I thought threads in moderator forums couldn't be touched.

It was moved to Feedback Mantra..

It looks like buttons have been selectively pressed to ensure some members here have no say on Feedback - even Aussie, who as it turns out has quite a bit of support from the members for the job of global moderator.

I didn't think I would see a time when members would be segregated into two categories - those who can say whatever they want, wherever they please and others are excluded, but it seems to be a recurring theme.

This thread is for Aussie.

I support him as a global moderator. Perceptions and Muso have both gone - at least let there be a little balance here to counteract Andrei's right wing stance.

I support Aussie as well..and your so right about the segregation...disgusting..

Hey.....as Aussie..............I can now access my own Forum.  I'll do the quick wardrobe change to see if I can access as Mod.

Aussie wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 7:57pm:

Hey.....as Aussie..............I can now access my own Forum.  I'll do the quick wardrobe change to see if I can access as Mod.

Oh....now I can access my own Board.  That's nice.  I wonder why I was cut off?  Let's see if I can access Feedback where there is an important Board decision being discussed.

Or, am I still gagged there.

Let's see.

No.  Shut out.  I mean ~ really, FD.  Let's be fair here, and not absurd.  I am clearly a candidate, and you have prevented me from responding to the very Thread you opened and asked people to respond in......except me, and others who may or may not support my candidacy.

I guess he wants to cut back on the spam.

You are clearly not a candidate.
Never were.
Never will be.

You can't be trusted with global mod buttons.

I nominate iqsrlow

hazy123 wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 8:14pm:

I nominate iqsrlow

What the heck. OK.   ;D

Aussie wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 8:06pm:

No.  Shut out.  I mean ~ really, FD.  Let's be fair here, and not absurd.  I am clearly a candidate, and you have prevented me from responding to the very Thread you opened and asked people to respond in......except me, and others who may or may not support my candidacy.

Dear Aussie - as a retired lawyer you would make an ideal moderator -
you are trained in: equity, fairness & natural justice.

Bobby. wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 8:24pm:

Aussie wrote on May 27th, 2014 at 8:06pm: No.  Shut out.  I mean ~ really, FD.  Let's be fair here, and not absurd.  I am clearly a candidate, and you have prevented me from responding to the very Thread you opened and asked people to respond in......except me, and others who may or may not support my candidacy. Dear Aussie - as a retired lawyer you would make an ideal moderator - you are trained in: equity, fairness & natural justice.

Its a shame diversity is missing from that list  ;D

Bobby. wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 8:24pm:

Aussie wrote on May 27th, 2014 at 8:06pm: No.  Shut out.  I mean ~ really, FD.  Let's be fair here, and not absurd.  I am clearly a candidate, and you have prevented me from responding to the very Thread you opened and asked people to respond in......except me, and others who may or may not support my candidacy. Dear Aussie - as a retired lawyer you would make an ideal moderator - you are trained in: equity, fairness & natural justice.

Thanks, Sir Bobby.  Could you post that over at the Thread in Feedback?

Don't you think that being banned from feedback in both of your usernames is more than enough evidence that you are not a candidate, despite what the uninformed masses of the leftardian empty head brigade?

Freediver already knows how good a moderator you are, hence why you are not a candidate.

Aussie wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 8:27pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 27th, 2014 at 8:24pm: Aussie wrote on May 27th, 2014 at 8:06pm: No.  Shut out.  I mean ~ really, FD.  Let's be fair here, and not absurd.  I am clearly a candidate, and you have prevented me from responding to the very Thread you opened and asked people to respond in......except me, and others who may or may not support my candidacy. Dear Aussie - as a retired lawyer you would make an ideal moderator - you are trained in: equity, fairness & natural justice. Thanks, Sir Bobby.  Could you post that over at the Thread in Feedback?

done - you are welcome.

Do you do swan dives as well with pike ?  ;D

IQSRLOW wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 8:31pm:

Don't you think that being banned from feedback in both of your usernames is more than enough evidence that you are not a candidate, despite what the uninformed masses of the leftardian empty head brigade? Freediver already knows how good a moderator you are, hence why you are not a candidate.

It's certainly not a good look is it.

Do posters know that Freediver had to forcefully remove you as moderator not once, but twice because you failed so miserably at it, drove posters away and had the forum down to its lowest level of activity ever recorded?

They should be aware of this.

IQSRLOW wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 8:36pm:

Do posters know that Freediver had to forcefully remove you as moderator not once, but twice because you failed so miserably at it, drove posters away and had the forum down to its lowest level of activity ever recorded? They should be aware of this.

I also banned you.  Someone let you back in.........and we can all see what PA has become.  I am no fan of FD, and I have made that quite plain.  But I don't need to lick his stamps or he mine.

He has a set of Rules here.....easy to follow.  A Moderator simply enforces them.  It begins and ends there.  Easy.

IQSRLOW  is forgiven

namaste

;D ;D ;D

2 threads about it.

I nominate IQ on this one!!!

IQSRLOW for MOD.

(and THAT his how much i do not give a bugger who is MOD ;))

;D ;D ;D

IQSRLOW For the win.

I accept the nomination.

After all, I have as much claim to candidacy as Aussie does but at least I haven't been removed from a moderating position twice by the forum owner. I'd say that makes my claim even greater than his.

IQSRLOW wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 8:55pm:

I accept the nomination. After all, I have as much claim to candidacy as Aussie does but at least I haven't been removed from a moderating position twice by the forum owner. I'd say that makes my claim even greater than his.

That's true............after people were duped by the likes of you and AiA.  The outcome is there for all to see.  A moribund Forum in need of help.

The forum is still far more active that it was under your administration. That will always be the case as you took it to its lowest level. Shutting it down would have been the only way you could have taken it any lower.

IQSRLOW wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 8:55pm:

I accept the nomination. After all, I have as much claim to candidacy as Aussie does but at least I haven't been removed from a moderating position twice by the forum owner. I'd say that makes my claim even greater than his.

Twice by the forum owner  :o

WOW

The choice of Moderator isn't a general election.

People can put forward names and they would be considered.

But the choice isn't picked by toting up the number of posts of people saying "I support xxx", rather its based on who (from the list put forward or additionals - and that the person wants to do it) - is then deemed best able to carry out the role.

They need not have opinions on the Right, Left Centre or not at all on politics.

The role of Moderator and that of a username giving their views are completely divorced from each other.

That was after he turned the last remaining few posters who were still on the forum against him. Most others simply left, never to return. Freediver had to step in because even after he was voted out of the position, he refused to vacate the premises and squatted. Freediver had to forcefully remove the keys from him. Aussie has had a scorched earth policy ever since, hence the reason why he always tries to run the forum down because he is no longer wanted there.

IQSRLOW wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 9:16pm:

That was after he turned the last remaining few posters who were still on the forum against him. Most others simply left, never to return. Freediver had to step in because even after he was voted out of the position, he refused to vacate the premises and squatted. Freediver had to forcefully remove the keys from him. Aussie has had a scorched earth policy ever since, hence the reason why he always tries to run the forum down because he is no longer wanted there.

leave Aussie alone - you hate mongerer - troll.


forgiven

namaste

IQSRLOW wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 9:16pm:

That was after he turned the last remaining few posters who were still on the forum against him. Most others simply left, never to return. Freediver had to step in because even after he was voted out of the position, he refused to vacate the premises and squatted. Freediver had to forcefully remove the keys from him. Aussie has had a scorched earth policy ever since, hence the reason why he always tries to run the forum down because he is no longer wanted there.

Ouch, he obviously hasn't learnt from public humiliation that he is no good as a moderator. That explains why FD is interested in other candidates. Its a shame the other forum suffered so much. I find it funny he would be in Freedivers face vying for a moderator role after that humiliation. That would explain why he sits on that other polanimal clone forum with A.G. and mantra seething all day and night.

Bobby. wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 9:20pm:

IQSRLOW wrote on May 27th, 2014 at 9:16pm: That was after he turned the last remaining few posters who were still on the forum against him. Most others simply left, never to return. Freediver had to step in because even after he was voted out of the position, he refused to vacate the premises and squatted. Freediver had to forcefully remove the keys from him. Aussie has had a scorched earth policy ever since, hence the reason why he always tries to run the forum down because he is no longer wanted there. leave Aussie alone - you hate mongerer - troll. forgiven namaste

I'm sure Aussie appreciates the skirt you are offering him to hide behind, booby.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 9:12pm:

The choice of Moderator isn't a general election. People can put forward names and they would be considered. But the choice isn't picked by toting up the number of posts of people saying "I support xxx", rather its based on who (from the list put forward or additionals - and that the person wants to do it) - is then deemed best able to carry out the role. They need not have opinions on the Right, Left Centre or not at all on politics. The role of Moderator and that of a username giving their views are completely divorced from each other.

True to some extent*.  But why am I precluded from campaigning in the very Thread FD commenced for exactly that purpose.  Did you do that Andrea?

*So you reckon Member views are unimportant?  That cannot be true otherwise FD would never have opened that Thread.  Why bother asking if you are going to ignore the answers?

Nah, Mr Hicks.  Nasty.

Anyway, I am clearly a candidate with significant support.  What can I say other than I appreciate that support a great deal.  I do not take it for granted, Mr Hicks.  I am humbled by it.

Bobby. wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 9:20pm:

IQSRLOW wrote on May 27th, 2014 at 9:16pm: That was after he turned the last remaining few posters who were still on the forum against him. Most others simply left, never to return. Freediver had to step in because even after he was voted out of the position, he refused to vacate the premises and squatted. Freediver had to forcefully remove the keys from him. Aussie has had a scorched earth policy ever since, hence the reason why he always tries to run the forum down because he is no longer wanted there. leave Aussie alone - you hate mongerer - troll. forgiven namaste

Not much light there getting upset at the truth.

forgiven

toothpaste

Aussie wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 9:27pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 27th, 2014 at 9:12pm: The choice of Moderator isn't a general election. People can put forward names and they would be considered. But the choice isn't picked by toting up the number of posts of people saying "I support xxx", rather its based on who (from the list put forward or additionals - and that the person wants to do it) - is then deemed best able to carry out the role. They need not have opinions on the Right, Left Centre or not at all on politics. The role of Moderator and that of a username giving their views are completely divorced from each other. True to some extent*.  But why am I precluded from campaigning in the very Thread FD commenced for exactly that purpose.  Did you do that Andrea? *So you reckon Member views are unimportant?  That cannot be true otherwise FD would never have opened that Thread.  Why bother asking if you are going to ignore the answers? Nah, Mr Hicks.  Nasty. Anyway, I am clearly a candidate with significant support.  What can I say other than I appreciate that support a great deal.  I do not take it for granted, Mr Hicks.  I am humbled by it.

Dear Aussie,
you do have a lot of support but this forum is not a democracy -

FD has already decided that you are not the moderator he wants
& as the boss he makes the decision.
You have to respect that.

namaste

Bobby. wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 10:01pm:

Dear Aussie, you do have a lot of support but this forum is not a democracy - FD has already decided that you are not the moderator he wants & as the boss he makes the decision. You have to respect that. namaste

Probably because he never did what he was told on FD's other forum and FD booted him twice. You can't have rogue staff manning your forums for you as mods. No matter how many people they convince to make a post batting for them, minority, sock or not .

You have a new mod at PA  ;)

Aussie has training in these matters to be fair & impartial.

He is offering his normal service fee of $300 an hour for nothing.
I would say that's a good deal.

FD is forgiven

namaste

This whole thing is rigged, it's as plain as the nose on your face..makes me sick. This should be about who the community wants..nothing else.

They need forgiving.

The Mole wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 11:51pm:

You have a new mod at PA  ;)

I don't post at PA you muppet.  ;D

Bobby. wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 11:56pm:

Aussie has training in these matters to be fair & impartial. He is offering his normal service fee of $300 an hour for nothing. I would say that's a good deal. FD is forgiven namaste

FD is Smart

toothpaste

Mattywisk wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 10:25pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 27th, 2014 at 10:01pm: Dear Aussie, you do have a lot of support but this forum is not a democracy - FD has already decided that you are not the moderator he wants & as the boss he makes the decision. You have to respect that. namaste Probably because he never did what he was told on FD's other forum and FD booted him twice. You can't have rogue staff manning your forums for you as mods. No matter how many people they convince to make a post batting for them, minority, sock or not .

Wrong.  FD would not do what the duly elected Admin asked him to do.  And....you can see the result at PA right now.  I am hoping that I will be allowed to contribute as a G-Mod here to ensure that OzPol does not end up in the same place. 

Mattywisk wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 12:06am:

The Mole wrote on May 27th, 2014 at 11:51pm: You have a new mod at PA  ;) I don't post at PA you muppet.  ;D

Did I mention your name Matty, I believe I did not... ?

The Mole wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 12:08am:

Mattywisk wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 12:06am: The Mole wrote on May 27th, 2014 at 11:51pm: You have a new mod at PA  ;) I don't post at PA you muppet.  ;D Did I mention your name Matty, I believe I did not... ?

Be more specific when you post after people then DUH....

.

Aussie wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 12:08am:

Mattywisk wrote on May 27th, 2014 at 10:25pm: Bobby. wrote on May 27th, 2014 at 10:01pm: Dear Aussie, you do have a lot of support but this forum is not a democracy - FD has already decided that you are not the moderator he wants & as the boss he makes the decision. You have to respect that. namaste Probably because he never did what he was told on FD's other forum and FD booted him twice. You can't have rogue staff manning your forums for you as mods. No matter how many people they convince to make a post batting for them, minority, sock or not . Wrong.  FD would not do what the duly elected Admin asked him to do.  And....you can see the result at PA right now.  I am hoping that I will be allowed to contribute as a G-Mod here to ensure that OzPol does not end up in the same place.

So this never happened then ?

"Freediver had to step in because even after he was voted out of the position, he refused to vacate the premises and squatted. Freediver had to forcefully remove the keys from him."

You have a lot of curiosity for a board you say you never go to.

The Mole wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 12:36am:

You have a lot of curiosity for a board you say you never go to.

Oh the irony  ::)

The Mole wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 12:36am:

You have a lot of curiosity for a board you say you never go to.

I never said I never go there I said I never posted there muppet.
You were the one that peaked my curiosity with all the sooking that I was supposed to be from there with your muppet mantra, do get it right  old dear.

You seem to have a lot of hang ups about that forum yourself. Does it scare you ?
Or did diddums get banned.  ;D

This is of course if your post was addressing me like your other one was  ;D

If Aussies performance and behaviour on PA as a mod tonight is of any reference, then people will be very interested in what he did as a bit of an eye opener as to what he would be like as a g-mod here.

Do you want to tell them about your behaviour? Should I post all your posts from this evening?  :D

I'm sure everyone would enjoy seeing what you are like as soon as you get a little bit of responsibility.  ;D ;D

Lol did you guys pop training wheels on him ?  ;D

I'm not sure if posters here would like posts like this from Aussie if he was a mod.

He gets very threatening and throws his weight around. He will do this here as well.

Quote from Aussie on PA after getting the mod buttons.

Quote:

One more post along those lines and you'll join QION. Post in Politics or shut up. The deal is done. If you don't like it, I don't care.

Why not give Aussie a chance?  I mean, why not? I did.

AiA wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 1:18am:

Why not give Aussie a chance?  I mean, why not? I did.

;D ;D ;D

AiA wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 1:18am:

Why not give Aussie a chance?  I mean, why not? I did.

He did prove conclusively, his suitability for the role tonight, didnt he, wot?  :D

Aussie wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 12:08am:

Mattywisk wrote on May 27th, 2014 at 10:25pm: Bobby. wrote on May 27th, 2014 at 10:01pm: Dear Aussie, you do have a lot of support but this forum is not a democracy - FD has already decided that you are not the moderator he wants & as the boss he makes the decision. You have to respect that. namaste Probably because he never did what he was told on FD's other forum and FD booted him twice. You can't have rogue staff manning your forums for you as mods. No matter how many people they convince to make a post batting for them, minority, sock or not . Wrong.  FD would not do what the duly elected Admin asked him to do.  And....you can see the result at PA right now.  I am hoping that I will be allowed to contribute as a G-Mod here to ensure that OzPol does not end up in the same place.

Dear Aussie - they are arrogant towards authority:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgghWr3oICI

Aussie lasted about half an hour as Mod over at PolAnimal before he flounced out.  Most amusing. ;D ;D

Keep trying - there's at least 3 active members left who might be interested in the job.

sarcasm is the lowest form of wit  :P

mantra wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 7:27am:

Keep trying - there's at least 3 active members left who might be interested in the job.

Mmmmm mmmmm taste that bitterness.  :D

Bobby. wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 7:24am:

Aussie wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 12:08am: Mattywisk wrote on May 27th, 2014 at 10:25pm: Bobby. wrote on May 27th, 2014 at 10:01pm: Dear Aussie, you do have a lot of support but this forum is not a democracy - FD has already decided that you are not the moderator he wants & as the boss he makes the decision. You have to respect that. namaste Probably because he never did what he was told on FD's other forum and FD booted him twice. You can't have rogue staff manning your forums for you as mods. No matter how many people they convince to make a post batting for them, minority, sock or not . Wrong.  FD would not do what the duly elected Admin asked him to do.  And....you can see the result at PA right now.  I am hoping that I will be allowed to contribute as a G-Mod here to ensure that OzPol does not end up in the same place.  Dear Aussie - they are arrogant towards authority:

I fail to see what that has to do with Aussie he isn't in Authority.

forgiven

toothpaste

mantra wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 7:27am:

Keep trying - there's at least 3 active members left who might be interested in the job.

Over at the Polanimal clone where you 3 post whining over posters on other forums ?  :D

Wow, I am really amazed at some of the names popping up in this thread to support Aussie.

Especially the input from the three stooges.

I really didn't see that coming. Good to see some people can rise above their hate filled existences and give support where it is appropriate.

Mattywisk wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 3:20pm:

Over at the Polanimal clone where you 3 post whining over posters on other forums ?

You're absolutely fascinated with George's forum and its female inhabitants aren't you Lucas. Pity you come across as so repugnant to females. Mellie ran for her life when she encountered you, then the same happened to Lisa and now you're trying to get A.G. and me to notice you.

Well you've been noticed. You might attract more females in a positive way if you actually lost some weight and got your blood pressure down - and that means stepping away from the computer and getting some exercise.

You could kill two birds with one stone.

mantra wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 4:24pm:

Mattywisk wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 3:20pm: Over at the Polanimal clone where you 3 post whining over posters on other forums ? You're absolutely fascinated with George's forum and its female inhabitants aren't you Lucas. Pity you're so repugnant to females. Mellie ran for her life when she encountered you, then the same happened to Lisa and now you're trying to get A.G. and me to notice you. Well you've been noticed. You might attract more females if you actually lost some weight and got your blood pressure down - and that means stepping away from the computer and getting some exercise. You could kill two birds with one stone.

;) :D  ;D

Aussie wrote on May 27^th, 2014 at 9:27pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 27th, 2014 at 9:12pm: The choice of Moderator isn't a general election. People can put forward names and they would be considered. But the choice isn't picked by toting up the number of posts of people saying "I support xxx", rather its based on who (from the list put forward or additionals - and that the person wants to do it) - is then deemed best able to carry out the role. They need not have opinions on the Right, Left Centre or not at all on politics. The role of Moderator and that of a username giving their views are completely divorced from each other. True to some extent*.  But why am I precluded from campaigning in the very Thread FD commenced for exactly that purpose.  Did you do that Andrea? *So you reckon Member views are unimportant?  That cannot be true otherwise FD would never have opened that Thread.  Why bother asking if you are going to ignore the answers? Nah, Mr Hicks.  Nasty. Anyway, I am clearly a candidate with significant support.  What can I say other than I appreciate that support a great deal.  I do not take it for granted, Mr Hicks.  I am humbled by it.

Support by the workers, is not the same as support from Management, which you obviously do NOT have. Your reputation goes before you and you wouldn't know humility if it hit you in the face! Talk about an opinionated prick!

Everyone's reputation precedes them Neferti including your's ! Why say it like its a bad thing anyway, because in Aussie's case it's obviously not, you can't have that much support and be a bastard.  ::)

Aussie is a good bloke and its generally recognised that he is.

The Mole wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 5:07pm:

Everyone's reputation precedes them Neferti including your's ! Why say it like its a bad thing anyway, because in Aussie's case it's obviously not, you can't have that much support and be a bastard.  ::)

Some have fallen into a bad small group of nasty and vindictive people who are so tired of talking within that small group of what, say four max, they need to vent their silly stuff here where there is a larger audience, most of whom just ignore them, and their hate.

.

Aussie:

Quote:

Some have fallen into a bad small group of nasty and vindictive people who are so tired of talking within that small group of what, say four max, they need to vent their silly stuff here where there is a larger audience, most of whom just ignore them, and their hate.

Neferti:



Quote:

Support by the workers, is not the same as support from Management, which you obviously do NOT have. Your reputation goes before you and you wouldn't know humility if it hit you in the face! Talk about an opinionated prick!

You mean hate filled like this ?  ;D

Neferti wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 5:31pm:

The Mole wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 5:07pm: Everyone's reputation precedes them Neferti including your's ! Why say it like its a bad thing anyway, because in Aussie's case it's obviously not, you can't have that much support and be a bastard.  ::) Aussie is a good bloke and its generally recognised that he is. AG, I have never spoken to you, mantra, aussie, monk, etcetera via PM so you have no idea who I am. LIES to discredit me on a Forum are just that ..... LIES. Some people make up these lies to make themselves feel in charge or something.  God knows why. It is DISHONEST. Aussie might be a "good bloke" when he gets his own way but he is a rude bastard otherwise.  I wouldn't trust him as far as I could kick him. I would trust IQ before Aussie (or Monk, Annie, Mantra, yourself and several others).  Sorry.  ;)

So why do you persist in posting nasty lies about everyone else ?

Don't you have a love forum to be posting on somewhere. ?   ;)

Aussie wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 5:12pm:

The Mole wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 5:07pm: Everyone's reputation precedes them Neferti including your's ! Why say it like its a bad thing anyway, because in Aussie's case it's obviously not, you can't have that much support and be a bastard.  ::) Some have fallen into a bad small group of nasty and vindictive people who are so tired of talking within that small group of what, say four max, they need to vent their silly stuff here where there is a larger audience, most of whom just ignore them, and their hate.

Did the indian bride take over your keyboard?
;D

Bobby. wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 7:24am:

Aussie wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 12:08am: Mattywisk wrote on May 27th, 2014 at 10:25pm: Bobby. wrote on May 27th, 2014 at 10:01pm: Dear Aussie, you do have a lot of support but this forum is not a democracy - FD has already decided that you are not the moderator he wants & as the boss he makes the decision. You have to respect that. namaste Probably because he never did what he was told on FD's other forum and FD booted him twice. You can't have rogue staff manning your forums for you as mods. No matter how many people they convince to make a post batting for them, minority, sock or not . Wrong.  FD would not do what the duly elected Admin asked him to do.  And....you can see the result at PA right now.  I am hoping that I will be allowed to contribute as a G-Mod here to ensure that OzPol does not end up in the same place.  Dear Aussie - they are arrogant towards authority: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgghWr3oICI

Dear Aussie -

they are bogans - jealous of your qualifications.

forgive them

namaste

Bobby you are so right...they are forgiven.

Im sure a quick review of your post over on Monks twitterblog  before you hid them all will show where the hate lies. Your foul bitterness has been rippling just under the surface like a fermenting boil ready to explode.

Quote:

Aussie is a good bloke and its generally recognised that he is.

I agree with you. Aussie is a good bloke.

Equally, I agree that he would not make a good mod. He is inclined towards being easily manipulated by those who are not so kind as he. Aussie cares too much about being seen to be fair instead of using a more objective measure... hence his being so easily manipulated by less fair minded forumites. He has a habit of doing the wrong thing for the right reasons which tends to put others off side. Aussie takes things personally when the wrong thing is done by him and so will hold a grudge impacting his decision making abilities. He promises to 'follow the letter of the law' without regard for his capacity for discretionary authority to be applied where it is that absurd outcomes would result. He can never please all of the people all of the time, but he would try leaving him the target of attacks. He has a preference to support the perceived underdog, even if the underdog is making an ass of himself.

So yes, AG, Aussie is a good man... too good for the role of mod. Too soft by halves.

Let the role go to a strong willed mind who will seek to satisfy the overarching forum harmony for the greater good of the greatest number. Let Utility dictate the actions of the mod and not  categorical imperatives.

And FFS... Let Freediver decide who should mod his forum instead of engaging in this piss weak fence sitting behavior of his.   

Neferti wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 5:38pm:

Aussie wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 5:12pm: The Mole wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 5:07pm: Everyone's reputation precedes them Neferti including your's ! Why say it like its a bad thing anyway, because in Aussie's case it's obviously not, you can't have that much support and be a bastard.  ::) Some have fallen into a bad small group of nasty and vindictive people who are so tired of talking within that small group of what, say four max, they need to vent their silly stuff here where there is a larger audience, most of whom just ignore them, and their hate. Did the indian bride take over your keyboard? ;D

You have no right to comment on Aussie and his family, but then you come from the bowels of bottom's past over there don't you..so you don't know any better..
Btw Aussie is married, no good in coming after him ! Monk rejected you and now Aussie. :P

Just stop...it's getting weird.

mantra wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 4:24pm:

Mattywisk wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 3:20pm: Over at the Polanimal clone where you 3 post whining over posters on other forums ? You're absolutely fascinated with George's forum and its female inhabitants aren't you Lucas. Pity you come across as so repugnant to females. Mellie ran for her life when she encountered you, then the same happened to Lisa and now you're trying to get A.G. and me to notice you. Well you've been noticed. You might attract more females in a positive way if you actually lost some weight and got your blood pressure down - and that means stepping away from the computer and getting some exercise. You could kill two birds with one stone.

Nah I'm not fascinated at trolls at all. What fascinates me is the whinging you A.G. and Aussie do elsewhere about posters who disagree with you elsewhere. All you do is make shyte up about them your life must be one big bore. Here you are again making useless stories up in the hope that someone believes you. I have never encountered  mellie nor lisa. Snap looney tunes right there. If you think I have the hots for some old troll like you you have rocks in your head. Sorry love not interested, move on with your life.

I'd say more to the point you need to take a step back and see a psychiatrist you are clearly delusional. I have only posted what I have seen. You make shyte up. I couldn't care less if you notice me or not. In fact I prefer not. As for A.G. she seems to have more spine than you will ever have.

Now be a good nanna and go write another fictional novel about me again.  :D

The Mole wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 5:46pm:

Neferti wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 5:38pm: Aussie wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 5:12pm: The Mole wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 5:07pm: Everyone's reputation precedes them Neferti including your's ! Why say it like its a bad thing anyway, because in Aussie's case it's obviously not, you can't have that much support and be a bastard.  ::) Some have fallen into a bad small group of nasty and vindictive people who are so tired of talking within that small group of what, say four max, they need to vent their silly stuff here where there is a larger audience, most of whom just ignore them, and their hate. Did the indian bride take over your keyboard? ;D You have no right to comment on Aussie and his family, but then you come from the bowels of bottom's past over there don't you..so you don't know any better.. Btw Aussie is married, no good in coming after him ! Monk rejected you and now Aussie. :P Just stop...it's getting weird.

;D

The Mole wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 4:25pm:

mantra wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 4:24pm: Mattywisk wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 3:20pm: Over at the Polanimal clone where you 3 post whining over posters on other forums ? You're absolutely fascinated with George's forum and its female inhabitants aren't you Lucas. Pity you're so repugnant to females. Mellie ran for her life when she encountered you, then the same happened to Lisa and now you're trying to get A.G. and me to notice you. Well you've been noticed. You might attract more females if you actually lost some weight and got your blood pressure down - and that means stepping away from the computer and getting some exercise. You could kill two birds with one stone. ;) :D  ;D

I did that too, I think she likes me.  :o

Aussie wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 5:12pm:

The Mole wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 5:07pm: Everyone's reputation precedes them Neferti including your's ! Why say it like its a bad thing anyway, because in Aussie's case it's obviously not, you can't have that much support and be a bastard.  ::) Some have fallen into a bad small group of nasty and vindictive people who are so tired of talking within that small group of what, say four max, they need to vent their silly stuff here where there is a larger audience, most of whom just ignore them, and their hate.

Like you and mantra on the Polanimal Clone forum  ;D

Maybe you PA escapees need to take it back a notch.

Matty Wisks sloppy farted:


Quote:

Nah I'm not fascinated at trolls at all. What fascinates me is the whinging you A.G. and Aussie do elsewhere about posters who disagree with you elsewhere.

Do you ever shut up?

Bobby. wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 5:39pm:

Dear Aussie - they are bogans - jealous of your qualifications. forgive them namaste

I am a Doctor, and have been a Judge and a Police Officer and Police Commissioner and Scientist. After all I posted it here. Thank you for understanding my qualifications in advance bobby.

forgiven

toothpaste

The Mole wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 6:14pm:

Matty Wisks sloppy farted: Quote: Nah I'm not fascinated at trolls at all. What fascinates me is the whinging you A.G. and Aussie do elsewhere about posters who disagree with you elsewhere. Do you ever shut up?

Do you ?

Mattywisk wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 6:15pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 5:39pm: Dear Aussie - they are bogans - jealous of your qualifications. forgive them namaste I am a Doctor, and have been a Judge and a Police Officer and Police Commissioner and Scientist. After all I posted it here. Thank you for understanding my qualifications in advance bobby. forgiven toothpaste

Not only as thick as a plank , but lame too. ::)

Sappho wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 5:45pm:

Quote: Aussie is a good bloke and its generally recognised that he is. I agree with you. Aussie is a good bloke. Equally, I agree that he would not make a good mod. He is inclined towards being easily manipulated by those who are not so kind as he. Aussie cares too much about being seen to be fair instead of using a more objective measure... hence his being so easily manipulated by less fair minded forumites. He has a habit of doing the wrong thing for the right reasons which tends to put others off side. Aussie takes things personally when the wrong thing is done by him and so will hold a grudge impacting his decision making abilities. He promises to 'follow the letter of the law' without regard for his capacity for discretionary authority to be applied where it is that absurd outcomes would result. He can never please all of the people all of the time, but he would try leaving him the target of attacks. He has a preference to support the perceived underdog, even if the underdog is making an ass of himself. So yes, AG, Aussie is a good man... too good for the role of mod. Too soft by halves. Let the role go to a strong willed mind who will seek to satisfy the overarching forum harmony for the greater good of the greatest number. Let Utility dictate the actions of the mod and not  categorical imperatives. And for goodness sake... Let Freediver decide who should mod his forum instead of engaging in this piss weak fence sitting behavior of his.

I am perfectly capable of discretion (33 years of exactly that) and just as capable of seeing a Rule breach and acting appropriately.  Please leave your arm-chair amateur diagnosis of someone you do not know, out of this.

Mattywisk wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 6:15pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 5:39pm: Dear Aussie - they are bogans - jealous of your qualifications. forgive them namaste I am a Doctor, and have been a Judge and a Police Officer and Police Commissioner and Scientist. After all I posted it here. Thank you for understanding my qualifications in advance bobby. forgiven toothpaste

Such arrogance

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgghWr3oICI


forgiven

namaste

Mattywisk wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 6:16pm:

The Mole wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 6:14pm: Matty Wisks sloppy farted: Quote: Nah I'm not fascinated at trolls at all. What fascinates me is the whinging you A.G. and Aussie do elsewhere about posters who disagree with you elsewhere. Do you ever shut up? Do you ?

Mr Wisk.  Cease, please.

Bobby. wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 6:17pm:

Such arrogance forgiven namaste

I agree you are forgiven for it

toothpaste

Aussie wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 6:18pm:

Mr Wisk.  Cease, please.

Oh so people can now post to me and I am not allowed to respond.

Is that fair moderation ?

.

Mattywisk wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 6:20pm:

Is that fair moderation ?

There is no such thing as fair moderation. Go find another forum if you don't like it.

You have badmouthed Aussie non stop over the last couple of days - be grateful he even gives you a voice here.

mantra wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 6:34pm:

Mattywisk wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 6:20pm: Is that fair moderation ? There is no such thing as fair moderation. Go find another forum if you don't like it. You have badmouthed Aussie non stop over the last couple of days - be grateful he even gives you a voice here.

After you,  aussie and A.G.  Bad mouthed me you sour old nanna.

Be grateful mods here don't BAN you for your lies you spin about people.

Go spin your BS somewhere else and leave me alone.

If you don't like it you go back to the troll forum you came from where you abuse posters that disagree with you here.

I think we are all quite aware of the views of Aussie and those who support him.

Mattywisk wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 7:52pm:

mantra wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 6:34pm: Mattywisk wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 6:20pm: Is that fair moderation ? There is no such thing as fair moderation. Go find another forum if you don't like it. You have badmouthed Aussie non stop over the last couple of days - be grateful he even gives you a voice here. After you,  aussie and A.G.  Bad mouthed me you sour old nanna. Be grateful mods here don't BAN you for your lies you spin about people. Go spin your BS somewhere else and leave me alone. If you don't like it you go back to the troll forum you came from where you abuse posters that disagree with you here.

Mr Wisk......last warning.  Cease.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 7:55pm:

I think we are all quite aware of the views of Aussie and those who support him.

Really Mr. Hicks!  Perhaps you'd care to enlighten us all.  That'll be fun to watch.  Come on Good Sir, you opened your mouth.  Let's hear the words.

Aussie wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 7:57pm:

Mattywisk wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 7:52pm: mantra wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 6:34pm: Mattywisk wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 6:20pm: Is that fair moderation ? There is no such thing as fair moderation. Go find another forum if you don't like it. You have badmouthed Aussie non stop over the last couple of days - be grateful he even gives you a voice here. After you,  aussie and A.G.  Bad mouthed me you sour old nanna. Be grateful mods here don't BAN you for your lies you spin about people. Go spin your BS somewhere else and leave me alone. If you don't like it you go back to the troll forum you came from where you abuse posters that disagree with you here. Mr Wisk......last warning.  Cease.

Warning about what may I ask ?

Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 7:55pm:

I think we are all quite aware of the views of Aussie and those who support him.

I'm not and I don't care.

See that clip "Your feelings and why they don't matter."

Gee, you make it hard.  Just cease the warfare.  Please abide by that very simple request.

Sprintcyclist wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 8:07pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 7:55pm: I think we are all quite aware of the views of Aussie and those who support him. I'm not and I don't care. See that clip "Your feelings and why they don't matter."

here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7RTd-4RVL8

Aussie wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 8:08pm:

Gee, you make it hard.  Just cease the warfare.  Please abide by that very simple request.

It's not hard it is really simple. If you post warnings to people on a forum, tell them what you are warning them about and your authority to do so and the ramifications if not heeded. I could warn you also but I have no warning for you. 

You interpret it as warefare yet I am only responding to a troll who posts lies about me. Sort mantra out first and I will give you Kudos instead of providing a skirt for her to hide behind.

In the 400 posts Mattywisk has made - 350 have either been a persistent whinge about the global moderators or a reference to A.G. and myself being trolls on some clone forum. Now his new theme is Aussie's credibility as a moderator.

Why is he dragging unrelated forums into almost every one of his posts. He has posted foul links which Perceptions had to delete. He trashed a thread in Feedback and now he's turned to badmouthing Aussie in his own member run forum.

There has been no peace for some of us since Mattywisk joined this board. What is his interest in us? None of us ever posted on Yahoo.

How about you stop following some of us around this board Mattywisk making nasty attacks - then we would have no reason to defend ourselves.

mantra wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 8:30pm:

In the 400 posts Mattywisk has made - 350 have either been a persistent whinge about the global moderators or a reference to A.G. and myself being trolls on some clone forum. Now his new theme is Aussie's credibility as a moderator. Why is he dragging unrelated forums into almost every one of his posts. He has posted foul links which Perceptions had to delete. He trashed a thread in Feedback and now he's turned to badmouthing Aussie in his own member run forum. There has been no peace for some of us since Mattywisk joined this board. What is his interest in us? None of us ever posted on Yahoo. How about you stop following some of us around this board Mattywisk making nasty attacks - then we would have no reason to defend ourselves.

Why don't you complain to FD & have him banned?

Bobby. wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 8:34pm:

Why don't you complain to FD & have him banned?

I won't complain to FD and he would know why. Muso would have banned him. Regardless of some of the accusations made about me reporting members - I've rarely done it. I have collected lists up until recently, but rarely submitted them because someone else usually reports them before I do.

mantra wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 8:30pm:

In the 400 posts Mattywisk has made - 350 have either been a persistent whinge about the global moderators or a reference to A.G. and myself being trolls on some clone forum. Now his new theme is Aussie's credibility as a moderator. Why is he dragging unrelated forums into almost every one of his posts. He has posted foul links which Perceptions had to delete. He trashed the thread and now he's turned to badmouthing Aussie in his own member's forum. There has been no peace for some of us since Mattywisk joined this board. What is his interest in us? None of us ever posted on Yahoo. How about you stop following some of us around this board Mattywisk making nasty attacks - then we would have no reason to defend ourselves.

That would be hilarious if I actually posted on yahoo. Another Lie allowed by Aussie in his forum by the troll mantra.

I started on this forum and watch old mantra here abuse others along with her cronies. I chimed in as I don't like trolls. Next minute she and her besties are posting that I was from a forum called Polanimal , PA for short. Never heard of it but IQ was from there so I asked him for a link to see what the fuss was about. Well mantra continues trolling me banging on forever more that I was this poster Lucas from PA. Clearly the troll has a few screws loose. Lucas posts a thread on there and posts some links to a clone forum of their PA forum ran by some dude that looks like a monkey. I take a look and here is mantra abusing people and posting stuff all about the PA forum. That forum was called pola nimal.com.au . Not to be outdone she quickly hid the thread she was posting all this abuse in. Then cries and sooks to perceptions_now a mod here to ban me for 24 hours. The excuse by this skirt was that there was a swear word that someone posted on the OTHER board  ;D . That was hilarious.

Mantra you are nothing but a troll, sook and liar and no you have no status here recognized by anyone of any substance. Get lost and troll someone else you are a joke. As I have asked you before. Your opinion is laughed at as usual.   ;D

.

Bobby. wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 8:34pm:

mantra wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 8:30pm: In the 400 posts Mattywisk has made - 350 have either been a persistent whinge about the global moderators or a reference to A.G. and myself being trolls on some clone forum. Now his new theme is Aussie's credibility as a moderator. Why is he dragging unrelated forums into almost every one of his posts. He has posted foul links which Perceptions had to delete. He trashed a thread in Feedback and now he's turned to badmouthing Aussie in his own member run forum. There has been no peace for some of us since Mattywisk joined this board. What is his interest in us? None of us ever posted on Yahoo. How about you stop following some of us around this board Mattywisk making nasty attacks - then we would have no reason to defend ourselves. Why don't you complain to FD & have him banned?

Because it's all BS Bobby that's why and FD knows it.

Mattywisk wrote on May 28^th, 2014 at 8:42pm:

mantra wrote on May 28th, 2014 at 8:30pm: In the 400 posts Mattywisk has made - 350 have either been a persistent whinge about the global moderators or a reference to A.G. and myself being trolls on some clone forum. Now his new theme is Aussie's credibility as a moderator. Why is he dragging unrelated forums into almost every one of his posts. He has posted foul links which Perceptions had to delete. He trashed the thread and now he's turned to badmouthing Aussie in his own member's forum. There has been no peace for some of us since Mattywisk joined this board. What is his interest in us? None of us ever posted on Yahoo. How about you stop following some of us around this board Mattywisk making nasty attacks - then we would have no reason to defend ourselves. That would be hilarious if I actually posted on yahoo. Another Lie allowed by Aussie in his forum by the troll mantra. I started on this forum and watch old mantra here abuse others along with her cronies. I chimed in as I don't like trolls. Next minute she and her besties are posting that I was from a forum called Polanimal , PA for short. Never heard of it but IQ was from there so I asked him for a link to see what the fuss was about. Well mantra continues trolling me banging on forever more that I was this poster Lucas from PA. Clearly the troll has a few screws loose. Lucas posts a thread on there and posts some links to a clone forum of their PA forum ran by some dude that looks like a monkey. I take a look and here is mantra abusing people and posting stuff all about the PA forum. That forum was called pola nimal.com.au . Not to be outdone she quickly hid the thread she was posting all this abuse in. Then cries and sooks to perceptions_now a mod here to ban me for 24 hours. The excuse by this skirt was that there was a swear word that someone posted on the OTHER board  ;D . That was hilarious. Mantra you are nothing but a troll, sook and liar and no you have no status here recognized by anyone of any substance. Get lost and troll someone else you are a joke. As I have asked you before. Your opinion is laughed at as usual.   ;D

This is 100% correct and factual.

Mantra is a troll of the worst kind.

Who the fck cares? Get a smacking life and stop acting like 12 year olds for fcks sake.

Enough.

Locked.