Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> General Board >> White mans countries
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1390433673

Message started by Sprintcyclist on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:34am

Title: White mans countries
Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:34am

Noticed how white mans countries are better ?

Noticed how we are at the top of the heap ?

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Oh_Yeah on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:38am
Do you think that makes you superior?

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by viewpoint on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:45am

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:34am:
Noticed how white mans countries are better ?

Noticed how we are at the top of the heap ?


What's your point?

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by The Grappler 2014 on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:52am
No Country For White Men.

Without being racist at all, I have to agree.  generally we have less random crime and murder as just a part of life, less disease, better social security,and tougher, spoilt women.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by cods on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:57am
better at what??

drinking???.. well we top that dont we  BRAVO

beating each other up...mmmmm pretty good as well..

sticking our thumb up at social behavior etiquette if you will..

yep think we top that one as well ...

not sure its something to boast about though :'(

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 10:09am

The most desirable countries to live in are always white mans countries.

nonwhite invasions have only ever degraded the living standards of a white country.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Rubin on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 1:31pm
Lol only if you are brought up that way I sure the numbers of people living in other parts of the world would out number that sentiment 3 to 1 and argue the converse and be correct to :)

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Frances on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 2:54pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:34am:
Noticed how white mans countries are better ?

Noticed how we are at the top of the heap ?


So Iceland is better than Japan for example?

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by donincognito on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 3:12pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 10:09am:
The most desirable countries to live in are always white mans countries.

nonwhite invasions have only ever degraded the living standards of a white country.


Really? After the thorough smacking over that whites have given Australia, the inclusion of varied ethnic groups has massively improved our nation. Or are you too stupid to realise it? poo, all you need to do is look to the food we eat now.

Course, if you enjoy eating sand while burying your head in it, I can see why you would have a problem. Course, the thing is, its your problem. Noone elses.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 3:46pm

what country run by blacks does anyone want to live in ??

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Sparky on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 3:52pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 3:46pm:
what country run by blacks does anyone want to live in ??
( crickets chirping).

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Cliff48 on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 5:15pm
http://youtu.be/4HHT_V294Co

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Innocent bystander on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 5:25pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 3:46pm:
what country run by blacks does anyone want to live in ??


The left are importing them all here instead to help them carve up the spoils of two hundred years of white conservative wealth building.
Pretty rude of them considering they never contributed f*ck all themselves, the left know how to spend it but have f*ck all clue when it comes to accumulating it  ;D

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Jackness on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 5:52pm
Couldn't have said it better.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Jackness on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 5:55pm
Look at the black countries. Look at the muslim countries. Look at the ching chong slitty-eyed countries. Crime and disease ridden, corruption, violence, rape, etc.

This is why I'm proud to be Australian.



Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Gnads on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 5:59pm

Quote:
Crime and disease ridden, corruption, violence, rape, etc.


Sounds like Sydney & Melbourne  ;D ;D

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Jackness on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 6:05pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 10:09am:
The most desirable countries to live in are always white mans countries.

nonwhite invasions have only ever degraded the living standards of a white country.


Couldn't agree more. Case in point: Look at the suburbs and the neighbourhoods where the minorities are the majority.



Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Jackness on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 6:07pm

Gnads wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 5:59pm:

Quote:
Crime and disease ridden, corruption, violence, rape, etc.


Sounds like Sydney & Melbourne  ;D ;D


Yeah. Thanks to the minorities and non-whites who are ruining Australia. And for your info Sydney and Melbourne have higher ratio of non-whites. So that pretty much explains it.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Gnads on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 6:16pm

Quote:
And for your info Sydney and Melbourne have higher ratio of non-whites.


So? .... don't live there

Never seen a post like this get this much air before .....

it's usually pulled pronto.........

thought it was a bait post actually ... maybe it still is

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Jackness on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 6:19pm

Gnads wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 6:16pm:

Quote:
And for your info Sydney and Melbourne have higher ratio of non-whites.


So? .... don't live there

Never seen a post like this get this much air before .....

it's usually pulled pronto.........

thought it was a bait post actually ... maybe it still is



Ohhh don't you worry about me you knobhead I'm not living in any of those cities.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Jackness on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 6:20pm

Gnads wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 6:16pm:

Quote:
And for your info Sydney and Melbourne have higher ratio of non-whites.


So? .... don't live there



Ohhh don't you worry about me you poofter I'm not living in any of those cities. Try again.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Gnads on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 6:24pm
You might not be around here long either Noddy.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Innocent bystander on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 6:25pm

Jackness wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 5:55pm:
Look at the black countries. Look at the muslim countries. Look at the ching chong slitty-eyed countries. Crime and disease ridden, corruption, violence, rape, etc.

This is why I'm proud to be Australian.




Look at South Africa, funny sh*t, everythings all good there now because its no longer white racist coppers shooting the blacks its the black coppers shooting the blacks, what progress   ;D

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Frances on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 6:50pm

Jackness wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 6:19pm:

Gnads wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 6:16pm:

Quote:
And for your info Sydney and Melbourne have higher ratio of non-whites.


So? .... don't live there

Never seen a post like this get this much air before .....

it's usually pulled pronto.........

thought it was a bait post actually ... maybe it still is



Ohhh don't you worry about me you knobhead I'm not living in any of those cities.


Well, that's nice to know.  I wouldn't want to think that you might be living down the road from me.....

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by donincognito on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:06pm
I love these threads. Makes it real simple to spot the racist knuckledraggers.


Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by The Grappler 2014 on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:44pm

cods wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:57am:
better at what??

drinking???.. well we top that dont we  BRAVO

beating each other up...mmmmm pretty good as well..

sticking our thumb up at social behavior etiquette if you will..

yep think we top that one as well ...

not sure its something to boast about though :'(


You're discussing minority issues again...

You're welcome...

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by The Grappler 2014 on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:46pm

Frances wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 2:54pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:34am:
Noticed how white mans countries are better ?

Noticed how we are at the top of the heap ?


So Iceland is better than Japan for example?


The Japanese are Token whites... they adopted and adapted to the White Man's civilisation.  Remember WWII?

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by The Grappler 2014 on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:48pm

donincognito wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 3:12pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 10:09am:
The most desirable countries to live in are always white mans countries.

nonwhite invasions have only ever degraded the living standards of a white country.


Really? After the thorough smacking over that whites have given Australia, the inclusion of varied ethnic groups has massively improved our nation. Or are you too stupid to realise it? poo, all you need to do is look to the food we eat now.

Course, if you enjoy eating sand while burying your head in it, I can see why you would have a problem. Course, the thing is, its your problem. Noone elses.



Yeah - I love Thai food and Indian, but not over-fussed on Korean and Vietnamese - Italian now - that's the good oil!  Middle Eastern food is OK, but not all.

Might make up some tacos...... dinner calls....

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by The Grappler 2014 on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:52pm

Jackness wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 5:55pm:
Look at the black countries. Look at the muslim countries. Look at the ching chong slitty-eyed countries. Crime and disease ridden, corruption, violence, rape, etc.

This is why I'm proud to be Australian.


Old it, Bruvva!  What's this 'ching chong' stuff?   My favourite lady is a Malay Chinese and she is a class act all the way, let me tell you, with an illustrious family history.

She teaches refugee children Malay culture and how to get on in that country and society - and she does it free, even though she has not been well.

Her grandfather flew reconnaissance missions in his personal Tiger Moth for the RAF in 1942 - unarmed, unescorted and unacknowledged - there's a book out about it - and after the Japanese invaded he flew by island-hopping to Australia and joined the RAAF.

Watch the generalisations about corruption and stuff, mister!

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Jackness on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:54pm

donincognito wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:06pm:
I love these threads. Makes it real simple to spot the racist knuckledraggers.


You weak knobheads have no other better rebuttal than the usual "you're a RACIST!!!" to suppress a debate.

You want to talk about racist, well ok then. Why didin't you mention about blacks and other minorities committing crimes targeting whites? How's that for racism?

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Honky on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:55pm
I bet this thread is going to be chock-full of reasoned and insightful debate. 


Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Jackness on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:58pm

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:52pm:

Jackness wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 5:55pm:
Look at the black countries. Look at the muslim countries. Look at the ching chong slitty-eyed countries. Crime and disease ridden, corruption, violence, rape, etc.

This is why I'm proud to be Australian.


Old it, Bruvva!  What's this 'ching chong' stuff?   My favourite lady is a Malay Chinese and she is a class act all the way, let me tell you, with an illustrious family history.

She teaches refugee children Malay culture and how to get on in that country and society - and she does it free, even though she has not been well.

Her grandfather flew reconnaissance missions in his personal Tiger Moth for the RAF in 1942 - unarmed, unescorted and unacknowledged - there's a book out about it - and after the Japanese invaded he flew by island-hopping to Australia and joined the RAAF.

Watch the generalisations about corruption and stuff, mister!


I'm sorry for the generalisation. I have to admit though not all asians are like that. It's just the majority of them giving asians a bad name. The malays are generally a well-behaved bunch I believe. (Been to Malaysia for vacation)

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Gnads on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:58pm
*

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Soren on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 8:03pm

Frances wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 2:54pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:34am:
Noticed how white mans countries are better ?

Noticed how we are at the top of the heap ?


So Iceland is better than Japan for example?


Absolutely.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2QgGoAuwoU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCjxzpSrFP4




Anyway,
culture allows you to transcend your race - white, African, East/South Asian, Arab, etc. It is the vehicle of mobility between race/cultures.

Culture allows you, invites you, as an individual, to transcend your race. Most people, however, have a sense of cultural solidarity that maps onto their race.  So the very few people who change culture illustrate the point. VS Naipaul, is such an example.

Class (standards) are also very important. But the size of the underclass in each culture/race is not he same. In Africa and the third world generally, the vast majority are illiterate, uncultivated. In European and European-derived societies the underclass has ben steadily shrinking due to specifically European cultural values like education, equality before the law, individual responsibility trumping group identity (ie class).


One of the best things about European/white/enlightenment culture/race is tht it i open to personal merit and individual achievement due to personal effort  in  way no other race or culture is. And foremost among European and European-derived cultures/races in this regard are the Anglo-Celtic-European, English speaking countries.

Test it and see if this s wrong.

UK, Australia, NZ, Canada, US, Ireland -  European and English speaking  - tick
South Africa, Zimbabwe, Singapore, Hong Kong, Kenya, PNG, Fiji, etc - English speaking but not European - no tick or cigar.






Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 8:11pm

Gnads wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 6:16pm:

Quote:
And for your info Sydney and Melbourne have higher ratio of non-whites.


So? .... don't live there

Never seen a post like this get this much air before .....

it's usually pulled pronto.........

thought it was a bait post actually ... maybe it still is


grow a set of 'nads

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 8:12pm

... wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:55pm:
I bet this thread is going to be chock-full of reasoned and insightful debate. 



go take a flying jump at yourself

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Setanta on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 8:29pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 8:12pm:

... wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:55pm:
I bet this thread is going to be chock-full of reasoned and insightful debate. 



go take a flying jump at yourself


It seems he was spot on, eh? ::)

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by The Grappler 2014 on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 8:39pm

Jackness wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:58pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:52pm:

Jackness wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 5:55pm:
Look at the black countries. Look at the muslim countries. Look at the ching chong slitty-eyed countries. Crime and disease ridden, corruption, violence, rape, etc.

This is why I'm proud to be Australian.


Old it, Bruvva!  What's this 'ching chong' stuff?   My favourite lady is a Malay Chinese and she is a class act all the way, let me tell you, with an illustrious family history.

She teaches refugee children Malay culture and how to get on in that country and society - and she does it free, even though she has not been well.

Her grandfather flew reconnaissance missions in his personal Tiger Moth for the RAF in 1942 - unarmed, unescorted and unacknowledged - there's a book out about it - and after the Japanese invaded he flew by island-hopping to Australia and joined the RAAF.

Watch the generalisations about corruption and stuff, mister!


I'm sorry for the generalisation. I have to admit though not all asians are like that. It's just the majority of them giving asians a bad name. The malays are generally a well-behaved bunch I believe. (Been to Malaysia for vacation)


OK.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 8:45pm

Setanta wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 8:29pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 8:12pm:

... wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:55pm:
I bet this thread is going to be chock-full of reasoned and insightful debate. 



go take a flying jump at yourself


It seems he was spot on, eh? ::)


doubted that anyone would be stupid enough to rise to the bait

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by donincognito on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 8:57pm

Jackness wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:54pm:

donincognito wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:06pm:
I love these threads. Makes it real simple to spot the racist knuckledraggers.


You weak knobheads have no other better rebuttal than the usual "you're a RACIST!!!" to suppress a debate.

You want to talk about racist, well ok then. Why didin't you mention about blacks and other minorities committing crimes targeting whites? How's that for racism?

I know that you havent really gotten past the school ground debating mentality, but you are supposed to be a grown up. Two wrongs dont make a right. Just because someone else is racist doesnt mean that its ok for you to be racist. Its still wrong.

I have no interest in suppressing this debate, because it really does highlight how little you know and how pig ignorant and stupid you really are. So please, continue on with your racist as bugger rants. It will leave all those slightly more cerebral of us free to ignore your pathetic, crappy opinions.

P.S. Maybe if we didnt lock up innocent women and children maybe people wouldnt attack us. Food for thought. You must be starving.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Soren on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:06pm

donincognito wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 8:57pm:

Jackness wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:54pm:

donincognito wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:06pm:
I love these threads. Makes it real simple to spot the racist knuckledraggers.


You weak knobheads have no other better rebuttal than the usual "you're a RACIST!!!" to suppress a debate.

You want to talk about racist, well ok then. Why didin't you mention about blacks and other minorities committing crimes targeting whites? How's that for racism?

I know that you havent really gotten past the school ground debating mentality, but you are supposed to be a grown up. Two wrongs dont make a right. Just because someone else is racist doesnt mean that its ok for you to be racist. Its still wrong.

I have no interest in suppressing this debate, because it really does highlight how little you know and how pig ignorant and stupid you really are. So please, continue on with your racist as bugger rants. It will leave all those slightly more cerebral of us free to ignore your pathetic, crappy opinions.

P.S. Maybe if we didnt lock up innocent women and children maybe people wouldnt attack us. Food for thought. You must be starving.

Snow job.
Why not address yourself to the question and THEn do the snow job if your heart is still in it.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:09pm

Soren wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:06pm:

donincognito wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 8:57pm:

Jackness wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:54pm:

donincognito wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:06pm:
I love these threads. Makes it real simple to spot the racist knuckledraggers.


You weak knobheads have no other better rebuttal than the usual "you're a RACIST!!!" to suppress a debate.

You want to talk about racist, well ok then. Why didin't you mention about blacks and other minorities committing crimes targeting whites? How's that for racism?

I know that you havent really gotten past the school ground debating mentality, but you are supposed to be a grown up. Two wrongs dont make a right. Just because someone else is racist doesnt mean that its ok for you to be racist. Its still wrong.

I have no interest in suppressing this debate, because it really does highlight how little you know and how pig ignorant and stupid you really are. So please, continue on with your racist as bugger rants. It will leave all those slightly more cerebral of us free to ignore your pathetic, crappy opinions.

P.S. Maybe if we didnt lock up innocent women and children maybe people wouldnt attack us. Food for thought. You must be starving.

Snow job.
Why not address yourself to the question and THEn do the snow job if your heart is still in it.


nah, he's a coward/bully.
too scared to stand up for anything he believes.

totally gutless

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by donincognito on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:09pm

Soren wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:06pm:

donincognito wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 8:57pm:

Jackness wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:54pm:

donincognito wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 7:06pm:
I love these threads. Makes it real simple to spot the racist knuckledraggers.


You weak knobheads have no other better rebuttal than the usual "you're a RACIST!!!" to suppress a debate.

You want to talk about racist, well ok then. Why didin't you mention about blacks and other minorities committing crimes targeting whites? How's that for racism?

I know that you havent really gotten past the school ground debating mentality, but you are supposed to be a grown up. Two wrongs dont make a right. Just because someone else is racist doesnt mean that its ok for you to be racist. Its still wrong.

I have no interest in suppressing this debate, because it really does highlight how little you know and how pig ignorant and stupid you really are. So please, continue on with your racist as bugger rants. It will leave all those slightly more cerebral of us free to ignore your pathetic, crappy opinions.

P.S. Maybe if we didnt lock up innocent women and children maybe people wouldnt attack us. Food for thought. You must be starving.

Snow job.
Why not address yourself to the question and THEn do the snow job if your heart is still in it.

I know reading and comprehension is not your strong suit, but do try and keep up.

Here, maybe this will help

Two wrongs dont make a right. Just because someone else is racist doesnt mean that its ok for you to be racist. Its still wrong.

If I could be bothered I would argue that its our racism that causes the retaliation against us, but I honestly dont think you racist simpletons can hold more than two or three thoughts in your head at the one time, so baby steps, baby steps. 

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:14pm

ooohhhh, look. He is yelling.
Proves he is unsure of himself AND a bully.

hahahha, go join islam,  my coward.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:15pm

and by the way, racism is right.

though you may squeal against that fact.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by donincognito on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:29pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:14pm:
ooohhhh, look. He is yelling.
Proves he is unsure of himself AND a bully.

hahahha, go join islam,  my coward.


Look, I know you are new to this whole internets thingamajigger, but the convention is that typing in caps is yelling. What I did was highlight the relevant passage because some knuckledragger missed it the first time.

And now you know.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Peter Freedman on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:40pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:15pm:
and by the way, racism is right.

though you may squeal against that fact.


This is not a "fact", but an opinion. The opinion of a self confessed racist.

Make of it what you will. I know what I think of it and its author.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Rubin on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 11:28pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:15pm:
and by the way, racism is right.

though you may squeal against that fact.

Racism in Australia in illegal that's a fact

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by WorldSacred on Jan 24th, 2014 at 2:10am

The_Barnacle wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:38am:
Do you think that makes you superior?


In many ways, yes.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by WorldSacred on Jan 24th, 2014 at 2:14am

Frances wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 2:54pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:34am:
Noticed how white mans countries are better ?

Noticed how we are at the top of the heap ?


So Iceland is better than Japan for example?


There are 350,000 people living in Iceland. Most of those living in the capital. It's easy to spot where the social problems are in the country in such a centralised island nation. Japan has 120 million people living on an island the size of New Zealand. Japanese have a good social structure, but it's easy to become anonymous in such a large population.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by sherri on Jan 24th, 2014 at 7:20am
I think that what is interesting here is how some people define racism.
Racism is never (in my opinion) the ability to acknowledge fact. It is when someone carries it further and uses only race to judge another person or group.
Some people seem to think that to be non racist, you have to claim everyone is the same, there are no differences.

I think it is perfectly clear that over the last few hundred years, European civilization came into its own. It flourished, there was a period of exploration, discovery, scientific advancement. It has been the white man's turn to be top dog for quite a while now.
That doesn't mean whites are morally superior.  A civilized country that could allow or create the holocaust should remind us of that. Plus, most citizens are just along for the ride. They have been lucky to be born in a country where the living standards have been improving in leaps and bounds.

Because we live such short lives, we think things will stay the same virtually forever. But European civilization wasn't always top of the heap, and we live in a world that is changing. South Korea, China & India are forging ahead. Because of sheer population numbers, India's number of gifted students now pretty much equals the entire population of the USA.
It's not just about race, it is about opportunity. The African nations and some of the middle east-I can't see them having their time in the sun anytime in the next 100 or 200 years.


Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 24th, 2014 at 7:50am

Peter Freedman wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:40pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:15pm:
and by the way, racism is right.

though you may squeal against that fact.


This is not a "fact", but an opinion. The opinion of a self confessed racist.

Make of it what you will. I know what I think of it and its author.



"......... self confessed......" , I am quite proud if being a racist.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Morning Mist on Jan 24th, 2014 at 9:43am
The white countries are also the only ones that "progressives" can live in. They are the most liberal, tolerate the most dissenting views, tolerate rampant anti-authoritativeness, tolerate disrespect for its institutions and customs. It would be hilarious watching them live their "lifestyle" in somewhere like eastern Turkey.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Oh_Yeah on Jan 24th, 2014 at 10:01am

UnSubRocky wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 2:10am:

The_Barnacle wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:38am:
Do you think that makes you superior?


In many ways, yes.


So what have you personally done that has contributed to the dominance of Western civilisation? Or are you just riding coat tails off the accomplishments of other people?
What gives you the right to feel superior?

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Oh_Yeah on Jan 24th, 2014 at 10:02am

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 9:43am:
The white countries are also the only ones that "progressives" can live in. They are the most liberal, tolerate the most dissenting views, tolerate rampant anti-authoritativeness, tolerate disrespect for its institutions and customs. It would be hilarious watching them live their "lifestyle" in somewhere like eastern Turkey.


You've got that the wrong way round MM. It is the progressives that have made Western civilisation what it is today.

If eastern Turkey had more progressives it would be a much better place to live.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by WorldSacred on Jan 24th, 2014 at 11:49am

Gnads wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 5:59pm:

Quote:
Crime and disease ridden, corruption, violence, rape, etc.


Sounds like Sydney & Melbourne  ;D ;D


Full of ethnics that import the problems to Melbourne.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by WorldSacred on Jan 24th, 2014 at 11:54am

Rubin wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 11:28pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:15pm:
and by the way, racism is right.

though you may squeal against that fact.

Racism in Australia in illegal that's a fact


There is no law against being a racist. Else everyone, including the gaolers would be in gaol.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by WorldSacred on Jan 24th, 2014 at 11:59am

The_Barnacle wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 10:01am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 2:10am:

The_Barnacle wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:38am:
Do you think that makes you superior?


In many ways, yes.


So what have you personally done that has contributed to the dominance of Western civilisation? Or are you just riding coat tails off the accomplishments of other people?
What gives you the right to feel superior?


Oh, I wish I could tell you. Contributed ideas to the government (local) to help improve the efficiency of the country. Implemented practical ideas that have recently been adopted, and should help in the conservation and repairing of the Australian environment. Various other things, too. Plus, I'm an all around good guy that lives according to the law.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Morning Mist on Jan 24th, 2014 at 12:03pm

The_Barnacle wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 10:02am:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 9:43am:
The white countries are also the only ones that "progressives" can live in. They are the most liberal, tolerate the most dissenting views, tolerate rampant anti-authoritativeness, tolerate disrespect for its institutions and customs. It would be hilarious watching them live their "lifestyle" in somewhere like eastern Turkey.


You've got that the wrong way round MM. It is the progressives that have made Western civilisation what it is today.

If eastern Turkey had more progressives it would be a much better place to live.


Today's "progressives" are nothing like the progressives of the pre-1960s. The development of Europe and its cousin states owes very little, if anything, to the "progressives" of today. 

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Soren on Jan 24th, 2014 at 5:40pm

sherri wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 7:20am:
I think that what is interesting here is how some people define racism.
Racism is never (in my opinion) the ability to acknowledge fact. It is when someone carries it further and uses only race to judge another person or group.
Some people seem to think that to be non racist, you have to claim everyone is the same, there are no differences.

I think it is perfectly clear that over the last few hundred years, European civilization came into its own. It flourished, there was a period of exploration, discovery, scientific advancement. It has been the white man's turn to be top dog for quite a while now.
That doesn't mean whites are morally superior.  A civilized country that could allow or create the holocaust should remind us of that. Plus, most citizens are just along for the ride. They have been lucky to be born in a country where the living standards have been improving in leaps and bounds.

Because we live such short lives, we think things will stay the same virtually forever. But European civilization wasn't always top of the heap, and we live in a world that is changing. South Korea, China & India are forging ahead. Because of sheer population numbers, India's number of gifted students now pretty much equals the entire population of the USA.
It's not just about race, it is about opportunity. The African nations and some of the middle east-I can't see them having their time in the sun anytime in the next 100 or 200 years.



Who gave the Europeans the opportunity? And why don't thy give the same opportunity to Africans and Muslim middle easterners?

Because it is not about someone outside a society giving the opportunities. They are created by the societies.
This is why some cultures are objectively better than others. It's not about chance or luck ('opportunity')

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Karnal on Jan 24th, 2014 at 6:50pm

Frances wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 2:54pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:34am:
Noticed how white mans countries are better ?

Noticed how we are at the top of the heap ?


So Iceland is better than Japan for example?


How about Russia? Sprint would love Siberia - so many white people.

Not many cyclists though.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Karnal on Jan 24th, 2014 at 6:53pm

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 12:03pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 10:02am:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 9:43am:
The white countries are also the only ones that "progressives" can live in. They are the most liberal, tolerate the most dissenting views, tolerate rampant anti-authoritativeness, tolerate disrespect for its institutions and customs. It would be hilarious watching them live their "lifestyle" in somewhere like eastern Turkey.


You've got that the wrong way round MM. It is the progressives that have made Western civilisation what it is today.

If eastern Turkey had more progressives it would be a much better place to live.


Today's "progressives" are nothing like the progressives of the pre-1960s. The development of Europe and its cousin states owes very little, if anything, to the "progressives" of today. 


Is this one of your unideological posts backed up with experience, Mistie?

I’d like to enrol in creative and critical thinking. Do you think I’d be elligible?

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Karnal on Jan 24th, 2014 at 6:56pm

Soren wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 5:40pm:

sherri wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 7:20am:
I think that what is interesting here is how some people define racism.
Racism is never (in my opinion) the ability to acknowledge fact. It is when someone carries it further and uses only race to judge another person or group.
Some people seem to think that to be non racist, you have to claim everyone is the same, there are no differences.

I think it is perfectly clear that over the last few hundred years, European civilization came into its own. It flourished, there was a period of exploration, discovery, scientific advancement. It has been the white man's turn to be top dog for quite a while now.
That doesn't mean whites are morally superior.  A civilized country that could allow or create the holocaust should remind us of that. Plus, most citizens are just along for the ride. They have been lucky to be born in a country where the living standards have been improving in leaps and bounds.

Because we live such short lives, we think things will stay the same virtually forever. But European civilization wasn't always top of the heap, and we live in a world that is changing. South Korea, China & India are forging ahead. Because of sheer population numbers, India's number of gifted students now pretty much equals the entire population of the USA.
It's not just about race, it is about opportunity. The African nations and some of the middle east-I can't see them having their time in the sun anytime in the next 100 or 200 years.



Who gave the Europeans the opportunity? And why don't thy give the same opportunity to Africans and Muslim middle easterners?

Because it is not about someone outside a society giving the opportunities. They are created by the societies.
This is why some cultures are objectively better than others. It's not about chance or luck ('opportunity')


That’s right, old chap. We put all that coal and iron ore in the ground years ago. Safekeeping, you see.

We wanted to stop the boong getting his hands on it.

Cunning, no?

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Karnal on Jan 24th, 2014 at 6:59pm

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 9:43am:
The white countries are also the only ones that "progressives" can live in. They are the most liberal, tolerate the most dissenting views, tolerate rampant anti-authoritativeness, tolerate disrespect for its institutions and customs. It would be hilarious watching them live their "lifestyle" in somewhere like eastern Turkey.


Been there, Mistie? I hear the beer’s very cheap.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Karnal on Jan 24th, 2014 at 7:01pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 7:50am:

Peter Freedman wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:40pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 9:15pm:
and by the way, racism is right.

though you may squeal against that fact.


This is not a "fact", but an opinion. The opinion of a self confessed racist.

Make of it what you will. I know what I think of it and its author.



"......... self confessed......" , I am quite proud if being a racist.


And a New Zealander, Sprint. Don’t forget that.

Aussie Aussie Aussie.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Soren on Jan 24th, 2014 at 9:47pm

Karnal wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 6:56pm:

Soren wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 5:40pm:

sherri wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 7:20am:
I think that what is interesting here is how some people define racism.
Racism is never (in my opinion) the ability to acknowledge fact. It is when someone carries it further and uses only race to judge another person or group.
Some people seem to think that to be non racist, you have to claim everyone is the same, there are no differences.

I think it is perfectly clear that over the last few hundred years, European civilization came into its own. It flourished, there was a period of exploration, discovery, scientific advancement. It has been the white man's turn to be top dog for quite a while now.
That doesn't mean whites are morally superior.  A civilized country that could allow or create the holocaust should remind us of that. Plus, most citizens are just along for the ride. They have been lucky to be born in a country where the living standards have been improving in leaps and bounds.

Because we live such short lives, we think things will stay the same virtually forever. But European civilization wasn't always top of the heap, and we live in a world that is changing. South Korea, China & India are forging ahead. Because of sheer population numbers, India's number of gifted students now pretty much equals the entire population of the USA.
It's not just about race, it is about opportunity. The African nations and some of the middle east-I can't see them having their time in the sun anytime in the next 100 or 200 years.



Who gave the Europeans the opportunity? And why don't thy give the same opportunity to Africans and Muslim middle easterners?

Because it is not about someone outside a society giving the opportunities. They are created by the societies.
This is why some cultures are objectively better than others. It's not about chance or luck ('opportunity')


That’s right, old chap. We put all that coal and iron ore in the ground years ago. Safekeeping, you see.

We wanted to stop the boong getting his hands on it.

Cunning, no?


From the late 18th to the middle of the 20th century Australia was not relying on coal and iron ore, yet that's when Australia was made into what it is - you stupid, stupid, grinning Paki idiot.



Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by sherri on Jan 24th, 2014 at 11:02pm

Soren wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 5:40pm:

sherri wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 7:20am:
I think that what is interesting here is how some people define racism.
Racism is never (in my opinion) the ability to acknowledge fact. It is when someone carries it further and uses only race to judge another person or group.
Some people seem to think that to be non racist, you have to claim everyone is the same, there are no differences.

I think it is perfectly clear that over the last few hundred years, European civilization came into its own. It flourished, there was a period of exploration, discovery, scientific advancement. It has been the white man's turn to be top dog for quite a while now.
That doesn't mean whites are morally superior.  A civilized country that could allow or create the holocaust should remind us of that. Plus, most citizens are just along for the ride. They have been lucky to be born in a country where the living standards have been improving in leaps and bounds.

Because we live such short lives, we think things will stay the same virtually forever. But European civilization wasn't always top of the heap, and we live in a world that is changing. South Korea, China & India are forging ahead. Because of sheer population numbers, India's number of gifted students now pretty much equals the entire population of the USA.
It's not just about race, it is about opportunity. The African nations and some of the middle east-I can't see them having their time in the sun anytime in the next 100 or 200 years.



Who gave the Europeans the opportunity? And why don't thy give the same opportunity to Africans and Muslim middle easterners?

Because it is not about someone outside a society giving the opportunities. They are created by the societies.
This is why some cultures are objectively better than others. It's not about chance or luck ('opportunity')



It is very much luck where you happen to have been born, or what era, for that matter.

But you ask about creating opportunities. You are right-no one outside your society is going to walk in and hand over any opportunities, you have to create the conditions within your own society. European society was aggressive, very much so in the past, but the social structure allowed for exploration, science.

The culture was right. But nothing stays the same forever and I think the culture within some other nations, Korea, China, India, Japan for eg, could see them forge ahead in the next 100 years.
We can't rest on our laurels, that's what I'm saying. ;)

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Peter Freedman on Jan 24th, 2014 at 11:23pm
Well said, Sherri.  One of the most sensible and coherent contributions I've seen in quite a while.

Hope you stick around. I look forward to reading a lot more of your postings.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Karnal on Jan 25th, 2014 at 12:28am

Soren wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 9:47pm:

Karnal wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 6:56pm:

Soren wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 5:40pm:

sherri wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 7:20am:
I think that what is interesting here is how some people define racism.
Racism is never (in my opinion) the ability to acknowledge fact. It is when someone carries it further and uses only race to judge another person or group.
Some people seem to think that to be non racist, you have to claim everyone is the same, there are no differences.

I think it is perfectly clear that over the last few hundred years, European civilization came into its own. It flourished, there was a period of exploration, discovery, scientific advancement. It has been the white man's turn to be top dog for quite a while now.
That doesn't mean whites are morally superior.  A civilized country that could allow or create the holocaust should remind us of that. Plus, most citizens are just along for the ride. They have been lucky to be born in a country where the living standards have been improving in leaps and bounds.

Because we live such short lives, we think things will stay the same virtually forever. But European civilization wasn't always top of the heap, and we live in a world that is changing. South Korea, China & India are forging ahead. Because of sheer population numbers, India's number of gifted students now pretty much equals the entire population of the USA.
It's not just about race, it is about opportunity. The African nations and some of the middle east-I can't see them having their time in the sun anytime in the next 100 or 200 years.



Who gave the Europeans the opportunity? And why don't thy give the same opportunity to Africans and Muslim middle easterners?

Because it is not about someone outside a society giving the opportunities. They are created by the societies.
This is why some cultures are objectively better than others. It's not about chance or luck ('opportunity')


That’s right, old chap. We put all that coal and iron ore in the ground years ago. Safekeeping, you see.

We wanted to stop the boong getting his hands on it.

Cunning, no?


From the late 18th to the middle of the 20th century Australia was not relying on coal and iron ore, yet that's when Australia was made into what it is - you stupid, stupid, grinning Paki idiot.


You’re right, old chap. Perhaps we should reinvigorate the logging and whaling industries, no? I was wondering when you’d suggest that.

Or opium? There’s a shilling or two in that, dear, let me tell you. Your Chinaman can’t get enough of it.

Yes, that’s what makes us objectively superior - someone inferior enough to buy the fruits of our indentured labour.

Let me play Mother. One stool or two, dear boy?


Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Karnal on Jan 25th, 2014 at 12:33am

Peter Freedman wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 11:23pm:
Well said, Sherri.  One of the most sensible and coherent contributions I've seen in quite a while.

Hope you stick around.


After the old boy lays into her, yes. New blood, you see. And female. The old boy’s going to love you, Sherri. Just don’t take it personally.

He’s a Freudian, you see. He can’t help it.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Lols on Jan 25th, 2014 at 3:03am
From a different perspective  8-)


Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by The Grappler 2014 on Jan 25th, 2014 at 8:23am
Lols - no favouritism here (nah, hah) - but that is excellent.  A picture tells a thousand words.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Lols on Jan 25th, 2014 at 8:59am
Ta humbly Mr. Grappler  8-)

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Laugh till you cry on Jan 25th, 2014 at 5:47pm

Jackness wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 5:55pm:
Look at the black countries. Look at the muslim countries. Look at the ching chong slitty-eyed countries. Crime and disease ridden, corruption, violence, rape, etc.

This is why I'm proud to be Australian.


Are you black? If not, you are just a closet pom devoid of culture.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Jackness on Jan 25th, 2014 at 11:30pm

Laugh till you cry wrote on Jan 25th, 2014 at 5:47pm:

Jackness wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 5:55pm:
Look at the black countries. Look at the muslim countries. Look at the ching chong slitty-eyed countries. Crime and disease ridden, corruption, violence, rape, etc.

This is why I'm proud to be Australian.


Are you black? If not, you are just a closet pom devoid of culture.


No I am not black, Mr chingchong 2inchdick. Well thank you anyway. And you're welcome.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by Laugh till you cry on Jan 25th, 2014 at 11:51pm

Jackness wrote on Jan 25th, 2014 at 11:30pm:

Laugh till you cry wrote on Jan 25th, 2014 at 5:47pm:

Jackness wrote on Jan 23rd, 2014 at 5:55pm:
Look at the black countries. Look at the muslim countries. Look at the ching chong slitty-eyed countries. Crime and disease ridden, corruption, violence, rape, etc.

This is why I'm proud to be Australian.


Are you black? If not, you are just a closet pom devoid of culture.


No I am not black, Mr chingchong 2inchdick. Well thank you anyway. And you're welcome.



Dear Jack-off, your 12 inch penis is of no use if it is flaccid. Have another beer.

Title: Re: White mans countries
Post by sherri on Jan 26th, 2014 at 8:58am

Karnal wrote on Jan 25th, 2014 at 12:33am:

Peter Freedman wrote on Jan 24th, 2014 at 11:23pm:
Well said, Sherri.  One of the most sensible and coherent contributions I've seen in quite a while.

Hope you stick around.


After the old boy lays into her, yes. New blood, you see. And female. The old boy’s going to love you, Sherri. Just don’t take it personally.

He’s a Freudian, you see. He can’t help it.



Thank you Peter Freedman, for your kind words. :)
Much appreciated.

Who on earth is the old boy. ;D ;D

Don't worry, I've been on a couple of other boards where abuse was almost an art form at one stage. I've been abused by the best in the business, anything on here will be mild in comparison. ;)
Although the worst of it was awhile back, I have to admit. Been civilized enough since then.
Personally, I am not much interested in personal abuse or slanging matches, so I won't be good value, entertainment wise.

There are about 3 or 4 others here from the same board, but I won't dob them in. ;)

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.