Since Australia sends it's ships into Indonesia territory then I guess the conservatives will welcome china's walships in Australian water, as they welcome illegal japanese whaling ships in our waters.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-02-13/china-flexed-military-muscle-north-of-australia/5257686


RAAF monitored Chinese military exercise in waters between Christmas Island and Indonesia



The RAAF monitored an unprecedented and unannounced exercise involving three Chinese warships in international waters to the north of Australia, it has emerged.

The unusual naval exercise late last week is considered to have been a deliberate and provocative move by the Chinese that will send a clear message to the region.

For the first time, the Chinese navy sent warships sailing through the Sunda Strait between the Indonesian islands of Java and Sumatra.

The ships travelled along the southern edge of Java, close to Christmas Island, and then through the Lombok Strait between Lombok and Bali.

The move is considered to be an unprecedented show of military might by the Chinese, and will have a significant impact on security and strategic policy settings for Australia and our regional neighbours, particularly Indonesia and India.

Analysts believe that by sending ships through the region in such a fashion, Beijing is making it clear that it now considers the Indian Ocean a strategic priority.

They believe it signals that China will deploy its military to protect its interests in the region if needed.

Maybe we need to re-jig 'Operation Sovereign Borders'......

Another '3-star' land-warfare General in charge of Naval operations should do it....

:D

Another brain dead thread.

Lobo wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 1:49pm:

Maybe we need to re-jig 'Operation Sovereign Borders'...... Another '3-star' land-warfare General in charge of Naval operations should do it.... :D

No need, working just fine at stopping unwanted illegal country shoppers.

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 1:55pm:

Another brain dead thread.

Yeah we all know you lower the tone.


Do cons plan to defend our territory or will they roll over like they have for the Japanese whalers

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 1:55pm:

Another brain dead thread.

Legitimate concerns about real boarder protection with a strong power steaming war ships along our boarder is brain dead but the brain dead war against genuine refugees seeking assistance is well justified and has people wetting their pants in fear.

go figure ?

Once agian the ABC is talking about our navy.

UNAUSTRALIAN!

And we're too busy stopping terrorists on boats to worry about what the Chinese are doing. So who cares.

____ wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 2:00pm:

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 1:55pm: Another brain dead thread. Yeah we all know you lower the tone. Do cons plan to defend our territory or will they roll over like they have for the Japanese whalers

How'd the Greens go stopping whaling when they were selling all their principles for a carbon tax?

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 2:09pm:

Once agian the ABC is talking about our navy. UNAUSTRALIAN! And we're too busy stopping terrorists on boats to worry about what the Chinese are doing. So who cares.

The Chinese were in our waters!!!!

OMG!!!!

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 2:15pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:09pm: Once agian the ABC is talking about our navy. UNAUSTRALIAN! And we're too busy stopping terrorists on boats to worry about what the Chinese are doing. So who cares. The Chinese were in our waters!!!! OMG!!!!

Chows aren't as bad as choccos. They're a shade lighter.

They're still the enemy though.

Karnal wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 2:29pm:

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:15pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:09pm: Once agian the ABC is talking about our navy. UNAUSTRALIAN! And we're too busy stopping terrorists on boats to worry about what the Chinese are doing. So who cares. The Chinese were in our waters!!!! OMG!!!! Chows aren't as bad as choccos. They're a shade lighter. They're still the enemy though.

Love the chows,  good solid citizens, terrible gardeners though.
Love the indians, great accent, speak english as well as the queen. Bit pushy though
Yellow, brown...all welcome.
Just not those stooooooooooooooopid greens

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 2:15pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:09pm: Once agian the ABC is talking about our navy. UNAUSTRALIAN! And we're too busy stopping terrorists on boats to worry about what the Chinese are doing. So who cares. The Chinese were in our waters!!!! OMG!!!!

MUSTAFA IS IN OUR WATERS!!!!!

OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 2:15pm:

____ wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:00pm: FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 1:55pm: Another brain dead thread. Yeah we all know you lower the tone. Do cons plan to defend our territory or will they roll over like they have for the Japanese whalers How'd the Greens go stopping whaling when they were selling all their principles for a carbon tax?

Try again … this time on the topic

how are the adults in charge going to stop these boats  …  tow them back to bejing?

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 2:15pm:

____ wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:00pm: FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 1:55pm: Another brain dead thread. Yeah we all know you lower the tone. Do cons plan to defend our territory or will they roll over like they have for the Japanese whalers How'd the Greens go stopping whaling when they were selling all their principles for a carbon tax?

Wait , wait, let me get this straight.  The greens sold their principles by arguing for a policy that is basically their entire principle?

You're an idiot?  Oh yes you are! *pat* *pat*

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 2:39pm:

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:15pm: ____ wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:00pm: FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 1:55pm: Another brain dead thread. Yeah we all know you lower the tone. Do cons plan to defend our territory or will they roll over like they have for the Japanese whalers How'd the Greens go stopping whaling when they were selling all their principles for a carbon tax? Wait , wait, let me get this straight.  The greens sold their principles by arguing for a policy that is basically their entire principle? You're an idiot?  Oh yes you are! *pat* *pat*

So a carbon tax is their entire principle.

OK, swell.

ffs ::)

____ wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 2:38pm:

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:15pm: ____ wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:00pm: FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 1:55pm: Another brain dead thread. Yeah we all know you lower the tone. Do cons plan to defend our territory or will they roll over like they have for the Japanese whalers How'd the Greens go stopping whaling when they were selling all their principles for a carbon tax? Try again … this time on the topic how are the adults in charge going to stop these boats  …  tow them back to bejing?

The topic is retarded.... ::)

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 2:53pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:39pm: FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:15pm: ____ wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:00pm: FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 1:55pm: Another brain dead thread. Yeah we all know you lower the tone. Do cons plan to defend our territory or will they roll over like they have for the Japanese whalers How'd the Greens go stopping whaling when they were selling all their principles for a carbon tax? Wait , wait, let me get this straight.  The greens sold their principles by arguing for a policy that is basically their entire principle? You're an idiot?  Oh yes you are! *pat* *pat* So a carbon tax is their entire principle. OK, swell. for goodness sake ::)

*pat* *pat* *pat*  Have a treat :)  *pat* *pat* *pat*

Would you agree that action against climate change is a principle of the Greens Political Party?

Well the article mentioned international waters and I suspect this was a planned right of passage exercise that was announced many moons ago.  I cannot see an issue and I suspect some hyper-bowl in the report. 

And it would be silly if Oz did not monitor the activity and exercise its own assets.  Such is the nature of these things. 

Datalife wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 2:55pm:

Well the article mentioned international waters and I suspect this was a planned right of passage exercise that was announced many moons ago.  I cannot see an issue and I suspect some hyper-bowl in the report.  And it would be silly if Oz did not monitor the activity and exercise its own assets.  Such is the nature of these things.

Of course you would suspect some hyper-bowl in the report.

Even though the report overs no hyperbole and once again is simply reporting that, hey "this is what happened" and people who are paid to analyse such events believe it may mean the following things.

But hey, no, you're right. There is some hyper-bowl in the report.

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 2:55pm:

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:53pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:39pm: FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:15pm: ____ wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:00pm: FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 1:55pm: Another brain dead thread. Yeah we all know you lower the tone. Do cons plan to defend our territory or will they roll over like they have for the Japanese whalers How'd the Greens go stopping whaling when they were selling all their principles for a carbon tax? Wait , wait, let me get this straight.  The greens sold their principles by arguing for a policy that is basically their entire principle? You're an idiot?  Oh yes you are! *pat* *pat* So a carbon tax is their entire principle. OK, swell. for goodness sake ::) *pat* *pat* *pat*  Have a treat :)  *pat* *pat* *pat* Would you agree that action against climate change is a principle of the Greens Political Party?

Awwwww, you made a dumb comment now you're back tracking.

::)

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 2:58pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:55pm: FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:53pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:39pm: FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:15pm: ____ wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:00pm: FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 1:55pm: Another brain dead thread. Yeah we all know you lower the tone. Do cons plan to defend our territory or will they roll over like they have for the Japanese whalers How'd the Greens go stopping whaling when they were selling all their principles for a carbon tax? Wait , wait, let me get this straight.  The greens sold their principles by arguing for a policy that is basically their entire principle? You're an idiot?  Oh yes you are! *pat* *pat* So a carbon tax is their entire principle. OK, swell. for goodness sake ::) *pat* *pat* *pat*  Have a treat :)  *pat* *pat* *pat* Would you agree that action against climate change is a principle of the Greens Political Party? Awwwww, you made a dumb comment now you're back tracking. ::)

Awww *pat* *pat* poor little pet, still hungry?

Would you agree that the principle of the Greens is to come up with policies that protect the environment?

Oh guess what the carbon tax is intended to do?


But yesssss, the greens went away from their principles.  Who made the dumb comment again?

Are you upset because your master has gone away from his principles and has lied at every turn, just to win an election?

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 2:59pm:

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:58pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:55pm: FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:53pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:39pm: FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:15pm: ____ wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:00pm: FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 1:55pm: Another brain dead thread. Yeah we all know you lower the tone. Do cons plan to defend our territory or will they roll over like they have for the Japanese whalers How'd the Greens go stopping whaling when they were selling all their principles for a carbon tax? Wait , wait, let me get this straight.  The greens sold their principles by arguing for a policy that is basically their entire principle? You're an idiot?  Oh yes you are! *pat* *pat* So a carbon tax is their entire principle. OK, swell. for goodness sake ::) *pat* *pat* *pat*  Have a treat :)  *pat* *pat* *pat* Would you agree that action against climate change is a principle of the Greens Political Party? Awwwww, you made a dumb comment now you're back tracking. ::) Awww *pat* *pat* poor little pet, still hungry? Would you agree that the principle of the Greens is to come up with policies that protect the environment? Oh guess what the carbon tax is intended to do? But yesssss, the greens went away from their principles.  Who made the dumb comment again?

Awwwww, idiot and imbecile, crikey your on fire today, such personal abuse!!!!


Doesn’t change the fact your comment was wrong and dumb and your trying to work a way out of it. ::)

I highlighted it above.

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Go one call me another name!!

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Edit much…..

::) ;D ;D ;D

Will Abbott STOP These BOATS !

No they are too big to tow back and there are too many to fit in their little orange boats.

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 3:06pm:

Edit much….. ::) ;D ;D ;D

I felt bad calling you out for what you really are.

;)

Actually, it's called editing after the fact to still offer some level of respect to you, despite your obvious stupidity.

Feel free to retract your dumb comment. Or you can continue to play along, I'm game.

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 3:05pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:59pm: FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:58pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:55pm: FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:53pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:39pm: FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:15pm: ____ wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:00pm: FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 1:55pm: Another brain dead thread. Yeah we all know you lower the tone. Do cons plan to defend our territory or will they roll over like they have for the Japanese whalers How'd the Greens go stopping whaling when they were selling all their principles for a carbon tax? Wait , wait, let me get this straight.  The greens sold their principles by arguing for a policy that is basically their entire principle? You're an idiot?  Oh yes you are! *pat* *pat* So a carbon tax is their entire principle. OK, swell. for goodness sake ::) *pat* *pat* *pat*  Have a treat :)  *pat* *pat* *pat* Would you agree that action against climate change is a principle of the Greens Political Party? Awwwww, you made a dumb comment now you're back tracking. ::) Awww *pat* *pat* poor little pet, still hungry? Would you agree that the principle of the Greens is to come up with policies that protect the environment? Oh guess what the carbon tax is intended to do? But yesssss, the greens went away from their principles.  Who made the dumb comment again? Awwwww, idiot and imbecile, crikey your on fire today, such personal abuse!!!! Doesn’t change the fact your comment was wrong and dumb and your trying to work a way out of it. ::) I highlighted it above. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Go one call me another name!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

My comment wasn't wrong.  Policies to protect the environment are the basic principle of the greens political party.

YOu're going to need to show how the carbon tax destroys the environment in order to substantiate your dumbass, idiotic and imbecilic not very intelligent poorly thought out comment that the greens argued against their principles when trying to secure the carbon tax.

I won't hold my breath.

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 3:12pm:

My comment wasn't wrong.  Policies to protect the environment are the basic principle of the greens political party.

No you said basically their entire principle, I’ll quote “basically their entire principle”

So they have no economic principles?

Immigration and asylum seekers, nothing!

Education and health….nothing!


Wow, what a dumb comment you made, huh?

:-?

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 3:26pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 3:12pm: My comment wasn't wrong.  Policies to protect the environment are the basic principle of the greens political party. No you said basically their entire principle, I’ll quote “basically their entire principle” So they have no economic principles? Immigration and asylum seekers, nothing! Education and health….nothing! Wow, what a dumb comment you made, huh? :-? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

You clearly don't understand what a principle is. sad :(

you tell me please, based off this, how the greens argued against their principles, when arguing for the carbon tax.  Or, in my words, how the carbon tax isn't basically their principles:
http://greens.org.au/structure-charter

Another biscuit?  :)

Awwww now a buscuit line.

::)

“buscuitly their entire principle”

They must have loved getting their carbon tax at the expense of assylum seekers.

Bloody hell they must have felt so sick on the inside.

[quote author=alevine link=1392262229/27#27 date=1392269355] Or, in my words, how the carbon tax isn't basically their principles:
[/quote]

Your words....basically their entire principle.

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 3:39pm:

Awwww now a buscuit line. ::) “buscuitly their entire principle” They must have loved getting their carbon tax at the expense of assylum seekers. Bloody hell they must have felt so sick on the inside.

Did they really? Care to clarify?

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 1:57pm:

Lobo wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 1:49pm: Maybe we need to re-jig 'Operation Sovereign Borders'...... Another '3-star' land-warfare General in charge of Naval operations should do it.... :D No need, working just fine at stopping unwanted illegal country shoppers.

Want him to multi-task, do you??

He shouldn't have too much trouble doing so; after all he can look in two directions at the same time......

:)

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 3:39pm:

Awwww now a buscuit line. ::) “buscuitly their entire principle”

Don't you drizzle, FriYay. I expect a decent spray from you.

Lobo wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 3:49pm:

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 1:57pm: Lobo wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 1:49pm: Maybe we need to re-jig 'Operation Sovereign Borders'...... Another '3-star' land-warfare General in charge of Naval operations should do it.... :D No need, working just fine at stopping unwanted illegal country shoppers. Want him to multi-task, do you??

Not at all. There's no reason why FriYay can't use his keyboard and hit the biscuit at the same time.

Dnarever wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 2:07pm:

FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 1:55pm: Another brain dead thread. Legitimate concerns about real boarder protection with a strong power steaming war ships along our boarder is brain dead but the brain dead war against genuine refugees seeking assistance is well justified and has people wetting their pants in fear. go figure ?

The dopey leftists don't know the difference between border and boarder, good thing the adults are back in charge.

So what is this boarder protection?

Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 13^th, 2014 at 5:49pm:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 2:07pm: FriYAY wrote on Feb 13th, 2014 at 1:55pm: Another brain dead thread. Legitimate concerns about real boarder protection with a strong power steaming war ships along our boarder is brain dead but the brain dead war against genuine refugees seeking assistance is well justified and has people wetting their pants in fear. go figure ? The dopey leftists don't know the difference between border and boarder, good thing the adults are back in charge. So what is this boarder protection?

The spelling bee champ is back!

Oh wait, you only got a participation ribbon.