Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Extremism Exposed >> Why was he free in Aust ? http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1369751141 Message started by Sprintcyclist on May 29th, 2013 at 12:25am |
Title: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Sprintcyclist on May 29th, 2013 at 12:25am Quote:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/bail-refused-for-milad-bin-ahmad-shah-al-ahmadzai-after-terror-arrest/story-e6frg6nf-1226652512401 Quote:
http://www.smh.com.au/national/man-with-links-to-alqaeda-preacher-arrested-20110928-1kxm0.html oh, look - he is a muslim !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Yadda on May 29th, 2013 at 12:43am Sprintcyclist wrote on May 29th, 2013 at 12:25am:
It is just one of those weird coincidences, sprint! |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Spot of Borg on May 29th, 2013 at 4:18am
How do you know hes muslim? Does it say hes muslim? why is the religion mentioned on stories about muslims and not on others? There have been several horrific crimes in oz last couple weeks and the religion of the perpetrators isnt mentioned.
SOB |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Sprintcyclist on May 30th, 2013 at 12:40pm yes, it says that in another news article. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by shockresist on Jun 13th, 2013 at 3:41pm Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 29th, 2013 at 4:18am:
The man was arrested more likely due to the fact he was under surveillance from the attempted robbery of the armoured van, then the threat of terrorism. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Belgarion on Jun 19th, 2013 at 8:32pm Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 29th, 2013 at 4:18am:
His religion was mentioned because it was of relevance to his actions. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Soren on Jun 19th, 2013 at 10:30pm Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 29th, 2013 at 4:18am:
;D ;D Milad bin Ahmad-Shah al-Ahmadzai - hmmm. Lemme see. Irish Catholic?? Could be, could be. You can never be sure in these multicultural times, can you, slimey old bint? The guy: His supporters: Catholic nuns, aren't they, ijit. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Karnal on Jun 19th, 2013 at 10:58pm
Now now, old chap, no need to jump to conclusions.
His tracksuit looks British at any rate. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Spot of Borg on Jun 20th, 2013 at 5:40am Soren wrote on Jun 19th, 2013 at 10:30pm:
So that means all crimes are committed by muslims? SOB |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Soren on Jun 20th, 2013 at 10:14am Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 20th, 2013 at 5:40am:
ANd how do you arrive to the conclusion that anything like that is implied by these two pictures? Or is this yet another of your slimey, stupid 'ironic' statements (or what the rest of as properly identify as your phosphorsecent idiocy)? |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Soren on Jun 20th, 2013 at 10:30am Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 29th, 2013 at 4:18am:
English metropolitan life in the 21st century: If you miss one beheading story, there’ll be another one along in a minute: A 20-year-old man has appeared in court charged with the murder of a young woman who was beheaded in a knife attack in Sheffield. Aras Hussein appeared at Sheffield Magistrates’ Court accused of murdering Reema Ramzan, 18. Miss Ramzan, who was from the Darnall area of Sheffield, died on June 4 following an incident at a property on Herries Road, in the city. Detectives said she suffered a severe knife attack resulting in fatal injuries, including the severing of her head. Hussein, of Herries Road, Sheffield, is also charged with assaulting five people at Sheffield’s Northern General Hospital, where he was taken following his arrest by police. That’s some genius policing just in the last sentence. But no Islam to see here, folks. Don’t even think about it. Just “an incident at a property”. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by gandalf on Jun 20th, 2013 at 11:51am
Sorry Soren, I must have missed the bit about it being anything at all to do with islam.
|
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Soren on Jun 20th, 2013 at 11:01pm polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 20th, 2013 at 11:51am:
I am not at all surprised. A Muslim fvcker with a Muslim name beheads a girl with a Muslim name and everyone will bleat that the news service didn't actually identify him or her as Muslims (as if the name and the full beard and the manner of killing the girls were not obvious pointers) - but then if a news service does identify a fvcker like this as Muslims, then the bozos like you and SOB will bleat about why the religion is identified in the news item. Everyone knows that this fvcker and all the crazy beheader bastards are Muslims. You know it. Yet you come the all innocent and ignorant-like little bleater. They all have Muslim names, they all act like Muslims. They are Muslims. You are Muslim. You know them being Muslim better than the rest of us. These smacking bastards should be pilloried and ridiculed and shamed at every bloody turn, and so should you, their excuser, mitigater, defender and excusing bvllshitter, because until you are shamed out of court, you will use every goddam excuse to deflect and dissemble. And to think that you are one of the 'vast majority of decent and reasonable Muslims'. God help us. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by gandalf on Jun 20th, 2013 at 11:26pm
Having a muslim sounding name doesn't make you muslim.
The media didn't state their religion probably because they have no evidence that he was a muslim. Did he commit the murder in the name of islam? If so, then there must be some evidence for this. Yet none exists based on the facts that we know. If it wasn't committed in the name of islam, then islam is entirely irrelevant to this case. Statistically, most John Smith's will identify as christian, yet when a John Smith commits a murder, we never talk about this "christian" atrocity. Finally, this grandstanding coming from the person who lied through his teeth stating that the Swedish riots were started by a knife wielding muslim attempting to commit an "islamic" honour killing. You have absolutely no legs to stand on in stating what is and what isn't factual about these cases Soren. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Soren on Jun 20th, 2013 at 11:43pm polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 20th, 2013 at 11:26pm:
As if that made any difference -even when they behead a British soldier in London, shouting allahu akhbar, and giving all the Koranic justification, chapter and verse, you will say it has nothing to do with Islam. You are the worst kind of dissembler and arse-coverer. You will take responsibility for everything - except for whatever is at hand, whatever is actually discussed, whatever is the actual point or topic. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Spot of Borg on Jun 21st, 2013 at 6:06am
You have a problem with muslims. We all get that. Seriously every crime isnt committed by a muslim and every muslim isnt a criminal. Tone it down a bit. . . . think . . . . get some therapy.
SOB |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by gandalf on Jun 21st, 2013 at 8:33am Soren wrote on Jun 20th, 2013 at 11:43pm:
No, that was very good evidence that it was committed in the name of islam. Supported by the fact that I have already acknowledged very openly that that crime was committed in the name of islam. So there goes that strawman. A bearded man with a muslim-sounding name killing his ex-girlfriend on the other hand is not itself evidence of a crime committed in the name of islam. Even you should be able to understand that Soren. After having your fairy tales exposed about what caused the Swedish riots, I can't believe you would have the gaul to come out swinging like this again. Like SOB says, you have a completely irrational problem with muslims. You need to get the bugger over yourself. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by shockresist on Jun 21st, 2013 at 11:05am polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 21st, 2013 at 8:33am:
And lets turn a blind eye to the guy who raped and killed Reba meagher, Dean the nurse who killed those nursing home residents or the 16 innocent afghanis killed by a poor rogue American soldier. Its all islams fault I say. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by gandalf on Jun 21st, 2013 at 12:27pm
All over the western world a majority of citizens still identify themselves as "christian" - mostly non-practicing, but christian nonetheless.
When an anglo-white person commits a garden-variety murder, no one thinks to label this as a "christian" crime - even though, statistically, the perpetrator is likely to identify himself as a christian. When a brown immigrant with a muslim-sounding name commits a garden-variety murder, the media correctly does not label this as an "islamic" crime - even though its more than likely the perpetrator would identify as a muslim. Yet the Soren's of this world are immediately up in arms crying out blue murder that the crime wasn't labelled as a specifically "islamic" crime. I would not mind so much if the Soren's of this world would also be up in arms whenever whilte-anglo crime is not labelled as a specifically "christian" crime. Of course, doing either is equally absurd. I have no beef with labelling crime "islamic" where there is evidence that it was committed in the name of islam - as with the UK beheading incident - the perpetrator invoked Allah, and quoted from the quran to justify his actions. But I will challenge anyone who cries "islamic crime" purely on the fact that the perpetrator has a beard and an islamic-sounding name. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by PZ547 on Jun 21st, 2013 at 3:17pm polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 21st, 2013 at 12:27pm:
How many people do you imagine you'll be able to 'challenge' in your lifetime (which could end in five minutes, tomorrow, ten or 50 years time) ? How many do you imagine you'll be able to challenge compared with opinions formed each and every day in the minds of billions ? Pretty small potatoes, aren't you? Then we come to Spot of Borg who has convinced me he/she/it posts simplistic, deliberately provocative comments in the HOPE of gulling someone into a heated response which Spot of Borg's owners/employers can attempt to translate into something which will satisfy FOB and the Jewish Council's screams for sacrificial lambs in the name of some form of 'discrimination' which they can them parlay into a headline 'discrimination' case complete with $27,000 fine and 3.5 years behind bars |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Soren on Jun 21st, 2013 at 3:40pm polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 21st, 2013 at 12:27pm:
Beheading is Islamic. Not murder. Beheading. Islamic ritual execution. The victim: Muslim man yelling Allahu Akhbar beheads wife in front of their 6 children "Moderate" Muslim founder of outreach TV station beheads wife Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 21st, 2013 at 6:06am:
Muslim name + beheading = it has EVERYTHING to do with Islam. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by gandalf on Jun 21st, 2013 at 4:18pm Soren wrote on Jun 21st, 2013 at 3:40pm:
Plenty of non-muslims commit murder by beheading. I'm not saying he doesn't identify as muslim - he probably does. But where is the evidence he committed this crime in the name of islam? There is none. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by shockresist on Jun 21st, 2013 at 7:51pm polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 21st, 2013 at 4:18pm:
It doesn't really matter to the aussie media or politicians if a crime was in the name of islam or not, they will stir up any link to islam to blame violence on muslims. Case example was the gang rape by few muslims around 12 years ago in Sydney. You had a group of guys 17-18 years old, who were not practicing muslims, spent more time in a disco than a mosque, and the muslim community were bombarded from every angle on how this kind of thing can happen in Australia. Front page media weeks on end, press releases were given, meetings were scheduled, mosques bombarded for comment etc etc. There doesn't have to be a " name in islam" link. They will make a defunct link to islam or muslims just to show that muslims are a violent munch. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Yadda on Jun 21st, 2013 at 8:57pm shockresist wrote on Jun 21st, 2013 at 7:51pm:
shockresist, What a load of insincere and deceitful shite. Google; rape, victim "had no right to say no", "She was not covering her face or wearing any headscarf" Google; Bilal rape victim was "aussie slut" Google; rape jihad Of course, moslems had nothing to do with those Sydney rapes. Moslems, only ever act righteously. And wherever bad things are done, well of course they were not moslems doing those bad things, coz those people were not acting in accordance with what ISLAM allows. BULLSHITE! BULLSHITE! BULLSHITE! BULLSHITE! BULLSHITE! BULLSHITE! ISLAMIC BULLSHITE! ISLAMIC BULLSHITE! ISLAMIC BULLSHITE! ISLAMIC BULLSHITE! i In a recent 'immigrant youth' rape case..... Google; australian judge finds muslim cultural differences valid excuse for rape p.s. i really, really, hope that someone rapes that particular judge, with a HUGE over sized dildo, coz its only natural to want to rape stupid judges with over sized dildos. honest! |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Spot of Borg on Jun 22nd, 2013 at 5:05am PZ547 wrote on Jun 21st, 2013 at 3:17pm:
Gotcha. Now you called me a jew you can pay me lots of money SOB |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by adamant on Jun 22nd, 2013 at 12:22pm Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 22nd, 2013 at 5:05am:
No, you are an aerobic bacteria named Thiobacillus concretivorus, you produce hydrogen sulphide and poison all around. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by shockresist on Jun 22nd, 2013 at 2:10pm Yadda wrote on Jun 21st, 2013 at 8:57pm:
Why should I google it. Rape Jihad? What is that? Did you imagine that? Aussie slut? Not sure why the guys called her aussie slut when most of the rapists had aussie girlfriends. They called her aussie slut not "Non muslim slut". |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Soren on Jun 22nd, 2013 at 5:13pm shockresist wrote on Jun 21st, 2013 at 11:05am:
Your fallacy is that in your mind Islam has nuffin' do wiv nuffin' because non-muslims also commit crimes. In your mind, only the act counts, not the motivation. In law (and in common sense), however, the motivation is also important. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Yadda on Jun 22nd, 2013 at 5:21pm shockresist wrote on Jun 22nd, 2013 at 2:10pm:
Coz i am associating the rape of non-moslem women as a 'lawful' act for every moslem guy. And i want non-moslems to understand that that, is true. And before you ask, the only reason that moslem men, in Australia, do not routinely rape non-moslem women, in Australia, is because Australian laws are protecting those non-moslem women. Otherwise, as in many other countries, where moslems have the 'opportunity' to do so, they ROUTINELY rape local non-moslem women. Let me say it again, in many other countries, where moslem men have the 'opportunity' to do so, they ROUTINELY rape local non-moslem women. Google it. Why do moslem men, where they have the 'opportunity' to do so, choose to ROUTINELY rape local non-moslem women ? Because they are being good moslems, by imitating the sunna of And moslem men know that they will get 'brownie points' from Allah, for imitating the acts of Yadda wrote on Sep 1st, 2009 at 9:16am:
All moslem men are taught from childhood that the actions of the life of So moslems believe that being pirate-rapists is 'good works'. And that is what moslem men are doing with non-moslem women in Pakistan, and Turkey, and Egypt, and Myanmar, and Libya, and Sudan, and Somalia, and Sweden, and England, and, and, and, and........ Raping them. Because raping local non-moslem women when the 'opportunity' is there, is 'good works'. So, are we straight now, shockresist ? +++ Hey shockresist, If rape is not permitted by ISLAM, then why wasn't Mohammed punished for the rapes which he committed [upon captive women] ? Rape your 'war booty', its OK, say ISLAMIC texts http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1251760605/0#0 The Koran refers to Mohammed's morality thus; "Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah a beautiful pattern (of conduct) for any one whose hope is in Allah and the Final Day, and who engages much in the Praise of Allah." Koran 33.021 |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by adamant on Jun 22nd, 2013 at 5:40pm
[right]
shockresist wrote on Jun 22nd, 2013 at 2:10pm:
We know you are incapable of it so don't bother. Remain ignorant. shockresist wrote on Jun 22nd, 2013 at 2:10pm:
It is what happens when the West allows muslims into our part of the world! shockresist wrote on Jun 22nd, 2013 at 2:10pm:
Because she was not a muslim you drongo. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by shockresist on Jun 22nd, 2013 at 6:45pm Adamant wrote on Jun 22nd, 2013 at 5:40pm:
All ways the muslims fault I say. Since I cant put a link cause I need more than 100 posts, members are free to research these crimes. Rabbi held for raping young girls Rabbi rapes 12 year old girl. Siks/hindus rape a female and child every 20min in india Catholic priest covered up child rape |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by shockresist on Jun 22nd, 2013 at 6:48pm shockresist wrote on Jun 22nd, 2013 at 2:10pm:
I wonder what the people did to deserve this. More Murder Rape and Pillage (Deuteronomy 20:10-14) As you approach a town to attack it, first offer its people terms for peace. If they accept your terms and open the gates to you, then all the people inside will serve you in forced labor. But if they refuse to make peace and prepare to fight, you must attack the town. When the LORD your God hands it over to you, kill every man in the town. But you may keep for yourselves all the women, children, livestock, and other plunder. You may enjoy the spoils of your enemies that the LORD your God has given you. Murder, rape, and pillage at Jabesh-gilead (Judges 21:10-24 NLT) So they sent twelve thousand warriors to Jabesh-gilead with orders to kill everyone there, including women and children. "This is what you are to do," they said. "Completely destroy all the males and every woman who is not a virgin." Among the residents of Jabesh-gilead they found four hundred young virgins who had never slept with a man, and they brought them to the camp at Shiloh in the land of Canaan. Rape of Female Captives (Deuteronomy 21:10-14 NAB) "When you go out to war against your enemies and the LORD, your God, delivers them into your hand, so that you take captives, if you see a comely woman among the captives and become so enamored of her that you wish to have her as wife, you may take her home to your house. But before she may live there, she must shave her head and pare her nails and lay aside her captive's garb. After she has mourned her father and mother for a full month, you may have relations with her, and you shall be her husband and she shall be your wife. However, if later on you lose your liking for her, you shall give her her freedom, if she wishes it; but you shall not sell her or enslave her, since she was married to you under compulsion." |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Soren on Jun 23rd, 2013 at 1:05am shockresist wrote on Jun 22nd, 2013 at 2:10pm:
Thank you, SOB, you may bugger off. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Spot of Borg on Jun 23rd, 2013 at 4:41am Soren wrote on Jun 23rd, 2013 at 1:05am:
go away troll SOB |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Yadda on Jun 23rd, 2013 at 5:32am shockresist wrote on Jun 22nd, 2013 at 6:45pm:
We agree, then. :Pi Quote:
shockresist, The difference between other cultures, and ISLAM, is that; ISLAM sanctions rape - when the rapee's are non-moslem women. FROM THE KORAN, "..Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess:..." Koran 4.22-24 "O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee;..." Koran 33.50 "women.....whom your right hands possess" ??? Q. What does that mean ??? A. war booty, i.e. captive women slaves. YOUR EXAMPLES...... Rabbi held for raping young girls - Judaism DOES NOT SANCTION THE rape young girls Rabbi rapes 12 year old girl - Judaism DOES NOT SANCTION THE rape young girls Siks/hindus rape a female and child every 20min in india - Indian law DOES NOT SANCTION THE rape young girls Catholic priest covered up child rape - Christianity DOES NOT SANCTION THE rape young girls July 12, 2008 Pakistan: Christian girls kidnapped; captors file for custody, claiming girls converted to Islam And the police weren't about to be of any help without outside pressure: The girls' father "was told to 'remain silent,' as the officers said the girls had embraced Islam in a written statement." "Pakistan: Girls kidnapped, allegedly forced to convert," http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/021731.php "The girls' father "was told to 'remain silent,' " July 14, 2008 Pakistan: 13- and 10-year-old girls abducted, raped, and forced into the fold of Islam More Christian girls being forced to convert to the religion of peace. As this report notes, the Muslim majority, including the police, are either actively or passively aiding the abductors, a common phenomenon in Muslim majority countries, such as Egypt, where Coptic girls are regularly abducted. http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/021760.php update.... July 20, 2008 Pakistan: Court grants custody of Christian girls to Muslim kidnappers Because they converted to Islam, you see. More on this story. "Pakistan: Court Grants Custody of Girls to Kidnappers," from Compass Direct News, July 18: ISTANBUL, July 18 (Compass Direct News) A Pakistani couple has appealed a court decision to award custody of their two daughters, 10 and 13, to the children’s alleged kidnappers. The court based its custody decision on the girls’ conversion to Islam. http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/021866.php January 14, 2009 Pakistan: Christian girls drugged, coverted to Islam, sold as sex slaves Muslim men are permitted to have sex with the "captives their right hands possess" (Qur'an 4:24). "Christian Girls Drugged and Sold As Sex Slaves in Pakistan," from AINA, January 13: http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/024393.php Allah Akbar!!!!! |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Yadda on Jun 23rd, 2013 at 5:45am Yadda wrote on Jun 23rd, 2013 at 5:32am:
shockresist, ISLAM, Allah's perfect religion [ROFLOL!], sanctions rape - when the rapee's are non-moslem women. Even moslems, in unguarded moments, will admit that truth. Quote:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/06/kuwait-female-political-activist-calls-for-legalizing-sex-slavery-to-protect-men-from-adultery-or-co.html i.e. In the article above, ISLAMISTS are saying, that the keeping of captive [non-moslem] women [within Sharia jurisdictions] as sex slaves, is completely 'lawful' within ISLAM. And that raping those sex slaves [female captives] is halal [i.e. kosher]. see also, THE DESCRIPTION OF LIFE IN A 'RIGHTLY GUIDED' ISLAMIC CALIPHATE... Quote:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/06/egyptian-imam-when-i-want-a-sex-slave-i-just-go-to-the-market-and-choose-the-woman-i-like-and-purcha.html ISLAM, Allah's perfect religion [ROFLOL!], makes criminal behaviour, lawful. ISLAM, Allah's perfect religion [ROFLOL!], sanctifies PERVERSION. ISLAM, Allah's perfect religion [ROFLOL!], legitimises criminal behaviour, in moslem society. shockresist, Aren't you humiliated by these truths about ISLAM, being exposed for everyone to see ??? I really hope that you are! |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Yadda on Jun 23rd, 2013 at 6:08am shockresist wrote on Jun 22nd, 2013 at 6:48pm:
They use to take their own child to a 'barbeque', as the main course. That is what those people [in O.T. times] did to deserve 'this'. Quote:
You poor, poor demented thing. "The ancient Hebrews did it [3,400 years ago], so we moslems can do it too. Coz we are God's people today!" ??? shockresist, My response in full, to your bible quotes, is here.... 'Western culture is perverse, corrupt.', ISLAMISTS http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1323918513/11#11 Quote:
|
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by shockresist on Jun 23rd, 2013 at 8:44am Yadda wrote on Jun 23rd, 2013 at 6:08am:
[/quote] Well, you find a fault with a muslims actions, then you run and find out any link that it has to islam even though they have no connection to the incident at hand. Example, your linking muslims rape crime and going back 1400 years to find a story which 99% of muslims haven't even heard of or studied the battles that you bring proof that rape is allowed. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Soren on Jun 23rd, 2013 at 2:59pm shockresist wrote on Jun 22nd, 2013 at 6:48pm:
You must be a Muslim. Only Muslims know these sort of OT passages. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Chimp_Logic on Jun 23rd, 2013 at 8:44pm Soren wrote on Jun 23rd, 2013 at 2:59pm:
You have to admit that Muslim people are way ahead of citizens in western nations, when it comes to morality and integrity of character. The statistics and obvious results of Islam proves this without a shadow of a doubt. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by adamant on Jun 23rd, 2013 at 10:13pm Chimp_Logic wrote on Jun 23rd, 2013 at 8:44pm:
It may appear to some that you have made a stupid statement. Here on Ozpolitic however sane contributors know you as a complete smacking moron. http://patdollard.com/2013/06/6-muslims-sentenced-to-community-service-for-gang-rape-of-15-year-old-swedish-girl/ We in the west would be happy if mo men decided to Shiites in their own sand pit. Here is a piece that would make most muslim men salivate. http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/407931/Scots-police-smash-two-large-paedophile-rings Quote "There are groups of foreign nationals involved in this and maybe respect for women isn't seen as being a high priority in their country of origin.” I remember watching Punch and Judy as a kid, this is not a parody however. http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/06/london-based-muslim-tv-channel-rebroadcasts-show-on-wife-beating-to-european-audiences-in-french-eng.html Lets have a look at Europe to see if they like islam. http://islamversuseurope.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/netherlands-muslims-rape-torture-and.html http://www.geertwilders.nl/index.php/in-english-mainmenu-98/in-the-press-mainmenu-101/77-in-the-press/1828-reaction-geert-wilders-to-islam-poll-the-netherlands-has-had-enough-of-islam Lets see if they have blended into the background in Sweden/ http://www.siotw.org/modules/news_english/item.php?itemid=1228&fb_source=message#.Ub8Luxo21FJ.facebook No it seems no better in that place. Lets try a Muslim Country how about Saudi Arabia, the biggest sponsor of state terrorism on the planet today. http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/middle-east/2013/06/22/Fight-or-flight-Saudi-cleric-heads-to-London-after-calling-for-Jihad-in-Syria.html Redeeming features are sadly lacking in the birth place of the first muslim it seems, so I will say goodbye you illogical Ape. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Yadda on Jun 24th, 2013 at 10:22am Chimp_Logic wrote on Jun 23rd, 2013 at 8:44pm:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/02/somalia-al-shabaab-abducting-teenage-girls-to-marry-jihadists.html and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on..... |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Yadda on Jun 24th, 2013 at 10:28am Chimp_Logic wrote on Jun 23rd, 2013 at 8:44pm:
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1231993677/36#36 http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1315270914/16#16 http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1236217597/2#2 http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1302177029/3#3 |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by gandalf on Jun 24th, 2013 at 10:49am Yadda wrote on Jun 24th, 2013 at 10:28am:
Yemeni law: Quote:
The marriage was annulled: Quote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7351336.stm Yadda wrote on Jun 24th, 2013 at 10:28am:
Pretty funny isn't it? I have regular lols reading about kids getting raped and abused. |
Title: Re: Why was he free in Aust ? Post by Yadda on Jun 24th, 2013 at 9:59pm polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 24th, 2013 at 10:49am:
The LOL, was at the absurd chimp statement..... Yadda wrote on Jun 24th, 2013 at 10:28am:
But, it is good gandalf, To see that the only way that you can find to attack me, attack my posts, is by misrepresenting my LOL's as being a LOL at a heinous moslem sexual abuse act against an 8, eight, year old girl. ISLAM, the philosophy which gandalf proudly declares that he/she is a part of. ISLAM, the philosophy which directly enabled and facilitated the marriage, and the POSSESSION, and the rape, of an 8, eight, year old girl - BY A FELLOW MOSLEM. ISLAM, the philosophy which, BY ITS LAWFUL AUTHORITY IN EVERY SHARIA JURISDICTION, makes criminal acts, lawful ! |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved. |