Fresh from enjoying a boost in the Galaxy poll, the ALP drops down again in the Essential poll.


Quote:

2 Party Preferred       23/7/2013 ALP 49%, Lib-NP 51% 29/7/2013 ALP 49%, Lib-NP 51% http://essentialvision.com.au/category/essentialreport

salad in wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 4:51pm:

Fresh from enjoying a boost in the Galaxy poll, the ALP drops down again in the Essential poll. Quote: 2 Party Preferred       23/7/2013 ALP 49%, Lib-NP 51% 29/7/2013 ALP 49%, Lib-NP 51% http://essentialvision.com.au/category/essentialreport

Actually they didnt drop at all, but thanks for the misleading quote.

From last week to this week the ALP was stagnant on 39%, the Coalition dropped one point to 44% and the greens increased two points while independants dropped one.

In the two party preferred stakes the result is the SAME as last week.  It didnt slide at all.  It didnt increase at all.  In the 2pp it did nothing.

Verge wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 4:56pm:

salad in wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 4:51pm: Fresh from enjoying a boost in the Galaxy poll, the ALP drops down again in the Essential poll. Quote: 2 Party Preferred       23/7/2013 ALP 49%, Lib-NP 51% 29/7/2013 ALP 49%, Lib-NP 51% http://essentialvision.com.au/category/essentialreport Actually they didnt drop at all, but thanks for the misleading quote. From last week to this week the ALP was stagnant on 39%, the Coalition dropped one point to 44% and the greens increased two points while independants dropped one. In the two party preferred stakes the result is the SAME as last week.  It didnt slide at all.  It didnt increase at all.  In the 2pp it did nothing.

If you take the time to READ what I said I compared the Essential result with that of Galaxy.

salad in wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 5:12pm:

Verge wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 4:56pm: salad in wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 4:51pm: Fresh from enjoying a boost in the Galaxy poll, the ALP drops down again in the Essential poll. Quote: 2 Party Preferred       23/7/2013 ALP 49%, Lib-NP 51% 29/7/2013 ALP 49%, Lib-NP 51% http://essentialvision.com.au/category/essentialreport Actually they didnt drop at all, but thanks for the misleading quote. From last week to this week the ALP was stagnant on 39%, the Coalition dropped one point to 44% and the greens increased two points while independants dropped one. In the two party preferred stakes the result is the SAME as last week.  It didnt slide at all.  It didnt increase at all.  In the 2pp it did nothing. If you take the time to READ what I said I compared the Essential result with that of Galaxy.

Why are you comparing an increase in one poll to a decrease in another.

Its a flawed comparison.  You should compare poll company with its own polls as they are the true reflection on whether they have indicated a slide.

All it does when you compare results from one to another is have people question which one is a truer reflection on voters habits.

Galaxy up and essiential showing the same doesnt say anything.

and you wrote "the ALP drops down again in the Essential poll".  Well, you tell me how to READ that, because its easy to say in reply, it didnt.

salad in wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 5:12pm:

Verge wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 4:56pm: salad in wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 4:51pm: Fresh from enjoying a boost in the Galaxy poll, the ALP drops down again in the Essential poll. Quote: 2 Party Preferred       23/7/2013 ALP 49%, Lib-NP 51% 29/7/2013 ALP 49%, Lib-NP 51% http://essentialvision.com.au/category/essentialreport Actually they didnt drop at all, but thanks for the misleading quote. From last week to this week the ALP was stagnant on 39%, the Coalition dropped one point to 44% and the greens increased two points while independants dropped one. In the two party preferred stakes the result is the SAME as last week.  It didnt slide at all.  It didnt increase at all.  In the 2pp it did nothing. If you take the time to READ what I said I compared the Essential result with that of Galaxy.

Apples and oranges, anyone???

;)

Salad is just showing how fearful the conga line are now. A month ago they had it in the bag, now it looks like another draw, at best, which probably means another three years of Labor given the GREENS and independents would support Labor again over an Abbott led coalition.
The coalitions best chance would be to dump Abbott, if they don't they deserve to stay in the wilderness, a lesson they need to learn.

skippy. wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 5:31pm:

Salad is just showing how fearful the conga line are now. A month ago they had it in the bag, now it looks like another draw, at best, which probably means another three years of Labor given the GREENS and independents would support Labor again over an Abbott led coalition. The coalitions best chance would be to dump Abbott, if they don't they deserve to stay in the wilderness, a lesson they need to learn.

Greens? Bandt is gone, Labor will win with Liberal preferences.

Independents? Which ones? Lyne and New England will both go to the Nationals.

Verge wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 5:18pm:

salad in wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:12pm: Verge wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 4:56pm: salad in wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 4:51pm: Fresh from enjoying a boost in the Galaxy poll, the ALP drops down again in the Essential poll. Quote: 2 Party Preferred       23/7/2013 ALP 49%, Lib-NP 51% 29/7/2013 ALP 49%, Lib-NP 51% http://essentialvision.com.au/category/essentialreport Actually they didnt drop at all, but thanks for the misleading quote. From last week to this week the ALP was stagnant on 39%, the Coalition dropped one point to 44% and the greens increased two points while independants dropped one. In the two party preferred stakes the result is the SAME as last week.  It didnt slide at all.  It didnt increase at all.  In the 2pp it did nothing. If you take the time to READ what I said I compared the Essential result with that of Galaxy. Why are you comparing an increase in one poll to a decrease in another. Its a flawed comparison.  You should compare poll company with its own polls as they are the true reflection on whether they have indicated a slide. All it does when you compare results from one to another is have people question which one is a truer reflection on voters habits. Galaxy up and essiential showing the same doesnt say anything. and you wrote "the ALP drops down again in the Essential poll".  Well, you tell me how to READ that, because its easy to say in reply, it didnt.

I wouldn't complain too much.  If it were Greens_lose posting the heading would say, 'LNP trounced, Greens preparing for government'

skippy. wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 5:31pm:

Salad is just showing how fearful the conga line are now. A month ago they had it in the bag, now it looks like another draw, at best, which probably means another three years of Labor given the GREENS and independents would support Labor again over an Abbott led coalition. The coalitions best chance would be to dump Abbott, if they don't they deserve to stay in the wilderness, a lesson they need to learn.

what independents, fool?  Oakeshott and Windsor are not standing and will revert to Coalition hands (unless you think labor will miraculously jump from 8% to a winning position).  Bandt will most likely lose and be replaced by labor.  That leaves just Wilkie to consider.

matty wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 5:34pm:

skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:31pm: Salad is just showing how fearful the conga line are now. A month ago they had it in the bag, now it looks like another draw, at best, which probably means another three years of Labor given the GREENS and independents would support Labor again over an Abbott led coalition. The coalitions best chance would be to dump Abbott, if they don't they deserve to stay in the wilderness, a lesson they need to learn. Greens? Bandt is gone, Labor will win with Liberal preferences. Independents? Which ones? Lyne and New England will both go to the Nationals.

Katter, he has already said he'll support Rudd if needs be. So will Wilkie, as for Bandt, I believe he will win the seat again too. suck it up Matty. ;D ;D ;D there will most Likely be more too.

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 5:44pm:

skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:31pm: Salad is just showing how fearful the conga line are now. A month ago they had it in the bag, now it looks like another draw, at best, which probably means another three years of Labor given the GREENS and independents would support Labor again over an Abbott led coalition. The coalitions best chance would be to dump Abbott, if they don't they deserve to stay in the wilderness, a lesson they need to learn. what independents, fool?  Oakeshott and Windsor are not standing and will revert to Coalition hands (unless you think labor will miraculously jump from 8% to a winning position).  Bandt will most likely lose and be replaced by labor.  That leaves just Wilkie to consider.

Another tard that doesn't think Katter will win. Not to mention Palmer who will not support a coalition gov under phoney tony, and its all your own fault, suck it up tards.

skippy. wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 6:02pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:44pm: skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:31pm: Salad is just showing how fearful the conga line are now. A month ago they had it in the bag, now it looks like another draw, at best, which probably means another three years of Labor given the GREENS and independents would support Labor again over an Abbott led coalition. The coalitions best chance would be to dump Abbott, if they don't they deserve to stay in the wilderness, a lesson they need to learn. what independents, fool?  Oakeshott and Windsor are not standing and will revert to Coalition hands (unless you think labor will miraculously jump from 8% to a winning position).  Bandt will most likely lose and be replaced by labor.  That leaves just Wilkie to consider. Another tard that doesn't think Katter will win. Not to mention Palmer who will not support a coalition gov under phoney tony, and its all your own fault, suck it up tards.

Will Tony last another 3 yrs as opposition leader in a hung parliament?
Tony might end up being the longest serving opposition leader in history  ;D

Matty and longlyingfool are licking their wounds hiding under a rock given their stupidity in forgetting Katter and even Palmer could well hold the balance of power and Katter has  said he would back Labor if Kevvy is PM and Palmer hates Abbotts guts, too funny. ;D ;D ;D

skippy. wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 6:10pm:

Matty and longlyingfool are licking their wounds hiding under a rock given their stupidity in forgetting Katter and even Palmer could well hold the balance of power and Katter has  said he would back Labor if Kevvy is PM and Palmer hates Abbotts guts, too funny. ;D ;D ;D

Wouldnt it be hilarious if Clive stopped Tony from becoming PM..I might even start believing in God of that happens  :D

adelcrow wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 6:13pm:

skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 6:10pm: Matty and longlyingfool are licking their wounds hiding under a rock given their stupidity in forgetting Katter and even Palmer could well hold the balance of power and Katter has  said he would back Labor if Kevvy is PM and Palmer hates Abbotts guts, too funny. ;D ;D ;D Wouldnt it be hilarious if Clive stopped Tony from becoming PM..I might even start believing in God of that happens  :D

;D ;D ;D

I'd second that

John Smith wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 6:16pm:

adelcrow wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 6:13pm: skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 6:10pm: Matty and longlyingfool are licking their wounds hiding under a rock given their stupidity in forgetting Katter and even Palmer could well hold the balance of power and Katter has  said he would back Labor if Kevvy is PM and Palmer hates Abbotts guts, too funny. ;D ;D ;D Wouldnt it be hilarious if Clive stopped Tony from becoming PM..I might even start believing in God of that happens  :D ;D ;D ;D I'd second that

Yea , very funny. Imagine phoney Tony begging Clive, Clive would ensure Abbott was his bitch, just to demean him, worth it big time.

skippy. wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 6:20pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 6:16pm: adelcrow wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 6:13pm: skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 6:10pm: Matty and longlyingfool are licking their wounds hiding under a rock given their stupidity in forgetting Katter and even Palmer could well hold the balance of power and Katter has  said he would back Labor if Kevvy is PM and Palmer hates Abbotts guts, too funny. ;D ;D ;D Wouldnt it be hilarious if Clive stopped Tony from becoming PM..I might even start believing in God of that happens  :D ;D ;D ;D I'd second that Yea , very funny. Imagine phoney Tony begging Clive, Clive would ensure Abbott was his bitch, just to demean him, worth it big time.

I wonder if he would offer big Clive his ar$e ....

I suppose you would know by Tony's gait after the meeting

Clive Palmer Party 1..Labor 2...looks like I finally have a reason to vote  :D

adelcrow wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 6:45pm:

Clive Palmer Party 1..Labor 2...looks like I finally have a reason to vote  :D

Yeas!


Quote:

Yea , very funny. Imagine phoney Tony begging Clive, Clive would ensure Abbott was his bitch, just to demean him, worth it big time.

Skippy, you have no idea how bloody funny that would be.  Abbott has, not too long ago, physically threatened Clive who brushed him aside like a waif.  Clive would be delirious if Abbott had to come begging, and there is no way he will forget or forgive either Abbott or the LNP.

Oooooh, how delicious is that prospect!

Verge

What the polls are showing is the Rudd sugar rush looks over, they have flatlined and will need to boost their primary by a few % points to be a clear winner, everyone is forgetting that 2010 was a draw which means the ALP have to trend higher that 2010 to win.

A day is along time in Politics, let alone a week.

We all have to rely on the form guide.

Now Kevvy is rattling along quite nicely right now.

He has rolled the dice big time on the New Guinea gambit. For the first time ever, I think his planners have come up with something that could work, could make him a hero. He could realistically have stopped the boats, given a few weeks.

Then he will definitely win the Election because the average punter is sick to death of boat loads of freeloaders turning up then having to support them for the rest of their lives.

But there is a big bloody question mark over the PNG plan. It is like an unstable stick of dynamite. This could turn sour, it very much depends on how well the people smugglers are selling the package in Indonesia.

Apparently they are filling the boats at the moment with stories that the PNG thing won't fly and they will be good as apples.

The whole PNG thing could very well turn out to be a basket of rotten apples for Kevvy.

If it is, he is history.

skippy. wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 6:02pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:44pm: skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:31pm: Salad is just showing how fearful the conga line are now. A month ago they had it in the bag, now it looks like another draw, at best, which probably means another three years of Labor given the GREENS and independents would support Labor again over an Abbott led coalition. The coalitions best chance would be to dump Abbott, if they don't they deserve to stay in the wilderness, a lesson they need to learn. what independents, fool?  Oakeshott and Windsor are not standing and will revert to Coalition hands (unless you think labor will miraculously jump from 8% to a winning position).  Bandt will most likely lose and be replaced by labor.  That leaves just Wilkie to consider. Another tard that doesn't think Katter will win. Not to mention Palmer who will not support a coalition gov under phoney tony, and its all your own fault, suck it up tards.

Katter will be lucky to get three votes outside of QLD.  Palmer wont even get that much.  it is highly unlikely that either party will win a seat in the lower house other than Katter himself.  The senate is a different situation where we have already seen Family First win a seat on 2% of the vote.

but do you have actual evidence obtained without masturbating to contradict that?

skippy. wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 6:10pm:

Matty and longlyingfool are licking their wounds hiding under a rock given their stupidity in forgetting Katter and even Palmer could well hold the balance of power and Katter has  said he would back Labor if Kevvy is PM and Palmer hates Abbotts guts, too funny. ;D ;D ;D

I was just about to type that Katter is not stupid before remembering that Katter is not only stupid but also insane.  That notwithstanding, Katter will not support a labor govt over a coalition one.  he has seen what doing that has done to Windsor and oakeshoot and how their electorates turned on them savagely.

RightSadFred wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 7:21pm:

Verge What the polls are showing is the Rudd sugar rush looks over, they have flatlined and will need to boost their primary by a few % points to be a clear winner, everyone is forgetting that 2010 was a draw which means the ALP have to trend higher that 2010 to win.

But so does the coalition, they have to trend higher too and on current polls they are not. The conga line seem to think phoney tony can pull the same numbers against Rudd he did against Gillard, yet every poll says there is no way of that happening. You're best off continuing to sit in a circle having a group wank and singing koombaha.

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 7:43pm:

skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 6:02pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:44pm: skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:31pm: Salad is just showing how fearful the conga line are now. A month ago they had it in the bag, now it looks like another draw, at best, which probably means another three years of Labor given the GREENS and independents would support Labor again over an Abbott led coalition. The coalitions best chance would be to dump Abbott, if they don't they deserve to stay in the wilderness, a lesson they need to learn. what independents, fool?  Oakeshott and Windsor are not standing and will revert to Coalition hands (unless you think labor will miraculously jump from 8% to a winning position).  Bandt will most likely lose and be replaced by labor.  That leaves just Wilkie to consider. Another tard that doesn't think Katter will win. Not to mention Palmer who will not support a coalition gov under phoney tony, and its all your own fault, suck it up tards. Katter will be lucky to get three votes outside of QLD.  Palmer wont even get that much.  it is highly unlikely that either party will win a seat in the lower house other than Katter himself.  The senate is a different situation where we have already seen Family First win a seat on 2% of the vote. but do you have actual evidence obtained without masturbating to contradict that?

Lol, the imbecile, thanks for taking another smack in the head from me..Katter has a seat, you said no independents would win, loser.

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 7:45pm:

skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 6:10pm: Matty and longlyingfool are licking their wounds hiding under a rock given their stupidity in forgetting Katter and even Palmer could well hold the balance of power and Katter has  said he would back Labor if Kevvy is PM and Palmer hates Abbotts guts, too funny. ;D ;D ;D I was just about to type that Katter is not stupid before remembering that Katter is not only stupid but also insane.  That notwithstanding, Katter will not support a labor govt over a coalition one.  he has seen what doing that has done to Windsor and oakeshoot and how their electorates turned on them savagely.

Thanks for another sucker punch. Katter has said already  said he would support labor over the coalition if Rudd were PM. You must love getting smacked in the head, I certainly love doing it to you. ;D

skippy. wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 7:50pm:

RightSadFred wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 7:21pm: Verge What the polls are showing is the Rudd sugar rush looks over, they have flatlined and will need to boost their primary by a few % points to be a clear winner, everyone is forgetting that 2010 was a draw which means the ALP have to trend higher that 2010 to win. But so does the coalition, they have to trend higher too and on current polls they are not. The conga line seem to think phoney tony can pull the same numbers against Rudd he did against Gillard, yet every poll says there is no way of that happening. You're best off continuing to sit in a circle having a group wank and singing koombaha.

talking of group wanks... is this all you ever do regarding polls???  you don't even bother to simply misinterpret them now; you just make them up.  the libs are UP on primary vote from 2010 and in addition have the two indies seats.

you are sounding stupider than ever before.  Maybe take your hand of it long enough to get some blood to your BRAIN.

matty wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 5:34pm:

skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:31pm: Salad is just showing how fearful the conga line are now. A month ago they had it in the bag, now it looks like another draw, at best, which probably means another three years of Labor given the GREENS and independents would support Labor again over an Abbott led coalition. The coalitions best chance would be to dump Abbott, if they don't they deserve to stay in the wilderness, a lesson they need to learn. Greens? Bandt is gone, Labor will win with Liberal preferences. Independents? Which ones? Lyne and New England will both go to the Nationals.

Given up already, matty??
Somehow I expected a bit more fight from you.

;)

matty wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 5:34pm:

skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:31pm: Salad is just showing how fearful the conga line are now. A month ago they had it in the bag, now it looks like another draw, at best, which probably means another three years of Labor given the GREENS and independents would support Labor again over an Abbott led coalition. The coalitions best chance would be to dump Abbott, if they don't they deserve to stay in the wilderness, a lesson they need to learn. Greens? Bandt is gone, Labor will win with Liberal preferences..

Matty, are you saying Labor will win? This would be a catastrophe for our country. You would be forced to leave for good.

Matty, please explain your statement. I don’t like it at all.

None of us do.

Lobo wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 8:03pm:

matty wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:34pm: skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:31pm: Salad is just showing how fearful the conga line are now. A month ago they had it in the bag, now it looks like another draw, at best, which probably means another three years of Labor given the GREENS and independents would support Labor again over an Abbott led coalition. The coalitions best chance would be to dump Abbott, if they don't they deserve to stay in the wilderness, a lesson they need to learn. Greens? Bandt is gone, Labor will win with Liberal preferences. Independents? Which ones? Lyne and New England will both go to the Nationals. Given up already, matty?? Somehow I expected a bit more fight from you. ;)

Excuse me, Matty will fight, I can assure you.

He’s now campaigning for the Labor Party.

It was only a matter of time, leftards.

Karnal wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 8:26pm:

matty wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:34pm: skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:31pm: Salad is just showing how fearful the conga line are now. A month ago they had it in the bag, now it looks like another draw, at best, which probably means another three years of Labor given the GREENS and independents would support Labor again over an Abbott led coalition. The coalitions best chance would be to dump Abbott, if they don't they deserve to stay in the wilderness, a lesson they need to learn. Greens? Bandt is gone, Labor will win with Liberal preferences.. Matty, are you saying Labor will win? This would be a catastrophe for our country. You would be forced to leave for good. Matty, please explain your statement. I don’t like it at all. None of us do.

WHAT HAVE THEY DONE WITH MATTY? Explain LEFTARDS!

RightSadFred wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 7:21pm:

Verge What the polls are showing is the Rudd sugar rush looks over, they have flatlined and will need to boost their primary by a few % points to be a clear winner, everyone is forgetting that 2010 was a draw which means the ALP have to trend higher that 2010 to win.

Don't bother. I was dealing with raw polling rather than delving into the minutiae of seats, trends, preferences etc.

skippy. wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 6:02pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:44pm: skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:31pm: Salad is just showing how fearful the conga line are now. A month ago they had it in the bag, now it looks like another draw, at best, which probably means another three years of Labor given the GREENS and independents would support Labor again over an Abbott led coalition. The coalitions best chance would be to dump Abbott, if they don't they deserve to stay in the wilderness, a lesson they need to learn. what independents, fool?  Oakeshott and Windsor are not standing and will revert to Coalition hands (unless you think labor will miraculously jump from 8% to a winning position).  Bandt will most likely lose and be replaced by labor.  That leaves just Wilkie to consider. Another tard that doesn't think Katter will win. Not to mention Palmer who will not support a coalition gov under phoney tony, and its all your own fault, suck it up tards.

Exactly. Suck it up, leftards.

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 8:33pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 8:26pm: matty wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:34pm: skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:31pm: Salad is just showing how fearful the conga line are now. A month ago they had it in the bag, now it looks like another draw, at best, which probably means another three years of Labor given the GREENS and independents would support Labor again over an Abbott led coalition. The coalitions best chance would be to dump Abbott, if they don't they deserve to stay in the wilderness, a lesson they need to learn. Greens? Bandt is gone, Labor will win with Liberal preferences.. Matty, are you saying Labor will win? This would be a catastrophe for our country. You would be forced to leave for good. Matty, please explain your statement. I don’t like it at all. None of us do. WHAT HAVE THEY DONE WITH MATTY? Explain LEFTARDS!

They’ve got him in Dunedin, Alevine. I don’t like it either.

Pathetic, leftards, just pathetic.

Karnal wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 8:37pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 8:33pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 8:26pm: matty wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:34pm: skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:31pm: Salad is just showing how fearful the conga line are now. A month ago they had it in the bag, now it looks like another draw, at best, which probably means another three years of Labor given the GREENS and independents would support Labor again over an Abbott led coalition. The coalitions best chance would be to dump Abbott, if they don't they deserve to stay in the wilderness, a lesson they need to learn. Greens? Bandt is gone, Labor will win with Liberal preferences.. Matty, are you saying Labor will win? This would be a catastrophe for our country. You would be forced to leave for good. Matty, please explain your statement. I don’t like it at all. None of us do. WHAT HAVE THEY DONE WITH MATTY? Explain LEFTARDS! They’ve got him in Dunedin, Alevine. I don’t like it either. Pathetic, leftards, just pathetic.

Typical Leftards, brainwashing poor matty with their ABC propaganda, in Dunedin! FOR SHAME, LABOR, FOR SHAME!

THERE WILL BE NO CARBON TAX UNDER A GOVERNMENT I LEAD, MATTY! THERE WILL BE NO CARBON TAX UNDER A GOVERNMENT I LEAD.  NEVER FORGET MATTY, NEVER FORGET!

adelcrow wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 6:45pm:

Clive Palmer Party 1..Labor 2...looks like I finally have a reason to vote  :D

That’s right. Matty will be running.

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 8:38pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 8:37pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 8:33pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 8:26pm: matty wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:34pm: skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:31pm: Salad is just showing how fearful the conga line are now. A month ago they had it in the bag, now it looks like another draw, at best, which probably means another three years of Labor given the GREENS and independents would support Labor again over an Abbott led coalition. The coalitions best chance would be to dump Abbott, if they don't they deserve to stay in the wilderness, a lesson they need to learn. Greens? Bandt is gone, Labor will win with Liberal preferences.. Matty, are you saying Labor will win? This would be a catastrophe for our country. You would be forced to leave for good. Matty, please explain your statement. I don’t like it at all. None of us do. WHAT HAVE THEY DONE WITH MATTY? Explain LEFTARDS! They’ve got him in Dunedin, Alevine. I don’t like it either. Pathetic, leftards, just pathetic. Typical Leftards, brainwashing poor matty with their ABC propaganda, in Dunedin! FOR SHAME, LABOR, FOR SHAME! THERE WILL BE NO CARBON TAX UNDER A GOVERNMENT I LEAD, MATTY! THERE WILL BE NO CARBON TAX UNDER A GOVERNMENT I LEAD.  NEVER FORGET MATTY, NEVER FORGET!

MATTY WILL WIN. we need Matty more than ever. MATTY WILL REMEMBER!

Bomb The Boats.

:D

John Smith wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 6:23pm:

skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 6:20pm: John Smith wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 6:16pm: adelcrow wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 6:13pm: skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 6:10pm: Matty and longlyingfool are licking their wounds hiding under a rock given their stupidity in forgetting Katter and even Palmer could well hold the balance of power and Katter has  said he would back Labor if Kevvy is PM and Palmer hates Abbotts guts, too funny. ;D ;D ;D Wouldnt it be hilarious if Clive stopped Tony from becoming PM..I might even start believing in God of that happens  :D ;D ;D ;D I'd second that Yea , very funny. Imagine phoney Tony begging Clive, Clive would ensure Abbott was his bitch, just to demean him, worth it big time. I wonder if he would offer big Clive his ar$e .... I suppose you would know by Tony's gait after the meeting

Hmmm....
Could explain the walk, I suppose.....

:)

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 7:43pm:

skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 6:02pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:44pm: skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:31pm: Salad is just showing how fearful the conga line are now. A month ago they had it in the bag, now it looks like another draw, at best, which probably means another three years of Labor given the GREENS and independents would support Labor again over an Abbott led coalition. The coalitions best chance would be to dump Abbott, if they don't they deserve to stay in the wilderness, a lesson they need to learn. what independents, fool?  Oakeshott and Windsor are not standing and will revert to Coalition hands (unless you think labor will miraculously jump from 8% to a winning position).  Bandt will most likely lose and be replaced by labor.  That leaves just Wilkie to consider. Another tard that doesn't think Katter will win. Not to mention Palmer who will not support a coalition gov under phoney tony, and its all your own fault, suck it up tards. Katter will be lucky to get three votes outside of QLD.  Palmer wont even get that much.  it is highly unlikely that either party will win a seat in the lower house other than Katter himself.  The senate is a different situation where we have already seen Family First win a seat on 2% of the vote. but do you have actual evidence obtained without masturbating to contradict that?

Excuse me, you said masturbating.

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 7:59pm:

skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 7:50pm: RightSadFred wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 7:21pm: Verge What the polls are showing is the Rudd sugar rush looks over, they have flatlined and will need to boost their primary by a few % points to be a clear winner, everyone is forgetting that 2010 was a draw which means the ALP have to trend higher that 2010 to win. But so does the coalition, they have to trend higher too and on current polls they are not. The conga line seem to think phoney tony can pull the same numbers against Rudd he did against Gillard, yet every poll says there is no way of that happening. You're best off continuing to sit in a circle having a group wank and singing koombaha. talking of group wanks... is this all you ever do regarding polls???  you don't even bother to simply misinterpret them now; you just make them up.  the libs are UP on primary vote from 2010 and in addition have the two indies seats. you are sounding stupider than ever before.  Maybe take your hand of it long enough to get some blood to your BRAIN.

you're no  smarter than a Lego figurine. Elections are not won on primary votes numbskull.

Lobo wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 8:43pm:

Bomb The Boats. :D

That’s Mr Abbott’s plan.Unfortunately, he won’t be able to impliment this from the back benches.

Mr Turnbull will support Rudd, but by then Matty and Longy will be in the Labor Party.

STOP THE BOATS.

skippy. wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 8:49pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 7:59pm: skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 7:50pm: RightSadFred wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 7:21pm: Verge What the polls are showing is the Rudd sugar rush looks over, they have flatlined and will need to boost their primary by a few % points to be a clear winner, everyone is forgetting that 2010 was a draw which means the ALP have to trend higher that 2010 to win. But so does the coalition, they have to trend higher too and on current polls they are not. The conga line seem to think phoney tony can pull the same numbers against Rudd he did against Gillard, yet every poll says there is no way of that happening. You're best off continuing to sit in a circle having a group wank and singing koombaha. talking of group wanks... is this all you ever do regarding polls???  you don't even bother to simply misinterpret them now; you just make them up.  the libs are UP on primary vote from 2010 and in addition have the two indies seats. you are sounding stupider than ever before.  Maybe take your hand of it long enough to get some blood to your BRAIN. you're no  smarter than a Lego figurine. Elections are not won on primary votes numbskull.

Yes, but Matty’s now at uni. I think they call this a tertiary vote.

Karnal wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 8:50pm:

Lobo wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 8:43pm: Bomb The Boats. :D That’s Mr Abbott’s plan.Unfortunately, he won’t be able to impliment this from the back benches. Mr Turnbull will support Rudd, but by then Matty and Longy will be in the Labor Party. STOP THE BOATS.

Easily solved.....

Steal the freakin' plan!!!!

:)

Karnal wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 8:46pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 7:43pm: skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 6:02pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:44pm: skippy. wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:31pm: Salad is just showing how fearful the conga line are now. A month ago they had it in the bag, now it looks like another draw, at best, which probably means another three years of Labor given the GREENS and independents would support Labor again over an Abbott led coalition. The coalitions best chance would be to dump Abbott, if they don't they deserve to stay in the wilderness, a lesson they need to learn. what independents, fool?  Oakeshott and Windsor are not standing and will revert to Coalition hands (unless you think labor will miraculously jump from 8% to a winning position).  Bandt will most likely lose and be replaced by labor.  That leaves just Wilkie to consider. Another tard that doesn't think Katter will win. Not to mention Palmer who will not support a coalition gov under phoney tony, and its all your own fault, suck it up tards. Katter will be lucky to get three votes outside of QLD.  Palmer wont even get that much.  it is highly unlikely that either party will win a seat in the lower house other than Katter himself.  The senate is a different situation where we have already seen Family First win a seat on 2% of the vote. but do you have actual evidence obtained without masturbating to contradict that? Excuse me, you said masturbating.

Longlyingfool meant to write......., we are going to be Mass   Debating......, he must think a lot of us are going to discuss the situation. But that bloody spell check got him, must be on an IPad.

1 point slides are within margin of error. As it stands today, this election is TOO CLOSE TO CALL.

One can dispute the independent votes for New England and Lynne, and sure as it stands these will go to the Nationals, but the polls suggest swings accross the board, meaning that marginals will shift between Labor and Liberals. And as they shift, it's currently TOO CLOSE TO CALL.

As for you longie, you're a disgrace mate.  Palmer is crazy, and yet you're very eager to vote for Tony. The difference being what, one doesn't have the money to build a Titanic replica but the other does?  Tony would put it to good use - he'd STOP THE BOATS with his Titanic replica. The wanker.

Verge wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 5:18pm:

salad in wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:12pm: Verge wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 4:56pm: salad in wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 4:51pm: Fresh from enjoying a boost in the Galaxy poll, the ALP drops down again in the Essential poll. Quote: 2 Party Preferred       23/7/2013 ALP 49%, Lib-NP 51% 29/7/2013 ALP 49%, Lib-NP 51% http://essentialvision.com.au/category/essentialreport Actually they didnt drop at all, but thanks for the misleading quote. From last week to this week the ALP was stagnant on 39%, the Coalition dropped one point to 44% and the greens increased two points while independants dropped one. In the two party preferred stakes the result is the SAME as last week.  It didnt slide at all.  It didnt increase at all.  In the 2pp it did nothing. If you take the time to READ what I said I compared the Essential result with that of Galaxy. Why are you comparing an increase in one poll to a decrease in another. Its a flawed comparison.  Galaxy up and essiential showing the same doesnt say anything.

... cos "LettuceHead" - just  "ain't that bright"

Yes, Skippy, but Longy is Catholic. He probably meant he was going to Mass.

I’ll have you know msturbation is a carnal sin.

Q&A on later has Josh Frydenberg on it.

I've been fortunate to talk to him a couple of occasions both here and in the US.
He's a really good guy and really understands the things which are important.

I am sure he will do well.

Karnal wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 9:03pm:

Yes, Skippy, but Longy is Catholic.

WHAT A LYING C*NT !!

He told ME, he is a CHRISTIAN !

buzzanddidj wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 9:53pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 9:03pm: Yes, Skippy, but Longy is Catholic. WHAT A LYING C*NT !! He told ME, he is a CHRISTIAN !

I thought he was a member of one if those tub-thumping sects that start up in California every second week.

:)

buzzanddidj wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 9:53pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 9:03pm: Yes, Skippy, but Longy is Catholic. WHAT A LYING C*NT !! He told ME, he is a CHRISTIAN ! Yes, the Papists call themselves Christians. Back in Roman times they called themselves Paulines. In a few hundred years time they’ll be called Muslims, so it’s a moot point, really.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 9:22pm:

Q&A on later has Josh Frydenberg on it. I've been fortunate to talk to him a couple of occasions both here and in the US. He's a really good guy and really understands the things which are important. I am sure he will do well.

He is.

At dribbling shyt.

You'd need a bucket under the speaker to catch it all.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 9:22pm:

Q&A on later has Josh Frydenberg on it. I've been fortunate to talk to him a couple of occasions both here and in the US. He's a really good guy and really understands the things which are important. I am sure he will do well.

How do you watch Q&A?

Every time I’m out of Australia I can’t even download it on the ABC website.

I'm in Australia until mid Aug.

I can't see it from Cali.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 10:06pm:

I'm in Australia until mid Aug. I can't see it from Cali.

lies. I had no problems when I was in San Diego.

Frydenberg is good eh?

Future PM in my mind.

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 10:08pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 10:06pm: I'm in Australia until mid Aug. I can't see it from Cali. lies. I had no problems when I was in San Diego.

I have not been able to download it in San Diego the two times I have tried.
I'm not going to lie about it.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 10:09pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 10:08pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 10:06pm: I'm in Australia until mid Aug. I can't see it from Cali. lies. I had no problems when I was in San Diego. I have not been able to download it in San Diego the two times I have tried. I'm not going to lie about it.

what can I do if I'm not lying either? Try harder. Because you can and I did.  http://abc.net.au/qanda

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 10:08pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 10:06pm: I'm in Australia until mid Aug. I can't see it from Cali. lies. I had no problems when I was in San Diego.

http://www.abc.net.au/iview/#/series/q%2526a/

Why not revoke your other citizenship and vote when you’re here, Andrei?

You’re loyal to this country, remember?

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 10:23pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 10:09pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 10:08pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 10:06pm: I'm in Australia until mid Aug. I can't see it from Cali. lies. I had no problems when I was in San Diego. I have not been able to download it in San Diego the two times I have tried. I'm not going to lie about it. what can I do if I'm not lying either? Try harder. Because you can and I did.  http://abc.net.au/qanda

Yes, but they often don’t let you download Australian TV in other countries.

I have no idea why. It’s not like they’re going to sell Q&A in the US.

Karnal wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 10:40pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 10:23pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 10:09pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 10:08pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 10:06pm: I'm in Australia until mid Aug. I can't see it from Cali. lies. I had no problems when I was in San Diego. I have not been able to download it in San Diego the two times I have tried. I'm not going to lie about it. what can I do if I'm not lying either? Try harder. Because you can and I did.  http://abc.net.au/qanda Yes, but they often don’t let you download Australian TV in other countries. I have no idea why. It’s not like they’re going to sell Q&A in the US.

geo protection isn't on qanda - I've had no probs in both US and in Malaysia.

Unless they've changed it very recently in the US. 

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 10:08pm:

Frydenberg is good eh? Future PM in my mind.

... and the child of REFUGEE parents

I'm sure there's relevance somewhere there.....

Karnal wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 10:37pm:

Why not revoke your other citizenship and vote when you’re here, Andrei? You’re loyal to this country, remember?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTsXtu3ivko

Andrei doesn’t like shoeshiners and rubbish people.

Karnal wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 10:37pm:

Why not revoke your other citizenship and vote when you’re here, Andrei? You’re loyal to this country, remember?

I'm loyal to both my nations. I'm as loyal to Australia as you people.

However I want to vote in the UK General Election thanks.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 10:51pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 10:37pm: Why not revoke your other citizenship and vote when you’re here, Andrei? You’re loyal to this country, remember? I'm loyal to both my nations. I'm as loyal to Australia as you people. However I want to vote in the UK General Election thanks.

That means you’re loyal to another country.

You don’t believe in all that dual nationality nonsense, remember?

buzzanddidj wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 10:45pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 10:08pm: Frydenberg is good eh? Future PM in my mind. ... and the child of REFUGEE parents

His grandparents were refugees.

Karnal wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 10:54pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 10:51pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 10:37pm: Why not revoke your other citizenship and vote when you’re here, Andrei? You’re loyal to this country, remember? I'm loyal to both my nations. I'm as loyal to Australia as you people. However I want to vote in the UK General Election thanks. That means you’re loyal to another country. You don’t believe in all that dual nationality nonsense, remember?

I'm a dual national.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 10:51pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 10:37pm: Why not revoke your other citizenship and vote when you’re here, Andrei? You’re loyal to this country, remember? I'm loyal to both my nations. I'm as loyal to Australia as you people. However I want to vote in the UK General Election thanks.

You are nowhere near as loyal to Australia as I am for many reasons, not the least of which is that I do not confuse myself trying to serve two National Masters.

There is no confusion Aussie.

I have two nationalities and one Head of State. Elizabeth II.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 10:58pm:

There is no confusion Aussie. I have two nationalities and one Head of State. Elizabeth II.

And when Australia plays England?

In sport I cheer for England or Great Britain.

Otherwise Great Britain and Australia are in sync.

There are hundreds of thousands in Australia who are loyal to both Australia but also to Great Britain like I am.
Majority of us support the Monarchy system too.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 11:08pm:

In sport I cheer for England or Great Britain. Otherwise Great Britain and Australia are in sync. There are hundreds of thousands in Australia who are loyal to both Australia but also to Great Britain like I am. Majority of us support the Monarchy system too.

Why?

Because you can't cheer for both sides, I grew up and have spent the majority of my life in England.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 11:13pm:

I grew up

Ohhhhhhh !       





F*CK OFF !







Who do YOU think you're kiddin' ?

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 10:58pm:

There is no confusion Aussie. I have two nationalities and one Head of State. Elizabeth II.

Nelson Mandela is your pin up boy isn't he andrei

Verge wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 5:18pm:

salad in wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 5:12pm: Verge wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 4:56pm: salad in wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 4:51pm: Fresh from enjoying a boost in the Galaxy poll, the ALP drops down again in the Essential poll. [quote] 2 Party Preferred       23/7/2013 ALP 49%, Lib-NP 51% 29/7/2013 ALP 49%, Lib-NP 51% http://essentialvision.com.au/category/essentialreport Actually they didnt drop at all, but thanks for the misleading quote. From last week to this week the ALP was stagnant on 39%, the Coalition dropped one point to 44% and the greens increased two points while independants dropped one. In the two party preferred stakes the result is the SAME as last week.  It didnt slide at all.  It didnt increase at all.  In the 2pp it did nothing. If you take the time to READ what I said I compared the Essential result with that of Galaxy.

... and is Freda aware of the on-line "polling" METHOD practiced by Essential Research, compared to the industry standard used by Newspoll, Galaxy and  Nielsen - and their records, juxtaposed with election outcomes ?

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 8:59pm:

1 point slides are within margin of error. As it stands today, this election is TOO CLOSE TO CALL. One can dispute the independent votes for New England and Lynne, and sure as it stands these will go to the Nationals, but the polls suggest swings accross the board, meaning that marginals will shift between Labor and Liberals. And as they shift, it's currently TOO CLOSE TO CALL. As for you longie, you're a disgrace mate.  Palmer is crazy, and yet you're very eager to vote for Tony. The difference being what, one doesn't have the money to build a Titanic replica but the other does?  Tony would put it to good use - he'd STOP THE BOATS with his Titanic replica. The wanker.

palmer is a lunatic in the established QLD mold.  But in case you are unaware,  palmer and Abbott are NOT in the same party so your silly complaint means what exactly?

Lobo wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 9:57pm:

buzzanddidj wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 9:53pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 9:03pm: Yes, Skippy, but Longy is Catholic. WHAT A LYING C*NT !! He told ME, he is a CHRISTIAN ! I thought he was a member of one if those tub-thumping sects that start up in California every second week. :)

I could tell you what I am ...  again.  but what is the point.  every time you and your ilk come back at me calling me a Catholic when Ive never even been inside a Catholic Church even as a tourist.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29^th, 2013 at 11:08pm:

In sport I cheer for England or Great Britain. Otherwise Great Britain and Australia are in sync. There are hundreds of thousands in Australia who are loyal to both Australia but also to Great Britain like I am. Majority of us support the Monarchy system too.

I don't think you have the foggiest idea what loyalty means.  I don't think you are really loyal to either country or anyone outside your family.

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 30^th, 2013 at 5:21pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 8:59pm: 1 point slides are within margin of error. As it stands today, this election is TOO CLOSE TO CALL. One can dispute the independent votes for New England and Lynne, and sure as it stands these will go to the Nationals, but the polls suggest swings accross the board, meaning that marginals will shift between Labor and Liberals. And as they shift, it's currently TOO CLOSE TO CALL. As for you longie, you're a disgrace mate.  Palmer is crazy, and yet you're very eager to vote for Tony. The difference being what, one doesn't have the money to build a Titanic replica but the other does?  Tony would put it to good use - he'd STOP THE BOATS with his Titanic replica. The wanker. palmer is a lunatic in the established QLD mold.  But in case you are unaware,  palmer and Abbott are NOT in the same party so your silly complaint means what exactly?

That you won't vote for Palmer as he is a lunatic...yet...you'll vote for Tony.

Aside from the party, the difference is...?

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 30^th, 2013 at 5:30pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 30th, 2013 at 5:21pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 8:59pm: 1 point slides are within margin of error. As it stands today, this election is TOO CLOSE TO CALL. One can dispute the independent votes for New England and Lynne, and sure as it stands these will go to the Nationals, but the polls suggest swings accross the board, meaning that marginals will shift between Labor and Liberals. And as they shift, it's currently TOO CLOSE TO CALL. As for you longie, you're a disgrace mate.  Palmer is crazy, and yet you're very eager to vote for Tony. The difference being what, one doesn't have the money to build a Titanic replica but the other does?  Tony would put it to good use - he'd STOP THE BOATS with his Titanic replica. The wanker. palmer is a lunatic in the established QLD mold.  But in case you are unaware,  palmer and Abbott are NOT in the same party so your silly complaint means what exactly? That you won't vote for Palmer as he is a lunatic...yet...you'll vote for Tony. Aside from the party, the difference is...?

policy, practice, experience, intelligence, competence, sanity...

do you want more?

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 30^th, 2013 at 5:27pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jul 29th, 2013 at 11:08pm: In sport I cheer for England or Great Britain. Otherwise Great Britain and Australia are in sync. There are hundreds of thousands in Australia who are loyal to both Australia but also to Great Britain like I am. Majority of us support the Monarchy system too. I don't think you have the foggiest idea what loyalty means.  I don't think you are really loyal to either country or anyone outside your family.

Yes, but Andrei's family are Amerikan.

49% are going to vote for Rudd-Labor?

LOL

Fools!

Obviously listen to ABC and FM radio, watch Left brainwashing tv shows, read the Left media and believe everything the Canberra press gallery tell them.  :)

Won't they get a rude shock.

bambu wrote on Jul 31^st, 2013 at 12:22pm:

49% are going to vote for Rudd-Labor? LOL Fools! Obviously listen to ABC and FM radio, watch Left brainwashing tv shows, read the Left media and believe everything the Canberra press gallery tell them.  :) Won't they get a rude shock.

Well according to the polls 39% of the population will.
I think its 44% for the coalition.

Neither party will get over 50% of the population vote for them anyway.

Thanks for playing along.