The mannerisms of the baby ~ is he gay?

Will he be the first open gay head of state if Australia never grows up into a republic.


Royal Baby: British Public Happy With A Gay King, Poll Finds


An overwhelming majority of British subjects would not have a problem if the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge's newly born son turned out to be gay.

A YouGov poll for Stonewall has found that 83% of people in Britain would be "very comfortable", "comfortable", or "neutral" if the heir to the throne was lesbian, gay or bisexual. The poll was conducted before the sex of the child was revealed.

During the recent parliamentary debates over whether to introduce gay marriage, Lord Tebbit caused confusion by warning of the dangers of a lesbian queen.

"When we have a queen who is a lesbian and she marries another lady and then decides she would like to have a child and someone donates sperm and she gives birth to a child, is that child heir to the throne?" he said.

However the polling suggests the British public are not quite as scared by the prospect as the former Tory cabinet minister.

Stonewall Chief Executive Ben Summerskill said: "Millions of people will be celebrating today’s news, just as millions last week celebrated the news of equal marriage in England and Wales. Happily, since last week every child born in Britain is born into a society where gay people are now equal in law."

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/07/23/royal-baby-gay-king_n_3639637.html

you are one sick dude.. thats for sure...isnt there a gay forum on here you can join.. >:(

cods wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 9:46am:

you are one sick dude.. thats for sure...isnt there a gay forum on here you can join.. >:(

Yuck !

that's the lib party forum

moron

Is The Royal Baby Gay?

If he is he will fit in well, with the not so openly gay royals.

He might even be safe, being gay in the royal circle is not as bad as being Arab.

This is in shocking taste.


Really poor form.

This is a little baby.

Well I’m sure if the faggots got to him they would do everything in their power to convince him he was gay.

Seems that gays need acceptance at every turn.

Probably internal turmoil.

FriYAY wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 10:49am:

Well I’m sure if the faggots got to him they would do everything in their power to convince him he was gay. Seems that gays need acceptance at every turn. Probably internal turmoil.

Why is this hate speech allowed on here?

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 10:47am:

This is in shocking taste. Really poor form. This is a little baby.

Homosexuality is a born trait, not a thing to revile from.

For the sake of the baby, review your hatred of gay children.

____ wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 11:00am:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 10:47am: This is in shocking taste. Really poor form. This is a little baby. Homosexuality is a born trait, not a thing to revile from. For the sake of the baby, review your hatred of gay children.

stupidity can also be a born trait ... one which it appears you have inherited.

____ wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 11:00am:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 10:47am: This is in shocking taste. Really poor form. This is a little baby. Homosexuality is a born trait, not a thing to revile from. For the sake of the baby, review your hatred of gay children.

So you have already concluded the baby is gay. Sick moron.

donincognito wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 10:59am:

FriYAY wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 10:49am: Well I’m sure if the faggots got to him they would do everything in their power to convince him he was gay. Seems that gays need acceptance at every turn. Probably internal turmoil. Why is this hate speech allowed on here?

And the internal turmoil bubbles to the surface……..not a good look. :(

Ahhh, the intolerance of gays squealing about tolerance, gold.

Quantum wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 11:07am:

____ wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:00am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 10:47am: This is in shocking taste. Really poor form. This is a little baby. Homosexuality is a born trait, not a thing to revile from. For the sake of the baby, review your hatred of gay children. So you have already concluded the baby is gay. Sick moron.

Have I.

For the sake of all babies, gay, bi, het, inter, homophobes should revaluate their position.

Don't you guys have work to do?

http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130217000843/dragonball/images/thumb/c/cd/Baby-facepalm.jpg/626px-Baby-facepalm.jpg

____ wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 11:23am:

Quantum wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:07am: ____ wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:00am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 10:47am: This is in shocking taste. Really poor form. This is a little baby. Homosexuality is a born trait, not a thing to revile from. For the sake of the baby, review your hatred of gay children. So you have already concluded the baby is gay. Sick moron. Have I. For the sake of all babies, gay, bi, het, inter, homophobes should revaluate their position.

Yes you have.


Quote:

For the sake of the baby

____ wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 9:16am:

The mannerisms of the baby ~ is he gay? Will he be the first open gay head of state if Australia never grows up into a republic. Royal Baby: British Public Happy With A Gay King, Poll Finds An overwhelming majority of British subjects would not have a problem if the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge's newly born son turned out to be gay. A YouGov poll for Stonewall has found that 83% of people in Britain would be "very comfortable", "comfortable", or "neutral" if the heir to the throne was lesbian, gay or bisexual. The poll was conducted before the sex of the child was revealed. During the recent parliamentary debates over whether to introduce gay marriage, Lord Tebbit caused confusion by warning of the dangers of a lesbian queen. "When we have a queen who is a lesbian and she marries another lady and then decides she would like to have a child and someone donates sperm and she gives birth to a child, is that child heir to the throne?" he said. However the polling suggests the British public are not quite as scared by the prospect as the former Tory cabinet minister. Stonewall Chief Executive Ben Summerskill said: "Millions of people will be celebrating today’s news, just as millions last week celebrated the news of equal marriage in England and Wales. Happily, since last week every child born in Britain is born into a society where gay people are now equal in law." http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/07/23/royal-baby-gay-king_n_3639637.html

It's little wonder Britain is finished as a leader and cultural power when this kind of garbage is what fills people's minds.

FriYAY wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 11:18am:

donincognito wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 10:59am: FriYAY wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 10:49am: Well I’m sure if the faggots got to him they would do everything in their power to convince him he was gay. Seems that gays need acceptance at every turn. Probably internal turmoil. Why is this hate speech allowed on here? And the internal turmoil bubbles to the surface……..not a good look. :( Ahhh, the intolerance of gays squealing about tolerance, gold.

There is no internal turmoil over here. Im very secure in my sexuality, and I have a great time.

My question remains. Why is this hate speech allowed on here?

Hey I know guys - let's show how "tolerant" and "open minded" we are by wishing misofrtune upon newborn babies.

My turn - I hope the baby has a congenital heart defect!  Aren't I great?!

Quantum wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 11:28am:

____ wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:23am: Quantum wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:07am: ____ wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:00am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 10:47am: This is in shocking taste. Really poor form. This is a little baby. Homosexuality is a born trait, not a thing to revile from. For the sake of the baby, review your hatred of gay children. So you have already concluded the baby is gay. Sick moron. Have I. For the sake of all babies, gay, bi, het, inter, homophobes should revaluate their position. Yes you have. Quote: For the sake of the baby

That doesn't prove your argument.

If I claimed it was a certainty, I would of stated it.

... wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 11:36am:

Hey I know guys - let's show how "tolerant" and "open minded" we are by wishing misofrtune upon newborn babies. My turn - I hope the baby has a congenital heart defect!  Aren't I great?!

Yet homosexuality isn't a faulty organ. It is a part of the diversity of humanity.

Why do homophobes want to homogenise and weaken the experience of being human.

____ wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 11:42am:

Quantum wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:28am: ____ wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:23am: Quantum wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:07am: ____ wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:00am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 10:47am: This is in shocking taste. Really poor form. This is a little baby. Homosexuality is a born trait, not a thing to revile from. For the sake of the baby, review your hatred of gay children. So you have already concluded the baby is gay. Sick moron. Have I. For the sake of all babies, gay, bi, het, inter, homophobes should revaluate their position. Yes you have. Quote: For the sake of the baby That doesn't prove your argument. If I claimed it was a certainty, I would of stated it.

Unless we start redefining the use of definite articles and singular nouns... Yes it does. 

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 10:47am:

This is in shocking taste. Really poor form. This is a little baby.

Im sure the lil baby is offended too - knowing how to read and all . . . .

If someone other than greens had posted it you would all be on the bandwagon

SOB

http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

FriYAY wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 11:18am:

donincognito wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 10:59am: FriYAY wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 10:49am: Well I’m sure if the faggots got to him they would do everything in their power to convince him he was gay. Seems that gays need acceptance at every turn. Probably internal turmoil. Why is this hate speech allowed on here? And the internal turmoil bubbles to the surface……..not a good look. :( Ahhh, the intolerance of gays squealing about tolerance, gold.

Oh really? Who are gays intolerant of?

SOB

http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

Quantum wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 11:48am:

____ wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:42am: Quantum wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:28am: ____ wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:23am: Quantum wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:07am: ____ wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:00am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 10:47am: This is in shocking taste. Really poor form. This is a little baby. Homosexuality is a born trait, not a thing to revile from. For the sake of the baby, review your hatred of gay children. So you have already concluded the baby is gay. Sick moron. Have I. For the sake of all babies, gay, bi, het, inter, homophobes should revaluate their position. Yes you have. Quote: For the sake of the baby That doesn't prove your argument. If I claimed it was a certainty, I would of stated it. Unless we start redefining the use of definite articles and singular nouns... Yes it does.

For the sake of the baby, the less hatred there is the better.

The baby doesn't have to be exclusively gay to benefit.

I was not imply the baby was gay. He could be bisexual.

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 9:59am:

Is The Royal Baby Gay? If he is he will fit in well, with the not so openly gay royals. He might even be safe, being gay in the royal circle is not as bad as being Arab.

I dont have any problems with anyone being gay even if they do happen to be of royal birth.. none of my business..I do think anyone making jokes or disparaging remarks is in bad taste.. and completely unnecessary and they wonder why most people avoid them

Not so much in bad taste as in fun. Have you heard some of the comments the royals have made about us commoners over the years?

They're always good value to ridicule.

Charlie said....yeees..yeees..wo..wo..one is a..a..a grand papa.....Maggie Thatcher all over again.

Anyway, if the lad turns out to be gay, good on him, he won't be the first gay king of England, although he might be the first to admit it.

____ wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 11:47am:

... wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:36am: Hey I know guys - let's show how "tolerant" and "open minded" we are by wishing misofrtune upon newborn babies. My turn - I hope the baby has a congenital heart defect!  Aren't I great?! Yet homosexuality isn't a faulty organ. It is a part of the diversity of humanity. Why do homophobes want to homogenise and weaken the experience of being human.

Oh OK, so you draw the line at faulty organs.  In that case, I hope the baby has downs syndrome!  Wouldn't that be nice n "diverse".

... wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 1:46pm:

____ wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:47am: ... wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:36am: Hey I know guys - let's show how "tolerant" and "open minded" we are by wishing misofrtune upon newborn babies. My turn - I hope the baby has a congenital heart defect!  Aren't I great?! Yet homosexuality isn't a faulty organ. It is a part of the diversity of humanity. Why do homophobes want to homogenise and weaken the experience of being human. Oh OK, so you draw the line at faulty organs.  In that case, I hope the baby has downs syndrome!  Wouldn't that be nice n "diverse".

A reflection on you

donincognito wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 11:34am:

FriYAY wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:18am: donincognito wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 10:59am: FriYAY wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 10:49am: Well I’m sure if the faggots got to him they would do everything in their power to convince him he was gay. Seems that gays need acceptance at every turn. Probably internal turmoil. Why is this hate speech allowed on here? And the internal turmoil bubbles to the surface……..not a good look. :( Ahhh, the intolerance of gays squealing about tolerance, gold. There is no internal turmoil over here. Im very secure in my sexuality, and I have a great time. My question remains. Why is this hate speech allowed on here?

LOL, go visit some of your poor asylum seekers, I’m sure they could give you a real run down on hate speech when it comes to gays.

;D ;D

____ wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 1:57pm:

... wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 1:46pm: ____ wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:47am: ... wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:36am: Hey I know guys - let's show how "tolerant" and "open minded" we are by wishing misofrtune upon newborn babies. My turn - I hope the baby has a congenital heart defect!  Aren't I great?! Yet homosexuality isn't a faulty organ. It is a part of the diversity of humanity. Why do homophobes want to homogenise and weaken the experience of being human. Oh OK, so you draw the line at faulty organs.  In that case, I hope the baby has downs syndrome!  Wouldn't that be nice n "diverse". A reflection on you

yep, well at least I was being facetious.  What's your excuse?

FriYAY wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 2:05pm:

donincognito wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:34am: FriYAY wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:18am: donincognito wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 10:59am: FriYAY wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 10:49am: Well I’m sure if the faggots got to him they would do everything in their power to convince him he was gay. Seems that gays need acceptance at every turn. Probably internal turmoil. Why is this hate speech allowed on here? And the internal turmoil bubbles to the surface……..not a good look. :( Ahhh, the intolerance of gays squealing about tolerance, gold. There is no internal turmoil over here. Im very secure in my sexuality, and I have a great time. My question remains. Why is this hate speech allowed on here? LOL, go visit some of your poor asylum seekers, I’m sure they could give you a real run down on hate speech when it comes to gays. ;D ;D

So you are happy to share some parts of their culture, but not others. Why would you chose negative aspects of their culture to integrate into your own? Surely there are more positive things they can offer. There is a shop in Iran that has been making and selling sweet breads for over 500 years. Why not try to copy what they know? Can you imagine how good that recipe must be if its had 500 years of refining and perfecting?

donincognito wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 2:26pm:

FriYAY wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 2:05pm: donincognito wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:34am: FriYAY wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 11:18am: donincognito wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 10:59am: FriYAY wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 10:49am: Well I’m sure if the faggots got to him they would do everything in their power to convince him he was gay. Seems that gays need acceptance at every turn. Probably internal turmoil. Why is this hate speech allowed on here? And the internal turmoil bubbles to the surface……..not a good look. :( Ahhh, the intolerance of gays squealing about tolerance, gold. There is no internal turmoil over here. Im very secure in my sexuality, and I have a great time. My question remains. Why is this hate speech allowed on here? LOL, go visit some of your poor asylum seekers, I’m sure they could give you a real run down on hate speech when it comes to gays. ;D ;D So you are happy to share some parts of their culture, but not others. Why would you chose negative aspects of their culture to integrate into your own? Surely there are more positive things they can offer. There is a shop in Iran that has been making and selling sweet breads for over 500 years. Why not try to copy what they know? Can you imagine how good that recipe must be if its had 500 years of refining and perfecting?

LOL, why not ask yourself the exact same question? You are obviously happy that they make good sweet breads, but I’m sure you do not the way many of the countries they originate from treat gays.

Why are YOU happy to share some parts of their culture but not others? :-?

Quote:

There is a shop in Iran that has been making and selling sweet breads for over 500 years

Pancreas or testicles?

____ wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 11:00am:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 10:47am: This is in shocking taste. Really poor form. This is a little baby. Homosexuality is a born trait, not a thing to revile from. For the sake of the baby, review your hatred of gay children.

yOU ARE MAKING UNVALIDATED ASSERTION!

  :-X

Will the baby be a Nazi?

The royals have already produced two in the last 80 years.

http://www.sovereignindependentuk.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/prince_harry_nazi.jpg

http://socialistpartyp.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/hitlerroyals.jpg

Godwin strikes again.

____ wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 9:16am:

The mannerisms of the baby ~ is he gay? Will he be the first open gay head of state if Australia never grows up into a republic. Royal Baby: British Public Happy With A Gay King, Poll Finds An overwhelming majority of British subjects would not have a problem if the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge's newly born son turned out to be gay. A YouGov poll for Stonewall has found that 83% of people in Britain would be "very comfortable", "comfortable", or "neutral" if the heir to the throne was lesbian, gay or bisexual. The poll was conducted before the sex of the child was revealed. During the recent parliamentary debates over whether to introduce gay marriage, Lord Tebbit caused confusion by warning of the dangers of a lesbian queen. "When we have a queen who is a lesbian and she marries another lady and then decides she would like to have a child and someone donates sperm and she gives birth to a child, is that child heir to the throne?" he said. However the polling suggests the British public are not quite as scared by the prospect as the former Tory cabinet minister. Stonewall Chief Executive Ben Summerskill said: "Millions of people will be celebrating today’s news, just as millions last week celebrated the news of equal marriage in England and Wales. Happily, since last week every child born in Britain is born into a society where gay people are now equal in law." http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/07/23/royal-baby-gay-king_n_3639637.html

you are one very bad person  :-X
really, really mean, I dread to imagine how you perform your daily activities without having a break down once in a while.

____ wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 9:16am:

The mannerisms of the baby ~ is he gay? Will he be the first open gay head of state if Australia never grows up into a republic.

Are you a fantastically stupid gay?

Yes.

Are you fantastically stupid because you are gay - or are you gay because you are eye-wateringly stupid?



Please explain.

[quote aauthor=Andrei.Hicks link=1374621381/5#5 date=1374626825]This is in shocking taste.


Really poor form.

This is a little baby.[/quote]

Are you saying babies aren’t born gay?

Shame, Andrei, shame. Your bigoted  nonsense won’t wash here. This is a Royal baby we’re talking about.

This is our next Queen.

Karnal wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 10:00pm:

[quote aauthor=Andrei.Hicks link=1374621381/5#5 date=1374626825]This is in shocking taste. Really poor form. This is a little baby.

Are you saying babies aren’t born gay?

Shame, Andrei, shame. Your bigoted  nonsense won’t wash here. This is a Royal baby we’re talking about.

This is our next Queen.[/quote]


Thank you, kvnt, back to your sh!t sandwich, there's a good PB.

True Colours wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 7:59pm:

Will the baby be a Nazi? The royals have already produced two in the last 80 years. http://www.sovereignindependentuk.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/prince_harry_nazi.jpg http://socialistpartyp.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/hitlerroyals.jpg

Hail Mohammed!

http://wikiislam.net/wiki/uploads/6/62/Hizbollah_nazi_salute.jpg

Soren wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 10:00pm:

____ wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 9:16am: The mannerisms of the baby ~ is he gay? Will he be the first open gay head of state if Australia never grows up into a republic. Are you a fantastically stupid gay? Yes. Are you fantastically stupid because you are gay - or are you gay because you are eye-wateringly stupid? Please explain.

Excuse me, I won’t tolerate this nonsense on a civilized board. This baby has every right to express himself, royal or not. Whether it be through feltching, fingerpainting, shelving, fisting, fishing, fudgepacking or gefildebuggering, this boy is entitled to his rights as an out, proud gay man.

And I hope you will let him be and give him that right, old boy, I really do.

You, for one, understand the challenges of living in a heteronormative society.

I hope I have mafe muyself clear. This bigotry will not be tolerated.

Karnal wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 10:10pm:

Excuse me, I won’t tolerate this nonsense on a civilized board. This baby has every right to express himself, royal or not. Whether it be through feltching, fingerpainting, shelving, fisting, fishing, fudgepacking or gefildebuggering, this boy is entitled to his rights as an out, proud gay man. And I hope you will let him be and give him that right, old boy, I really do. You, for one, understand the challenges of living in a heteronormative society. I hope I have mafe muyself clear. This bigotry will not be tolerated.

That you for stating the case against letting in Paki Bvggers.

Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 8:09pm:

Godwin strikes again.

Godwins rule does not apply

SOB

http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

____ wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 11:00am:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 10:47am: This is in shocking taste. Really poor form. This is a little baby. Homosexuality is a born trait, not a thing to revile from.

And ALL part of God's creation


The SAME God that created black, white, Jews, Muslims, Christians and Adelaidians
 

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 25^th, 2013 at 6:04am:

Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 8:09pm: Godwin strikes again. Godwins rule does not apply SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

SOB's rule does not apply.

So some idiots are so desperate, for some silly reason, for this baby to be gay, that they are even saying he's gay even though he's only three days' old.

We are definitely moving closer to the times when being a nufter will be compulsory.

Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 25^th, 2013 at 6:23pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 25th, 2013 at 6:04am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 8:09pm: Godwin strikes again. Godwins rule does not apply SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg SOB's rule does not apply.

Awwww didnt like being wrong then?

SOB

http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 26^th, 2013 at 5:44am:

Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 25th, 2013 at 6:23pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 25th, 2013 at 6:04am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 8:09pm: Godwin strikes again. Godwins rule does not apply SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg SOB's rule does not apply. Awwww didnt like being wrong then? SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

Are you being intolerant again? Bigot.

The first thing that comes out of some punk in relation to the royal baby is to sexually harass it. Surely, you could atleast wait until it is 18 before you admit to some kind of pedarast fantasy you had about him when it was growing up.

____ wrote on Jul 24^th, 2013 at 11:00am:

Homosexuality is a born trait, not a thing to revile from. For the sake of the baby, review your hatred of gay children.

I could just as much claim that it is also wrong to question the child if he was straight or not

Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 26^th, 2013 at 7:14am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 26th, 2013 at 5:44am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 25th, 2013 at 6:23pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 25th, 2013 at 6:04am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 8:09pm: Godwin strikes again. Godwins rule does not apply SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg SOB's rule does not apply. Awwww didnt like being wrong then? SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg Are you being intolerant again? Bigot.

Explain how you being wrong is me being intolerant

BTW are you banned and came back in another name? That is frowned upon you know.

SOB

http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 27^th, 2013 at 6:36am:

Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 26th, 2013 at 7:14am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 26th, 2013 at 5:44am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 25th, 2013 at 6:23pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 25th, 2013 at 6:04am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 8:09pm: Godwin strikes again. Godwins rule does not apply SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg SOB's rule does not apply. Awwww didnt like being wrong then? SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg Are you being intolerant again? Bigot. Explain how you being wrong is me being intolerant BTW are you banned and came back in another name? That is frowned upon you know. SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

Stop persecuting me you bigot.

Why do I find this title offensive ???

Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 27^th, 2013 at 9:44am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 6:36am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 26th, 2013 at 7:14am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 26th, 2013 at 5:44am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 25th, 2013 at 6:23pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 25th, 2013 at 6:04am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 8:09pm: Godwin strikes again. Godwins rule does not apply SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg SOB's rule does not apply. Awwww didnt like being wrong then? SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg Are you being intolerant again? Bigot. Explain how you being wrong is me being intolerant BTW are you banned and came back in another name? That is frowned upon you know. SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg Stop persecuting me you bigot.

go away troll

SOB

http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 27^th, 2013 at 10:42am:

Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 9:44am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 6:36am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 26th, 2013 at 7:14am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 26th, 2013 at 5:44am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 25th, 2013 at 6:23pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 25th, 2013 at 6:04am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 8:09pm: Godwin strikes again. Godwins rule does not apply SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg SOB's rule does not apply. Awwww didnt like being wrong then? SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg Are you being intolerant again? Bigot. Explain how you being wrong is me being intolerant BTW are you banned and came back in another name? That is frowned upon you know. SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg Stop persecuting me you bigot. go away troll SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

Stop replying to my posts then.

Why do so many threads get turned into talk about homos?

You people seem to be obsessed with homosexuality.

Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 27^th, 2013 at 10:50am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 10:42am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 9:44am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 6:36am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 26th, 2013 at 7:14am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 26th, 2013 at 5:44am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 25th, 2013 at 6:23pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 25th, 2013 at 6:04am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 8:09pm: Godwin strikes again. Godwins rule does not apply SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg SOB's rule does not apply. Awwww didnt like being wrong then? SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg Are you being intolerant again? Bigot. Explain how you being wrong is me being intolerant BTW are you banned and came back in another name? That is frowned upon you know. SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg Stop persecuting me you bigot. go away troll SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg Stop replying to my posts then.

Answer the original question.

Seriously you post @ me and think im persecuting you by replying? Poooooooooor lil trolly.

SOB

http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 27^th, 2013 at 11:13am:

Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 10:50am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 10:42am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 9:44am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 6:36am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 26th, 2013 at 7:14am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 26th, 2013 at 5:44am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 25th, 2013 at 6:23pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 25th, 2013 at 6:04am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 8:09pm: Godwin strikes again. Godwins rule does not apply SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg SOB's rule does not apply. Awwww didnt like being wrong then? SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg Are you being intolerant again? Bigot. Explain how you being wrong is me being intolerant BTW are you banned and came back in another name? That is frowned upon you know. SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg Stop persecuting me you bigot. go away troll SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg Stop replying to my posts then. Answer the original question. Seriously you post @ me and think im persecuting you by replying? Poooooooooor lil trolly. SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

There was no original question, there was only an assertion. You know the difference don't you, bigot?

Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 27^th, 2013 at 11:23am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 11:13am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 10:50am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 10:42am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 9:44am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 6:36am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 26th, 2013 at 7:14am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 26th, 2013 at 5:44am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 25th, 2013 at 6:23pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 25th, 2013 at 6:04am: Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 24th, 2013 at 8:09pm: Godwin strikes again. Godwins rule does not apply SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg SOB's rule does not apply. Awwww didnt like being wrong then? SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg Are you being intolerant again? Bigot. Explain how you being wrong is me being intolerant BTW are you banned and came back in another name? That is frowned upon you know. SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg Stop persecuting me you bigot. go away troll SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg Stop replying to my posts then. Answer the original question. Seriously you post @ me and think im persecuting you by replying? Poooooooooor lil trolly. SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg There was no original question, there was only an assertion. You know the difference don't you, bigot?

Awww poor widdle trolly . . . . . .

SOB

http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

Like 99.9% of the conversations you get involved in here, you yell 'troll' when someone opposes your view. You really are a bigot in the true meaning of the term.

Go away, bigot!

Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 27^th, 2013 at 12:09pm:

Like 99.9% of the conversations you get involved in here, you yell 'troll' when someone opposes your view. You really are a bigot in the true meaning of the term. Go away, bigot!

What view would that be? That you were wrong? Hahahahaha poor widdle trolly . . . .

SOB

http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

---

Go away, bigot.

Stop talking about homos.

Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 27^th, 2013 at 1:04pm:

Go away, bigot.

Obviously you dont know the meaning of the term - or you have trouble with projecting trolly

SOB

http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

we should follow the revolutionist's path in Russia, this will ensure the bright and fair future, for everyone... except for some people, but they don't count, everything counts in large amounts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_the_Romanov_family

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 27^th, 2013 at 1:24pm:

Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 1:04pm: Go away, bigot. Obviously you dont know the meaning of the term - or you have trouble with projecting trolly SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

Stop persecuting me. Go away, bigot.

Spot, is that you?
http://imageshack.com/a/img20/9808/4wid.jpgUploaded with ImageShack.com
He looks totally sane, just like all the red lefties

Dnarever wrote on Jul 27^th, 2013 at 10:27am:

Why do I find this title offensive ???

It's a title that is sexual harassment by implication.

wow... great thread...  :-?

Torpedo wrote on Jul 27^th, 2013 at 1:39pm:

Spot, is that you? http://imageshack.com/a/img20/9808/4wid.jpgUploaded with ImageShack.com He looks totally sane, just like all the red lefties

Awww had to bring a sock in to defend you?

SOB

http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

True Blue... wrote on Jul 27^th, 2013 at 6:31pm:

wow... great thread...  :-?

As a general rule, any thread spot of borg participates in ends up in childish drivel far removed from the topic in question.

Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 28^th, 2013 at 9:04am:

True Blue... wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 6:31pm: wow... great thread...  :-? As a general rule, any thread spot of borg participates in ends up in childish drivel far removed from the topic in question.

Oh really. Who was it took it off topic then? Hmmmm? Seems it was you!

SOB

http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

Go away, bigot.

Torpedo wrote on Jul 27^th, 2013 at 1:28pm:

we should follow the revolutionist's path in Russia, this will ensure the bright and fair future, for everyone... except for some people, but they don't count, everything counts in large amounts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_the_Romanov_family

Right and Left Wing Extremists have a lot in common. 

I also think that Spot and Über really have a thing going and thoroughly deserve each other.  ;D

Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 28^th, 2013 at 9:22am:

Go away, bigot.

Go away troll

SOB

http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

Stop replying to my posts then.

muso wrote on Jul 28^th, 2013 at 9:30am:

Torpedo wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 1:28pm: we should follow the revolutionist's path in Russia, this will ensure the bright and fair future, for everyone... except for some people, but they don't count, everything counts in large amounts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_the_Romanov_family Right and Left Wing Extremists have a lot in common.  I also think that Spot and Über really have a thing going and thoroughly deserve each other.  ;D

that's why I am saying: POWER to the Royals!

Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 28^th, 2013 at 10:23am:

Stop replying to my posts then.

Stop replying to my posts then

SOB

http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 28^th, 2013 at 6:25am:

Torpedo wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 1:39pm: Spot, is that you? http://imageshack.com/a/img20/9808/4wid.jpgUploaded with ImageShack.com He looks totally sane, just like all the red lefties Awww had to bring a sock in to defend you? SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

wtf?
what are you talking about? what sock?

Torpedo wrote on Jul 28^th, 2013 at 10:27am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 28th, 2013 at 6:25am: Torpedo wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 1:39pm: Spot, is that you? http://imageshack.com/a/img20/9808/4wid.jpgUploaded with ImageShack.com He looks totally sane, just like all the red lefties Awww had to bring a sock in to defend you? SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg wtf? what are you talking about? what sock?

How else do you explain some supposedly new troll showing up and trying to insult me without even knowing my views on anything?

SOB

http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 28^th, 2013 at 10:51am:

How else do you explain some supposedly new troll showing up and trying to insult me without even knowing my views on anything? SOB

:D :D :D :D

Well, put it this way - they instantly and correctly assess you.

Soren wrote on Jul 28^th, 2013 at 11:33am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 28th, 2013 at 10:51am: How else do you explain some supposedly new troll showing up and trying to insult me without even knowing my views on anything? SOB :D :D :D :D Well, put it this way - they instantly and correctly assess you.

I guess you cant see it as usual but that doesnt make sense or is a lie. Knowing you you just dont see it but i could be mistaken.

SOB

http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

Soren wrote on Jul 28^th, 2013 at 11:33am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 28th, 2013 at 10:51am: How else do you explain some supposedly new troll showing up and trying to insult me without even knowing my views on anything? SOB :D :D :D :D Well, put it this way - they instantly and correctly assess you.

sock  ;D

muso wrote on Jul 28^th, 2013 at 12:10pm:

Soren wrote on Jul 28th, 2013 at 11:33am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 28th, 2013 at 10:51am: How else do you explain some supposedly new troll showing up and trying to insult me without even knowing my views on anything? SOB :D :D :D :D Well, put it this way - they instantly and correctly assess you. sock  ;D

Go away troll  ;D

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 28^th, 2013 at 10:51am:

Torpedo wrote on Jul 28th, 2013 at 10:27am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 28th, 2013 at 6:25am: Torpedo wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 1:39pm: Spot, is that you? http://imageshack.com/a/img20/9808/4wid.jpgUploaded with ImageShack.com He looks totally sane, just like all the red lefties Awww had to bring a sock in to defend you? SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg wtf? what are you talking about? what sock? How else do you explain some supposedly new troll showing up and trying to insult me without even knowing my views on anything? SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

;D bhahaha
and so the old trolls are in a hideout, waiting to defend someone else.
Geez

Torpedo wrote on Jul 28^th, 2013 at 12:31pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 28th, 2013 at 10:51am: Torpedo wrote on Jul 28th, 2013 at 10:27am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 28th, 2013 at 6:25am: Torpedo wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 1:39pm: Spot, is that you? http://imageshack.com/a/img20/9808/4wid.jpgUploaded with ImageShack.com He looks totally sane, just like all the red lefties Awww had to bring a sock in to defend you? SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg wtf? what are you talking about? what sock? How else do you explain some supposedly new troll showing up and trying to insult me without even knowing my views on anything? SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg ;D bhahaha and so the old trolls are in a hideout, waiting to defend someone else. Geez

What does that even mean?

SOB

http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 6:51am:

Torpedo wrote on Jul 28th, 2013 at 12:31pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 28th, 2013 at 10:51am: Torpedo wrote on Jul 28th, 2013 at 10:27am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jul 28th, 2013 at 6:25am: Torpedo wrote on Jul 27th, 2013 at 1:39pm: Spot, is that you? http://imageshack.com/a/img20/9808/4wid.jpgUploaded with ImageShack.com He looks totally sane, just like all the red lefties Awww had to bring a sock in to defend you? SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg wtf? what are you talking about? what sock? How else do you explain some supposedly new troll showing up and trying to insult me without even knowing my views on anything? SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg ;D bhahaha and so the old trolls are in a hideout, waiting to defend someone else. Geez What does that even mean? SOB http://spotofborg.com/files/persecution5.jpg

I don't know, just trying to make some sort of sense of what you said about the sock