Misandrist gillard is using sexism again to try to get over the top of Tony Abbott and using sexism to say she is a strong woman with strong policies, while Abbott is a weak man with weak policies.

Will this worst PM in Australias history, finally stop putting our parliament into disrepute and call an election now, so we can kick her misandrist arse to the curb.

poll

if it was true she was a strong women she wouldnt have to remind us all the time..

Maggie Thatcher she aint... and nothing she says or does will change anything..

as a female shes embarrassing...the highest position in the land..

and all she does is WHINE..


go away gillard you make me cringe.

she is a nasty disliked woman I know of noone who has a single positive to say about it.

she is a strong woman with strong policies, while Abbott is a weak man with weak policies.

I think you have accidentally hit the nail on the head.

Dnarever wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 3:36pm:

she is a strong woman with strong policies, while Abbott is a weak man with weak policies. I think you have accidentally hit the nail on the head.

That gillard is a misandrist. Yes we know how sexist the woman is, she displays it in parliament in its true form from time to time when she slips up and thinks she is being smart.

The title of this thread should be  'Looser starts another useless thread'..

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 3:38pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 3:36pm: she is a strong woman with strong policies, while Abbott is a weak man with weak policies. I think you have accidentally hit the nail on the head. That gillard is a misandrist. Yes we know how sexist the woman is, she displays it in parliament in its true form from time to time when she slips up and thinks she is being smart.

Abbott has a long long consistant history that you can not cover up.

Quote:

Misandrist gillard is using sexism again to try to get over the top of Tony Abbott and using sexism to say she is a strong woman with strong policies, while Abbott is a weak man with weak policies.

That is not what she said.

;)

John Smith wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 3:40pm:

The title of this thread should be  'Looser starts another useless thread'..

Yeh we leave that for your threads loser.

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 4:04pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 3:40pm: The title of this thread should be  'Looser starts another useless thread'.. Yeh we leave that for your threads loser.

loser

Dnarever wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 3:41pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 3:38pm: Dnarever wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 3:36pm: she is a strong woman with strong policies, while Abbott is a weak man with weak policies. I think you have accidentally hit the nail on the head. That gillard is a misandrist. Yes we know how sexist the woman is, she displays it in parliament in its true form from time to time when she slips up and thinks she is being smart. Abbott has a long long consistant history that you can not cover up.

The history interpreted by Gillard to improve her polls

Looks like the death kick by this dog of a PM

The interesting point here is Abbott's reaction

If he stood up and defended himself - he would have not gained anything.

Gillard's ultimate goal here is to drag him down to her level. She wants to engage one on one with him

Gillard's playing the gender card very well here.

Society is now conditioned to be more tolerant to a woman striking out at a man than for a man to strike out at a woman. When in facts it's not okay to strikeout.

Using this social conditioning - Gillard have repeatedly struck out at Gillard using the "I am woman....he's a man" card

If he hit back - he would have been seen as a bully attacking a woman

Staying silent - he risk of being seen by some as being weaker than a woman

So while he will be seen by a minority as being weak - the majority will see this as qualities of a strong leader and Gillard further displaying her bully-girl tactics of taunts.

Dnarever - what policies? The policy that gave us a 125 Billion dollar debt, the policy that turned the much heralded surplus into a 20 Billion dlr deficit, the policy that allowed anyone who gets an inkling to turn up on  beach on our North with their hand out? The Policy with the Carbon Tax that is sending 1 business an hour to the wall? The policy that wanted to turn our Media into a slave to the Government?...They some of them Dnarever?

Gillard sure is a one trick pony.  A one term pony too.

How about some context, progs.

MOTR wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 9:30pm:

How about some context, progs.

you might be waiting a while .... if it's not on Pickering he doesn't get past the title.

MOTR wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 9:30pm:

How about some context, progs.

Gillard helps with context

Gillard to man (you) for asking a question
"misogynist motr is back"

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 9:36pm:

MOTR wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 9:30pm: How about some context, progs. Gillard helps with context Gillard to man (you) for asking a question "misogynist motr is back"

ohh, the village idiot struggled with that did he?

John Smith wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 9:38pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 9:36pm: MOTR wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 9:30pm: How about some context, progs. Gillard helps with context Gillard to man (you) for asking a question "misogynist motr is back" ohh, the village idiot struggled with that did he?

Ill have you know that gillard may look flat chested and like a man, but she is all womanz

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 9:40pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 9:38pm: progressiveslol wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 9:36pm: MOTR wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 9:30pm: How about some context, progs. Gillard helps with context Gillard to man (you) for asking a question "misogynist motr is back" ohh, the village idiot struggled with that did he? Ill have you know that gillard may look flat chested and like a man, but she is all womanz

opps, he's lost it completely folks .... go to bed progs, you'll feel better in the morning.

John Smith wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 9:42pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 9:40pm: John Smith wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 9:38pm: progressiveslol wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 9:36pm: MOTR wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 9:30pm: How about some context, progs. Gillard helps with context Gillard to man (you) for asking a question "misogynist motr is back" ohh, the village idiot struggled with that did he? Ill have you know that gillard may look flat chested and like a man, but she is all womanz opps, he's lost it completely folks .... go to bed progs, you'll feel better in the morning.

Dont think so. You were talking about gillard, so in reference, lost it = found it, got it, nailed it.  ;D

Maqqa wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 4:37pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 3:41pm: progressiveslol wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 3:38pm: Dnarever wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 3:36pm: she is a strong woman with strong policies, while Abbott is a weak man with weak policies. I think you have accidentally hit the nail on the head. That gillard is a misandrist. Yes we know how sexist the woman is, she displays it in parliament in its true form from time to time when she slips up and thinks she is being smart. Abbott has a long long consistant history that you can not cover up. The history interpreted by Gillard to improve her polls

Abbotts views on Women and womans issues were well known before anybody even knew who Julia Gillard was.

Difficult to blame Gillard for Abbotts poor behaviour and attrocious record, nice try though.

Dnarever wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 10:41pm:

Maqqa wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 4:37pm: Dnarever wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 3:41pm: progressiveslol wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 3:38pm: Dnarever wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 3:36pm: she is a strong woman with strong policies, while Abbott is a weak man with weak policies. I think you have accidentally hit the nail on the head. That gillard is a misandrist. Yes we know how sexist the woman is, she displays it in parliament in its true form from time to time when she slips up and thinks she is being smart. Abbott has a long long consistant history that you can not cover up. The history interpreted by Gillard to improve her polls Abbotts views on Women and womans issues were well known before anybody even knew who Julia Gillard was. Difficult to blame Gillard for Abbotts poor behaviour and attrocious record, nice try though.

Are well crafted by the left during the Howard years in hope of bringing down the then government

Maqqa wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 11:05pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 10:41pm: Maqqa wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 4:37pm: Dnarever wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 3:41pm: progressiveslol wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 3:38pm: Dnarever wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 3:36pm: she is a strong woman with strong policies, while Abbott is a weak man with weak policies. I think you have accidentally hit the nail on the head. That gillard is a misandrist. Yes we know how sexist the woman is, she displays it in parliament in its true form from time to time when she slips up and thinks she is being smart. Abbott has a long long consistant history that you can not cover up. The history interpreted by Gillard to improve her polls Abbotts views on Women and womans issues were well known before anybody even knew who Julia Gillard was. Difficult to blame Gillard for Abbotts poor behaviour and attrocious record, nice try though. Are well crafted by the left during the Howard years in hope of bringing down the then government

Pretty desperate, that is not how Labor tend to opperate in opposition and the numbers at that time make you comment look as silly as it is.

Clearly undermining one or even 5 government ministers would not have overturned the government.

Dnarever wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 11:08pm:

Maqqa wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 11:05pm: Dnarever wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 10:41pm: Maqqa wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 4:37pm: Dnarever wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 3:41pm: progressiveslol wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 3:38pm: Dnarever wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 3:36pm: she is a strong woman with strong policies, while Abbott is a weak man with weak policies. I think you have accidentally hit the nail on the head. That gillard is a misandrist. Yes we know how sexist the woman is, she displays it in parliament in its true form from time to time when she slips up and thinks she is being smart. Abbott has a long long consistant history that you can not cover up. The history interpreted by Gillard to improve her polls Abbotts views on Women and womans issues were well known before anybody even knew who Julia Gillard was. Difficult to blame Gillard for Abbotts poor behaviour and attrocious record, nice try though. Are well crafted by the left during the Howard years in hope of bringing down the then government Pretty desperate, that is not how Labor tend to opperate in opposition and the numbers at that time make you comment look as silly as it is. Clearly undermining one or even 5 government ministers would not have overturned the government.

You look pretty silly because I did say "in hope of bringing down the government"

Never said "it will bring down the government"

As for "not how Labor tends to operate" - once again it's your one-eyed observation

Maqqa wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 11:18pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 11:08pm: Pretty desperate, that is not how Labor tend to opperate in opposition and the numbers at that time make you comment look as silly as it is. Clearly undermining one or even 5 government ministers would not have overturned the government. You look pretty silly because I did say "in hope of bringing down the government" Never said "it will bring down the government" As for "not how Labor tends to operate" - once again it's your one-eyed observation

"in hope of bringing down the government"

As I said silly - it just wasn't on, your clarification was sillier than the original statment.

As for "not how Labor tends to operate" - once again it's your one-eyed observation

No its not the feral opositions in my life time have been the Fraser opposition - the Howard opposition not quite as much and the Abbott opposition worst than Fraser.

Labor oppositions tend to behave as responsible oppositions, they perform in a very different manner.

Dnarever wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 12:09am:

Maqqa wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 11:18pm: Dnarever wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 11:08pm: Pretty desperate, that is not how Labor tend to opperate in opposition and the numbers at that time make you comment look as silly as it is. Clearly undermining one or even 5 government ministers would not have overturned the government. You look pretty silly because I did say "in hope of bringing down the government" Never said "it will bring down the government" As for "not how Labor tends to operate" - once again it's your one-eyed observation "in hope of bringing down the government" As I said silly - it just wasn't on, your clarification was sillier than the original statment. As for "not how Labor tends to operate" - once again it's your one-eyed observation No its not the feral opositions in my life time have been the Fraser opposition - the Howard opposition not quite as much and the Abbott opposition worst than Fraser. Labor oppositions tend to behave as responsible oppositions, they perform in a very different manner.

Thats because, as they are a bunch of dummies in power, they are also a bunch of dummies in opposition.

It not because labor dont know how to be dirty ("in hope of bringing down the government"), it is because labor dont know how to be smart.

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 9:36pm:

MOTR wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 9:30pm: How about some context, progs. Gillard helps with context Gillard to man (you) for asking a question "misogynist motr is back"

Did she call Tony a misogynist, again?

MOTR wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 5:36am:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 9:36pm: MOTR wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 9:30pm: How about some context, progs. Gillard helps with context Gillard to man (you) for asking a question "misogynist motr is back" Did she call Tony a misogynist, again?

And her a strong woman and a man weak. Cant believe how sexist she is in the open. She has nothing to lose I guess, as only the rusted on respect her at this stage and she must believe the rusted on are also sexist and love this type of thing.

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 12:11am:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 12:09am: Maqqa wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 11:18pm: Dnarever wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 11:08pm: Pretty desperate, that is not how Labor tend to opperate in opposition and the numbers at that time make you comment look as silly as it is. Clearly undermining one or even 5 government ministers would not have overturned the government. You look pretty silly because I did say "in hope of bringing down the government" Never said "it will bring down the government" As for "not how Labor tends to operate" - once again it's your one-eyed observation "in hope of bringing down the government" As I said silly - it just wasn't on, your clarification was sillier than the original statment. As for "not how Labor tends to operate" - once again it's your one-eyed observation No its not the feral opositions in my life time have been the Fraser opposition - the Howard opposition not quite as much and the Abbott opposition worst than Fraser. Labor oppositions tend to behave as responsible oppositions, they perform in a very different manner. Thats because, as they are a bunch of dummies in power, they are also a bunch of dummies in opposition. It not because labor dont know how to be dirty ("in hope of bringing down the government"), it is because labor dont know how to be smart.

So you approve of the way that Abbott and co have undermined Australia for the last 3 years at every opportunity for nothing but their personal political advantage.

It has been a disgraceful exhibition from a terrible opposition keen to hurt Australia at every turn.

They have not been smart - more like mean tricky and dishonest.

Dnarever wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 7:27am:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 12:11am: Dnarever wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 12:09am: Maqqa wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 11:18pm: [quote author=Jim_Puddle-Duck link=1363670125/25#25 date=1363698537] Pretty desperate, that is not how Labor tend to opperate in opposition and the numbers at that time make you comment look as silly as it is. Clearly undermining one or even 5 government ministers would not have overturned the government. You look pretty silly because I did say "in hope of bringing down the government" Never said "it will bring down the government" As for "not how Labor tends to operate" - once again it's your one-eyed observation "in hope of bringing down the government" As I said silly - it just wasn't on, your clarification was sillier than the original statment. As for "not how Labor tends to operate" - once again it's your one-eyed observation No its not the feral opositions in my life time have been the Fraser opposition - the Howard opposition not quite as much and the Abbott opposition worst than Fraser. Labor oppositions tend to behave as responsible oppositions, they perform in a very different manner. Thats because, as they are a bunch of dummies in power, they are also a bunch of dummies in opposition. It not because labor dont know how to be dirty ("in hope of bringing down the government"), it is because labor dont know how to be smart.

So you approve of the way that Abbott Gillard and co have undermined Australia for the last 3 years at every opportunity for nothing but their personal political advantage.

It has been a disgraceful exhibition from a terrible opposition  government keen to hurt Australia at every turn.

They have not been smart - more like mean tricky and dishonest.

Fixed it for you DNA.

Dnarever wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 3:36pm:

she is a strong woman with strong policies, while Abbott is a weak man with weak policies. I think you have accidentally hit the nail on the head.

strong policies??  how about we go for GOOD policies instead?

Dnarever wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 12:09am:

Maqqa wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 11:18pm: Dnarever wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 11:08pm: Pretty desperate, that is not how Labor tend to opperate in opposition and the numbers at that time make you comment look as silly as it is. Clearly undermining one or even 5 government ministers would not have overturned the government. You look pretty silly because I did say "in hope of bringing down the government" Never said "it will bring down the government" As for "not how Labor tends to operate" - once again it's your one-eyed observation "in hope of bringing down the government" As I said silly - it just wasn't on, your clarification was sillier than the original statment. As for "not how Labor tends to operate" - once again it's your one-eyed observation No its not the feral opositions in my life time have been the Fraser opposition - the Howard opposition not quite as much and the Abbott opposition worst than Fraser. Labor oppositions tend to behave as responsible oppositions, they perform in a very different manner.

vomitous drivel and nothing more that rewriting of history.

Dnarever wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 7:27am:

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 12:11am: Dnarever wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 12:09am: Maqqa wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 11:18pm: Dnarever wrote on Mar 19th, 2013 at 11:08pm: Pretty desperate, that is not how Labor tend to opperate in opposition and the numbers at that time make you comment look as silly as it is. Clearly undermining one or even 5 government ministers would not have overturned the government. You look pretty silly because I did say "in hope of bringing down the government" Never said "it will bring down the government" As for "not how Labor tends to operate" - once again it's your one-eyed observation "in hope of bringing down the government" As I said silly - it just wasn't on, your clarification was sillier than the original statment. As for "not how Labor tends to operate" - once again it's your one-eyed observation No its not the feral opositions in my life time have been the Fraser opposition - the Howard opposition not quite as much and the Abbott opposition worst than Fraser. Labor oppositions tend to behave as responsible oppositions, they perform in a very different manner. Thats because, as they are a bunch of dummies in power, they are also a bunch of dummies in opposition. It not because labor dont know how to be dirty ("in hope of bringing down the government"), it is because labor dont know how to be smart. So you approve of the way that Abbott and co have undermined Australia for the last 3 years at every opportunity for nothing but their personal political advantage. It has been a disgraceful exhibition from a terrible opposition keen to hurt Australia at every turn. They have not been smart - more like mean tricky and dishonest.

the coalition have supported 90% of govt bills - about the same as any previous govt. So your point is what exactly??  And you can hardly say that the coalition has not right - either constitutional or moral - to oppose some of this govt legislation. We have an adversarial kind of government. So unless you want to change that and replace parliament with a rubber stamp you need to accept that you cant get your own way all the time.

and something you seem to forget is that Gillard sold her soul to the Greens and what did they give her back? Abbott cant stop ANY legislation unless the Greens also reject it. So where's your complaint about the Greens?

Dnarever wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 12:09am:

[quote author=Maqqa link=1363670125/26#26 date=1363699127][quote author=Jim_Puddle-Duck link=1363670125/25#25 date=1363698537] Labor oppositions tend to behave as responsible oppositions, they perform in a very different manner.

But then again I think we can expect Labor 2013 to perform as competently in Opposition as they have been doing in Government eh.
I think the Coalition better get set for another three terms in Government.

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 8:14am:

the coalition have supported 90% of govt bills - about the same as any previous govt. So your point is what exactly??  And you can hardly say that the coalition has not right - either constitutional or moral - to oppose some of this govt legislation. We have an adversarial kind of government. So unless you want to change that and replace parliament with a rubber stamp you need to accept that you cant get your own way all the time. and something you seem to forget is that Gillard sold her soul to the Greens and what did they give her back? Abbott cant stop ANY legislation unless the Greens also reject it. So where's your complaint about the Greens?

Two of the stand out areas is the manner in which the opposition ensured that the boats were not stopped, not because of their beliefs but just to hurt Labor. For a party with their beliefs this was despicable.

and

Any opportunity to adversly impact the budget outcome - they have deliberatly ensured that there would be no return to surplus.

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 8:17am:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 12:09am: [quote author=Maqqa link=1363670125/26#26 date=1363699127][quote author=Jim_Puddle-Duck link=1363670125/25#25 date=1363698537] Labor oppositions tend to behave as responsible oppositions, they perform in a very different manner. But then again I think we can expect Labor 2013 to perform as competently in Opposition as they have been doing in Government eh. I think the Coalition better get set for another three terms in Government.

You should pray that the opposition do better in government than they have in opposition - they have been a dishonest despicable disgrace.

Dnarever wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 8:20am:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:14am: the coalition have supported 90% of govt bills - about the same as any previous govt. So your point is what exactly??  And you can hardly say that the coalition has not right - either constitutional or moral - to oppose some of this govt legislation. We have an adversarial kind of government. So unless you want to change that and replace parliament with a rubber stamp you need to accept that you cant get your own way all the time. and something you seem to forget is that Gillard sold her soul to the Greens and what did they give her back? Abbott cant stop ANY legislation unless the Greens also reject it. So where's your complaint about the Greens? Two of the stand out areas is the manner in which the opposition ensured that the boats were not stopped, not because of their beliefs but just to hurt Labor. For a party with their beliefs this was dispicable. and Any opportunity to adversly impact the budget outcome - they have deliberatly ensured that there would be no return to surplus.

1. There was no policy to block on boat people. Maybe you can point to it if there was

2. Thats labors poor financial governance.

3. You are full of excuses for this pathetic government arent you.

Dnarever wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 8:22am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:17am: Dnarever wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 12:09am: [quote author=Maqqa link=1363670125/26#26 date=1363699127][quote author=Jim_Puddle-Duck link=1363670125/25#25 date=1363698537] Labor oppositions tend to behave as responsible oppositions, they perform in a very different manner. But then again I think we can expect Labor 2013 to perform as competently in Opposition as they have been doing in Government eh. I think the Coalition better get set for another three terms in Government. You should pray that the opposition do better in government than they have in opposition - they have been a dishonest despicable disgrace.

You need to look at the real purpose of an Opposition party.
And it has absolutely nothing to do with supporting an incompetent Labor government to implement bad policies.
And in all the KPI's an Opposition party has, the Coalition has ticked all the boxes which is why they will hand Labor the drubbing of a lifetime come September.

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 8:31am:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:22am: chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:17am: Dnarever wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 12:09am: [quote author=Maqqa link=1363670125/26#26 date=1363699127][quote author=Jim_Puddle-Duck link=1363670125/25#25 date=1363698537] Labor oppositions tend to behave as responsible oppositions, they perform in a very different manner. But then again I think we can expect Labor 2013 to perform as competently in Opposition as they have been doing in Government eh. I think the Coalition better get set for another three terms in Government. You should pray that the opposition do better in government than they have in opposition - they have been a dishonest despicable disgrace. You need to look at the real purpose of an Opposition party. And it has absolutely nothing to do with supporting an incompetent Labor government to implement bad policies. And in all the KPI's an Opposition party has, the Coalition has ticked all the boxes which is why they will hand Labor the drubbing of a lifetime come September.

You need to look at the real purpose of an Opposition party.

I am fairly sure that it is not to be a dishonest despicable disgrace

I am also fairly sure it is not to undermine Australias economic position for their political gain.

Or to ensure that problems like Boat arrivals are not stopped for their political gain.

Dnarever wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 8:20am:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:14am: the coalition have supported 90% of govt bills - about the same as any previous govt. So your point is what exactly??  And you can hardly say that the coalition has not right - either constitutional or moral - to oppose some of this govt legislation. We have an adversarial kind of government. So unless you want to change that and replace parliament with a rubber stamp you need to accept that you cant get your own way all the time. and something you seem to forget is that Gillard sold her soul to the Greens and what did they give her back? Abbott cant stop ANY legislation unless the Greens also reject it. So where's your complaint about the Greens? Two of the stand out areas is the manner in which the opposition ensured that the boats were not stopped, not because of their beliefs but just to hurt Labor. For a party with their beliefs this was despicable. and Any opportunity to adversly impact the budget outcome - they have deliberatly ensured that there would be no return to surplus.

you are confusing the coalitions actual BELIEFS and POLICIES with the concept of hurting labor. the coalition had a working effective policy which labor disbanded. why should the coalition abandon its principles to support labors continued bad policies and ideas?

the boats are a problem labor initiated and the solution is one that labor have repeated refused to countenance.

but once again, you seem to not understand the notion of what and opposition is and what is supposed to do. perhaps the word 'opposition' will clue you in.

Dnarever wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 8:33am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:31am: Dnarever wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:22am: chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:17am: Dnarever wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 12:09am: [quote author=Maqqa link=1363670125/26#26 date=1363699127][quote author=Jim_Puddle-Duck link=1363670125/25#25 date=1363698537] Labor oppositions tend to behave as responsible oppositions, they perform in a very different manner. But then again I think we can expect Labor 2013 to perform as competently in Opposition as they have been doing in Government eh. I think the Coalition better get set for another three terms in Government. You should pray that the opposition do better in government than they have in opposition - they have been a dishonest despicable disgrace. You need to look at the real purpose of an Opposition party. And it has absolutely nothing to do with supporting an incompetent Labor government to implement bad policies. And in all the KPI's an Opposition party has, the Coalition has ticked all the boxes which is why they will hand Labor the drubbing of a lifetime come September. You need to look at the real purpose of an Opposition party. I am fairly sure that it is not to be a dishonest despicable disgrace I am also fairly sure it is not to undermine Australias economic position for their political gain. Or to ensure that problems like Boat arrivals are not stopped for their political gain.

So then we can expect Labor in Opposition to agree with the Coalitions policies and to assist them in Parliament. ;)
Or is Labor too going to be regarded as a dishonest despicable disgrace?
Or is Labor going to do their job.

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 8:48am:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:33am: chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:31am: Dnarever wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:22am: chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:17am: Dnarever wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 12:09am: [quote author=Maqqa link=1363670125/26#26 date=1363699127][quote author=Jim_Puddle-Duck link=1363670125/25#25 date=1363698537] Labor oppositions tend to behave as responsible oppositions, they perform in a very different manner. But then again I think we can expect Labor 2013 to perform as competently in Opposition as they have been doing in Government eh. I think the Coalition better get set for another three terms in Government. You should pray that the opposition do better in government than they have in opposition - they have been a dishonest despicable disgrace. You need to look at the real purpose of an Opposition party. And it has absolutely nothing to do with supporting an incompetent Labor government to implement bad policies. And in all the KPI's an Opposition party has, the Coalition has ticked all the boxes which is why they will hand Labor the drubbing of a lifetime come September. You need to look at the real purpose of an Opposition party. I am fairly sure that it is not to be a dishonest despicable disgrace I am also fairly sure it is not to undermine Australias economic position for their political gain. Or to ensure that problems like Boat arrivals are not stopped for their political gain. So then we can expect Labor in Opposition to agree with the Coalitions policies and to assist them in Parliament. ;) Or is Labor too going to be regarded as a dishonest despicable disgrace? Or is Labor going to do their job.

Labor normaly do their job in opposition a lot better than the born to rule mob who spit the dummy and refuse to be a responsible opposition.

The Abbott mob have carried on like spoilt children.

Labor typically do not oppose legislation because they can when they actually believe in it. In NSW the Liberals prior to the last election had opposed privatisation of power. The federal opposition opposed an off shore solution.

These were both political decisions where they voted against their own political beliefs for political gain and both produced result which in NSW damaged the economy and federally caused many more boats to arrive.

Quote:

Misandrist Gillard is back

Again, Christians need to discern the Left wing Atheist populism of Stalin and the right wing populism of Hitler and recognize that both Atheist paradigm are evil and antichristian as well as heretical...neither Atheist position express a Christian perspective to the community...

Dnarever wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 8:57am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:48am: Dnarever wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:33am: chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:31am: Dnarever wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:22am: chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:17am: Dnarever wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 12:09am: [quote author=Maqqa link=1363670125/26#26 date=1363699127][quote author=Jim_Puddle-Duck link=1363670125/25#25 date=1363698537] Labor oppositions tend to behave as responsible oppositions, they perform in a very different manner. But then again I think we can expect Labor 2013 to perform as competently in Opposition as they have been doing in Government eh. I think the Coalition better get set for another three terms in Government. You should pray that the opposition do better in government than they have in opposition - they have been a dishonest despicable disgrace. You need to look at the real purpose of an Opposition party. And it has absolutely nothing to do with supporting an incompetent Labor government to implement bad policies. And in all the KPI's an Opposition party has, the Coalition has ticked all the boxes which is why they will hand Labor the drubbing of a lifetime come September. You need to look at the real purpose of an Opposition party. I am fairly sure that it is not to be a dishonest despicable disgrace I am also fairly sure it is not to undermine Australias economic position for their political gain. Or to ensure that problems like Boat arrivals are not stopped for their political gain. So then we can expect Labor in Opposition to agree with the Coalitions policies and to assist them in Parliament. ;) Or is Labor too going to be regarded as a dishonest despicable disgrace? Or is Labor going to do their job. Labor normaly do their job in opposition a lot better than the born to rule mob who spit the dummy and refuse to be a responsible opposition. The Abbott mob have carried on like spoilt children. Labor typically do not oppose legislation because they can when they actually believe in it. In NSW the Liberals prior to the last election had opposed privatisation of power. The federal opposition opposed an off shore solution. These were both political decisions where they voted against their own political beliefs for political gain and both produced result which in NSW damaged the economy and federally caused many more boats to arrive.

You know what the saddest thing is....

You actually believe the crap you write.

Maqqa wrote on Mar 19^th, 2013 at 6:56pm:

The interesting point here is Abbott's reaction If he stood up and defended himself - he would have not gained anything. Gillard's ultimate goal here is to drag him down to her level. She wants to engage one on one with him Gillard's playing the gender card very well here. Society is now conditioned to be more tolerant to a woman striking out at a man than for a man to strike out at a woman. When in facts it's not okay to strikeout. Using this social conditioning - Gillard have repeatedly struck out at Gillard using the "I am woman....he's a man" card If he hit back - he would have been seen as a bully attacking a woman Staying silent - he risk of being seen by some as being weaker than a woman So while he will be seen by a minority as being weak - the majority will see this as qualities of a strong leader and Gillard further displaying her bully-girl tactics of taunts.

exactly.
And all the men with a skerrick of self respect are saying "there is a woman unjustly picking on a man. he has my vote.".
All the women with a good man are saying a very similar thing.

Dnarever wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 8:20am:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:14am: the coalition have supported 90% of govt bills - about the same as any previous govt. So your point is what exactly??  And you can hardly say that the coalition has not right - either constitutional or moral - to oppose some of this govt legislation. We have an adversarial kind of government. So unless you want to change that and replace parliament with a rubber stamp you need to accept that you cant get your own way all the time. and something you seem to forget is that Gillard sold her soul to the Greens and what did they give her back? Abbott cant stop ANY legislation unless the Greens also reject it. So where's your complaint about the Greens? Two of the stand out areas is the manner in which the opposition ensured that the boats were not stopped, not because of their beliefs but just to hurt Labor. For a party with their beliefs this was despicable. and Any opportunity to adversly impact the budget outcome - they have deliberatly ensured that there would be no return to surplus.

The boats were stopped prior to Rudd becoming PM and scrapping Howards' policy. So none of this crap about negativity and Abbott standing in the way. There was a problem in the early 2000's that Howard fixed. Rudd came along as stuffed it up and Gillard has made it worse in what can only be described as an EPIC FAIL!!!

the real julia




Quote:

.........Ms Gillard startled parliament when she finished a response to a question from Mr Abbott about whether she would consider the votes of the media bills as a vote of confidence that could spark an early election. "On the question of when the election will be, the election will be on 14 September," she said. "Let me say very clearly to the Leader of the Opposition, it will be a contest counterintuitive to those believing in gender stereotypes but a contest between a strong, feisty woman and a policy-weak man, and I will win it." In the furore that followed, she made her allegation "Misogynist Tony is back". Amid the uproar, manager of opposition business Christopher Pyne leapt to his feet and repeated the word, demanding that the Speaker make her withdraw. "It is a slur on the Leader of the Opposition and a desperate ploy by a desperate Prime Minister," he yelled, before being ejected. Former attorney-general Nicola Roxon interjected when he rose, "two policy-weak men". Ms Burke said she had not heard the Prime Minister's remarks but asked her to withdraw. "If the Leader of the Opposition is upset in any way then I withdraw," she said. As Coalition members erupted in fury, Ms Burke ordered the Prime Minister to apologise "unreservedly" and sat down manager of government business Anthony Albanese as he attempted to take a point of order. Ms Burke again ordered Ms Gillard to withdraw. The Prime Minister finally obliged.But afterwards opposition members lambasted Ms Gillard for her move. "Playing the misogyny card again confirms that Julia Gillard is unworthy of the office of prime minister," deputy Liberal leader Julie Bishop said. "It was the act of a desperate prime minister whose colleagues are deserting her by the hour. "She's lashing out in a crass and undignified way." Liberal member for Higgins Kelly O'Dwyer said: "Everybody is as tired in the parliament as they are in the public of the Gillard gratuitous slap on gender whenever she is confronted by an issue that she finds challenging." Ms O'Dwyer compared the episode with Ms Gillard's comments last week on 457 visas. "This slap follows up on the Prime Minister's gratuitous playing of the race card in her comments on foreign workers and her sop to union bosses." .

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/gender-card-backfires-for-julia-gillard/story-fn59niix-1226601067210

Sprintcyclist wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 1:15pm:

the real julia Quote: .........Ms Gillard startled parliament when she finished a response to a question from Mr Abbott about whether she would consider the votes of the media bills as a vote of confidence that could spark an early election. "On the question of when the election will be, the election will be on 14 September," she said. "Let me say very clearly to the Leader of the Opposition, it will be a contest counterintuitive to those believing in gender stereotypes but a contest between a strong, feisty woman and a policy-weak man, and I will win it." In the furore that followed, she made her allegation "Misogynist Tony is back". Amid the uproar, manager of opposition business Christopher Pyne leapt to his feet and repeated the word, demanding that the Speaker make her withdraw. "It is a slur on the Leader of the Opposition and a desperate ploy by a desperate Prime Minister," he yelled, before being ejected. Former attorney-general Nicola Roxon interjected when he rose, "two policy-weak men". Ms Burke said she had not heard the Prime Minister's remarks but asked her to withdraw. "If the Leader of the Opposition is upset in any way then I withdraw," she said. As Coalition members erupted in fury, Ms Burke ordered the Prime Minister to apologise "unreservedly" and sat down manager of government business Anthony Albanese as he attempted to take a point of order. Ms Burke again ordered Ms Gillard to withdraw. The Prime Minister finally obliged.But afterwards opposition members lambasted Ms Gillard for her move. "Playing the misogyny card again confirms that Julia Gillard is unworthy of the office of prime minister," deputy Liberal leader Julie Bishop said. "It was the act of a desperate prime minister whose colleagues are deserting her by the hour. "She's lashing out in a crass and undignified way." Liberal member for Higgins Kelly O'Dwyer said: "Everybody is as tired in the parliament as they are in the public of the Gillard gratuitous slap on gender whenever she is confronted by an issue that she finds challenging." Ms O'Dwyer compared the episode with Ms Gillard's comments last week on 457 visas. "This slap follows up on the Prime Minister's gratuitous playing of the race card in her comments on foreign workers and her sop to union bosses." . http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/gender-card-backfires-for-julia-gillard/story-fn59niix-1226601067210

The real juliar is an utter disgrace and yes, many Australians are sick of her use, in parliament no less, of her try hard victim status as a woman. Her misandrist use of the word misogyny. Her outright strong man hatred.

Misandri...Hitlers doctrine... :)

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 20^th, 2013 at 8:48am:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:33am: chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:31am: Dnarever wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:22am: chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 8:17am: Dnarever wrote on Mar 20th, 2013 at 12:09am: [quote author=Maqqa link=1363670125/26#26 date=1363699127][quote author=Jim_Puddle-Duck link=1363670125/25#25 date=1363698537] Labor oppositions tend to behave as responsible oppositions, they perform in a very different manner. But then again I think we can expect Labor 2013 to perform as competently in Opposition as they have been doing in Government eh. I think the Coalition better get set for another three terms in Government. You should pray that the opposition do better in government than they have in opposition - they have been a dishonest despicable disgrace. You need to look at the real purpose of an Opposition party. And it has absolutely nothing to do with supporting an incompetent Labor government to implement bad policies. And in all the KPI's an Opposition party has, the Coalition has ticked all the boxes which is why they will hand Labor the drubbing of a lifetime come September. You need to look at the real purpose of an Opposition party. I am fairly sure that it is not to be a dishonest despicable disgrace I am also fairly sure it is not to undermine Australias economic position for their political gain. Or to ensure that problems like Boat arrivals are not stopped for their political gain. So then we can expect Labor in Opposition to agree with the Coalitions policies and to assist them in Parliament. ;) Or is Labor too going to be regarded as a dishonest despicable disgrace? Or is Labor going to do their job.

so I geuss then that the Carbon tax repeal and mining tax repeal and workchoices 2 will all be passed by a labor-dominated Senate in the spirt that you expect the coalition to simply roll-over?

do you even understand the concept of parliamentary democracy? You certainly seem to be an epic fail on the notion of principles and promises.