Moderators, the title of the post linked below is deliberately false and misleading. This topic should either be deleted or the title changed. Prime Minister Tony Abbott has NOT said he wants taxpayers to pay for Qantas' debt. The article included in the link of the OP makes no mention of Abbott asking taxpayers to fund payment of Qantas' debt. Indeed, there is not one single mention of Abbott in the entire article - NOT ONE!

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1392235815/0#2

have you ever known a lefty to be honest...ap...lol...I dont even open them for the most part...they are too ridiculous.and their bitterness is showing more and more
who can debate bitterness and sour grapes... its impossible.

cods wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 7:37am:

have you ever known a lefty to be honest...ap...lol...I dont even open them for the most part...they are too ridiculous.and their bitterness is showing more and more who can debate bitterness and sour grapes... its impossible.

I don't mind bias or honest mistakes. But such a deliberate, blatant and obvious lie such as that from Greens_Loser just cannot be allowed or else there is no point in having moderators or forum rules.

Why on earth would you think that Greenswine would post anything which is believable? I know he should NOT be allowed to originate threads that mislead, and are in 99% of cases blatant lies, but really if members on here don't know by now he (it) is a stupid twat with a sadly ridiculous mind, they will just disappoint themselves every time they open his (it's) inane shyte.

Salem it is.

Clearly the mods on this forum are an appalling waste of bandwidth given that they're allowing Greens_Liar to keep his dishonest topic title. If this had happened in a restaurant, for example, Greens_Loser would have been sued for defamation. Perhaps mods should keep this in mind, given that another forum DID get sued (and sued big-time; they had to close) by the pissed-off subject of blatant lies on that forum when made aware of it.

Greens Wins is always a bit slimy like that...

he couldn't "lie" straight in bed...  ::)

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 7:25am:

Moderators, the title of the post linked below is deliberately false and misleading. This topic should either be deleted or the title changed. Prime Minister Tony Abbott has NOT said he wants taxpayers to pay for Qantas' debt. The article included in the link of the OP makes no mention of Abbott asking taxpayers to fund payment of Qantas' debt. Indeed, there is not one single mention of Abbott in the entire article - NOT ONE! http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1392235815/0#2

ROTFLMAO You really ought to grow a set, what a bloody sook.
Did butch Peta tell you to write that?

---

skippy. wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 7:08am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 7:25am: Moderators, the title of the post linked below is deliberately false and misleading. This topic should either be deleted or the title changed. Prime Minister Tony Abbott has NOT said he wants taxpayers to pay for Qantas' debt. The article included in the link of the OP makes no mention of Abbott asking taxpayers to fund payment of Qantas' debt. Indeed, there is not one single mention of Abbott in the entire article - NOT ONE! http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1392235815/0#2 ROTFLMAO You really ought to grow a set, what a bloody sook. Did butch Peta tell you to write that?

So you're one of the halfwits who thinks that Gillard didn't lie about the carbon tax, eh? That says a lot about you and your inability to comprehend the difference between the truth and a lie.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 6:23am:

Clearly the mods on this forum are an appalling waste of bandwidth given that they're allowing Greens_Liar to keep his dishonest topic title. If this had happened in a restaurant, for example, Greens_Loser would have been sued for defamation. Perhaps mods should keep this in mind, given that another forum DID get sued (and sued big-time; they had to close) by the pissed-off subject of blatant lies on that forum when made aware of it.

Pal, they leave your posts alone.

They leave a myriad of other dishonest/misleading, hell even derogatory titles alone too.

You are having a tanty and in effect trying to implement your own immature form of censorship.

I don't personally care about Green's thread, post etc. In fact, I think I make myself perfectly clear that I put all of you  primary party sycophants and voters in the same basket, however, this ranting and unbalanced quest of yours to control thread titles based on nothing more than your ideological view point is deplorable. Arguably, that could border on being worth a ban (how ironic) except that I would not support that either, regardless of how ignorant, biased, ill informed, arrogant or moronic the opinion, you should always still have a right to express it.

cods wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 7:37am:

have you ever known a lefty to be honest...ap...lol...I dont even open them for the most part...they are too ridiculous.and their bitterness is showing more and more who can debate bitterness and sour grapes... its impossible.

You can quite readily exchange Left for Right there and the sentence still works.

That is what you don't get, the facts are interchangeable regardless of which side is doing the lying....

I agree with viewpoint, think everyone on these forums knows Greeny just posts BS, I'm surprised his not banned for being a troll.

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 7:43am:

I agree with viewpoint, think everyone on these forums knows Greeny just posts BS, I'm surprised his not banned for being a troll.

;D ;D ;D  Why bother it's sub human, gets it's muck hole confused with a bugger* hole  ;D ;D ;D

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 7:34am:

skippy. wrote on Feb 14th, 2014 at 7:08am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 7:25am: Moderators, the title of the post linked below is deliberately false and misleading. This topic should either be deleted or the title changed. Prime Minister Tony Abbott has NOT said he wants taxpayers to pay for Qantas' debt. The article included in the link of the OP makes no mention of Abbott asking taxpayers to fund payment of Qantas' debt. Indeed, there is not one single mention of Abbott in the entire article - NOT ONE! http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1392235815/0#2 ROTFLMAO You really ought to grow a set, what a bloody sook. Did butch Peta tell you to write that? So you're one of the halfwits who thinks that Gillard didn't lie about the carbon tax, eh? That says a lot about you and your inability to comprehend the difference between the truth and a lie.

Gillard said she would price carbon, did butch Peta tell ya to say that sweet thing? She's as dumb as you are. ::)

skippy. wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 7:50am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 14th, 2014 at 7:34am: skippy. wrote on Feb 14th, 2014 at 7:08am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 7:25am: Moderators, the title of the post linked below is deliberately false and misleading. This topic should either be deleted or the title changed. Prime Minister Tony Abbott has NOT said he wants taxpayers to pay for Qantas' debt. The article included in the link of the OP makes no mention of Abbott asking taxpayers to fund payment of Qantas' debt. Indeed, there is not one single mention of Abbott in the entire article - NOT ONE! http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1392235815/0#2 ROTFLMAO You really ought to grow a set, what a bloody sook. Did butch Peta tell you to write that? So you're one of the halfwits who thinks that Gillard didn't lie about the carbon tax, eh? That says a lot about you and your inability to comprehend the difference between the truth and a lie. Gillard said she would price carbon, did butch Peta tell ya to say that sweet thing? She's as dumb as you are. ::)

Awww, nobody bought you any flowers today. Poor petal!  :'(

This either belongs in Extremism exposed, Relationships or Feedback.  Given its Armpit, it's definitely worthy of extremism exposed.  In fact, can't the mods enforce that Armpit only has access to Extremism Exposed?

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:48am:

This either belongs in Extremism exposed, Relationships or Feedback.  Given its Armpit, it's definitely worthy of extremism exposed.  In fact, can't the mods enforce that Armpit only has access to Extremism Exposed?

I agree, Greens_Win's post should be moved to Extremism Exposed...

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:49am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 14th, 2014 at 8:48am: This either belongs in Extremism exposed, Relationships or Feedback.  Given its Armpit, it's definitely worthy of extremism exposed.  In fact, can't the mods enforce that Armpit only has access to Extremism Exposed? I agree, Greens_Win's post should be moved to Extremism Exposed...

Mods, here is more evidence on why Armpit either needs his own forum, maybe something along the lines of "humorous smart intellectually disabled", or be restricted to Extremism Exposed.

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:53am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 14th, 2014 at 8:49am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 14th, 2014 at 8:48am: This either belongs in Extremism exposed, Relationships or Feedback.  Given its Armpit, it's definitely worthy of extremism exposed.  In fact, can't the mods enforce that Armpit only has access to Extremism Exposed? I agree, Greens_Win's post should be moved to Extremism Exposed... Mods, here is more evidence on why Armpit either needs his own forum, maybe something along the lines of "humorous smart intellectually disabled", or be restricted to Extremism Exposed.

... and yet you have no problem with Greens_Lunatic creating a topic claiming Abbott wants us to pay Qantas' debt despite the linked article not mentioning Abbott or any member of his government a single time - not once? Hypocrisy, anyone? ;D

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 14^th, 2014 at 8:55am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 14th, 2014 at 8:53am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 14th, 2014 at 8:49am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 14th, 2014 at 8:48am: This either belongs in Extremism exposed, Relationships or Feedback.  Given its Armpit, it's definitely worthy of extremism exposed.  In fact, can't the mods enforce that Armpit only has access to Extremism Exposed? I agree, Greens_Win's post should be moved to Extremism Exposed... Mods, here is more evidence on why Armpit either needs his own forum, maybe something along the lines of "humorous smart intellectually disabled", or be restricted to Extremism Exposed. ... and yet you have no problem with Greens_Lunatic creating a topic claiming Abbott wants us to pay Qantas' debt despite the linked article not mentioning Abbott or any member of his government a single time - not once? Hypocrisy, anyone? ;D

when they start enforcing the rules on Maqqa, yourself, laborarecorrupt, etc, then they can enforce on Greens Win.  But until then, THIS thread does not belong in politics suck. It belongs in maybe Feedback, or a PM, or Relationship .  After the many years of posting, you STILL HAVEN'T LEARNT.

This Topic was moved here from Politicians Suck by Andrei.Hicks.

Thank you Andrei.

alevine, I haven't seen the post in question BUT I seem to remember you preaching to me the other day that the more freedom there was the better things were.
Typically selective thinking of the left.

no

An attempt to start a similar misleading, purely points scoring thread title, by Green_Wins, was also started in Politics Suck & it also was transferred elsewhere, to a more suitable home.
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1392335728/all

So, we have attempts from "both sides" to sore points & both got what they deserved.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 7:25am:

Moderators, the title of the post linked below is deliberately false and misleading

says the guy who came up with this little gen

Shorten secretly wants compulsory Union membership

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1392328814

http://stumblerz.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/s911_complete_moron.jpg