Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1392672843 Message started by woody2013 on Feb 18th, 2014 at 7:34am |
Title: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by woody2013 on Feb 18th, 2014 at 7:34am
Craig Thomson fraud trial: Melbourne Magistrates Court expected to hand down decision today
Posted 13 minutes ago Craig Thomson PHOTO: If found guilty, Craig Thomson faces a maximum sentence of five years' jail. (AAP: David Crosling) RELATED STORY: Evidence against Thomson only circumstantial, court toldRELATED STORY: Prostitute's witness statement reveals Thomson was 'regular client' MAP: Australia The Melbourne Magistrates Court is today expected to hand down its decision in the criminal trial of former federal MP Craig Thomson. Thomson has pleaded not guilty to 145 charges of theft and deception relating to the alleged misuse of his union credit card while national secretary of the Health Services Union (HSU). It is alleged he used the card to pay for prostitutes, pornographic movies and other personal expenses totalling more than $28,000. If found guilty, he faces a maximum sentence of five years' jail. A large number of prosecution witnesses were called to give evidence at Thomson's trial, including HSU officials. Whistleblower Kathy Jackson, who took over as national secretary when Thomson resigned in 2007, described the union as "being like a cult". A forensic accountant for Victoria Police testified that the money spent included almost $6,000 at a Sydney brothel. Gerard Curtin said the HSU's accounting system recorded the brothel spending as "entertainment", "teleconferencing", or national office meeting expenses. One prostitute who used the name Misty also revealed Thomson was a "regular client" who always had a glass of champagne waiting for her. However, whether or not Thomson used the HSU credit card to pay for expenses such as prostitutes was not the issue in the case. Thomson did not make any admissions to the court, but the fact the transactions were made was disputed by the defence. Union authority to use card the crucial issue Instead, the crucial issues for the court to consider were whether Thomson had the union's authority to use his card for personal expenses and what his state of mind was when he used the card. Thomson's lawyers argued he had discretion to authorise union expenditure of up to $50,000 without running it past the union's national executive. Several union witnesses, including the former auditor, also told the court they believed there were no concrete written rules stipulating what union funds could be spent on. Making the closing submissions for the defence, Greg James QC told the court Thomson had not deceived the union to obtain any property or financial advantage. He said the prosecution's case was "circumstantial" and had failed to meet the necessary burden of proof. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by The Abzi Party on Feb 18th, 2014 at 8:58am
"He said the prosecution's case was "circumstantial" and had failed to meet the necessary burden of proof."
I will laugh if this proves to be a witch hunt! |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by cods on Feb 18th, 2014 at 9:02am Fit of Absent Mindeness wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 8:58am:
WHY?... I guess you are not in favour of FAIRWORK then??.. as for it being a laugh...you dont mind small unions with poorly paid members being ripped off..??.... he wasnt alone you know.. but he was the only one with brothels on his credit card. ::) ::) if he is found not guilty I wonder what will happen to Williamson and Jackson....... |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Alinta on Feb 18th, 2014 at 9:05am Fit of Absent Mindeness wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 8:58am:
I'm expecting acquittal.............but won't be laughing.... |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Herbert on Feb 18th, 2014 at 9:12am
Ah. Today. The sheer chutzpah of this fellow is incredible.
Bold as brass. An exaggerated sense of entitlement to other people's money. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by cods on Feb 18th, 2014 at 9:20am Lord Herbert wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 9:12am:
he will be bac k in the ALP soon as look at him..may even have i his eye on swannies seat... hes got to be next to go. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by John Smith on Feb 18th, 2014 at 9:27am cods wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 9:02am:
so you've already decided that no matter what the courts find, Thommo is guilty? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by cods on Feb 18th, 2014 at 9:48am cods wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 9:20am:
i thought this would have suggested I think he is going to get off.. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Aussie on Feb 18th, 2014 at 9:50am cods wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 9:48am:
Why do you think that, cods? |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Aussie on Feb 18th, 2014 at 10:04am |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 18th, 2014 at 10:05am
I hope they hang the lousy thief.
|
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Aussie on Feb 18th, 2014 at 10:32am
Verdict - guilty.
|
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Herbert on Feb 18th, 2014 at 11:06am
Never play poker with this man.
145 charges against him, and he kept a straight face in parliament, and to a thousand media cameras. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by progressiveslol on Feb 18th, 2014 at 11:21am Fit of Absent Mindeness wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 8:58am:
Typical labor corruption loving response |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by woody2013 on Feb 18th, 2014 at 11:33am progressiveslol wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 11:21am:
Craig Thomson fraud trial: Court hands down guilty verdict Updated 7 minutes ago Craig Thomson PHOTO: Craig Thomson was found guilty of obtaining financial advantage by using his HSU credit card. (AAP: Quentin Jones) RELATED STORY: Evidence against Thomson only circumstantial, court told MAP: Melbourne 3000 Former federal MP Craig Thomson has been found guilty of obtaining financial advantage by using his Health Services Union (HSU) credit card to pay for sexual services and making cash withdrawals. In handing down his findings in the Melbourne Magistrates Court, Magistrate Charlie Rozencwajg found Thomson dishonestly used his union cards while national secretary of the HSU. The magistrate said the court had heard from several union witnesses who made it clear that union credit cards were for business purposes only. "This must have been known by the accused," Mr Rozencwajg said. The magistrate acknowledged there was some grey area defining what constituted business use, but he said it would be an affront to think the card could be used to pay for sexual services. The magistrate is continuing to deliver his ruling on 145 charges. Thomson was also found guilty of using his card to pay for cigarettes and of some charges relating to paying for spousal travel with his union credit card. All charges relating to the misuse of union funds to pay for adult movies have been dismissed. Thomson had pleaded not guilty to the 145 charges of theft and deception relating to the alleged misuse. It was alleged he used the card to pay for prostitutes, pornographic movies and other personal expenses totalling more than $28,000. A large number of prosecution witnesses were called to give evidence at Thomson's trial, including HSU officials. Whistleblower Kathy Jackson, who took over as national secretary when Thomson resigned in 2007, described the union as "being like a cult". A forensic accountant for Victoria Police testified that the money spent included almost $6,000 at a Sydney brothel. Gerard Curtin said the HSU's accounting system recorded the brothel spending as "entertainment", "teleconferencing", or national office meeting expenses. One prostitute who used the name Misty also revealed Thomson was a "regular client" who always had a glass of champagne waiting for her. However, whether or not Thomson used the HSU credit card to pay for expenses such as prostitutes was not the issue in the case. Thomson did not give any evidence in the court, but his lawyers did not deny he visited prostitutes and did not dispute evidence he had used his union credit card to pay for their services. Union authority to use card the crucial issue Instead, the crucial issues for the court to consider were whether Thomson had the union's authority to use his card for personal expenses and what his state of mind was when he used the card. Thomson's lawyers argued he had discretion to authorise union expenditure of up to $50,000 without running it past the union's national executive. Several union witnesses, including the former auditor, also told the court they believed there were no concrete written rules stipulating what union funds could be spent on. Making the closing submissions for the defence, Greg James QC told the court Thomson had not deceived the union to obtain any property or financial advantage. He said the prosecution's case was "circumstantial" and had failed to meet the necessary burden of proof. Prosecutor Lesley Taylor SC reiterated his case that Thomson, as the national secretary, was bound by the rules of the union to use to use union credit cards for official business only. He argued Thomson lied about his conduct in media interviews and this incriminates him. However, Mr James told the court that his client was under great pressure at the time of doing those interviews, given his failing marriage and desire to protect his parliamentary career and image, and he was not thinking that what he said would eventually be used against him in a criminal case. In the past, Thomson has claimed he was set up. Topics: courts-and-trials, unions, fraud-and-c |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by viewpoint on Feb 18th, 2014 at 11:43am Fit of Absent Mindeness wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 8:58am:
Well cry ya moron, this is no "witch hunt" he's been found GUILTY....GUILTY I say! Hang the kiwi bastard! By his balls..... [smiley=vrolijk_1.gif] [smiley=tekst-toppie.gif] [smiley=2vrolijk_08.gif] [smiley=2vrolijk_08.gif] |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 18th, 2014 at 12:17pm viewpoint wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 11:43am:
Get the rope ready because he also lied to parliament. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Andrei.Hicks on Feb 18th, 2014 at 12:25pm
What scum unions can so often produce...
|
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Herbert on Feb 18th, 2014 at 12:51pm Bobby. wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 12:17pm:
Is we gonna have us another lynchin'? Yee-Haaa... ! |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by aquascoot on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:03pm
geez, a judge that speaks common sense.
hope we can get him to assess eddie obeid as well |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by aquascoot on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:05pm
i think he will serve time for this....2 years would be my guess.
|
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 18th, 2014 at 1:07pm Lord Herbert wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 12:51pm:
Yep - we're gunna hang em & hang em high. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsMQABEiRMc |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Dnarever on Feb 18th, 2014 at 6:49pm
Looks like the News Limited / Liberal verdict was upheld.
|
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Andrei.Hicks on Feb 18th, 2014 at 7:08pm Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 6:49pm:
Yeah because his defence someone stole his card and then put it back was air tight. Don't be so fricken biased and recognize scum when you see it. What about all the poor b@stards whose money this guy spent on hookers and flying around business class with his wife? The lowest paid, some of hardest workers in Australia and this is how he spent their membership money?? Maybe if - just for a second - you put aside your partisan view of the world you'd see he deserves this... I am disgusted by this bloke. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Aussie on Feb 18th, 2014 at 7:12pm Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 7:08pm:
That was not his defence. Goes to show your fundamental ignorance of the matter. Partisan, huh? :D |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Andrei.Hicks on Feb 18th, 2014 at 7:57pm
You suggesting a court of Australia got it wrong Aussie??
He's guilty!!! Couldn't happen to a nicer bloke. And had the nerve to accuse the media of upsetting his pregnant wife? What about the fact several witnesses declared him to be a regular who banged hookers in their brothels. Scum. Guilty scum too. Very happy about it. I hope it wrecks his life. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Aussie on Feb 18th, 2014 at 8:08pm Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 7:57pm:
Mr Hicks. Let's not be seen as dishonest here. You said: Quote:
You are absolutely wrong ~ that was nowhere near his 'defence,' ~ but I guess it is beyond your personal and arrogant 'dignity' tolerance levels to just simply admit that you got that wrong. Bloke, you are digging the hole. :-? |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by mantra on Feb 18th, 2014 at 8:09pm Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 7:57pm:
I would think his life is already wrecked. Aussie wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 7:12pm:
The defence his lawyers used wasn't great, but it was all they had. Maybe from a legal perspective it could have worked, but from a moral stance - definitely not. If anything it put the unions in an even worse light. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Grendel on Feb 18th, 2014 at 8:27pm Aussie wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 7:12pm:
Still in denial of his guilt and lies I see Aussie... :D ;D :D ;D :D ;D :D ;D :D |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Aussie on Feb 18th, 2014 at 8:32pm
Mr Grendel.....this..........
Quote:
.......was not his defence. Do you agree? |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Andrei.Hicks on Feb 18th, 2014 at 8:45pm
There was no defence.
Personally what I find most appalling is that there were those who were happy to have it drag out just so he could remain in parliament and prolong the life of that last car crash of a minority Government. I take a high stand on morals and banging hookers using the money of the lowest paid workers in the country is about as low as they come. Did anyone stop and think for a minute about the low paid guys whose money this was? No of course not, just petty partisan politics. Shame on them all. I hope his whole life is wrecked. He deserves it. I'm not partisan. My views are the same for that repugnant filthy homosexual ex speaker too. He deserves a public flogging as well. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Andrei.Hicks on Feb 18th, 2014 at 8:47pm Grendel wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 8:27pm:
He is guilty. That's the official answer. If Aussie is 100% against it, then we should look for the hand of Palmer in this somewhere. Aussie is Clive's hand on here. I saw it on Palmer TV on loop ;D |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by cods on Feb 18th, 2014 at 9:28pm mantra wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 8:09pm:
HE WAS GUTLESS AND A CREEP... GOD ONLY KNOWS WHOS PAYING FOR ALL THIS... BUT YOU CAN BET YOUR BOTTOM DOLLAR IT ISNT HIM..HES A CREEP OF THE WORST KIND...AND POINTING THE FINGER AT SOMEONE ELSE.. IS THE PITS...I TRUST THEY THROW THE BOOK AT HIM. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Grendel on Feb 18th, 2014 at 9:42pm Aussie wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 8:32pm:
Hate to tell you yet again... but it has always been HIS defence |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Herbert on Feb 19th, 2014 at 5:13am Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 8:45pm:
'Mussel-man'? What a vile creature he turned out to be. Between him and 'Brothel-man' they made our parliament look very shabby indeed. And then wasn't Julia involved in some sort of shady money-lending deal to a former boyfriend? |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Generation X on Feb 19th, 2014 at 6:59am cods wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 9:28pm:
Dillard and Dudd should be next in line. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by mantra on Feb 19th, 2014 at 7:09am cods wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 9:28pm:
Obviously Thompson is a liar and it says a lot for our politicians generally. Most of them are liars. They don't offer transparency or truth and usually we don't have a clue what they're up to. The Coalition haven't kept their hands clean either. Last time they were in government - a couple of them were caught with their hands in the till. The same thing happened when they were in opposition - smaller, less obvious rorts - but rorts all the same. In Thompson's case he has caused enormous damage - not only to Labor, but to the unions as well. Maybe he'll get 12 months. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Dnarever on Feb 19th, 2014 at 7:13am Grendel wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 9:42pm:
Rubbish. He said that he had been threatened to be ruined through accusations about prostitutes. A copy of his credit card was on file - there was no need for anyone to steel his card. The Australian media had charged convicted and sentenced Thomson 3 years ago now a legitimate court has upheld that previous media driven decision. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Herbert on Feb 19th, 2014 at 8:17am mantra wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 7:09am:
That will be very 'hard time' for him away from all those brothels. It's possible he'll jump-the-fence while he's in jail just to get his rocks off. I have a feeling he's going to spend an awful lot of time in the showers. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by cods on Feb 19th, 2014 at 8:24am mantra wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 7:09am:
and so were a couple of lefties.. mantra one GIllard and one KRUDD also paid back money to the finance dept. some how I draw the line at supporting someone for 12 months or more..and then when finally it comes down to this guy does have something to answer for... instead of suspending him they tell him to shift to the independent benches...I MEAN COME ON..... they already paid a huge sum to his lawyers to keep him in parliament...even though they knew about the claims against him.. ::) ::) ::) ::) he wasnt charged in court,but you can see by what the HSU is saying he took.... he used their money to get into parliament in the first place... stolen money mantra??? and then untold support whilst he sat there pretending butter wouldnt melt..grrrrrrrr |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by cods on Feb 19th, 2014 at 8:26am Lord Herbert wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 8:17am:
have a look kin feedback herb.. wiseone is complaining about too many THOMO threads..LOLOLOL he sure as hell doesnt like being a loser does he.. he has supported thomo through thick and thin... ;D ;D ;D ;D I wouldnt be surprised if they are related.. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Dnarever on Feb 19th, 2014 at 8:30am cods wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 8:26am:
I would think you can win just as well on one topic as seventeen, actually more definitively. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by cods on Feb 19th, 2014 at 8:33am Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 7:13am:
sorry dna.. he claimed over and over it was someone else.. and you know full well it was\nt just the credit card.. dont you??...how funny his drivers licence his mobile his room even was all used by this THIEF> and then guess what THOMO signed off on them all back at the office... funny that... yet he stopped another employee of the union..who used the HSU credit card to book a magazine subscription........... ::) ::) ::).. shock horror.. kind of twisted morality there... |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by cods on Feb 19th, 2014 at 8:34am Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 8:30am:
yep I have started a one only Abbott thread campaign.. dna you may want to sign up for it... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Dnarever on Feb 19th, 2014 at 8:38am cods wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 8:34am:
Just like we had a one only Rudd or Gillard topic last term ??? I think the PM can have an impact on a number of very different topics, the economy performance and asylum seekers for instance have nothing in common except for the mismanagement and incompetence. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 19th, 2014 at 9:10am Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 8:45pm:
Hear hear Andrei, we can be friends after this. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Grendel on Feb 19th, 2014 at 9:24am Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 7:13am:
He lied.... even Laurie Oakes laughed at him and his lies... |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Herbert on Feb 19th, 2014 at 9:45am cods wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 8:26am:
Craig's going to have an arse you could drive a bus through by the time he gets out of jail. We can only hope. He reminds me too much of the investment company managers who went bankrupt and left thousands of 'Mums and dads' investors flat-broke for the rest of their life after losing all their savings. These kind of people can rot in hell. The suicides, the despair, the grieving over the loss of expected 'golden retirement years'. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 19th, 2014 at 9:51am Lord Herbert wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 9:45am:
Yes - Craig will have a sore bum every day but this is not the type of language a moderator should use. forgiven namaste |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Herbert on Feb 19th, 2014 at 10:08am Bobby. wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 9:51am:
Correction: A double-decker through his derriere. :) |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 19th, 2014 at 10:12am Lord Herbert wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 10:08am:
That's better. ;D |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Herbert on Feb 19th, 2014 at 10:29am Bobby. wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 10:12am:
Let's see if he can keep a straight face when Big Bruce sees him drop his soap in the showers... |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 19th, 2014 at 12:18pm Lord Herbert wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 10:29am:
Actually it's shocking that people in jail get sodomised - the dirty filthy animals that exist there. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by laborarecorrupt on Feb 19th, 2014 at 1:09pm Bobby. wrote on Feb 18th, 2014 at 10:05am:
Could think of nothing better for the scumbag |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Herbert on Feb 19th, 2014 at 1:34pm Bobby. wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 12:18pm:
Don't take me for a Lefty ~ but to save some of the young ones from rape I would allow for frequent visits by wives, girlfriends and prostitutes as they do in some countries. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by cods on Feb 19th, 2014 at 2:10pm Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 8:38am:
good for you you have finally admitted they were incompetent and mismanaged everything.. thanks dna..we have been pointing it out to you for 6 ,loooooooooog year how bad that labor govt was.. god they couldnt even stand each other.. ::) ::) and supporting a toerag like THOMO was the pits.. so glad you have admitted that after all these years.. hopeless every last one of them...labor should remain in exile for many years to come. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by perceptions_now on Feb 19th, 2014 at 2:30pm cods wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 2:10pm:
It would seem Cods, that you may have a little problem, something like Maqqa, with the 3R's? |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Karnal on Feb 19th, 2014 at 3:14pm Bobby. wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 12:18pm:
Not that there's anything wrong with it. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Herbert on Feb 19th, 2014 at 4:22pm Karnal wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 3:14pm:
I can feel a confession coming on ... The squeak of rusty hinges to a closet being slowly opened ... I've been wondering where his bitchy petulance comes from. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 19th, 2014 at 4:37pm Lord Herbert wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 4:22pm:
Karnal is a confessed fruit. He is forgiven namaste |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Herbert on Feb 19th, 2014 at 4:41pm Bobby. wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 4:37pm:
I think the boyz down at the gym might have scrambled his brains a little by screwing him from the wrong end all these years. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 19th, 2014 at 4:43pm Lord Herbert wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 4:41pm:
No it happened while he did military service - there was a shortage of holes with all those bloke around. |
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by Herbert on Feb 19th, 2014 at 4:55pm
Are we gonna have another lynchin' Bobby? YEEEEE-HAAAAAA!! ;D
|
Title: Re: Craig (SLEAZE) Thompson decision today Post by bobbythebat1 on Feb 19th, 2014 at 5:17pm Lord Herbert wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 4:55pm:
No - I think sodomites should just be horse whipped & placed in stocks. We'll leave the hanging list for : murderers, rapists thieves pedophiles terrorists |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved. |