Australian Politics Forum

Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl Member Run Boards >> Relationships >> Maqqa http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1360316893 Message started by Aussie on Feb 8^th, 2013 at 7:48pm

Title: Maqqa
Post by Aussie on Feb 8^th, 2013 at 7:48pm

Is there some reason why people are unable to ignore this retard? Have you not noticed his MO? He is so lucky I am not a Global Mod. Duplicate/triplicate/multiple Threads on the same issues..............and there are people who keep feeding it. Maybe they are his muppets. Ignore the idiot, please.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by John Smith on Feb 8^th, 2013 at 7:59pm

he is usually easy to put in his place,

of course he can rely on progs, cods and armpit and to a lessor extent Fred and swag, to support his claims no matter how ridiculous they are

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Aussie on Feb 8^th, 2013 at 8:08pm

John Smith wrote on Feb 8^th, 2013 at 7:59pm:

he is usually easy to put in his place,

of course he can rely on progs, cods and armpit and to a lessor extent Fred and swag, to support his claims no matter how ridiculous they are

Okay.....but maybe...no longer you?

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by John Smith on Feb 8^th, 2013 at 8:11pm

Aussie wrote on Feb 8^th, 2013 at 8:08pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 8^th, 2013 at 7:59pm:

he is usually easy to put in his place,

of course he can rely on progs, cods and armpit and to a lessor extent Fred and swag, to support his claims no matter how ridiculous they are

Okay.....but maybe...no longer you?

someone has to show him the error of his ways .... I have faith in him that one day he will see again. (OK, the faith part is a joke, it's more wishful thinking on my part)

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Aussie on Feb 8^th, 2013 at 8:30pm

There is not one politically aware garden gnome who needs to respond to him. At all. I am considering the utterly absurd concept that anyone who does is likely one of his many socks.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Spot of Borg on Feb 9^th, 2013 at 4:53am

I already posted in a couple of his newer threads before i saw this one

SOB

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by aquascoot on Feb 9^th, 2013 at 7:10am

maqqa'a all right
crooks all right.

they both have a tendency to only start threads about their sides POV . but they start a lot of interesting debates.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Dnarever on Feb 9^th, 2013 at 7:51am

I feed the sea gulls too.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Karnal on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 2:25am

Isn’t he still in New Zealand avoiding the carbon tax?

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Emma Peel on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 2:40am

relationships..!!
and Maqqa.!!

Do they go together??
yes they do.... not that I bother replying to Maqqa you understand... i find it next to impossible to relate to him.. but.. that is all about relationships, isn't it?

On this FORUM.

I WAS GOING TO START A NEW TOPIC ON THIS IDEA. But this topic is ready made so...

When we find ourselves responding to some posters, with conscious communication .(as opposed to knee-jerk reaction). we are in a human relationship..albeit at long distance.
Even the knee-jerk is a type of communication.. a relationship. Negative as it may be.

The interaction between posters is all about connecting..or not..but it's still all about a relationship with the poster you are seeking to engage.

Some I choose to eschew.. some to engage.. some to challenge... and it's all good really. :)

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Spot of Borg on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 4:05am

Actually maqqa, like every one else, is entitled to his opinion.

Is this thread going to be locked as soon as quantum has its say like others in this area? Or was it feedback? whatever.

SOB

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Aussie on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 6:18am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 4:05am:

Actually maqqa, like every one else, is entitled to his opinion.

Is this thread going to be locked as soon as quantum has its say like others in this area? Or was it feedback? whatever.

SOB

Given I am the Mod. here, I doubt it.

;)

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Quantum on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 9:16am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 4:05am:

Actually maqqa, like every one else, is entitled to his opinion.

Is this thread going to be locked as soon as quantum has its say like others in this area? Or was it feedback? whatever.

SOB

What the hell are you going on about this time you stupid cat? I have had nothing to do with this thread but yet again you just can't help bringing me into it. You are completely obsessed with me you dopey troll.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Spot of Borg on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 10:12am

Quantum wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 9:16am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 4:05am:

Actually maqqa, like every one else, is entitled to his opinion.

Is this thread going to be locked as soon as quantum has its say like others in this area? Or was it feedback? whatever.

SOB

You know exactly what im talking about troll

SOB

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Quantum on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 10:27am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 10:12am:

Quantum wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 9:16am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 4:05am:

Actually maqqa, like every one else, is entitled to his opinion.

Is this thread going to be locked as soon as quantum has its say like others in this area? Or was it feedback? whatever.

SOB

You know exactly what im talking about troll

SOB

Again, I have nothing to do with this thread so stop bring me into it. You are the biggest troll this forum has. You name people is threads that they are not posting in and then call them trolls when they respond. You are batshit loopy.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Doctor Jolly on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 10:38am

The board would be a lot better if Maqqa was restricted to one new topic per day.

As it is, (s)he floods the board with liberal party propaganda which makes it unreadable.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Spot of Borg on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 11:06am

Quantum wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 10:27am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 10:12am:

Quantum wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 9:16am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 4:05am:

Actually maqqa, like every one else, is entitled to his opinion.

Is this thread going to be locked as soon as quantum has its say like others in this area? Or was it feedback? whatever.

SOB

You know exactly what im talking about troll

SOB

Look who is talking . . . . . as i said you know very well what i was talking about.

SOB

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Quantum on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 11:21am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 11:06am:

Look who is talking . . . . . as i said you know very well what i was talking about.

SOB

No one knows what you are talking about. What point exactly where you trying to make?

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 11:34am

Why do people keep starting threads about that Libbo stooge Maqqa?

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by aquascoot on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 11:35am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 10:12am:

Quantum wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 9:16am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 4:05am:

Actually maqqa, like every one else, is entitled to his opinion.

Is this thread going to be locked as soon as quantum has its say like others in this area? Or was it feedback? whatever.

SOB

You know exactly what im talking about troll

SOB

ONLY 60 MORE PAGES TO BEAT SPOT OF TROLL ;) ;)

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Emma Peel on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 3:45pm

clearly SOB and Quantum have a relationship.. :)

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Aussie on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 3:59pm

Bobby. wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 11:34am:

Why do people keep starting threads about that Libbo stooge Maqqa?

I think it is because, unbelievably, people actually communicate with the idiot, instead of leaving him grasping for air.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Quantum on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 4:16pm

Emma wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 3:45pm:

clearly SOB and Quantum have a relationship.. :)

Like roadkill and a bullbar have a relationship.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Spot of Borg on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 4:43pm

Quantum wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 4:16pm:

Emma wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 3:45pm:

clearly SOB and Quantum have a relationship.. :)

Like roadkill and a bullbar have a relationship.

*hoses down the front of his car*

SOB

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 23^rd, 2013 at 4:10pm

Quantum wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 4:16pm:

Emma wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 3:45pm:

clearly SOB and Quantum have a relationship.. :)

Like roadkill and a bullbar have a relationship.

Yes a stormy relationship - but one day you'll make up. ::)

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by cods on Feb 24^th, 2013 at 10:20am

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 10:38am:

The board would be a lot better if Maqqa was restricted to one new topic per day.

As it is, (s)he floods the board with liberal party propaganda which makes it unreadable.

DITTO DRAH!..

I will accept macca goes over the top. but he doesnt destroy other threads with.

ilovethenbn a thousand times.

which lefties seem to find acceptable..i

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by cods on Feb 24^th, 2013 at 10:25am

anyone notice 3 threads started by aussie on the front page of relationships..LOL

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Spot of Borg on Feb 24^th, 2013 at 10:28am

cods wrote on Feb 24^th, 2013 at 10:25am:

anyone notice 3 threads started by aussie on the front page of relationships..LOL

Seriously so what? You don't want anyone to start threads?

SOB

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 24^th, 2013 at 11:18am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 24^th, 2013 at 10:28am:

cods wrote on Feb 24^th, 2013 at 10:25am:

anyone notice 3 threads started by aussie on the front page of relationships..LOL

Seriously so what? You don't want anyone to start threads?

SOB

But this thread is about Maqqa starting multiple treads per day, and the person who started the thread, has done precisely the same thing...that's called hypocrisy.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Aussie on Feb 24^th, 2013 at 11:28am

Quote:

But this thread is about Maqqa starting multiple treads per day, and the person who started the thread, has done precisely the same thing...that's called hypocrisy.

...and what you just posted (as quoted) is called bull-shite. Go check the dates, numbnut.

:D

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Kat on Feb 25^th, 2013 at 12:50pm

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2013 at 10:38am:

The board would be a lot better if Maqqa was restricted to one new topic per day.

As it is, (s)he floods the board with liberal party propaganda which makes it unreadable.

The board would be better if Maqqa (and a couple of other delusionals , NOT Bill or DRAH) were
sin-binned for six months. With another six to follow if they haven't learned anything.

One's a spammer, the others are trolls.

NEITHER have any place on here.

Nor would they be, were it my forum to make the call.

Most other fora of which I'm a member, they wouldn't last a fortnight, if that.

And before anyone starts, it has nothing to do with their 'side' of politics.

Idiocy is idiocy, spamming is spamming, trolling is trolling. Nothing partisan about it.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by cods on Feb 25^th, 2013 at 1:51pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 24^th, 2013 at 11:18am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 24^th, 2013 at 10:28am:

cods wrote on Feb 24^th, 2013 at 10:25am:

anyone notice 3 threads started by aussie on the front page of relationships..LOL

Seriously so what? You don't want anyone to start threads?

SOB

But this thread is about Maqqa starting multiple treads per day, and the person who started the thread, has done precisely the same thing...that's called hypocrisy.

now you will be called a troll for pointing out the obvious not allowed to do that to the sensitive left..

I will also be called a spammer for daring to post more than once.. again I am not allowed to I am not a lefty..

in a perfect world we would all be lefties gizmo..

:'( :'( :'(

the left are in for a torrid time and people like macca dont back off...

and the corrupt like to bully people into BACKING OFF.. dont cha-no?

if they knew where macca lived.. I wonder how many shovels he would now have..LOL>.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Kat on Feb 25^th, 2013 at 2:31pm

Ah, Christ!

I give up!!!

(Face-palms, shakes head, grabs six-pack, leaves).

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by cods on Feb 25^th, 2013 at 5:03pm

Kat wrote on Feb 25^th, 2013 at 2:31pm:

Ah, Christ!

I give up!!!

(Face-palms, shakes head, grabs six-pack, leaves).

butbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbut..

its ok for you to whinge?????

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Kat on Feb 25^th, 2013 at 6:25pm

cods wrote on Feb 25^th, 2013 at 5:03pm:

Kat wrote on Feb 25^th, 2013 at 2:31pm:

Ah, Christ!

I give up!!!

(Face-palms, shakes head, grabs six-pack, leaves).

butbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbut..

its ok for you to whinge?????

(Says someone who post thread after thread, whinging. Gotten rid of poor DRAH yet?).

Too goddamned right it is!

Especially if my main objective is to save the forum from fools, idiots and trolls.

I value this place and am part of it, as it is part of me.

Shame more of YOU don't.

Oh, but I forgot.

I'm only a 'leftie' (supposedly), my opinions don't count.....

If Adolf Hitler disagreed with you, you'd call him a 'leftie'.

Like I said, I give up.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Emma Peel on Feb 25^th, 2013 at 10:13pm

No No KAT.... trick is never give up..!! Yeah I agree Cods is one of the most annoying and persistently brainless posters ... but she's not alone... takes all kinds Unfortunately to make the world...

I fink praps she only has half a brain... hence this insistence on lefties.... nothing else 'computes'.!!

Its pretty funny really... they speak,,, and show themselves ::) ::) ::) ::)

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by KJT1981 on Feb 26^th, 2013 at 5:31am

Kat wrote on Feb 25^th, 2013 at 6:25pm:

cods wrote on Feb 25^th, 2013 at 5:03pm:

Kat wrote on Feb 25^th, 2013 at 2:31pm:

Ah, Christ!

I give up!!!

(Face-palms, shakes head, grabs six-pack, leaves).

butbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbut..

its ok for you to whinge?????

So, Kat is the arbiter of fools and idiots.

Maybe you could begin with ridding us of skippy, adel, alevine, Borg, Emma, wiseone.........they all fit the fools and idiots category.

Anyone that uses Hitler to defend their position is a dick.

I value this place and am part of it, as it is part of me.

It's a message board for gods sake not a way of life.

Go away and fix some push bikes.

BTW, how many times have you said 'I am out of here'?

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by KJT1981 on Feb 26^th, 2013 at 5:41am

Quote:

The board would be better if Maqqa (and a couple of other delusionals , NOT Bill or DRAH) were
sin-binned for six months. With another six to follow if they haven't learned anything.

Because the "delusionals" don't agree with you you want them banned? Interesting. It's a worry if you don't consider Bill and DRAH "delusionals". ::)

Quote:

And before anyone starts, it has nothing to do with their 'side' of politics.

Total bullsh1t Kats.

Quote:

Nor would they be, were it my forum to make the call.

It isn't your forum Kat so suck it up.

Can't be to hard to start your own forum as Miss Borg has done it.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by KJT1981 on Feb 26^th, 2013 at 6:25am

Emma wrote on Feb 25^th, 2013 at 10:13pm:

From the drug addled brain of Jalane.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Spot of Borg on Feb 26^th, 2013 at 6:34am

KJT1981 wrote on Feb 26^th, 2013 at 5:41am:

Quote:

The board would be better if Maqqa (and a couple of other delusionals , NOT Bill or DRAH) were
sin-binned for six months. With another six to follow if they haven't learned anything.

Because the "delusionals" don't agree with you you want them banned? Interesting. It's a worry if you don't consider Bill and DRAH "delusionals". ::)

[quote]And before anyone starts, it has nothing to do with their 'side' of politics.

Total bullsh1t Kats.

Quote:

Nor would they be, were it my forum to make the call.

It isn't your forum Kat so suck it up.

Can't be to hard to start your own forum as Miss Borg has done it.
[/quote]

Go away troll

SOB

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Emma Peel on Feb 26^th, 2013 at 8:08pm

KJT1981 wrote on Feb 26^th, 2013 at 6:25am:

Emma wrote on Feb 25^th, 2013 at 10:13pm:

From the drug addled brain of Jalane.

KJTnumber

you think YOU are the arbiter?? don't you just love that word??
..'he who know's...'... ::) ::) :P ::) ::) :-? :D :D

and I do hope you're the poster who hates overuse of emoticons

SOB is right sometimes.. and he's right about you... :) :) :) :)
Don't go away Kat, anything you post is worth 50 of anything KJTnumber posts,..!!! :) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by cods on Feb 27^th, 2013 at 6:04am

Kat wrote on Feb 25^th, 2013 at 6:25pm:

cods wrote on Feb 25^th, 2013 at 5:03pm:

Kat wrote on Feb 25^th, 2013 at 2:31pm:

Ah, Christ!

I give up!!!

(Face-palms, shakes head, grabs six-pack, leaves).

butbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbutbut..

its ok for you to whinge?????

'

WOW what a temper tanny....do hope you feel better for that...wont call you a lefty anymore poor diddums didnt realize it was in insult.. thought everyone liked being called a lefty.....oh well if you dont say how can we know you are OFFENDED by it..LOL>.

Kat wrote on Feb 25^th, 2013 at 6:25pm:

I'm only a 'leftie' (supposedly), my opinions don't count.....

my opinions dont count??? boohoo what does that mean?..people are taking the trouble to answer you... doesnt that mean something??????
oh well maybe not.

you are calling some people nasty names you know

Kat wrote on Feb 25^th, 2013 at 12:50pm:

and then complain when they hit back...tsk tsk..

if you are going to bleed all over the boards Kat then maybe it is time you left...when you dish it out expect it to return, its life..

when little people upset you dont bother with them.....I know I dont..a certain party on here finds fault with everything about myself.. but could I care less NOPE. I get a buzz out of knowing they bother reading me.. LOL..

turn the other cheek kat its not worth getting so upset about..you will never meet any of us...look on the bright side..lol

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Emma Peel on Feb 27^th, 2013 at 11:32pm

well this certain party was only interested 'cos Kat was posting... then you have your usual go
and hey what can I say ... you are irresistably stupid.... I have wonder at the level of your ignorance, maliciousness, and hypocricy...

I can't help it?? :) ;D :-* :-*

Ooh I didn't realise calling people lefties was an insult...says CODS ooohh ahhh I'm so misunderstood.... NO YOU ARE NOT MISUNDERSTOOD AT ALL CODS.. 8-) 8-)

you are a nasty bit of work... and I'll keep telling you that whenever we merge... :) on a thread... tough cookies...

too bad so sad :D

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by KJT1981 on Feb 28^th, 2013 at 6:45am

Emma wrote on Feb 27^th, 2013 at 11:32pm:

Scrambled brains for breakfast anyone?

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Emma Peel on Feb 28^th, 2013 at 7:28pm

are you sure you have enough to share KJTDOB? ;D

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by cods on Mar 2^nd, 2013 at 8:44am

KJT1981 wrote on Feb 28^th, 2013 at 6:45am:

Emma wrote on Feb 27^th, 2013 at 11:32pm:

Scrambled brains for breakfast anyone?

I love it KJ..I bother this person.... makes me really happy...I dont have a problem with kat he seems to fall apart easily and then wants to stamp off making a big noise about it..why not just log off and go?? he seems to have got extra touchy since the labs have been going down.. that what made me think he was a lefty.......whats wrong with being a lefty? as long as you are not self opinionated...and abusive.,..I dont see them any different from anyone else..

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by John Smith on Mar 2^nd, 2013 at 8:47am

cods wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2013 at 8:44am:

I love it KJ..I bother this person.... makes me really happy

and finally you admit what a sad and sorry peron you really are !!! .....

like you've never made a big noise , unfortunately you haven't had the decency to log off and go.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Emma Peel on Mar 2^nd, 2013 at 8:56pm

No we're stuck with Cods... I wonder what it is an acronym for??/ :) ;) 8-)

C O D S hmm might give it a bit of thought >>!! ;D

Can Only Discuss Stupidly...
:D

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by cods on Mar 5^th, 2013 at 5:19pm

so funny...

people.. people who hate people...

are the saddest people in the world..

sorry Barbs...

I didnt know my name was maqqa...aussie you need a new thread.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Emma Peel on Mar 6^th, 2013 at 12:16am

as pointed out by others...
this is a thread about posters...
posters who are particularly obnoxious, to various other co-posters. ... for various reasons...
IT'S a VENT... Yeah??
and ,, OK .. post multiple threads... guess that leaves you out CODS.

OK I 'll leave you alone...

until the next time I read something that annoys me... for whatever reason.... same as every other poster.. yyou aren't singled out CODS... just more annoying than most.!!
:)
I'm sure that pleases you..

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Spot of Borg on Mar 6^th, 2013 at 4:54am

As i have said before Maqqa isnt that obnoxious. Just well - prolly a shill.

SOB

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by cods on Mar 11^th, 2013 at 7:35am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 6^th, 2013 at 4:54am:

As i have said before Maqqa isnt that obnoxious. Just well - prolly a shill.

SOB

I am back again I only pop in once in a while..you might have to explain a shill.sob.. thats a new one for me..

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by mantra on Mar 11^th, 2013 at 11:14am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 6^th, 2013 at 4:54am:

As i have said before Maqqa isnt that obnoxious. Just well - prolly a shill.

SOB

You're not too lazy to make 50 posts a day and type an irritating SOB after your every comment - so why are you too lazy to type a word correctly?

Quote:

PROLLY - Shortened version of "probably". Typically used in online conversations by REALLY lazy and ignorant people. Extremely inflaming to those who communicate in English.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Spot of Borg on Mar 11^th, 2013 at 12:06pm

mantra wrote on Mar 11^th, 2013 at 11:14am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 6^th, 2013 at 4:54am:

As i have said before Maqqa isnt that obnoxious. Just well - prolly a shill.

SOB

You're not too lazy to make 50 posts a day and type an irritating SOB after your every comment - so why are you too lazy to type a word correctly?

Quote:

PROLLY - Shortened version of "probably". Typically used in online conversations by REALLY lazy and ignorant people. Extremely inflaming to those who communicate in English.

You are a particularly nasty lil troll arent you. You have only ever tried to aggravate me. Never tried to participate in any discussion @ all that i have seen. Yuck.

SOB

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by mantra on Mar 11^th, 2013 at 12:40pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 11^th, 2013 at 12:06pm:

You are a particularly nasty lil troll arent you. You have only ever tried to aggravate me. Never tried to participate in any discussion @ all that i have seen. Yuck.

And you have a limited vocabulary. Have you ever posted more than a dozen words without calling someone a troll? Have you ever participated in a mature discussion with anyone here?

Call me whatever names you please. Your primary school peers would be proud of you.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by bobbythebat1 on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 3:43pm

Maqqa should be limited to starting one new thread per day.
He seems to start up at least 5 a day in the politics section -
& always about the same subject -

Look at the number he started on the leadership spill yesterday!

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by muso on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 8:59pm

Provide some links and I'll take a look.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by bobbythebat1 on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 10:30pm

Hi Muso,
just from yesterday - the day of the leadership spill - 21st March 2013
Maqqa started 6 threads just on the leadership spill:

Leadership spill 4.30 AEST
Yesterday at 2:03pm
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1363835030/0#0

Rudd will not nominate
Yesterday at 4:20pm
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1363843224/0#0

Gillard - we are not done yet!!
Yesterday at 2:32pm
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1363836743

Applause for Crean
Yesterday at 2:13pm
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1363835610

Gillard need to shut down leadership debate
Yesterday at 12:53am
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1363787623

Where now for Rudd
Yesterday at 7:04pm
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1363853047

Rudd will not nominate
Yesterday at 4:20pm
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1363843224/0#0

And then today another 3 today on the same topic:

Rudd dub Bowen as next challenger
Today at 8:08pm
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1363943321

Rudd - no challenge under ANY circumstance
Today at 12:04pm
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1363914295/0#0

Who won yesterday?
Today at 11:00am
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1363910429

Plus many others on politics topics not listed.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by muso on Mar 23^rd, 2013 at 8:45am

Point taken.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Aussie on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 6:24pm

Come on, Muso:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1364113187

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1364113051

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1364102127

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1364113187

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1364121287

etc etc etc etc!!!!!!!!!

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Kat on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 10:49pm

I realised years ago on Blah-hoo that there was no point reading the
majority of Maqqa'a posts, and even less point replying to them.

Hence, I seldom bother to do either.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Emma Peel on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 1:11am

sensible decision.. a bigger time-waster you couldn't find on the forum.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Spot of Borg on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 5:31am

He never answers questions or replies anyway

SOB

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by aquascoot on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 6:33pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 5:31am:

He never answers questions or replies anyway

SOB

piss off squadron leader

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by muso on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 6:48pm

Aussie wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 6:24pm:

Two of those links were the same thread. The others were not the same subject. They are all reasonably coherent posts and seem to have generated good discussion.

Where do you think the forum rules were broken?

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by aquascoot on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 6:54pm

maqqas alright, like crrok they start a lot of interesting threads.i agree though cant see the need for 5 threads on the same topic.
reminds me of "china says fttn is boat anchor technology" :D

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Aussie on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 7:19pm

muso wrote on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 6:48pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 6:24pm:

Do you care if a Member starts thread after thread after thread after thread after thread on exactly the same theme? Just say so if you don't and I will not trouble you again.

I'll just do exactly the same, when it suits me.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by muso on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 7:47pm

As I said, two are duplicates of the same thread that you cut and pasted twice. This one:

Quote:

Victorian Premier Denis Napthine has urged Julia Gillard to start showing leadership on "the big issues" – or step aside and call an early election

One is about the federal opposition:

Quote:

The federal opposition will unveil its full industrial relations policy within weeks.

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott on Sunday reiterated promises to make "careful, cautious, responsible changes" to the Fair Work Act.

One is about Bell Weather seats:

Quote:

If Julia Gillard wants to win the next election, she probably needs the Labor Party to hold on in the western Sydney seat of Lindsay - one of the very few electorates that has been claimed by the governing party in every election since it was founded.

One is about Opposition members receiving text messages.

I won't go on. They are on different subjects. So again, what forum rules were broken?

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Aussie on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 8:10pm

Why run to the protection of a lack of existing Rule? You and I both can read read the 'Rules' as they are.

I don't care Muso......

I have the view that to allow repetitive Threads on the same theme is white noise. But.......no matter. I now understand what you want, and I will encourage DRAH to go for his life from now on.

I might even chip in.

After all..............there is no Rule.

;)

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by muso on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 8:32pm

I'll PM you.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by muso on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 9:10pm

Aussie wrote on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 8:10pm:

There are very few rules. If you think there should be another rule, try a post in Feedback explaining how you think the rule can be interpreted and applied. It needs to be clear cut though. We just can't apply arbitrary rules.

I wouldn't interpret those posts as spamming.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by bobbythebat1 on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 9:31pm

Hi Muso,
I think everyone should be limited to one new thread startup every day.

People like Maqqa who often start 10 or more every day spam the politics board
& it's always anti-Labor - it's as if he is a paid Libbo stooge.

It means that other threads which may be more important get pushed off the top 20 list.

If the software can be set to stop this then maybe I should start a thread up on the Feedback Board?

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Aussie on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 9:32pm

muso wrote on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 9:10pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 8:10pm:

There is no Rule against spamming, no matter the definition either of us might suggest.

But.....I accept your judgement. If there is no Rule breached, the Mods. will not intervene.

All good.

:)

Quote:

People like Maqqa who often start 10 or more every day spam the politics board
& it's always anti-Labor - it's as if he is a paid Libbo stooge.

Good point there, Muso.....but there is no "Rule," just some weird invention about 'spamming' applied against DRAH.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Spot of Borg on Mar 26^th, 2013 at 5:05am

aquascoot wrote on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 6:33pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 5:31am:

He never answers questions or replies anyway

SOB

piss off squadron leader

Go away troll

SOB

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by KJT1981 on Mar 26^th, 2013 at 8:07pm

Quote:

It means that other threads which may be more important get pushed off the top 20 list.

Can't count past twenty bobbi?

Who decides which is more important?

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by bobbythebat1 on Mar 27^th, 2013 at 6:38am

KJT1981 wrote on Mar 26^th, 2013 at 8:07pm:

Quote:

It means that other threads which may be more important get pushed off the top 20 list.

Can't count past twenty bobbi?

Who decides which is more important?

I used the word - " may "

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by bobbythebat1 on Mar 27^th, 2013 at 6:41am

Bobby. wrote on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 9:31pm:

Bump

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by KJT1981 on Mar 27^th, 2013 at 7:34am

Quote:

It means that other threads which may be more important get pushed off the top 20 list.

I will ask the same question bobbi.

Who decides which threads MAY be more important?

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by progressiveslol on Mar 27^th, 2013 at 9:21am

KJT1981 wrote on Mar 27^th, 2013 at 7:34am:

Quote:

It means that other threads which may be more important get pushed off the top 20 list.

I will ask the same question bobbi.

Who decides which threads MAY be more important?

If the way they go on about the little dictator we have as PM is any guide, then I would say someone like gillard should decide.

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by Aussie on Apr 4^th, 2013 at 8:48pm

Here we go again. Multiple Threads (all started today) which are redundant, because the subject is already the subject of other Threads:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1365071895

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1365036688/0#0

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1365071500

Title: Re: Maqqa
Post by iceyone on Apr 4^th, 2013 at 9:48pm

Maybe we need some crayons and windows to lick!