Bishops crocodile tears for the good people of the Middle East are in stark contrast to her actions when it came to the victims  of CSR's evil asbestos mines.

Remember her remarks to the judge.."why should these people have their cases pushed forward in the courts just because they are seriously ill and dying?"
Yep...she tried to manipulate the courts so the seriously ill victims of CSR's asbestos mining would die before her employer would have to pay any compensation.
Julie Bishop is no less evil than the IS leadership in fact she's worse because she financially profited from these wretched victims early and painful deaths.

......quiet news day today ay crowy?  :-?

no terrorists were arrested today

John Smith wrote on Sep 20^th, 2014 at 1:44pm:

no terrorists were arrested today

...you can always turn yourself in  :D

Swagman wrote on Sep 20^th, 2014 at 1:48pm:

John Smith wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 1:44pm: no terrorists were arrested today ...you can always turn yourself in  :D

it won't work ... they have to be muslims or Abbotts scare campaign will fall apart

John Smith wrote on Sep 20^th, 2014 at 1:56pm:

Swagman wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 1:48pm: John Smith wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 1:44pm: no terrorists were arrested today ...you can always turn yourself in  :D it won't work ... they have to be muslims or Abbotts scare campaign will fall apart

http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/avatars/smurfs.gif

So why have you got that rag on your head?  ;D

Bishop is practising to be the next PM. She's so blank faced and monotone though, it's as if she's been programmed as a newsreader. I can see little that's human about her. I hope the RW's have noted that she's barren and mark her down the way they did with Gillard for the same handicap.


adelcrow wrote on Sep 20^th, 2014 at 1:29pm:

Remember her remarks to the judge.."why should these people have their cases pushed forward in the courts just because they are seriously ill and dying?"Yep...she tried to manipulate the courts so the seriously ill victims of CSR's asbestos mining would die before her employer would have to pay any compensation.Julie Bishop is no less evil than the IS leadership in fact she's worse because she financially profited from these wretched victims early and painful deaths.

She's a hard person and would be a worse leader than Abbott, who is an extreme opportunist - not unlike Howard. Howard for all his faults wasn't quite as callous. Bishop and Abbott are preaching fear to the masses to distract us while they push through volumes of legislation deregulating everything they can without consultation.

Howard was more cunning, except when control of the Senate went to his head. Just as callous, more careful.

St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 20^th, 2014 at 3:41pm:

Howard was more cunning, except when control of the Senate went to his head. Just as callous, more careful.

He was extremely careful especially when it came to appearing  fair, but it was obvious that he had sold us out.

Abbott is moving far too quickly. He's trying to fulfil 40 years of his personal ideology in a few years, but he's giving no consideration to the people he's trampling on to achieve this. Regardless of Labor's faults - you feel a lot more secure with them in government than you do under a Coalition government. Amazing how there's always an excuse for a war under the Libs.

When Howard won the 1998 election - he had less primary votes than Beazley, but won on preferences. I can see the same scenario happening in the next election.

Actually—Howard lost on preferences, 48.5% of the TPP. Just hung on due to way votes varied between seats and his huge seat buffer helped too.

Abbott will be kicked out in 2016...so we only have just over a year more of this far right extremist idiocy to endure...then it will be all over.

Bishop...CSR can kill their employees and rip off their grieving families as long as its about profits....but anyone that kills because of misguided religious beliefs is evil.

Bishop is the true evil monster in all of this.

mantra wrote on Sep 20^th, 2014 at 3:35pm:

Bishop is practising to be the next PM. She's so blank faced and monotone though, it's as if she's been programmed as a newsreader. I can see little that's human about her. I hope the RW's have noted that she's barren and mark her down the way they did with Gillard for the same handicap. adelcrow wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 1:29pm: Remember her remarks to the judge.."why should these people have their cases pushed forward in the courts just because they are seriously ill and dying?"Yep...she tried to manipulate the courts so the seriously ill victims of CSR's asbestos mining would die before her employer would have to pay any compensation.Julie Bishop is no less evil than the IS leadership in fact she's worse because she financially profited from these wretched victims early and painful deaths. She's a hard person and would be a worse leader than Abbott, who is an extreme opportunist - not unlike Howard. Howard for all his faults wasn't quite as callous. Bishop and Abbott are preaching fear to the masses to distract us while they push through volumes of legislation deregulating everything they can without consultation.

don't make the beginners mistake of quoting adelcrow thinking what he has written is fact.  you should know better.

St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 20^th, 2014 at 4:06pm:

Actually—Howard lost on preferences, 48.5% of the TPP. Just hung on due to way votes varied between seats and his huge seat buffer helped too.

wrong again... as always.  he won SEATS on preferences and that's what wins elections.  2PP figures are irrelelvent and largely to confound the dim-witted like you.

adelcrow wrote on Sep 20^th, 2014 at 4:34pm:

Abbott will be kicked out in 2016...so we only have just over a year more of this far right extremist idiocy to endure...then it will be all over.

adelcrow maths.   just like he was saying there was two years of Gillard right up about a month before the last election, it is now TWO years until the next one.

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 20^th, 2014 at 4:41pm:

St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 4:06pm: Actually—Howard lost on preferences, 48.5% of the TPP. Just hung on due to way votes varied between seats and his huge seat buffer helped too. wrong again... as always.  he won SEATS on preferences and that's what wins elections.  2PP figures are irrelelvent and largely to confound the dim-witted like you.

Get an adult to read out to you what I wrote.

Oh—and get some help with grammar, spelling and punctuation, then you can concentrate on reading & comprehension, Worm.

St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 20^th, 2014 at 4:47pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 4:41pm: St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 4:06pm: Actually—Howard lost on preferences, 48.5% of the TPP. Just hung on due to way votes varied between seats and his huge seat buffer helped too. wrong again... as always.  he won SEATS on preferences and that's what wins elections.  2PP figures are irrelelvent and largely to confound the dim-witted like you. Get an adult to read out to you what I wrote. Oh—and get some help with grammar, spelling and punctuation, then you can concentrate on reading & comprehension, Worm.

hey George-of-jungle...  worked out yet why linear and exponentional are NOT the same thing?

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 20^th, 2014 at 5:04pm:

St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 4:47pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 4:41pm: St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 4:06pm: Actually—Howard lost on preferences, 48.5% of the TPP. Just hung on due to way votes varied between seats and his huge seat buffer helped too. wrong again... as always.  he won SEATS on preferences and that's what wins elections.  2PP figures are irrelelvent and largely to confound the dim-witted like you. Get an adult to read out to you what I wrote. Oh—and get some help with grammar, spelling and punctuation, then you can concentrate on reading & comprehension, Worm. hey George-of-jungle...  worked out yet why linear and exponentional are NOT the same thing?

See what I mean? Crap capitalisation, spelling and punctuation all wrong. No wonder you cannot comprehend what you read (lips moving all the time.) Why not get a 2nd grader to read out my posts to you? Then you MAY comprehend I never said linear and exponential curves are the same.

Saying PARTS of the exponential curve can be approximately linear says just that, not talking about the entire curve, Worm.

St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 20^th, 2014 at 5:37pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 5:04pm: St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 4:47pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 4:41pm: St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 4:06pm: Actually—Howard lost on preferences, 48.5% of the TPP. Just hung on due to way votes varied between seats and his huge seat buffer helped too. wrong again... as always.  he won SEATS on preferences and that's what wins elections.  2PP figures are irrelelvent and largely to confound the dim-witted like you. Get an adult to read out to you what I wrote. Oh—and get some help with grammar, spelling and punctuation, then you can concentrate on reading & comprehension, Worm. hey George-of-jungle...  worked out yet why linear and exponentional are NOT the same thing? See what I mean? Crap capitalisation, spelling and punctuation all wrong. No wonder you cannot comprehend what you read (lips moving all the time.) Why not get a 2nd grader to read out my posts to you? Then you MAY comprehend I never said linear and exponential curves are the same. Saying PARTS of the exponential curve can be approximately linear says just that, not talking about the entire curve, Worm.

and the reason you made that claim was.... so you could claim a linear increase in temperature was in fact and exponentional one.  you are very obvious.  and very dumb.

What was that about four wheel driving? Sorry all just went off on a tangent, not unlike the posts above.

Its time wrote on Sep 20^th, 2014 at 5:52pm:

What was that about four wheel driving? Sorry all just went off on a tangent, not unlike the posts above.

We need a royal commision into Bishops time as a lawyer for CSR.

adelcrow wrote on Sep 20^th, 2014 at 5:58pm:

Its time wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 5:52pm: What was that about four wheel driving? Sorry all just went off on a tangent, not unlike the posts above. We need a royal commision into Bishops time as a lawyer for CSR.

If Labor play Tony's petty politics when they win in 2016 we probably will.

adelcrow wrote on Sep 20^th, 2014 at 5:58pm:

Its time wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 5:52pm: What was that about four wheel driving? Sorry all just went off on a tangent, not unlike the posts above. We need a royal commision into Bishops time as a lawyer for CSR.

An ambulance chaser chasing ambulances....how unusual

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 20^th, 2014 at 5:45pm:

St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 5:37pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 5:04pm: St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 4:47pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 4:41pm: St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 4:06pm: Actually—Howard lost on preferences, 48.5% of the TPP. Just hung on due to way votes varied between seats and his huge seat buffer helped too. wrong again... as always.  he won SEATS on preferences and that's what wins elections.  2PP figures are irrelelvent and largely to confound the dim-witted like you. Get an adult to read out to you what I wrote. Oh—and get some help with grammar, spelling and punctuation, then you can concentrate on reading & comprehension, Worm. hey George-of-jungle...  worked out yet why linear and exponentional are NOT the same thing? See what I mean? Crap capitalisation, spelling and punctuation all wrong. No wonder you cannot comprehend what you read (lips moving all the time.) Why not get a 2nd grader to read out my posts to you? Then you MAY comprehend I never said linear and exponential curves are the same. Saying PARTS of the exponential curve can be approximately linear says just that, not talking about the entire curve, Worm. and the reason you made that claim was.... so you could claim a linear increase in temperature was in fact and exponentional one.  you are very obvious.  and very dumb.

Did you work that out by yourself? Did you need an icepack on your head afterwards?

Does that justify repeatedly misstating what I had in fact posted? Your conclusion is wrong in any case, Worm.

Swagman wrote on Sep 20^th, 2014 at 2:06pm:

John Smith wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 1:56pm: Swagman wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 1:48pm: John Smith wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 1:44pm: no terrorists were arrested today ...you can always turn yourself in  :D it won't work ... they have to be muslims or Abbotts scare campaign will fall apart http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/avatars/smurfs.gif So why have you got that rag on your head?  ;D

i know this will come as a shock to you, but thats not really me ....

afterall,  your ears aren't really that big are they?  ;D ;D ;D

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 20^th, 2014 at 4:39pm:

don't make the beginners mistake of quoting adelcrow thinking what he has written is fact.  you should know better.

I have been posting on political forums for many years, so don't consider myself a beginner. Adelcrow is giving his opinion and I agree with it.

Bishop has always appeared cold and detached, but she's good at spruiking the party line verbatim.

Of course an opinion isn't fact, but it depends on whether it comes across as credible or not. Believers will call it a fact.

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 20^th, 2014 at 4:42pm:

adelcrow wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 4:34pm: Abbott will be kicked out in 2016...so we only have just over a year more of this far right extremist idiocy to endure...then it will be all over. adelcrow maths.   just like he was saying there was two years of Gillard right up about a month before the last election, it is now TWO years until the next one.

Shorten would have to pull off one of the biggest turn-arounds in political history for that to happen and it won't happen. The Neanderthal is simply too stupid and cannot think for himself...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFELLK8htKM

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 5:51am:

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 4:42pm: adelcrow wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 4:34pm: Abbott will be kicked out in 2016...so we only have just over a year more of this far right extremist idiocy to endure...then it will be all over. adelcrow maths.   just like he was saying there was two years of Gillard right up about a month before the last election, it is now TWO years until the next one. Shorten would have to pull off one of the biggest turn-arounds in political history for that to happen and it won't happen. The Neanderthal is simply too stupid and cannot think for himself... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFELLK8htKM

Swinging voters decide election outcomes and Tony has dug a hole for himself that he will never get out of, he could save a family from a burning building in his budgie smugglers and will still be the most detested leader this country has seen to date. Quite simply, LNP are doomed with the basher at the helm.

That is why JulieBitchop is being groomed to take over and that is probably part of the reason for the OTT “terror” raids—monkey trying to entrench himself in the PMO!

mantra wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 5:30am:

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 20th, 2014 at 4:39pm: don't make the beginners mistake of quoting adelcrow thinking what he has written is fact.  you should know better. I have been posting on political forums for many years, so don't consider myself a beginner. Adelcrow is giving his opinion and I agree with it. Bishop has always appeared cold and detached, but she's good at spruiking the party line verbatim. Of course an opinion isn't fact, but it depends on whether it comes across as credible or not. Believers will call it a fact.

And Julie Bishops work for CSR and what she said in court to delay dying victims actions against CSR is well documented.
Slater and Gordon were working for the victims of CSR where as Julie Bishop was working against the victims interests and she profited handsomely from the victims misery.
It is all factual.