Ruddster
Still swanning around campaigning with other MPs. I can't remember a backbencher does this in another electorate.


Blue ties
A day after poking fun at Abbott about the LIBs being dominated with men in blue ties - Rudd rocks up the next day campaigning in a blue tie


Sattler
As I mentioned in the other thread. Sattler's comment was not sexist. It's more probable that it reflects the hatred the electorate has for Gillard. There have been female MPs for the last 30 years. Questions like this have never been levelled at female PMs before.


Abortion chestnut
When all else fails - go back to the abortion issue. Just like Workchoices chestnut. The real nut here is Gillard


Menu-gate
She criticised Brough for distributing it. She criticised Abbott for support Brough. Then it was revealed that Brough and Abbott had nothing to do with it. And it was never distributed during the dinner.

Instead of TAKING RESPONSIBILITY and apologising for being wrong - she wants to question the word of the restaurant owner.

If she wants the electorate to give her the benefit of the doubt - then she needs to give people the benefit of the doubt.


Abbott's overtaking Rudd in the polls as well

So Gillard can't even make her self sacrificing speech pretending to step down so Labor could win under Rudd

Gillard must be so pissed

Maqqa wrote on Jun 14^th, 2013 at 8:28pm:

Sattler As I mentioned in the other thread. Sattler's comment was not sexist. It's more probable that it reflects the hatred the electorate has for Gillard. There have been female MPs for the last 30 years. Questions like this have never been levelled at female

I hope Sattler asks Abbott if he's a pedophiles, we have the right to know. We also need to know if Margie is a dyke.  ::)
Dickhead.

skippy. wrote on Jun 14^th, 2013 at 8:42pm:

Maqqa wrote on Jun 14th, 2013 at 8:28pm: Sattler As I mentioned in the other thread. Sattler's comment was not sexist. It's more probable that it reflects the hatred the electorate has for Gillard. There have been female MPs for the last 30 years. Questions like this have never been levelled at female I hope Sattler asks Abbott if he's a pedophiles, we have the right to know. We also need to know if Margie is a dyke.  ::) Dickhead.

I was hoping everyone with half a brain would not respond to this Thread.

skippy. wrote on Jun 14^th, 2013 at 8:42pm:

Maqqa wrote on Jun 14th, 2013 at 8:28pm: Sattler As I mentioned in the other thread. Sattler's comment was not sexist. It's more probable that it reflects the hatred the electorate has for Gillard. There have been female MPs for the last 30 years. Questions like this have never been levelled at female I hope Sattler asks Abbott if he's a pedophiles, we have the right to know. We also need to know if Margie is a dyke.  ::) Dickhead.

Absolutely skippy, because we have the loony right justifying assertions that hairdressers are all  gay, it is public knowledge that obsessive fundamentalist catholics have the most twisted sexuality on the planet.
So we have a right to know what perversions Abbott imposes upon his "loved" ones. Luckily I have never been "loved" by a middle aged male catholic, the mere thought of what might go through those minds makes my skin crawl.
Like the Robert Hannsen guy, a fanatically pious catholic, senior FBI agent, traitor, and perverted sex deviant. He used to go to the bishop for guidance too.
Do we have a pattern here??
Surely it is in the public interest that these questions be asked?
Surely righties would think that what's good for the goose is good for the gander?
Yes?
or
No?

I know what I think, but I'm not a hypocritical Abbott fanboy, so what they actually think is getting harder and harder to know.

Aussie wrote on Jun 14^th, 2013 at 8:48pm:

skippy. wrote on Jun 14th, 2013 at 8:42pm: Maqqa wrote on Jun 14th, 2013 at 8:28pm: Sattler As I mentioned in the other thread. Sattler's comment was not sexist. It's more probable that it reflects the hatred the electorate has for Gillard. There have been female MPs for the last 30 years. Questions like this have never been levelled at female I hope Sattler asks Abbott if he's a pedophiles, we have the right to know. We also need to know if Margie is a dyke.  ::) Dickhead. I was hoping everyone with half a brain would not respond to this Thread.

A  ::) for you...

And a  ::) for me...

::)

skippy. wrote on Jun 14^th, 2013 at 8:42pm:

Maqqa wrote on Jun 14th, 2013 at 8:28pm: They may not like Abbott but they respect him more than they respect Gillard Sattler As I mentioned in the other thread. Sattler's comment was not sexist. It's more probable that it reflects the hatred the electorate has for Gillard. There have been female MPs for the last 30 years. Questions like this have never been levelled at female I hope Sattler asks Abbott if he's a pedophiles, we have the right to know. We also need to know if Margie is a dyke.  ::) Dickhead.

Maqqa wrote on Jun 14^th, 2013 at 8:28pm:

Menu-gate She criticised Brough for distributing it. She criticised Abbott for support Brough. Then it was revealed that Brough and Abbott had nothing to do with it. And it was never distributed during the dinner.

Actually, that's a lie Maqqa.

The Libs approved and distributed the menu.

The restaurant owner lied (twice).

The Libs lied.

You are one gullible MoFo.

The thing I don't get about the whole Slatter thing.
Sure he stereotyped male hairdressers as being gay yet he gets sacked.
How is that any different to the Standard Gillard set when she stereotyped men in blue ties as being sexist?

Is she saying that Homosexuals are bad people or something and that's why its offensive?
If so why would it be so wrong for a radio presenter to ask a question that would bring to light if she is living in sin or just has a room mate?

Labor just don't get it.they are being played off a break. And shockingly that break is of their own doing.
The electorate don't care about garbage like menu gate
They want action on jobs boats and cost of living.
So labor store this one away for 3months and then wheel it out and go the blue ties and the abortion.

These issues mean nothing to the electorate. They are soap opera.

They are the stuff the lobs should welcome coz it makes gillard look like some slapper at woolies mouthing off in the tearoom.

Who cares Greg if menu gate is a lie or not by the lobs. The electorate could not give a flying f.

Could you see Martin ferguson or good labor men giving such garbage oxygen.

Macca is not playing you, labor are playing themselves

I watched the whole interview on youtube which was more than was shown on the news.

I'm no Julia fan from a political point of view, but I thought she handled herself extremely well considering she was dealing with an idiot who wouldn't let the question go.

If I had been his manager I would have sacked him for no other reason than that he asked the question at all. It was ugly and grossly disrespectful of any woman, let alone the prime minister of this nation. It was embarrassing to see her being treated so shabbily.

It's this same culture of contemptuous disrespect for women that has the Australian navy and army being routinely exposed for yet more incidences of juvenile and delinquent misbehaviour towards their womenfolk.



 

Herbert

While I agree that the grubbier women's weekly style of journos feel they have a right to be attack Gillard in such a way, the way she answered the questions just made it worse.

Gillard is incapable of hosing down an issue, she just always go on the attack automatically.

I would have supported her just walking out of the interview or just asking for different questions.

It is not HER fault the guy is an arsehole - stop trying to blame the victim - if she had walked out you ppl would be saying that was the wrong thing to do

SOB

aquascoot wrote on Jun 15^th, 2013 at 6:27am:

Labor just don't get it.they are being played off a break. And shockingly that break is of their own doing. The electorate don't care about garbage like menu gate They want action on jobs boats and cost of living. So labor store this one away for 3months and then wheel it out and go the blue ties and the abortion. These issues mean nothing to the electorate. They are soap opera. They are the stuff the lobs should welcome coz it makes gillard look like some slapper at woolies mouthing off in the tearoom. Who cares Greg if menu gate is a lie or not by the lobs. The electorate could not give a flying f. Could you see Martin ferguson or good labor men giving such garbage oxygen. Macca is not playing you, labor are playing themselves

aquascoot

Gillard complains about the personal style of politics yet the function of the menugate issue was back on March..... apparently he spin/sh1t flick team were sitting on it.

RightSadFred wrote on Jun 15^th, 2013 at 7:58am:

Herbert While I agree that the grubbier women's weekly style of journos feel they have a right to be attack Gillard in such a way, the way she answered the questions just made it worse. Gillard is incapable of hosing down an issue, she just always go on the attack automatically. I would have supported her just walking out of the interview or just asking for different questions.

I thought Gillard showed exemplary style and restraint during that grossly insolent and bad mannered serving by Sattler. He deserved a hard slap in the face for his disgraceful abuse of her dignity as a woman and as the nation's prime minister.

Had Gillard's boyfriend been there, Sattler might have thought twice about asking this question rather than risk being hit by his handbag.

8-) 
 

Aussie wrote on Jun 14^th, 2013 at 8:48pm:

I was hoping everyone with half a brain would not respond to this Thread.

Doesn't say much for your cerebral hemisphere, which appears to be sadly lacking.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 15^th, 2013 at 12:21am:

Maqqa wrote on Jun 14th, 2013 at 8:28pm: Menu-gate She criticised Brough for distributing it. She criticised Abbott for support Brough. Then it was revealed that Brough and Abbott had nothing to do with it. And it was never distributed during the dinner. Actually, that's a lie Maqqa. The Libs approved and distributed the menu. The restaurant owner lied (twice). The Libs lied. You are one gullible MoFo.

Could you show evidence of this approval?