Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Non-Core Promises http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1385775045 Message started by iceyone on Nov 30th, 2013 at 11:30am |
Title: Non-Core Promises Post by iceyone on Nov 30th, 2013 at 11:30am
Now that the Coalition are in charge, they will have non-core promises.
These aren't lies, their just promises they can't fulfill and are "non-core". The nbn - they stated 25mbps minimum to all Australians by 2016 - we know this is now false. Gonski is gonsk. Repealing the carbon tax and the cutting of power bills. Stopping the boats. What else has our new government failed at? |
Title: Re: Non-Core Promises Post by The Thinking Mans Grappler on Nov 30th, 2013 at 11:32am
Only part-time casuals under PromiseChoices..... no argument for reinstatement whatsoever....
:o |
Title: Re: Non-Core Promises Post by progressiveslol on Nov 30th, 2013 at 11:34am
There will be no carbon tax under a governmebt I lead
There will be no gonski lies under a government election im trying to win There will be a surplus I will tell you about 200 or more times There will be a 16 year old come in to play soon I dont know about any brown paperr bag with 5000 cash |
Title: Re: Non-Core Promises Post by # on Nov 30th, 2013 at 12:59pm Fit of Absent Mindeness wrote on Nov 30th, 2013 at 11:30am:
Making a promise that you later find you can't keep is one thing. Making a promise that you know you won't be able to keep is another. Making a promise that you have no intention of keeping, even if you can, is yet another. |
Title: Re: Non-Core Promises Post by buzzanddidj on Nov 30th, 2013 at 1:55pm progressiveslol wrote on Nov 30th, 2013 at 11:34am:
buzzanddidj wrote on Nov 30th, 2013 at 11:13am:
|
Title: Re: Non-Core Promises Post by progressiveslol on Nov 30th, 2013 at 2:36pm buzzanddidj wrote on Nov 30th, 2013 at 1:55pm:
Oh you poor thing. You want that moment for your ideology soooo bad don't you. lol pizzzzzz off fool. You can get it when liberals invite labor to campaign for them at an election. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: Non-Core Promises Post by Karnal on Nov 30th, 2013 at 2:39pm
SHAME LABOR SHAME
|
Title: Re: Non-Core Promises Post by buzzanddidj on Nov 30th, 2013 at 3:40pm progressiveslol wrote on Nov 30th, 2013 at 2:36pm:
That "ideology" I adhere to, and want "soooo bad", is that EVERY child has the RIGHT to a quality of education as much as the next one Regardless of being born into wealth, EVERY child has EVERY RIGHT to an equal opportunity and start in life - wherever possible Outside of the political and social agenda of the government of the day I STAND by this, PROUDLY |
Title: Re: Non-Core Promises Post by adelcrow on Nov 30th, 2013 at 4:03pm
At the CORE of the speedo kids promises were lies :D
|
Title: Re: Non-Core Promises Post by buzzanddidj on Nov 30th, 2013 at 4:19pm
Non-core promise definition - and origins
A commitment to deliver (a service, funding, an item) that is subsequently set aside. The broken promise is then explained with the glib expression "oh, but that promise was non-core" Now generalised to non-political situations, too. Origin: Australian federal elections at the turn of the 20th/21st centuries. The conservative party (known as the LibNat coalition) made a number of election promises which were broken soon after the election. The prime minister, John Howard, attempted to explain this behaviour by claiming that some promises are "core" and some are "non-core" and thus, don't count. Not only did "No tax increases, no new taxes" turn out to be a non-core promise, but in the campaign, Howard had also given a solemn undertaking that "I'm not going to break any promises". That one was certainly "non-core" Laurie Oakes (Australian political reporter/writer) Excerpt from National Nine News (network TV) 12 May 2005 as quoted at news.ninemsn.com.au |
Title: Re: Non-Core Promises Post by Andrei.Hicks on Nov 30th, 2013 at 4:22pm buzzanddidj wrote on Nov 30th, 2013 at 3:40pm:
Every child deserves an education, I think you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who doesn't believe that. But in a supply / demand market capitalist society, you would agree that people who pay should receive a better one - as in better facilities, lower class numbers per teacher etc. Supply and demand & return for investment. |
Title: Re: Non-Core Promises Post by progressiveslol on Nov 30th, 2013 at 5:45pm buzzanddidj wrote on Nov 30th, 2013 at 3:40pm:
Oh BS, get over yourself. Who the hell you think your fooling. You. There is no government or person who doesn't feel the same. Your ideology stinks mate. |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved. |