one after the other all rubbish all made up...

come on MODS one thread on Abbott .. just to make the playing field equal..  :P

boo hoo 3 threads on THOMO... 303 on Abbott... ::) ::)

killing the motor industry killing asylum seekers...killing the unions.. killing lefties...sheeeze...

wont be long ans he will be killing cats and dogs...now that would be rude.

cods wrote on Feb 19^th, 2014 at 8:18am:

one after the other all rubbish all made up... come on MODS one thread on Abbott .. just to make the playing field equal..  :P boo hoo 3 threads on THOMO... 303 on Abbott... ::) ::) killing the motor industry killing asylum seekers...killing the unions.. killing lefties...sheeeze... wont be long ans he will be killing cats and dogs...now that would be rude.

Having yet another whinge cods?

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 19^th, 2014 at 8:20am:

cods wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 8:18am: one after the other all rubbish all made up... come on MODS one thread on Abbott .. just to make the playing field equal..  :P boo hoo 3 threads on THOMO... 303 on Abbott... ::) ::) killing the motor industry killing asylum seekers...killing the unions.. killing lefties...sheeeze... wont be long ans he will be killing cats and dogs...now that would be rude. Having yet another whinge cods? SOB

It's always a nice day for it!  ;D

Motor industry , Asylum seekers and Unions are all different topics ????

Thomson's court case is only one topic.

In fact before the election there were literally hundreds of topics started by conservatives on Asylum seekers alone.

Dnarever wrote on Feb 19^th, 2014 at 8:34am:

Motor industry , Asylum seekers and Unions are all different topics ???? Thomson's court case is only one topic. In fact before the election there were literally hundreds of topics started by conservatives on Asylum seekers alone.

and who whinges about them.. over and over again.. ask aussie.....

THOMO is still a different topic on each thread..

he is such an allrounder...,.

cods wrote on Feb 19^th, 2014 at 8:39am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 8:34am: Motor industry , Asylum seekers and Unions are all different topics ???? Thomson's court case is only one topic. In fact before the election there were literally hundreds of topics started by conservatives on Asylum seekers alone. and who whinges about them.. over and over again.. ask aussie..... THOMO is still a different topic on each thread.. he is such an allrounder...,.

you do

SOB

Call the whaaaaambulance.

POOR CODS . . . . .

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 19^th, 2014 at 9:59am:

POOR CODS . . . . . SOB

poor sod...ooppps sob.

cods wrote on Feb 19^th, 2014 at 8:18am:

one after the other all rubbish all made up... come on MODS one thread on Abbott .. just to make the playing field equal..  :P boo hoo 3 threads on THOMO... 303 on Abbott... ::) ::) killing the motor industry killing asylum seekers...killing the unions.. killing lefties...sheeeze... wont be long ans he will be killing cats and dogs...now that would be rude.

Yes  dear, the woman basher is the pm( thanks to a bunch of
morons who now seem unhappy with their choice) so he will have as many threads written about him as Gillard and Rudd did. I didn't notice you whine about those threads.

skippy. wrote on Feb 19^th, 2014 at 2:16pm:

morons who now seem unhappy with their choice) so he will have as many threads written about him as Gillard and Rudd did. I didn't notice you whine about those threads.

Shortly after I got here I noticed a similar statement and decided to see for myself if it was true.  I spent a long time going down the lists and posted the outcome for all to see.

The result was the posts after Abbott became PM far far outnumbered the posts after Gillard became PM. 

It is still out there if you care to look and you can replicate the methodology and see for yourself if you like and don't trust my result.

Hell if you had any common sense you would realise greens win alone, at 3 or 4 demented posts a day is enough to skew the results toward anti-Abbott posts.  Adelcrow helps as well. 

So in other words, you are wrong.  Thanks for playing.

I suspect another reason for the imbalance is it seems to me many of the luvvies are here 24/7 and with massive post counts.  I am not commenting on why that is but I have my suspicions.  8-)   

Datalife wrote on Feb 19^th, 2014 at 2:52pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 2:16pm: morons who now seem unhappy with their choice) so he will have as many threads written about him as Gillard and Rudd did. I didn't notice you whine about those threads. Shortly after I got here I noticed a similar statement and decided to see for myself if it was true.  I spent a long time going down the lists and posted the outcome for all to see. The result was the posts after Abbott became PM far far outnumbered the posts after Gillard became PM.  It is still out there if you care to look and you can replicate the methodology and see for yourself if you like and don't trust my result. Hell if you had any common sense you would realise greens win alone, at 3 or 4 demented posts a day is enough to skew the results toward anti-Abbott posts.  Adelcrow helps as well.  So in other words, you are wrong.  Thanks for playing. I suspect another reason for the imbalance is it seems to me many of the luvvies are here 24/7 and with massive post counts.  I am not commenting on why that is but I have my suspicions.  8-)

Perhaps thats because he is doing far more damage in a far shorter time than the others ever could . . . .

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 19^th, 2014 at 2:56pm:

Perhaps thats because he is doing far more damage in a far shorter time than the others ever could . . . . SOB

I was only going off the subject titles not the validity.  If you look at Greens wins and Addled idiots posts they target Abbott and rarely have any validity but at a rate high enough to mean Skippys statement was wrong and that Abbott has received much more attention that Gillard did. 

cods wrote on Feb 19^th, 2014 at 8:39am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 8:34am: Motor industry , Asylum seekers and Unions are all different topics ???? Thomson's court case is only one topic. In fact before the election there were literally hundreds of topics started by conservatives on Asylum seekers alone. and who whinges about them.. over and over again.. ask aussie..... THOMO is still a different topic on each thread.. he is such an allrounder...,.

I have created about 4 topics in 4 years and my last one was rolled into another topic and the title and discussion were almost the opposite of the other topic.

This is the brave new world that Andrei has put together. It is fair enough but I can't help but to notice that some get more latitude from Andrei in this regard.

Datalife wrote on Feb 19^th, 2014 at 3:00pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 2:56pm: Perhaps thats because he is doing far more damage in a far shorter time than the others ever could . . . . SOB I was only going off the subject titles not the validity.  If you look at Greens wins and Addled idiots posts they target Abbott and rarely have any validity but at a rate high enough to mean Skippys statement was wrong and that Abbott has received much more attention that Gillard did.

Hasnt got anything to do with validity - he is doing so much damage so fast that there has to be an increase in the titles

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 19^th, 2014 at 3:17pm:

Datalife wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 3:00pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 2:56pm: Perhaps thats because he is doing far more damage in a far shorter time than the others ever could . . . . SOB I was only going off the subject titles not the validity.  If you look at Greens wins and Addled idiots posts they target Abbott and rarely have any validity but at a rate high enough to mean Skippys statement was wrong and that Abbott has received much more attention that Gillard did.  Hasnt got anything to do with validity - he is doing so much damage so fast that there has to be an increase in the titles SOB

meh, they haven't even done a budget yet and been in how long now?  To my mind, most of what the luvvies are screaming loudest about is the result of previous 6 years of actions, and in things like car manufacturing go further back to the Button plan where the problem with Oz car manufacturing was already being recognised. 

Greens wins hysterical posts are mostly that, hysterical and with no basis in any reasonable perception of reality. 

But I don't expect you to understand that or even to acknowledge it. 

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 19^th, 2014 at 3:17pm:

Datalife wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 3:00pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 2:56pm: Perhaps thats because he is doing far more damage in a far shorter time than the others ever could . . . . SOB I was only going off the subject titles not the validity.  If you look at Greens wins and Addled idiots posts they target Abbott and rarely have any validity but at a rate high enough to mean Skippys statement was wrong and that Abbott has received much more attention that Gillard did.  Hasnt got anything to do with validity - he is doing so much damage so fast that there has to be an increase in the titles SOB

It's got everything to do with 'validity'. Post about things he (Abbott) may have done are one thing. Post along the lines of 'Abbott killed my dog/cat/budgie/goldfish/bicycle' are obviously false and are the result of whiny disappointment and prolly brain damage.

Datalife wrote on Feb 19^th, 2014 at 2:52pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 2:16pm: morons who now seem unhappy with their choice) so he will have as many threads written about him as Gillard and Rudd did. I didn't notice you whine about those threads. Shortly after I got here I noticed a similar statement and decided to see for myself if it was true.  I spent a long time going down the lists and posted the outcome for all to see. The result was the posts after Abbott became PM far far outnumbered the posts after Gillard became PM.  It is still out there if you care to look and you can replicate the methodology and see for yourself if you like and don't trust my result. Hell if you had any common sense you would realise greens win alone, at 3 or 4 demented posts a day is enough to skew the results toward anti-Abbott posts.  Adelcrow helps as well.  So in other words, you are wrong.  Thanks for playing. I suspect another reason for the imbalance is it seems to me many of the luvvies are here 24/7 and with massive post counts.  I am not commenting on why that is but I have my suspicions.  8-)

You obviously missed all of maqqas posts, sweet cheeks. ::) if, and I emphasise IF( as you're a conga line dancer and we know your word is ....) Abbott has more posts about him it's because he is obviously even worse than Gillard, not hard to imagine given this governments continued  slump in support.

cods wrote on Feb 19^th, 2014 at 8:18am:

one after the other all rubbish all made up... come on MODS one thread on Abbott .. just to make the playing field equal..  :P boo hoo 3 threads on THOMO... 303 on Abbott... ::) ::) killing the motor industry killing asylum seekers...killing the unions.. killing lefties...sheeeze... wont be long ans he will be killing cats and dogs...now that would be rude.

not sure if you noticed or not Cods, but Abbott is the PM, and this is a politics forum ...

lets see if you can link the dots. :D :D :D

Datalife wrote on Feb 19^th, 2014 at 3:25pm:

Greens wins hysterical posts are mostly that, hysterical and with no basis in any reasonable perception of reality. But I don't expect you to understand that or even to acknowledge it.

Datalife wrote on Feb 19^th, 2014 at 3:00pm:

If you look at Greens wins and Addled idiots posts they target Abbott and rarely have any validity but at a rate high enough to mean Skippys statement was wrong and that Abbott has received much more attention that Gillard did.

Datalife wrote on Feb 19^th, 2014 at 2:52pm:

Hell if you had any common sense you would realise greens win alone, at 3 or 4 demented posts a day is enough to skew the results toward anti-Abbott posts.  Adelcrow helps as well.

Have you thought about making some political posts for a change rather than just insulting members who actually do contribute to the political discussions here?

mantra wrote on Feb 19^th, 2014 at 6:30pm:

Have you thought about making some political posts for a change rather than just insulting members who actually do contribute to the political discussions here?

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

I am sure Greens and Addled appreciate you defending their contributions, demented as they are.

Anything else bothering you?  Or at least, anything bothering you,  you think I might actually give a poo about? 

John Smith wrote on Feb 19^th, 2014 at 6:16pm:

cods wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 8:18am: one after the other all rubbish all made up... come on MODS one thread on Abbott .. just to make the playing field equal..  :P boo hoo 3 threads on THOMO... 303 on Abbott... ::) ::) killing the motor industry killing asylum seekers...killing the unions.. killing lefties...sheeeze... wont be long ans he will be killing cats and dogs...now that would be rude. not sure if you noticed or not Cods, but Abbott is the PM, and this is a politics forum ... lets see if you can link the dots. :D :D :D

Link them?

She doesn't even SEE them.  >:(

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 19^th, 2014 at 4:10pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 3:17pm: Datalife wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 3:00pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 2:56pm: Perhaps thats because he is doing far more damage in a far shorter time than the others ever could . . . . SOB I was only going off the subject titles not the validity.  If you look at Greens wins and Addled idiots posts they target Abbott and rarely have any validity but at a rate high enough to mean Skippys statement was wrong and that Abbott has received much more attention that Gillard did.  Hasnt got anything to do with validity - he is doing so much damage so fast that there has to be an increase in the titles SOB It's got everything to do with 'validity'. Post about things he (Abbott) may have done are one thing. Post along the lines of 'Abbott killed my dog/cat/budgie/goldfish/bicycle' are obviously false and are the result of whiny disappointment and prolly brain damage.

Thread titles? Validity? You are just arguing for the sake of arguing there. Cods said she was whinging (this time) about the titles.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 20^th, 2014 at 5:18am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 4:10pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 3:17pm: Datalife wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 3:00pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Feb 19th, 2014 at 2:56pm: Perhaps thats because he is doing far more damage in a far shorter time than the others ever could . . . . SOB I was only going off the subject titles not the validity.  If you look at Greens wins and Addled idiots posts they target Abbott and rarely have any validity but at a rate high enough to mean Skippys statement was wrong and that Abbott has received much more attention that Gillard did.  Hasnt got anything to do with validity - he is doing so much damage so fast that there has to be an increase in the titles SOB It's got everything to do with 'validity'. Post about things he (Abbott) may have done are one thing. Post along the lines of 'Abbott killed my dog/cat/budgie/goldfish/bicycle' are obviously false and are the result of whiny disappointment and prolly brain damage. Thread titles? Validity? You are just arguing for the sake of arguing there. Cods said she was whinging (this time) about the titles. SOB

you give me for too much credit... sob..

I should have used the word TROLL shouldnt I.. you do understand that word so well...I think.....


I was trolling the too many thomo threads... ::) ::)

but shhhhh dont tell anyone. ;) ;)