Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> General Board >> 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1360373854

Message started by thelastnail on Feb 9th, 2013 at 11:37am

Title: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 9th, 2013 at 11:37am
My favourite topic on 9/11 because the posts always got deleted on yahoo politics every time there was mention of the never talked about building 7 collapse. Now there are more revelations !!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9b4D-aO3zY

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 9th, 2013 at 12:43pm

Oh.

I thought that the buildings collapsed because of man-made global warming.

I didn't realise there were planes involved.

Perhaps the planes were affected by man-made global warming   :-/

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by Baronvonrort on Feb 9th, 2013 at 1:01pm
The nutjobs are back ,lmfao at youtube being considered as evidence.

www.debunking911.com

Do they explain what the nutjobs ignore?


Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by KJT1981 on Feb 9th, 2013 at 1:04pm
Bobby says nails is an international business man with uni degrees.

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by The Heartless Felon on Feb 9th, 2013 at 1:37pm

Has anyone told Wharfy about this?

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 9th, 2013 at 1:55pm

Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 1:01pm:
The nutjobs are back ,lmfao at youtube being considered as evidence.

www.debunking911.com

Do they explain what the nutjobs ignore?


Speaking of nutjobs have you found any Weapons of Mass Deception in Iraq yet or are you still looking for them ??

Maybe you will find them one day. Keep looking for those mobile chemical weapons labs too. The last time I saw them was in a comic strip in one of Colonel Powells slide shows to the UN ;D ;D ;D ;D

The war in error ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 9th, 2013 at 2:00pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 12:43pm:
Oh.

I thought that the buildings collapsed because of man-made global warming.

I didn't realise there were planes involved.

Perhaps the planes were affected by man-made global warming   :-/


yeh but there was certainly plenty of oil involved in Iraq. Still can't see the connection though.

The planes need oil so it's all Iraq's fault ;D ;D

There's the connection ;D ;D

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 9th, 2013 at 4:22pm

Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 1:01pm:
The nutjobs are back ,lmfao at youtube being considered as evidence.

www.debunking911.com

Do they explain what the nutjobs ignore?


the link above is a known CIA front and

disinformationalistical misnomerism grounded

within deceit

this inanity and inconsequentialism is forgiven

9/11 was an inside job

carry on regardless

namaste

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 9th, 2013 at 4:24pm

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 11:37am:
My favourite topic on 9/11 because the posts always got deleted on yahoo politics every time there was mention of the never talked about building 7 collapse. Now there are more revelations !!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9b4D-aO3zY


great topic nail..

and yes,the site known as yahoo deleted

much evidences i and others gathered not once

but twice..

so i searched for a new site to deliver truth

circa 2010

blessings unto all hearts

namaste

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by KJT1981 on Feb 9th, 2013 at 4:28pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 4:24pm:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 11:37am:
My favourite topic on 9/11 because the posts always got deleted on yahoo politics every time there was mention of the never talked about building 7 collapse. Now there are more revelations !!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9b4D-aO3zY


great topic nail..

and yes,the site known as yahoo deleted

much evidences i and others gathered not once

but twice..

so i searched for a new site to deliver truth

circa 2010

blessings unto all hearts

namaste

- : )


Both of you are missing grey matter.

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:02pm
why not comment upon the video in the

original post?

limp wristed character assassination

does not effect unto fact

or the intended attack on any said character

does this comfort you?

be at peace

namaste

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:58pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:02pm:
why not comment upon the video in the

original post?

l

- : )



Because it's pointless to comment on the video..you didn't accept the proof that building 7 collapsed due to damage from falling debris, back on the Yahoo boards, and we all know you won't accept it now.

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 9th, 2013 at 6:37pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:58pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:02pm:
why not comment upon the video in the

original post?

l

- : )



Because it's pointless to comment on the video..you didn't accept the proof that building 7 collapsed due to damage from falling debris, back on the Yahoo boards, and we all know you won't accept it now.


Building 7 collapsed with the precision of a controlled demolition and we are supposed to believe that a couple of small fires did this. Even the jew landlord said he had the building pulled which is code speak for bringing it down. That would have taken some pre-planning to achieve that. Go figure !!

Lets take a closer look at the damage to building 7 ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QA9r9sHXs8A

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by longweekend58 on Feb 9th, 2013 at 6:45pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:58pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:02pm:
why not comment upon the video in the

original post?

l

- : )



Because it's pointless to comment on the video..you didn't accept the proof that building 7 collapsed due to damage from falling debris, back on the Yahoo boards, and we all know you won't accept it now.


its just liek house prices. the ABS now confirm that they are rising but liquid-nails will just point to a couple homes on the Gold Coast and declare the ABS wrong.

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 9th, 2013 at 6:53pm

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 6:37pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:58pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:02pm:
why not comment upon the video in the

original post?

l

- : )



Because it's pointless to comment on the video..you didn't accept the proof that building 7 collapsed due to damage from falling debris, back on the Yahoo boards, and we all know you won't accept it now.


Building 7 collapsed with the precision of a controlled demolition and we are supposed to believe that a couple of small fires did this. Even the jew landlord said he had the building pulled which is code speak for bringing it down. That would have taken some pre-planning to achieve that. Go figure !!

Lets take a closer look at the damage to building 7 ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QA9r9sHXs8A


No, not really..they did 'pull it' true...but with cables attached to cranes, to make it fall with in a small area.

And 'a couple of small fires'?? a hole extending between 10 and 20 stories up the side of the building, covering perhaps 1/3 of the height of it...

Yeah, right..

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by longweekend58 on Feb 9th, 2013 at 7:20pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 6:53pm:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 6:37pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:58pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:02pm:
why not comment upon the video in the

original post?

l

- : )



Because it's pointless to comment on the video..you didn't accept the proof that building 7 collapsed due to damage from falling debris, back on the Yahoo boards, and we all know you won't accept it now.


Building 7 collapsed with the precision of a controlled demolition and we are supposed to believe that a couple of small fires did this. Even the jew landlord said he had the building pulled which is code speak for bringing it down. That would have taken some pre-planning to achieve that. Go figure !!

Lets take a closer look at the damage to building 7 ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QA9r9sHXs8A


No, not really..they did 'pull it' true...but with cables attached to cranes, to make it fall with in a small area.

And 'a couple of small fires'?? a hole extending between 10 and 20 stories up the side of the building, covering perhaps 1/3 of the height of it...

Yeah, right..


as soon as you read the totally unneccesary 'jew' (landlord) comment you know this is standard conspiracy theory stuff.

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 9th, 2013 at 7:27pm

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 6:45pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:58pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:02pm:
why not comment upon the video in the

original post?

l

- : )



Because it's pointless to comment on the video..you didn't accept the proof that building 7 collapsed due to damage from falling debris, back on the Yahoo boards, and we all know you won't accept it now.


its just liek house prices. the ABS now confirm that they are rising but liquid-nails will just point to a couple homes on the Gold Coast and declare the ABS wrong.


Are these the same ABS statistics that always give us 5% unemployment ;D ;D

and whose buying anyway dickhead ??

Look at retail spending. People can't even afford to buy a mars bar these days let alone an overpriced house.

ABS statistics ;D what a joke you are coming up with that bullsh.t.

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 9th, 2013 at 7:31pm

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 7:20pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 6:53pm:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 6:37pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:58pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:02pm:
why not comment upon the video in the

original post?

l

- : )



Because it's pointless to comment on the video..you didn't accept the proof that building 7 collapsed due to damage from falling debris, back on the Yahoo boards, and we all know you won't accept it now.


Building 7 collapsed with the precision of a controlled demolition and we are supposed to believe that a couple of small fires did this. Even the jew landlord said he had the building pulled which is code speak for bringing it down. That would have taken some pre-planning to achieve that. Go figure !!

Lets take a closer look at the damage to building 7 ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QA9r9sHXs8A


No, not really..they did 'pull it' true...but with cables attached to cranes, to make it fall with in a small area.

And 'a couple of small fires'?? a hole extending between 10 and 20 stories up the side of the building, covering perhaps 1/3 of the height of it...

Yeah, right..


as soon as you read the totally unneccesary 'jew' (landlord) comment you know this is standard conspiracy theory stuff.


well it's funny how he just happens to own all of the buildings that collapsed like they were demolished and the other damaged ones still were standing ;)

Just listen to his words and look at building 7 collapse and tell us that you don't honestly believe that all of this was the work of osama bin empty just because George wanker bush said so ;D

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 9th, 2013 at 7:33pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 6:53pm:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 6:37pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:58pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:02pm:
why not comment upon the video in the

original post?

l

- : )



Because it's pointless to comment on the video..you didn't accept the proof that building 7 collapsed due to damage from falling debris, back on the Yahoo boards, and we all know you won't accept it now.


Building 7 collapsed with the precision of a controlled demolition and we are supposed to believe that a couple of small fires did this. Even the jew landlord said he had the building pulled which is code speak for bringing it down. That would have taken some pre-planning to achieve that. Go figure !!

Lets take a closer look at the damage to building 7 ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QA9r9sHXs8A


No, not really..they did 'pull it' true...but with cables attached to cranes, to make it fall with in a small area.

And 'a couple of small fires'?? a hole extending between 10 and 20 stories up the side of the building, covering perhaps 1/3 of the height of it...

Yeah, right..


what cables and cranes ??

give it up gizmo ;D

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 9th, 2013 at 9:55pm

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 7:33pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 6:53pm:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 6:37pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:58pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:02pm:
why not comment upon the video in the

original post?

l

- : )



Because it's pointless to comment on the video..you didn't accept the proof that building 7 collapsed due to damage from falling debris, back on the Yahoo boards, and we all know you won't accept it now.


Building 7 collapsed with the precision of a controlled demolition and we are supposed to believe that a couple of small fires did this. Even the jew landlord said he had the building pulled which is code speak for bringing it down. That would have taken some pre-planning to achieve that. Go figure !!

Lets take a closer look at the damage to building 7 ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QA9r9sHXs8A


No, not really..they did 'pull it' true...but with cables attached to cranes, to make it fall with in a small area.

And 'a couple of small fires'?? a hole extending between 10 and 20 stories up the side of the building, covering perhaps 1/3 of the height of it...

Yeah, right..


what cables and cranes ??

give it up gizmo ;D


And, as demonstrated in this video (of the 'pulling' of 'building 6'), much the same method used on WTC 7
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1uxlrcQL5Dk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uxlrcQL5Dk&feature=player_detailpage


THESE cables and cranes
image004.jpg (23 KB | 26 )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 10th, 2013 at 6:48am
i am glad to see the id gizmo has actually commented

on the topic rather than abuse for a change,

so gizmo now says they did it with cranes and

cables?

as your evidence here this video you supply..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uxlrcQL5Dk



they pulled it huh gizmo?

you admit it then?

they pulled it and the building did'nt actually collapse

due to falling debris which in turn caused building

7 to collapse in the exact manner the twins fell?

please explain yourself here gizmo

as i would like to see how these "cables and cranes"

can make a building as tall as building 7

fall at free-fall

in the same manner as the building 7 demolition here

also please explain the blast squibs at 1:31 ******

[ we have caught you now ]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2hfqSrxg30

Was Building 7 A Controlled Demolition? You Be The Judge - The Time Is Now

[ the id gizmo has severely stuffed up

,cables and cranes ???????????? .... ]

blessings

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by The Heartless Felon on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:00am

Damn! Someone told Wharfy...

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 10th, 2013 at 11:01am

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 9:55pm:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 7:33pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 6:53pm:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 6:37pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:58pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:02pm:
why not comment upon the video in the

original post?

l

- : )



Because it's pointless to comment on the video..you didn't accept the proof that building 7 collapsed due to damage from falling debris, back on the Yahoo boards, and we all know you won't accept it now.


Building 7 collapsed with the precision of a controlled demolition and we are supposed to believe that a couple of small fires did this. Even the jew landlord said he had the building pulled which is code speak for bringing it down. That would have taken some pre-planning to achieve that. Go figure !!

Lets take a closer look at the damage to building 7 ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QA9r9sHXs8A


No, not really..they did 'pull it' true...but with cables attached to cranes, to make it fall with in a small area.

And 'a couple of small fires'?? a hole extending between 10 and 20 stories up the side of the building, covering perhaps 1/3 of the height of it...

Yeah, right..


what cables and cranes ??

give it up gizmo ;D


And, as demonstrated in this video (of the 'pulling' of 'building 6'), much the same method used on WTC 7
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1uxlrcQL5Dk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uxlrcQL5Dk&feature=player_detailpage


THESE cables and cranes


that's building 6 not building 7 and building 6 was nearly completely destroyed by the neigbouring WTC buildings.

Have you seen building 7 ? You're not going to pull a 30 or 40 story high building still in tact with a couple of cranes. Get real will you !!

It's a controlled demolition for sure and that takes months of planning !!

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 10th, 2013 at 11:10am

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 6:48am:
i am glad to see the id gizmo has actually commented

on the topic rather than abuse for a change,

so gizmo now says they did it with cranes and

cables?

as your evidence here this video you supply..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uxlrcQL5Dk



they pulled it huh gizmo?

you admit it then?

they pulled it and the building did'nt actually collapse

due to falling debris which in turn caused building

7 to collapse in the exact manner the twins fell?

please explain yourself here gizmo

as i would like to see how these "cables and cranes"

can make a building as tall as building 7

fall at free-fall

in the same manner as the building 7 demolition here

also please explain the blast squibs at 1:31 ******

[ we have caught you now ]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2hfqSrxg30

Was Building 7 A Controlled Demolition? You Be The Judge - The Time Is Now

[ the id gizmo has severely stuffed up

,cables and cranes ???????????? .... ]

blessings

- : )


LOL oh wharfy..

Yes it was collapsing due to damage from falling debris, the 'pulling' (with cranes and cables) was to control where it landed. 

Very similar idea to precision felling a big tree in restricted space,tree fellers sometimes use ropes to aim the fall..

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 10th, 2013 at 11:16am

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 11:01am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 9:55pm:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 7:33pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 6:53pm:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 6:37pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:58pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:02pm:
why not comment upon the video in the

original post?

l

- : )



Because it's pointless to comment on the video..you didn't accept the proof that building 7 collapsed due to damage from falling debris, back on the Yahoo boards, and we all know you won't accept it now.


Building 7 collapsed with the precision of a controlled demolition and we are supposed to believe that a couple of small fires did this. Even the jew landlord said he had the building pulled which is code speak for bringing it down. That would have taken some pre-planning to achieve that. Go figure !!

Lets take a closer look at the damage to building 7 ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QA9r9sHXs8A


No, not really..they did 'pull it' true...but with cables attached to cranes, to make it fall with in a small area.

And 'a couple of small fires'?? a hole extending between 10 and 20 stories up the side of the building, covering perhaps 1/3 of the height of it...

Yeah, right..


what cables and cranes ??

give it up gizmo ;D


And, as demonstrated in this video (of the 'pulling' of 'building 6'), much the same method used on WTC 7
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1uxlrcQL5Dk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uxlrcQL5Dk&feature=player_detailpage


THESE cables and cranes


that's building 6 not building 7 and building 6 was nearly completely damaged by the neigbouring WTC buildings.

Have you seen building 7 ? You're not going to pull a 30 or 40 story high building still in tact with a couple of cranes. Get real will you !!

It's controlled demolition for sure and that takes months of planning !!


point one: WTC 7 was 47 stories tall.
point two: It wasn't even close to intact, it had about 30% of the  lower part of south side destroyed.


Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 10th, 2013 at 11:46am

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 11:10am:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 6:48am:
i am glad to see the id gizmo has actually commented

on the topic rather than abuse for a change,

so gizmo now says they did it with cranes and

cables?

as your evidence here this video you supply..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uxlrcQL5Dk



they pulled it huh gizmo?

you admit it then?

they pulled it and the building did'nt actually collapse

due to falling debris which in turn caused building

7 to collapse in the exact manner the twins fell?

please explain yourself here gizmo

as i would like to see how these "cables and cranes"

can make a building as tall as building 7

fall at free-fall

in the same manner as the building 7 demolition here

also please explain the blast squibs at 1:31 ******

[ we have caught you now ]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2hfqSrxg30

Was Building 7 A Controlled Demolition? You Be The Judge - The Time Is Now

[ the id gizmo has severely stuffed up

,cables and cranes ???????????? .... ]

blessings

- : )


LOL oh wharfy..

Yes it was collapsing due to damage from falling debris, the 'pulling' (with cranes and cables) was to control where it landed. 

Very similar idea to precision felling a big tree in restricted space,tree fellers sometimes use ropes to aim the fall..


so no need for controlled explosives to pull a huge building down when you can do it with cranes and a couple of ropes ;D ;D

how come they still use explosives when cranes can do just as good a job ;D ;D

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 10th, 2013 at 12:43pm

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 11:46am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 11:10am:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 6:48am:
i am glad to see the id gizmo has actually commented

on the topic rather than abuse for a change,

so gizmo now says they did it with cranes and

cables?

as your evidence here this video you supply..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uxlrcQL5Dk



they pulled it huh gizmo?

you admit it then?

they pulled it and the building did'nt actually collapse

due to falling debris which in turn caused building

7 to collapse in the exact manner the twins fell?

please explain yourself here gizmo

as i would like to see how these "cables and cranes"

can make a building as tall as building 7

fall at free-fall

in the same manner as the building 7 demolition here

also please explain the blast squibs at 1:31 ******

[ we have caught you now ]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2hfqSrxg30

Was Building 7 A Controlled Demolition? You Be The Judge - The Time Is Now

[ the id gizmo has severely stuffed up

,cables and cranes ???????????? .... ]

blessings

- : )


LOL oh wharfy..

Yes it was collapsing due to damage from falling debris, the 'pulling' (with cranes and cables) was to control where it landed. 

Very similar idea to precision felling a big tree in restricted space,tree fellers sometimes use ropes to aim the fall..


so need for controlled explosives to pull a huge building down when you can do it with cranes and a couple of ropes ;D ;D

how come they still use explosives when cranes can do just as good a job ;D ;D


yeah nail i know...still though

gizmo wont explain the demolition squibs

going off ( @ 1:31 )

in the footage of building 7 collapse i provided...

...why is that do you think?

namaste

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 10th, 2013 at 1:13pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 11:16am:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 11:01am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 9:55pm:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 7:33pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 6:53pm:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 6:37pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:58pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:02pm:
why not comment upon the video in the

original post?

l

- : )



Because it's pointless to comment on the video..you didn't accept the proof that building 7 collapsed due to damage from falling debris, back on the Yahoo boards, and we all know you won't accept it now.


Building 7 collapsed with the precision of a controlled demolition and we are supposed to believe that a couple of small fires did this. Even the jew landlord said he had the building pulled which is code speak for bringing it down. That would have taken some pre-planning to achieve that. Go figure !!

Lets take a closer look at the damage to building 7 ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QA9r9sHXs8A


No, not really..they did 'pull it' true...but with cables attached to cranes, to make it fall with in a small area.

And 'a couple of small fires'?? a hole extending between 10 and 20 stories up the side of the building, covering perhaps 1/3 of the height of it...

Yeah, right..


what cables and cranes ??

give it up gizmo ;D


And, as demonstrated in this video (of the 'pulling' of 'building 6'), much the same method used on WTC 7
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1uxlrcQL5Dk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uxlrcQL5Dk&feature=player_detailpage


THESE cables and cranes


that's building 6 not building 7 and building 6 was nearly completely damaged by the neigbouring WTC buildings.

Have you seen building 7 ? You're not going to pull a 30 or 40 story high building still in tact with a couple of cranes. Get real will you !!

It's controlled demolition for sure and that takes months of planning !!


point one: WTC 7 was 47 stories tall.
point two: It wasn't even close to intact, it had about 30% of the  lower part of south side destroyed.


Just watch it again. It's a text book controlled demolition !! It takes months of planning and burying explosives in the right place to get a building to fall like that without effecting the surrounding structures and you are trying to tell us that a handful of crane drivers risked their lives to achieve the impossible demolition ;D ;D

Also why wasn't this building ever mentioned on the news at the time ? There was never any mention of it at all nor was there any pictures !! Not to mention countless deleted posts on yahoo politics. How come ?





Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 10th, 2013 at 3:26pm

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 1:13pm:
Just watch it again. It's a text book controlled demolition !! It takes months of planning and burying explosives in the right place to get a building to fall like that without effecting the surrounding structures and you are trying to tell us that a handful of crane drivers risked their lives to achieve the impossible demolition ;D ;D

Also why wasn't this building ever mentioned on the news at the time ? There was never any mention of it at all nor was there any pictures !! Not to mention countless deleted posts on yahoo politics. How come ?


Yes, rusty, you're absolutely correct....they set the demolition charges months in advance, then mind-controlled every person who went into the building, so that they just couldn't see that the floor and walls were covered with over 300 kilometres of electrical cables and 200 kilograms of plastic explosives..

By the way, I heard the other day, giant meteorites crash into Sydney harbour every second Thursday...but the Government and the Press covers it up...

(the proceeding has been a sarcastic comment, no responsibility taken for damage to fragile worldviews)

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by Baronvonrort on Feb 10th, 2013 at 4:59pm

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 1:13pm:
Just watch it again. It's a text book controlled demolition !! It takes months of planning and burying explosives in the right place to get a building to fall like that.


Tin foil hats are in aisle 5.




Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 10th, 2013 at 5:22pm
tin foil hats?

whats that going to do against a shape shifting

energy sucking entity?

that is so 70's

we use orgonite these days and blast the negative

aspect that attempts to take out we humans these days

here..











we are armed , but not limited ,to the teeth

onward to victory!

namaste

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 10th, 2013 at 5:51pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 3:26pm:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 1:13pm:
Just watch it again. It's a text book controlled demolition !! It takes months of planning and burying explosives in the right place to get a building to fall like that without effecting the surrounding structures and you are trying to tell us that a handful of crane drivers risked their lives to achieve the impossible demolition ;D ;D

Also why wasn't this building ever mentioned on the news at the time ? There was never any mention of it at all nor was there any pictures !! Not to mention countless deleted posts on yahoo politics. How come ?


Yes, rusty, you're absolutely correct....they set the demolition charges months in advance, then mind-controlled every person who went into the building, so that they just couldn't see that the floor and walls were covered with over 300 kilometres of electrical cables and 200 kilograms of plastic explosives..

By the way, I heard the other day, giant meteorites crash into Sydney harbour every second Thursday...but the Government and the Press covers it up...

(the proceeding has been a sarcastic comment, no responsibility taken for damage to fragile worldviews)


or there is the other version that you believe in. Some dude in a cave in Afghanistan organized all of this and nobody knew about  it until after the event ;D ;D ;D

then of course we were led to believe he had friends in Iraq who possessed very dangerous weapons that were invisible to the naked eye ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 10th, 2013 at 6:24pm

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 5:51pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 3:26pm:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 1:13pm:
Just watch it again. It's a text book controlled demolition !! It takes months of planning and burying explosives in the right place to get a building to fall like that without effecting the surrounding structures and you are trying to tell us that a handful of crane drivers risked their lives to achieve the impossible demolition ;D ;D

Also why wasn't this building ever mentioned on the news at the time ? There was never any mention of it at all nor was there any pictures !! Not to mention countless deleted posts on yahoo politics. How come ?


Yes, rusty, you're absolutely correct....they set the demolition charges months in advance, then mind-controlled every person who went into the building, so that they just couldn't see that the floor and walls were covered with over 300 kilometres of electrical cables and 200 kilograms of plastic explosives..

By the way, I heard the other day, giant meteorites crash into Sydney harbour every second Thursday...but the Government and the Press covers it up...

(the proceeding has been a sarcastic comment, no responsibility taken for damage to fragile worldviews)


or there is the other version that you believe in. Some dude in a cave in Afghanistan organized all of this and nobody knew about  it until after the event ;D ;D ;D

then of course we were led to believe he had friends in Iraq who possessed very dangerous weapons that were invisible to the naked eye ;D ;D ;D


Never said 'nobody knew about it'...Quite happy to accept that a small group of people had foreknowledge and did nothing..

That's entire different to 'the US Government managed to do it all, and nobody chickened out or blew the whistle'.


Oh, and on the subject of controlled demolitions...the largest and tallest building ever demolished by controlled implosion was the J.L Hudson Dept store in Detroit in 1998. It was 29 stories tall, and had a floor area of 723,422 sq ft (67,208.1 m2).
On the other hand, WTC 7 was 47 stories tall with 1,868,000 sq ft (173,500 m2) of just rentable office space..

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 10th, 2013 at 6:27pm

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 11:37am:
My favourite topic on 9/11 because the posts always got deleted on yahoo politics every time there was mention of the never talked about building 7 collapse. Now there are more revelations !!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9b4D-aO3zY



Great video Nail.

Looks there needs to be another investigation into 911.

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:30pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2hfqSrxg30

another investigation you say?

squib charges @ 1:31 bringing the building 7 down.

the evidence is in and all across the globe

do you think the entity that took this video

knew what was happening upon that day?

trials are now on,

expect more arrests

be at peace

as the curtain falls

namaste

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:37pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:30pm:
expect more arrests[/highlight]
be at peace

as the curtain falls

namaste

- : )



Dear naive one - the only arrests will be for those who expose the evil.

forgiven

namaste

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:39pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:30pm:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2hfqSrxg30

another investigation you say?

squib charges @ 1:31 bringing the building 7 down.

the evidence is in and all across the globe

trials are now on,

expect more arrests

be at peace

as the curtain falls

namaste

- : )


Would you care to give any details as to exactly who is on trial, and in which countries??

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:41pm

Bobby. wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:37pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:30pm:
expect more arrests[/highlight]
be at peace

as the curtain falls

namaste

- : )



Dear naive one - the only arrests will be for those who expose the evil.

forgiven

namaste


........grasshopper

i sense fear in thee

thou ist not a finite being

deny?

forgiven

namaste

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:43pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:30pm:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2hfqSrxg30

another investigation you say?

squib charges @ 1:31 bringing the building 7 down.

the evidence is in and all across the globe

do you think the entity that took this video

knew what was happening upon that day?

trials are now on,

expect more arrests

be at peace

as the curtain falls

namaste

- : )


trial by the public

its all over the interwebs and awareness mass

global consciousness

not everyone watches footy these days

too much calf blood in the veins and suchnesses

namaste

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:46pm

Bobby. wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:37pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:30pm:
expect more arrests[/highlight]
be at peace

as the curtain falls

namaste

- : )



Dear naive one - the only arrests will be for those who expose the evil.

forgiven

namaste


any comment upon the footage

of the building collapsing?

the id gizmo is welcome to address the court as well

@ circa 1:31 ?

im interested in your opinion

blessings

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:48pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:41pm:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:37pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:30pm:
expect more arrests[/highlight]
be at peace

as the curtain falls

namaste

- : )



Dear naive one - the only arrests will be for those who expose the evil.

forgiven

namaste


........grasshopper

i sense fear in thee

thou ist not a finite being

deny?

forgiven

namaste

- : )



Dear master Light,
have you forgotten the video I posted on the fate
of anyone who exposes the truth on 911?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiHU

you are forgiven according to the DP.

namaste

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:53pm
"tin foil hats at isle 5"


it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 5:22pm:
tin foil hats?

whats that going to do against a shape shifting

energy sucking entity?

that is so 70's

we use orgonite these days and blast the negative

aspect that attempts to take out we humans these days

here..











we are armed , but not limited ,to the teeth

onward to victory!

namaste

- : )




Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:54pm

Bobby. wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:48pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:41pm:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:37pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:30pm:
expect more arrests[/highlight]
be at peace

as the curtain falls

namaste

- : )



Dear naive one - the only arrests will be for those who expose the evil.

forgiven

namaste


........grasshopper

i sense fear in thee

thou ist not a finite being

deny?

forgiven

namaste

- : )



Dear master Light,
have you forgotten the video I posted on the fate
of anyone who exposes the truth on 911?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiHU

you are forgiven according to the DP.

namaste


you forgot to comment upon 1:31 into the footage

blessings

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 10th, 2013 at 8:04pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:54pm:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:48pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:41pm:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:37pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:30pm:
expect more arrests[/highlight]
be at peace

as the curtain falls

namaste

- : )



Dear naive one - the only arrests will be for those who expose the evil.

forgiven

namaste


........grasshopper

i sense fear in thee

thou ist not a finite being

deny?

forgiven

namaste

- : )



Dear master Light,
have you forgotten the video I posted on the fate
of anyone who exposes the truth on 911?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiHU

you are forgiven according to the DP.

namaste


you forgot to comment upon 1:31 into the footage

blessings

- : )



Dear master LIght,
I am too scared to give my opinion lest I become a victim of the 911 truth persecution.

blessings

namaste

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 10th, 2013 at 8:19pm
Dear master LIght,
I am too scared to give my opinion lest I become a victim of the 911 truth persecution.

___________

you are an honest and highly regarded being

of light.

this is eternal fact

be at peace beloved brother being

all is well

namaste

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 10th, 2013 at 8:25pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:43pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 7:30pm:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2hfqSrxg30

another investigation you say?

squib charges @ 1:31 bringing the building 7 down.

the evidence is in and all across the globe

do you think the entity that took this video

knew what was happening upon that day?

trials are now on,

expect more arrests

be at peace

as the curtain falls

namaste

- : )


trial by the public

its all over the interwebs and awareness mass

global consciousness

not everyone watches footy these days

too much calf blood in the veins and suchnesses

namaste

- : )


Ahhh so, not a trial that has any jurisdiction, or ability to enact penalties......or indeed, any need to bother with such silly complications as 'Truth' or 'Justice'.. :D :D :D :D :D

(edit) And no power to actually make any arrests either...so much for 'expect more arrests'?....Shouldn't that have been 'don't expect any arrests'??

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 10th, 2013 at 8:29pm
the id gizmo forgets to comment upon this footage

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2hfqSrxg30

particularly @1:31

im interested in your take of the

footage in question here

blessings

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 10th, 2013 at 8:33pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZmSHTiYa2M

lets see it again from a different angle

another point of reference and footage of

building 7 collapse

have a quick look only 48 seconds here

very good footage what do you think gizmo?

im interested in your take here

namaste

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 10th, 2013 at 8:35pm
and here

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=972ETepp4GI

17 million views and counting

whats your take on this gizmo?

im interested in your take here also

namaste

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 10th, 2013 at 9:34pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 8:33pm:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZmSHTiYa2M

lets see it again from a different angle

another point of reference and footage of

building 7 collapse

have a quick look only 48 seconds here

very good footage what do you think gizmo?

im interested in your take here

namaste

- : )


it was osama bin empty shooting at the windows ;D

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 10th, 2013 at 10:03pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 8:35pm:
and here

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=972ETepp4GI

17 million views and counting

whats your take on this gizmo?

im interested in your take here also

namaste

- : )


What's my take on it..humour..The 'highlighted' bits were the big windows breaking under the stress of the collapse..

1) That's the wrong place for demo charges.
2) During the 2nd play through...the widows didn't go until AFTER the collapse started, demo charges should have gone off several seconds prior to the collapse, not a couple of seconds after it started.

Real video, fantasy theory.

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 10th, 2013 at 10:10pm

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 9:34pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 8:33pm:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZmSHTiYa2M

lets see it again from a different angle

another point of reference and footage of

building 7 collapse

have a quick look only 48 seconds here

very good footage what do you think gizmo?

im interested in your take here

namaste

- : )


it was osama bin empty shooting at the windows ;D


yeah they are still looking for those

intercontinental alqaeda rifles..

looks like itd be a good bit of gear if it exists..

and if your into that type of caper

namaste

- : )



Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 10th, 2013 at 10:14pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 10:03pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 8:35pm:
and here

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=972ETepp4GI

17 million views and counting

whats your take on this gizmo?

im interested in your take here also

namaste

- : )


What's my take on it..humour..The 'highlighted' bits were the big windows breaking under the stress of the collapse..

1) That's the wrong place for demo charges.
2) During the 2nd play through...the widows didn't go until AFTER the collapse started, demo charges should have gone off several seconds prior to the collapse, not a couple of seconds after it started.

Real video, fantasy theory.


hey thanks unto you id gizmo

for your considered comment

so at 1:31 what is happening

with all the charges going off

as you see the lights going off in synchronicity?

is it one of those intercontinental rifles

nail is alluding to?

blessings

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 10th, 2013 at 10:29pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 10:14pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 10:03pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 8:35pm:
and here

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=972ETepp4GI

17 million views and counting

whats your take on this gizmo?

im interested in your take here also

namaste

- : )


What's my take on it..humour..The 'highlighted' bits were the big windows breaking under the stress of the collapse..

1) That's the wrong place for demo charges.
2) During the 2nd play through...the widows didn't go until AFTER the collapse started, demo charges should have gone off several seconds prior to the collapse, not a couple of seconds after it started.

Real video, fantasy theory.


hey thanks unto you id gizmo

for your considered comment

so at 1:31 what is happening

with all the charges going off

as you see the lights going off in synchronicity?

is it one of those intercontinental rifles

nail is alluding to?

blessings

- : )


No, once again, at 1:31, what you see is NOT charges going off, but windows shattering from the stress of the collapse..

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 10th, 2013 at 10:54pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 10:29pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 10:14pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 10:03pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 8:35pm:
and here

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=972ETepp4GI

17 million views and counting

whats your take on this gizmo?

im interested in your take here also

namaste

- : )


What's my take on it..humour..The 'highlighted' bits were the big windows breaking under the stress of the collapse..

1) That's the wrong place for demo charges.
2) During the 2nd play through...the widows didn't go until AFTER the collapse started, demo charges should have gone off several seconds prior to the collapse, not a couple of seconds after it started.

Real video, fantasy theory.


hey thanks unto you id gizmo

for your considered comment

so at 1:31 what is happening

with all the charges going off

as you see the lights going off in synchronicity?

is it one of those intercontinental rifles

nail is alluding to?

blessings

- : )


No, once again, at 1:31, what you see is NOT charges going off, but windows shattering from the stress of the collapse..


windows on fire eh ;D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZmSHTiYa2M

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 10th, 2013 at 11:10pm

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 10:54pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 10:29pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 10:14pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 10:03pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 8:35pm:
and here

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=972ETepp4GI

17 million views and counting

whats your take on this gizmo?

im interested in your take here also

namaste

- : )


What's my take on it..humour..The 'highlighted' bits were the big windows breaking under the stress of the collapse..

1) That's the wrong place for demo charges.
2) During the 2nd play through...the widows didn't go until AFTER the collapse started, demo charges should have gone off several seconds prior to the collapse, not a couple of seconds after it started.

Real video, fantasy theory.


hey thanks unto you id gizmo

for your considered comment

so at 1:31 what is happening

with all the charges going off

as you see the lights going off in synchronicity?

is it one of those intercontinental rifles

nail is alluding to?

blessings

- : )


No, once again, at 1:31, what you see is NOT charges going off, but windows shattering from the stress of the collapse..


windows on fire eh ;D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZmSHTiYa2M


If you say so nails..


Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 6:14am

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 10th, 2013 at 8:19pm:
Dear master LIght,
I am too scared to give my opinion lest I become a victim of the 911 truth persecution.

___________

you are an honest and highly regarded being

of light.

this is eternal fact

be at peace beloved brother being

all is well

namaste

- : )


Thanks master Light,

The truth will be revealed officially one day but not in our lifetimes.

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 11th, 2013 at 7:02am
The truth will be revealed officially one day but not in our lifetimes.

_____________

this is your incorrect interpretation which results from

the fear you comfort

this is ok and cool,however

you can not speak with any validity and reference

other than that of said fear which is in and of itself

illusion,it is so...

and so it is the fact that you can quite factually not

comment with any authority here being within

said fear and say never never not in our lifetimes

this is the fear talking and shuddering from that which

you think is all powerful evil,it may seem so yes

the program of fear however,

fear not ...be at peace

love is the most powerful frequency in existence

do you deny this fact? im interested,

for the one is the all and the all are

the one

so be it

namaste

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 11th, 2013 at 7:07am
No, once again, at 1:31, what you see is NOT charges going off, but windows shattering from the stress of the collapse..

_____________

hey great gizmo,thanks for your continued

and considered responses,

can you explain why the windows shatter in a column

instead of all the windows?

why do the windows shatter in a straight vertical line?

and also why do these windows that are shattering

flash/bang in the same vertical context

we focus on here?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZmSHTiYa2M

im interested in your take upon as much

many blessings

namaste

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 7:18am

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 7:02am:
The truth will be revealed officially one day but not in our lifetimes.

_____________

this is your incorrect interpretation which results from

the fear you comfort

this is ok and cool,however

you can not speak with any validity and reference

other than that of said fear which is in and of itself

illusion,it is so...

and so it is the fact that you can quite factually not

comment with any authority here being within

said fear and say never never not in our lifetimes

this is the fear talking and shuddering from that which

you think is all powerful evil,it may seem so yes

the program of fear however,

fear not ...be at peace

love is the most powerful frequency in existence

do you deny this fact? im interested,

for the one is the all and the all are

the one

so be it

namaste

- : )



Dear master Light,
I am not fearful except as per the video posted before where
revealers of the truth were murdered by the state.

forgiven for your misunderstanding

namaste

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 11th, 2013 at 7:27am
Dear master Light,
I am not fearful except as per the video posted before where
revealers of the truth were murdered by the state.

forgiven for your misunderstanding

namaste

____________

you misrepresent forgiveness and take it

out of context for you factually say

"Dear master LIght,
I am too scared to give my opinion lest I become a victim of the 911 truth persecution."

thus then you are in fear to comment

effectively hindering your response

it is of fear that you can not comment

upon as much for perceived reprisal of the boogy man

coming to get you

so you stay from truth which you know yet

shall not utter,

you have no authority to forgive in the context

you convey as you are by your own admission scared.

this is ok and cool

however

does not effect the facts of the matter

of which you are in fear

be at peace

you have been taken out of the argument

until you comment from truth instead of your fear

i await your truthful response

you are forgiven until this eventuates

namaste

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 9:20am
Dear master Light,
Your forgiveness is accepted.

My comment is that the collapse of building 7 appears to be a controlled demolition.

How this would have happened - I don't know -
as it would have taken longer than just a few hours to place the charges.

It would not have been possible to place those charges without everyone who worked
in the building over the previous few months knowing.

The whole story remains a mystery.

with blessings

namaste

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 11th, 2013 at 10:26am

Bobby. wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 9:20am:
Dear master Light,
Your forgiveness is accepted.

My comment is that the collapse of building 7 appears to be a controlled demolition.

How this would have happened - I don't know -
as it would have taken longer than just a few hours to place the charges.

It would not have been possible to place those charges without everyone who worked
in the building over the previous few months knowing.

The whole story remains a mystery.

with blessings

namaste


I think I can shed some light on that ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ygitqkl9-5M

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 11th, 2013 at 10:34am

Bobby. wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 9:20am:
Dear master Light,
Your forgiveness is accepted.

My comment is that the collapse of building 7 appears to be a controlled demolition.

How this would have happened - I don't know -
as it would have taken longer than just a few hours to place the charges.

It would not have been possible to place those charges without everyone who worked
in the building over the previous few months knowing.

The whole story remains a mystery.

with blessings

namaste


brother being blessings as the trumpets begin to sound!

you pass yet another obstacle and test!

as you step closer to

the divine

i send gratitude and divine frequencies

unto your sacred heart

be at peace as you step in time

with the host of heaven

onward to victory!!!!!!!!!

namaste!

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 11th, 2013 at 10:39am
more great info lastnail

as we step closer to this truth of

building 7 and why this was done

blessings unto your heart

another much loved warrior of LIGHT

namaste

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 10:50am

Bobby. wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 9:20am:
Dear master Light,
Your forgiveness is accepted.

My comment is that the collapse of building 7 appears to be a controlled demolition.

How this would have happened - I don't know -
as it would have taken longer than just a few hours to place the charges.

It would not have been possible to place those charges without everyone who worked
in the building over the previous few months knowing.

The whole story remains a mystery.

with blessings

namaste


And that's really the problem, isn't it Bobby...
It can't be a controlled demolition because you can't set one up in the time available, without everyone knowing.
So unless there was a suicide pact involving all the staff and visitors to the buildings, it HAD to be a collapse due to fire/impact damage....no matter what 'inconsistencies' people have 'found' or imagined.

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 11th, 2013 at 11:07am
It can't be a controlled demolition because you can't set one up in the time available, without everyone knowing.

_______________

under "national security" need to know basis

this is quite factual as everyone does not know

do you deny this id gizmo?

you had better get some nay sayers on board,

for the way i do observe it this is 3 knowing here

and you 1 denier

the facts remains whether you are on said

" need to know " or not

this was facilitated by marvin bush the security chief

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911security.html

9/11 Security
Courtesy of Marvin Bush

Marvin P. Bush, the president’s younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport. The company, Burns noted, was backed by KuwAm, a Kuwaiti-American investment firm on whose board Marvin Burns also served. [Utne]
According to its present CEO, Barry McDaniel, the company had an ongoing contract to handle security at the World Trade Center "up to the day the buildings fell down."

The company lists as government clients "the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S Air force, and the Department of Justice," in projects that "often require state-of-the-art security solutions for classified or high-risk government sites."

Stratesec (Securacom) differs from other security companies which separate the function of consultant from that of service provider. The company defines itself as a "single-source" provider of "end-to-end" security services, including everything from diagnosis of existing systems to hiring subcontractors to installing video and electronic equipment. It also provides armored vehicles and security guards.

The Dulles Internation contract is another matter. Dulles is regarded as "absolutely a sensitive airport," according to security consultant Wayne Black, head of a Florida-based security firm, due to its location, size, and the number of international carriers it serves.

Black has not heard of Stratesec, but responds that for one company to handle security for both airports and airlines is somewhat unusual. It is also delicate for a security firm serving international facilities to be so interlinked with a foreign-owned company: "Somebody knew somebody," he suggested, or the contract would have been more closely scrutinized.

As Black points out, "when you [a company] have a security contract, you know the inner workings of everything." And if another company is linked with the security company, then "What's on your computer is on their computer." [American Reporter]

A heightened WTC security alert was lifted on 9/6/2001...

The World Trade Center was destroyed just days after a heightened security alert was lifted at the landmark 110-story towers, security personnel said yesterday [September 11]. Daria Coard, 37, a guard at Tower One, said the security detail had been working 12-hour shifts for the past two weeks because of numerous phone threats. But on Thursday [September 6], bomb-sniffing dogs were abruptly removed. [NY Newsday]
...there was a power down in WTC 2 the weekend before 9/11...

On the weekend of 9/8, 9/9 there was a 'power down' condition in WTC tower 2, the south tower. This power down condition meant there was no electrical supply for approx 36 hrs from floor 50 up... "Of course without power there were no security cameras, no security locks on doors and many, many 'engineers' coming in and out of the tower." [WingTV]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-I2FO8bLR2Y

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_s5w6uZof00

9/11 WTC Employee Discusses pre 9/11 Power downs.

Uploaded on Sep 16, 2010
Gary Corbett , World Trade Center employee discusses the power down at the WTC the weekend before 9/11.

...Bush's cousin had a fortunate change of venue for a September 11 business conference...

President Bush's cousin should have been in the World Trade Centre when it was attacked. Jim Pierce, managing director of AON Corporations, had arranged a business conference on the 105th floor of the South Tower where its New York offices were based. But his group was too large so they decided to move across the street to the Millennium Hotel. [Annova]
...and it just so happens that Marvin Bush was in New York on 9/11.

Both WTC 6 and WTC 7 were evacuated within minutes of Flight 11 striking WTC 1, but this did not happen in the twin towers. There were no evacuation announcements in WTC 1 following the plane strike, and workers were encouraged to stay in their building...

Dan Baumbach - WTC 1 Survivor:

Dan Baumbach, 24, a software engineer from Merrick, was stunned to find that building officials in One World Trade Center were telling workers not to evacuate even after the first jet struck. "You can try it, but it's at your own risk," he quoted one official as telling a group of 100 people on the 75th floor. Many chose to follow that advice; Baumbach continued his descent from the 80th floor and survived, but only after braving the debris that fell when the neighboring tower collapsed. "The reason we got out was because we didn't listen," he said. [Newsday]
     "In the neighboring south tower people were also evacuating, but an announcement over the PA system tells them their building is secure and they can return to their desks..."
WMV video download (43kB)

Stanley Praimnath - WTC 2 Survivor:


Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 11th, 2013 at 11:08am
'If they had continued on and exited the building, all of their lives would have been spared. As it was, that's not the way it happened. "As soon as we reached the concourse level, the security guard stopped us and said, 'Where are you going?' Stanley explained about seeing the fire in Tower One. According to Stanley, the guard said, "Oh, that was just an accident. Two World Trade is secured. Go back to your office."' [Mercola]
      "Today it is still a mystery why no-one in the towers reached the roof..."

WMV video download (145kB)

The solution to the mystery is simple - the roof doors were locked, as were many stairwell doors.

WTC surveillance tapes feared missing
Imagine my surprise...

Surveillance tapes and maintenance logs are among the missing evidence as investigators try to figure out why the World Trade Center collapsed, federal officials said Monday. ... The lost records probably contain vital information that could help answer questions, Sunder said. Investigators are trying to locate copies of many destroyed documents from the building's owners and city agencies. [FortWayne.com]

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by FriYAY on Feb 11th, 2013 at 11:16am

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 9th, 2013 at 5:02pm:
why not comment upon the video in the

original post?

limp wristed character assassination

does not effect unto fact

or the intended attack on any said character

does this comfort you?

be at peace

namaste

- : )



So when exactly did all those people that were involved on demolishing the WTC building get the time to plant all the explosives? :-?

Oh that’s right, when everyone was at smoko. ;D ;D

Arrrrrrrrrrgh, tin foil hat soooooooooooo tight….. :D :D

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 11th, 2013 at 11:58am
read reply #66 your question has been answered..

watch the videos supplied

drills were conducted in the weeks previous,

shut downs of power as well

of course,

you would have already known that id friyay?

blessings

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 12:10pm

Quote:
brother being blessings as the trumpets begin to sound!

you pass yet another obstacle and test!

as you step closer to

the divine

i send gratitude and divine frequencies

unto your sacred heart

be at peace as you step in time

with the host of heaven

onward to victory!!!!!!!!!

namaste!

- : )


Thankyou master Light,
Grasshopper has learnt a great deal.

namaste

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 12:14pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 11:07am:
It can't be a controlled demolition because you can't set one up in the time available, without everyone knowing.

_______________

under "national security" need to know basis

this is quite factual as everyone does not know

do you deny this id gizmo?

you had better get some nay sayers on board,

for the way i do observe it this is 3 knowing here

and you 1 denier

the facts remains whether you are on said

" need to know " or not

this was facilitated by marvin bush the security chief

:


Which STILL doesn't account for the amount of wiring, det cord, switches and lumps of plastic explosive needed, being totally invisible to all the people who worked in, and visited, the buildings...now does it???

Yes, there are companies who could have rigged the buildings, but that much equipment and that many demolition workers can't be hidden from view....If someone walks into your office, dragging det-cord, 30 metres of wire and a bread loaf sized packet of plastique, you're going to wonder why...

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 12:16pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 12:14pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 11:07am:
It can't be a controlled demolition because you can't set one up in the time available, without everyone knowing.

_______________

under "national security" need to know basis

this is quite factual as everyone does not know

do you deny this id gizmo?

you had better get some nay sayers on board,

for the way i do observe it this is 3 knowing here

and you 1 denier

the facts remains whether you are on said

" need to know " or not

this was facilitated by marvin bush the security chief

:


Which STILL doesn't account for the amount of wiring, det cord, switches and lumps of plastic explosive needed, being totally invisible to all the people who worked in, and visited, the buildings...now does it???

Yes, there are companies who could have rigged the buildings, but that much equipment and that many demolition workers can't be hidden from view....If someone walks into your office, dragging det-cord, 30 metres of wire and a bread loaf sized packet of plastique, you're going to wonder why...


That's right Gizmo - so explain the controlled demolition then?

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 11th, 2013 at 12:21pm

Bobby. wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 12:10pm:

Quote:
brother being blessings as the trumpets begin to sound!

you pass yet another obstacle and test!

as you step closer to

the divine

i send gratitude and divine frequencies

unto your sacred heart

be at peace as you step in time

with the host of heaven

onward to victory!!!!!!!!!

namaste!

- : )


Thankyou master Light,
Grasshopper has learnt a great deal.

namaste


i am in humble service unto

the good of all my beloved brother/sister beings

i may be stern sometimes

however

without malice this does assist others

in overcoming obstacles

are you comforted?

be at peace brother

namaste

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 11th, 2013 at 12:25pm
Which STILL doesn't account for the amount of wiring, det cord, switches and lumps of plastic explosive needed, being totally invisible to all the people who worked in, and visited, the buildings...now does it???

Yes, there are companies who could have rigged the buildings, but that much equipment and that many demolition workers can't be hidden from view....

____________

secret service "need to know" clearance

freemasonic operatives playing dress-ups as

contractors rewiring building turning off power

"power outages" relaying generators so as not

to interrupt 'business as usual' for the unsuspecting

types without a "need to know"

inserting plastique nano thermite and C4 charges

in ceilings and down into wall cavities..

research knowledge is power

there is no argument here for the majority

on this thread now realize that which they did not

'need to know' before

comforted?

sweet

namaste

- : )


Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by FriYAY on Feb 11th, 2013 at 1:50pm
Freemasons put bombs in ceiling, yep, that’s how you demolish massive buildings, put bombs in the ceiling.

Perhaps the building was in on it?

Was WTC a freemason? :o :o :o

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 1:59pm

Bobby. wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 12:16pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 12:14pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 11:07am:
It can't be a controlled demolition because you can't set one up in the time available, without everyone knowing.

_______________

under "national security" need to know basis

this is quite factual as everyone does not know

do you deny this id gizmo?

you had better get some nay sayers on board,

for the way i do observe it this is 3 knowing here

and you 1 denier

the facts remains whether you are on said

" need to know " or not

this was facilitated by marvin bush the security chief

:


Which STILL doesn't account for the amount of wiring, det cord, switches and lumps of plastic explosive needed, being totally invisible to all the people who worked in, and visited, the buildings...now does it???

Yes, there are companies who could have rigged the buildings, but that much equipment and that many demolition workers can't be hidden from view....If someone walks into your office, dragging det-cord, 30 metres of wire and a bread loaf sized packet of plastique, you're going to wonder why...


That's right Gizmo - so explain the controlled demolition then?


Quite simple really...
It WASN'T a controlled demolition. It may have looked similar to one, but since we've established that it couldn't have been one, what does that leave us with??

'Once you have eliminated the impossible, whatever is left, no matter how improbable, must be the truth'.
Arthur Conan Doyle

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by FriYAY on Feb 11th, 2013 at 2:04pm
Was the pentagon set-up for total demolition as well?

And it intrigues me, the plane that went down in the paddock, where was that headed?

Was the intended target also rigged for demolition as well?

Is there a building somewhere full of explosives?

If this building is a freemason, imagine what will happen if it finds it’s own detonation button!!!!!

:P

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 2:08pm

FriYAY wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 2:04pm:
Was the pentagon set-up for total demolition as well?

And it intrigues me, the plane that went down in the paddock, where was that headed?

Was the intended target also rigged for demolition as well?

Is there a building somewhere full of explosives?

If this building is a freemason, imagine what will happen if it finds it’s own detonation button!!!!!

:P


It was headed FOR the paddock....it was owned by the head freemason, and he wanted it plowed for crop planting..

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 2:12pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 12:25pm:
Which STILL doesn't account for the amount of wiring, det cord, switches and lumps of plastic explosive needed, being totally invisible to all the people who worked in, and visited, the buildings...now does it???

Yes, there are companies who could have rigged the buildings, but that much equipment and that many demolition workers can't be hidden from view....

____________

secret service "need to know" clearance

freemasonic operatives playing dress-ups as

contractors rewiring building turning off power

"power outages" relaying generators so as not

to interrupt 'business as usual' for the unsuspecting

types without a "need to know"

inserting plastique nano thermite and C4 charges

in ceilings and down into wall cavities..

research knowledge is power

there is no argument here for the majority

on this thread now realize that which they did not

'need to know' before

comforted?

sweet

namaste

- : )


None of which (ceilings and wall cavities?? since when do high rise buildings have wall cavities?) are structural...so enough explosives planted in those places, to 'bring down' the building would have blown it into fragments straight way, and a lesser amount would have simply blown out the windows and the false ceilings (so all that would have happened was that building would need a paint job, and a 5hit-load of screen doors)

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 2:59pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 1:59pm:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 12:16pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 12:14pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 11:07am:
It can't be a controlled demolition because you can't set one up in the time available, without everyone knowing.

_______________

under "national security" need to know basis

this is quite factual as everyone does not know

do you deny this id gizmo?

you had better get some nay sayers on board,

for the way i do observe it this is 3 knowing here

and you 1 denier

the facts remains whether you are on said

" need to know " or not

this was facilitated by marvin bush the security chief

:


Which STILL doesn't account for the amount of wiring, det cord, switches and lumps of plastic explosive needed, being totally invisible to all the people who worked in, and visited, the buildings...now does it???

Yes, there are companies who could have rigged the buildings, but that much equipment and that many demolition workers can't be hidden from view....If someone walks into your office, dragging det-cord, 30 metres of wire and a bread loaf sized packet of plastique, you're going to wonder why...


That's right Gizmo - so explain the controlled demolition then?


Quite simple really...
It WASN'T a controlled demolition. It may have looked similar to one, but since we've established that it couldn't have been one, what does that leave us with??

'Once you have eliminated the impossible, whatever is left, no matter how improbable, must be the truth'.
Arthur Conan Doyle



But it was a controlled demolition.
The center of the building collapsed first -
you would have noticed that wouldn't you?

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:07pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 2:12pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 12:25pm:
Which STILL doesn't account for the amount of wiring, det cord, switches and lumps of plastic explosive needed, being totally invisible to all the people who worked in, and visited, the buildings...now does it???

Yes, there are companies who could have rigged the buildings, but that much equipment and that many demolition workers can't be hidden from view....

____________

secret service "need to know" clearance

freemasonic operatives playing dress-ups as

contractors rewiring building turning off power

"power outages" relaying generators so as not

to interrupt 'business as usual' for the unsuspecting

types without a "need to know"

inserting plastique nano thermite and C4 charges

in ceilings and down into wall cavities..

research knowledge is power

there is no argument here for the majority

on this thread now realize that which they did not

'need to know' before

comforted?

sweet

namaste

- : )


None of which (ceilings and wall cavities?? since when do high rise buildings have wall cavities?) are structural...so enough explosives planted in those places, to 'bring down' the building would have blown it into fragments straight way, and a lesser amount would have simply blown out the windows and the false ceilings (so all that would have happened was that building would need a paint job, and a 5hit-load of screen doors)


and you reckon they did that with a couple of cranes ;D ;D

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:09pm

Bobby. wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 2:59pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 1:59pm:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 12:16pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 12:14pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 11:07am:
It can't be a controlled demolition because you can't set one up in the time available, without everyone knowing.

_______________

under "national security" need to know basis

this is quite factual as everyone does not know

do you deny this id gizmo?

you had better get some nay sayers on board,

for the way i do observe it this is 3 knowing here

and you 1 denier

the facts remains whether you are on said

" need to know " or not

this was facilitated by marvin bush the security chief

:


Which STILL doesn't account for the amount of wiring, det cord, switches and lumps of plastic explosive needed, being totally invisible to all the people who worked in, and visited, the buildings...now does it???

Yes, there are companies who could have rigged the buildings, but that much equipment and that many demolition workers can't be hidden from view....If someone walks into your office, dragging det-cord, 30 metres of wire and a bread loaf sized packet of plastique, you're going to wonder why...


That's right Gizmo - so explain the controlled demolition then?


Quite simple really...
It WASN'T a controlled demolition. It may have looked similar to one, but since we've established that it couldn't have been one, what does that leave us with??

'Once you have eliminated the impossible, whatever is left, no matter how improbable, must be the truth'.
Arthur Conan Doyle



But it was a controlled demolition.
The center of the building collapsed first -
you would have noticed that wouldn't you?


gizmo only noticed what george bush told him and that was some guy in an elaborate underground cave in the mountains in afghanistan did it all ;D

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:12pm
Nail,

Quote:
Gizmo only noticed what george bush told him and that was some guy in an elaborate underground cave in the mountains in afghanistan did it all


Yes Nail,
Gizmo is a bit naive.

he is forgiven.

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:25pm

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:07pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 2:12pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 12:25pm:
Which STILL doesn't account for the amount of wiring, det cord, switches and lumps of plastic explosive needed, being totally invisible to all the people who worked in, and visited, the buildings...now does it???

Yes, there are companies who could have rigged the buildings, but that much equipment and that many demolition workers can't be hidden from view....

____________

secret service "need to know" clearance

freemasonic operatives playing dress-ups as

contractors rewiring building turning off power

"power outages" relaying generators so as not

to interrupt 'business as usual' for the unsuspecting

types without a "need to know"

inserting plastique nano thermite and C4 charges

in ceilings and down into wall cavities..

research knowledge is power

there is no argument here for the majority

on this thread now realize that which they did not

'need to know' before

comforted?

sweet

namaste

- : )


None of which (ceilings and wall cavities?? since when do high rise buildings have wall cavities?) are structural...so enough explosives planted in those places, to 'bring down' the building would have blown it into fragments straight way, and a lesser amount would have simply blown out the windows and the false ceilings (so all that would have happened was that building would need a paint job, and a 5hit-load of screen doors)


and you reckon they did that with a couple of cranes ;D ;D


You don't ever listen, do you nails???

They didn't 'collapse the building using cranes'....they CONTROLLED the fall, using cranes...entirely different thing.

The building was going to fall anyway, and as is normal under the circumstances, it would have tipped over (towards the south or south-west). All the engineers did was apply tension, in a northerly direction, to the top section of the building. This allowed the lowest floors to crumble and the top portion fell straight down when the support dropped away.
Gravity usually causes objects to fall in perpendicular direction, unless something ( in this case the undamaged side of the building) acts to change the angle of descent..

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by Doctor Jolly on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:25pm

Is it the same people who believe in climate change conspiracies, also believe in 9/11 conspiracies ?

Is there a propensity to be a skeptic in all things if you are from the hard right, or hard left  ?

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:26pm

Bobby. wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:12pm:
Nail,

Quote:
Gizmo only noticed what george bush told him and that was some guy in an elaborate underground cave in the mountains in afghanistan did it all


Yes Nail,
Gizmo is a bit naive.

he is forgiven.


Well I'd rather believe the engineers and investigators (not Bush), than Alex Jones and the assorted dingbats who came up with these conspiracy ideas..

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:29pm

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:25pm:
Is it the same people who believe in climate change conspiracies, also believe in 9/11 conspiracies ?

Is there a propensity to be a skeptic in all things if you are from the hard right, or hard left  ?


LOL no Doc...Lastnails and Bobby BELIEVE in Climate Change, AND in the 9/11 conspiracies as well...
Whereas I'm a skeptic about climate change, and don't believe the 9/11 theory that the US government did it..

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by Doctor Jolly on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:31pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:29pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:25pm:
Is it the same people who believe in climate change conspiracies, also believe in 9/11 conspiracies ?

Is there a propensity to be a skeptic in all things if you are from the hard right, or hard left  ?


LOL no Doc...Lastnails and Bobby BELIEVE in Climate Change, AND in the 9/11 conspiracies as well...
Whereas I'm a skeptic about climate change, and don't believe the 9/11 theory that the US government did it..



You have selective skeptism then ?

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:38pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:29pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:25pm:
Is it the same people who believe in climate change conspiracies, also believe in 9/11 conspiracies.

Is there a propensity to be a skeptic in all things if you are from the hard right, or hard left  ?


LOL no Doc...Lastnails and Bobby BELIEVE in Climate Change, AND in the 9/11 conspiracies as well...
Whereas I'm a skeptic about climate change, and don't believe the 9/11 theory that the US government did it..



At the very least the US government knew the attacks were imminent.

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:53pm

FriYAY wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 2:04pm:
Was the pentagon set-up for total demolition as well?

And it intrigues me, the plane that went down in the paddock, where was that headed?

Was the intended target also rigged for demolition as well?

Is there a building somewhere full of explosives?

If this building is a freemason, imagine what will happen if it finds it’s own detonation button!!!!!

:P


offtopic post and intended smoke screen

stay on the topic of building 7 if you have the care

or start up another 9/11 thread or continue on one

of the many that have already started

this poster has the classic attributes of

covert intelligence operative

or

mear ignorant dupe

this does not effect unto the fact either way

of the building 7 collapse

be at peace

namaste

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:57pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:29pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:25pm:
Is it the same people who believe in climate change conspiracies, also believe in 9/11 conspiracies ?

Is there a propensity to be a skeptic in all things if you are from the hard right, or hard left  ?


LOL no Doc...Lastnails and Bobby BELIEVE in Climate Change, AND in the 9/11 conspiracies as well...
Whereas I'm a skeptic about climate change, and don't believe the 9/11 theory that the US government did it..


And if George tells you something you'd better believe it ;D ;D

BTW have you found the Weapons of Mass Deception in Iraq yet or are you still looking for them ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 11th, 2013 at 4:03pm

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:25pm:
Is it the same people who believe in climate change conspiracies, also believe in 9/11 conspiracies ?

Is there a propensity to be a skeptic in all things if you are from the hard right, or hard left  ?


what about the conspiracy that some dude in an elaborate mountain cave in afghanistan organized it all and that he had friends in Iraq that supplied him with some weapons that didn't actually exist ;D

Not only that after the WTC  buildings came down they miraculously found the passports in tact of the terrorist pilots ;D ;D

you believe that sh.t don't you ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 11th, 2013 at 4:05pm
the id gizmo says

"They didn't 'collapse the building using cranes'....they CONTROLLED the fall, using cranes...entirely different thing."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2hfqSrxg30

i cant see any cranes

also,

BBC reported the building had collapsed when you

can still see building 7 in the background standing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iB0QECqoaI

Uploaded on Mar 1, 2007
An astounding video uncovered from the archives today shows the BBC reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. The incredible footage shows a BBC reporter talking about the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building while it remains standing in the live shot behind her head.

More info at http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/... (more) (less)
Category
News & Politics

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 4:09pm
Dear master Light,
you should forgive these mere ignorant dupes

namaste


Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 4:10pm

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:57pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:29pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:25pm:
Is it the same people who believe in climate change conspiracies, also believe in 9/11 conspiracies ?

Is there a propensity to be a skeptic in all things if you are from the hard right, or hard left  ?


LOL no Doc...Lastnails and Bobby BELIEVE in Climate Change, AND in the 9/11 conspiracies as well...
Whereas I'm a skeptic about climate change, and don't believe the 9/11 theory that the US government did it..


And if George tells you something you'd better believe it ;D ;D

BTW have you found the Weapons of Mass Deception in Iraq yet or are you still looking for them ;D ;D ;D


Nope, they were never there....Iraq didn't have anything to do with WMDs..

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 4:13pm

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:31pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:29pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:25pm:
Is it the same people who believe in climate change conspiracies, also believe in 9/11 conspiracies ?

Is there a propensity to be a skeptic in all things if you are from the hard right, or hard left  ?


LOL no Doc...Lastnails and Bobby BELIEVE in Climate Change, AND in the 9/11 conspiracies as well...
Whereas I'm a skeptic about climate change, and don't believe the 9/11 theory that the US government did it..



You have selective skeptism then ?


LOL no, I just know how easy it is for small groups to make big changes.

So I'm skeptical about both theories. Man made climate change AND government involvement in 9/11.

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 11th, 2013 at 4:15pm

Bobby. wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 4:09pm:
Dear master Light,
you should forgive these mere ignorant dupes

namaste


it is done

blessings brother bobby

- : )

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 4:17pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 4:15pm:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 4:09pm:
Dear master Light,
you should forgive these mere ignorant dupes

namaste


it is done

blessings brother bobby

- : )



Blessings to you too brother Light.
Only you & Nail could shed light on these matters.

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by FriYAY on Feb 11th, 2013 at 4:45pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 4:10pm:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:57pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:29pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:25pm:
Is it the same people who believe in climate change conspiracies, also believe in 9/11 conspiracies ?

Is there a propensity to be a skeptic in all things if you are from the hard right, or hard left  ?


LOL no Doc...Lastnails and Bobby BELIEVE in Climate Change, AND in the 9/11 conspiracies as well...
Whereas I'm a skeptic about climate change, and don't believe the 9/11 theory that the US government did it..


And if George tells you something you'd better believe it ;D ;D

BTW have you found the Weapons of Mass Deception in Iraq yet or are you still looking for them ;D ;D ;D


Nope, they were never there....Iraq didn't have anything to do with WMDs..


Except of course for the ones they used to kill 10,000 odd Kurds.

::)

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by FriYAY on Feb 11th, 2013 at 4:46pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:53pm:

FriYAY wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 2:04pm:
Was the pentagon set-up for total demolition as well?

And it intrigues me, the plane that went down in the paddock, where was that headed?

Was the intended target also rigged for demolition as well?

Is there a building somewhere full of explosives?

If this building is a freemason, imagine what will happen if it finds it’s own detonation button!!!!!

:P


offtopic post and intended smoke screen

stay on the topic of building 7 if you have the care

or start up another 9/11 thread or continue on one

of the many that have already started

this poster has the classic attributes of

covert intelligence operative

or

mear ignorant dupe

this does not effect unto the fact either way

of the building 7 collapse

be at peace

namaste

- : )


No answer.

Not forgiven.

:o

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 5:07pm

FriYAY wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 4:45pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 4:10pm:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:57pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:29pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:25pm:
Is it the same people who believe in climate change conspiracies, also believe in 9/11 conspiracies ?

Is there a propensity to be a skeptic in all things if you are from the hard right, or hard left  ?


LOL no Doc...Lastnails and Bobby BELIEVE in Climate Change, AND in the 9/11 conspiracies as well...
Whereas I'm a skeptic about climate change, and don't believe the 9/11 theory that the US government did it..


And if George tells you something you'd better believe it ;D ;D

BTW have you found the Weapons of Mass Deception in Iraq yet or are you still looking for them ;D ;D ;D


Nope, they were never there....Iraq didn't have anything to do with WMDs..


Except of course for the ones they used to kill 10,000 odd Kurds.

::)


Yeah, but they got rid of those ones during the first Gulf War...Desert Storm

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by FriYAY on Feb 11th, 2013 at 5:12pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 5:07pm:

FriYAY wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 4:45pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 4:10pm:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:57pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:29pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:25pm:
Is it the same people who believe in climate change conspiracies, also believe in 9/11 conspiracies ?

Is there a propensity to be a skeptic in all things if you are from the hard right, or hard left  ?


LOL no Doc...Lastnails and Bobby BELIEVE in Climate Change, AND in the 9/11 conspiracies as well...
Whereas I'm a skeptic about climate change, and don't believe the 9/11 theory that the US government did it..


And if George tells you something you'd better believe it ;D ;D

BTW have you found the Weapons of Mass Deception in Iraq yet or are you still looking for them ;D ;D ;D


Nope, they were never there....Iraq didn't have anything to do with WMDs..


Except of course for the ones they used to kill 10,000 odd Kurds.

::)


Yeah, but they got rid of those ones during the first Gulf War...Desert Storm


OK, sure they did.

Don't forget the 3 or 4 years the UN gave them to get rid of them as well. Scary stuff those UN resolutions.

;)


Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 11th, 2013 at 6:38pm

Bobby. wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:38pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:29pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:25pm:
Is it the same people who believe in climate change conspiracies, also believe in 9/11 conspiracies.

Is there a propensity to be a skeptic in all things if you are from the hard right, or hard left  ?


LOL no Doc...Lastnails and Bobby BELIEVE in Climate Change, AND in the 9/11 conspiracies as well...
Whereas I'm a skeptic about climate change, and don't believe the 9/11 theory that the US government did it..



At the very least the US government knew the attacks were imminent.


Now that, I might even consider agreeing with..
At least some in the US government may have know....whether or not they believed it is another matter of course.

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 11th, 2013 at 11:30pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 4:15pm:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 4:09pm:
Dear master Light,
you should forgive these mere ignorant dupes

namaste


it is done

blessings brother bobby

- : )


brother light. Some more revelations ;)

Can thermite of any type burn through steel beams ? I guess it can ;)

namaste ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNOM_U5UM6Q



Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 11th, 2013 at 11:36pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 6:38pm:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:38pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:29pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:25pm:
Is it the same people who believe in climate change conspiracies, also believe in 9/11 conspiracies.

Is there a propensity to be a skeptic in all things if you are from the hard right, or hard left  ?


LOL no Doc...Lastnails and Bobby BELIEVE in Climate Change, AND in the 9/11 conspiracies as well...
Whereas I'm a skeptic about climate change, and don't believe the 9/11 theory that the US government did it..



At the very least the US government knew the attacks were imminent.


Now that, I might even consider agreeing with..
At least some in the US government may have know....whether or not they believed it is another matter of course.


George bush knew ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlWSv0NZBRw





Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 12th, 2013 at 12:51am

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 11:36pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 6:38pm:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:38pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:29pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:25pm:
Is it the same people who believe in climate change conspiracies, also believe in 9/11 conspiracies.

Is there a propensity to be a skeptic in all things if you are from the hard right, or hard left  ?


LOL no Doc...Lastnails and Bobby BELIEVE in Climate Change, AND in the 9/11 conspiracies as well...
Whereas I'm a skeptic about climate change, and don't believe the 9/11 theory that the US government did it..



At the very least the US government knew the attacks were imminent.


Now that, I might even consider agreeing with..
At least some in the US government may have know....whether or not they believed it is another matter of course.


George bush knew ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlWSv0NZBRw


Sorry, have to disagree...sort of. I know there was no footage of the first plane, but I also know GWB didn't know before hand..
That interview was recorded (at a guess) 2 or more years after 9/11, so his comments about watching it on tv are simply him trying to pretend that he did, on the day, have some kind of clue what was happening in his country....he didn't though.

I'd recommend Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11. Has actual time stamped footage of  Bush, minutes after the planes hit...

First plane, his advisors told him about while he was reading to the kids...his reaction?, a blank stare. He had no idea what to do, or how to act. He did respond until they told him about the 2nd impact.

He's not complicit, just dumb as a stump...

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by Spot of Borg on Feb 12th, 2013 at 4:39am
Last night i watched something and the trade towers were in the background. They were rather magnificent werent they.

SOB

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 12th, 2013 at 11:12am

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 12th, 2013 at 12:51am:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 11:36pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 6:38pm:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:38pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:29pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:25pm:
Is it the same people who believe in climate change conspiracies, also believe in 9/11 conspiracies.

Is there a propensity to be a skeptic in all things if you are from the hard right, or hard left  ?


LOL no Doc...Lastnails and Bobby BELIEVE in Climate Change, AND in the 9/11 conspiracies as well...
Whereas I'm a skeptic about climate change, and don't believe the 9/11 theory that the US government did it..



At the very least the US government knew the attacks were imminent.


Now that, I might even consider agreeing with..
At least some in the US government may have know....whether or not they believed it is another matter of course.


George bush knew ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlWSv0NZBRw


Sorry, have to disagree...sort of. I know there was no footage of the first plane, but I also know GWB didn't know before hand..
That interview was recorded (at a guess) 2 or more years after 9/11, so his comments about watching it on tv are simply him trying to pretend that he did, on the day, have some kind of clue what was happening in his country....he didn't though.

I'd recommend Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11. Has actual time stamped footage of  Bush, minutes after the planes hit...

First plane, his advisors told him about while he was reading to the kids...his reaction?, a blank stare. He had no idea what to do, or how to act. He did respond until they told him about the 2nd impact.

He's not complicit, just dumb as a stump...


so you're just adding your bullshit to it as usual.

the thing is what was he waiting for when he was told of the first strike ? He was sitting in the kindergarten like a stunned mullet. Perhaps he was waiting for the second strike before he did something ;)

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by FriYAY on Feb 12th, 2013 at 11:30am

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 12th, 2013 at 11:12am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 12th, 2013 at 12:51am:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 11:36pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 6:38pm:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:38pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:29pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:25pm:
Is it the same people who believe in climate change conspiracies, also believe in 9/11 conspiracies.

Is there a propensity to be a skeptic in all things if you are from the hard right, or hard left  ?


LOL no Doc...Lastnails and Bobby BELIEVE in Climate Change, AND in the 9/11 conspiracies as well...
Whereas I'm a skeptic about climate change, and don't believe the 9/11 theory that the US government did it..



At the very least the US government knew the attacks were imminent.


Now that, I might even consider agreeing with..
At least some in the US government may have know....whether or not they believed it is another matter of course.


George bush knew ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlWSv0NZBRw


Sorry, have to disagree...sort of. I know there was no footage of the first plane, but I also know GWB didn't know before hand..
That interview was recorded (at a guess) 2 or more years after 9/11, so his comments about watching it on tv are simply him trying to pretend that he did, on the day, have some kind of clue what was happening in his country....he didn't though.

I'd recommend Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11. Has actual time stamped footage of  Bush, minutes after the planes hit...

First plane, his advisors told him about while he was reading to the kids...his reaction?, a blank stare. He had no idea what to do, or how to act. He did respond until they told him about the 2nd impact.

He's not complicit, just dumb as a stump...


so you're just adding your bullshit to it as usual.

the thing is what was he waiting for when he was told of the first strike ? He was sitting in the kindergarten like a stunned mullet. Perhaps he was waiting for the second strike before he did something ;)



Oh FFS

If there is proof to any of this retarded conspiracy then why TF is no one acting on it?

Oh I know, the proof resides in the minds of the mentally incompetent.

Tell me Nail, what TF would you do if you’d just heard that information? Put your cape on and fly up and knock the planes out of the sky? Don’t you think you’d be just a little bit stunned? How many thoughts and scenarios would be racing through your mind?

Honestly you drop kicks have NFI.

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by Chard on Feb 12th, 2013 at 12:04pm
Guys, I've been working for the US federal government for about sixteen years now so trust me when I tell you that we're no where near competent enough to precision demo multiple skyscrapers without anyone noticing. An operation of that scale simply isn't possible to accomplish while maintaining operational security.

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 12th, 2013 at 12:56pm

FriYAY wrote on Feb 12th, 2013 at 11:30am:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 12th, 2013 at 11:12am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 12th, 2013 at 12:51am:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 11:36pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 6:38pm:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:38pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:29pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:25pm:
Is it the same people who believe in climate change conspiracies, also believe in 9/11 conspiracies.

Is there a propensity to be a skeptic in all things if you are from the hard right, or hard left  ?


LOL no Doc...Lastnails and Bobby BELIEVE in Climate Change, AND in the 9/11 conspiracies as well...
Whereas I'm a skeptic about climate change, and don't believe the 9/11 theory that the US government did it..



At the very least the US government knew the attacks were imminent.


Now that, I might even consider agreeing with..
At least some in the US government may have know....whether or not they believed it is another matter of course.


George bush knew ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlWSv0NZBRw


Sorry, have to disagree...sort of. I know there was no footage of the first plane, but I also know GWB didn't know before hand..
That interview was recorded (at a guess) 2 or more years after 9/11, so his comments about watching it on tv are simply him trying to pretend that he did, on the day, have some kind of clue what was happening in his country....he didn't though.

I'd recommend Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11. Has actual time stamped footage of  Bush, minutes after the planes hit...

First plane, his advisors told him about while he was reading to the kids...his reaction?, a blank stare. He had no idea what to do, or how to act. He did respond until they told him about the 2nd impact.

He's not complicit, just dumb as a stump...


so you're just adding your bullshit to it as usual.

the thing is what was he waiting for when he was told of the first strike ? He was sitting in the kindergarten like a stunned mullet. Perhaps he was waiting for the second strike before he did something ;)



Oh FFS

If there is proof to any of this retarded conspiracy then why TF is no one acting on it?

Oh I know, the proof resides in the minds of the mentally incompetent.

Tell me Nail, what TF would you do if you’d just heard that information? Put your cape on and fly up and knock the planes out of the sky? Don’t you think you’d be just a little bit stunned? How many thoughts and scenarios would be racing through your mind?

Honestly you drop kicks have NFI.


what about the conspiracy that a guy in an elaborate cave in Afghanistan did it all. Much easier to swallow for someone like you ;D

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by FriYAY on Feb 12th, 2013 at 1:03pm

Chard wrote on Feb 12th, 2013 at 12:04pm:
Guys, I've been working for the US federal government for about sixteen years now so trust me when I tell you that we're no where near competent enough to precision demo multiple skyscrapers without anyone noticing. An operation of that scale simply isn't possible to accomplish while maintaining operational security.



Don’t expect any of these morons to actually have a practical thought about the garbage conspiracy crap they peddle.

One even said they put the explosives in the ceiling FFS.

One moron even ignores Bin Laden’s wealth and connections with banal comments about him living in a cave.

No, don’t expect anything rational from the tin foil hat brigade.


Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 12th, 2013 at 1:17pm

Chard wrote on Feb 12th, 2013 at 12:04pm:
Guys, I've been working for the US federal government for about sixteen years now so trust me when I tell you that we're no where near competent enough to precision demo multiple skyscrapers without anyone noticing. An operation of that scale simply isn't possible to accomplish while maintaining operational security.


OK Colonel Flag can you prove that ;D



Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 12th, 2013 at 1:33pm

FriYAY wrote on Feb 12th, 2013 at 1:03pm:

Chard wrote on Feb 12th, 2013 at 12:04pm:
Guys, I've been working for the US federal government for about sixteen years now so trust me when I tell you that we're no where near competent enough to precision demo multiple skyscrapers without anyone noticing. An operation of that scale simply isn't possible to accomplish while maintaining operational security.



Don’t expect any of these morons to actually have a practical thought about the garbage conspiracy crap they peddle.

One even said they put the explosives in the ceiling FFS.

One moron even ignores Bin Laden’s wealth and connections with banal comments about him living in a cave.

No, don’t expect anything rational from the tin foil hat brigade.


Speaking of tin foil hats.

Have you found any Weapons of Mass Deception in Iraq yet or are you still looking for them ;D ;D

and whilst your at it help colon powell to find his mobile biological weapons labs. They should be there somewhere. Keep looking ;D ;D



Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 12th, 2013 at 1:36pm

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 12th, 2013 at 12:56pm:

FriYAY wrote on Feb 12th, 2013 at 11:30am:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 12th, 2013 at 11:12am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 12th, 2013 at 12:51am:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 11:36pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 6:38pm:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:38pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:29pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:25pm:
Is it the same people who believe in climate change conspiracies, also believe in 9/11 conspiracies.

Is there a propensity to be a skeptic in all things if you are from the hard right, or hard left  ?


LOL no Doc...Lastnails and Bobby BELIEVE in Climate Change, AND in the 9/11 conspiracies as well...
Whereas I'm a skeptic about climate change, and don't believe the 9/11 theory that the US government did it..



At the very least the US government knew the attacks were imminent.


Now that, I might even consider agreeing with..
At least some in the US government may have know....whether or not they believed it is another matter of course.


George bush knew ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlWSv0NZBRw


Sorry, have to disagree...sort of. I know there was no footage of the first plane, but I also know GWB didn't know before hand..
That interview was recorded (at a guess) 2 or more years after 9/11, so his comments about watching it on tv are simply him trying to pretend that he did, on the day, have some kind of clue what was happening in his country....he didn't though.

I'd recommend Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11. Has actual time stamped footage of  Bush, minutes after the planes hit...

First plane, his advisors told him about while he was reading to the kids...his reaction?, a blank stare. He had no idea what to do, or how to act. He did respond until they told him about the 2nd impact.

He's not complicit, just dumb as a stump...


so you're just adding your bullshit to it as usual.

the thing is what was he waiting for when he was told of the first strike ? He was sitting in the kindergarten like a stunned mullet. Perhaps he was waiting for the second strike before he did something ;)



Oh FFS

If there is proof to any of this retarded conspiracy then why TF is no one acting on it?

Oh I know, the proof resides in the minds of the mentally incompetent.

Tell me Nail, what TF would you do if you’d just heard that information? Put your cape on and fly up and knock the planes out of the sky? Don’t you think you’d be just a little bit stunned? How many thoughts and scenarios would be racing through your mind?

Honestly you drop kicks have NFI.


what about the conspiracy that a guy in an elaborate cave in Afghanistan did it all. Much easier to swallow for someone like you ;D


Actually yes it is much easier to believe..
The reason being, it's much easier to kill people you don't know because you don't have any positive feelings about them. And it's much much simpler for a small group to find loopholes in security setups than you'd think..

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by FriYAY on Feb 12th, 2013 at 2:07pm

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 12th, 2013 at 1:33pm:

FriYAY wrote on Feb 12th, 2013 at 1:03pm:

Chard wrote on Feb 12th, 2013 at 12:04pm:
Guys, I've been working for the US federal government for about sixteen years now so trust me when I tell you that we're no where near competent enough to precision demo multiple skyscrapers without anyone noticing. An operation of that scale simply isn't possible to accomplish while maintaining operational security.



Don’t expect any of these morons to actually have a practical thought about the garbage conspiracy crap they peddle.

One even said they put the explosives in the ceiling FFS.

One moron even ignores Bin Laden’s wealth and connections with banal comments about him living in a cave.

No, don’t expect anything rational from the tin foil hat brigade.


Speaking of tin foil hats.

Have you found any Weapons of Mass Deception in Iraq yet or are you still looking for them ;D ;D

and whilst your at it help colon powell to find his mobile biological weapons labs. They should be there somewhere. Keep looking ;D ;D


When/where did i ever say the where WMD?

Other than reminding people that Sadam DID use them and the UN gave him years to remove or hide any he MAY have had.

I guess when you think the US government blew up the twin towers, the Pentagon and failed to apparently blow something else up when the other plane crashed, in what must be the greatest cover-up in the history of the universe, you use any crap to hide that fact that you are a 1st class donkey.

::) ::)

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by thelastnail on Feb 12th, 2013 at 2:21pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 12th, 2013 at 1:36pm:
Actually yes it is much easier to believe..
The reason being, it's much easier to kill people you don't know because you don't have any positive feelings about them. And it's much much simpler for a small group to find loopholes in security setups than you'd think..


Of course. Don't think to hard. You still need to be told how to think by conmen in grey suits ;)

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by gizmo_2655 on Feb 12th, 2013 at 6:40pm

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 12th, 2013 at 11:12am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 12th, 2013 at 12:51am:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 11:36pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 6:38pm:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:38pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:29pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 11th, 2013 at 3:25pm:
Is it the same people who believe in climate change conspiracies, also believe in 9/11 conspiracies.

Is there a propensity to be a skeptic in all things if you are from the hard right, or hard left  ?


LOL no Doc...Lastnails and Bobby BELIEVE in Climate Change, AND in the 9/11 conspiracies as well...
Whereas I'm a skeptic about climate change, and don't believe the 9/11 theory that the US government did it..



At the very least the US government knew the attacks were imminent.


Now that, I might even consider agreeing with..
At least some in the US government may have know....whether or not they believed it is another matter of course.


George bush knew ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlWSv0NZBRw


Sorry, have to disagree...sort of. I know there was no footage of the first plane, but I also know GWB didn't know before hand..
That interview was recorded (at a guess) 2 or more years after 9/11, so his comments about watching it on tv are simply him trying to pretend that he did, on the day, have some kind of clue what was happening in his country....he didn't though.

I'd recommend Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11. Has actual time stamped footage of  Bush, minutes after the planes hit...

First plane, his advisors told him about while he was reading to the kids...his reaction?, a blank stare. He had no idea what to do, or how to act. He did respond until they told him about the 2nd impact.

He's not complicit, just dumb as a stump...


so you're just adding your bullshit to it as usual.

the thing is what was he waiting for when he was told of the first strike ? He was sitting in the kindergarten like a stunned mullet. Perhaps he was waiting for the second strike before he did something ;)


Or maybe he was waiting for his advisors to tell him what to do...

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by muso on Feb 12th, 2013 at 6:44pm
It was the moon landing conspiracy theorists that did it. They were in league with the lizard people.

Title: Re: 9/11 and the rarely mentioned building 7 collapse
Post by philperth2010 on Feb 12th, 2013 at 7:13pm


Those who think 9/11 had nothing to do with Israel the USA Government should be able to answer the following.....


Quote:
The footage of the building 7 collapse looks like a controlled demolition???

Independent experts believe building 7 was a controlled demolition???

Building 7 was not hit be an aircraft and had several fires burning on one side....Yet the whole building collapsed at once???

No other steel skyscraper has ever collapsed from fire (except for the WTC 1 & 2 that where hit by jet aircraft)

No one has ever explained how building 7 collapsed in a heap so quickly???

Building 7 was not mentioned in the 9/11 report and no investigation has ever been launched???

Why???

:-? :-? :-?

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.