Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Abbott should embrace homos http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1364711192 Message started by adelcrow on Mar 31st, 2013 at 4:26pm |
Title: Abbott should embrace homos Post by adelcrow on Mar 31st, 2013 at 4:26pm
It looks like Tony is the only one in his family who hates gays and lesbians and thinks they are second class citizens not deserving of the same rights the rest of us take for granted.
http://au.news.yahoo.com/latest/a/-/latest/16479330/abbott-under-pressure-on-gay-marriage/ |
Title: Re: Abbott should embrace homos Post by Armchair_Politician on Mar 31st, 2013 at 4:27pm
So according to you, Tony Abbott isn't permitted to have a differing point of view?
|
Title: Re: Abbott should embrace homos Post by alevine on Mar 31st, 2013 at 4:28pm Armchair_Politician wrote on Mar 31st, 2013 at 4:27pm:
He can, he just isn't permitted to change his view every 2 hours, depending on who he is talking to. ;D |
Title: Re: Abbott should embrace homos Post by progressiveslol on Mar 31st, 2013 at 4:45pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Mar 31st, 2013 at 4:28pm:
Ok, so you remind me of why it is best for the people who have differing views on gays, just to keep them views. Never change your thinking and keep the box locked. Why stop at gays. Lets have that type of thinking in all aspects of life. I think you are on a winner. No I dont. I think you are a desperate little person. |
Title: Re: Abbott should embrace homos Post by John Smith on Mar 31st, 2013 at 4:51pm progressiveslol wrote on Mar 31st, 2013 at 4:45pm:
Is subway open today?? |
Title: Re: Abbott should embrace homos Post by Armchair_Politician on Mar 31st, 2013 at 4:52pm John Smith wrote on Mar 31st, 2013 at 4:51pm:
Yep, that's where Labor's vote hangs out these days. Underground... |
Title: Re: Abbott should embrace homos Post by adelcrow on Mar 31st, 2013 at 5:51pm
Hating homos and denying them basic human rights is peculiar to the worlds ultra conservatives such as the US Tea Baggers, Abbotts Liberal Party faction, the Taliban and corrupt African Warlords.
But now Abbott has a chance to change his ways and listen to his daughters and his sister on gay marriage...What will he do? |
Title: Re: Abbott should embrace homos Post by Dnarever on Mar 31st, 2013 at 5:59pm
He can't afford too, half his front bench would come out.
|
Title: Re: Abbott should embrace homos Post by freediver on Mar 31st, 2013 at 6:02pm
Progs, if 51% of the population though Abbott should embrace homos, would that make it the honourable thing to do?
|
Title: Re: Abbott should embrace homos Post by Chimp_Logic on Mar 31st, 2013 at 6:08pm adelcrow wrote on Mar 31st, 2013 at 5:51pm:
Yes the only discussion you can have in Australian (US) politics is WHAT IS YOUR VIEW ON GAY MARRIAGE, ABORTION and REFUGEES. You cannot discuss how Banks operate in this country. The level of taxation that applies to the rich and corporations. You cannot discuss why we follow the USA and the UK into senseless illegal wars Why are we still in Afganastan killing children who are hearding cattle across the field? What are we doing there? Why did we enter the illegal war in Iraq? What did we do there? How many civilians did the Australian forces kill? Who owns our so called Australian Mining industry? How much tax should they pay? Should our mining and energy resources be 83% foreign owned? What sort of health system should we have? What sort of Education system should we have? Are these adequately funded? Should private schools receive tax payers money Should private hospitals receive tax payers money? Should foreign corporations such as GM and FOrd receive millions of dollars of tax payers money JUST to keep their auto plants running in AUstralia. Should we make our own cars with Australian owned companies? No - WE STICK TO ABORTION, REFUGESS AND GAy MARRAIGE the critical issues of society we are smacking nuts in this nations - absolute suckers |
Title: Re: Abbott should embrace homos Post by Peter Freedman on Mar 31st, 2013 at 6:09pm Dnarever wrote on Mar 31st, 2013 at 5:59pm:
I don't know what his front bench would do, and don't want to know. Seeing him in his budgie smugglers he doesn't have a very large front bench, anyway. |
Title: Re: Abbott should embrace homos Post by Quantum on Mar 31st, 2013 at 6:15pm Peter Freedman wrote on Mar 31st, 2013 at 6:09pm:
But gillard has a lot on the backbench in more ways than one. |
Title: Re: Abbott should embrace homos Post by FriYAY on Mar 31st, 2013 at 6:24pm adelcrow wrote on Mar 31st, 2013 at 5:51pm:
That's your list of intollerence to gays... Does the research exhaust you? |
Title: Re: Abbott should embrace homos Post by chicken_lipsforme on Mar 31st, 2013 at 9:58pm
Stupid thread.
Abbott has more important things to concern him. |
Title: Re: Abbott should embrace homos Post by john_g on Mar 31st, 2013 at 10:02pm
I'm absolutely tired of those supporting gay marriage trying to convince the rest of us to change our opinion on the subject.
You have your opinion, I'll have mine. |
Title: Re: Abbott should embrace homos Post by corporate_whitey on Mar 31st, 2013 at 10:08pm
I suspect that like John Howard, Tony Abbots professed Christian faith is a lie and he will turn out to be a radical like John Howard imposing Anarchistic doctrines like self reliance and individualism.
|
Title: Re: Abbott should embrace homos Post by Chimp_Logic on Mar 31st, 2013 at 10:10pm
Interesting How Taliban Tony Abbott supported the IRaq invasion in 2003 (and still does) when the Pope in the Vatican made a public statement that the war should cease.
Abbott rationalised this by saying that his political life is separate from his personal faith and beliefs lol So the slaughter of 1.42 million Iraqi civilians is OK - but Taliban Tony cannot drag himself away from some interpretation of the Scriptures that morally looks down upon homosexuality Remember what the public MUST focus on 1 Gay marriage 2 Abortion 3 Asylum seekers What sort of society and economy we want is OFF the agenda What wars we fund and participate in is OFF the agenda What ideals and future plans we have for our nation is OFF the agenda Only gay marriage, abortion and asylum seekers - that's it |
Title: Re: Abbott should embrace homos Post by Chimp_Logic on Mar 31st, 2013 at 10:17pm corporate_whitey wrote on Mar 31st, 2013 at 10:08pm:
youre most probably right on what Taliban TOny would do if elected as PM But I don't understand why you would describe anything Howard did as Anarchistic Anarchism is not about chaos in the streets, or individualism Anarchism is a Greek word and is well defined. Its a system where there are NO RULERS, it is not a system where there are no rules. Anarchism is a system which is perhaps the highest form of freedom and democracy a society could potentially enjoy. It is the antithesis of Tyranny and totalitarianism. look it up - do some research in Anarchism and read some works by Anarchists over the ages. Howard's policies were best described as Stalinist type statism. Howard was also the biggest spending PM in our history. I suggest that you examine WHAT Howard spend his massive budgets on - that will expose what Howard represented and what his ideals were Howard was easily the second worst PM this country has ever had |
Title: Re: Abbott should embrace homos Post by chicken_lipsforme on Mar 31st, 2013 at 10:35pm Chimp_Logic wrote on Mar 31st, 2013 at 10:10pm:
And which other countries on the planet allow the public to decide policy? It doesn't happen so why expect it here. |
Title: Re: Abbott should embrace homos Post by corporate_whitey on Mar 31st, 2013 at 10:39pm
Abbot should clarify to us if he intends to radically impose on Christians "Muscular Individualism" an atheist doctrine that violates our religious freedom...
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved. |