Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Thinking Globally >> Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1409194962

Message started by red baron on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:02pm

Title: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:02pm
Not interested in the middle East conflict? You should be, that's your future right there.

We are inextricably linked to the conflicts in the Middle East. As a result of long term migration of Muslims into our Country we now have a burgeoning Muslim population. One only has to look at England to see the catastrophic problems that are a daily occurrence there.

What we now have is ISIS the latest metamorphosis of the latest radical Islam cult to take a tilt at the championship for the most blood thirsty western hating cult to rise in the Middle East.

It's too late to shut the gate as we now have young Muslims, embracing ISIS ideals and as far as they are concerned, we infidels are a team of sh.t.

It's gratifying to see Labor going with the Liberals on this one. If ever we need a united front, to deal with these people who take everything that is good in our Country then betray us by going radical, it is now.

We need to get rid of them and get rid if them quick. I say, allow them to go to these places of their choice but their papers need to be marked - Never To Return - EVER!

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by GA on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:10pm

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:02pm:
Not interested in the middle East conflict? You should be, that's your future right there.

We are inextricably linked to the conflicts in the Middle East. As a result of long term migration of Muslims into our Country we now have a burgeoning Muslim population. One only has to look at England to see the catastrophic problems that are a daily occurrence there.

What we now have is ISIS the latest metamorphosis of the latest radical Islam cult to take a tilt at the championship for the most blood thirsty western hating cult to rise in the Middle East.

It's too late to shut the gate as we now have young Muslims, embracing ISIS ideals and as far as they are concerned, we infidels are a team of sh.t.

It's gratifying to see Labor going with the Liberals on this one. If ever we need a united front, to deal with these people who take everything that is good in our Country then betray us by going radicals, it is now.

We need to get rid of them and get rid if them quick. I say, allow them to go to these places of their choice but their papers need to be marked - Never To Return - EVER!


What a load of over-sensationalized crap. The Muslims are actually less trouble than are the Aussies. And if we had never interfered in their countries they would be no trouble to us at all.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by GA on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:12pm
It's people like you that should be sent packin' orff 'ome.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Hot Breath on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:19pm

GA wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:12pm:
It's people like you that should be sent packin' orff 'ome.


I was born here, I'll vote with GA on this one.  Where you going to send me?  The Pacific Guantanamo Bay, Manus Island?   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by longweekend58 on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:28pm

GA wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:10pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:02pm:
Not interested in the middle East conflict? You should be, that's your future right there.

We are inextricably linked to the conflicts in the Middle East. As a result of long term migration of Muslims into our Country we now have a burgeoning Muslim population. One only has to look at England to see the catastrophic problems that are a daily occurrence there.

What we now have is ISIS the latest metamorphosis of the latest radical Islam cult to take a tilt at the championship for the most blood thirsty western hating cult to rise in the Middle East.

It's too late to shut the gate as we now have young Muslims, embracing ISIS ideals and as far as they are concerned, we infidels are a team of sh.t.

It's gratifying to see Labor going with the Liberals on this one. If ever we need a united front, to deal with these people who take everything that is good in our Country then betray us by going radicals, it is now.

We need to get rid of them and get rid if them quick. I say, allow them to go to these places of their choice but their papers need to be marked - Never To Return - EVER!


What a load of over-sensationalized crap. The Muslims are actually less trouble than are the Aussies. And if we had never interfered in their countries they would be no trouble to us at all.



you are an incredibly stupid person which is why few debate the patent nonsense you come up with such as this.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by GA on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:54pm

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:28pm:

GA wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:10pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:02pm:
Not interested in the middle East conflict? You should be, that's your future right there.

We are inextricably linked to the conflicts in the Middle East. As a result of long term migration of Muslims into our Country we now have a burgeoning Muslim population. One only has to look at England to see the catastrophic problems that are a daily occurrence there.

What we now have is ISIS the latest metamorphosis of the latest radical Islam cult to take a tilt at the championship for the most blood thirsty western hating cult to rise in the Middle East.

It's too late to shut the gate as we now have young Muslims, embracing ISIS ideals and as far as they are concerned, we infidels are a team of sh.t.

It's gratifying to see Labor going with the Liberals on this one. If ever we need a united front, to deal with these people who take everything that is good in our Country then betray us by going radicals, it is now.

We need to get rid of them and get rid if them quick. I say, allow them to go to these places of their choice but their papers need to be marked - Never To Return - EVER!


What a load of over-sensationalized crap. The Muslims are actually less trouble than are the Aussies. And if we had never interfered in their countries they would be no trouble to us at all.



you are an incredibly stupid person which is why few debate the patent nonsense you come up with such as this.


So you're saying the statistics will show that Muslims are more likely to be criminal than Aussies? And we've been interfering in the Mid East for over one hundred years now, time for us to 'pack' off out of there, don't you think!   

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by GA on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:00pm

|dev|null wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:19pm:

GA wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:12pm:
It's people like you that should be sent packin' orff 'ome.


I was born here, I'll vote with GA on this one.  Where you going to send me?  The Pacific Guantanamo Bay, Manus Island?   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D


To an Aussie, muvva England is 'ome. Swagman should pack 'e's swag an 'ead orff there, is wot I'm sayin', matey.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:12pm

GA wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:54pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:28pm:

GA wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:10pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:02pm:
Not interested in the middle East conflict? You should be, that's your future right there.

We are inextricably linked to the conflicts in the Middle East. As a result of long term migration of Muslims into our Country we now have a burgeoning Muslim population. One only has to look at England to see the catastrophic problems that are a daily occurrence there.

What we now have is ISIS the latest metamorphosis of the latest radical Islam cult to take a tilt at the championship for the most blood thirsty western hating cult to rise in the Middle East.

It's too late to shut the gate as we now have young Muslims, embracing ISIS ideals and as far as they are concerned, we infidels are a team of sh.t.

It's gratifying to see Labor going with the Liberals on this one. If ever we need a united front, to deal with these people who take everything that is good in our Country then betray us by going radicals, it is now.

We need to get rid of them and get rid if them quick. I say, allow them to go to these places of their choice but their papers need to be marked - Never To Return - EVER!


What a load of over-sensationalized crap. The Muslims are actually less trouble than are the Aussies. And if we had never interfered in their countries they would be no trouble to us at all.



you are an incredibly stupid person which is why few debate the patent nonsense you come up with such as this.


So you're saying the statistics will show that Muslims are more likely to be criminal than Aussies? And we've been interfering in the Mid East for over one hundred years now, time for us to 'pack' off out of there, don't you think!   


That's a useless comparison ....Muslim is a religion, and Australian is a nationality. What about crimes committed by Muslims whose Grandparents emigrated here, do you classify them as Muslim or Aussie???

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:32pm

GA wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:10pm:
What a load of over-sensationalized crap. The Muslims are actually less trouble than are the Aussies. And if we had never interfered in their countries they would be no trouble to us at all.




Red's worldview is formed by Pickering and 60 Minutes (he's certainly not alone, by the way).

He believes that most terrorist attacks are committed by Muslims, and that most Muslims are terrorists.

Using Red's logic, most sexual assaults are carried out by British entertainers, and most British entertainers are sexual predators.

May I suggest some good reading material:  http://alaindebotton.com/news-users-manual/



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by longweekend58 on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:36pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:12pm:

GA wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:54pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:28pm:

GA wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:10pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:02pm:
Not interested in the middle East conflict? You should be, that's your future right there.

We are inextricably linked to the conflicts in the Middle East. As a result of long term migration of Muslims into our Country we now have a burgeoning Muslim population. One only has to look at England to see the catastrophic problems that are a daily occurrence there.

What we now have is ISIS the latest metamorphosis of the latest radical Islam cult to take a tilt at the championship for the most blood thirsty western hating cult to rise in the Middle East.

It's too late to shut the gate as we now have young Muslims, embracing ISIS ideals and as far as they are concerned, we infidels are a team of sh.t.

It's gratifying to see Labor going with the Liberals on this one. If ever we need a united front, to deal with these people who take everything that is good in our Country then betray us by going radicals, it is now.

We need to get rid of them and get rid if them quick. I say, allow them to go to these places of their choice but their papers need to be marked - Never To Return - EVER!


What a load of over-sensationalized crap. The Muslims are actually less trouble than are the Aussies. And if we had never interfered in their countries they would be no trouble to us at all.



you are an incredibly stupid person which is why few debate the patent nonsense you come up with such as this.


So you're saying the statistics will show that Muslims are more likely to be criminal than Aussies? And we've been interfering in the Mid East for over one hundred years now, time for us to 'pack' off out of there, don't you think!   


That's a useless comparison ....Muslim is a religion, and Australian is a nationality. What about crimes committed by Muslims whose Grandparents emigrated here, do you classify them as Muslim or Aussie???


GA is a true dope. for some reason he hates aussies while still living here. Why don't we take up an collection and pay for his air fare to the Middle East. Anywhere will do.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Greens_Win on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:42pm
Coalition to settle Afghan interpreters


The Coalition Government will settle about 800 Afghan interpreters and their families who had helped Australian forces in Afghanistan, continuing a process started under the previous Labor government.

www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/coalition-to-settle-afghan-interpreters-20131003-2uwz3.html


So who is condemning muslim migration again?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:45pm
Suit yourselves, I blame the Politicians who decades ago started bringing in Muslims by the plane loads.

Did you know that there have already been terrorist plots to blow up buildings etc.? However due to great Intelligence work those plots (thus far) have been thwarted.

There will come the inevitable day, not far off, when terror acts will occur.

Don't start crying like babies then  will you!

Incidentally I have always been against sending our Armed Forces to Iraq and Afghanistan. And yes - we could well reap the wild wind because of it.

The problem with some of you left wing sob sisters, is that you don't like the mirror of 'the condition our conditions is in', being held up in plain sight to you.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Greens_Win on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:49pm
Then lets charge back in ... without yet another exit strategy ... and repeat our mistakes.

Thats what the hard right think ... isn't it?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:57pm
GA it is not 'over sensationalised crap'.

Fact: Over 50 Muslims have left Australia to fight in the Syria/Iraq for ISIS. and are still there.

FACT: An ostensibly 'Aussie' kid proudly held the severed head dear old Dad supplied him, the whole world gagged at that one.

Fact: There are many more who are going over or planning to go over and join the Jihadist fight.

Only today a Muslim was attempting to fly over, he had over 30 grand on him and plenty of Jihadist literature. He was detained by a newly formed unit that will work to weed these would be heros out.

Nothing sensationalist about that lot. That's just plain facts.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:57pm

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:42pm:
Coalition to settle Afghan interpreters


The Coalition Government will settle about 800 Afghan interpreters and their families who had helped Australian forces in Afghanistan, continuing a process started under the previous Labor government.

www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/coalition-to-settle-afghan-interpreters-20131003-2uwz3.html


So who is condemning muslim migration again?


yes, i think thats fair.
they have shown loyalty to aussies and we should repay the courtesy

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:59pm
No Greens-win, many of us right wingers want to stay the hell out of the Middle East. Nothing is going to stop that sh.thole of the world from tearing each others' throats out.

After all, they have been doing it successfully for centuries.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Greens_Win on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:02pm

aquascoot wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:57pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:42pm:
Coalition to settle Afghan interpreters


The Coalition Government will settle about 800 Afghan interpreters and their families who had helped Australian forces in Afghanistan, continuing a process started under the previous Labor government.

www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/coalition-to-settle-afghan-interpreters-20131003-2uwz3.html


So who is condemning muslim migration again?


yes, i think thats fair.
they have shown loyalty to aussies and we should repay the courtesy



So muslim migration is acceptable ... well done for agreeing.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Greens_Win on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:05pm

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:59pm:
No Greens-win, many of us right wingers want to stay the hell out of the Middle East. Nothing is going to stop that sh.thole of the world from tearing each others' throats out.

After all, they have been doing it successfully for centuries.



Then you better start educating your hard right mates about Greens' renewable energy. Sooner we end our addiction to arab oil and middle eastern exports, like live animals, the sooner we can distance ourselves.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:13pm
No...I don't want Muslim Immigration. We are sewing the seeds for something really terrible in this Country.

You don't invite the wolf into the yard.

I am not saying that all Muslims are like this. However, I am saying that many, many of them are. They are flying under the radar and getting strong, just like Hitler's Storm Troopers before little Adolph rose to power.

Sensationalist right? No one thought much about little Adolph and his brown shirted followers, until they stormed to power, whilst the do gooders stood by and tut tutted.



If you are a student of history you can see exactly what is happening here. Soon it will be too late, it most probably already is.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Greens_Win on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:15pm
Pull your head in.

You are now comparing australian muslims to storm troopers.

How ignorant are you.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by life_goes_on on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:23pm
Two percent of the population. Just two percent of the population.

Even if every last one of them - man, woman, child, toddler, baby - fronted up wanting to kick something off, they'd be hopelessly outnumbered.

I just don't find those kind of odds scary.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:27pm
A brief look at our own recent history:
New Terrorist Plot Uncovered


Tuesday, 04 August 2009 07:32   Wendy Larkson 
     
Police RaidNew Terrorist Plot Uncovered.
Raids in Melbourne by AFP and ASIO.

Just when Sydney-siders thought it was safe to close their eyes and go to sleep for a night, pondering the lack of evening gun battles lately, they learn of something worse than drive by shootings.

As they woke to another day’s work the people of Sydney [and Melbourne] learned of a joint operation between their States’ Police forces and the Australian Federal Police, against an imminent terrorist attack in their cities.


Four men - all Australian citizens - were arrested this morning as federal and state police, armed with search warrants, swooped on members of the suspected terror cell this morning in the second-largest counter-terrorism operation in the nation's history…. About 400 police raided homes in the northern Melbourne suburbs of Glenroy, Meadow Heights, Roxburgh Park, Broadmeadows, Westmeadows, Preston and Epping. They also raided homes at Carlton in inner Melbourne and Colac in southwestern Victoria. (source)
 

The intention, apparently, was to attack a Sydney army base:


Authorities believe the group is at an advanced stage of preparing to storm an Australian Army base, using automatic weapons, as punishment for Australia's military involvement in Muslim countries. It is understood the men plan to kill as many soldiers as possible before they are themselves killed. Members of the group have been observed carrying out surveillance of Holsworthy Barracks in western Sydney and other suspicious activity around defence bases in Victoria. Electronic surveillance on the suspects is believed to have picked up discussions about ways to obtain weapons to carry out what would be the worst terror attack on Australian soil.





Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by GA on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:29pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:12pm:

GA wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:54pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:28pm:

GA wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:10pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:02pm:
Not interested in the middle East conflict? You should be, that's your future right there.

We are inextricably linked to the conflicts in the Middle East. As a result of long term migration of Muslims into our Country we now have a burgeoning Muslim population. One only has to look at England to see the catastrophic problems that are a daily occurrence there.

What we now have is ISIS the latest metamorphosis of the latest radical Islam cult to take a tilt at the championship for the most blood thirsty western hating cult to rise in the Middle East.

It's too late to shut the gate as we now have young Muslims, embracing ISIS ideals and as far as they are concerned, we infidels are a team of sh.t.

It's gratifying to see Labor going with the Liberals on this one. If ever we need a united front, to deal with these people who take everything that is good in our Country then betray us by going radicals, it is now.

We need to get rid of them and get rid if them quick. I say, allow them to go to these places of their choice but their papers need to be marked - Never To Return - EVER!


What a load of over-sensationalized crap. The Muslims are actually less trouble than are the Aussies. And if we had never interfered in their countries they would be no trouble to us at all.



you are an incredibly stupid person which is why few debate the patent nonsense you come up with such as this.


So you're saying the statistics will show that Muslims are more likely to be criminal than Aussies? And we've been interfering in the Mid East for over one hundred years now, time for us to 'pack' off out of there, don't you think!   


That's a useless comparison ....Muslim is a religion, and Australian is a nationality. What about crimes committed by Muslims whose Grandparents emigrated here, do you classify them as Muslim or Aussie???


As many as 100,000 Aboriginals may have been slaughtered by 'Aussies', I don't blame Christianity for that. And what about the grandparents, if they've behaved 'worse' it would be because of the influence of their new home. How could it be anything else? They would have had their aussieness brow-beaten into them.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by GA on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:30pm

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:59pm:
No Greens-win, many of us right wingers want to stay the hell out of the Middle East. Nothing is going to stop that sh.thole of the world from tearing each others' throats out.

After all, they have been doing it successfully for centuries.


Whereas Europe's been a peaceful place, right?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:32pm
Sydney Morning Herald December 16, 2011
(extract of article)

Three Muslim extremists convicted of conspiring to plan an Australian terrorist attack have been sentenced to each serve 18 years' jail.

The men were part of an Islamic terrorist cell who were planning to attack the Holsworthy army barracks in Sydney's south-west.

Their aim was to enter the barracks armed with military weapons and shoot 500 personnel, or as many people as possible, before they were killed or ran out of ammunition.

Wissam Mahmoud Fattal, Saney Edow Aweys and Nayef El Sayed, who had all met at the Preston Mosque, had weapons when they were arrested in August 2009.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/18-years-jail-for-army-terrorattack-plan-20111216-1oy3f.html#ixzz3Bf67O869



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:38pm
GA, I think the last time we had a real bang on here was the Rum Rebellion right?

Now I don't think there would be too many Australians who would like to have a Jihadist' bang on' here, it could get really messy.

Most probably a lot of bewildered innocents who said it would never happen, would be collateral damage as the Muslims promote their promise to 'have the gutters run red with infidels' blood" (a direct quote incidentally from their propaganda)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:45pm
Greens -win, I am comparing Muslims to Storm Troopers. Do you have any idea what the Muslims are up to in Iraq? ISIS are committing genocide on a grand scale to anyone to doesn't belong to the right branch of Islam.

They are not like the Storm Troopers of Germany, they are much, much worse.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Sprintcyclist on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:51pm

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:02pm:
Not interested in the middle East conflict? You should be, that's your future right there.

We are inextricably linked to the conflicts in the Middle East. As a result of long term migration of Muslims into our Country we now have a burgeoning Muslim population. One only has to look at England to see the catastrophic problems that are a daily occurrence there.

What we now have is ISIS the latest metamorphosis of the latest radical Islam cult to take a tilt at the championship for the most blood thirsty western hating cult to rise in the Middle East.

It's too late to shut the gate as we now have young Muslims, embracing ISIS ideals and as far as they are concerned, we infidels are a team of sh.t.

It's gratifying to see Labor going with the Liberals on this one. If ever we need a united front, to deal with these people who take everything that is good in our Country then betray us by going radical, it is now.

We need to get rid of them and get rid if them quick. I say, allow them to go to these places of their choice but their papers need to be marked - Never To Return - EVER!


i am with you baron

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:54pm

GA wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:29pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:12pm:

GA wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:54pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:28pm:

GA wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:10pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:02pm:
Not interested in the middle East conflict? You should be, that's your future right there.

We are inextricably linked to the conflicts in the Middle East. As a result of long term migration of Muslims into our Country we now have a burgeoning Muslim population. One only has to look at England to see the catastrophic problems that are a daily occurrence there.

What we now have is ISIS the latest metamorphosis of the latest radical Islam cult to take a tilt at the championship for the most blood thirsty western hating cult to rise in the Middle East.

It's too late to shut the gate as we now have young Muslims, embracing ISIS ideals and as far as they are concerned, we infidels are a team of sh.t.

It's gratifying to see Labor going with the Liberals on this one. If ever we need a united front, to deal with these people who take everything that is good in our Country then betray us by going radicals, it is now.

We need to get rid of them and get rid if them quick. I say, allow them to go to these places of their choice but their papers need to be marked - Never To Return - EVER!


What a load of over-sensationalized crap. The Muslims are actually less trouble than are the Aussies. And if we had never interfered in their countries they would be no trouble to us at all.



you are an incredibly stupid person which is why few debate the patent nonsense you come up with such as this.


So you're saying the statistics will show that Muslims are more likely to be criminal than Aussies? And we've been interfering in the Mid East for over one hundred years now, time for us to 'pack' off out of there, don't you think!   


That's a useless comparison ....Muslim is a religion, and Australian is a nationality. What about crimes committed by Muslims whose Grandparents emigrated here, do you classify them as Muslim or Aussie???


As many as 100,000 Aboriginals may have been slaughtered by 'Aussies', I don't blame Christianity for that. And what about the grandparents, if they've behaved 'worse' it would be because of the influence of their new home. How could it be anything else? They would have had their aussieness brow-beaten into them.


But still, comparing religion and country of birth is a circular argument. Any Australian born Muslim who commits a crime under your definition would be 'Aussie', not Muslim.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Greens_Win on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:59pm

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:45pm:
Greens -win, I am comparing Muslims to Storm Troopers. Do you have any idea what the Muslims are up to in Iraq? ISIS are committing genocide on a grand scale to anyone to doesn't belong to the right branch of Islam.

They are not like the Storm Troopers of Germany, they are much, much worse.



All Muslims?

You are on a hate speech, hiding behind a keyboard, about all muslims and that makes you a fanatical terrorist.

You are part of the current problem, not part of the solution ... unless your agenda is a religious world war.

If that is so, then come out of hiding and admit it.
have some guts and tell the truth for once.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by longweekend58 on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:07pm

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:05pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:59pm:
No Greens-win, many of us right wingers want to stay the hell out of the Middle East. Nothing is going to stop that sh.thole of the world from tearing each others' throats out.

After all, they have been doing it successfully for centuries.



Then you better start educating your hard right mates about Greens' renewable energy. Sooner we end our addiction to arab oil and middle eastern exports, like live animals, the sooner we can distance ourselves.



there is a better solution and more likely.  USA is now only 6 years away from becoming an oil EXPORTER due to shale and tar oil extraction and horizontal drilling. Up SA's far north likes a shale oil deposit that would make Australia an oil exporter as well.  As canadas oil supplies com on stream other countries will be buying their oil from other countries than the M/E area to avoid the troubles there.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by life_goes_on on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:07pm

Quote:
They are not like the Storm Troopers of Germany, they are much, much worse.


Actually, that's emotive bullshit and shows a very poor understanding of just how hardcore some elements of Hitler's Waffen SS were.

You'll find that the likes of SS Brigade Dirlewanger and the odd foreign SS division make the likes of ISIS look like a bunch of cub scouts trying to act tough.

I thought you were a "student of history"? - apparently not, Walter.




Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:09pm

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:27pm:
A brief look at our own recent history:
New Terrorist Plot Uncovered


Tuesday, 04 August 2009 07:32   Wendy Larkson 
     
Police RaidNew Terrorist Plot Uncovered.
Raids in Melbourne by AFP and ASIO.

Just when Sydney-siders thought it was safe to close their eyes and go to sleep for a night, pondering the lack of evening gun battles lately, they learn of something worse than drive by shootings.

As they woke to another day’s work the people of Sydney [and Melbourne] learned of a joint operation between their States’ Police forces and the Australian Federal Police, against an imminent terrorist attack in their cities.


Four men - all Australian citizens - were arrested this morning as federal and state police, armed with search warrants, swooped on members of the suspected terror cell this morning in the second-largest counter-terrorism operation in the nation's history…. About 400 police raided homes in the northern Melbourne suburbs of Glenroy, Meadow Heights, Roxburgh Park, Broadmeadows, Westmeadows, Preston and Epping. They also raided homes at Carlton in inner Melbourne and Colac in southwestern Victoria. (source)
 

The intention, apparently, was to attack a Sydney army base:


Authorities believe the group is at an advanced stage of preparing to storm an Australian Army base, using automatic weapons, as punishment for Australia's military involvement in Muslim countries. It is understood the men plan to kill as many soldiers as possible before they are themselves killed. Members of the group have been observed carrying out surveillance of Holsworthy Barracks in western Sydney and other suspicious activity around defence bases in Victoria. Electronic surveillance on the suspects is believed to have picked up discussions about ways to obtain weapons to carry out what would be the worst terror attack on Australian soil.




No actual attack.   Hmmm    :-/

Just "plans" and "intentions".


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:10pm

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:32pm:
Sydney Morning Herald December 16, 2011
(extract of article)

Three Muslim extremists convicted of conspiring to plan an Australian terrorist attack have been sentenced to each serve 18 years' jail.

The men were part of an Islamic terrorist cell who were planning to attack the Holsworthy army barracks in Sydney's south-west.

Their aim was to enter the barracks armed with military weapons and shoot 500 personnel, or as many people as possible, before they were killed or ran out of ammunition.

Wissam Mahmoud Fattal, Saney Edow Aweys and Nayef El Sayed, who had all met at the Preston Mosque, had weapons when they were arrested in August 2009.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/18-years-jail-for-army-terrorattack-plan-20111216-1oy3f.html#ixzz3Bf67O869



No actual attack.   Hmmm    :-/

Just "conspiring to plan".


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by longweekend58 on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:14pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:10pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:32pm:
Sydney Morning Herald December 16, 2011
(extract of article)

Three Muslim extremists convicted of conspiring to plan an Australian terrorist attack have been sentenced to each serve 18 years' jail.

The men were part of an Islamic terrorist cell who were planning to attack the Holsworthy army barracks in Sydney's south-west.

Their aim was to enter the barracks armed with military weapons and shoot 500 personnel, or as many people as possible, before they were killed or ran out of ammunition.

Wissam Mahmoud Fattal, Saney Edow Aweys and Nayef El Sayed, who had all met at the Preston Mosque, had weapons when they were arrested in August 2009.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/18-years-jail-for-army-terrorattack-plan-20111216-1oy3f.html#ixzz3Bf67O869



No actual attack.   Hmmm    :-/

Just "conspiring to plan".


how does that change anything to you?  conspiracy to commit serious crime with the ability to do so is generally treated and punished just below the level of those who actually committed the offences.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Greens_Win on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:21pm

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:07pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:05pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:59pm:
No Greens-win, many of us right wingers want to stay the hell out of the Middle East. Nothing is going to stop that sh.thole of the world from tearing each others' throats out.

After all, they have been doing it successfully for centuries.



Then you better start educating your hard right mates about Greens' renewable energy. Sooner we end our addiction to arab oil and middle eastern exports, like live animals, the sooner we can distance ourselves.



there is a better solution and more likely.  USA is now only 6 years away from becoming an oil EXPORTER due to shale and tar oil extraction and horizontal drilling. Up SA's far north likes a shale oil deposit that would make Australia an oil exporter as well.  As canadas oil supplies com on stream other countries will be buying their oil from other countries than the M/E area to avoid the troubles there.



Lets ignore it's catastrophic depletion rates and horrendous costs aye long ...

First, a good shale oil well, fully fracked, may produce in the region of 500 to 1,000 oil barrels a day, when it first starts producing. This is abysmal compared with a conventional oil well that typically produces in the tens of thousands of barrels a day.
Second, after a year of production, the shale oil well will be producing at 50 per cent of its initial rate, and after two years at around 15 per cent of its initial rate, ie, the well is pretty much depleted.
Third, the shale oil project has indeed increased crude oil production by some 2m b/d. Unfortunately to achieve this, in the Bakken shale oilfield alone, this has required the completion of 7,000 wells in a little over five years. To maintain production, some 200 rigs are in operation in the Bakken field, each one drilling a new well every month or so, ie, more than 2,000 new wells every year. Similar figures apply to the other North American shale oilfields.
Fourth, proposals to further increase shale oil production in the US to replace the crude oil still being imported (more than 10m b/d) would require a massive further increase in the already frenetic drilling rate. Are we really to believe that it is actually physically possible to drill and complete several tens of thousands of shale oil wells each year and every year for the indefinite future? Since such an increase is in fact impossible, how exactly is the US going to achieve energy independence, or even maintain existing shale oil production rates?
Fifth, shale oil wells are painfully expensive to drill given the quantities of materials consumed and the sophisticated drilling rigs they must use. While some wells can break even with an oil price of between $50 and $80 a barrel, many need more than $100 a barrel to stay solvent.
Finally, the only investment destination worse than shale oil is shale gas. Think of it as shale oil on steroids as a way of losing money.


http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/658ecfb0-1748-11e4-87c0-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3BfIh20yy

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:22pm

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:10pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:32pm:
Sydney Morning Herald December 16, 2011
(extract of article)

Three Muslim extremists convicted of conspiring to plan an Australian terrorist attack have been sentenced to each serve 18 years' jail.

The men were part of an Islamic terrorist cell who were planning to attack the Holsworthy army barracks in Sydney's south-west.

Their aim was to enter the barracks armed with military weapons and shoot 500 personnel, or as many people as possible, before they were killed or ran out of ammunition.

Wissam Mahmoud Fattal, Saney Edow Aweys and Nayef El Sayed, who had all met at the Preston Mosque, had weapons when they were arrested in August 2009.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/18-years-jail-for-army-terrorattack-plan-20111216-1oy3f.html#ixzz3Bf67O869



No actual attack.   Hmmm    :-/

Just "conspiring to plan".


how does that change anything to you?  conspiracy to commit serious crime with the ability to do so is generally treated and punished just below the level of those who actually committed the offences.



It's very convenient for the government to publicise people being charged with conspiracy to commit a crime.  Especially terrorism.  Don't you think?

Be alert, but not alarmed    ;)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:27pm

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:10pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:32pm:
Sydney Morning Herald December 16, 2011
(extract of article)

Three Muslim extremists convicted of conspiring to plan an Australian terrorist attack have been sentenced to each serve 18 years' jail.

The men were part of an Islamic terrorist cell who were planning to attack the Holsworthy army barracks in Sydney's south-west.

Their aim was to enter the barracks armed with military weapons and shoot 500 personnel, or as many people as possible, before they were killed or ran out of ammunition.

Wissam Mahmoud Fattal, Saney Edow Aweys and Nayef El Sayed, who had all met at the Preston Mosque, had weapons when they were arrested in August 2009.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/18-years-jail-for-army-terrorattack-plan-20111216-1oy3f.html#ixzz3Bf67O869



No actual attack.   Hmmm    :-/

Just "conspiring to plan".


how does that change anything to you?  conspiracy to commit serious crime with the ability to do so is generally treated and punished just below the level of those who actually committed the offences.



what he means is... they were probably playing monopoly and they got carried away by buying bombs instead of hotels.....

and unless they really do blow something up.. the good lefties will always give them the benefit of the doubt..because they know all bad guys are righties.. and anyone that votes labor is a good guy..

and of course these guys voted labor...you can betcha

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:30pm

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:10pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:32pm:
Sydney Morning Herald December 16, 2011
(extract of article)

Three Muslim extremists convicted of conspiring to plan an Australian terrorist attack have been sentenced to each serve 18 years' jail.

The men were part of an Islamic terrorist cell who were planning to attack the Holsworthy army barracks in Sydney's south-west.

Their aim was to enter the barracks armed with military weapons and shoot 500 personnel, or as many people as possible, before they were killed or ran out of ammunition.

Wissam Mahmoud Fattal, Saney Edow Aweys and Nayef El Sayed, who had all met at the Preston Mosque, had weapons when they were arrested in August 2009.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/18-years-jail-for-army-terrorattack-plan-20111216-1oy3f.html#ixzz3Bf67O869



No actual attack.   Hmmm    :-/

Just "conspiring to plan".


how does that change anything to you?  conspiracy to commit serious crime with the ability to do so is generally treated and punished just below the level of those who actually committed the offences.



what he means is... they were probably playing monopoly and they got carried away by buying bombs instead of hotels.....

and unless they really do blow something up.. the good lefties will always give them the benefit of the doubt..because they know all bad guys are righties.. and anyone that votes labor is a good guy..

and of course these guys voted labor...you can betcha



It's very convenient for the government to publicise people being charged with "buying bombs".   Don't you think?

Be alert, but not alarmed     ;)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Greens_Win on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:32pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:30pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:10pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:32pm:
Sydney Morning Herald December 16, 2011
(extract of article)

Three Muslim extremists convicted of conspiring to plan an Australian terrorist attack have been sentenced to each serve 18 years' jail.

The men were part of an Islamic terrorist cell who were planning to attack the Holsworthy army barracks in Sydney's south-west.

Their aim was to enter the barracks armed with military weapons and shoot 500 personnel, or as many people as possible, before they were killed or ran out of ammunition.

Wissam Mahmoud Fattal, Saney Edow Aweys and Nayef El Sayed, who had all met at the Preston Mosque, had weapons when they were arrested in August 2009.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/18-years-jail-for-army-terrorattack-plan-20111216-1oy3f.html#ixzz3Bf67O869



No actual attack.   Hmmm    :-/

Just "conspiring to plan".


how does that change anything to you?  conspiracy to commit serious crime with the ability to do so is generally treated and punished just below the level of those who actually committed the offences.



what he means is... they were probably playing monopoly and they got carried away by buying bombs instead of hotels.....

and unless they really do blow something up.. the good lefties will always give them the benefit of the doubt..because they know all bad guys are righties.. and anyone that votes labor is a good guy..

and of course these guys voted labor...you can betcha



It's very convenient for the government to publicise people being charged with "buying bombs".   Don't you think?

Be alert, but not alarmed     ;)



Next, they will be throwing their children overboard.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:09pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:30pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:10pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:32pm:
Sydney Morning Herald December 16, 2011
(extract of article)

Three Muslim extremists convicted of conspiring to plan an Australian terrorist attack have been sentenced to each serve 18 years' jail.

The men were part of an Islamic terrorist cell who were planning to attack the Holsworthy army barracks in Sydney's south-west.

Their aim was to enter the barracks armed with military weapons and shoot 500 personnel, or as many people as possible, before they were killed or ran out of ammunition.

Wissam Mahmoud Fattal, Saney Edow Aweys and Nayef El Sayed, who had all met at the Preston Mosque, had weapons when they were arrested in August 2009.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/18-years-jail-for-army-terrorattack-plan-20111216-1oy3f.html#ixzz3Bf67O869



No actual attack.   Hmmm    :-/

Just "conspiring to plan".


how does that change anything to you?  conspiracy to commit serious crime with the ability to do so is generally treated and punished just below the level of those who actually committed the offences.



what he means is... they were probably playing monopoly and they got carried away by buying bombs instead of hotels.....

and unless they really do blow something up.. the good lefties will always give them the benefit of the doubt..because they know all bad guys are righties.. and anyone that votes labor is a good guy..

and of course these guys voted labor...you can betcha



It's very convenient for the government to publicise people being charged with "buying bombs".   Don't you think?

Be alert, but not alarmed     ;)



tell you what buddy... if my neighbour had a bomb in his shed.. I sure as hell hope the powers that be remove it..

OMG you do know they dont advertise they are bomb making dont you???

maybe your neighbour is into bombs I sure hope you are alert but not to concerned..

maybe if you dont say anything he wont let it off anywhere..


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:12pm

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:30pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:10pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:32pm:
Sydney Morning Herald December 16, 2011
(extract of article)

Three Muslim extremists convicted of conspiring to plan an Australian terrorist attack have been sentenced to each serve 18 years' jail.

The men were part of an Islamic terrorist cell who were planning to attack the Holsworthy army barracks in Sydney's south-west.

Their aim was to enter the barracks armed with military weapons and shoot 500 personnel, or as many people as possible, before they were killed or ran out of ammunition.

Wissam Mahmoud Fattal, Saney Edow Aweys and Nayef El Sayed, who had all met at the Preston Mosque, had weapons when they were arrested in August 2009.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/18-years-jail-for-army-terrorattack-plan-20111216-1oy3f.html#ixzz3Bf67O869



No actual attack.   Hmmm    :-/

Just "conspiring to plan".


how does that change anything to you?  conspiracy to commit serious crime with the ability to do so is generally treated and punished just below the level of those who actually committed the offences.



what he means is... they were probably playing monopoly and they got carried away by buying bombs instead of hotels.....

and unless they really do blow something up.. the good lefties will always give them the benefit of the doubt..because they know all bad guys are righties.. and anyone that votes labor is a good guy..

and of course these guys voted labor...you can betcha



It's very convenient for the government to publicise people being charged with "buying bombs".   Don't you think?

Be alert, but not alarmed     ;)



Next, they will be throwing their children overboard.




nah we spent 6 years watching  the GREENS WAY of doing it ....smashing them on rocks.... or watching them swallow the ocean....

thats the greens way isnt it?..

and now its only the Jews we have to fear.. muslims are all good..everyone knows that... ::) ::)

its the GREENS WAY


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Greens_Win on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:19pm

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:12pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:30pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:10pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:32pm:
Sydney Morning Herald December 16, 2011
(extract of article)

Three Muslim extremists convicted of conspiring to plan an Australian terrorist attack have been sentenced to each serve 18 years' jail.

The men were part of an Islamic terrorist cell who were planning to attack the Holsworthy army barracks in Sydney's south-west.

Their aim was to enter the barracks armed with military weapons and shoot 500 personnel, or as many people as possible, before they were killed or ran out of ammunition.

Wissam Mahmoud Fattal, Saney Edow Aweys and Nayef El Sayed, who had all met at the Preston Mosque, had weapons when they were arrested in August 2009.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/18-years-jail-for-army-terrorattack-plan-20111216-1oy3f.html#ixzz3Bf67O869



No actual attack.   Hmmm    :-/

Just "conspiring to plan".


how does that change anything to you?  conspiracy to commit serious crime with the ability to do so is generally treated and punished just below the level of those who actually committed the offences.



what he means is... they were probably playing monopoly and they got carried away by buying bombs instead of hotels.....

and unless they really do blow something up.. the good lefties will always give them the benefit of the doubt..because they know all bad guys are righties.. and anyone that votes labor is a good guy..

and of course these guys voted labor...you can betcha



It's very convenient for the government to publicise people being charged with "buying bombs".   Don't you think?

Be alert, but not alarmed     ;)



Next, they will be throwing their children overboard.




nah we spent 6 years watching  the GREENS WAY of doing it ....smashing them on rocks.... or watching them swallow the ocean....

thats the greens way isnt it?..

and now its only the Jews we have to fear.. muslims are all good..everyone knows that... ::) ::)

its the GREENS WAY



Then you will have to admit to the blood of over 1,000,000,000 civilian deaths  on your hands because of your side's warmongering and illegal invasions.

Taking responsibility ... man or mouse cods?


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Hot Breath on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:25pm

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:30pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:10pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:32pm:
Sydney Morning Herald December 16, 2011
(extract of article)

Three Muslim extremists convicted of conspiring to plan an Australian terrorist attack have been sentenced to each serve 18 years' jail.

The men were part of an Islamic terrorist cell who were planning to attack the Holsworthy army barracks in Sydney's south-west.

Their aim was to enter the barracks armed with military weapons and shoot 500 personnel, or as many people as possible, before they were killed or ran out of ammunition.

Wissam Mahmoud Fattal, Saney Edow Aweys and Nayef El Sayed, who had all met at the Preston Mosque, had weapons when they were arrested in August 2009.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/18-years-jail-for-army-terrorattack-plan-20111216-1oy3f.html#ixzz3Bf67O869



No actual attack.   Hmmm    :-/

Just "conspiring to plan".


how does that change anything to you?  conspiracy to commit serious crime with the ability to do so is generally treated and punished just below the level of those who actually committed the offences.



what he means is... they were probably playing monopoly and they got carried away by buying bombs instead of hotels.....

and unless they really do blow something up.. the good lefties will always give them the benefit of the doubt..because they know all bad guys are righties.. and anyone that votes labor is a good guy..

and of course these guys voted labor...you can betcha



It's very convenient for the government to publicise people being charged with "buying bombs".   Don't you think?

Be alert, but not alarmed     ;)



Next, they will be throwing their children overboard.


Thank goodness the adults are now in charge, right?   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:27pm

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:19pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:12pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:30pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:10pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:32pm:
Sydney Morning Herald December 16, 2011
(extract of article)

Three Muslim extremists convicted of conspiring to plan an Australian terrorist attack have been sentenced to each serve 18 years' jail.

The men were part of an Islamic terrorist cell who were planning to attack the Holsworthy army barracks in Sydney's south-west.

Their aim was to enter the barracks armed with military weapons and shoot 500 personnel, or as many people as possible, before they were killed or ran out of ammunition.

Wissam Mahmoud Fattal, Saney Edow Aweys and Nayef El Sayed, who had all met at the Preston Mosque, had weapons when they were arrested in August 2009.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/18-years-jail-for-army-terrorattack-plan-20111216-1oy3f.html#ixzz3Bf67O869



No actual attack.   Hmmm    :-/

Just "conspiring to plan".


how does that change anything to you?  conspiracy to commit serious crime with the ability to do so is generally treated and punished just below the level of those who actually committed the offences.



what he means is... they were probably playing monopoly and they got carried away by buying bombs instead of hotels.....

and unless they really do blow something up.. the good lefties will always give them the benefit of the doubt..because they know all bad guys are righties.. and anyone that votes labor is a good guy..

and of course these guys voted labor...you can betcha



It's very convenient for the government to publicise people being charged with "buying bombs".   Don't you think?

Be alert, but not alarmed     ;)



Next, they will be throwing their children overboard.




nah we spent 6 years watching  the GREENS WAY of doing it ....smashing them on rocks.... or watching them swallow the ocean....

thats the greens way isnt it?..

and now its only the Jews we have to fear.. muslims are all good..everyone knows that... ::) ::)

its the GREENS WAY



Then you will have to admit to the blood of over 1,000,000,000 civilian deaths  on your hands because of your side's warmongering and illegal invasions.

Taking responsibility ... man or mouse cods?
Who killed a million civilians??

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:30pm

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:19pm:
Then you will have to admit to the blood of over 1,000,000,000 civilian deaths  on your hands because of your side's warmongering and illegal invasions.

Taking responsibility ... man or mouse cods?



hilarious.. cannot tell the difference between a war when both sides are armed and ready..

to helping people with money, pay criminals like  people smugglers to smuggle them into a foreign country..... in the hope we will look after them for life..

and this idiot cant tell the difference.. >:(

perish the thought a greeny would take responsibility for opening our borders..and being the direct cause of these people drowning..

.wont mention the boat loads that went missing never to be seen again..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Greens_Win on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:32pm

Shakey wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:27pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:19pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:12pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:30pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:10pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:32pm:
Sydney Morning Herald December 16, 2011
(extract of article)

Three Muslim extremists convicted of conspiring to plan an Australian terrorist attack have been sentenced to each serve 18 years' jail.

The men were part of an Islamic terrorist cell who were planning to attack the Holsworthy army barracks in Sydney's south-west.

Their aim was to enter the barracks armed with military weapons and shoot 500 personnel, or as many people as possible, before they were killed or ran out of ammunition.

Wissam Mahmoud Fattal, Saney Edow Aweys and Nayef El Sayed, who had all met at the Preston Mosque, had weapons when they were arrested in August 2009.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/18-years-jail-for-army-terrorattack-plan-20111216-1oy3f.html#ixzz3Bf67O869



No actual attack.   Hmmm    :-/

Just "conspiring to plan".


how does that change anything to you?  conspiracy to commit serious crime with the ability to do so is generally treated and punished just below the level of those who actually committed the offences.



what he means is... they were probably playing monopoly and they got carried away by buying bombs instead of hotels.....

and unless they really do blow something up.. the good lefties will always give them the benefit of the doubt..because they know all bad guys are righties.. and anyone that votes labor is a good guy..

and of course these guys voted labor...you can betcha



It's very convenient for the government to publicise people being charged with "buying bombs".   Don't you think?

Be alert, but not alarmed     ;)



Next, they will be throwing their children overboard.




nah we spent 6 years watching  the GREENS WAY of doing it ....smashing them on rocks.... or watching them swallow the ocean....

thats the greens way isnt it?..

and now its only the Jews we have to fear.. muslims are all good..everyone knows that... ::) ::)

its the GREENS WAY



Then you will have to admit to the blood of over 1,000,000,000 civilian deaths  on your hands because of your side's warmongering and illegal invasions.

Taking responsibility ... man or mouse cods?
Who killed a million civilians??



Political policies ... like the policy of the howard government to invade Iraqi illegally.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:32pm

Shakey wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:27pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:19pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:12pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:30pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:10pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:32pm:
Sydney Morning Herald December 16, 2011
(extract of article)

Three Muslim extremists convicted of conspiring to plan an Australian terrorist attack have been sentenced to each serve 18 years' jail.

The men were part of an Islamic terrorist cell who were planning to attack the Holsworthy army barracks in Sydney's south-west.

Their aim was to enter the barracks armed with military weapons and shoot 500 personnel, or as many people as possible, before they were killed or ran out of ammunition.

Wissam Mahmoud Fattal, Saney Edow Aweys and Nayef El Sayed, who had all met at the Preston Mosque, had weapons when they were arrested in August 2009.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/18-years-jail-for-army-terrorattack-plan-20111216-1oy3f.html#ixzz3Bf67O869



No actual attack.   Hmmm    :-/

Just "conspiring to plan".


how does that change anything to you?  conspiracy to commit serious crime with the ability to do so is generally treated and punished just below the level of those who actually committed the offences.



what he means is... they were probably playing monopoly and they got carried away by buying bombs instead of hotels.....

and unless they really do blow something up.. the good lefties will always give them the benefit of the doubt..because they know all bad guys are righties.. and anyone that votes labor is a good guy..

and of course these guys voted labor...you can betcha



It's very convenient for the government to publicise people being charged with "buying bombs".   Don't you think?

Be alert, but not alarmed     ;)



Next, they will be throwing their children overboard.




nah we spent 6 years watching  the GREENS WAY of doing it ....smashing them on rocks.... or watching them swallow the ocean....

thats the greens way isnt it?..

and now its only the Jews we have to fear.. muslims are all good..everyone knows that... ::) ::)

its the GREENS WAY



Then you will have to admit to the blood of over 1,000,000,000 civilian deaths  on your hands because of your side's warmongering and illegal invasions.

Taking responsibility ... man or mouse cods?
Who killed a million civilians??

That's a billion. Who did that??

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:33pm

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:32pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:27pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:19pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:12pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:30pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:10pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:32pm:
Sydney Morning Herald December 16, 2011
(extract of article)

Three Muslim extremists convicted of conspiring to plan an Australian terrorist attack have been sentenced to each serve 18 years' jail.

The men were part of an Islamic terrorist cell who were planning to attack the Holsworthy army barracks in Sydney's south-west.

Their aim was to enter the barracks armed with military weapons and shoot 500 personnel, or as many people as possible, before they were killed or ran out of ammunition.

Wissam Mahmoud Fattal, Saney Edow Aweys and Nayef El Sayed, who had all met at the Preston Mosque, had weapons when they were arrested in August 2009.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/18-years-jail-for-army-terrorattack-plan-20111216-1oy3f.html#ixzz3Bf67O869



No actual attack.   Hmmm    :-/

Just "conspiring to plan".


how does that change anything to you?  conspiracy to commit serious crime with the ability to do so is generally treated and punished just below the level of those who actually committed the offences.



what he means is... they were probably playing monopoly and they got carried away by buying bombs instead of hotels.....

and unless they really do blow something up.. the good lefties will always give them the benefit of the doubt..because they know all bad guys are righties.. and anyone that votes labor is a good guy..

and of course these guys voted labor...you can betcha



It's very convenient for the government to publicise people being charged with "buying bombs".   Don't you think?

Be alert, but not alarmed     ;)



Next, they will be throwing their children overboard.




nah we spent 6 years watching  the GREENS WAY of doing it ....smashing them on rocks.... or watching them swallow the ocean....

thats the greens way isnt it?..

and now its only the Jews we have to fear.. muslims are all good..everyone knows that... ::) ::)

its the GREENS WAY



Then you will have to admit to the blood of over 1,000,000,000 civilian deaths  on your hands because of your side's warmongering and illegal invasions.

Taking responsibility ... man or mouse cods?
Who killed a million civilians??



Political policies ... like the policy of the howard government to invade Iraqi illegally.
You shouldn't be making up figures .

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Greens_Win on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:34pm

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:30pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:19pm:
Then you will have to admit to the blood of over 1,000,000,000 civilian deaths  on your hands because of your side's warmongering and illegal invasions.

Taking responsibility ... man or mouse cods?



hilarious.. cannot tell the difference between a war when both sides are armed and ready..

to helping people with money, pay criminals like  people smugglers to smuggle them into a foreign country..... in the hope we will look after them for life..

and this idiot cant tell the difference.. >:(

perish the thought a greeny would take responsibility for opening our borders..and being the direct cause of these people drowning..

.wont mention the boat loads that went missing never to be seen again..



So you are a hypocrite.

It was the right's policies that caused some of the push factors for refugees to flee war zones and so take risks to reach security.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Greens_Win on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:36pm

Shakey wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:33pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:32pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:27pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:19pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:12pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:30pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:10pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:32pm:
Sydney Morning Herald December 16, 2011
(extract of article)

Three Muslim extremists convicted of conspiring to plan an Australian terrorist attack have been sentenced to each serve 18 years' jail.

The men were part of an Islamic terrorist cell who were planning to attack the Holsworthy army barracks in Sydney's south-west.

Their aim was to enter the barracks armed with military weapons and shoot 500 personnel, or as many people as possible, before they were killed or ran out of ammunition.

Wissam Mahmoud Fattal, Saney Edow Aweys and Nayef El Sayed, who had all met at the Preston Mosque, had weapons when they were arrested in August 2009.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/18-years-jail-for-army-terrorattack-plan-20111216-1oy3f.html#ixzz3Bf67O869



No actual attack.   Hmmm    :-/

Just "conspiring to plan".


how does that change anything to you?  conspiracy to commit serious crime with the ability to do so is generally treated and punished just below the level of those who actually committed the offences.



what he means is... they were probably playing monopoly and they got carried away by buying bombs instead of hotels.....

and unless they really do blow something up.. the good lefties will always give them the benefit of the doubt..because they know all bad guys are righties.. and anyone that votes labor is a good guy..

and of course these guys voted labor...you can betcha



It's very convenient for the government to publicise people being charged with "buying bombs".   Don't you think?

Be alert, but not alarmed     ;)



Next, they will be throwing their children overboard.




nah we spent 6 years watching  the GREENS WAY of doing it ....smashing them on rocks.... or watching them swallow the ocean....

thats the greens way isnt it?..

and now its only the Jews we have to fear.. muslims are all good..everyone knows that... ::) ::)

its the GREENS WAY



Then you will have to admit to the blood of over 1,000,000,000 civilian deaths  on your hands because of your side's warmongering and illegal invasions.

Taking responsibility ... man or mouse cods?
Who killed a million civilians??



Political policies ... like the policy of the howard government to invade Iraqi illegally.
You shouldn't be making up figures .



How many civilians died then?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:38pm

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:34pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:30pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:19pm:
Then you will have to admit to the blood of over 1,000,000,000 civilian deaths  on your hands because of your side's warmongering and illegal invasions.

Taking responsibility ... man or mouse cods?



hilarious.. cannot tell the difference between a war when both sides are armed and ready..

to helping people with money, pay criminals like  people smugglers to smuggle them into a foreign country..... in the hope we will look after them for life..

and this idiot cant tell the difference.. >:(

perish the thought a greeny would take responsibility for opening our borders..and being the direct cause of these people drowning..

.wont mention the boat loads that went missing never to be seen again..



So you are a hypocrite.

It was the right's policies that caused some of the push factors for refugees to flee war zones and so take risks to reach security.
Most refugees are fleeing wars that are nothing to do with Australia.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Greens_Win on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:40pm

Shakey wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:38pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:34pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:30pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:19pm:
Then you will have to admit to the blood of over 1,000,000,000 civilian deaths  on your hands because of your side's warmongering and illegal invasions.

Taking responsibility ... man or mouse cods?



hilarious.. cannot tell the difference between a war when both sides are armed and ready..

to helping people with money, pay criminals like  people smugglers to smuggle them into a foreign country..... in the hope we will look after them for life..

and this idiot cant tell the difference.. >:(

perish the thought a greeny would take responsibility for opening our borders..and being the direct cause of these people drowning..

.wont mention the boat loads that went missing never to be seen again..



So you are a hypocrite.

It was the right's policies that caused some of the push factors for refugees to flee war zones and so take risks to reach security.
Most refugees are fleeing wars that are nothing to do with Australia.



So when abbott gives the go ahead for young australians to head into the middle east and spill their blood, Australia will not be responsible for the consequences?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:41pm

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:36pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:33pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:32pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:27pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:19pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:12pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:30pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 4:10pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:32pm:
Sydney Morning Herald December 16, 2011
(extract of article)

Three Muslim extremists convicted of conspiring to plan an Australian terrorist attack have been sentenced to each serve 18 years' jail.

The men were part of an Islamic terrorist cell who were planning to attack the Holsworthy army barracks in Sydney's south-west.

Their aim was to enter the barracks armed with military weapons and shoot 500 personnel, or as many people as possible, before they were killed or ran out of ammunition.

Wissam Mahmoud Fattal, Saney Edow Aweys and Nayef El Sayed, who had all met at the Preston Mosque, had weapons when they were arrested in August 2009.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/18-years-jail-for-army-terrorattack-plan-20111216-1oy3f.html#ixzz3Bf67O869



No actual attack.   Hmmm    :-/

Just "conspiring to plan".


how does that change anything to you?  conspiracy to commit serious crime with the ability to do so is generally treated and punished just below the level of those who actually committed the offences.



what he means is... they were probably playing monopoly and they got carried away by buying bombs instead of hotels.....

and unless they really do blow something up.. the good lefties will always give them the benefit of the doubt..because they know all bad guys are righties.. and anyone that votes labor is a good guy..

and of course these guys voted labor...you can betcha



It's very convenient for the government to publicise people being charged with "buying bombs".   Don't you think?

Be alert, but not alarmed     ;)



Next, they will be throwing their children overboard.




nah we spent 6 years watching  the GREENS WAY of doing it ....smashing them on rocks.... or watching them swallow the ocean....

thats the greens way isnt it?..

and now its only the Jews we have to fear.. muslims are all good..everyone knows that... ::) ::)

its the GREENS WAY



Then you will have to admit to the blood of over 1,000,000,000 civilian deaths  on your hands because of your side's warmongering and illegal invasions.

Taking responsibility ... man or mouse cods?
Who killed a million civilians??



Political policies ... like the policy of the howard government to invade Iraqi illegally.
You shouldn't be making up figures .



How many civilians died then?
Well I looked it up and you put up a trillion which is more than the population of the earth. So going by your figures John Howards part in the invasion of Iraq killed the entire population of planet . OH NO, IM DEAD :D :D :D :D :D :D

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:44pm

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:40pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:38pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:34pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:30pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:19pm:
Then you will have to admit to the blood of over 1,000,000,000 civilian deaths  on your hands because of your side's warmongering and illegal invasions.

Taking responsibility ... man or mouse cods?



hilarious.. cannot tell the difference between a war when both sides are armed and ready..

to helping people with money, pay criminals like  people smugglers to smuggle them into a foreign country..... in the hope we will look after them for life..

and this idiot cant tell the difference.. >:(

perish the thought a greeny would take responsibility for opening our borders..and being the direct cause of these people drowning..

.wont mention the boat loads that went missing never to be seen again..



So you are a hypocrite.

It was the right's policies that caused some of the push factors for refugees to flee war zones and so take risks to reach security.
Most refugees are fleeing wars that are nothing to do with Australia.



So when abbott gives the go ahead for young australians to head into the middle east and spill their blood, Australia will not be responsible for the consequences?
Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Palestine, Somalia, Iran all have nothing to do with Australia's foreign policy. Most of the Afghan's were fleeing the Taliban because they were minorities so that has nothing to do with Australia either.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Greens_Win on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:47pm

Shakey wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:44pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:40pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:38pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:34pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:30pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:19pm:
Then you will have to admit to the blood of over 1,000,000,000 civilian deaths  on your hands because of your side's warmongering and illegal invasions.

Taking responsibility ... man or mouse cods?



hilarious.. cannot tell the difference between a war when both sides are armed and ready..

to helping people with money, pay criminals like  people smugglers to smuggle them into a foreign country..... in the hope we will look after them for life..

and this idiot cant tell the difference.. >:(

perish the thought a greeny would take responsibility for opening our borders..and being the direct cause of these people drowning..

.wont mention the boat loads that went missing never to be seen again..



So you are a hypocrite.

It was the right's policies that caused some of the push factors for refugees to flee war zones and so take risks to reach security.
Most refugees are fleeing wars that are nothing to do with Australia.



So when abbott gives the go ahead for young australians to head into the middle east and spill their blood, Australia will not be responsible for the consequences?
Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Palestine, Somalia, Iran all have nothing to do with Australia's foreign policy. Most of the Afghan's were fleeing the Taliban because they were minorities so that has nothing to do with Australia either.


So Australia has no foreign policy now. Australia isn't interacting in the wider world ... we are now an isolated island aye !

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:48pm

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:34pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:30pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:19pm:
Then you will have to admit to the blood of over 1,000,000,000 civilian deaths  on your hands because of your side's warmongering and illegal invasions.

Taking responsibility ... man or mouse cods?



hilarious.. cannot tell the difference between a war when both sides are armed and ready..

to helping people with money, pay criminals like  people smugglers to smuggle them into a foreign country..... in the hope we will look after them for life..

and this idiot cant tell the difference.. >:(

perish the thought a greeny would take responsibility for opening our borders..and being the direct cause of these people drowning..

.wont mention the boat loads that went missing never to be seen again..



So you are a hypocrite.

It was the right's policies that caused some of the push factors for refugees to flee war zones and so take risks to reach security.



HILARIOUS>....what war did they cause in Sri Lanka??...or Pakistan...or Lebanon. get a life sport you are just about the worse one on here...

havent seen any Germans of late trying to come in on rickety boats...



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:51pm

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:47pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:44pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:40pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:38pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:34pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:30pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:19pm:
Then you will have to admit to the blood of over 1,000,000,000 civilian deaths  on your hands because of your side's warmongering and illegal invasions.

Taking responsibility ... man or mouse cods?



hilarious.. cannot tell the difference between a war when both sides are armed and ready..

to helping people with money, pay criminals like  people smugglers to smuggle them into a foreign country..... in the hope we will look after them for life..

and this idiot cant tell the difference.. >:(

perish the thought a greeny would take responsibility for opening our borders..and being the direct cause of these people drowning..

.wont mention the boat loads that went missing never to be seen again..



So you are a hypocrite.

It was the right's policies that caused some of the push factors for refugees to flee war zones and so take risks to reach security.
Most refugees are fleeing wars that are nothing to do with Australia.



So when abbott gives the go ahead for young australians to head into the middle east and spill their blood, Australia will not be responsible for the consequences?
Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Palestine, Somalia, Iran all have nothing to do with Australia's foreign policy. Most of the Afghan's were fleeing the Taliban because they were minorities so that has nothing to do with Australia either.


So Australia has no foreign policy now. Australia isn't interacting in the wider world ... we are now an isolated island aye !
You said that our refugee problem was because of our foreign policies. These countries refugees have been rocking up and Australia hasn't been involved in a war with these countries.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Lord Herbert on Aug 28th, 2014 at 6:08pm

aquascoot wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:57pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:42pm:
Coalition to settle Afghan interpreters


The Coalition Government will settle about 800 Afghan interpreters and their families who had helped Australian forces in Afghanistan, continuing a process started under the previous Labor government.

www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/coalition-to-settle-afghan-interpreters-20131003-2uwz3.html

So who is condemning muslim migration again?


yes, i think thats fair.
they have shown loyalty to aussies and we should repay the courtesy


Let's not bring out the violins and the hankies, okay?

It wasn't 'loyalty' ~ it was a job that paid well and gave them a few perks not enjoyed by others.

If these interpreters are 'at risk', then it's proof that nothing has been achieved in the 12 years that Western forces have been there, and the deaths of hundreds of Western soldiers, and the umpteen billions poured into the country to make it safe for people like these interpreters.

The whole thing has been a farce, and the reason we're bringing these 'interpreters' over here is because nobody is under any illusions that the Taliban won't be back in control of the country ~ stronger than ever.

That is the reason the interpreters are being taken out of the place ~ for the very same reason we took the interpreters out of Vietnam ~ we lost the war and their lives were therefore very much at risk.

Nothing to do with some sob-sister nonsense about 'loyalty'.

Dear Jesus when will you people start to wake up.

I thought you had more horse-sense, aquastud.  8-)

 

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 28th, 2014 at 6:22pm
Strap in your seat belts Lefties. I believe Tony Abbott is about to announce that R.A.A.F.. Fighter Jets are about to be deployed to Iraq to assist the U.S.A.  in attacking ISIS Forces.

Bill Shorten today in Parliament virtually gave his imprimatur with a 'soft question' to Abbott about how Australia will react to the ongoing ISIS genocide in Iraq.

If this happens it will only add fuel to the would be 'Home Grown Terrorists' to carry out reprisal actions against the Australian Government.

The stakes are being raised. And if we were America we would be going to Defcon 4 if the jets are deployed.

PS In regard to my comments about Hitler's Storm Troopers, I am in no way minimising what butchers they were. However the rapidity and callousness of ISIS is breathtaking. I think it's been a long time since we seen heads being cut off with gay abandon by the butchers who claim to represent Islam. (They don't Mohammed the Prophet never preached this butchery).

Abbott said that ISIS is committing Genocide and I guess unlike the impotent United Nations, he is prepared to stand up and be counted. I respect that.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yadda on Aug 28th, 2014 at 7:31pm

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:45pm:

Incidentally I have always been against sending our Armed Forces to Iraq and Afghanistan.


Snap.

Ditto.

Me too.



I have always advocated 'containment' of the moslem, in his own lands.

I have always wanted the moslem to demonstrate the 'perfection' of ISLAM, in his own land(s).



Of course, moslems are now stating that Australia is a moslem country.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yadda on Aug 28th, 2014 at 7:34pm

aquascoot wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:57pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:42pm:
Coalition to settle Afghan interpreters


The Coalition Government will settle about 800 Afghan interpreters and their families who had helped Australian forces in Afghanistan, continuing a process started under the previous Labor government.

www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/coalition-to-settle-afghan-interpreters-20131003-2uwz3.html


So who is condemning muslim migration again?


yes, i think thats fair.
they have shown loyalty to aussies and we should repay the courtesy



I agree.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yadda on Aug 28th, 2014 at 7:38pm

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:15pm:
Pull your head in.

You are now comparing australian muslims to storm troopers.

How ignorant are you.



How ignorant are you, greens ?

Google;
similarity between islam and nazism


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yadda on Aug 28th, 2014 at 7:52pm

Life_goes_on wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 3:23pm:

Two percent of the population. Just two percent of the population.


Even if every last one of them - man, woman, child, toddler, baby - fronted up wanting to kick something off, they'd be hopelessly outnumbered.

I just don't find those kind of odds scary.




life_goes_on,

Just 19 moslems, in 4 passenger aircraft, armed with just planning and box cutters, achieved the 9/11 atrocity within a complacent US, in 2001.






IMAGE....

wtc-9-11.jpg
The 'gift', from ISLAM and moslems, to the USA!




'Normal' criminal behaviour - in mankind
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1293669294/0#0



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Gnads on Aug 28th, 2014 at 8:14pm

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:34pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:30pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:19pm:
Then you will have to admit to the blood of over 1,000,000,000 civilian deaths  on your hands because of your side's warmongering and illegal invasions.

Taking responsibility ... man or mouse cods?



hilarious.. cannot tell the difference between a war when both sides are armed and ready..

to helping people with money, pay criminals like  people smugglers to smuggle them into a foreign country..... in the hope we will look after them for life..

and this idiot cant tell the difference.. >:(

perish the thought a greeny would take responsibility for opening our borders..and being the direct cause of these people drowning..

.wont mention the boat loads that went missing never to be seen again..



So you are a hypocrite.

It was the right's policies that caused some of the push factors for refugees to flee war zones and so take risks to reach security.

Most of those arriving by boat into Australian territory are economic migrants not genuine refugees from war zones.

Your belief otherwise is testament to your own stupidity.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Brian Ross on Aug 28th, 2014 at 8:52pm

Gnads wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 8:14pm:
Most of those arriving by boat into Australian territory are economic migrants not genuine refugees from war zones.


An interesting claim.  On what basis do you make it?  Your evidence to support it is?  ::)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yadda on Aug 28th, 2014 at 9:31pm

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 8:52pm:

Gnads wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 8:14pm:
Most of those arriving by boat into Australian territory are economic migrants not genuine refugees from war zones.


An interesting claim.  On what basis do you make it?  Your evidence to support it is?  ::)





Many of those claiming to be asylum seekers, patently are ILLEGAL economic migrants and are not legitimate asylum seekers.

1/ They travel through safe 2nd and 3rd countries, seeking 'refuge'.

2/ They have enough personal resources to travel half way around the planet!, to come to countries like Australia.  [....if they are truly seeking safe refuge when escaping their circumstances, why don't they travel to the 1st, closest, safe country???]



Many 'asylum seekers' seeking 'sanctuary' in Australia, are ILLEGAL migrants, or economic migrants, at best.

And at worst?

Many of these ppl arriving on our shores uninvited [by Australia] are moslems.

And being moslems, they clearly embrace societal values which are antithetical/incompatible with our own value system.

And worst of all....
Moslems do not come to Australia to become Australians.

Moslems come to Australia to be MOSLEMS, 1st, 2nd, and 3rd, and are working tirelessly to undermine Australian society and Australian institutions.



e.g.

Quote:

"[a respected moslem community spokesman has] called on Australian Muslims to spurn secular democracy and Western notions of moderate Islam...
...[moslems in Australia were told] that democracy is "haram" (forbidden) for Muslims, whose political engagement should be be based purely on Islamic law.
"We must adhere to Islam and Islam alone," Mr Hanif [said]"

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/07/australia-members-of-hizb-ut-tahrir-say-country-is-god-forsaken-and-that-muslims-must-shun-secular-a.html



Moslem ARE NOT PERMITTED, by ISLAM, to join themselves, to integrate with, the un-ISLAMIC society.

If a moslem does so, ISLAM declares that his Kafir blood can be spilled, because he is no longer a moslem.

And this [above] is how moslem community leaders in Australia have been recorded, advising members of their own community, here in Australia!




IMAGE....

"We only want Sharia Law!"





IMAGE....

"F-uck Democracy! We are moslems! We only want Sharia Law!"



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Brian Ross on Aug 29th, 2014 at 12:23am

Yadda wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 9:31pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 8:52pm:

Gnads wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 8:14pm:
Most of those arriving by boat into Australian territory are economic migrants not genuine refugees from war zones.


An interesting claim.  On what basis do you make it?  Your evidence to support it is?  ::)





Many of those claiming to be asylum seekers, patently are ILLEGAL economic migrants and are not legitimate asylum seekers.


And how do you know that, Yadda?  The Australian Government has not been processing Asylum Applications now for over 18 months.  No one knows whether they are genuine refugees or not.   What insight do you have that the Government itself lacks?

Ah, is this it?   ::)


Quote:
1/ They travel through safe 2nd and 3rd countries, seeking 'refuge'.

2/ They have enough personal resources to travel half way around the planet!, to come to countries like Australia.  [....if they are truly seeking safe refuge when escaping their circumstances, why don't they travel to the 1st, closest, safe country???]


Perhaps because the closest countries and even the intervening ones, are not signatories to the UN Convention on Refugees, Yadda?  If you claim asylum in a non-signatory country you can be punished for doing so, you can be subject to arbitary arrest and deportation and you and your family have no rights, either politically, legally or to earn a livelihood.


Quote:
Many 'asylum seekers' seeking 'sanctuary' in Australia, are ILLEGAL migrants, or economic migrants, at best.

And at worst?

Many of these ppl arriving on our shores uninvited [by Australia] are moslems.

And being moslems, they clearly embrace societal values which are antithetical/incompatible with our own value system.

And worst of all....
Moslems do not come to Australia to become Australians.

Moslems come to Australia to be MOSLEMS, 1st, 2nd, and 3rd, and are working tirelessly to undermine Australian society and Australian institutions.


Yet hundreds of thousands of them live peacefully and happily as part of the wider Australian multicultural community, Yadda.   Probatur botellus.   ::)



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Laugh till you cry on Aug 29th, 2014 at 12:25am
Legal migrants are economic migrants too. That term does not discriminate between different migrants.

People would not migrate here if they did not believe it was economically beneficial.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 29th, 2014 at 7:02am
This isn't a migration thread there are plenty of those here. Please let's keep this to the spectre  our involvement in the Middle East crisis with ISIS.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 7:05am

Gnads wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 8:14pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:34pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:30pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:19pm:
Then you will have to admit to the blood of over 1,000,000,000 civilian deaths  on your hands because of your side's warmongering and illegal invasions.

Taking responsibility ... man or mouse cods?



hilarious.. cannot tell the difference between a war when both sides are armed and ready..

to helping people with money, pay criminals like  people smugglers to smuggle them into a foreign country..... in the hope we will look after them for life..

and this idiot cant tell the difference.. >:(

perish the thought a greeny would take responsibility for opening our borders..and being the direct cause of these people drowning..

.wont mention the boat loads that went missing never to be seen again..



So you are a hypocrite.

It was the right's policies that caused some of the push factors for refugees to flee war zones and so take risks to reach security.

Most of those arriving by boat into Australian territory are economic migrants not genuine refugees from war zones.



1. Can you substantiate that claim?

2. They are genuine asylum seekers (refugee status is unknown).

3. One does not need to be from a war zone in order to be an asylum seeker (or refugee).




Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yadda on Aug 29th, 2014 at 9:31am

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 7:05am:

Gnads wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 8:14pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:34pm:

cods wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:30pm:

____ wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 5:19pm:
Then you will have to admit to the blood of over 1,000,000,000 civilian deaths  on your hands because of your side's warmongering and illegal invasions.

Taking responsibility ... man or mouse cods?



hilarious.. cannot tell the difference between a war when both sides are armed and ready..

to helping people with money, pay criminals like  people smugglers to smuggle them into a foreign country..... in the hope we will look after them for life..

and this idiot cant tell the difference.. >:(

perish the thought a greeny would take responsibility for opening our borders..and being the direct cause of these people drowning..

.wont mention the boat loads that went missing never to be seen again..



So you are a hypocrite.

It was the right's policies that caused some of the push factors for refugees to flee war zones and so take risks to reach security.

Most of those arriving by boat into Australian territory are economic migrants not genuine refugees from war zones.



1. Can you substantiate that claim?

2. They are genuine asylum seekers (refugee status is unknown).

3. One does not need to be from a war zone in order to be an asylum seeker (or refugee).


VERY TRUE, gp!

Dictionary;
asylum = = the protection granted by a state to someone who has left their native country as a political refugee. shelter or protection from danger.





I Yadda, too, am an asylum seeker.

And i demand that the Australian government provide me with asylum [protection from fear] from the threats coming from moslems in our Australian community.
.....because i know that all moslems, are moslems.

IMAGE...






Dictionary;
Muslim = = a follower of Islam.


And all moslems follow an ideology called ISLAM.


Because moslems, in being a moslem, are choosing to associate themselves, with a lying, deceitful philosophy/organisation [ISLAM], which encourages political and religious violence against those who do not believe as they believe.




e.g.
Just look at what they [moslems] do to those who do not believe as they [moslems] believe in places like Somalia, Nigeria, Kenya, Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, ect, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, even the UK!!!!

IMAGE....


"He didn't want to believe, what we believe!!!!"


Google;
Almost a quarter of UK Muslims believe 7/7 was justified       

Almost a quarter of UK Muslims - ADMIT - that they believe 7/7 was justified

Moslems believe that terrorising






And all moslems are wanna-be murderers.

And i demand that the Australian government provide me with asylum [protection from fear] from moslems who are walking on the streets of our Australian community.





Yadda said.....

Quote:

From what i know, from my study, of ISLAM's own texts, and doctrines, i would confidently make this statement...
Every good moslem in Australia [and indeed, every good moslem on the planet], by self declaring as a moslem, is self declaring a criminal intent [by our laws] against local non-moslems.
Every moslem!
ISLAM is in fact, a criminal compact among moslems, to wage a violent 'religious' war against ALL non-moslems ['unbelievers'].
In my estimation, all good moslems do understand what their religious OBLIGATION is, to ISLAM, and to fellow moslems.
Those assertions i make, may be uncomfortable to some among us, but are based in TRUTH, and the truthful tenets of 'faith' which ISLAM teaches.








All moslems are wanna-be murderers - as plain as the nose on your face.

Just look at the religious philosophy societal philosophy which all moslems endorse and are choosing to empower!!!.....


"....Lo! Allah is an enemy to those who reject Faith."
Koran 2.98


"....those who reject Allah have no protector."
Koran 47.008
v. 8-11


"...And why should ye not fight in the cause of Allah and of [i.e. for] those who, being weak, are ill-treated (and oppressed)?...Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah, and those who reject Faith Fight in the cause of Evil: So fight ye against the friends of Satan:.."
Koran 4.74-76


"Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain:...."
Koran 9.111


"If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah), never will it be accepted of him;...."
Koran 3.85


"And fight with them until.....religion should be only for Allah,..."
Koran 2.193


"Allah 's Apostle said, " I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' ...."
hadithsunnah/bukhari #004.052.196




Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 9:42am

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 9:31am:
And all moslems are wanna-be murderers.

And i demand that the Australian government provide me with asylum [protection from fear] from moslems who are walking on the streets of our Australian community.



Where would you like the government to put you?

The Sydney Hilton, perhaps    :-/



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yadda on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:01am

IMAGE....



greggerypeccary,

The difference between Australians and moslems, is that right thinking Australians would not sanction such an act [image above].

But that right thinking moslems - would - sanction such an act - whenever disbelievers were the victims.



Google;
Almost a quarter of UK Muslims believe 7/7 was justified       

Almost a quarter of UK Muslims - ADMIT - that they believe 7/7 was justified!!!!




IMAGE....





ALL MOSLEMS ARE GOING TO THE HOT PLACE - Allah's paradise.

Coz, the moslem [EVERY moslem] sanctions murder - justifying it as being done in Allah's cause.




A UK moslem community leader, speaking of the London 7/7 bombing;

YT
KILLING OF NON-MUSLIMS IS LEGITIMATE
"...when we say innocent people, we mean moslems."
"....[not accepting ISLAM] is a crime against God."
"...If you are a non-moslem, then you are guilty of not believing in God."
"...as a moslem....i must have hatred towards everything which is non-ISLAM."
"...[moslems] allegiance is always with the moslems, so i will never condemn a moslem for what he does."
"...Britain has always been Dar al Harb [the Land of War]"
"...no, i could never condemn a moslem brother, i would never condemn a moslem brother. I will always stand with my moslem brother....whether he is an oppresser or the oppressed."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maHSOB2RFm4





Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:06am

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:01am:
IMAGE....



greggerypeccary,

The difference between Australians and moslems ...




... is obvious: one is a nationality, the other is a religion.

So, how many Muslim terrorist attacks have there been in Australia?

Was the Sydney Hilton bombing a Muslim terrorist attack?


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yadda on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:11am

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:01am:

ALL MOSLEMS ARE GOING TO THE HOT PLACE - Allah's paradise.

Coz, the moslem [EVERY moslem] sanctions murder - justifying it as being done in Allah's cause.



Who is a moslem,      ....except the person who self declares; "I am a moslem!"

Being a moslem, is like being pregnant.

Either you are pregnant, or, you aren't!



And, either you are a moslem, or, you aren't.







Are you a moslem ?


All moslems are wanna-be murderers - as plain as the nose on your face.

Just look at the religious philosophy societal philosophy which all moslems endorse and are choosing to empower!!!.....


"....Lo! Allah is an enemy to those who reject Faith."
Koran 2.98


"....those who reject Allah have no protector."
Koran 47.008
v. 8-11


"...And why should ye not fight in the cause of Allah and of [i.e. for] those who, being weak, are ill-treated (and oppressed)?...Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah, and those who reject Faith Fight in the cause of Evil: So fight ye against the friends of Satan:.."
Koran 4.74-76


"Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain:...."
Koran 9.111


"If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah), never will it be accepted of him;...."
Koran 3.85


"And fight with them until.....religion should be only for Allah,..."
Koran 2.193


"Allah 's Apostle said, " I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' ...."
hadithsunnah/bukhari #004.052.196


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:13am

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:06am:

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:01am:
IMAGE....



greggerypeccary,

The difference between Australians and moslems ...




... is obvious: one is a nationality, the other is a religion.

So, how many Muslim terrorist attacks have there been in Australia?

Was the Sydney Hilton bombing a Muslim terrorist attack?
In 1916 there was a muslim terrorist attack on a picnic train just outside Broken Hill.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yadda on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:14am

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:06am:

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:01am:
IMAGE....



greggerypeccary,

The difference between Australians and moslems ...




... is obvious: one is a nationality, the other is a religion.

So, how many Muslim terrorist attacks have there been in Australia?

Was the Sydney Hilton bombing a Muslim terrorist attack?



Sure it was.

Maybe.



It had all the 'hallmarks' of being a moslem bombing.
....a bomb went of in a public place.



e.g.

IMAGE....






Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:17am

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:13am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:06am:

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:01am:
IMAGE....



greggerypeccary,

The difference between Australians and moslems ...




... is obvious: one is a nationality, the other is a religion.

So, how many Muslim terrorist attacks have there been in Australia?
In 1916 there was a muslim terrorist attack on a picnic train just outside Broken Hill.



So, your answer is "one"?


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yadda on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:18am
I blame ISLAM.

....just like K does.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:19am

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:14am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:06am:

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:01am:
IMAGE....



greggerypeccary,

The difference between Australians and moslems ...




... is obvious: one is a nationality, the other is a religion.

So, how many Muslim terrorist attacks have there been in Australia?

Was the Sydney Hilton bombing a Muslim terrorist attack?



Sure it was.

Maybe.



It had all the 'hallmarks' of being a moslem bombing.
....a bomb went of in a public place.



e.g.

IMAGE....



It had all the hallmarks of a terrorist attack.

Moreover, most terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

Have any Muslim groups come forward to claim responsibility for the Hilton bombing?


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:24am

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:17am:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:13am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:06am:

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:01am:
IMAGE....



greggerypeccary,

The difference between Australians and moslems ...




... is obvious: one is a nationality, the other is a religion.

So, how many Muslim terrorist attacks have there been in Australia?
In 1916 there was a muslim terrorist attack on a picnic train just outside Broken Hill.



So, your answer is "one"?
Don't blame me because their plans keep getting foiled. ASIO tracks their messages.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yadda on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:28am

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:19am:

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:14am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:06am:

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:01am:
IMAGE....



greggerypeccary,

The difference between Australians and moslems ...




... is obvious: one is a nationality, the other is a religion.

So, how many Muslim terrorist attacks have there been in Australia?

Was the Sydney Hilton bombing a Muslim terrorist attack?



Sure it was.

Maybe.



It had all the 'hallmarks' of being a moslem bombing.
....a bomb went of in a public place.



e.g.

IMAGE....



It had all the hallmarks of a terrorist attack.




greggerypeccary,

I have got news for you.......

In today's world, terrorism is synonymous with ISLAM.

And rightly so.





FROM THE SUNNA OF MOHAMMED - ISLAM'S PROPHET AND ARGUABLY, THE AUTHOR OF ISLAM'S THEOLOGY OF TERROR

Allah's Apostle said,
"I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy)...."
hadith/bukhari #004.052.220

".....I have been given superiority......; I have been helped by terror (in the hearts of enemies):....."
hadithsunnah/muslim/ #004.1062







Hot place!



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Laugh till you cry on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:38am
Muslims have a very much higher chance of being terrorized by non-muslims than non-muslims have of being terrorized by muslims.

Don't forget that USA and UK are the countries that kicked off ISIS in Syria, supplied them with weapons and polictical cover and are now fearing blowback.

Middle East was much more peaceful before Bush.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 11:27am

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:24am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:17am:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:13am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:06am:

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:01am:
IMAGE....



greggerypeccary,

The difference between Australians and moslems ...




... is obvious: one is a nationality, the other is a religion.

So, how many Muslim terrorist attacks have there been in Australia?
In 1916 there was a muslim terrorist attack on a picnic train just outside Broken Hill.



So, your answer is "one"?
Don't blame me because their plans keep getting foiled. ASIO tracks their messages.



So they say.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 11:28am

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:28am:
greggerypeccary,

I have got news for you.......

In today's world, terrorism is synonymous with ISLAM.



In the minds of the ignorant, yes.

In the real world, not so much.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Aug 29th, 2014 at 11:37am

Laugh till you cry wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:38am:
Muslims have a very much higher chance of being terrorized by non-muslims than non-muslims have of being terrorized by muslims.

Don't forget that USA and UK are the countries that kicked off ISIS in Syria, supplied them with weapons and polictical cover and are now fearing blowback.

Middle East was much more peaceful before Bush.



me thinks you should google that...the middle east has never been peaceful...why do you think we have so many Lebanese here??..
and I guess we can forget about the kurds

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Aug 29th, 2014 at 11:40am

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 11:28am:

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:28am:
greggerypeccary,

I have got news for you.......

In today's world, terrorism is synonymous with ISLAM.



In the minds of the ignorant, yes.

In the real world, not so much.




so you think America and Australia are more about terrorism?..

havent seen them use car bombs or blow up tall building with airplanes as yet but I am sure you can show us where they have.

I fear I am living in a different world to the one you are living in.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 29th, 2014 at 12:33pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 11:28am:

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:28am:
greggerypeccary,

I have got news for you.......

In today's world, terrorism is synonymous with ISLAM.



In the minds of the ignorant, yes.

In the real world, not so much.


Can you list how many terrorist attacks in recent history have NOT been carried out by Muslims, compared to how many HAVE been carried out by Muslims??? (And the Gaza/Israel thing doesn't count)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:00pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 12:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 11:28am:

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:28am:
greggerypeccary,

I have got news for you.......

In today's world, terrorism is synonymous with ISLAM.



In the minds of the ignorant, yes.

In the real world, not so much.


Can you list how many terrorist attacks in recent history have NOT been carried out by Muslims, compared to how many HAVE been carried out by Muslims???



Well, in the USA, for example:

"Non-Muslims Carried Out More than 90% of All Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Soil"

"An FBI report shows that only a small percentage of terrorist attacks carried out on U.S. soil between 1980 and 2005 were perpetrated by Muslims."



http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/05/muslims-only-carried-out-2-5-percent-of-terrorist-attacks-on-u-s-soil-between-1970-and-2012.html

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:02pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:00pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 12:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 11:28am:

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:28am:
greggerypeccary,

I have got news for you.......

In today's world, terrorism is synonymous with ISLAM.



In the minds of the ignorant, yes.

In the real world, not so much.


Can you list how many terrorist attacks in recent history have NOT been carried out by Muslims, compared to how many HAVE been carried out by Muslims???



Well, in the USA, for example:

"Non-Muslims Carried Out More than 90% of All Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Soil"

"An FBI report shows that only a small percentage of terrorist attacks carried out on U.S. soil between 1980 and 2005 were perpetrated by Muslims."



Oh wow...David Icke??? How many were carried out by 'shaped shifted alien reptiles'???

And, of course, how many since 2001?? Worldwide?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:08pm

cods wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 11:40am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 11:28am:

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:28am:
greggerypeccary,

I have got news for you.......

In today's world, terrorism is synonymous with ISLAM.



In the minds of the ignorant, yes.

In the real world, not so much.




so you think America and Australia are more about terrorism?..



No.

I think America and Australia are countries.

I think Islam is a religion.

I don't think any of them are "synonymous" with terrorism.




Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:09pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:00pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 12:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 11:28am:

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:28am:
greggerypeccary,

I have got news for you.......

In today's world, terrorism is synonymous with ISLAM.



In the minds of the ignorant, yes.

In the real world, not so much.


Can you list how many terrorist attacks in recent history have NOT been carried out by Muslims, compared to how many HAVE been carried out by Muslims???



Well, in the USA, for example:

"Non-Muslims Carried Out More than 90% of All Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Soil"

"An FBI report shows that only a small percentage of terrorist attacks carried out on U.S. soil between 1980 and 2005 were perpetrated by Muslims."



Oh wow...David Icke??? How many were carried out by 'shaped shifted alien reptiles'???



Are you suggesting that the FBI figures are incorrect?

If so, can you substantiate your claim?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:17pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:02pm:
And, of course, how many since 2001?? Worldwide?



You'll eventually have to learn how to use google.  I can't do this for you all the time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2001

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2002

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2003

And the rest are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents  (in a box near the bottom of the page).

Once you go to each year, do a word search of 'Islam' and 'Muslim'.  Let me know your results   ;)

Most terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

I've provided you with the proof, yet somehow I don't think you are willing to accept it.

If you want to keep drinking the kool-aid, that's your choice.

I prefer to live in the real world.

Cheers.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yadda on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:22pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:08pm:

cods wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 11:40am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 11:28am:

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:28am:
greggerypeccary,

I have got news for you.......

In today's world, terrorism is synonymous with ISLAM.



In the minds of the ignorant, yes.

In the real world, not so much.




so you think America and Australia are more about terrorism?..



No.

I think America and Australia are countries.

I think Islam is a religion.

I don't think any of them are "synonymous" with terrorism.





And of course Mohammed's historic words are being 'misinterpreted'.....           :D



FROM THE SUNNA OF MOHAMMED - ISLAM'S PROPHET AND ARGUABLY, THE AUTHOR OF ISLAM'S THEOLOGY OF SUPPORTING AND ENDORSING ACTS OF TERROR, TO FURTHER 'ALLAH'S CAUSE'

Allah's Apostle said,
"I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy)...."
hadith/bukhari #004.052.220

".....I have been given superiority......; I have been helped by terror (in the hearts of enemies):....."
hadithsunnah/muslim/ #004.1062





Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:23pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:08pm:

cods wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 11:40am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 11:28am:

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:28am:
greggerypeccary,

I have got news for you.......

In today's world, terrorism is synonymous with ISLAM.



In the minds of the ignorant, yes.

In the real world, not so much.




so you think America and Australia are more about terrorism?..



No.

I think America and Australia are countries.

I think Islam is a religion.

I don't think any of them are "synonymous" with terrorism.




really??...ok so who do you think is "synonymous" with TERRORISM... as it is on the rise...

and it [terrorism]usually attracts like thinking people...

so not yanks or aussies... not muslims...maybe Baptists..

if you dont think these people or countries are linked.to terrorism..


are you saying its just a group of mad people from all walks of life who do mad things from time to time....but they are   not connected in anyway? through country or religion?.

just a coincidence they all like killing and chopping heads off..




Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:27pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:09pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:00pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 12:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 11:28am:

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:28am:
greggerypeccary,

I have got news for you.......

In today's world, terrorism is synonymous with ISLAM.



In the minds of the ignorant, yes.

In the real world, not so much.


Can you list how many terrorist attacks in recent history have NOT been carried out by Muslims, compared to how many HAVE been carried out by Muslims???



Well, in the USA, for example:

"Non-Muslims Carried Out More than 90% of All Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Soil"

"An FBI report shows that only a small percentage of terrorist attacks carried out on U.S. soil between 1980 and 2005 were perpetrated by Muslims."



Oh wow...David Icke??? How many were carried out by 'shaped shifted alien reptiles'???



Are you suggesting that the FBI figures are incorrect?

If so, can you substantiate your claim?


Yes I am suggesting they might be outdated. And no, YOU need to substantiate your claim, since your source is a conspiracy theorist (like It_is_the_light) who thinks he is the 'Son of the Godhead' and that the British Royal Family are shape-shifting Alien Reptiles...

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:31pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:17pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:02pm:
And, of course, how many since 2001?? Worldwide?



You'll eventually have to learn how to use google.  I can't do this for you all the time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2001

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2002

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2003

And the rest are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents  (in a box near the bottom of the page).

Once you go to each year, do a word search of 'Islam' and 'Muslim'.  Let me know your results   ;)

Most terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

I've provided you with the proof, yet somehow I don't think you are willing to accept it.

If you want to keep drinking the kool-aid, that's your choice.

I prefer to live in the real world.

Cheers.



so ISIS is not American/Australian/Musliim... ::) ::)

btw wiki is a bit out of date...

so where did it spring from ??   and which religious group are they doing their best  persuading people to join.. unless they want their heads on a pole.

just like to clear it all up thats all.

btw where would you class the Taliban???..



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:32pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:09pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:00pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 12:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 11:28am:

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:28am:
greggerypeccary,

I have got news for you.......

In today's world, terrorism is synonymous with ISLAM.



In the minds of the ignorant, yes.

In the real world, not so much.


Can you list how many terrorist attacks in recent history have NOT been carried out by Muslims, compared to how many HAVE been carried out by Muslims???



Well, in the USA, for example:

"Non-Muslims Carried Out More than 90% of All Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Soil"

"An FBI report shows that only a small percentage of terrorist attacks carried out on U.S. soil between 1980 and 2005 were perpetrated by Muslims."



Oh wow...David Icke??? How many were carried out by 'shaped shifted alien reptiles'???



Are you suggesting that the FBI figures are incorrect?

If so, can you substantiate your claim?


Yes I am suggesting they might be outdated. And no, YOU need to substantiate your claim, since your source is a conspiracy theorist (like It_is_the_light) who thinks he is the 'Son of the Godhead' and that the British Royal Family are shape-shifting Alien Reptiles...



The figures from the FBI are for specific years, so they aren't outdated (nice try though).

And, I have provided you with the proof: http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1409194961/93#93

Most terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.  Undeniable, verifiable fact.



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:36pm

cods wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:17pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:02pm:
And, of course, how many since 2001?? Worldwide?



You'll eventually have to learn how to use google.  I can't do this for you all the time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2001

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2002

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2003

And the rest are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents  (in a box near the bottom of the page).

Once you go to each year, do a word search of 'Islam' and 'Muslim'.  Let me know your results   ;)

Most terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

I've provided you with the proof, yet somehow I don't think you are willing to accept it.

If you want to keep drinking the kool-aid, that's your choice.

I prefer to live in the real world.

Cheers.



so ISIS is not American/Australian/Musliim... ::) ::)

btw wiki is a bit out of date...

so where did it spring from ??   and which religious group are they doing their best  persuading people to join.. unless they want their heads on a pole.

just like to clear it all up thats all.

btw where would you class the Taliban???..




Most terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

What part of that are you struggling to understand?

If you disagree with the FBI, please present your evidence.

And, the Taliban is is an Islamic fundamentalist terrorist organisation.

Anything else I can help you with?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:47pm

Again, most attacks carried out by non-Muslims:

http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terrorism-2002-2005/terror02_05#terror_05sum

This is too easy.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:48pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:36pm:

cods wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:17pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:02pm:
And, of course, how many since 2001?? Worldwide?



You'll eventually have to learn how to use google.  I can't do this for you all the time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2001

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2002

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2003

And the rest are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents  (in a box near the bottom of the page).

Once you go to each year, do a word search of 'Islam' and 'Muslim'.  Let me know your results   ;)

Most terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

I've provided you with the proof, yet somehow I don't think you are willing to accept it.

If you want to keep drinking the kool-aid, that's your choice.

I prefer to live in the real world.

Cheers.



so ISIS is not American/Australian/Musliim... ::) ::)

btw wiki is a bit out of date...

so where did it spring from ??   and which religious group are they doing their best  persuading people to join.. unless they want their heads on a pole.

just like to clear it all up thats all.

btw where would you class the Taliban???..




Most terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

What part of that are you struggling to understand?

If you disagree with the FBI, please present your evidence.

And, the Taliban is is an Islamic fundamentalist terrorist organisation.

Anything else I can help you with?


Really...because from the Wiki link (2001 I think) 33 out of 55 are Islamic based attacks...and I'd guess the numbers have increased since then.

Let's face it, other than the 'internal' ones i.e US nutjob Militias and the IRA (who seem to have calmed down a lot lately) most attacks do seem to be Muslim extremists. Just count the ones carried out by extremists from the ISIS and all the stuff in the African nations and Afghanistan.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:53pm

And again, in Europe, most terrorist attacks carried out by non-Muslims:

https://www.europol.europa.eu/latest_publications/37

Most terrorist attacks around the world, in recent years, are carried out by non-Muslims. Still waiting for evidence to the contrary    :-/

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:58pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:48pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:36pm:

cods wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:17pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:02pm:
And, of course, how many since 2001?? Worldwide?



You'll eventually have to learn how to use google.  I can't do this for you all the time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2001

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2002

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2003

And the rest are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents  (in a box near the bottom of the page).

Once you go to each year, do a word search of 'Islam' and 'Muslim'.  Let me know your results   ;)

Most terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

I've provided you with the proof, yet somehow I don't think you are willing to accept it.

If you want to keep drinking the kool-aid, that's your choice.

I prefer to live in the real world.

Cheers.



so ISIS is not American/Australian/Musliim... ::) ::)

btw wiki is a bit out of date...

so where did it spring from ??   and which religious group are they doing their best  persuading people to join.. unless they want their heads on a pole.

just like to clear it all up thats all.

btw where would you class the Taliban???..




Most terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

What part of that are you struggling to understand?

If you disagree with the FBI, please present your evidence.

And, the Taliban is is an Islamic fundamentalist terrorist organisation.

Anything else I can help you with?



Let's face it, other than the 'internal' ones i.e US nutjob Militias and the IRA (who seem to have calmed down a lot lately) most attacks do seem to be Muslim extremists. Just count the ones carried out by extremists from the ISIS and all the stuff in the African nations and Afghanistan.



Oh, so NOW you're saying "other than".  Nice try, again.

Let's not say "other than", OK?

Most terrorist attacks around the world are carried out by non-Muslims. Simple, undeniable (and verified) fact.

::)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:13pm

cods wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:23pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:08pm:

cods wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 11:40am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 11:28am:

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:28am:
greggerypeccary,

I have got news for you.......

In today's world, terrorism is synonymous with ISLAM.



In the minds of the ignorant, yes.

In the real world, not so much.




so you think America and Australia are more about terrorism?..



No.

I think America and Australia are countries.

I think Islam is a religion.

I don't think any of them are "synonymous" with terrorism.




really??...ok so who do you think is "synonymous" with TERRORISM... as it is on the rise...



Terrorists.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:16pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:58pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:48pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:36pm:

cods wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:17pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:02pm:
And, of course, how many since 2001?? Worldwide?



You'll eventually have to learn how to use google.  I can't do this for you all the time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2001

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2002

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2003

And the rest are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents  (in a box near the bottom of the page).

Once you go to each year, do a word search of 'Islam' and 'Muslim'.  Let me know your results   ;)

Most terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

I've provided you with the proof, yet somehow I don't think you are willing to accept it.

If you want to keep drinking the kool-aid, that's your choice.

I prefer to live in the real world.

Cheers.



so ISIS is not American/Australian/Musliim... ::) ::)

btw wiki is a bit out of date...

so where did it spring from ??   and which religious group are they doing their best  persuading people to join.. unless they want their heads on a pole.

just like to clear it all up thats all.

btw where would you class the Taliban???..




Most terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

What part of that are you struggling to understand?

If you disagree with the FBI, please present your evidence.

And, the Taliban is is an Islamic fundamentalist terrorist organisation.

Anything else I can help you with?



Let's face it, other than the 'internal' ones i.e US nutjob Militias and the IRA (who seem to have calmed down a lot lately) most attacks do seem to be Muslim extremists. Just count the ones carried out by extremists from the ISIS and all the stuff in the African nations and Afghanistan.



Oh, so NOW you're saying "other than".  Nice try, again.

Let's not say "other than", OK?

Most terrorist attacks around the world are carried out by non-Muslims. Simple, undeniable (and verified) fact.

::)


NO I'm not saying 'other than....which you seem to want to believe...I'm saying WORLDWIDE, post 2001 (recent history). The Sunni and Shiite muslims have been killing each other for 1200 years. Which religion is involved in the killing and terror attacks in Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Israel/Gaza, England etc???

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:17pm
bump

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:20pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:58pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:48pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:36pm:

cods wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:17pm:
[quote author=gizmo_2655 link=1409194961/90#90 date=1409281354]

And, of course, how many since 2001?? Worldwide?



You'll eventually have to learn how to use google.  I can't do this for you all the time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2001

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2002

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2003

And the rest are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents  (in a box near the bottom of the page).

Once you go to each year, do a word search of 'Islam' and 'Muslim'.  Let me know your results   ;)

Most terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

I've provided you with the proof, yet somehow I don't think you are willing to accept it.

If you want to keep drinking the kool-aid, that's your choice.

I prefer to live in the real world.

Cheers.



so ISIS is not American/Australian/Musliim... ::) ::)

btw wiki is a bit out of date...

so where did it spring from ??   and which religious group are they doing their best  persuading people to join.. unless they want their heads on a pole.

just like to clear it all up thats all.

btw where would you class the Taliban???..




Most terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

What part of that are you struggling to understand?

If you disagree with the FBI, please present your evidence.

And, the Taliban is is an Islamic fundamentalist terrorist organisation.

Anything else I can help you with?



Let's face it, other than the 'internal' ones i.e US nutjob Militias and the IRA ...


NO I'm not saying 'other than....which you seem to want to believe..



And now the lying and backpedaling starts.

You said it, now own it: "other than".

::)


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:24pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:16pm:
...I'm saying WORLDWIDE, post 2001 (recent history). The Sunni and Shiite muslims have been killing each other for 1200 years. Which religion is involved in the killing and terror attacks in Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Israel/Gaza, England etc???



Islam.

And yet, the fact still remains, most terrorist attacks, worldwide, since 2001 are carried out by non-Muslims.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by JaSin on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:28pm
Yellow People outbreed you.
Black people inseminate your women.
Brown people just want to kill you.

...wonder what the White people are doing then?


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:30pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:20pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:58pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:48pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:36pm:

cods wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:17pm:
[quote author=gizmo_2655 link=1409194961/90#90 date=1409281354]

And, of course, how many since 2001?? Worldwide?



You'll eventually have to learn how to use google.  I can't do this for you all the time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2001

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2002

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2003

And the rest are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents  (in a box near the bottom of the page).

Once you go to each year, do a word search of 'Islam' and 'Muslim'.  Let me know your results   ;)

Most terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

I've provided you with the proof, yet somehow I don't think you are willing to accept it.

If you want to keep drinking the kool-aid, that's your choice.

I prefer to live in the real world.

Cheers.



so ISIS is not American/Australian/Musliim... ::) ::)

btw wiki is a bit out of date...

so where did it spring from ??   and which religious group are they doing their best  persuading people to join.. unless they want their heads on a pole.

just like to clear it all up thats all.

btw where would you class the Taliban???..




Most terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

What part of that are you struggling to understand?

If you disagree with the FBI, please present your evidence.

And, the Taliban is is an Islamic fundamentalist terrorist organisation.

Anything else I can help you with?



Let's face it, other than the 'internal' ones i.e US nutjob Militias and the IRA ...


NO I'm not saying 'other than....which you seem to want to believe..



And now the lying and backpedaling starts.

You said it, now own it: "other than".

::)


Perhaps you should do the WHOLE quote???

"NO I'm not saying 'other than....which you seem to want to believe...I'm saying WORLDWIDE, post 2001 (recent history). The Sunni and Shiite muslims have been killing each other for 1200 years. Which religion is involved in the killing and terror attacks in Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Israel/Gaza, England etc???"

In the last 10 or 15 years, most of (more than half) the terror attacks/deaths have been the result of Islamic Extremists. Ok, so 'maybe' it was because of the 'Coalition of the Willing' post 9/11. But that may have simply been that the Western Media actually started reporting those things after the WTC attacks.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:34pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:24pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:16pm:
...I'm saying WORLDWIDE, post 2001 (recent history). The Sunni and Shiite muslims have been killing each other for 1200 years. Which religion is involved in the killing and terror attacks in Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Israel/Gaza, England etc???



Islam.

And yet, the fact still remains, most terrorist attacks, worldwide, since 2001 are carried out by non-Muslims.
Says who? The Wikipedia links you posted don't even mention one African incident. You are talking out of your ass greggorry. Post some better information.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:35pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:30pm:
In the last 10 or 15 years, most of (more than half) the terror attacks/deaths have been the result of Islamic Extremists. 



In the last 10 to 15 years, most (more than half) terrorist attacks have been carried out by non-Muslims.

I've already provided the proof of this.

If you refuse to believe, that's your problem. Go on crossing the road every time you see a Muslim on your side of the street, if that makes you feel safer.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:40pm

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:24pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:16pm:
...I'm saying WORLDWIDE, post 2001 (recent history). The Sunni and Shiite muslims have been killing each other for 1200 years. Which religion is involved in the killing and terror attacks in Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Israel/Gaza, England etc???



Islam.

And yet, the fact still remains, most terrorist attacks, worldwide, since 2001 are carried out by non-Muslims.
Says who? The Wikipedia links you posted don't even mention one African incident. You are talking out of your ass greggorry. Post some better information.
There's been hundreds in Iraq alone.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:45pm

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:40pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:24pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:16pm:
...I'm saying WORLDWIDE, post 2001 (recent history). The Sunni and Shiite muslims have been killing each other for 1200 years. Which religion is involved in the killing and terror attacks in Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Israel/Gaza, England etc???



Islam.

And yet, the fact still remains, most terrorist attacks, worldwide, since 2001 are carried out by non-Muslims.
Says who? The Wikipedia links you posted don't even mention one African incident. You are talking out of your ass greggorry. Post some better information.
There's been hundreds in Iraq alone.



The Iraq terrorist attacks are reported.

You need to look harder:

"And the rest are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents  (in a box near the bottom of the page)."

e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_July%E2%80%93December_2013

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:47pm
Just another day in Iraq as ISIS continues their genocide.

(Extract from)
DailyMail  UK

Friday, Aug 29th 2014 4PM

Jihadists issuing their warning that the beheadings will continue if the U.S. continues to support the Kurds
Hours after shocking world with desert execution of 300 Syrian soldiers, ISIS parade Kurds dressed in Guantanamo-style suits, behead one and promise to kill them all unless USA pull out of Iraq


Survivor: Mohammed, whose name has been changed out of fears for his safety, was forced to attend an Islamic State children's camp
Survivor of ISIS children's camp reveals how young boys are whipped and made to watch men being crucified and women stoned to death


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:48pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:35pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:30pm:
In the last 10 or 15 years, most of (more than half) the terror attacks/deaths have been the result of Islamic Extremists. 



In the last 10 to 15 years, most (more than half) terrorist attacks have been carried out by non-Muslims.

I've already provided the proof of this.

If you refuse to believe, that's your problem. Go on crossing the road every time you see a Muslim on your side of the street, if that makes you feel safer.


No, actually you have NOT..your 'proof' ends in 2005, which is 9 years ago..how many non-mulim terror attacks happened between 2005 and 2014, and how many muslim terror attacks happened in the same period??

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:52pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:48pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:35pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:30pm:
In the last 10 or 15 years, most of (more than half) the terror attacks/deaths have been the result of Islamic Extremists. 



In the last 10 to 15 years, most (more than half) terrorist attacks have been carried out by non-Muslims.

I've already provided the proof of this.

If you refuse to believe, that's your problem. Go on crossing the road every time you see a Muslim on your side of the street, if that makes you feel safer.


No, actually you have NOT..your 'proof' ends in 2005, which is 9 years ago..how many non-mulim terror attacks happened between 2005 and 2014, and how many muslim terror attacks happened in the same period??



This is the third time I've provided this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents  In a box, a little over half way down the page: "1970–present".

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:54pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:45pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:40pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:24pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:16pm:
...I'm saying WORLDWIDE, post 2001 (recent history). The Sunni and Shiite muslims have been killing each other for 1200 years. Which religion is involved in the killing and terror attacks in Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Israel/Gaza, England etc???



Islam.

And yet, the fact still remains, most terrorist attacks, worldwide, since 2001 are carried out by non-Muslims.
Says who? The Wikipedia links you posted don't even mention one African incident. You are talking out of your ass greggorry. Post some better information.
There's been hundreds in Iraq alone.



The Iraq terrorist attacks are reported.

You need to look harder:

"And the rest are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents  (in a box near the bottom of the page)."

e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_July%E2%80%93December_2013
You know you are lying. For years decade upon decade Islamic nutjobs have been letting off bombs right across the world. India, Bangladesh, Iran, Egypt, Iraq, Syria, Israel, Russia, USA, UK, Spain, Afghanistan , Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan, Algeria, Libya, UAE, Serbia, Bosnia, Kosovo, China, Thailand, Mali, Indonesia etc etc etc.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:57pm

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:54pm:
You know you are lying.

No lies: the Iraq attacks are reported at the link I provided. Have a closer look. I'm not sure why you can't see them.




Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:54pm:
For years decade upon decade Islamic nutjobs have been letting off bombs right across the world. India, Bangladesh, Iran, Egypt, Iraq, Syria, Israel, Russia, USA, UK, Spain, Afghanistan , Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan, Algeria, Libya, UAE, Serbia, Bosnia, Kosovo, China, Thailand, Mali, Indonesia etc etc etc.

Indeed, they have.  They're certainly a crazy mob.  Is someone suggesting that they haven't been involved in terrorist attacks?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:58pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:45pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:40pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:24pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:16pm:
...I'm saying WORLDWIDE, post 2001 (recent history). The Sunni and Shiite muslims have been killing each other for 1200 years. Which religion is involved in the killing and terror attacks in Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Israel/Gaza, England etc???



Islam.

And yet, the fact still remains, most terrorist attacks, worldwide, since 2001 are carried out by non-Muslims.
Says who? The Wikipedia links you posted don't even mention one African incident. You are talking out of your ass greggorry. Post some better information.
There's been hundreds in Iraq alone.



The Iraq terrorist attacks are reported.

You need to look harder:

"And the rest are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents  (in a box near the bottom of the page)."

e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_July%E2%80%93December_2013


Well just for the July section of that Wiki link, about 26 out of 31 attacks were Muslim inspired attacks.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:59pm
bump

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:00pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:57pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:54pm:
You know you are lying.

No lies: the Iraq attacks are reported at the link I provided. Have a closer look. I'm not sure why you can't see them.




Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:54pm:
For years decade upon decade Islamic nutjobs have been letting off bombs right across the world. India, Bangladesh, Iran, Egypt, Iraq, Syria, Israel, Russia, USA, UK, Spain, Afghanistan , Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan, Algeria, Libya, UAE, Serbia, Bosnia, Kosovo, China, Thailand, Mali, Indonesia etc etc etc.

Indeed, they have.  They're certainly a crazy mob.  Is someone suggesting that they haven't been involved in terrorist attacks?

Your links don't mention hardly any terrorist attacks. Why bother. There would be over 1,000 attacks in Afghanistan and Iraq alone. Go and make a cup of coffee and watch Days Of Our Lives.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:03pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:45pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:40pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:24pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:16pm:
...I'm saying WORLDWIDE, post 2001 (recent history). The Sunni and Shiite muslims have been killing each other for 1200 years. Which religion is involved in the killing and terror attacks in Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Israel/Gaza, England etc???



Islam.

And yet, the fact still remains, most terrorist attacks, worldwide, since 2001 are carried out by non-Muslims.
Says who? The Wikipedia links you posted don't even mention one African incident. You are talking out of your ass greggorry. Post some better information.
There's been hundreds in Iraq alone.



The Iraq terrorist attacks are reported.

You need to look harder:

"And the rest are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents  (in a box near the bottom of the page)."

e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_July%E2%80%93December_2013


Well just for the July section of that Wiki link, about 26 out of 31 attacks were Muslim inspired attacks.



I believe you.

However, we're talking about "since 2001", aren't we?

If you want to narrow it down to July 2013, there may indeed be more Muslim attacks.

The goal posts seem to be moved with every new post you make.

At least I can agree with you on one point: most terrorist attacks carried out on behalf of Islam, are perpetrated by Muslims.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:05pm

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:57pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:54pm:
You know you are lying.

No lies: the Iraq attacks are reported at the link I provided. Have a closer look. I'm not sure why you can't see them.




Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:54pm:
For years decade upon decade Islamic nutjobs have been letting off bombs right across the world. India, Bangladesh, Iran, Egypt, Iraq, Syria, Israel, Russia, USA, UK, Spain, Afghanistan , Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan, Algeria, Libya, UAE, Serbia, Bosnia, Kosovo, China, Thailand, Mali, Indonesia etc etc etc.

Indeed, they have.  They're certainly a crazy mob.  Is someone suggesting that they haven't been involved in terrorist attacks?

Your links don't mention hardly any terrorist attacks. Why bother. There would be over 1,000 attacks in Afghanistan and Iraq alone. Go and make a cup of coffee and watch Days Of Our Lives.



Well, I'll hand it over to you then, so that you can substantiate your claim:

"There would be over 1,000 attacks in Afghanistan and Iraq alone."

                                            :-/




Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:13pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:03pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:45pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:40pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:24pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:16pm:
...I'm saying WORLDWIDE, post 2001 (recent history). The Sunni and Shiite muslims have been killing each other for 1200 years. Which religion is involved in the killing and terror attacks in Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Israel/Gaza, England etc???



Islam.

And yet, the fact still remains, most terrorist attacks, worldwide, since 2001 are carried out by non-Muslims.
Says who? The Wikipedia links you posted don't even mention one African incident. You are talking out of your ass greggorry. Post some better information.
There's been hundreds in Iraq alone.



The Iraq terrorist attacks are reported.

You need to look harder:

"And the rest are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents  (in a box near the bottom of the page)."

e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_July%E2%80%93December_2013


Well just for the July section of that Wiki link, about 26 out of 31 attacks were Muslim inspired attacks.



I believe you.

However, we're talking about "since 2001", aren't we?

If you want to narrow it down to July 2013, there may indeed be more Muslim attacks.

The goal posts seem to be moved with every new post you make.

At least I can agree with you on one point: most terrorist attacks carried out on behalf of Islam, are perpetrated by Muslims.


Well it's YOUR link, not mine...but so July 2013 isn't an accurate test...can you show the non-muslim terror attacks between 2001 and 2014, as a percentage of the TOTAL terror attacks for the same period??

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:24pm
Just putting history aside for the moment, there is the current situation of ISIS carrying out Genocide on innocent civilians in numbers which are countless thousands.

Now that is something to get concerned about.

It is no different to the genocides carried out in Bosnia, Rawanda etc. the list just goes on and on.

The only reoccurring phenomena is the muted response from the United Nations in each and every episode of Genocide. The blue bereted troops, stand by, whilst monsters carry out atrocities even to the point where the Dutch UN troops handed over thousands of people they were supposed to be defending in Bosnia. They were subsequently slaughtered.

The alarming thing is that Barrack Obama has come out and said that the U.S. has 'no strategy' where ISIS is concerned.

Then it had better get one and in a hurry, the  impotent U.N. will do what they always do in massacres of innocents i.e. Nothing!!

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:45pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:13pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:03pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:45pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:40pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:24pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:16pm:
...I'm saying WORLDWIDE, post 2001 (recent history). The Sunni and Shiite muslims have been killing each other for 1200 years. Which religion is involved in the killing and terror attacks in Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Israel/Gaza, England etc???



Islam.

And yet, the fact still remains, most terrorist attacks, worldwide, since 2001 are carried out by non-Muslims.
Says who? The Wikipedia links you posted don't even mention one African incident. You are talking out of your ass greggorry. Post some better information.
There's been hundreds in Iraq alone.



The Iraq terrorist attacks are reported.

You need to look harder:

"And the rest are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents  (in a box near the bottom of the page)."

e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_July%E2%80%93December_2013


Well just for the July section of that Wiki link, about 26 out of 31 attacks were Muslim inspired attacks.



I believe you.

However, we're talking about "since 2001", aren't we?

If you want to narrow it down to July 2013, there may indeed be more Muslim attacks.

The goal posts seem to be moved with every new post you make.

At least I can agree with you on one point: most terrorist attacks carried out on behalf of Islam, are perpetrated by Muslims.


...can you show the non-muslim terror attacks between 2001 and 2014, as a percentage of the TOTAL terror attacks for the same period??



No, I'm not going to convert them to a percentage for you.  I've done far too much for you already.

I've provided the information, and it clearly substantiates my claim: most terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

If you choose to ignore the facts, and remain irrationally fearful, that's your prerogative.






Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:48pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:45pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:13pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:03pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:45pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:40pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:24pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:16pm:
...I'm saying WORLDWIDE, post 2001 (recent history). The Sunni and Shiite muslims have been killing each other for 1200 years. Which religion is involved in the killing and terror attacks in Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Israel/Gaza, England etc???



Islam.

And yet, the fact still remains, most terrorist attacks, worldwide, since 2001 are carried out by non-Muslims.
Says who? The Wikipedia links you posted don't even mention one African incident. You are talking out of your ass greggorry. Post some better information.
There's been hundreds in Iraq alone.



The Iraq terrorist attacks are reported.

You need to look harder:

"And the rest are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents  (in a box near the bottom of the page)."

e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_July%E2%80%93December_2013


Well just for the July section of that Wiki link, about 26 out of 31 attacks were Muslim inspired attacks.



I believe you.

However, we're talking about "since 2001", aren't we?

If you want to narrow it down to July 2013, there may indeed be more Muslim attacks.

The goal posts seem to be moved with every new post you make.

At least I can agree with you on one point: most terrorist attacks carried out on behalf of Islam, are perpetrated by Muslims.


...can you show the non-muslim terror attacks between 2001 and 2014, as a percentage of the TOTAL terror attacks for the same period??



No, I'm not going to convert them to a percentage for you.  I've done far too much for you already.

I've provided the information, and it clearly substantiates my claim: most terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

If you choose to ignore the facts, and remain irrationally fearful, that's your prerogative.


I'm not ignoring any facts...and it's ok that you won't convert non muslim vs muslim attacks to a percentage...since the unchanged numbers will still prove my point.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:50pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:13pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:03pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:45pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:40pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:24pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:16pm:
...I'm saying WORLDWIDE, post 2001 (recent history). The Sunni and Shiite muslims have been killing each other for 1200 years. Which religion is involved in the killing and terror attacks in Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Israel/Gaza, England etc???



Islam.

And yet, the fact still remains, most terrorist attacks, worldwide, since 2001 are carried out by non-Muslims.
Says who? The Wikipedia links you posted don't even mention one African incident. You are talking out of your ass greggorry. Post some better information.
There's been hundreds in Iraq alone.



The Iraq terrorist attacks are reported.

You need to look harder:

"And the rest are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents  (in a box near the bottom of the page)."

e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_July%E2%80%93December_2013


Well just for the July section of that Wiki link, about 26 out of 31 attacks were Muslim inspired attacks.



I believe you.

However, we're talking about "since 2001", aren't we?

If you want to narrow it down to July 2013, there may indeed be more Muslim attacks.

The goal posts seem to be moved with every new post you make.

At least I can agree with you on one point: most terrorist attacks carried out on behalf of Islam, are perpetrated by Muslims.


Well it's YOUR link, not mine...but so July 2013 isn't an accurate test..



Yes, it's my link, and I'm not disputing the numbers you quoted.

However, it's one month out of more than 150.  How can it possibly be an accurate test?

Keep moving those goal posts.



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:54pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:48pm:
...since the unchanged numbers will still prove my point.



Incorrect.

Most terrorist attacks around the world, since 2001, have been carried out by non-Muslims.

I've provided the proof.  I've proven my point beyond all doubt.

Thus far, you have provided absolutely nothing, except your personal opinion (which is based on irrational fear, fueled by talk-back radio, 60 Minutes, and ignorant work colleagues/friends).

When you can come up with something concrete to refute the facts I've presented, let me know.  I'll be right here.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:57pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:50pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:13pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:03pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:45pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:40pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:24pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:16pm:
...I'm saying WORLDWIDE, post 2001 (recent history). The Sunni and Shiite muslims have been killing each other for 1200 years. Which religion is involved in the killing and terror attacks in Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Israel/Gaza, England etc???



Islam.

And yet, the fact still remains, most terrorist attacks, worldwide, since 2001 are carried out by non-Muslims.
Says who? The Wikipedia links you posted don't even mention one African incident. You are talking out of your ass greggorry. Post some better information.
There's been hundreds in Iraq alone.



The Iraq terrorist attacks are reported.

You need to look harder:

"And the rest are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents  (in a box near the bottom of the page)."

e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_July%E2%80%93December_2013


Well just for the July section of that Wiki link, about 26 out of 31 attacks were Muslim inspired attacks.



I believe you.

However, we're talking about "since 2001", aren't we?

If you want to narrow it down to July 2013, there may indeed be more Muslim attacks.

The goal posts seem to be moved with every new post you make.

At least I can agree with you on one point: most terrorist attacks carried out on behalf of Islam, are perpetrated by Muslims.


Well it's YOUR link, not mine...but so July 2013 isn't an accurate test..



Yes, it's my link, and I'm not disputing the numbers you quoted.

However, it's one month out of more than 150.  How can it possibly be an accurate test?

Keep moving those goal posts.


No, I'll leave that to you...it is after all a 'lefty' thing.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:58pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:57pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:50pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:13pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:03pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:45pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:40pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:24pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:16pm:
...I'm saying WORLDWIDE, post 2001 (recent history). The Sunni and Shiite muslims have been killing each other for 1200 years. Which religion is involved in the killing and terror attacks in Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Israel/Gaza, England etc???



Islam.

And yet, the fact still remains, most terrorist attacks, worldwide, since 2001 are carried out by non-Muslims.
Says who? The Wikipedia links you posted don't even mention one African incident. You are talking out of your ass greggorry. Post some better information.
There's been hundreds in Iraq alone.



The Iraq terrorist attacks are reported.

You need to look harder:

"And the rest are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents  (in a box near the bottom of the page)."

e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_July%E2%80%93December_2013


Well just for the July section of that Wiki link, about 26 out of 31 attacks were Muslim inspired attacks.



I believe you.

However, we're talking about "since 2001", aren't we?

If you want to narrow it down to July 2013, there may indeed be more Muslim attacks.

The goal posts seem to be moved with every new post you make.

At least I can agree with you on one point: most terrorist attacks carried out on behalf of Islam, are perpetrated by Muslims.


Well it's YOUR link, not mine...but so July 2013 isn't an accurate test..



Yes, it's my link, and I'm not disputing the numbers you quoted.

However, it's one month out of more than 150.  How can it possibly be an accurate test?

Keep moving those goal posts.


No, I'll leave that to you...it is after all a 'lefty' thing.



When you can come up with something concrete to refute the facts I've presented, let me know.  I'll be right here.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:00pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:54pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:48pm:
...since the unchanged numbers will still prove my point.



Incorrect.

Most terrorist attacks around the world, since 2001, have been carried out by non-Muslims.

I've provided the proof.  I've proven my point beyond all doubt.

Thus far, you have provided absolutely nothing, except your personal opinion (which is based on irrational fear, fueled by talk-back radio, 60 Minutes, and ignorant work colleagues/friends).

When you can come up with something concrete to refute the facts I've presented, let me know.  I'll be right here.



Well NO, since I don't have any 'irrational fear', don't listen to 'talk-back radio', and don't have any 'work colleagues'....

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:06pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:54pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:48pm:
...since the unchanged numbers will still prove my point.



Incorrect.

Most terrorist attacks around the world, since 2001, have been carried out by non-Muslims.

I've provided the proof.  I've proven my point beyond all doubt.

Thus far, you have provided absolutely nothing, except your personal opinion (which is based on irrational fear, fueled by talk-back radio, 60 Minutes, and ignorant work colleagues/friends).

When you can come up with something concrete to refute the facts I've presented, let me know.  I'll be right here.



Well NO, since I don't have any 'irrational fear', don't listen to 'talk-back radio', and don't have any 'work colleagues'....



I apologise, and retract the statement.

Thus far, you have provided absolutely nothing, except your personal opinion.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:16pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:06pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:54pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:48pm:
...since the unchanged numbers will still prove my point.



Incorrect.

Most terrorist attacks around the world, since 2001, have been carried out by non-Muslims.

I've provided the proof.  I've proven my point beyond all doubt.

Thus far, you have provided absolutely nothing, except your personal opinion (which is based on irrational fear, fueled by talk-back radio, 60 Minutes, and ignorant work colleagues/friends).

When you can come up with something concrete to refute the facts I've presented, let me know.  I'll be right here.



Well NO, since I don't have any 'irrational fear', don't listen to 'talk-back radio', and don't have any 'work colleagues'....



I apologise, and retract the statement.

Thus far, you have provided absolutely nothing, except your personal opinion.


Based on real media report...(not the Greens/lefty/AGW type news)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:25pm

Quote:
Based on real media report...(not the Greens/lefty/AGW type news)



And that's exactly why you are mistaken.

Not all terrorist attacks are reported in our media.

Most of the Muslim ones are, as those guys are the current "baddies".

However, the majority of terrorist attacks don't make our news. 

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:32pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:25pm:

Quote:
Based on real media report...(not the Greens/lefty/AGW type news)



And that's exactly why you are mistaken.

Not all terrorist attacks are reported in our media.

Most of the Muslim ones are, as those guys are the current "baddies".

However, the majority of terrorist attacks don't make our news. 


Which helps MY position, not yours..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:46pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:25pm:

Quote:
Based on real media report...(not the Greens/lefty/AGW type news)



And that's exactly why you are mistaken.

Not all terrorist attacks are reported in our media.

Most of the Muslim ones are, as those guys are the current "baddies".

However, the majority of terrorist attacks don't make our news. 


Which helps MY position, not yours..



No, not at all.  Quite the contrary.

The majority of terrorist attacks are committed by non-Muslims and, as such, they just aren't interesting enough to make the news. 

The non-Muslim attacks are recorded though, by the FBI, Europol, etc.  I posted information from them before.  You remember that?  It showed that most terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims. Of course you remember   ;)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:47pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:25pm:

Quote:
Based on real media report...(not the Greens/lefty/AGW type news)



And that's exactly why you are mistaken.

Not all terrorist attacks are reported in our media.

Most of the Muslim ones are, as those guys are the current "baddies".

However, the majority of terrorist attacks don't make our news. 


Wikipedia-

1.1 2003: 25 suicide bombings
1.2 2004: 140 suicide bombings
1.3 2005: 478 suicide bombings
1.4 2006: 297 suicide bombings
1.5 2007: 442 Suicide Bombings
1.6 2008: 257 Suicide Bombings
1.7 2009: 76 Suicide Bombings
1.8 2010: 44 Suicide Bombings
1.9 Post American pull-out


And you scoffed at my 1,000 terrorist bombings for Afghanistan and Iraq alone. It's  more. Why are you wrong so much greggorry?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:47pm
;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:48pm

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:25pm:

Quote:
Based on real media report...(not the Greens/lefty/AGW type news)



And that's exactly why you are mistaken.

Not all terrorist attacks are reported in our media.

Most of the Muslim ones are, as those guys are the current "baddies".

However, the majority of terrorist attacks don't make our news. 


Wikipedia-

1.1 2003: 25 suicide bombings
1.2 2004: 140 suicide bombings
1.3 2005: 478 suicide bombings
1.4 2006: 297 suicide bombings
1.5 2007: 442 Suicide Bombings
1.6 2008: 257 Suicide Bombings
1.7 2009: 76 Suicide Bombings
1.8 2010: 44 Suicide Bombings
1.9 Post American pull-out


And you scoffed at my 1,000 terrorist bombings for Afghanistan and Iraq alone. It's  more. Why are you wrong so much greggorry?
That's for Iraq.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:48pm
;) ;) ;) ;)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Aug 29th, 2014 at 6:32pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 2:13pm:

cods wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:23pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:08pm:

cods wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 11:40am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 11:28am:

Yadda wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:28am:
greggerypeccary,

I have got news for you.......

In today's world, terrorism is synonymous with ISLAM.



In the minds of the ignorant, yes.

In the real world, not so much.




so you think America and Australia are more about terrorism?..



No.

I think America and Australia are countries.

I think Islam is a religion.

I don't think any of them are "synonymous" with terrorism.




really??...ok so who do you think is "synonymous" with TERRORISM... as it is on the rise...



Terrorists.




so terrorists have no agenda?? they just seem to like  blowing things up and chopping off head and taking selfies with them..

terrorists come from all walks of life..

and I guess anyone who robs a bank is a terrorist because he is usually armed and the other person isnt....

it is you who are disclaiming terrorists are of the Muslim faith...mostly..you c&p a lot of other peoples   comments on this.. which are all pretty old...

so as I said terrorism is on the increase.


.if you can c&p something written in 2014 to say its on the decrease I will be more than happy to agree with you..in fact I will go out and celebrate.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Aug 29th, 2014 at 6:36pm
the trouble with quoting figures they are always out of date..

we have a very nasty element happening in the middle east it is growing like a cancer...are they from all different walks of life?? who cares.. they are doing the WRONG THING..they are killing people for not following them...they are not only proud of it they are showing the world.. its all about FEAR...

sorry but I do not see this FEAR anywhere else but in the middle east.... prove me wrong.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Gnads on Aug 29th, 2014 at 6:59pm
Just to throw the conspiracy theory back into the limelight ....

I believe that the greatest terrorist attack supposedly perpetrated by Muslims in the last decade ... the World Trade Centre

.... was not carried out by Islamic Terrorists ... but was an inside job used as an excuse to fight the war on the WOMD & the Axis of Evil.

The real axis of evil being the Bushes & their clique of scum like Cheney, Rumsfeld & other world elite.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 8:36pm

cods wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 6:32pm:
it is you who are disclaiming terrorists are of the Muslim faith...



No, I'm not at all.

Quite the contrary.

There are many, many crazy Muslim terrorists.

You should read the posts in this forum properly before you make your stupid, ignorant comments.  You are continually making a fool of yourself.

Lay off the sherry dear, and try to keep up with the conversation.  OK?





Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 8:37pm

cods wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 6:32pm:
and I guess anyone who robs a bank is a terrorist because he is usually armed and the other person isnt....



No, that's not terrorism.

Stay off the sherry, you silly old woman.



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 8:41pm

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:25pm:

Quote:
Based on real media report...(not the Greens/lefty/AGW type news)



And that's exactly why you are mistaken.

Not all terrorist attacks are reported in our media.

Most of the Muslim ones are, as those guys are the current "baddies".

However, the majority of terrorist attacks don't make our news. 


Wikipedia-

1.1 2003: 25 suicide bombings
1.2 2004: 140 suicide bombings
1.3 2005: 478 suicide bombings
1.4 2006: 297 suicide bombings
1.5 2007: 442 Suicide Bombings
1.6 2008: 257 Suicide Bombings
1.7 2009: 76 Suicide Bombings
1.8 2010: 44 Suicide Bombings
1.9 Post American pull-out


And you scoffed at my 1,000 terrorist bombings for Afghanistan and Iraq alone. It's  more. Why are you wrong so much greggorry?




I'm not wrong.

The majority of terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

Indisputable fact.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Rhino on Aug 29th, 2014 at 8:42pm

red baron wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 2:57pm:

Only today a Muslim was attempting to fly over, he had over 30 grand on him and plenty of Jihadist literature. He was detained by a newly formed unit that will work to weed these would be heros out.

Nothing sensationalist about that lot. That's just plain facts.
why are we stopping these people.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 8:47pm

cods wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 6:36pm:
the trouble with quoting figures they are always out of date..

we have a very nasty element happening in the middle east it is growing like a cancer...are they from all different walks of life?? who cares.. they are doing the WRONG THING..they are killing people for not following them...they are not only proud of it they are showing the world.. its all about FEAR...

sorry but I do not see this FEAR anywhere else but in the middle east.... prove me wrong.




I already have, dear.

Scroll back through this thread and you will see that I have proven beyond all doubt that the majority of terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

That's not to say that some Muslims don't indulge in terrorism: they certainly do, and nobody is denying that.

However, when it comes to the number of attacks across the world since 2001, they are in the minority.

Stop watching the Channel 7 news, and you might just learn something.




Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 29th, 2014 at 8:55pm

cods wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 6:32pm:
.if you can c&p something written in 2014 to say its on the decrease I will be more than happy to agree with you..in fact I will go out and celebrate.



Why would I c&p something written in 2014 to say it's on the decrease?

I'm not saying that terrorism is on the decrease.

Perhaps you have mistaken me for someone else.

What I am saying, once again, is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

Is alcohol to blame for your total lack of comprehension, or is it just plain stupidity?



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yasser CrackaFat on Aug 29th, 2014 at 9:29pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 8:41pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:25pm:

Quote:
Based on real media report...(not the Greens/lefty/AGW type news)



And that's exactly why you are mistaken.

Not all terrorist attacks are reported in our media.

Most of the Muslim ones are, as those guys are the current "baddies".

However, the majority of terrorist attacks don't make our news. 


Wikipedia-

1.1 2003: 25 suicide bombings
1.2 2004: 140 suicide bombings
1.3 2005: 478 suicide bombings
1.4 2006: 297 suicide bombings
1.5 2007: 442 Suicide Bombings
1.6 2008: 257 Suicide Bombings
1.7 2009: 76 Suicide Bombings
1.8 2010: 44 Suicide Bombings
1.9 Post American pull-out


And you scoffed at my 1,000 terrorist bombings for Afghanistan and Iraq alone. It's  more. Why are you wrong so much greggorry?




I'm not wrong.

The majority of terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

Indisputable fact.


No you're not wrong. You're an idiot obviously.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yasser CrackaFat on Aug 29th, 2014 at 9:30pm
Where is the support for you widdle indisputable pretend fact groggery ?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yadda on Aug 29th, 2014 at 9:57pm

red baron wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 3:24pm:
Just putting history aside for the moment, there is the current situation of ISIS carrying out Genocide on innocent civilians in numbers which are countless thousands.

....
....
The only reoccurring phenomena is the muted response from the United Nations in each and every episode of Genocide.

The blue bereted troops, stand by, whilst monsters carry out atrocities even to the point where the Dutch UN troops handed over thousands of people they were supposed to be defending in Bosnia. They were subsequently slaughtered.

The alarming thing is that Barrack Obama has come out and said that the U.S. has 'no strategy' where ISIS is concerned.



baron,

ISIS in Iraq, Al Shabaab, Boko Haram, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc,........moslems ?



"There is nothing that is wrong, that cannot be corrected by doing what is right."
- ???


Quote:
Q.
But what is 'right' ?


Pursuing truth, even to our own cost ?







baron,

It is apparent to any idiot with three brain cells, that no political leader in the West - whether his name Barack Obama, or Tony Abbott - knows how to do what is right.

Our political leaders in the West refuse to confront what ISLAM is.

Our - SELF SERVING - political leaders in the West, continue, to refuse to confront the truth.






Quote:

"Honest, ISLAM is the Religion of Peace"
, Tony Blair and George Bush




The Video That Made Pakistan Block YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKCZfnpU1uc




Watch Tony Blair and George Bush in the opening of that YOUTUBE video, apologise to ISLAM and to moslems, post 9/11 - when they began their 'war on terror'.

Watch Tony Blair and George Bush declare to the world the bona fides of ISLAM as a peace loving religion.


"ISLAM is a peaceful and tolerant religion....the acts of these people [Taliban, Al-Qaeda] are wholly contrary to the teachings of the Koran."
- Tony Blair

"I also want to speak tonight directly to moslems throughout the world. We respect your faith..... Its teachings are good and peaceful..."
- George Bush





Time has moved on, it is 2014, and Tony Blair and George Bush are both out of office.
But in exactly the same way that Tony Blair and George Bush refused to confront what ISLAM is, our political leaders in the West, today, are still 'leading us down the garden path'.
And our political leaders in the West, today, are still refusing to confront what ISLAM is.
And our political leaders are seeking to appease moslems and the moslem community.
Both our own political leaders, and the moslem community, are lying to the citizens of Western nations - about the nature and the character of ISLAM.

Strange times indeed.

Good [truth] is evil.

And evil is good.




Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by JaSin on Aug 29th, 2014 at 10:04pm
Northern Hemisphere: a region of the world that has a majority of people breeding and a minority of people in power thinking. Think of a physically strong person with just a few brain cells.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by UnSubRocky on Aug 30th, 2014 at 12:41am

GA wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:10pm:
What a load of over-sensationalized crap. The Muslims are actually less trouble than are the Aussies. And if we had never interfered in their countries they would be no trouble to us at all.


It was only 20 years ago that Muslims of a certain region were asking Australian government to send troops to their dung heap of a country. Wish I can remember which one it was. General consensus was that no one was going to take those requests seriously -- unless requested by the British or American governments. Even then, I bet the public would have laughed it off.

Muslims have a tendency to take their religion a bit too seriously. Then there are those that think they are exempt from punishment, since they perpetrate crimes against non-Muslims. If Aussies showed the same level of criminality that Muslims do, then rape, murder, and a heap of other criminality characteristics would go through the roof.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yasser CrackaFat on Aug 30th, 2014 at 12:48am
Its not a religion its just an ideology and the faggots at the top pray on the simpletons of society feeding them bullshit. Allah does not and never will exist, these people are simpletons at best. Just look at the average intellect of the apologists here. They are all simpletons and don't even know what they are talking about. The Brian Ross's with their socks and Kamels of the wanna be mussey apologists is a joke. Gandalf is just a daft fool and if Isis in his Sunni mosque says jump he would simply ask how high. Blind thick spineless fools every one of them. Just a bunch of life sucking maggots on society to everything that is good. Truly ugly lonely evil sick people.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Laugh till you cry on Aug 30th, 2014 at 1:48am

SweetLambo wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 12:48am:
Its not a religion its just an ideology and the faggots at the top pray on the simpletons of society feeding them bullshit. Allah does not and never will exist, these people are simpletons at best. Just look at the average intellect of the apologists here. They are all simpletons and don't even know what they are talking about. The Brian Ross's with their socks and Kamels of the wanna be mussey apologists is a joke. Gandalf is just a daft fool and if Isis in his Sunni mosque says jump he would simply ask how high. Blind thick spineless fools every one of them. Just a bunch of life sucking maggots on society to everything that is good. Truly ugly lonely evil sick people.


It seems you have overdosed on dogma and are unable to crack a fat. Don't give head!

If you feel so strongly why don't you volunteer to fight the people you hate.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 30th, 2014 at 8:11am
We have reached 'tipping point' in Iraq.

Clearly the U.S.A.'s Obama is reticent to get caught up in another crisis. Australia is highly unlikely to get involve unless Uncle Sam is there first.

The problem is there is a genuine human crisis going on, in that ISIS is butchering anyone who doesn't belong to their brand of Islam.

There is a definite shift in the U.S. not wanting to get its hands dirty. The last thing Obama wants to do is get involved again.

So, tipping point, there is genocide occurring. Will the West do something about it or will they turn around, look at the ocean and whistle?




Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Aug 30th, 2014 at 8:15am

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 8:55pm:

cods wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 6:32pm:
.if you can c&p something written in 2014 to say its on the decrease I will be more than happy to agree with you..in fact I will go out and celebrate.



Why would I c&p something written in 2014 to say it's on the decrease?

I'm not saying that terrorism is on the decrease.

Perhaps you have mistaken me for someone else.

What I am saying, once again, is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

Is alcohol to blame for your total lack of comprehension, or is it just plain stupidity?



no I dont drink but I must have done to be even bothering with you...so keep living in dream world..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 8:34am

SweetLambo wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 9:29pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 8:41pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 4:25pm:

Quote:
Based on real media report...(not the Greens/lefty/AGW type news)



And that's exactly why you are mistaken.

Not all terrorist attacks are reported in our media.

Most of the Muslim ones are, as those guys are the current "baddies".

However, the majority of terrorist attacks don't make our news. 


Wikipedia-

1.1 2003: 25 suicide bombings
1.2 2004: 140 suicide bombings
1.3 2005: 478 suicide bombings
1.4 2006: 297 suicide bombings
1.5 2007: 442 Suicide Bombings
1.6 2008: 257 Suicide Bombings
1.7 2009: 76 Suicide Bombings
1.8 2010: 44 Suicide Bombings
1.9 Post American pull-out


And you scoffed at my 1,000 terrorist bombings for Afghanistan and Iraq alone. It's  more. Why are you wrong so much greggorry?




I'm not wrong.

The majority of terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

Indisputable fact.


No you're not wrong.



Correct.



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 8:36am

SweetLambo wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 9:30pm:
Where is the support for you widdle indisputable pretend fact groggery ?




In this thread.

Have a look at some earlier pages: it's all there.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Aug 30th, 2014 at 8:51am

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 8:47pm:
I already have, dear.

Scroll back through this thread and you will see that I have proven beyond all doubt that the majority of terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

That's not to say that some Muslims don't indulge in terrorism: they certainly do, and nobody is denying that.

However, when it comes to the number of attacks across the world since 2001, they are in the minority.

Stop watching the Channel 7 news, and you might just learn something.


Rubbish. The majority of terrorist acts against the west have been carried out in the name of Islam.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Phemanderac on Aug 30th, 2014 at 9:19am
The "Middle East" as such is not OUR biggest issue, we are.

Now what I mean by that, the West has interfered in the Middle East for a long time (I am not talking about the intentions here, because, at least some of that "interference" was well intended, just poorly administered). As such, we have some responsibility in having facilitated the current problems there.

That said, the current knee jerk strong man approach with our own home grown and more radicalised (every day) youth is ineffectual and inflammatory. To my mind it lays the ground work for the self fulfilling prophecy that at some point a significant terrorist act will happen on our shores. Why, because we are being inflammatory.

Firstly, let's be very clear, innocent people are dying in the Middle East, however, that is not isolated, innocent people are dying every day, world wide....

We may not want a religious war, we may not even want an ideological war, however, our part in history seems to indicate that, whether we want it or not, it could be coming our way. These young people who strongly feel the need to take up arms in the middle east are further radicalised if we tear up their passports and try to stop them going. We are to some degree being the tyrants the radicals perceive they are opposed to. Yep, once again, I think the intention is good, but poor practice.

Let them go to their little war, let's face it, listening to reason is not a strong suit for radicals, young angst driven people, or rusted on ideologues for that matter. So reasoning isn't going to cut it - let them go, but make it perfectly clear they will no longer have the capacity to re-enter Australia, either as a citizen or as a legal visitor. Let them make a commitment for life.

Further, if (I think it is still a big if too) we (the Royal we, as in the West) do feel the need to "go in their with our military might" then we also need to not go half paced.

Make no mistake, I am not a fan, advocate or groupie for war/terrorism (it often seems one in the same), but, I understand the mechanics of this stuff enough to realise that a half arsed response will be calamitous. In effect, if we are going to do it, implement a clear and overt take no prisoner policy and use extreme force.

That is if....

Of course we either will not go in, maybe drop a few bombs and wring our hands briefly about some collateral damage, then the media will analyse and re-analyse what we did for weeks, months, years to come...Yet there will still be a "problem" to deal with... Or, we will go in and kill a few of our own young men and women and, once enough money has been spent/made, pull out and wait for the next carbuncle on the backside of humanity to take root somewhere in the world....

It would be nice to think that we (the so superior) West could do some significant self reflecting and recognise our own part in generating the "problems" in the world, however, I am doubtful that we as a people have the integrity en masse or the self confidence en masse to be able to accept that burden and still feel ok about ourselves...

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 30th, 2014 at 9:50am
Phemanderac, of  course we should let radicalised Muslims go. As long as they take their family and their relatives with them; their passports to be marked, 'never to re-enter Australia".

That would be a logical move. You are correct in saying that they will only become frustrated if they are held back.

Frustrated Terrorists are not something we want in our own backyard.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 30th, 2014 at 9:50am
#

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 30th, 2014 at 9:54am
bump

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Aug 30th, 2014 at 10:28am

Phemanderac wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 9:19am:
Now what I mean by that, the West has interfered in the Middle East for a long time (I am not talking about the intentions here, because, at least some of that "interference" was well intended, just poorly administered). As such, we have some responsibility in having facilitated the current problems there.




so what are your thought on the Ukraine?.. at this very moment they believe Russia is going to WAR with them Russia being MIGHTY.. Ukraine being a sitting duck...

so what do you say... look the other way.should they call for help?..

history tells us Churchill faced the same "Its none of our Business" in 1939

how would you administer either?????iPhemanderac wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 9:19am:
t would be nice to think that we (the so superior) West could do some significant self reflecting and recognise our own part in generating the "problems" in the world, however, I am doubtful that we as a people have the integrity en masse or the self confidence en masse to be able to accept that burden and still feel ok about ourselves...



why do you say that???... if trying to stop one group of people annihilating another... [for reasons that usually escape myself]...is abhorrent

what do you call turning a blind eye?..

I would  be more ashamed if we went about  our business as if all this killing wasnt happening..

for me to see heads hanging on fence posts...

that tells me something is very very wrong somewhere...

no it isnt on our shores... but what if it were.. and the rest of the world turned a blind eye.. and said..

well basically get on with it none of our business!

please dont tell me thats not what you are saying because thats the way it comes across.

you call it interfering...I call it going to someones aid in a crisis... someone who is usually weaker than we are.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Team Grappler on Aug 30th, 2014 at 11:02am

|dev|null wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:19pm:

GA wrote on Aug 28th, 2014 at 1:12pm:
It's people like you that should be sent packin' orff 'ome.


I was born here, I'll vote with GA on this one.  Where you going to send me?  The Pacific Guantanamo Bay, Manus Island?   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D


'ang on.. 'ang on..... so you reckon if you go out jihading on a Saturday night, hope a flight to Iraq and chop off a few heads - you reckon you should just be allowed to do that?

If you did those things, I'd imprison you for life in a hell hole.

He's not talking about ordinary people - just the brain short circuit punk kids who think that being an ISIS local branch jihadist is really cool....

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:28pm

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 8:51am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 8:47pm:
I already have, dear.

Scroll back through this thread and you will see that I have proven beyond all doubt that the majority of terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

That's not to say that some Muslims don't indulge in terrorism: they certainly do, and nobody is denying that.

However, when it comes to the number of attacks across the world since 2001, they are in the minority.

Stop watching the Channel 7 news, and you might just learn something.


Rubbish. The majority of terrorist acts against the west have been carried out in the name of Islam.




I said, "the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims."

"against the west" are your words, not mine.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yasser CrackaFat on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:44pm
The majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by Muslims.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:47pm

SweetLambo wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:44pm:
The majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by Muslims.



100% incorrect.

However, I'll give you one chance to substantiate your claim.

Over to you ...



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yasser CrackaFat on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:50pm
I never asked for a chance nor do I need too.

Thanks for the reply though.

Chin Chin.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:54pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:28pm:

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 8:51am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 8:47pm:
I already have, dear.

Scroll back through this thread and you will see that I have proven beyond all doubt that the majority of terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

That's not to say that some Muslims don't indulge in terrorism: they certainly do, and nobody is denying that.

However, when it comes to the number of attacks across the world since 2001, they are in the minority.

Stop watching the Channel 7 news, and you might just learn something.


Rubbish. The majority of terrorist acts against the west have been carried out in the name of Islam.




I said, "the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims."

"against the west" are your words, not mine.
Weren't you saying that a majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 were carried out  by non muslims??

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:56pm

SweetLambo wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:50pm:
I never asked for a chance nor do I need too.

Thanks for the reply though.

Chin Chin.




White flag accepted.

Thanks for playing.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yasser CrackaFat on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:57pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:56pm:

SweetLambo wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:50pm:
I never asked for a chance nor do I need too.

Thanks for the reply though.

Chin Chin.




White flag accepted.

Thanks for playing.


Don't take drugs kids.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yasser CrackaFat on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:58pm

Shakey wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:28pm:

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 8:51am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 8:47pm:
I already have, dear.

Scroll back through this thread and you will see that I have proven beyond all doubt that the majority of terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

That's not to say that some Muslims don't indulge in terrorism: they certainly do, and nobody is denying that.

However, when it comes to the number of attacks across the world since 2001, they are in the minority.

Stop watching the Channel 7 news, and you might just learn something.


Rubbish. The majority of terrorist acts against the west have been carried out in the name of Islam.




I said, "the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims."

"against the west" are your words, not mine.
Weren't you saying that a majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 were carried out  by non muslims??


Anyone saying that would have to be a few screws loose of a root.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:59pm

Shakey wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:28pm:

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 8:51am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 8:47pm:
I already have, dear.

Scroll back through this thread and you will see that I have proven beyond all doubt that the majority of terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

That's not to say that some Muslims don't indulge in terrorism: they certainly do, and nobody is denying that.

However, when it comes to the number of attacks across the world since 2001, they are in the minority.

Stop watching the Channel 7 news, and you might just learn something.


Rubbish. The majority of terrorist acts against the west have been carried out in the name of Islam.




I said, "the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims."

"against the west" are your words, not mine.
Weren't you saying that a majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 were carried out  by non muslims??



That's correct.

And, you may be curious as to why I have said that the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

Well, it's simple really: the fact is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

If I can be of any further assistance, let me know.

Cheers.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yasser CrackaFat on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:08pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:59pm:
Well, it's simple really: the fact is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

If I can be of any further assistance, let me know.

Cheers.


No, the fact is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by Muslims.


Cheers

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:09pm
For Pakistan alone they had 657 terrorist attacks in 2006, 1,503 in 2007 and 2,148 in 2008. Stop talking through your butt greggorry.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:10pm
;D ;D ;D ;D
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:59pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:28pm:

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 8:51am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 8:47pm:
I already have, dear.

Scroll back through this thread and you will see that I have proven beyond all doubt that the majority of terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

That's not to say that some Muslims don't indulge in terrorism: they certainly do, and nobody is denying that.

However, when it comes to the number of attacks across the world since 2001, they are in the minority.

Stop watching the Channel 7 news, and you might just learn something.


Rubbish. The majority of terrorist acts against the west have been carried out in the name of Islam.




I said, "the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims."

"against the west" are your words, not mine.
Weren't you saying that a majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 were carried out  by non muslims??



That's correct.

And, you may be curious as to why I have said that the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

Well, it's simple really: the fact is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

If I can be of any further assistance, let me know.

Cheers.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:10pm

SweetLambo wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:59pm:
Well, it's simple really: the fact is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

If I can be of any further assistance, let me know.

Cheers.


No, the fact is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by Muslims.


Cheers
absolutely correct.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yasser CrackaFat on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:16pm
You would have to be living inside a mosque or doing drugs to think any different.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:17pm

SweetLambo wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:59pm:
Well, it's simple really: the fact is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

If I can be of any further assistance, let me know.

Cheers.


No, the fact is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by Muslims.


Cheers



Incorrect.

Moreover, the fact that you didn't even attempt to substantiate your claim, means that you can no longer be taken seriously.

What am I talking about?  You were never taken seriously.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yasser CrackaFat on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:18pm
See what I mean - doing drugs.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Team Grappler on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:20pm
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/jul/07/terrorism.uk1

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/terrorist-attacks-quadrupled-2001-article-1.1212991

Seems to me that most terrorist attacks in Muslim countries are by separatist or factional Muslims....

"Iraq accounts for about a third of all terrorist deaths over the last decade, and Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan account for over 50 percent of fatalities."

The study says terrorism incidents numbered 982 in 2002, causing 3,823 deaths, rising to 4,564 terrorist incidents globally in 2011, resulting in 7,473 deaths.

The researchers used the University of Maryland definition of "terrorism": "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".

It did not include casualties from government-backed action such as aerial bombing or other killings."

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yasser CrackaFat on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:21pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:17pm:
Incorrect.

Moreover, the fact that you didn't even attempt to substantiate your claim, means that you can no longer be taken seriously.

What am I talking about?  You were never taken seriously.


Since you aren't taken seriously because of your ludicrous comment which actually IS INCORRECT and you never substantiated any of your silly comments. That post you just made is moot as you never were taken seriously yourself.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:24pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:47pm:

SweetLambo wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:44pm:
The majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by Muslims.



100% incorrect.

Nonsense, you know it.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:25pm

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:20pm:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/jul/07/terrorism.uk1

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/terrorist-attacks-quadrupled-2001-article-1.1212991

Seems to me that most terrorist attacks in Muslim countries are by separatist or factional Muslims....

"Iraq accounts for about a third of all terrorist deaths over the last decade, and Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan account for over 50 percent of fatalities."

The study says terrorism incidents numbered 982 in 2002, causing 3,823 deaths, rising to 4,564 terrorist incidents globally in 2011, resulting in 7,473 deaths.

The researchers used the University of Maryland definition of "terrorism": "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".

It did not include casualties from government-backed action such as aerial bombing or other killings."




"Muslim countries" and "deaths".   Yes.

However, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:26pm

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:47pm:

SweetLambo wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:44pm:
The majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by Muslims.



100% incorrect.

Nonsense, you know it.



Substantiate your claim.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yasser CrackaFat on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:28pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:25pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:20pm:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/jul/07/terrorism.uk1

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/terrorist-attacks-quadrupled-2001-article-1.1212991

Seems to me that most terrorist attacks in Muslim countries are by separatist or factional Muslims....

"Iraq accounts for about a third of all terrorist deaths over the last decade, and Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan account for over 50 percent of fatalities."

The study says terrorism incidents numbered 982 in 2002, causing 3,823 deaths, rising to 4,564 terrorist incidents globally in 2011, resulting in 7,473 deaths.

The researchers used the University of Maryland definition of "terrorism": "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".

It did not include casualties from government-backed action such as aerial bombing or other killings."




"Muslim countries" and "deaths".   Yes.

However, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.


Substantiate your claim.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:35pm

SweetLambo wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:28pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:25pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:20pm:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/jul/07/terrorism.uk1

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/terrorist-attacks-quadrupled-2001-article-1.1212991

Seems to me that most terrorist attacks in Muslim countries are by separatist or factional Muslims....

"Iraq accounts for about a third of all terrorist deaths over the last decade, and Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan account for over 50 percent of fatalities."

The study says terrorism incidents numbered 982 in 2002, causing 3,823 deaths, rising to 4,564 terrorist incidents globally in 2011, resulting in 7,473 deaths.

The researchers used the University of Maryland definition of "terrorism": "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".

It did not include casualties from government-backed action such as aerial bombing or other killings."




"Muslim countries" and "deaths".   Yes.

However, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.


Substantiate your claim.




I have, at least six times in this very thread.

It's up to you to read the entire thread, in order to see where I have actually proven my point.

Of course, you will say "bullshit" and ask me to provide the links again.

However, you have already proven yourself to be stupid so, demonstrating your laziness and incopetence, as well, will not be a sensible move.  Stupid and lazy, isn't a good look.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yasser CrackaFat on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:40pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:35pm:

SweetLambo wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:28pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:25pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:20pm:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/jul/07/terrorism.uk1

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/terrorist-attacks-quadrupled-2001-article-1.1212991

Seems to me that most terrorist attacks in Muslim countries are by separatist or factional Muslims....

"Iraq accounts for about a third of all terrorist deaths over the last decade, and Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan account for over 50 percent of fatalities."

The study says terrorism incidents numbered 982 in 2002, causing 3,823 deaths, rising to 4,564 terrorist incidents globally in 2011, resulting in 7,473 deaths.

The researchers used the University of Maryland definition of "terrorism": "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".

It did not include casualties from government-backed action such as aerial bombing or other killings."




"Muslim countries" and "deaths".   Yes.

However, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.


Substantiate your claim.




I have, at least six times in this very thread.

It's up to you to read the entire thread, in order to see where I have actually proven my point.

Of course, you will say "bullshit" and ask me to provide the links again.

However, you have already proven yourself to be stupid so, demonstrating your laziness and incopetence, as well, will not be a sensible move.  Stupid and lazy, isn't a good look.


No you haven't, and you have already proven yourself to be stupid so again your own post is moot and unsubstantiated.
You going through life fat dumb and stupid is no way to spend it son

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:43pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:25pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:20pm:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/jul/07/terrorism.uk1

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/terrorist-attacks-quadrupled-2001-article-1.1212991

Seems to me that most terrorist attacks in Muslim countries are by separatist or factional Muslims....

"Iraq accounts for about a third of all terrorist deaths over the last decade, and Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan account for over 50 percent of fatalities."

The study says terrorism incidents numbered 982 in 2002, causing 3,823 deaths, rising to 4,564 terrorist incidents globally in 2011, resulting in 7,473 deaths.

The researchers used the University of Maryland definition of "terrorism": "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".

It did not include casualties from government-backed action such as aerial bombing or other killings."




"Muslim countries" and "deaths".   Yes.

However, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.
I've looked over your links and they are crap. You are wrong greggorry.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:44pm

I hate to say "I told you so".

Hang on, what am I saying? I LOVE to say "I told you so".

"Stupid and lazy, isn't a good look."




Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:46pm

Shakey wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:25pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:20pm:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/jul/07/terrorism.uk1

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/terrorist-attacks-quadrupled-2001-article-1.1212991

Seems to me that most terrorist attacks in Muslim countries are by separatist or factional Muslims....

"Iraq accounts for about a third of all terrorist deaths over the last decade, and Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan account for over 50 percent of fatalities."

The study says terrorism incidents numbered 982 in 2002, causing 3,823 deaths, rising to 4,564 terrorist incidents globally in 2011, resulting in 7,473 deaths.

The researchers used the University of Maryland definition of "terrorism": "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".

It did not include casualties from government-backed action such as aerial bombing or other killings."




"Muslim countries" and "deaths".   Yes.

However, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.
I've looked over your links and they are crap.




You'll have to take that up with the FBI, and Europol.

When you eventually contact them, and tell them that they are wrong, could you please get back to me and let me know what they said.  I'm genuinely interested.

Cheers.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Aussie on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:46pm

Shakey wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:25pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:20pm:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/jul/07/terrorism.uk1

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/terrorist-attacks-quadrupled-2001-article-1.1212991

Seems to me that most terrorist attacks in Muslim countries are by separatist or factional Muslims....

"Iraq accounts for about a third of all terrorist deaths over the last decade, and Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan account for over 50 percent of fatalities."

The study says terrorism incidents numbered 982 in 2002, causing 3,823 deaths, rising to 4,564 terrorist incidents globally in 2011, resulting in 7,473 deaths.

The researchers used the University of Maryland definition of "terrorism": "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".

It did not include casualties from government-backed action such as aerial bombing or other killings."




"Muslim countries" and "deaths".   Yes.

However, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.
I've looked over your links and they are crap. You are wrong greggorry.


I read the links.  Where is the 'crap?'

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yasser CrackaFat on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:55pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:44pm:
I hate to say "I told you so".

Hang on, what am I saying? I LOVE to say "I told you so".

"Stupid and lazy, isn't a good look."


I told you so.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yasser CrackaFat on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:56pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:46pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:25pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:20pm:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/jul/07/terrorism.uk1

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/terrorist-attacks-quadrupled-2001-article-1.1212991

Seems to me that most terrorist attacks in Muslim countries are by separatist or factional Muslims....

"Iraq accounts for about a third of all terrorist deaths over the last decade, and Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan account for over 50 percent of fatalities."

The study says terrorism incidents numbered 982 in 2002, causing 3,823 deaths, rising to 4,564 terrorist incidents globally in 2011, resulting in 7,473 deaths.

The researchers used the University of Maryland definition of "terrorism": "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".

It did not include casualties from government-backed action such as aerial bombing or other killings."




"Muslim countries" and "deaths".   Yes.

However, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.
I've looked over your links and they are crap. You are wrong greggorry.


I read the links.  Where is the 'crap?'


Clearly you haven't.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:57pm

SweetLambo wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:56pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:46pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:25pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:20pm:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/jul/07/terrorism.uk1

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/terrorist-attacks-quadrupled-2001-article-1.1212991

Seems to me that most terrorist attacks in Muslim countries are by separatist or factional Muslims....

"Iraq accounts for about a third of all terrorist deaths over the last decade, and Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan account for over 50 percent of fatalities."

The study says terrorism incidents numbered 982 in 2002, causing 3,823 deaths, rising to 4,564 terrorist incidents globally in 2011, resulting in 7,473 deaths.

The researchers used the University of Maryland definition of "terrorism": "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".

It did not include casualties from government-backed action such as aerial bombing or other killings."




"Muslim countries" and "deaths".   Yes.

However, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.
I've looked over your links and they are crap. You are wrong greggorry.


I read the links.  Where is the 'crap?'


Clearly you haven't.




Let's assume that nobody has read them.

So, where is the "crap"?

Here's your chance to shine.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:59pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:46pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:25pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:20pm:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/jul/07/terrorism.uk1

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/terrorist-attacks-quadrupled-2001-article-1.1212991

Seems to me that most terrorist attacks in Muslim countries are by separatist or factional Muslims....

"Iraq accounts for about a third of all terrorist deaths over the last decade, and Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan account for over 50 percent of fatalities."

The study says terrorism incidents numbered 982 in 2002, causing 3,823 deaths, rising to 4,564 terrorist incidents globally in 2011, resulting in 7,473 deaths.

The researchers used the University of Maryland definition of "terrorism": "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".

It did not include casualties from government-backed action such as aerial bombing or other killings."




"Muslim countries" and "deaths".   Yes.

However, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.
I've looked over your links and they are crap. You are wrong greggorry.


I read the links.  Where is the 'crap?'
They don't mention hardly any of the incidents. There's been thousands in Pakistan, Iraq and Afghanistan alone. One link is the USA in 2001 ??????

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:01pm

Shakey wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:59pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:46pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:25pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:20pm:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/jul/07/terrorism.uk1

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/terrorist-attacks-quadrupled-2001-article-1.1212991

Seems to me that most terrorist attacks in Muslim countries are by separatist or factional Muslims....

"Iraq accounts for about a third of all terrorist deaths over the last decade, and Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan account for over 50 percent of fatalities."

The study says terrorism incidents numbered 982 in 2002, causing 3,823 deaths, rising to 4,564 terrorist incidents globally in 2011, resulting in 7,473 deaths.

The researchers used the University of Maryland definition of "terrorism": "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".

It did not include casualties from government-backed action such as aerial bombing or other killings."




"Muslim countries" and "deaths".   Yes.

However, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.
I've looked over your links and they are crap. You are wrong greggorry.


I read the links.  Where is the 'crap?'
They don't mention hardly any of the incidents.



Substantiate your claim.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:04pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:25pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:20pm:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/jul/07/terrorism.uk1

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/terrorist-attacks-quadrupled-2001-article-1.1212991

Seems to me that most terrorist attacks in Muslim countries are by separatist or factional Muslims....

"Iraq accounts for about a third of all terrorist deaths over the last decade, and Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan account for over 50 percent of fatalities."

The study says terrorism incidents numbered 982 in 2002, causing 3,823 deaths, rising to 4,564 terrorist incidents globally in 2011, resulting in 7,473 deaths.

The researchers used the University of Maryland definition of "terrorism": "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".

It did not include casualties from government-backed action such as aerial bombing or other killings."




"Muslim countries" and "deaths".   Yes.

However, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.




can you name the non muslim terrorists and the attacks they have made lets say since 2002 the Bali Bombing..

I dont like blaming someone or group when in fact its someone else doing the evil deeds..

we need names... we can all name a Muslim terrorist group... give us the non muslim so we can understand more.... and how much they have done will help..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:04pm

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:47pm:

SweetLambo wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:44pm:
The majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by Muslims.



100% incorrect.

Nonsense, you know it.



Substantiate your claim.



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:06pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:57pm:

SweetLambo wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:56pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:46pm:

Shakey wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:25pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:20pm:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/jul/07/terrorism.uk1

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/terrorist-attacks-quadrupled-2001-article-1.1212991

Seems to me that most terrorist attacks in Muslim countries are by separatist or factional Muslims....

"Iraq accounts for about a third of all terrorist deaths over the last decade, and Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan account for over 50 percent of fatalities."

The study says terrorism incidents numbered 982 in 2002, causing 3,823 deaths, rising to 4,564 terrorist incidents globally in 2011, resulting in 7,473 deaths.

The researchers used the University of Maryland definition of "terrorism": "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".

It did not include casualties from government-backed action such as aerial bombing or other killings."




"Muslim countries" and "deaths".   Yes.

However, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.
I've looked over your links and they are crap. You are wrong greggorry.


I read the links.  Where is the 'crap?'


Clearly you haven't.




Let's assume that nobody has read them.

So, where is the "crap"?

Here's your chance to shine.
The only link you posted that is relevant is the List of Terrorist Attacks by Wikipedia. Above most of the pages from 2001 to now there is a little notice reading "This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it". Go and have a Bex and watch Every Hates Raymond greggorry.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:06pm

cods wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:04pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:25pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:20pm:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/jul/07/terrorism.uk1

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/terrorist-attacks-quadrupled-2001-article-1.1212991

Seems to me that most terrorist attacks in Muslim countries are by separatist or factional Muslims....

"Iraq accounts for about a third of all terrorist deaths over the last decade, and Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan account for over 50 percent of fatalities."

The study says terrorism incidents numbered 982 in 2002, causing 3,823 deaths, rising to 4,564 terrorist incidents globally in 2011, resulting in 7,473 deaths.

The researchers used the University of Maryland definition of "terrorism": "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".

It did not include casualties from government-backed action such as aerial bombing or other killings."




"Muslim countries" and "deaths".   Yes.

However, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.




can you name the non muslim terrorists and the attacks they have made lets say since 2002 the Bali Bombing..



Yes.

I have done so at least six times in this very thread.

Go back over the pages and you will see my links.

If there's anything you don't understand, let me know and I'll walk you through it.





Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:09pm
You make stupid assertions (although it is not illegal) and then demand proof that you have made stupid assertions.
The proof is everywhere you look, numpty.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:10pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:04pm:

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:47pm:

SweetLambo wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 2:44pm:
The majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by Muslims.



100% incorrect.

Nonsense, you know it.



Substantiate your claim.
Wikipedia " List Of Incidents" above most pages from 2001 to now it reads --This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it.

Like I said there's been 1,000's in Iraq , Afghanistan and Pakistan alone. The list would be pages and pages long if everything was reported.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:11pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:06pm:

cods wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:04pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:25pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:20pm:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/jul/07/terrorism.uk1

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/terrorist-attacks-quadrupled-2001-article-1.1212991

Seems to me that most terrorist attacks in Muslim countries are by separatist or factional Muslims....

"Iraq accounts for about a third of all terrorist deaths over the last decade, and Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan account for over 50 percent of fatalities."

The study says terrorism incidents numbered 982 in 2002, causing 3,823 deaths, rising to 4,564 terrorist incidents globally in 2011, resulting in 7,473 deaths.

The researchers used the University of Maryland definition of "terrorism": "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".

It did not include casualties from government-backed action such as aerial bombing or other killings."




"Muslim countries" and "deaths".   Yes.

However, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.




can you name the non muslim terrorists and the attacks they have made lets say since 2002 the Bali Bombing..



Yes.

I have done so at least six times in this very thread.

Go back over the pages and you will see my links.

If there's anything you don't understand, let me know and I'll walk you through it.
Your relevant link  is incomplete.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:12pm

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:09pm:
You make stupid assertions (although it is not illegal) and then demand proof that you have made stupid assertions.
The proof is everywhere you look, numpty.




So, you can't substantiate your claim?

No probs.

I knew that already, but I just wanted to hear it from you.

Cheers.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:17pm

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:09pm:
You make stupid assertions (although it is not illegal) and then demand proof that you have made stupid assertions.
The proof is everywhere you look, numpty.


i'm interested in the origin of the word "numpty"
i agree it fits greg to a tee, just wondering where it came from?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yasser CrackaFat on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:19pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:06pm:

cods wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:04pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:25pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 3:20pm:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/jul/07/terrorism.uk1

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/terrorist-attacks-quadrupled-2001-article-1.1212991

Seems to me that most terrorist attacks in Muslim countries are by separatist or factional Muslims....

"Iraq accounts for about a third of all terrorist deaths over the last decade, and Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan account for over 50 percent of fatalities."

The study says terrorism incidents numbered 982 in 2002, causing 3,823 deaths, rising to 4,564 terrorist incidents globally in 2011, resulting in 7,473 deaths.

The researchers used the University of Maryland definition of "terrorism": "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".

It did not include casualties from government-backed action such as aerial bombing or other killings."




"Muslim countries" and "deaths".   Yes.

However, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.




can you name the non muslim terrorists and the attacks they have made lets say since 2002 the Bali Bombing..



Yes.

I have done so at least six times in this very thread.

Go back over the pages and you will see my links.

If there's anything you don't understand, let me know and I'll walk you through it.


Substantiate your claim.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yasser CrackaFat on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:21pm

aquascoot wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:17pm:

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:09pm:
You make stupid assertions (although it is not illegal) and then demand proof that you have made stupid assertions.
The proof is everywhere you look, numpty.



i'm interested in the origin of the word "numpty"
i agree it fits greg to a tee, just wondering where it came from?


NOUN BRITISH INFORMAL

an insulting word for a person who is stupid or who does something badly
Synonyms or related words for this sense of numpty
Someone who is unintelligent, stupid or silly: boxhead, numpty, fool, buffoon, clown, idiot, maniac, dope, duffer, airhead...


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:31pm

aquascoot wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:17pm:

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:09pm:
You make stupid assertions (although it is not illegal) and then demand proof that you have made stupid assertions.
The proof is everywhere you look, numpty.


i'm interested in the origin of the word "numpty"
i agree it fits greg to a tee, just wondering where it came from?

Scotland.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:38pm

SweetLambo wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:21pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:17pm:

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:09pm:
You make stupid assertions (although it is not illegal) and then demand proof that you have made stupid assertions.
The proof is everywhere you look, numpty.



i'm interested in the origin of the word "numpty"
i agree it fits greg to a tee, just wondering where it came from?


NOUN BRITISH INFORMAL

an insulting word for a person who is stupid or who does something badly
Synonyms or related words for this sense of numpty
Someone who is unintelligent, stupid or silly: boxhead, numpty, fool, buffoon, clown, idiot, maniac, dope, duffer, airhead...


those are a bit mild for greg ;)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Yasser CrackaFat on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:43pm
Maybe we could make one up for greg and call him a Gumpty and add it to the urban dictionary.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:47pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:36pm:

cods wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:17pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 29th, 2014 at 1:02pm:
And, of course, how many since 2001?? Worldwide?



You'll eventually have to learn how to use google.  I can't do this for you all the time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2001

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2002

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents,_2003

And the rest are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents  (in a box near the bottom of the page).

Once you go to each year, do a word search of 'Islam' and 'Muslim'.  Let me know your results   ;)

Most terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

I've provided you with the proof, yet somehow I don't think you are willing to accept it.

If you want to keep drinking the kool-aid, that's your choice.

I prefer to live in the real world.

Cheers.



so ISIS is not American/Australian/Musliim... ::) ::)

btw wiki is a bit out of date...

so where did it spring from ??   and which religious group are they doing their best  persuading people to join.. unless they want their heads on a pole.

just like to clear it all up thats all.

btw where would you class the Taliban???..




Most terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

What part of that are you struggling to understand?

If you disagree with the FBI, please present your evidence.

And, the Taliban is is an Islamic fundamentalist terrorist organisation.

Anything else I can help you with?




on the one hand we have those who will accusing the USA of lying and making things up,.. CIA> FBI..

and on the other the USA is all you quote....

which involves most attacks either on American soil or on American embassies..or ships.. or planes...

just about always AMerican...

I for one am thinking worldwide..groups who have even recruited in ausland.

Islam is all over the world..and most terrorist groups that take ownership are muslim and proud of it..


just because an anti abortionist blows up an abortion clinic in Idaho... doesnt make him/her a  threat to the rest of the world..

I have back peddled here and cant find anything on other world terrorist groups.. that could be living in my neighbourhood..

so if you could just name a few   as every new group I read about is a Muslim group..

these groups are usually headed up by some one of which nationality would be helpful..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Team Grappler on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:50pm
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/TheList.htm



This list of terrorist attacks committed by Muslims since 9/11/01 (a rate of about five a day) is incomplete because not all such attacks are picked up by international news sources, even those resulting in multiple loss of life.

These are not incidents of ordinary crime involving nominal Muslims killing for money or vendetta.  We only include incidents of deadly violence that are reasonably determined to have been committed out of religious duty - as interpreted by the perpetrator.  Islam needs to be a motive, but it need not be the only factor.


http://thinkprogress.org/security/2011/09/10/316260/terrorism-expert-since-911-only-33-deaths-from-muslim-terrorism-vs-150000-deaths-from-murders/

Lot of research needed - it seems nobody does any studies on non-Muslim acts of terrorism... Grigor.. ?  What can you tell us?

Point me in he right direction....

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:51pm
lets be fair.. I am very interested in the names of these terrorist groups that are doing more than muslim terrorist groups will ever do..

and I would like to know how come we don t read about them if they are blowing innocent people up..and driving them from their homes into the hills without food or water.. I want to know who they are..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:54pm

cods wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:47pm:
... most terrorist groups that take ownership are muslim ..
..



Can you substantiate that claim?



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:56pm

cods wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:51pm:
lets be fair.. I am very interested in the names of these terrorist groups that are doing more than muslim terrorist groups will ever do..
.



I have posted the links to their names in this thread.

Go back a few pages, and you will find them.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:58pm

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:31pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:17pm:

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:09pm:
You make stupid assertions (although it is not illegal) and then demand proof that you have made stupid assertions.
The proof is everywhere you look, numpty.


i'm interested in the origin of the word "numpty"
i agree it fits greg to a tee, just wondering where it came from?

Scotland.




Still can't substantiate your claim, Sore-end?


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Aug 30th, 2014 at 5:03pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:56pm:

cods wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:51pm:
lets be fair.. I am very interested in the names of these terrorist groups that are doing more than muslim terrorist groups will ever do..
.



I have posted the links to their names in this thread.

Go back a few pages, and you will find them.




I have all I can find is C&P from America...can you at least give me the post number...I do hate putting you to this trouble but I cant just take someones word for things...I am sure you understand...

well ISIS for instance doesnt mind posting their atrocities on the web... for a start... and they are or at least were very good at making videos... aka Osama bin laden...

the gentlemen that have left our shores to support certain terrorist groups in Syria...havent been shy either...and they are muslim through and through.

I dont want to hate all muslims....but its not easy when they seem very shy about condemning whats going on..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 5:07pm

cods wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 5:03pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:56pm:

cods wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:51pm:
lets be fair.. I am very interested in the names of these terrorist groups that are doing more than muslim terrorist groups will ever do..
.



I have posted the links to their names in this thread.

Go back a few pages, and you will find them.




I have all I can find is C&P from America...can you at least give me the post number...I do hate putting you to this trouble but I cant just take someones word for things...I am sure you understand...

well ISIS for instance doesnt mind posting their atrocities on the web... for a start... and they are or at least were very good at making videos... aka Osama bin laden...

the gentlemen that have left our shores to support certain terrorist groups in Syria...havent been shy either...and they are muslim through and through.

I dont want to hate all muslims....but its not easy when they seem very shy about condemning whats going on..




I don't disagree with anything you've said, cods.

However, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001, have been carried out by non-Muslims.

What you see on the "news" isn't a true representation of the overall picture of what's happening in the world.

And, just to note, Muslims who don't condemn Muslim terrorist groups are probably concerned about their heads: the crazy Muslims wouldn't think twice about chopping off the heads of those who condemn them.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Aug 30th, 2014 at 5:47pm
You cannot possibly be right, numpty. Your arguments are invariably spurious, based on hairsplitting at best, but mostly on complete misrepresentation.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 5:49pm

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 5:47pm:
You cannot possibly be right, numpty. Your arguments are invariably spurious, based on hairsplitting at best, but mostly on complete misrepresentation.



OK.

Prove me wrong then.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Aug 30th, 2014 at 6:31pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 5:07pm:

cods wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 5:03pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:56pm:

cods wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 4:51pm:
lets be fair.. I am very interested in the names of these terrorist groups that are doing more than muslim terrorist groups will ever do..
.



I have posted the links to their names in this thread.

Go back a few pages, and you will find them.




I have all I can find is C&P from America...can you at least give me the post number...I do hate putting you to this trouble but I cant just take someones word for things...I am sure you understand...

well ISIS for instance doesnt mind posting their atrocities on the web... for a start... and they are or at least were very good at making videos... aka Osama bin laden...

the gentlemen that have left our shores to support certain terrorist groups in Syria...havent been shy either...and they are muslim through and through.

I dont want to hate all muslims....but its not easy when they seem very shy about condemning whats going on..




I don't disagree with anything you've said, cods.

However, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001, have been carried out by non-Muslims.

What you see on the "news" isn't a true representation of the overall picture of what's happening in the world.

And, just to note, Muslims who don't condemn Muslim terrorist groups are probably concerned about their heads: the crazy Muslims wouldn't think twice about chopping off the heads of those who condemn them.




I understand we on ly get told what we think we want to know.. I get that.. I thought you had the proof though..you know when you c&p American.. it is always about America...what affects them...its as if the rest of the world doesnt matter..

for instance MH17 there wasnt one American on it.. so to me there has been very little input from America...on solving that crime..no I dont think terrorists..but holy hell someone is responsible..

I also get why muslims dont condemn... does that make it right though???>...I am one of these people that believe the more that stand up and condemn the more they will see they are not on the right track.... the more people afraid of them the stronger they get.

I know easy when I am not a muslim... but they scare me..

I would still like some names or nationalities nut cases aside...I can handle one offs... its these cell things that bother me..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 30th, 2014 at 7:12pm
Great Britain has just raised its Terrorist level to Severe, which equates to a Terrorist Attack is Likely.

Tony Abbott has stated that Australia's Terrorist Threat level will remain at Medium for now. Look forward to this level being raised a the game of high stakes Jihad is played out in the Middle East.

I believe Abbott is making a very serious mistake indeed in not allowing Muslims to go fight in the Middle East. By restraining them here in Australia he is begging for a terror attack on home soil. Nothing ferments trouble like trying to put it in a bottle and cork it.

If this gambit continues, I am tipping some rough times for Australia right here.

Better to let them go and mark their papers, 'Never to return'.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Brian Ross on Aug 30th, 2014 at 7:33pm

red baron wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 7:12pm:
I believe Abbott is making a very serious mistake indeed in not allowing Muslims to go fight in the Middle East. By restraining them here in Australia he is begging for a terror attack on home soil. Nothing ferments trouble like trying to put it in a bottle and cork it.


The cynic in me suggests this is exactly what our Dear Leader desires.  Nothing would suit his agenda better than to have an Australian populace panicked and looking for blood.    ::)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 7:35pm

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 7:33pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 7:12pm:
I believe Abbott is making a very serious mistake indeed in not allowing Muslims to go fight in the Middle East. By restraining them here in Australia he is begging for a terror attack on home soil. Nothing ferments trouble like trying to put it in a bottle and cork it.


The cynic in me suggests this is exactly what our Dear Leader desires.  Nothing would suit his agenda better than to have an Australian populace panicked and looking for blood.    ::)



Exactly.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 30th, 2014 at 8:21pm

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 5:47pm:
You cannot possibly be right, numpty. Your arguments are invariably spurious, based on hairsplitting at best, but mostly on complete misrepresentation.




OK.

Prove me wrong.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Aug 30th, 2014 at 9:42pm

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 7:33pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 7:12pm:
I believe Abbott is making a very serious mistake indeed in not allowing Muslims to go fight in the Middle East. By restraining them here in Australia he is begging for a terror attack on home soil. Nothing ferments trouble like trying to put it in a bottle and cork it.


The cynic in me suggests this is exactly what our Dear Leader desires.  Nothing would suit his agenda better than to have an Australian populace panicked and looking for blood.    ::)



And this is why you are held in such wide contempt - you are a cynic without brains or comprehension, not as a result of a cohesive understanding of anything. You are a cynic because it is easier for you than actually thinking.




Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Aug 30th, 2014 at 9:45pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 7:35pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 7:33pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 7:12pm:
I believe Abbott is making a very serious mistake indeed in not allowing Muslims to go fight in the Middle East. By restraining them here in Australia he is begging for a terror attack on home soil. Nothing ferments trouble like trying to put it in a bottle and cork it.


The cynic in me suggests this is exactly what our Dear Leader desires.  Nothing would suit his agenda better than to have an Australian populace panicked and looking for blood.    ::)



Exactly.



:D :D :D

And there's the other numpty,  jumping eagerly right onto the opportunity to show himself up as ... well,, another numpty.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Aug 30th, 2014 at 9:48pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 8:21pm:

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 5:47pm:
You cannot possibly be right, numpty. Your arguments are invariably spurious, based on hairsplitting at best, but mostly on complete misrepresentation.




OK.

Prove me wrong.



You are Gweggowy the Negligible.
You are always wrong. You cannot be right. Looking at things out of your skull means that everything you see and report is distorted and false.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Team Grappler on Aug 31st, 2014 at 12:04am

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 7:33pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 7:12pm:
I believe Abbott is making a very serious mistake indeed in not allowing Muslims to go fight in the Middle East. By restraining them here in Australia he is begging for a terror attack on home soil. Nothing ferments trouble like trying to put it in a bottle and cork it.


The cynic in me suggests this is exactly what our Dear Leader desires.  Nothing would suit his agenda better than to have an Australian populace panicked and looking for blood.    ::)


Yup - send 'em off overseas with our blessings - get them to call home on the mobile so we can track 'em and send in the drones...

As for Big To - of course the only thing that might save him and his government would be a war of some kind... worked for his heroine Maggie thatcher, whose government promptly hid away the wounded veterans of that conflict so as not to upset the public.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aftermath_of_the_Falklands_War#Medical_and_psychological_treatment_of_Falklands_veterans

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Brian Ross on Aug 31st, 2014 at 1:18am

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 9:42pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 7:33pm:

red baron wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 7:12pm:
I believe Abbott is making a very serious mistake indeed in not allowing Muslims to go fight in the Middle East. By restraining them here in Australia he is begging for a terror attack on home soil. Nothing ferments trouble like trying to put it in a bottle and cork it.


The cynic in me suggests this is exactly what our Dear Leader desires.  Nothing would suit his agenda better than to have an Australian populace panicked and looking for blood.    ::)



And this is why you are held in such wide contempt - you are a cynic without brains or comprehension, not as a result of a cohesive understanding of anything. You are a cynic because it is easier for you than actually thinking.


Soren, it is comments like you which reinforce my cynicism.  I wonder how can someone who claims such superior intelligence be actually so foolish and bigoted all the time.    ::)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 31st, 2014 at 8:15am
Thus it begins!

Announcements this morning of Australia providing Weapons and Logistics with the R.A.A.F. flying missions in Iraq.

Soren, yes I am a cynic, life has made me that way.

I am reporting what is as obvious as the hand on the end of your arm. Come out of you glass bubble and get real.

If there is a problem, deal with it. My Police and Air Force training taught me that much.

Here's a little word to help you through life, S.M.E.A.C.

Situation

Mission

Execution

Administration

Command and Logistics

Apply that little Military word to your life Soren and you will be amazed how many problems fall over.

Oh and have a happy day :)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 31st, 2014 at 8:23am
Dr Jamal Rifi a prominent Muslim leader this morning on Sunrise condemned the actions of ISIS.

He stated that the Azzizzis had lived in peace with Muslims in the Middle East for thousands of years. He stated that through that period Muslims had not try to convert them by force to Islam nor had they waged war on them.

He claims ISIS has reinvented Muslim ideology and that the mainstream of 500,000 Australian Muslims do not support this ideology.

He also stated that young people were at danger of being drawn into a Jihadist ideology and that the leaders of the Muslim Community in Australia were working hard to stop this happening.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Aug 31st, 2014 at 9:24am

red baron wrote on Aug 31st, 2014 at 8:23am:
Dr Jamal Rifi a prominent Muslim leader this morning on Sunrise condemned the actions of ISIS.

He stated that the Azzizzis had lived in peace with Muslims in the Middle East for thousands of years. He stated that through that period Muslims had not try to convert them by force to Islam nor had they waged war on them.

He claims ISIS has reinvented Muslim ideology and that the mainstream of 500,000 Australian Muslims do not support this ideology.

He also stated that young people were at danger of being drawn into a Jihadist ideology and that the leaders of the Muslim Community in Australia were working hard to stop this happening.



he is a HERO.. well done to him..

the trouble is YOUNG people the emphasis on YOUNG.... almost always get dissatisfied and look for someone else to tell them how worthy they are  a bit of bullying or racism at school can do so much harm,...and this is where these cults get their hands on them...they train their brains to hate everything that thinks different to them..they end up bitter and twisted at a very young age... very hard to change.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by NorthOfNorth on Aug 31st, 2014 at 9:31am

red baron wrote on Aug 31st, 2014 at 8:15am:
Apply that little Military word to your life Soren and you will be amazed how many problems fall over.

"To a man with a hammer, every problem is a nail."

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Aug 31st, 2014 at 9:36am
You realise I was talking to Brain, not you, re cynicism.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Aug 31st, 2014 at 9:38am

red baron wrote on Aug 31st, 2014 at 8:23am:
Dr Jamal Rifi a prominent Muslim leader this morning on Sunrise condemned the actions of ISIS.

He stated that the Azzizzis had lived in peace with Muslims in the Middle East for thousands of years. He stated that through that period Muslims had not try to convert them by force to Islam nor had they waged war on them.

He claims ISIS has reinvented Muslim ideology and that the mainstream of 500,000 Australian Muslims do not support this ideology.

He also stated that young people were at danger of being drawn into a Jihadist ideology and that the leaders of the Muslim Community in Australia were working hard to stop this happening.

He named one of his sons Jihad.

Talk about mixed messages.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Aug 31st, 2014 at 9:55am

Soren wrote on Aug 31st, 2014 at 9:38am:

red baron wrote on Aug 31st, 2014 at 8:23am:
Dr Jamal Rifi a prominent Muslim leader this morning on Sunrise condemned the actions of ISIS.

He stated that the Azzizzis had lived in peace with Muslims in the Middle East for thousands of years. He stated that through that period Muslims had not try to convert them by force to Islam nor had they waged war on them.

He claims ISIS has reinvented Muslim ideology and that the mainstream of 500,000 Australian Muslims do not support this ideology.

He also stated that young people were at danger of being drawn into a Jihadist ideology and that the leaders of the Muslim Community in Australia were working hard to stop this happening.

He named one of his sons Jihad.

Talk about mixed messages.




Jihad is not a violent concept.
Jihad is not a declaration of war against other religions. It is worth noting that the Koran specifically refers to Jews and Christians as "people of the book" who should be protected and respected. All three faiths worship the same God. Allah is just the Arabic word for God, and is used by Christian Arabs as well as Muslims.
Military action in the name of Islam has not been common in the history of Islam. Scholars says most calls for violent jihad are not sanctioned by Islam.
Warfare in the name of God is not unique to Islam. Other faiths throughout the world have waged wars with religious justifications


its all in the interpretation... ::) ::)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 31st, 2014 at 10:09am
No Soren, I didn't realise that, apologies for my oversight.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 31st, 2014 at 10:17am
NorthofNorth, don't take my S.M.E.A.C. message too literally, Just a little military joke from bygone days. In the Airfield Defence Guards my Mustering the R.A.A.F.  in Vietnam days, we were always having S.M.E.A.C. shoved down our throats and we got to saying you can use S.M.E.A.C.  for everything from taking out the rubbish to going on Patrol. ;)


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 31st, 2014 at 10:30am
I believe the latest news that the R.A.A.F. will be doing Weapon and Supply drops to the Iraqi Forces is the thin end of the wedge.

I also believe that the 24 Aircraft that comprise our Super Hornets fighter jets will be itching to get over there. What better theatre of War and it is a War to try out our latest weaponry.

If the Yanks continue with air strikes which I also think will be enlarged, then it will only be a matter of time before our fighter jets are there too.

I have mixed emotions on this one because 'something' has to be done about the wholesale genocide going on there. ISIS cannot be allowed to grow strong and mighty like a new version of Nazis Germany.

There are huge lessons to be learned from WW2 e.g. When Neville Chamberlain arrived back in England infamously waving his 'Peace in our Time' document, shortly afterwards (days) the Nazis marched into Poland.

We as a world community, cannot allow something as sinister as ISIS to grow strong and virulent.

The price to pay for not getting involved, pales into insignificance, as to what will happen if these modern day Nazis are allowed to take over the Middle East.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by NorthOfNorth on Aug 31st, 2014 at 10:45am

red baron wrote on Aug 31st, 2014 at 10:30am:
I believe the latest news that the R.A.A.F. will be doing Weapon and Supply drops to the Iraqi Forces is the thin end of the wedge.

I also believe that the 24 Aircraft that comprise our Super Hornets fighter jets will be itching to get over there. What better theatre of War and it is a War to try out our latest weaponry.

If the Yanks continue with air strikes which I also think will be enlarged, then it will only be a matter of time before our fighter jets are there too.

I have mixed emotions on this one because 'something' has to be done about the wholesale genocide going on there. ISIS cannot be allowed to grow strong and mighty like a new version of Nazis Germany.

There are huge lessons to be learned from WW2 e.g. When Neville Chamberlain arrived back in England infamously waving his 'Peace in our Time' document, shortly afterwards (days) the Nazis marched into Poland.

We as a world community, cannot allow something as sinister as ISIS to grow strong and virulent.

The price to pay for not getting involved, pales into insignificance, as to what will happen if these modern day Nazis are allowed to take over the Middle East.

This is not a fight the west can win by engaging itself (or being lured into) another middle east murderous black comedy.. The 'dragon' of Islamism can only be subdued from within by those from the region.

Islamism is solely a force for destruction which is fueled by the zeal of psychopaths which, in its turn, is fueled by luring foreigners directly into the fray. This is how the psychopathic scum (many of them ironically are Islamist turds from Europe) 'justify' their need to murder... Without foreign fighters on their soil, they will turn on other Muslims... Their point is to kill and nothing else.

The only viable solution is to arm the Kurds and assist them without our being directly involved... They, too, are Muslim, which acts as an antidote to Islamism by revealing its sectarian underbelly... It also reveals the lie to the claim of Muslim 'brotherhood'...

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 31st, 2014 at 3:29pm

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 9:48pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 8:21pm:

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 5:47pm:
You cannot possibly be right, numpty. Your arguments are invariably spurious, based on hairsplitting at best, but mostly on complete misrepresentation.




OK.

Prove me wrong.



You are Gweggowy the Negligible.
You are always wrong. You cannot be right. Looking at things out of your skull means that everything you see and report is distorted and false.




Still can't substantiate your claim, hey?

I'm loving this   ;D

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Aug 31st, 2014 at 3:47pm

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 5:47pm:
You cannot possibly be right, numpty. Your arguments are invariably spurious, based on hairsplitting at best, but mostly on complete misrepresentation.




http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/05/muslims-only-carried-out-2-5-percent-of-terrorist-attacks-on-u-s-soil-between-1970-and-2012.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents

http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terrorism-2002-2005/terror02_05#terror_05sum

https://www.europol.europa.eu/latest_publications/37

You've gone vewy qwiet, Sore-end   ;)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Aug 31st, 2014 at 4:50pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 31st, 2014 at 3:47pm:

Soren wrote on Aug 30th, 2014 at 5:47pm:
You cannot possibly be right, numpty. Your arguments are invariably spurious, based on hairsplitting at best, but mostly on complete misrepresentation.




http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/05/muslims-only-carried-out-2-5-percent-of-terrorist-attacks-on-u-s-soil-between-1970-and-2012.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents

http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terrorism-2002-2005/terror02_05#terror_05sum

https://www.europol.europa.eu/latest_publications/37

You've gone vewy qwiet, Sore-end   ;)



You silly prat, the first  and third talk about the US only, the last one clearly identifies Al Qaida inspired terrorists as the main threat to European countries. The Wiki is clear that since 2000, Islamic terrorism is the main danger.


None of them prove your stupid assertion.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Aug 31st, 2014 at 5:34pm
Whatever way you cut it. There is no disputing that ISIS are heavily involved in 'ethnic cleansing'. The latest atrocity was on TV last night. They marched 250 Syrian soldiers in their underpants made them lie in a line then gunned the lot of them.

A stand must, must be made against ISIS. They must be ripped to pieces.

It's one thing to wage war and another thing altogether to carry out the wholesale genocide they are carrying out.

They must be defeated.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Aug 31st, 2014 at 7:02pm

red baron wrote on Aug 31st, 2014 at 5:34pm:
Whatever way you cut it. There is no disputing that ISIS are heavily involved in 'ethnic cleansing'. The latest atrocity was on TV last night. They marched 250 Syrian soldiers in their underpants made them lie in a line then gunned the lot of them.

A stand must, must be made against ISIS. They must be ripped to pieces.

It's one thing to wage war and another thing altogether to carry out the wholesale genocide they are carrying out.

They must be defeated.



exterminated,  get the simon weisenthal organisation onto them

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 1st, 2014 at 9:43am

Soren wrote on Aug 31st, 2014 at 4:50pm:
... the last one clearly identifies Al Qaida inspired terrorists as the main threat to European countries.



You obviously don't understand the difference between a threat, and something that has actually happened.

The majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 1st, 2014 at 9:45am

red baron wrote on Aug 31st, 2014 at 5:34pm:
Whatever way you cut it. There is no disputing that ISIS are heavily involved in 'ethnic cleansing'.

Yep, they're crazy, evil bastards.




red baron wrote on Aug 31st, 2014 at 5:34pm:
They must be defeated.

Now you're starting to sound like them.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 1st, 2014 at 9:57am

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 9:43am:

Soren wrote on Aug 31st, 2014 at 4:50pm:
... the last one clearly identifies Al Qaida inspired terrorists as the main threat to European countries.



You obviously don't understand the difference between a threat, and something that has actually happened.

The majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.



I am still waiting for you to give me the number of the post you claim where you have listed all the other terrorist non muslim groups..... that are a threat to the rest of the world.. and not just Americans who we know are capable of just about any crime.....  on their own soil...

this is about terrorism world wide...and judging by the Number of Australian and British [madmen] that have rushed to join the mad army....it is pretty much worldwide..

so if you can give me the list I would appreciate it...

I dont want to accuse you of talking CRAP now do I?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 1st, 2014 at 9:59am

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 9:45am:

red baron wrote on Aug 31st, 2014 at 5:34pm:
They must be defeated.

Now you're starting to sound like them.


While you would, of course, roll over and beg forgiveness.

Because it's not illegal to be craven.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 1st, 2014 at 10:32am

cods wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 9:57am:
I am still waiting for you to give me the number of the post you claim where you have listed all the other terrorist non muslim groups..... that are a threat to the rest of the world.. and not just Americans who we know are capable of just about any crime.....  on their own soil...



This is the fourth or fifth time I've provided it now.

I won't be doing it again:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents

Just over half way down the page, you'll find "1970–present".

Click on whichever year you want to investigate, and you will see a list of attacks and who carried them out.

Moreover, I did not say anything about "a threat to the rest of the world".

What I have said is, "The majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims."

Read it very carefully.  It is 100% correct.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 1st, 2014 at 10:35am

Soren wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 9:59am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 9:45am:

red baron wrote on Aug 31st, 2014 at 5:34pm:
They must be defeated.

Now you're starting to sound like them.


While you would, of course, roll over and beg forgiveness.



I've done nothing wrong, so I won't be doing any begging.

It's people like you, whose lives are completely consumed by irrational fear, who would drop to their knees at the sight of a Muslim.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:23am

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 10:32am:

cods wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 9:57am:
I am still waiting for you to give me the number of the post you claim where you have listed all the other terrorist non muslim groups..... that are a threat to the rest of the world.. and not just Americans who we know are capable of just about any crime.....  on their own soil...



This is the fourth or fifth time I've provided it now.

I won't be doing it again:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents

Just over half way down the page, you'll find "1970–present".

Click on whichever year you want to investigate, and you will see a list of attacks and who carried them out.

Moreover, I did not say anything about "a threat to the rest of the world".

What I have said is, "The majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims."

Read it very carefully.  It is 100% correct.



well yes I have browsed wiki...very long...I thought you had some well known names up your sleeve...

you know wiki going back years when even the worst terrorist groups were not CHOPPING OFF HEAD AND DISPLAYING THEM ON FENCE POSTS..

even the IRA never stooped that low did they?..

NAZI Germany was not a muslim country.... but it did come close..cleansing..forcing people to join or else..death in a very nasty way.. because you were not of their BELIEF...over throwing other govts.

it all depends on how you perseive the evil that one human can do to another human... I guess..
you may not think that evil.. terrorism is getting worse and stronger....I read somewhere where 100.000 have been killed in Syria by ISIS...which is a muslim group...

no matter where I look no other terrorist groups seem to come anywhere near what is happening today...

these were not THREATS BTW


ew      Arabian Sea      Dec 8, 1971
20      HMS Sheffield      UK      Guided missile destroyer      Crew      South Atlantic      May 4, 1982
Terrorist attacks[edit]
See also: List of terrorist incidents and List of assassins
Estimate      Name      Political Ideology      Country      City      Date
2,977      September 11 attacks      Islamism      United States      World Trade Center, New York City,
The Pentagon, Arlington, Virginia,
Shanksville, Pennsylvania      2001
796      2007 Yazidi communities bombings      Islamism      Iraq      Kahtaniya and Adnaniyah      2007
774      1990 massacre of Sri Lankan Police officers      Tamil Separatism      Sri Lanka      Eastern Province, Sri Lanka      1990
449      May 2013 Iraq attacks      Islamism      Iraq      Across Iraq      2013
422      Cinema Rex fire      Islamism      Iran      Abadan, Iran      1978
389      July 2013 Iraq attacks      Islamism      Iraq      Across Iraq      2013
336+      2014 Gamboru Ngala attack      Islamism      Nigeria      Gamboru Ngala      2014
334      Beslan school hostage crisis      Islamism      Russia      Beslan      2004
329      Air India Flight 182      Sikh extremism      Ireland      Irish Atlantic airspace      1985
309      1983 Beirut barracks bombing      Islamism      Lebanon      Beirut      1983
293      Russian apartment bombings      Islamism      Russia      Moscow      1999
270      Pan Am Flight 103      Islamism      United Kingdom      Lockerbie, Scotland      1988
257      1993 Bombay bombings      Islamism      India      Mumbai      1993
252      2001 Angola train attack      Angolan nationalism      Angola            2001
238      MV Dara      Unknown      Southwest Asia      Persian Gulf      1961
237      1998 United States embassy bombings      Islamism      Kenya,
Tanzania      Nairobi,
Dar es Salaam      1998
222+      January 2012 Nigeria attacks      Islamism      Nigeria      Mubi, Yola, Gombi, Maiduguri and Kano      2012
215      23 November 2006 Sadr City bombings      Islamism      Iraq      Sadr City      2006
209      2006 Mumbai train bombings      Islamism      India      Mumbai      2006
202      2002 Bali bombings      Islamism      Indonesia      Bali      2002
198      18 April 2007 Baghdad bombings      Islamism      Iraq      Baghdad      2007
191      2004 Madrid train bombings      Islamism      Spain      Madrid      2004
178+      2004 Ashura bombings in Iraq      Islamism      Iraq      Kerbala and Baghdad      2004
175      2008 Mumbai attacks      Islamism      India      Mumbai      2008
171      UTA Flight 772      Islamism      Niger            1989
170      Moscow theater hostage crisis      Islamism      Russia      Moscow      2002
168      Kizlyar-Pervomayskoye hostage crisis      Islamism      Russia      Kizlyar, Pervomayskoye[disambiguation needed], and Sovetskoye[disambiguation needed]      1996
168      Oklahoma City bombing      Militia movement      United States      Oklahoma City      1995
155      October 2009 Baghdad bombings      Islamism      Iraq      Baghdad      2009
152      2007 Tal Afar bombings and massacre      Islamism      Iraq      Tal Afar      2007
150      St Nedelya Church assault      Communism      Bulgaria      Sofia      1925
148      Gyaneshwari Express train derailment      Unknown      India            2010
147      Kattankudy mosque massacre      Tamil Separatism      Sri Lanka      Kattankudy, Batticaloa District      1990
146      Anuradhapura massacre      Tamil Separatism      Sri Lanka      Anuradhapura, Anuradhapura District      1985
140      Budyonnovsk hospital hostage crisis      Islamism      Russia      Budyonnovsk      1995
136      2007 Karachi bombing      Islamism      Pakistan      Karachi      2007
135      February 3, 2007 Baghdad market bombing      Islamism      Iraq      Baghdad      2007
133+      January 2011 Iraq suicide attacks      Islamism      Iraq            2011
130      Rafiganj train disaster      Unknown      India      Rafiganj      2002
128      Xiamen Airlines Flight 8301      Unknown      China      Guangzhou      1990
127      December 2009 Baghdad bombings      Islamism      Iraq      Baghdad      2009
127      2005 Al Hillah bombing      Islamism      Iraq      Al Hillah      2005
125      Ethiopian Airlines Flight 961      Unknown      Indian Ocean            1996
120      2007 Al Hillah bombings      Islamism      Iraq      Al Hillah      2007
120      2012 Sana'a bombing      Islamism      Yemen      Sana'a      2012
this is just part of a long list from your link..too long to produce on here..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:27am

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 10:35am:

Soren wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 9:59am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 9:45am:

red baron wrote on Aug 31st, 2014 at 5:34pm:
They must be defeated.

Now you're starting to sound like them.


While you would, of course, roll over and beg forgiveness.



I've done nothing wrong, so I won't be doing any begging.

It's people like you, whose lives are completely consumed by irrational fear, who would drop to their knees at the sight of a Muslim.



total bull shIte get a grip boy... you seem to be under the impression we are bullet proof in this country..

you see no THREAT at all and if you do you turn your nose up at it..


WHATS A THREAT.. no one should fear a threat its meaningless.. even from head hunters..

dont worry if one is living near you..nothing to fear.. ::) ::).

I bet you havent got a muslim community living within cooee of your home town....

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:39am

cods wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:27am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 10:35am:

Soren wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 9:59am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 9:45am:

red baron wrote on Aug 31st, 2014 at 5:34pm:
They must be defeated.

Now you're starting to sound like them.


While you would, of course, roll over and beg forgiveness.



I've done nothing wrong, so I won't be doing any begging.

It's people like you, whose lives are completely consumed by irrational fear, who would drop to their knees at the sight of a Muslim.



total bull shIte get a grip boy... you seem to be under the impression we are bullet proof in this country..

you see no THREAT at all and if you do you turn your nose up at it..


WHATS A THREAT.. no one should fear a threat its meaningless.. even from head hunters..

dont worry if one is living near you..nothing to fear.. ::) ::).

I bet you havent got a muslim community living within cooee of your home town....
Aint that the truth cods. Most of these Muslim threat deniers and multiculturalism lovers are admires from afar.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:44am

cods wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:23am:
you may not think that evil.. terrorism is getting worse and stronger.....



Really?  When did I say anything like that?

What I have said is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

Simple fact.  Why do you people struggle so much with facts?


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:47am

cods wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:27am:
I bet you havent got a muslim community living within cooee of your home town....



I'll take that bet, any day.  How much?

By the way, I have Muslim communities near me, not terrorists.  You do realise that they aren't the same thing, don't you?



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:49am

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:47am:

cods wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:27am:
I bet you havent got a muslim community living within cooee of your home town....



I'll take that bet, any day.  How much?

By the way, I have Muslim communities near me, not terrorists.  You do realise that they aren't the same thing, don't you?
What area do you live in greggorry? Be honest.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 1st, 2014 at 12:03pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:49am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:47am:

cods wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:27am:
I bet you havent got a muslim community living within cooee of your home town....



I'll take that bet, any day.  How much?

By the way, I have Muslim communities near me, not terrorists.  You do realise that they aren't the same thing, don't you?
What area do you live in greggorry? Be honest.
I thought so. :) :)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 1st, 2014 at 1:28pm

cods wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:27am:
... you seem to be under the impression we are bullet proof in this country..
....



Really?

How did you get that, from this:

"The majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims."

:-/


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Baronvonrort on Sep 1st, 2014 at 1:30pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 1:28pm:

cods wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:27am:
... you seem to be under the impression we are bullet proof in this country..
....



Really?

How did you get that, from this:

"The majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims."

:-/


The FBI counts arson and vandalism as a terrorist attack.

So what is the bodycount from Islamic terrorism compared to non Islamic terrorism,are you avoiding that statistic peckerhead?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 1st, 2014 at 1:38pm


Quote:
The FBI counts arson and vandalism as a terrorist attack.

Please read this:  http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/terrorism/terrorism-definition


Quote:
So what is the bodycount from Islamic terrorism compared to non Islamic terrorism ...

I don't know.  Do you?


Quote:
... are you avoiding that statistic peckerhead?

Not at all.  If you know the answer, please post the figures.  I'd be very interested in seeing them.

You see, I'm not claiming that Muslim terrorist attacks have resulted in less deaths.  I'm merely stating the fact that the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Baronvonrort on Sep 1st, 2014 at 1:41pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 1:38pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 1:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 1:28pm:

cods wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:27am:
... you seem to be under the impression we are bullet proof in this country..
....



Really?

How did you get that, from this:

"The majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims."

:-/



Quote:
The FBI counts arson and vandalism as a terrorist attack.


Please read this:  http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/terrorism/terrorism-definition



[quote]So what is the bodycount from Islamic terrorism compared to non Islamic terrorism ...


I don't know.  Do you?


[quote] ... are you avoiding that statistic peckerhead?


Not at all.  If you know the answer, please post the figures.  I'd be very interested in seeing them.

You see, I'm not claiming that Muslim terrorist attacks have resulted in less deaths.  I'm merely stating the fact that the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.


Check out your FBI link for the bodycount, it appears the muslims are winning that one.

How many deaths did the graffiti which was called a terrorist attack result in?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 1st, 2014 at 1:56pm

Baronvonrort wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 1:41pm:
Check out your FBI link for the bodycount, it appears the muslims are winning that one.

Are they?  I didn't know it was a competition. Seeing as you won't post the figures, I'll just take your word for it. 


Baronvonrort wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 1:41pm:
How many deaths did the graffiti which was called a terrorist attack result in?

I don't know.  Do you?

Moreover, what do those questions have to do my argument?  I'm not talking about deaths. You seem to be arguing with yourself.

Just to recap, I am simply stating the fact that the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 1st, 2014 at 3:37pm
I can't see what is wrong with saying that ISIS, 'Must be defeated'. They are committing genocide not just waging war but wiping out a race of people.

They, 'MUST BE DEFEATED!'


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 1st, 2014 at 3:44pm

red baron wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 3:37pm:
I can't see what is wrong with saying that ISIS, 'Must be defeated'. They are committing genocide not just waging war but wiping out a race of people.

They, 'MUST BE DEFEATED!'



http://www.isis.com.au/

Prices too high?    :-/

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 1st, 2014 at 3:45pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 3:44pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 3:37pm:
I can't see what is wrong with saying that ISIS, 'Must be defeated'. They are committing genocide not just waging war but wiping out a race of people.

They, 'MUST BE DEFEATED!'



http://www.isis.com.au/

Prices too high?    :-/
So what suburb do you live in Greggorry??

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 1st, 2014 at 3:54pm
Where do you get this stuff Pec?


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 1st, 2014 at 3:58pm

red baron wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 3:54pm:
Where do you get this stuff Pec?



They did some work for me recently.

Unfortunate name   :(

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by life_goes_on on Sep 1st, 2014 at 4:31pm
Anyone else starting to think that here in OZ, this whole ISIS story is bigger than anywhere else in the world other than the Middle East itself?

Google the trending news stories for UK, Europe.... the US.... then compare them to here.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 1st, 2014 at 4:44pm

Life_goes_on wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 4:31pm:
Anyone else starting to think that here in OZ, this whole ISIS story is bigger than anywhere else in the world other than the Middle East itself?

Google the trending news stories for UK, Europe.... the US.... then compare them to here.



;)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 1st, 2014 at 4:55pm

Life_goes_on wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 4:31pm:
Anyone else starting to think that here in OZ, this whole ISIS story is bigger than anywhere else in the world other than the Middle East itself?

Google the trending news stories for UK, Europe.... the US.... then compare them to here.


Rupert's helping out with a little budget distraction.

Don't worry, things will return to normal in no time. Wait until Mr Abbott's polls improve.

Mr Abbott taking more overseas trips than Kevin 747? Lucky he doesn't need the hairdryer.

Thanks heavens the grown-ups are back in charge.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 1st, 2014 at 4:58pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:49am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:47am:

cods wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:27am:
I bet you havent got a muslim community living within cooee of your home town....



I'll take that bet, any day.  How much?

By the way, I have Muslim communities near me, not terrorists.  You do realise that they aren't the same thing, don't you?
What area do you live in greggorry? Be honest.


You know where I live, dearie. I bought your old mate's house - the one next door to the mosque.

It's gone up in value too.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 1st, 2014 at 6:19pm
It wouldn't matter, if we were the only Country in the World, where this conflict is being reported. The horrendous images of ISIS committing genocide have turned the strongest stomach, kids holding severed heads - our kids!!!.

We are not going to be like piss weak Neville Chamberlain in 1939. Abbott is right, we can't stand by whilst these bastards carry out Genocide.

Too often in the history of the world, Nations who were capable of doing something to stop the tyrants of history growing strong, have stood idley by.

Not this time.




Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 1st, 2014 at 6:44pm

red baron wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 6:19pm:
It wouldn't matter, if we were the only Country in the World, where this conflict is being reported. The horrendous images of ISIS committing genocide have turned the strongest stomach, kids holding severed heads - our kids!!!.

We are not going to be like piss weak Neville Chamberlain in 1939. Abbott is right, we can't stand by whilst these bastards carry out Genocide.

Too often in the history of the world, Nations who were capable of doing something to stop the tyrants of history growing strong, have stood idley by.

Not this time.



What makes you so sure?


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:17pm
Elementary, Greggerry, as the ISIS convoys move along the roads to the next target town, the Allies of the Willing will bomb their sorry arses to Kingdom Come...think that might do it? :)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:17pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:44am:

cods wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:23am:
you may not think that evil.. terrorism is getting worse and stronger.....



Really?  When did I say anything like that?

What I have said is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

Simple fact.  Why do you people struggle so much with facts?




please give me the names of those non muslim terrorists that have terrorised the world since 2001.



tell us which group/s is FEARED THE MOST...

come on you are the expert.. you are the one that keeps telling us so you must have the names of the

WORST TERRORISTS...the ones that are taking over countries..... not in the name of Allah.

are they Catholic or atheist.. maybe devil worshippers....but give us the names not the wiki link....come on you must have them to know there are more of them than muslim ones..

how many aussies have gone overseas to join non muslim terrorist groups?????

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:20pm

red baron wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:17pm:
Elementary, Greggerry, as the ISIS convoys move along the roads to the next target town, the Allies of the Willing will bomb their sorry arses to Kingdom Come...think that might do it?



Of course that will would do it.

Isn't going to happen though.



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:24pm

cods wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:17pm:
tell us which group/s is FEARED THE MOST...



Personally?  None.

Around the world?  Not sure.

Here, in this forum, and probably most of Australia?  Muslim extremists (nasty pieces of work).

All of which is completely irrelevant to what I have said: the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:36pm

cods wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:17pm:
WORST TERRORISTS...the ones that are taking over countries.....



I haven't mentioned anything about the "worst terrorists" or terrorists that are supposedly "taking over countries".

What I have said is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 1st, 2014 at 10:41pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:36pm:

cods wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:17pm:
WORST TERRORISTS...the ones that are taking over countries.....



I haven't mentioned anything about the "worst terrorists" or terrorists that are supposedly "taking over countries".

What I have said is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

You are lying.
You could have demonstrated if it was true but stupidly - you think cleverly - you want others to disprove it.
We all live with the daily news of Muslim terror. You should demonstrate it if the perception and of constant Muslim terror is incorrect.
But you cannot because it is not.
You are thick and ridiculous because it is not illegal.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:07pm

Soren wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 10:41pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:36pm:

cods wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:17pm:
WORST TERRORISTS...the ones that are taking over countries.....



I haven't mentioned anything about the "worst terrorists" or terrorists that are supposedly "taking over countries".

What I have said is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

You are lying.
You could have demonstrated if it was true but stupidly - you think cleverly - you want others to disprove it.
We all live with the daily news of Muslim terror.


Er, yes, this is the product of the Danish education system.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:20pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 11:07pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 10:41pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:36pm:

cods wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:17pm:
WORST TERRORISTS...the ones that are taking over countries.....



I haven't mentioned anything about the "worst terrorists" or terrorists that are supposedly "taking over countries".

What I have said is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

You are lying.
You could have demonstrated if it was true but stupidly - you think cleverly - you want others to disprove it.
We all live with the daily news of Muslim terror.


Er, yes, this is the product of the Danish education system.


You'd know that would you Rambo?
Could you even find Denmark on a map?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:56am

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:24pm:

cods wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:17pm:
tell us which group/s is FEARED THE MOST...



Personally?  None.

Around the world?  Not sure.

Here, in this forum, and probably most of Australia?  Muslim extremists (nasty pieces of work).

All of which is completely irrelevant to what I have said: the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.



they are that bad no one knows their name   ::) ::) I think I get it..

it strikes me as odd that we know almost every name of every muslim terrorist group..at least since 2001.... and yet you claim they are the least involved in terrorism...


What I have said is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.


there should be a law about making statements AS GRAND AS THIS with no back up.,.. :P



you are almost alone on this one.....yet you keep insisting you are correct.... because deaths dont count in your calculations...


you say the majority yet can name none of them.. well how about you give us the

number of attacks by muslims..

and the number of  attacks by non muslims...since 2001...

I will settle for that.

then neither of us need to keep repeating ourselves.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 8:16am
Uh...actually Pec, it is happening. The U.S. is involved in air strikes and has been for over a week. Watch for these to be stepped up big time as many countries from Europe have signed on to get rid of ISIS.

One of our supply dropping aircraft was fired on this morning. U.S., Jet fighters responded.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 8:20am

cods wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:56am:
.... because deaths dont count in your calculations...




I'm not talking about deaths (you are): I'm talking about terrorist attacks.

The simple fact is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.





Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 8:32am

Soren wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 10:41pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:36pm:

cods wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:17pm:
WORST TERRORISTS...the ones that are taking over countries.....



I haven't mentioned anything about the "worst terrorists" or terrorists that are supposedly "taking over countries".

What I have said is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

You are lying.
You could have demonstrated if it was true but stupidly - you think cleverly - you want others to disprove it.
We all live with the daily news of Muslim terror. You should demonstrate it if the perception and of constant Muslim terror is incorrect.
But you cannot because it is not.
You are thick and ridiculous because it is not illegal.



The majority of terrorist attacks reported on TV are the ones carried out by Muslims.  No argument from me on that one.

However, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

I've proven this, at lease a half a dozen times.  You just can't handle the truth.  The media has brainwashed you into believing what they want you to believe.

Here's a little exercise for you: get on google and see if you can find any official reports that say the majority of terrorist attacks around the world have been carried out by Muslims.  If that's the truth, surely someone is reporting it, right? 

Let me know how you go with that one   ;)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 9:27am

cods wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:56am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:24pm:

cods wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:17pm:
tell us which group/s is FEARED THE MOST...



Personally?  None.

Around the world?  Not sure.

Here, in this forum, and probably most of Australia?  Muslim extremists (nasty pieces of work).

All of which is completely irrelevant to what I have said: the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.



they are that bad no one knows their name   ::) ::) I think I get it..



No, you don't get it at all.

The names are well known.

For example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_designated_terrorist_organizations

And here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents

Here, too:  http://www.nctc.gov/site/other/fto.html

Abu Nidal Organization (ANO)
Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG)
Aum Shinrikyo (AUM)
Basque Fatherland and Liberty (ETA)
Gama’a al-Islamiyya (Islamic Group)
HAMAS
Harakat ul-Mujahidin (HUM)
Hizballah (Party of God)
Kahane Chai (KACH)
Kurdistan Workers' Party (Kongra-Gel, PKK)
Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE)
National Liberation Army (ELN)
Palestine Liberation Front (PLF)
Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ)
Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP)
PFLP-General Command (PFLP-GC)
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC)
Revolutionary Organization 17 November (17N)
Revolutionary People’s Liberation Party/Front (DHKP/C)
Shining Path (SL)
Al-Qa’ida (AQ)
Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU)
Real Irish Republican Army (RIRA)
United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC)
Jaish-e-Mohammed (JEM)
Lashkar-e Tayyiba (LeT)
Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade (AAMB)
Asbat al-Ansar (AAA)
Al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM)
Communist Party of the Philippines/New People's Army (CPP/NPA)
Jemaah Islamiya (JI)
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LJ)
Ansar al-Islam (AAI)
Continuity Irish Republican Army (CIRA)
Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG)
Al-Qa’ida in Iraq (AQI)
Islamic Jihad Group (IJU)
Harakat ul-Jihad-i-Islami/Bangladesh (HUJI-B)
Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP)
Jundallah
Army of Islam (AOI)
Indian Mujahidin (IM)
Jemaah Anshorut Tawhid (JAT)
Abdallah Azzam Brigades (AAB)
Haqqani Network (HQN)
Ansar al-Dine (AAD)
Boko Haram
Ansaru
al-Mulathamun Battalion
Ansar al-Shari'a in Benghazi
Ansar al-Shari'a in Darnah
Ansar al-Shari'a in Tunisia

Here:  http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/2012/209989.htm

etc.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 9:52am
indeed, I think Presbyterians are the most likely terrorists.
heres a few pics of a Presbyterian sunday school group of boys.

Isis_v2.jpg (39 KB | 24 )

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 9:53am
and heres a lovely young Presbyterian boy who's just finished cutting up the chops for his nan
18ohd2uph7o0ojpg_001.jpg (55 KB | 22 )

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 9:55am

aquascoot wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 9:52am:
indeed, I think Presbyterians are the most likely terrorists.
heres a few pics of a Presbyterian sunday school group of boys.



You're confused, again.

I haven't said anything about "the most likely terrorists".  Nor have I suggested that Muslims aren't involved in terrorism.

What I have said is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

Simple fact.  Don't shoot the messenger.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:19am

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 9:27am:

cods wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:56am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:24pm:

cods wrote on Sep 1st, 2014 at 7:17pm:
tell us which group/s is FEARED THE MOST...



Personally?  None.

Around the world?  Not sure.

Here, in this forum, and probably most of Australia?  Muslim extremists (nasty pieces of work).

All of which is completely irrelevant to what I have said: the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.



they are that bad no one knows their name   ::) ::) I think I get it..



No, you don't get it at all.

The names are well known.

For example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_designated_terrorist_organizations

And here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents

Here, too:  http://www.nctc.gov/site/other/fto.html

Abu Nidal Organization (ANO)
Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG)
Aum Shinrikyo (AUM)
Basque Fatherland and Liberty (ETA)
Gama’a al-Islamiyya (Islamic Group)
HAMAS
Harakat ul-Mujahidin (HUM)
Hizballah (Party of God)
Kahane Chai (KACH)
Kurdistan Workers' Party (Kongra-Gel, PKK)
Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE)
National Liberation Army (ELN)
Palestine Liberation Front (PLF)
Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ)
Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP)
PFLP-General Command (PFLP-GC)
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC)
Revolutionary Organization 17 November (17N)
Revolutionary People’s Liberation Party/Front (DHKP/C)
Shining Path (SL)
Al-Qa’ida (AQ)
Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU)
Real Irish Republican Army (RIRA)
United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC)
Jaish-e-Mohammed (JEM)
Lashkar-e Tayyiba (LeT)
Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade (AAMB)
Asbat al-Ansar (AAA)
Al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM)
Communist Party of the Philippines/New People's Army (CPP/NPA)
Jemaah Islamiya (JI)
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LJ)
Ansar al-Islam (AAI)
Continuity Irish Republican Army (CIRA)
Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG)
Al-Qa’ida in Iraq (AQI)
Islamic Jihad Group (IJU)
Harakat ul-Jihad-i-Islami/Bangladesh (HUJI-B)
Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP)
Jundallah
Army of Islam (AOI)
Indian Mujahidin (IM)
Jemaah Anshorut Tawhid (JAT)
Abdallah Azzam Brigades (AAB)
Haqqani Network (HQN)
Ansar al-Dine (AAD)
Boko Haram
Ansaru
al-Mulathamun Battalion
Ansar al-Shari'a in Benghazi
Ansar al-Shari'a in Darnah
Ansar al-Shari'a in Tunisia

Here:  http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/2012/209989.htm

etc.




not sure what the purpose of keep printing up wiki...as these are just about all MUSLIM based...and I got bored... I was hoping you had the list as you are so insistent muslims are out numbered when it comes to terrorist attacks...

but I would say you are just  believing you own C&P...ok you cant back up what you claim....CRAP aint it?
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks-2001-2003.htm

btw this site lists 23.743 Islamic attacks sine 9/11.
it didnt say how up to date it is..but take a look anyway.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:22am

cods wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:19am:
not sure what the purpose of keep printing up wiki...as these are just about all MUSLIM based...and I got bored... I was hoping you had the list as you are so insistent muslims are out numbered when it comes to terrorist attacks...



I have never said that non-Muslim terrorist groups outnumber Muslim terrorist groups.

What I have said is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

Simple fact.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:22am

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 9:55am:

aquascoot wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 9:52am:
indeed, I think Presbyterians are the most likely terrorists.
heres a few pics of a Presbyterian sunday school group of boys.



You're confused, again.

I haven't said anything about "the most likely terrorists".  Nor have I suggested that Muslims aren't involved in terrorism.

What I have said is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

Simple fact.  Don't shoot the messenger.



we know greg but for some unknown reason you keep expecting wiki to prove what you are saying...

can you tell me how many attacks other than islamic driven have taken place since 2001.....I bet you cant...yet you claim muslims do the least attacks....how can you make that statement over and over without figures..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:27am

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:22am:

cods wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:19am:
not sure what the purpose of keep printing up wiki...as these are just about all MUSLIM based...and I got bored... I was hoping you had the list as you are so insistent muslims are out numbered when it comes to terrorist attacks...



I have never said that non-Muslim terrorist groups outnumber Muslim terrorist groups.

What I have said is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

Simple fact.




hahahahahahahahaha..

what does the MAJORITY of TERRORIST ATTACKS have been instigated by NON MUSLIM GROUPS>.. mean exactly...


you sent a list that was supposed to tell me more non muslim caused attacks have taken place since 2001...

me thinks you are having reading problems..

stop twisting everything around.. I will give you this like most lefties you are good at it... ::) ::)

stick to the list you sent claiming more non muslims were on it...

when even the biggest sight retarded person can see it aint true..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:36am

cods wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:27am:
what does the MAJORITY of TERRORIST ATTACKS have been instigated by NON MUSLIM GROUPS>.. mean exactly...

Majority = the greater number.

Terrorist attack = the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof in furtherance of political or social objectives.

Non-Muslims = people who do not practice Islam, or associate in any way with that religion.



cods wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:27am:
stop twisting everything around..

I'm not twisting anything: you are.

I have merely stated that, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.  Simple fact.

I have not said that there are more non-Muslim terrorist groups than Muslim groups.

I have not said that the Muslim attacks have resulted in less deaths than the non-Muslim attacks.

I have not said that people are more scared of non-Muslim groups.

What I have said is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims. 

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:45am

cods wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:22am:
....how can you make that statement over and over without figures..


I've given you the figures (several times).

Every year, from 1800 to 2014.

See for yourself:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents

And here: http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:50am
Greggorry stated that non muslims did most terrorist attacks between 2001 and now. Go to his link and look at the very top of each year. It reads.........  This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:00pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:50am:
Greggorry stated that non muslims did most terrorist attacks between 2001 and now. Go to his link and look at the very top of each year. It reads.........  This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it



So, have you expanded it yet?

If not, go here - http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/ - and you will learn that the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

Simple fact.  Don't shoot the messenger.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:12pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:00pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:50am:
Greggorry stated that non muslims did most terrorist attacks between 2001 and now. Go to his link and look at the very top of each year. It reads.........  This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it



So, have you expanded it yet?

If not, go here - http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/ - and you will learn that the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

Simple fact.  Don't shoot the messenger.
Wrong again.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:17pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:12pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:00pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:50am:
Greggorry stated that non muslims did most terrorist attacks between 2001 and now. Go to his link and look at the very top of each year. It reads.........  This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it



So, have you expanded it yet?

If not, go here - http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/ - and you will learn that the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

Simple fact.  Don't shoot the messenger.

Wrong again.



Can you substantiate that claim?

No, I didn't think so    ;D

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:19pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:17pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:12pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:00pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:50am:
Greggorry stated that non muslims did most terrorist attacks between 2001 and now. Go to his link and look at the very top of each year. It reads.........  This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it



So, have you expanded it yet?

If not, go here - http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/ - and you will learn that the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

Simple fact.  Don't shoot the messenger.

Wrong again.



Can you substantiate that claim?

No, I didn't think so    ;D

Take your crumby website and go hunt for a Muslim community in your local area. I'll see you back on here in 10 years.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:22pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:17pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:12pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:00pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:50am:
Greggorry stated that non muslims did most terrorist attacks between 2001 and now. Go to his link and look at the very top of each year. It reads.........  This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it



So, have you expanded it yet?

If not, go here - http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/ - and you will learn that the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

Simple fact.  Don't shoot the messenger.

Wrong again.



Can you substantiate that claim?

No, I didn't think so    ;D

Take your crumby website and go hunt for a Muslim community in your local area. I'll see you back on here in 10 years.



"No Muslims in Hobart or Perth"    ;D

You've learnt two things today:
- the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.
- lots of Muslims in Perth and Hobart.

;D

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:27pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:22pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:17pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:12pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:00pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:50am:
Greggorry stated that non muslims did most terrorist attacks between 2001 and now. Go to his link and look at the very top of each year. It reads.........  This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it



So, have you expanded it yet?

If not, go here - http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/ - and you will learn that the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

Simple fact.  Don't shoot the messenger.

Wrong again.



Can you substantiate that claim?

No, I didn't think so    ;D

Take your crumby website and go hunt for a Muslim community in your local area. I'll see you back on here in 10 years.



"No Muslims in Hobart or Perth"    ;D

You've learnt two things today:
- the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.
- lots of Muslims in Perth and Hobart.

;D
You knock Taipan and I when we actually live amongst mulsims while  you live in 2 cities dominated by white people. Especially Hobart. I can see now why you love multiculturalism so much, you don't know it. You lefties are an absolute crack up.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:40pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:27pm:
You knock Taipan and I when we actually live amongst mulsims ...



Well, you obviously like them.

Why would you live with people you don't like?    :-/

So, what's all the fuss?



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by The Outrage Bus on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:43pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:27pm:
You knock Taipan and I when we actually live amongst mulsims while  you live in 2 cities dominated by white people. Especially Hobart. I can see now why you love multiculturalism so much, you don't know it. You lefties are an absolute crack up.


Living amongst seems to indicate interactions. I imagine you and Taipan more living in areas where Muslims happen to live, not getting sun, not going outside for fear of the evil Muslim threat living next door, posting stuff on the internet and fluffing each other at 2 am.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:48pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:43pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:27pm:
You knock Taipan and I when we actually live amongst mulsims while  you live in 2 cities dominated by white people. Especially Hobart. I can see now why you love multiculturalism so much, you don't know it. You lefties are an absolute crack up.


Living amongst seems to indicate interactions. I imagine you and Taipan more living in areas where Muslims happen to live, not getting sun, not going outside for fear of the evil Muslim threat living next door, posting stuff on the internet and fluffing each other at 2 am.




Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:15pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:27pm:
... we actually live amongst mulsims ...



Why, though?

If you don't like them, why live with them?


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:19pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:36am:

cods wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:27am:
what does the MAJORITY of TERRORIST ATTACKS have been instigated by NON MUSLIM GROUPS>.. mean exactly...

Majority = the greater number.

Terrorist attack = the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof in furtherance of political or social objectives.

Non-Muslims = people who do not practice Islam, or associate in any way with that religion.



cods wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:27am:
stop twisting everything around..

I'm not twisting anything: you are.

I have merely stated that, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.  Simple fact.

I have not said that there are more non-Muslim terrorist groups than Muslim groups.

I have not said that the Muslim attacks have resulted in less deaths than the non-Muslim attacks.

I have not said that people are more scared of non-Muslim groups.

What I have said is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims. 




and you dont call that twisting... omg... what an artist a true lefty..dodge duck weave in and out of tight corners.. kruddy and gillard would be proud of you...

you are right YOU HAVE NOT SAID....

but then when you make claims like the MAJORITY..you dont have to do you??

I have read you wiki and none of them give the numbers unless one wants to stream through years of whatever... which I presume you have done..
to come up with your..

MAJORITY slogan...

you must have counted them as wiki from what I read doesnt do that....did you read the little item I sent you that claimed 23.743 muslim attacks have happened since 2001...

I am sure you can come up with a figure to prove your MAJORITY is correct..

in the mean time I say you are talking CRAP.. whether it includes what YOU CLAIM YOU DONT SAY> ::) ::) ::)

when someone comes back with I didnt do this or say that every time someone questions the FACTS they talk about..

we know instinctively they are backing away from claims they cannot substantiate....

wiki... its all yours....

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:20pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:22pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:17pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:12pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:00pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:50am:
Greggorry stated that non muslims did most terrorist attacks between 2001 and now. Go to his link and look at the very top of each year. It reads.........  This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it



So, have you expanded it yet?

If not, go here - http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/ - and you will learn that the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.

Simple fact.  Don't shoot the messenger.

Wrong again.



Can you substantiate that claim?

No, I didn't think so    ;D

Take your crumby website and go hunt for a Muslim community in your local area. I'll see you back on here in 10 years.



"No Muslims in Hobart or Perth"    ;D

You've learnt two things today:
- the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.
- lots of Muslims in Perth and Hobart.

;D
You knock Taipan and I when we actually live amongst mulsims while  you live in 2 cities dominated by white people. Especially Hobart. I can see now why you love multiculturalism so much, you don't know it. You lefties are an absolute crack up.


How many mosques have you got in Roti Hill, Shakey?

You drove your truck through my Multicultural ghetto once, remember? You said you didn’t want to go back. Why? Too many Muslims.

I can see why you hate multiculturalism so much.

You’ve only driven through it.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:22pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:15pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:27pm:
... we actually live amongst mulsims ...



Why, though?

If you don't like them, why live with them?



what a pathetic reply.... they live with him..

if you are first here isnt that a FACT...

why should we CHristians move out to allow those who chose to live as if they are still  in the dessert...and bring all their bizarre laws with them... no thanks...

you are welcome to them as you are so understanding....and believe they are not nearly as bad as painted...

I guess all those headhunters are not muslims then?..or dont you call chopping heads off an ATTACK>

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:22pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:15pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:27pm:
... we actually live amongst mulsims ...



Why, though?

If you don't like them, why live with them?


He had to make a delivery.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:27pm

cods wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:36am:

cods wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:27am:
what does the MAJORITY of TERRORIST ATTACKS have been instigated by NON MUSLIM GROUPS>.. mean exactly...

Majority = the greater number.

Terrorist attack = the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof in furtherance of political or social objectives.

Non-Muslims = people who do not practice Islam, or associate in any way with that religion.



cods wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 11:27am:
stop twisting everything around..

I'm not twisting anything: you are.

I have merely stated that, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.  Simple fact.

I have not said that there are more non-Muslim terrorist groups than Muslim groups.

I have not said that the Muslim attacks have resulted in less deaths than the non-Muslim attacks.

I have not said that people are more scared of non-Muslim groups.

What I have said is, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims. 




and you dont call that twisting... omg... what an artist a true lefty..dodge duck weave in and out of tight corners.. ....



No twisting.

No ducking, and no weaving.

I'm not in a corner: I'm out in the open.

I have clearly stated that the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.  Simple fact.

All of the other claims have come from you.  When you lose an argument, you like to put words into other people's mouths.  That doesn't work with me, sorry.

To recap, the majority of terrorist attacks around the world since 2001 have been carried out by non-Muslims.  A simple fact, that nobody on here has successfully challenged.  Funny that.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by The Outrage Bus on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:30pm

cods wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:22pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:15pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:27pm:
... we actually live amongst mulsims ...



Why, though?

If you don't like them, why live with them?



what a pathetic reply.... they live with him..
>


Well look if he chose to take Muslims on as tenants when he doesn't like them, tough luck.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:31pm

cods wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:22pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:15pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:27pm:
... we actually live amongst mulsims ...



Why, though?

If you don't like them, why live with them?



what a pathetic reply.... they live with him..

if you are first here isnt that a FACT...

why should we CHristians move out to allow those who chose to live as if they are still  in the dessert...and bring all their bizarre laws with them... no thanks...

you are welcome to them as you are so understanding....and believe they are not nearly as bad as painted...

I guess all those headhunters are not muslims then?..or dont you call chopping heads off an ATTACK>



Ah, another classic example of cods' "logic".

"All headhunters are Muslims, therefore, all Muslims are headhunters."

Nice one   ;)

I suppose this is a banana?





;D

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:35pm

cods wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:22pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:15pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:27pm:
... we actually live amongst mulsims ...



Why, though?

If you don't like them, why live with them?



what a pathetic reply.... they live with him..

if you are first here isnt that a FACT...




Ah, I see.

So you'll be moving out soon, so that an aboriginal family can live in your caravan?

"if you are here first"    :-/

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 3:28pm

cods wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:19pm:
I have read you wiki and none of them give the numbers unless one wants to stream through years of whatever... which I presume you have done..
to come up with your..

MAJORITY slogan...

....




Yes.  It's called counting.





Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 3:50pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:22pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:15pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:27pm:
... we actually live amongst mulsims ...



Why, though?

If you don't like them, why live with them?


He had to make a delivery.
Back in the kitchen princess, hubby wants a chicken tikka. You have to be a good little Pakistani housewife or hubby is going to smack you right across the face. You don't want his frustrations getting taken out on his taxi fare clients.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 3:55pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 3:28pm:

cods wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:19pm:
I have read you wiki and none of them give the numbers unless one wants to stream through years of whatever... which I presume you have done..
to come up with your..

MAJORITY slogan...

....




Yes.  It's called counting.
So being a Tasmanian would it be correct to assume that you've had it off with your sister.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:08pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 3:55pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 3:28pm:

cods wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:19pm:
I have read you wiki and none of them give the numbers unless one wants to stream through years of whatever... which I presume you have done..
to come up with your..

MAJORITY slogan...

....




Yes.  It's called counting.
So being a Tasmanian would it be correct to assume that you've had it off with your sister.



Absolutely.

And yours.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:11pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:22pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:15pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:27pm:
... we actually live amongst mulsims ...



Why, though?

If you don't like them, why live with them?


He had to make a delivery.




                                           :-/



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:15pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:08pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 3:55pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 3:28pm:

cods wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:19pm:
I have read you wiki and none of them give the numbers unless one wants to stream through years of whatever... which I presume you have done..
to come up with your..

MAJORITY slogan...

....




Yes.  It's called counting.
So being a Tasmanian would it be correct to assume that you've had it off with your sister.



Absolutely.

And yours.
I've got a joke-

How does greggorry know if his sister is menstruating??

His brothers d I ck  tastes different. ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by The Outrage Bus on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:18pm
I thought Rodney Rudes career died 20 years ago.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:21pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:18pm:
I thought Rodney Rudes career died 20 years ago.
Nope, I saw him about 6 months ago at Rooty Hill RSL Discharge Pus. I saw Pauline Hanson there as well.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by The Outrage Bus on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:23pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:21pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:18pm:
I thought Rodney Rudes career died 20 years ago.
Nope, I saw him about 6 months ago at Rooty Hill RSL Discharge Pus. I saw Pauline Hanson there as well.



Appearing at the Rooty Hill RSL does indicate career death.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:26pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:23pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:21pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:18pm:
I thought Rodney Rudes career died 20 years ago.
Nope, I saw him about 6 months ago at Rooty Hill RSL Discharge Pus. I saw Pauline Hanson there as well.



Appearing at the Rooty Hill RSL does indicate career death.
He can still pack a house. How many old performers can still do that?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by The Outrage Bus on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:28pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:26pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:23pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:21pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:18pm:
I thought Rodney Rudes career died 20 years ago.
Nope, I saw him about 6 months ago at Rooty Hill RSL Discharge Pus. I saw Pauline Hanson there as well.



Appearing at the Rooty Hill RSL does indicate career death.
He can still pack a house. How many old performers can still do that?



You mean what 500 bogans at the Rooty HIll RSL? Probably not many, The Eagles when I saw them still played at the Acer Arena.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:29pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:18pm:
I thought Rodney Rudes career died 20 years ago.




I can just imagine Shakey listening to his old Rodney Rude tapes    ;D

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 3:50pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:22pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:15pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:27pm:
... we actually live amongst mulsims ...



Why, though?

If you don't like them, why live with them?


He had to make a delivery.
Back in the kitchen princess, hubby wants a chicken tikka. You have to be a good little Pakistani housewife or hubby is going to smack you right across the face. You don't want his frustrations getting taken out on his taxi fare clients.


Chicken Tikka is an English recipe, dearie. It was originally made with tinned tomato soup. It was one of Queen Victoria's favourites.

Given you live in Rooty Hill and know so much about multiculturalism, you should know this. As you know, Rooty Hill was misspelt. It was originally called Roti Hill, due to your multicultural Curry friends settling the area.

Sparky and I discussed all this. He wasn't very happy about it if I recall.

My multicultural ghetto was originally called Parramatta Siding - an Aboriginal/English name.

Food for thought, eh?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:28pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:26pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:23pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:21pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:18pm:
I thought Rodney Rudes career died 20 years ago.
Nope, I saw him about 6 months ago at Rooty Hill RSL Discharge Pus. I saw Pauline Hanson there as well.



Appearing at the Rooty Hill RSL does indicate career death.
He can still pack a house. How many old performers can still do that?



You mean what 500 bogans at the Rooty HIll RSL? Probably not many, The Eagles when I saw them still played at the Acer Arena.

So this is about snobbery then? That's something you should get looked at. Well the Eagles are an international act and rude is a domestic act so it's hardly the same thing.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by The Outrage Bus on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:32pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm:
So this is about snobbery then? That's something you should get looked at. Well the Eagles are an international act and rude is a domestic act so it's hardly the same thing.



Not overly, I didnt think the Eagles were much chop either.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:33pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 3:50pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:22pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:15pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:27pm:
... we actually live amongst mulsims ...



Why, though?

If you don't like them, why live with them?


He had to make a delivery.
Back in the kitchen princess, hubby wants a chicken tikka. You have to be a good little Pakistani housewife or hubby is going to smack you right across the face. You don't want his frustrations getting taken out on his taxi fare clients.


Chicken Tikka is an English recipe, dearie. It was originally made with tinned tomato soup. It was one of Queen Victoria's favourites.

Given you live in Rooty Hill and know so much about multiculturalism, you should know this. As you know, Rooty Hill was misspelt. It was originally called Roti Hill, due to your multicultural Curry friends settling the area.

Sparky and I discussed all this. He wasn't very happy about it if I recall.

My multicultural ghetto was originally called Parramatta Siding - an Aboriginal/English name.

Food for thought, eh?
Indians settled Rooty Hill and the old days????That's just as stupid as The Tank stream running underground in convict times. History just isn't one of your finer points Karnal. You ethnics have never been good at Australian history.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:37pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:33pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 3:50pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:22pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:15pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:27pm:
... we actually live amongst mulsims ...



Why, though?

If you don't like them, why live with them?


He had to make a delivery.
Back in the kitchen princess, hubby wants a chicken tikka. You have to be a good little Pakistani housewife or hubby is going to smack you right across the face. You don't want his frustrations getting taken out on his taxi fare clients.


Chicken Tikka is an English recipe, dearie. It was originally made with tinned tomato soup. It was one of Queen Victoria's favourites.

Given you live in Rooty Hill and know so much about multiculturalism, you should know this. As you know, Rooty Hill was misspelt. It was originally called Roti Hill, due to your multicultural Curry friends settling the area.

Sparky and I discussed all this. He wasn't very happy about it if I recall.

My multicultural ghetto was originally called Parramatta Siding - an Aboriginal/English name.

Food for thought, eh?
Indians settled Rooty Hill and the old days????That's just as stupid as The Tank stream running underground in convict times. History just isn't one of your finer points Karnal. You ethnics have never been good at Australian history.


Ask Sparky, Shakey. He lives just down the road from you. We've been through all this before.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:38pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:32pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm:
So this is about snobbery then? That's something you should get looked at. Well the Eagles are an international act and rude is a domestic act so it's hardly the same thing.



Not overly, I didnt think the Eagles were much chop either.
What sort of music do you think I like Outrage Bus??

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:39pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:38pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:32pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm:
So this is about snobbery then? That's something you should get looked at. Well the Eagles are an international act and rude is a domestic act so it's hardly the same thing.



Not overly, I didnt think the Eagles were much chop either.
What sort of music do you think I like Outrage Bus??


Indian music?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by The Outrage Bus on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:39pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:38pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:32pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm:
So this is about snobbery then? That's something you should get looked at. Well the Eagles are an international act and rude is a domestic act so it's hardly the same thing.



Not overly, I didnt think the Eagles were much chop either.
What sort of music do you think I like Outrage Bus??




I'm guessing Cold Chisel, Acca Dacca, Rose Tattoo eh

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:40pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:37pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:33pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 3:50pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:22pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 2:15pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 12:27pm:
... we actually live amongst mulsims ...



Why, though?

If you don't like them, why live with them?


He had to make a delivery.
Back in the kitchen princess, hubby wants a chicken tikka. You have to be a good little Pakistani housewife or hubby is going to smack you right across the face. You don't want his frustrations getting taken out on his taxi fare clients.


Chicken Tikka is an English recipe, dearie. It was originally made with tinned tomato soup. It was one of Queen Victoria's favourites.

Given you live in Rooty Hill and know so much about multiculturalism, you should know this. As you know, Rooty Hill was misspelt. It was originally called Roti Hill, due to your multicultural Curry friends settling the area.

Sparky and I discussed all this. He wasn't very happy about it if I recall.

My multicultural ghetto was originally called Parramatta Siding - an Aboriginal/English name.

Food for thought, eh?
Indians settled Rooty Hill and the old days????That's just as stupid as The Tank stream running underground in convict times. History just isn't one of your finer points Karnal. You ethnics have never been good at Australian history.


Ask Sparky, Shakey. He lives just down the road from you. We've been through all this before.
I don't remember. That Sparky must have been a smart chap. He knew that the tank Stream ran above ground.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:41pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:39pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:38pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:32pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm:
So this is about snobbery then? That's something you should get looked at. Well the Eagles are an international act and rude is a domestic act so it's hardly the same thing.



Not overly, I didnt think the Eagles were much chop either.
What sort of music do you think I like Outrage Bus??




I'm guessing Cold Chisel, Rose Tattoo eh

See, you are a stereotyper like us all. Join the club. Have another guess.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Hot Breath on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:43pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:21pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:18pm:
I thought Rodney Rudes career died 20 years ago.
Nope, I saw him about 6 months ago at Rooty Hill RSL Discharge Pus. I saw Pauline Hanson there as well.


Is this something to be proud of?  I take it you were one a nostalgia trip for a bygone age now that Australia has moved on past both of them?   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:43pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:41pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:39pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:38pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:32pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm:
So this is about snobbery then? That's something you should get looked at. Well the Eagles are an international act and rude is a domestic act so it's hardly the same thing.



Not overly, I didnt think the Eagles were much chop either.
What sort of music do you think I like Outrage Bus??




I'm guessing Cold Chisel, Rose Tattoo eh

See, you are a stereotyper like us all. Join the club. Have another guess.


I'd say sophisticated, cosmopolitan music. You know, the sort of thing worldly, urbane, multicultural people like. 

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by The Outrage Bus on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:44pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:41pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:39pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:38pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:32pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm:
So this is about snobbery then? That's something you should get looked at. Well the Eagles are an international act and rude is a domestic act so it's hardly the same thing.



Not overly, I didnt think the Eagles were much chop either.
What sort of music do you think I like Outrage Bus??




I'm guessing Cold Chisel, Rose Tattoo eh

See, you are a stereotyper like us all. Join the club. Have another guess.




Well sorry it was either that or Rolf Harris.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:44pm

|dev|null wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:43pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:21pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:18pm:
I thought Rodney Rudes career died 20 years ago.
Nope, I saw him about 6 months ago at Rooty Hill RSL Discharge Pus. I saw Pauline Hanson there as well.


Is this something to be proud of?  I take it you were one a nostalgia trip for a bygone age now that Australia has moved on past both of them?   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D
Australia hasn't moved on at all. It's more racist than ever. A white Christian male can't marry a muslim girl. How's that for advancement? Australia has become tribal.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by The Outrage Bus on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:45pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:44pm:

|dev|null wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:43pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:21pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:18pm:
I thought Rodney Rudes career died 20 years ago.
Nope, I saw him about 6 months ago at Rooty Hill RSL Discharge Pus. I saw Pauline Hanson there as well.


Is this something to be proud of?  I take it you were one a nostalgia trip for a bygone age now that Australia has moved on past both of them?   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D
Australia hasn't moved on at all. It's more racist than ever. A white Christian male can't marry a muslim girl. How's that for advancement? Australia has become tribal.




I dated a Muslim once, boy was that fun.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:47pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:44pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:41pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:39pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:38pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:32pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm:
So this is about snobbery then? That's something you should get looked at. Well the Eagles are an international act and rude is a domestic act so it's hardly the same thing.



Not overly, I didnt think the Eagles were much chop either.
What sort of music do you think I like Outrage Bus??




I'm guessing Cold Chisel, Rose Tattoo eh

See, you are a stereotyper like us all. Join the club. Have another guess.




Well sorry it was either that or Rolf Harris.
Dirty old Rolf sure is better than the bloody Eagles. What were you thinking?? The last big act I saw was Leornard Cohen. before that Neil Young. I watched Spy vs Spy the other week. Just because I'm racist doesn't mean I don't like good music.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by The Outrage Bus on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:48pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:47pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:44pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:41pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:39pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:38pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:32pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm:
So this is about snobbery then? That's something you should get looked at. Well the Eagles are an international act and rude is a domestic act so it's hardly the same thing.



Not overly, I didnt think the Eagles were much chop either.
What sort of music do you think I like Outrage Bus??




I'm guessing Cold Chisel, Rose Tattoo eh

See, you are a stereotyper like us all. Join the club. Have another guess.




Well sorry it was either that or Rolf Harris.
Dirty old Rolf sure is better than the bloody Eagles. What were you thinking?? The last big act I saw was Leornard Cohen. before that Neil Young. I watched Spy vs Spy the other week. Just because I'm racist doesn't mean I don't like good music.



Isnt the part about music taste?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:52pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:44pm:

|dev|null wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:43pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:21pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:18pm:
I thought Rodney Rudes career died 20 years ago.
Nope, I saw him about 6 months ago at Rooty Hill RSL Discharge Pus. I saw Pauline Hanson there as well.


Is this something to be proud of?  I take it you were one a nostalgia trip for a bygone age now that Australia has moved on past both of them?   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D
Australia hasn't moved on at all. It's more racist than ever. A white Christian male can't marry a muslim girl. How's that for advancement? Australia has become tribal.


Yes, but you did stop in Granville that time, didn't you? You must have seen some of the place, met some of the people.

You're not holed up behind your garage door all the time. You do get out sometimes, Shakey.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:53pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:47pm:
I watched Spy vs Spy the other week.



They're back together?!

With Bloxom?

:o

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:53pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:48pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:47pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:44pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:41pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:39pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:38pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:32pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm:
So this is about snobbery then? That's something you should get looked at. Well the Eagles are an international act and rude is a domestic act so it's hardly the same thing.



Not overly, I didnt think the Eagles were much chop either.
What sort of music do you think I like Outrage Bus??




I'm guessing Cold Chisel, Rose Tattoo eh

See, you are a stereotyper like us all. Join the club. Have another guess.




Well sorry it was either that or Rolf Harris.
Dirty old Rolf sure is better than the bloody Eagles. What were you thinking?? The last big act I saw was Leornard Cohen. before that Neil Young. I watched Spy vs Spy the other week. Just because I'm racist doesn't mean I don't like good music.



Isnt the part about music taste?
It's not that 'm racist Outrage Bus. In fact I'm not. I just hate self righteous people telling me how to think. The whole world is full of it. Who has the right to tell other people how to think??

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:54pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:47pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:44pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:41pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:39pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:38pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:32pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm:
So this is about snobbery then? That's something you should get looked at. Well the Eagles are an international act and rude is a domestic act so it's hardly the same thing.



Not overly, I didnt think the Eagles were much chop either.
What sort of music do you think I like Outrage Bus??




I'm guessing Cold Chisel, Rose Tattoo eh

See, you are a stereotyper like us all. Join the club. Have another guess.




Well sorry it was either that or Rolf Harris.
Dirty old Rolf sure is better than the bloody Eagles. What were you thinking?? The last big act I saw was Leornard Cohen. before that Neil Young. I watched Spy vs Spy the other week. Just because I'm racist doesn't mean I don't like good music.


You see? You've even been to Homebush Stadium.

Don't be so hard on yourself, Shakey.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by The Outrage Bus on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:54pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:53pm:
It's not that 'm racist Outrage Bus. In fact I'm not. I just hate self righteous people telling me how to think. The whole world is full of it. Who has the right to tell other people how to think??




Noone really is saying you should stop being racist, embrace it.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:56pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:53pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:48pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:47pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:44pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:41pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:39pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:38pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:32pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm:
So this is about snobbery then? That's something you should get looked at. Well the Eagles are an international act and rude is a domestic act so it's hardly the same thing.



Not overly, I didnt think the Eagles were much chop either.
What sort of music do you think I like Outrage Bus??




I'm guessing Cold Chisel, Rose Tattoo eh

See, you are a stereotyper like us all. Join the club. Have another guess.




Well sorry it was either that or Rolf Harris.
Dirty old Rolf sure is better than the bloody Eagles. What were you thinking?? The last big act I saw was Leornard Cohen. before that Neil Young. I watched Spy vs Spy the other week. Just because I'm racist doesn't mean I don't like good music.



Isnt the part about music taste?
It's not that 'm racist Outrage Bus. In fact I'm not. I just hate self righteous people telling me how to think. The whole world is full of it. Who has the right to tell other people how to think??


You learn to live with it, Shakey. I have people telling me I'm a Paki housewife.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:57pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:53pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:47pm:
I watched Spy vs Spy the other week.



They're back together?!

:o
Yes. They have a different lead singer. The original singer played bass. They've got a new bloke who plays rhythm/sings  and a bass player. They have the original guitar player who is still brilliant.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:58pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:56pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:53pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:48pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:47pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:44pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:41pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:39pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:38pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:32pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm:
So this is about snobbery then? That's something you should get looked at. Well the Eagles are an international act and rude is a domestic act so it's hardly the same thing.



Not overly, I didnt think the Eagles were much chop either.
What sort of music do you think I like Outrage Bus??




I'm guessing Cold Chisel, Rose Tattoo eh

See, you are a stereotyper like us all. Join the club. Have another guess.




Well sorry it was either that or Rolf Harris.
Dirty old Rolf sure is better than the bloody Eagles. What were you thinking?? The last big act I saw was Leornard Cohen. before that Neil Young. I watched Spy vs Spy the other week. Just because I'm racist doesn't mean I don't like good music.



Isnt the part about music taste?
It's not that 'm racist Outrage Bus. In fact I'm not. I just hate self righteous people telling me how to think. The whole world is full of it. Who has the right to tell other people how to think??


You learn to live with it, Shakey. I have people telling me I'm a Paki housewife.
And I'm a truck driver from Rooty Hill.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:59pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:54pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:53pm:
It's not that 'm racist Outrage Bus. In fact I'm not. I just hate self righteous people telling me how to think. The whole world is full of it. Who has the right to tell other people how to think??




Noone really is saying you should stop being racist, embrace it.


Exactly. Shakey should get to know some of those people who live outside Western Sydney. The Blue Mountains, the Sutherland Shire, the Eastern Suburbs...

It's a big wide world, you know.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:01pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:58pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:56pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:53pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:48pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:47pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:44pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:41pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:39pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:38pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:32pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm:
So this is about snobbery then? That's something you should get looked at. Well the Eagles are an international act and rude is a domestic act so it's hardly the same thing.



Not overly, I didnt think the Eagles were much chop either.
What sort of music do you think I like Outrage Bus??




I'm guessing Cold Chisel, Rose Tattoo eh

See, you are a stereotyper like us all. Join the club. Have another guess.




Well sorry it was either that or Rolf Harris.
Dirty old Rolf sure is better than the bloody Eagles. What were you thinking?? The last big act I saw was Leornard Cohen. before that Neil Young. I watched Spy vs Spy the other week. Just because I'm racist doesn't mean I don't like good music.



Isnt the part about music taste?
It's not that 'm racist Outrage Bus. In fact I'm not. I just hate self righteous people telling me how to think. The whole world is full of it. Who has the right to tell other people how to think??


You learn to live with it, Shakey. I have people telling me I'm a Paki housewife.
And I'm a truck driver from Rooty Hill.


Not married to a bloke called Sparky by any chance, are you? He's a man of the world as well.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:02pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:59pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:54pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:53pm:
It's not that 'm racist Outrage Bus. In fact I'm not. I just hate self righteous people telling me how to think. The whole world is full of it. Who has the right to tell other people how to think??




Noone really is saying you should stop being racist, embrace it.


Exactly. Shakey should get to know some of those people who live outside Western Sydney. The Blue Mountains, the Sutherland Shire, the Eastern Suburbs...

It's a big wide world, you know.
Nah!! Too many snots in those areas.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:04pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:02pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:59pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:54pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:53pm:
It's not that 'm racist Outrage Bus. In fact I'm not. I just hate self righteous people telling me how to think. The whole world is full of it. Who has the right to tell other people how to think??




Noone really is saying you should stop being racist, embrace it.


Exactly. Shakey should get to know some of those people who live outside Western Sydney. The Blue Mountains, the Sutherland Shire, the Eastern Suburbs...

It's a big wide world, you know.
Nah!! Too many snots in those areas.


Well. You won't assimilate with that sort of attitude.

Some of my best friends come from the non-tinted suburbs.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:04pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:01pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:58pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:56pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:53pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:48pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:47pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:44pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:41pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:39pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:38pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:32pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm:
So this is about snobbery then? That's something you should get looked at. Well the Eagles are an international act and rude is a domestic act so it's hardly the same thing.



Not overly, I didnt think the Eagles were much chop either.
What sort of music do you think I like Outrage Bus??




I'm guessing Cold Chisel, Rose Tattoo eh

See, you are a stereotyper like us all. Join the club. Have another guess.




Well sorry it was either that or Rolf Harris.
Dirty old Rolf sure is better than the bloody Eagles. What were you thinking?? The last big act I saw was Leornard Cohen. before that Neil Young. I watched Spy vs Spy the other week. Just because I'm racist doesn't mean I don't like good music.



Isnt the part about music taste?
It's not that 'm racist Outrage Bus. In fact I'm not. I just hate self righteous people telling me how to think. The whole world is full of it. Who has the right to tell other people how to think??


You learn to live with it, Shakey. I have people telling me I'm a Paki housewife.
And I'm a truck driver from Rooty Hill.


Not married to a bloke called Sparky by any chance, are you? He's a man of the world as well.
Oh he's a great man. You'd go for a good aussie man like him. In Pakistan the ladies love white blokes  I hear.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:06pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:02pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:59pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:54pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:53pm:
It's not that 'm racist Outrage Bus. In fact I'm not. I just hate self righteous people telling me how to think. The whole world is full of it. Who has the right to tell other people how to think??




Noone really is saying you should stop being racist, embrace it.


Exactly. Shakey should get to know some of those people who live outside Western Sydney. The Blue Mountains, the Sutherland Shire, the Eastern Suburbs...

It's a big wide world, you know.
Nah!! Too many snots in those areas.


That's strange. Only yesterday you were gushing over the British managerial class in those areas.

Joined the workers, have you?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:09pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:06pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:02pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:59pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:54pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:53pm:
It's not that 'm racist Outrage Bus. In fact I'm not. I just hate self righteous people telling me how to think. The whole world is full of it. Who has the right to tell other people how to think??




Noone really is saying you should stop being racist, embrace it.


Exactly. Shakey should get to know some of those people who live outside Western Sydney. The Blue Mountains, the Sutherland Shire, the Eastern Suburbs...

It's a big wide world, you know.
Nah!! Too many snots in those areas.


That's strange. Only yesterday you were gushing over the British managerial class in those areas.

Joined the workers, have you?
Well it is true. The eastern suburbs , the shire and the blue mountains are full of absolute snots. Boring snots as well.  I like real people.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:09pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:04pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:01pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:58pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:56pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:53pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:48pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:47pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:44pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:41pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:39pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:38pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:32pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm:
So this is about snobbery then? That's something you should get looked at. Well the Eagles are an international act and rude is a domestic act so it's hardly the same thing.



Not overly, I didnt think the Eagles were much chop either.
What sort of music do you think I like Outrage Bus??




I'm guessing Cold Chisel, Rose Tattoo eh

See, you are a stereotyper like us all. Join the club. Have another guess.




Well sorry it was either that or Rolf Harris.
Dirty old Rolf sure is better than the bloody Eagles. What were you thinking?? The last big act I saw was Leornard Cohen. before that Neil Young. I watched Spy vs Spy the other week. Just because I'm racist doesn't mean I don't like good music.



Isnt the part about music taste?
It's not that 'm racist Outrage Bus. In fact I'm not. I just hate self righteous people telling me how to think. The whole world is full of it. Who has the right to tell other people how to think??


You learn to live with it, Shakey. I have people telling me I'm a Paki housewife.
And I'm a truck driver from Rooty Hill.


Not married to a bloke called Sparky by any chance, are you? He's a man of the world as well.
Oh he's a great man. You'd go for a good aussie man like him. In Pakistan the ladies love white blokes  I hear.


They don't marry outside their race, remember? They're inbreds.

Sparky would be most disappointed to hear you spouting multiculturalist propaganda like that.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:10pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:09pm:
I like real people.


Like Sparky?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:12pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:09pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:04pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:01pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:58pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:56pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:53pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:48pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:47pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:44pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:41pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:39pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:38pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:32pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:30pm:
So this is about snobbery then? That's something you should get looked at. Well the Eagles are an international act and rude is a domestic act so it's hardly the same thing.



Not overly, I didnt think the Eagles were much chop either.
What sort of music do you think I like Outrage Bus??




I'm guessing Cold Chisel, Rose Tattoo eh

See, you are a stereotyper like us all. Join the club. Have another guess.




Well sorry it was either that or Rolf Harris.
Dirty old Rolf sure is better than the bloody Eagles. What were you thinking?? The last big act I saw was Leornard Cohen. before that Neil Young. I watched Spy vs Spy the other week. Just because I'm racist doesn't mean I don't like good music.



Isnt the part about music taste?
It's not that 'm racist Outrage Bus. In fact I'm not. I just hate self righteous people telling me how to think. The whole world is full of it. Who has the right to tell other people how to think??


You learn to live with it, Shakey. I have people telling me I'm a Paki housewife.
And I'm a truck driver from Rooty Hill.


Not married to a bloke called Sparky by any chance, are you? He's a man of the world as well.
Oh he's a great man. You'd go for a good aussie man like him. In Pakistan the ladies love white blokes  I hear.


They don't marry outside their race, remember? They're inbreds.

Sparky would be most disappointed to hear you spouting multiculturalist propaganda like that.
I really did  poke your ego when I picked you up on your poor history. A trucker driver bogan from Rooty Hill knew something you didn't. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:16pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:10pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:09pm:
I like real people.


Like Sparky?
Eastern suburbs people fill their empty spaces with postcode medication. Where you live dictates your worth in their eyes. You do the same . Are you from there??

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 6:48pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 4:58pm:
And I'm a truck driver from Rooty Hill.



Is that a Slim Dusty song?


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 8:35pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:16pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:10pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 2nd, 2014 at 5:09pm:
I like real people.


Like Sparky?
Eastern suburbs people fill their empty spaces with postcode medication. Where you live dictates your worth in their eyes. You do the same . Are you from there??


Now you’re pretending.

Like real people, do you?

You really are a multiculturalist.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 3:44pm
ISIS, thinks it's being clever beheading Sotoff but they have played right into the U.S.A.'s hands.

Stand by for massive retribution courtesy of the U.S. Air Force, this happened first time around but you can expect a bigger response this time.

The U.S. doesn't take kindly to human blackmail. They won't pay a ransom but they will hand out retribution. Wouldn't like to be in an ISIS encampment right now.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 4:03pm

red baron wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 3:44pm:
ISIS, thinks it's being clever beheading Sotoff but they have played right into the U.S.A.'s hands.

Stand by for massive retribution courtesy of the U.S. Air Force, this happened first time around but you can expect a bigger response this time.

The U.S. doesn't take kindly to human blackmail. They won't pay a ransom but they will hand out retribution. Wouldn't like to be in an ISIS encampment right now.



I would prefer to see the Ebola virus amongst ISIS.. just to see who they go crying to for treatment.

.lets face it disease has been responsible for wiping out all sorts of nasties if it wasnt for the black plague they would never have slaughtered the RATS.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:13pm

red baron wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 3:44pm:
ISIS, thinks it's being clever beheading Sotoff but they have played right into the U.S.A.'s hands.

Stand by for massive retribution courtesy of the U.S. Air Force, this happened first time around but you can expect a bigger response this time.

The U.S. doesn't take kindly to human blackmail. They won't pay a ransom but they will hand out retribution. Wouldn't like to be in an ISIS encampment right now.


The US knows that by doing this, they would play right into ISIS's hands.

Sure the US doesn't take too kindly to blackmail. They have a policy of not paying ransoms. The reason Steven Sotloff is all over the news and not a dead Swedish or Japanese journalist is due to US policy - as difficult as that policy must be for those who impliment it. If they did pay ransoms, US citizens around the world could be much more at risk.

I can't think of anyone in the world who wants to see ISIS prosper. Surely a new rogue state in the Middle East is not in the interests of the Saudis. The Taliban maybe, but only because it takes the heat off them.

But having the US dragged into a new endless war is in the interests of many - Russia, China, and maybe even Iran if it kills off a few bloodthirsty Sunnis on their doorstep.

This time, the US needs to speak softly, even if it carries a big stick. The days of Wagner being blasted out of choppers and the smell of Nepalm in the morning are long gone. The actions of the last US administration has stymied US foreign policy for at least a generation - maybe more if the rot spreads, which in the case of ISIL, it clearly has.

Talking tough on ISIS is just self-indulgent. Quiet, decisive - and limited - action is required. The US's actions have allowed ISIL to come into being. Deposing Saddam and sacking the Ba'athists created a vacuum. Just being in Iraq sent an invitation to Al Qaida. Propping up Al Malaki and allowing him to create a corrupt, Shi'ite fiefdom gave the Sunnis a just cause.

ISIS is the direct result of the failure of US policy - failure on the biggest scale in living memory. The end result of the US invasion and occuptaion of Iraq is so different to US objectives as to present a millennial case study on what not to do in foreign intervention.

Massive retribution would be just plain dumb, and the US are in no position to try this. Air strikes are one thing, but rarely successful against insurgencies. This time, any boots on the ground need to be wearing blue berets.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:24pm
perhaps they could pay the ransom by leaflet dropping it all over Syria and Iraq...

well its just a thought...dealing with madmen is the pits.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Neferti on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:32pm

cods wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:24pm:
perhaps they could pay the ransom by leaflet dropping it all over Syria and Iraq...

well its just a thought...dealing with madmen is the pits.


Planes get shot down for no reason in that region, cods.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:39pm

cods wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:24pm:
perhaps they could pay the ransom by leaflet dropping it all over Syria and Iraq...

well its just a thought...dealing with madmen is the pits.


They could have dropped a trillion US dollar bills over Syria and Iraq and saved going in in the first place.

They would have saved well over 200,000 lives and the region would be safer now.

Mind you, shares in Haliburton, Blackwater and Lockheed Martin would not be so high and 3 CEOs would have made lower bonuses between 2003 and 2008.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:41pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:39pm:

cods wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:24pm:
perhaps they could pay the ransom by leaflet dropping it all over Syria and Iraq...

well its just a thought...dealing with madmen is the pits.


They could have dropped a trillion US dollar bills over Syria and Iraq and saved going in in the first place.

They would have saved well over 200,000 lives and the region would be safer now.

Mind you, shares in Haliburton, Blackwater and Lockheed Martin would not be so high and 3 CEOs would have made lower bonuses between 2003 and 2008.
How is  Syria's situation anything to do with America karnal knowledge??

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:42pm

Neferti wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:32pm:

cods wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:24pm:
perhaps they could pay the ransom by leaflet dropping it all over Syria and Iraq...

well its just a thought...dealing with madmen is the pits.


Planes get shot down for no reason in that region, cods.


You think? If I was a bored Iraqi out in the desert with the US missile launcher I found, I'd have plenty of reasons to shoot down a B52.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:43pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:41pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:39pm:

cods wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:24pm:
perhaps they could pay the ransom by leaflet dropping it all over Syria and Iraq...

well its just a thought...dealing with madmen is the pits.


They could have dropped a trillion US dollar bills over Syria and Iraq and saved going in in the first place.

They would have saved well over 200,000 lives and the region would be safer now.

Mind you, shares in Haliburton, Blackwater and Lockheed Martin would not be so high and 3 CEOs would have made lower bonuses between 2003 and 2008.
How is  Syria's situation anything to do with America karnal knowledge??


I'm not sure, Shakey. Is it?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:48pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:43pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:41pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:39pm:

cods wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:24pm:
perhaps they could pay the ransom by leaflet dropping it all over Syria and Iraq...

well its just a thought...dealing with madmen is the pits.


They could have dropped a trillion US dollar bills over Syria and Iraq and saved going in in the first place.

They would have saved well over 200,000 lives and the region would be safer now.

Mind you, shares in Haliburton, Blackwater and Lockheed Martin would not be so high and 3 CEOs would have made lower bonuses between 2003 and 2008.
How is  Syria's situation anything to do with America karnal knowledge??


I'm not sure, Shakey. Is it?
They're having a civil war aren't they??

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:50pm

Shakey wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:48pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:43pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:41pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:39pm:

cods wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:24pm:
perhaps they could pay the ransom by leaflet dropping it all over Syria and Iraq...

well its just a thought...dealing with madmen is the pits.


They could have dropped a trillion US dollar bills over Syria and Iraq and saved going in in the first place.

They would have saved well over 200,000 lives and the region would be safer now.

Mind you, shares in Haliburton, Blackwater and Lockheed Martin would not be so high and 3 CEOs would have made lower bonuses between 2003 and 2008.
How is  Syria's situation anything to do with America karnal knowledge??


I'm not sure, Shakey. Is it?
They're having a civil war aren't they??


Are they? You must have been watching the news again, Shakey.

It comes on after Deal Or No Deal, doesn't it?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Shakey on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:51pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:50pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:48pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:43pm:

Shakey wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:41pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:39pm:

cods wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:24pm:
perhaps they could pay the ransom by leaflet dropping it all over Syria and Iraq...

well its just a thought...dealing with madmen is the pits.


They could have dropped a trillion US dollar bills over Syria and Iraq and saved going in in the first place.

They would have saved well over 200,000 lives and the region would be safer now.

Mind you, shares in Haliburton, Blackwater and Lockheed Martin would not be so high and 3 CEOs would have made lower bonuses between 2003 and 2008.
How is  Syria's situation anything to do with America karnal knowledge??


I'm not sure, Shakey. Is it?
They're having a civil war aren't they??


You've been watching the news again, Shakey.

It comes on after Deal Or No Deal, doesn't it?
Nope, after Pakistani world news on SBS. ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 7:16pm

Neferti wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:32pm:

cods wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:24pm:
perhaps they could pay the ransom by leaflet dropping it all over Syria and Iraq...

well its just a thought...dealing with madmen is the pits.


Planes get shot down for no reason in that region, cods.



then the money would be spread further.. think positive !!

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 7:20pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:42pm:

Neferti wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:32pm:

cods wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:24pm:
perhaps they could pay the ransom by leaflet dropping it all over Syria and Iraq...

well its just a thought...dealing with madmen is the pits.


Planes get shot down for no reason in that region, cods.


You think? If I was a bored Iraqi out in the desert with the US missile launcher I found, I'd have plenty of reasons to shoot down a B52.




I think America are canny enough to put signs on the planes..

saying special delivery

YOU JUST GOT MONEY BY AIR  MAIL...

think of all those US dollars...falling out of the sky.

I might have found the answer to all these problems.....its always been about MONEY.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 7:21pm
Karnal I completely agree that due to the power vacuum left by the Middle East Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, power vacuums were made to exist.

This was the origin of ISIS.  However because a ten headed snake emerged out of the fog, is no reason for the U.S. to back off. In the contrary, the U.S. is working hard to get a coalition of Muslim Countries together, to fight ISIS whilst they back them with logistics.

It will be interesting to see just how this plays out.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 7:50pm

red baron wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 7:21pm:
Karnal I completely agree that due to the power vacuum left by the Middle East Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, power vacuums were made to exist.

This was the origin of ISIS.  However because a ten headed snake emerged out of the fog, is no reason for the U.S. to back off. In the contrary, the U.S. is working hard to get a coalition of Muslim Countries together, to fight ISIS whilst they back them with logistics.

It will be interesting to see just how this plays out.


Agreed, but I know how I’d feel if I was a Yank, and had to keep paying taxes - not to pay off the multi-ttrillion dollar US surplus, but to keep funding endless wars in the Middle East.

Many Australians don’t even want to fork out for tthe foreign aid we committed as part of the Millenium Goals. How do you think they’d feel if they saw war dollars coming out of health and education funding?

End the budget emergency, or sell a few more News Ltd newspapers?

You know, the ones with front page photos of someone’s son having their head cut off.

ISIL are fcked up, but there are varying degrees of fcked upedness.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 7:55pm

cods wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 7:20pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:42pm:

Neferti wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:32pm:

cods wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:24pm:
perhaps they could pay the ransom by leaflet dropping it all over Syria and Iraq...

well its just a thought...dealing with madmen is the pits.


Planes get shot down for no reason in that region, cods.


You think? If I was a bored Iraqi out in the desert with the US missile launcher I found, I'd have plenty of reasons to shoot down a B52.




I think America are canny enough to put signs on the planes..

saying special delivery

YOU JUST GOT MONEY BY AIR  MAIL...

think of all those US dollars...falling out of the sky.

I might have found the answer to all these problems.....its always been about MONEY.


You’ve only just realised that?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 8:55pm
Remember, kids, 'It is fatal to enter a war without the will to win it.'

Kill 'em until they know they are beaten otherwise don't bother.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 10:10pm

Soren wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 8:55pm:
Remember, kids, 'It is fatal to enter a war without the will to win it.'

Kill 'em until they know they are beaten otherwise don't bother.


Kill who?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Team Murdoch on Sep 4th, 2014 at 1:48am

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 10:10pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 8:55pm:
Remember, kids, 'It is fatal to enter a war without the will to win it.'

Kill 'em until they know they are beaten otherwise don't bother.


Kill who?


Soren supports Israel. Israel recently killed 600 women and children in Gaza.

Soren encourage war crimes. Should be prosecuted.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Dame Pansi on Sep 4th, 2014 at 7:42am

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 4th, 2014 at 9:31am

Team Murdoch wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 1:48am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 10:10pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 8:55pm:
Remember, kids, 'It is fatal to enter a war without the will to win it.'

Kill 'em until they know they are beaten otherwise don't bother.


Kill who?


Soren supports Israel. Israel recently killed 600 women and children in Gaza.

Soren encourage war crimes. Should be prosecuted.


Now now, the old boy is a new Australian. He simply hasn’t assimilated yet. Team Australia, innit. One for all and all for one.

There must be a cultural awareness program we can send him on, shurely.

You know, like in.Clockwork Orange.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 4th, 2014 at 10:31am

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 7:42am:




wow pansi where have you been???.. I trust you are well.. and were just having your batteries recharged...

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 4th, 2014 at 10:33am

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 7:55pm:

cods wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 7:20pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:42pm:

Neferti wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:32pm:

cods wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:24pm:
perhaps they could pay the ransom by leaflet dropping it all over Syria and Iraq...

well its just a thought...dealing with madmen is the pits.


Planes get shot down for no reason in that region, cods.


You think? If I was a bored Iraqi out in the desert with the US missile launcher I found, I'd have plenty of reasons to shoot down a B52.




I think America are canny enough to put signs on the planes..

saying special delivery

YOU JUST GOT MONEY BY AIR  MAIL...

think of all those US dollars...falling out of the sky.

I might have found the answer to all these problems.....its always been about MONEY.


You’ve only just realised that?




well let me put it this I havent noticed you claiming that. ::) ::)

but then what would you know ::) ::)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 4th, 2014 at 10:36am

Team Murdoch wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 1:48am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 10:10pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 8:55pm:
Remember, kids, 'It is fatal to enter a war without the will to win it.'

Kill 'em until they know they are beaten otherwise don't bother.


Kill who?


Soren supports Israel. Israel recently killed 600 women and children in Gaza.

Soren encourage war crimes. Should be prosecuted.



HAMAS killed the women and children by hiding behind their skirts....like the cowards they show themselves to be...if you hide your rocket launches in schools and churches ... then expect those who inhabit them to be in danger...thats all i can say.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 4th, 2014 at 11:18am

cods wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 10:36am:

Team Murdoch wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 1:48am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 10:10pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 8:55pm:
Remember, kids, 'It is fatal to enter a war without the will to win it.'

Kill 'em until they know they are beaten otherwise don't bother.


Kill who?


Soren supports Israel. Israel recently killed 600 women and children in Gaza.

Soren encourage war crimes. Should be prosecuted.



HAMAS killed the women and children by hiding behind their skirts...


Exactly. Hamas are murderers because they wear skirts.

Excellent analysis, dear.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 4th, 2014 at 11:21am

Karnal wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 11:18am:

cods wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 10:36am:

Team Murdoch wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 1:48am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 10:10pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 8:55pm:
Remember, kids, 'It is fatal to enter a war without the will to win it.'

Kill 'em until they know they are beaten otherwise don't bother.


Kill who?


Soren supports Israel. Israel recently killed 600 women and children in Gaza.

Soren encourage war crimes. Should be prosecuted.



HAMAS killed the women and children by hiding behind their skirts...


Exactly. Hamas are murderers because they wear skirts.

Excellent analysis, dear.



why do you persist in bring any serious thread down to your childish level....

cant you go and make your own thread where stupid ignorant remarks that you enjoy making


shame labor shame

can go unnoticed...


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 4th, 2014 at 11:24am

cods wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 10:33am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 7:55pm:

cods wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 7:20pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:42pm:

Neferti wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:32pm:

cods wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 5:24pm:
perhaps they could pay the ransom by leaflet dropping it all over Syria and Iraq...

well its just a thought...dealing with madmen is the pits.


Planes get shot down for no reason in that region, cods.


You think? If I was a bored Iraqi out in the desert with the US missile launcher I found, I'd have plenty of reasons to shoot down a B52.




I think America are canny enough to put signs on the planes..

saying special delivery

YOU JUST GOT MONEY BY AIR  MAIL...

think of all those US dollars...falling out of the sky.

I might have found the answer to all these problems.....its always been about MONEY.


You’ve only just realised that?




well let me put it this I havent noticed you claiming that. ::) ::)

but then what would you know ::) ::)


Nothing, dear. I'm a mere tabla rasa. I'm here to learn from those in the know - people like yourself.

You know, experts.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 4th, 2014 at 11:28am

cods wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 11:21am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 11:18am:

cods wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 10:36am:

Team Murdoch wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 1:48am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 10:10pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 8:55pm:
Remember, kids, 'It is fatal to enter a war without the will to win it.'

Kill 'em until they know they are beaten otherwise don't bother.


Kill who?


Soren supports Israel. Israel recently killed 600 women and children in Gaza.

Soren encourage war crimes. Should be prosecuted.



HAMAS killed the women and children by hiding behind their skirts...


Exactly. Hamas are murderers because they wear skirts.

Excellent analysis, dear.



why do you persist in bring any serious thread down to your childish level....


Sorry, dear. I'll try to raise myself to the standard of blaming Palestinians for getting themselves blown up by Israeli bombs.

In a thread about Iraq and ISIS.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 4th, 2014 at 11:51am

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 10:10pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 8:55pm:
Remember, kids, 'It is fatal to enter a war without the will to win it.'

Kill 'em until they know they are beaten otherwise don't bother.


Kill who?

The enemy.

Don't tell me we don't have enemies any more, only friends whose grievances we are yet to accommodate?



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 4th, 2014 at 11:52am

Team Murdoch wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 1:48am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 10:10pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 8:55pm:
Remember, kids, 'It is fatal to enter a war without the will to win it.'

Kill 'em until they know they are beaten otherwise don't bother.


Kill who?


Soren supports Israel. Israel recently killed 600 women and children in Gaza.

Soren encourage war crimes. Should be prosecuted.



Which idiot's reincarnation are you?


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 4th, 2014 at 12:02pm

Soren wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 11:51am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 10:10pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 8:55pm:
Remember, kids, 'It is fatal to enter a war without the will to win it.'

Kill 'em until they know they are beaten otherwise don't bother.


Kill who?

The enemy.


Jolly good. Now that we’ve worked that one out, maybe we can move onto solving world poverty.

You know what you are, old boy?

You’re a humanitarian.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 4th, 2014 at 12:39pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 12:02pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 11:51am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 10:10pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 8:55pm:
Remember, kids, 'It is fatal to enter a war without the will to win it.'

Kill 'em until they know they are beaten otherwise don't bother.


Kill who?

The enemy.


Jolly good. Now that we’ve worked that one out, maybe we can move onto solving world poverty.

You know what you are, old boy?

You’re a humanitarian.



War always comes, whether you want it or not so it is better to be prepared than not prepared. And when it does arrive and you have to fight it, it is better to win it than to lose it.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 4th, 2014 at 1:34pm

Soren wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 12:39pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 12:02pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 11:51am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 10:10pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 8:55pm:
Remember, kids, 'It is fatal to enter a war without the will to win it.'

Kill 'em until they know they are beaten otherwise don't bother.


Kill who?

The enemy.


Jolly good. Now that we’ve worked that one out, maybe we can move onto solving world poverty.

You know what you are, old boy?

You’re a humanitarian.



War always comes, whether you want it or not so it is better to be prepared than not prepared.


Oh, I agree. Should we start with the mosque on my street? The underage marriage epidemic? Herbie’s library book thieves?

Decisions, decisions.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 4th, 2014 at 2:00pm

Soren wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 11:51am:
Don't tell me we don't have enemies any more, only friends whose grievances we are yet to accommodate?


I must admit, old boy, I'm struggling to understand who these enemies are.

An ADF spokesman was on 7.30 the other night trying to pitch the government's message. The message he was selling was that we need to defend "Western values" and our alliance with the US. He repeated these things a number of times in the interview, which told me he was following the government's script.

There was no mention of humanitarian issues, preventing genocide or defending Shi'ites and Christians in Northern Iraq. For the ADF spokesman, it was all about our loyalty to the US and the vague, abstract notion of defending Western values.

All good reasons maybe, but I would have thought that defending innocents from slaughter would be a much easier sell.

We gave up promoting Western values in Iraq when we propped up the Shi'ite administration of Al Malaki. Mind you, we did make sure they privatized oil distribution before we pulled out, so there's that.

As for our loyalty to the US, it would seem Mr Abbott is much more keen to follow Uncle into this one than Obama is to go in.

Oh, and Mr Abbott's polling seems to be improving, so it's a win-win for all.

Another example of correlation not causation, eh?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 4th, 2014 at 3:48pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 11:28am:

cods wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 11:21am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 11:18am:

cods wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 10:36am:

Team Murdoch wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 1:48am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 10:10pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 8:55pm:
Remember, kids, 'It is fatal to enter a war without the will to win it.'

Kill 'em until they know they are beaten otherwise don't bother.


Kill who?


Soren supports Israel. Israel recently killed 600 women and children in Gaza.

Soren encourage war crimes. Should be prosecuted.



HAMAS killed the women and children by hiding behind their skirts...


Exactly. Hamas are murderers because they wear skirts.

Excellent analysis, dear.



why do you persist in bring any serious thread down to your childish level....


Sorry, dear. I'll try to raise myself to the standard of blaming Palestinians for getting themselves blown up by Israeli bombs.

In a thread about Iraq and ISIS.



no dont bother just start you own childish thread...thank you... shame labor shame

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 4th, 2014 at 3:51pm

Soren wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 12:39pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 12:02pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 11:51am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 10:10pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 8:55pm:
Remember, kids, 'It is fatal to enter a war without the will to win it.'

Kill 'em until they know they are beaten otherwise don't bother.


Kill who?

The enemy.


Jolly good. Now that we’ve worked that one out, maybe we can move onto solving world poverty.

You know what you are, old boy?

You’re a humanitarian.



War always comes, whether you want it or not so it is better to be prepared than not prepared. And when it does arrive and you have to fight it, it is better to win it than to lose it.



kamel thinks he is man expurt not sure on what? crap I think... why do you bother with him.??

all you get from him is more crap.. he makes drah look like a champion  when it comes to debate. ::) ::)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 4th, 2014 at 4:17pm

cods wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 3:48pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 11:28am:

cods wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 11:21am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 11:18am:

cods wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 10:36am:

Team Murdoch wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 1:48am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 10:10pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 8:55pm:
Remember, kids, 'It is fatal to enter a war without the will to win it.'

Kill 'em until they know they are beaten otherwise don't bother.


Kill who?


Soren supports Israel. Israel recently killed 600 women and children in Gaza.

Soren encourage war crimes. Should be prosecuted.



HAMAS killed the women and children by hiding behind their skirts...


Exactly. Hamas are murderers because they wear skirts.

Excellent analysis, dear.



why do you persist in bring any serious thread down to your childish level....


Sorry, dear. I'll try to raise myself to the standard of blaming Palestinians for getting themselves blown up by Israeli bombs.

In a thread about Iraq and ISIS.


no dont bother just start you own childish thread...thank you... shame labor shame


Sorry, dear - just trying to better myself.

Do you think Australia should be involved in Iraq again? You haven't said.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 4th, 2014 at 5:23pm
I think its past your bedtime. sonnyboy.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 4th, 2014 at 5:36pm
It's my western values like pity and charity towards the afflicted and the odd... ;)


cods wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 3:51pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 12:39pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 12:02pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 11:51am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 10:10pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 3rd, 2014 at 8:55pm:
Remember, kids, 'It is fatal to enter a war without the will to win it.'

Kill 'em until they know they are beaten otherwise don't bother.


Kill who?

The enemy.


Jolly good. Now that we’ve worked that one out, maybe we can move onto solving world poverty.

You know what you are, old boy?

You’re a humanitarian.



War always comes, whether you want it or not so it is better to be prepared than not prepared. And when it does arrive and you have to fight it, it is better to win it than to lose it.



kamel thinks he is man expurt not sure on what? crap I think... why do you bother with him.??

all you get from him is more crap.. he makes drah look like a champion  when it comes to debate. ::) ::)


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 4th, 2014 at 7:11pm
This is not just a matter 'of being involved in Iraq again'. This is a matter of stopping a monster which is gaining strength every day, in it's tracks.

This monster butchers women and children by the thousands, this monster beheads victims then parades them on the media.

This monster is every bit as dangerous as the Nazis.

The Coalition of the willing need to get cracking and smash ISIS into the next world.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 4th, 2014 at 7:29pm

red baron wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 7:11pm:
This is not just a matter 'of being involved in Iraq again'. This is a matter of stopping a monster which is gaining strength every day, in it's tracks.

This monster butchers women and children by the thousands, this monster beheads victims then parades them on the media.

This monster is every bit as dangerous as the Nazis.

The Coalition of the willing need to get cracking and smash ISIS into the next world.


And how do you kill a hydra? Every tentacle you remove grows back again. This is not a question of why, but how.

You can bang on about the US, but you’re not committing our own infantry to Iraq. And why would you?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 4th, 2014 at 7:32pm

red baron wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 7:11pm:
This is not just a matter 'of being involved in Iraq again'. This is a matter of stopping a monster which is gaining strength every day, in it's tracks.

This monster butchers women and children by the thousands, this monster beheads victims then parades them on the media.

This monster is every bit as dangerous as the Nazis.

The Coalition of the willing need to get cracking and smash ISIS into the next world.



not if you are  green senator wishy wilson....he thinks terrorists are hard done by..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 4th, 2014 at 7:36pm

cods wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 5:23pm:
I think its past your bedtime. sonnyboy.


Is it my imagination, or is poor Cods trying to get rid of me?

Gee dear, if you don’t want to talk, all you have to do is say.

We’re all friends here, you know.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 4th, 2014 at 7:39pm
Karnal the thing we have in common is that we are both Vets. Any Vet worth his salt, would not stand by, whilst a monster commits genocide on hapless innocent people. We have to get involved, what do you think our forefathers at Gallipoli would think about this lot?

They would go after them that's what they would do.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Datalife on Sep 4th, 2014 at 7:40pm

cods wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 7:32pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 7:11pm:
This is not just a matter 'of being involved in Iraq again'. This is a matter of stopping a monster which is gaining strength every day, in it's tracks.

This monster butchers women and children by the thousands, this monster beheads victims then parades them on the media.

This monster is every bit as dangerous as the Nazis.

The Coalition of the willing need to get cracking and smash ISIS into the next world.



not if you are  green senator wishy wilson....he thinks terrorists are hard done by..


I would be happy with no involvement and watch them hack each other to death.  It would be a wake up call to the west and a poke in the eye for the luvvies who protest against the great satan. No aid, no nuffin.  Let the Arab league sort it out.

Negotiate with who ever is left who will be the baddest motherbuggerer in the region.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 4th, 2014 at 7:44pm

cods wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 7:32pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 7:11pm:
This is not just a matter 'of being involved in Iraq again'. This is a matter of stopping a monster which is gaining strength every day, in it's tracks.

This monster butchers women and children by the thousands, this monster beheads victims then parades them on the media.

This monster is every bit as dangerous as the Nazis.

The Coalition of the willing need to get cracking and smash ISIS into the next world.



not if you are  green senator wishy wilson....he thinks terrorists are hard done by..


He’s spot on. Heading over to the desert to fight in 50 degree heat until you die as cannon fodder for some brutal friendless regime sounds like a pretty rough trot to me.

A tough job, but someone’s got to do it.

If it wasn’t for ISIL, the old boy might be stuck without an enemy.

For a few minutes, anyway.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 4th, 2014 at 7:51pm

red baron wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 7:39pm:
Karnal the thing we have in common is that we are both Vets. Any Vet worth his salt, would not stand by, whilst a monster commits genocide on hapless innocent people. We have to get involved, what do you think our forefathers at Gallipoli would think about this lot?

They would go after them that's what they would do.


Not a good example, Baron. They were slaughtered.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 5th, 2014 at 7:04pm
It's the best example. Defeat at Gallipoli had nothing to do with it Karnal, stop leg pulling. You know as well as I do that I am referring to the spirit of Anzac and what the core values of those diggers were.
Could you see them tolerating these fascist cowboys of ISIS for 5 seconds?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 5th, 2014 at 10:04pm

red baron wrote on Sep 5th, 2014 at 7:04pm:
It's the best example. Defeat at Gallipoli had nothing to do with it Karnal, stop leg pulling. You know as well as I do that I am referring to the spirit of Anzac and what the core values of those diggers were.


What a load of krap.

My great uncle fought in WWI. The one thing he told me - when he could lift his attention from the races on 2KY - was never let the bastards get to you.

He hated the spirit of Anzac. He knew that there is no spirit of Anzac. We ALL know that there is no spirit of Anzac.

The spirit of Anzac is 19 year old kids emptying their rifles to save ammunition before they say a quick prayer and run into Johnny Turk’s machine gun fire.

The spirit of Anzac is body counts and pinewood coffins being lined up in the shade.

The spirit of Anzac is little white crosses lined up in military formation as if on some limp dick parade.

Fck the spirit of Anzac. It’s the biggest con we ever had forced on us after rum, sodomy and the lash.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 7th, 2014 at 9:22am
What a load of absolute shite Karnal just because you've got a relo who hated it, doesn't mean jack sh.t.

I have met diggers in my younger days on Anzac Day and had a beer with them and their attitude was anything but the mindless bile you are spewing out. What the f....k happened to your head in the Vietnam jungles?

That post of yours is he biggest crock of sh.t I have ever read on this site bar none! >:(

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 7th, 2014 at 10:24am

red baron wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 9:22am:
What a load of absolute shite Karnal just because you've got a relo who hated it, doesn't mean jack sh.t.

I have met diggers in my younger days on Anzac Day and had a beer with them and their attitude was anything but the mindless bile you are spewing out. What the f....k happened to your head in the Vietnam jungles?

That post of yours is he biggest crock of sh.t I have ever read on this site bar none! >:(



he is so good at leaving kamel sh!te pats all over the forum.. I bet he wouldnt have the balls to sit with the diggers on ANZAC DAY and tell them what he has just written....

a bastard of the worst kind. >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(

some have a knack of making you ashamed to be Australian...cruel words from a cruel heart.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 7th, 2014 at 10:27am

Datalife wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 7:40pm:

cods wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 7:32pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 4th, 2014 at 7:11pm:
This is not just a matter 'of being involved in Iraq again'. This is a matter of stopping a monster which is gaining strength every day, in it's tracks.

This monster butchers women and children by the thousands, this monster beheads victims then parades them on the media.

This monster is every bit as dangerous as the Nazis.

The Coalition of the willing need to get cracking and smash ISIS into the next world.



not if you are  green senator wishy wilson....he thinks terrorists are hard done by..


I would be happy with no involvement and watch them hack each other to death.  It would be a wake up call to the west and a poke in the eye for the luvvies who protest against the great satan. No aid, no nuffin.  Let the Arab league sort it out.

Negotiate with who ever is left who will be the baddest motherbuggerer in the region.




if we all sat back and watched the STRONG defeat the weak... where do you think the world would end up???...

do you think its right certain people because they have the guns..should have the right to push those who dont off the planet???

and the rest oif us sit back and say..

well it isnt us they are doing it too... so turn the footy on.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 7th, 2014 at 10:54am
Good on you  Cods, at least you are True Blue!

Karnal belongs right up there with Neville Chamberlain  and his, "Peace in our time" whilst the jackboots of the Nazis were marching into Poland as he waved that very piece of useless sh.t paper in the faces of the British declaring, "Peace in our time!"

If the strong don't act, the world will be overtaken by these Fascist Moslems called ISIS or suchlike. We are on a precipice right now. The big threat are the Jihadist Moslems, do we wait until they have conquered the entire Middle East with their genocide or do we go in and deal them out of the game?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 7th, 2014 at 11:07am
No-Chamberlan was an honest fool. Can't say that of Karnal.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 7th, 2014 at 11:33am

red baron wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 10:54am:
Good on you  Cods, at least you are True Blue!

Karnal belongs right up there with Neville Chamberlain  and his, "Peace in our time" whilst the jackboots of the Nazis were marching into Poland as he waved that very piece of useless sh.t paper in the faces of the British declaring, "Peace in our time!"

If the strong don't act, the world will be overtaken by these Fascist Moslems called ISIS or suchlike. We are on a precipice right now. The big threat are the Jihadist Moslems, do we wait until they have conquered the entire Middle East with their genocide or do we go in and deal them out of the game?



he believed RB.. and lived in hope.. cant blame him for what Hitler turned out to be a LIAR and murderer..

I dont even know where the ANZACs came into a thread about more murderers to be honest... I just didnt like what he said thats all..we should honor our dead they paid the ultimate price..for someone being able to say... well what he said in 2014...on a public forum...if someone doesnt appreciate that then they need to take a good look at themselves...

if we tell the world we should have looked the other way in 1914 and 1939...do they really think we would all be sitting here eating the Sunday roast with not a care in the world???... do they really?.


imagine the spread of NAZISM where would it have ended if it ever did... well this to me is the same...where will it end if we ignore it??... will it come to our door...of course it will look at what we have to offer... we are a sitting DUCK.. the rest of the world is being over run by muslims... nice muslims that is...but how long before they too become twisted and full of hate.. if these mad Imams have their way.

and I mean mad.. and they have a lot of clout..and influence..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 7th, 2014 at 12:14pm
I have long been against Australia's involvement in the Middle East.

But times have changed and the balance of power has reached a critical juncture.

It is not a case of should we become involved but a case of we must become involved as should every society in the World that values freedom.

The West has the capacity to crush these fanatics with their supremacy in weapons and just pure fighting skill.

It is time they did.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 7th, 2014 at 12:34pm

Soren wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 11:07am:
No-Chamberlan was an honest fool. Can't say that of Karnal.


Listen son, you p!ss off back to your Ikea factory and leave the fighting to the men. And Cods.

Churn us out some cheap plywood coffins while you’re at it. Don’t forget to pack the Alan key, chop chop.

Red’s ready for war again.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 7th, 2014 at 12:37pm

red baron wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 12:14pm:
I have long been against Australia's involvement in the Middle East.

But times have changed and the balance of power has reached a critical juncture.


Yeah - Rupert’s publishing their Facebook photos.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Sep 7th, 2014 at 1:02pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 5th, 2014 at 10:04pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 5th, 2014 at 7:04pm:
It's the best example. Defeat at Gallipoli had nothing to do with it Karnal, stop leg pulling. You know as well as I do that I am referring to the spirit of Anzac and what the core values of those diggers were.


What a load of krap.

My great uncle fought in WWI. The one thing he told me - when he could lift his attention from the races on 2KY - was never let the bastards get to you.

He hated the spirit of Anzac. He knew that there is no spirit of Anzac. We ALL know that there is no spirit of Anzac.

The spirit of Anzac is 19 year old kids emptying their rifles to save ammunition before they say a quick prayer and run into Johnny Turk’s machine gun fire.

The spirit of Anzac is body counts and pinewood coffins being lined up in the shade.

The spirit of Anzac is little white crosses lined up in military formation as if on some limp dick parade.

Fck the spirit of Anzac. It’s the biggest con we ever had forced on us after rum, sodomy and the lash.



We have learnt well from those losses karnal. Mainly about the ways to minimise deaths on our side.
So why would we send in troops when we can send in drones.
The morons in ISIS truly are stuck back in the days of Gallipoli.
We've moved on
A pimply faced civil servant with wifi sitting in HQ in South Carolina is about to turn ISIS into toast.

Gud is great for providing us with these rightard weapons.
Sure the barbarians will hate that, they,d love nothing better than troops on the ground.

You know, it's scarey Shiite when a magpie swoops you.  Soon everyone in ISIS will be living in fear of "the good news" falling from the sky.

I wouldn't send one troop there, except to call in the GPS on the targets.
This will be a yippie shoot.
Technology has come a long way since gulf war 1

Just wait til all the jihadists have had time to assemble, then it's game on.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 7th, 2014 at 1:29pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 12:34pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 11:07am:
No-Chamberlan was an honest fool. Can't say that of Karnal.


Listen son, you p!ss off back to your Ikea factory and leave the fighting to the men. And Cods.

Churn us out some cheap plywood coffins while you’re at it. Don’t forget to pack the Alan key, chop chop.

Red’s ready for war again.



oh more little love pats from kamel... :-* :-*

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 7th, 2014 at 4:23pm
Don't tell me to piss off Karnal, you know Jack about what I have done  in life, I don't and won't justify myself to you, you crock.

Don't set yourself up as some sort of anti hero arbiter, who eats  barbed wire for breakfast, I'm not buying it 'hero' and nor should anyone else you're dropping your crap on here.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 7th, 2014 at 5:19pm

aquascoot wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 1:02pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 5th, 2014 at 10:04pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 5th, 2014 at 7:04pm:
It's the best example. Defeat at Gallipoli had nothing to do with it Karnal, stop leg pulling. You know as well as I do that I am referring to the spirit of Anzac and what the core values of those diggers were.


What a load of krap.

My great uncle fought in WWI. The one thing he told me - when he could lift his attention from the races on 2KY - was never let the bastards get to you.

He hated the spirit of Anzac. He knew that there is no spirit of Anzac. We ALL know that there is no spirit of Anzac.

The spirit of Anzac is 19 year old kids emptying their rifles to save ammunition before they say a quick prayer and run into Johnny Turk’s machine gun fire.

The spirit of Anzac is body counts and pinewood coffins being lined up in the shade.

The spirit of Anzac is little white crosses lined up in military formation as if on some limp dick parade.

Fck the spirit of Anzac. It’s the biggest con we ever had forced on us after rum, sodomy and the lash.



We have learnt well from those losses karnal. Mainly about the ways to minimise deaths on our side.
So why would we send in troops when we can send in drones.
The nice people in ISIS truly are stuck back in the days of Gallipoli.
We've moved on
A pimply faced civil servant with wifi sitting in HQ in South Carolina is about to turn ISIS into toast.

Gud is great for providing us with these rightard weapons.


And the spider-veined faces in the ADF tell us drones don’t work against a force of over ten thousand heavily armed troops in the desert.

Drones are good against one or two badly equipped Taliban volunteers in the mountains. Drones aren’t yet capable of fighting armies.

Drones are used largely against civilians (or those posing as civilians), not well-armed troops who can defend themselves.

ISIL are begging for the opportunity to stage a long, protracted ambush against Uncle in the desert. Obey them, and you end up in Iraq again, or Afghanistan, or Vietnam. If we’ve learned anything in the last 50 years, it’s that you don’t engage in military operations without very clear objectives, and a viable alternative administration to hold them.

Wetting your pantaloons and yelling atUncle to do something - anything - is just stupid unless you have a viable plan.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 7th, 2014 at 5:33pm

red baron wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 4:23pm:
Don't tell me to piss off Karnal, you know Jack about what I have done  in life, I don't and won't justify myself to you, you crock.

Don't set yourself up as some sort of anti hero arbiter, who eats  barbed wire for breakfast, I'm not buying it 'hero' and nor should anyone else you're dropping your crap on here.


Read my posts the right way up before you tell me what to do, old son. I don’t take orders from Air Force personel (retired).

Put your glasses on before posting, and leave the panty wetting to Cods and the cheese-dealer.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 7th, 2014 at 5:37pm
Forget about it Karnal, your post about the Anzacs was enough for me, I didn't need my glasses to read that load of cobblers.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Aussie on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:10pm

red baron wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 5:37pm:
Forget about it Karnal, your post about the Anzacs was enough for me, I didn't need my glasses to read that load of cobblers.


Well......I have a Father and a couple of Grand Uncles who would agree 100% with Karnal.

That 'Anzac Spirit' is post fact National jingoism readily peddled by the needy.  Saying so is not being disrespectful of the blokes who fought, or died or survived.  While they were there shooting and being shot at, they did not give a ferk about a 'spirit.'  It was shoot or be shot.

The crappy alleged 'spirit' came much later for political purposes.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:16pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 5:33pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 4:23pm:
Don't tell me to piss off Karnal, you know Jack about what I have done  in life, I don't and won't justify myself to you, you crock.

Don't set yourself up as some sort of anti hero arbiter, who eats  barbed wire for breakfast, I'm not buying it 'hero' and nor should anyone else you're dropping your crap on here.


Read my posts the right way up before you tell me what to do, old son. I don’t take orders from Air Force personel (retired).

Put your glasses on before posting, and leave the panty wetting to Cods and the cheese-dealer.



ooppps another plop of poo... erkkkkkkkkkkk ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:17pm

red baron wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 5:37pm:
Forget about it Karnal, your post about the Anzacs was enough for me, I didn't need my glasses to read that load of cobblers.


No worries, Red. They probably taught you we marched into Gallipoli, taught Johnny Turk a thing or two, played a few games of cricket, and came back in time for Christmas.

Now you know otherwise, feel free to reflect on our noble history of failed foreign interventions and apply them to the situation in the Middle East today - a situation we’ve played our part in, believe it.

If you and the defence contractors in the White House had listened a bit more carefully back in 2003, we would not be having such a frank exchange of views today.

All those neatly lined white crosses are there in Turkey and France and Belgium because the chumps  in charge were powerless to stop the empty, deafening roar that always precedes the march into battle.

If you want to be a part of that, be my guest, but don’t expect me to give up without a fight.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:17pm

Aussie wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:10pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 5:37pm:
Forget about it Karnal, your post about the Anzacs was enough for me, I didn't need my glasses to read that load of cobblers.


Well......I have a Father and a couple of Grand Uncles who would agree 100% with Karnal.

That 'Anzac Spirit' is post fact National jingoism readily peddled by the needy.  Saying so is not being disrespectful of the blokes who fought, or died or survived.  While they were there shooting and being shot at, they did not give a ferk about a 'spirit.'  It was shoot or be shot.

The crappy alleged 'spirit' came much later for political purposes.



maybe you should move back to India and take kamel with you then..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:19pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:17pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 5:37pm:
Forget about it Karnal, your post about the Anzacs was enough for me, I didn't need my glasses to read that load of cobblers.


No worries, Red. They probably taught you we marched into Gallipoli, taught Johnny Turk a thing or two, played a few games of cricket, and came back in time for Christmas.

Now you know otherwise, feel free to reflect on our noble history of failed foreign interventions and apply them to the situation in the Middle East today - a situation we’ve played our part in, believe it.

If you and the defence contractors in the White House had listened a bit more carefully back in 2003, we would not be having such a frank exchange of views today.

All those neatly lined white crosses are there in Turkey and France and Belgium because the chumps  in charge were powerless to stop the empty, deafening roar that always precedes the march into battle.

If you want to be a part of that, be my guest, but don’t expect me to give up without a fight.



so when ISIS arrives on our doorstep you and aussie will be well and truly under the bed I guess along with your uncles and cousins who believe any form of war is for dills...and only to be disrespected... we get it.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Aussie on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:29pm

cods wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:17pm:

Aussie wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:10pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 5:37pm:
Forget about it Karnal, your post about the Anzacs was enough for me, I didn't need my glasses to read that load of cobblers.


Well......I have a Father and a couple of Grand Uncles who would agree 100% with Karnal.

That 'Anzac Spirit' is post fact National jingoism readily peddled by the needy.  Saying so is not being disrespectful of the blokes who fought, or died or survived.  While they were there shooting and being shot at, they did not give a ferk about a 'spirit.'  It was shoot or be shot.

The crappy alleged 'spirit' came much later for political purposes.



maybe you should move back to India and take kamel with you then..


Cods.....is that you using abusive language?  You know ~ the stuff you have been whingeing about in Feedback?  I go out of my way not to be personally insulting or personally critical of you (in fact, as a Member Run Board Mod I have acted to assist you) yet you are blind to your own hypocrisy it seems.

I am neither Indian, and nor do I know of a Member named kamel.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:36pm

Aussie wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:29pm:

cods wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:17pm:

Aussie wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:10pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 5:37pm:
Forget about it Karnal, your post about the Anzacs was enough for me, I didn't need my glasses to read that load of cobblers.


Well......I have a Father and a couple of Grand Uncles who would agree 100% with Karnal.

That 'Anzac Spirit' is post fact National jingoism readily peddled by the needy.  Saying so is not being disrespectful of the blokes who fought, or died or survived.  While they were there shooting and being shot at, they did not give a ferk about a 'spirit.'  It was shoot or be shot.

The crappy alleged 'spirit' came much later for political purposes.



maybe you should move back to India and take kamel with you then..


Cods.....is that you using abusive language?  You know ~ the stuff you have been whingeing about in Feedback?  I go out of my way not to be personally insulting or personally critical of you (in fact, as a Member Run Board Mod I have acted to assist you) yet you are blind to your own hypocrisy it seems.

I am neither Indian, and nor do I know of a Member named kamel.



just telling you where to go.. is hardly calling you a pot of piss....

.India has a calling for you i understand...go to Kathmandu for all I care with that attitude...as for doing favour look whos TALKING....

oh that right you believe in neither saying thank you nor remembering...do you.. aka the ANZACs  how could I forget that...

aussie the MOD great on short MEMORY SYNDROME>>>

dont trust him... never ever trust this guy..


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:38pm
you sure show your true colours on here aussie.. you really do.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:39pm

Aussie wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:10pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 5:37pm:
Forget about it Karnal, your post about the Anzacs was enough for me, I didn't need my glasses to read that load of cobblers.


Well......I have a Father and a couple of Grand Uncles who would agree 100% with Karnal.

That 'Anzac Spirit' is post fact National jingoism readily peddled by the needy.  Saying so is not being disrespectful of the blokes who fought, or died or survived.  While they were there shooting and being shot at, they did not give a ferk about a 'spirit.'  It was shoot or be shot.

The crappy alleged 'spirit' came much later for political purposes.


They drum that Anzac Spirit krap into new recruits the way they drill them in everything else. Weapon, gun, fighting, fun. The kids fall in line, just as football players stand in a row looking vacant with their hands on their dicks, trying to mouth the words of the national anthem before a game.

The loss you feel for people you know killed in battle, that’s real.

Stop sending kids to get killed in pointless foreign wars - problem solved. No need for Anzac Spirit.

The last thing I would wish on any parent or brother or sister or friend or comrade is Anzac Spirit. The last I would wish on people in any other country is Anzac Spirit.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:48pm

cods wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:19pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:17pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 5:37pm:
Forget about it Karnal, your post about the Anzacs was enough for me, I didn't need my glasses to read that load of cobblers.


No worries, Red. They probably taught you we marched into Gallipoli, taught Johnny Turk a thing or two, played a few games of cricket, and came back in time for Christmas.

Now you know otherwise, feel free to reflect on our noble history of failed foreign interventions and apply them to the situation in the Middle East today - a situation we’ve played our part in, believe it.

If you and the defence contractors in the White House had listened a bit more carefully back in 2003, we would not be having such a frank exchange of views today.

All those neatly lined white crosses are there in Turkey and France and Belgium because the chumps  in charge were powerless to stop the empty, deafening roar that always precedes the march into battle.

If you want to be a part of that, be my guest, but don’t expect me to give up without a fight.



so when ISIS arrives on our doorstep you and aussie will be well and truly under the bed I guess along with your uncles and cousins who believe any form of war is for dills...and only to be disrespected... we get it.


And when the Turks come down here, closely followed by the Vietnamese, and the Iraqis and the Afghanis and the
ISISies, we’ll send you in, dear, guns blazing.

You’ll hold the fort. No worries.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Aussie on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:51pm

Quote:
so when ISIS arrives on our doorstep you and aussie will be well and truly under the bed I guess along with your uncles and cousins who believe any form of war is for dills...and only to be disrespected... we get it.


The only thing you get, cods is the fantasy of the alleged honour and glory of having the beegeezus belted out of you in a War.  There is nothing sweet, nothing charming, nothing in itself to be admired.  It is grubby, non-humane and very terrible.  There is nothing to glorify.  That is for people who believe Biggles was real.  My Father and his Uncles got shot at, and they shot back.  The Great Uncles were lousy shots as they were killed.  My Dad survived WW2 and he metaphorically spat at the political wankers who wanted for their own purposes to seek votes out of military nationalism.  I remember wishing nothing more than wanting to join the Cadets at my High School in the mid 60s, and my Dad absolutely refusing to allow it on the basis that he did not want me to be playing at 'war.'  He reckoned he had paid the 'Family Dues,' in that regard.  For all of his Life, so far as I knew, he never, ever entered an RSL and he never marched in or watched an Anzac Day March/Ceremony ~ yet, on the day my Brother and I buried him, we learned that the Old Fart was a Life Member of the RSL.  That, my Dear Cods, is 'spirit,' of the private and honourable kind.

Later, my Brother was conscripted....taken out of his civilian job and plonked into the LNP's 'All the Way with LBJ' Military, potentially directly into Vietnam.  Thank ferk that Whitlam arrived and stopped the ships which were about to send my Brother to Vietnam.  My Old Man supported him every step of the way, but he never slept about it.

Long story....Brother stayed in ~ retired as a Brigadier, and he too will figuratively spit on your stupid vicarious claim about a 'spirit.'

War is shite, and there is nothing to glorify whatsoever.  Nothing.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 7th, 2014 at 7:02pm
You’ve got it, Aussie. You know what the game’s about.

Fck ISIS,  fck the drones, fck Lockheed Martin, the Marines,  Coalitions of the Willing, all the officers in 3RAR Holsworthy, and dumb chocolate soldiers on the internet who don’t know any better.

Fck Anzac Spirit. Fck the lot.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 7th, 2014 at 7:15pm

Aussie wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 6:51pm:

Quote:
so when ISIS arrives on our doorstep you and aussie will be well and truly under the bed I guess along with your uncles and cousins who believe any form of war is for dills...and only to be disrespected... we get it.


The only thing you get, cods is the fantasy of the alleged honour and glory of having the beegeezus belted out of you in a War.  There is nothing sweet, nothing charming, nothing in itself to be admired.  It is grubby, non-humane and very terrible.  There is nothing to glorify.  That is for people who believe Biggles was real.  My Father and his Uncles got shot at, and they shot back.  The Great Uncles were lousy shots as they were killed.  My Dad survived WW2 and he metaphorically spat at the political wankers who wanted for their own purposes to seek votes out of military nationalism.  I remember wishing nothing more than wanting to join the Cadets at my High School in the mid 60s, and my Dad absolutely refusing to allow it on the basis that he did not want me to be playing at 'war.'  He reckoned he had paid the 'Family Dues,' in that regard.  For all of his Life, so far as I knew, he never, ever entered an RSL and he never marched in or watched an Anzac Day March/Ceremony ~ yet, on the day my Brother and I buried him, we learned that the Old Fart was a Life Member of the RSL.  That, my Dear Cods, is 'spirit,' of the private and honourable kind.

Later, my Brother was conscripted....taken out of his civilian job and plonked into the LNP's 'All the Way with LBJ' Military, potentially directly into Vietnam.  Thank ferk that Whitlam arrived and stopped the ships which were about to send my Brother to Vietnam.  My Old Man supported him every step of the way, but he never slept about it.

Long story....Brother stayed in ~ retired as a Brigadier, and he too will figuratively spit on your stupid vicarious claim about a 'spirit.'

War is shite, and there is nothing to glorify whatsoever.  Nothing.



I dont want to hear you uncl;es glory days thanks you have said enough what you think what a fool he/they was..you dont have to go into details...

my baby hood was spent in a dug out shelter...

your family do you no justice or service.. I am glad I will never meet any of you...

they are not GLORIFYING WAR you stupid people..

they are saying THANK YOU...to those who did come back.. some in pieces...

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Aussie on Sep 7th, 2014 at 7:43pm

Quote:
they are saying THANK YOU...to those who did come back.. some in pieces...


Given how confusing what you post can be, I'm not sure who 'they' are.  If 'they' are my Great Uncles and Mates of my Dad who were blown into body parts, they are not saying 'thank you' at all.  They are saying, "Don't believe the bull-shite the Johnny Come Lateltys (Karnal's 'chocolate soldiers') will tell you is 'spirit.' 

I'll fight when some bastard points a gun at me directly, here in this Country.  Stuffed if I'll support 'Abbott's War' in some place I have to look at a World Map to locate.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 7th, 2014 at 8:21pm
I’ll fight if there’s a decent enemy worth fighting.

Being pointed in the direction of a region or a religion or a seventh century prophet and told to take out whatever moves is just asking for trouble. All you end up doing is running in and out of people’s houses, trying to interpret what they’re telling you wiith a gun to their head and their families screaming in the background.

It’s a recipe for PTSD on all sides with no winner, no loser, and no end. Back in the War To End All Wars, both sides came out to shake hands and sing Christmas songs.

Those days are long gone. The only enemy worth fighting today is the defeated, lumpen mass of ha has and gigglers who have so little to live for they want to kill everyone else off.

And they don’t even know what killing is.

Fck Anzac Spirit, and fck the gigglers who think they know.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 8th, 2014 at 1:23am

Aussie wrote on Sep 7th, 2014 at 7:43pm:

Quote:
they are saying THANK YOU...to those who did come back.. some in pieces...


Given how confusing what you post can be, I'm not sure who 'they' are.  If 'they' are my Great Uncles and Mates of my Dad who were blown into body parts, they are not saying 'thank you' at all.  They are saying, "Don't believe the bull-shite the Johnny Come Lateltys (Karnal's 'chocolate soldiers') will tell you is 'spirit.' 

I'll fight when some bastard points a gun at me directly, here in this Country.  Stuffed if I'll support 'Abbott's War' in some place I have to look at a World Map to locate.



no THEY would have nothing to do with your family I can promise you..

I mean the people that line the streets,...

of course you guys dont take the day off do you??..

of course not..

the people that buy the badges and the Legacy buttons and the Poppies...that say hey we dont forget

no no one would ask you to stand up for this country I am sure.. so settle down you can relax...

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 8th, 2014 at 10:59am
Following last week's admission by Obama that the US does not have a plan for ISIS, Julie Bishop has just said that getting rid of ISIL will be hard to do. According to Julie Bishop, ISIL is not just an army or a country, it's an ideology.

And how do you carpet bomb an ideology? How do you contain it? Destroy ISIL in Iraq, and they'll re-appear in Syria.

What Barack Obama means when he says the US does not have a plan is just that - the US does not have a plan. It looks like they're now leaning towards Assad in Syria after years of having him in the Axis of Evil.

And they would do anything for a new Saddam in Iraq. The US would do anything for a functioning secular state in the heart of oil country.

The Arab League will be discussing ISIS this week. This is the only hope. Only Arabs can deal with ISIS. If the US gets involved, Iraq will become the new front for global jihad. And let's face it, ISIS is a splinter group of Al Qaida, a Saudi creation.

The Saudis have been playing both sides for years. The Saudis receive weapons and training from the US, and similtaneously fund Al Qaida. The Saudis are the quietest geo-political player in the game. While Iran bangs on about Great Satans, the Saudis quietly get down to business. The Saudis are such good friends of Uncle that when a Saudi-backed terror group flew planes into the World Trade Centre, Uncle flew the bin Laden family out of America.

The Saudis will join the Arab League this week, but it's the Egyptians who will press the case for destroying ISIS. The Egyptian generals are over Saudi Arabia and Qatar's meddling, Morsi is still in jail, and the majority of Egyptians are over Islamicist politics.

The minority, however, are at risk of joining ISIS. All the disgruntled Arab Spring resistance fighters are potential ISIS candidates. All the disgruntled jihadists around the world are potential "citizens" of ISIS.

As Bishop says, ISIS is not a state, it's a state of mind. Again, reponding with military means alone will not solve the problem. The region needs to get together to address this problem. ISIS is as much a security issue within other Arab states as it's an issue in Iraq and Syria.

Iraq has been turned into failed state. While the Coalition caused this problem, the Coalition cannot fix the problem. This is a regional Middle Eastern issue, best solved by a regional partnership. Any military campaign by a Western "coalition of the willing" will only make the enemy stronger and more determined.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Sep 8th, 2014 at 12:06pm
It is a complex problem karmal but there is always the place for a well thought out solution.

Say i owned a big patch of desert in the NT (not dissimilar to the middle east) and i had troublesome rogue brumbies getting in amongst my herd of fine quarterhorses.
What to do?

a multi pronged approach.

helicopter shooting to reduce numbers (this would be the equivalent of the drone).

trying to pick off the brumby stallions and leave the herds of mares with a quarterhorse stallion, slowly breeding out the brumby traits.

so we could send settlers in to intermarry and reduce the ISIS angry arab gene.  perhaps muslims from a peaceful part of the world. Malaysian muslim men may be the equivalent of quarterhorses in this scenario.

we could make the environment bad for the brumbies, poison waterholes, reduce fodder.  starve them out.  this shouldn't be that difficult in the desert.

we have to prevent the brumbies spreading.  good fences make good neighbours and the fence between Syria and Iraq seems in need of urgent repair.  the jews have a better idea of fence building. 

trapping,  surely we can just lay a million mines around the ISIS encampments and leave them to it.

there are many many options.

some, can be undoubtedly be caught and re educated to become fine riding hacks.

we shouldn't just look at a problem and walk away. problems should be assaulted head on with every ounce of vigour we can muster. the longer you let a feral problem exist, the harder it is to deal with down the track

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 8th, 2014 at 12:48pm

aquascoot wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 12:06pm:
we shouldn't just look at a problem and walk away.


I don't think anyone's saying we should. The issue is how to solve the problem, and who.

If we're looking at a military solution, you need boots on the ground. Air strikes are only a start - you can't finish a job with air strikes.

The boots on the ground need to be locals. If Uncle and Mother go in, you'll create a front for global jihad. If Uncle and Mother go in, they'll never get out.

The locals need to agree on a strategy - this is where diplomacy comes in. The days of Uncle picking sides and playing them against each other has twisted US foreign policy into knots. Now, Uncle doesn't know whether he supports Assad in Syria, or the resistance. Uncle doesn't know whether he supports another corrupt Shi'ite regime in Iraq, or someone else (and there is no one else). In all the other countries Uncle's meddled in - Afghanistan, Egypt, Palestine - Uncle chops and changes teams like an inept coach.

Remember, the US supports the most fundamentalist state in the world: Saudi Arabia. The UK supported the most dangerous terrorist leader in the world at the time: Ghadafi. It wasn't a corrupt Arab state that released the Lockerby bombers, it was Mother England. It wasn't the Arab states who drew Ghadafi into a warm embrace, it was the UK and Europe.

Since the end of the Cold War, Western intervention in the Middle East has been a spectacular failure. Hearing Obama say that he doesn't have a plan for Iraq and Syria is such refreshing honesty. In Rumsfeld terminology, this is a known-unknown. Backing leaders like Saddam and Ghadafi et al, and then throwing them away when they turn on you is a recipe for disaster.

As the source of much of the world's energy, the Middle East needs to be secure. How you secure it, and who you back, is pivotal. Obama was elected with a mandate to withdraw US forces from Iraq, not send them back in. I understand that you have to face problems when they happen, but you need to do this with brains, not brawn.

The Middle East is in the situation it is today thanks to the Western support for dictatorships and direct military involvement. The Middle East is in this situation because very few Arab states have made the transition to popularly elected governments. The Middle East is still a collection of tribes and tribal allegiances, with very few stable republics. Rather than fostering and strengthening local systems of governance and popular representation, Western intervention has merely backed tribes, trained their armies and security forces, and let them do their job of supressing their populations rather than including them. The most recent example of this is the al Malaki government in Iraq, backed all the way by Uncle.

If you ask me, it's time the Middle East started to solve its own problems, and it's time we started to look for alternative sources of energy.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Sep 8th, 2014 at 2:39pm
Yes, the Middle East probably should just be left to its own devices.
Declare it a national park, let the law if the jungle prevail and , as the greens say, lock the gate

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 8th, 2014 at 4:03pm

aquascoot wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 2:39pm:
Yes, the Middle East probably should just be left to its own devices.
Declare it a national park, let the law if the jungle prevail and , as the greens say, lock the gate


As our tall glass of water PM, Mr Abbott, put it, it's baddies versus baddies. We can't drop bombs on the entire population of Syria and Iraq. Someone needs to be left standing to run the shop.

Particularly Iraq - it's an oil state.

Air strikes are good at one thing: making enemies of populations. The bombing of Vietnam - more TNT used than WWII - did fck all. The bombing of Cambodia led to the rise of Pol Pot.

Mind you, the bombing of Serbia did lead to the fall of Milosevic, but his government was not an insurgency. What's happening in Syria and Iraq right now is not conventional war. It's guerrilla war, and for this you need an entirely different approach to knee-jerk displays of force.

The Maoist slogan for guerrilla war was the weak overcoming the strong. In guerrilla war, mobile and lightweight militias have the ability to turn the bloated weight of the enemy against itself. local resistance forces have on their side is time. The US has to pull out eventually, and the administrations it leaves behind are usually weak and unpopular. A newly-established regime is only as strong as its army. US trained troops in both Iraq and Afghanistan have taken their skills and their weapons and joined the other side.

A conventional show of force will not destroy ISIS. This time, the West needs diplomacy to get Arab leaders on side. Arabs themselves have not taken to fondly to militant jihadists. Al Qaida was despised by the majority of Iraqis, just as Egyptians turned against the fundamentalist leadership of Morsi. It is not an axiom that, given the opportunity, Arabs will elect Islamicist leaders and call for Sharia law.

It is far more likely that bombing Iraq and Syria to Kingdom Come will unite them against the West. If led well, bombings unify populations, as wartime England showed.

The world could take a leaf out of Mao's book - the weak shall overcome the strong.

If the Cold War taught us anything, it is this. Top-down hierarchies and bloated state buraucracies are inefficient and unpopular. Fascism and communism failed for this very reason, just as we failed in Vietnam.

If we don't learn from history, we'll be in Iraq forever.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 8th, 2014 at 5:53pm
I think the current option of supplying  the enemies of ISIS with logistical and air support. Without an Air Force ISIS  is f.....d, that is a dead set certainty. Unlike Vietnam they don't have tunnel systems to evade the might of air power.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 8th, 2014 at 8:18pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 12:48pm:
The Middle East is in the situation it is today thanks to the Western support for dictatorships and direct military involvement. The Middle East is in this situation because very few Arab states have made the transition to popularly elected governments. The Middle East is still a collection of tribes and tribal allegiances, with very few stable republics. Rather than fostering and strengthening local systems of governance and popular representation, Western intervention has merely backed tribes, trained their armies and security forces, and let them do their job of supressing their populations rather than including them. The most recent example of this is the al Malaki government in Iraq, backed all the way by Uncle.

If you ask me, it's time the Middle East started to solve its own problems, and it's time we started to look for alternative sources of energy.


That sounds like a call to halt Middle Eastern/Muslim immigration until they grow up and sort out their pathologies and join the modern world.

With the US becoming dependent on nothing more sinister than Canada, the Middle East is fast becoming China's problem.  They know it and so they are ready to tango with Russia. (that'll be an interesting thing to behold - two dishonest, corrupt swindlers trying to outwit each other).
Once the Arab oil become economically marginal, they will be like Africa - sad but irrelevant.


Didn't think it was in you, PB, to be a 'realpolitiker'. Well done.





Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 8th, 2014 at 8:39pm

Soren wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 8:18pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 12:48pm:
The Middle East is in the situation it is today thanks to the Western support for dictatorships and direct military involvement. The Middle East is in this situation because very few Arab states have made the transition to popularly elected governments. The Middle East is still a collection of tribes and tribal allegiances, with very few stable republics. Rather than fostering and strengthening local systems of governance and popular representation, Western intervention has merely backed tribes, trained their armies and security forces, and let them do their job of supressing their populations rather than including them. The most recent example of this is the al Malaki government in Iraq, backed all the way by Uncle.

If you ask me, it's time the Middle East started to solve its own problems, and it's time we started to look for alternative sources of energy.


That sounds like a call to halt Middle Eastern/Muslim immigration until they grow up and sort out their pathologies and join the modern world.

With the US becoming dependent on nothing more sinister than Canada, the Middle East is fast becoming China's problem.  They know it and so they are ready to tango with Russia. (that'll be an interesting thing to behold - two dishonest, corrupt swindlers trying to outwit each other).
Once the Arab oil become economically marginal, they will be like Africa - sad but irrelevant.


Didn't think it was in you, PB, to be a 'realpolitiker'. Well done.


You were warned in 2003. Back then, you were a foreign policy idealist, quoting erstwhile articles from the Wilsonian Institute. Remember?

You believed in exporting Freeedom and demokracy through carpet-bombing. Always, absolutely, never ever, eh?

How times have changed.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 8th, 2014 at 9:45pm
Indeed. I, like millions o:f others, gave them the benefit of universalism, of common, shared humanity going beyond religion or ideology.


Big fvkn mistake.

No shared humanity, no shared values, no universalist common ground.
1400 years of struggle is right, post-modern bromides of post-secular wisdom is balls.
Not going to give them the benefit the second time. Nobody is. (Except Brain, of course, but he will spinelessly excuse anything as long as it is 'other' - he is an ethical tourist of the worst kind, will praise every misery he doesn't have to live in.)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 9th, 2014 at 2:27pm
Lots of Neville Chamberlains around here, waving their little bits of white paper.

Don't worry if we don't take it on over there, as surely as day follows night you will get your opportunity to fight them in the streets here.

An interesting little scenario at the Liverpool Mosque the other day when they auctioned an ISIS flag as a fundraiser.

Don't worry friends the enemy is already within the walls. It is growing in the hearts and minds of the 'would be if they could be' Jihadists.

The time will come and it's coming a lot faster than some of you realise.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 9th, 2014 at 2:42pm

Soren wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 9:45pm:
Indeed. I, like millions o:f others, gave them the benefit of universalism, of common, shared humanity going beyond religion or ideology.


But not contractors, eh? Uncle cleaned up on all those Iraqi utilities - not to mention Pizza Hut and Subway. Even the company that took down that Saddam statue sent Uncle a bill for a few million.

Money for jam, no?

Please, old chap, don't be so hard on yourself. You gave those Iraqis the benefit of submitting to the shared humanity of carpet bombing. No one can say you didn't extend yourself. You've given so much love to these people - no doubt the influence of your Lutheran saviour.

One day, they'll thank you, old boy. I'm sure of it.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 9th, 2014 at 2:46pm

red baron wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 2:27pm:
Lots of Neville Chamberlains around here, waving their little bits of white paper.

Don't worry if we don't take it on over there, as surely as day follows night you will get your opportunity to fight them in the streets here.


I see. You're saying the Syrian and Iraqi civil wars will spread down here.

Now you tell us. Why didn't you warn us of all this before we deposed Saddam and exported Freeedom and demokracy to the Middle East?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 9th, 2014 at 3:08pm
Fear not Karnal, you've still got time to strip down and ready that trusty old SLR you have up the back shed.

I'm sure you're savvy enough to source some kick arse 7.62mm ammunition.

Geez that's a fire fight I'd pay money to watch!

PS You might want to check out my crystal ball thread where I look into our future - I believe  it deserves its own thread. Cheers :)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 9th, 2014 at 3:23pm

red baron wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 3:08pm:
Fear not Karnal, you've still got time to strip down and ready that trusty old SLR you have up the back shed.


The Torana? No one's used that since the first Gulf War.

Good thing you've got a crystal ball though. Tony Abbott thinks we're at war with Russia. Jaquie Lambie thinks we're at war with Indonesia. Clive Palmer thinks we're at war with Chinese mongrels who steal our resources.

Only an advanced fortune teller would predict an invasion by Iraq and Syria.

You must be looking into the very distant future, Red. Don't worry - my money's on human life dying out before then.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 9th, 2014 at 4:27pm
This is covered in my new thread but I'll round off by saying that I don't expect an invasion of any kind by the Moslems., Why worry? They've got a decent percentage of 500,000  Moslems  here,  just itching to try out Jihadist stuff.

I mean it makes sense doesn't it? 500,000 Moslems here, even if only 5% want to sign up for the campaign, there's 2,500 potential terrorists right there, raring to go. That's a lot of suicide missions right? :)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 9th, 2014 at 4:38pm

red baron wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 4:27pm:
This is covered in my new thread but I'll round off by saying that I don't expect an invasion of any kind by the Moslems., Why worry? They've got a decent percentage of 500,000  Moslems  here,  just itching to try out Jihadist stuff.

I mean it makes sense doesn't it? 500,000 Moslems here, even if only 5% want to sign up for the campaign, there's 2,500 potential terrorists right there, raring to go. That's a lot of suicide missions right? :)



Where do you get the 5% figure from?

What makes you think that 5% of Muslims in Australia are extremists/"potential terrorists"?




Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 9th, 2014 at 4:54pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 4:38pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 4:27pm:
This is covered in my new thread but I'll round off by saying that I don't expect an invasion of any kind by the Moslems., Why worry? They've got a decent percentage of 500,000  Moslems  here,  just itching to try out Jihadist stuff.

I mean it makes sense doesn't it? 500,000 Moslems here, even if only 5% want to sign up for the campaign, there's 2,500 potential terrorists right there, raring to go. That's a lot of suicide missions right? :)



Where do you get the 5% figure from?

What makes you think that 5% of Muslims in Australia are extremists/"potential terrorists"?


Red's got a crystal ball - bald chap, goes by the name of Alan. 

Cross my palm with silver, eh?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 9th, 2014 at 5:48pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 4:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 4:38pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 4:27pm:
This is covered in my new thread but I'll round off by saying that I don't expect an invasion of any kind by the Moslems., Why worry? They've got a decent percentage of 500,000  Moslems  here,  just itching to try out Jihadist stuff.

I mean it makes sense doesn't it? 500,000 Moslems here, even if only 5% want to sign up for the campaign, there's 2,500 potential terrorists right there, raring to go. That's a lot of suicide missions right? :)



Where do you get the 5% figure from?

What makes you think that 5% of Muslims in Australia are extremists/"potential terrorists"?


Red's got a crystal ball - bald chap, goes by the name of Alan. 

Cross my palm with silver, eh?


Karnal wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 3:23pm:
Only an advanced fortune teller would predict an invasion by Iraq and Syria.

You must be looking into the very distant future, Red. Don't worry - my money's on human life dying out before then




lets hope your crystal ball cost more and therefor better at predictions..

because only one of you can be right..... right?

either they invade or they dont... :D :D

what would ,you call a 9/11 happening on our shores?...

not war or an invasion of course... but you would say its something wouldnt you?..

not a tickle I trust.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 9th, 2014 at 6:45pm
My post is clearly about the  'enemy within'. They are there ready, eager, waiting for some crazy Mufti to urge them to commit their bodies to the cause.

It will only take a daemon with the power to shift mens' motivation for the ball to start rolling.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 9th, 2014 at 8:15pm

cods wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 5:48pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 4:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 4:38pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 4:27pm:
This is covered in my new thread but I'll round off by saying that I don't expect an invasion of any kind by the Moslems., Why worry? They've got a decent percentage of 500,000  Moslems  here,  just itching to try out Jihadist stuff.

I mean it makes sense doesn't it? 500,000 Moslems here, even if only 5% want to sign up for the campaign, there's 2,500 potential terrorists right there, raring to go. That's a lot of suicide missions right? :)



Where do you get the 5% figure from?

What makes you think that 5% of Muslims in Australia are extremists/"potential terrorists"?


Red's got a crystal ball - bald chap, goes by the name of Alan. 

Cross my palm with silver, eh?


Karnal wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 3:23pm:
Only an advanced fortune teller would predict an invasion by Iraq and Syria.

You must be looking into the very distant future, Red. Don't worry - my money's on human life dying out before then




lets hope your crystal ball cost more and therefor better at predictions..

because only one of you can be right..... right?

either they invade or they dont... :D :D

what would ,you call a 9/11 happening on our shores?...

not war or an invasion of course... but you would say its something wouldnt you?..

not a tickle I trust.


A bit more than a tickle, dear. Do you predict it?

Maybe if we invade Iraq and Syria, we’ll hold off your prediction for a ticky tock.

Or maybe not. Either way, my money’s still on human life ceasing to exist before we’re invaded by Iraq and Syria.

Stop the boats, eh?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 9th, 2014 at 8:18pm

red baron wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 6:45pm:
My post is clearly about the  'enemy within'. They are there ready, eager....


So the plan’s to invade Iraq and Syria and wait for them all to head over and duke it out, is it?

That could work.

I must say, Red, I wish we had generals with balls like that back in Nam. Who knows?

We might have won.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 9th, 2014 at 8:33pm

cods wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 5:48pm:
what would ,you call a 9/11 happening on our shores?...



11/9



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Aussie on Sep 9th, 2014 at 8:59pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 8:33pm:

cods wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 5:48pm:
what would ,you call a 9/11 happening on our shores?...



11/9


That has to be paid.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 10th, 2014 at 10:18am
Well Greggerry, I had a bit of a look around of what would represent a reasonable percentage, given the popularity amongst our towel headed friends for the Jihad taking place in the Middle East and well, 5% just seemed like a chummy little number, of course I most probably vastly under estimated the true percentage of Moslems that hate our infidels' guts.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 10th, 2014 at 11:01am

red baron wrote on Sep 10th, 2014 at 10:18am:
Well Greggerry, I had a bit of a look around of what would represent a reasonable percentage, given the popularity amongst our towel headed friends for the Jihad taking place in the Middle East and well, 5% just seemed like a chummy little number, of course I most probably vastly under estimated the true percentage of Moslems that hate our infidels' guts.


That's strange. You've been quoting percentages quite a lot here lately, Red.

Surely you're not saying you just make them up?

That couldn't possibly be right. I mean, some could say that if you're making this up, you could be making up your entire agenda.

I won't have that, Red. You have your crystal ball. How could you possibly make that up?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 10th, 2014 at 6:40pm
Well Karnal, I must be doing something right with my crystal ball because low and behold David Irvine Head of ASIO today said that he was considering lifting our readiness level from Medium to High.

And no, David nor anyone else did not give me a heads up on my correct prediction.

Two Moslems arrested today for Terrorist offences, tip of the iceberg I'm tipping.

As they say in Alice in Wonderland, Curiouser and curiouser

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 10th, 2014 at 6:57pm

Aussie wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 8:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 8:33pm:

cods wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 5:48pm:
what would ,you call a 9/11 happening on our shores?...



11/9


That has to be paid.



sadly you can make jokes whilst people are dying.. I find that so left...I really do..

almost 3000 people blown out of the sky... time to make jokes time to brush it off ...

WOW...

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 10th, 2014 at 7:07pm

red baron wrote on Sep 10th, 2014 at 6:40pm:
Well Karnal, I must be doing something right with my crystal ball because low and behold David Irvine Head of ASIO today said that he was considering lifting our readiness level from Medium to High.

And no, David nor anyone else did not give me a heads up on my correct prediction.

It just kinda makes sense don't ya think? :)



you are arguing with a brain washed lefty

they will never see the danger even when it jumps up and bites them....

look most of them vote green.. and look what they believe in... wishy washy hates the word terrorist...and milne agrees.. lets not brand anyone...

dont call anything by its real name.. everyone is NICE PERSONS now..

if chopping off heads is not a work of terrorism.. then what is it exactly?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Redneck on Sep 10th, 2014 at 7:08pm

cods wrote on Sep 10th, 2014 at 6:57pm:

Aussie wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 8:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 8:33pm:

cods wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 5:48pm:
what would ,you call a 9/11 happening on our shores?...



11/9


That has to be paid.



sadly you can make jokes whilst people are dying.. I find that so left...I really do..

almost 3000 people blown out of the sky... time to make jokes time to brush it off ...

WOW...



Cods there are as many lefties concerned about this you twit!

How about trying to be inclusive rather than points scoring poo comments!

A lot of us do care!

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 10th, 2014 at 9:04pm

red baron wrote on Sep 10th, 2014 at 6:40pm:
Well Karnal, I must be doing something right with my crystal ball because low and behold David Irvine Head of ASIO today said that he was considering lifting our readiness level from Medium to High.

And no, David nor anyone else did not give me a heads up on my correct prediction.

Two Moslems arrested today for Terrorist offences, tip of the iceberg I'm tipping.

As they say in Alice in Wonderland, Curiouser and curiouser


It certainly is. Scott Morrison was all very hush-hush on 7.30 about what criteria David Irvine raised that security clearance.

He nearly tripped up.and said, "on-water issues".

I’m going out on a limb here, but could it possibly have something to.do with the government’s poor polling and the Australian’s scary photos of head-hackers?

If anyone asks, you didn’t hear that from me, Red. It’s just what they’re saying.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 10th, 2014 at 9:07pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Sep 10th, 2014 at 7:08pm:

cods wrote on Sep 10th, 2014 at 6:57pm:

Aussie wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 8:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 8:33pm:

cods wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 5:48pm:
what would ,you call a 9/11 happening on our shores?...



11/9


That has to be paid.



sadly you can make jokes whilst people are dying.. I find that so left...I really do..

almost 3000 people blown out of the sky... time to make jokes time to brush it off ...

WOW...



Cods there are as many lefties concerned about this you twit!

How about trying to be inclusive rather than points scoring poo comments!


You’re addressing Cods here, Redneck. You might as well be talking to a fish.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 11th, 2014 at 1:34pm
President Barack Obama, today  gave a State of the Nation address. Now it would appear the U.S. finally have 'A strategy'.

It seems that the U.S. is going to weigh in heavily with their Air Force plus 487 advisors are slated to go in and train the friendlies.

Hang on a tic, isn't this how Vietnam started out? Let's hope it's not how Vietnam finished down the track.

Following the address, Obama's approval rating rocketed the charts at home.

Big difference between Nam and ISIS, is that the North Vietnamese didn't carry out wholesale genocide on their own faith. Mixed bag of lollies this outfit.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 11th, 2014 at 2:09pm

red baron wrote on Sep 11th, 2014 at 1:34pm:
Big difference between Nam and ISIS, is that the North Vietnamese didn't carry out wholesale genocide on their own faith. Mixed bag of lollies this outfit.


Exactly.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Team Murdoch on Sep 11th, 2014 at 2:22pm

red baron wrote on Sep 11th, 2014 at 1:34pm:
...Big difference between Nam and ISIS, is that the North Vietnamese didn't carry out wholesale genocide on their own faith...


Do you have some sort of evidence that IS "carry out wholesale genocide on their own faith"?

From the media reports I have read, there were a few executions of Iraqi and Syrian soldiers who they are fighting, but not the "genocide" that you talk of.



By the way if you want to know about genocide I suggest you start by looking at the actions of Western nations.


Quote:
The United States of Genocide: Putting the US on Trial for Genocide Against the Peoples of Korea, Laos, Viet Nam, Cambodia, Iraq, and Elsewhere


The United States of America was built on a foundation of genocide against the Indigenous peoples of North America. In fact, all successful settler colonial societies are founded in genocide. The process is one of dispossession – the erasure of one group identity and the imposition of another on the people and/or on the land. But genocide is not merely the foundation of the US nation state, it is also the foundation of the US empire. The US habit of genocide has not died, but has transformed. The US has become a serial perpetrator of genocide with the blood of many millions of innocents spilled in pursuit of imperial hegemony.

There is a fight going on for the very meaning of the term “genocide”. Western powers assert their right to accuse enemies of committing genocide using the broadest possible definitions whilst also touting a twisted undefined sense of “genocide” which can never, ever be applied to their own actions...

...All of those who oppose Western aggression justified as humanitarian intervention under the “responsibility to protect” must stop burying their heads in the sand over this matter. This is a very real fight for the future of humanity. We can either learn and propagate the understanding that US imperial interventions are, by nature, genocidal. Or we can just pretend the word has no meaning; indulge our childish moral impulses and the lazy fatuousness of our scholars and pundits and let Western mass-murderers use this Orwellian buzzword (for that is what “genocide” currently is) to commit heinous acts of horrific violence which ensure the continued domination of the world’s masses by a tiny imperialist elite...

...US “Wars” are Actually Genocides

Every major military action by the US since World War II has first and foremost been an act of genocide. I do not state this as a moral condemnation. If I were seeking to condemn I would try to convey the enormous scale of suffering, death, loss and misery caused by US mass violence. My purpose instead is to correct a terrible misconception of US actions – their nature, their meaning and their strategic utility. This understanding which I am trying to convey is a very dangerous notion with an inescapable moral dimension because the US has always maintained that the suffering, death and destruction it causes are incidental to military purposes – they are instances of “collateral damage”. But, with all due respect to the fact that US personnel may face real dangers, these are not real wars. These are genocides and it is the military aspect that is incidental. In fact, it is straining credulity to continue believing in a string of military defeats being sustained by the most powerful military in the history of the world at the hands of impoverished Third World combatants. The US hasn’t really been defeated in any real sense. They committed genocide in Indochina, increasing the level of killing as much as possible right through to the clearly foreseen inevitable conclusion which was a cessation of direct mass violence, not a defeat. The US signed a peace agreement which they completely ignored. The Vietnamese did not occupy US territory and force the US to disarm and pay crippling reparations.

There is no question that the US has committed actions which fit the description of genocide. Genocide does not mean the successful extermination of a defined group (there is no such thing as “attempted genocide”). It was never conceived that way, but rather as any systematic attack on “a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.” Those who deny US genocides usually only deny that there is any intent to commit genocide. The UN definition of genocide (recognised by 142 states) is:

… any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

...bear in mind that the victims of US armed violence are not usually combatants and are not engaged in some sort of contested combat that gives them some ability to defend themselves or to kill or be killed. They are helpless as they die of incineration, asphyxiation, dismemberment, cancer, starvation...

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-united-states-of-genocide-putting-the-us-on-trial-for-genocide-against-the-peoples-of-korea-laos-viet-nam-cambodia-iraq-and-elsewhere/5352227

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 11th, 2014 at 2:45pm

Team Murdoch wrote on Sep 11th, 2014 at 2:22pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 11th, 2014 at 1:34pm:
...Big difference between Nam and ISIS, is that the North Vietnamese didn't carry out wholesale genocide on their own faith...


Do you have some sort of evidence that IS "carry out wholesale genocide on their own faith"?


Only news footage and interviews with Shi'ites - and Christians - in refugee camps who had been told to convert or die.

If that's what you mean, I'd define that as precisely as genocide: the systematic destruction of a religious/national/ethnic group.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 11th, 2014 at 4:13pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2014 at 2:45pm:

Team Murdoch wrote on Sep 11th, 2014 at 2:22pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 11th, 2014 at 1:34pm:
...Big difference between Nam and ISIS, is that the North Vietnamese didn't carry out wholesale genocide on their own faith...


Do you have some sort of evidence that IS "carry out wholesale genocide on their own faith"?


Only news footage and interviews with Shi'ites - and Christians - in refugee camps who had been told to convert or die.

If that's what you mean, I'd define that as precisely as genocide: the systematic destruction of a religious/national/ethnic group.



4 Corners did a program about 4 weeks ago...

you dont have to kill people to make them do what they dont want to do..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 11th, 2014 at 4:19pm

red baron wrote on Sep 11th, 2014 at 1:34pm:
President Barack Obama, today  gave a State of the Nation address. Now it would appear the U.S. finally have 'A strategy'.

It seems that the U.S. is going to weigh in heavily with their Air Force plus 487 advisors are slated to go in and train the friendlies.

Hang on a tic, isn't this how Vietnam started out? Let's hope it's not how Vietnam finished down the track.

Following the address, Obama's approval rating rocketed the charts at home.

Big difference between Nam and ISIS, is that the North Vietnamese didn't carry out wholesale genocide on their own faith. Mixed bag of lollies this outfit.




that may well be..

but I have asked this before....what is wrong with dividing a country like Vietnam North and South.??

if that is how two people with different views can live in the same patch... then so be it...

we are talking people killing their brothers.. even if people change religion to prevent being killed.. does it make for them to love you? I wouldnt think so..

with hate in their heart I wouldnt want to turn my back on anyone..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Baronvonrort on Sep 11th, 2014 at 4:40pm

Team Murdoch wrote on Sep 11th, 2014 at 2:22pm:
Do you have some sort of evidence that IS "carry out wholesale genocide on their own faith"?

From the media reports I have read, there were a few executions of Iraqi and Syrian soldiers who they are fighting, but not the "genocide" that you talk of.



By the way if you want to know about genocide I suggest you start by looking at the actions of Western nations.


Quote:
The United States of Genocide: Putting the US on Trial for Genocide Against the Peoples of Korea, Laos, Viet Nam, Cambodia, Iraq, and Elsewhere


The United States of America was built on a foundation of genocide ...

...US “Wars” are Actually Genocides

Every major military action by the US since World War II has first and foremost been an act of genocide. I do not state this as a moral condemnation. If I were seeking to condemn I would try to convey the enormous scale of suffering, death, loss and misery caused by US mass violence.

[url]http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-united-states-of-genocide-putting-the-us-on-trial-for-genocide-against-the-peoples-of-korea-laos-viet-nam-cambod


Are you a muslim  team murdoch?

Global research is not a reliable source only a muslim or dumbfukistani would cite that garbage.
[quote]Whenever someone makes a claim and cites Globalresearch ,they are almost certainly wrong.
rationalwiki.org/wiki/Globalresearch.ca



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 11th, 2014 at 6:57pm
For Team Murdoch

Screen Shot 2014-08-07 at 11.48.12 AM
Genocide Emergency: Genocide and Mass Atrocities against Christians, Shias, Turkomen,Yazidis, Shabaks, Assyrians, and other minority groups in Iraq

August 6, 2014

ISIS fighters, who have already driven out Christians from their ancestral homes in northern Iraq – including Zumar — have been especially targeting the Yazidis. The United Nations has called the situation in Shingal and other parts of Nineveh province “a humanitarian disaster.” The Yazidis are the latest victims of the brutal advance by the Islamic State, formerly the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, or ISIS, whose Sunni Muslim fighters have been targeting Iraq’s Christians and other minority groups, as well as Shiite Muslims.

ISIS has captured the primarily Yazidi towns of Sinjar and Zumar, killing nearly 2,000 and forcing 200,000 to flee into the nearby mountains without food and water. More than 50 children have died from dehydration since August and hundreds more children and elderly are at risk. Other crimes against humanity are also being committed by ISIS, include beheadings, rapes, and selling minority children and women into slavery, according to a member of Iraq’s Parliament, lawmaker Vian Dakhil.  A UN official has called the ISIS actions “genocide.”

Originating from a splinter group of Al-Qaeda, ISIS, has grown into a complex threat to peace and security in Iraq and Syria as well as across borders into other Middle Eastern countries such as Lebanon. ISIS sees itself as the ultimate authority over all Muslims as it attempts to establish a new Muslim Caliphate stretching across all Muslim countries in the Middle East.

ISIS has also persecuted religious minorities in Iraq’s Nineveh province, including orders to non-Muslims to convert to Islam, pay a special tax, and either leave or face execution. Systematic abductions, killings, rapes, and destruction of property owned by non-Muslims have become common in ISIS controlled areas.

It is estimated that since the beginning of 2014, 1.2 Million Iraqis have been displaced.

Many Yasidis currently are trapped in the mountains without food and water. ISIS is not only directly killing them, but is preventing them from getting food and water.  This is genocide under Article 2 (a) (b) and (c) of the Genocide Convention.

Genocide Watch recommends that:

1) The UN Security Council should immediately condemn these genocidal acts by ISIS and declare ISIS a terrorist group subject to the full panoply of UN sanctions.

2) Iraq should use its air power to drive ISIS forces out of the areas ISIS is using to besiege the Yasidis and should deliver weapons to the Yasidis for their self-defense.

3) The US and NATO should physically and financially support Iraq’s battle against ISIS.

4) UN member states, through the government of Iraq, should airlift supplies to the Yasidis now trapped in the mountains, including establishment of secure relief areas.

5) ISIS leaders should be referred to the International Criminal Court, or to a Middle Eastern International Criminal Court, as Genocide Watch has recommended establishing since the outbreak of civil war in Syria.



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 11th, 2014 at 8:22pm

cods wrote on Sep 11th, 2014 at 4:19pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 11th, 2014 at 1:34pm:
President Barack Obama, today  gave a State of the Nation address. Now it would appear the U.S. finally have 'A strategy'.

It seems that the U.S. is going to weigh in heavily with their Air Force plus 487 advisors are slated to go in and train the friendlies.

Hang on a tic, isn't this how Vietnam started out? Let's hope it's not how Vietnam finished down the track.

Following the address, Obama's approval rating rocketed the charts at home.

Big difference between Nam and ISIS, is that the North Vietnamese didn't carry out wholesale genocide on their own faith. Mixed bag of lollies this outfit.




that may well be..

but I have asked this before....what is wrong with dividing a country like Vietnam North and South.??.


An interesting question, dear. What’s wrong with it?

Nothing except that it’s a Cold War solution when the bi-lateral powers reached a stalemate - Korea, Germany, Vietnam.

Nation states are not "people with different views". If you believe conservative thinkers like Edmund Burke, a nation is organic, like a life form. Dividing up a nation, for Burke, would be akin to Solomon’s test to cut a baby in half to give to two conflicting sets of parents.

You can’t divide states in a post-Cold War world, because this solution required each state to be defended by two balanced super-powers. North Korea is left standing because it’s backed by China.

In a post-Cold War world, it is far more likely that states would split into even smaller atoms, not unlike Yugoslavia.

The Middle East is going through a similar transition now.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Sep 11th, 2014 at 8:29pm
Charlie was an awesome foe. Persistent, tough, relentless.

ISIS recruits from places like the UK are more akin to military tourists,

One decent battalion of Aussie diggers would see them pack up their you tube and hightail it for tullamarine. ;)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 11th, 2014 at 8:32pm

aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2014 at 8:29pm:
Charlie was an awesome foe. Persistent, tough, relentless.

ISIS recruits from places like the UK are more akin to military tourists,

One decent battalion of Aussie diggers would see them pack up their you tube and hightail it for tullamarine. ;)


True, Aquascoot. We could always send in the Light Horse Brigade.

Problem is, there’s a lot more of them than there are of us.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 12th, 2014 at 10:21am
Just a clarification Karnal, when I said that's how Vietnam started out; I was referring to how the U.S. and Australia and allies got involved in the conflict.

It started with sending military advisers and worked it's way up from there, as the War escalated, until we were 'all the way with L.B.J.'

I agree with you on your concept of what constitutes a Country.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 12th, 2014 at 2:10pm

red baron wrote on Sep 12th, 2014 at 10:21am:
Just a clarification Karnal, when I said that's how Vietnam started out; I was referring to how the U.S. and Australia and allies got involved in the conflict.


I understood what you meant, Red. Vietnam, Korea and the Berlin Wall were the exceptions in the Cold War as they were actual wars (or, in the case of Berlin, very nearly a nuclear war).

The rest of the world went with either superpower without, in most cases, an actual fight. Like other colonies, Middle Eastern states went straight from their former colonial masters to Uncle or Russia.

The Arab Spring was the natural consequence of the end of the Cold War. Without well-organised puppet governments in countries like Egypt, Lybia and Tunisia, their populations voted with their own feet (or weapons). Either way, they got to vote for the first time.

Trying to understand local civil wars and conflicts without an understanding of the bigger picture will lead to problems. Likewise, describing local conflicts solely in reference to universal signifiers like the Domino Theory or the Clash of Civilizations is equally flawed.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 12th, 2014 at 2:14pm
2.15pm Friday 12.9.  Just watched Tony Abbott on national television lifting our National Security rating from  Medium to High.

This means now that a Terrorist attack IS LIKELY.

I have been waiting for this to happen and take no comfort at all that it is.

No need to be unduly alarmed as you go about your life. However just be aware of people acting suspiciously. We all have a sixth sense when something seems odd or out of place.

Like packages being left unattended in shopping malls under seats etc.

Or people moving about like they are being watched.

Don't be afraid to make the phone call if you do notice suspicious activity, you could be saving a whole lot of lives.

National Security Hotline Number is : 1800 1234 00

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 12th, 2014 at 3:41pm
15.31, AEST.

BULLSHIT.

The Abbott government is playing the electorate for fools. They’re doing the old security agenda shift to take the heat off their mismanagement of domestic issues.

What other PM goes to TV to announce a security upgrade?

What other PM can’t even specify why our security status is being raised?

The Abbott security game, like Thatcher’s Faulkland war,  is a complete crock - but this time, there’s not even a clear threat. We’re not at war, no one has attacked, and it’s all BULLSHIT.

This is so easy to see, I’m.surprised even the Bolt crowd doesn’t see through it.

No I’m not. They started it.

And Red Baron is the biggest cheerleader. No need to be unduly alarmed indeed. Don’t panic.

Alarmed about what?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 12th, 2014 at 3:51pm
thats strange on another thread the sore losers are complaining it the Head of ASIO that is making all the noise....boy is there anything that will please lefties????

of course not using the TERRORIST word...

how could we forget.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 12th, 2014 at 7:43pm
Well Karnal, if 60 well trained Jihadists infiltrated my Country, people have been trained keenly in the art of terrorism, I would be scared sh.tless of what trouble they would cook up once they got back home from their 'big adventure'. The fact is they have.

Why the hell they let those bastards back into Australia I don't know. Perhaps the laws hadn't been passed that allowed the Government to prevent them from re-entering Australia.

But re-enter they have and everything I have ever been trained for in the military and even the Police for that matter has a big red warning light going off.

Anyone who doesn't think that these Jihadists roaming around here, with their Jihadists masters calling the moves, are not a threat is not living in the real world.

The A.S.I.O. boss had every right to raise the threat level.

What has happened is like letting 60 murderers back into the Country and setting them free. Unbelievable madness in letting them back in, now the Country faces a real and serious threat from them.

PS I suppose the terrorist bombings in London were bullsh.too Karnal, that is of course, until they happened.
9/11 a blush.t exercise too. After all it couldn't happen in America...that is until it did.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Team Murdoch on Sep 12th, 2014 at 8:09pm

red baron wrote on Sep 12th, 2014 at 7:43pm:
PS I suppose the terrorist bombings in London were bullsh.


Wouldn't have happened if Tony Blair could mind his own business and not invade Iraq and Afghanistan



red baron wrote on Sep 12th, 2014 at 7:43pm:
9/11 a blush.t exercise too. After all it couldn't happen in America...that is until it did.


It took nearly 40 years to happen though. The US had helped Israel to oppress Arabs with massive military and financial aid since 1973.

It is amazing that the Arabs hadn't got to the US sooner.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 12th, 2014 at 9:06pm
Never mind the 'if' 'what' and 'but'.

We are dealing with the here and the now. And right now there are 60 trained Jihadists at large in our Country and they represent are real danger, one we have rarely seen this species of here before.

But mark my words we will know all about some of them, sooner rather than later.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 13th, 2014 at 12:19am

red baron wrote on Sep 12th, 2014 at 9:06pm:
Never mind the 'if' 'what' and 'but'.

We are dealing with the here and the now. And right now there are 60 trained Jihadists at large in our Country and they represent are real danger, one we have rarely seen this species of here before.

But mark my words we will know all about some of them, sooner rather than later.


You’re making this up, Red, as everybody knows.

Where’s the 60 figure come from? And what does "60 Jihadis" even mean?

Is Abbott citing "on water" issues, or do you want to have a stab in the dark?

Citing London bombings and September 11 means nothing. You could cite them in a hundred years time.

As everybody knows.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 13th, 2014 at 7:49am
Scenario:

You have a beautiful, well tended  garden.

One day you see a family of brown snakes cross from the adjacent bush and take up residence amongst the well tended plants.

Would you

A) Go in and tell the children they need to get out of the house and go exercise in the garden   or:

B) Go and deal with the nest of snakes, ensuring that every last jack one of them was removed from the garden forever

then:

C) Put up barriers around your garden, so that the offending snakes could never re-enter paradise.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Sir Bobby on Sep 13th, 2014 at 8:03am

red baron wrote on Sep 12th, 2014 at 7:43pm:
Well Karnal, if 60 well trained Jihadists infiltrated my Country, people have been trained keenly in the art of terrorism, I would be scared sh.tless of what trouble they would cook up once they got back home from their 'big adventure'. The fact is they have.

Why the hell they let those bastards back into Australia I don't know. Perhaps the laws hadn't been passed that allowed the Government to prevent them from re-entering Australia.

But re-enter they have and everything I have ever been trained for in the military and even the Police for that matter has a big red warning light going off.

Anyone who doesn't think that these Jihadists roaming around here, with their Jihadists masters calling the moves, are not a threat is not living in the real world.

The A.S.I.O. boss had every right to raise the threat level.

What has happened is like letting 60 murderers back into the Country and setting them free. Unbelievable madness in letting them back in, now the Country faces a real and serious threat from them.

PS I suppose the terrorist bombings in London were bullsh.too Karnal, that is of course, until they happened.
9/11 a blush.t exercise too. After all it couldn't happen in America...that is until it did.



They need to round them up & imprison them - not spend money watching them.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 13th, 2014 at 9:01am

Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 8:03am:

red baron wrote on Sep 12th, 2014 at 7:43pm:
Well Karnal, if 60 well trained Jihadists infiltrated my Country, people have been trained keenly in the art of terrorism, I would be scared sh.tless of what trouble they would cook up once they got back home from their 'big adventure'. The fact is they have.

Why the hell they let those bastards back into Australia I don't know. Perhaps the laws hadn't been passed that allowed the Government to prevent them from re-entering Australia.

But re-enter they have and everything I have ever been trained for in the military and even the Police for that matter has a big red warning light going off.

Anyone who doesn't think that these Jihadists roaming around here, with their Jihadists masters calling the moves, are not a threat is not living in the real world.

The A.S.I.O. boss had every right to raise the threat level.

What has happened is like letting 60 murderers back into the Country and setting them free. Unbelievable madness in letting them back in, now the Country faces a real and serious threat from them.

PS I suppose the terrorist bombings in London were bullsh.too Karnal, that is of course, until they happened.
9/11 a blush.t exercise too. After all it couldn't happen in America...that is until it did.



They need to round them up & imprison them - not spend money watching them.



can on ly imagine what lefties would do with that one???. ::) ::)..and as for the anything to win a vote mob... wishy washy and the greens  they would march on the prisons and demand release..

or we will obstruct everything this govt tries to do..

>:( >:( >:( >:( 

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 13th, 2014 at 9:51am

Team Murdoch wrote on Sep 12th, 2014 at 8:09pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 12th, 2014 at 7:43pm:
PS I suppose the terrorist bombings in London were bullsh.


Wouldn't have happened if Tony Blair could mind his own business and not invade Iraq and Afghanistan


Ah, so Indonesia invaded Afghanistan and so they bombed Bali.
Got it, numpty.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 13th, 2014 at 9:52am
No Sir Bobby they need to return them to the Country in which they trained as a Terrorist with papers , marked 'never to return'.

The last I heard from the Government they were tub thumping, saying they would not be re admitted to Australia?

Why were they let back in?

Now we have a "High Level Threat" because our Government were slothful in reacting.

They knew they were coming back, they had bi partisan support to deal with it and they didn't

Abbott and Co and the main reason we are now on high threat level because they failed in their duty to protect the Nation.

No good closing the bloody gate when the enemy is already in the yard.






Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 13th, 2014 at 10:00am

red baron wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 9:52am:
No Sir Bobby they need to return them to the Country in which they trained as a Terrorist with papers , marked 'never to return'.

The last I heard from the Government they were tub thumping, saying they would not be re admitted to Australia?

Why were they let back in?

Now we have a "High Level Threat" because our Government were slothful in reacting.

They knew they were coming back, they had bi partisan support to deal with it and they didn't

Abbott and Co and the main reason we are now on high threat level because they failed in their duty to protect the Nation.

No good closing the bloody gate when the enemy is already in the yard.



do you think they go straight on to centerlink?????.........nothing would surprise.

the bleeding hearts will b e out in droves..if Abbott blocks that.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 13th, 2014 at 10:04am
Sydney Morning Herald August 5, 2014

The federal government will have enhanced powers to suspend passports at short notice to stem the flow of young Australians joining the Islamist rebellions in Syria and Iraq, under legislation expected to be put to Parliament shortly.

The reforms, which have strong support in the counter-terrorism community and from government, will plug a security gap at Australia’s borders that is being exploited by scores of would-be jihadists.

Counter-terrorism sources have said the measure would see passports suspended for 48 hours, and possibly for up to a week, if a person was suspected of planning to travel to Syria, Iraq and other “hot spots”.

The interim suspension - which could apply to both Australian and foreign passports - will allow ASIO to undertake a more thorough security assessment, leading to a possible permanent cancellation of the passport.

Advertisement
In addition, counter-terrorism authorities will encourage family members, respected community members and clerics to counsel the traveller on mainstream Islamic values while their passport is suspended.

The aim is twofold - to dissuade the young person from travelling and, more broadly, begin a program of counter-radicalisation, especially if the passport ends up permanently cancelled.

“We don’t want to deal with people who are planning an attack in Australia because we have cancelled their passport,” said one security source.

The vast bulk of Australians travelling to the Syria and Iraq conflict are under the age of 25. For example, Adam Dahman - the Melbourne man who became a suicide bomber in Iraq - was just 17 years old when he left Australia.

Attorney-General George Brandis said on the weekend that “wicked and evil” terrorist recruiters “prey upon vulnerable young men - they are almost always young men”.

“They are encouraged to believe a particularly radical form of Islamic ideology. They are encouraged to believe there is some kind of romance in self-destruction,” he said.

“We are determined to do everything we can to thwart them.”

Revoking passports is a key strategy to stop the exodus of Australians to the Middle East conflict zones, amid concerns that jihadists who return to Australia could launch terrorist attacks here.

More than 50 passports have been cancelled due to adverse security assessments in the past two years.

More people are being stopped, but many escape the dragnet and the number of Australians fighting in the Middle East is growing. Some 150 Australians are believed to be in Syria and Iraq assisting Islamists, with about 60 reckoned to be frontline fighters.

Under the changes, ASIO, and possibly the Australian Federal Police, would have the power to make a rapid fire call to the Minister for Foreign Affairs to temporarily revoke a passport, even if ASIO has not completed a security assessment on the individual.

Under the current regime, a full assessment from ASIO must be considered by the Minister for Foreign Affairs before a passport is cancelled, generally for an unlimited duration.

The young age of most of those heading to Syria and Iraq means ASIO and other agencies often have scant information about them, and sometimes have none.

In a review of counter-terrorism laws earlier this year, the independent national security legislation monitor Bret Walker SC said the introduction of interim passport suspensions “would strengthen ASIO’s operational agility”.

“This would include circumstances where ASIO becomes aware at short notice of security dimensions to an individual’s imminent travel or receive no intelligence warning that an individual of security concern intends to travel overseas.”

The changes are part of a suite of measures, which include giving the authorities the explicit power to revoke a passport if the person is suspected of financing terrorism, and of joining a foreign conflict, not just for terrorism reasons.

The government is also weighing whether it can revoke the Australian passports of dual nationals fighting abroad, although this is yet to be finalised and is proving problematic to implement given Australia’s obligations under UN treaties.

The passport reforms are expected to be presented to Parliament when it resumes in late August and September.

Follow us on Twitter





Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/government-plans-new-measures-to-enhance-powers-to-suspend-and-cancel-passports-20140804-100ab4.html#ixzz3D9JcFKwQ

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 13th, 2014 at 10:04am

red baron wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 9:52am:
No Sir Bobby they need to return them to the Country in which they trained as a Terrorist with papers , marked 'never to return'.

The last I heard from the Government they were tub thumping, saying they would not be re admitted to Australia?

Why were they let back in?

Now we have a "High Level Threat" because our Government were slothful in reacting.

They knew they were coming back, they had bi partisan support to deal with it and they didn't

Abbott and Co and the main reason we are now on high threat level because they failed in their duty to protect the Nation.

No good closing the bloody gate when the enemy is already in the yard.




we can keep an eye on them here cant we??>..I mean there is a 100 of them???>.. how hard will they be to monitor?  I would think everyone will be watching them...even there own kind...

if they are people that are born here...I am not sure what choice we have other than to take them back... ::) ::)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 13th, 2014 at 10:19am

Karnal wrote on Sep 12th, 2014 at 3:41pm:
15.31, AEST.

BULLSHIT.

The Abbott government is playing the electorate for fools. They’re doing the old security agenda shift to take the heat off their mismanagement of domestic issues.

What other PM goes to TV to announce a security upgrade?

What other PM can’t even specify why our security status is being raised?

The Abbott security game, like Thatcher’s Faulkland war,  is a complete crock - but this time, there’s not even a clear threat. We’re not at war, no one has attacked, and it’s all BULLSHIT.

This is so easy to see, I’m.surprised even the Bolt crowd doesn’t see through it.

No I’m not. They started it.

And Red Baron is the biggest cheerleader. No need to be unduly alarmed indeed. Don’t panic.

Alarmed about what?

The UK raised its alert level from substantial to severe in August.
Sometimes a terrorist alert is just a terrorist alert, PB. There are western jihad is, you know. 60, 31, 57, 93, 42 - how many are you comfortable with?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Sir Bobby on Sep 13th, 2014 at 10:24am

red baron wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 9:52am:
No Sir Bobby they need to return them to the Country in which they trained as a Terrorist with papers , marked 'never to return'.

The last I heard from the Government they were tub thumping, saying they would not be re admitted to Australia?

Why were they let back in?

Now we have a "High Level Threat" because our Government were slothful in reacting.

They knew they were coming back, they had bi partisan support to deal with it and they didn't

Abbott and Co and the main reason we are now on high threat level because they failed in their duty to protect the Nation.

No good closing the bloody gate when the enemy is already in the yard.



But England had internment without trial for the IRA.

Just lock them up.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Demetrius


Quote:
Operation Demetrius was a British Army operation in Northern Ireland on 9–10 August 1971, during the Troubles. It involved the mass arrest and internment (without trial) of 342 people suspected of being involved with Irish republican paramilitaries (the Provisional IRA and Official IRA), which were waging campaigns against the state. It was proposed by the Northern Ireland Government and approved by the British Government. Armed soldiers launched dawn raids throughout Northern Ireland, sparking four days of violence in which 20 civilians, two Provisional IRA members and two British soldiers were killed. Due mainly to faulty intelligence, many of those arrested were Catholics or Irish nationalists who had no links with republican paramilitaries. Loyalist paramilitaries were also carrying out acts of violence, which were mainly directed against the Catholic and Irish nationalist community, but no loyalists were included in the sweep.[1]


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 13th, 2014 at 11:13am
Problem Cods, with surveillance and I harken to my Police days, it is incredibly labour intensive and that is just one target. The human resources that go into 24/7 surveillance of 1 individual are substantial. Try doing that with 60 of them, plus whomever they are training up, which they will be even, as I type this missive.

We need to kick them out of the Country.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Sir Bobby on Sep 13th, 2014 at 1:13pm

red baron wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 11:13am:
Problem Cods, with surveillance and I harken to my Police days, it is incredibly labour intensive and that is just one target. The human resources that go into 24/7 surveillance of 1 individual are substantial. Try doing that with 60 of them, plus whomever they are training up, which they will be even, as I type this missive.

We need to kick them out of the Country.



No - try  internment without trial.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Brian Ross on Sep 13th, 2014 at 1:49pm

Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 1:13pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 11:13am:
Problem Cods, with surveillance and I harken to my Police days, it is incredibly labour intensive and that is just one target. The human resources that go into 24/7 surveillance of 1 individual are substantial. Try doing that with 60 of them, plus whomever they are training up, which they will be even, as I type this missive.

We need to kick them out of the Country.



No - try  internment without trial.


Be interesting trying to get that through both houses of Parliament and then past the High Court, Bobby.

Of course, it didn't do very well when it was tried in Northern Ireland.  It's generally recognised as actually worsening the situation when it was used there and prolonging and deepening resentment against British rule as it was used by the Protestants to further oppress the Catholics, being targeted specifically against them.    ::)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Brian Ross on Sep 13th, 2014 at 1:50pm

red baron wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 11:13am:
Problem Cods, with surveillance and I harken to my Police days, it is incredibly labour intensive and that is just one target. The human resources that go into 24/7 surveillance of 1 individual are substantial. Try doing that with 60 of them, plus whomever they are training up, which they will be even, as I type this missive.

We need to kick them out of the Country.


Be interesting watching a Government try and get that past the High Court for those born here, with native born Australian citizenship.  Where you going to deport them to in that case, Red?    ::)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Sir Bobby on Sep 13th, 2014 at 1:54pm

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 1:49pm:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 1:13pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 11:13am:
Problem Cods, with surveillance and I harken to my Police days, it is incredibly labour intensive and that is just one target. The human resources that go into 24/7 surveillance of 1 individual are substantial. Try doing that with 60 of them, plus whomever they are training up, which they will be even, as I type this missive.

We need to kick them out of the Country.



No - try  internment without trial.


Be interesting trying to get that through both houses of Parliament and then past the High Court, Bobby.

Of course, it didn't do very well when it was tried in Northern Ireland.  It's generally recognised as actually worsening the situation when it was used there and prolonging and deepening resentment against British rule as it was used by the Protestants to further oppress the Catholics, being targeted specifically against them.    ::)



But we don't have the resources to watch all the muzzies.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Brian Ross on Sep 13th, 2014 at 1:59pm

Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 1:54pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 1:49pm:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 1:13pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 11:13am:
Problem Cods, with surveillance and I harken to my Police days, it is incredibly labour intensive and that is just one target. The human resources that go into 24/7 surveillance of 1 individual are substantial. Try doing that with 60 of them, plus whomever they are training up, which they will be even, as I type this missive.

We need to kick them out of the Country.



No - try  internment without trial.


Be interesting trying to get that through both houses of Parliament and then past the High Court, Bobby.

Of course, it didn't do very well when it was tried in Northern Ireland.  It's generally recognised as actually worsening the situation when it was used there and prolonging and deepening resentment against British rule as it was used by the Protestants to further oppress the Catholics, being targeted specifically against them.    ::)



But we don't have the resources to watch all the muzzies.


We don't have to watch them all, as not all are involved in any Terrorist activity.  Indeed, to even suggest they should all should be "watched", Bobby displays a level of bigotry towards them.

FD had it right when he said,

Quote:
What we need to do is stop alienating the entire muslim community and work with them towards the goals we have in common. The more we tar them all with the same brush, the more we push weaker individuals towards extremism.


All you're going to do with Internment Without Trial is further alienate them, just as the Catholics were in Northern Ireland and we know how well that worked out, now don't we?   ::)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Sir Bobby on Sep 13th, 2014 at 2:03pm

Quote:
We don't have to watch them all, as not all are involved in any Terrorist activity.
Indeed, to even suggest they should all should be "watched", Bobby displays a level of bigotry towards them.



Come on - we'd have to watch 1000s of them.

How are we going to do that?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 13th, 2014 at 2:16pm
Nobody is alienating Muslims but Muslims themselves.
It's their own ideology and their adherence to it that makes them keen to alienate themselves from the infidels. They cultivate  a massive victimhood complex but they deliberately segregating themselves. And numpties like Brain are eager to excuse them from all the mind-wrought prison they inhabit and refuse to be free from.

The ones that are not fussed about Islam are not alienated. They are not demonstrating their opposition to their society in speech, manner, clothes etc.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Brian Ross on Sep 13th, 2014 at 2:26pm

Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 2:03pm:

Quote:
We don't have to watch them all, as not all are involved in any Terrorist activity.
Indeed, to even suggest they should all should be "watched", Bobby displays a level of bigotry towards them.



Come on - we'd have to watch 1000s of them.


And on what basis do you arrive at that figure, Bobby?


Quote:
How are we going to do that?


An excellent question.  Imagine how much harder it is when it's hundreds of thousands, Bobby.

I suppose you could make them sew a nice Green Crescent on their clothing, to make it easier to spot them?   ::)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Brian Ross on Sep 13th, 2014 at 2:28pm

Soren wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 2:16pm:
Nobody is alienating Muslims but Muslims themselves.

It's their own ideology and their adherence to it that makes them keen to alienate themselves from the infidels. They cultivate  a massive victimhood complex but they deliberately segregating themselves. And numpties like Brain are eager to excuse them from all the mind-wrought prison they inhabit and refuse to be free from.

The ones that are not fussed about Islam are not alienated. They are not demonstrating their opposition to their society in speech, manner, clothes etc.


So, there is a tiny minority then, who are the problem, Soren?

Doesn't this rather contradict all your other pronouncements on Muslims which have made no effort to differentiate between them and the majority of moderate Muslims?    ::)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 13th, 2014 at 2:30pm
Who said it's a minority? I didn't.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 13th, 2014 at 6:21pm

Soren wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 10:19am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 12th, 2014 at 3:41pm:
15.31, AEST.

BULLSHIT.

The Abbott government is playing the electorate for fools. They’re doing the old security agenda shift to take the heat off their mismanagement of domestic issues.

What other PM goes to TV to announce a security upgrade?

What other PM can’t even specify why our security status is being raised?

The Abbott security game, like Thatcher’s Faulkland war,  is a complete crock - but this time, there’s not even a clear threat. We’re not at war, no one has attacked, and it’s all BULLSHIT.

This is so easy to see, I’m.surprised even the Bolt crowd doesn’t see through it.

No I’m not. They started it.

And Red Baron is the biggest cheerleader. No need to be unduly alarmed indeed. Don’t panic.

Alarmed about what?

The UK raised its alert level from substantial to severe in August.
Sometimes a terrorist alert is just a terrorist alert, PB. There are western jihad is, you know. 60, 31, 57, 93, 42 - how many are you comfortable with?


Oh, I’d just be comfortable with an explanation, old chap. I’m easily pleased.

It’s not as if we’re at war or anything. Would you prefer a decent war, dear boy?

Something tells me that would cheer you up no end.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 13th, 2014 at 6:24pm

Soren wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 2:30pm:
Who said it's a minority? I didn't.


60, 31, 57, 93, 42. Hardly a minority.

Correlation not causation, innit.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 13th, 2014 at 6:33pm
Brian, therein lies the conundrum. We let them back in...we let them back in....we let them back in.

Why did the Government lie about stopping them from returning. Seriously, Abbott promised to stop them getting back in.

What went wrong?

Now is the time for some serious Legislation to be put through. Labor are onside with Security issues.

I'm sure between them they could up with something that will offer reassurance to a Country that is looking for some where the Middle East issues are concerned.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 13th, 2014 at 6:43pm

Soren wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 2:30pm:
Who said it's a minority? I didn't.



it only takes one car one bomb one jihadist and BINGO hundreds dead or wounded.

100 jihadist in the country 100 bombers ..

they dont really care who or where...

we are dealing with mad people like psychos they have NO conscience whatever ..

they enjoy what they do...

in some case they are never satisfied killing is what their life is about...

yes they too risk death... but in this case they actually look forward to that knowing full well someone will step into their place once they have left for paradise..where they will meet Muhammad and pick up the 70 virgins..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 13th, 2014 at 6:47pm

red baron wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 6:33pm:
Brian, therein lies the conundrum. We let them back in...we let them back in....we let them back in.

Why did the Government lie about stopping them from returning. Seriously, Abbott promised to stop them getting back in.

What went wrong?

Now is the time for some serious Legislation to be put through. Labor are onside with Security issues.

I'm sure between them they could up with something that will offer reassurance to a Country that is looking for some where the Middle East issues are concerned.



stop whineing red.... he probably found out they cannot be prevented coming back....this is the stupid laws .

if they are born here we have no choice as most of them are young... it is more than likely...

do you think Saudi Arabia would take them?>??...like hell they would...if they are left in Syria and get murdered guess who cops the blame...

or the bleeding heart start up claiming we are preventing them from being with their families...god only knows what wishy washy would do with that..he would have a field day


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 13th, 2014 at 7:38pm

cods wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 6:43pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 2:30pm:
Who said it's a minority? I didn't.



it only takes one car one bomb one jihadist and BINGO hundreds dead or wounded.

100 jihadist in the country 100 bombers ..

they dont really care who or where...

we are dealing with mad people like psychos they have NO conscience whatever ..


That’s right, dear. It only takes one bomb dropped out of a plane and BINGO - hundreds dead or wounded. Christians, Muslims, men, women, children, farm animals...

Bombs have NO conscience whatsoever...

They don’t really care...

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 13th, 2014 at 8:48pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 7:38pm:

cods wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 6:43pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 2:30pm:
Who said it's a minority? I didn't.



it only takes one car one bomb one jihadist and BINGO hundreds dead or wounded.

100 jihadist in the country 100 bombers ..

they dont really care who or where...

we are dealing with mad people like psychos they have NO conscience whatever ..


That’s right, dear. It only takes one bomb dropped out of a plane and BINGO - hundreds dead or wounded. Christians, Muslims, men, women, children, farm animals...

Bombs have NO conscience whatsoever...

They don’t really care...



its the drip/ :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

stop dropping those turds..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Sir Bobby on Sep 13th, 2014 at 8:52pm

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 2:26pm:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2014 at 2:03pm:

Quote:
We don't have to watch them all, as not all are involved in any Terrorist activity.
Indeed, to even suggest they should all should be "watched", Bobby displays a level of bigotry towards them.



Come on - we'd have to watch 1000s of them.


And on what basis do you arrive at that figure, Bobby?

[quote]
How are we going to do that?


An excellent question.  Imagine how much harder it is when it's hundreds of thousands, Bobby.

I suppose you could make them sew a nice Green Crescent on their clothing, to make it easier to spot them?   ::)[/quote]


1000's is just an estimation.

Do you really believe that it's only 60 as Abbott's puppets are saying?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 14th, 2014 at 7:59am
Of course it's more than 60. 60 represents the 'known' expatriates that are fighting on the frontline with ISIS.

It's a bit like an iceberg, it's the stuff underneath that is the real worry.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Sir Bobby on Sep 14th, 2014 at 9:13am

red baron wrote on Sep 14th, 2014 at 7:59am:
Of course it's more than 60. 60 represents the 'known' expatriates that are fighting on the frontline with ISIS.

It's a bit like an iceberg, it's the stuff underneath that is the real worry.



Thanks Baron.

A reality check was needed.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 15th, 2014 at 4:23pm
Our F-18's are primed and waiting for the call to Iraq. Abbott has pledged 600 Australian Forces to the call to arms. Most of these will be logistical support for the fighters.

Personally I can't wait to see ISIS get caned for one reason only, to stop the genocide that is going on over there. I consider that the main reason why we need to be there.

Cods, I don't think Abbott has done a bad job with this, obviously Labor think so too because Shorten has promised bilateral support.

But the question lingers, why are they letting them back in? You wouldn't let a fox in the chicken coop.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 15th, 2014 at 8:40pm
If the majority of Muslims were against IS and all the other Islamic terrorist organisation - these organisations would not exist. The Majority of Muslims would make sure, through 'direct action' that they have no financial and community support.

But they exist. The vast majority of Muslims are thinking it's all inshallah as far as Islamists are concerned. Islam is a slothful, fatalistic religion and the 'vas majority' will sit on their hands, waiting how it all turns out.

The 'vast majority' of Muslims are lazy (like most of the rest of us) and cowardly (ditto).

But they are not innocent just because they are lazy cowards.

THAT IS THE POINT.




Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Sir Bobby on Sep 15th, 2014 at 10:12pm

red baron wrote on Sep 15th, 2014 at 4:23pm:
Our F-18's are primed and waiting for the call to Iraq. Abbott has pledged 600 Australian Forces to the call to arms. Most of these will be logistical support for the fighters.

Personally I can't wait to see ISIS get caned for one reason only, to stop the genocide that is going on over there. I consider that the main reason why we need to be there.

Cods, I don't think Abbott has done a bad job with this, obviously Labor think so too because Shorten has promised bilateral support.

But the question lingers, why are they letting them back in? You wouldn't let a fox in the chicken coop.



I can't wait to ISIS get the ruddy good thrashing they deserve.

We should take no prisoners - just wipe them out.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Sep 16th, 2014 at 7:11am
I agree bobby but we need to send a message that the next strike is "punishment"
WE need to set the agenda.

so we identify as many ISIS targets as possible and wait for the next beheading (shouldn't be long).
then we launch Blitzkreig on every target that can be identified and we publish it on the web.

Arab youth respect strength and will radiate to strength.

having citizens beheaded makes us look like pussies.

it is important the strikes are devastating, immediate and well publicised.

the greens should hang their heads in shame for not being 100 % behind this initiative.

they are true quislings and their position weakens our position, makes arab youth more likely to seek the comfort of the strong , and sends a message to ISIS to keep going.

ISIS wont keep going for long.
I hear they have 40 Turkish hostages that they are threatening to behead if turkey tries to stop the flow of munitions to ISIS.
when the first turk is on youtube, the local turks aided by our military will hunt these clowns down.

The important thing is we publicise their defeat and humiliate them

then they will see their god is no match for US armaments.

Green senators in OZ should be interned at Cowra for the duration of the fight. hopefully they will try to escape and all end up on the train line as the express comes thru

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Sir Bobby on Sep 16th, 2014 at 7:14am

aquascoot wrote on Sep 16th, 2014 at 7:11am:
I agree bobby but we need to send a message that the next strike is "punishment"
WE need to set the agenda.

so we identify as many ISIS targets as possible and wait for the next beheading (shouldn't be long).
then we launch Blitzkreig on every target that can be identified and we publish it on the web.

Arab youth respect strength and will radiate to strength.

having citizens beheaded makes us look like pussies.

it is important the strikes are devastating, immediate and well publicised.

the greens should hang their heads in shame for not being 100 % behind this initiative.

they are true quislings and their position weakens our position, makes arab youth more likely to seek the comfort of the strong , and sends a message to ISIS to keep going.

ISIS wont keep going for long.
I hear they have 40 Turkish hostages that they are threatening to behead if turkey tries to stop the flow of munitions to ISIS.
when the first turk is on youtube, the local turks aided by our military will hunt these clowns down.

The important thing is we publicise their defeat and humiliate them

then they will see their god is no match for US armaments.

Green senators in OZ should be interned at Cowra for the duration of the fight. hopefully they will try to escape and all end up on the train line as the express comes thru



The Inquisition knew what to do:

they would have burnt them all at the stake.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 16th, 2014 at 7:32am
Now you see Aquascoot, you are saying a lot of things that people are thinking.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 16th, 2014 at 7:40am
Waiting for Great Britain to get really serious about ISIS.

David Cameron needs to suck it up and get Britain involved on a scale of which it is capable. It is all on the line in the Middle East and the sooner Cameron stops worrying about Muslim votes and starts taking care of business the better.

We've heard him tub thumping about binging the killer of David  Haines to Justice but what about the big picture Cameron? What are you going to do about the wholesale genocide ISIS is carrying out?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Sep 16th, 2014 at 7:48am

red baron wrote on Sep 16th, 2014 at 7:32am:
Now you see Aquascoot, you are saying a lot of things that people are thinking.



If I was a 20 year old muslim in western Sydney, unemployed, pissed off at the world, looking for something to break the tedium of the modern leftard nanny state, I would find the ISIS videos very interesting.
If a fat stupid female green senator started trying to love up on me and treat me like some sort of western sydeny house pet, I'd be on the next plane to Syria.
The fags and elites don't understand suburban mentality (hardly surprising).
The pissed off youth aren't going to listen to the greens, they aren't going to listen to their boring old farts in the mosques telling them tch tch and having a love in BBQ.
they respect strength and manliness. They will side with OUR special forces when they go in and whip the asses of these yokels who are only good at beheading unarmed civilians.

SO PLEASE GREEN FAGS AND LEFTARD LOSERS,
if you don't want to follow, do the next best thing and get out of the way ;)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 16th, 2014 at 12:24pm

red baron wrote on Sep 16th, 2014 at 7:40am:
Waiting for Great Britain to get really serious about ISIS.

David Cameron needs to suck it up and get Britain involved on a scale of which it is capable. It is all on the line in the Middle East and the sooner Cameron stops worrying about Muslim votes and starts taking care of business the better.

We've heard him tub thumping about binging the killer of David  Haines to Justice but what about the big picture Cameron? What are you going to do about the wholesale genocide ISIS is carrying out?


You've nagged the Yanks and Australians into this, and now you're working on the Poms.

And you still don't have a plan for what you want military intervention to achieve - other than more endless war.

Apart from a convenient excuse for having no details, what exactly is the big picture you want David Cameron to articulate?

Based on yesterdays doorstops with Abbott and Hockey, the Libs seem to be moving on from "defending Western values and our US alliance" to "humanitarian support".

The Libs haven't said how they will provide this support. What they have done, however, is put about 300 troops back into Iraq - with no exit strategy.

So what, exactly, do you want the western powers to achieve, Red? When should we get out of this mess - a mess we created in 2003? What objectives are we going in to achieve? What do we want to see happen?

This is a question for you, Red, based on your support for our involvement. Please feel free to respond.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 16th, 2014 at 12:27pm

Soren wrote on Sep 15th, 2014 at 8:40pm:
The 'vast majority' of Muslims are lazy (like most of the rest of us) and cowardly (ditto).

But they are not innocent just because they are lazy cowards.

THAT IS THE POINT.


Ah - so we need to bomb them into cultivating a work ethic. That should work.

Good point, old boy.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 16th, 2014 at 12:48pm

aquascoot wrote on Sep 16th, 2014 at 7:11am:
I agree bobby but we need to send a message that the next strike is "punishment"
WE need to set the agenda.

so we identify as many ISIS targets as possible and wait for the next beheading (shouldn't be long).
then we launch Blitzkreig on every target that can be identified and we publish it on the web.

Arab youth respect strength and will radiate to strength.

having citizens beheaded makes us look like pussies.

it is important the strikes are devastating, immediate and well publicised.

the greens should hang their heads in shame for not being 100 % behind this initiative.

they are true quislings and their position weakens our position, makes arab youth more likely to seek the comfort of the strong , and sends a message to ISIS to keep going.

ISIS wont keep going for long.


That's not what everyone from Julie Bishop to the White House are saying. ISIS WILL keep going for long, because they'll simply go back to Syria and wait us out.

That means any intervention - military or otherwise - must resolve the Syrian Civil War. But alas, no one's made a decision yet on who they want to win. Ousting Assad should be pretty easy for an Iraq-style coalition, but Russia won't support this in the UN, as they showed last time.

This can only mean one thing: another illegal invasion of Syria, which would mean Obama going back on every statement he's ever made on the invasion of Iraq, US foreign policy, and the use of the US military in general.

At present, that's impossible, which can only mean the reverse: the US will support the Assad regime oust ISIL, Al Nusra, and every other terrorist unit fighting the Syrian civil war. This solution, of course, means going back on the old Axis of Evil line. And there goes the whole idealist foreign policy agenda championed so shamelessly by the neo-cons.

We might as well support North Korea next.

You can't just fight ISIL a little bit. Boots on the ground in Iraq mean boots on the ground in Syria - and this means solving the Syrian civil war in a way that somehow saves face for Uncle.

Whatever the long-term strategy turns out to be, one thing is certain: ISIL will keep going, and we're in this one for the long haul. No matter how it pans out, everyone's going to come out with blood on their hands, and it won't be pretty.

And this is what you get when you go in without a plan.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Aussie on Sep 16th, 2014 at 1:20pm

red baron wrote on Sep 15th, 2014 at 4:23pm:
Our F-18's are primed and waiting for the call to Iraq. Abbott has pledged 600 Australian Forces to the call to arms. Most of these will be logistical support for the fighters.

Personally I can't wait to see ISIS get caned for one reason only, to stop the genocide that is going on over there. I consider that the main reason why we need to be there.

Cods, I don't think Abbott has done a bad job with this, obviously Labor think so too because Shorten has promised bilateral support.

But the question lingers, why are they letting them back in? You wouldn't let a fox in the chicken coop.


I have explained this either in this Thread or one similar.  Constitutionally, as an Australian citizen, they have a natural right to re-enter.  We have a capacity to arrest them and put them away if they are guilty of an offence competent under Australian Law.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 16th, 2014 at 2:08pm
Karnal, I'm delighted to answer your invitation to respond.

There is something happening in Iraq called a Genocide. ISIS is butchering anyone Moslem or Christian that will not adhere to their idea of being as 'proper' Muslim. They have already carried out a genocide on a large scale.

You are correct in stating that we the West had a lot to do with ISIS starting because the Middle East was left in a power vacuum after the Iraqi War.


Because we the West are in a very big way responsible for the circumstances that allowed ISIS to grow, we need to go and fix up the genetic mutation that is ISIS.

If we don't ISIS could very well grow into some sort of monolith whose base values, are butchery on a grand scale.

Therefore we need to go and smash ISIS into Kingdom Come, the last thing we need or the Muslims for that matter is a modern day version of the Nazis.

This time we shouldn't leave until stability of a reasonable form is entrenched. Not an easy job with the Middle East I admit but ISIS simply can't be allowed to flourish. If we do, eventually it will be at our peril.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 16th, 2014 at 2:13pm
Aussie, I am on board with what you are saying but if the National Security is being placed in peril then the Politicians need to get off their arse and ask us to vote for a change in our Constitution so that our Country may stay safe.

These arseholes who want to go fight for ISIS....fine but don't come back. You like it so much freaking stay there,with your severed heads for company.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by George_Orhell on Sep 16th, 2014 at 2:19pm

red baron wrote on Sep 16th, 2014 at 7:40am:
Waiting for Great Britain to get really serious about ISIS.

David Cameron needs to suck it up and get Britain involved on a scale of which it is capable. It is all on the line in the Middle East and the sooner Cameron stops worrying about Muslim votes and starts taking care of business the better.

We've heard him tub thumping about binging the killer of David  Haines to Justice but what about the big picture Cameron? What are you going to do about the wholesale genocide ISIS is carrying out?


Great Britain has had SF in Syria and Northern Iraq for months. It has also been flying sorties out of Cyprus also for months.

Get your facts right before flapping your tongue!



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 16th, 2014 at 2:35pm

Aussie wrote on Sep 16th, 2014 at 1:20pm:
I have explained this either in this Thread or one similar.  Constitutionally, as an Australian citizen, they have a natural right to re-enter.  We have a capacity to arrest them and put them away if they are guilty of an offence competent under Australian Law.


Which is what Leigh Sailes put to David Johnston, Minister of Defence, on 7.30 last night.

The government's sole rationale to ISIS being an Australian regional issue is that returned fighters trained in explosives and firearms use would be an internal risk.

The logical question to this, then, is why do we need boots on the ground in Iraq and Syria?

David Johnston had no answer to this. Any returned fighter is, as the government keeps arguing, subject to Australian laws for supporting terrorism and fighting in foreign wars.

The government are currently mouthing motherhood statements and platitudes - "humanitarian", "global partnerships", "restoring international security".

But they're failing to show how their involvement will not, as the recent invasion of Iraq clearly showed, work against all these values and objectives.

It's a pretty simple question all citizens should want to know if their government is sending their country to war: why?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Aussie on Sep 16th, 2014 at 2:56pm

red baron wrote on Sep 16th, 2014 at 2:13pm:
Aussie, I am on board with what you are saying but if the National Security is being placed in peril then the Politicians need to get off their arse and ask us to vote for a change in our Constitution so that our Country may stay safe.

These arseholes who want to go fight for ISIS....fine but don't come back. You like it so much freaking stay there,with your severed heads for company.


Yeas...we can't have our boys going to foreign places to fight, being brutalised by War, become adept at its execution and then returning here.....that'd be just awful!  I can't imagine that ever being allowed.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 16th, 2014 at 2:59pm
The answer is already there Karnal - to stop a Genocide - any additional information is irrelevant.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Aussie on Sep 16th, 2014 at 3:05pm

red baron wrote on Sep 16th, 2014 at 2:59pm:
The answer is already there Karnal - to stop a Genocide - any additional information is irrelevant.


That's just rubbish.  People get killed in a civil war, and that is what this is.....a War within parts of the ME.....Arab -v- Arab, a civil War (like the Yanks had and there was genocide or subjugation of the other on the mind of both sides) in which we have zero national interest, or interest by Treaty and/or UN sanction.

I know its not a new line, but a close mate of mine who was (now retired) a dyed in the wool diplomat who was Australia's Rep at the UN at one time in his career today agreed with my POV, and he added....(the not new line)..."This will end in tears."

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 16th, 2014 at 3:11pm

red baron wrote on Sep 16th, 2014 at 2:08pm:
Karnal, I'm delighted to answer your invitation to respond.

There is something happening in Iraq called a Genocide. ISIS is butchering anyone Moslem or Christian that will not adhere to their idea of being as 'proper' Muslim. They have already carried out a genocide on a large scale.

You are correct in stating that we the West had a lot to do with ISIS starting because the Middle East was left in a power vacuum after the Iraqi War.


Because we the West are in a very big way responsible for the circumstances that allowed ISIS to grow, we need to go and fix up the genetic mutation that is ISIS.

If we don't ISIS could very well grow into some sort of monolith whose base values, are butchery on a grand scale.

Therefore we need to go and smash ISIS into Kingdom Come, the last thing we need or the Muslims for that matter is a modern day version of the Nazis.

This time we shouldn't leave until stability of a reasonable form is entrenched. Not an easy job with the Middle East I admit but ISIS simply can't be allowed to flourish. If we do, eventually it will be at our peril.


This is just a mindless headline in the style the Tele have been parroting of late. Last Friday's was SEND THEM ALL TO HELL.

It's not a plan.

Fighting ISIS on home ground will also send many of our own to Kingdom Come. That's what wars tend to do.

We all have the objective of sending ISIS to Kingdom Come - even ISIS. The question is how to do that.

The issue of genocide is an entirely different issue. It's possible for us to protect local civilians or arm them to protect themselves, but this is not sustainable long-term. Ultimately, this is a job best done by local forces who are able to get in quick. The Kurds and Turks have already acted to do this. The Iraqis - a government and army we suported, trained and set up - have proven to be incapable of doing this.

Sending ISIS to Kingdom Come is a nice-sounding objective, but it's not actually possible to do, and it's not what we're in there to do.

What we are in there to do, beyond assisting Iraq to defend its own borders better, is questionable.

This, of course, is just how we got into Vietnam - as everybody knows.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 16th, 2014 at 3:12pm

red baron wrote on Sep 16th, 2014 at 2:59pm:
The answer is already there Karnal - to stop a Genocide - any additional information is irrelevant.


But that's not what the government itself is saying.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 16th, 2014 at 6:22pm
Last time I checked we were sending Fighter Jets with logistical support for them,. I also believe elements of S.A.S. are involved.

No, it's not what the Government is saying but it's what most Australians know. That's what justifies it to me, I'm not too concerned about any other reason. Genocide is reason alone, enough to commit.

We didn't go into Vietnam to stop a genocide, bit different there.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 16th, 2014 at 8:34pm

red baron wrote on Sep 16th, 2014 at 6:22pm:
Last time I checked we were sending Fighter Jets with logistical support for them,. I also believe elements of S.A.S. are involved.

No, it's not what the Government is saying but it's what most Australians know. That's what justifies it to me, I'm not too concerned about any other reason. Genocide is reason alone, enough to commit.

We didn't go into Vietnam to stop a genocide, bit different there.


No, according to Harold Holt, we went in to join Uncle.

Which is exactly what the government was saying last week.

The vast majority of Australians do not start wars. They either support or condemn them, based on what they hear. In both cases - the invasion of Iraq and Nam - Australians ended up condemning them. History condemns them. We lost.

And nobody won.

This time, it will be no different. And why would it?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 16th, 2014 at 10:21pm
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere   
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst   
Are full of passionate intensity.



The IS monsters are full of passionate conviction while many in the west lack any conviction other than to remain always passive, to always cede the field, always concede defeat as an opening gambit.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 16th, 2014 at 10:54pm
And yet, old boy, Yeats writes about your own unstoppable, craven impulses: the blood-dimmed tide is loosed... full of passionate intensity.

He was writing about the horrors of war, you goose.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 16th, 2014 at 11:06pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 16th, 2014 at 10:54pm:
And yet, old boy, Yeats writes about your own unstoppable, craven impulses: the blood-dimmed tide is loosed... full of passionate intensity.

He was writing about the horrors of war, you goose.

Unleashed by IS in its latest iteration.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 17th, 2014 at 12:13am

Soren wrote on Sep 16th, 2014 at 11:06pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 16th, 2014 at 10:54pm:
And yet, old boy, Yeats writes about your own unstoppable, craven impulses: the blood-dimmed tide is loosed... full of passionate intensity.

He was writing about the horrors of war, you goose.

Unleashed by IS in its latest iteration.


Unleashed by you against an ever-shifting enemy on a daily basis.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 17th, 2014 at 7:04am
To sit by whilst the Terrorist  movement ISIS commits wholesale Genocide is unthinkable.

ISIS must be smashed. It does not represent ISLAM in any way.

Just as Hitler hypnotised many to fall in alongside  him, so ISIS is trying to represent itself as the voice of Islam. It isn't and it must be stopped.

There is growing unity amongst world nations to band together and get rid of this vermin ISIS.

This has nothing at all too do with Vietnam, it could not be any more different.

For too long in modern times, strong Countries have remained silent whilst terrible Genocides have been carried out on defenceless people.

The United Nations has proved itself a eunuch in these matters.

We along with 30 other Nations have pledged themselves to this cause. They are doing what is right.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Sep 17th, 2014 at 7:20am
Karmal and western leaders over think what is really a fairly basic set of principles.

If you have a tiger snake in your back yard and you know its there but it leaves you alone, the last thing you do is go and stir it up.
So if ISIS were just frigging around in the middle east and leaving us (the west) alone,  this would be the approach.

But if said snake came up your back stairs into your house and killed one of your kids and then slinked off back to your back yard.
If it killed one of your kids and then made a snake video of the killing and taunted you to do something about it, well, for f*cks sake. you do something about it.

9/11 was the snake coming into your house.
youtube is ISIS taunting the west.

What sort of cowardly lowlife scum doesn't protect his family from this.
What sort of coward says
"Oh i'm not going down the back yard, the big snakey scares me, sorry if he gets any more of you kids"

A "real" man . a "real" Australian goes down that backyard, torches the lair with 50 litres of gasoline and blasts every single smacking snake as it emerges.
Now if some carpet snakes and other "non combatants" get blasted and fried as well, Too smacking Bad.
in future the carpet snakes will learn that they should have killed the tiger snake and presented it to you as a gift to show their solidarity.

thoughts? ;)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by JaSin on Sep 17th, 2014 at 10:06am


So what if the Moslems do to the French, what the Germans did to the Jews (because later, the Jews will have to fight for the 'unarmed' Moslems against the Italians) soon while China invades Russia to take back Siberia, etc, etc. It's all just a process of change, just like all the Lands were once 'one' (Pangaea) long ago, separated to acknowledge the 'differences' and will become 'One' once again.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Sir Bobby on Sep 17th, 2014 at 10:10am
The Pope warns of the End Times -  WW3:





http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-29190890


Quote:
A "piecemeal" World War III may have already begun with the current spate of crimes, massacres and destruction, Pope Francis has warned.
He was speaking during a visit to Italy's largest military cemetery, where he was commemorating the centenary of World War I.

"War is madness," the Pope said at a memorial to 100,000 Italian soldiers at Redipuglia cemetery near Slovenia.

The Argentine Pope has often condemned the idea of war in God's name.

Only last month, Pope Francis said the international community would be justified in using force to stop what he called "unjust aggression" by Islamic State militants, who have killed or displaced thousands of people in Iraq and Syria, including many Christians, the BBC's David Willey reports.

In Saturday's homily, standing at the altar beneath Italy's fascist-era Redipuglia memorial - where 100,000 Italian soldiers killed during WWI are buried, 60,000 of them unnamed, the Pope paid tribute to the victims of all wars.

"Humanity needs to weep, and this is the time to weep," he said.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 17th, 2014 at 11:07am

aquascoot wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 7:20am:
Karmal and western leaders over think what is really a fairly basic set of principles.
...

thoughts? ;)


My thoughts are that whenever you try to simplify things with your horse behaviour or your ubermensch schtick, we're all in for a really long ride.

Correcting your simplifications takes a lot of work. I do my best, but I have the sneaky suspicion that most of it falls on deaf ears.

The situation in Iraq is so complex that even Barack Obama has come out to say that he doesn't know what to make of it all. He suffered for that one too. Fox News must have been showing him no mercy for it for the past 2 weeks. I believe Obama's polls dropped a few notches.

Being angry at a group or country or enemy is easy. Finding a way to deal with them is much harder. It's easy to write headlines like SEND THEM ALL TO HELL. It's much harder to come up with a plan to stop ISIL carrying out their atrocities, threatening the stability of the Middle East, and having a gen-u-wine rogue state in the heart of oil country. 

This is not simple at all, and it will take a long, carefully coordinated plan of military and diplomatic moves to stop ISIL and prevent their spread.

Do this right, and we'll hear nothing (apart from the usual News Ltd beat-ups and chest-thumping). Do it wrong, and we'll be involved in another endless military occupation of Iraq, probably Syria, and big issues with Iran as well.

A very cautious US military talking head was on 7.30 last night. When asked how ISIS is a threat to US and Australian domestic security, he didn't have a lot to say. Basically, they're not much of a threat to us at all. When asked why ISIS has presented such a problem to the White House, he put much of it down to the cable news coverage.

In other words, the media is in large part driving the security agenda - the tail wagging the dog.

The issue that is ISIS is not simple. It's a complex array of forces, and most, I woulod say, are domestic - media coverage, poll numbers of world leaders, and the endless demands of citizens to do something - anything - before they even know what the problem is.

I don't like rules, but I do have a general principle when it comes to military involvement: defence forces are for defence. You deploy them when you're attacked, or when you're threatened with attack. You don't just send them off to wherever the current whim takes you because your polls aren't looking good or the Tele runs a front page calling to SEND THEM ALL TO HELL.

I know I'm going against the grain of Australia's entire military history (excluding the Pacific War), and arguably against the entire history of Europe - but it's just a principle. I'm also pragmatic. Australia has a role in global policing, and the best example of that, I think, was East Timor - when we wore blue berets, not US stripes, and we stayed within our own region.

Where we can help, I think, we should. Iraq clearly needs help right now. The objective, however, is not to SEND anyone TO HELL. It's to restore the peace. These two objectives are so far apart as to give you a hint of what fruits they'll bear. Asking how you improve security in Iraq gives you completely different answers to the question of how to send a shapeless ideology to hell.

Knee-jerk responses will not send them to hell. As history has shown, they'll end up taking us to hell with them.

And who wants that?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Sep 17th, 2014 at 12:37pm
karmal, thats a well thought out position.

therefore, it will undoubtedly be ignored.

its asking too much of people to use well thought out positions when the opponent is using such raw emotion, anger and cruelty.

ISIS brought this or are about to bring this, on themselves.
Our troops probably wouldnt be too keen going up against the wiley, resourceful and brave viet cong, but i'll bet they are chomping at the bit to go up against these god-awful cowards. ;)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 17th, 2014 at 3:25pm

aquascoot wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 12:37pm:
karmal, thats a well thought out position.

therefore, it will undoubtedly be ignored.

its asking too much of people to use well thought out positions when the opponent is using such raw emotion, anger and cruelty.


I hate to break it to you, dear, but that's the whole point of having a modern, well-planned and well-trained defence force. It's why armies have what they call discipline within the ranks, with NCOs and MPs to carry it out.

The days of two tribes heading off with clubs and spears to have it out are long gone. The days of getting a posse together to hunt down the outlaws or the injuns or the niggras are long gone too.

The opponent is not using emotion at all - they're using Facebook and Youtube. The emotion is all on the front pages of the Tele, and the editors aren't very emotional either.

You are.

ISIL certainly did bring this upon themselves, but they're itching for martyrdom. If you think the best way to deal with ISIL is an eye for an eye or a head for a head, you're simply playing their game.

This is a game we can never win, and it's a game we should never want to win.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by gandalf on Sep 17th, 2014 at 3:53pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 11:07am:

aquascoot wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 7:20am:
Karmal and western leaders over think what is really a fairly basic set of principles.
...

thoughts? ;)


My thoughts are that whenever you try to simplify things with your horse behaviour or your ubermensch schtick, we're all in for a really long ride.

Correcting your simplifications takes a lot of work. I do my best, but I have the sneaky suspicion that most of it falls on deaf ears.

The situation in Iraq is so complex that even Barack Obama has come out to say that he doesn't know what to make of it all. He suffered for that one too. Fox News must have been showing him no mercy for it for the past 2 weeks. I believe Obama's polls dropped a few notches.

Being angry at a group or country or enemy is easy. Finding a way to deal with them is much harder. It's easy to write headlines like SEND THEM ALL TO HELL. It's much harder to come up with a plan to stop ISIL carrying out their atrocities, threatening the stability of the Middle East, and having a gen-u-wine rogue state in the heart of oil country. 

This is not simple at all, and it will take a long, carefully coordinated plan of military and diplomatic moves to stop ISIL and prevent their spread.

Do this right, and we'll hear nothing (apart from the usual News Ltd beat-ups and chest-thumping). Do it wrong, and we'll be involved in another endless military occupation of Iraq, probably Syria, and big issues with Iran as well.

A very cautious US military talking head was on 7.30 last night. When asked how ISIS is a threat to US and Australian domestic security, he didn't have a lot to say. Basically, they're not much of a threat to us at all. When asked why ISIS has presented such a problem to the White House, he put much of it down to the cable news coverage.

In other words, the media is in large part driving the security agenda - the tail wagging the dog.

The issue that is ISIS is not simple. It's a complex array of forces, and most, I woulod say, are domestic - media coverage, poll numbers of world leaders, and the endless demands of citizens to do something - anything - before they even know what the problem is.

I don't like rules, but I do have a general principle when it comes to military involvement: defence forces are for defence. You deploy them when you're attacked, or when you're threatened with attack. You don't just send them off to wherever the current whim takes you because your polls aren't looking good or the Tele runs a front page calling to SEND THEM ALL TO HELL.

I know I'm going against the grain of Australia's entire military history (excluding the Pacific War), and arguably against the entire history of Europe - but it's just a principle. I'm also pragmatic. Australia has a role in global policing, and the best example of that, I think, was East Timor - when we wore blue berets, not US stripes, and we stayed within our own region.

Where we can help, I think, we should. Iraq clearly needs help right now. The objective, however, is not to SEND anyone TO HELL. It's to restore the peace. These two objectives are so far apart as to give you a hint of what fruits they'll bear. Asking how you improve security in Iraq gives you completely different answers to the question of how to send a shapeless ideology to hell.

Knee-jerk responses will not send them to hell. As history has shown, they'll end up taking us to hell with them.

And who wants that?


Well said K - reasonable and considered as always.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by ImSpartacus2 on Sep 17th, 2014 at 4:29pm

aquascoot wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 7:20am:
Karmal and western leaders over think what is really a fairly basic set of principles.

If you have a tiger snake in your back yard and you know its there but it leaves you alone, the last thing you do is go and stir it up.
So if ISIS were just frigging around in the middle east and leaving us (the west) alone,  this would be the approach.

But if said snake came up your back stairs into your house and killed one of your kids and then slinked off back to your back yard.
If it killed one of your kids and then made a snake video of the killing and taunted you to do something about it, well, for f*cks sake. you do something about it.

9/11 was the snake coming into your house.
youtube is ISIS taunting the west.

What sort of cowardly lowlife scum doesn't protect his family from this.
What sort of coward says
"Oh i'm not going down the back yard, the big snakey scares me, sorry if he gets any more of you kids"

A "real" man . a "real" Australian goes down that backyard, torches the lair with 50 litres of gasoline and blasts every single smacking snake as it emerges.
Now if some carpet snakes and other "non combatants" get blasted and fried as well, Too smacking Bad.
in future the carpet snakes will learn that they should have killed the tiger snake and presented it to you as a gift to show their solidarity.

thoughts? ;)
Logic 101. If you have to identify the correlations in your analogy it's because your analogy Doesn't work!!!!!. Here's a clue. Instead of just absorbing the domestic media and then deciding that you have all the answers, Don't just stop there. Do some research, read some history about the middle east, watch some of the videos that the IS have posted on youtube (Thats what the CIA and US/Aust military are doing right now frame by frame so they can understand their enemy) not the beheading ones but the ones where they tell you what they're all about.  You don't have to agree with what they are saying but if your going to have any hope of understanding what motivates them, you will listen to what they have to say about themselves and the justifications they give for why they do what they do. I don't believe that those who are running the IS give one sh!t about religion or islam. They're just using religion to do what you and many Australian's and defiantly many American's would do if they were in IS's position. They're fighting a war to kick foreigners out of their lands and they're using religion to unify the people of the middle east so that as a unified force under one banner they can finally kick the west out of the middle east and have their lands to themselves. If you watch their video's you will see them repeat often "We are all Muslims". They want to unify all of the middle east under their one caliphate, in exactly the same way and using exactly the same ferocious methods as your right wing friends on this forum would use if the Indonesians determined and controlled the internal workings of this country and pilfered the wealth for themselves. You knew of course didn't you that the borders between Syria, Iraq, Iran turkey Lebanon Jordon, are all just fabricated lines set by France and England a few years after WW1 to suite the interests of France and England.  Lets see how many hot head Australians on this forum wouldn't be chopping off heads if the Indonesians tried the same stunt on Australia.

And how do we think were going to fix this mess that we brought on ourselves by sending in troops in Iraq in 2003.  I know lets send in troops again. What a gift you are giving to the IS cause. What has history shown us over and over and over again about how you unify a people under one cause.  I know, you invade them.  But hey aqua, has just finished his morning intake of the Daily Telegraph and now he has all the answers.  Just tend to your horses mate and try not to get in the way.         

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Sep 17th, 2014 at 4:53pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 3:25pm:

aquascoot wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 12:37pm:
karmal, thats a well thought out position.

therefore, it will undoubtedly be ignored.

its asking too much of people to use well thought out positions when the opponent is using such raw emotion, anger and cruelty.


I hate to break it to you, dear, but that's the whole point of having a modern, well-planned and well-trained defence force. It's why armies have what they call discipline within the ranks, with NCOs and MPs to carry it out.

The days of two tribes heading off with clubs and spears to have it out are long gone. The days of getting a posse together to hunt down the outlaws or the injuns or the niggras are long gone too.

The opponent is not using emotion at all - they're using Facebook and Youtube. The emotion is all on the front pages of the Tele, and the editors aren't very emotional either.

You are.

ISIL certainly did bring this upon themselves, but they're itching for martyrdom. If you think the best way to deal with ISIL is an eye for an eye or a head for a head, you're simply playing their game.

This is a game we can never win, and it's a game we should never want to win.



youre a smart man K.
you just need a bit of street sense and a good dose of pragmatism.
just because you are smart and thoughtful and considered and non-emotional, don't make the mistake of thinking the rest of society think that way.
the days of getting a posse together are indeed still with us.

when some looney lone wolf ISIS wannabe beheads some random in martin place,  that posse will torch every mosque they can lay their hands on.
I understand people K.  they aren't half as civilised as you think . watch a few teenage boys playing grand theft auto some time, dear ;)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 17th, 2014 at 5:25pm

aquascoot wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 4:53pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 3:25pm:

aquascoot wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 12:37pm:
karmal, thats a well thought out position.

therefore, it will undoubtedly be ignored.

its asking too much of people to use well thought out positions when the opponent is using such raw emotion, anger and cruelty.


I hate to break it to you, dear, but that's the whole point of having a modern, well-planned and well-trained defence force. It's why armies have what they call discipline within the ranks, with NCOs and MPs to carry it out.

The days of two tribes heading off with clubs and spears to have it out are long gone. The days of getting a posse together to hunt down the outlaws or the injuns or the niggras are long gone too.

The opponent is not using emotion at all - they're using Facebook and Youtube. The emotion is all on the front pages of the Tele, and the editors aren't very emotional either.

You are.

ISIL certainly did bring this upon themselves, but they're itching for martyrdom. If you think the best way to deal with ISIL is an eye for an eye or a head for a head, you're simply playing their game.

This is a game we can never win, and it's a game we should never want to win.



youre a smart man K.
you just need a bit of street sense and a good dose of pragmatism.
just because you are smart and thoughtful and considered and non-emotional, don't make the mistake of thinking the rest of society think that way.
the days of getting a posse together are indeed still with us.


So what you're saying is that we should go into Iraq again because Australians have got themselves into a tizz about stuff they saw in the media.

Oh - and because of the risk that someone might get beheaded in Martin Place.

Is that the argument here?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Sir Bobby on Sep 17th, 2014 at 5:33pm

Quote:
the days of getting a posse together are indeed still with us.


Yee haa - we is gunna hang em high.  :)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 17th, 2014 at 5:56pm

Bobby. wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 5:33pm:

Quote:
the days of getting a posse together are indeed still with us.


Yee haa - we is gunna hang em high.  :)


Ain't no niggras out there in the desert, Bobbie. Them niggras come from the jungles of far-off Afrikee. Only thing in the desert worth a damn's black gold. Man can strike it rich out there, yessir.

If'n I weren't no cattle man, I might buy some land and puts in an oil rig myself.

All be told, ain't much land left, anyhow. Damn Bush family went and bought out the place years ago.

Them oilmen can kiss my ass.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by JaSin on Sep 17th, 2014 at 5:56pm

Welcome to the International Military Games here in the Middle-East as usual.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Sir Bobby on Sep 17th, 2014 at 6:05pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 5:56pm:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 5:33pm:

Quote:
the days of getting a posse together are indeed still with us.


Yee haa - we is gunna hang em high.  :)


Ain't no niggras out there in the desert, Bobbie. Them niggras come from the jungles of far-off Afrikee. Only thing in the desert worth a damn's black gold. Man can strike it rich out there, yessir.

If'n I weren't no cattle man, I might buy some land and puts in an oil rig myself.

All be told, ain't much land left, anyhow. Damn Bush family went and bought out the place years ago.

Them oilmen can kiss my ass.



But they is sand niggras.

But where is we gunna find ourselves a tree in the desert?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 17th, 2014 at 6:14pm

Bobby. wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 6:05pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 5:56pm:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 5:33pm:

Quote:
the days of getting a posse together are indeed still with us.


Yee haa - we is gunna hang em high.  :)


Ain't no niggras out there in the desert, Bobbie. Them niggras come from the jungles of far-off Afrikee. Only thing in the desert worth a damn's black gold. Man can strike it rich out there, yessir.

If'n I weren't no cattle man, I might buy some land and puts in an oil rig myself.

All be told, ain't much land left, anyhow. Damn Bush family went and bought out the place years ago.

Them oilmen can kiss my ass.



But they is sand niggras.

But where is we gunna find ourselves a tree in the desert?


Sand niggras? Shoot, ain't no such thing, boy. You been readin too many a them drugstore books. How's a niggra gonna live if'n he don't have no tree?

You want my advice, stick to the Bible, Bobbie, and stop readin them adventure stories. Ain't nothin out there in the desert 'cept a whole lot of sand'n maybe a few Injuns.

And every man knows Injuns ain't for hangin.

Hot dog, Injuns be for shootin.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Sir Bobby on Sep 17th, 2014 at 6:25pm
Karnal,

Quote:
You want my advice, stick to the Bible, Bobbie



Yep - I've turned into a hellfire & brimstone preacher.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 17th, 2014 at 6:31pm

Bobby. wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 6:25pm:
Karnal,

Quote:
You want my advice, stick to the Bible, Bobbie



Yep - I've turned into a hellfire & brimstone preacher.


You make sure you keep your gun fully loaded, boy. Women-folk here want us all pre-pared like.

He he he. Maybe an Injun's gonna scalp a Christian in the town square or somethin.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 17th, 2014 at 6:41pm
Enough of the bullsh.t. What is complex about knowing that an organisation called ISIS or ISIL or both is carrying out Genocide on a grand scale in the Middle East.

What is complex about making a decision to go and stop it?

Yes, the strategies are complex but not the decision to go and save innocent people from being butchered by a terrorist organisation.

They can only be classified as a Terrorist Organisation because they are prepared to butcher men women and children who do not adhere to their version of Islam.

Don't try and over complicate it.

The basic reason to be there is simple.

The solution, yes, not so easy but we need to go.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Sep 17th, 2014 at 6:46pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 5:25pm:

aquascoot wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 4:53pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 3:25pm:

aquascoot wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 12:37pm:
karmal, thats a well thought out position.

therefore, it will undoubtedly be ignored.

its asking too much of people to use well thought out positions when the opponent is using such raw emotion, anger and cruelty.


I hate to break it to you, dear, but that's the whole point of having a modern, well-planned and well-trained defence force. It's why armies have what they call discipline within the ranks, with NCOs and MPs to carry it out.

The days of two tribes heading off with clubs and spears to have it out are long gone. The days of getting a posse together to hunt down the outlaws or the injuns or the niggras are long gone too.

The opponent is not using emotion at all - they're using Facebook and Youtube. The emotion is all on the front pages of the Tele, and the editors aren't very emotional either.

You are.

ISIL certainly did bring this upon themselves, but they're itching for martyrdom. If you think the best way to deal with ISIL is an eye for an eye or a head for a head, you're simply playing their game.

This is a game we can never win, and it's a game we should never want to win.



youre a smart man K.
you just need a bit of street sense and a good dose of pragmatism.
just because you are smart and thoughtful and considered and non-emotional, don't make the mistake of thinking the rest of society think that way.
the days of getting a posse together are indeed still with us.


So what you're saying is that we should go into Iraq again because Australians have got themselves into a tizz about stuff they saw in the media.

Oh - and because of the risk that someone might get beheaded in Martin Place.

Is that the argument here?


im not saying " we should go". I'm saying "we will go" ;)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Aussie on Sep 17th, 2014 at 7:38pm

red baron wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 6:41pm:
Enough of the bullsh.t. What is complex about knowing that an organisation called ISIS or ISIL or both is carrying out Genocide on a grand scale in the Middle East.

What is complex about making a decision to go and stop it?

Yes, the strategies are complex but not the decision to go and save innocent people from being butchered by a terrorist organisation.

They can only be classified as a Terrorist Organisation because they are prepared to butcher men women and children who do not adhere to their version of Islam.

Don't try and over complicate it.

The basic reason to be there is simple.

The solution, yes, not so easy but we need to go.


And among the Kurds doing their fighting against ISIS is a proscribed (in Australia) terrorist group.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 17th, 2014 at 10:06pm

red baron wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 6:41pm:
Enough of the bullsh.t. What is complex about knowing that an organisation called ISIS or ISIL or both is carrying out Genocide on a grand scale in the Middle East.

What is complex about making a decision to go and stop it?

Yes, the strategies are complex but not the decision to go and save innocent people from being butchered by a terrorist organisation.

They can only be classified as a Terrorist Organisation because they are prepared to butcher men women and children who do not adhere to their version of Islam.

Don't try and over complicate it.

The basic reason to be there is simple.

The solution, yes, not so easy but we need to go.


And you said the same about Saddam, yes?

And you were stationed in Indochine, no?

How do you feel about the results of our derring do in those wars, Red?

I’m curious.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 17th, 2014 at 10:11pm

Aussie wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 7:38pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 6:41pm:
Enough of the bullsh.t. What is complex about knowing that an organisation called ISIS or ISIL or both is carrying out Genocide on a grand scale in the Middle East.

What is complex about making a decision to go and stop it?

Yes, the strategies are complex but not the decision to go and save innocent people from being butchered by a terrorist organisation.

They can only be classified as a Terrorist Organisation because they are prepared to butcher men women and children who do not adhere to their version of Islam.

Don't try and over complicate it.

The basic reason to be there is simple.

The solution, yes, not so easy but we need to go.


And among the Kurds doing their fighting against ISIS is a proscribed (in Australia) terrorist group.


The US initially supported ISIL in Syria.

What is left to say?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Sep 18th, 2014 at 6:47am

Karnal wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 10:11pm:

Aussie wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 7:38pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 6:41pm:
Enough of the bullsh.t. What is complex about knowing that an organisation called ISIS or ISIL or both is carrying out Genocide on a grand scale in the Middle East.

What is complex about making a decision to go and stop it?

Yes, the strategies are complex but not the decision to go and save innocent people from being butchered by a terrorist organisation.

They can only be classified as a Terrorist Organisation because they are prepared to butcher men women and children who do not adhere to their version of Islam.

Don't try and over complicate it.

The basic reason to be there is simple.

The solution, yes, not so easy but we need to go.


And among the Kurds doing their fighting against ISIS is a proscribed (in Australia) terrorist group.


The US initially supported ISIL in Syria.

What is left to say?


what is left to say is that the middle east seems to be inhabited by
death adders
cobras
taipans
black snakes
black mamba's
rattlesnakes
the occasional harmless python.

so when uncle starts dropping ordinance, he may kill the odd python (regrettable) but he makes the world a safer place by eradicating so many deadly species.
if these species would stay put in the middle east we could leave them alone but since the movie
"Snakes on a Plane" has inspired them to start global roaming , we need to attack the problem at its source

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 18th, 2014 at 9:29am
What is left to say Karnal is that the U.S. if they did support ISIL got it horribly wrong.

This only heightens the onus on those that f.....d it up to go in and put things to rights.

I think it is fanciful that Obama think he can solve this with the Air Force and Advisers.

Obama has always been piss weak and has been pushed into this. I believe the highest ranking U.S. General when he said he believed it likely Combat troops would get involved.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 18th, 2014 at 11:39am

red baron wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 9:29am:
What is left to say Karnal is that the U.S. if they did support ISIL got it horribly wrong.


Ah.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 18th, 2014 at 11:40am

Karnal wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 10:06pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 17th, 2014 at 6:41pm:
Enough of the bullsh.t. What is complex about knowing that an organisation called ISIS or ISIL or both is carrying out Genocide on a grand scale in the Middle East.

What is complex about making a decision to go and stop it?

Yes, the strategies are complex but not the decision to go and save innocent people from being butchered by a terrorist organisation.

They can only be classified as a Terrorist Organisation because they are prepared to butcher men women and children who do not adhere to their version of Islam.

Don't try and over complicate it.

The basic reason to be there is simple.

The solution, yes, not so easy but we need to go.


And you said the same about Saddam, yes?

And you were stationed in Indochine, no?

How do you feel about the results of our derring do in those wars, Red?

I’m curious.


I'm still curious, Red. Do you think we got it horribly wrong in Iraq and Nam as well?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 18th, 2014 at 2:45pm
Karnal, I do think we got it wrong in Nam.

However, I don't think we got it wrong in Iraq. Let's not forget Saddam Hussein was committing genocide too. Chemical attacks against the Kurds and more.

I also think that our exit strategy was shocking, premature, totally not thought out and created the climate for ISIL to grow strong and successfully attack Iraq.

I think we are morally bound to go back and stop ISIL from doing exactly what Hussein was doing and by bloody hell we had better get it right this time.

Most probably won't be that long before we will be having a little  War all of our own here.

The exposition of a terrorist plot here shows how that the Jihadist supporters have been busy little beavers and leaves one to wonder just how much activity it going on out there.

We will soon find that this is not an isolated incident and I hope to God that our Intelligence Services are right across this.

No matter how good they are, there will be incidents and blood will flow. Hope I'm dead wrong about that last comment but I feel I'm right.

I also believe that  there is considerable support amongst Moslems at large for the ISIL movement. There are 500,000 Moslems in Australia. Let's just say purely as speculation that 10% of them support ISIL. Then that would make 50,000 people out there that would like to see us infidels in the grave.

Am I stirring up things by suggesting that? No, not at all, I think I am being conservative.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 18th, 2014 at 3:32pm

red baron wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 2:45pm:
I also believe that  there is considerable support amongst Moslems at large for the ISIL movement. There are 500,000 Moslems in Australia. Let's just say purely as speculation that 10% of them support ISIL. Then that would make 50,000 people out there that would like to see us infidels in the grave.



Where are you getting this information from?

Who told you that there is "considerable support" among Muslims for ISIL?

Where did you pull that 10% figure from?

Why not a figure of 0.01%?





Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 18th, 2014 at 3:37pm
Are you living on Earth Greg or the planet Krypton...I think you've had way too much Kryptonite for one day.

Your worrying about stats is puerile.

I'm going to ask you one simple question Pec.....

Do you think that Moslems out there support the Australian Christian majority or ISIL which states they want all Moslems under one flag,  the ISIL flag?


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 18th, 2014 at 3:42pm

red baron wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 3:37pm:
Are you living on Earth Greg or the planet Krypton...I think you've had way too much Kryptonite for one day.

Your worrying about stats is puerile.

I'm going to ask you one simple question Pec.....

Do you think that Moslems out there support the Australian Christian majority or ISIL which states they want all Moslems under one flag,  the ISIL flag?



You didn't answer my questions.

Who told you that there is "considerable support" among Muslims for ISIL?

Where did you pull that figure of 10% from?




Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 18th, 2014 at 3:48pm
It came from me as speculative figure, it doesn't mean sh.t. What does mean sh.t and deep sh.t for us is that a major terrorist plot has been uncovered. Stay tuned to your crystal wireless for there will surely be more to come in the immediate future.

You didn't answer my question:

Do you think Australian Muslims would support

A) The  Christian majority of this Country

or

B) ISIL who want all Muslims under one flag.

Please answer this question Pec.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Datalife on Sep 18th, 2014 at 3:51pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 3:42pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 3:37pm:
Are you living on Earth Greg or the planet Krypton...I think you've had way too much Kryptonite for one day.

Your worrying about stats is puerile.

I'm going to ask you one simple question Pec.....

Do you think that Moslems out there support the Australian Christian majority or ISIL which states they want all Moslems under one flag,  the ISIL flag?



You didn't answer my questions.

Who told you that there is "considerable support" among Muslims for ISIL?

Where did you pull that figure of 10% from?


I don't know where the figure is coming from but I do enjoy your "tactics".  No doubt if a source for that figure is presented you will immediately shift to saying the source is not reputable. 

It is just the way you roll. 

I have no idea why the forum sandalistas even when presented with evidence of grinning loons from Australia holding up heads still deny there is a problem with Islamic terrorism and it is alive within the Muslim community within Australia. 

I guess after a lifetime of doing making apologies, grovelling statements of mitigation and lots of "hey look over there!" It becomes unthinking second nature. 

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 18th, 2014 at 4:06pm
"Red Baron to  planet Peccary", repeat transmission:

You didn't answer my question:

Do you think Australian Muslims would support

A) The  Christian majority of this Country

or

B) ISIL who want all Muslims under one flag.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 18th, 2014 at 4:07pm

red baron wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 2:45pm:
Karnal, I do think we got it wrong in Nam.

However, I don't think we got it wrong in Iraq. Let's not forget Saddam Hussein was committing genocide too. Chemical attacks against the Kurds and more.

I also think that our exit strategy was shocking, premature, totally not thought out and created the climate for ISIL to grow strong and successfully attack Iraq.


You're right there. We backed Saddam gassing the Kurds. Uncle vetoed a UN resolution against Saddam's attacks on the Kurds on the Security Council, and Australia has a policy of supporting Uncle on the UN every step of the way.

The gassing of the Kurds did not even become an issue until Kuwait brought it up after Saddam's invasion of them. And after we went into Iraq the first time, there was a deliberate policy to leave Saddam in place. When the Iraqis themselves armed up to fight Saddam, US troops allowed them to be captured by Saddam's Republican Guard in the territories the US held.


Quote:
I also believe that  there is considerable support amongst Moslems at large for the ISIL movement.


Uncle himself supported ISIL in 2012. How quickly things change. When Syrians armed to fight Assad, Uncle thought all his Christmases had come at once. Now, it seems, the policy is to leave Assad where he is - the way the US backed Saddam, and after Saddam, Gaddafi.

Well, we first backed Saddam, then not Saddam. Then not Gaddafi, then Gaddafi, then not Gaddafi again.

In Syria, it was not Assad, then tacit approval of Assad. In Iran, it's still not the Mullahs - there are still sanctions in place - but Uncle's starting to rely on Iran in his war against Sunni terrorism. In Iraq, Uncle supports the Shi'ah regime that is starting to look a bit like Saddam, only different, so it makes sense that he'll soften towards the Mullahs in Iran, who are the enemies of his enemies enemies. Confused?

How do you think local populations feel?

And how do you expect all those Australians to know which groups are listed as terrorist organizations? Many wouldn't even know which organizations they're fighting for or sending money to.

This is a problem, sure. But if you've got relatives in Syria or Iraq who's lives are being threatened by the regimes in those countries, what do you do? Do you stay calm and hope Uncle sorts it out?

Uncle doesn't even know which side he's on.

You're making a big mistake to assume that Syrian or Iraqi nationals support head-hacking extremists for the pure head-hacking extremism of it all. Syria is at war. The Islamic State is a by-product of that war. I don't know what the percentage is - 10%? 20%? 99.9%?  - but many Australians sending funds or fighting in that war are there to defend friends and family from the Assad regime. Many just want to topple that axis-of-evil villain, Bashar al Assad.

You know, like Uncle once did.

How oculd you NOT make mistakes in your analysis of the situation in Syria and Iraq? Even the Central Intelligence Agency makes mistakes. The White House, in particular, has been known to make a few mistakes itself - Saddam's mysterious WMDs, for example, have never been found. Those nuclear fuel rods disguised as pipes?

They turned out to be pipes.

And every single regime backed by Uncle in the Middle East over the past 30 years or so - ALL have been guilty of some form of genocide, violations of human rights including torture, terrorist support, or corruption on the grandest of scales. Hosni Mubarak, for example, is believed to have been one of the richest men in the world. No one knows how much still sits in those numbered Swiss bank accounts.

It seems to me that the perpetrators of the incidents you're describing - genocide, gassing, terrorism - need to be brought to justice based on one set of criteria only: which ones AREN'T backed by Uncle.

We can pick a country at random, based on whomever we like or don't like at a random point in time. Like our last invasion of Iraq, we can take out more than 200,000 civilians. We won't call it genocide, but "collateral damage". And when the boss we put in charge turns out to be as big a bastard as the last one, we can go in again - only we won't call it invasion, but "humanitarian support".

Yes Red, we got in wrong in Nam, we got in wrong in Iraq, and we will, most likely, get it wrong next time too.


Quote:
What is left to say Karnal is that the U.S. if they did support ISIL got it horribly wrong.

This only heightens the onus on those that f.....d it up to go in and put things to rights.


Don't you ever get tired of trying to put things right?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 18th, 2014 at 4:07pm

red baron wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 4:06pm:
"Red Baron to  planet Peccary", repeat transmission:

You didn't answer my question:

Do you think Australian Muslims would support

A) The  Christian majority of this Country

or

B) ISIL who want all Muslims under one flag.



C) Neither.





Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 18th, 2014 at 4:09pm

red baron wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 4:06pm:
"Red Baron to  planet Peccary", repeat transmission:



Stop being a child, red.

I asked you my questions first.

Get out from under your bed, grow a set of balls, and be a man for once in your life.

Who told you that there is "considerable support" among Muslims for ISIL?

Where did you pull that figure of 10% from?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 18th, 2014 at 4:10pm

Datalife wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 3:51pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 3:42pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 3:37pm:
Are you living on Earth Greg or the planet Krypton...I think you've had way too much Kryptonite for one day.

Your worrying about stats is puerile.

I'm going to ask you one simple question Pec.....

Do you think that Moslems out there support the Australian Christian majority or ISIL which states they want all Moslems under one flag,  the ISIL flag?



You didn't answer my questions.

Who told you that there is "considerable support" among Muslims for ISIL?

Where did you pull that figure of 10% from?


I don't know where the figure is coming from ...



Get back to us when you do.



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 18th, 2014 at 4:28pm

What a surprise: red and Data ran away    ::)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Datalife on Sep 18th, 2014 at 4:47pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 4:28pm:
What a surprise: red and Data ran away    ::)


Eh? From what?  What would you like me to address?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 18th, 2014 at 4:50pm

Datalife wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 4:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 4:28pm:
What a surprise: red and Data ran away    ::)


Eh? From what?  What would you like me to address?



"I don't know where the figure is coming from ... "

Get back to me when you do know.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Datalife on Sep 18th, 2014 at 4:54pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 4:50pm:

Datalife wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 4:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 4:28pm:
What a surprise: red and Data ran away    ::)


Eh? From what?  What would you like me to address?



"I don't know where the figure is coming from ... "

Get back to me when you do know.


;D ;D

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 18th, 2014 at 5:06pm

Datalife wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 4:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 4:50pm:

Datalife wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 4:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 4:28pm:
What a surprise: red and Data ran away    ::)


Eh? From what?  What would you like me to address?



"I don't know where the figure is coming from ... "

Get back to me when you do know.


;D ;D



As I suspected.

No further questions, your honour.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 18th, 2014 at 5:09pm
I would be surprised if only 10% of muslims supported IS.  In france it is 1in 5.
Many,  most would be revolted by some of their actions. But also many,  probably most would agree with their political aims:  overthrow dictators,  establish an islamic heartland, demonstratrete the possibility of a functioning islamic state,  opposition to western policies in the ME,  etc.
The snag is that these political aims are impossible to acieve without violence.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 18th, 2014 at 5:27pm

Soren wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 5:09pm:
I would be surprised if only 10% of muslims supported IS.  In france it is 1in 5.
Many,  most would be revolted by some of their actions. But also many,  probably most would agree with their political aims:  overthrow dictators,  establish an islamic heartland, demonstratrete the possibility of a functioning islamic state,  opposition to western policies in the ME,  etc.
The snag is that these political aims are impossible to acieve without violence.


They've got me. With the exception of the head-hacking and the Islamic heartland bit, I'm on board.

Allah Uakbar.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 18th, 2014 at 5:43pm
Contrare Pec, just had a great curry, now, back to you.

I have answered your questions Pec. I have said that the 10% I have quoted as likely to be radicalised in Australia is speculation on my part. It's most probably much higher than that.

But there is a glaring question out there that you just won't answer because it's going to make you look lame:

Ready for this Pec?

Would you say that

A)The majority of Australian Moslems are more likely to support the Majority Christian rule in this Country

OR

B) ISIS' call for Moslems to rally under ISIS under one flag and attack the west.

(Being a little more specific this time Greg) ;)


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 18th, 2014 at 5:47pm
I don't think they'd take you Karnal they're a bit choosy about whom they pick to cut heads off for them. ;)

PS Don't think they give exemptions there mate.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 18th, 2014 at 6:17pm

red baron wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 5:43pm:
Contrare Pec, just had a great curry, now, back to you.

I have answered your questions Pec. I have said that the 10% I have quoted as likely to be radicalised in Australia is speculation on my part. It's most probably much higher than that.

But there is a glaring question out there that you just won't answer because it's going to make you look lame:

Ready for this Pec?

Would you say that

A)The majority of Australian Moslems are more likely to support the Majority Christian rule in this Country

OR

B) ISIS' call for Moslems to rally under ISIS under one flag and attack the west.

(Being a little more specific this time Greg) ;)



They don't have to make that choice, red.

My answer is 'neither'.

What part of that don't you understand?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 18th, 2014 at 6:19pm

red baron wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 5:43pm:
Contrare Pec, just had a great curry, now, back to you.

I have answered your questions Pec. I have said that the 10% I have quoted as likely to be radicalised in Australia is speculation on my part. It's most probably much higher than that.



You just pulled the figure out of thin air?

Correct?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 18th, 2014 at 6:29pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 5:27pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 5:09pm:
I would be surprised if only 10% of muslims supported IS.  In france it is 1in 5.
Many,  most would be revolted by some of their actions. But also many,  probably most would agree with their political aims:  overthrow dictators,  establish an islamic heartland, demonstratrete the possibility of a functioning islamic state,  opposition to western policies in the ME,  etc.
The snag is that these political aims are impossible to acieve without violence.


They've got me. With the exception of the head-hacking and the Islamic heartland bit, I'm on board.

Allah Uakbar.

Exactly.
And while Scotland can gain independence after 300 years by a simple vote, Muslims cannot achieve their political aims without bloody violence.
It's worth reflecting on the difference.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 18th, 2014 at 7:43pm

Soren wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 6:29pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 5:27pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 18th, 2014 at 5:09pm:
I would be surprised if only 10% of muslims supported IS.  In france it is 1in 5.
Many,  most would be revolted by some of their actions. But also many,  probably most would agree with their political aims:  overthrow dictators,  establish an islamic heartland, demonstratrete the possibility of a functioning islamic state,  opposition to western policies in the ME,  etc.
The snag is that these political aims are impossible to acieve without violence.


They've got me. With the exception of the head-hacking and the Islamic heartland bit, I'm on board.

Allah Uakbar.

Exactly.
And while Scotland can gain independence after 300 years by a simple vote, Muslims cannot achieve their political aims without bloody violence.
It's worth reflecting on the difference.


You think Mother brought Scotland into the UK with a bit of a cuddle do you, old chap?

Shurely shome mishtake.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 19th, 2014 at 7:07am
Pec can't answer the question because the answer is GLARINGLY OBVIOUS.

Of course Muslim sentiment will be with ISIS.

The rest of us are Infidels, no believers. Do you think for one second they will side with us when push comes to shove.

The enemy is within and it comes from the Muslims who support ISIS.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 19th, 2014 at 8:58am

red baron wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 7:07am:
The enemy is within and it comes from the Muslims who support ISIS.



Which is approximately 0.001% of the Muslim population.

Get out from under your bed, red.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by St George of the Puissant HLT on Sep 19th, 2014 at 12:35pm
All 3 of them.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 19th, 2014 at 1:15pm

red baron wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 7:07am:
Pec can't answer the question because the answer is GLARINGLY OBVIOUS.

Of course Muslim sentiment will be with ISIS.


Muslim sentiment goes with a range of groups. ISIL is just one military organization with global networks and alliances. There are dozens of others, all with different views on terrorism, Islamic states, fighting in foreign wars, waging military jihad on the home front, etc, etc, etc.

ISIL are on the extreme end of the spectrum. Al Nusra are also up there, but have a different take on the global struggle. Here's what Sidney Jones, Director of the Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict, has to say about these groups in Indonesia, the world's largest Muslim country, on Lateline last night:


Quote:
SIDNEY JONES: Basically, all of those people who are committed to jihad but believe that it's counterproductive to wage jihad inside Indonesia are with the al-Nusra Front, and that includes the Jemaah Islamiyah and some other groups that have renounced violence for a long time in Indonesia now. All of the groups that are still committed to terrorist attacks inside Indonesia are aligned with ISIS, so that's how it breaks down.


And here's what she has to say about the popularity of these groups in Indonesia:


Quote:
SIDNEY JONES: ...it's also worth noting I have never seen such basic grassroots backlash to ISIS as I've seen in Indonesia now. Communities and mosques and Muslim groups and individuals are using social media, which has been used to recruit ISIS members, to also fight back and that's good thing.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 19th, 2014 at 2:22pm
Greg, my 10% I plucked out of the air. Pure speculation, now just where did you get your little teensy weensy sample from Greg.

Did you do a straw poll on North Sydney station? :D

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 19th, 2014 at 3:35pm

red baron wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 2:22pm:
Greg, my 10% I plucked out of the air.


But Red, what happened to your crystal ball?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 19th, 2014 at 4:28pm

red baron wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 2:22pm:
Greg, my 10% I plucked out of the air. Pure speculation ...

And tell me again, why should anyone take notice of it?


red baron wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 2:22pm:
... now just where did you get your little teensy weensy sample from Greg.

I asked six Muslims.  Every one of them said that they don't support ISIS.  I then made an adjustment for error (which is foreign to me, by the way).

                                     :-/




Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 19th, 2014 at 4:34pm

red baron wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 2:22pm:
Greg, my 10% I plucked out of the air. Pure speculation, now just where did you get your little teensy weensy sample from Greg.

Did you do a straw poll on North Sydney station? :D



do numbers really matter.... if you were on a train with 1000 aussies on it and one muslim but that muslim had a bomb strapped to him..... would it really matter if he was the only extreme muslim in this country????..would we look at the crime and say .. oh well it could have been worse???...the mere thought we have ONE Muslim extremist who is contemplating beheadings walking the streets makes me shudder..

I tend to look at things as

"That Could Happen to ME"

or someone I know..

rather than..

that would only ever happen to OTHER PEOPLE.

so 1 or a hundred.....its evil.....

and this evil appears to be catching.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 19th, 2014 at 4:41pm

cods wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 4:34pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 2:22pm:
Greg, my 10% I plucked out of the air. Pure speculation, now just where did you get your little teensy weensy sample from Greg.

Did you do a straw poll on North Sydney station? :D



do numbers really matter.... if you were on a train with 1000 aussies on it and one muslim but that muslim had a bomb strapped to him..... would it really matter if he was the only extreme muslim in this country????..would we look at the crime and say .. oh well it could have been worse???...the mere thought we have ONE Muslim extremist who is contemplating beheadings walking the streets makes me shudder..

I tend to look at things as

"That Could Happen to ME"

or someone I know..

rather than..

that would only ever happen to OTHER PEOPLE.

so 1 or a hundred.....its evil.....

and this evil appears to be catching.


True, dear, but what if that 1 Muslim wasn't really a Muslim but, say, a backpacker killer, or a Port Arthur Massacrer, or a Sydney Airport Bikie shooter, or just a big tough guy who takes out random passers-by with one king hit?

Do you shudder at the thought of them as well?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 19th, 2014 at 5:27pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 4:41pm:

cods wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 4:34pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 2:22pm:
Greg, my 10% I plucked out of the air. Pure speculation, now just where did you get your little teensy weensy sample from Greg.

Did you do a straw poll on North Sydney station? :D



do numbers really matter.... if you were on a train with 1000 aussies on it and one muslim but that muslim had a bomb strapped to him..... would it really matter if he was the only extreme muslim in this country????..would we look at the crime and say .. oh well it could have been worse???...the mere thought we have ONE Muslim extremist who is contemplating beheadings walking the streets makes me shudder..

I tend to look at things as

"That Could Happen to ME"

or someone I know..

rather than..

that would only ever happen to OTHER PEOPLE.

so 1 or a hundred.....its evil.....

and this evil appears to be catching.


True, dear, but what if that 1 Muslim wasn't really a Muslim but, say, a backpacker killer, or a Port Arthur Massacrer, or a Sydney Airport Bikie shooter, or just a big tough guy who takes out random passers-by with one king hit?

Do you shudder at the thought of them as well?



Not unless Ms Grimshaw tells her to.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 19th, 2014 at 6:24pm
Why Karnal I thought you knew already, that 10% IS in the crystal ball.

Personally I think the crystal ball is bullsh...ing me. I think it is most probably more like 20% of the Muslims here who hold ISIL dear.

PS Karnal, haven't heard of many back packers planning to cut someone's head off.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 19th, 2014 at 6:26pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 3:35pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 2:22pm:
Greg, my 10% I plucked out of the air.


But Red, what happened to your crystal ball?



Red has crystal balls?

That explains why he walks funny.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 19th, 2014 at 6:31pm
Don't go letting on to the Jihadists in your local area that your a team player, just not their team.

You see Jihardists don't like that team. They are intent on killing out that team, so I'd keep my team association right away from them.

Mind you Greg that team doesn't worry me in the slightest but then this isn't downtown ISIL ville, at least it isn't yet.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 19th, 2014 at 6:32pm

red baron wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 6:31pm:
Don't go letting on to the Jihadists in your local area ...



Is there a sign on their door?



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 19th, 2014 at 6:43pm
No...no, you've got to know the secret handshake. Also you have to pass a DNA test that you come from ISIL ville.
The initiation..so they know you've truly come across to 'their' team, is you must be prepared to cut the balls off your boyfriend.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 19th, 2014 at 7:12pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 4:41pm:
True, dear, but what if that 1 Muslim wasn't really a Muslim but, say, a backpacker killer, or a Port Arthur Massacrer, or a Sydney Airport Bikie shooter, or just a big tough guy who takes out random passers-by with one king hit?

Do you shudder at the thought of them as well?



Get back to us when these guys organise themselves into a common creed,  complete with preachers hot for worldwide struggle agaist anyone who doesn't submit to their creed,  an international network of armed militants financed by countries governed by their belief in backpacker killing,  port arthur massacring or bikie shooting - and with increasing migration from those countries to Australia and to other wester countries.
In other words,  get back to us when you have found a demographic that actually resembles the jihadis.  Until then you are just talking shite,  as usual.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 19th, 2014 at 7:58pm

red baron wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 6:24pm:
PS Karnal, haven't heard of many back packers planning to cut someone's head off.



A backpacker killer.

Someone who kills backpackers.

Not a backpacker, who kills.

"Walters had been stabbed 35 times, and Clarke had been shot 10 times in the head."

"Schmidl was found to have died from numerous stab wounds to the upper torso."

"Forensic study determined that each had suffered multiple stab wounds to the torso."

And, here's the one you've been waiting for:

" Anja Habschied had been decapitated ... "

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backpacker_murders

Jesus red, it's like you don't even try anymore.    ::)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 19th, 2014 at 10:28pm

Soren wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 7:12pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 4:41pm:
True, dear, but what if that 1 Muslim wasn't really a Muslim but, say, a backpacker killer, or a Port Arthur Massacrer, or a Sydney Airport Bikie shooter, or just a big tough guy who takes out random passers-by with one king hit?

Do you shudder at the thought of them as well?



Get back to us when these guys organise themselves into a common creed,  complete with preachers hot for worldwide struggle agaist anyone who doesn't submit to their creed,  an international network of armed militants financed by countries governed by their belief in backpacker killing,  port arthur massacring or bikie shooting - and with increasing migration from those countries to Australia and to other wester countries.
In other words,  get back to us when you have found a demographic that actually resembles the jihadis.  Until then you are just talking shite,  as usual.


Sorry, old chap, I just thought I should point out the score.

Jihadis: 0.

Killers, massacrers, shooters, king-hitters: hundreds.

Have you got a crystal ball too, dear boy? Hang on, I’ll cross your palm with silver.

Or would you like it somewhere else?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 19th, 2014 at 10:31pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 7:58pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 6:24pm:
PS Karnal, haven't heard of many back packers planning to cut someone's head off.



A backpacker killer.

Someone who kills backpackers.

Not a backpacker, who kills.

"Walters had been stabbed 35 times, and Clarke had been shot 10 times in the head."

"Schmidl was found to have died from numerous stab wounds to the upper torso."

"Forensic study determined that each had suffered multiple stab wounds to the torso."

And, here's the one you've been waiting for:

" Anja Habschied had been decapitated ... "

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backpacker_murders

Jesus red, it's like you don't even try anymore.    ::)


Yes, but he does have a point, you have to admit.

They don’t hack heads in the halal style.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 19th, 2014 at 10:31pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 7:58pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 6:24pm:
PS Karnal, haven't heard of many back packers planning to cut someone's head off.



A backpacker killer.

Someone who kills backpackers.

Not a backpacker, who kills.

"Walters had been stabbed 35 times, and Clarke had been shot 10 times in the head."

"Schmidl was found to have died from numerous stab wounds to the upper torso."

"Forensic study determined that each had suffered multiple stab wounds to the torso."

And, here's the one you've been waiting for:

" Anja Habschied had been decapitated ... "

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backpacker_murders

Jesus red, it's like you don't even try anymore.    ::)


Yes, but he does have a point, you have to admit.

They don’t hack heads in the halal style.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 19th, 2014 at 10:50pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 10:28pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 7:12pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 4:41pm:
True, dear, but what if that 1 Muslim wasn't really a Muslim but, say, a backpacker killer, or a Port Arthur Massacrer, or a Sydney Airport Bikie shooter, or just a big tough guy who takes out random passers-by with one king hit?

Do you shudder at the thought of them as well?



Get back to us when these guys organise themselves into a common creed,  complete with preachers hot for worldwide struggle agaist anyone who doesn't submit to their creed,  an international network of armed militants financed by countries governed by their belief in backpacker killing,  port arthur massacring or bikie shooting - and with increasing migration from those countries to Australia and to other wester countries.
In other words,  get back to us when you have found a demographic that actually resembles the jihadis.  Until then you are just talking shite,  as usual.


Sorry, old chap, I just thought I should point out the score.

Jihadis: 0.

Killers, massacrers, shooters, king-hitters: hundreds.

Have you got a crystal ball too, dear boy? Hang on, I’ll cross your palm with silver.

Or would you like it somewhere else?

Actually,  jihadis:  88 (just in Bali in 2002) ,  another 4 in 2005, 10 on Sept 11, 1 in London on 7/7, 1 in Nairobi.

104 australians murdered in the name of Islam,  you stupid, grinning clown. Not 0.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 19th, 2014 at 11:16pm

Soren wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 10:50pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 10:28pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 7:12pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 4:41pm:
True, dear, but what if that 1 Muslim wasn't really a Muslim but, say, a backpacker killer, or a Port Arthur Massacrer, or a Sydney Airport Bikie shooter, or just a big tough guy who takes out random passers-by with one king hit?

Do you shudder at the thought of them as well?



Get back to us when these guys organise themselves into a common creed,  complete with preachers hot for worldwide struggle agaist anyone who doesn't submit to their creed,  an international network of armed militants financed by countries governed by their belief in backpacker killing,  port arthur massacring or bikie shooting - and with increasing migration from those countries to Australia and to other wester countries.
In other words,  get back to us when you have found a demographic that actually resembles the jihadis.  Until then you are just talking shite,  as usual.


Sorry, old chap, I just thought I should point out the score.

Jihadis: 0.

Killers, massacrers, shooters, king-hitters: hundreds.

Have you got a crystal ball too, dear boy? Hang on, I’ll cross your palm with silver.

Or would you like it somewhere else?

Actually,  jihadis:  88 (just in Bali in 2002) ,  another 4 in 2005, 10 on Sept 11, 1 in London on 7/7, 1 in Nairobi.

104 australians murdered in the name of Islam,  you stupid, grinning clown. Not 0.


True, dear boy, but we were discussing poor old Cods’ fears of getting her head cut off in Woolworths I’m not sure if she’s been to Bali.

Carry on.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 19th, 2014 at 11:47pm
A warning to jihadists - if you need to kidnap dear Cods, get the money and give her back as quick as you can.

There is a very real risk of Stockholm Syndrome here. The poor guy who married her was never the same.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 19th, 2014 at 11:59pm

wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 11:16pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 10:50pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 10:28pm:

Soren wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 7:12pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 19th, 2014 at 4:41pm:
True, dear, but what if that 1 Muslim wasn't really a Muslim but, say, a backpacker killer, or a Port Arthur Massacrer, or a Sydney Airport Bikie shooter, or just a big tough guy who takes out random passers-by with one king hit?

Do you shudder at the thought of them as well?



Get back to us when these guys organise themselves into a common creed,  complete with preachers hot for worldwide struggle agaist anyone who doesn't submit to their creed,  an international network of armed militants financed by countries governed by their belief in backpacker killing,  port arthur massacring or bikie shooting - and with increasing migration from those countries to Australia and to other wester countries.
In other words,  get back to us when you have found a demographic that actually resembles the jihadis.  Until then you are just talking shite,  as usual.


Sorry, old chap, I just thought I should point out the score.

Jihadis: 0.

Killers, massacrers, shooters, king-hitters: hundreds.

Have you got a crystal ball too, dear boy? Hang on, I’ll cross your palm with silver.

Or would you like it somewhere else?

Actually,  jihadis:  88 (just in Bali in 2002) ,  another 4 in 2005, 10 on Sept 11, 1 in London on 7/7, 1 in Nairobi.

104 australians murdered in the name of Islam,  you stupid, grinning clown. Not 0.


True, dear boy, but we were discussing poor old Cods’ fears of getting her head cut off in Woolworths I’m not sure if she’s been to Bali.

Carry on.


So there have been killers, massacrers, shooters, king-hittersby the hundreds at Woolies ??
Are doing another one of your stupid and dishonest furphies, PB? 

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 20th, 2014 at 12:07am
Good point, old boy.

Cods, Woolworths is clear.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 20th, 2014 at 10:34am
The call went out to the Muslims to go to Lakemba Railway Station for a protest. The muftis were expecting thousands, they ended up with a couple of hundred.

Let's hope that support for ISIL here is at the same level of interest amongst our Muslim neighbours as that protest.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 20th, 2014 at 4:48pm
Red’s posts read like communiques from the front line.

As you were, Red.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Redneck on Sep 20th, 2014 at 4:54pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 12:07am:
Good point, old boy.

Cods, Woolworths is clear.


Take no notice of them cods...not clear at all!

Woolies is full of radical lefties.

They are responsible for all problems you know!

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 20th, 2014 at 5:04pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 4:48pm:
Red’s posts read like communiques from the front line.

As you were, Red.



He takes his fear very seriously.

Over.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 20th, 2014 at 5:31pm
Not the Frontline yet Karnal but you just never know do you? Not with our young Jihadist enthusiasts keen to prove to Allah that they are willing to spill theirs and our blood for him.

Just give this pot some time to bubble along and then we'll see what happens..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Aussie on Sep 20th, 2014 at 6:22pm

red baron wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 5:31pm:
Not the Frontline yet Karnal but you just never know do you? Not with our young Jihadist enthusiasts keen to prove to Allah that they are willing to spill theirs and our blood for him.

Just give this pot some time to bubble along and then we'll see what happens..


Turn it up.  Have a look into the tea leaves ~ the time line must be there, if not in your crystal ball.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 20th, 2014 at 7:51pm

red baron wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 5:31pm:
Not the Frontline yet Karnal but you just never know do you? Not with our young Jihadist enthusiasts keen to prove to Allah that they are willing to spill theirs and our blood for him.

Just give this pot some time to bubble along and then we'll see what happens..


True, Red. The Air Force might put you back into commission.

Better keep the blower nearby - you might need to answer the call of duty any day now.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 20th, 2014 at 8:08pm

red baron wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 5:31pm:
Not the Frontline yet Karnal but you just never know do you? Not with our young Jihadist enthusiasts keen to prove to Allah that they are willing to spill theirs and our blood for him.

Just give this pot some time to bubble along and then we'll see what happens..


See what happens?

Isn’t that what the crystal ball’s for?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 7:28am
It seems I have an ally in former Prime Minister John Howard who said on an interview on Sunday Night last night on channel 7, that every Country in the world should anticipate terrorist events.

Do not lose sight of the fact that ISIL has called for a world wide Jihad against Western Countries and called for the Muslims to rise up against us infidels..

It's not a case of if it will happen but when.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 9:42am

red baron wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 7:28am:
It seems I have an ally in former Prime Minister John Howard who said on an interview on Sunday Night last night on channel 7, that every Country in the world should anticipate terrorist events.

Do not lose sight of the fact that ISIL has called for a world wide Jihad against Western Countries and called for the Muslims to rise up against us infidels..


No, they’re calling for a brutal Feudal regime within quite specific perameters - the boundaries of the old Ottoman Empire. The Moghal Empire might be thrown in, but who’d try to take back India? You’d have to be mad. Imagine having to deal with all those Hindus.

Who knows? Maybe there are parallels with the fight against Fascism in the 1940s. The West, however, never fought Fascism per se, but Nazi Germany. Franco and Peron were left in power. We never fought an ideology, but nation states.

My prediction is that the wars of the future will not be fought against nations, but amorphous insurgencies. This requires a completely different military to what we’ve had in the past. The current defence systems in the US and Europe are still essentially Cold War in nature: NATO, nuclear defense systems, even the UN. The size and planning capacity of such a bloated military are not capable of fighting insurgencies. The US was learning in Iraq, but morale by that stage was lost. In Afghanistan, the strategy was largely to buy the local chieftans off - such a strategy can only last while you’re paying. Once you leave, you’ve lost them.

Groups like ISIL will win because they have something worth fighting for - martyrdom. Unless we can stumble across a way that works, we’ll be running from one war to the other, holding the fort for a few years, and leaving chaos in our wakes.

The proof of this is that no one wanted Uncle in Iraq and Afghanistan. Even the soldiers we were training took pot shots at us. In WWII, we were liberators. These days, there is no trust in Uncle and his friends.

And this requires a completely different way of waging war.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 11:13am

Karnal wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 9:42am:
     Posted on: Today at 9:42am
red baron wrote Today at 7:28am:
It seems I have an ally in former Prime Minister John Howard who said on an interview on Sunday Night last night on channel 7, that every Country in the world should anticipate terrorist events.

Do not lose sight of the fact that ISIL has called for a world wide Jihad against Western Countries and called for the Muslims to rise up against us infidels..


No, they’re calling for a brutal Feudal regime within quite specific perameters - the boundaries of the old Ottoman Empire. The Moghal Empire might be thrown in, but who’d try to take back India? You’d have to be mad. Imagine having to deal with all those Hindus.

Who knows? Maybe there are parallels with the fight against Fascism in the 1940s. The West, however, never fought Fascism per se, but Nazi Germany. Franco and Peron were left in power. We never fought an ideology, but nation states.

My prediction is that the wars of the future will not be fought against nations, but amorphous insurgencies. This requires a completely different military to what we’ve had in the past. The current defence systems in the US and Europe are still essentially Cold War in nature: NATO, nuclear defense systems, even the UN. The size and planning capacity of such a bloated military are not capable of fighting insurgencies. The US was learning in Iraq, but morale by that stage was lost. In Afghanistan, the strategy was largely to buy the local chieftans off - such a strategy can only last while you’re paying. Once you leave, you’ve lost them.

Groups like ISIL will win because they have something worth fighting for - martyrdom. Unless we can stumble across a way that works, we’ll be running from one war to the other, holding the fort for a few years, and leaving chaos in our wakes.

The proof of this is that no one wanted Uncle in Iraq and Afghanistan. Even the soldiers we were training took pot shots at us. In WWII, we were liberators. These days, there is no trust in Uncle and his friends.

And this requires a completely different way of waging war



karmal isnt that the case every 10 years or so??..nothing remains the same..the world wars almost sound fair by todays standards...as for the Geneva Conv..that the hell is that>>>

no one wants Uncle Sam until their backjs are against the wall. at least I havent noticed anyone starving asking ISIS for help.. ::) ::).. funny that...

you seem to hold the West responsible for every countries ills.. like leaving a country  in chaos...hummm ok.. but just when do you expect the owners of said country to actually stand up for themselves and be counted????????

Sth Korea and STh Vietnam seem to be holding on ok...do you think they would be better off had they been left to the communists???....

I dont know what is right or wrong anymore.. but I do get sick of hearing it is always the West that was/is wrong..

you claim this terrorism in only in the Middle East where it will stay...how can you say that after 9/11 Bali the London bombing Spain...thats doesnt sound very Middle East to me..

and I for one believe its only the beginning..because they rely on fear.. and our bloody complacency.. ::) ::)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by PZ547 on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 1:21pm
Can't wait for the middle east to become a glassed over parking strip

and yes, that does include Israhell

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 2:14pm

cods wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 11:13am:
... STh Vietnam seem(s) to be holding on ok...do you think they would be better off had they been left to the communists???....


?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 1:06pm
Karnal, you in particular, I'd like you to read what Sheik Mohammad Abu al - Adnani......is telling Muslims world wide to do to us infidels. You will note that Australians have been specifically targeted by him. Now tell me there isn't a threat out there to each and every one of us.

Source Sydney Morning Herald

Tony Abbott: Some freedoms may have to shift

Followers of the Islamic State terror group are being urged to attack by any means possible civilians of the West, including Australia, in a chilling exhortation posted online by the militant group's chief spokesman.

In what is believed to be the group's first blanket call to violence against countries planning military action in Iraq, the statement attributed to chief Islamic State spokesman Muhammad al-Adnani mentions Australia three times amid page after page of apocalyptic threats against "crusaders".

An image allegedly shows members of Islamic State, including Abu Omar al-Shishani (left) and ISIL sheikh Abu Mohammed al-Adnani (right), whose picture was blurred from the source to protect his identity, at an unknown location in Iraq or Syria. 
An image allegedly shows members of Islamic State, including Abu Omar al-Shishani (left) and ISIL sheikh Abu Mohammed al-Adnani (right), whose picture was blurred from the source to protect his identity, at an unknown location in Iraq or Syria. Photo: AFP

"If you can kill a disbelieving American or European – especially the spiteful and filthy French – or an Australian, or a Canadian, or any other disbeliever from the disbelievers waging war, including the citizens of the countries that entered into a coalition against the Islamic State, then rely upon Allah, and kill him in any manner or way however it may be," the statement says.

Advertisement
"Do not ask for anyone's advice and do not seek anyone's verdict. Kill the disbeliever, whether he is civilian or military, for they have the same ruling. Both of them are disbelievers."

Over 11 pages, the statement unrestrainedly urges followers towards martyrdom, telling them they are "like predatory warriors" who "face death with bare chests".

Police leave with what appears to be a sword after a raid in Sydney on Thursday. 
Police leave with what appears to be a sword after a raid in Sydney on Thursday. Photo: Peter Rae

It comes just days after police smashed an alleged plot in Sydney to kill random Australians on camera and also as world leaders prepare to meet at the United Nations in New York to discuss how to combat the problem of foreign fighters travelling to Iraq and Syria.

Al-Adnani is regarded as the most authoratitive spokesman at Islamic State, also known as ISIL. The statement represents the most concrete threat yet to Australia by the group's leadership.

A spokewoman for Prime Minister Tony Abbott said on Monday that the statement is considered to be an authentic statement from the terror organisation.

"Australian agencies regard the statement issued today by ISIL calling for attacks against members of the international coalition, including Australians, as genuine," she said.

"ISIL will claim that our involvement in this international effort is the reason they are targeting us, but these people do not attack us for what we do, but for who we are and how we live."

Mr Abbott opened question time on Monday with a speech warning that some freedoms for Australians may need to be restricted to prevent attacks from terror groups.

Chilling threats

Disturbingly, the statement attributed to al-Adnani also offers itself as a final declaration, telling followers they need no further permission from a Muslim cleric.

It calls US President Barack Obama a "mule of the Jews" and Secretary of State John Kerry an "uncircumcised old geezer".

In apocalyptic tones, the message goes on to declare: "O soldiers of the Islamic State, be ready for the final campaign of the crusaders. Yes, by Allah's will, it will be the final one."

The statement threatens not just to beat back any military campaign in Iraq and Syrian but also to go on the offensive, even if it takes generations.

"We will conquer your Rome, break your crosses, and enslave your women, by the permission of Allah, the Exalted," it says. "If we do not reach that time, then our children and grandchildren will reach it, and they will sell your sons as slaves at the slave market."

It focuses most of its fury on the United States but mentions Australia three times, urging Islamic fighters in various countries who are American allies to take up arms.

"O America, O allies of America, and O crusaders, know that the matter is more dangerous than you have imagined and greater than you have envisioned," it says. "We have warned you that today we are in a new era, an era where the State, its soldiers, and its sons are leaders not slaves. Being killed – according to their account – is a victory. This is where the secret lies."

It asks of Islamic State followers: "Why is it that the world has united against you? … What threat do you pose to the distant place of Australia for it to send its legions towards you? What does Canada have anything to do with you?"

The statement goes on to say that anyone who refuses to recognise the Islamic State's self-declared caliphate is mocking the Prophet.

It calls on followers to "fear not the swarms of planes, nor ballistic missiles, nor drones, nor satellites, nor battleships, nor weapons of mass destruction".

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 2:42pm

Quote:
Followers of the Islamic State terror group are being urged to attack by any means possible civilians of the West, including Australia, in a chilling exhortation posted online by the militant group's chief spokesman.


Red, why are you ignoring all the other Twitter posts of crazed Muslim shieks and assorted knuckleheads over the last few years?

Do you know what they were saying when we invaded Iraq? When the Navy SEALS got bin Laden? After various Al Qaida-affiliated capos were taken out in Iraq? After every drone strike in Pakistan?

Some shiek calling for killings in the West is nothing in comparison to the daily calls for death and destruction written on this very board. You've written a few yourself.


Quote:
Police leave with what appears to be a sword after a raid in Sydney on Thursday.


Evidence, eh?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 4:01pm
The declaration was by the current Big Cheese of ISIL. there are quite a few knuckleheads around the world who are taking notice of this latest numero uno of Terrorists. The new Osama?

His sail is starting to get a bit of wind in it.

Incidentally the U.S. today launched serious air attacks into Syria both from the air and naval missile launches.

Apparently they were extremely successful because Military strategy is not one of the ISIL's honour classes at this stage. They didn't know how to hide their stuff.

Sh.t happens huh? ;D

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 5:50pm

red baron wrote on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 4:01pm:
Incidentally the U.S. today launched serious air attacks into Syria both from the air and naval missile launches.

Apparently they were extremely successful because Military strategy is not one of the ISIL's honour classes at this stage. They didn't know how to hide their stuff.

Sh.t happens huh? ;D


Sure does, Red. Lucky ASIO's onto it.

With Uncle bombing their munitions over there, and the police confiscating a sword over here, our boys should be home by Christmas, eh?

In other news, our boys in blue stopped the Muslims bombing Lucas Heights:


Quote:
Police quizzed the men about their movements, taking down particulars from each of them and checking their identifications.

After the discussions, the men were allowed to go without charge, with police warning them that Lucas Heights is a protected Commonwealth facility controlled by the Australian Nuclear Science And Technology Organisation.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/group-of-five-men-released-after-police-called-to-area-near-lucas-heights-nuclear-reactor/story-fni0cx12-1227067165264

We can sleep well tonight, Red.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Redneck on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 5:56pm
Well done for trying Red

The trouble is you can lead a horse to water etc.....


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 5:59pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 5:56pm:
Well done for trying Red

The trouble is you can lead a horse to water etc.....


Exactly. These leftards need to be taught a lesson.

Longy has the right idea:


longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 12:59pm:
as sad as it sounds, what some idiots in this country need are a successful terrorist attack so they can shut up and the rest of us can go on protecting the country without having to listen to their faux outrage.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 7:01pm
Good to see you having fun Karnal, can't wait to see you in the streets of despair, with the weapon of your choice mowing down terrorists like there's no tomorrow.

And hearing you say between bursts, "told you there was no threat, here I am in full living colour doing what I do best!"

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 7:36pm


We can now add red to the list of Australians hoping for a terrorist attack in our country.

"can't wait to see you in the streets of despair"

"can't wait" !  

It seems that the people we need to be more concerned about, are the people who (mistakenly) call themselves true blue Australians.

Longy wants to see me die at the hands of terrorists, and now red can't wait to see you confronted by terrorists in the streets.

ASIO, I hope you're watching.




Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 7:59pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 7:36pm:
We can now add red to the list of Australians hoping for a terrorist attack in our country.

"can't wait to see you in the streets of despair"

"can't wait" !  

It seems that the people we need to be more concerned about, are the people who (mistakenly) call themselves true blue Australians.

Longy wants to see me die at the hands of terrorists, and now red can't wait to see you confronted by terrorists in the streets.

ASIO, I hope you're watching.


I don’t know what Red means by the streets of despair, but it is interesting to see the tolerance threshold of certain people, and how close we are to a state of violent jihad.

Longy wants terrorism purely to see those he disagrees with silenced. Two other posters agreed with him.

Forget bombing ISIL munitions caches in Syria and confiscating Muslim swords in Sydney. Besides, they’ll be replaced in a nanosecond.

The real threat lies within.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 8:03pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 7:36pm:
We can now add red to the list of Australians hoping for a terrorist attack in our country.

"can't wait to see you in the streets of despair"

"can't wait" !  

It seems that the people we need to be more concerned about, are the people who (mistakenly) call themselves true blue Australians.

Longy wants to see me die at the hands of terrorists, and now red can't wait to see you confronted by terrorists in the streets.

ASIO, I hope you're watching.



poor you... you do take things to heart dont you.... oooooooooo.. a jihad on greg... :D :D :D :D :D :D

SHAME RED SHAME...

nasty righties....

the greens have spoken there are no terrorist s in this country only NICE PEOPLE>

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 8:07pm

cods wrote on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 8:03pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 7:36pm:
We can now add red to the list of Australians hoping for a terrorist attack in our country.

"can't wait to see you in the streets of despair"

"can't wait" !  

It seems that the people we need to be more concerned about, are the people who (mistakenly) call themselves true blue Australians.

Longy wants to see me die at the hands of terrorists, and now red can't wait to see you confronted by terrorists in the streets.

ASIO, I hope you're watching.


... you do take things to heart dont you....



Longy is hoping (he used the word "hope") that I'm killed in a terrorist attack, on Australian soil, and two other forum members have agreed with him.

So, yes.

The enemy lies within.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 8:21pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 8:07pm:

cods wrote on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 8:03pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 7:36pm:
We can now add red to the list of Australians hoping for a terrorist attack in our country.

"can't wait to see you in the streets of despair"

"can't wait" !  

It seems that the people we need to be more concerned about, are the people who (mistakenly) call themselves true blue Australians.

Longy wants to see me die at the hands of terrorists, and now red can't wait to see you confronted by terrorists in the streets.

ASIO, I hope you're watching.


... you do take things to heart dont you....



Longy is hoping (he used the word "hope") that I'm killed in a terrorist attack, on Australian soil, and two other forum members have agreed with him.

So, yes.

The enemy lies within.



yeah right and they all know where you live or drink.. shudder/ shock horror....come on get real...you have said some pretty not nice things yourself on here..[who hasnt]..

when you see a pic of longy holding up a severed head that looks like you.. then yes beware...move quick I would suggest...

in the mean time greg I am pretty sure you are safe.. it was probably  a metaphor  a figure of speech .. he is frustrated that the left seem to only believe in something if it actually happens on our soil...which under the circumstances... does cause the right to wonder!!!!!!...

would you be happy if the govt was ignoring all thats happening overseas and the threats to ourselves...and put all the information in the too hard basket??>>.

some lefties have been beside themselves at the horrors we are told that asylum seekers are running away from??>... ::)

yet when heads are hanging from poles and they threaten to do the same on aussie soil....

you guys are laughing... ;) ;)..it  cant be for real..
Abbotts making it up.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 8:40pm

cods wrote on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 8:21pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 8:07pm:

cods wrote on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 8:03pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 7:36pm:
We can now add red to the list of Australians hoping for a terrorist attack in our country.

"can't wait to see you in the streets of despair"

"can't wait" !  

It seems that the people we need to be more concerned about, are the people who (mistakenly) call themselves true blue Australians.

Longy wants to see me die at the hands of terrorists, and now red can't wait to see you confronted by terrorists in the streets.

ASIO, I hope you're watching.


... you do take things to heart dont you....



Longy is hoping (he used the word "hope") that I'm killed in a terrorist attack, on Australian soil, and two other forum members have agreed with him.

So, yes.

The enemy lies within.

...you have said some pretty not nice things yourself on here..



I've never wished for someone's death.

I've never even said that I hate someone.

Longy has crossed the line, and his mates Quantum, Soren, Misty, et al. are following him down this path of ideological intolerance.

The enemy lies within.



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 24th, 2014 at 12:15pm
Hi Pec, having a good day saying that there is nothing to concern yourself with  huh? Other than a fanatic knifing two Police in a Police Station...nothing out of the ordinary at all.

Could be you in the street next time.

They are out there.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 24th, 2014 at 12:17pm

red baron wrote on Sep 24th, 2014 at 12:15pm:
Hi Pec, having a good day saying that there is nothing to concern yourself with  huh?



I've never said that there is "nothing" to concern myself with.

Why do you feel the need to lie?

Moreover, crazy people have been attacking police officers for hundreds of years:

http://www.npm.org.au/honour-roll

Try to keep up, red.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 24th, 2014 at 2:16pm
You really are a mixed up bag of little lollies Pec. For the record I hope and pray you remain safe on the streets along with all other respondents who don't share my point of view. :)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 24th, 2014 at 5:36pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 8:40pm:

cods wrote on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 8:21pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 8:07pm:

cods wrote on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 8:03pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23rd, 2014 at 7:36pm:
We can now add red to the list of Australians hoping for a terrorist attack in our country.

"can't wait to see you in the streets of despair"

"can't wait" !  

It seems that the people we need to be more concerned about, are the people who (mistakenly) call themselves true blue Australians.

Longy wants to see me die at the hands of terrorists, and now red can't wait to see you confronted by terrorists in the streets.

ASIO, I hope you're watching.


... you do take things to heart dont you....



Longy is hoping (he used the word "hope") that I'm killed in a terrorist attack, on Australian soil, and two other forum members have agreed with him.

So, yes.

The enemy lies within.

...you have said some pretty not nice things yourself on here..



I've never wished for someone's death.

I've never even said that I hate someone.

Longy has crossed the line, and his mates Quantum, Soren, Misty, et al. are following him down this path of ideological intolerance.

The enemy lies within.



well get over it.. you dont seem concerned with what the left say to others.....thats what bugs me about this forum...people get called out for saying something..

ok I agree to point a person writing  " I hope you get killed greg".... is not nice...and I would never do that...but similar things has been said by lefties...

I have been told I wish you would die.. although the person always denies it even when the link was put up...

I would go along with your pout if I ever saw you stick up for a righty who was being told to die......

I have not seen that post to be honest... my shame is when a righty sinks to that level...when they use the words Die and Hate in the headings....I usually have my say... not that anyone takes any notice...we have enough hate in the world...even my grandkids are asking questions...I think we have to let things go for our own benefit  and if someone stoops to that level again...I will back you 100% if I see it...I am not beyond sending it to the mods...

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 24th, 2014 at 5:37pm

red baron wrote on Sep 24th, 2014 at 2:16pm:
You really are a mixed up bag of little lollies Pec. For the record I hope and pray you remain safe on the streets along with all other respondents who don't share my point of view. :)



hear hear..

the thought of little kids becoming victims of madness is beyond thinking about.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Dame Pansi on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:12am

Anyone would think Obama wants to use ISIS to get to Assad.


from Twitter

Rep. Jeff Duncan ‏@RepJeffDuncan  Sep 23

An example of why I have concerns with POTUS's strategy. Did you hear how he grouped together Assad & ISIS? Radically different issues

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:23am
Assad will probably end up in control of the south of Syria. It would seem impossible for anyone to remove him.
As for the north, who knows, it would seem that anyone who isn't an extremist would have left and that the world leaders are going to pulverise whats still there so it will end up an uninhabited wasteland (which it may well have been already).
there must be a lot of Syrians in turkey living in fairly squalid conditions.
if the west can reach out to these people (who by and large would be the people in the area most deserving of help) and put them back , it will fill the vacuum.

But they probably cant go back til ISIS is finished and until Assad is forced to negotiate.

Gun barrel diplomacy by ISIS and the various crazy groups in the middle east and Africa can really only be sorted by carrying and using a bigger gun.

The righties can be responsible for this aspect.

But they can work hand in hand with the lefties who can be responsible for the winning of the "hearts and minds " of the people who have fled to camps.
The lefties can run a sort of "marshall plan" and turn the middle east into a sort of post war Europe style rebuild with American culture.
I'd build maccas, footy fields, bowling alleys, a few theme parks, starbucks etc etc.
Show the middle east what is great about the west and that embracing the west is the way to go.

Win/Win

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 25th, 2014 at 8:23am
Hearts and minds was a flop in South Vietnam

Certainly won't work in the Middle East.

We do have the bigger gun and we need to crush ISIL but solving the problems from there on in will need the wisdom of Solomon.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 25th, 2014 at 9:41am

red baron wrote on Sep 24th, 2014 at 2:16pm:
You really are a mixed up bag of little lollies Pec.



Mixed up because I stated that: "I've never said that there is "nothing" to concern myself with".

How is that "mixed up", red?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 25th, 2014 at 10:04am

red baron wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 8:23am:
Hearts and minds was a flop in South Vietnam

Certainly won't work in the Middle East.

We do have the bigger gun and we need to crush ISIL but solving the problems from there on in will need the wisdom of Solomon.



how do we get left and right to agree on anything greg??.. lets start there... ;D ;D.

if we cannot agree on how to deal with our very own problem with home grown terrorist....then I am bloody sure winning the peace is beyond us...

dna doesnt thinkwe have done enough to win over the mulsim community..

like letting them come here.. build their Mosques and schools.. and wear their own attire that is completely foreign to our way of life...but we should be doing more.......so far he hasnt been able to actually say WHAT..but I am sure he doesnt think we have done enough...and thats the impression I get from a lot of our left chums..whatever we do is the wrong thing..

ignore/ warn..... warn/ignore...

be against anything if its the Libs doing it..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 25th, 2014 at 10:08am

red baron wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 8:23am:
Hearts and minds was a flop in South Vietnam

Certainly won't work in the Middle East.

We do have the bigger gun and we need to crush ISIL but solving the problems from there on in will need the wisdom of Solomon.



Sth Viet seem ok from where I sit.. I know a few poeple who go there for holidays and love it..

seems to me Nth and STh works pretty well for those that live in the Sth that is.. aka Sth Korea...

why it wouldnt work in the middle east no one cares to explain..... however I know it wouldnt be as simple as drawing a line in the sand........sorry


I dont think all middle east countries need splitting up.. but Iraq/Syria seem to have a history..of only one religious group can dominate.  why that is I havent a clue.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Aussie on Sep 25th, 2014 at 11:13am
This is really dumb on our part.  When we run out of bombs to drop and bullets to fire, and the last IS Member is killed....we will leave?  And what do you reckon will happen next?  What do the tea leaves say Mr Baron?

My solution?  Get out of there.  Let them slug it out as theyt have been for centuries.  Let their Muslim neighbours wade in if they want.

Go spend the (obviously) spare $M400 PA in either our own back-yard or on sorting out ebola in Africa.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 25th, 2014 at 6:47pm
So you are O.K. with the Genocides still being carried out by ISIL on innocent victims by their tens of thousands.

For too long the world has stood by whilst innocent people were slaughtered.

Over 40 Countries are on board to stop ISIL.

ISIL have already called for a Jihad in all Western Countries, we are seeing the seed of this already here. It would happen irregardless of whether we were over there or not.

Time to stand up Aussie. And we are whether it offends your sensibilities or not.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by John Smith on Sep 25th, 2014 at 6:51pm

red baron wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 6:47pm:
So you are O.K. with the Genocides still being carried out by ISIL on innocent victims by their tens of thousands.


what about the genoicide of hundreds of thousands of Africans, why weren't you calling for Australia to send troops there?


red baron wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 6:47pm:
ISIL have already called for a Jihad in all Western Countries


nutjobs have called for Jihad against us many times, and yet your still here ...  :D :D :D

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 25th, 2014 at 6:57pm
I find it hard to answer your questions John, they are so, well, Neanderthal. ::)

Incidentally, "your still here", should be "you're still here".

If you're going to do it, do it right. ;)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Datalife on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:05pm

John Smith wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 6:51pm:
what about the genoicide of hundreds of thousands of Africans, why weren't you calling for Australia to send troops there?


If you are talking Rwanda we were there. 

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Aussie on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:10pm

red baron wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 6:47pm:
So you are O.K. with the Genocides still being carried out by ISIL on innocent victims by their tens of thousands.

For too long the world has stood by whilst innocent people were slaughtered.

Over 40 Countries are on board to stop ISIL.

ISIL have already called for a Jihad in all Western Countries, we are seeing the seed of this already here. It would happen irregardless of whether we were over there or not.

Time to stand up Aussie. And we are whether it offends your sensibilities or not.


I'm uncomfortable about people being slaughtered in an unfair fight.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:11pm
Anyone seen or heard from a guy named Karnal?

Haven't heard from him lately. Had a parallel with two Police being attacked by a Jihadist.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Aussie on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:11pm

Datalife wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:05pm:

John Smith wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 6:51pm:
what about the genoicide of hundreds of thousands of Africans, why weren't you calling for Australia to send troops there?


If you are talking Rwanda we were there. 


What with?  Pop guns or War Planes?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:13pm
Unfair, I'll tell you what's unfair Aussie, ISIL trapping thousands of men women and children on a mountain, then waiting at it's base for them to starve to death.

Don't worry though, the good old U.S. Air Force caned their sorry arse and allowed the people to escape.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Datalife on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:25pm

Aussie wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:11pm:

Datalife wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:05pm:

John Smith wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 6:51pm:
what about the genoicide of hundreds of thousands of Africans, why weren't you calling for Australia to send troops there?


If you are talking Rwanda we were there. 


What with?  Pop guns or War Planes?


Google and learn something you fool.  I cannot be bothered providing a reference so I guess in your world it never happened.   ::)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Soren on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:26pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 24th, 2014 at 12:17pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 24th, 2014 at 12:15pm:
Hi Pec, having a good day saying that there is nothing to concern yourself with  huh?



I've never said that there is "nothing" to concern myself with.

Well, what ARE you concerned with?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Datalife on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:55pm

Aussie wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:10pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 6:47pm:
So you are O.K. with the Genocides still being carried out by ISIL on innocent victims by their tens of thousands.

For too long the world has stood by whilst innocent people were slaughtered.

Over 40 Countries are on board to stop ISIL.

ISIL have already called for a Jihad in all Western Countries, we are seeing the seed of this already here. It would happen irregardless of whether we were over there or not.

Time to stand up Aussie. And we are whether it offends your sensibilities or not.


I'm uncomfortable about people being slaughtered in an unfair fight.


Yet you loudly and proudly didn't give a poo about people blown out of the sky.  So I don't think you are uncomfortable at all, just attempting to score debating points.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Aussie on Sep 25th, 2014 at 8:17pm

Datalife wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:55pm:

Aussie wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:10pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 6:47pm:
So you are O.K. with the Genocides still being carried out by ISIL on innocent victims by their tens of thousands.

For too long the world has stood by whilst innocent people were slaughtered.

Over 40 Countries are on board to stop ISIL.

ISIL have already called for a Jihad in all Western Countries, we are seeing the seed of this already here. It would happen irregardless of whether we were over there or not.

Time to stand up Aussie. And we are whether it offends your sensibilities or not.


I'm uncomfortable about people being slaughtered in an unfair fight.


Yet you loudly and proudly didn't give a poo about people blown out of the sky.  So I don't think you are uncomfortable at all, just attempting to score debating points.


I never thought you were a fool, or unable to read the whole of a Post, and not some edited bit used by a wanker in his signature.

I guess I was wrong.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 25th, 2014 at 8:22pm

red baron wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:11pm:
Anyone seen or heard from a guy named Karnal?

Haven't heard from him lately. Had a parallel with two Police being attacked by a Jihadist.


I’m free.

Are you free, Mr Grainger?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Aussie on Sep 25th, 2014 at 8:24pm

Datalife wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:25pm:

Aussie wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:11pm:

Datalife wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:05pm:

John Smith wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 6:51pm:
what about the genoicide of hundreds of thousands of Africans, why weren't you calling for Australia to send troops there?


If you are talking Rwanda we were there. 


What with?  Pop guns or War Planes?


Google and learn something you fool.  I cannot be bothered providing a reference so I guess in your world it never happened.   ::)


What bravado and acts of heroism did Australia do to stop that real genocide of up to one million people?  Nothing is the answer.  We made a token contribution to a far too late UN Peace Keeping Force, but not one bomb did we drop.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Aussie on Sep 25th, 2014 at 8:31pm

red baron wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:13pm:
Unfair, I'll tell you what's unfair Aussie, ISIL trapping thousands of men women and children on a mountain, then waiting at it's base for them to starve to death.

Don't worry though, the good old U.S. Air Force caned their sorry arse and allowed the people to escape.


Yeah....that was unfair, and the Yanks unfairly sure beat the living beejessus out of those bastards who wanted to unfairly beat the beejessus out of those people on that hill.  But it was not our shite fight.

Hey, I don't mind us taking a gun to a knife fight but it is unfair that we do.....and why don't we do it everywhere there is an imbalance in capacity to fight.

Nah.....Mr Baron.  We ought stay out of what has been going on for centuries.

No-one ever said that survival of the fittest was a fair fight, but it is the cold hard, heart tugging reality.  I get pissed off when a lion pulls down a zebra and gorges on it.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Datalife on Sep 25th, 2014 at 8:33pm

Aussie wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 8:24pm:

Datalife wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:25pm:

Aussie wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:11pm:

Datalife wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 7:05pm:

John Smith wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 6:51pm:
what about the genoicide of hundreds of thousands of Africans, why weren't you calling for Australia to send troops there?


If you are talking Rwanda we were there. 


What with?  Pop guns or War Planes?


Google and learn something you fool.  I cannot be bothered providing a reference so I guess in your world it never happened.   ::)


What bravado and acts of heroism did Australia do to stop that real genocide of up to one million people?  Nothing is the answer.  We made a token contribution to a far too late UN Peace Keeping Force, but not one bomb did we drop.


You would have preferred we did?  I was addressing the claim we did not send troops to an African genocide.  And yes I agree, too little too late, which is what happens when you wait for the UN to get its poo together.

The UN does some great things in medicine and vaccinations but absolutely hopeless when it comes to managing or preventing conflict. 

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Aussie on Sep 25th, 2014 at 8:40pm

Quote:
You would have preferred we did?  I was addressing the claim we did not send troops to an African genocide.  And yes I agree, too little too late, which is what happens when you wait for the UN to get its poo together.


Why have I got to drag then truth out of you when at all times you knew it?   I know we were there pissily with our pop gun.  But, we were token....no bombs, no war birds, just 'peace keeping' pop guns. 

Maybe you need to get rid of that knife you have an insane and unjustified need to put on my back.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Datalife on Sep 25th, 2014 at 8:46pm

Aussie wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 8:40pm:

Quote:
You would have preferred we did?  I was addressing the claim we did not send troops to an African genocide.  And yes I agree, too little too late, which is what happens when you wait for the UN to get its poo together.


Why have I got to drag then truth out of you when at all times you knew it?   I know we were there pissily with our pop gun.  But, we were token....no bombs, no war birds, just 'peace keeping' pop guns. 

Maybe you need to get rid of that knife you have an insane and unjustified need to put on my back.


Drag the truth?  Again I was addressing another posters claim about Australia's lack of presence at an African genocide and pointing out we were present in a UN mission, but thanks for your pointless interjection. 

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 25th, 2014 at 8:51pm

red baron wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 6:57pm:
I find it hard to answer your questions John, they are so, well, Neanderthal.)


Now now, Red, don’t you get all snippy - not when your own use of numbers is so, well, rhodensiensis.

10,000s? 10%? It’s as if you’ve just learned to count using both, well, paws.

Thank God for that crystal ball. If it wasn’t for that, we’d have every reason to believe you just make this stuff up.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Aussie on Sep 25th, 2014 at 9:00pm

Quote:
Drag the truth?  Again I was addressing another posters claim about Australia's lack of presence at an African genocide and pointing out we were present in a UN mission, but thanks for your pointless interjection.


No.  You asked:


Quote:
If you are talking Rwanda we were there. 


And I asked:


Quote:
What with?  Pop guns or War Planes?


Instead of responding along the lines of my question (to which I always knew the answer) you had to up the anti telling me to go off and google, implying that I was being misleading with my question, and that Australia had done something significant, which we never did there.  (Genocide ~ real ~ there.....rhetorical genocide in Iraq and off we go with all guns and war birds blazing.)

Whatever it is Datalife, get over it.  I don't bite.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Datalife on Sep 25th, 2014 at 9:11pm

Aussie wrote on Sep 25th, 2014 at 9:00pm:

Quote:
Drag the truth?  Again I was addressing another posters claim about Australia's lack of presence at an African genocide and pointing out we were present in a UN mission, but thanks for your pointless interjection.


No.  You asked:

[quote]If you are talking Rwanda we were there. 


And I asked:


Quote:
What with?  Pop guns or War Planes?


Instead of responding along the lines of my question (to which I always knew the answer) you had to up the anti telling me to go off and google, implying that I was being misleading with my question, and that Australia had done something significant, which we never did there.  (Genocide ~ real ~ there.....rhetorical genocide in Iraq and off we go with all guns and war birds blazing.)

Whatever it is Datalife, get over it.  I don't bite.

[/quote]

I didn't imply poo, read back, I stated a simple fact to a misapprehension, that we had not responded to African genocides, I told you to google because I couldn't be bothered with what I anticipated your usual response to be, a time wasting tactic to demand links and references for simple statements. 


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Aussie on Sep 25th, 2014 at 9:56pm
Maybe you need to be less in false anticipation of what I might have in mind.

My point is quite simple ~ Rwanda = real genocide. Aussie reaction = pop gun.  Iraq = political rhetorical genocide.  Aussie reaction = all the bombs we have.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 26th, 2014 at 7:29am
Too much theory coming from you Aussie and not enough reality.

Here's a reality check. The enemy is already inside the Castle.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by ImSpartacus2 on Sep 26th, 2014 at 9:59am
Anyone notice how Red keeps popping in and out in quick succession. Suppose he feels he's got to keep on the move. Staying in one place for too long risks a possible terrorist attack.   

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by ImSpartacus2 on Sep 26th, 2014 at 9:59am
Anyone notice how Red keeps popping in and out in quick succession. Suppose he feels he's got to keep on the move. Staying in one place for too long risks a possible terrorist attack.   

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 26th, 2014 at 1:50pm
You are smarter than the average bear I'm Spartacus2, aka Boo Boo Boy! :)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 26th, 2014 at 1:53pm
Karnal, frankly, I'm just glad you're back. After the two Police were attacked, you went down faster than the Nautilus.

I was worried than you might have skipped Summer Bay but joyously you are back with us and all is well in Oz Politic world.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 26th, 2014 at 1:56pm

ImSpartacus2 wrote on Sep 26th, 2014 at 9:59am:
Anyone notice how Red keeps popping in and out in quick succession. Suppose he feels he's got to keep on the move. Staying in one place for too long risks a possible terrorist attack.   



It also risks someone asking him why he doesn't answer questions, or substantiate any of his ridiculous claims.




Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 26th, 2014 at 1:59pm
Hey Aussie the Lion and the Zebra what you are talking about it is the law of the jungle.

Right now, the allies are the top of the food chain and they are going to cream that Genocide wielding ISL's sorry arse, until it resembles a pile of ashen dust.

You don't pull  the bullies down before they get too strong, we get what Hitler presented us with in WW2.

Sorry mate, let's get 'em before they can get too strong, after all, they've got a billion dollars in their piggy bank and that will buy you weapons no matter what side of the line you are playing on.

You see, bottom line Aussie, I'm, just not for standing by whilst genocide is carried out.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 26th, 2014 at 1:59pm
#

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by greggerypeccary on Sep 26th, 2014 at 2:05pm

red baron wrote on Sep 26th, 2014 at 1:59pm:
You see, bottom line Aussie, I'm, just not for standing by whilst genocide is carried out.



No, you're banning flags (flags you've never actually seen).

That'll show 'em!



Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 26th, 2014 at 2:10pm
Yes Pec, burn their flags and kick their sorry arses until their towel heads cave in! That's what you do with ISIL. ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Dame Pansi on Sep 27th, 2014 at 6:52am

red baron wrote on Sep 26th, 2014 at 1:59pm:
You see, bottom line Aussie, I'm, just not for standing by whilst genocide is carried out.



I didn't hear you say much about ISIL (aka the Rebels) when they were in Syria fighting against Assad, slaughtering thousands of innocent people.

Remember the genocide in Sri Lanka? Or the genocide in Africa? Didn't Alan Jones have much to say about that genocide?

No doubt you would have taken part in the Vietnam protests, I'm sure.

Are you against those that created ISIS?.....I wonder.

Pick and choose your genocide red.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 27th, 2014 at 7:39am
Seeing, like all of us that I'm subject to the same Media Releases that you are Dame, I wasn't aware of what ISIL was doing in Syria until it all burst wide open.

Let me be clear I am against Genocide.

What about you Dame, get down off your lecturn and tell us what you stand for.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 27th, 2014 at 7:52am

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 6:52am:

red baron wrote on Sep 26th, 2014 at 1:59pm:
You see, bottom line Aussie, I'm, just not for standing by whilst genocide is carried out.



I didn't hear you say much about ISIL (aka the Rebels) when they were in Syria fighting against Assad, slaughtering thousands of innocent people.

Remember the genocide in Sri Lanka? Or the genocide in Africa? Didn't Alan Jones have much to say about that genocide?

No doubt you would have taken part in the Vietnam protests, I'm sure.

Are you against those that created ISIS?.....I wonder.

Pick and choose your genocide red.



you left out RWANDA...

hes talking about here and n ow pansi....if we were threatened by a famine in the range of Ethiopia I am sure we would all be talking about starving children.... as it is we are be threatened with jihad in this country...it is NOT IMPOSSIBLE.

ISIL wasnt fighting for freedom in Syria...in 2011



How did it all start?

The trouble began in 2011 in the Syrian city of Deraa.

Locals took to the streets to protest after 15 schoolchildren had been arrested - and reportedly tortured - for writing anti-government graffiti on a wall.

The protests were peaceful to begin with, calling for the kids' release, democracy and greater freedom for people in the country.

The government responded angrily, and on 18 March 2011, the army opened fire on protesters, killing four people.

The following day, they shot at mourners at the victims' funerals, killing another person.

People were shocked and angry at what had happened and soon the unrest had spread to other parts of the country.


terrorist groups like ISIL.. which has been called many names......have found a weakness in Syria and are exploiting it..left right and centre.. there has been civil war there for a long time... whos right and whos wrong.. who knows... the point is.. the terrorist see an opportunity to take over at all costs...100s of thousands have left the country and over 100.000 dead...for what?? the terrorists dont care...thats the problem...they respect nothing and no one unless its ISLAM...

and guess what.. when is all over and they have the country on its knees.. they will expect the West to feed them..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 27th, 2014 at 7:57am

red baron wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 7:39am:
Seeing, like all of us that I'm subject to the same Media Releases that you are Dame, I wasn't aware of what ISIL was doing in Syria until it all burst wide open.

Let me be clear I am against Genocide.

What about you Dame, get down off your lecturn and tell us what you stand for.



she believes the rebels were always ISIL.. no way..

if these guys get their hands on real 2014 weaponry then we can look at murder on the streets here..

if they had planes and tanks...and rockets there would be no stopping them...as they are evil through and through.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 27th, 2014 at 1:01pm

red baron wrote on Sep 26th, 2014 at 1:59pm:
Hey Aussie the Lion and the Zebra what you are talking about it is the law of the jungle.

Right now, the allies are the top of the food chain and they are going to cream that Genocide wielding ISL's sorry arse, until it resembles a pile of ashen dust.


How will they do this? The air strikes have had little to no effect. Obama is serious about not redeploying troops.

If anyone fights IS, it will be a coalition of Kurds and gulf states and maybe even Turks if IS try it out on them.

The West will do no such creaming in Iraq, and this is as it should be.

Does this make you happy? I know you’ve always been very reluctant for us to join foreign wars.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 27th, 2014 at 1:04pm

red baron wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 7:39am:
Seeing, like all of us that I'm subject to the same Media Releases that you are Dame, I wasn't aware of what ISIL was doing in Syria until it all burst wide open..


Didn’t it come up in the crystal ball?

That’s strange.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 27th, 2014 at 3:48pm
That's right Karnal, the Middle East Countries have the responsibility of waging the ground war against ISIL. But it is very comforting for them to have overwhelming air superiority. An ace in the pack if ever there was one.

Good luck winning a full on battle when the opposition can pull in fighter jet's with one radio call. No jungle they can run into there Karnal. Don't think there's a web of tunnels under all that sand there either.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Aussie on Sep 27th, 2014 at 4:38pm

red baron wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 3:48pm:
That's right Karnal, the Middle East Countries have the responsibility of waging the ground war against ISIL. But it is very comforting for them to have overwhelming air superiority. An ace in the pack if ever there was one.

Good luck winning a full on battle when the opposition can pull in fighter jet's with one radio call. No jungle they can run into there Karnal. Don't think there's a web of tunnels under all that sand there either.


Where are they?  Any on the ground yet?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 27th, 2014 at 5:09pm

red baron wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 3:48pm:
That's right Karnal, the Middle East Countries have the responsibility of waging the ground war against ISIL. But it is very comforting for them to have overwhelming air superiority. An ace in the pack if ever there was one.

Good luck winning a full on battle when the opposition can pull in fighter jet's with one radio call. No jungle they can run into there Karnal. Don't think there's a web of tunnels under all that sand there either.


So you’re happy now? Somehow, Red, I have a sneaky suspicion you won’t be happy until we’re at war again.

But the above strategy is the right one. Sending Uncle in to open a front against groups like al Nusra, al Qaida and ISIL is just begging for a protracted Middle Eastern war and sure martyrdom for our troops. It’s also a strategy to bring terrorism to our shores.

ISIS needs to be erradicated, but it’s not going to be easy. We’re also going to need to sleep with quite a few enemies to do it. The Assad regime in Syria will be one.

If you thought "we" could just blaze on into Iraq playing Wagner on the loudspeakers and blowing them all to Kingdom Come, you were deluded. Apocolypse Now, remember, was an anti-war movie. It was about a war we lost, but used more TNT in than any other war.

Bombs are not a solution. The belief that they are has more to do with fiction, video games and cable news coverage than reality.

Oh - and crystal balls.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 27th, 2014 at 5:55pm

Aussie wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 4:38pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 3:48pm:
That's right Karnal, the Middle East Countries have the responsibility of waging the ground war against ISIL. But it is very comforting for them to have overwhelming air superiority. An ace in the pack if ever there was one.

Good luck winning a full on battle when the opposition can pull in fighter jet's with one radio call. No jungle they can run into there Karnal. Don't think there's a web of tunnels under all that sand there either.


Where are they?  Any on the ground yet?


Apart from a few Iraqi Kurds with Uncles weapons, none.

My crystal ball tells me no Middle Eastern states are going to march into ISIS-land too easily. The only reason the gulf states have made the token gesture of air strikes is that they’re monarchies - they don’t have to worry about the political consequences of fighting a group that calls itself an "Islamic" state.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Sep 29th, 2014 at 7:36am

Karnal wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 5:55pm:

Aussie wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 4:38pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 3:48pm:
That's right Karnal, the Middle East Countries have the responsibility of waging the ground war against ISIL. But it is very comforting for them to have overwhelming air superiority. An ace in the pack if ever there was one.

Good luck winning a full on battle when the opposition can pull in fighter jet's with one radio call. No jungle they can run into there Karnal. Don't think there's a web of tunnels under all that sand there either.


Where are they?  Any on the ground yet?


Apart from a few Iraqi Kurds with Uncles weapons, none.

My crystal ball tells me no Middle Eastern states are going to march into ISIS-land too easily. The only reason the gulf states have made the token gesture of air strikes is that they’re monarchies - they don’t have to worry about the political consequences of fighting a group that calls itself an "Islamic" state.



Karnal, you seem knowledgeable about the middle east. How long do you think the Saudi monarchy will survive and how will it / or can it, ever transition to a democracy?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by NorthOfNorth on Sep 29th, 2014 at 8:17am

Karnal wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 5:55pm:
Apart from a few Iraqi Kurds with Uncles weapons, none.

My crystal ball tells me no Middle Eastern states are going to march into ISIS-land too easily. The only reason the gulf states have made the token gesture of air strikes is that they’re monarchies - they don’t have to worry about the political consequences of fighting a group that calls itself an "Islamic" state.

There's another, more obvious, reason for their reluctance... Arising from realpolitik as opposed to complacent smugness of the ruling elite. That being, a significant and potent minority of their subjects support the actions of Islamists. ISIS is only one of many Islamist sects all with similar ambitions and differing only by varying degrees of preparedness to express extreme religious fanaticism.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by NorthOfNorth on Sep 29th, 2014 at 8:17am
.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 29th, 2014 at 9:20am
In the end it will be Christians versus Muslims.

The fanatical brand of Islam view Christians as 'Infidels'. They have already called a Jihad against the Western Countries.

This is going to be a long protracted fight. Muslims have established themselves in all Western countries to larger of lesser degree. Many of these Muslims are so called 'moderates'.

But if it comes to a knock them down drag them out War, they will side with their brothers.

We feel insulated here but never forget we have 500,000 Muslims amongst us.

It is highly likely that the 'new' conflict involving Western allies will be a long and protracted one.

You can expect reprisals rights across the west as local 'fanatical Muslims' endeavour to cripple us.

I can only see this War in the Middle East eventually becoming an ultimate struggle of East versus West.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 29th, 2014 at 9:40am
does anyone think the Saudi Monarchy will surrender all their toys cars and planes and casinos..and play grounds.......for a life of a Muslim??>.....

REALLY?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by NorthOfNorth on Sep 29th, 2014 at 9:44am

red baron wrote on Sep 29th, 2014 at 9:20am:
In the end it will be Christians versus Muslims.

The fanatical brand of Islam view Christians as 'Infidels'. They have already called a Jihad against the Western Countries.

This is going to be a long protracted fight. Muslims have established themselves in all Western countries to larger of lesser degree. Many of these Muslims are so called 'moderates'.

But if it comes to a knock them down drag them out War, they will side with their brothers.

We feel insulated here but never forget we have 500,000 Muslims amongst us.

It is highly likely that the 'new' conflict involving Western allies will be a long and protracted one.

You can expect reprisals rights across the west as local 'fanatical Muslims' endeavour to cripple us.

I can only see this War in the Middle East eventually becoming an ultimate struggle of East versus West.

I think the answer is to continue the destruction of religious extremism and go quietly about it.

We must accept that it will be a fight that will be fought over decades so as not to be held culturally or politically hostage to it.

Just as the British learned to go on with 20th century life in the wake of IRA attacks, so we too must go about our 21st century lives without succumbing to a state of hysteria into which religious extremist zealots want to lead us.

Their weapon is instilling terror in a society in the hopes of provoking an over-reaction.

Let us just get on with the destruction of religious extremism while living as if it didn't exist.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 29th, 2014 at 12:24pm
There is no way known that the religious extremism, which is becoming more the path many Muslims are taking, can be dismantled.

The only way to dismantle this type of extremism is with the gun. Nothing much has changed over the centuries however with the Muslims now trading their swords for guns and rockets we can expect much more fanaticism in the Middle East.

You crush the Saddam Husseins and the Osama Bin Ladens but like a ten headed snake new forces come into existence.

The biggest threat to Western countries are the Muslims they have imported, mainly sleeping giants, they are likely to be awakened by world events in the Middle East.

Once that happens there will be huge problems for the West to address from 'the enemy within'.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 30th, 2014 at 6:28am

red baron wrote on Sep 29th, 2014 at 12:24pm:
There is no way known that the religious extremism, which is becoming more the path many Muslims are taking, can be dismantled.

The only way to dismantle this type of extremism is with the gun. Nothing much has changed over the centuries however with the Muslims now trading their swords for guns and rockets we can expect much more fanaticism in the Middle East.

You crush the Saddam Husseins and the Osama Bin Ladens but like a ten headed snake new forces come into existence.

The biggest threat to Western countries are the Muslims they have imported, mainly sleeping giants, they are likely to be awakened by world events in the Middle East.

Once that happens there will be huge problems for the West to address from 'the enemy within'.

\


be fair red.. its the extreme Muslims they even kill other Muslims.. not just Christians..

throughout history its always been the zealots.that take conflict to the outer edges of human behavior

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 30th, 2014 at 6:39am

NorthOfNorth wrote on Sep 29th, 2014 at 9:44am:

red baron wrote on Sep 29th, 2014 at 9:20am:
In the end it will be Christians versus Muslims.

The fanatical brand of Islam view Christians as 'Infidels'. They have already called a Jihad against the Western Countries.

This is going to be a long protracted fight. Muslims have established themselves in all Western countries to larger of lesser degree. Many of these Muslims are so called 'moderates'.

But if it comes to a knock them down drag them out War, they will side with their brothers.

We feel insulated here but never forget we have 500,000 Muslims amongst us.

It is highly likely that the 'new' conflict involving Western allies will be a long and protracted one.

You can expect reprisals rights across the west as local 'fanatical Muslims' endeavour to cripple us.

I can only see this War in the Middle East eventually becoming an ultimate struggle of East versus West.

I think the answer is to continue the destruction of religious extremism and go quietly about it.

We must accept that it will be a fight that will be fought over decades so as not to be held culturally or politically hostage to it.

Just as the British learned to go on with 20th century life in the wake of IRA attacks, so we too must go about our 21st century lives without succumbing to a state of hysteria into which religious extremist zealots want to lead us.

Their weapon is instilling terror in a society in the hopes of provoking an over-reaction.

Let us just get on with the destruction of religious extremism while living as if it didn't exist.



have you seen the Walls built separating Belfast??

it will be a long way to hell before they come down..

the HATE is still bubbling away...they just ran out of money and probably motivation as it was one extreme against another...

IN Syria its one extreme against..power structure..

if a govt does the wrong thing in the first place it only builds contempt for it..people get disillusioned and in some cases hit back..

which is what the rebels did...they hit back at Bashar al Assad..his answer to them was kill them...not a good look killing your own people because they dare to ask for a fair go...

and of course the extremists have taken over from the [early] rebels..and are now in charge of certain areas of Syria and Baghdad. and gaining..give people a cause and it will fire up extreme responses .. and then it will wane because people then see they are getting worse than what they are fighting.... ::) ::).

does life ever improve in the Middle East for the little people ?????  not that I can see..

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Sep 30th, 2014 at 6:49am

NorthOfNorth wrote on Sep 29th, 2014 at 9:44am:

red baron wrote on Sep 29th, 2014 at 9:20am:
In the end it will be Christians versus Muslims.

The fanatical brand of Islam view Christians as 'Infidels'. They have already called a Jihad against the Western Countries.

This is going to be a long protracted fight. Muslims have established themselves in all Western countries to larger of lesser degree. Many of these Muslims are so called 'moderates'.

But if it comes to a knock them down drag them out War, they will side with their brothers.

We feel insulated here but never forget we have 500,000 Muslims amongst us.

It is highly likely that the 'new' conflict involving Western allies will be a long and protracted one.

You can expect reprisals rights across the west as local 'fanatical Muslims' endeavour to cripple us.

I can only see this War in the Middle East eventually becoming an ultimate struggle of East versus West.

I think the answer is to continue the destruction of religious extremism and go quietly about it.

We must accept that it will be a fight that will be fought over decades so as not to be held culturally or politically hostage to it.

Just as the British learned to go on with 20th century life in the wake of IRA attacks, so we too must go about our 21st century lives without succumbing to a state of hysteria into which religious extremist zealots want to lead us.

Their weapon is instilling terror in a society in the hopes of provoking an over-reaction.

Let us just get on with the destruction of religious extremism while living as if it didn't exist.



yes, a good post north.
since my visit to the mosque and meeting some really quite pleasant guys, they have sent me some literature.
this includes

there is no compulsion to religion
(Al-Baqrah , verse 257)

whoever kills a person ...it shall be as if he killed all mankind (Al maidah , verse 33)

obey the government!!

"obey allah and his messenger and those in authority among you" (Al-nisa, verse 60).

in my horse training principles of rewarding good behaviour and punishing bad behaviour, it would seem that the attacks on Isis are punishment for bad behaviour but we must reward and nurture good behaviour.

Kicking prams, attacking women on trains, this is punishment that would be as counter productive as randomly whipping a horse for no reason. it is unhelpful.

the battle for this war will be fought in suburbia and people like pansi and the socialist alliance who see our war effort as war crimes etc, are just going to alienate the good people of suburbia.

it is the good people of suburbia (yet again) who will have to do the work of building true relationships with the muslim community and they will have to do it whilst they are called racists by the socialist elite, whilst they are called snivelling cowards by certain people and whilst they get no support for their hard work from any in authority. 

The media and the government will use it to sell papers and chest thump and win votes but the good/great people of suburban Australia will prevail as always and the muslims will be assimilated.

Like wild brumbys , when dealt with with fairness and respect, they eventually come to love and accept their new "community". a community based on sport, maccas and playstation.They eventually come to love the aussie way of life more than the aussies.

The western way is the best way (look at Dubai ...it looks like the gold coast on steroids)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 30th, 2014 at 7:05am
I for one am a bit over those who blame the West or Australia for all the ills going on...wouldnt matter which way we went they would complain and blame...

if they think talking to someone who is hell bent on being totally extreme...then all I can say is they are a sandwich short of a picnic....

we dont talk about politics/policies in this country havent you noticed..

its all Abbott or Gillard/krudd...its about people not policies ...as my dad used to thunder about... ::) ::)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by NorthOfNorth on Sep 30th, 2014 at 7:07am

aquascoot wrote on Sep 30th, 2014 at 6:49am:
Kicking prams, attacking women on trains, this is punishment that would be as counter productive as randomly whipping a horse for no reason. it is unhelpful.

Much worse than unhelpful... It is unjust...

Nothing cuts as deeply as injustice done.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 30th, 2014 at 7:31am
Cods, I know that the great majority of Muslims in Australia are 'moderates'.

However, once again I draw on the lessons of Germany in the Second World War.

Not all Germans were Nazis, far from it. But once Hitler got going he enjoyed huge national support from the bulk of the population.

If you go to history the answer lies there.

I say once again if the extremists are successful in turning, even a minor share of the Muslim population against us then there will be serious trouble.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Sep 30th, 2014 at 7:40am

NorthOfNorth wrote on Sep 30th, 2014 at 7:07am:

aquascoot wrote on Sep 30th, 2014 at 6:49am:
Kicking prams, attacking women on trains, this is punishment that would be as counter productive as randomly whipping a horse for no reason. it is unhelpful.

Much worse than unhelpful... It is unjust...

Nothing cuts as deeply as injustice done.



Ah, indeed north.

Did you hear labor minister bourke before the last election .
he said

"the idea that the people of western Sydney are affected by immigrants is truly bizarre. "


now this followed comments by a liberal candidate that the people of western Sydney felt the high levels of immigration were affecting services like hospital casualties, roads etc.

and it is unjust to

1  put all the immigrants in already overcrowded suburbs with much poorer services than inner city rich suburbs

2  then go on to say if the residents complain they are "red necks" or 'racists"

this is unjust and as you say
"nothing cuts as deeply as injustice'

what we need is political commentators (and PM abbott has been speaking well on this) to say

congratulations to the fine, wonderful, accepting and unselfish people of suburban Australia.

we don't need politicians saying that any concerns are "bizarre"

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Dame Pansi on Sep 30th, 2014 at 7:42am
The western way is the best way (look at Dubai ...it looks like the gold coast on steroids)

'looks like' being the operative words. Sometimes it pays to look a bit deeper.


The western way is the best way.......says who?......the west, of course.

I have no intention of trying to change people's cultural or religious beliefs just because they live in a western country.

If the Italians want to speak their native tongue, practice the Catholic faith and eat spaghetti whilst living here.....let them be.

If the Muslims want to speak Arabic, practice their Islamic faith and eat hummus whilst living here.....let them be.

I believe Karma will play out in the end. What comes around, goes around.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 30th, 2014 at 7:52am

red baron wrote on Sep 30th, 2014 at 7:31am:
Cods, I know that the great majority of Muslims in Australia are 'moderates'.

However, once again I draw on the lessons of Germany in the Second World War.

Not all Germans were Nazis, far from it. But once Hitler got going he enjoyed huge national support from the bulk of the population.

If you go to history the answer lies there.

I say once again if the extremists are successful in turning, even a minor share of the Muslim population against us then there will be serious trouble.



you miss the point.. HITLER WASN'T SUCCESSFUL

like I said.. idealism only last a short time...mainly because those who lead get lost....Hitler did the right thing by the Germans he got them out of depression and austerity but used the wrong way and with the wrong reasons..

evil never really prevails....sooner or later those that join start asking questions and looking at those who are running it.. and they are usually fanatical to the point where they even hate their own followers...

is it KARMA or what goes around comes around...a bit of both....

but in the end.. good will outstrip evil...

99% of people are moderates but that 1% can be hell and we have no choice but to fight fire with fire....

havent you noticed... Hitler was STRONG Germany was STRONG.they prepared for WW11 for a long time..Britain was weak didnt even have an airforce had to borrow like hell from America...but she didnt PANIC...Germany thought they had won even before the clash...Russia is a good point...so arrogant.....and the ISIL is the same...think they can bash and murder their way to being accepted.. I dont think so.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Sep 30th, 2014 at 7:54am
People who live in the west,
enjoy the western technologies
enjoy the western internet, the western healthcare, the western system of law and order.
enjoy the western TV, the western sport, the western creature comforts, the hard work and sweat and toil of the western businessman and the western entrepreneur and then do nothing but
CRITICISE the west are a bizarre phenomenom in the extreme. I basicly think they are just dishonest ;)

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Team Murdoch on Sep 30th, 2014 at 8:57am

cods wrote on Sep 30th, 2014 at 7:52am:

red baron wrote on Sep 30th, 2014 at 7:31am:
Cods, I know that the great majority of Muslims in Australia are 'moderates'.

However, once again I draw on the lessons of Germany in the Second World War.

Not all Germans were Nazis, far from it. But once Hitler got going he enjoyed huge national support from the bulk of the population.

If you go to history the answer lies there.

I say once again if the extremists are successful in turning, even a minor share of the Muslim population against us then there will be serious trouble.



you miss the point.. HITLER WASN'T SUCCESSFUL

like I said.. idealism only last a short time...mainly because those who lead get lost....Hitler did the right thing by the Germans he got them out of depression and austerity but used the wrong way and with the wrong reasons..

evil never really prevails....sooner or later those that join start asking questions and looking at those who are running it.. and they are usually fanatical to the point where they even hate their own followers...

is it KARMA or what goes around comes around...a bit of both....

but in the end.. good will outstrip evil...

99% of people are moderates but that 1% can be hell and we have no choice but to fight fire with fire....

havent you noticed... Hitler was STRONG Germany was STRONG.they prepared for WW11 for a long time..Britain was weak didnt even have an airforce had to borrow like hell from America...but she didnt PANIC...Germany thought they had won even before the clash...Russia is a good point...so arrogant.....and the ISIL is the same...think they can bash and murder their way to being accepted.. I dont think so.



If anything, it is Australia and the US who resemble the Nazis.

Nazis - false flag attack on German Parliament
US - false flag attack on Pentagon and WTC

Nazis  - overreach invading Russia
US  - overreach invading Afghanistan and Iraq

Nazis - vivified and oppressed religious minority (Jews)
US- vivified and oppressed religious minority (Muslims)

Nazis - promised to get Germany out of economic trouble by building infrastructure
Australia - elects Abbott 'infrastructure PM"


Nazis - teamed up with fascist dictators in Italy and Japan
US - teams up with fascist dictator in Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Egypt.

Nazis - Hitler used boogeyman of communism to scare the public and remove freedoms.
Australia - Abbott uses boogeyman of Islamism to scare the public, and remove freedoms.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 30th, 2014 at 2:36pm
What a load of old cobblers from Team Murdoch.

The Coalition of the Willing liberated both Iraq and Afghanistan from tyrants who gassed and murdered their own people.

The problem came when the Allies left both Countries to manage themselves. A task it has turned out was beyond them.

This created a power vacuum in which ISIL thrived and grew, both in Iraq and Afghanistan but mainly in Syria where the civil war made it possible for ISIL to grow strong without any real opposition from the Government.

ISIL has and is committing Genocide. For that reason alone the Allies had a duty to return and get rid of the dangerous ISIL as it has gathered momentum and popularity amongst extremists Muslims from everywhere.

Now the Allies are returning and how this plays out is anyone's guess.

Your comments about Abbott are just plain stupid.

Your comments about the Nazis is biased and adjusted to your own agenda, that is, to get a some kicks in on the Liberal Government.

The Government enjoys bi partisan support from the Labor Party on our National stance on security. Only the idiot Greens disagree but they would hand over the Country to Islam in a heartbeat.

What a ridiculous post yours was.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Karnal on Sep 30th, 2014 at 4:42pm

aquascoot wrote on Sep 29th, 2014 at 7:36am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 5:55pm:

Aussie wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 4:38pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 3:48pm:
That's right Karnal, the Middle East Countries have the responsibility of waging the ground war against ISIL. But it is very comforting for them to have overwhelming air superiority. An ace in the pack if ever there was one.

Good luck winning a full on battle when the opposition can pull in fighter jet's with one radio call. No jungle they can run into there Karnal. Don't think there's a web of tunnels under all that sand there either.


Where are they?  Any on the ground yet?


Apart from a few Iraqi Kurds with Uncles weapons, none.

My crystal ball tells me no Middle Eastern states are going to march into ISIS-land too easily. The only reason the gulf states have made the token gesture of air strikes is that they’re monarchies - they don’t have to worry about the political consequences of fighting a group that calls itself an "Islamic" state.



Karnal, you seem knowledgeable about the middle east. How long do you think the Saudi monarchy will survive and how will it / or can it, ever transition to a democracy?


As long as there’s oil in the ground, dear.

And as long as Uncle props them up as their preferred Arab head hackers.

It is a jolly world, no?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by red baron on Sep 30th, 2014 at 5:22pm
Yes Karnal, this is about the most complex War we have ever been involved in.

The goal posts might as well be on the water because they continually shift.

A mate of mine advanced a conspiracy theory to me which has been heralded by former BBC Commentator David Ickle.

Ickle's P.O.V. is that this is a huge conspiracy mainly by the U.S. with one world Government in mind. Ickle states that the U.S. actually set up ISIS and their agenda is to get the Sunnies and Shiites(think Iran) all going full tilt at each other.

I haven't familiarised myself with Ickle's claims but I will.

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by cods on Sep 30th, 2014 at 6:13pm

red baron wrote on Sep 30th, 2014 at 2:36pm:
What a load of old cobblers from Team Murdoch.

The Coalition of the Willing liberated both Iraq and Afghanistan from tyrants who gassed and murdered their own people.

The problem came when the Allies left both Countries to manage themselves. A task it has turned out was beyond them.

This created a power vacuum in which ISIL thrived and grew, both in Iraq and Afghanistan but mainly in Syria where the civil war made it possible for ISIL to grow strong without any real opposition from the Government.

ISIL has and is committing Genocide. For that reason alone the Allies had a duty to return and get rid of the dangerous ISIL as it has gathered momentum and popularity amongst extremists Muslims from everywhere.

Now the Allies are returning and how this plays out is anyone's guess.

Your comments about Abbott are just plain stupid.

Your comments about the Nazis is biased and adjusted to your own agenda, that is, to get a some kicks in on the Liberal Government.

The Government enjoys bi partisan support from the Labor Party on our National stance on security. Only the idiot Greens disagree but they would hand over the Country to Islam in a heartbeat.

What a ridiculous post yours was.



hes a twat ye gods it was 75 years ago...

nothing I dislike more than anyone who bloody has the hide to live here and take everything thats handed to them.. call Australia and the US NAZIs

show they havent got a brain....or have any idea what it is like to live under a regime...

one that had gas ovens as the answer to ethnic superiority and the terrorists of today have beheadings and torture...

and this guy claims thats how we are living.. what an assssssssssssssshole.


Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by aquascoot on Sep 30th, 2014 at 6:33pm

Karnal wrote on Sep 30th, 2014 at 4:42pm:

aquascoot wrote on Sep 29th, 2014 at 7:36am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 5:55pm:

Aussie wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 4:38pm:

red baron wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 3:48pm:
That's right Karnal, the Middle East Countries have the responsibility of waging the ground war against ISIL. But it is very comforting for them to have overwhelming air superiority. An ace in the pack if ever there was one.

Good luck winning a full on battle when the opposition can pull in fighter jet's with one radio call. No jungle they can run into there Karnal. Don't think there's a web of tunnels under all that sand there either.


Where are they?  Any on the ground yet?


Apart from a few Iraqi Kurds with Uncles weapons, none.

My crystal ball tells me no Middle Eastern states are going to march into ISIS-land too easily. The only reason the gulf states have made the token gesture of air strikes is that they’re monarchies - they don’t have to worry about the political consequences of fighting a group that calls itself an "Islamic" state.



Karnal, you seem knowledgeable about the middle east. How long do you think the Saudi monarchy will survive and how will it / or can it, ever transition to a democracy?


As long as there’s oil in the ground, dear.

And as long as Uncle props them up as their preferred Arab head hackers.

It is a jolly world, no?



Ah but it won't be that long til oil is no longer an issue.
Then what?
Civil war.
Is Saudi Arabia like Syria and Iraq, fractured along tribal/religious sectarian lines?

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by Datalife on Sep 30th, 2014 at 6:41pm

aquascoot wrote on Sep 30th, 2014 at 6:33pm:
Ah but it won't be that long til oil is no longer an issue.
Then what?
Civil war.
Is Saudi Arabia like Syria and Iraq, fractured along tribal/religious sectarian lines?


The whole world is, far from the one world of luvvie open borders kumbayah or the one world of the neocons one world order the tendency seems to be toward balkanisation and break up. 

Title: Re: Not interested in the Middle East? - You should be
Post by NorthOfNorth on Sep 30th, 2014 at 7:27pm

aquascoot wrote on Sep 30th, 2014 at 7:40am:

NorthOfNorth wrote on Sep 30th, 2014 at 7:07am:

aquascoot wrote on Sep 30th, 2014 at 6:49am:
Kicking prams, attacking women on trains, this is punishment that would be as counter productive as randomly whipping a horse for no reason. it is unhelpful.

Much worse than unhelpful... It is unjust...

Nothing cuts as deeply as injustice done.



Ah, indeed north.

Did you hear labor minister bourke before the last election .
he said

"the idea that the people of western Sydney are affected by immigrants is truly bizarre. "


now this followed comments by a liberal candidate that the people of western Sydney felt the high levels of immigration were affecting services like hospital casualties, roads etc.

and it is unjust to

1  put all the immigrants in already overcrowded suburbs with much poorer services than inner city rich suburbs

2  then go on to say if the residents complain they are "red necks" or 'racists"

this is unjust and as you say
"nothing cuts as deeply as injustice'

what we need is political commentators (and PM abbott has been speaking well on this) to say

congratulations to the fine, wonderful, accepting and unselfish people of suburban Australia.

we don't need politicians saying that any concerns are "bizarre"

Would that we could learn from the great...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7wQUesDhok

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.