Quote:

..........The extreme lack of scientific and social contributions from the Muslim world may be another result of inbreeding. While 184 Jews have received the Nobel Prize for their scientific, social and artistic contributions to the world, only 10 Muslims have had this honor. Since 1901 Jews have received 34 percent of all Nobel Prizes. The world Jewish population in 2012 is approximately 14 million whereas the total number of Muslims is estimated to number 1.5 billion..........

http://islamversuseurope.blogspot.com.au/2013/05/psychologist-serious-consequences-of.html

The evidence of a repressive cult .

Quote:

..........Muslim countries only produce one-tenth of the World average when it comes to scientific research. In 2003 the world average for production of scientific articles was 137 per million inhabitants, whereas the average among 47 Islamic countries was just 13..........

http://islamversuseurope.blogspot.com.au/2013/05/psychologist-serious-consequences-of.html

islam - produces 1/10th of the scientific articles.
Almost ALL the terrorists.
Far higher 'genetic deficiencies'.

Ban islam.

How many Muslims have ever won a Nobel prize, Sprint? Tell me that.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 7^th, 2015 at 11:10am:

Quote: ..........The extreme lack of scientific and social contributions from the Muslim world may be another result of inbreeding. While 184 Jews have received the Nobel Prize for their scientific, social and artistic contributions to the world, only 10 Muslims have had this honor. Since 1901 Jews have received 34 percent of all Nobel Prizes. The world Jewish population in 2012 is approximately 14 million whereas the total number of Muslims is estimated to number 1.5 billion.......... http://islamversuseurope.blogspot.com.au/2013/05/psychologist-serious-consequences-of.html The evidence of a repressive cult .

They may not have the most Nobel prizes but they sure do get alot of coversions to islam from various other religions.

There goes your argument that islam is repressive when people are entering islam at a steady rate.

wally1 wrote on Jan 7^th, 2015 at 6:06pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 7th, 2015 at 11:10am: Quote: ..........The extreme lack of scientific and social contributions from the Muslim world may be another result of inbreeding. While 184 Jews have received the Nobel Prize for their scientific, social and artistic contributions to the world, only 10 Muslims have had this honor. Since 1901 Jews have received 34 percent of all Nobel Prizes. The world Jewish population in 2012 is approximately 14 million whereas the total number of Muslims is estimated to number 1.5 billion.......... http://islamversuseurope.blogspot.com.au/2013/05/psychologist-serious-consequences-of.html The evidence of a repressive cult . They may not have the most Nobel prizes but they sure do get alot of coversions to islam from various other religions. There goes your argument that islam is repressive when people are entering islam at a steady rate.

With a convert or die philosophy... no bloody wonder.

Quantum wrote on Jan 7^th, 2015 at 9:51pm:

With a convert or die philosophy... no bloody wonder.

Once they have they kill to keep you, it's all in the little black book.

---

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 7^th, 2015 at 11:19am:

islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists.

Not even close.

Who told you that?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 10:10am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 7th, 2015 at 11:19am: islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists. Not even close. Who told you that?

How many Australians have died at the hands of Muslim nutjobs? Over 100. Don't know any other group that has racked up that amount of Australian dead. It's understandable that the Australian public don't like or trust muslims when you look at it.

Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 10:14am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:10am: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 7th, 2015 at 11:19am: islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists. Not even close. Who told you that? How many Australians have died at the hands of Muslim nutjobs?

That's not what Sprint was discussing.

He said, "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists."

He couldn't have been further from the truth.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 10:17am:

Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:14am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:10am: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 7th, 2015 at 11:19am: islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists. Not even close. Who told you that? How many Australians have died at the hands of Muslim nutjobs? That's not what Sprint was discussing. He said, "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists." He couldn't have been further from the truth.

It is a big problem  for western people greggorry.

Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 10:18am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:17am: Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:14am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:10am: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 7th, 2015 at 11:19am: islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists. Not even close. Who told you that? How many Australians have died at the hands of Muslim nutjobs? That's not what Sprint was discussing. He said, "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists." He couldn't have been further from the truth. It is a big problem  for western people greggorry.

Continually telling lies, like "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists", is a "big problem"?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 10:23am:

Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:18am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:17am: Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:14am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:10am: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 7th, 2015 at 11:19am: islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists. Not even close. Who told you that? How many Australians have died at the hands of Muslim nutjobs? That's not what Sprint was discussing. He said, "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists." He couldn't have been further from the truth. It is a big problem  for western people greggorry. Continually telling lies, like "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists", is a "big problem"?

All is wrong. A big chunk of it is correct.

Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 10:28am:

All is wrong. A big chunk of it is correct.

Almost ALL is wrong too.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 10:32am:

Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:28am: All is wrong. A big chunk of it is correct. Almost ALL is wrong too.

Look at the sates in the last 40 years. They've had a few right to life terrorist attacks. Small personal attacks- letter bombs etc. That Oklahoma bombing. WTC attack, 9/11 , Boston Marathon. The most death has been from Isalmic extremism. It's a big issue. England has had IRA bombings and various Islamic attacks. It's fair to say that at this moment (last 15 years) it's mostly Islamic attacks in the west. There is a trend happening.

Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 10:40am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:32am: Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:28am: All is wrong. A big chunk of it is correct. Almost ALL is wrong too. Look at the states in the last 40 years.

The States:

" ... official FBI records ... show that only 6% of terrorist attacks on U.S. soil from 1980 to 2005 were carried out by Islamic extremists.  The remaining 94% were from other groups (42% from Latinos, 24% from extreme left wing groups, 7% from extremist Jews, 5% from communists, and 16% from all other groups)."


Europe:

" ... a whopping 99.6% of terrorist attacks in Europe were by non-Muslim groups; a good 84.8% of attacks were from separatist groups completely unrelated to Islam.  Leftist groups accounted for over sixteen times as much terrorism as radical Islamic groups.  Only a measly 0.4% of terrorist attacks from 2006 to 2008 could be attributed to extremist Muslims."

http://www.loonwatch.com/2010/01/terrorism-in-europe/

http://www.loonwatch.com/2010/01/not-all-terrorists-are-muslims/

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 10:52am:

Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:40am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:32am: Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:28am: All is wrong. A big chunk of it is correct. Almost ALL is wrong too. Look at the states in the last 40 years. The States: " ... official FBI records ... show that only 6% of terrorist attacks on U.S. soil from 1980 to 2005 were carried out by Islamic extremists.  The remaining 94% were from other groups (42% from Latinos, 24% from extreme left wing groups, 7% from extremist Jews, 5% from communists, and 16% from all other groups)." Europe: " ... a whopping 99.6% of terrorist attacks in Europe were by non-Muslim groups; a good 84.8% of attacks were from separatist groups completely unrelated to Islam.  Leftist groups accounted for over sixteen times as much terrorism as radical Islamic groups.  Only a measly 0.4% of terrorist attacks from 2006 to 2008 could be attributed to extremist Muslims." http://www.loonwatch.com/2010/01/terrorism-in-europe/ http://www.loonwatch.com/2010/01/not-all-terrorists-are-muslims/

None of the others killed over 3,000 people in one go though. How about- Muslims responsible for most of the worlds bad terrorist activities??

Are there any good Terrorist activities Rocket?  You make a needless qualification.  In reality, Muslims aren't responsible for most of the world's Terrorism.   You seem ignorant of the numerous Terrorist attacks in India by Hindu and Christian Terrorists, the Buddhist Terrorist attacks in Burma and Thailand and the Communist Terrorist attacks in Korea and Central and Southern America.  Why?

|dev|null wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 10:57am:

Are there any good Terrorist activities Rocket?  You make a needless qualification.  In reality, Muslims aren't responsible for most of the world's Terrorism.   You seem ignorant of the numerous Terrorist attacks in India by Hindu and Christian Terrorists, the Buddhist Terrorist attacks in Burma and Thailand and the Communist Terrorist attacks in Korea and Central and Southern America.  Why?

I can't think of too many groups abducting 200 girls to be sold as slaves , killing 140 children in a school, shooting up shopping centres and killing 200, blowing up buildings, buses, market places, clubs  etc etc etc like Islamic nutjobs are at the moment. I can't stand seeing this big world issue being belittled.

Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 10:54am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:52am: Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:40am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:32am: Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:28am: All is wrong. A big chunk of it is correct. Almost ALL is wrong too. Look at the states in the last 40 years. The States: " ... official FBI records ... show that only 6% of terrorist attacks on U.S. soil from 1980 to 2005 were carried out by Islamic extremists.  The remaining 94% were from other groups (42% from Latinos, 24% from extreme left wing groups, 7% from extremist Jews, 5% from communists, and 16% from all other groups)." Europe: " ... a whopping 99.6% of terrorist attacks in Europe were by non-Muslim groups; a good 84.8% of attacks were from separatist groups completely unrelated to Islam.  Leftist groups accounted for over sixteen times as much terrorism as radical Islamic groups.  Only a measly 0.4% of terrorist attacks from 2006 to 2008 could be attributed to extremist Muslims." http://www.loonwatch.com/2010/01/terrorism-in-europe/ http://www.loonwatch.com/2010/01/not-all-terrorists-are-muslims/ None of the others killed over 3,000 people in one go though. How about- Muslims responsible for most of the worlds bad terrorist activities??

Nothing was said about killing.

Sprint said: "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists."

He couldn't have been further from the truth.

What's a "good" terrorist activity, by the way?

Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 11:01am:

|dev|null wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:57am: Are there any good Terrorist activities Rocket?  You make a needless qualification.  In reality, Muslims aren't responsible for most of the world's Terrorism.   You seem ignorant of the numerous Terrorist attacks in India by Hindu and Christian Terrorists, the Buddhist Terrorist attacks in Burma and Thailand and the Communist Terrorist attacks in Korea and Central and Southern America.  Why? I can't think of too many groups abducting 200 girls to be sold as slaves , killing 140 children in a school, shooting up shopping centres and killing 200, blowing up buildings, buses, market places, clubs  etc etc etc like Islamic nutjobs are at the moment. I can't stand seeing this big world issue being belittled.

I love how Islamophobes keep moving the goal posts.  "All Terrorists are Muslims!"  "No, they aren't."  "Most Terrorist attacks are committed by Muslims!"  "No, they aren't."  "OK, Terrorist attacks by Muslims kill more people!"

Rocket, Muslim Terrorist attacks may kill more people per attack but you didn't start out that way in this thread.  Why can't you just admit that you started out from a prejudiced position and are now just trying desperately to shore that position up by changing your claims on the fly?   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 11:04am:

Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:54am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:52am: Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:40am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:32am: Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:28am: All is wrong. A big chunk of it is correct. Almost ALL is wrong too. Look at the states in the last 40 years. The States: " ... official FBI records ... show that only 6% of terrorist attacks on U.S. soil from 1980 to 2005 were carried out by Islamic extremists.  The remaining 94% were from other groups (42% from Latinos, 24% from extreme left wing groups, 7% from extremist Jews, 5% from communists, and 16% from all other groups)." Europe: " ... a whopping 99.6% of terrorist attacks in Europe were by non-Muslim groups; a good 84.8% of attacks were from separatist groups completely unrelated to Islam.  Leftist groups accounted for over sixteen times as much terrorism as radical Islamic groups.  Only a measly 0.4% of terrorist attacks from 2006 to 2008 could be attributed to extremist Muslims." http://www.loonwatch.com/2010/01/terrorism-in-europe/ http://www.loonwatch.com/2010/01/not-all-terrorists-are-muslims/ None of the others killed over 3,000 people in one go though. How about- Muslims responsible for most of the worlds bad terrorist activities?? Nothing was said about killing. Sprint said: "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists." He couldn't have been further from the truth. What's a "good" terrorist activity, by the way?

None of them are good but muslim ones seem to be the worst. Like the Taliban killing 140 children in a school is worse that a letter bomb that kills one person. I agree , muslims are not doing all of them. But over the last 10 years I'd like to see the figures.

|dev|null wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 11:08am:

Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 11:01am: |dev|null wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 10:57am: Are there any good Terrorist activities Rocket?  You make a needless qualification.  In reality, Muslims aren't responsible for most of the world's Terrorism.   You seem ignorant of the numerous Terrorist attacks in India by Hindu and Christian Terrorists, the Buddhist Terrorist attacks in Burma and Thailand and the Communist Terrorist attacks in Korea and Central and Southern America.  Why? I can't think of too many groups abducting 200 girls to be sold as slaves , killing 140 children in a school, shooting up shopping centres and killing 200, blowing up buildings, buses, market places, clubs  etc etc etc like Islamic nutjobs are at the moment. I can't stand seeing this big world issue being belittled. I love how Islamophobes keep moving the goal posts.  "All Terrorists are Muslims!"  "No, they aren't."  "Most Terrorist attacks are committed by Muslims!"  "No, they aren't."  "OK, Terrorist attacks by Muslims kill more people!" Rocket, Muslim Terrorist attacks may kill more people per attack but you didn't start out that way in this thread.  Why can't you just admit that you started out from a prejudiced position and are now just trying desperately to shore that position up by changing your claims on the fly?   ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D

I never said muslims do all terrorist attacks. They just do a damned lot of them. Is that correct?

Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 11:11am:

I never said muslims do all terrorist attacks. They just do a damned lot of them. Is that correct?

They may.  So, should all Muslims be punished for those Terrorist attacks?   ;D ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D ;D

|dev|null wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 11:14am:

Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 11:11am: I never said muslims do all terrorist attacks. They just do a damned lot of them. Is that correct? They may.  So, should all Muslims be punished for those Terrorist attacks?   ;D ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D ;D

No. But it's a natural reaction to become suspicious of a group that is producing so much terrorism. If it was Eskimos doing the bombing the same thing would happen. I believe the mosques and their other belief systems (including in the home) should be studied to find out what's happening. It's in the best interest of community peace.

|dev|null wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 11:14am:

Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 11:11am: I never said muslims do all terrorist attacks. They just do a damned lot of them. Is that correct? They may.  So, should all Muslims be punished for those Terrorist attacks?   ;D ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Not they may. They are.

First you have to prove how many Terrorist attacks in total there are.  Then you have to find out what proportion are attributed to Muslims Rocket.  Then you might be able to work out if it is greater or lesser than the other motivated groups.   You haven't presented any evidence, just asked us to accept your proclamation.  Very silly really.   Next you'll be asking us to believe in some bloke up in the sky being God.   ;D ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D ;D

|dev|null wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 11:24am:

First you have to prove how many Terrorist attacks in total there are.  Then you have to find out what proportion are attributed to Muslims Rocket.  Then you might be able to work out if it is greater or lesser than the other motivated groups.   You haven't presented any evidence, just asked us to accept your proclamation.  Very silly really.   Next you'll be asking us to believe in some bloke up in the sky being God.   ;D ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D ;D

So Islamic nutjobs aren't killing thousands of people per year around the world then?? :-/ :-/ :-/

All Terrorists are Muslims…Except the 94% that Aren’t in the USA.

Non-Muslims Carried Out More than 90% of All Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Soil

Europol Report: All Terrorists are Muslims…Except the 99.6% that Aren’t

So, in the US and Europe most Terrorists aren't Muslims...

I'll fix this:

"islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists that are seen on the 6 o'clock news in Australia."

It doesn't surprise me that Islam is not responsible for the majority of terrorist attacks. When you can shoot up a cafe in sydney in the name of Islam; when you can shoot up a magazine office is Paris in the name of Islam; when you can blow up trains, buildings, and planes in the name of Islam only to have the same fckwits every time say "these are just the actions of insane people... Ain't got nuffin to do with Islam", then it becomes easy to keep the stats low. Frenchy Muslims in Paris shooting up offices will simple become "homegrown French terrorists" and bingo;

French terrorist = 1
Muslim terrorist = 0

Anyone why says otherwise is just a bigoted islamophobe.

Rocketanski wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 11:26am:

|dev|null wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 11:24am: First you have to prove how many Terrorist attacks in total there are.  Then you have to find out what proportion are attributed to Muslims Rocket.  Then you might be able to work out if it is greater or lesser than the other motivated groups.   You haven't presented any evidence, just asked us to accept your proclamation.  Very silly really.   Next you'll be asking us to believe in some bloke up in the sky being God.   ;D ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D ;D So Islamic nutjobs aren't killing thousands of people per year around the world then??

You've changed it to "killing" again.

We're discussing "terrorists".

Quantum wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 11:41am:

... the same fckwits every time say ... "Ain't got nuffin to do with Islam" ...

Can you substantiate that claim?

|dev|null wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 11:30am:

All Terrorists are Muslims…Except the 94% that Aren’t in the USA. Non-Muslims Carried Out More than 90% of All Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Soil Europol Report: All Terrorists are Muslims…Except the 99.6% that Aren’t So, in the US and Europe most Terrorists aren't Muslims...

Loonwatch is not a credible source, you and peccahead are scraping the bottom of the barrel with that one.
Does loonwatch ever criticse Islam or muslims or are they a spin network run by muslims?

Google loonwatch criticism and see what people say about your source,lmao at stupid assclowns like peccahead and hb.

themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2013/05/11/loonwatch-has-been-claiming-that-94-of-all-terrorists-arent-muslim-whats-up-with-that

Another one refuting the garbage from loonwatch-
www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/01/loonwatch_the_mooslims_theyre_heere.html

The FBI stats loonwatch uses include graffiti and vandalism which result in no deaths or injuries as terrorism.
How many terror attacks on the FBI list resulted in fatalities?

Abdus Salam won the first nobel prize for a muslim in science, he worked on Pakistans nuclear project.
They removed the word muslim from his grave because he was an ahmadi, the Ahmadis are not allowed to call themselves muslims in Pakistan.

Shirin Ebadi won a nobel prize, the Mad Mullahs in Iran took it and she has fled to the UK to live.

Anwar Sadat was given a nobel prize, he was killed by a muslim for making peace with Israel.

Did someone resign in protest when Yasser Crackafat was given a nobel prize?

Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 12:00pm:

Loonwatch is not a credible source ...

Shoot the messenger.  Nice try.  Predictable though.

They are actually taking their information from the FBI.  They include direct links: http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terrorism-2002-2005/terror02_05#terror_05sum
FBI not credible enough for you?



Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 12:00pm:

The FBI stats loonwatch uses include graffiti and vandalism which result in no deaths or injuries as terrorism.

We're not discussing deaths.  We're discussing terrorists.  Stay focused.

To refresh your memory:

Sprint - "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists."

If it makes you happy though, remove all of the graffiti and vandalism attacks from the list.  Every single one of them.

The result will still be that same: "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists" is a complete lie.

Why do you feel the need to defend liars?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 12:08pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 12:00pm: Loonwatch is not a credible source ... Shoot the messenger.  Nice try.  Predictable though. They are actually taking their information from the FBI.  They include direct links: http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terrorism-2002-2005/terror02_05#terror_05sum FBI not credible enough for you? Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 12:00pm: The FBI stats loonwatch uses include graffiti and vandalism which result in no deaths or injuries as terrorism. We're not discussing deaths.  We're discussing terrorists.  Stay focused. To refresh your memory: Sprint - "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists." If it makes you happy though, remove all of the graffiti and vandalism attacks from the list.  Every single one of them. The result will still be that same: "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists" is a complete lie. Why do you feel the need to defend liars?

this has been debunked several times in this forum,i guess we are dealing with thick peccaheads.

How many of those FBI terror attacks include graffiti and vandalism that result in no deaths?

Should graffiti and vandalism which result in no deaths or injuries be considered terrorism?

Do you even read what you post?

Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 12:13pm:

How many of those FBI terror attacks include graffiti and vandalism that result in no deaths? Should graffiti and vandalism which result in no deaths or injuries be considered terrorism?

too many stupid rhetorical questions, not enough reading comprehension:


greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 12:08pm:

If it makes you happy though, remove all of the graffiti and vandalism attacks from the list.  Every single one of them. The result will still be that same: "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists" is a complete lie.

Go try it for yourself Baron - and report back your findings.

Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 12:13pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 12:08pm: Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 12:00pm: Loonwatch is not a credible source ... Shoot the messenger.  Nice try.  Predictable though. They are actually taking their information from the FBI.  They include direct links: http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terrorism-2002-2005/terror02_05#terror_05sum FBI not credible enough for you? Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 12:00pm: The FBI stats loonwatch uses include graffiti and vandalism which result in no deaths or injuries as terrorism. We're not discussing deaths.  We're discussing terrorists.  Stay focused. To refresh your memory: Sprint - "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists." If it makes you happy though, remove all of the graffiti and vandalism attacks from the list.  Every single one of them. The result will still be that same: "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists" is a complete lie. Why do you feel the need to defend liars? this has been debunked several times in this forum,i guess we are dealing with thick peccaheads. How many of those FBI terror attacks include graffiti and vandalism that result in no deaths? Should graffiti and vandalism which result in no deaths or injuries be considered terrorism? Do you even read what you post?

We're not discussing deaths.  We're discussing terrorists.  Stay focused.

To refresh your memory:

Sprint - "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists."

If it makes you happy though, remove all of the graffiti and vandalism attacks from the list.  Every last one of them.

The result will still be the same: "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists" is a complete lie.

Capiche?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 12:24pm:

Capiche?

Stand by for another barrage of completely nonsensical rhetorical questions.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 12:24pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 12:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 12:08pm: Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 12:00pm: Loonwatch is not a credible source ... Shoot the messenger.  Nice try.  Predictable though. They are actually taking their information from the FBI.  They include direct links: http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terrorism-2002-2005/terror02_05#terror_05sum FBI not credible enough for you? Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 12:00pm: The FBI stats loonwatch uses include graffiti and vandalism which result in no deaths or injuries as terrorism. We're not discussing deaths.  We're discussing terrorists.  Stay focused. To refresh your memory: Sprint - "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists." If it makes you happy though, remove all of the graffiti and vandalism attacks from the list.  Every single one of them. The result will still be that same: "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists" is a complete lie. Why do you feel the need to defend liars? this has been debunked several times in this forum,i guess we are dealing with thick peccaheads. How many of those FBI terror attacks include graffiti and vandalism that result in no deaths? Should graffiti and vandalism which result in no deaths or injuries be considered terrorism? Do you even read what you post? We're not discussing deaths.  We're discussing terrorists.  Stay focused. To refresh your memory: Sprint - "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists." If it makes you happy though, remove all of the graffiti and vandalism attacks from the list.  Every last one of them. The result will still be the same: "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists" is a complete lie. Capiche?

Nearly 25,000 terror attacks by those following Islamic ideology since 911.

www.thereligionofpeace.com

Who has done more than 25,000 terror attacks since 911?

Which group is in second place for terror attacks and can you cite a list of those terror attacks?

polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 12:38pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 12:24pm: Capiche? Stand by for another barrage of completely nonsensical rhetorical questions.

Standing by ...

You don't suppose that he'd ignore everything I've explained to him, and post a link to some Islamophobic web site instead, do you?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 12:56pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 12:38pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 12:24pm: Capiche? Stand by for another barrage of completely nonsensical rhetorical questions. Standing by ... You don't suppose that he'd ignore everything I've explained to him, and post a link to some Islamophobic web site instead, do you?

The 25,000 terror attacks on the religion of peace have all been documented, your mates at loonwatch had less than 20 removed from their list.

Still waiting for your list detailing every attack to justify second place for terror attacks peccahead.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 12:56pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 12:38pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 12:24pm: Capiche? Stand by for another barrage of completely nonsensical rhetorical questions. Standing by ... You don't suppose that he'd ignore everything I've explained to him, and post a link to some Islamophobic web site instead, do you?

You are an apologist for Islamic terror peccahead.

Over 35,000 Pakistanis have been killed by Islamic terror since 911,perhaps you should pull your head out of your ass.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_Pakistan

polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 12:38pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 12:24pm: Capiche? Stand by for another barrage of completely nonsensical rhetorical questions.

Standing by ...

I don't think even he is silly enough to post a link to an Islamophobic web site.

However, he might try to cause some deflection by calling people apologists etc.  Nah, he wouldn't be that silly... would he?

Surely he knows that we're discussing this lie: "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists."

He has the intelligence to view it objectively, doesn't he?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 1:32pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 12:38pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 12:24pm: Capiche? Stand by for another barrage of completely nonsensical rhetorical questions. Standing by ... I don't think even he is silly enough to post a link to an Islamophobic web site. However, he might try to cause some deflection by calling people apologists etc.  Nah, he wouldn't be that silly... would he? Surely he knows that we're discussing this lie: "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists." He has the intelligence to view it objectively, doesn't he?

You are an apologist peccahead.

So websites that are critical of Christians are christianophobic, are websites critical of the jews judeophobic?

35,000 deaths from Islamic terror in Pakistan since 911, anything to say about that peccahead?

Nearly 25,000 attacks since 911, the religion of peace only document the ones reported in the media so the figures could be higher,your mates at loonwatch only objected to less than 20 on their list.

The religion of peace has more credibility than your loonwatch.

polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 12:38pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 12:24pm: Capiche? Stand by for another barrage of completely nonsensical rhetorical questions.

You were correct, sir.

It was hardly worth waiting for though.

Anyway, to recap: "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists" = lie (debunked by credible FBI and Europol statistics).

;D ;D ;D

Baron never fails to disappoint.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 10:52am:

Europe:" ... a whopping 99.6% of terrorist attacks in Europe were by non-Muslim groups; a good 84.8% of attacks were from separatist groups completely unrelated to Islam.  Leftist groups accounted for over sixteen times as much terrorism as radical Islamic groups.  Only a measly 0.4% of terrorist attacks from 2006 to 2008 could be attributed to extremist Muslims."http://www.loonwatch.com/2010/01/terrorism-in-europe/http://www.loonwatch.com/2010/01/not-all-terrorists-are-muslims/

The problem with you gweg is the fact loonwatch deliberately and consistently fudges the figures. Muslim apologists like yourself read their fascist diatribe and are sucked into believing they are innocent of all crimes.

Did you know gweg if I blew up a chainsaw in Tassie to stop old growth logging I would be classed as a terrorist?

No of course you wouldn't, ignorance is bliss, and you are blissfully ignorant.

You posted links to America so I will do the same, definition of a terrorist.

"Domestic terrorism is the unlawful use, or threatened use, of force or violence by a group or individual based and operating entirely within the United States or Puerto Rico without foreign direction committed against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof in furtherance of political or social objectives".

Loonwatch conveniently forgets crap like that!

The FBI Divides Terrorist-Related Activities into Two Categories:
◾A terrorist incident is a violent act or an act dangerous to human life, in violation of the criminal laws of the United States, or of any state, to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.
◾A terrorism prevention is a documented instance in which a violent act by a known or suspected terrorist group or individual with the means and a proven propensity for violence is successfully interdicted through investigative activity.

Quote loonwatch and look like a........? Bigot?

http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terrorism-2002-2005

polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 1:51pm:

Gandalf never fails to disappoint.

I do hope you see how easy it is to misquote somebody Gandalf.

Adamant wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 4:03pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 1:51pm: Gandalf never fails to disappoint. I do hope you see how easy it is to misquote somebody Gandalf.

Tsk, tsk, Adam/Matty/Anti.   Here we have some people pursuing Greg for misquoting and you're doing exactly the same thing.  Tsk, tsk, tsk.   ::)

Adamant wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 3:59pm:

The problem with you gweg is the fact loonwatch deliberately and consistently fudges the figures.

No problem whatsoever with me.

The figures come from the FBI.

You can continue to shoot the messenger, or you can pull your head out of your arse.  The choice is yours.

Here you go: http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terrorism-2002-2005/terror02_05#terror_05sum

Anyway, to recap: "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists" = lie (debunked by credible FBI and Europol statistics).

Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 12:00pm:

Loonwatch is not a credible source ...

Well not to you, obviously.

You're one of the loons.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9^th, 2015 at 7:56pm:

Adamant wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 3:59pm: The problem with you gweg is the fact loonwatch deliberately and consistently fudges the figures. No problem whatsoever with me. The figures come from the FBI. You can continue to shoot the messenger, or you can pull your head out of your arse.  The choice is yours. Here you go: http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terrorism-2002-2005/terror02_05#terror_05sum Anyway, to recap: "islam - produces ... Almost ALL the terrorists" = lie (debunked by credible FBI and Europol statistics).

Selectively quoting gweg just shows your inferiority complex!

Coupled with the ability to hide the truth, (lie).

Sure, but we can still blame Islam, can’t we?