The summary for policy makers is final after pollies had their go at reviewing and changing it.
However the rest of the report that you know makes up the information used for the summary is not final. In fact they have even said they may change parts to be more in line with the summary for policy makers!

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/10/12/tail-wagging-the-dog-ipcc-to-rework-ar5-to-be-consistent-with-the-spm/


Quote:

Dave Burton writes: Anthony, The IPCC replied promptly to my inquiry (below), and they surprised me, twice: 1. They say that the just released “final” draft of the AR5 WG1 Report isn’t really final after all, but the Summary for Policy Makers is final; and 2. They say the “underlying chapters” may be revised for consistency with the SPM. Does that seem backwards, to you? The SPM is the political statement. The “underlying chapters” are (supposedly) the science. So they’re saying that they may still need to revise the science to make it consistent with the political statement. OTOH, while they might have low standards for their science, they have remarkably high standards for promptness. They replied just 98 minutes after I emailed them, yet they asked me to “please accept our apology for the late response.” Dave

David's email to the IPCC


Quote:

Dear IPCC WGI TSU, The AR5 WGI Report has now been released, and we were told that when the Report was released all of the expert reviewer comments would be released as well. But I can’t find them on the web sites. Can you please give me the link(s)? Thank you, David Burton (WG1 expert reviewer, USA)

Their reply:


Quote:

———- Forwarded message ———- From: IPCC WGI TSU <wg1@ipcc.unibe.ch> Date: Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 7:50 AM Subject: RE: AR5 WGI Expert Reviewers’ comments To: ncdave@xxxxxxx.xxx Cc: IPCC WGI TSU wg1@ipcc.unibe.ch Dear Mr. Burton, Thank you for the interest in the Working Group I contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. What has been released so far is the approved Summary for Policymakers as well as the final drafts (version 7 June 2013) of the underlying chapters and the Technial Summary (downloadable free of charge from www.climatechange2013.org). These drafts are still subject to copy edit, error correction and any necessary changes for consistency with the approved SPM. We anticipate that the full report in its finalised and publication-ready form will be released electronically in January 2014. At that time, also all the review comments and responses will become part of the public record and will be posted on our web site. Please do not hesitate to contact us again should you have further questions. Thank you again for your interest and please accept our apology for the late response. Best regards, IPCC WGI TSU ———————————————————————

15% admits the fossil fuel calculus  :o

So change the facts to suit the ideology...sounds like standard scientific method...really...  ::) ;)

namnugenot wrote on Oct 30^th, 2013 at 2:07pm:

So change the facts to suit the ideology...sounds like standard scientific method...really...  ::) ;)

Ketchup

I knew it was bullshit from the very beginning when we were told that in order to save ourselves we have to create a $2 trillion dollar market on wall street.