Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Extremism Exposed >> another dirty stinking muslim
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1418628917

Message started by Sprintcyclist on Dec 15th, 2014 at 5:35pm

Title: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Sprintcyclist on Dec 15th, 2014 at 5:35pm


Quote:
Man arrested in terror raid in western Sydney

A 25-year-old man has been arrested in Sydney's north-west in relation to terrorism offences.

Australian Federal Police (AFP) said the Beecroft man was arrested by the joint counter-terrorism team as part of investigations into the planning of a terrorist attack on Australian soil and the facilitation of travel of Australian citizens to Syria.

New South Wales Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione said there was no suggestion the incident was connected to the hostage situation in Sydney's Martin Place.

"No, at this stage there is no connection," he said.

The AFP was expected to provide more details later.


http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-15/man-arrested-in-suspected-sydney-terror-raid-reports/5967148

what should our law be against this belief ?

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by moses on Dec 15th, 2014 at 5:52pm
Two Australian women flee to Syria to become jihadi brides

December 14, 2014 8:15AM 


A TEENAGER and a 20-year-old have become the first Australian women to flee to Syria to become jihadi brides. 
 
Hodan, 18 and her friend Hafsa, 20, flew out of Sydney in the past fortnight after having lied to their families about where they were going, according to The Sunday Telegraph.

Up to 90 young men are believed to have travelled to Syria to fight with the Islamic State terror group, and a number of European women have fled their homes to become jihadi brides but this is the first time Australian women have made the journey.

The girls, who are believed to have links with the Somali community, risk a 10 year jail sentence if they travel to Al-Raqqa, the Islamic State’s stronghold in northern Syria.

Foreign Minister Julie Bishop recently declared Raqqa a no-go zone for Australian citizens, making it an offence to enter or remain in the province without a legitimate purpose.

“Declared Al-Raqqa province under the Criminal Code sends a strong message to those Australians who seek to participate in the Syrian conflict,” she said.

Ms Bishop told Sky News this morning that the government needed to work closely with communities and families, who are the “first line of defence”.

“They’ll be the ones that can detect changes in behaviour or determine what their children are up to,” she said. “They are seemingly young Australians who think they are going off on an adventure - well, they’re not. They’re joining terrorist organisations that are carrying out shockingly brutal attacks.”

Many girls meet their prospective husbands via the website Ask.fn, where young jihadis tell the world about their terror actions.

A British woman who monitors the site told The Times of London: “I’d say 90 per cent of the Ask.fm messages to these jihadi men are marriage proposals. It’s ‘You’re so attractive. Will you marry me if I come to Syria?’

Recently a British woman was detained and threatened with execution by the Islamic State after travelling to the region to try to persuade her twin daughters Salma and Zahra Halane — nicknamed in the UK ‘the terror twins’ to leave their terrorist husbands and return home.

Attorney General George Brandis said families were now on the frontline of authorities’ hopes of stopping young Australians from travelling to the region.

“Families should tell any family members or friends over there not to engage in any fighting and to leave Syria or Iraq as soon as possible. Leaving the region is the best way to reduce the potential dangers to themselves and others,’’ he said.

source

islamic terrorism will reign over muslims while ever islam exists.

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Karnal on Dec 15th, 2014 at 10:17pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 15th, 2014 at 5:35pm:

Quote:
Man arrested in terror raid in western Sydney

A 25-year-old man has been arrested in Sydney's north-west in relation to terrorism offences.

Australian Federal Police (AFP) said the Beecroft man was arrested by the joint counter-terrorism team as part of investigations into the planning of a terrorist attack on Australian soil and the facilitation of travel of Australian citizens to Syria.

New South Wales Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione said there was no suggestion the incident was connected to the hostage situation in Sydney's Martin Place.

"No, at this stage there is no connection," he said.

The AFP was expected to provide more details later.


http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-15/man-arrested-in-suspected-sydney-terror-raid-reports/5967148

what should our law be against this belief ?


Good question, Sprint. What law do you think he was arrested under?

Do you think it was criminal law?

Arrest them.

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Brian Ross on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:00am

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 15th, 2014 at 5:35pm:

Quote:
Man arrested in terror raid in western Sydney

A 25-year-old man has been arrested in Sydney's north-west in relation to terrorism offences.

Australian Federal Police (AFP) said the Beecroft man was arrested by the joint counter-terrorism team as part of investigations into the planning of a terrorist attack on Australian soil and the facilitation of travel of Australian citizens to Syria.

New South Wales Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione said there was no suggestion the incident was connected to the hostage situation in Sydney's Martin Place.

"No, at this stage there is no connection," he said.

The AFP was expected to provide more details later.


http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-15/man-arrested-in-suspected-sydney-terror-raid-reports/5967148

what should our law be against this belief ?


We already have more than sufficient and draconian laws against Terrorism, Sprint.

Are you suggesting we need to persecute people who share a religion with this fellow?   Why are you against our liberal, democratic traditions and values such as Freedom of Religion and Association, Sprint?

I look forward to hearing how you will explain how the government(s) can introduce laws in contravention of Section 116 of the Australian Constitution, which prohibit the Government(s) of Australia from passing laws "prohibiting the free exercise of any religion."    ::)

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Yadda on Dec 16th, 2014 at 9:44am

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:00am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 15th, 2014 at 5:35pm:

Quote:
Man arrested in terror raid in western Sydney

A 25-year-old man has been arrested in Sydney's north-west in relation to terrorism offences.

Australian Federal Police (AFP) said the Beecroft man was arrested by the joint counter-terrorism team as part of investigations into the planning of a terrorist attack on Australian soil and the facilitation of travel of Australian citizens to Syria.

New South Wales Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione said there was no suggestion the incident was connected to the hostage situation in Sydney's Martin Place.

"No, at this stage there is no connection," he said.

The AFP was expected to provide more details later.


http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-15/man-arrested-in-suspected-sydney-terror-raid-reports/5967148

what should our law be against this belief ?


We already have more than sufficient and draconian laws against Terrorism, Sprint.


Are you suggesting we need to persecute people who share a religion with this fellow?



Brian,

ISLAM.

It is ISLAM, which is the religion which moslems living in Australia 'share with this fellow'.iBrian Ross wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:00am:


Why are you against our liberal, democratic traditions and values such as Freedom of Religion and Association, Sprint?


I look forward to hearing how you will explain how the government(s) can introduce laws in contravention of Section 116 of the Australian Constitution, which prohibit the Government(s) of Australia from passing laws "prohibiting the free exercise of any religion."    ::)



Brian,

ISLAM considers it the 'Religious Freedom' of 'the moslem', to murder those who reject ISLAM [and reject ISLAM's authority over the lives of EVERY HUMAN BEING ON THE PLANET].

That is the 'Religious Freedom' which you propose that we should extend to ISLAM !

If that is what you propose, then i call you insane.


ISLAM is a murderous death cult.

Even ISLAM's own foundation texts attest to that fact      [....of ISLAM being a murderous death cult].

Your refusal to acknowledge those evidences of ISLAM's malice, proves your own malice, or, insanity [imo].




WHAT TO DO ????

The spread and practice of ISLAM, within Australia, should be proscribed by law [by an act of the Commonwealth parliament].

[but i doubt that our parliamentarians will ever accede to this sane necessity.]







EVIDENCE WHICH SUPPORT MY CLAIMS ABOUT ISLAM [made above]......

Dictionary;
Muslim = = a follower of Islam.


Google;
Shahada, confession of faith, of a muslim

"There is no god except for Allah alone; and Muhammad is the Apostle of Allah."





ISLAMIC LAW....
"Ibn 'Umar related that the Messenger of Allah, upon whom be peace, said, "I have been ordered to kill the people until they testify that there is no god except Allah, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and they establish prayer and pay the zakah. If they do that, their blood and wealth are protected from me save by the rights of Islam. Their reckoning will be with Allah." (Related by al-Bukhari and Muslim.) "
fiqhussunnah/fus1_06


ISLAMIC LAW....
"Ibn 'Abbas reported that the Prophet said: "The bare essence of Islam and the basics of the religion are three [acts], upon which Islam has been established. Whoever leaves one of them becomes an unbeliever and his blood may legally be spilled. [The acts are:] Testifying that there is no God except Allah, the obligatory prayers, and the fast of Ramadan."...."
fiqhussunnah/#3.110

n.b.
"Whoever......becomes an unbeliever.....his blood may legally be spilled."





THE HADITH....

"...the Prophet said, 'If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him." - DEAD.
hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #004.052.260




Yadda said....

Quote:

Every moslem in Australia [and indeed, every moslem on the planet], by self declaring as a moslem, is self declaring a criminal intent [by our laws] against local non-moslems.

ISLAM is a criminal compact among moslems, to wage a violent 'religious' war against non-moslems ['unbelievers'].

TRUTH.

All cognisant moslems themselves, know this to be true, and deny and hide this criminal intent from their non-moslem host communities.




Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Sprintcyclist on Dec 16th, 2014 at 10:10am

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:00am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 15th, 2014 at 5:35pm:

Quote:
Man arrested in terror raid in western Sydney

A 25-year-old man has been arrested in Sydney's north-west in relation to terrorism offences.

Australian Federal Police (AFP) said the Beecroft man was arrested by the joint counter-terrorism team as part of investigations into the planning of a terrorist attack on Australian soil and the facilitation of travel of Australian citizens to Syria.

New South Wales Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione said there was no suggestion the incident was connected to the hostage situation in Sydney's Martin Place.

"No, at this stage there is no connection," he said.

The AFP was expected to provide more details later.


http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-15/man-arrested-in-suspected-sydney-terror-raid-reports/5967148

what should our law be against this belief ?


We already have more than sufficient and draconian laws against Terrorism, Sprint.

Are you suggesting we need to persecute people who share a religion with this fellow?   Why are you against our liberal, democratic traditions and values such as Freedom of Religion and Association, Sprint?

I look forward to hearing how you will explain how the government(s) can introduce laws in contravention of Section 116 of the Australian Constitution, which prohibit the Government(s) of Australia from passing laws "prohibiting the free exercise of any religion."    ::)


change the law.

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Hot Breath on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:01am

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 10:10am:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:00am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 15th, 2014 at 5:35pm:

Quote:
Man arrested in terror raid in western Sydney

A 25-year-old man has been arrested in Sydney's north-west in relation to terrorism offences.

Australian Federal Police (AFP) said the Beecroft man was arrested by the joint counter-terrorism team as part of investigations into the planning of a terrorist attack on Australian soil and the facilitation of travel of Australian citizens to Syria.

New South Wales Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione said there was no suggestion the incident was connected to the hostage situation in Sydney's Martin Place.

"No, at this stage there is no connection," he said.

The AFP was expected to provide more details later.


http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-15/man-arrested-in-suspected-sydney-terror-raid-reports/5967148

what should our law be against this belief ?


We already have more than sufficient and draconian laws against Terrorism, Sprint.

Are you suggesting we need to persecute people who share a religion with this fellow?   Why are you against our liberal, democratic traditions and values such as Freedom of Religion and Association, Sprint?

I look forward to hearing how you will explain how the government(s) can introduce laws in contravention of Section 116 of the Australian Constitution, which prohibit the Government(s) of Australia from passing laws "prohibiting the free exercise of any religion."    ::)


change the law.



Good luck with a constitution change of that magnitude!  It will be fought by every religion in the land.  Any government that attempted it would suffer a massive defeat as they were damned from ever pulpit, by every preacher.   It would suffer the same fate as the Communist Party Dissolution bill!    ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D :D :D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Rocketanski on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:03am
This piece of muslim trash was a bloody asylum seeker. Thank you Labor. Strike another up for the do-gooders.

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Hot Breath on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:07am

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:03am:
This piece of muslim trash was a bloody asylum seeker. Thank you Labor. Strike another up for the do-gooders.


Errr, he arrived in Australia in 1996.  He applied and was granted Aslyum in 2001.  Guess which party was in power as the Government for both those dates?  It wasn't Labor.   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D :D

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by greggerypeccary on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:12am

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:03am:
This piece of muslim trash was a bloody asylum seeker. Thank you Labor. Strike another up for the do-gooders.



Labor?

What did Labor have to do with him being granted asylum?

This is the man you should be thanking:



Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Rocketanski on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:14am
Keating was in until the 11th of march. Howard was cleaning up Labor's mess again.

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by greggerypeccary on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:22am

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
Keating was in until the 11th of march. Howard was cleaning up Labor's mess again.



The nut job was granted asylum in 2001.

This guy had been in the job for five years by then.



He's the man you should be thanking.

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Hot Breath on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:24am

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
Keating was in until the 11th of march. Howard was cleaning up Labor's mess again.


This man arrived in late 1996.  He was granted Asylum in 2001.  Again, who was the PM in that time period?  John W. Howard, a ilLiberal party politician.   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Rocketanski on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:25am

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:22am:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
Keating was in until the 11th of march. Howard was cleaning up Labor's mess again.



The nut job was granted asylum in 2001.

This guy had been in the job for five years by then.



He's the man you should be thanking.
That's okay because I don't like the Liberal Party either. Just be careful that it wasn't Keating that let him in the country. I blame the idiots who brought islam to our country and a future of problems. Thanks a smacking lot you  m orons.

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by greggerypeccary on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:30am

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:25am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:22am:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
Keating was in until the 11th of march. Howard was cleaning up Labor's mess again.



The nut job was granted asylum in 2001.

This guy had been in the job for five years by then.



He's the man you should be thanking.
That's okay because I don't like the Liberal Party either. Just be careful that it wasn't Keating that let him in the country. I blame the idiots who brought islam to our country and a future of problems. Thanks a smacking lot you  m orons.



It's not who let him into the country who counts: it's who let him stay.

This is the man you should be thanking:



Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Rocketanski on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:31am

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:30am:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:25am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:22am:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
Keating was in until the 11th of march. Howard was cleaning up Labor's mess again.



The nut job was granted asylum in 2001.

This guy had been in the job for five years by then.



He's the man you should be thanking.
That's okay because I don't like the Liberal Party either. Just be careful that it wasn't Keating that let him in the country. I blame the idiots who brought islam to our country and a future of problems. Thanks a smacking lot you  m orons.



It's not who let him into the country who counts: it's who let him stay.

This is the man you should be thanking:

So whoever let him inside our borders doesn't count?

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by greggerypeccary on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:35am

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:31am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:30am:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:25am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:22am:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
Keating was in until the 11th of march. Howard was cleaning up Labor's mess again.



The nut job was granted asylum in 2001.

This guy had been in the job for five years by then.



He's the man you should be thanking.
That's okay because I don't like the Liberal Party either. Just be careful that it wasn't Keating that let him in the country. I blame the idiots who brought islam to our country and a future of problems. Thanks a smacking lot you  m orons.



It's not who let him into the country who counts: it's who let him stay.

This is the man you should be thanking:

So whoever let him inside our borders doesn't count?



No.

It's the person who let him stay who counts.

They had two choices:

1. Send him back home
2. Let him stay

They chose number 2, which led to yesterday's tragedy.

This is the man you should be thanking:


Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Hot Breath on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:41pm
No one can tell the future.  When this man was granted Asylum, he wasn't mentally ill.  That developed later.   So, don't blame the process or other Asylum Seekers for what this man did.  That is Guilt by Association.  That is not part of our democratic tradition.  Why Rocket do you hate our Australian traditions?    ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Sprintcyclist on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:44pm

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:41pm:
No one can tell the future.  When this man was granted Asylum, he wasn't mentally ill.  That developed later.   So, don't blame the process or other Asylum Seekers for what this man did.  That is Guilt by Association.  That is not part of our democratic tradition.  Why Rocket do you hate our Australian traditions?    ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D


if he is a muslim he is mentally ill

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by John Smith on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:46pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:44pm:

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:41pm:
No one can tell the future.  When this man was granted Asylum, he wasn't mentally ill.  That developed later.   So, don't blame the process or other Asylum Seekers for what this man did.  That is Guilt by Association.  That is not part of our democratic tradition.  Why Rocket do you hate our Australian traditions?    ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D


if he is a muslim he is mentally ill


judging by some of your posts over the last few days, I'd say you are mentally ill too!

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Sprintcyclist on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:47pm

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:24am:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
Keating was in until the 11th of march. Howard was cleaning up Labor's mess again.


This man arrived in late 1996.  He was granted Asylum in 2001.  Again, who was the PM in that time period?  John W. Howard, a ilLiberal party politician.   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D


when the libs are in power the illegals are halted.
the alp invite the scum in.



Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by greggerypeccary on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:49pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:47pm:

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:24am:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
Keating was in until the 11th of march. Howard was cleaning up Labor's mess again.


This man arrived in late 1996.  He was granted Asylum in 2001.  Again, who was the PM in that time period?  John W. Howard, a ilLiberal party politician.   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D


when the libs are in power the illegals are halted.
the alp invite the scum in.



He wasn't an illegal: Howard granted him asylum.

Your hero is responsible for yesterday's tragedy.

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Rocketanski on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:52pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:49pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:47pm:

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:24am:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
Keating was in until the 11th of march. Howard was cleaning up Labor's mess again.


This man arrived in late 1996.  He was granted Asylum in 2001.  Again, who was the PM in that time period?  John W. Howard, a ilLiberal party politician.   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D


when the libs are in power the illegals are halted.
the alp invite the scum in.



He wasn't an illegal: Howard granted him asylum.

Your hero is responsible for yesterday's tragedy.
He was a stinking asylum seeker. Nobody can deny that.

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by greggerypeccary on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:00pm

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:49pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:47pm:

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:24am:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
Keating was in until the 11th of march. Howard was cleaning up Labor's mess again.


This man arrived in late 1996.  He was granted Asylum in 2001.  Again, who was the PM in that time period?  John W. Howard, a ilLiberal party politician.   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D


when the libs are in power the illegals are halted.
the alp invite the scum in.



He wasn't an illegal: Howard granted him asylum.

Your hero is responsible for yesterday's tragedy.
He was a stinking asylum seeker. Nobody can deny that.



That's correct: nobody is even trying to deny that.

He was seeking asylum.

Howard had two options:
1. Send him home
2. Let him stay here

He chose the second option.




Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Rocketanski on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:02pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:00pm:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:49pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:47pm:

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:24am:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
Keating was in until the 11th of march. Howard was cleaning up Labor's mess again.


This man arrived in late 1996.  He was granted Asylum in 2001.  Again, who was the PM in that time period?  John W. Howard, a ilLiberal party politician.   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D


when the libs are in power the illegals are halted.
the alp invite the scum in.



He wasn't an illegal: Howard granted him asylum.

Your hero is responsible for yesterday's tragedy.
He was a stinking asylum seeker. Nobody can deny that.



That's correct: nobody is even trying to deny that.

He was seeking asylum.

Howard had two options:
1. Send him home
2. Let him stay here

He chose the second option.
You've mention that. Let's talk about that Afghan piece of crap arrested recently planning to cut some poor buggers head off. He came in under Labor.

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by greggerypeccary on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:04pm

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:00pm:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:49pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:47pm:

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:24am:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
Keating was in until the 11th of march. Howard was cleaning up Labor's mess again.


This man arrived in late 1996.  He was granted Asylum in 2001.  Again, who was the PM in that time period?  John W. Howard, a ilLiberal party politician.   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D


when the libs are in power the illegals are halted.
the alp invite the scum in.



He wasn't an illegal: Howard granted him asylum.

Your hero is responsible for yesterday's tragedy.
He was a stinking asylum seeker. Nobody can deny that.



That's correct: nobody is even trying to deny that.

He was seeking asylum.

Howard had two options:
1. Send him home
2. Let him stay here

He chose the second option.
You've mention that. Let's talk about that Afghan piece of crap arrested recently planning to cut some poor buggers head off. He came in under Labor.



Ah, nice: change the subject.

You're a sly one, I'll give you that.


Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Rocketanski on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:08pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:04pm:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:00pm:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:49pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:47pm:

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:24am:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
Keating was in until the 11th of march. Howard was cleaning up Labor's mess again.


This man arrived in late 1996.  He was granted Asylum in 2001.  Again, who was the PM in that time period?  John W. Howard, a ilLiberal party politician.   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D


when the libs are in power the illegals are halted.
the alp invite the scum in.



He wasn't an illegal: Howard granted him asylum.

Your hero is responsible for yesterday's tragedy.
He was a stinking asylum seeker. Nobody can deny that.



That's correct: nobody is even trying to deny that.

He was seeking asylum.

Howard had two options:
1. Send him home
2. Let him stay here

He chose the second option.
You've mention that. Let's talk about that Afghan piece of crap arrested recently planning to cut some poor buggers head off. He came in under Labor.



Ah, nice: change the subject.

You're a sly one, I'll give you that.
I don't care which PM brought them here. It disgusts me . Some of your downtrodden asylum seekers are racking up some brutal crimes. Sexual assaults, murders and now terrorism offences. How do you feel about that? Reminds me of that piece of crap Iranian who cut that other blokes head off in Parramatta Shopping Centre in front of kids. Fantastic!!

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Hot Breath on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:23pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:44pm:

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:41pm:
No one can tell the future.  When this man was granted Asylum, he wasn't mentally ill.  That developed later.   So, don't blame the process or other Asylum Seekers for what this man did.  That is Guilt by Association.  That is not part of our democratic tradition.  Why Rocket do you hate our Australian traditions?    ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D


if he is a muslim he is mentally ill


You are obviously mentally ill Sprint.  Seek help, please!  I don't want to read about some innocent Muslims being hurt by you!   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Hot Breath on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:25pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:47pm:

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:24am:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
Keating was in until the 11th of march. Howard was cleaning up Labor's mess again.


This man arrived in late 1996.  He was granted Asylum in 2001.  Again, who was the PM in that time period?  John W. Howard, a ilLiberal party politician.   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D


when the libs are in power the illegals are halted.


This would explain the tens of thousands of illegal immigrants who have arrived in Australia under the ilLiberal Governments for decades?   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Rocketanski on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:26pm

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:25pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:47pm:

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:24am:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
Keating was in until the 11th of march. Howard was cleaning up Labor's mess again.


This man arrived in late 1996.  He was granted Asylum in 2001.  Again, who was the PM in that time period?  John W. Howard, a ilLiberal party politician.   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D


when the libs are in power the illegals are halted.


This would explain the tens of thousands of illegal immigrants who have arrived in Australia under the ilLiberal Governments for decades?   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D
Because the Liberal Party comes into power when our borders are down.

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by greggerypeccary on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:34pm

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:08pm:
I don't care which PM brought them here.

Then why did you bring it up?

"This piece of muslim trash was a bloody asylum seeker. Thank you Labor. Strike another up for the do-gooders."


Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:08pm:
Some of your downtrodden asylum seekers are racking up some brutal crimes. Sexual assaults, murders and now terrorism offences. How do you feel about that?

I don't like that at all.

Are you suggesting that if it wasn't for asylum seekers, we wouldn't have sexual assaults, murders, and terrorism offences?


Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Karnal on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:36pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:44pm:

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:41pm:
No one can tell the future.  When this man was granted Asylum, he wasn't mentally ill.  That developed later.   So, don't blame the process or other Asylum Seekers for what this man did.  That is Guilt by Association.  That is not part of our democratic tradition.  Why Rocket do you hate our Australian traditions?    ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D


if he is a muslim he is mentally ill


Medicate them.

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by BachToTheFuture on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:37pm

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:25pm:
This would explain the tens of thousands of illegal immigrants who have arrived in Australia under the ilLiberal Governments for decades?


Sheesh, HB, get your facts right. Illegal immigrants means people who come by boat, not plane. If you come by plane, you've got money and might be a Liberal supporter. They're simply "non-regular-entrants".


greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:34pm:
Are you suggesting that if it wasn't for asylum seekers, we wouldn't have sexual assaults, murders, and terrorism offences?


Precisely. All those dirty Muslim habits have rubbed off onto the good people trying to leave.

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Sprintcyclist on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:37pm

Karnal wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:36pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:44pm:

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:41pm:
No one can tell the future.  When this man was granted Asylum, he wasn't mentally ill.  That developed later.   So, don't blame the process or other Asylum Seekers for what this man did.  That is Guilt by Association.  That is not part of our democratic tradition.  Why Rocket do you hate our Australian traditions?    ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D


if he is a muslim he is mentally ill


Medicate them.


with a lump of lead

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Rocketanski on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:38pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:34pm:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:08pm:
I don't care which PM brought them here.

Then why did you bring it up?

"This piece of muslim trash was a bloody asylum seeker. Thank you Labor. Strike another up for the do-gooders."


Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:08pm:
Some of your downtrodden asylum seekers are racking up some brutal crimes. Sexual assaults, murders and now terrorism offences. How do you feel about that?

I don't like that at all.

Are you suggesting that if it wasn't for asylum seekers, we wouldn't have sexual assaults, murders, and terrorism offences?
Even you must be questioning the character of some of the dirtbags that pushed their way into our country via people smuggling criminals. They certainly are racking up the crimes.

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by greggerypeccary on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:39pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:47pm:

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:24am:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
Keating was in until the 11th of march. Howard was cleaning up Labor's mess again.


This man arrived in late 1996.  He was granted Asylum in 2001.  Again, who was the PM in that time period?  John W. Howard, a ilLiberal party politician.   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D


when the libs are in power the illegals are halted.



Who's a naughty boy then?

First you were inciting acts of terrorism, and now you're telling porkies.

There were plenty of illegals coming in by plane when the Libs were last in power, and they're still coming in today under Abboott.

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Hot Breath on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:43pm

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:26pm:

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:25pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:47pm:

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:24am:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
Keating was in until the 11th of march. Howard was cleaning up Labor's mess again.


This man arrived in late 1996.  He was granted Asylum in 2001.  Again, who was the PM in that time period?  John W. Howard, a ilLiberal party politician.   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D


when the libs are in power the illegals are halted.


This would explain the tens of thousands of illegal immigrants who have arrived in Australia under the ilLiberal Governments for decades?   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D
Because the Liberal Party comes into power when our borders are down.


I said decades.  The ilLiberal Party has been in power for approximately 12 out of the last 15 years.  So, who has allowed all these illegal migrants to arrive and stay in our society?  Note, not official Asylum Seekers or Refugees but actual, real, illegal immigrants who hide amongst the population after their arrival.   I'll give you a hint, it's not the Labor Party.   These illegal immigrants arrive by plane, not boat.  They over-stay their visas.  They take jobs illegally, given to them by unscrupulous Australian employers.  Tsk, tsk.   ;D ;D :D :D ;D ;D :D :D ;D ;D

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Rocketanski on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:45pm

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:43pm:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:26pm:

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:25pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:47pm:

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:24am:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
Keating was in until the 11th of march. Howard was cleaning up Labor's mess again.


This man arrived in late 1996.  He was granted Asylum in 2001.  Again, who was the PM in that time period?  John W. Howard, a ilLiberal party politician.   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D


when the libs are in power the illegals are halted.


This would explain the tens of thousands of illegal immigrants who have arrived in Australia under the ilLiberal Governments for decades?   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D
Because the Liberal Party comes into power when our borders are down.


I said decades.  The ilLiberal Party has been in power for approximately 12 out of the last 15 years.  So, who has allowed all these illegal migrants to arrive and stay in our society?  Note, not official Asylum Seekers or Refugees but actual, real, illegal immigrants who hide amongst the population after their arrival.   I'll give you a hint, it's not the Labor Party.   These illegal immigrants arrive by plane, not boat.  They over-stay their visas.  They take jobs illegally, given to them by unscrupulous Australian employers.  Tsk, tsk.   ;D ;D :D :D ;D ;D :D :D ;D ;D
12 out of the last 15 years. Are you sure about that?

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Karnal on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:46pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:34pm:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:08pm:
I don't care which PM brought them here.

Then why did you bring it up?

"This piece of muslim trash was a bloody asylum seeker. Thank you Labor. Strike another up for the do-gooders."


Maybe Jockohomo was thanking the do-gooders for being out of power. You know, thank heavens the grown-ups were in charge.

Good point, Homo.

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Karnal on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:47pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:37pm:

Karnal wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:36pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:44pm:

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:41pm:
No one can tell the future.  When this man was granted Asylum, he wasn't mentally ill.  That developed later.   So, don't blame the process or other Asylum Seekers for what this man did.  That is Guilt by Association.  That is not part of our democratic tradition.  Why Rocket do you hate our Australian traditions?    ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D


if he is a muslim he is mentally ill


Medicate them.


with a lump of lead


Did Jesus use lead too, Sprint?

I thought he used the Holy Spirit.

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Rocketanski on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:48pm

Karnal wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:46pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:34pm:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:08pm:
I don't care which PM brought them here.

Then why did you bring it up?

"This piece of muslim trash was a bloody asylum seeker. Thank you Labor. Strike another up for the do-gooders."


Maybe Jockohomo was thanking the do-gooders for being out of power. You know, thank heavens the grown-ups were in charge.

Good point, Homo.
Poor old Ms Knowledge must be thinking- Oh my god, another brother has screwed up again. Looks like I'll have to defend my brothers and sisters until I'm blue in the face again.

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Karnal on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:50pm

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:48pm:

Karnal wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:46pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:34pm:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:08pm:
I don't care which PM brought them here.

Then why did you bring it up?

"This piece of muslim trash was a bloody asylum seeker. Thank you Labor. Strike another up for the do-gooders."


Maybe Jockohomo was thanking the do-gooders for being out of power. You know, thank heavens the grown-ups were in charge.

Good point, Homo.
Poor old Ms Knowledge must be thinking- Oh my god, another brother has screwed up again. Looks like I'll have to defend my brothers and sisters until I'm blue in the face again.


Is that what you meant by the do-gooders, Homo? You're not saying.

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Rocketanski on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:53pm

Karnal wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:50pm:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:48pm:

Karnal wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:46pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:34pm:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:08pm:
I don't care which PM brought them here.

Then why did you bring it up?

"This piece of muslim trash was a bloody asylum seeker. Thank you Labor. Strike another up for the do-gooders."


Maybe Jockohomo was thanking the do-gooders for being out of power. You know, thank heavens the grown-ups were in charge.

Good point, Homo.
Poor old Ms Knowledge must be thinking- Oh my god, another brother has screwed up again. Looks like I'll have to defend my brothers and sisters until I'm blue in the face again.


Is that what you meant by the do-gooders, Homo? You're not saying.
You know -do-gooders. The same people that let this Iranian piece of trash out on bail when he's got sexual assault charges hanging over his head and an Islamic extremist attitude.

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Rocketanski on Dec 16th, 2014 at 2:04pm

Karnal wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:50pm:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:48pm:

Karnal wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:46pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:34pm:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:08pm:
I don't care which PM brought them here.

Then why did you bring it up?

"This piece of muslim trash was a bloody asylum seeker. Thank you Labor. Strike another up for the do-gooders."


Maybe Jockohomo was thanking the do-gooders for being out of power. You know, thank heavens the grown-ups were in charge.

Good point, Homo.
Poor old Ms Knowledge must be thinking- Oh my god, another brother has screwed up again. Looks like I'll have to defend my brothers and sisters until I'm blue in the face again.


Is that what you meant by the do-gooders, Homo? You're not saying.
The same do-gooders who didn't deport him when this piece of trash was writing offensive letters to dead Australian soldiers families.

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Karnal on Dec 16th, 2014 at 2:13pm

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 2:04pm:

Karnal wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:50pm:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:48pm:

Karnal wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:46pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:34pm:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:08pm:
I don't care which PM brought them here.

Then why did you bring it up?

"This piece of muslim trash was a bloody asylum seeker. Thank you Labor. Strike another up for the do-gooders."


Maybe Jockohomo was thanking the do-gooders for being out of power. You know, thank heavens the grown-ups were in charge.

Good point, Homo.
Poor old Ms Knowledge must be thinking- Oh my god, another brother has screwed up again. Looks like I'll have to defend my brothers and sisters until I'm blue in the face again.


Is that what you meant by the do-gooders, Homo? You're not saying.
The same do-gooders who didn't deport him when this piece of trash was writing offensive letters to dead Australian soldiers families.


That's against the law, Homo. Are you suggesting a government send someone to a country without a visa?

STOP THE BOATS.

So, what did you mean by do-gooders letting this fellow in?

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Karnal on Dec 16th, 2014 at 2:14pm

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:53pm:

Karnal wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:50pm:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:48pm:

Karnal wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:46pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:34pm:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:08pm:
I don't care which PM brought them here.

Then why did you bring it up?

"This piece of muslim trash was a bloody asylum seeker. Thank you Labor. Strike another up for the do-gooders."


Maybe Jockohomo was thanking the do-gooders for being out of power. You know, thank heavens the grown-ups were in charge.

Good point, Homo.
Poor old Ms Knowledge must be thinking- Oh my god, another brother has screwed up again. Looks like I'll have to defend my brothers and sisters until I'm blue in the face again.


Is that what you meant by the do-gooders, Homo? You're not saying.
You know -do-gooders. The same people that let this Iranian piece of trash out on bail when he's got sexual assault charges hanging over his head and an Islamic extremist attitude.


The Parole Board?

They aren't the Labor Party, Homo. What do they have to do with this again?

Title: Re: another dirty stinking muslim
Post by Hot Breath on Dec 16th, 2014 at 3:17pm

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:45pm:

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:43pm:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:26pm:

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 1:25pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 12:47pm:

|dev|null wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:24am:

Rocketanski wrote on Dec 16th, 2014 at 11:14am:
Keating was in until the 11th of march. Howard was cleaning up Labor's mess again.


This man arrived in late 1996.  He was granted Asylum in 2001.  Again, who was the PM in that time period?  John W. Howard, a ilLiberal party politician.   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D


when the libs are in power the illegals are halted.


This would explain the tens of thousands of illegal immigrants who have arrived in Australia under the ilLiberal Governments for decades?   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D
Because the Liberal Party comes into power when our borders are down.


I said decades.  The ilLiberal Party has been in power for approximately 12 out of the last 15 years.  So, who has allowed all these illegal migrants to arrive and stay in our society?  Note, not official Asylum Seekers or Refugees but actual, real, illegal immigrants who hide amongst the population after their arrival.   I'll give you a hint, it's not the Labor Party.   These illegal immigrants arrive by plane, not boat.  They over-stay their visas.  They take jobs illegally, given to them by unscrupulous Australian employers.  Tsk, tsk.   ;D ;D :D :D ;D ;D :D :D ;D ;D
12 out of the last 15 years. Are you sure about that?


"Approximately" - yes.    ;D ;D :D :D ;D ;D :D :D ;D ;D

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.