could somebody explain to me the basis for this, where did it originate

this should be good :D :D


though i do expect every second post to be

"go away troll" :D

aquascoot wrote on Mar 17^th, 2013 at 9:09am:

this should be good :D :D though i do expect every second post to be "go away troll"

Go away troll (Happy)

Dnarever wrote on Mar 17^th, 2013 at 9:31am:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 17th, 2013 at 9:09am: this should be good :D :D though i do expect every second post to be "go away troll" Go away troll (Happy)

Go away troll (Grumpy)

Apparently spot flies F111s in his spare time, even though they are all buried. One time, John Howard wanted a ride in spot's plane. There is only one seat in an F111, so John had to sit on spot's lap.

Ask longliar he made it up. I said howard was flying qantas but dont let that spoil a good trolling..

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 17^th, 2013 at 10:07am:

Ask longliar he made it up. I said howard was flying qantas but dont let that spoil a good trolling.. SOB

Go away troll! :-*

You could scroll through spots posts to check.

There's only 1,500 per month for a year....

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 17^th, 2013 at 10:37am:

You could scroll through spots posts to check. There's only 1,500 per month for a year....

go away all you trolls  :'(

freediver wrote on Mar 17^th, 2013 at 9:56am:

Apparently spot flies F111s in his spare time, even though they are all buried. One time, John Howard wanted a ride in spot's plane. There is only one seat in an F111, so John had to sit on spot's lap.

Uh, the F-111 is a two-seater, side-by-side pilot and WSO.

aww disagree so you have to lash out?

Chard wrote on Mar 17^th, 2013 at 10:46am:

freediver wrote on Mar 17th, 2013 at 9:56am: Apparently spot flies F111s in his spare time, even though they are all buried. One time, John Howard wanted a ride in spot's plane. There is only one seat in an F111, so John had to sit on spot's lap. Uh, the F-111 is a two-seater, side-by-side pilot and WSO.

Thanks Chard. I see now that I was wrong to doubt spot.

spots in a lot of trouble when longweekend's finished at mass

freediver wrote on Mar 17^th, 2013 at 11:13am:

Chard wrote on Mar 17th, 2013 at 10:46am: freediver wrote on Mar 17th, 2013 at 9:56am: Apparently spot flies F111s in his spare time, even though they are all buried. One time, John Howard wanted a ride in spot's plane. There is only one seat in an F111, so John had to sit on spot's lap. Uh, the F-111 is a two-seater, side-by-side pilot and WSO. Thanks Chard. I see now that I was wrong to doubt spot.

It's still feasible that Howard could have been in his lap, but I'm pretty it'd be a safety violation or something. The alternative would be to stow the former PM in the weapons bay, but he wouln't be very comfortable in there.

Yes, it is important not to jump to conclusions.

freediver wrote on Mar 17^th, 2013 at 11:13am:

Chard wrote on Mar 17th, 2013 at 10:46am: freediver wrote on Mar 17th, 2013 at 9:56am: Apparently spot flies F111s in his spare time, even though they are all buried. One time, John Howard wanted a ride in spot's plane. There is only one seat in an F111, so John had to sit on spot's lap. Uh, the F-111 is a two-seater, side-by-side pilot and WSO. Thanks Chard. I see now that I was wrong to doubt spot.

To doubt SPOT, is just plain wrong!

All posters on OzPol, please take note!

freediver wrote on Mar 17^th, 2013 at 1:28pm:

Yes, it is important not to jump to conclusions.

It's perfectly reasonable to stumble into a notion though.

[smiley=vrolijk_26.gif] [smiley=vrolijk_26.gif] Hi trolls  [smiley=vrolijk_26.gif]  [smiley=vrolijk_26.gif]

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Mar 17^th, 2013 at 2:35pm:

[smiley=vrolijk_26.gif] [smiley=vrolijk_26.gif] Hi trolls  [smiley=vrolijk_26.gif]  [smiley=vrolijk_26.gif]

http://i.imgur.com/rXO7Wh7.gif

Awww look @ the trolls playing . . . .

SOB

http://i.imgur.com/jqwuRty.jpg

thats good chard you are wasted on here I can see..

http://i.imgur.com/n3vwrv4.gif

Remember the comment about Howard wanting to leave the plane 1st?

Apparently they used the “plane will tip over “ line.

;D ;D

FriYAY wrote on Mar 18^th, 2013 at 11:37am:

Remember the comment about Howard wanting to leave the plane 1st? Apparently they used the “plane will tip over “ line. ;D ;D

Yup but not on an F111 like you trolls are making out

SOB

"awww whats the matter, have to lash out?"

"I never said that prove it"

"Go away troll"

Current Top 3 from our mate.

Chard wrote on Mar 18^th, 2013 at 10:30am:

http://i.imgur.com/n3vwrv4.gif

"This thread sucks" post

And so does your pathetic mentality.......grow up you phucking retard!

simonhall1900 wrote on Mar 18^th, 2013 at 3:22pm:

Chard wrote on Mar 18th, 2013 at 10:30am: http://i.imgur.com/n3vwrv4.gif "This thread sucks" post And so does your pathetic mentality.......grow up you phucking retard!

Sorry, I think Chard may have hit the nail on the head (not meaning lastnail, in anyway though)

simonhall1900 wrote on Mar 18^th, 2013 at 3:22pm:

Chard wrote on Mar 18th, 2013 at 10:30am: http://i.imgur.com/n3vwrv4.gif "This thread sucks" post And so does your pathetic mentality.......grow up you phucking retard!

http://i.imgur.com/4cpUyW6.png

Stupid Old Bugger(SOB)'s comments about the F1-11 was quite interesting as it gives an insight into what passes for his brain. He claimed Howard rode in an F111 but even more importantly that HE himself had flown in one.

Match that up to his repeated recollections of events that never happened and you have quite simply the least believable poster in anyone's memory. Vegy and Pansi by comparison look like Nobel Laureates!

Quote:

Vegy and Pansi by comparison look like Nobel Laureates!

Looking like one, even by way of comparison,  will never be a problem for you melielongtime.

;)

Aussie wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 6:36pm:

Quote: Vegy and Pansi by comparison look like Nobel Laureates! Looking like one, even by way of comparison,  will never be a problem for you melielongtime. ;)

It is my lifelong goal to win the Nobel Prize in either Physics or Medicine. Have to admit that my rather short list of publications is not helping the goal much.

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 6:57pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 6:36pm: Quote: Vegy and Pansi by comparison look like Nobel Laureates! Looking like one, even by way of comparison,  will never be a problem for you melielongtime. ;) It is my lifelong goal to win the Nobel Prize in either Physics or Medicine. Have to admit that my rather short list of publications is not helping the goal much.

Oh....from your side of the keyboard, that ought not be a problem.  Just submit the Posts you have made here, and you'll shoe it in.

;)

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 6:07pm:

Stupid Old Bugger(SOB)'s comments about the F1-11 was quite interesting as it gives an insight into what passes for his brain. He claimed Howard rode in an F111 but even more importantly that HE himself had flown in one. Match that up to his repeated recollections of events that never happened and you have quite simply the least believable poster in anyone's memory. Vegy and Pansi by comparison look like Nobel Laureates!

Liar

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 6:21am:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 6:07pm: Stupid Old Bugger(SOB)'s comments about the F1-11 was quite interesting as it gives an insight into what passes for his brain. He claimed Howard rode in an F111 but even more importantly that HE himself had flown in one. Match that up to his repeated recollections of events that never happened and you have quite simply the least believable poster in anyone's memory. Vegy and Pansi by comparison look like Nobel Laureates! Liar SOB

we've even searched for and shown you the quotes before and STILL you say you didnt post it.

you are record-breaking dumb!

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 6:49am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 6:21am: longweekend58 wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 6:07pm: Stupid Old Bugger(SOB)'s comments about the F1-11 was quite interesting as it gives an insight into what passes for his brain. He claimed Howard rode in an F111 but even more importantly that HE himself had flown in one. Match that up to his repeated recollections of events that never happened and you have quite simply the least believable poster in anyone's memory. Vegy and Pansi by comparison look like Nobel Laureates! Liar SOB we've even searched for and shown you the quotes before and STILL you say you didnt post it. you are record-breaking dumb!

The quotes themselves said i didnt say it liar.

As you know i said he was travelling on qantas.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 7:08am:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 6:49am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 6:21am: longweekend58 wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 6:07pm: Stupid Old Bugger(SOB)'s comments about the F1-11 was quite interesting as it gives an insight into what passes for his brain. He claimed Howard rode in an F111 but even more importantly that HE himself had flown in one. Match that up to his repeated recollections of events that never happened and you have quite simply the least believable poster in anyone's memory. Vegy and Pansi by comparison look like Nobel Laureates! Liar SOB we've even searched for and shown you the quotes before and STILL you say you didnt post it. you are record-breaking dumb! The quotes themselves said i didnt say it liar. As you know i said he was travelling on qantas. SOB

you unequivocably said that you had flown in an F-111 as a separate claim to the howard nonsense. it is always entertaining watching your madness deny the things you have said and are on record.

Ok, provide a link to the post. Simple enough to prove, really.

spot , you are a liar and you need to kick this habit as an adult, now go and re read what you posted in the try living on the pension thread, then be a man and apologise for lying.  like LW said its all in the record

Chard wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:09am:

Ok, provide a link to the post. Simple enough to prove, really.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1352894422/34#34

This is where it all started;


Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 5^th, 2012 at 10:50am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 5th, 2012 at 10:33am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 5th, 2012 at 9:55am: longweekend58 wrote on Jun 5th, 2012 at 9:41am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 5th, 2012 at 9:39am: Maqqa wrote on Jun 5th, 2012 at 7:03am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 5th, 2012 at 6:40am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 4th, 2012 at 6:00pm: Quote: So you consider both events as having the same severity of impact? The goal of both was to manipulate the public so yes they were both lies. SOB WHY DO YOU ASK MAQQA? SOB I ask because your posts attempts to lump all lies in the same basket which is not the way society works Shows your lefties tail? Oh really. So that whole BS about children overboard was okay? And the WMDs in iraq was okay? But no carbon tax was not? What a complete hypocrit you are. All lies are lies. SOB not even in the same league. Howard was reporting what he was told - nothing more. the carbon tax promise however was told to EVERYBODY and then reneged on mere days after the election. Bullshit. He knew he was lying and he lied because he was (and still is) a lying lair. He cant do ANYTHING without lying. I was once on a plane arriving in canberra and he was onboard. Just because he wanted to get off first and he was up the back they LIED and said that if the back ppl didnt get off first the plane would tip over! You could hear the muffled laughter go through the plane. He just had to lie. SOB Howard travelled between canberra and sydney by RAAF jet - not commercial. And i doubt he has travelled cattel class in many decades. So no, I dont beleive your story. it is a lie. Not always. It was when that herc or F1-11 was being repaired. Dont remember what year it was but it WAS on the news. He travelled by quantus several times. I dont really care if you believe me or not though. SOB

And so again you prove yourself to be liars. Longy said he travelled by RAAF jet not  me.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:56am:

And so again you prove yourself to be liars. Longy said he travelled by RAAF jet not  me. SOB

How? I just quoted the conversation that started it.


Quote:

Longy said he travelled by RAAF jet not  me

RAAF does not equall F111.

Quantum wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:03am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 8:56am: And so again you prove yourself to be liars. Longy said he travelled by RAAF jet not  me. SOB How? I just quoted the conversation that started it. Quote: Longy said he travelled by RAAF jet not  me RAAF does not equall F111.

"The RAAF's current VIP aircraft are two leased Boeing Business Jets and three Bombardier Challengers which are operated by No. 34 Squadron RAAF and are based at Canberra International Airport. The Boeing Business Jets are custom configured Boeing 737-700s fitted with facilities such as conference tables, offices suites, secure satellite and communication capabilities. The two planes have a longer range than is standard for Boeing Business Jets. The Prime Minister regularly makes use of the aircraft for domestic and international travel.
Prior to the acquisition of the 737s, passenger-configured RAAF Boeing 707s tanker-transports were used. These aircraft were larger than the 737s currently in use."

(that took me all of 45 seconds to find btw)

Haha well the qantas in question was pretty small.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:40am:

Haha well the qantas in question was pretty small. SOB

And also didn't exist....And the RAAF have NEVER used a Hercules as a VIP aircraft..

gizmo_2655 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 9:42am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 9:40am: Haha well the qantas in question was pretty small. SOB And also didn't exist....And the RAAF have NEVER used a Hercules as a VIP aircraft..

Didnt say they did. Said it was qantas. It was @ THE SAME TIME as that herc or f111 was in the news. Why do you trolls have such comprehension problems?

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 10:29am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 9:42am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 9:40am: Haha well the qantas in question was pretty small. SOB And also didn't exist....And the RAAF have NEVER used a Hercules as a VIP aircraft.. Didnt say they did. Said it was qantas. It was @ THE SAME TIME as that herc or f111 was in the news. Why do you trolls have such comprehension problems? SOB

its fun watching you squirm and very revealing as you continue to say that you DIDNT say something that we even quoted back to you.

I could call you an idiot but that is unfair to idiots. you are far stupider than that.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 10:29am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 9:42am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 9:40am: Haha well the qantas in question was pretty small. SOB And also didn't exist....And the RAAF have NEVER used a Hercules as a VIP aircraft.. Didnt say they did. Said it was qantas. It was @ THE SAME TIME as that herc or f111 was in the news. Why do you trolls have such comprehension problems? SOB

WHICH Herc or F-11 in the news??

Australia has 12 Hercules aircraft at the moment, and we had 28 or 30 F-111 aircraft..

The reason no one believes you is that there is basically no way that the PM's security staff would put him/her on a commercial flight (with ordinary passengers). You never let your protectee get onto an unsupportable, vulnerable platform with no escape route and no defensible fallback position, surrounded by that many strangers.

IF the RAAF VIP plane had a break down (and one of the 6 or 8 others wasn't available) the Government would simply have chartered a special plane.

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 10:39am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 10:29am: gizmo_2655 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 9:42am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 9:40am: Haha well the qantas in question was pretty small. SOB And also didn't exist....And the RAAF have NEVER used a Hercules as a VIP aircraft.. Didnt say they did. Said it was qantas. It was @ THE SAME TIME as that herc or f111 was in the news. Why do you trolls have such comprehension problems? SOB its fun watching you squirm and very revealing as you continue to say that you DIDNT say something that we even quoted back to you. I could call you an idiot but that is unfair to idiots. you are far stupider than that.

Anyone reading the post can see that you are the liar here

SOB

gizmo_2655 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 10:48am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 10:29am: gizmo_2655 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 9:42am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 9:40am: Haha well the qantas in question was pretty small. SOB And also didn't exist....And the RAAF have NEVER used a Hercules as a VIP aircraft.. Didnt say they did. Said it was qantas. It was @ THE SAME TIME as that herc or f111 was in the news. Why do you trolls have such comprehension problems? SOB WHICH Herc or F-11 in the news?? Australia has 12 Hercules aircraft at the moment, and we had 28 or 30 F-111 aircraft.. The reason no one believes you is that there is basically no way that the PM's security staff would put him/her on a commercial flight (with ordinary passengers). You never let your protectee get onto an unsupportable, vulnerable platform with no escape route and no defensible fallback position, surrounded by that many strangers. IF the RAAF VIP plane had a break down (and one of the 6 or 8 others wasn't available) the Government would simply have chartered a special plane.

BS they can and did. The guys in black were right there on the plane with him. As for the herc of f111 - obviously i dont remember (hence the or) gawd no comprehension skills whatsoever. Seriously this isnt america.

Oh and dont go trying to change the story now after almost a year of longy and the other trolls lying and saying i said howard was on an f11.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 10:52am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 10:48am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 10:29am: gizmo_2655 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 9:42am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 9:40am: Haha well the qantas in question was pretty small. SOB And also didn't exist....And the RAAF have NEVER used a Hercules as a VIP aircraft.. Didnt say they did. Said it was qantas. It was @ THE SAME TIME as that herc or f111 was in the news. Why do you trolls have such comprehension problems? SOB WHICH Herc or F-11 in the news?? Australia has 12 Hercules aircraft at the moment, and we had 28 or 30 F-111 aircraft.. The reason no one believes you is that there is basically no way that the PM's security staff would put him/her on a commercial flight (with ordinary passengers). You never let your protectee get onto an unsupportable, vulnerable platform with no escape route and no defensible fallback position, surrounded by that many strangers. IF the RAAF VIP plane had a break down (and one of the 6 or 8 others wasn't available) the Government would simply have chartered a special plane. BS they can and did. The guys in black were right there on the plane with him. As for the herc of f111 - obviously i dont remember (hence the or) gawd no comprehension skills whatsoever. Seriously this isnt america. Oh and dont go trying to change the story now after almost a year of longy and the other trolls lying and saying i said howard was on an f11. SOB

you still said that YOU flew on an F1-11. Now I know you will deny it but I quoted the link to your actual comment.

do you have any idea how foolish you are looking by denying something that is in black and white?

sp... did you or did you not fly in an F1-11

no spot, i missed the F111 thread but yesterday you accused quantum of introducing a strawman arguement by saying the dole should be raised to 50,000.  when he pointed out to you that is was warrigal that said this , you called quantum a troll and a liar and told him to go away.

its all there to read.

now man up and apologise or live with the label of a liar.

i wont abide people who refuse to admit they were wrong.
do the right thing  please

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 11:08am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 10:52am: gizmo_2655 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 10:48am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 10:29am: gizmo_2655 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 9:42am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 9:40am: Haha well the qantas in question was pretty small. SOB And also didn't exist....And the RAAF have NEVER used a Hercules as a VIP aircraft.. Didnt say they did. Said it was qantas. It was @ THE SAME TIME as that herc or f111 was in the news. Why do you trolls have such comprehension problems? SOB WHICH Herc or F-11 in the news?? Australia has 12 Hercules aircraft at the moment, and we had 28 or 30 F-111 aircraft.. The reason no one believes you is that there is basically no way that the PM's security staff would put him/her on a commercial flight (with ordinary passengers). You never let your protectee get onto an unsupportable, vulnerable platform with no escape route and no defensible fallback position, surrounded by that many strangers. IF the RAAF VIP plane had a break down (and one of the 6 or 8 others wasn't available) the Government would simply have chartered a special plane. BS they can and did. The guys in black were right there on the plane with him. As for the herc of f111 - obviously i dont remember (hence the or) gawd no comprehension skills whatsoever. Seriously this isnt america. Oh and dont go trying to change the story now after almost a year of longy and the other trolls lying and saying i said howard was on an f11. SOB you still said that YOU flew on an F1-11. Now I know you will deny it but I quoted the link to your actual comment. do you have any idea how foolish you are looking by denying something that is in black and white? sp... did you or did you not fly in an F1-11

It was a completely different discussion - months apart - and nothing to do with this one.

Yes I have been on an F111. Why the heck is that so unbelievable? My wife was in the RAAF and worked on them.

SOB

aquascoot wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 11:26am:

no spot, i missed the F111 thread but yesterday you accused quantum of introducing a strawman arguement by saying the dole should be raised to 50,000.  when he pointed out to you that is was warrigal that said this , you called quantum a troll and a liar and told him to go away. its all there to read. now man up and apologise or live with the label of a liar. i wont abide people who refuse to admit they were wrong. do the right thing  please

No i think you should reread it. I didnt call him a liar and tell him to go away because of warrigal i said it because he was trolling. I also pointed out that he didnt provide a link - common courtesy - which he didnt (not that its any of your business). WTF has it got to do with qantas and howard?

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 11:28am:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 11:08am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 10:52am: gizmo_2655 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 10:48am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 10:29am: gizmo_2655 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 9:42am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 9:40am: Haha well the qantas in question was pretty small. SOB And also didn't exist....And the RAAF have NEVER used a Hercules as a VIP aircraft.. Didnt say they did. Said it was qantas. It was @ THE SAME TIME as that herc or f111 was in the news. Why do you trolls have such comprehension problems? SOB WHICH Herc or F-11 in the news?? Australia has 12 Hercules aircraft at the moment, and we had 28 or 30 F-111 aircraft.. The reason no one believes you is that there is basically no way that the PM's security staff would put him/her on a commercial flight (with ordinary passengers). You never let your protectee get onto an unsupportable, vulnerable platform with no escape route and no defensible fallback position, surrounded by that many strangers. IF the RAAF VIP plane had a break down (and one of the 6 or 8 others wasn't available) the Government would simply have chartered a special plane. BS they can and did. The guys in black were right there on the plane with him. As for the herc of f111 - obviously i dont remember (hence the or) gawd no comprehension skills whatsoever. Seriously this isnt america. Oh and dont go trying to change the story now after almost a year of longy and the other trolls lying and saying i said howard was on an f11. SOB you still said that YOU flew on an F1-11. Now I know you will deny it but I quoted the link to your actual comment. do you have any idea how foolish you are looking by denying something that is in black and white? sp... did you or did you not fly in an F1-11 It was a completely different discussion - months apart - and nothing to do with this one. Yes I have been on an F111. Why the heck is that so unbelievable? My wife was in the RAAF and worked on them. SOB

and they handed out free flights on the F1-11 to spouses of engineers?  Or when you mean 'on' an  F1-11 do you mean you once stood next to one?

you are a serious dunce.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 11:29am:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 11:26am: no spot, i missed the F111 thread but yesterday you accused quantum of introducing a strawman arguement by saying the dole should be raised to 50,000.  when he pointed out to you that is was warrigal that said this , you called quantum a troll and a liar and told him to go away. its all there to read. now man up and apologise or live with the label of a liar. i wont abide people who refuse to admit they were wrong. do the right thing  please No i think you should reread it. I didnt call him a liar and tell him to go away because of warrigal i said it because he was trolling. I also pointed out that he didnt provide a link - common courtesy - which he didnt (not that its any of your business). WTF has it got to do with qantas and howard? SOB

what it has got to do with is your lying.

please explain how it is "none of my business' when it was posted on a public forum.  if you wish to have a private conversation with someone send them a text. if you post a
LIE

then i will call you for it.  stupidity , in my opinion is acceptable.
to lie is not.
no go back and re read it and apologise for your lie.

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 8:46am:

Chard wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 8:09am: Ok, provide a link to the post. Simple enough to prove, really. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1352894422/34#34

Odd, I was told there would be a post of Spot saying he flew in an F-111. All I'm see is more bullshit of other people saying he said it, but still no direct quote of Spot saying it.

Chard wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 11:53am:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 8:46am: Chard wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 8:09am: Ok, provide a link to the post. Simple enough to prove, really. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1352894422/34#34 Odd, I was told there would be a post of Spot saying he flew in an F-111. All I'm see is more bullshit of other people saying he said it, but still no direct quote of Spot saying it.

are you blind or a SOB troll? you only have to go back 3 posts to have him REPEAT IT not to say the quotes of other times he has said it.

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 11:35am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 11:28am: longweekend58 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 11:08am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 10:52am: gizmo_2655 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 10:48am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 10:29am: gizmo_2655 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 9:42am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 9:40am: Haha well the qantas in question was pretty small. SOB And also didn't exist....And the RAAF have NEVER used a Hercules as a VIP aircraft.. Didnt say they did. Said it was qantas. It was @ THE SAME TIME as that herc or f111 was in the news. Why do you trolls have such comprehension problems? SOB WHICH Herc or F-11 in the news?? Australia has 12 Hercules aircraft at the moment, and we had 28 or 30 F-111 aircraft.. The reason no one believes you is that there is basically no way that the PM's security staff would put him/her on a commercial flight (with ordinary passengers). You never let your protectee get onto an unsupportable, vulnerable platform with no escape route and no defensible fallback position, surrounded by that many strangers. IF the RAAF VIP plane had a break down (and one of the 6 or 8 others wasn't available) the Government would simply have chartered a special plane. BS they can and did. The guys in black were right there on the plane with him. As for the herc of f111 - obviously i dont remember (hence the or) gawd no comprehension skills whatsoever. Seriously this isnt america. Oh and dont go trying to change the story now after almost a year of longy and the other trolls lying and saying i said howard was on an f11. SOB you still said that YOU flew on an F1-11. Now I know you will deny it but I quoted the link to your actual comment. do you have any idea how foolish you are looking by denying something that is in black and white? sp... did you or did you not fly in an F1-11 It was a completely different discussion - months apart - and nothing to do with this one. Yes I have been on an F111. Why the heck is that so unbelievable? My wife was in the RAAF and worked on them. SOB and they handed out free flights on the F1-11 to spouses of engineers?  Or when you mean 'on' an  F1-11 do you mean you once stood next to one? you are a serious dunce.

I didnt say she was an engineer - what the heck is wrong with you?

SOB

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 2:33pm:

Chard wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 11:53am: longweekend58 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 8:46am: Chard wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 8:09am: Ok, provide a link to the post. Simple enough to prove, really. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1352894422/34#34 Odd, I was told there would be a post of Spot saying he flew in an F-111. All I'm see is more bullshit of other people saying he said it, but still no direct quote of Spot saying it. are you blind or a SOB troll? you only have to go back 3 posts to have him REPEAT IT not to say the quotes of other times he has said it.

You are the liar longy - you have been going on and on for almost a year about me being on an F111 with howard when i never said any such thing. Trying to change the goalposts now wont change the fact you are a lying troll.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 5:19pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 11:35am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 11:28am: longweekend58 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 11:08am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 10:52am: gizmo_2655 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 10:48am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 10:29am: gizmo_2655 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 9:42am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 9:40am: Haha well the qantas in question was pretty small. SOB And also didn't exist....And the RAAF have NEVER used a Hercules as a VIP aircraft.. Didnt say they did. Said it was qantas. It was @ THE SAME TIME as that herc or f111 was in the news. Why do you trolls have such comprehension problems? SOB WHICH Herc or F-11 in the news?? Australia has 12 Hercules aircraft at the moment, and we had 28 or 30 F-111 aircraft.. The reason no one believes you is that there is basically no way that the PM's security staff would put him/her on a commercial flight (with ordinary passengers). You never let your protectee get onto an unsupportable, vulnerable platform with no escape route and no defensible fallback position, surrounded by that many strangers. IF the RAAF VIP plane had a break down (and one of the 6 or 8 others wasn't available) the Government would simply have chartered a special plane. BS they can and did. The guys in black were right there on the plane with him. As for the herc of f111 - obviously i dont remember (hence the or) gawd no comprehension skills whatsoever. Seriously this isnt america. Oh and dont go trying to change the story now after almost a year of longy and the other trolls lying and saying i said howard was on an f11. SOB you still said that YOU flew on an F1-11. Now I know you will deny it but I quoted the link to your actual comment. do you have any idea how foolish you are looking by denying something that is in black and white? sp... did you or did you not fly in an F1-11 It was a completely different discussion - months apart - and nothing to do with this one. Yes I have been on an F111. Why the heck is that so unbelievable? My wife was in the RAAF and worked on them. SOB and they handed out free flights on the F1-11 to spouses of engineers?  Or when you mean 'on' an  F1-11 do you mean you once stood next to one? you are a serious dunce. I didnt say she was an engineer - what the heck is wrong with you? SOB

you said she WORKED on them, you dunderhead!  if she worked on them she was an aircraft engineer. So what was she???  cmon, let's hear just what amazing tale you can tell us now. She was a air hostess on them????

so are you going to tell us what her job was 'on' F1-11's??

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 5:21pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 2:33pm: Chard wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 11:53am: longweekend58 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 8:46am: Chard wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 8:09am: Ok, provide a link to the post. Simple enough to prove, really. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1352894422/34#34 Odd, I was told there would be a post of Spot saying he flew in an F-111. All I'm see is more bullshit of other people saying he said it, but still no direct quote of Spot saying it. are you blind or a SOB troll? you only have to go back 3 posts to have him REPEAT IT not to say the quotes of other times he has said it. You are the liar longy - you have been going on and on for almost a year about me being on an F111 with howard when i never said any such thing. Trying to change the goalposts now wont change the fact you are a lying troll. SOB

today we are focussing on your claim to have been 'on' and F1-11 which your 'wife' worked on. I can only imagine what you really mean but we are well assured that it has nothing to do with ever having flown on an f1-11.

so are you going to tell us what it was like to fly in an F1-11? was the service good? nice leg room?

No im not going to tell you but the answer is pretty friggin obvious.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 11:28am:

Yes I have been on an F111. Why the heck is that so unbelievable? My wife was in the RAAF and worked on them. SOB

What I find unbelievable is you being married to someone in the RAAF.

On this forum you have done nothing but rubbish anything connected to the military. You have gone on the attack of any member who supports the military on this forum. You have even gone as far as to accuse anyone who joins the defence forces as being stupid. Yet now we find out you were married to someone in the RAAF?

Quantum wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 5:44pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 11:28am: Yes I have been on an F111. Why the heck is that so unbelievable? My wife was in the RAAF and worked on them. SOB What I find unbelievable is you being married to someone in the RAAF. On this forum you have done nothing but rubbish anything connected to the military. You have gone on the attack of any member who supports the military on this forum. You have even gone as far as to accuse anyone who joins the defence forces as being stupid. Yet now we find out you were married to someone in the RAAF?

What the heck are you talking about? No i havent. What a lying troll you are.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 6:21pm:

Quantum wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 5:44pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 11:28am: Yes I have been on an F111. Why the heck is that so unbelievable? My wife was in the RAAF and worked on them. SOB What I find unbelievable is you being married to someone in the RAAF. On this forum you have done nothing but rubbish anything connected to the military. You have gone on the attack of any member who supports the military on this forum. You have even gone as far as to accuse anyone who joins the defence forces as being stupid. Yet now we find out you were married to someone in the RAAF? What the heck are you talking about? No i havent. What a lying troll you are. SOB

Really;


Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 12:06pm:

yup.that is why it is stupid to join the army in peacetime and go fight someone elses war. SOB

In regards to joining the army;


Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 12:08pm:

it more stupid than brave and you arent serving this country. it has nothing to do with honour. you can strive for betterment without going off and killing ppl. SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 2^nd, 2012 at 5:04pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Sep 2nd, 2012 at 4:04pm: Even if they chose to go, I still don't see how that's weak minded or moronic. Moreover, how can it be weak minded if you make a conscious decision to participate in the defence force? Well: a) doesnt pay well b) risks are great SOB

More about how those who join the military are just out to kill people, which gives a good indication on how you view their mentality;


Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 6:08am:

How does it make ppl courageous to put themselves in harms way for little pay for no reason? Seriously we arent @ war or anything - we dont need defending. the only reason someone would join up nowadays to go overseas and fight in someone elses war is because they want to kill ppl. Not because they are "brave". SOB

Another comment showing your views about those who sign up to the defence forces, reinforcing that the only reason you think they sign up is because they are stupid psychos out to kill for the fun out it;


Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 12:05pm:

That doesnt make them heroes or brave SOB

And to top it off, after being confronted over your comments, just so there was no confusion about where you stand regarding the military;


Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2012 at 2:04pm:

I haven't seen anyone criticising the military anyway. Pointing out facts about it is not criticising. SOB

Them signing up to the military are stupid and those are the facts ay spot?

so now we add this mythical wife who 'worked on F1-11s' in the military (which he hates) but isnt a flight engineer.

the comedy just gets better day in and day out.

I came access this gem while I was searching for the defense quotes above;


Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 4:11am:

Adamant wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 4:45pm: Did you know that in the days of Herod, Israel was larger than it is today. The Muslims STOLE that land from the Jews! The Jews then took their land back. Should they be allowed to TAKE BACK ALL THAT WAS THEIRS AT THE TIME OF HEROD? And if not, why not? Herod? are you saying that because a fiction book says something it must be history?

It would seem that spot thinks that Herod is not a real person. But since he has so much trouble remembering things that he said months (and sometimes only minutes) ago, then not knowing of someone from 2000 years ago is not that much of a shock.

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 2:33pm:

Chard wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 11:53am: longweekend58 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 8:46am: Chard wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 8:09am: Ok, provide a link to the post. Simple enough to prove, really. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1352894422/34#34 Odd, I was told there would be a post of Spot saying he flew in an F-111. All I'm see is more bullshit of other people saying he said it, but still no direct quote of Spot saying it. are you blind or a SOB troll? you only have to go back 3 posts to have him REPEAT IT not to say the quotes of other times he has said it.

Nope, you're right. I see it.

Know what I also see? A bunch of collssal faggots ruining an otherwise semidecent discussion with obnoxious bullshit about an alleged airplane ride. I spell it out for you and everyone else in the thread...

WHO smacking CARES.

Oh, useless assholes that would rathet enage in bitch distractions everytime they either cannot back up a claim and are to much of an ethically challenged wasre of oxygen to admit it. Seroously, if this board is any indication Australia really is a 1/10th scale replica of the US.

Quantum wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 7:21pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 6:21pm: Quantum wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 5:44pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 11:28am: Yes I have been on an F111. Why the heck is that so unbelievable? My wife was in the RAAF and worked on them. SOB What I find unbelievable is you being married to someone in the RAAF. On this forum you have done nothing but rubbish anything connected to the military. You have gone on the attack of any member who supports the military on this forum. You have even gone as far as to accuse anyone who joins the defence forces as being stupid. Yet now we find out you were married to someone in the RAAF? What the heck are you talking about? No i havent. What a lying troll you are. SOB Really; Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 12:06pm: yup.that is why it is stupid to join the army in peacetime and go fight someone elses war. SOB In regards to joining the army; Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 12:08pm: it more stupid than brave and you arent serving this country. it has nothing to do with honour. you can strive for betterment without going off and killing ppl. SOB Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 2nd, 2012 at 5:04pm: Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Sep 2nd, 2012 at 4:04pm: Even if they chose to go, I still don't see how that's weak minded or moronic. Moreover, how can it be weak minded if you make a conscious decision to participate in the defence force? Well: a) doesnt pay well b) risks are great SOB More about how those who join the military are just out to kill people, which gives a good indication on how you view their mentality; Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 6:08am: How does it make ppl courageous to put themselves in harms way for little pay for no reason? Seriously we arent @ war or anything - we dont need defending. the only reason someone would join up nowadays to go overseas and fight in someone elses war is because they want to kill ppl. Not because they are "brave". SOB Another comment showing your views about those who sign up to the defence forces, reinforcing that the only reason you think they sign up is because they are stupid psychos out to kill for the fun out it; Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 12:05pm: That doesnt make them heroes or brave SOB And to top it off, after being confronted over your comments, just so there was no confusion about where you stand regarding the military; Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Sep 3rd, 2012 at 2:04pm: I haven't seen anyone criticising the military anyway. Pointing out facts about it is not criticising. SOB Them signing up to the military are stupid and those are the facts ay spot?

Wow. Obviously out of context but yeah if someone joins up in wartime then they want to kill ppl. Doesnt mean i do nothing but rubbish it. Just means you cherry picked the bits where i was talking about ppl joining in wartime. You seem to have the problem that everything has to be black or white. In your lil world nobody can have different views about different situations.

SOB

Chard wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 3:17am:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 2:33pm: Chard wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 11:53am: longweekend58 wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 8:46am: Chard wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 8:09am: Ok, provide a link to the post. Simple enough to prove, really. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1352894422/34#34 Odd, I was told there would be a post of Spot saying he flew in an F-111. All I'm see is more bullshit of other people saying he said it, but still no direct quote of Spot saying it. are you blind or a SOB troll? you only have to go back 3 posts to have him REPEAT IT not to say the quotes of other times he has said it. Nope, you're right. I see it. Know what I also see? A bunch of collssal faggots ruining an otherwise semidecent discussion with obnoxious bullshit about an alleged airplane ride. I spell it out for you and everyone else in the thread... WHO smacking CARES. Oh, useless assholes that would rathet enage in bitch distractions everytime they either cannot back up a claim and are to much of an ethically challenged wasre of oxygen to admit it. Seroously, if this board is any indication Australia really is a 1/10th scale replica of the US.

If you are any indication of a black American it is easy to see why Africa is still a sh1t hole.

How do you educate an African/American?

You can't.

Australians are racist assholes? Nope, didn't see that coming.

Thanks for providing an example of why it is no one takes your country seriously.

Chard wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 7:22am:

Australians are racist assholes? Nope, didn't see that coming. Thanks for providing an example of why it is no one takes your country seriously.

No one hey?

Suits us just fine.

Chard wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 7:22am:

Australians are racist assholes? Nope, didn't see that coming. Thanks for providing an example of why it is no one takes your country seriously.

Yeah i have discovered there are a lot of extremely racist trolls on this forum. In real life i dont run across that many though. There is a TV show about how racist aussies are so i think we actually do have a reputation for it (the racist trolls are loud mouthed like the yank tourist stereotype).

SOB

You accusing me of being  racist Miss Borg?

KJT1981 wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 8:08am:

You accusing me of being  racist Miss Borg?

Does the shoe fit troll?

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 8:20am:

KJT1981 wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 8:08am: You accusing me of being  racist Miss Borg? Does the shoe fit troll? SOB

My shoes are a perfect fit thank you Miss Borg.

Now, back to the question....You accusing me of being  racist Miss Borg?

KJT1981 wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 8:24am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 8:20am: KJT1981 wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 8:08am: You accusing me of being  racist Miss Borg? Does the shoe fit troll? SOB My shoes are a perfect fit thank you Miss Borg. Now, back to the question....You accusing me of being  racist Miss Borg?

http://idioms.yourdictionary.com/if-the-shoe-fits-wear-it


Quote:

What does "if the shoe fits, wear it" mean? Also, if the cap fits, wear it. If something applies to you, accept it, as in These problems are hard to solve, and most people would need help, so if the shoe fits, wear it! This expression originated as if the cap fits, which alluded to a fool's cap and dates from the early 1700s. Although this version has not died out entirely, shoe today is more common and probably gained currency through the Cinderella fairy tale, in which the prince sought her out by means of the slipper she lost at the ball.

Most ppl would have heard that saying before and if they hadnt any intelligent person would have been able to work it out for themselves.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 8:33am:

KJT1981 wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 8:24am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 8:20am: KJT1981 wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 8:08am: You accusing me of being  racist Miss Borg? Does the shoe fit troll? SOB My shoes are a perfect fit thank you Miss Borg. Now, back to the question....You accusing me of being  racist Miss Borg? http://idioms.yourdictionary.com/if-the-shoe-fits-wear-it Quote: What does "if the shoe fits, wear it" mean? Also, if the cap fits, wear it. If something applies to you, accept it, as in These problems are hard to solve, and most people would need help, so if the shoe fits, wear it! This expression originated as if the cap fits, which alluded to a fool's cap and dates from the early 1700s. Although this version has not died out entirely, shoe today is more common and probably gained currency through the Cinderella fairy tale, in which the prince sought her out by means of the slipper she lost at the ball. Most ppl would have heard that saying before and if they hadnt any intelligent person would have been able to work it out for themselves. SOB

Oh FFS Miss Borg answer the friggen question.

You accusing me of being  racist Miss Borg?

It's a yes or no answer.

go away troll

if you cant understand simple english you shouldn't be here

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 8:39am:

go away troll if you cant understand simple english you shouldn't be here SOB

oh the irony...

just for the newbies (except chard)

1) SOB flew with John Howard
2) SOB flew in an F1-11
3) SOB has a wife who 'worked' on F1-11s (whatever that means)
4) SOB calls everyone a troll despite being THE troll of the boards
5) SOB calls people racists without any concept of the meaning of the word
6) add your own...

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 8:39am:

go away troll if you cant understand simple english you shouldn't be here SOB

UNE are looking for  an ignoramus for research Miss Borg. I have nominated you.

I would submit this piece of hypocrisy;


Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 4:20am:

Everyone should apologise when they do something wrong or by accident. Its common decency. SOB

Has spot apologized for anything on this forum, even when caught blatantly lying and making false accusations?

Likewise, when he has said something stupid and people have pulled him up on it, has he ever said "sorry, my mistake. What I was trying to say is...." as opposed to "you know what I meant you quote mining troll. You just wanted to twist my words so you could lash out at me because you are lying troll! Go away troll, you lying liar."?

No... I don't remember him ever apologizing for anything at all.

Quantum wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 9:08am:

I would submit this piece of hypocrisy; Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 4:20am: Everyone should apologise when they do something wrong or by accident. Its common decency. SOB Has spot apologized for anything on this forum, even when caught blatantly lying and making false accusations? Likewise, when he has said something stupid and people have pulled him up on it, has he ever said "sorry, my mistake. What I was trying to say is...." as opposed to "you know what I meant you quote mining troll. You just wanted to twist my words so you could lash out at me because you are lying troll! Go away troll, you lying liar."? No... I don't remember him ever apologizing for anything at all.

imagine trying to explain the concept of 'apology' to SOB!!!!

Wow - having a troll session girls?

SOB

no spot, your simply dishonest. its in the 10 commandments,
i know you got "way too much religious education" at your public school  ???  , but you were obviously off with the flu the day they did the 10 commandments

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:03pm:

Wow - having a troll session girls? SOB

'Yeah i have discovered there are a lot of extremely sexist trolls on this forum. In real life i dont run across that many though. (the sexist trolls are loud mouthed like the yank tourist stereotype).'

Quantum wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:27pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 12:03pm: Wow - having a troll session girls? SOB 'Yeah i have discovered there are a lot of extremely sexist trolls on this forum. In real life i dont run across that many though. (the sexist trolls are loud mouthed like the yank tourist stereotype).'

That kjt thing says its a girl

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:35pm:

Quantum wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 12:27pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 12:03pm: Wow - having a troll session girls? SOB 'Yeah i have discovered there are a lot of extremely sexist trolls on this forum. In real life i dont run across that many though. (the sexist trolls are loud mouthed like the yank tourist stereotype).' That kjt thing says its a girl SOB

does SOB have a gender? and if it does, does it know which it is and is it capable of telling the truth about it?

all valid questions.  afer all it said it had a wife in the RAAF working on F1-11s yet everything else it says is confirmed BS.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:35pm:

Quantum wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 12:27pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 12:03pm: Wow - having a troll session girls? SOB 'Yeah i have discovered there are a lot of extremely sexist trolls on this forum. In real life i dont run across that many though. (the sexist trolls are loud mouthed like the yank tourist stereotype).' That kjt thing says its a girl SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 12:03pm:

Wow - having a troll session girls?

Problems with singular and plural? (like the problems you have with English in general) or trying to cover up the fact that you made a sexist comment? (is there something wrong with being a girl spot that would lead you to call men girls?)

KJT1981 wrote on Jan 1^st, 1970 at 10:00am:

You accusing me of being  racist Miss Borg?

No need to accuse when your posting confirms it. You all but called me a nig-nog, you cock swallowing bigotted whore. When your boyfriend pulls his dick out of your mouth I bet your iq drops by half. If there is in fact a just God in this universe you'll drop from getting tagteamed by breast and ovarian cancer hefore you sqeeze out any crotch spawn and contaminate the human genome.

Chard wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 1:30pm:

KJT1981 wrote on Jan 1st, 1970 at 10:00am: You accusing me of being  racist Miss Borg? No need to accuse when your posting confirms it. You all but called me a nig-nog, you cock swallowing bigotted whore. When your boyfriend pulls his dick out of your mouth I bet your iq drops by half. If there is in fact a just God in this universe you'll drop from getting tagteamed by breast and ovarian cancer hefore you sqeeze out any crotch spawn and contaminate the human genome.

your attitude exempts you from the general behavioural standards of response here. you are moron and clearly dont have an opinion worth listening to. If it isnt about something you are interested in you are what most americans are seen to be: ignorant self-obsessed pigs with next to no idea what lives outside your own borders.

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 4:30pm:

Chard wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 1:30pm: KJT1981 wrote on Jan 1st, 1970 at 10:00am: You accusing me of being  racist Miss Borg? No need to accuse when your posting confirms it. You all but called me a nig-nog, you cock swallowing bigotted whore. When your boyfriend pulls his dick out of your mouth I bet your iq drops by half. If there is in fact a just God in this universe you'll drop from getting tagteamed by breast and ovarian cancer hefore you sqeeze out any crotch spawn and contaminate the human genome. your attitude exempts you from the general behavioural standards of response here. you are moron and clearly dont have an opinion worth listening to. If it isnt about something you are interested in you are what most americans are seen to be: ignorant self-obsessed pigs with next to no idea what lives outside your own borders.

It's ok Longy, Chard is from Alabama.

Chards mother is also his sister and his father is also his uncle. well, that's who his mother claims is the father amongst the other six relatives that banged her.

Makes for interesting research into the life of retards.

Real Jerry Springer stuff.

True, KJT, but Chard is right, you have to admit - except for one thing.

Your boyfriend is impotent, no?

Longy’s stall is occupied. Slip it in, dear. He won’t bite, you know.

He’s really very gentle.

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 4:30pm:

Chard wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 1:30pm: KJT1981 wrote on Jan 1st, 1970 at 10:00am: You accusing me of being  racist Miss Borg? No need to accuse when your posting confirms it. You all but called me a nig-nog, you cock swallowing bigotted whore. When your boyfriend pulls his dick out of your mouth I bet your iq drops by half. If there is in fact a just God in this universe you'll drop from getting tagteamed by breast and ovarian cancer hefore you sqeeze out any crotch spawn and contaminate the human genome. your attitude exempts you from the general behavioural standards of response here. you are moron and clearly dont have an opinion worth listening to. If it isnt about something you are interested in you are what most americans are seen to be: ignorant self-obsessed pigs with next to no idea what lives outside your own borders.

What? Who do you think you are?

SOB

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 4:30pm:

Chard wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 1:30pm: KJT1981 wrote on Jan 1st, 1970 at 10:00am: You accusing me of being  racist Miss Borg? No need to accuse when your posting confirms it. You all but called me a nig-nog, you cock swallowing bigotted whore. When your boyfriend pulls his dick out of your mouth I bet your iq drops by half. If there is in fact a just God in this universe you'll drop from getting tagteamed by breast and ovarian cancer hefore you sqeeze out any crotch spawn and contaminate the human genome. your attitude exempts you from the general behavioural standards of response here. you are moron and clearly dont have an opinion worth listening to. If it isnt about something you are interested in you are what most americans are seen to be: ignorant self-obsessed pigs with next to no idea what lives outside your own borders.

So what you're saying is that you support racism. Good to know. Now go play in traffic, white boy.

What I really love is KJT is such an ignorant slut she doesn't understand that the inbred, poorly educated, and socio-econmically disenfranchised southern stereotype is about white people. This cumdumpster is so smacking stupid she can't get her racial stereotypes right. Seriously, just stick to sucking dick for beer money, woman. It's all you're good for anyway.

Chard wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2013 at 6:21am:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 4:30pm: Chard wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 1:30pm: KJT1981 wrote on Jan 1st, 1970 at 10:00am: You accusing me of being  racist Miss Borg? No need to accuse when your posting confirms it. You all but called me a nig-nog, you cock swallowing bigotted whore. When your boyfriend pulls his dick out of your mouth I bet your iq drops by half. If there is in fact a just God in this universe you'll drop from getting tagteamed by breast and ovarian cancer hefore you sqeeze out any crotch spawn and contaminate the human genome. your attitude exempts you from the general behavioural standards of response here. you are moron and clearly dont have an opinion worth listening to. If it isnt about something you are interested in you are what most americans are seen to be: ignorant self-obsessed pigs with next to no idea what lives outside your own borders. So what you're saying is that you support racism. Good to know. Now go play in traffic, white boy. What I really love is KJT is such an ignorant slut she doesn't understand that the inbred, poorly educated, and socio-econmically disenfranchised southern stereotype is about white people. This cumdumpster is so smacking stupid she can't get her racial stereotypes right. Seriously, just stick to sucking dick for beer money, woman. It's all you're good for anyway.

Sucked you in big time Gollywog.

Yeah, try and play it off like you were just kidding around. Your posting history still says you're a racist moron.

KJT1981 wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2013 at 9:46pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 4:30pm: Chard wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 1:30pm: KJT1981 wrote on Jan 1st, 1970 at 10:00am: You accusing me of being  racist Miss Borg? No need to accuse when your posting confirms it. You all but called me a nig-nog, you cock swallowing bigotted whore. When your boyfriend pulls his dick out of your mouth I bet your iq drops by half. If there is in fact a just God in this universe you'll drop from getting tagteamed by breast and ovarian cancer hefore you sqeeze out any crotch spawn and contaminate the human genome. your attitude exempts you from the general behavioural standards of response here. you are moron and clearly dont have an opinion worth listening to. If it isnt about something you are interested in you are what most americans are seen to be: ignorant self-obsessed pigs with next to no idea what lives outside your own borders. It's ok Longy, Chard is from Alabama. Chards mother is also his sister and his father is also his uncle. well, that's who his mother claims is the father amongst the other six relatives that banged her. Makes for interesting research into the life of retards. Real Jerry Springer stuff.

normally, I woudl say your response was over-the-top and abusive but given 'charred's' reponse I would say it was both restrained and informative.

Chard wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2013 at 6:21am:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 4:30pm: Chard wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 1:30pm: KJT1981 wrote on Jan 1st, 1970 at 10:00am: You accusing me of being  racist Miss Borg? No need to accuse when your posting confirms it. You all but called me a nig-nog, you cock swallowing bigotted whore. When your boyfriend pulls his dick out of your mouth I bet your iq drops by half. If there is in fact a just God in this universe you'll drop from getting tagteamed by breast and ovarian cancer hefore you sqeeze out any crotch spawn and contaminate the human genome. your attitude exempts you from the general behavioural standards of response here. you are moron and clearly dont have an opinion worth listening to. If it isnt about something you are interested in you are what most americans are seen to be: ignorant self-obsessed pigs with next to no idea what lives outside your own borders. So what you're saying is that you support racism. Good to know. Now go play in traffic, white boy. What I really love is KJT is such an ignorant slut she doesn't understand that the inbred, poorly educated, and socio-econmically disenfranchised southern stereotype is about white people. This cumdumpster is so smacking stupid she can't get her racial stereotypes right. Seriously, just stick to sucking dick for beer money, woman. It's all you're good for anyway.

all you are doing is playing to the stereotype and further proving your genetic and sub-cultural inadequacies.

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2013 at 12:34pm:

Chard wrote on Mar 23rd, 2013 at 6:21am: longweekend58 wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 4:30pm: Chard wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 1:30pm: KJT1981 wrote on Jan 1st, 1970 at 10:00am: You accusing me of being  racist Miss Borg? No need to accuse when your posting confirms it. You all but called me a nig-nog, you cock swallowing bigotted whore. When your boyfriend pulls his dick out of your mouth I bet your iq drops by half. If there is in fact a just God in this universe you'll drop from getting tagteamed by breast and ovarian cancer hefore you sqeeze out any crotch spawn and contaminate the human genome. your attitude exempts you from the general behavioural standards of response here. you are moron and clearly dont have an opinion worth listening to. If it isnt about something you are interested in you are what most americans are seen to be: ignorant self-obsessed pigs with next to no idea what lives outside your own borders. So what you're saying is that you support racism. Good to know. Now go play in traffic, white boy. What I really love is KJT is such an ignorant slut she doesn't understand that the inbred, poorly educated, and socio-econmically disenfranchised southern stereotype is about white people. This cumdumpster is so smacking stupid she can't get her racial stereotypes right. Seriously, just stick to sucking dick for beer money, woman. It's all you're good for anyway. all you are doing is playing to the stereotype and further proving your genetic and sub-cultural inadequacies.

At least apply the right stereotype. For f*ck's sake, not only are you both racist assholes, you're also to dumb to use the right slurs. If you can't even get that much right, yet inbred morons from Mississippi can, then I've got to wonder exactly how useless your education system really is.

Chard wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2013 at 12:53pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 23rd, 2013 at 12:34pm: Chard wrote on Mar 23rd, 2013 at 6:21am: longweekend58 wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 4:30pm: Chard wrote on Mar 22nd, 2013 at 1:30pm: KJT1981 wrote on Jan 1st, 1970 at 10:00am: You accusing me of being  racist Miss Borg? No need to accuse when your posting confirms it. You all but called me a nig-nog, you cock swallowing bigotted whore. When your boyfriend pulls his dick out of your mouth I bet your iq drops by half. If there is in fact a just God in this universe you'll drop from getting tagteamed by breast and ovarian cancer hefore you sqeeze out any crotch spawn and contaminate the human genome. your attitude exempts you from the general behavioural standards of response here. you are moron and clearly dont have an opinion worth listening to. If it isnt about something you are interested in you are what most americans are seen to be: ignorant self-obsessed pigs with next to no idea what lives outside your own borders. So what you're saying is that you support racism. Good to know. Now go play in traffic, white boy. What I really love is KJT is such an ignorant slut she doesn't understand that the inbred, poorly educated, and socio-econmically disenfranchised southern stereotype is about white people. This cumdumpster is so smacking stupid she can't get her racial stereotypes right. Seriously, just stick to sucking dick for beer money, woman. It's all you're good for anyway. all you are doing is playing to the stereotype and further proving your genetic and sub-cultural inadequacies. At least apply the right stereotype. For f*ck's sake, not only are you both racist assholes, you're also to dumb to use the right slurs. If you can't even get that much right, yet inbred morons from Mississippi can, then I've got to wonder exactly how useless your education system really is.

funny coming from an american where basic college degrees are not even considered over here as genuine tertiary training. your basic college degrees cover little material in excess of our year 12. It is why everyone over there has to have a Master's degree - because your bachelors degrees are so poorly respected. Then of course there are your elite universities which are a completely different matter. But you come from an education system where fully 1/3 of high school students cant find US on a world map.

Wait, your telling me the average American is a dumbass? No sh*t. Yet as dumb as most of my countymen are, at least the racists here are smart enough to know their slurs such that they can properly apply them. Not finding something on a map I can understand, but not being able to black from white? That's an entirely new level of weapons grade retardation.


Also, I notice that you aren't denying that you are a racist. Tell me, did you get you Klan robes tailored or did ya just cut eye holes in one of your mother's bed sheets?

Chard wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2013 at 3:44pm:

Wait, your telling me the average American is a dumbass? No sh*t. Yet as dumb as most of my countymen are, at least the racists here are smart enough to know their slurs such that they can properly apply them. Not finding something on a map I can understand, but not being able to black from white? That's an entirely new level of weapons grade retardation. Also, I notice that you aren't denying that you are a racist. Tell me, did you get you Klan robes tailored or did ya just cut eye holes in one of your mother's bed sheets?

not SOMETHING you twit. your own country. the fact you see that as reasonable says so much about you - all of it bad.

http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/very_interesting.gif

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2013 at 5:22pm:

Chard wrote on Mar 23rd, 2013 at 3:44pm: Wait, your telling me the average American is a dumbass? No sh*t. Yet as dumb as most of my countymen are, at least the racists here are smart enough to know their slurs such that they can properly apply them. Not finding something on a map I can understand, but not being able to black from white? That's an entirely new level of weapons grade retardation. Also, I notice that you aren't denying that you are a racist. Tell me, did you get you Klan robes tailored or did ya just cut eye holes in one of your mother's bed sheets? not SOMETHING you twit. your own country. the fact you see that as reasonable says so much about you - all of it bad.

Turns out geography takes longer to teach than basic color recognition. Who knew?

Still noticing you're not denying that you're a racist bugger.

Chard wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 4:55am:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 23rd, 2013 at 5:22pm: Chard wrote on Mar 23rd, 2013 at 3:44pm: Wait, your telling me the average American is a dumbass? No sh*t. Yet as dumb as most of my countymen are, at least the racists here are smart enough to know their slurs such that they can properly apply them. Not finding something on a map I can understand, but not being able to black from white? That's an entirely new level of weapons grade retardation. Also, I notice that you aren't denying that you are a racist. Tell me, did you get you Klan robes tailored or did ya just cut eye holes in one of your mother's bed sheets? not SOMETHING you twit. your own country. the fact you see that as reasonable says so much about you - all of it bad. Turns out geography takes longer to teach than basic color recognition. Who knew? Still noticing you're not denying that you're a racist bugger.

There are several racists here and they dont deny it. Have a look in some other threads and you will find longy, quantum, paulson and other trolls going on. They are the loudest minority here.

SOB

Spot, you really need a new gimmick. If you think these guys are trolling you then you're seriously thin skinned.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 5:06am:

Chard wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 4:55am: longweekend58 wrote on Mar 23rd, 2013 at 5:22pm: Chard wrote on Mar 23rd, 2013 at 3:44pm: Wait, your telling me the average American is a dumbass? No sh*t. Yet as dumb as most of my countymen are, at least the racists here are smart enough to know their slurs such that they can properly apply them. Not finding something on a map I can understand, but not being able to black from white? That's an entirely new level of weapons grade retardation. Also, I notice that you aren't denying that you are a racist. Tell me, did you get you Klan robes tailored or did ya just cut eye holes in one of your mother's bed sheets? not SOMETHING you twit. your own country. the fact you see that as reasonable says so much about you - all of it bad. Turns out geography takes longer to teach than basic color recognition. Who knew? Still noticing you're not denying that you're a racist bugger. There are several racists here and they dont deny it. Have a look in some other threads and you will find longy, quantum, paulson and other trolls going on. They are the loudest minority here. SOB

BS. I don't have a problem with skin colour. I have a problem with different cultures being shoved into the one area.

I would happily be friends with a black man or an Asian who is Australian then I would a white man who doesn't speak English and doesn't understand Australian culture.

Again, I have no problem with race. The colour of a persons skin is irrelevant. I have a problem with different cultures living in the one area when it ultimately leads to clashes of culture and a fractured society.

i'm a nice guy and i am more than happy to help people who are intellectually disabled. i will suffer fools for a while in the hope they will see sense.

spot isnt intellectually disabled,  he's a narciscistic fool who tries to make every thread about him by basicly telling lies and upsetting people with principles.

spot has no principles, he is a liar and this is his modus operandi.
i have caught him twice now telling direct lies.

fool me once shame on you
fool me twice shame on me.
fool me three times,  sorry spot  3 strikes and youre out. until you apologise for the lies you have told, you have no place on a forum like this and contribute absolutely nothing to it.  get your act together and act your age

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21^st, 2013 at 11:28am:

It was a completely different discussion - months apart - and nothing to do with this one. Yes I have been on an F111. Why the heck is that so unbelievable? My wife was in the RAAF and worked on them. SOB

Really!

I think Ill call bullshit early on this one.


Judging by your age and assuming your aren't married to a 20 - 30 yr old, she would have served about the same time as myself.

Condidering there were only three of four females tradies working on pigs at the time (70-80s), there is an absolute 100% chance i know her.

Tell me her mustering and Ill give you her (maiden) name, even tell everyone that your are not totally full of sh1t, at least on this occasion.

I even have photos of two of them. 

You, like your compadres hate those who serve and take every opportunity to denigrate them. So do you really feel like maintaining this lie?

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 8:04am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 11:28am: It was a completely different discussion - months apart - and nothing to do with this one. Yes I have been on an F111. Why the heck is that so unbelievable? My wife was in the RAAF and worked on them. SOB Really! I think Ill call bullshit early on this one. Judging by your age and assuming your aren't married to a 20 - 30 yr old, she would have served about the same time as myself. Condidering there were only three of four females tradies working on pigs at the time (70-80s), there is an absolute 100% chance i know her. Tell me her mustering and Ill give you her (maiden) name, even tell everyone that your are not totally full of sh1t, at least on this occasion. I even have photos of two of them.  You, like your compadres hate those who serve and take every opportunity to denigrate them. So do you really feel like maintaining this lie?

Hahahahahahaha! Why you go making all those (wrong) assumptions?

Look you trolling liar quit that crap about me hating everyone who serves. I already told you my wife was in the RAAF. She obviously wasnt there in the 70s/80s so you are just being a dick assuming crap like that.

SOB

Oh dear - Another Borg whopper that'll become part of ozpolitic folklore. 

... wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 9:25am:

Oh dear - Another Borg whopper that'll become part of ozpolitic folklore.

Gawd you ppl are friggin trolls.

SOB

Well if you don't like us, why come here?

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 9:18am:

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 8:04am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 11:28am: It was a completely different discussion - months apart - and nothing to do with this one. Yes I have been on an F111. Why the heck is that so unbelievable? My wife was in the RAAF and worked on them. SOB Really! I think Ill call bullshit early on this one. Judging by your age and assuming your aren't married to a 20 - 30 yr old, she would have served about the same time as myself. Condidering there were only three of four females tradies working on pigs at the time (70-80s), there is an absolute 100% chance i know her. Tell me her mustering and Ill give you her (maiden) name, even tell everyone that your are not totally full of sh1t, at least on this occasion. I even have photos of two of them.  You, like your compadres hate those who serve and take every opportunity to denigrate them. So do you really feel like maintaining this lie? Hahahahahahaha! Why you go making all those (wrong) assumptions? Look you trolling liar quit that crap about me hating everyone who serves. I already told you my wife was in the RAAF. She obviously wasnt there in the 70s/80s so you are just being a dick assuming crap like that. SOB

My assumptions are pretty correct, starting with your claim being full of sh1t.


I find it hard to believe any woman who has served in the RAAF would marry a man who hates everything she stands for, her friends and the very organisation she worked for.

You and your scumbag mates have made it more than obvious of your hatred of those who serve, as was proven by Quantum on page 5 of this post.

I doubt there is a wife let alone one who has served in the RAAF, I don't know too many WRAAFies that tolerate morons, so.......... that kinda leaves you out now, doesn't it?



You are full of sh1t and have been caught out yet again in yet another pathetic lie to try and big note yourself.  ;D  ;D

Oh no.
Another shocker for Spot.

Now a wife claim
On RAAF.

Spot, Bigol knows a fair bit in this area.
I'd retreat from this one....

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 10:17am:

Oh no. Another shocker for Spot. Now a wife claim On RAAF. Spot, Bigol knows a fair bit in this area. I'd retreat from this one....

The thing is Andre, he won't.

Whenever he gets caught in a lie he just calls "troll" and hopes no-one will notice. It's is really pathetic, another reason a female RAAF Tradie would have nothing to do with him.


;)

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 10:04am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 9:18am: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 8:04am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 21st, 2013 at 11:28am: It was a completely different discussion - months apart - and nothing to do with this one. Yes I have been on an F111. Why the heck is that so unbelievable? My wife was in the RAAF and worked on them. SOB Really! I think Ill call bullshit early on this one. Judging by your age and assuming your aren't married to a 20 - 30 yr old, she would have served about the same time as myself. Condidering there were only three of four females tradies working on pigs at the time (70-80s), there is an absolute 100% chance i know her. Tell me her mustering and Ill give you her (maiden) name, even tell everyone that your are not totally full of sh1t, at least on this occasion. I even have photos of two of them.  You, like your compadres hate those who serve and take every opportunity to denigrate them. So do you really feel like maintaining this lie? Hahahahahahaha! Why you go making all those (wrong) assumptions? Look you trolling liar quit that crap about me hating everyone who serves. I already told you my wife was in the RAAF. She obviously wasnt there in the 70s/80s so you are just being a dick assuming crap like that. SOB My assumptions are pretty correct, starting with your claim being full of sh1t. I find it hard to believe any woman who has served in the RAAF would marry a man who hates everything she stands for, her friends and the very organisation she worked for. You and your scumbag mates have made it more than obvious of your hatred of those who serve, as was proven by Quantum on page 5 of this post. I doubt there is a wife let alone one who has served in the RAAF, I don't know too many WRAAFies that tolerate morons, so.......... that kinda leaves you out now, doesn't it? You are full of sh1t and have been caught out yet again in yet another pathetic lie to try and big note yourself.  ;D  ;D

You are the one that is full of it. I already told you your assumptions are wrong. You are just a troll.

SOB

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 10:17am:

Oh no. Another shocker for Spot. Now a wife claim On RAAF. Spot, Bigol knows a fair bit in this area. I'd retreat from this one....

Why should i? My wife was in the RAAF and just because he didnt know her doesnt mean she didnt. He just thinks that because he was in the RAAF he knows everyone in the RAAF.

SOB

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 10:25am:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 10:17am: Oh no. Another shocker for Spot. Now a wife claim On RAAF. Spot, Bigol knows a fair bit in this area. I'd retreat from this one.... The thing is Andre, he won't. Whenever he gets caught in a lie he just calls "troll" and hopes no-one will notice. It's is really pathetic, another reason a female RAAF Tradie would have nothing to do with him. ;)

What a load of BS. in fact you are protesting so much that i dont believe you were in the RAAF. No way.You are making it up to "big note".

SOB

Borg, when you say your wife was in the RAAF, do you mean for a few hours while she chained herself to a fence?

freediver wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 10:52am:

Borg, when you say your wife was in the RAAF, do you mean for a few hours while she chained herself to a fence?

6 smacking years you smacking front bottoms

SOB

What sort of planes did she fly? Air Force One?

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 11:02am:

freediver wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 10:52am: Borg, when you say your wife was in the RAAF, do you mean for a few hours while she chained herself to a fence? 6 smacking years you smacking nice people SOB

reported for foul language and abuse.

Spot, If you were claiming she was USAF I'd ask for things like what squadron/wing she was with at the time, what her MOS was, who her CO/1STSGT was ect. Pretty sure the same questions work for service in the RAAF. So...

What squadron/wing or the RAAF equivalent was she in? The were only so many that operated the 111, so who was she with?

Who was her squadron and wing or RAAF equivalent commanding officer and seniormost non-commissioned officers?

Was she an actual aircraft maintainer and if so what area of specilization (A&P mech, avionics tech, ect)?

These are all easy to answer questions to answer.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 10:42am:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 10:17am: Oh no. Another shocker for Spot. Now a wife claim On RAAF. Spot, Bigol knows a fair bit in this area. I'd retreat from this one.... Why should i? My wife was in the RAAF and just because he didnt know her doesnt mean she didnt. He just thinks that because he was in the RAAF he knows everyone in the RAAF. SOB

No but in those days women RAAF were as common as black Klansmen.

Chard wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 11:26am:

Spot, If you were claiming she was USAF I'd ask for things like what squadron/wing she was with at the time, what her MOS was, who her CO/1STSGT was ect. Pretty sure the same questions work for service in the RAAF. So... What squadron/wing or the RAAF equivalent was she in? The were only so many that operated the 111, so who was she with? Who was her squadron and wing or RAAF equivalent commanding officer and seniormost non-commissioned officers? Was she an actual aircraft maintainer and if so what area of specilization (A&P mech, avionics tech, ect)? These are all easy to answer questions to answer.

There were very few female maintainers in the RAAF during the F111's time in service; a sqadron, mustering and a year is all that is needed to work out who it was.

I have a mate who has been at Amberley since 1983 as an F111 and F18 maintainer; one phone call is all it would take, more than cover the time after I left

But as per usual ol' borgy has been caught out and anyone who questions his lies is immediately called a  troll.

And this tool wonders why no-one believes anything he has to say, friggen muppet.

Chard wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 11:26am:

Spot, If you were claiming she was USAF I'd ask for things like what squadron/wing she was with at the time, what her MOS was, who her CO/1STSGT was ect. Pretty sure the same questions work for service in the RAAF. So... What squadron/wing or the RAAF equivalent was she in? The were only so many that operated the 111, so who was she with? Who was her squadron and wing or RAAF equivalent commanding officer and seniormost non-commissioned officers? Was she an actual aircraft maintainer and if so what area of specilization (A&P mech, avionics tech, ect)? These are all easy to answer questions to answer.

Yeah they are but im not telling you trolls any personally identifying information.

SOB

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 11:51am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 10:42am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 10:17am: Oh no. Another shocker for Spot. Now a wife claim On RAAF. Spot, Bigol knows a fair bit in this area. I'd retreat from this one.... Why should i? My wife was in the RAAF and just because he didnt know her doesnt mean she didnt. He just thinks that because he was in the RAAF he knows everyone in the RAAF. SOB No but in those days women RAAF were as common as black Klansmen.

In what days?

SOB

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 12:23pm:

Chard wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 11:26am: Spot, If you were claiming she was USAF I'd ask for things like what squadron/wing she was with at the time, what her MOS was, who her CO/1STSGT was ect. Pretty sure the same questions work for service in the RAAF. So... What squadron/wing or the RAAF equivalent was she in? The were only so many that operated the 111, so who was she with? Who was her squadron and wing or RAAF equivalent commanding officer and seniormost non-commissioned officers? Was she an actual aircraft maintainer and if so what area of specilization (A&P mech, avionics tech, ect)? These are all easy to answer questions to answer. There were very few female maintainers in the RAAF during the F111's time in service; a sqadron, mustering and a year is all that is needed to work out who it was. I have a mate who has been at Amberley since 1983 as an F111 and F18 maintainer; one phone call is all it would take, more than cover the time after I left But as per usual ol' borgy has been caught out and anyone who questions his lies is immediately called a  troll. And this tool wonders why no-one believes anything he has to say, friggen muppet.

I know ppl @ amberly too - care to give me your full name and address?

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 12:32pm:

Chard wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 11:26am: Spot, If you were claiming she was USAF I'd ask for things like what squadron/wing she was with at the time, what her MOS was, who her CO/1STSGT was ect. Pretty sure the same questions work for service in the RAAF. So... What squadron/wing or the RAAF equivalent was she in? The were only so many that operated the 111, so who was she with? Who was her squadron and wing or RAAF equivalent commanding officer and seniormost non-commissioned officers? Was she an actual aircraft maintainer and if so what area of specilization (A&P mech, avionics tech, ect)? These are all easy to answer questions to answer. Yeah they are but im not telling you trolls any personally identifying information. SOB

Like who your wife works for?

freediver wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 12:48pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 12:32pm: Chard wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 11:26am: Spot, If you were claiming she was USAF I'd ask for things like what squadron/wing she was with at the time, what her MOS was, who her CO/1STSGT was ect. Pretty sure the same questions work for service in the RAAF. So... What squadron/wing or the RAAF equivalent was she in? The were only so many that operated the 111, so who was she with? Who was her squadron and wing or RAAF equivalent commanding officer and seniormost non-commissioned officers? Was she an actual aircraft maintainer and if so what area of specilization (A&P mech, avionics tech, ect)? These are all easy to answer questions to answer. Yeah they are but im not telling you trolls any personally identifying information. SOB Like who your wife works for?

Hmmm... . . . .  you know better. She doesnt work for anyone she is dead.

SOB

I thought you weren't going to talk about her any more?

... wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 9:25am:

Oh dear - Another Borg whopper that'll become part of ozpolitic folklore.

"the whoppers are better at ozpolitic.com

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 10:42am:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 10:17am: Oh no. Another shocker for Spot. Now a wife claim On RAAF. Spot, Bigol knows a fair bit in this area. I'd retreat from this one.... Why should i? My wife was in the RAAF and just because he didnt know her doesnt mean she didnt. He just thinks that because he was in the RAAF he knows everyone in the RAAF. SOB

your biggest whopper was that you claimed you went in an F1-11 because your wife worked on them. its not like taking a mates ute for a spin. a fighter-bomber is a tad more expensive to run and there is zero chance you had a joyflight and even less that you had an authorised flight.

you are more than a liar. you are a delusional moron.

freediver wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 10:52am:

Borg, when you say your wife was in the RAAF, do you mean for a few hours while she chained herself to a fence?

best comment to date...

freediver wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 11:18am:

What sort of planes did she fly? Air Force One?

ah... nice followup question...

freediver wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 1:36pm:

I thought you weren't going to talk about her any more?

When did i say that you provoking nice person?

SOB

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 1:59pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 10:42am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 10:17am: Oh no. Another shocker for Spot. Now a wife claim On RAAF. Spot, Bigol knows a fair bit in this area. I'd retreat from this one.... Why should i? My wife was in the RAAF and just because he didnt know her doesnt mean she didnt. He just thinks that because he was in the RAAF he knows everyone in the RAAF. SOB your biggest whopper was that you claimed you went in an F1-11 because your wife worked on them. its not like taking a mates ute for a spin. a fighter-bomber is a tad more expensive to run and there is zero chance you had a joyflight and even less that you had an authorised flight. you are more than a liar. you are a delusional moron.

Nope. Obviously you cant read. I didnt say because of it. There were obviously other reasons of which im not going  to tell you.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 2:05pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 1:59pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 10:42am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 10:17am: Oh no. Another shocker for Spot. Now a wife claim On RAAF. Spot, Bigol knows a fair bit in this area. I'd retreat from this one.... Why should i? My wife was in the RAAF and just because he didnt know her doesnt mean she didnt. He just thinks that because he was in the RAAF he knows everyone in the RAAF. SOB your biggest whopper was that you claimed you went in an F1-11 because your wife worked on them. its not like taking a mates ute for a spin. a fighter-bomber is a tad more expensive to run and there is zero chance you had a joyflight and even less that you had an authorised flight. you are more than a liar. you are a delusional moron. Nope. Obviously you cant read. I didnt say because of it. There were obviously other reasons of which im not going  to tell you. SOB

well unless you were a secret agent or SAS you would be able to tell us. and the F111 doesnt take passengers. it takes 2.

and you make the very worst defense possible

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 2:24pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 2:05pm: longweekend58 wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 1:59pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 10:42am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 10:17am: Oh no. Another shocker for Spot. Now a wife claim On RAAF. Spot, Bigol knows a fair bit in this area. I'd retreat from this one.... Why should i? My wife was in the RAAF and just because he didnt know her doesnt mean she didnt. He just thinks that because he was in the RAAF he knows everyone in the RAAF. SOB your biggest whopper was that you claimed you went in an F1-11 because your wife worked on them. its not like taking a mates ute for a spin. a fighter-bomber is a tad more expensive to run and there is zero chance you had a joyflight and even less that you had an authorised flight. you are more than a liar. you are a delusional moron. Nope. Obviously you cant read. I didnt say because of it. There were obviously other reasons of which im not going  to tell you. SOB well unless you were a secret agent or SAS you would be able to tell us. and the F111 doesnt take passengers. it takes 2. and you make the very worst defense possible

Nope i wont tell you because it will reveal personal details. Are you going to tell me your full name and address?

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 12:32pm:

Chard wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 11:26am: Spot, If you were claiming she was USAF I'd ask for things like what squadron/wing she was with at the time, what her MOS was, who her CO/1STSGT was ect. Pretty sure the same questions work for service in the RAAF. So... What squadron/wing or the RAAF equivalent was she in? The were only so many that operated the 111, so who was she with? Who was her squadron and wing or RAAF equivalent commanding officer and seniormost non-commissioned officers? Was she an actual aircraft maintainer and if so what area of specilization (A&P mech, avionics tech, ect)? These are all easy to answer questions to answer. Yeah they are but im not telling you trolls any personally identifying information. SOB

Spot, none of that is information that can directly ID your wife. All of it is stuff that any serviceman should be able to rattle off without having to think of it. It's a reasonable thing to ask when someone identifies themselves or their loved ones as current or prior service military and your continued refusal to answer really makes me thing Biggie is on to something.


Also, Spot, if I start trolling you you''ll know it. I've done it before, I know exactly what buttons to press, and you know I'll smile while you tear your hair out in frustration. Don't lump me in with these amateurs, you know from personal experience I am far better at trolling than anyone here.

Spot this is like claiming you are a part time astronaut, then insisting you cannot reveal anything else because it is personal. You said you wouldn't reveal anything more about your wife, then in the next post you said she is dead. I know there are plenty of women out at Amberley these days, but it used to be pretty rare.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 2:33pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 2:24pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 2:05pm: longweekend58 wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 1:59pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 10:42am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 10:17am: Oh no. Another shocker for Spot. Now a wife claim On RAAF. Spot, Bigol knows a fair bit in this area. I'd retreat from this one.... Why should i? My wife was in the RAAF and just because he didnt know her doesnt mean she didnt. He just thinks that because he was in the RAAF he knows everyone in the RAAF. SOB your biggest whopper was that you claimed you went in an F1-11 because your wife worked on them. its not like taking a mates ute for a spin. a fighter-bomber is a tad more expensive to run and there is zero chance you had a joyflight and even less that you had an authorised flight. you are more than a liar. you are a delusional moron. Nope. Obviously you cant read. I didnt say because of it. There were obviously other reasons of which im not going  to tell you. SOB well unless you were a secret agent or SAS you would be able to tell us. and the F111 doesnt take passengers. it takes 2. and you make the very worst defense possible Nope i wont tell you because it will reveal personal details. Are you going to tell me your full name and address? SOB

all you have to do is tell us how you came to be on the F1-11 or even just some impressions from your flight.

but you wont of course, because it is all in your head. See SOB> all you need to do to deflect this torrent of mocking abuse at you is to provide a credible story. you cant expect people to believe you flew in an F1-11 fight-bomber and not expect ot be asked for a few details on it.

SOB was your wife flying the plane for you? I don't think that is too personal. I don't think describing the experience is too personal either. At least I hope not anyway.

Chard wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 3:36pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 12:32pm: Chard wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 11:26am: Spot, If you were claiming she was USAF I'd ask for things like what squadron/wing she was with at the time, what her MOS was, who her CO/1STSGT was ect. Pretty sure the same questions work for service in the RAAF. So... What squadron/wing or the RAAF equivalent was she in? The were only so many that operated the 111, so who was she with? Who was her squadron and wing or RAAF equivalent commanding officer and seniormost non-commissioned officers? Was she an actual aircraft maintainer and if so what area of specilization (A&P mech, avionics tech, ect)? These are all easy to answer questions to answer. Yeah they are but im not telling you trolls any personally identifying information. SOB Spot, none of that is information that can directly ID your wife. All of it is stuff that any serviceman should be able to rattle off without having to think of it. It's a reasonable thing to ask when someone identifies themselves or their loved ones as current or prior service military and your continued refusal to answer really makes me thing Biggie is on to something. Also, Spot, if I start trolling you you''ll know it. I've done it before, I know exactly what buttons to press, and you know I'll smile while you tear your hair out in frustration. Don't lump me in with these amateurs, you know from personal experience I am far better at trolling than anyone here.

Yeah i know @ rattling off but someone mentioned earlier the shortage of females in the RAAF and if i say the timeframe, what she did, or why i was there it would be far too easy to check and find out who i am or she was.

SOB

freediver wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 5:17pm:

Spot this is like claiming you are a part time astronaut, then insisting you cannot reveal anything else because it is personal. You said you wouldn't reveal anything more about your wife, then in the next post you said she is dead. I know there are plenty of women out at Amberley these days, but it used to be pretty rare.

So? Are you just saying that to provoke? since its already been said several times?

SOB

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 5:29pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 2:33pm: longweekend58 wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 2:24pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 2:05pm: longweekend58 wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 1:59pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 10:42am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 10:17am: Oh no. Another shocker for Spot. Now a wife claim On RAAF. Spot, Bigol knows a fair bit in this area. I'd retreat from this one.... Why should i? My wife was in the RAAF and just because he didnt know her doesnt mean she didnt. He just thinks that because he was in the RAAF he knows everyone in the RAAF. SOB your biggest whopper was that you claimed you went in an F1-11 because your wife worked on them. its not like taking a mates ute for a spin. a fighter-bomber is a tad more expensive to run and there is zero chance you had a joyflight and even less that you had an authorised flight. you are more than a liar. you are a delusional moron. Nope. Obviously you cant read. I didnt say because of it. There were obviously other reasons of which im not going  to tell you. SOB well unless you were a secret agent or SAS you would be able to tell us. and the F111 doesnt take passengers. it takes 2. and you make the very worst defense possible Nope i wont tell you because it will reveal personal details. Are you going to tell me your full name and address? SOB all you have to do is tell us how you came to be on the F1-11 or even just some impressions from your flight. but you wont of course, because it is all in your head. See SOB> all you need to do to deflect this torrent of mocking abuse at you is to provide a credible story. you cant expect people to believe you flew in an F1-11 fight-bomber and not expect ot be asked for a few details on it.

You are only going on about this because your crap about howard blew up in your face

SOB

freediver wrote on Mar 24^th, 2013 at 5:54pm:

SOB was your wife flying the plane for you? I don't think that is too personal. I don't think describing the experience is too personal either. At least I hope not anyway.

You know full well its too personal and why.

As for describing the flight well - what is there to say? It brings back bad memories so i dont want to even if there was anything to say.

SOB

spot , i'm being quite serious now.

your behaviour in the last few months has become more erratic and your thought processes seem to be worsening.

i really think you need to be checked out.
it may be you have a slow growing tumor in the frontal lobe, or a lesion in the corpus callosum. a possible small stroke or some sort of multiple sclerosis or demyelination disease. you seem to be awake very early and abnormal sleep patterns and memory problems (which seem to be both short term and long term) can be a sign of some subtle brain injury/degeneration.

i believe you need a CT at least. consult your doctor or vet or whatever. but there seems to have been a definite degeneration in recent weeks.

aquascoot wrote on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 7:03am:

spot , i'm being quite serious now. your behaviour in the last few months has become more erratic and your thought processes seem to be worsening. i really think you need to be checked out. it may be you have a slow growing tumor in the frontal lobe, or a lesion in the corpus callosum. a possible small stroke or some sort of multiple sclerosis or demyelination disease. you seem to be awake very early and abnormal sleep patterns and memory problems (which seem to be both short term and long term) can be a sign of some subtle brain injury/degeneration. i believe you need a CT at least. consult your doctor or vet or whatever. but there seems to have been a definite degeneration in recent weeks.

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 6:19am:

freediver wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 5:54pm: SOB was your wife flying the plane for you? I don't think that is too personal. I don't think describing the experience is too personal either. At least I hope not anyway. You know full well its too personal and why. As for describing the flight well - what is there to say? It brings back bad memories so i dont want to even if there was anything to say. SOB

;D  ;D

Spot, you are such a clown. Give it up man.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 6:17am:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 5:29pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 2:33pm: longweekend58 wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 2:24pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 2:05pm: longweekend58 wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 1:59pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 10:42am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 10:17am: Oh no. Another shocker for Spot. Now a wife claim On RAAF. Spot, Bigol knows a fair bit in this area. I'd retreat from this one.... Why should i? My wife was in the RAAF and just because he didnt know her doesnt mean she didnt. He just thinks that because he was in the RAAF he knows everyone in the RAAF. SOB your biggest whopper was that you claimed you went in an F1-11 because your wife worked on them. its not like taking a mates ute for a spin. a fighter-bomber is a tad more expensive to run and there is zero chance you had a joyflight and even less that you had an authorised flight. you are more than a liar. you are a delusional moron. Nope. Obviously you cant read. I didnt say because of it. There were obviously other reasons of which im not going  to tell you. SOB well unless you were a secret agent or SAS you would be able to tell us. and the F111 doesnt take passengers. it takes 2. and you make the very worst defense possible Nope i wont tell you because it will reveal personal details. Are you going to tell me your full name and address? SOB all you have to do is tell us how you came to be on the F1-11 or even just some impressions from your flight. but you wont of course, because it is all in your head. See SOB> all you need to do to deflect this torrent of mocking abuse at you is to provide a credible story. you cant expect people to believe you flew in an F1-11 fight-bomber and not expect ot be asked for a few details on it. You are only going on about this because your crap about howard blew up in your face SOB

the crap is very definitely blowing up in your face as you make lie after lie after lie. and none of them are even remotely beleivable.

you didnt fly in an F1-11. You didnt fly with Howard. Your wife (assuming she ever existed) did not work on F1-11s nor was she in the RAAF.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 6:19am:

freediver wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 5:54pm: SOB was your wife flying the plane for you? I don't think that is too personal. I don't think describing the experience is too personal either. At least I hope not anyway. You know full well its too personal and why. As for describing the flight well - what is there to say? It brings back bad memories so i dont want to even if there was anything to say. SOB

bad memories would only be if you crashed... in which case you are dead. even if you threw-up in your face mask (happens often) it would be a worthy experience to recount. I would be telling everyone I know that I had done that.

but it's just a lie... just like all the others.

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 8:17am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 25th, 2013 at 6:19am: freediver wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 5:54pm: SOB was your wife flying the plane for you? I don't think that is too personal. I don't think describing the experience is too personal either. At least I hope not anyway. You know full well its too personal and why. As for describing the flight well - what is there to say? It brings back bad memories so i dont want to even if there was anything to say. SOB bad memories would only be if you crashed... in which case you are dead. even if you threw-up in your face mask (happens often) it would be a worthy experience to recount. I would be telling everyone I know that I had done that. but it's just a lie... just like all the others.

Maybe for you but i loved my wife.

SOB

aquascoot wrote on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 7:03am:

spot , i'm being quite serious now. your behaviour in the last few months has become more erratic and your thought processes seem to be worsening. i really think you need to be checked out. it may be you have a slow growing tumor in the frontal lobe, or a lesion in the corpus callosum. a possible small stroke or some sort of multiple sclerosis or demyelination disease. you seem to be awake very early and abnormal sleep patterns and memory problems (which seem to be both short term and long term) can be a sign of some subtle brain injury/degeneration. i believe you need a CT at least. consult your doctor or vet or whatever. but there seems to have been a definite degeneration in recent weeks.

So getting up early in the morning is "abnormal" and in need of treatment? So 50% of the world is "abnormal"? You have problems.

SOB

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 7:30am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 25th, 2013 at 6:19am: freediver wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 5:54pm: SOB was your wife flying the plane for you? I don't think that is too personal. I don't think describing the experience is too personal either. At least I hope not anyway. You know full well its too personal and why. As for describing the flight well - what is there to say? It brings back bad memories so i dont want to even if there was anything to say. SOB ;D  ;D Spot, you are such a clown. Give it up man.

go away troll

SOB

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 8:14am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 25th, 2013 at 6:17am: longweekend58 wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 5:29pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 2:33pm: longweekend58 wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 2:24pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 2:05pm: longweekend58 wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 1:59pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 10:42am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 10:17am: Oh no. Another shocker for Spot. Now a wife claim On RAAF. Spot, Bigol knows a fair bit in this area. I'd retreat from this one.... Why should i? My wife was in the RAAF and just because he didnt know her doesnt mean she didnt. He just thinks that because he was in the RAAF he knows everyone in the RAAF. SOB your biggest whopper was that you claimed you went in an F1-11 because your wife worked on them. its not like taking a mates ute for a spin. a fighter-bomber is a tad more expensive to run and there is zero chance you had a joyflight and even less that you had an authorised flight. you are more than a liar. you are a delusional moron. Nope. Obviously you cant read. I didnt say because of it. There were obviously other reasons of which im not going  to tell you. SOB well unless you were a secret agent or SAS you would be able to tell us. and the F111 doesnt take passengers. it takes 2. and you make the very worst defense possible Nope i wont tell you because it will reveal personal details. Are you going to tell me your full name and address? SOB all you have to do is tell us how you came to be on the F1-11 or even just some impressions from your flight. but you wont of course, because it is all in your head. See SOB> all you need to do to deflect this torrent of mocking abuse at you is to provide a credible story. you cant expect people to believe you flew in an F1-11 fight-bomber and not expect ot be asked for a few details on it. You are only going on about this because your crap about howard blew up in your face SOB the crap is very definitely blowing up in your face as you make lie after lie after lie. and none of them are even remotely beleivable. you didnt fly in an F1-11. You didnt fly with Howard. Your wife (assuming she ever existed) did not work on F1-11s nor was she in the RAAF.

I did not fly with howard in an f111. You made that up.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 8:25am:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 25th, 2013 at 7:30am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 25th, 2013 at 6:19am: freediver wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 5:54pm: SOB was your wife flying the plane for you? I don't think that is too personal. I don't think describing the experience is too personal either. At least I hope not anyway. You know full well its too personal and why. As for describing the flight well - what is there to say? It brings back bad memories so i dont want to even if there was anything to say. SOB ;D  ;D Spot, you are such a clown. Give it up man. go away troll SOB

Anyone claiming on here what you are is a troll.
You are - frankly - an idiot who has gone way too far now.

Had a ride in an F1-11 because the missus worked in the RAAF...LOL.

Note, you have called literally everyone a "troll" now????

"It's not me, it's everyone else"

Spot I am not asking you to recount your wife's death. I am asking you what the ride in the F111 was like. I doubt they were the same event.

Are you trying to say that you are John Howard?

An old school mate of mine is in the USAF.

I fancy a ride in one of those B1 stealth bombers.

I should be able to turn up to the base in the UK and just get a ride.
Seeing as I know him and all....

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 8:59am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 25th, 2013 at 8:25am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 25th, 2013 at 7:30am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 25th, 2013 at 6:19am: freediver wrote on Mar 24th, 2013 at 5:54pm: SOB was your wife flying the plane for you? I don't think that is too personal. I don't think describing the experience is too personal either. At least I hope not anyway. You know full well its too personal and why. As for describing the flight well - what is there to say? It brings back bad memories so i dont want to even if there was anything to say. SOB ;D  ;D Spot, you are such a clown. Give it up man. go away troll SOB Anyone claiming on here what you are is a troll. You are - frankly - an idiot who has gone way too far now. Had a ride in an F1-11 because the missus worked in the RAAF...LOL. Note, you have called literally everyone a "troll" now???? "It's not me, it's everyone else"

Oh look another illiterate.

SOB

Still illiterate i see. I take it latin is the only language you know?

SOB

freediver wrote on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 9:05am:

Spot I am not asking you to recount your wife's death. I am asking you what the ride in the F111 was like. I doubt they were the same event. Are you trying to say that you are John Howard?

go away troll

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 25^th, 2013 at 9:29am:

freediver wrote on Mar 25th, 2013 at 9:05am: Spot I am not asking you to recount your wife's death. I am asking you what the ride in the F111 was like. I doubt they were the same event. Are you trying to say that you are John Howard? go away troll SOB

This is his smacking forum!!!!

My goodness, you are beyond belief!