Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Thank God for Miranda Vol 6 http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1395963072 Message started by bogarde73 on Mar 28th, 2014 at 9:31am |
Title: Thank God for Miranda Vol 6 Post by bogarde73 on Mar 28th, 2014 at 9:31am
T’S no egalitarian tribute to Sydney that its most precious triangle of north-facing harbourfront real estate, at the foot of the Harbour Bridge, is a run-down hovel.
It’s just a reminder of this city’s bad old days of greed, thuggery - and graft, for those in the know. So when you hear Lord Mayor Clover Moore and Paul McAleer from the Maritime Union of Australia complain about the NSW government’s decision to sell off half a billion dollars worth of public housing in Millers Point, keep in mind the troubled history of this little patch of paradise. Millers Point, from the northern end of Lower Fort St, through Argyle Place to Merriman St in the west, and down to the southern end of High St, is a decaying monument to the standover tactics of the wharfies and the defunct, deregistered, disgraced Builders Labourers Federation. These belligerent unions helped keep Millers Point in the hands of their friends and family for generations, people who paid peppercorn rents, first to the Sydney Harbour Trust, then the Maritime Services Board from 1910, and finally, from 1970, to the Housing Commission (now Housing NSW). The lucky few who managed to score a terrace house or apartment just passed those priceless tenancies down to their children. . . . . . Millers Point today remains an aristocracy of hereditary housos, like Mr H, 39, who lives alone in a four bedroom house in Argyle Place, whose tenancy was passed on to him by his mother 12 years ago. He pays $271 a month when the market rent is $4000 a month. Until the deceptively dainty Community Service Minister Pru Goward came along, no government had been game to touch this enclave of taxpayer-funded privilege, even while public housing waiting lists blew out and maintenance costs for the historic buildings soared. She wants to capitalise on a buoyant real estate market and sell 293 public housing residences in Millers Point over the next two years. On top of the $500 million windfall, the taxpayer will save $7 million in annual maintenance costs. Goward promises to put every penny into public housing. For every sale, she says she can build four new houses for the 57,000 people waiting for public housing. She is offering Millers Point residents priority for new public housing nearby in the inner-city. But Moore and fellow agitators slam the project as “social cleansing” and are determined to stop it, out of nostalgia for some mythical workers’ paradise in which the best property in town goes to the working poor. |
Title: Re: Thank God for Miranda Vol 6 Post by mantra on Mar 28th, 2014 at 9:40am
I don't think there will be too many opposed to this sell off. We've seen so many scams over the years from those living in public housing with water views or in other prime locations. Their Mercedes are parked outside and they're paying minimal rents - that is if they choose to pay any rent all.
We've allowed generational occupants to inherit these properties while so many battlers are renting privately and trying to save up for a modest home? Public housing was originally intended to be a temporary handout until the residents got on their feet. |
Title: Re: Thank God for Miranda Vol 6 Post by cods on Mar 28th, 2014 at 9:52am mantra wrote on Mar 28th, 2014 at 9:40am:
so true .. and progress we all make way for progress...if we didnt we would all be living in houses with the loo and laundry down the back... it is a bit sad.. but it is inevitable..imagine if we were all still driving on goat tracks. |
Title: Re: Thank God for Miranda Vol 6 Post by bogarde73 on Mar 28th, 2014 at 10:05am
But the screaming and abuse about "social cleansing"!
You'd think we were talking about Bosnia. . .instead of the age of entitlement being over. The ironic thing about the left, or the "progressives" as they would like to be known in an exercise of spin worthy of the Ministry of Truth, is that they have a generosity of spirit which ends at their own pockets. |
Title: Re: Thank God for Miranda Vol 6 Post by Sir Dame smithy70 on Mar 28th, 2014 at 10:50am bogarde73 wrote on Mar 28th, 2014 at 10:05am:
Please Don't fall into the mindless bullsh!t of labels, your last sentence is nothing but cliches I expect better. As to the issue itself I have no problem, a fool & his money are easily separated & if the state ACTUALLY uses the sale proceeds to build more housing to cover more people in need then how can anyone protest. As for the residents they were hoping title would eventually come their way, & if it ever did these "ties that bind" would disappear & for Sale signs would go up quicker than you can say Hungry Mile >:( |
Title: Re: Thank God for Miranda Vol 6 Post by bogarde73 on Mar 28th, 2014 at 10:52am
Please!
Don't fall into the mindless bullsh!t of labelling everything that displeases you as clichés. |
Title: Re: Thank God for Miranda Vol 6 Post by Sir Dame smithy70 on Mar 28th, 2014 at 10:55am bogarde73 wrote on Mar 28th, 2014 at 10:52am:
LOL ;) |
Title: Re: Thank God for Miranda Vol 6 Post by bogarde73 on Mar 28th, 2014 at 11:13am
I can understand the preying on the soon-to-be-dispossessed by her dykeness, the Lady Mayoress.
Her electorate will be shrinking faster than an 83yo Rupert after a dengi. Especially when O"Farrell brings in the voting rights for more business people in the city. We might even get those bike lanes turned back into parking spaces and spare us the sight of too much out of control lycra. |
Title: Re: Thank God for Miranda Vol 6 Post by bogarde73 on Mar 28th, 2014 at 2:38pm
No socialist collectives or progressive thinkers here to give us a rant on the inhuman NSW Lib govt?
Nobody prepared to stand up for the hereditary inhabitants of the Rocks & Millers Pt? |
Title: Re: Thank God for Miranda Vol 6 Post by John Smith on Mar 28th, 2014 at 2:47pm
these old properties require to much maintenance anyway .... if they sell and put the money into new houses all the better.
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved. |