htt
p://ww
w.wikiislam.n
et/wiki/uploads/5/54/Pakistani_hypocrisy.jpg

Pakistan has banned content on more than a dozen websites because of "offensive" and "blasphemous" material, while they themselves rank No. 1 for certain sex-related search terms, including "child sex," "rape sex," "animal sex," "camel sex," "donkey sex," "dog sex," and "horse sex"

------

Number 1 for : -

"child sex,"
"rape sex,"
"animal sex,"
"camel sex,"
"donkey sex,"
"dog sex,"
"horse sex"


How ironic they ban more than a dozen because of "offensive" and "blasphemous" material.
Islam mustn't be delivering on the personal front too well it seems. Maybe because it is a false religion,
just a man made cult based on one mans fetish to be a warlord and rape and pillage and have sex with
little girls.

Anybody got the search statistics for the Catholic clergy?   ;D ;D ;D ;D

Ah, the old Pakistani web search story. It’s been almost a year since this one was posted - it must be that time of year again, before all the Moslems banning Christmas stories are sent out.

I wonder which global agency monitors and records rankings for "sex-related search terms". Not Jihadwatch, shurely? We know they’re the experts on all things sinister and Moslem, but "horse sex"?

I blame Mormor. She hasn’t been the same since the old boy cancelled her stool supply. Still, the show must go on, no?

Ours is the superior culture in every ranking. Correlation not causation, innit.

Karnal wrote on Jun 24^th, 2014 at 4:33pm:

Ah, the old Pakistani web search story. It’s been almost a year since this one was posted - it must be that time of year again, before all the Moslems banning Christmas stories are sent out. I wonder which global agency monitors and records rankings for "sex-related search terms". Not Jihadwatch, shurely? We know they’re the experts on all things sinister and Moslem, but "horse sex"? I blame Mormor. She hasn’t been the same since the old boy cancelled her stool supply. Still, the show must go on, no? Ours is the superior culture in every ranking. Correlation not causation, innit.

Very true kernel let true dish lickers of the world unite. Miam Miam, as far as u r concerned no doubt. More stool for U means less for humans. Go skat on it init whatever takes your perverted fancy!

Do you often post in text?  I blame the education system.  Your ignorance is an obvious example of its failure Adamant.   ;D ;D ;D ;D

I wonder what St.Paul's opinion on sex is? 

Christians all.....do you have a self raping child?

Get one of these today, sanctioned by God.



https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfp1/t1.0-9/10421466_306568146171125_4888112676521980816_n.jpg

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jun 28^th, 2014 at 9:41am:

Christians all.....do you have a self raping child? Get one of these today, sanctioned by God. https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfp1/t1.0-9/10421466_306568146171125_4888112676521980816_n.jpg

No sanctioned by idiots like you.

|dev|null wrote on Jun 24^th, 2014 at 5:42pm:

Do you often post in text?  I blame the education system.  Your ignorance is an obvious example of its failure Adamant.   ;D ;D ;D ;D

I take it you don't read the illiterate Kernal at all.

Grand Duke Imam Mahdi wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2014 at 9:51pm:

htt p://ww w.wikiislam.n et/wiki/uploads/5/54/Pakistani_hypocrisy.jpg Pakistan has banned content on more than a dozen websites because of "offensive" and "blasphemous" material, while they themselves rank No. 1 for certain sex-related search terms, including "child sex," "rape sex," "animal sex," "camel sex," "donkey sex," "dog sex," and "horse sex" ------ Number 1 for : - "child sex," "rape sex," "animal sex," "camel sex," "donkey sex," "dog sex," "horse sex" How ironic they ban more than a dozen because of "offensive" and "blasphemous" material. Islam mustn't be delivering on the personal front too well it seems. Maybe because it is a false religion, just a man made cult based on one mans fetish to be a warlord and rape and pillage and have sex with little girls.

Stats now show the average muslim intellect is also lower and attracts other slow or backward people.
I guess there is no surprises when it comes to the sick minded rooting animals.

Yes its interesting that muslim countries are of lesser intelligence than most Western civilizations Mahdi.

If we look at a map of the IQ of the world people will notice that Saudi Arabia ( a very religious State) is on a lower level of intelligence than most other muslim state's, even though they have an abundance of money to throw at education. When you look at Vietnam, a very poor country its IQ is on a par with the West.

Can we deduct from this that all muslim countries are backward and intolerant of others because they are the most racist bigoted & ignorant of all peoples? Should we in the West eradicate Islam for our own good?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:AverageIQ-Map-World.png#mediaviewer/File:IQ_by_Country.png

   

Funny, that map is somewhat different to this map, from the same source:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/92/AverageIQ-Map-World.png

Interesting contrast between the two and in particular on this map between Australia and Saudi Arabia.

Of course, you realise most IQ tests tend to display bias according to whom is giving them...   ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 12^th, 2014 at 7:43pm:

Funny, that map is somewhat different to this map, from the same source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/92/AverageIQ-Map-World.png Interesting contrast between the two and in particular on this map between Australia and Saudi Arabia. Of course, you realise most IQ tests tend to display bias according to whom is giving them...   ::)

Yet the map you used is disputed on Wikipedia  ;D ;D ;D ;D :D

Mattywisk wrote on Jul 12^th, 2014 at 7:45pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 12th, 2014 at 7:43pm: Funny, that map is somewhat different to this map, from the same source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/92/AverageIQ-Map-World.png Interesting contrast between the two and in particular on this map between Australia and Saudi Arabia. Of course, you realise most IQ tests tend to display bias according to whom is giving them...   ::) Yet the map you used is disputed on Wikipedia  ;D ;D ;D ;D :D

Did I claim it was accurate?  I just mentioned it as a contrast to Adamants attempt to portray Muslims as all being of low intelligence...   ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 12^th, 2014 at 7:47pm:

Mattywisk wrote on Jul 12th, 2014 at 7:45pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jul 12th, 2014 at 7:43pm: Funny, that map is somewhat different to this map, from the same source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/92/AverageIQ-Map-World.png Interesting contrast between the two and in particular on this map between Australia and Saudi Arabia. Of course, you realise most IQ tests tend to display bias according to whom is giving them...   ::) Yet the map you used is disputed on Wikipedia  ;D ;D ;D ;D :D Did I claim it was accurate?  I just mentioned it as a contrast to Adamants attempt to portray Muslims as all being of low intelligence...   ::)

I never said you did claim it was. Posting it inferred it was. I was just making it clear. You are in no position to say whether something is an empty claim or not unless you prove otherwise.

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 12^th, 2014 at 7:47pm:

Did I claim it was accurate?  I just mentioned it ...

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Lionel Edriess wrote on Jul 12^th, 2014 at 9:06pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 12th, 2014 at 7:47pm: Did I claim it was accurate?  I just mentioned it ... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

He's not all there is he  ;D

Mattywisk wrote on Jul 12^th, 2014 at 7:53pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 12th, 2014 at 7:47pm: Mattywisk wrote on Jul 12th, 2014 at 7:45pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jul 12th, 2014 at 7:43pm: Funny, that map is somewhat different to this map, from the same source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/92/AverageIQ-Map-World.png Interesting contrast between the two and in particular on this map between Australia and Saudi Arabia. Of course, you realise most IQ tests tend to display bias according to whom is giving them...   ::) Yet the map you used is disputed on Wikipedia  ;D ;D ;D ;D :D Did I claim it was accurate?  I just mentioned it as a contrast to Adamants attempt to portray Muslims as all being of low intelligence...   ::) I never said you did claim it was. Posting it inferred it was. I was just making it clear. You are in no position to say whether something is an empty claim or not unless you prove otherwise.

No, you are missing the second sentence which I posted under my comments WRT the map, Matty.

Prove to me the means of producing the first map was not biased, please.   ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 12^th, 2014 at 9:35pm:

Mattywisk wrote on Jul 12th, 2014 at 7:53pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jul 12th, 2014 at 7:47pm: Mattywisk wrote on Jul 12th, 2014 at 7:45pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jul 12th, 2014 at 7:43pm: Funny, that map is somewhat different to this map, from the same source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/92/AverageIQ-Map-World.png Interesting contrast between the two and in particular on this map between Australia and Saudi Arabia. Of course, you realise most IQ tests tend to display bias according to whom is giving them...   ::) Yet the map you used is disputed on Wikipedia  ;D ;D ;D ;D :D Did I claim it was accurate?  I just mentioned it as a contrast to Adamants attempt to portray Muslims as all being of low intelligence...   ::) I never said you did claim it was. Posting it inferred it was. I was just making it clear. You are in no position to say whether something is an empty claim or not unless you prove otherwise. No, you are missing the second sentence which I posted under my comments WRT the map, Matty. Prove to me the means of producing the first map was not biased, please.   ::)

I saw your second sentence. So ?
Secondly I never posted the first map ask the author I'm not your lap poodle.

Grand Duke Imam Mahdi wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2014 at 9:51pm:

Pakistan has banned content on more than a dozen websites because of "offensive" and "blasphemous" material, while they themselves rank No. 1 for certain sex-related search terms, including "child sex," "rape sex," "animal sex," "camel sex," "donkey sex," "dog sex," and "horse sex" ------ Number 1 for : - "child sex," "rape sex," "animal sex," "camel sex," "donkey sex," "dog sex," "horse sex"

I notice that the only source for that story, Murdoch's Foxnews, has taken down the story - probably because it has no basis in fact at all.

vvvvvv.foxnews.com/world/2010/07/12/data-shows-pakistan-googling-pornographic-material/


The Australian branch of Murdoch news still carries the story however, but you will notice that is quotes a now non-existent Foxnews web article:


vvvvvv.news.com.au/breaking-news/pakistan-no1-in-the-world-in-pornographic-internet-searches/story-e6frfku0-1225891458276


Rupert Murdoch, endarkening the world with his tabloid filth yet again.


What is telling is that Murdoch's own wife preferred a pathetic hated liar to her own husband:

Rupert Murdoch 'shocked' by Wendi Deng's diary entries about former PM

vvvvvv.smh.com.au/business/rupert-murdoch-shocked-by-wendi-dengs-diary-entries-about-former-pm-20140411-36iek.html

That's a nice theory.

Congrats on your 46th post sock BTW  ;D
I wonder who you might be  ;D