Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Labor's primary lowest in 100 years http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1378556222 Message started by Maqqa on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:17pm |
Title: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by Maqqa on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:17pm
This is an indictment on Rudd the selfish self-absorb selfie seeker
|
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by Dnarever on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:19pm Maqqa wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:17pm:
More an indictment of Abbott - the first thing he had to say - what a grub. |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by Greens_Win on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:20pm
Yep, Bott has no class.
|
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by Maqqa on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:25pm Dnarever wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:19pm:
I see You are blaming Abbott for the result!!! ;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by Bam on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:26pm
And yet only lost about 15 seats, why? The minor parties and independents polled one vote in eight, or more than one vote in five if the Greens are included. When was the last time that one vote in five went to a party other than the ALP or a Coalition party?
|
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by Sprintcyclist on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:43pm What a whipping. And the spazzo lefties cheered on the architect of their demise. they merit sterilization |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by Bam on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:44pm
Yet the ALP polled more primary votes than any other party.
|
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by Sprintcyclist on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:46pm shows a leftys vote is worth 1/4 of anyone elses. |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by bobbythebat1 on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:48pm
Labor will come back to power - they always do.
|
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by skippy. on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:52pm Maqqa wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:17pm:
Abbott already telling lies as PM. It is the lowest since the second world war, not one hundred years, ABBOTT is a lying dog, still. |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by Sprintcyclist on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:01pm Bobby. wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:48pm:
a dog returns to its vomit |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by longweekend58 on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:02pm Bam wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:26pm:
actually looks closer to a loss of 20 seats and ~40 seat majority. pretty good result! |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by longweekend58 on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:03pm Bam wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 10:44pm:
pitiful. they were massacred by the COALITION. get over it loser. |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by Ahovking on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:03pm
Labor's primary lowest in 100 years, as it should be!!!
|
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by skippy. on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:07pm longweekend58 wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:03pm:
Still a bitter old man even in triumph. |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by John Smith on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:08pm
and the libs could still only manage a swing of 1.8% ..... imagine the swing if they'd had a leader people liked
|
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by John Smith on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:10pm skippy. wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:07pm:
he'll always be a bitter old man ... he can't help it |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by Sprintcyclist on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:19pm John Smith wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:08pm:
idiot - the leftards treated the election like a 'talent quest'. and gave us the worst govt in living memory. the right is different, get used to it. |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by longweekend58 on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:19pm skippy. wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:07pm:
wrong word. not bitter. TRIUMPHANT try again, loser. |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by John Smith on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:21pm longweekend58 wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:19pm:
nope, bitter describes you perfectly |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by John Smith on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:22pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:19pm:
you have an aversion to the truth do you? What do you think the swing would be if someone like Costello had put his hand up? |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by Bam on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:28pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:01pm:
Abbott won the election. ;D |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by Bam on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:30pm longweekend58 wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:03pm:
You are such an ungracious winner. |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by John Smith on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:32pm Bam wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:30pm:
he's ungracious in all aspects of his life, win or lose |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by Sprintcyclist on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:34pm Bam wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:30pm:
show me a good loser, I'll show you a loser. |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by PZ547 on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:35pm
Ok. You whining Labor Losers have run your time now
It's no longer about corrupt, incompetent Labor crooks Tonight is about the Liberal win and Labor and Rudd hitting the kerb You're behaving like five years olds Which is the mental age of Labor supporters Go and sulk in your bedrooms I'm sick of your pouting and crying Go on. Buzz off like Rudd |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by John Smith on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:37pm PZ547 wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:35pm:
Is it past your bedtime? You seem to be having an tanty ...... |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by longweekend58 on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:39pm Bam wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:30pm:
only to you, you arrogant sod. If you were still ultimate dictator on that failed website you would still have just 6 posters all gratuitously agreeing with you. Here you have to earn your strips. And labor supporters have been extraordinarily ugly people these last 3 years. |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by Bam on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:40pm John Smith wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:08pm:
This gives them not much of a buffer. |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by PZ547 on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:41pm
.
Labor supporters are still ugly Whine, bitch, whine, cry, waaa waaaa Labor --- you lost It's not about YOU You lost Deal with it |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by longweekend58 on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:44pm Bam wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:40pm:
11% on primary votes is not much of a buffer? 6% on 2PP is not much of a buffer?? dream on, pebbles. |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by John Smith on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:50pm longweekend58 wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:44pm:
easy come, easy go. What was the buffer when Rudd won in 2007? didn't take long for that to whittle away |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by John Smith on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:51pm PZ547 wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:41pm:
If it's not about labor supporters, why are all your posts directed at labor supporters? make up your mind! |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by PZ547 on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:53pm
.
Aussie Labor and Greens supporters Captured the market on bitter pills and appear to have overdosed on them Hilarious Tossing dummy spits in an online forum as if that will rid them of their bile or change the election results Hey, losers ----- narcissism time is ovuh It's now about Liberals and Lib supporters |
Title: Re: Labor's primary lowest in 100 years Post by longweekend58 on Sep 8th, 2013 at 12:03am John Smith wrote on Sep 7th, 2013 at 11:50pm:
Rudd has the second smallest winning margin ever for a change of govt. didn't know that, did you? |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved. |