Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Relationships >> Mia and Woody are not relating well! http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1391932785 Message started by Aussie on Feb 9th, 2014 at 5:59pm |
Title: Mia and Woody are not relating well! Post by Aussie on Feb 9th, 2014 at 5:59pm |
Title: Re: Mia and Woody are not relating well! Post by mantra on Feb 10th, 2014 at 4:45am
I've never thought much of Woody Allen's humour or his acting skills. He's a creepy sort of character and you have to wonder what Mia Farrow saw in him.
He's a protected species in Hollywood, probably because of his connections with the Jewish movie moguls. No surprises here. Quote:
|
Title: Re: Mia and Woody are not relating well! Post by PZ547 on Feb 11th, 2014 at 7:49pm
Mia Farrow is a pathological narcissist in my opinion
Let's look at her life's history She played the fragile waif thing to death She used it to get Andre Previn She used it to get Frank Sinatra and coupled with her new act -- that of wannabee Mother Teresa -- she used it to get Woody Allen How old was Farrow when she married Previn ? How old was she when she married Sinatra ? So why is she carping on about Allen marrying Soon Yi ? Then we look at Farrow's immediate family One of her brothers is serving ten or so years for paedophilia and he's limp wristed, apparently Another brother killed himself mid life Farrow's mother screamed allegations about Allen when he split from Farrow Farrow's son (Satchel become Ronan) is a self admitted bi-sexual. He's supposed to be some sort of genius but I haven't heard anything remotely intelligent emerge from him Allen never lived with Farrow. He maintained his own place on the other side of the park from where she lived with over a dozen children and handful of child minders. Farrow said in an interview when they were a couple that the dual household situation suited her and Allen perfectly Sinatra dumped Farrow after a couple of years. To save face, they claimed it was because she'd refused to 'give up acting', even though she was far from in-demand Sinatra went on to marry again to a mature woman who's remained discreetly in the background throughout this tawdry mess Sinatra's dead, so he gets no say in the claims being bandied around now. Farrow gets to claim he was 'the love of her life' ----- now. She wasn't saying it when he dumped her, nor was she claiming that when she roped in Allen Unknown individuals professing to speak for Farrow now claim she always remained close to Sinatra and that the Sinatra clan 'love Ronan as one of their own' Ok. Where's the DNA test, Farrow? Come on Ronan -- bright boy like you should be able to get himself DNA analysed against the Sinatra DNA to settle your paternity once and for all Neither Farrow nor her son have produced DNA proof that the kid's Sinatra's Instead, looking like The Skull, Farrow drags herself around with a series of insane grins for the cameras and with her son under her arm Both of them attempted to hijack awards being granted by his peers to Allen Both Farrow and her son have ridiculed Allen Yet Allen claims he's been paying handsomely for that son and for the daughter with the scowl and goodness knows how many more of Farrow's brood for over two decades My sympathies lie with Woody Allen. He was an introvert all his life. Farrow and her Mother Teresa-Fragile Waif number co-opted him as 'male role model' for her massive brood, none of whom seem to have emerged looking too good after her ministrations He maintained his own place. He was never a father to Soon Yi or whatever her name is. He was a guy who popped in whenever Farrow got the media in to photograph her 'amazing family' Farrow is a nut case imo. She was always a nut case. Sinatra must have felt sorry for her. But even pity couldn't keep him around her for long Narcissists LOVE being in control of kids, the smaller the better -- because little kids can't stand up for themselves Farrow's fan base shrank rapidly. She was Johnny One-Note, always the same act, no matter which role was assigned to her If this were a movies, I'd expect to learn that the bookish sucker finally turned off the money tap after two or three decades. And the ageing actress would be broke. With some of her poisonous brood, she would concoct a blackmail sting against the sucker who turned off the tap. And when that didn't work and he refused to buckle, the ageing crone actress and her idiot brood would decide to 'destroy' the guy they could no longer bring to heel REad up about narcissists. When people stand up to them and refuse to be controlled, the narcissist explodes in a massive, destructive rage -- their one intent being to DESTROY those whom they can't control I hope Allen keeps his money tight. His mates are sticking with him. The attempt to destroy his reputation has backfired. Farrow and her kids look like complete idiots And now the entire world knows that Farrow was a slut who got herself impregnated according to her by a guy who dumped her and was already married to another --- after which Farrow put Allen's name on the birth certificate and took his money for over 20 years for a kid she now says was never his to begin with Who lost ? You lost, Farrow. Now stay lost |
Title: Re: Mia and Woody are not relating well! Post by Honky on Feb 11th, 2014 at 7:56pm
Its quite fascinating seeing the huge gulf between what people will say about normal people accused of paedophilia, compared to what they'll say about Woody Allen. There's none of the usual "hang 'em high" malarkey, just an odd refusal to even entertain the thought that he might really be a grotesque, creepy letch. It might explain why he does that sort of persona in every single one of his movies...
|
Title: Re: Mia and Woody are not relating well! Post by PZ547 on Feb 11th, 2014 at 8:11pm
I don't think he's guilty of the charge, simple
It's my opinion the charges were exhumed out of bitterness and rage Allen was investigated. He's spent millions in court trying to gain access to the adopted kids and the son he believed was his biological child He was cleared of the charges back in the day. There's been no suggestion from any quarter during those 20 odd years since that he's dealt improperly with any child He's gone on to further successes since getting free of Farrow What's Farrow achieved during that same time? Zip. So it stands to reason she's in need of a cash injection, imo. She's not getting any younger and all the child support from Previn and Allen must have dried up a few years ago when the kids all came of age All Farrow seems to have managed is to poison a dozen kids against a guy who was no relation of theirs to begin with Allen's old. He's worth a bomb. He has a wife and two daughters who'll be very wealthy. And Farrow's kids with Previn plus those she adopted, plus the one she claimed was Allen's ---- they've done their dash Let's remember, when questioned extensively by trained therapists, the woman who today claims to have been molested by Allen said nothing of the kind. It's said Farrow had to get the kid aside and tell her what to say. And STILL the charges against Allen were dropped I hope Allen and his family just keep on enjoying their lives supported by their friends --- of which Farrow appears to have none, apart from the now grown kids whose minds she appears to have poisoned |
Title: Re: Mia and Woody are not relating well! Post by Aussie on Feb 11th, 2014 at 8:20pm PZ547 wrote on Feb 11th, 2014 at 7:49pm:
You are a naughty person PZ547.......please always credit your source who, in this case is Franc Maco. Play nice. Cheers. :) |
Title: Re: Mia and Woody are not relating well! Post by PZ547 on Feb 11th, 2014 at 8:28pm
.
You're accusing me of plagiarising ? You lie But here's your chance ---- put up Put up what I wrote and show it was written by someone else You can't Because I wrote that My own words My own thoughts My own opinion You are jealous You are infuriated that I've championed Woody Allen and your devious lies might work at home against your siblings But not here So get it up right now, this proof you'd BETTER have Fast |
Title: Re: Mia and Woody are not relating well! Post by PZ547 on Feb 11th, 2014 at 8:32pm
.....
I AM WAITING |
Title: Re: Mia and Woody are not relating well! Post by PZ547 on Feb 11th, 2014 at 8:38pm
And what's the funny business with my computer ?
You can't / won't admit you are wrong so you try to hack my computer ? You're a joke But you're not getting off Put up your evidence Stop hiding Put up or shut up You can't though So you're hiding and stuffing around with my computer I hope you're banned |
Title: Re: Mia and Woody are not relating well! Post by PZ547 on Feb 11th, 2014 at 8:53pm
..
To the thing calling itself 'Aussie' You revealed yourself to be a lying piece of shite right here You're also revealed as one who is gutless You're wrong You're exposed as wrong, a liar and a coward Further --- seeing you have nothing better to do go read my posts You and anyone else interested and hiding behind the scenes will discover that I invariably provide sources Check REad my posts They're there The proof is evident I provide sources and links beyond any need to do so when I am citing someone else or a news source, etc Keep out of my way from now on You have exposed yourself as despicable, a liar and a coward |
Title: Re: Mia and Woody are not relating well! Post by Aussie on Feb 11th, 2014 at 9:29pm Quote:
I can't imagine why any sane person would not oblige you. Yes, I'll 'stay out of your way,' given it is for the benefit of the entire Forum. Cheers. :) |
Title: Re: Mia and Woody are not relating well! Post by skippy. on Feb 11th, 2014 at 10:04pm PZ547 wrote on Feb 11th, 2014 at 8:32pm:
Good drugs tonight dear? ;D ;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: Mia and Woody are not relating well! Post by PZ547 on Feb 11th, 2014 at 10:29pm
The gutless things calling itself 'Aussie' does NOT have a 'reply' button beneath it
noticed that ? Well I have and I've taken a screen shot of it Now to the rest Thing called 'Aussie' ----- you didn't reply until I was logged-out how brave of you Well I'm back So put up or shut up And we know you can't put up so you bring your rancorous little buddy with you BUT ------------------- very clearly, you have admin or mod powers hence the missing 'reply' button beneath your post So you've slipped up big time and twice in an hour or so Better out yourself now What is your 'other' ID and why are you attacking and slandering other posters using your 'mod' or admin powers to do it Makes it all the more understandable now, doesn't it --- the way my computer was hacked Instance One when I demanded you prove your accusations All the more understandable as to why it was so difficult to log in afterwards and just now You are abusing whatever status you have and YOU are showing definite signs of moon madness although I seem to remember you were kicked out of the ebay forums for the same shite stirring and general divisiveness very recently and your ban is still current No wonder you're in such a bitch of a mood No wonder you're attacking everyone whose posts and articulateness you have no hope of matching and no wonder you dragged in your pathetic alter ego Skippy, known forum wide as a nut job Skippy is you, isn't it, 'Aussie' and both Skippy and Aussie are abusing mod and/or admin powers Well, you've outed yourself You did it to yourself Look in the mirror and abuse yourself Look around at why you are so unpopular and accept it's because of the way you are You could learn to be more informed and articulate You could get an education to prevent you being at such a disadvantage But no Like the true narcissistic, insane, hate-filled, envious, jealous mess you are, you simply continue as you always have Definition of idiocy: doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting different results |
Title: Re: Mia and Woody are not relating well! Post by Deathridesahorse on Feb 12th, 2014 at 3:49am ... wrote on Feb 11th, 2014 at 7:56pm:
Like Rolf, no one wants to believe it: or Jacko etc.. |
Title: Re: Mia and Woody are not relating well! Post by Honky on Feb 12th, 2014 at 11:20am
He even looks like a paedo.
|
Title: Re: Mia and Woody are not relating well! Post by Sorryyouarewrong on Feb 12th, 2014 at 12:00pm Quote:
I would think that either a link or an apology should be forthcoming. If you make an accusation of plagiarism, then you should back it up with sources or admit you were in error. Did you make up your plagiarism accusation, Aussie? |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved. |