Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Environment >> Ice cores - simultaneous changes of CO2 and Temp http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1378457001 Message started by muso on Sep 6th, 2013 at 6:43pm |
Title: Ice cores - simultaneous changes of CO2 and Temp Post by muso on Sep 6th, 2013 at 6:43pm Quote:
http://www.awi.de/en/news/press_releases/detail/item/ice_cores_show_simultaneous_changes_of_co2_and_antarctic_temperature_during_the_last_deglacial_warmi/?cHash=c0633524db7f25615c72108b0f139121 |
Title: Re: Ice cores - simultaneous changes of CO2 and Temp Post by Ajax on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:06am muso wrote on Sep 6th, 2013 at 6:43pm:
CO2 follows temperature, temperature doesn't follow CO2. Here are the Vostok ice cores graphed to a scale where its visible to the naked eye that CO2 follows temperature. http://joannenova.com.au/global-warming-2/ice-core-graph/ Quote:
|
Title: Re: Ice cores - simultaneous changes of CO2 and Temp Post by muso on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:20am
Well that paper shows temperature and CO2 rising synchronously. No lead time. That's going back 20,000 years.
Joanne Nova doesn't understand the term runaway Greenhouse Effect either. Nobody is claiming anything of the sort. Tell me, what is the step interval of the Vostok ice core data? How many years between datapoints? I know, but I want to see if you do. |
Title: Re: Ice cores - simultaneous changes of CO2 and Temp Post by Ajax on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:34am muso wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:20am:
I said its visible to the naked eye, I didn't say that in on a scale of about 50000 years you will detect the 800 year lag. Seriously champ you have to stop twisting things around to suit your argument. Quote:
Ok she doesn't understand it and you do....????!!!! Quote:
Does it really matter whether I know the interval or not. Even if I didn't know I could look it up..?? So what has this to do with the price of the fish..??? |
Title: Re: Ice cores - simultaneous changes of CO2 and Temp Post by muso on Sep 7th, 2013 at 5:40pm Ajax wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:34am:
What, GISP2? The air temperature at the summit of the Greenland icecap? The obvious answer is that its about as relevant to the discussion as the price of fish. |
Title: Re: Ice cores - simultaneous changes of CO2 and Temp Post by muso on Sep 7th, 2013 at 5:42pm Ajax wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:34am:
Well if the step interval is 1000 years, then you're certainly not going to detect a lag of 800 years. Anyway, you're not digesting this new and more accurate work that's presented in the paper. |
Title: Re: Ice cores - simultaneous changes of CO2 and Temp Post by Ajax on Sep 8th, 2013 at 12:24pm muso wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 5:40pm:
Why not.....???? You're constantly claiming that Greenland's glaciers are melting and the north pole is disappearing why not....???? As you can see from the chart temperatures have been warmer than today in Greenland and the north pole. AND that CO2 and temperature don't correlate at all. So why should we get taxed on the air we breath, when its all part of the natural cycle of the earth..????? |
Title: Re: Ice cores - simultaneous changes of CO2 and Temp Post by Ajax on Sep 8th, 2013 at 12:29pm muso wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 5:42pm:
1000 years - 800 years, it will be noticeable on a graph there's not that much difference. Whether you can measure it on a 50000 year time scale might be another matter. Well first I would ask who is the work from......???? And if its that complex why don't you explain it to us all...??? |
Title: Re: Ice cores - simultaneous changes of CO2 and Temp Post by muso on Sep 8th, 2013 at 12:39pm
I won't bother answering your post on surface temperature versus air temperature. I'll just leave it there for posterity ;D
A little primer on measurement and uncertainty error for you: https://www2.southeastern.edu/Academics/Faculty/rallain/plab194/error.html Now let's say that Joanne Nova plotted a dataset that had a step interval of 1000 years, what would be the x-axis uncertainty? |
Title: Re: Ice cores - simultaneous changes of CO2 and Temp Post by Ajax on Sep 8th, 2013 at 12:46pm muso wrote on Sep 8th, 2013 at 12:39pm:
I know there is always an uncertainty in science or an error of margin. So when you tell us all that the rains over Australia in 2010-2011 lowered sea levels by 7mm. What would be the error of margine in that reading then....??? |
Title: Re: Ice cores - simultaneous changes of CO2 and Temp Post by muso on Sep 8th, 2013 at 12:59pm
It's not relevant because if it were 9mm or 6 mm, it would still be possible. The measurement of rainfall also had some error involved. The calculation just showed that about 22% of the rainfall was held up for 1- 2 years or so.
So you agree that it's not possible to make the determination that CO2 lags by 800 years if each point in JN's data was separated by 1000 years? (Actually it's closer to 1054 years, but I'm happy to settle for 1000) |
Title: Re: Ice cores - simultaneous changes of CO2 and Temp Post by Ajax on Sep 8th, 2013 at 1:06pm muso wrote on Sep 8th, 2013 at 12:59pm:
What makes you say that, I never said anything of the sort...?? What would be the margin error in calculating that sea levels dropped 7mm.......????? When the satellite frequency has an accuracy of about 100mm.....??? How was this 7mm measured......? |
Title: Re: Ice cores - simultaneous changes of CO2 and Temp Post by muso on Sep 8th, 2013 at 1:12pm Ajax wrote on Sep 8th, 2013 at 1:06pm:
Well maybe you should follow Nils Axel Morner's advice and ask INQUA. Didn't you watch the video? He said "They're the real experts". They'd be quite happy to refer you to the University of Colorado, but I'll save you the trouble: Nerem, R. S., D. Chambers, C. Choe, and G. T. Mitchum. "Estimating Mean Sea Level Change from the TOPEX and Jason Altimeter Missions." Marine Geodesy 33, no. 1 supp 1 (2010): 435. |
Title: Re: Ice cores - simultaneous changes of CO2 and Temp Post by muso on Sep 8th, 2013 at 1:14pm Ajax wrote on Sep 8th, 2013 at 1:06pm:
I like the way you totally change the subject from Ice Cores to sea level when you're getting out of your depth. |
Title: Re: Ice cores - simultaneous changes of CO2 and Temp Post by Ajax on Sep 8th, 2013 at 1:18pm
Nothing wrong with Dr. Nils Axel Morner's view on the AGW religion, he's fair and honest.
That's what i'm after too. Talk about anything you want. Surface temperature air temperature....??!! You cannot discredit the graphs they are graphs that both sides use and they are graphs from real data bases. So no matter how you wiggle the argument they are there like dogs balls for all to see. |
Title: Re: Ice cores - simultaneous changes of CO2 and Temp Post by muso on Sep 8th, 2013 at 1:24pm
Try comparing global surface temperatures trends to regional air temperature trends anywhere. Is there any relationship at all ?
|
Title: Re: Ice cores - simultaneous changes of CO2 and Temp Post by Ajax on Sep 8th, 2013 at 1:31pm muso wrote on Sep 8th, 2013 at 1:24pm:
Ok please explain....?? What are you trying to say......??? There will be a difference between global temperature and regional temperature, i'm sue most of us will be aware of this. That's why we have the mean isn't it...???? Or are you trying to say that the temperature over Greenland is somehow meaningless...???? Make your point......!!! |
Title: Re: Ice cores - simultaneous changes of CO2 and Temp Post by muso on Sep 8th, 2013 at 1:42pm Ajax wrote on Sep 8th, 2013 at 1:31pm:
I'm trying to get you to investigate things for yourself rather than being spoonfed by Anthony Watts and Joanne Nova, but to answer your question, surface temperatures are way different to air temperatures, and regional trends are way different to global trends. |
Title: Re: Ice cores - simultaneous changes of CO2 and Temp Post by Ajax on Sep 9th, 2013 at 8:48am muso wrote on Sep 8th, 2013 at 1:42pm:
WTF are you trying to say because alarmists also use both. Dude you haven't got a leg to stand on........!!!!!! |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved. |