bob katter and barnaby joyce.


Labour and liberal are exactly the same in policies so i guess you would consider liberal "socialist" as well?

What exactly has labour done that you think it socialist?

SOB


You mean apart from it (Socialism) being in their constitution

http://www.alp.org.au/getattachment/3350e9d4-ac61-47e9-8c7e-dbcaea7d628c/our-platform/

Quote:
The Australian Labor Party is a democratic socialist party and has the objective of the democratic
socialisation of industry, production, distribution and exchange, to the extent necessary to eliminate
exploitation and other anti-social features in these fields
.


It Married the Greens and thus endorses the Greens Party's radical eco-socialist policies :( :( :(

It introduced an unmandated carbon tax as a means of wealth redistribution under the guise of saving the world. :(

It wasted lots of taxpayer money on useless scams to pork barrell more votes. :(

It has given the Taxed Enough Already (TEA) taxpayer over $300 billion in future income tax increases.  (Yes folks going into debt is in effect a future tax increase) :(

And what aqua says.......>


aquascoot wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 7:23am:
medicare...socialist
black armbands...socialist
multiculturalism...socialist
un...socialist
kyoto...world socialism
national curiculum...socilaist
ndis..socialist
nbn...socialist
welfare state..socialist
progressive tax...socialist


etcetera  etcetera  etcetera  etcetera  etcetera  etcetera

:D :D :D


Its just the word. Obviously not the deed since they are privatising stuff not taking it over.

SOB

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by KJT1981 on Jan 9th, 2013 at 8:31am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 8:18am:

Swagman wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 7:53am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 6:20am:

aquascoot wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 6:17am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 5:26am:

Swagman wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:59pm:
Looks like the neo hippy Pinko Eco-Socialists have got some competition....and they don't like it. :-?


Which party are they?

SOB



socialist pinkos ?

well that would be labor
the greens and the liberal party.
and all the independants.

early parole for good behaviour for bob katter and barnaby joyce.


Labour and liberal are exactly the same in policies so i guess you would consider liberal "socialist" as well?

What exactly has labour done that you think it socialist?

SOB


You mean apart from it (Socialism) being in their constitution

http://www.alp.org.au/getattachment/3350e9d4-ac61-47e9-8c7e-dbcaea7d628c/our-platform/

Quote:
The Australian Labor Party is a democratic socialist party and has the objective of the democratic
socialisation of industry, production, distribution and exchange, to the extent necessary to eliminate
exploitation and other anti-social features in these fields
.


It Married the Greens and thus endorses the Greens Party's radical eco-socialist policies :( :( :(

It introduced an unmandated carbon tax as a means of wealth redistribution under the guise of saving the world. :(

It wasted lots of taxpayer money on useless scams to pork barrell more votes. :(

It has given the Taxed Enough Already (TEA) taxpayer over $300 billion in future income tax increases.  (Yes folks going into debt is in effect a future tax increase) :(

And what aqua says.......>


aquascoot wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 7:23am:
medicare...socialist
black armbands...socialist
multiculturalism...socialist
un...socialist
kyoto...world socialism
national curiculum...socilaist
ndis..socialist
nbn...socialist
welfare state..socialist
progressive tax...socialist


etcetera  etcetera  etcetera  etcetera  etcetera  etcetera

:D :D :D


Its just the word. Obviously not the deed since they are privatising stuff not taking it over.

SOB



Thank you wise one?  I knew you wouldn't let me down.

The Comedy Fest is still running. You even managed to get Miss Borg and Adel on stage with you.

Bravo.

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Morning Mist on Jan 9th, 2013 at 8:36am

John S wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:16pm:

(Image: screen shot of story on news.com.au)



Quote:
David Flint and his extreme rightwing chums are looking to set up an Australian version of the U.S. Tea Party movement. Senior correspondent Barry Everingham is most amused.

David Flint is becoming more loopy as the days roll on; his latest ridiculous fantasy is to link the rightwing CANdo organisation – which he runs in tandem with Australians  for Constitutional Monarchy – with a Cory Bernardi thought bubble, loosely based on the idiotic, unpatriotic, lunatic, Tea Party cowboy outfit, which almost made the U.S.A. the world’s laughing stock.

Now to give Flint his dues he isn’t the only “celebrity” connected to CANdo: Alan Jones, Australia’s most reviled broadcaster, is a patron, along with the highly regarded yet even more highly misguided businessman Hugh Morgan, who my late wife and I have known for many years, in spite of his extremist right wing leanings. Jones, of course, is someone no decent Australian would want to be seen with.

Another CANdo cum Tea Party aficionado is Jai Martinkovits, who Flint is grooming to eventually take over ACM when Flint is either removed – which we hear isn’t too far away – or  voluntarily retires — which means, in effect, he dies on the job. I have been warning Jai for some time to be more discerning about the company he keeps, but he takes no heed. Jai, you will eventually rue the day you didn’t take my advice.

Now, late last year Flint and young Jai went public about this Australian Tea Party nonsense, which means the “sponsors” of ACM – there are no members as such – will at last realise that ACM is, despite Flint’s claims  to the contrary , a political organisation whose roots are deep inside the furthrest rightwing extremes of the Liberal Party. That faction is peopled  by the likes of the foul-mouthed Sophie Mirabella; the extreme Cory Bernardi, the thuggish woman-hating Tony Abbott; the frontbench representative of Cardinal Pell, Kevin Andrews; the impossibly named Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells and, for God’s sake, my own local member, the loud-mouthed Kelly O’Dwyer — to name but a few.

http://youtu.be/CAj30f-_CyU

Now, Flint has really crazy ideas about the role of this “Australian Tea Party”, not the least being  the return of corporal punishment in schools.

The Indonesian-born, silver-haired, icon then made a startling admission in respect to his claim – he had indeed been caned when he had spoken out of turn in Singapore, which may explain a lot about Flint and begs the question of whether the caner got as much pleasure from the incident as the recipient — after all, David did say he didn’t step out if line again. That, of course, is a value judgement, as there are many – nay, thousands – of people who think Flint steps out of line every time he opens his mouth.

As an example, he says the reaction to comments his mate Jones made about Julia Gillard’s father “dying of shame” were an overreaction!

He says half asylum seekers of the arriving on boats are not genuine refuges and he wants protect the legal rights of citizens to denigrate each other without fear of legal action.

If that isn’t un-Australian, please tell me please what is.

He even defends the anti- gay marriage comments of his idol Cory Bernardi and seems to think that gay marriage could result in legalising human sex with animals!

As though that isn’t enough, he has a bizarre prediction that legalising gay marriage might even see local Muslims call for the legalisation of polygamy, which he fears, if it came about, could cause a run on the welfare system.

This seems to me a hint of ridiculing his Indonesian heritage – his own genealogy – about which most people in the same position would take some pride in – and, on further examination, perhaps may throw up some burqa wearing relatives.

But Flint is Flint and he is the gift that keeps on giving – to the Republicans.


http://youtu.be/nGK34F4uDWI





http://www.independentaustralia.net/2013/politics/the-mad-hatters-australian-tea-party/


The very fact that they make the trendy lefties write such vitriol and spittle means they must have something interesting to say. I'll be keenly watching out for this Australia Tea party now. Thanks for the heads up!

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Swagman on Jan 9th, 2013 at 9:11am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 8:18am:

Swagman wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 7:53am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 6:20am:

aquascoot wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 6:17am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 5:26am:

Swagman wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:59pm:
Looks like the neo hippy Pinko Eco-Socialists have got some competition....and they don't like it. :-?


Which party are they?

SOB



socialist pinkos ?

well that would be labor
the greens and the liberal party.
and all the independants.

early parole for good behaviour for bob katter and barnaby joyce.


Labour and liberal are exactly the same in policies so i guess you would consider liberal "socialist" as well?

What exactly has labour done that you think it socialist?

SOB


You mean apart from it (Socialism) being in their constitution

http://www.alp.org.au/getattachment/3350e9d4-ac61-47e9-8c7e-dbcaea7d628c/our-platform/

Quote:
The Australian Labor Party is a democratic socialist party and has the objective of the democratic
socialisation of industry, production, distribution and exchange, to the extent necessary to eliminate
exploitation and other anti-social features in these fields
.


It Married the Greens and thus endorses the Greens Party's radical eco-socialist policies :( :( :(

It introduced an unmandated carbon tax as a means of wealth redistribution under the guise of saving the world. :(

It wasted lots of taxpayer money on useless scams to pork barrell more votes. :(

It has given the Taxed Enough Already (TEA) taxpayer over $300 billion in future income tax increases.  (Yes folks going into debt is in effect a future tax increase) :(

And what aqua says.......>


aquascoot wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 7:23am:
medicare...socialist
black armbands...socialist
multiculturalism...socialist
un...socialist
kyoto...world socialism
national curiculum...socilaist
ndis..socialist
nbn...socialist
welfare state..socialist
progressive tax...socialist


etcetera  etcetera  etcetera  etcetera  etcetera  etcetera

:D :D :D


Its just the word. Obviously not the deed since they are privatising stuff not taking it over.

SOB


Just a word? :exclamation..........Ok ok then on that basis even their constitution is a a big fat LIE  ;D  ;D

What hope to do they have?......a witch with a forked tongue for a leader and a constitution that LIES to boot............... :( :( :( :(

Own Goal Own Goal Own Goal.......... :D

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by FriYAY on Jan 9th, 2013 at 9:14am
the thuggish woman-hating Tony Abbott

Do the slanderous morons on PF write the garbage you put up?

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by aquascoot on Jan 9th, 2013 at 9:33am

FriYAY wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 9:14am:
the thuggish woman-hating Tony Abbott

Do the slanderous morons on PF write the garbage you put up?


actually despite adelcrow harping on about this and accusing tony of sleeping with his assistant (cheap gossip)
one could comment on jules as a woman hater.

certainly she was quite hateful towards wilsons wife whilst she was sleeping with that married man
and quite hateful to craig emmersons wife whilst she was sleeping with that married man.

the double standards are pretty poor from julia.

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Robert Paulson on Jan 9th, 2013 at 9:48am

Kat wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 5:53am:

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:46pm:

... wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:41pm:

Kat wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 9:31pm:
WHAT a bunch of nut-bars.

NOT WANTED HERE.



never heard of 'em.  What do they do that makes em nut-bars?

I think it goes along the lines of not being a left leaning political activist. Everyone is a nutbar that does not lean to the left from centre according to the far left activists.



Possibly.

Except I'm a LONG way from being 'far-left', as those who know
me in RL can testify.. although I do claim to be an 'activist' when
it comes to a better deal for welfare recips.

That does NOT mean I'm 'far-left'.

This mob are nut-bars because THEY ARE extremists. And
extremists are bad news, whether right OR left.


What are some of their "extreme" views or policies?

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Spot of Borg on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:07am

Swagman wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 9:11am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 8:18am:

Swagman wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 7:53am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 6:20am:

aquascoot wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 6:17am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 5:26am:

Swagman wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:59pm:
Looks like the neo hippy Pinko Eco-Socialists have got some competition....and they don't like it. :-?


Which party are they?

SOB



socialist pinkos ?

well that would be labor
the greens and the liberal party.
and all the independants.

early parole for good behaviour for bob katter and barnaby joyce.


Labour and liberal are exactly the same in policies so i guess you would consider liberal "socialist" as well?

What exactly has labour done that you think it socialist?

SOB


You mean apart from it (Socialism) being in their constitution

http://www.alp.org.au/getattachment/3350e9d4-ac61-47e9-8c7e-dbcaea7d628c/our-platform/

Quote:
The Australian Labor Party is a democratic socialist party and has the objective of the democratic
socialisation of industry, production, distribution and exchange, to the extent necessary to eliminate
exploitation and other anti-social features in these fields
.


It Married the Greens and thus endorses the Greens Party's radical eco-socialist policies :( :( :(

It introduced an unmandated carbon tax as a means of wealth redistribution under the guise of saving the world. :(

It wasted lots of taxpayer money on useless scams to pork barrell more votes. :(

It has given the Taxed Enough Already (TEA) taxpayer over $300 billion in future income tax increases.  (Yes folks going into debt is in effect a future tax increase) :(

And what aqua says.......>


aquascoot wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 7:23am:
medicare...socialist
black armbands...socialist
multiculturalism...socialist
un...socialist
kyoto...world socialism
national curiculum...socilaist
ndis..socialist
nbn...socialist
welfare state..socialist
progressive tax...socialist


etcetera  etcetera  etcetera  etcetera  etcetera  etcetera

:D :D :D


Its just the word. Obviously not the deed since they are privatising stuff not taking it over.

SOB


Just a word? :exclamation..........Ok ok then on that basis even their constitution is a a big fat LIE  ;D  ;D

What hope to do they have?......a witch with a forked tongue for a leader and a constitution that LIES to boot............... :( :( :( :(

Own Goal Own Goal Own Goal.......... :D


Well? They havent actually taken over anything and made it public property have they? They have privatised things. That is not socialist OR communist. Its just a word obviosuly.

SOB

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Spot of Borg on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:07am

KJT1981 wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 8:31am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 8:18am:

Swagman wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 7:53am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 6:20am:

aquascoot wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 6:17am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 5:26am:

Swagman wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:59pm:
Looks like the neo hippy Pinko Eco-Socialists have got some competition....and they don't like it. :-?


Which party are they?

SOB



socialist pinkos ?

well that would be labor
the greens and the liberal party.
and all the independants.

early parole for good behaviour for bob katter and barnaby joyce.


Labour and liberal are exactly the same in policies so i guess you would consider liberal "socialist" as well?

What exactly has labour done that you think it socialist?

SOB


You mean apart from it (Socialism) being in their constitution

http://www.alp.org.au/getattachment/3350e9d4-ac61-47e9-8c7e-dbcaea7d628c/our-platform/

Quote:
The Australian Labor Party is a democratic socialist party and has the objective of the democratic
socialisation of industry, production, distribution and exchange, to the extent necessary to eliminate
exploitation and other anti-social features in these fields
.


It Married the Greens and thus endorses the Greens Party's radical eco-socialist policies :( :( :(

It introduced an unmandated carbon tax as a means of wealth redistribution under the guise of saving the world. :(

It wasted lots of taxpayer money on useless scams to pork barrell more votes. :(

It has given the Taxed Enough Already (TEA) taxpayer over $300 billion in future income tax increases.  (Yes folks going into debt is in effect a future tax increase) :(

And what aqua says.......>


aquascoot wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 7:23am:
medicare...socialist
black armbands...socialist
multiculturalism...socialist
un...socialist
kyoto...world socialism
national curiculum...socilaist
ndis..socialist
nbn...socialist
welfare state..socialist
progressive tax...socialist


etcetera  etcetera  etcetera  etcetera  etcetera  etcetera

:D :D :D


Its just the word. Obviously not the deed since they are privatising stuff not taking it over.

SOB



Thank you wise one?  I knew you wouldn't let me down.

The Comedy Fest is still running. You even managed to get Miss Borg and Adel on stage with you.

Bravo.


miss troll on a roll huh

SOB

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by adelcrow on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:12am

aquascoot wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 9:33am:

FriYAY wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 9:14am:
the thuggish woman-hating Tony Abbott

Do the slanderous morons on PF write the garbage you put up?


actually despite adelcrow harping on about this and accusing tony of sleeping with his assistant (cheap gossip)
one could comment on jules as a woman hater.

certainly she was quite hateful towards wilsons wife whilst she was sleeping with that married man
and quite hateful to craig emmersons wife whilst she was sleeping with that married man.

the double standards are pretty poor from julia.


Theres no cheap gossip involved..its common knowledge in media and political circles and if you had any involvement or friends in the Liberal Party you would know it to be a fact.
As you know pollies affairs have always been a no go area when it comes to the media and political circles and pretty much every one of them has a bit of fluff in Canberra including Phony Tony.

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by aquascoot on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:15am

adelcrow wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:12am:

aquascoot wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 9:33am:

FriYAY wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 9:14am:
the thuggish woman-hating Tony Abbott

Do the slanderous morons on PF write the garbage you put up?


actually despite adelcrow harping on about this and accusing tony of sleeping with his assistant (cheap gossip)
one could comment on jules as a woman hater.

certainly she was quite hateful towards wilsons wife whilst she was sleeping with that married man
and quite hateful to craig emmersons wife whilst she was sleeping with that married man.

the double standards are pretty poor from julia.


Theres no cheap gossip involved..its common knowledge in media and political circles and if you had any involvement or friends in the Liberal Party you would know it to be a fact.
As you know pollies affairs have always been a no go area when it comes to the media and political circles and pretty much every one of them has a bit of fluff in Canberra including Phony Tony.



POSSIBLY :D :D

but at least the only marriages he would be wrecking would be his own.
sleeping with married men, she should be like thommo and go to the chippendales

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by FRED. on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:16am

adelcrow wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:12am:

aquascoot wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 9:33am:

FriYAY wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 9:14am:
the thuggish woman-hating Tony Abbott

Do the slanderous morons on PF write the garbage you put up?


actually despite adelcrow harping on about this and accusing tony of sleeping with his assistant (cheap gossip)
one could comment on jules as a woman hater.

certainly she was quite hateful towards wilsons wife whilst she was sleeping with that married man
and quite hateful to craig emmersons wife whilst she was sleeping with that married man.

the double standards are pretty poor from julia.


Theres no cheap gossip involved..its common knowledge in media and political circles and if you had any involvement or friends in the Liberal Party you would know it to be a fact.
As you know pollies affairs have always been a no go area when it comes to the media and political circles and pretty much every one of them has a bit of fluff in Canberra including Phony Tony.


And you know this how  WINGNUT    or just more lying shyte  from you   ;)

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Swagman on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:29am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:07am:
Well? They havent actually taken over anything and made it public property have they? They have privatised things. That is not socialist OR communist. Its just a word obviosuly


I think you've been assimilated into their eco-socialist collective Borg.... ;)

The eco-socialists have you brainwashed... ;D


Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Robert Paulson on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:29am


The manjaw on this shiela is an indicator of high testosterone, which is an indicator of a high sex drive.  maybe tony gets a piece, maybe not - but no doubt plenty of people in parliament have been there.


Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by KJT1981 on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:30am

Swagman wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:29am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:07am:
Well? They havent actually taken over anything and made it public property have they? They have privatised things. That is not socialist OR communist. Its just a word obviosuly


I think you've been assimilated into their eco-socialist collective Borg.... ;)

The eco-socialists have you brainwashed... ;D



Impossible.

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by corporate_whitey on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:31am
I cant believe they have all those right wing extremists on the Drum...that show should be pulled and canned...its offensive...lets all right letters to the ABC to complain... :)

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Swagman on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:34am

corporate_whitey wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:31am:
I cant believe they have all those right wing extremists on the Drum...that show should be pulled and canned...its offensive...lets all right letters to the ABC to complain... :)


Hey you should add Milne to your Nic-Pic Whitey.  She endorses the same dangerous prankster behavious that kills people like those 2 you already have........ :(

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by progressiveslol on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:34am

... wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:29am:


The manjaw on this shiela is an indicator of high testosterone, which is an indicator of a high sex drive.  maybe tony gets a piece, maybe not - but no doubt plenty of people in parliament have been there.

Pretty sexist.

Why dont you say because every man in parliament has balls, that he has slept with everyone incuding gillard.

It just a big orgy in parliament isnt it, because there are so many men with balls and testosterone.

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by KJT1981 on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:37am

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:34am:

... wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:29am:


The manjaw on this shiela is an indicator of high testosterone, which is an indicator of a high sex drive.  maybe tony gets a piece, maybe not - but no doubt plenty of people in parliament have been there.

Pretty sexist.

Why dont you say because every man in parliament has balls, that he has slept with everyone incuding gillard.

It just a big orgy in parliament isnt it, because there are so many men with balls and testosterone.



EEEWWW!

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Robert Paulson on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:39am

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:34am:

... wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:29am:


The manjaw on this shiela is an indicator of high testosterone, which is an indicator of a high sex drive.  maybe tony gets a piece, maybe not - but no doubt plenty of people in parliament have been there.

Pretty sexist.

Why dont you say because every man in parliament has balls, that he has slept with everyone incuding gillard.

It just a big orgy in parliament isnt it, because there are so many men with balls and testosterone.



It's not sexist at all.  High testosterone translates to a high libido.  Just a biological fact mate, make of it what you will.      

I bet very few men in parliament have high T - being old and out of shape, as 90% of parliament are, sends T levels through the floor.

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by adelcrow on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:39am

... wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:29am:


The manjaw on this shiela is an indicator of high testosterone, which is an indicator of a high sex drive.  maybe tony gets a piece, maybe not - but no doubt plenty of people in parliament have been there.


Sadly while Tony is chocka up Peta the wife he drags out every now and then to get him out of trouble is home dealing with the day to day drudgery of her life.


Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Rider on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:41am


The manjaw on this shiela is an indicator of high testosterone, which is an indicator of a high sex drive.  maybe tony gets a piece, maybe not - but no doubt plenty of people in parliament have been there.

[/quote]

load up a photo of your loved ones and I'll happily provide some constructive feedback too - how about it pondscum?

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Robert Paulson on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:42am

Rider wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:41am:
The manjaw on this shiela is an indicator of high testosterone, which is an indicator of a high sex drive.  maybe tony gets a piece, maybe not - but no doubt plenty of people in parliament have been there.


load up a photo of your loved ones and I'll happily provide some constructive feedback too - how about it pondscum?[/quote]


nah, why would I need feedback from a novice, who doesn't know what to look for?

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by adelcrow on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:44am

... wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:42am:

Rider wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:41am:
The manjaw on this shiela is an indicator of high testosterone, which is an indicator of a high sex drive.  maybe tony gets a piece, maybe not - but no doubt plenty of people in parliament have been there.


load up a photo of your loved ones and I'll happily provide some constructive feedback too - how about it pondscum?



nah, why would I need feedback from a novice, who doesn't know what to look for?[/quote]

I think you have a fan Rob..   :D

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by FRED. on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:44am

adelcrow wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:39am:

... wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:29am:


The manjaw on this shiela is an indicator of high testosterone, which is an indicator of a high sex drive.  maybe tony gets a piece, maybe not - but no doubt plenty of people in parliament have been there.


Sadly while Tony is chocka up Peta the wife he drags out every now and then to get him out of trouble is home dealing with the day to day drudgery of her life.


Hey WINGNUT is you $100. wife still getting her jollies   ;D ;D

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Spot of Borg on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:46am

aquascoot wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 7:23am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 6:20am:

aquascoot wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 6:17am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 5:26am:

Swagman wrote on Jan 8th, 2013 at 10:59pm:
Looks like the neo hippy Pinko Eco-Socialists have got some competition....and they don't like it. :-?


Which party are they?

SOB



socialist pinkos ?

well that would be labor
the greens and the liberal party.
and all the independants.

early parole for good behaviour for bob katter and barnaby joyce.


Labour and liberal are exactly the same in policies so i guess you would consider liberal "socialist" as well?

What exactly has labour done that you think it socialist?

SOB


since malcolm fraser ( a great socialist)  we have had many socialists.

keating perhaps was the best for the market and business,

but howard was a terrible socialist
gillard is a member of some socialist forum. all her union mates are pinker than the rock star by that name
the loonie greens are socialists (well they dont know what they are,,, they are just nincompoops)
abbott is a catholic big government socialist with no ideas for business

medicare...socialist
black armbands...socialist
multiculturalism...socialist
un...socialist
kyoto...world socialism
national curiculum...socilaist
ndis..socialist
nbn...socialist
welfare state..socialist
progressive tax...socialist


the major parties support all this.

only the russians and chinese support free markets, no imigration, flat rate tax and the abandonment of the nanny state.


i wish mr PUTIN was running in oz (but campbell will have to do, til he gets to the lodge) ;) ;)


There is no difference  NOW. If you think gillard is socialist then you think abbott is too. Seriously neither of them are.

SOB

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Spot of Borg on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:47am

Swagman wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:29am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:07am:
Well? They havent actually taken over anything and made it public property have they? They have privatised things. That is not socialist OR communist. Its just a word obviosuly


I think you've been assimilated into their eco-socialist collective Borg.... ;)

The eco-socialists have you brainwashed... ;D


So you cant come up with anything then?

SOB

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by corporate_whitey on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:47am

Swagman wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:34am:

corporate_whitey wrote on Jan 9th, 2013 at 10:31am:
I cant believe they have all those right wing extremists on the Drum...that show should be pulled and canned...its offensive...lets all right letters to the ABC to complain... :)


Hey you should add Milne to your Nic-Pic Whitey.  She endorses the same dangerous prankster behavious that kills people like those 2 you already have........ :(

She is single minded about the creation of high income jobs, which seems to be not so much of a priority as a first class welfare and social security system for the most marginalized... :)

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by corporate_whitey on Jan 9th, 2013 at 11:29am
Get Fecjked rightards... ;D

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by the wise one on Jan 10th, 2013 at 6:50am
I haven't laugh so much at the replies at threads from the neo-cons on here in a long time.

They come on here and say the threads I start from Independent Australia web site are unreasonable, the site is a labor party hack site etc etc etc. They try to run down the web site then I post a comment that says that a person is going to start up a Tea Party in Australia and the neo-cons come on and say it is a good thing and guess where I got it from.

The neo-cons only say that Independent Australia web site is a labor party hack site when it doesn't suit their point of view. It just show how stupid they are.


Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Spot of Borg on Jan 10th, 2013 at 6:55am

John S wrote on Jan 10th, 2013 at 6:50am:
I haven't laugh so much at the replies at threads from the neo-cons on here in a long time.

They come on here and say the threads I start from Independent Australia web site are unreasonable, the site is a labor party hack site etc etc etc. They try to run down the web site then I post a comment that says that a person is going to start up a Tea Party in Australia and the neo-cons come on and say it is a good thing and guess where I got it from.

The neo-cons only say that Independent Australia web site is a labor party hack site when it doesn't suit their point of view. It just show how stupid they are.


Hahahahahahahahahahahaha

SOB

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by pansi1951 on Jan 10th, 2013 at 7:03am

John S wrote on Jan 10th, 2013 at 6:50am:
I haven't laugh so much at the replies at threads from the neo-cons on here in a long time.

They come on here and say the threads I start from Independent Australia web site are unreasonable, the site is a labor party hack site etc etc etc. They try to run down the web site then I post a comment that says that a person is going to start up a Tea Party in Australia and the neo-cons come on and say it is a good thing and guess where I got it from.

The neo-cons only say that Independent Australia web site is a labor party hack site when it doesn't suit their point of view. It just show how stupid they are.




We didn't need any extra proof, that they're willing to vote for Tony Abbott is enough.

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by corporate_whitey on Jan 10th, 2013 at 7:33am
Julia Gillard is a committed victimizer of the poor and pacifists...its not as if there are not rightists in the labor party with no greater vision in life than to give the poor a further kick in the guts if they possibly can...They just drop one in every now and then like kicking 2 million people off the DSP and Single Mothers pension - just to reduce them further into destitution...The right are committed to kill the poor thats why they go into politics... :(

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Swagman on Jan 10th, 2013 at 8:17am

John S wrote on Jan 10th, 2013 at 6:50am:
I haven't laugh so much at the replies at threads from the neo-cons on here in a long time.

They come on here and say the threads I start from Independent Australia web site are unreasonable, the site is a labor party hack site etc etc etc. They try to run down the web site then I post a comment that says that a person is going to start up a Tea Party in Australia and the neo-cons come on and say it is a good thing and guess where I got it from.

The neo-cons only say that Independent Australia web site is a labor party hack site when it doesn't suit their point of view. It just show how stupid they are.


The True Believer's hack site was a bit late. 

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/capital-circle/tea-party-comes-to-australia/story-fn59nqgy-1225924785030

http://www.politicsforum.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=133684

......

Mind you ---->  THANKS WISEY for pointing out the Aussie Tea Party site.  It's an excellent source for anti Eco-Socialist stuff................... ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by KJT1981 on Jan 10th, 2013 at 8:39am

John S wrote on Jan 10th, 2013 at 6:50am:
I haven't laugh so much at the replies at threads from the neo-cons on here in a long time.

They come on here and say the threads I start from Independent Australia web site are unreasonable, the site is a labor party hack site etc etc etc. They try to run down the web site then I post a comment that says that a person is going to start up a Tea Party in Australia and the neo-cons come on and say it is a good thing and guess where I got it from.

The neo-cons only say that Independent Australia web site is a labor party hack site when it doesn't suit their point of view. It just show how stupid they are.



Wow, I get two big belly laughs from you today.

You really have outdone yourself today wise one?

Try not to let me down tomorrow.

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Morning Mist on Jan 10th, 2013 at 8:44am

John S wrote on Jan 10th, 2013 at 6:50am:
I haven't laugh so much at the replies at threads from the neo-cons on here in a long time.

They come on here and say the threads I start from Independent Australia web site are unreasonable, the site is a labor party hack site etc etc etc. They try to run down the web site then I post a comment that says that a person is going to start up a Tea Party in Australia and the neo-cons come on and say it is a good thing and guess where I got it from.

The neo-cons only say that Independent Australia web site is a labor party hack site when it doesn't suit their point of view. It just show how stupid they are.


The article in the op was so rancorous it doesn't deserve to be taken seriously. There was little, if any, attempt at refutation of tea-party policy; all it contained was numerous ad hominem toward certain people.





Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by aquascoot on Jan 10th, 2013 at 8:54am

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jan 10th, 2013 at 7:03am:

John S wrote on Jan 10th, 2013 at 6:50am:
I haven't laugh so much at the replies at threads from the neo-cons on here in a long time.

They come on here and say the threads I start from Independent Australia web site are unreasonable, the site is a labor party hack site etc etc etc. They try to run down the web site then I post a comment that says that a person is going to start up a Tea Party in Australia and the neo-cons come on and say it is a good thing and guess where I got it from.

The neo-cons only say that Independent Australia web site is a labor party hack site when it doesn't suit their point of view. It just show how stupid they are.




We didn't need any extra proof, that they're willing to vote for Tony Abbott is enough.



SEE, THATS JUST WRONG

gulp, swallow, borg was actually right to say abbott is just like gillard. HE IS.

an opportunistic, big government, suck up to the 47 % who contribute nothing, big welfare, power hungry tool.

now jules is perhaps 2 % worse and milne is more left leaning then lenin.

BUT THEY ARE ALL SHOCKING  BIG GOVERNMENT SOCIALISTS.

the ONLY sector in OZ that contributes to the tax revenue that lets the various welfare programs and public sector junkets continue is the small businessman.

RIO,BHP, these are FOREIGN OWNED and would hardly pay any tax here. MURDOCH< PACKER< GERRY HARVEY, do you think these blokes put their hands in their pockets to fund socialism. :D :D :D :D

the totally unrepresented small business sector is withering on the vine in OZ.

when it dies (and its currently on life support)  all the socialists die with it.

rio, bhp, move to africa.
woolies and coles move to asia.
so do the big banks.
murdoch is already moving there and packer wants to build a mega rich casino for ASIAN clients in sydney.

i am so going to enjoy sitting at my farm gate with my shotty, watching the endless streams of urban green , labor and liberal voters wandering past begging for an egg or some milk or a side of beef. :D :D :D

seyonara suckers.

just keep rolling out those unfunded big government projects :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D


Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Morning Mist on Jan 10th, 2013 at 11:39am

John S wrote on Jan 10th, 2013 at 6:50am:
I haven't laugh so much at the replies at threads from the neo-cons on here in a long time.

They come on here and say the threads I start from Independent Australia web site are unreasonable, the site is a labor party hack site etc etc etc. They try to run down the web site then I post a comment that says that a person is going to start up a Tea Party in Australia and the neo-cons come on and say it is a good thing and guess where I got it from.

The neo-cons only say that Independent Australia web site is a labor party hack site when it doesn't suit their point of view. It just show how stupid they are.



Wasn't it you citing the anti-discrimination legislation the other day because someone made a joke about gays? Then I made the point if such derogatory language had been used toward conservatives you wouldn't bat an eye-lid. You replied that "I don't know you very well." Well, here you are posting vitriol about the tea-party and their supporters.

It's just as I suspected (as I've seen thousands of times): The trendies believe they can lambaste others with impunity, while conservatives must be subject to anti-discrimination legislation if they lambaste others.

Cultural Marxism in action.

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by Robert Paulson on Jan 10th, 2013 at 11:51am
I still never found out what was "extreme" about them. 



Quote:
The Tea Party movement is an American political movement that advocates strict adherence to the United States Constitution,[1] reducing U.S. government spending and taxes,[2][3][3] and reduction of the U.S. national debt and federal budget deficit.


Sounds very sensible to me. 

Title: Re: Tea Party to Rip up a Storm
Post by progressiveslol on Jan 10th, 2013 at 12:36pm

John S wrote on Jan 10th, 2013 at 6:50am:
I haven't laugh so much at the replies at threads from the neo-cons on here in a long time.

They come on here and say the threads I start from Independent Australia web site are unreasonable, the site is a labor party hack site etc etc etc. They try to run down the web site then I post a comment that says that a person is going to start up a Tea Party in Australia and the neo-cons come on and say it is a good thing and guess where I got it from.

The neo-cons only say that Independent Australia web site is a labor party hack site when it doesn't suit their point of view. It just show how stupid they are.

With a heading like that, did anyone even notice where the content came from.

I for one didnt need to read, the heading said it all, but if the independent had the story, then I can say with confidence that it would be a piece against the tea party and a piece that was more akin to a labor hack story.

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.