Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Abo To Lead Labor
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1378555456

Message started by Greens_Win on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:04pm

Title: Abo To Lead Labor
Post by Greens_Win on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:04pm
Sources in Labor said Abo is favourite for leadership.

Could be a smart move so to bring Labor back to the Greens.

Title: Re: Abo To Lead Labor
Post by skippy. on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:07pm

____ wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:04pm:
Sources in Labor said Abo is favourite for leadership.

Could be a smart move so to bring Labor back to the Greens.

Could be.
Plebiseck is my outsider bet. Anyone but Shorten, pleeeeese.

Title: Re: Abo To Lead Labor
Post by progressiveslol on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:07pm
OMG it just gets worse in labor and for Australia. Next we will get the unionist Shorton.

Labor have no hope in the near future

Title: Re: Abo To Lead Labor
Post by Maqqa on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:10pm
I am tipping Shorten

When Shorten betrayed Gillard - the deal would have been

(1) I'll support you over Gillard
(2) If you lose - you quit and I'll be leader

Title: Re: Abo To Lead Labor
Post by Kat on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:12pm

Wong would be a good choice.

They could do a lot worse.

Title: Re: Abo To Lead Labor
Post by Bam on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:14pm

Kat wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:12pm:
Wong would be a good choice.

They could do a lot worse.

Wong's in the Senate. The leader has to be a member of the House.

Title: Re: Abo To Lead Labor
Post by Kat on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:17pm

Bam wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:14pm:

Kat wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:12pm:
Wong would be a good choice.

They could do a lot worse.

Wong's in the Senate. The leader has to be a member of the House.


Well, that cruels that idea.

Don't know who else I'd choose.

Not Shorten, and not Plibersek, that's for sure.

Title: Re: Abo To Lead Labor
Post by Bam on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:18pm
Albo would make a good leader.

Title: Re: Abo To Lead Labor
Post by bobbythebat1 on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:13pm
Doug Cameron - his accent would remind voters of the union roots of Labor.

Title: Re: Abo To Lead Labor
Post by John Smith on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:14pm

skippy. wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:07pm:

____ wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:04pm:
Sources in Labor said Abo is favourite for leadership.

Could be a smart move so to bring Labor back to the Greens.

Could be.
Plebiseck is my outsider bet. Anyone but Shorten, pleeeeese.


I don't think they'd try another woman at this stage .... to close to Gillards time

Title: Re: Abo To Lead Labor
Post by John Smith on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:15pm

Bam wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:14pm:

Kat wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:12pm:
Wong would be a good choice.

They could do a lot worse.

Wong's in the Senate. The leader has to be a member of the House.


that's not actually a rule ....

Title: Re: Abo To Lead Labor
Post by Bam on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:25pm

John Smith wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:15pm:

Bam wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:14pm:

Kat wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:12pm:
Wong would be a good choice.

They could do a lot worse.

Wong's in the Senate. The leader has to be a member of the House.


that's not actually a rule ....

It's much harder for the Leader of the Opposition to ask questions of the Prime Minister in Question Time if the LOTO is in the Senate. The Prime Minister is always a member of the House, to the extent that Senators that become PM must resign from the Senate and be elected to the House in a by-election. Example: Gorton in 1968.

We can nominate good Senators, but it is likely that the LOTO will be a member of the House, so we should look there first.

Title: Re: Abo To Lead Labor
Post by MOTR on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:26pm
Where is Combet when you desperately need him?

Title: Re: Abo To Lead Labor
Post by John Smith on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:27pm

Bam wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:25pm:

John Smith wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:15pm:

Bam wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:14pm:

Kat wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:12pm:
Wong would be a good choice.

They could do a lot worse.

Wong's in the Senate. The leader has to be a member of the House.


that's not actually a rule ....

It's much harder for the Leader of the Opposition to ask questions of the Prime Minister in Question Time if the LOTO is in the Senate. The Prime Minister is always a member of the House, to the extent that Senators that become PM must resign from the Senate and be elected to the House in a by-election. Example: Gorton in 1968.

We can nominate good Senators, but it is likely that the LOTO will be a member of the House, so we should look there first.


I don't disagree with that, but the fact remains that if they wanted a senator as leader of the party they can do it.

Newman was leader of the opposition and he wasn't even a member of parliament yet.

Title: Re: Abo To Lead Labor
Post by Swagman on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:28pm

____ wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:04pm:
Sources in Labor said Abo is favourite for leadership.

Could be a smart move so to bring Labor back to the Greens.


Abbo is the PM  ;D

Title: Re: Abo To Lead Labor
Post by Greens_Win on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:31pm

Swagman wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:28pm:

____ wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:04pm:
Sources in Labor said Abo is favourite for leadership.

Could be a smart move so to bring Labor back to the Greens.


Abbo is the PM  ;D


Post Lib's DD, maybe.

There again it could be Mal Turnbull.

Title: Re: Abo To Lead Labor
Post by RightSadFred on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:33pm

skippy. wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:07pm:

____ wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:04pm:
Sources in Labor said Abo is favourite for leadership.

Could be a smart move so to bring Labor back to the Greens.

Could be.
Plebiseck is my outsider bet. Anyone but Shorten, pleeeeese.


skippy.

According to ALP sources Shorten is the most likely,

Shorten is a dumb f... and for that reason he might be a good choice for first term as he will be unlikely to win and the dumbo would be easy to remove.

He lost any chance after that stupid interview he gave.

Credibility can take years to build up but can be destroyed in 20 minutes or less.


Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.